ML090790322

Diablo Canyon-2009-02-Draft Outline Comments

ML090790322
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	02/06/2009
From:	Larson B T Operations Branch IV
To:	Pacific Gas & Electric Co
References
50-275/09-301, 50-323/09-301
Download: ML090790322 (3)

Text

Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Rev 0 Facility:

DC First Exam Date:

02/06/2009 Written Exam Outline (12/9/2008)

Comment Resolution 1 Put revision number on all forms.

Will do. 2 Two KA repeat on SRO exam from last 2 NRC exams (T2/G1-007)

None. 3 Five KA repeats on RO exam from last 2 NRC exams - Note that limit is 4 repeat

questions. Only one question is repeated from past 2 NRC exams.

4 List of suppressed KAs?

Sent via email.

5 If questions are repeated from previous 2 NRC exams, review post-exam analysis to determine quality of

questions. Done. No issues identified.

Administrative JPM Outline (12/9/2008)

Comment Resolution 1 Use "A" designators (A1, A2, etc)

Will do. 2 Put revision number on all forms.

Will do. 3 Provide ES-301-1 for Audit exam Will do.

Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (12/9/2008)

Comment Resolution 1 Draft exam submittal for Modified JPMs must include a copy of the parent JPM. Will send via email.

2 What are the "LJC-XXX" and "LJP-XXX"

designators? LJC - License JPM Control Room LJP - License JPM Plant 3 Provide ES-301-2 for Audit exam Will do. 4 Put revision number on all forms.

Will do. 5 S2 - what is PT-456?

PZR pressure transmitter

Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (12/9/2008)

Comment Resolution 1 Was facility-specific or industry-generic

operating experience used in development of the scenarios?

Yes. Hi swell, FCV-540 failure.

2 Was PRA used to identify risk-important

operator actions?

Yes. 3 2 scenarios are MOL, 1 is BOL, and 1 doesn't identify core life. Does training include differences? Yes. No simulator issues anticipated.

4 Provide ES-D-1's for Audit exam.

Will do. 5 Will identify B/U scenario during validation. Change name of B/U to Scenario 4.

Done. 6 For each scenario, complete Target Quantitative Attributes from ES-301-4 and include on D-1's.

Will do. 7 In Event column of D-1's, identify applicant position (i.e. R-ATC, N-SRO, BOP) Will do. 8 On Scenario Narrative - replace A, B, C with 1, 2, 3.

Will do. 9 Precursors to events don't count as events (Scenario 1, Events 5/6). Each event must have verifiable actions.

Noted. 10 Scenario 2, Event 1 - move this event to Event 4 (in case the applicants are too slow to prevent reactor trip)

Will do.

Attachment 6 OBDI 202 - IOLE Process 11 Scenario 2, Event 3 - actually 2 events (PZR level channel fails - I for SRO and

ATC. Restore letdown is N for SRO and BOP). Okay. 12 Scenario 3, Event 2 - D-1 says 900 MW, narrative says 800 MW.

Fixed. 900 MW is correct.

13 Scenario 3, Event 3: D-1 says NI-44 fails

high, narrative says Tc RTD fails hi Fixed. D-1 is correct.

14 Scenario 4, Event 5 - initiate steam leak as small, then ramp up slowly.

Will implement a 5 min ramp and test during

validation.

15 Scenario 4, Event 3 - is this 2 events?

No. 16 Scenario 4, Event 7 - how is this CT? Do all Train B components align

properly?

Not a CT. Fixed.

17 If Scenarios 2 and 4 are selected for the exam, ensure different applicants restore

letdown. Will do once exam scenarios are identified.

18 When preparing Draft Op Test, identify all Tech Specs and action statement(s) in the D-2 for each TS call.

N/A 19 When preparing Draft Op Test, Critical Tasks must be carefully defined, including time limits where applicable.

N/A 20 When preparing Draft Op Test, identify all procedure transitions in the D-2's.

N/A