ML090790322

2009-02-Draft Outline Comments

ML090790322
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	02/06/2009
From:	Brian Larson Operations Branch IV
To:	Pacific Gas & Electric Co
References
50-275/09-301, 50-323/09-301
Download: ML090790322 (3)

Text

DRAFT OUTLINE COMMENTS Rev 0 Facility: DC First Exam Date: 02/06/2009 Written Exam Outline (12/9/2008)

Comment Resolution 1 Put revision number on all forms. Will do.

Two KA repeat on SRO exam from last 2 None.

2 NRC exams (T2/G1-007)

Five KA repeats on RO exam from last 2 Only one question is repeated from past 2 3 NRC exams - Note that limit is 4 repeat NRC exams.

questions.

4 List of suppressed KAs? Sent via email.

If questions are repeated from previous Done. No issues identified.

2 NRC exams, review post-exam 5

analysis to determine quality of questions.

Administrative JPM Outline (12/9/2008)

Comment Resolution 1 Use A designators (A1, A2, etc) Will do.

2 Put revision number on all forms. Will do.

3 Provide ES-301-1 for Audit exam Will do. OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

Control Room / In-Plant System JPM Outline (12/9/2008)

Comment Resolution Draft exam submittal for Modified JPMs Will send via email.

1 must include a copy of the parent JPM.

What are the LJC-XXX and LJP-XXX LJC - License JPM Control Room 2

designators? LJP - License JPM Plant 3 Provide ES-301-2 for Audit exam Will do.

4 Put revision number on all forms. Will do.

5 S2 - what is PT-456? PZR pressure transmitter Simulator Scenario Outline Comments (12/9/2008)

Comment Resolution Was facility-specific or industry-generic Yes. Hi swell, FCV-540 failure.

1 operating experience used in development of the scenarios?

Was PRA used to identify risk-important Yes.

2 operator actions?

2 scenarios are MOL, 1 is BOL, and 1 Yes. No simulator issues anticipated.

3 doesnt identify core life. Does training include differences?

4 Provide ES-D-1s for Audit exam. Will do.

Will identify B/U scenario during Done.

5 validation. Change name of B/U to Scenario 4.

For each scenario, complete Target Will do.

6 Quantitative Attributes from ES-301-4 and include on D-1s.

In Event column of D-1s, identify Will do.

7 applicant position (i.e. R-ATC, N-SRO, BOP)

On Scenario Narrative - replace A, B, C Will do.

8 with 1, 2, 3.

Precursors to events dont count as Noted.

9 events (Scenario 1, Events 5/6). Each event must have verifiable actions.

Scenario 2, Event 1 - move this event to Will do.

10 Event 4 (in case the applicants are too slow to prevent reactor trip) OBDI 202 - IOLE Process

Scenario 2, Event 3 - actually 2 events Okay.

(PZR level channel fails - I for SRO and 11 ATC. Restore letdown is N for SRO and BOP).

Scenario 3, Event 2 - D-1 says 900 MW, Fixed. 900 MW is correct.

12 narrative says 800 MW.

Scenario 3, Event 3: D-1 says NI-44 fails Fixed. D-1 is correct.

13 high, narrative says Tc RTD fails hi Scenario 4, Event 5 - initiate steam leak Will implement a 5 min ramp and test during 14 as small, then ramp up slowly. validation.

15 Scenario 4, Event 3 - is this 2 events? No.

Scenario 4, Event 7 - how is this CT? Not a CT. Fixed.

16 Do all Train B components align properly?

If Scenarios 2 and 4 are selected for the Will do once exam scenarios are identified.

17 exam, ensure different applicants restore letdown.

When preparing Draft Op Test, identify N/A 18 all Tech Specs and action statement(s) in the D-2 for each TS call.

When preparing Draft Op Test, Critical N/A 19 Tasks must be carefully defined, including time limits where applicable.

When preparing Draft Op Test, identify N/A 20 all procedure transitions in the D-2s. OBDI 202 - IOLE Process