ML17037C240

From kanterella
Revision as of 01:47, 8 July 2018 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Nine Mile Point Unit 1 - Letter Responding to the April 11, 1974 Letter Concerning a Change to the Facility Pursuant to Section 50.59 of the Commission'S Regulations and Advising Niagara Mohawk That a Description of the Change Including a S
ML17037C240
Person / Time
Site: Nine Mile Point Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 05/06/1974
From: Goller K R
US Atomic Energy Commission (AEC)
To: Raymond P D
Niagara Mohawk Power Corp
References
Download: ML17037C240 (4)


Text

DISTRIBUTION:

AEC PDR Local PDR ORB-2 Reading NY PDR RO (3)DLZiemann JSnell RDiggs-PCOllins TJCarter Blinks.&%4~HIMuel 1 er JRBuchanan HJHcAlduff

.TBAbernathy ACRS (16)Docket No>50-220 Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation ATTN: Mr.AM@D.>>>%@lend Uice President-RnjiRe&iny-":

300 Erie Boulevard Hest Syracuse, New York 13202 Gentlemen:

Your letter of April ll, 1974, submitted information concerning a change to the Nine Nile Point Unit 1 facility pursuant to Section 50.59 of the Commission's regulations.

If your staff or safety, review committee determines that a proposed change, test, or experiment does involve an unreviewed safety question, it must be reported to the AEC specifically indicatin'g

%hat an unreviewed safety question is involved with the bases for your'onclusion.

Such changes, tests, or experiments must be approved by the AEC prior to implementation.

Sincere'ly, r, Ciy>'<"--" 0<phd,;,,.y 60ller, Me have reviewed your letter, which implies that your on-site and off-site safety review committees have concluded that the proposed change does not involve any unreviewed safety question, although your letter does not specifically state this.If in fact.you and your safety review committees have concluded that no unreviewed safety question would arise from the planned change, then the change may be accomplishdd in accordance with 10 CFR Part 50 Section 50.59 with'out specific AEC approval<A brief description of the change including a summary safety evaluation of changes made in accordance with this provision of the regulation must be reported in your next semi-annual report, and a"copy of your complete review and evaluation should be available for inspection by gegulatpry Operations during their next inspection of your facility.cc: See attached Karl R.Goller, Assistant Director for Operating Reactors'irectorate of Licensing.L:ORB-L:ORB JCSn.sp OFFICE>SURNAMEIs DATE Is e awr~5..6..7.a............

Form hEC-318 (Rev,9-53) hKCM 0240 E 3 eggs......7.4.

R-DLZie nn 5/./74.........

...5/.PLM Os'o c4g-10~14gg 5 gs~gg N I 4 I'V Vr V Ik V V fl 1 P 4 n V I H k hk lk I I H I 1 N H I L I N 4 P HV f 4 4 E Il F Niagara Mohawk Power Corporation

~0 2 cc: Arvin E.Upton, Esquire LeBoeuf, Lamb, Leiby 8 ItacRae 1767 N Street, N.M.Washington, D.C.2Q036 Dr.Mi11iam Seymour Staff Coordinator New York State Atomic Energy Council New York State Department of Commerce 112 State Street Albany, New York 12207 (ul~~+OFFICE+e~s~~SURNAME~DATE 0 Po?ca hKC-$18 (Rev.9-SS)AKCM 0240 OPO Cl5?0 81405?4IM?8 f>>I[t K V I)t'tr t Cl s t l I I l I (",I I I t I~I V I>>I I l I