ML20211D636
| ML20211D636 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | 05000000, Diablo Canyon |
| Issue date: | 11/09/1982 |
| From: | Engelken R NRC OFFICE OF INSPECTION & ENFORCEMENT (IE REGION V) |
| To: | Harold Denton Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20209B155 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-86-151 NUDOCS 8610220242 | |
| Download: ML20211D636 (1) | |
Text
.
f can
,f g'4 UNITED STATES
!\\
('%
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
&. \\
(/
,E REGION V 0, *
- G 1450 MARIA LANE, SUITE 210
,d*
WALNUT CRE E K, CALIFORNIA 94596
....+
NOV 09 F9%
MEMORANDUM'FOR:
H. R. Denton, Director, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM:
R. H. Engelken,~ Regional Administrator
SUBJECT:
NRR AND RV VIEWS ON THE DIABLO CANYON DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM
~
This is in reference to your memorandum of November 9, 1982, on this same subject. My memorandum of September 15, 1982 was, in part, intended to inform your office of QA findings by R. F. Reedy and PG&E, to provide early identification of possible implications of these findings.
I concur with your view that the expanded Phase I and Phase II program, as proposed in SECY 82-414 will assure that any broad programmatic deficiencies in the design program of PG&E and its contractors will be identified.
The other comments included in my memorandum relate to the administrative execution of the~ program and are being addressed by the IDVP contractor and the staff. The resolution of these comments will not affect our mutual view expressed in the SECY 82-414 paper.
R. H. Engelken Regional Administrator cc:
J. L. Crews j
T. W. Bishop D. G. Eisenhut
\\)C E. Schierling
)
~.
d ' i) r 8610220242 860930 i
~ HOLMt.S86-151 i
i
-~
a m
e, r,) ' "' ' ""
- p Kf og\\
p o
fI
~ ~
UNITED STATES y
', c 7,
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION E
WASHINGTON. D. C. 20555
- 4 o, Y ' "" [/f
. GCLAETED wc s, v October 21, 1982
'82 00T 21 P3:3 E Ei Ti:.iM '
_,, A.m3 & SERvlC,:
To Participants in the Diablo Canyon Proceedings
.ERANCH
SUBJECT:
COMMENTS ON STAFF BRIEFING SEnv0 OCT 211982 The Commission held an open meeting on Wednesday, October 20, 1982 to receive the NRC staff's briefing on the proposed scope of Phase II of the Independent Design Verification Program (IDVP) for Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant.
The NRC staff, Pacific Gas and Electric Company, and participants in the IDVP had met in Bethesda, Maryland on Tuesday, October 19, 1982 to discuss the same subject.
Copies of the transcripts of these two meetings and SECY-82-414, transmitting the staff recommendation presently before the Commission, are hereby provided for your information.
Parties have been notified by the Office of the General Counsel of the opportunity to address the C:= mission in a meeting tentatively scheduled for Wednesday, November 10, 1982 in response to the staff briefing.
We will inform you of the details regarding the upcoming meeting as socn as they are finalized.
, n Rrc%
Sincerely, A>o'
. 'l v&N e
?.
Samu 1 J. Chilk Sec tary of the Commiss.,,,,..
.Q..
y.....
Atrachmsnts:
Transcript of 10/20/82 Commission Meecing Transcript of 10/19/82 IDVP Meeting e
f, g#
.i.
-.o,.
t
(
) ( 'd.;,,, -
3 00:
Service Lis* w/o Attachments "s
/
Q(i.,..
/
s
>... u. \\.. s *
[
r !
o
/
-~
o*
A t* (
(
\\j.
,,,..s.
,/
.\\.
C N
r
, 9e u_
- ~
A l
0
?
..t t
~
T.CTID STATI.C G7 1" C5.
- .t e.* =,* - y e* =.= =.=. C=.=.:* w..* *=_:.e..e..* **
e aa
.s In. the lh::er of
)
PACIFIC GAS AND ELECTRIC COMPANY
)
Decke.: N~c. (r ),5C-275
)
50-323.
( Diablo Canyon, Units 1 and 2)
)
)
)
)
SERTICI LIST
~
~
Philip A. Crane, Jn., Esq.
John F. Wolf, Esq.
Pacific Gas & Electric Co= piny
, 3409 Shepherd Street
' Chevy Chase, Maryland 20015 t.
77 Beale Street, Roon 3127 San Francisco, California 94106 o
Mr. Glenn O. Bright l
Ato=ic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co-4 ssion.
Washing:en, D.C.
20555 i
Janice E. Kerr, Esq.
Dr. Jerry R. Kline California Public Utilities Cc-4ssion kto ic Safe:v and Licensing Board 5246 State' Building San Francisco,' California 94102
~
'W.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co==ission Washington, D.C.
20555 Mrs. Raye Fleming 1920 Mattie Road 76.cca s S'afety and L.c,ensing Appeal Board Moore, Esc.
Chairtsn Ato.ic S Shell Beach, California 93440 U.S. Nuclear Regulatofy Co=nissien Washingten. D.C.
20555 Mr. Frederick Eissler
. Scenic Shoreline Preservation Conference, Inc.
Dr. W. Reef Jchnsen 4623 More Mesa Drive Atenic Safety and Licensing Appeal Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co-4 ssion Santa Barbara, California i3105 Washington, D.C.
2055.5 Mrs. Sandra A. Silver 1760 Alisal Street nr. 1chn H. Buck San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Atc=ic Safety and Licensing Appeal. Board C. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cc-4 ssion Washing:cn, D.C.
20555 Mr. Gordon A. Silver 1760 Alisal Street Ccunsel for NRC Staff San Luis Obispo, California 93 Cffice of the Executive Legal Director U.S. Nuclear Regula cry Co=nission Washing:ca, D. C.
20555'
./
Mrs. Elicabeth Apfelberg
//
c/o Ms. I!ancy Culve-152 Lune:a Drive f
San Luis Chispc, Califernia 9 3 f01
,-r
-.v 2-.
r-.
m-
roarc anc carrie: - cent:.nu2c g
50-275, -323
.l
$e2bSP/OR0ld/JQ.
['ftm.ranceCosLnnp,nar,Esq.
po,e2. E: Reynolds, Esq.
John R; Phill'ps, Esq.
Td.rkpatrick, Lockhart, Eill, Cen:er for Law in the Public interest Christopher & Phillips
.10951 West Pico Boulevard, 3rd Floor 1900 F.. Street, N.W.
Los Angeles, California 90054 Washington, D.C.
20036 i,
.gDavidF.Fleischaker,Esq.
P.O_._ 3'ex317 8 Oklaho=a City, Ok.
73101 1
g f!:thur C. Gehr, Esq.
'Fr. Carl Neiburger Snell & Wilmer San Luis Obispo Telegrzn-Tribune 3100 Valley Center P.O. Box 112 Phoenix,. ) icona 85073 San Luis Obispo, California 93406 F.r. James 0. Schuyler Fr. James Eanchett Euclear Projects Engineer Public Affairs Officer, Region V Pacific Gas & Electric Co=pany U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Co==ission 77 seale Street 1990 N. California Boulevard, Suite 20 San Francisco, California 94106 Walnut Creek, California 94596
' g' g3ruce Norton, Esq.
Dian Grueneich, Esq.
~
3 3216 North Tnird Street, Suite 202 California Inergy Co H ssion Phoenix, Irizona 85012 1111 Howe Avenue, P.S 27 Sacramento, California 95825' ym. W. Andrev Baldein, Esq..
i5piends of the Earch
.. $5yronGeorgiou,Esq.
124 Soear Legal Affairs Secretary to the Governe:
San Francisco, Calife:nia 94105 State Capitol. Building
^
Sacra :aMn, CA 95 Al t.
Fr. C. en E. Davis, Directier
~
0 3mM 4.n.lu:
retera; Agency. lations g,
re
- e 7,
i 1180
(
A.A>
g gg g[
- /ashington, D'.C.
20036
/7LS YNJ6 /$4wux.
04 %
sa<Of estar.
p(
& f, y
g /0 d2/ $A4 l
f.
. aA NRJ p c Q n to 20 %
/
n n l~,;, u /l4
-u.ALL A W^'E "
- = 7 & & %y mm wu42 +- :EcV-N-M t~
DESCRIPTI0N 0F EOI/0I 0VERLAP
~
THERE ARE 33 OPEN ITEMS (0I) IDENTIFIED BY THE INTERNAL TECHNICAL PROGRAM (ITP) AND 14 CLASS A OR B ERROR /CPEN ITEMS (E0I) IDENTIFIED BY THE INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM (IDVP).
HOWEVER. ONE CANNOT SIMPLY ADD THESE TWO NUMBERS TOGETHER TO COME UP WITH THE TOTAL NUMBER OF ERRORS SINCE THERE ARE E0Is AND OIs WHICH OVERLAP AND/0R ENVELOPE ONE ANOTHER.
SLICE 1 CEMONSTRATES HCW THESE E0Is AND OIs INTERRELATE WITH EACH OTHER.
THE BASIC REASONS FOR THESE OIs AND E0Is TO OVERLAP AND/0R ENVELOP ARE T-E 70LLOUING:
1.
CIs WERE IDENTIFIED BY THE ITP AS GENERIC PROBLEMS WHERE AS E0Is WERE IDENTIFIED BY THE IDVP AS SPECIFIC PROBLEMS.
LATER THE IDVP REDEFINED THE E0Is AS GENERIC PROBLEMS BY LUMPING SOME OF THE SPECIFIC E0Is INTO A SINGLE E0I.
E.
THE INDEPENDENT NATURE OF THE ITP AND THE IDVP HAS FURTHER A:CENTUATED THE OVERLAP IN IDENTIFIED E0Is AND OIs. SINCE THE ITF AND THE IDVP REVIEWS HAVE OCCURRED SEPARATELY AND WITH LIMITED INTERACTION.
~
Pila 3[ LJI)VP l HkORS NIAl Akl LLA131FlBLA QPdl F
SECTION Ill ITP PilASE I ptir1BER DESCRIPIION CLASSIFICATION EJJLAL REPORl FCI #D!,2 IIPWARD VER1ICAl RESTRAlilT RE0'D FOR SllPPORT 585-23R A
2.2.3
~
EDI #9819 REVISE RIGIDITY OF f1AIN ANNUNCIATOR CABINET A OR B 2.3 FOI #9G3 EVALUATE ACCEPTABILITY OF'0APS FOR SUPPORT 595-32R B
2.2.3 E0I #983 RACEWAY SUPPORT REEVALUATION (INCLUDES FILES 910 AND 930)
A 2. 4. 11.
E01 #1002 TilREE SUPPLY FANS QUALIFIED WITil INCORRECT SPECTRA B
NONE E0I #1003 HVAC DUCT SUPPORT SEISMIC REVIEW (INCLUDES FILE 1077)
A OR B 2.5 E0I #1013 TEST SPECTRA FAILED TO ENVELOP OUALIFACTION SPECTRA FOR ONE B
NONE GROUP 0F ELEC. EQUIP.
E0I #10181 CONTAINMENT SEISMIC REVIEW A CR B 2.1.1-(INCLUDES FILES 977 AND 1009)
E0I #1022 INTAKE STRUCTURE SEISMIC REVIEW A OR B 2.1.5 INCLUDES FILES 967 AND 988)
E0I #1026 TURBINE BUILDINO SEISMIC REVIEW A OR B 2.1.4 (INCLUDES FILES 982, 984. 989, 1010, 1025)
E0I #1069 TWO VALVES WERE UNSUPPORTED A
2.2.1 E0I #1092 FUEL HANLING BUILDING SEISMIC REEVALUATION A
2.1.3 (INCLUDES 990, 991, 1027, 1079 AND 1091)
E01 #1097 AUXILIARY BUILDING SEISMIC REEVALUATION A OR 8 2.1.2 (INCLUDES FILES 920, 986, 1029, 1070, 1093)
E0I #1098 PIPING SEISMIC REEVALUATION A OR B 2.2 (INCLUDES FILES 961, 1021, 1058, 1059, 1060, 110t!)
PAGE 1 0F 1
PilASI J Par CPI N liiflu IMAI Al:1 LLAASTF1ED_A OftB SECTION IN ITP PilASE I JM1B[R DESf I'IPI 1ci!
CLASSJf_ICATION EllAL REE0BI 01 til SD: val Vf S flGuil l D Il1 CORRECTLY A
2.2.1 2.2.2-OI fl2 AUXILIARY BillLDIliG SPECTRA FRROR
'A 2.1.2 OI l!3 CACLWAY UEIGilTS IJUDERESTIf1ATFD A OR B 2.4 OI #81 FOURTY Sf1ALL BORE SUPPORTS RE0'D VERTICAL RESTRAINTS A
2.2.4 OI fl5 CNE ACTIVE VALVE LIST NOT REVIEWED A OR B 2.2.1 OI #6 OVER SPAN IN SMALL BORE PIPINE A
2.2.2 2.2.4 OI #7 TWO TilERt1AL PIPING CALCS l10 DELED SUPPORTS INCORRECTLY A OR 8 2.2.1 J
2.2.2 OI #8 USE OF CONTAINMENT SPECTRA FOR SOME PIPING AND RACEWAYS A OR B 2.2.1 i
f1AY BE INAPPLICABLE.
2.2.2 l
OI #9 ONE PIPE SUPPORT WITH FEWER LUGS thall REQUIRED.
A 2.2.3 2.2.4 OI #10 INAPPROPRIATE SPECTRA USED FOR SEVEN PIPING ANALYSIS A
2.2.1' i
01 #11 DYNAMIC PROPERTIES REVISED FOR PLANT VENT B
NONE l
OI #12 ESTIt1ATED MASSES IN CONTAINMENT INTERIOR DYNAMIC MODEL B
2.1.1 l
OI #13 DISCREPAllCIES BETWEEN ASBUILT PIPING CONFIGURATION AND A
2.2.1 IS0 METRICS 2.2.2 i
GI #15 LACK OF DOCUt1EllTATION FOR SOME Sf1ALL BORE PIPING A OR B 2.2.4 CI #16 ERROR IN SEISMIC COEFFICIENT USED FOR PIPE SUPPORT DESIGN A OR B 2.2.4 PAGE 1 0F 2
PilASf _. I PGf4 LPil: lll f a; 111/,1 Al;L CLASSiflED A !)R B SECTI0fl Ill
'ITP PilASE I fill!1l1LR P6081['l10D C_LASSIFICATION f_INAL REPORT 0] #17 CEISillC AliCl!CR 11CVLf1Efii I Ff fCTS NOI Al)DRESULD FOR SOME L ARGE A'OR B-2.2.1 BORE PIPIllG I
DI #18 REVIEW CF SPLCTRA USED TO CUALIFY AllXII.IARY CALTUATER SYSTEM A
2.2.1 ECUIPMEllT 2.3 2.4 i
2.5 OI #19 PCLAR CRAtlE 2D NCN-LINEAR Af!ALYSIS MAY l10T DE CONSERVATIVE A OR B SECTION TO DE ADDED OI #20 DOME SERVICE CRAllE ANALYSIS USED POLAR CRANE 3D NON-LINEAR A OR B SECTION ANALYSIS TO BE i
ADDED l
OI #21 INCORRECT SPECTRA USED FOR QUALIFICATION OF SOME HVAC A OR B 2.5.3 DUCT SUPPORTS OI #22 TWO ITEMS OF EQUIPMENT MODELED AS RIGID FOR PIPING A
2.2.1 ANALYSIS 2.2.2 0I #29 EFFECT OF INSULATION NOT CONSIDERED FOR PIPE SUPPORT A OR B 2.2.1 SPACING TABLES 2.2.2 OI #31 REVIEW 0F WELDED PIPE ATTACHMENTS FOR MAIN STEAM AND A OR B 2.2.3 j
FEEDWATER ANCHORS OI #32 FUEL HAflDLING BUILDING SEISMIC REANALYSIS A
2.1. 3' OI #33 GENERIC HVAC DUCT SUPPORT DOES NOT SATISFY APPLICABLE A OR B 2.5.4 CRITERIA PAGE 2 0F 2 w
m -
E011003 E011013 HVAC DUCT SUPPORT E01949 SHAKE TESTED l
E011002 l
SEISMIC REVIEW MAIN EQUIPMENT SUPPLY l ANNUNCIATOR I
SPECTRA i
FANS OVERLAP BETWEEP CABINET RIGIDITY SPECTRA PHASE I
/oI 0133 EOIS AND OIS THAL f
s c SUPPORT ARE CLASSIFIED i l DUCT I
\\
SUPPORT GENERIC A OR B 1
SPECTRA DESIGN E011097 AUXlLfARY BUILDING SEISMIC REEVALUATION FROM E011014 INDICATES SEISMIC INPUT E011026 TURBINE BUILDING (SPECTRA)
SEISMIC REVIEW l
E011092 FUEL HANDLING BLOG SEISMIC REEVALUATION 0132 E011098 FUEL PIPING SEISMIC HANDLING REEVALUATION BLOG SEISMIC REANALYSIS 01 E01 E01983 CON 0Ulf 1,2,4,5, R ACEWAY SUPPORT
& PIPING ll 932 l
I 6,7,9,10.
963 13.15,16,17, REEVALUATION SPECTRA 1069 22,29,31 E011022 INTAKE STRUCTU RE 01 3 SEISMIC REVIEW I
RACEWAY I
f E011014 CONTAINMENT SEISMIC REVIEW l
01 21 & 0133 ESTIMATED I
MASSES 01 18 AUX SALT Ol 19 WATE R SYS I
POLAR EQUIPMENT I
CRANE I
SPECTRA ANALYSIS i
VENT OYNAMIC 0120 R0PERTIES DOME I
SERVICE CRANE ANALYSIS
d hch - U p.E.'ees L
Tuferim Tu.kktca.l Reperf 5 ku3Lb 2.&A kap. k w
- I b u P PW I.
b ss
- 3. aA hp Ozw
- IDvP A wr E dkw
- t. G A Desp Lw
- P G 4B Loo k &4.
E lkw y
g.But Awaysa h.34F t,. b ut Audyse A} Com ew&5 W t&
3 T.
PG4E forr.r.<.4,ve. Ac.6% h%.
SchaL Ij a
Eag A
8.
k PJ-A > pu kw.s
( AodeJr5 lh
% LF ^
R. Snt Mo uwp.-t e a 3
e
,,n...
.n-__,___-.,,._,_
INTERIM TECHNICAL REPORTS (ITR)
ITRs ARE ISSUED BY IDVP ON PROGRAMMATIC ASPECTS COMPLETED TECHNICAL ACTIVITIES REVIEW 0F PG&E CORRECTIVE ACTIONS ITRs ISSUED AS OF OCTOBER 5. 1982 1.
ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION AND SAMPLING 2.
EVALUATION OF QA PROGRAM AND IMPLEMENTATION REVIEWS 3.
TANKS 4.
SHAKE TABLE TESTING 5.
DESIGN CHAIN
- 6. ' AUXILIARY BUILDING 7.
ELECTRICAL-RACEWAY SUPPORTS 8.
VERIFICATION PROGRAM FOR PG&E CORRECTIVE ACTION APPROXIMATELY 25 ADDITIONAL ITR's TO BE ISSUED FOR PHASE I 1
STAFF PERFORMS SELECTIVE AUDIT OF ITR's AT IDVP 0FFICES (10/20/82 ENCL 1)
BACKUP SLIDE 1
IDVP - PHASE I Cf. DESIGN REVIEW (RFR)
PHASE I RESULTS REPORTED IN ITR-2:
DEFICIENCIES IN QA CONTROLS FOR CERTAIN DESIGN ACTIVITIES NO ADDITIONAL SAMPLING AND VERIFICATION BEYOND ITR-1 RECOMMENDATIONS l
l l
\\
l
[
r r
I (10/20/82 ENCL. 6)
BACKUP SLIDE 2
'JDVP - PHASE II DA DESIGN REVIEW (RFR)
PHASE II DESIGN QA AUDIT APPROACH:
IF SATISFACTORY QA PROGRAM EVIDENT THEN ROUTINE QA ~ AUDIT IF SAllSFACTORY.0A PROGRAM NOT EVIDENT THEN AUDIT OFlla PRACTICES AGAINST IDVP CRITERIA PHASE II QA AUDIT OF PG8E AND'4 SERVICE CONTRACTORS (PRELIMINARY RUSULTS)
SATISFACTORY DESIGN QA PROGRAM 2
QA DEFICIENCIES IN DESIGN INPUTS, DESIGN 1 (PGSE)
ANALYSES AND CHANGE CONTROL NO ESTABLISHED DESIGN QA PROGRAfi, ADEQUATE 1-DESIGN CONTROL PRACTICES LACK OF EVIDENCE OF QA PROGRAM AND QA 1
PRACTICES REGION V COMMENTS:
SCOPE AND APPROACH WITH REFERENCE TO NRR LETTER (10/20/82 ENCL. 6)
BACKUP SLIDE 3
PGRE LOOK BACK OF 0A PROGRAMS PHASE I PHASE II CONTRACTORS REVIEWED 6
17 SATISFACTORY QA PROGRAMS 2
7 0A PROGRAM IMPLEMENTATION 2
4 i
DEFICIENCIES NO FORMAL QA PROGRAM 2
6 REGION V PERFORMED AUDIT OF RESULTS OF "LOOK BACK":
RECOMMENDS THAT IDVP USE RESULTS FOR DECISION ON ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION (10/20/82 ENCL, 5)
BACKUP SLIDE 4 f
-___.,-,____.______,_.__.,._,__,,..,_,,-y__,._,,..,
4 BNL ANALYSIS STAFF REQUESTED BNL INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS OF CONTAINMENT ANNULUS STRUCTURE AND SELECTED PIPING SYSTEMS (FALL 1981)
BNL USED PG&E INFORMATION FOR INPUT BNL EMPLOYED DIFFERENT SEISMIC ANALYSIS MODEL BNL REPORT COMPLETED JUNE 1982 STAFF IDENTIFIED SEVERAL ITEf1S FOR FURTHER EXPLORATION AND ASSESSMENT AS TO GENERIC IMPLICATIONS STAFF REQUESTED IDVP TO CONSIDER BNL REPORT IN THEIR DECISI0il MAKING PROCESS AND TO PROVIDE THEIR VEIWS, BNL REPORT DISCUSSED AT MEETING Oli 27 JULY (10/20/82 ENCL. 2)
BACKUP SLIDE 5 4
i t
y--,-.
_,.. _-. _ _ _ _.. _, _ _, - _. - -. - _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _., - - - -. _ _... - -, -......, -..,,. - - -
BNL ANALYSIS (STAFF COMMENTS)
ITEMS IDENTIFIED BY STAFF IN BNL REPORT FOR FURTHER EXPLORATION AND ASSESSMENT AS TO GENERIC IMPLICATIONS DISTRIBUTION OF MASSES ASSUMPTION FOR BEAM TO COLUMN JOINT CONSISTENCY OF STRUCTURAL CONNECTIONS IN HOSGRI REPORT AND IN ORIGINAL ANALYSIS RESPONSE SPECTRUM SM0OTHING TECHNIQUES DESIGN VERSUS AS-BUILT DIMENSIONS MODELING OF BENDS IN PIPING ANALYSIS COMPUTATION OF PIPING SUPPORT FORCES (10/20/82 ENCL. 2) i BACKUP SLIDE 6 i
_. ~. _ _ _ _ _. _ _, _ _. _ _. _ _ _ _. _ _...
l m
PGRE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAM (CAP)
PG&E INTERNAL TECHNICAL PROGRAM (ITP) INCLUDES RECENTLY (AUGUST) INITIATED CAP CAP INCLUDES COMPLETE REVIEW 0F ALL MAJOR SAFETY-RELATED STRUCTURES
- ALL LARGE BORE SAFETY-RELATED PIPING 4
SMALL BORE PIPING SYSTEMS AS NECESSARY IDVP WILL REVIEW RESULTS WITH RESPECT TO ITS NEED FOR ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION AND SAMPLING (ITR-1)
(10/20/82 ENCL. 7)
BACKUP SLIDE 7 1
4 i
I I
I
NRC INSPECTIONS AND AUDITS REGION V/NRR/IE AUDIT ITP AND IDVP ACTIVITIES AT PG&E AND IDVP 0FFICES l
REGION V INSPECTS MODIFICATIONS AT SITE AUDITS IDENTIFIED ISSUES IN SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF AUXILIARY BUILDING, INTAKE STRUCTURE, CERTAIN PIPING EQUIPMENT AND COMPONENTS.
ISSUES INCORPORATED IN AND TO BE RESOLVED BY IDVP AND ITP 1
l (10/20/82 ENCL. 3) l BACKUP SLIDE 8 I
r
SEISMIC ASSUMPTIONS HYPOTHETICAL EARTHQUAKES FOR DIABLO CANYON SEISMIC DESIGN:
(A)
DESIGN EARTHQUAKE (DE):
g2bPN (B)
DOUBLE DESIGN EARTHQUAKE (DDE):
g4bPMG (C)
HOSGRI EARTHQUAKE:
{GGDE. 1.60 ANALYSES RESULT IN DIFFERENCES IN DESIGN SPECTRA, ACCELERATION TIME HISTORIES, DAMPING VALUES, MODELS, ACCEPTANCE CRITERIA.
HOSGRI EARTHQUAKE NOT LIMITING FOR ALL ANALYSES OF STRUCTURES, SYSTEMS AND COMPONENTS IDVP PHASE I WITH RESPECT TO HOSGRI EARTHQUAKE PGaE PERFORMED (THROUGH URS/BLUME) REVIEW 0F HOSGRI-RELATED CIVIL-STRUCUTRAL ANALYSIS WITH RESPECT TO HOSGRI CRITERIA (BIR REPORT)
PG&E EFFORI IN ITP INCLUDES DE AND DDE CONSIDERATIONS IDVP PHASE 11 WILL INCLUDE NON-HOSGRI ANALYSES (10/20/82)
BACK!)P SLIDE 9 f
o BRIEFING ON PROPOSED PHASE II DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM DIABLO CANYON UNIT 1 EISENHUT X27672 10/20/82
J OUTLINE PURPOSE COMMISSION REQUEST RE:
PHASE II APPROVAL 3ACKGROUND 11/19/81 ORDER (PHASE I) 11/19/81 LETTER (PHASE II)
DESCRIPTION OF PROGRAM NOW UNDERWAY RESULTS TO DATE PHASE-I PHASE II CONSTRUCTION QA MODIFICATION TO DATE FACTORS INFLUENCING STAFF RECOMMENDATION i
PGE PROPOSED PHASE II PROGRAM PLAN CONTRACTORS CONCLUSIONS STAFF PROPOSAL RECOMMENDATION RE:
PHASE 11 10/20/82 SLIDE 1
BACKGROUND NOVEMBER 19. 1981 NRC REQUIREMENTS PHASE I COMMISSION ORDER SUSPENDED FUEL LOADING AND LOW POWER TESTING LICENSE REQUIRED 1.
RESULTS OF AN IDVP' FOR ALL SEISMIC SERVICE-RELATED.
CONTRACTS PRIOR TO JUNE 1978 PHASE II STAFF LETTER ACTIVITIES REQUIRED PRIOR TO DECISION REGARDING POWER LEVELS AB0VE 5%
2.
IDVP FOR NON-SEISMIC SERVICE RELAlED CONTRACTS PRIOR TO JUNE 1978 3.
IDVP FOR PGE INTERNAL QA 4.
IDVP FOR ALL SERVICE RELATED CONTRACTS POST JANUARY 1978 NOTE:
BOTH PHASE I AND PHASE II WERE DEFINED AS NECESSARY, BUT NOT NECESSARILY SUFFICIENT, FOR THE APPROPRIATE APPROVALS.
- IDVP = INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM i
10/20/82 SLIDE 2
IDVP/,PGAE ACilVIT_lL5 I
f I't.%I inistinq PilASE_,1 (solid lines) friteria 4
Analysis 1.
IDVP for all SSER prior Design to June 78 k
1r IDVP PIIASI I t
A TES + RLCA
- irR
- Sampling
- Check Calc.
l
)
- Indep. Calc.
l 1
- As-Builts i
1r 1r I
l E0!'s RESULTS i
1
- ITR's i
- E01 Resolution
- Basis Cause For each of above 1
co s-
)
[2, E2
~
'"*"IC* I*DI' C3 b0 a.
Basic Cause Report i
I"E2 Final Report b.
PG4E Effectiveness LN oo i
22 na y
T Conclusion l
c.
Schedule for PGAE NRC j
Modifications Iffectiveness Report j
tt..! i e i,.. t i nn L tici fie l e-i
i IDVP/PGLE AETIVlTILS i
i f
l'r, ', i I.istin.
1 PHASE I (solid lines) ieiterla Desiern 4
Analysis 1.
IDVP for all SSER prior to June 78 1r' I'llA5[ 11 (dotted lines)
IDVP PHA*I I
- Ni A' I II*
7.
IllVP for NS$R prior to A
TES + RLCA + l.FR
- + sWI L e
3.
- Sampling 4
IUVP for all SR post
- Check Calc.
~ Indep. Calc.
- As-Builts 1r 1r E0l's RESULTS
- ITR's
- E01 Resolution
- Basis Cause For each of above pg ennic. Impi, s.
Basic Cause Report
-N$y Final Report b.
PG8E Effectiveness x
U u co T
Conclusion CD N O
c.
Schedule for Pr.AE NRC Modifications Effectiveness Report it.,,l i f i,,, t i,in t, he,f o 1 os
l IIP BIR g
g QA SELF l
IDVP/_PGAE. ACTIY_IIILS L-. --.3L-
- _JL __ ASSE SSME NT J r
h i'. I I=istin's PHASE I (solid lines) friferia
~"-
4 Analysis 1.
IDVP for all SSER prior Desiesn to June 78 U'
U ntAst 11 (dotted lines) q IDVP PHAsi i
- ' hiASE !!' CONSTRUCTION:
3
/. II)VP f r N55R prior to e
QA n
TES + RLCA + 1.IR
- $WI C
- l l
June 78
.... b,,,,,,, _ _ j J.
- Sampling 4.
IDVP for all SR post
- Check Calc.
- Indep. Calc.
OTHER (dashed lines)
- As-Builts Additional activities under-taken or proposed PG&E.
E0!'s RESULTS
- ITR's i
j
- E01 Resolution
- Basis Cause for each of above i
" " ' ' ' I*PI"
~
c a._.
a.
Basic Cause Report Q
- Final Report m
b.
PG&E Effectiveness Q
V T
Conclusion e
N O
c.
Schedule for PG4E NRC Modifications Fffectivenen Report t '... ' i e i,., t i,,n '., b.. l. 1.. -
PRELIf11 NARY RESULTS PHASE I (HOSGRI SEISMIC; PRE 1978)
ASSOCIATED EFFORT NEARLY COMPLETE THOROUGH PROGRAM EXPECl IDVP TO IDENTIFY PROBLEMS EXPECT PROBLEMS TO BE RESOLVED (T0 IDVP SATISFACTION)
IDVP:
FINDINGS ARE BROAD IN APPLICABILIlY: NARROW IN SCOPE GOOD UNDERSTAllDING OF ERRORS ABOUT 200 E0lS: 13 ARE "A/B" EFFORT HAS DONE JOB 0F IDENTIFYING ERRORS SCHEDULE FOR IDVP (PHASE I)
TECHillCAL REPORTS COMPLETED (11/17)
COMPLETE ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION (12/15)
FINAL REPORT (1/25/83)
PRELIMINARY'RESULTS (CONTINUED)
-PHASE II UNDERTAKEN PRIOR TO NRC APPROVAL PRINCIPALLY. CHECKS 3 SYSTEMS AND 2-3 ANALYTICAL CHECKS 39 TECHNICAL CONCERNS (ANTICIPATED 55-60)
TO DATE, 5 "A/B"; 7 POTENTIAL "A/B" FEWERS E0IS THAN PHASE I; BUT FRACTION SIGNIFICANT IS LARGER SIGNIFICANT PROGRESS TO DATE IDVP:
NO COMMON TRENDS OF ERRORS TO DATE MANY INDIVIDUAL QUESTIONS SCHEDULE-MOST IDVP TECHNICAL REPORTS TO BE ISSUED NOVEMBER - DECEMBER, 1982 FINAL PHASE 11 REPORT - 1/25/83 CONSTRUCTION QA VOLUNTERRED BY PGSE NO EXPLICIT FINDINGS TO DICTATE NEED IMPLICIT 00ESTIONS RE:
OVERALL 0A IDVP SCHEDULE INTERIM REPORT 11/22 FINAL REPORT 12/15 10/20/82 SLIDE 4B
MODIFICATIONS TO DATE DESCRIPTION PIPE SUPPORTS 257 OTHER SUPPORTS 43 ANNULUS STRUCTURE 38 OTHER-6 ADDITIONAL MODS ARE EXPECTED CHARACTERIZATION OF MODIFICATIONS (SEE SLIDES 6A, 6B, AND 6C)
P f;
10/20/82 SLIDE 5
IATERAL RACEMAY. SUPPORTS i
i Raceway Supports 1
This slide shows modifications to a raceway support type S102. The vertical braces did not meet the acceptance criteria (allowable stress) for revised seismic loads. The angle braces (S-6) were insta.lled to stiffen the vertical members. They can be shown to have sufficient capability, through inelastic analysis, to perform their function and pose no threat to safety. However, it is very time consuning to demonstrate this by analysis, therefore modifications l
were carried out. 16 supports have been revised as shown in item 7 Table 1, Attachment 1 of PG8E's September 15, 1982 submittal.
I i
//
/
l N
6 1
l I
i SMALL BORE PIPE SUPPORTS CONTADHDIT ANNUIUS t
2155-23 Small bore support 2155-23, located in the Containment annulus, i
supports lines J 013 and 3143. Line 1013, a non-safety related line, i
is the primary water supply to the Reactor Coolant Pump 1-1 seal I
stand pipe. Line 3143, is the check valve leak test header for the Reactor Coolant System Hot Leg Safety Injection lines. This is a typical example of a support that was modified to provide sway struts in place of rod hangers in order to provide a bidirectional seismic restraint.
h 4N,
[
' Za j
p
. (
E~t_
~
7-4 v
4 N
k
- )
6
/
/s s
/'"~A s 3 3.
_Je l
3 r
I
w
.1
'N s
f
\\
'9 i
l l'
l I
l l
t 1
l
.. -.... - ~ _ -.. _
i i
REPLACED DIAGONAL BRACE C0h"fADF.ENT ANNUIUS i
i i
12-45 SL t
h l
Support 12-45SL is a mechanical snubber located in the annulus area f
of the Containment Building. It restrains line 1357, the Component j
i Cooling Water Return Header from the Reacter Coolant Pump Thermal r
Barrier Labyrinth Seals. The review for the reoriented-revised l
l Hosgri spectra showed that the diagonal brace, which was a structural j
l angle, did not meet stress criteria. The angle was replaced by the j
tube steel shown in the slide.
i I
l l
l
%,,. s x
g.
_>q*,}
t
{
s{
j y
l f
ij
...O '-
l f
k
~
'hl-[. ' '
q, l
f
'h l
l l
l I
f i
10/20/82 SLIDE 6C
FACTORS IflFLUEllCIf!G STAFF RECOMMENDATI0fS
{
PHASE I RESULTS TO DATE INTERIM TECHNICAL REPORT FINDINGS l
J BNL lilDEPENDENT ANALYSIS STAFF AUDITS / INSPECTIONS PHASE II RESULTS TO DATE
.PRELll11 NARY RFR RESULTS IDVP ASSESSMENT OF PG8E IflTERilAL QA PGEE ACTIONS-PGEE CORRECTIVE ACTION PROGRAI1 BIR REPORT PGEE "LOOK BACK" REPORT PRE 1978'VERSUS POST 1978 IDVP AUDIT OF CONSTRUCTION QA AS BUILT VERIFICATI0il i
l
- l 7
l l
10/20/82 SLIJE 7 l
w
O PROPOSED IDVP PHASE II PROGRAM PLAN RESPONSE TO NOVEMBER 19, 1981 STAFF LETTER PROPOSED IDVP PHASE II PLAN INCLUDES:
SYSTEM SAMPLE 1.
AFW SYSTEM 2.
CONTROL ROOM VENTILATION AND PRESSURIZATION SYSTEM 3.
SAFETY RELATED PORTION OF 4160 V ELECTRIC DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM DESIGN CHAINS QA AUDITS (PROGRAMS AND IMPLEMENTATION)
ADDITIONAL SAMPLING VERIFICATION. IF REQUIRED STAFF FINDINGS THE PROPOSED PHASE II PROGRAM PROVIDES ADEQUATE IDENTIFICATION AilD EVALUATION OF SIGNIFICANT DESIGN ERRORS IN THE SELECTED SAMPLE AND AN ADEQUATE UNDERSTANDING OF THE ROOT CAUSE.
10/20/82 SLIDE 8
IDVP PHASE II CONTRACTORS PROPOSED TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES (TES) - PROGRAM MANAGER R. L. CLOUD ASSOCIATES (RLCA)
- SEISMIC, MECHANICAL, STRUCTURAL STONE & WEBSTER ENGINEERING CORP.
- SAFETY SYSTEMS
- CONSTRUCTION QA R. F. REEDY INC. (RFR)
- QA AND DESIGN CONTROL IECHNICAL QUALIFICATIONS:
SWEC FOUND FULLY QUALIFIED FOR PHASE II OTHER EVALUATED FOR PHASE I AND FOUND ACCEPTABLE INDEPENDENCE OF CONTRACTOR ORGANIZATIONS:
FROM PG&E:
DETERMINED DURING PHASE I, INCLUDING S't.'EC FROM BECHTEL:
NO OWNERSHIP BY IDVP CONTRACTORS, VERY LIMITED BUSINESS CONNECTIONS INDEPENDENCE OF INDIVIDUALS:
EVALUATED PER OTTINGER LETTER CRITERIA ONE CONCERN - REEDY ASSOCIATES ARE EX-BECHTEL N0 OTHER CONFLICTS 10/20/82 SLIDE 9
CONCLUSIONS MAJOR, THOROUGH PROGRAM UNDERWAY PG8E INTERNAL EFFORTS G0 WELL BEYOND NOVEMBER 19 REQUIREMENTS PROGRAM SHOULD FIND ERRORS AND RESOLVE ANY ISSUES ERRORS FOUND TO DATE NOT MAJOR FROM SAFETY STANDPOINT-MANY MODIFICATIONS, BUT GENERALLY MINOR PHASE II PROGRAM CLOSELY LINKED WITH PHASE I SCOPE OF VERIFICATION REQUIRED BEFORE FL DECISION HAS EXPANDED f
e 10/20/82 SLIDE 10 1
---.---~.-.,-r,-
,-,,,,--v
-n y
r-,
-- - -. - -, e, -,.
,-..--e,p.e,--.
SUMMARY
OF STAFF PROPCSAL Ib h
lbi C
10N C
A.
PHASE I (COMMISSION ORDER)
- 1. IDgP,fF g g PRIOR TO B.
PHASE 11 (NRR 1ETTER)
- 2. IDVP FOR NSSR PRIOR TO 6/78 1R
- 4. IDVP FOR ALL SR POST 1/78 IR C.
DIllER
/
- 6. CONSTRUCTION QA IR
/
- 7. AS-BUILT WALK-DOWN IR
/
/
/
/
- 8. MODS. AS NECESSARY
/
/
/
- 9. PG&E/W INTERFACE EVAL.
- 10. VE.RIFY HOSGRI SPECTRA L SSR (NON-IR
/
- 11. IDVP FOR A'fl0R TO 6/78)
HOSGRI, P NOMERCLATURE:
O:
AS ORIGINALLY REQUIRED, NOVEMBER 19, 1981 ACTIVITY COMPLETE SSR:
SEISMIC SERVICE-RELATED CONTRACTS NSSR:
NON-SEISillC SERVICE RELATED CONTRACTS SR:
SERVICE-RELATED CONTRACTS IR:
INTERIM REPORT, DEMONSTRATING EFFORT SUBSTANTIALLY COMPLETE 10/20/82 l
SLIDE 11
=. - -..
l t
i RECOMMENDATION l
0 APPROVE PHASE 11 PROGRAM-0 APPROVE REDIRECTION OF PHASE l/
PHASE 11 INTERFACE t
i e
r l
10/20/82 SLIDE 12 i
1
=,
v--
3e--.w-w w-
-y.
---.g-y..----wy,_,3 m-----r-7 7.mw--, _ -
-r,- -
---.-,r--,
mi., - -,, + -
sw,
,.w-,-my.
-.%,%t ew,.
W((t F0F:
The Comissioners Fro":
l!illiam J. Dircks, Executive Director for Operations 1.. JECT:
DI A3LC CMiYO!! DESIGV VERIFICATI0'! PROGRR4 -
Prt/SE II recon"D,0ATIO! S P"P U :
In accerc:nce with the Corr.ission's re::uest (C9!UA-92 r,)
cf July 27, IM.2, this r. aper provides the staff recomendations re? arcing Phase II of the Diatlo Canyon Independent Design Verification Progren (ID\\D) and its relationship to the ongoing Phase I program.
7 c. :
r-*.
encranc.
ria tec Septerter 2.4, 1932, we orovided you uith a Stotus.encrt of oncoing activities associated c
with tbc verification of the seismic design of Diablo Car. yon Unit 1.
Te re' crardu'-noted that fincings fron Phase I of the ITVP anc ctber recent developrents my influence tree staff's cccclusions with regard to the Phasc II Program
- >lan which was suhritted to the hhC for correval on June H, IC42. ile have continued to pursue those natters ar.c
%ve develo::cr. our recc.rmenoations with regard to the P ro.r ra- :'l an. The steff findines and recomencations are viscussed telow.
v." F ':
"e have su 'rarized in Figure 1 the elenents of the Orcar
?M letter of I:everter 19, 1981. The original requirerents nea.;ed to suuport a fuel-loao/lcu-oc.er (FL/LP) decision t6ve recene known as Phase I whereas iters originally rer.eiriry co'cletion before a cecision regarcing perer levcir creater than M vere definec as Phase II.
It is irc.ortant to nnte that although they were cefined as such at t'ie tim, bcth the Phase I Orcer and toc Phase II Ictter ecr.nowled.?ed that an ex;'ansion of either or bcth efforts ay be necessary. 'In this context, the staff exarined t5c overall fincings to date and a number of recent develeprents to determine if any occificaticns to the cricinally cefined scope of Phase I and Phase II need be race.
-yet:
. i11 emet,
" F.:./.7L O F F 'C E )
.j.7 -.*l.}...
SUQ** WE )
O A?E )
.9: r:Su m me s:u e:c OFFICIAL RECORD CCPY us= =-e
.- Overall Findincs to Date As of Septenber 24, 1982, the IDVP had identified 199 technical concerns requiring resolution. A number of these have subsequently been resolved and 13 have been classified as "A/B" errors. These are errors in which design criteria or operating limits of safety-related equipnent could have been exceeded and physical redifications, changes in onerating procedures, eore realistic calculations, or retesting are required to bring the plant into conformance with the original design. These technical concerns can be summarized as follows:
Fully resolved:
147 Errors:
3 (3 A/B errors)
No design criteria or operating limits exceeded:
144.
Revicw. continuing:
52 by PG&E:
2E (9 A/P errors) by IDVP:
24 (1 A/B errors)
Total 199 (13 A/B errors)
Furthernore, PG&E has identified 33 concerns within their Internal Technical Progran (ITP). Six have been reselved and 27 concerns have been classified as A/P errors.
These errors are not directly additive because there exists scre overlep between the ICVP and ITP errors.
As cf Septerber 15,1992, PG4E had corpleted 344 rodifica-tinns as follo.es:
"o'.i f i ca ti on s Pine supports 257 Other supecrts a3 i,nnulus structure 39 Otner 6
Total 344 It should be noted that not all A/B errors will necessiate r:odifications and that a single error may result in a nurber of modifications. In addition so.Te of these rodifications, nade to cate, were a result of the errors f ro.m either, or both, the IDVP and ITP and soce were rcdifications undertal:en by PC&E even though they believe the error could have been shown acceptable by detailed calculations, omer p sva=wr >
ous) e.ac reav a s ow; sacu cm OFFICIAL RECORD COPY uss e. ieu-:
3-During a meeting on Septenber 1,1982 the staff discussed the modifications made to that date with PG&E. With respect to those codifications, PG8E stated that:
1.
!'ost nodifications flow from their Internal Technical Program and not the IDYP.
2.
All modifications are to restore margins or to neet design criteria.
3.
Nothing has been found which would have prevented a systen, structure or component from perfonaing its e
intended safety function in the event of the postulated Hosgri earthquake.
The staff has exanined nodifications ccroleted to cate and has concluded that they are generally minor in nature; while we have not done a detailed evaluation of each, we believe that had the nodifications not been made, the facility would likely have withstood an earthcuake without unacceptable conseocences.
Staff Evaluation of Recent Develoonents During recent nonths, a number of siqnificant developments and findings have occurred which influenced our recommendations regarcing the scope of the Phase II Program. Plan as proposed.
For your reference, we have graphically summarized in Figure 2 the functioning of Phase I of the IDVP, the functioning of Phase If of the IDVP, and various activities undertaken by PGSE and their relationship to the IDVP. The cevelopments exanined by the staff were briefly discussed in our Septenber 24, 15C2 r;ercrandun to you ano are further discussed in enclosures to this nenorandun. The de'.elopnents include:
1.
IOVP Phase I Results:
a.
The identification of a larger tnan originally expected nutber of errors or cpen itens (E0Is) from both the IDVP and the PGe.E ITP as discusseo above. A list of these errors and open itens were previced to you as attachnents to the September 24, 1932 recorandur.
b.
The issuance of eight Interim Tecnnical Reports (ITR),
as of October 5,1982, including ITR 1, which suggested that the sample for the reverification program cust be -
expanced, and ITR 2, which identified deficiencies in Qt, contrels for certain design e.ctivities. The staff evaluations of ITP.s 1 through 5 are provided in Enclosure 1.
T....J :.%
- s. w n..
+ c new e n w.u v a i;aads omer >
2 hRds..acceptahl.e..and..ccr:urs..with..the.ICr2. 200rc.ui............
and recormenditions.
sua m t>
oare >
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY wo. i i e t a: rcav m oc% sa:v em
.- c.
The results froo an indepencent analysis nerforced by the staff's contractor, Brookhaven National Laboratory, raised a number of seismic concerns regarding PG&E original seisnic analysis of the containment annulus structure. BKL developed a three dimensional vertical nodel and identified concerns regarding the distributed masses, nodeling of joints, as-built dimension variations, spectra-smoothing techniques, modeling of piping bends and calculated piping support forces used in PGLE's original analysis. These concerns were forwarded to TES for consideration of their generic implications by the IDVP. PGAE has indicated that a majority of these concerns had been separately icentified by the IDVP and/nr PGAE. The staff will audit the IDVP resolution of these concerns. Enclosure 2 provides additional discussion.
d.
Region V inspection of the ongoing activities identified a nunber of open inspection issues. These issues include verificatinn that the seis-ic analysis model adequately characteri:es the seisnte responses of the Auxiliary Duilding, Intake Structure and various ecuipment and components. Sone of these issues had been previously icentified by the IDVP.
These issues are being closed out by both Pegion Y and fiRR personnel via their consideration in the in the ITP and IDVP. A suonary of these issues is provided in Enclosure 3.
e.
The original Phase I IDVP proposed, and the NRC acceoted, to include a reevaluation of the Hosgri analyses only. The remaining seismic analyses will be examined by the IDVP in the Phase II progran.
The staff discussion of this action is provided in Enclosure 4.
2.
19VP Phase II P.esults:
a.
Preliminary results from the R. F. Reecy Phase II QA audit indicated that there exist deficiencies in the QA controls of the PG&E design progran and of certain of their contractors.
b.
The results from the PGLE initiated QA audits of tneir in-house design activities and their safety-related service contractors are summarized in Enclosure 5.
The PG8E findings are consistent with the creliminary results fron the P. F. P.cedy Phase II CA audit (discussed in a. above). Region V attended the u-..,.q,
-me.4,7 s--
. s4
.4 m.s
..a.w.d.i.t.e.4...tt?. P,Qjj,,,se,1,f,;re"i,%,, A,,,me,7,9rSM E dD,c,us,si ny,,,,,,,,
emec >
sua m e>
omy 94AC FORM 318 (10-80) P. ROM Cao OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usa m i n
\\
-s-i the Region's concents on both of these activities is provided as Enclosure 6.
The staff has also forwarded these comments to TES for their consideration in the IDVP, in particular with respect to the scope of the audit as compared to the scope delineated in the NP.R letter of November 19, 1981.
3.
PGLE Acticns:
a.
The establishment by the PG&E/Bechtel Project Tean of a corrective action program that includes a seismic reevaluation enconpassing all safety-related structures, systems, and components. The scope of the effort is discussed in nore detail in Enclosure 7.
The IDVP will audit and consider the results of tre corrective action progran.
b.
The completion of todifications, as necessary, to restore the "as-built" plant to the "as-designed" condition. A listing of nodifications made to date, and a listing of anticipated additional rodifications, are included in Enclosure 8.
c.
The undertaking of a review, to deterrine the adecuacy of the seismic evaluation originally done by Blune, called the Blume Internal Report (DIR). Speci fically, the EIR includes an internal technical review, conducted by Blume, of civil / structural work perforned with particular attention to the work for the Hesrei evaluation in the 1977-1978 time frame. The esults of this review have been cocumented by Blune in a report and subnitted to the staff in early October 1982.
d.
The recognition by PG&E that there is probably no step-uise distinction between pre-1978 and post-1978 activities as was assumed in the isseance of the Concission Orcer and the URR Letter of hevenber 19, 1981.
e.
The decision by PGLE to uncertake a reevaluation cf construction QA proposed as part the IDVP.
While PG6E has stated that they have no reason to cuestion the quality of construction, they also stated that such a progran is neeced to renove any doubts. The IDVP has recently submitted a progran plan fer review of these activities. Region V has reviewed this croposed progran and found it to l
be satisfactory and consistent with previous Region y recommendations.
O FFICE )
.....o.
o.....n........a..
..--.a.-aa...a.
.=~. - a aaa" ""
~ *
- a"~
" ~*
" " * =~ "
$URNAME h
...o.......n...
.o
...u....u......un..
..an apa.a *.a
"""*****."a
"**.a.
CATE)
.a.a--.-
..~n..
.o.~
. -~.-".."
. ~ aa..~ a -a a. ""
- aa.*
- aaa"a."a
~ ~ " " " " " " ~ *
-* a ~ ~ ~. ~ ~
- "~""
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY uwoani-r a.r..u.....,,a..ni waru me
, f.
The decision by PG&E to undertake a walkdown of as-built safety-related structures, systems, and components to increase confidence that cs-built conditions are identified and evaluated.
g.
The PG8E proposal for staged licensing is discussed in Enclosure 9.
This proposal is to complete, prior to fuel loading, the review, analysis, and modifications for those systems required for fuel load. The remainder of the systers will be examined subsequently. The staff has reviewed the PGLE proposal and concurs in their identification -
of systens with sone additions to the " supportive" list of equipnent.
4 IDVP/ITP Interface:
The IDVP has preserted plans to incluce the results of the expanded PG&E activities as inputs to the IDVP progran. This proposal is included in the Figure 2 flow chart.
Procosed Phase 11 Procram With regard to the contractors for Phase II of the IDVP, PGSE has proposed to retain Telecyne Engineering Services (TES) as the IDVP progran nanager. The principal subcontractors to TES are Robert L. Cloud Associates (RLCA), R. F. Peedy, l
Inc. (P.FR), and Stone A Uebster Engineering Company (SWEC).
The staff has examined the financial independence of the Phase II contractors fro.m both PG3E and Bechtel in addition l
to the independence of individual enployees assigned to the IDVP. The criteria used by the staff in its evaluation are the sane as those used in the Phase I evaluation. The staff also has reviewed the technical cualifications of the IDVP contractors. Erclosure 10 surrarizes the staff review l
and our findings, detemining that the contractors are l
technically cualified and are indepenuent.
The adecuacy of the Phase II Progran Plan was reviewed l
by the staff against the requirenents of our Hovember 19, l
1981 letter. Enclosure 11 describes the proposed progran and presents the staff findings on that progran.
00!:CLUSIONS:
Based on cur review of the proposed Diablo Canyon Phase II IDVP, the status and results.o,f other ongoing activities, as discussed above, and consideration of comments of the intervening parties to this proceeding, we have reached the following conclusions:
OFFICE )
""."*a."""*"
- "" ="""*
SUMNAMEh
- "*************o"***
" " " * * * =. " * * " " "
DATE )
""*"a OFFICIAL RECORD COPY usaroa u-:
- w. F.au m nexu em
]
i 1.
With respect to the anount of reevaluation activities required prior to any decision regarding fuel-load / low-power, we have concluded that, in addition to the require-ments of the November 19, 1981 Order. review and evaluation efforts for Phase II activities should be sufficiently complete to provide confidence that no major deficiencies exist. We therefore require that an interin report on Phase II, summarizing the IDVP conclusions and results to date, be sub:sitted prior to the FL/LP decision.
He recognize that certain plant modifications will likely not be needed prior to fuel loaoing, and accordingly we conclude that selected modifications could be ceferred until af ter fuel load. Similarly, we recocnize that coroletion of the Phase II program and other activities proposed by the IOVP and PG&E to provice additional assurance that the plant is built in accordance with the application, need not be completed prior to a fuel-loac/ low-power decision. Figure 3 summarizes the staff's proposal.
- 2. %'ith respect to the competence of the contractors proposed by PG&E project to carry out the Independent Design Verification Program, we conclude that the necessary experience and technical skills are being provided.
3.
Uith respect to the independence of the contractors proposed we conclude that the independence of the IDVP individuals are acceptable in view of those independence criteria provided in the Comnission's FeDruary 1,1982 responses to Congressmen Dingell and Ottinger.
4 In recognition of the expanded DGLE Program, we believe it is appropriate that the ongoing IDVP alter its approach to incluce a saraling of all of PGSE's efforts to gain overall conficence in that reverification effort.
j OFFICE)
SURNAME) our>
umr mau m no.n uncucus OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
.e.~...
.- REC 0;"'E!$ AT10"S: That the Cc:nission:
1.
Accrove the Phase II Program Plan and contractors as nocified by the staff conclusions in Enclosure 11.
2.
Acorove the redirection of the Phase I/ Phase II division to require that the Phase II review / evaluation efforts be sufficiently conpleted, as identified in Figure 3, prior to a fuel-load / low-power decision.
P1111am J. Dircks Executive Director for Operations
Enclosures:
- s stated "TE: Co.r-ission ccments should be provided directly to the' Off-f ce of the Secretary by c.o.b.
h DL:LB=3\\
B#3 nELD Schierlipp t Kerrigan Cu o,, -
s 1p/,8, 82 pkl tmc.
10/t /82 10/'Lf82 n.ona
/-,/
h.s J 03 kd9 a'l O r t
n
'. -. '..............QW1ER p
REGION:\\ V I&E \\ M @
NRR:
....~............4...
_n.:e T.J......a k R
e REn.....g e l ken RDeYoung
.D..G..... 5 9..n..h..u..t....
H..D..e.....n............
..i...............
9L@,2 l of.ggy 2,,,,,,,, lo/y82,.,.
.1.ofjy 8,2,,,,.,19ze82...... 194'k,g,2,....,,,,,10z,,,,z,g me >
uc c.+.u m om ~acu c:o OFFICIAL RECORD COPY us a m
. ggCU0ATI0!is: That the Comission:
1.
Approve the Phase II Program Plan and contractors as roodified by the staff conclusions in Enclosure 11.
2.
Ap_ prove the redirection of the Phase I/ Phase II division to require that the Phase II review / evaluation efforts be sufficiently completed, as identified in Figure 3 prior to a fuel-load / low-power dec1sion.
i Hilliam J. Dircks Fxecutive Director for Operations N!vsere>:
A, st.ited
'.C E: Ccmission corrents should be provided directly to tho Office of the Secretary by c.o.b.
~~... f
, y ~ ~
g.....,
....... _ __ f
\\ /
c2e m / % cues in Tne Wo/" EWM Dyu> CAWM DemYMmNO@PON oF M-Phse a7 r2eoggArtMy
% g, a w P A fuit.--
)
.\\
p ree. R.11.ti.eget s
~ ~ _... -
g o /,zg
/
f~/
s._
I
i 0
I (O
20 SL 0VW?O.
k knN 4
l
( _ -.~T ~ ~ ~ Y ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ 1 g
ITP BIR g
gg QA SELF g
L_.__JL__,_
JL_ASSESSMErli -.I U
lC0riSTRUCTIONg QA i
1 L __._ _ J OT,1(E_R (dashed lines)'
Additional activities utider-taken or proposed PGAE.
1 l
1
- 1 y
~.,
l PHASE II (dotted lines) eeeeeoe
- + PHASE !!*
2.
IDVP for NSSR prior to
- e e
June 78 l
e + SWEC e
e 3.
IDVP for PG&E internal eeeeeee i
QA 4.
IDVP for all SR post January 7B i
t i
i I
f i
l i
f; q
1
IOVP/PG&E ACTIVITIES f
PG&E Existing PHASE I (solid lines)
Criteria Analysis 1.
IDVP for all SSER prior Design to June 78 I f' IDVP PHASE I J L TES + RLCA + I;fR
- Sampling
- Check Calc.
i
- Indep. Calc.
- As-Builts If lf
)
E0l's RESULTS
- ITR's
- E01 Resolution
- Basis Cause for each of above
- Generic. Imp 1.
a.
Basic Cause Report
- final Report b.
PG&E Effectiveness 1 r T
Conclusion c.
Schedule for PG&E NRC Modifications Effectiveness Report Modification Schedules 4
i k
4 bfc L
k (1oblaJu Enp&,
[2ww:ss Snw%
t oft o[6 u
1 DE O d oc :
i S
_I u - o r A c. --i o u "icc.-ion No.
bcsa: pf.
fledt Ped a rc brau, w)
'4er be{en c
l I
v v
v 5
V
/
}
V
/
/
12-95 st v
v v
l2-ICSSL V
V V
12.-159 fL v
v v
34-24 v'
V J
QC - 55 Q V
V V
V
& R -\\], Q V
V V
v V
J J
SGS-l2 v v
v g55 33g v
v v
v v
585 -2 TV v
J J
V
.1I55- ),3 v
v v
l l
l l
e
-,___.___-.___-_-..3
_m,._r..-
Fan Cooler Weld 3
This poor photo shows modifications to the support welds on fan cooler No.1-3.
Originally, the base plate was anchored by welds on two sides. For the modification, the two welds were increased in size and a weld was added on the 3rd side.
(The 4th side is inaccessible). This modification involved only one of 19 supports on fan cooler No.1-3.
The modification was due to small installation variations of welds between a column foot and its corresponding embedded plate not being identical for all five fan coolers.
(PG&E September 15, 1982 Submittal,, Table 1, item 2.)
1 073?A/00:0A
hsfraw zut Tabw3 Supperi Tube Support 7
This slide shows a support for instrument tubing associated with a test flow orifice (FE 980) in the safety injection line to RCS Loop 3 hot leg and a test flow orifice (FE 926) for a boron injection line. Thc support is located in the center of the l
slide and is constructed of "Superstrut" which is a trade name i
for stock structural steel shapes, connectors, and brackets, which are routinely used for supporting such items and instrument tubing and electrical conduits and cable trays. The modification consisted of replacing one type of "Superstrut" angle brace with another, stronger connection to meet seismic acceptance criteria. Neither of these supports affected tubing associated with safety related instrumentation. However, they have been modified for consistency reasons only. These modifications are typical of other tubing support modifications which may be required due to spectra revisions.
(PG&E Septeober 15, 1982 subaittal, Attachment 1, Table 1, item 4. )
i 4 4 J
4 ~ ~~ '
d'1
%=T
}
i }f=3 I
.' l..
i J739A/033JA t
'a 1-12-45SL Support 12-45SL is a mechanical snubber located in the annulus area of the Containaent Building.
It restrains line 1357, the Component Cooling Water Return Header from the Reactor Coolant Pump Tneraal Barrier Labyrinth Seals. The review for the reoriented-revised Hosgri spectra snowed that the diagonal Drace, which was a structural angle, did not meet stress c ri teri a.
The angle was replaced by the tube steel shown in the slide.
g_
I I
j l
i i
d l
i 3
l l
\\2-45 e.
i PGGE Septeaoer 15, 1982 Subai ttal Attacnnent 1, Taole 2 Type 1 J739A/3030A
e/DINAL 7
HANGER SYMBOL
/12 \\
I G l-Kir-135 7 - 6 AREA uNE SI427
\\45 st/
10 7-6" EL LOC ON DWG 500057 k
EXIST.' W 21 5 5
@ = // W I I S # E &
ExlST. STRUCTURL STEEL 7poss y4, a\\
y.QIO 5 El Il61-10M" v
e,sk.
, -n =r a
M )yiv 3
ve\\
1
\\
$e A,- s T\\
/ TYR 2PLC5.
4 h
/)9 A.m/a s s siots. _
- i 3 51 DES 3
.T.p wes>.
ex 11
/N o
3 sioe5 r..
N sqD T 7.P y' pf a
.._$m._ a, B.O. S. EL. Il5'- 2"
_._2.
N (
y l,.
p ().- ; il-IX1%
ill
' , EXIST. CONDUITS
%g i
it l
as i
- 8ll i
3@~ ll V T b
/ TYR 2 PLC5. REAR f
/i aiN_NBR(T. To irEM 7 Ou 4-Slots L
h
?
3 3lpg3,TYP'
$ Q6 q
't
=
V~
_' f
~
h L=
- gyy,
[,# yrx Kg
//
I l
l 5
% ' l, ' c as chw a
=
. $t?R ahr. 0 @W _ h d=
ya H!
N-ELil2'-T3A 1_
)
"l
^
1 L
NCTE.-
$ b "
t.,1 l l'- (( j'
/
/
\\
b
-M
?"4 *E CCFE ITEM 8 TO CLEAR
[
/
\\_
REAR 3R<T. AND FACILITATE i
DA R *:AL PENET' RATION i
C i/
/
WELD 5 IN PLACE OF FILLETS l
2 Ne
-0 RILL (i) Ya.,f woLE 4
94 :rve /. N i
-a" AS - BUILT g
g
{
FOR DESIGN REVIEW
@ Q,,[x;o{i l W 'o ov ylgy 4 gelvso OCT 5 1981 ycxisT.w ai ss y,
._,a SECT.
B-B i
DSGN DRAWING NO DWN D C./2-29 -80 cnn t%1 m,.r.ar M
P R C J E C T;-
UNIT: /
S HT6C) OF SHTS PG&ECO ISSUE AEV lMICROFILVI l
X HANGER SYMBOL
/12 \\
I G I-KIT-1357 - 6 g LINE APc4 gl g 3y' i
AhoDIC/CA TION 107 6..
EL Loc ON OWG. 500037 7
4 EXIST. W21 = 55
@=/#4EJW #E/#
ExtST. STRUCTURat STEEL 1scos
, T. O.S. E..ll6'- 10M" y4 y..
f,,g.
'/I V N
L TYR-<'ugy -
9
,.m t
t
,, y
,jp -
h,TYe 2Plcs.
4 l
A
~* % gsasee__
p 35*k3 _
if
/
,/
.m--~~~
k B.0:5. EL. ll5'- 2" B
, 17[
l t SI coNoui
/
S i
s i
,/,,,.','
i l
Il
_ g/a* _i D
V 11
./
i
'i S
10 i'
le
'?
- GT, ' ' '
Nl@r-c Il l
11
/ rYR 2. PLcs. REAR r
li e jiuagrT..To. ITEM 7 cu y~
ll fi[
3 SIDE (TYR 5 6 1
//
I g_
[ yaX L
j
'au gyrc&v)
=
~
'h
\\
,7YP o
p'y,y'3 q-Q'.[3/}
i L-4 P t L.
N yg/ WAR BRxT. 0 cav.
/
~
4 x
2
/,d;g[imfe E
'/f V [
/
(4 pied EL.lli,- 11"f4' 4 j
7
\\
g N C T F_. -
COPE ITEM 8 TO CLDR l
REAR BRKT. AND FACILITATE
/. [
/
\\ygy PARTI AL DENE"i" RATION 8
/
a WELDS IN DLACE OF FILLETS 2
20RlW') 3/I*t L*M
',(
/
I,w[
- j. '/FJi ij
{
1 g
NA=JL '
- 7 a
beJV VIEbl A "A E
M i'
-CX:ST.W 21 = 55 h
'/N I
.,C i......
~
4 9
v SEC_T._5 - B DE BY CHC0 KID S'JP ' V ' D BY APP'V'D BY APP'V'D STi~O R DATE
/
SY PIPING ENGR.
SUFV. ENGR.
/-/ f - 8 2, i
cmsaw Gises 4s#
Co~7 O 2 'I PIPE SUPPOR:
No, i Ot ABLO C ANYON P G & E CO.
ORAWIN3 NUMBER P E v.
- wuc enAnct zuz user No 1
- 6. n e c 0493iO3B
- g... _.,12-105SL Support 12-105SL is a snubber restraining line 404, the letdown froa the regenerative heat exchanger to the letdown heat exchanger.
It is located inside the Containment.
There are two slides of this support. Slide l shows a closeup of three 3
snubbers, the rear-aost one being 12-105SL. The second slide shows an overall view of the frame to which 12-105SL and several other snubbers and l
spring supports are attached.
L When the DE piping analysis was revised due to a previous mistake in spectra selection, the load on this snubber increased, exceeding the allowaole load. Also, when the frame was analyzed, the restrained t
direction movements due to the DE loads were greater than our criteria allowed.
Tne snubber a PSA-1/4 pre-NF, was replaced with an PSA-l/4 NF and some frame members were reinforced.
i
\\?-ID5'> @
y i
\\
w
.h D
- e>
i Y
i k
e.
i t;gg
.~
'M
?GaE Septencer 15, 1982 Attacnaent 1, Table 2
..g e
I 8 '
"~-^-~'.c
, J-ID55 Type 1 l
s>
r p
9
/
+
y s
..k D
J739A.'J030A
A& ba 6 we Cow 4.
A n a wa i
12-1395L Support 12-159SL !.s a mechanical snubber located in the Containment annulus. It seismically restrains line 1043, the Steam Generator 1-4 Blowdown Tane, header. When the seismic piping analysis for line 1043 was performed with the reoriented-revised Hosgri spectra, it was decided to add this snubber to reduce the Hosgri movements of the pipe to meet internal criteria by limiting the pipe deflections, even though the piping was not seismically overstressed and did meet code requirements.
i l
l
,i.'
y-.>n 1
..a v ;g
- t. s.
e I
l
+ -
7 l '
4-I g^
k-h' SL s
l ou 8l. '9 u i
r........
m 4' q' I'
P$aE September 13, 1982 Submittal, Table 2 Type 3
(
I I
...l ~ '
t Gl't) l<bf Ib I" < Ib I D ' 'E' Y
\\'
LINE AREA e aS1 4.W j
-- 6,,
6N 4EN SLMOW INK M EL LOC ON DWG DOOO97
~
i DESIGN CLASS I d
h
/ "T"'f p cooE CLASS-~.
V\\M.FLM CALLED NORTH y
qlI pl eOo l
As T
EXIS'T INO O,
g!4 Jl b
N/ lp o' Mb@ C Wl2 X #181 }
I(
. 2 2.
e n
i I
9 s
{
I s
i Q
II x
,j o
O
.p, i
11 s
i
\\g Li s
l J V4/Trp'.\\
I r? \\
T ZFLSg i
l I
9h
,s s
@4 t,7 a
O
- J--
nC
/
df/V I /
'm LOCATION PLAN II =4 I
e {,,,
7 m, n p-
~
p' i
' "' [
'N f
TACK WELD
~~
/ SHIM TO FIT s
4 Pl. C 9..
3
\\
~
SETTING Cf=
k4 SNUBBER.
m
@ PIPE 2Y2"@ EL.lll'-O"
$!s"r![s$3 PLAN VIEEW i
NO OF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED NO REOD MATERIALS PER ASSEMBLY
-l 1
C4X7 7.9 X l'- 8" L.Ea. (CUT To FIT) i
'2 1
C 9 x 9 X l'- 2" LC1. (CUT Tt? P:IT)
PGA-3 SbJUS.W/FORW' RD tREAR SRK r CS=494" H.65 '7/8" A
S 1
?
4 1
P6A - 3 GL. AMP' 9180 2COS 3 "4 PIPE.
f 5
2 4'.% x 9" x OL4" LG, SHIM E.ATES (CURVE TO F:lT PIPE ii G
I F? 2.'/2 ' x :D'LGr. SHIM FLATE.
(THICKNESS s'r':!Eh C 2
E:6 oSow w/m4m oRAwiwo so R E.V. t - APP' D FO R. COM ST.
DWN RPbATI f, j CHKDJ HUANG O
UNIT: (
SHT2/MOF SHTS PG&E CO PROJECT:
y ISSUE REV l MICROFILM 1
/
12-1595L Support 12-1595L is a mechanical snubber located in the Containment annulus.
It seismically restrains line 1043, the Steam Generator 1-4 Blowdown Tank header. When the seismic piping analysis for line 1043 was performed with the reoriented-revised Hosgri spectra, it was decided to add this snubber to reduce the Hosgri movements of the pipe to meet internal criteria, even though the piping was not seismically overstressed.
d 7
7 4[.,t' j j
I
\\ 1; Q-h.SL \\ A.h k':
x d
' \\. T g.9.u s
s
. e t........
Y_ t
~
r-' } w p
,8 w.g T
I
~
~
d in i
c
?3Z Septencer 15, 1932 Submittal
?,:tacnnent 1, Table 2 Type 3 J7 3 ?.V J 03]'
l 39-24A l
Support 39-24A is located inside the Containment Building. It supports lines 2319 and 3289. These are the Component Cocling Water Return from Reactor Vessel Support Cooler 1-2 and the Component Cooling Water Supply to Reactor Vessel Support Coolers 1-1 'and 1-2, respectively.
During the review for the revised-reoriented Hosgri annulus spectra, it c
l was found that for the piping anchor on line 2319 a structural weld did not meet criteria for the corrected Hosgri loads. Additional plates and welds were added, to the lower pipe shown in the slide, to qualify this support.
l i
I l
s
~.
a'
~ ^
/
f\\
l I
W s
g-
~
l m.
l
- e..,
I i
PGZ Septender 15, 1902 Subaittal Attachaent I, Taole 2 Type 1 l
JI334003GA i
i
l 39-24A Support 39-24A is located inside the Containment Building. It supports lines 2319 and 3289. These are the Component Cooling Water Return from Reactor. Vessel Support Cooler 1-2 and the Component i
Cooling Water Supply to Reactor Vessel Support Coolers 1-1 and 1-2, respectively.
i During the review for the reoriented-revised Hosgri annulus spectra, I
it was found that for the piping anchor on line 2319 a structural weld did not meet stress criteria for the corrected Hosgri loads, since the we.ld was made to withstand a lesser load. Additional plates and welds were added to the piping in the region of this weld (the lower pipe shown in the slide) to qualify this support.
(
n -
\\.
S yn'
,1
\\
w sn
~
yl:
y t
PJ52 September 15, 1982 Submittal l, Table 2
[
Type 1 i
L t
I
- rA
39-24A 1
i Support 39-24A is ated inside the Containment Building.
It supports lines These are the Component Cooling Water Return from React Vesse Support Cooler 1-2 &nd the Component Cooling Water Supply to Reactor Vessel Support Ccolers
'-l and 1-2, respectively.
During the review for the i t' was f at the pip did-for the and a
, to the lower pipe shown in e si e, to qua is support.
Jfre>3 l
l l
l i
I i
p(A PG&E September 15, 1982 Suomittal Attachment ', Table 2 Type 1 l
0739A/0030A
OD6 WAC
.m sy.-
l e
MA8MBER SYlSOL f39 \\
I LNE I~K~ M '2 5 AREA D
o gg 9! '- O" l -K - 2 ; 19 - l 'h. b LOC ON DWG <frDEC 0
esssem class i 4
A FJ cosa cLassf-c.
X i
I-K.- 32 89-2 Fr.-C. '
- 4. I-K-2319-IVz.
l-Y..5 29 0-Yz.- C ~ -
O 5-
/
a'A 6EAME WALL F %IST6. IkJ5E,it.T5
'R 6 c.c4 '
- se g. 30' AS - BlRLT FOR DESIGN REVIEW RECElVED_ OCT 5 1981 L.OCAT tohJ PLAhJ NO OF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED I NO REQD MATERIAL 8 PER ASSEW8LY f
W 4 315 -T.L. Is'-l I Yr."
( 4 MLM BE.R.5) 2.
a MR. 3 74
- J'2." - C'-4" CUT A5 $ nob 1M 15aR. 3 ' z" x V " - C'- +" cut A,5 $HoWM
/
l 5r m-l I
FJ 4 = 13
!a-4 2" l 6 7
2.
W4 := 13 s '- o " L. Q.
CL4T To PIT 6
6 5 8 CcM t.,it.E T E, AMc.+kD R.5
' A.
i F yz'"x II.V "
l ' - l Vg." L.6 c)5 l
E y;" = l 5 %."- j ' - 2" L.(.1 ic 2
EA.R.E.V"wr,i 6 '- C " L,/1 l1 SM. 5Yz."" Y "
f'-4Y"L.CT 4
iz.
2 err.
v'"
V'"
' ' - 0 7. " LU.
t 13 i
5 A C. J. "= %"
C'- 4" L.d.
osom onAwine no oN N [l{w C C r TC y q. s -y g
' * ' ~ "
~
cnno m =-se-sa 4
PROJECT:-
UNIT: l sNT ' ' or SMTs P G & E CO issus nav
R S M OL
/
\\
AREA IF LINE l-K-32.39 -Z '/z, rcl
\\2W I
EL 41 '-O' t-K-7.519 - l '/tO LOC ON DWG M E4 T
p e
FJOTE(U h ",,v. -
- 1. e y 19 T 4, 149LET @ 345* SI'
. ~.
~
~
r FROM PA c)Z ' O" TO 104',5" 4 FMM LL tcc,'- /,"
EL los '- 9" To E,L,115' -9" s
i I
s""
- 2. 52.89 Axl* W19 i 680 47 '- M',, *' o s
3S i c)
PtAJ # )<l441 2, X14 48 1-4 w u T.
,. (;
- g-g
=
m As - BtMt.T
~~g me FOR DESIGN REVIEW OCT 5 19 81 ncEWED-(llK f3E8C)IZfdE l b
k 6
e i
't U N E7 p
,]B W
e g io,._ g,
\\l pp" x
s a ix io k
(
CTCN Tye s ns yw = ur / '
g Treg[
pt*
+ us -
g h
~5 i Kf ztM li'/:.)E 3
f~5 m
!_. B.L-Y"U l
s'- 9 %" To _
f EL E. VAT IOU A -A
'E 'C'T (mt A WRT mo Tu BIMO pr.,TAlt.,, > P,E, 6HT EW.,)
- DSGN, DR AWING NO DWN $ l'.3.l7g CHKDAAM Z 30 PROJECT UNIT: l SHT[h OF SHTS PG&ECO M
A issue A E5 l
! uic A OFILMt
HANGER SYMBOL
/3
\\
A Ib LINE l-K - EM -Z b O AREA g
\\2AA/
al-C" l-V - LE l % - l V'2, @
EL j
LOC ON DWG M o*A N
f P
,' i 11 '% V j
3
,- n, 4e4TIOLJ D-D (TTP) j
%s
-r eyu.;.ymy.yl:
L~-:-2 n-2.;:
M V
'. N.
ww
\\
)3'/z.y Ig CgMJ E.
i wAL.L-
- A i7
%s aa
=
=
NN
,a-
-o h
'N f
'. y.,
9e OA
=
M 8
,,,_ m b
W TfDbJ S-6
}
.o-
_o A
I i
_I i jfh II ' PE.TM L h( UPPLEL Ft.)
l5 Yi
-g----p h
-s-i AS - BLHLT S
0 FOR DESIGN REVIEW b
+
=
p RECEIVED OCT 5 1991 MW
, u E
o i i r
4
/
i i d
la,TYP uEIAl L h (_ ECTTCM ft) pa DSGN
~ OR AWING NO DW N \\_ f kJ ll, ^5 -l'1-bu CHKD WJ 3~I9-5c
&~',
PR OJE C T:
UNIT: l SHTCbOF SHrs PG&ECO
~
E-ISSUE A E'
--.-,-y
--1
.---..-,i m - -,
t t.
H A N G'dR SYMBOL
/" \\
a 7
)F LINE 1-k'
' 7 M -Z W fa
\\1s/
AREA e
- x EL
- > l '-O' t - t -211 # -i h, la LOC ON DWG
<@ N
/
E,' GTAIN L,Eh $TE.E,t TU6144 7
t
[4" 4Tgl, L.f,% STLEl TUSIM(_:
//.
f w.
=
m-Il N ae,may
//
P-Ic<.;0 x ic'
/
j l
/*
+
r-w e f~ UMisfEUT
/./,,[
u UNISTLuf
~.
u lc,u In4t+TCuT uulefit.uf si l l r'r c)" L4 lo" L4 O
i es s
i 1
(U
,1 u
i~,,,-- --- Q,;'
f l
x T9 j "y 'Ni *!:
u 4
luuetat
.T,-
+ ! F-200m I-bTAlutEh*
4 a
s
9TE,E.L.
W uui3f e.uv
- % :y Td*'*>
s l
t,/ ; j P-Icto l
/
i !
F,.'- 7 "
i -I" I s%:."
z' 4."
_ i '_ s ye g __
-~
t g
'i ',l uj
!/
i> g.
'x
/
l ULll6TELUT Map TU6ILJG DE TALL i
N C CE PE.P,. TO GHT7foA FCK. LCc -)
Q, u
ukitsTg gT l
) g,4ttTtuT r-icW P-icc i
-*/l
.A 4
-l GL E.L. 9 l' o" 1 __&
+
h k.~
[[>
}
l
-j b
1
- t. '. "
l v
l V
+
~
6
<,.;A :.
c A.. ; s AS Bull.T
,I.
40 A
i 6o4 OE31GN REVIEW r-a pt y.,10 OCT s 1991 9E.CT I O kJ E,- E.
m l
l DSGN DR AWING NO
^ ) =,Q, DWNj.Q cHnD a t1 H y si2;&n I'
I S H T.- O F SHis P G & E CO Y
. l UNIT:
P AOJE CT:
l
NOD (FKAT)0^./
. 4 E. m.
p 16 1-.ht =2Ae> -2. 'A h gggg gggg
\\L /
gg, A I '- O"
! -k - 2 % i 4 - I 'h. 2 LOC ON DWG
<TD *
- essism class l Ap N
cosa masc 4
)A a
l-K. 3289-zyr-c
',,- --4.
4,
.; l-K-Z319-1E l-y -s19c-z.k c - y &
- A *-
' k.'. -
g
'A cf.AME ALl.-
ExtSTt:. lusrAn
'R 4 c.aaT:
l
).MS *- so' l
V I
I LOCATIOM P M
@tt.F. Titts. OffT W[ GfW5. & A A4 NO OF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED I NO REQD MATER 8ALS PER A33EhtSLY
\\
l I
W 4 315 -TI 15'-ll 4."
( 4 M LM SE.R.td 2
g 4
SM. 3)' 5 72" -O'-F CUT As oNokJu
+
?
Sa 3 '. x V2"-o'- +" 4.uT As swoWM 5
2 4
a i
N + = IS
+'- 4 19 " Lt.t.
l.
7 2.
I,a44 :n 13 s '- o " L. O.
(uT To PIT 6
8 6 58 fcWc R.ETE AWc 440R.S 3,
-; A i
P, Vz'N lZ.YT -I *- J Vg," L.6 f
- c) 5 i
FP V:." = I 5%."
l' - I L c.1
{
l 2
!!%, R. 3 )t ",4.*
S'.o" Lt.a.
6 r
h i'
Ii E.A t 5Fz."= J
4'-4E' L.4 4
ia 2
54.R. S'4" = V.C' 2.'- 0 Fr L.f.t
(,
j 1
s.
m _i a nw e-sw___
i E (w f
et,n 2" i %."- #'- IVz." i Gt. E-4.,(AW As sit 4WN \\
~
~
8 ( IF
?x WS.. ?/o' x #'-9 L4, ovrri. iiN *iE' D, GT Tp Mi, f f
[.
y w
. y v - y_ w vw -
O3
'I c:
u DES. BY CHECKZD SUP'7'D BY AFP'Y'D BY APP'V'D BT' /#4 MTE
.BT< w.sc4
,c PIPING ENGR.
SUPV. ENGR, f 8f.
W pfff a (: 767 ~7 g
I~
FIPE SUPPORT NO.
P G & E CO.
ORAWING NUMBE A R E Y.
CRAVING CHANGE 7g8 M ONCT l
$HEET & OF SHEETS MNI p me+t c==
i 1..........
~ _,._, _ ___
.* 7 reaNGmA dYM3OL s
I*
LINE l -iC-W* -? '/. 0 2
AREA
'J,4A 8
A' EL 41 '-O
- t -IC "IS l O - l '/;., O g
LOC ON DWG 5'2 3 c i
MOTE Nh
.q. b*
- l. Ly.l>T42 14%FT @ S45* 31'
(
FlioM E.L. *)Z.' O" TO 104 '-3" 3 FR.oM g,L Icv.4" E.L Ic>5 '- 9 ' To LL l lS' -9 "
4 *.
W Z.
S2.b8 FW YG'70) k foCQ 3319 FWJ8)<l447 i X1448 67 '~ 3 5 T#
I 4
d' ##UT'
[l h
f
,[
. m l
,,7
/
'ulN!P[
g
/
3 l'
h i.
l '-4,,
_u _ 5 '-f,,,
j'
~
l'@.!x.4s" rm Y
DETAI L 17M [e J
f F
/
M-(iixfs2.eetzA0G
/
I 6
i
(
N l
f
~
19-. sL los '-
i s
s
/
g ie,o f.TC 9 M
N Tv, s EN FeTwr #
p4 i
- 4. gu 3 -
y WE W.'UP 7 m a
74 V i
c h
i p,
g ilk.tzst9 ti vDE 3
x
.?
E.LM 9' l V 4
~
n
.m: 1T+
(+ 4 IF N M
- ,- 9 'O. TO to
- 96WN 9% 4-@T"7
[
s u s.vuriou A-A
( = T-g (f0C. U W IdTF WT AMD TWStM(a PLTAll. S E.L GHT 2.f.c.)
DES. BY CHECKZD SUP'7'D BY APP'V'D BY APP'V'D 3T f/4 DATE BY g
PIPING ENGR.
SUPV. ENGR.
2-5-82 j.
N5l
\\67O7,,7
?!PE SUPPORT NO.
P G & E CO.
OR AvelNG NUMBER R E V.
f5?JC"^"GE 786 D' O N T I
sserTa5Aar seers #M 2 9 i
+8
/
- NIC.90 FILM L'+-
l cr irum: v:n t.Cir O
. - - ~ - -
HANGER SYMBOL g\\
l-E- 4 W -2 E C
!b LIN E
~
AREA EL 9 l -8 I~ S' N I 9 ~ !
LOC ON DWG N%*
7 b***
0 i
/(W, p,.. $$$.-?.T.? ?.5 V
f go
.'=-:..L I
/
l
y y*y,4*
\\
ww.
g g (,,K.A W E.
% M.L-w\\
I 6e4TIOU D-D (TTf')
7 0P 4
'is
- sv "
-y se z
e A
-HF h
6 kTIObJ 6-6 Tif. Z.
n l5 s
.N
[4
/
1/
k
(
x iv Y+
9
_ _ _ g
?l hV qV 0
IPMe PE[gjL @(uPFLt it)._
i c,.,
&Tl/N E'~5.
01 p
fN I[
h q
i
~
/
(
f 0
g
)
g
'd f
i
+
4-J l f
/$
~~
N O
[
y.
HP--
-=
a
}
- v,'
=A 5
.w...
t
..+.
_rn o
s t
I L
2.W-9 Ng
/
II
\\<N [4 t'
2%,
-" rs 0 x
f e it 0
=i
.g.
s b
I DE5AlL h C ECTTCM FO 2
confN s Pu 5 g
3 DES. BY CHECKED SUP'7'D BY AFP'Y'D BY APP'V'D g //f DATB BY FIFING ENGR.
SUF7 ENGR f - E ' 87-p 4/M 7/kb i ""#'
AC%
GM pg PIPE SUPPORT NO.
P G & E CO.
OR AWING NUMBER R EV.
DRAWING CHANGE 7g8 % @(T l b
N SHEET 2r4 0F SHEETS p mewc==
l
HANGER SYMBOL j/p \\
- h I
LINE 1-k'
'* 7 A * -E E C i
AREA
\\W/
I; EL
- >1'-6 l-it-M I4 lE.tz)
LOC ON DWG m W o o f
Yi GTA N14.w $Tr.a-Tu6144 l
7--t-J4." 4fgi,gi.f,% *TLLE. Tusi46 r-
/
f
~
w i,,
,0
./
r-w u
uHeft.uf uuiWE.uT
,/
4 T-loco a it."
Ici' L4
,7
,/.
wia rut ii wai+Tc.ur
--=
l m
r
=>
- L4 io Lo (J.
,I
/
a i
2 g---
h "g)ca j 1- ' k.---..Joi ur 7 g,,
i I
g m.
unt-
- i7 I
\\
i i;
1i 4
I
\\
"n e
Lu % mut 4 +TAiut.w+
J
- r. ice
"'%':g Tusivo i
+N 74-uw efeuv s
i cN
/
P-Icte I
z.'-7 '
i -l" l'. sV4."
z' 4."
i'sye'
+
=
c y
l; m
y lN _I' l'8 g
ULJI6T"R UT AMP TU61LJ6 DETAIL j
'Q
(,F.T FER. ~To sHT Z 4 A FoK LOC-)'
h u
\\
AS BUILT uuM>TRuT uutsTg.yT l
}
FOR DESIGN REVIEW g
P-icco
- g. ice:
OCT 2 196L p
I
-4 RECEIVED t-i O
I GL EL.91'-O" 6
9l.
i E A 1 h.
A '<. f 4
]
g d
J. '. ?
t-s Q
1
~2 i,
h
_ ". I a
+
e g.:n...,.&..:+
p
'I.
- '>O,
et
^
2 a
~
il SP CTIO LJ E-E.
S Me itE -rttis GetT. el sNT*.
2c,2.c-4,~23 s.
h 2
k DES. BY CHECKZD SUP'V'D BY APP'V'D BY APP'V'D Y /94 DATE*
l 3
BY PIPING ENGR.
SUPV ENGR.
8 'E-6f I '"d *9
.i C4rw
)
g[
GM DRAWihG NUMBER H E V.
l PIPE SUPPORT NO.
P G & E CO.
DRAWUTC CHANGE 7gS W VMlT l
b N
SHE OF SHEETS p mem c==
l 1
)
i
'0-55R Support 40-55R, which is located inside the Containment Building is a rigid restraint supporting lines 3289 and 3290, the Component Cooling Water supply and return lines from the reactor vessel support coolers l-1 and 1-2 respectively. When this support was reviewed for the reoriented-revised Hosdri spectra, it was found that the anchor bolts l
were overloaded due to possible lever prying effect at the base plate, and did not meet stress criteria. For line 3290, at the right side of the slide, it was found that an inadequate gap existed in one i
horizontal direction (N-S) and an excessive gap in the other norizontal direction (E-W).
The modification consisted of adding stiffness to the baseplate at the top of the slide to reinforce the l
baseplate anchor bolts, a shim plate to reduce the excessive gap and a flange of structural member was cut to create an adequate gap for the pipe movements in the unrestrained direction.
l 4
/
l 4 ~
l g
i'. s 9w/ j s
h
~
_M'n /
.a x -
l
~
~
W Wh b..
\\T f-I P0aE September 15, 1982 Submittal, Table 2 Type 2a5 I
i i
I
- J 7.i
40-55R i
Support 40-55R, which is located inside the Containment Building is a rigid restraint supporting lines 3289 and 3290, the Component Cooling j
llater supply and return lines from the reactor vessel support coolers 1-1 and 1-2 respectively. Ilhen this support was reviewed for the l
reoriented-revised Hosgri spectra, it was found that the anchor bolts were overloaded per criteria. For line 329C, at the right side of the slide, it was found that an inadequate gap existed in one horizontal direction and an excessive gap in the other horizontal direction. The modification consisted of adding stiffners to the base plate at the top of the slide, a shio plate to reduce the excessive gap and a flange of structural member 1
was cut to create an adequate gap for the pipe novements in the I
unrestrained direction.
M
,1
. t
's j'^
~\\f3
//pg)[- / j'.?
- ;T ~u f'
'q,'- %
I
,-~ ',
'4, i
E I
amm.
3
/
% i-
/;d P35E Septencer 15, 1982 Subaittal j
Atta:naent 1, Table 2 Type 2 & 5 t
]
I 1
t J73 W JJ30A I'. -
Y ~.' AREA
~
McDIR. A ts N HANGER SYMBOL LINE l
'.1 -
$4 7_%[n IY
'E
\\-W t
- 80C
\\==
~
EL 9 l' -r)I' l V_- h9o,1/n 8 ~c 2
LOC" ON DWG
- ~^W r)
E. A l L. A
/ yp 9,
4
% YN T
_ zs' a
\\
_ geuove aur.s
- y : --
w t
u fu "n
Ms-
~
1
.,l r
4 Q
./
jyg A*.
Y 3
l /-
so ym.o
- =s x-r
/ yp,4 PLc6.
~
- f.
D'm@;i. tu N
T I
K-
\\,!
{ 2g= l. v4 v, N m
~
N l$e'
' y (TB4./P.2$
i v Q g g r7g2 g ig n i
i ft p - n A lt S
- W 2 iL. C__
i 12'es'
- l
'=
l 1%'
i
,i d; oENi I t
$b R
.*; 7//
1._m i v, t-.ic.
i
-l.-
g' n!,a i
. + _
g +#.
- s. -
a a.
3 l lE',
l g;
i V
tn i
M.
l3
- - )
e,
-- l i
T 4
I N
4 9
+
E l?
3 T
3 U
- aw, I l
-i m
i i
al..::!c:no Rt,1 INDEXED REV.
. xs
!i:P'V'D!!
MP'V'D BY MP 'V 'D -BY FOR DATE j g A <g j s-Pirnic aca, s m. m an.
/- h G2 g g t
u 1
MJ17 lm
- ce+1 WNlse:spaGas-l57 ff$Ed.
y
/ 29/62 y
MI///
I 163 702 ~7
/
UR "3" W IEE fi__
i,? ?I 5:PT;T-l liO.
f-P G & E CO.
- /
^^nor0
- i
- e. u u, s - r eoe sa 7~)
/
oAid, W AL
'E MAWGER SYMBOL
/
\\
A AREA 1F UNE I-k. - SW
'2_'M Z
\\55P-/
i.
EL G l'- O' i - K - %?AO - 2.V2 {
LOC ON DWG E00040
,5
- 2 %y N-9 % %pA3)
".'a" 22 : i N.
I
~AI!
rf
' L.-' g/
Ro9f N s
\\
4 eL
{>
4
_lG'-Il W,
W K /jg / ' j y
. rmowr s 4
w iN b
\\
't N
h bL N
210*
Tm'f N 'lyg n &
4 u v m
an
's bl fgs)
WV s r u s) M k,.
q'O y
V
(
'\\
,:5 f:::.
\\
LOCATION PLAN
\\
e W._56516L.B.NEW
\\
N*ghN
_NY_2 4 3
AS BUILT
\\
- F'LAN. Vlf W___.
FOR DEstGN REVIEW NO OF ASSEMBLIES REQUINEff i ~
~ ~ ~
NO REOD MATERIALS PER ASSEMSLY i
1 4 if ro3 5%'M.
~~2 H
4 M ! 3, l'e 17s L 4. EA.
-~~ 3 2
4 M l3 PLT-Me* LG. (6 <-T' LEr ~~
_. 4:. ~ ~ T B.~
(1) C.S. M.10'415"*M (1) C.S f?._.[2Saf x IO.*A A' FJ/4
- L'4 HOLasM/F.
5
. L E-~.S. E8 PHIL.L,lPPs coNcRe-rE FAe 1'ENexs N/ecL%
s
_. G
_ _ L_-
- 4. M.13, 5 '- 5 'E' L 4..
/ ~ ~ - - 2F Wl'53O'e.(1'LG,'-
. ~
~.
_S. _
.I.
4 4 7.25, l'- 10 % L6
~
-~9 2T
'(I) C25. E 3% WM' ~(I) C,G O S'x 3'e }F 6HIMS
-- IQZ
.F--~~ 5.s..*,'% S'Of(! sR TNC-~ ~ -
~~
~~~
rti.
I 4 # is, -r-c
L4 cu110 rtf
. 12~ -' 2 C) H.S. 48"Cs. P 3.[2eM.* OH.S.49 C.S.ft. % 1474'x K.* VJ/4 $4 HOLES 8
Z.[3 f
I d.3AfxQ 2
DSGN
' DRAWING MO DW N G.J. '2.e.to Od97Q2
~
C H K D v ~~~
PROJECT:p{A=LO CANYON UNIT:
1 sHT 6' lor SMTs PG&E CO issue R v twicnoritui
- 06) :/NAL
?
A AREA IF l - k
'A 1 9 9 - 2.'d " d HANGER SYMBOL fg LINE
\\ssr/
i EL 9 I,_O,,
l-E-Mgo, z%, c LOC ON DWG Com4o N
i DE' FAIL. A Y
=
=
2 YS" !
c
~
AS - BUILT
- ik l "x+
a m W vs FOR DESIGN REVIEW 8
4
[
00T 2 1961 h
- k. +
NfT N
RECE@iC g 'O
) - - - -
II
,V
'N $
,N
.k 4/
"s N O W fl 0 N
" 4-
}
Qo
,'4 i
I i
i fI 25//r g
~' LMB CZF2fAILe L D M AIL $
__d 16'DhIL.- C--
L 12 9 #
10"
~,,
l q
i i,..
lW
- /
/
A 3
a, i
1._.'s I
- f. -t-o-
~' h v
I[
g
+-
_e_
13
-c T
f-[(
N 4
'm
+
[
-+
7 3
o 1
4 %.
-f-'
Y SHEETM EOF SHEETS DR AWING NO REV P ASLS u MyCN
.J N :-j' j
PG&ECO NE I
owN: 6. C. :-e ee OSGN:
CHKD: MI MICROFILM l
i M'O#FCAW8M MAWGER SYMaOL 7
- hlj
- kREA (JNE l-K ~ M " -
[
/
\\
\\ -Y
- j
_s s o.s-
'r rg a s'- C-r - v. r?ao _ g w - {
~ LOC ON DWG Sbce40
,', l II_ ? Wo, / h a :g ts*
g D E 81Gk C t. A 3 8.L
[I Ir 7dtw L M '
- 7'-
CODE C:.AS E C, hh,,,,, t'.r.o,'r *-
t g%. I ;l
/
OALLED NORTH L3h'6Xf,I, Q: v N$ExusT w/
H l
w t
}Q---
H6nt. 40kg a
- A M L O
)i
. w-n w v
w.r:0 W Nry-A W r,N4" f b d', y l
.32$ w % '
3,2R\\
~~~'
r
- g,4.,cA / K
\\
T gi r
P i cy-D i'
' rf x 4
/
yi e
hDW QV.
(
's
$2*.$
i_
Y:. Eq*
sy 9
h I
I Y
r A
CL.t5)
'*8 b, e l
b
~
E:
LOCATION PLAN
.:" ' \\
"g-
\\
a - N.6ff.,56Ei6M.NEW.~
\\
me.,_ 4 jij GD
~
LkN. VIN N
I
\\
NO OF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED i
.l
~
NO REOD MATERlALS PER ASSEWSLY P
l d. M L3. FA'L' 4 i.
l..
L.
3
.:.. 1.~. ~E_.
- _ __
- . -~!
~ 2.
[.2 M 13fE.-E.' l-G...(0 'AT L4
.:.~..
~~-Q._p(C.TCAR Jc' LEW (O Cfi~E_.J2iOTor.K M.*.yJ/4 L'.fil.sLas_.T,fS
-- _i_._l(,..!z'EiC5. =.a phi!.&lPPS CCNCRI-fE FASTENET,.s N/BCL% :.
r
= "1 % ' M.l5yiE==.?A?:lc,_..
2.~_
. ~.
s
,l 7.._ l_. 1T- - [:rW.75Td +.J f.". rXE.T. T_.i."J--'.r.~.
- ..._ _:.7:.. L _ 7.- ~.'.
>j Q_ li-- -i+-cs C, N0 %"
./(o THR. SHIM II_wT tz n
---n,.,.--.s-..,,,,-.,,,a f.
N._w.,x -e A-.-..-a Q to.__wv c.!-
- <a
-i m
-e " -
g y _a, l __ J_.. jr.O;;..'.'i.: a.Md-'.5RTP1
~ - - ~ ~ " '
'~
ElmTZ l:
I 14 kP IS. -'i'-c
4 C M TS.Fif
._T z
--U._ T. 2 -'l"7.YS. 45 CE. E'IIDT /Jhi.5 46 CiL *.' l WO M'.. VJ/4 W4 'dLM a
r
$_*..t I
( P 5% 5N M.'
14 2
e 4/B X2" X 26 %."! Gr 15
.4.
FC. Iltx2".X 2$ -.CVZ TP F!T
- O'.*S. ::? ' CIC i D.[ 5"P ' V ' D E T A?P'7'D BY APP 'V 'D -BY FOR CA E Ih]f 5Y gf$.b! fM' i
{U:
PIPING EL R.
hYr jSVP7. ENGR.
/ _ M - 8 2_.
4
,.0
- Af w.
lcanne cmn, 5.FV29/2z
/W
\\GnO2 7 r
w
!T! R F:F-FO.
P G & E co.
- OR*" "Ein "i
.. _4. O. C.
- i
.-sungy a.-
049252 14
- 5. 5 com po4 sum
wwwppvA 7/8N
.AREn, jp HANGER SYMBOL
//,r)\\
LINE I' '4 - 9
~
~
S 8e.6-YN EL A l'- o ',
l-V - %2A o - 2.8/-:p c LOC ON DWG
- 'hW O E.
A r.
i.
9' J
- /yyy j
2.%'y l '+ Y h l
ggMovE Ndr.$
'-N
"?I 88. *
+
M i i i 'i qd '*. f-f%
/5 e
4S M:-
3 5
s x
/-
w vec
~
" Si
/
D 'em. %
7 \\ yp,4.PLC5.
N T
-c I
. F4 V e.
\\-
F, 1 2%' i \\
M' Ju 4-RC$
4y j
7Il<3
[7MKlCh L PMAIL 8
% W:;T E C__
i
[$
l IW i
,P -
3 I M'\\ l g
l F
2/
/
- 1. ~ i le i
2 i
-=i.
t v
gt 1
-v-
,ag
+
g
--d-- h t p i
Y
--G-I llE'!
l m
is
= 1 Q,
Y
,a p
n
-N 4
E!
1+
+
3 3
7 3
l e i
.: K,
' t., i
-e. -
-o-1 i
I RM INDEXED REV.
I 4
I
" k'C RO 3'.'P'7'D !!
APP'7'D BY APP 'V 'D BY FOR DATT.,
i" lg4* 7 jIrdf p PIrnic cica, sm'v. Exca.
/- h G2 I tstM'lY WI6 h ee,= Geu l 6,7*
4/M/ph l2
'F1 f/29/82 l
hr T,1=:
M l
l6 702 ~7 a
i.P ?I 5'PT:T.-
lNo.
l P G & E CO.
DRA*"'G
- EER Fi' 1642 Dd# /-
C46126 2 y
- g.?2 cm: I
/
- ssm gyor
- ssm
1 1
l i
}
42-12R Support 42-12R originally supported 6 lines: 316, 317, 318, 321, 322 and 323. These lines are the component cooling water supply and return to the Containment Fan Coolers 1-1,1-2 and 1-3.
The top four lines were supported vertically only and the bottom 2 lines were i
supported axially along the line using lugs as well as supported i
vertically.
i The support did not meet natural frequency criteria in the restrained axial direction, so that its ability to withstand the DE and DDE cannot be assured. Also, the structural member used to support the 2 lower lines was overstressed per criteria for the DE and DDE loads.
The modification consisted of breaking the existing frame into two separate supports. The new support,42-82R, as seen in the lower i
portion of the slide now supports the lower 2 lines.
t
-o 5:
- b 3
c'
. ri,s J
~
l i
90 s.-
+.e k
l pnE September 15, 1982 Submittal Attacauent 1, Table 2 Type i 1
l
[
- .3 5 i
i 42-12R Support 42-12R originally supported 6 lines: 316, 317, 318, 321, 322 and 323. These lines are the component cooling water supply and return to the Containment Fan C 1-1.1-2 and 1-3.
The top four lines were and the bottom 2 lines were supported The modification consisted of breaking the existing frame into two separate supports. The new support,42-82R, as seen in the lower portion of the slide now supports the lower 2 lines, i
J l
~
i l
1 PG&E September 15, 1982 Submittal, Table 2 Type 1 l
l i
0739A/0030A
CC/6tWAL
.. e 76-813 i C 323-it - f AREA IF L I N E' c 316 -it - e.
HANGER SYMBOL I K2 322 11-e 1K E-
~
LOC. ON DWG. 5000M_
N O S. n. <7 3 i 7 - i t -
E L. IIT-O" s.3ri. i2 -
8 -<7 B l(o - it - M-2 B + $- r
- g atsicN cta.;s I 4
coce c Ass e
/r j
(/o;L !
CALLED NORTH
^i exist te5+s o..n..u.
f-T.O.c.EL 1364) y an o
n,}y$,,n W
Jt i J."
(D A- %
u ^'%
W 11 Lews. aon,
\\
,L l
--, -aa y,7,,.,;,
.a
?
e o iWidAro"[*
i 2
'~
l T.oh.
a\\.\\'
g g
is
,1 A
a V
l.l C EL ISS'*ll{
?
'i
~. :.s 5 L I3 3'-S,
f M 8
@l msr
,M
\\
~
f,,i y
- 30 c S.If
- S '3Q M' * * Q t
+
LOCATION PLAN
.tsd.fg.)
6/i
.6mrt To '/iticts.eaAticEe mL Q.
m'FotgscenOH FOR._
r G
_.l,m, ".'/ th j (D!-r ALL. LINE6 Atao Ay) A\\
CY O\\ RECT \\O% t. H L
.'Kl,-
?-+g
}-
^
DIRECTION FOR Ub4Eh e
C i-K 2. - s 21 - i 2. QA-_.
f9,>,g
-' e+ c+
y l-K 1 N -\\'L ti,,,
8 ELEV A-A 6
i/q n
-.n N O. OF EQUIRED
/
~~
'i N O..
REQD M ATERIALS y, pgg I
9 SVFl7 /.o '
'S>/4 " L6. EA, mn necir,y seview 2
2 M /.i x 7o, S'- 114" LO.'M EACH og, ggjgn ort e 1041 3
S AvrI3, 7 ' 7" L/n, E A.
A T
44" 15, M '. 6 '/2" L/h, CLAT_ To FG' 6EE. No M. 9 5~
2 v/ 4 w. I'b I O- l a LZ.s, EA, cut TO F\\T, 6
g O AR,. 7. x W/q x l'. O '5/44 " L.c.
7
/6
- T 3/45M" s %" W E D TO Pl PE e
i.
u co o, o - 1" c onc, v u e
e m w.in. w cur cc n ea rc m c w n n a
s s+ n., a w cur ccn. sos re rir w-ei 7a, eau _ve va. o'nwe" tc.
P G & E CO.
" - hA wrT m 049254 mir,y.
mm gn iseeyse sev.
tsa o:. / mw i
4 -a ma.
4-,-.-
se-set 6099r M
NLW
\\
exar is w se E'-o "
l S' y4 Y \\
am
\\l so6. cuMd' ri v 4
me N
'V e-y4 I
,/
mr Vt. /
J AIW (l;
e I.K5,-//z,..
M )/ '/4V \\ TY i e sic a d4 q EL I2*.$- @E '
+
[
E Vd V
(
'1..
et l
Mjii G
ma llEh
^
h 's.l
)a 18//
j a,
a LJ-J
//
3' _ r
/
SEV C-C 4
,,,/,'
l W
/%V) l 16
/
"E
(
l
'i si 73o_gj"
'E y
AS BUILT
%d
'T' N.
A-
\\
c:=W FOR DESIGN REVIEW g
}
RECENED gg7 g jgg; JEC7/0At 8 -8 JEC 7*/CN O-D No i Re.G o M ATE.R) AL6 l
It i
1 W 4 x )'b 9 '- I S /4 " L / ".
l l'6 I
I i6Hirl 6AR 4
- Y4, c' t o" LO. ( tac %. T o ITEM 'M
"- W^
P G & E CO.
049254 0
- " ' > a' seier,. 2, s~iers i
s~ n n w m w.u, gx eu i
LINE i3N~'i - h h
M
'I
~
AREA IF L
NOS.MtiM.',1: I s-se4
\\tzy m f
O.
LOC. ON OWG. 5 0 0 0 4-1 6'* G "
- l OESIGN CLx55 I O
SODE CLASS S y
C nstnew:e 4
CALLED NORTH l
gf E
i l
g r.o.s.a. isa'-(
l g
y sie e
A
_A.
ph
)_]
i Y
1 L8-Iid'_I, f
c w
2c 0
n-n -
2
} - *!,li
Oo$
k s
gj; M
u A
'\\\\ g\\ gw sf '(or.., -
7 i,.\\
/j,
- 1 T.0.6. E L I35' 5g,.
.g m
c n is W
w e
N v
1 y
,j Y4
"=-
@, O h
4m T.O.6.E'.is2:o[s.
1
,y f
- ~
$ 0 )L.-
W/
~>
1 a
mLOCATION PLAN dy l
g
-+
It-1 T.o '/itI.ctEARAt4cEe Qgy.
'IFTY;DIREC.TTCH FOR b
At L. UNE6 Apo Ayt AL, fI OlRECTioM e. H L
. ul FOR LiLIE Mos.1-X2-321-12 DIRECTtoN #oR usu6 4 !-
i 1.7" TKt -$2.) - 17 Q@ 4,e A W D l-K 2-St ro-12 SEE l' KL ~5ilo -l?
I H AWGE R No. 4 2/82 FR E2
/
NO.0F ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED o
N O-REQD M ATE RIALS ow l
9 8 vfl 7. (.oMW" L6. EA.
N O
2 jL til.r 17D,( Co'- Co*} LONG EACH Q
8 s_ (a) w as, F7" t.6. E A.
tti nu 00 a: :n - --[
.n= ;5, ~,- :33
,; y pu,,a j h
15_ __ ^2 v/tiv. )S,l7 ' (O') L6.EA. cut TO F\\T, e
a_
_ _v GI
. 2. - i"1 -
' O ~" !. ' ' '.'
^
8 5
.=. n
-=-
- -
3 g
2 3g 5:e.._
. =
g c: y 3,
3 3;ya;. y
- ww
=:
=
Fe IG /s" x 39Ar.," x 'Fe". CUT CORNERS To FIT %F ic~~4 7
BAR. 2V4" x V4' X O'- 7 /e"LG. (cut To plt W )
'9 ii 20 acs.bt l
carexza sur v.o my u p.v.o my up.v.o pr rv#
mrt
/
g/,,
mac acn.
s m. a an.
z - g-ez S %,,m
/qf,,p
- g3077 c,. - a,-
?~,PE SUPPORT po, g
l' ORAW MU M..
P G & E CO.
h lo%
~
SHEET 15 0F
$HEET3 1
McDifkA T/M/
42\\
EM ta nc a
\\
S'-c
- _=
/?
w
- 4Y \\ mrACes
/ Goh. Euntid5
\\
N'\\
Vy A
n 4
-=- ~
(
gi V*
gV a
TY P.
y S
s l
l
/
+
[* A' o
(I
/.15 -//
i i
.s s
/
i s$ Youi-
- ((f\\MY
./
s
.Sterica B-B I
S 5=
0 0 I.....
C d
'/
E 3
M ATE.R t A Lh C
yo Re.o O q_
-ja /q u- =L.
e
+
4mm og w m v > E-A = e e
' DES. BT OH ECKD SUP'V'D RT g APP'V'D BY APP'V'D Jr /pg DATZ 3
a Pf PTNG ENCR.
SUP7. ENGR.
8-9-62_
Cacm cme 2/9//2
- p IG7O27
?I?E SUPPORT l No.
- c P G & E CO, U A"U *II" "I**
[N)
NNN lb OU G44--
SHEET l(o 0F SHEET 5
44antriepriest HAN ER SwsOL l-F 1-K2 -321-I2 [bl
/42\\
t,Ne AREA i
SEQ & 6-4151 \\82R/
l l 7 '- O,,
l-K2 -3)G -12 fB 500042 EL LOC ON DWG e
DESIGN CLASS I 7
l h,
.g 8
CODE CLASS S CTYR f 6.g CALLED NORTH
- A 4
2 D
\\
A~
g@
O
~~~Z
-- --_ ~ -E T ~1 g'
h----g_f%/Z_-i!- L -- -
JA -
El. p,R M
9
_. j
[in EL.ize'-83" j^
h, lLTi N/x i.
i i
/
_/
i
/
j-
/! _A
/
l l *.n $
q'
(
EXIST.
/,T
-PLUE I
/r
,, t. T - - -
yr -- p\\
' j
',I2ig34 t/
/
2/
.l_' ad_ L_'_ l_ _ _4 n
!L _ _ J I
1
- A./lL_gy tv su so.
Qy)
,z y p
\\
k g\\~4,Np LOCATION PLAN 5
l N: @
ss
\\
4 [
\\.
lP VI 4
'F k, [e"7%h4y$- E,g,[_,..s yn
-)' y
\\
s s
4 yp NA
\\
2-ELEV
\\\\ '
O' y soas N
\\
\\-
286b-lfo f
NO OF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED I
NO REQD MATERIALS PER ASSEMBLY I
2 TS G"XG"X V2.",
8'- l" LG.
CCUT TO SUIT) 2 2
TS 4" X 4" X Vz.",
l'-4 %" LG.
E
.3 2
TS 4"X4" X '/2" lo'- 6 " LG.
(CUT To SUtT) fj 4
i TS G" X G " X. '/2" O'-O" LG. (CUT To SulT)
E 5
i BAR
- 2. " X 5 " X' l'- 4 'N' LG.
3 G
IG LUG %" X I" X 3 " LG.
7 2
TS 4"X 4
- X h",
4" LG.
(CUT To SUIT) 8 !
2.
I B A R 2" x S" X 3" L G.
REV I-AFP TD.
FCr<,
CONSTR.
DSGN k L,,
DR AWING NO DWN (d,G,6 Qg,g 2 CHKD M.hrEffyf_
PROJECT: PA6LC CAMTCL UNIT:* 1 SHT l0l OF SHTS PG&E CO ISSUE REV !
luit anan u n e
i
}
l 1
l 42 12R I
Support 42-12R originally supportt:d 6 lines: 316, 317, 318, 321, 322 and j
323. These lines are the component cooling water supply and return to the Containment Fan Coolers 1-1.1-2 and 1-3.
The top four lines were supported vertically only and the botton 2 lines were supported axially as well as vertically.
1 The support did not meet natural frequency criteria in the restrained j
di rec ti on. Also, lhe structural member used to support the 2 lower lines i
was overstressed per criteria for the DE and DDE loads.
i Tne uodification consisted of creaking the existing frame into two l
separate supports.
The new support,42-82R, as seen in the lower portion of the slide now supports the lower 2 lines.
1 l
l
..t, l
f,s e.
i
+=*
P31E Septeaoer 15, 1932 Subaittal Attacnnent 1, Taole 2 Type 1 l
l 1
l 37 3)?,; 3 Q3 k's 1
l l
~...
1 0$/(nM/AL AREA IF LINE' c sie it -[e N
t C b22-\\1 - s HANGER SYMBOL
~
/ K2 322 12 E
N OS. s.C 3 t 7 12 -
l-E L. in '- O"
<s 3 r i i 2 -
8 -<P 316 - 17.
_M___
LOC. ON DWG. 50004S_
0
- 5'- 6 "
- l JESIGN CLs.i3 I mahui CODE CUSS S 7
i l
exist 18 gs d
CALLED NORTH u..n...u.
l T.o.s.EL 1364]r" y,2dl.,us m
W 4'
If, LL.
L i'-l W l na s
t sn 1,
tem ~rs l
e -
,,7 o,a aa u,
17 2
- CI _t.....
,f.;-
s 3ig Y
nt istldha[-
,-y 2
e
- v. o^ -
s
.:.sn.In'-5(,
[} [i.
c etiss'tif
' *i
'f
\\ M@
msrN[
'.M.&
~
4 4
y w3o 7.0.k s'. 52:0[-
yigg liS*3c E
% 's luk"! n s' r//
a.tsfgh LOCATION PLAN g
.g 6/i g - ~ \\ \\
ik N h
.6HIM To.1 dct.EAEASCE6
/i a auus.t.
m rromsc.nON FCR._
Q.. c.,, pW w tt)) y %,p /,m At.t. usE6 Atao Ayi AL C-Wl,[y' q, DIRECTION e. H L i
(
DIRECTION FOR UNEh P. ),,,
hELEVA-A sc n-az -su - \\1 6
l' K7 - M - \\1.
I/ fl
.m N
.OF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED
/
~
'n N O..
REQD M ATERIALS y, pii,, 7 I
9 SYFl7 6 '- 3% " L6. EA.
rem npcinN ncvirw 2
2 M /.f x7o, S'- 114" '_ONG MCH
.i, en,en ort e 1041 5
5 M IS, t' 7 " 1 /.a. E A,
4 1
44 15, A '. 6 Y z" L f.:2. CUT"_ TO RT. ME NOTE 9
~5' 2
W 9 x 1%.1 O"- I" Lt.s.EA, cut To RT, 6
g OA9s, q_ x \\%4 x 15. O '5/q " L.t.a.
7
/6
'" 3/#x#*x%" W ELD TO Pl ?'
S
- L e n o. o*.w c onc, v u o
E l FE W I ^6g, %. -
Cur C.ce:,Er5 Tc rir ca w n A
l 6. lo:E s.^ k. t 0, = ~
(i,; T C C f.'. i ? $ ?C f/ T V f
\\
//
To ! OACL'/9 x va. O'.~7W D" L4a,
P G & E CO, (orr m 049254gA-om,,,
mm I
FM INDEyED RW-
/5d W/
h.uw
.1.,-<...
^ " ~ * "
g,gpg,og g mer 42\\
W R/
\\
G EXATT to W~ 45 S '- o "
lws
/T l
w y4 y prinnes
' 606. Et..\\M 'i'.
s
'v V j
4
!b g*
A \\Tsom i
py R
j V
34 Y
\\
i h/
l
/
/ 3 3/Q**S
/N ~//I n w
!% 4
[ '/.( V \\ 7YR i
?
g
- i f
] q EL t2$
q' C
3
'l@ V l
- Ju I
f!"2-dz Co l,
9lIt:w n
?/
[I i
1 h'
\\
ELEV C-C y.
blo!)
/
&s c,
v 4
/
g
~~
\\,jf'o,y QV a /23' gl" v
(
ii
\\
y 34 AS - BUILT T"N A
\\
"'4 FOR DESIGN REVIEW g
}
E ENED Op,,7 ; jgg; JEC7/CN B -8 JEC7/CN D-O f
No i REE.G Q M Ai c.R) AL6 C 8 - 1 '6 /e.4 " LL1.
l 17 i
i W 4 xl'b t
\\t i I
j6 Hit 1 AAR 4 y V4, OL to" L6, ( tac _%, T v l TEM 5)
P G & E CO.
049254 M
~'
s eir, 2,
s ests m e.=v g.s eu,s.u.nvw
\\
- o. x1. s?,3 - s q - t
' Maarftsn vie w m
AREA IF LINE' 4 si6 it - I HANGER SYMBOL
/42\\ b NOS.I!'.$!I.'i}'.{
s-S94
\\l3R/ m e
f E L. in, O' LOC. ON OWG._5o004-1 e
6*-5 * *
'l OESIGN CLASS I O
pm, 5:0DE CLAS$ S l,i-- est tens a
CALLED NORTH u.......
e
@- m lr.o.s.a.ist4 9
i m
o U
A.,
c u.t b
7 l
b*F Yin 2o y ~.. e,p.a k
'M" A)m-
'i
$1 om m*
-'9
'\\
Jef
'i.; $ {e\\',,
e(t
- 'g 3 2
8 r.o.s.etus'.si,,
e nany t
e' N_ &
y)
"*10 r
'.cj.c.s.t'. \\52:0[,N C ct.g g
?O,
'W' i
I w azu-3o yc r
w_
f b
LOCATION PLAN g
6Hin To 'M.ctsAuscae ELEV A-A nTyrotgscries gog Au. UNEh At.tO Axt A1.-
fI a
OlRECTtoM d. H L
. us FOR LIME MOS.1-X2-321-12 PIREcTioN #oR usu6 4b A W D l-K 2-31ro-12 SEE M 'Z
/2 1 E 4 e&
'-- 2 H A WG e R Wo. 4 2./82 R I' D 21 k -I'Z- \\!;$
I E2 NO.OF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED
/
N O.
REQD M ATERIALS 00' 9
i e
awn. 6Mw" L6. EA.
2 3
M b s?D,( G'- G) LONG EACH
@R g
3 (3) w ts.zn ata.aA, stiin i
=
- 3
=. w_ -...
= 7. ;.= w. = g au
=
52
^2 W4 5 IS./7 ' IO*) t/.2.EA, cut TO F)T, a
_w w,.,.... x..c.
10 u
z; z ^; - M ^ M -^-+_ ^ ^C = = ^
e r
3 _
g
---r r
_m-1_
- ---_=m._-.__
u.!
__.._s._-
w=.
n to~ ~4 e IG /s" x SeAG" X We". CUT CORNERS To FIT MF g
7
'3 BAR. 2V4" X V4' X O'- 7 /8"LG. (cut To FlT W )
ii 1 20
- ES.
T CHECKZD SUP'Y'D BY APP'Y'D BY APP'V'D,,5T'/F8 DATE
+
3p PIPING ENCR.
SUF7. ENGR.
- 2. 84 4
b C4 =e4u Gises ZM/h g[
h h
,,p-f PG&ECO ORAWM NWEE A RE.
~
M
-- y
~-
1 SHEET [3 0F
$HEET3 g
---d^
MC Wl:);7l:Al fiE\\
\\
NZR/
(W EXM7 la ne a s-s ea.
S '- a '
/T w
- 4Y \\ trmatn
\\' 6o6. su A%.:".i'/c d
NI WL du j,3
%v
_ ~%
/
gi V*
w ig7 I
gV a
U
' TY P.
5 0
/
+
/" 4.o I
i
- l.SS ~//
0l
- l
)
sx
{
L.
t" f 47 sw
/
x x
.SECf/M 8-E Q
5
~
E 25 i...
W u,x
'/
a 3
%e yo Re.a O MATE.RtALh l
_1
~' -' '
,___.___,,_-u
\\ ----
s
=s M ;,,ma i v, u-u-
~^ -
DES. ET CEECKED SUP'Y'D BT APP'Y'D BY APP 'Y 'D JT'/pg DATE
@ 3T g PIPDIC ENGR.
SUP7. ENGR.
f 62.
O c - c,.s e yq,pz
- f,gp?
I67O27 i
?~?E SUPPORT No, P G & E CO.
U""U # 8 "
).. C.g e l
~'f.i?2cmcI cw4._
mn ie a, mm O 4 9254 iB
A4cD/f/ CAT /eN HANIER SYMBOL A
1-F I-K2 -321 - 12 f61
/47\\
AREA ting N
6EQ We: 6-4I57 E2R/
3 l l 7 '- O
l-K 2 -31G -12 fBl 500042 l
EL LOC ON DWG Z
DESIGN CLASS I t
I!
CODE CLASS B l
j l
pp h
r.
~3 4,j f(
k, CALLED NORTH s, V
' s _ _[
(,
q
____,____7-___._. - _ _.
_ _ _ _ _ \\_hid/ -- - c J,,A _ _ _. _
ZR
^A
.t 9
2
-' f<
,gy
' 'q'4
,AT,5fe i,i i
i J
=
9,y g*
I._
4 EL.129'--8h, U(S)
P%
\\/ j i
i g.,
O, l
4 ii TA
.s
-li
, i u
(
- lg 4
\\/
f'
\\ '_,-i
,l!
O
/l.if,
/
i EXISI.
A y
..x u
m
\\ ' s,'4 -
i f*2' guy
$31' f
I/
/ rM l
/
Tf - -
C o
4 t/
.l _ % A \\_ _ L_ _ h.f L _ J L _ - - !a A
[.
gg
/
Ass'so' f-ps j
h
+8, 8,.M
\\
\\
.g.
LOCATION PLAN g
4
/
7 lY fN/8
\\ \\
4 J, 4
.<c b
' [8 jd PV s
N 4
.,j yg D
3
/g / *
-d. \\..Q
[.-
S gggt $ x $
ELEV A-A
- stae
\\
l 2163-l/o \\ Y i
NO OF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED I
~
NO REQD MATERIALS PER ASSEMBLY l
l 2
TS G"XG"X V2".
8'- l " LG.
CCUT TO SUlT)
C 2
2 TS 4"X 4" X V2.",
l'-4 %" LG.
E
.3 2
l TS 4"X4"X V2" 10'- 6 " LG.
(CUT To SUtT) 4 I
i TS G"X G" X.V2" O '-O" LG. (CUT To surr)
E E
I l BAR
- 2. " x 5 " X l'- 4 '*A4 LG.
5 G
IG l LUG 3N' X. I" X 3 " LG.
7 l
2 l TS 4'X 4 *x h",
4" LG.
(CUT To SUIT) e!
2.
! S AR 2"x 6"x 3" LG.
{g,,'
, pp/ 'p Pg CQtQ37{
DSGN ZL.
DRAWING NO DWN
(,G,, 6 g
CHKD h1.PrEEp^t'f/_
PROJECT: ?tA6LC CAfdTCk UNIT:
1 SHT IO! OF SHTS PG&E CO ISSUE REV l MICR OFIL M l ;I
l
.s l
36S-12V This support, 36S-12V, is ou line 118 and is located in the Auxiliary Building. Line 118 is the outlet dfrom Residual Heat Exchanger 1-1.
'inen the seismic piping analysis for line 118 was performed with the valve modeling corrected, the new seismic movement exceeded the range i
of the spring can, so that a spring can which can tolerate the new movement had to be added. Further, because the new lateral loads exceeded anchor bolt allowables, the baseplate had to have stiffeners added. The new spring can is shown at the very top center of the I
slide and the modified baseplate is shown behind valve HCV-638 near the bottom of the slide.
t i
l b
{
\\ 15 i
i c
t L
k.[
i
~~ W g 3, *j.'-ll $
~4 Ox
~
. QR 6
+-,y l
ja.
I
'a PJaE September 13, 1982 Submittal, Table 2
.T.('
.l '
~i fh0 I
l i
r l
l
.)
k i
};. '
56S-12V This support, 565-12V, is on line 118 and is located in the Auxiliary Building. Line 118 is the outlet from Residual Heat Exchanger 1-1.
- When, the seismic piping analysis for line 118 was performed with the valve eli corrected, and Th is shown at the very top center of -
the slide and the modi ase s shown behind valve HCV-638 near the bottom of the slide.
"--fT
[> ", -
^
l t
PG&E September 15, 1982 Submittal. Table 2 Type 1 & 2 1
0739A/0030A
d i Niv'StL 4 g,,,,,,, Q MANO3R SYhC50L i-s i-4 : e w a l a-a un, EL '
LOC' ON DYtG N -
O BE8tSM CLAAs C b
coca cLasa 8 r.
CALLED NORTH o O @@
AS - BUILT V
FOR DESIGN REVIEW RECEIVED-
,p
-^,g Chg 6-6'08 QS" LOCATION PLAN FOR p%TA Ocr.r'1LE ~25S 4/S *-J-se
/
NO OF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED r
NO REQD MATERIAL 8 PER ASSEW8LY
/
/
l~ f/S && QJ/8/Al(SVGNL.) 20
- a. F26H A. Ik"X /M"x /}4"J.Q.
2
/
I2,7"?PE 'B'F/G 268 NL.=/9*16' C/. =200/ ^*(SV'G42.)
3 2
F'IG /4Q /*/f7' Tc7At LEM67H(2)KE!s (t)/ o"t.6;,(t)4'7'24. W/4"7-BE L
4 4
\\" HEX ////16 (8YG//L) 2)
/ F/f.J/ 2. Jh."X /h."/ /YZ 46.
45
.E l I" F/G EGO (BYGU/-)
22 I F/6H 2. ft."x/J4"/ /V4"L4 G
I
& "& FIG: 295 (BY G,yt.)
7 I
h &x2C-2M" Gl (SY M!dr.)
~
E5 2
G 640- 4'- 7f4"J.r> (8P' Mut)
G I
&) 6x 20 - /'- /Fe" / 6:(8VfNut)
/G l
N & NE'O-4'-//%"l 6-(BV'MGr.)
//
2
/17~2x8/5 6"L 6: (8V'GHi-)
/2 2
=6 22 CLAMP W$100/MCAr/0,tl /ts Sydhy.z/ cop /77ct) C.c i REM //(TYCet
/S
/
2.Mx ltZd--2'- G7d (8YM/at)
/J-2 C..s. A!L. A x //fe"x /'CJs" (SV'MhW)
!8
/G MfJICLL TYPE ' CCW2ETE FA575VE23 "/57&C6/A/VT5(SYM2/
/6
/
/"Fi& 299 (&S/2l
/7
/
&4-x/3-5'9%'LG. (CW ra F/r)
/8
/
3AR GWW2' ~SL LG-
/G B
P"6TUD TYPE COA /C. AUCHO2 OSON 08 TAWING NO OW N 6,V 4.'*7e Qggg C M K D it e % -t r @
PROJ ECT: O!A2LO CANYCN UNIT:
1 sNTd6W eMTs P G & E CO issur
[WICm0 FILM l 1
- e is f
-E M b N-E-6 E GZLffCR28562VAlbrtygyj_
AREA LINE E
EL 7 N U ~~
~
LOC ON DWG N -
O s
?
5
~
6 k pg ik,g ~ "~ ' BURPLUS HM'Gf.R9/61.
Lmt:.n h.n En<oM~ ~ ~ ' ~
f
~ eaey ast.ou RELEGATE EXISTING.
~
(gr-952RlRG.2250RPEUS h
3 4
=
16 A$ BUlt.T FOR DESIGN REVigA2 l'-l @
fi RECEIVED
'D 24 i
i b..
9 c.
6 ll Y
I l-l G
11
-ran-f l
VI
--n i _ [ d -g:5 p -
~
~ ~R*QPLPL.
~
~
/
C
~a _ a @.
y=1
_,i N \\-
n i5
='f
g C
E /00'-Ihh N!!
.. 7 );.
.y 7
EL.100-o%
J
\\
\\
ig* (.'.?;is' > '-4/.?p,h
, [ %.*.i.
A A
+
ACTE: FRAME
"' ~
l C-LS ASSEMBLY /TEMS
~
SY M WK. THE REMAINDER Bf GRINNE!U-ELEVATION A-A._ _
SHEE OF SHEETS DR AWING NO REW Du. 2..Q :.: ':CS U *C 1 ram 7 19 PG&ECO
/
dMh) Y'hj,Gp DSGN:
CHED 4,-.
- 9, [ jb MIC R O FIL *4
. W N:
ed/&JNA4.
HANGER SYMBOL f1wn.215rawr/gg
~
AREA - W~
LINE " /-S/-//6-6 E
.B y,g y, E
EL-/ d C,-
0 LOC ~ON DWG NN-
- A Oh f f+ Y h
G 1.W.i
,7
+ I ld rm
%'m
//
i..
u
_ uwch-g"-~//
T
%. (
i LO; i
i-~
cog /y AV
/~
h
~-T N
1 k
/
I
/
J'
> g g
1 q
a. ee I
I
.?
t.m i lI 1
I
,/
Dfb g./
I S
13 Fl QAM fr y,I
?1
~
l y
7 7
Lg
[ ggjyt
^m fk'@Q;:sl: ?Y.
\\
(: ~ : A L A.
m 19 L5 g-e ees-
" LEVATEOtl T ~ C-C AS - BUfLT FOR DESIGN REVIEW RECE!VED 2
r t o ' 4 irec l
l l
SHEET (p90F SHEETS DR AWING NO
- REV,
- M t;.
- ,...'.'C 4 UN'T 1 P G & E CO
.l
}gg f pDSGN:
CHKD.M
'7[ffM)
MICROFILM D W N:
l
a et/wH.
"\\
~
&W LINE
~
AREA W/J.R R cDJ MIM"\\l2V/
I
'O,
~
EL LOC ON DWG ~N C
x l
\\ my M+
. Ig = -
- }
~MsL me
.3" IQ k~
- $/ rN'
- N Mi [-b /
'k?
~
l
/
'br l
I g
I
/
j 1
l/
qp
/PA l
?
=$
s 1
=
J, y
AS - 8' JILT E
+
D
_L.4 $
FOR DESIGli REVIEW
/
}
6 GI
,,,,_. N I
RECEIVED
' E " ' 10 "
i i
k N
I_
g.
.aw
- n \\. s w m
< I M+ +
scer r-r l
dd
_ coy $
?A5: Q w cJf*,fi, Ijb 1%l
- i~
x,b Lu
\\
~s l
1 I
1 11
\\
1
't
~
i h@ eT NO 4Q j
l ao
- 24,,
s m
s
' +
(
s a
c\\
=
=
cr'~V 1
ayt y
- d m
a,
.,L_j
,Wc
's 4
,g
,_m
~ ~
T s ' c Ea'_
bI. 4
[pf~
01 f-1 lI l
-p l l
!{
/
J
'l J
l
- y% d$\\ 4W,th Al j
/
IPE 89fs" d
-c
- m. g_ gag r-occr e-c s,@(2 DSGN DRAWING NO DWN M i34/3 gg@
l CHKVw v.
- Ve
/
[
P R OJE CT:D.%3LO OM.:veJUNIT:
1 swv
-e sHTs PG&ECO ISSUE REV lWICROFILW!
[
l
/WDDt#:rc+7'ON HANCER SYL' SOL 5
~~
l gggg Cr* W.
LtNE l' b l~Il8 ~ 8 11L L@
M(E SEG. # 47(S)
^/565\\
m w/.L HoRiz. RES 7"
,g y
{
gt / 00 '- 0 "
LOC ON DWG 500056 essiew class I
]
coca class a CALLED NORTH
'REV./G: DELETED ITEM 16. CHCr'D
.'5IZE OF ITEMS I,3,5 HTS. 66 A,698, 49C.
\\,$%
"l
+ f S TO 3/+ ".
ADDED ITEM 23,2 WITH A OlffERENT TYPE.
REPL ACED ITEM y
.'9 '
o 13'- O %*
m r
i g
9=8*02'08" U
TION hAN woen rnis SHT vt/Sy7s. 68A,69, A,6,C.
a rLy33 NO OF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED _L NO REQD MATERIAL 8 PER ASSEMBLY 1
I (3/4")=lCr. 66 W/B$N (BY CrNL) ll9 8
3/+"$ STUL:-TYPE CONC. AN D
I FICr 8-268, TYPE A,5IZE 9 HL = 900* CL = 924" (BY GNL) 3
.2 FM40(IS") EQUAL LENCrTHBYFLd 20 I
FISH l2. h "X l% ", I% " L Cr.
+
4
'%"' HEX NUTS (B Y (rNL) 21 I
FISH 2. Y2"1Ik ", I h "L Cr. -
~
FISH &. '2"X IY4 ',' lY;"L Cr.
/
5 2
s.%)FICr. 290 (BY QNL)
El 1
6 I
8 "$ FI(r. 295 (BY CrNL)
[23 )2 STIFR lE..' 2 "X 3 *;2 '-6Yz"l.CrE,
/
7 I
W 6 X 20, 2 ' - + "L Cr.
8 2
W fo X 2 0, 4 '- 7 Ya "L Cr.
~
9 l
W 6 X 2 0, l '- I Y2 " L Cr.
U 10
/
W 6 X 2 0, 4' - ll 3/a "L Cr.
'~
li 2
M T 2 x 8.15, O'- 8 L Cr.
(BY GNL) 12 2
FICr. 212 CLAMP w/MODiflCATION AS SHOWN 13 l
12., k "X l1V2 ', 2 '- (o k " L Cr.
9 14 2
C.S. /2., V2 "X llY2 ", l'- Olla " L Cr.
6 15 16 3/+ "Q SHELL-TYPE CONCRETE FASTENERS W/STUDSiNUTS S
l
- '.~.';. ::: (BY -NL)
(DELETED PER REV. IC) 17 I
W + X 13 ~, 5 '- 9 % " L Cr. (Cur To flT) 16 i
BA R, Y2 "x 5k ", O '- 8 " L Cr.
DES. BY CHECKED SUP'V'D BY l APP'V")BY APP'V'D p NI\\
l DATE 3Y PIPDiG ENGR.
SUFV. ENGR.
S-2 3 - 6 2_
W fdbO A.cH.m w
/R/
Ga;(gyoyy ff
?IPE SUPPORT NO.
P G & E CO.
08^* *IE A "E
DRAWING CHANGE 29q h C 4hl O
bb O'
SHEET 6 g 0F 5HEET5 r wm c,_,,.
---.-,.-.,~.--,c-
4Dwse.s vioAt G U' 7'6/~//6-g g A
-/5 661 2
AREA LINE
& N C R P M Alk?
yj
_ _73 g PG $G SEQ.O 4-7(s)
L 0
LOC-ON DWG N --
l m
m
[D
!B Dj M~
k rnsr wsa:>;~r*
7 ggtgyig_co I
iISS i
d _h a
(l'-t y
~
R _
V bi i
II i
g C
-J
-P l Y G
ll k-
~
1
'f Ei 4
lt!
m c-o
(
l 9-T) FT~lCA-2d__
y v\\
t
---t-
~ 'T EEpP/Fi d
le
\\
s
/ j v
i
--- [-
N 7
/
f l O k*s
\\
l 0
=r
=
-\\
mj EA./oc'- /W u
3 ye 1H
-H f
q)
B.. /CC-c'm
/,
's J,-
s
\\9
[*6 A
l A
y(.?; >JJg.$
k n
k HC l
b L5
~
ELENATION A-A k
Wbr4K WIS GHT". W[sHTS.(cs,(o9,A,B,c i
DES. BY CHECKED SUP'V'D BY APP'V'D BY APP'V'D # FOR DATE BY PIPING ENGR.
EUP7. ENGR,
.6~ S Z - 8 2.
MAro 76 A cArm
,uey,
167027 2
w, P G & E CO.
DR AWIPiG P4UMaiR R g y, FIPE SUPPORT NO*
PRA*a*ING CHANGE g37 Qg g /
SHEET (o6ADF SHEETS k9((p C [d.
f l
l MIC R O FILF llC l
\\
N00/Fx47soH o
LINE l~SI~//8" 5 '--
E AREA W
'~~
W.L lD2.2E5'31Wl&~N
,,._ / 4
/P6 iE GEQ..# 4 7(s)
\\,gyy i
3
.O.
LOC ON DWG
- - O6 ~
g.
s
. w-s
@9 A. v T
_I
/j G
{
- __f t j hq
/
\\
N
- uw.o2"-f 3
e m A v ~ N / - Ll,!
i l
T1fi g
s i
M Nl
{U L
/
d vf, 5
s ap q
l
/
6 I
.4 5
/
@~T
?
lI
/t 2'.
9 p'
k H ff
- e s
W (Y@.
I i
3 G
llM,I,,
I i.p /_ r _u gri ic x
_u 1
c:.n, A c =weo-us.. 9
- e.y..e.g r n-
\\
r c
d c*
- s
_c,-
e i,-
k.
s-c w 19 L5 W
l"~l E VATTON
_C. C ON woen. rmswr. w/wT3.ee, A,ma,s,c OES. BY CREOKZD SUP'7'D BT AFP'7'D BT r APP'Y'D E( "26 D&TE ET PIPING ENGR SUF7. ENGE.
S~-S Z - 8 ?_
N
^*
u mM. i M/pp
'*I/,7o 2 7
?!PI SUPPORT NO.
P G & E Co.
O R AW IN C, M U M EE R REV.
2.37 SHEET (o9 0F INEET5, Oh2hO [d i, WIC ROf t LW
' l'
Ev'sCincy 7;py W
~
AREA LINE 4 E 47(O Wd R i\\ OiFAI M lfY/
t r
m-v EL LOC ON OWG CN x
~
)+A97/p'e+wa=
La,e Io
~
=
- ffy
~
.II C
$f r x 1
i i
wen mis. wr. w/ww.
g
'b g =i /
3*
l 6 6, A, 6 9, A, S.
l i
/
=
t9 j
j ni N
i' ei gg s
,a:
y a
i o
t
=
h*
-- e >, M,, d ' - @ *, *',
d i
e
,,,,w S
s
- ,/-
h c
M FIELD To RECORD I.ENGT
\\'
' or ITEM 19 FROM TCP OF ITEM K
Q'Q
\\
- 13 (PLATE) To TCP OF GTUD AFT A DIPJ ITEM 23.(FOR EMBE
,g.
E $
Yi$I 1
4C dd
@ g ifs e
y g sW ?5, az
_ aZ6' l1Yi b
+0 Is.g
.g -
y g1 1
i i
9 4
e-- [ _ s i
\\9 6
i h
NE l
Im lMAR 24 4
e i ! 3
- ~
- g e
j p
p Tre '4 il g
L L
cel SP L
,g I
- 4 m,
=I wy C Cl I
f l
3
~
x 4
s lho Sf$
Y b 4'[ [
/
y Q*g gyuggp 57yp (2!)
SECT E-C DES. BT CHECKED SUP'V'D ET AFP'V'D BY APP'V'D B'( fWs DaTE BT PIPING ENGR.
SUP7. ENGR.
N 82 - 62, RSATo 8&
A.CHN pfffs an (o7 o 2 7 I
/pp am
?IPE SUPPORT NO.
P G & E CO.
U"#D'" # 8E" "I
NGE 2Q
.D O N l Oh 2bO l d.
f SHEET (g9c OF SHEET 3 MIC R &FILW lC
This support, 565-12V, is on line 118 and is located in the Auxiliary Building. Line 118 is the outlet from Residual Heat Exchanger 1-1.
When the seismic piping analysis for line 118 was performed with the valve nodeling corrected, the new seismic movecent exceeded the range of the spring can and the base plate had to have stiffeners added because of the new lateral loads. The new spring can is shown at the very top center of the slide and the modified base plate is shown behind valve HCV-638 near the botton of the slide.
l N.b
,,i ' -
l-at i
1 t
L. a L
g' l
1' -
c'
,73
'f l
ag~,h;;
.~
i 3
r-l3 i
I7
<~
~~
b i
i i
?32,E Septeaoer 15, 1982 Submittal Attacnaent 1, Table 2 Type 1 3 2 l
l l
l I
I J73DA/0J3JA
M/e> MAL l
f~ ~ ~
- 8M8 MAaeGER SYMBOL M
l-51-//$.
i GU gsug
.gpgg g _,,jg,g:9gyyy-j EL ',,3", nii w.
LOC ON DWG N
- l sasisN class I.
4 cons class S CALLED. NORTH 90e AS - BUILT FOR DESIGN REVIEW
/i' c3 RECEIVED-
'oI a
as-2, e-e#cd LOCATION PLAN A
FOR PATA OCE.PP_E SS a g 4_y.gf
//s\\
NO OF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED r
NO REQD MATERIALS PER ASSEM8LY
/
/
I~ F/G && W/8/N(8VGNL) 20
- 2. F7.6W A. Jh."X /M "x /M"M.
E
/
"I2,7f'PE B"/=/G 268 //L.=/94&' Cl =2%/ '(SV' Git'L) 3 2
F~/G /4C, I"/f-7' Tc7M. 44"A47H(2)KC3 (fI o"J4, Q)4 7% W/4" 7~BE L
L 4
.4-
\\" HEX N!/76 (8YGA/L) 2,1 i F/.6H 2. Jk'rlht"/ /Y/ L6.
l=
2.
s I" F/6-290 (8Y60/-)
22.
I f/fH 2. h."x /14"* IV4"L4 G
i E= "$ FIG: 295 (BY GHz.)
7 i
'o 6x2C -Bu" GL (8Y MWE)
E; 8
- 6) 6 40- 4'- 7/b"J/> (8?' N!<lt)
G I
!.<.) 6x 20 - /L /4" LCr:(6VfMlat)
/C
/
z'.;; & m2C-4'-//%" LG-(8t'MGC)
//
2 jt/7' 2 x G / 5 6"L6: (BV'G//L) 2 2
,=cr 22 Cl. AMP M/pMO/MGr/Otl /?s SHGullis/ ADD /776t/ c.'" trEM //(SYGL.
/S
/
P_/dx :!s--2'--G7d (BYMidK) iJ.
2 c.s. &. A x /V8'x /43's" (SV'MbK)
.s
/G
'%'f.KLL. TYPE CC&C2ETE FASTEVERS "/Srl/DSdNi/TS(SV'MM/
/6
/
/"K6-299 (BV GL2.)
's/4x/2-5'*%"LG. (C&r 70 F/O
/7
/
3AR GWw n -SL &
/s
/
e
'G E
M"37UD TYPE COUC. AUCHO2 OSGN OflAWING NO DNN M?) di-;2
~QGg&
CnKD-nn -vyn PROJ ECT: DIA2LO CANYCN UNIT:
1 eMT$6 or ses P G & E CO issus
[ Caomo u
& c.,/NAL
\\
AREA-LINE
' b-E
/CC'--O"
~
GZL EDR225NAlktygyj 0
LOC ON DWG N --
C.
?w rD fB k ns7 tysgW ~ SUMLUB HANGER *4/Gl.~
L QltJ H k N L P R ODi' "' ~
~
f
. @st.gv /tst.cs REEEGATE EJISTING.
m
~
i'$r-652 RING ~E750RPL275 WQ k
A g
4 0
I6 AS-BUlt.T l' fl>18
~
FOR DESIGN REVIEW 7:
I N 2 4 3 02 RECEIVED Q
- n. >
\\
l
,c 7f ll t.ia2s e
g tili G
II
[({'
ran-lT il
-f--
3 l ~f 1 Id-2&L
^R"QPIPE.
/
e-.,
ii
= '
C EL /N'- /hh 7'
A-H f
E/.. loGow
(
,(
i-f:< >- c y i :?:w 'nsl%
n is ACTE: FRAME
~
~
C A.SSEMBLY ITEMS 6
S?' MUK. 7~HE REi4AlNDER BYGPINNELL ELEVATION A-A - ____
i l
SHEE k OF SHEETS DR AWING NO REV/
l
- ~.x... u T ;
mgy 9
l P G & E CO
,4 l
"jem mesy, DScN:
co or m.... 4 p /3 l l
uicRogito
ed/3/n!AL o
LINE ' /-S/~//8-8 2ZZ-OL
/gggy AREA N
3
'{.LMR.P_ESTMT,gy
\\
EL lO y
LOC ON DWG N S6-I s
m.
pp[4 [ \\
..~
G
[F v +$
y l
__ m uxw'r.g'~ /)
n i
u gg8 K
pryep f, y :
6 lj 1,
s i
s t
0 4l
/
i y
l l
1x s_r 4
9
.?'
K I
- /
e.)
l n
i.
I s ss IS I
~
i}l146Y 1 t si,l
. J\\
3
(:%L iA ecrco x
. ~. -
y cu sco'-c; n,k:g. e.t n...a.k ;;
1.
\\
- s,
!f G M
s-e esx l9 L5 m
.. REVATEOtt. -' C-C l
AS - BUILT i
FOR DESIGN REVIEW RECElVED r t r. % 4 ra c S HE ET (p9 OF SHEETS DR AWING NO REV/
f l
N 3 t ; :..
O.' 4.A T i PG&ECO Igg eggDSGN:
CHMDS w - ?[$M MICROFILM DWN:
l
1 cA/ w AL b'W
~
AREA LINE W/J ffCD calMIMlfV/
?
IC#-~#
EL LOC ON DWG N x
l -$ +N' (( ast 4 +1MNw
. Lg\\
~
ag 10 M@/
r N c'
r f, f 9)
Ne l il r
Q)h
/PA f
,I W
l
=
e mg i
I
/8 F
+
AS - BUILT FOR DESIGN REVIEW
.L
[
e On ';3 P
1 asegiygo naa- !or
'In -,
I
[G f-f w
Iff5_ sVi
$X5-(zz w aJf' fa' 5;
'5,
=
w, j
~
Th
_y, 1
l 1 1
f
&G T b -k D 4Q 4
l l
l
?
T n
2.0
,; d/4 W
l
']
> Q-
)
(\\
on/
\\
et s
W a
.1-- J O
Q l hl (f'
%g O 6 h h hph - D 7-l Ot N
1 f l,l 4
3 i
j j
l f 'f$ 6W LR
)?_
/ $$ ' Sffi' W
a
,_ tr rog
~
SEC7~E-C DSGN ORAWING NO OWN A2 5C,i #43
@g@
CHK N
.,s r As sxvT =
sNTs P G & E CO PROJECT:0!A3LCr OA.NVC' JUNIT:
ISSUE REV lMICROFILW1
l M'NU" HANCER SYMBOL Q
& W.
unE I-S l-IIB -8 E e ME SEG. # 47(S) angs i
wl L HORIZ. RES 7~.
[
st / 00 '- C
Loc oN DWG ECOCS6 u.
1 y
coon ca. Ass a cAttan WORTH
'REV./G: DELETED ITEM /G. CHG.'D DIZE OP ITEMS I,3,SHTS.66A,69S,49C.
"l
+ $5 TO 3/+ ".
V ADDED ITEM 23,2 WITH A DIFFERENT TYPE.
REPL ACED ITEM y
,o 13'- 0 %"- $
9'~
e-e oz'oe~
O AN WoEx THIS SHT WlGH*rs. 68A,69, A,5,C.
ses rt.e 33 NO OF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED 1
NO REQD MATERIALS PER ASSEMBLY
/
I (3/4")~lG. 66 W/B $N (BY CrNL) ll9 8
3/+"$ STut-TYPE CONC. AM D
I FICr 8 -268, TYPE A,5/ZE 9 HL = 900* CL = 92+"
(BY GNL) i 3
2 FD 00Pb.") EQUAL LENcrTHBYRd 20 I
FISH 2. Y2 X 1% ", l'/+ " L Cr.
~
+
+
'%"' HEX NUTS
( 8 Y C7 N L )
2I I
FISH 2. h"X 1h *, I k "L Cr.
5 2
(3/+ "I FICr. 29 0 (BY QNL)
El 1
FlSH &. Y2"X / V4 ',' I74 L Cr.
~
6 I
8 "$ FICr. 2 95 (SY CrNL)
[23f2 STIFR R.f2 "X3
- 2' 6/z"LCrEi 7
I N6X20, 2 '- + " L Cr.
8 2
N 6 X 2 0, + '- 7 ' 8 "L Cr.
~
/
9 I
N 6 X 2 0, l '- I Y2 " L Cr.
U 10 l
W 6 X 2 0, 4 ' - Il 3/8 "L CT.
~
ie 2
M T 2 X 8.15, O'- 6 "L Q.
(BY GNL) 12 2
FICr. 212 CL AMP W/ MODIFICATION AS SHOWN h
/3 i
R., Y2 "X /IV2 " 2 '- 6 M " L Cr.
S l+
2 C.S. R., Y2 "X llY2 ", l'- Oj/ " L G.
2 U
15 l6 3/+ "$ 5 HELL-TYPE CONCRETE FASTENERS W/ STUD 5 dNUTS S
' " ~.';. 2 3 : (3Y ?'!L )
(DELETED PER REV. /C) 17 I
W + X 13, 5 '- 9 % " L Cr. (Cur To ft T) 16 i
BA R, Y2 "X 5k ", O '- 8 " L G-DES. BY CHECKED SUP'V'D BY APP'V'D BY APP'V'D # FCf\\
DATE SY PIPING ENGR.
SUPV. ENGR.
S-5 3 - 6 2-fld A. CHEM
?'
C w
- R m;
og
?IPE SUPPORT NO.
P G & E CO.
OR N m aER R E V.
W CHANGE 2K
.hC 4l NO SHEET 6 g Or SHEETS
4 : D:c:c.s. ris y
,o IMb LINE 7-~ b-//6-6 "'
A AREA OhNCRiLMAlki gyj PG lE $EG. # +7M y
gg4 i
s LOC ON D WG N - -
N pumus rD B
Dj M~
kKns ~ INss2?~
7
@suu nst o' m
s
-l [8r-1
@ /~
s (l'fdi' J
W 5E ll
-P 6)
\\l Y
Nl1 o
3
'I l
~
u h(
-~~-
g
. A~lC4'-fk_._
,e i
h
--- h-.- \\
EpP/Fi j!
2 e
w y
3
(
fA e:-,g*i23' \\~ [
i iI
'i
[L./00'- thn\\
y I' q)
E2. /CC-CM e'.
,s s
w
/c
^
l A
g.e: ge4:3 g
kg c.
b L5 N
b.
ELEMATION A-A hk W6f2K THis GHT. W[sHTS.68,fo9,A,B,c DES. BY CHECKED SUP'Y'D BY APP'Y'D BY APP'V'D # FD/%
DATE BY PIPING ENGR.
SUPV. ENGR.
5-2 2 - 8 2.
MATc 'd'&
/HA/f j1 (_jtru as i
pp 167027 w=
PIPE SUPPORT No.
P G & E CO.
DRAWIM M EER REV.
i DRNw'ING CHANGE 2"3]
hd f
yHEETfo8 0F SHEETS M 926o /6 I
l A
r m"r"
[MICROFILW h ! (_
l
M 00/FAC4 7/o M.
?
g3ng
/-5/-//8-2 _'_
5
- U ""
/MN ApgA
~
Y.! WlE 2 SIN' \\/gyj
/P6 iE SEQ..# +7(5)
EL '
LOC ON OWG
'- W 7
h Xs'G.sanP A-V T
l
[
lj G 1
m/ t [
NI
, _ ' - -%y jj
' '3 N
l/
_ ~ -- ' " 1. tc.,,4&k '_
ug WN A v N/- fI,! ' b, '
'T
'%i "g 2
s i
=
I 5
,i s
y 0
c I
sac A Q
)
l
~
9-K.
I
.?
'>o v
g 9
2'. a I
46 9
k l
/
, n
- i, +'
.x h.r3 0 z
g I
fcrre).l
/
~
2 Wi x,
- /
/ _ x:: _ / x:, T 5
'r!
r.,.
i.r _a/
_ /_
gr1 T
x.
' x ;> +=.n. y. g.: y n.
y c: n
>x c=wes-e ee-x
^
e e
u e
=i_
s e aze-G L5 l
nIVATf0N P-C e
q 5
N N
woer rmswr. w/wr3.ce,4,ma,s,c DES. BT CHECKZD SUF'7'D BT AFF'7'D BY r AFF'V'D E( FDIS DATE BT FIFING ENGE.
'SUF7. ENCE.
.f-3 3 - 8 2.
Y A C"N NW/pp "Qoqq wm
?!?! SUPPORT NO.
P G & E CO.
ORAWING NUMBE A R E V.
733 Oh2bO [d SHEET 69 0F SNEETS l
li MICROflLW 1
l'
AA*DifMA TION
&W
~
AREA LINE E.
- 4'7 O W/.l M iw 1FAl @lfY/
ICO-C' EL x
LOC ON DWG N g
h
\\ -G Sk h',I
~& N $M Cg
-7/x amLLa" W C
sl
[f r N l
$ Il I
f work ntis, wr. w/s4W.
? \\ I'
/ %W I /
(.
4 6, A, 6 9, A, B.
ki N
.l Y qu fl I
/8[
/
- g o
t
=
~
.f
,N,.I d
T
/
-Il I
de f p
c 1
1
~
%A ij gl b
I I
h f-I M FIELD To RECORD l.ENGrT k
l
' OP ITEM 89 FROM TOP OF l TEM 8
Q'Qg
- 13 (Pl. ATE) To TOP OF GTUD AFT A D
& ITEM 23.(FOR EMBE x
4 kE $
riV a
ec
-s W
N
/E*
SY I
_ c.If' IJM' h t,
y #
g - y
~,
k wt i
4 i
'?
j@S Od@
l l
y T
i s
1 /
7 j
i i\\
24, h
lll12.
e k
k
/4 dy4 23 f:.
3 v
, 9, k
/C h
k -- e-I J
4 w
.J g &a
-- j
/j'l,"lgy ; ~
e i
Q yy eg
- N ^ "% y;,g '
- -- -%"Al1 UNUSED STUD s
SEC7"C-C Y
W DES. BY CHECKZD SUP'Y'D BT AFP'Y'D BY APP'V'D Bf f0&
DATE BY FIPDIG ENGE.
SUPY. ENGR.
S 82 -6Q RSATo 8QD A.CHN fiff an (s7 0 2 7
/gp l
wm
?!PE SUPPORT NO.
P G & E CO.
ORAwsNG NUMBER R E v.-
ORA M G CHANGE
' 2,Q
.D C l
r mm e -
SHEET 69 0F SHEETS C 9260 l d.
i C
l MICR0f t LW I C, l
l
5 565-37A Support 565-37A, located in the Auxiliary building is an anchor on line 3849 which is the recirculation path to the Reactor Coolant System Cold Legs from Safety Injection Pump 1-1.
When a previous mistake in spectra selection was corrected, the Hosgri loads on this support increased. This increase caused the anchor bolt loads to exceed allowables on the base plates for the two braces. The base plate shown in the slide was reworked by adding the bolt shown between the stiffener plates and *enoving the 4 I
l small bolts near the attachment point of the brace. The other base plate, not shown, required the addition of stiffener plates only.
l l
s y
um 4
.T' '
/
3
~
~
l l
l l
l 1
PGOE Septeaoer 15, 1932 Sumi ttal Attachaent 1, tad 1e 2 l
Type 2 l
0739A/003JA
d$/6 MAL l 6@ $6M-4 6
/.cb4-HANGER SYMBOL 7
AREA LINE
\\m/
' O O '- C#
ICOOO EL LOC ON DWG
=
ac' II IO 12.
9 N'
/y
'/ C X
'N74 h-
/
+
{
14 6 fcfic t (C
Q
+
1
+
l 2
%N t-
- 5 4"
l Va V l"WF l 'T'
'6 -
llf Il ~
r f
/
k
- $KIW S
i V. #
. lLl6$/dI
', i8 s s s
m\\
)
r,,I s s s
7r
/
\\
t \\
\\ __
i l
N l
6 7
4 2
4,,
i AS - BUILT
- FO,3 DE5!GN REVIEW PEGivco JAN 211982 Odd N5 I
f9' Id li8 / ijb A
~~~~..-e DSGN DR AWING NO DWNRI14.""
{QC [h (]
CHKD"n_ m.A M 9<
Ra VC L; AO'O uNir: 0:Jf ssr il6 3 sHTs P G & E CO psOJEcT:
ISSUE REV lMICROFILV:
MeDIf/d. ATsoH I'
- DI
~#
AREA LINE j
W A/
EL ' O 0 '* O #
g LOC ON DWG ICCOO 9
F Q
A Il 15 10 I2. I ?
vuA l
~
L 7, g
v ga
+
+
~ k.-
D in N t
6(c fic d C-C J/
4N M.
n l
+
L-t M
/
l
@e g
w t-F
=
_.. w Q %
~
l#"W..
. I 's#
'O [J N Q)
/
llc l ~/ Sc.&
eM l
T'(f)-.
'I/
-( g.;6 f h
f '~ j y
,~ l ASI/2.T
- d., ', e i D8)
~
7
(., i i
l wI
)
!A \\
ik
\\
i g
i18' 6
7 4
2
~
V 16 W
D
$g u)
W IN W
1 a
az
~?
2 Ld a:
ec C$sk $Ib.bW bl& fM Il8 4 Ilb A ots sv cMecuso sup'v*o ey l APP' y'D BY APP'V'O JOR / GROUP OAft ge. av PtPtwo Emen, sury. rnen./ LEADER g,j,gg 5
0.SH4 Csp A CHM 0 7~
NW/
- 5. '4
/g 167027 en PtPt suPPcRT No.
Ol Agw Cg swerTHE6or snetTs OR AWING NO REY l
on in. en
=couar 6M UNIT #l PG&ECO 0492.70 iB 0
"'enern.m l\\ g l l
.Adys. ut S rimg cu pt,L,4 4
- ggh, p
l
>8S-27V Support 38S-27V is a variable spring support located in the Auxiliary Building. It serves as a deadload support on line 265, the discharge line from Containment Spray Pump 1-2.
This spring can, shown at the center of the slide, had its preload adjusted to reduce the piping deadload stress, so that internal criteria for minimizing stress are met.
The analysis which was performed previously for the stress did not consider all fluid conditions and underestimated possible stress.
a
)
l l
i i
h 7(
l
.~
^ ^ (,--
h f
. September 15, 1982 Submittal l#
A
.?
C7 attacament. 1. Table 2 Type ;
'I a 3 7.\\
~- '""*-~
m
. m st
/6/NAL
/68A AREA
- 6. E-LINE /hz/2ss /4EF C HANGER SYMBOL
\\riv/
E L.
lie' o" N'O S.
LOC. ON DWG.6aoo08 i
DESIGN C'_ ASS I 7
CODE CLASS C l
CALLED NORTH f.oi4" EE.117'- Z "
is EL. uW-9!!%"_ s stoes ao'. q " l N[
4 PLC S..
9 4,.g I ', I g,,,,
w x_
_gl{
p l
g y.,
l' l 7
i/,
l%
i i
A n
i c-.
=,
' EC Ii6'-0" h
E
^
'A LOC ATION PleaN i
i l
E.LE.V. LKG. NOK ~l-4 O
g,,cjg mgfysgy
= s4 i'- W
/
f7+Vg, 3.
N tu a. u ' "
_ r l
l l-. ll5-A *
?+
g 3 SIDES.
' 74V
/
\\
( //,
f
\\
/
/
g N, y li
- ,p j
y
/EW8-5
- _3,Enad g
. e l a ';>.
- c - d ij j.\\/IEW A-A
.. a a-n - --.
NO.OF' ASSEMELIES REQUIRED
.... ~
N O..
REQDj M ATERIALS 3
/
l C.S. /2 3x %X /'-2" FOR DESIGN REVIEW -
4
/
C b.
}E 8 X $4 >(
l'~ O "
RECElVED
~ ' ' ' '
~
5 i
C. 6. ft.
10"X Y4'X 1O" RM INDEXED REV.
2-rev 2'. Reviv60 FER NEW t 0Av IPAl A+4CE. ITEM 9 I 4 9 NEW M AT'L.
FOR DATA Aft!.aAT',' 49f. WRIN4: ( 9 - EB.2 fos - F) To sputt.PLuh.
- SEE FILE 33 r
g i
" ^ * ' "
P G & E CO. 0492.64 T.' *,0 7*7
..".I M SHEETJCCF
$HEET5
'2T 2 WW c, g.,... _, 9,,,,
McDifieA ripH r
j N85\\
L I N E //u,/r &&,/B EF E HANGER SYMBOL ARIA
(, E.
sg E L.
- 'e'-o" N'O S.
LOC. ON DWG.6oooe DESIGN CLASS I
[-
CODE CLASS C CALLED NORTH d'
r.o d g
n:iiv'-z" g
/
xtg
'a.ne-gM"asiensYmes.
oi.
MY
..,,:J
- c _-
2g
,g I
Es.q a-NT-l l
's
~,
At n
.A l ~ ~ ~~ $
J 1
. Ec 1is'-o*
2 l
3
'.h LOC ATION P L.',
~
t 2.LE.V. LKG. NOCl-1 i
i y
- 7. % =
. arxisnusar a eS
^
f- *'
A9e
\\
=
N e s.s si.i ' "
{gV N
=
)
N,g
.p 3
__ s Y4 3 SIC 75 I-US~ A. *.-
vy/ >; v Q
. I /,, ' V
\\
/
.g
/
j (24
, y lt 4
l y
/EW 8-8
,_;n,(,pm,4 t
l e 1.".".
N:
m,i i
V m
.. -; V/Evv A-A
<c e
1 t. 3-i
% i NO.OF' 4SSEMBLIES REQUIRED q
g NO REQDj M ATERIALS c-i I
g W
wa wA'Y.M.')
c.L..' 6 3 O *
WAria ut;.=
s30s a
2 2
z;
.5
/
X X l'-2 "
5 4
/
C h.
2 E x 3ti.
- l'~ D
~_
4 5
1 C. b. re.
10*X%'A')Ll0*
DES. BY ' CHECKED SUP'V'D BY APP'V'D BY APP 'V 'D 5Y' ft/\\
DATE BY PIPING ENCR.
SUPV. ENCR.
d-S'7. 82 neaM CV M*
5.T.
- A9' "l67027
?*?E SUPPORT NO.
P G & E Co.
U R A*'"
- EE R "E'
2 7 0 4.'.._^ C # l NNM U'
== c"'
swesTao or swerTs.
r-
[ MlC S OfllM l hs 1
/
s 585-27V l
Support 53S-27V is a variable spring support located in the Auxiliary building.
It serves as a deadload support on line 265, the discharge line froa Containment Spray Pump 1-2.
This spring can, shown at the center of the slide, had its preload adjusted to reduce the piping deadload stress to meet internal criteria.
l
(
s
\\
f
...,' [
4 's-l ~$
Fj PGaE Septeaber 15, 1932 Submittal 6ttaChaent 1, Table 2 Type 4 3739A/0030A
D W
M/6/NM,.
AREA 4 E-LINE L/sr/Ess/6EF E HANGER SYMBOL EL.
1 W-o" _
N'O S.
~
\\z1v7 LOC. ON OWG.6oom
_i DESIGN CLASS I CODE CLASS C i
_{
I f.ot4, CALLED NORTH 1
i' ;
Q i
f W
p
~EL~. l l 7'-2 "
i W
i
_ o,,,.; I l t _ EL. llW-9!!%" a stans &p
- oL q" l g
g,g N Y X 4PLcs.
x {2Ey v.2[i i
i~
r NB Xg Mi i h 1
--Ay 4,
~.
.m
~r
/
_ {[ l]f='0
.b E.LE.V. LKG. NOKTH
_L O C ATION PL:s N T#s, msciusar L eb -*lJ
.= M5 vN eva a. u ' "
4
,q 3g
/MV Ne g
-y-X3 sus m I
t 1L 2 4 V 'N D'
L. IIS-4 y=2
( =
_[
s t
i
\\
i p&.;
f !i 1,g..
I
{y/EW8-8, Fl$r%
N ;LbQ j
. e p.. G.
1 4
~
.__.,.L.y
-_; V/Evv A-A n.-
NO. OF ASSEM5!_lES REQUIRED o i
E N O..
'REQDl,
'3 MATERIALS
~14
- I I
- 6
~~~fFE 'F ",
F/4. 8-2(,8, W/LO/r0 FLANGE t.(wa wATEF.W.t... c.L..= GGs"i Acc n H o m p v o pen > Ti m 2
2 t 7 C /7. 6, 44.= /L 9"
~3
/
C. S. /2 sx %x /i 2" As. sult7 4
t C b. 2 Sx M x l'- 8" FOR DESIGN REVIEW-5
\\
C. tiin, it.
10"X % % 10 "
Recesyso-
~ ' * * ~ ~ ~ ~
~ A2Viv60 F5R NEW LOAv IPAL NCE RM INDEXED REV. _
EcV 2 :
'2 -
14!L'412. 6f a47. WillHfs
. ITEMS I 4 9 NEW M AT'L -
_._T
- MWK To Ortvm wrtiwG (Fft,aM aNLR - Eb-%S - F) TO &)Litt.PLun.
FOR DATA
- SEE FILE 33
- .l'.Is " ' ' *!
7.I M P G & E CO,
'. w '. 2: Nw SHEETfCOF SHEEtiP5 b b O "g 2
NoDicieprus
!68*
L I N E /A7 /E M,/B EF E HANCER SYMBOL ARIA C, E.
\\p1Y/,
E L.
t'e' o" A05 LOC. ON DWG.6aoM A I
DESIGN CLASS I CODE CLASS C.
i' CALLED NORTH f.oi4,
- n. iiv'-z" g
g et. uv-9M". a sross /gp m'.qti g.,,-
l
\\
N Y N + n c s.
ou,
i
s c__
=
_ Y. 6:JW.
' w&
I 2
~
7-l~..I T
.A A.
r 2i Y ' ~l _
.sc tie'-o"
}
.Sc LOC AT 10N P L.',
t 2.LE.V. LKG. NOCl-4 i.7 i B
%vsmr i 84
- d '1 V (e iN fb. 6 54. 0 ' "
f?4 p
Q
.{
d
' "T pl 5
L. H5-4 m Y+
.,,,,y>;3 SIDES k, < 9 l-/
'1 V
l
.?
\\'
... j f
i t b k N )
---l, f"
- /Evv A-Avikhkh l$[yg Y
,. t i. y i
..- 4 e
% i NO.OI ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED i
w N O..
REQDj M ATERIALS l
l l
3* 6 TYPE 'F "
FI4. B-2t,8, W/LOh0_ELANGE.Howt ca Q5 d
6 t'u wk
- 8.f
- c. L.* S3 0 * % MM-WnsA Ill. =
S30' ) '
y 2
2 WC/1.6. L&.= l' W
~
~-
3 5
/
C. S. /2 S >< h x / '-2 "
4 i
C.s.
2 8x M x l'- D
S i
- c. e. re.
to*x M'x so" DES. BY CHECKID SUP'V'D BY APP'V'D BY APP'V'D IF(FDM DATE BY PIPING ENGR.
SUPV. ENGR, 4-Z"/ 82
- RQ m!b7027 u es' O
M*
5.r.
? ?I SU? PORT No.
P G & E CO.
ORAWi% MER AE-
/
7 7 g,.,_ D.C.
DaxesG CEANGE SHEET 30 0F SHEETS e e,e-
.A
~_
, MIC R 0 film l}
.d
C+*f & 3-4GY 40-55R t 40-55R which is located inside the Containment Building is a supporting lines 3289 and 3290, the Component Cooling upp return lines froa the reactor vessel support coolers 1-1 and 1-2 re ectivel When this upport was reviewed for it was found that the a 3290, at the ri ht side o it was found tha and an consist ep ea
. top of the slide,-a 6to reduce the excessive gap and a flenge of structural member was cut to create an adequate gap for the pipe movecents in the unrestrained direction.
h l
I f
Y-
/
l l
l l
l PG&E September 15, 1982 Submittal, Table 2 i
Type 2 & 5 i
l 0739A/0030A
ORI& 1Af AL UANGER SYMSOL AREA 1F UNE l-k - SW N 3
/
\\
E
\\sss/
a !'- O' t - t. nqo - 2.y2 Et L,c og,,,
gggggg
- N k'V \\
,hgh M
"* $ $$ss I co g
46 CALLED RTH
- -- x N
qyg, -
e FRO l
T g/
N 4
y R/-il W,
j g
- IW K
)qv de_.m.f
, h. W l *u1' rw i
,y W
lh "M fbb[
h
$ hW h
ehs) 7 (3ne.s) M,.
LOCATION PLAN V\\
5 imm' eN5%16L.B. NEE.E7-N
_@@=4 AS BUILT N
h N'3\\
. PLAN Vil?.N___._
FOR DESIGN REVIEW s
No SF ASSEMBLIES REQUINEff i ~
~ ~ ~
NO REOD MATERIALS FER ASSEMBLY l
L 4 # 13, 5% ' M.
4 FF13 l'e lYa M. EA.
2 E
3
_.3
' 2.
4 MF 13fLT.7fe" 1,.6. (l) 'f ~l" L4 ~
._~4.T T~PE. O)~C,S. IP, D'^!5"aM
(1) C.S R_.12Saix. fC.?A h.'
FJ/4 L'.4 HEBS_ ~yB_
t 5 -
L2c-- _S. E8 PHIL t IPPS CcHCRE-TE FAMENER6 N/BOL'1%.
l
._h
_ _ L_
4 V2.13 52 5'N' ! A
.__.Z......__..
3 T-~ -Y--
TvFT33 0'. f t" ucG::- ~_ ~ -~~ ~- ^ _*..
- ~.
~.
~
9_
_.. I ~. -
4 L7.25, l'- 10 %" L.6
-9~
'~2-. (,I) C 5. C 3*K3TM' G) C.E ffi 3%.3% H3" SHIMS 5~.e. *.'.,%.3
%d SRTM-
- -- ~~-
-~
. ___t a F- - ~
J 1.
I 4 MF 13. T-o" L4 CUT TO F'tT~
__7
. 1 ?_ ~ T2 C) H.S. 46"C~s. 2 3pM' GH.5 46 C..SR 614Wx Y2. VJ/4 %"4 HAB5 as i
Ft. 3"3 =? x H.'
DSGN DR AWING NO DW N G.J. 2 0-e.o Od9 h,Q CHKD v~-
PROJECTCIA2LO C/ NYON UNIT:
1 sHT M or sNT:
PG&E CO ISSUE R V lWICROFILMi
M&tr/AL AREA Ib LINE l-k 'A2 f3 9
'2'd o
[40\\
\\05Yl II s
EL 9 I 'O'u l-K - 32AC - 2.'/4 C
LOC-ON DWG 5'om40 0
N Y
, 2.h* q
~
s ik l
g4 A
AS - BUILT M
p g
FOlt DE.5tGN REVIEW M[,4 I. % N 2
N'I s
RECEtV'dC g
k aw
$ ?]
Jy "h
Qg I
i y
I fl
, 2%'
,6 FL P M AIL 6
_A._ME 2 1t C--
IO" l
12.'Pg,'
e
(,
gs e,
, IW Oo O 4
in ti...N I
V W
,TyE j 4 x
$g +'
"dj,n A
8 1= 'y 1
r
+-
i 7
_g
]tj e
y l.
~_W Ml l
[
i t
th in t
l3 k
i y
N E
+
y -+
l 3
Y i
f sHesNor swests onAwina so nev
_ P ; A ".,LS c.A.Y y'C N L!N!T 1
NE I
P G & E CO ow s: 6. J. :-e-fr DSGN:
CHKD: Mf MICROFILM l
' g.
ervr/cueeM MAuc:R SYMSOL
/C \\
AqsA Lws 7-t - SW - 1M 8 A+-
'c hcaW.
S 80.s-EL C l'- O l - v. ':'? C O '2.'/ ],
ON N
__T O N O
-l 5MD i#/$ 3" h~
N 7$,/
\\ 'i !'
7 P y. h. w t2 D E 8 '""
C'*88 L coes class c hM]Y bl-I ?l
/
h 4
CALLED NORTH
$2xost w/S3f.
/
H Q
~
H6R. 'f 0 f,v
. p:sf N l5 N k(,
O t)
J {
, yj- \\ \\ W G
- * 's ^M 7y '
. 'm U
b
~
. i.
r,2$/%'
N L'T.N b <Q'"Y
- p.cg. /
- ,,)
hI I
--9' g
D i
\\
tl Yi qWW $K.[/ I h
d-28.d Q
l eg 2
yv 1
_i N
-6 j
h th
sy W
I
)
i Q
r
@ 54.$ '
l l
LOCATION PLAN 5
V\\
\\'
o - % 6f 059 5 F 2.N 55 2..
~
\\
we.. _ 4
- s E E E h N
\\
~hL R.VIBKj
=
s M
NO OF ASSEMBLIES REQUIRED 1
HQ REOD
' MATENIALS PER ASSEMBLY
~
L - j.... !_
l 4 # l's3.5 A' M.
C T.T.Z E_
~ l 4 FE i E l'-17e" L 6 EA.".
~.
_ _.:.-'!_~2.
_ [.Z XE l's/E--77s* L.C=...(0 F T L3 -- '.:...
~"- *-C':- l._
~ WCL1= LO%L5'n 'd (O CS' 2_12Ss_%TO.".s A.'
VJ l 9
- h *'.;;.M CL. 5 G - y e 4..
--_i_
Ea. phi!.4M PS CCNCRETii FAWiENS,5:s WI/SCLTE ~_
_-_.G A I3 ;5 = 1El%: L.%_. ' ' T _ _.............
J
<{ _ <..__ j_
____ F g.
__ g.
g Q._h: N %E w h.-
Q- {,- _ g m*.,.._g-.-.. - - ~,... _ ~. - -.-..., i' 1,,
X, s rHn. ssuu e cr 1-
,. m e.
.g o
M __ m l.
t.... iTS r:. ii.5MT.snipi.
~.....W
- - - ~ ~ ~ ~
wai Q".- lT r l 4 W 13. -T-c" L4. CUT.40.PT
. Z- '
--z:
j k --~[.'2 - 'lC7sS. 46 C's. E. ~9i2 4E (.DH.S.46 c. G a.'-1474 M._. VJ/4 5"4 W>t.59 i
E
~ ~.. l.~
l l P f^ 27.x M.'
~
l4 2
W.VB X2 .K 26 %. " i (r 15.
4.
1.1/8'x2"x 2 d - CVI TP F!T y-w
' 2'*S. E' ' CIC:T Dj SUF'V'D ET
[ APP'V'D BY
, AP P ' V ' D -BY FOR l LA E
- 7. N'b,sY
.F'2g.....l;hpt,.fv FIrIsc scz.
jsurV. s ca.
L_
f.-30 -az h,
j g,,,h 0
5.y AfM w.
w
, c w, ;
y297gg
/gp gg 7O2 7 g
ad:
_.~
'ITI !".*??DFC NO.
f PG&~co.
. WIM hNEEE
- -r.a cnu:n wxp
(-). C #1 h d.CY7 U ft
-