ML20211C030

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forwards Draft Commission Paper Re Facility Phase Ii,For Review & Comment.List of Open Items on Phase II Encl
ML20211C030
Person / Time
Site: 05000000, Diablo Canyon
Issue date: 10/01/1982
From: Eisenhut D
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To: Harold Denton
NRC
Shared Package
ML20209B155 List:
References
FOIA-86-151 NUDOCS 8610210252
Download: ML20211C030 (2)


Text

___

/

..s.

l,l 4

, U.'i r i O s T /. ? i s g

[ ' 'i,

,f q NUC tf. A R it,E GUi. AT OR Y CO'.".*lSSION

,l

,e

.v,

v. As.u.:, Ten. o c nv s e

j i '-

~ ',

%...../

OCT 01 1982 i

q

.f

'ft

0TE T0

Harold R. Denton '

1 Richard Yollmer

~

/

FR::4:

Carrell Eisenhut 5'30ECT:

DI ABLO CA!; YON PHASE II C0:*.: ISSIO:t PAPEP. -

(.

s s Enclosed fewr your review and comment is a Draft of the Diablo,Canhn..

Ccc. mission Paper relating to approval of Phase 11.

h'hile the Draft contains a nu ber of open items in it, we wanted to provide an.carly draft to you for your review to get an early indication regarding the genergl thrust of the paper.

(The Enclosures are particularly in

.. n::ed of revisicn).

.in crder to help focus you.r attention on tiie open issues we have attached a listing of the number, of major questions that we consider outstanding.

i Your early reactions would be appreciated. L'e intend to transmit the

'*:n ny Craft to the Region and if.E (on cnday) for their revie.v.

Our target is to finalize this paper and send to th,e Corenission next v.cek.

,s 7 t),b Carrell G.',Eisenhut, Director rivision 'of 1.icensing e

Enclosures:

As Stated cc: T. *bvak i

J. 1:e rri ca n 1

r. M raglia t

t.)

t

?$

~

,5 t

b e610210252 e60930

[ME 131 PDR i

f

..u y_.xy.vgny

^^

~ - - -

~^

^-

o O_P_EN ITEMS ON PHASE II CO:c'ISSIO" PAPER f

, /f' Response / position regarding the question raised in the September 15, 1982

~~

1.

memorandum from Region V (enclosure 6) on whether R. F. Reedy, Inc.

g'*

complied with the requirements of the November 19, 1981 letter regarding scope and approach;

~

2.

Agreement or disagreement with respect to PG&E 's assertion that nothing has.been found to date which would not have remained operabis following l

the Hosgri earthquake.

(Page 2, "Overall Findings to Date");,.e-3.

OE evaluation of Phase II (Enclosure 11); DE has concitted to provide d

}

by COS, Tuesday, October 5; e'

{

4..Several ' items /cor.nents of A. minor nature which are currently' bging resolved by DL.

~

}

a.:.-

4 i.

=

e O

=.

  • [Me.

e i

4 4

e

_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _