ML20199G575

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:32, 10 December 2024 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Lists Three Items Identified as Being Applicable to Qa/Qc Group in Response to 850503 Request for Review of Allegations
ML20199G575
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date: 05/28/1985
From: Livermore H
NRC
To: Noonan V
NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
Shared Package
ML20197J178 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8606250277
Download: ML20199G575 (3)


Text

w n f.

~

MAY 2 8 I!Ei s

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Vincent S. Noonan, Director 4

Comanche Peak Project FROM:

Herbert H. Livermore QA/QC Group Leader

SUBJECT:

RECORD REVIEW GROUP FINDINGS

[

As requested in your letter of May 3,1985, the QA/QC Group has reviewed the listing of allegation identified by the Records Review Group. Three items 2

were' identified as being potentially applicable to the QA/QC Group. These three items (Nos. 17, 2 & 9) were reviewed with the following results:

p Item No. 17:

"NRC inspectors spent insufficient time on each hanger inspection."

g t

This testimony was not related to the TRT, but l 4 involved three individuals from Region IV (i.e.,

Taylor, Smith and Gilbert).

No TRT action required.

g Item No. 2:

"ASME audit team rejected ASME N-Stamp for Brown &

Root."

n This deposition is inaccurate as renewal of B&R's N-Stamp was delayed on one occasion for two months but was not rejected. The TRT hr.d already looked at this subject and it is explained in our SSERs (AQ5).

No TRT action required.

?

Item No. 9:

"NRC was not finding the problem."

"NRC was not investigating all allegations."

i "NRC was not monitoring construction."

The testimony indicates that the subject was y

Regi6n IV personnel (i.e., Taylor) not the TRT.

p No TRT action required.

In conclusion, two of the three items above do not relate to the QA/QC group, and the other one has already been add ssed.

i eb

(

-QA/QC Group Leader i

cc:

C. Poslusny i'"= A a m 0FC :CP l?=g ll 4_4. Q m.. y _

Mh

-NAME :HLivermore:pf 8606250277 86061

_____:.___________:______PDR FO cp PDR

.DATE :5 M S

~ OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

'E

/f m

__L1

- s_ _

-~,

i -

~

n

_ =, _

r T

a UNITED STATES 8

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION h

  • WASHING TON, D. C. 20556 j

S 28 M

[

i MEMORANDUM FOR:

Vincent S. Noonan Director Comanche Peak Project FROM:

Herbert H. Livermore QA/QC Group Leader

SUBJECT:

RECORD REVIEW GROUP FINDINGS 4

As requested in your letter of May 3,1985, the QA/QC Group has reviewed the 7

listing of allegation identified by the Records Review Group. Three items

/

were identified as being potentially applicable to the QA/QC Group. These three items (Nos. 17, 2 & 9) were reviewed with the following results:

Item No. 17:

"NRC inspectors spent insufficient time on each hanger inspection."

f This testimony was not related to the TRT, but i

involved three individuals from Region IV (i.e.,

I Taylor Smith and Gilbert).

f No TRT action required.

J

~

f:

Item No. 2r "ASME audit team rejected ASME'N-Stamp for Brown &

E Root."

f.

This deposition is inaccurate as renewal of B&R's?

N-Stamp was delayed on one occasion for two months '

but was not rejected. The TRT had already looked at this subject and it'is explained in our SSERs (AQ5).

No TRT action required.

[

l-Item No. 9:

"NRC wa:: not finding the problem."

L l

"NRC was not investigating all allegations."

l "NRC was not monitoring construction."

l

[

The testimony indicates that the subject was Region IV personnel (i.e. Taylor) not the TRT.

j No TRT action required.

2 p

E In conclusion, two of the three items above do not relate to the QA/QC group.

and the other one has already been addressed.

L W

c/t.

Herbert H. Livermore QA/QC Group Leader cc:

C. Poslusny

[

l 1.

'~~

. I - --

is nA:

=~

x:

e

/,

-,; g w >

- i u

~

OM NU l

= r

. e w.

m MhG

&4

.,a.

a,64 Ju. iia %.. tk

)'

jj)&

s--

Qg Nk?

09"esic Z osef* Tuaw s.

& Y l Y am. AC~3A

So " &

e.

<.c.:i..u, a. nos n n/ ~ s,c.q.-

r x 6 :

k.. v. D m -

d

~

r S S. 1. I L Y ^D Q

's 9

i noe..no amwii L

- t_, d

' For Genremo.

Per Commesuen

/~.

I N

As noeuested For DersueMon Propese Asper

. $, l m

ror v., w n

s is.

I i

M t.

Desament

' invesuesto C :^_ ;

-v 7

M p..

.E. g '

.ht aa'-

()6,Q

. 71,- cW/6/>

e j*/f 4 A,fs-l t.

a.ss,c a u:4 4;<v.a H a c. M &Lan.

W^'

~

' Q.2 f,, ~n ~. c. c. ~ G i. w.

em y

' M is Y

r==44 caMosek. '

/

./

fi,.mhmf e4,Aaseunu m k=)m L,L b

canoesel,e cues osewee useskluf.e k s nR.s et<,

a s

-=-A. 4 L

p.J,*

4 4 k' ~*vt= af h +i. y n

q~1 4.,

j.

. ase 4

e M ovevs=ei d essohn ea., d 'ans k e A;

WG. aw. AseAC.g&m m ---

_% e,e.Meo

~

i i;

% !s,

en gomi.d s~ a ora,,- p 'c t e s t s-f)-

O

'd*4 <f "M Cfm]sfloww awwwe~ ef 4ts

  • j e,runna.e,w.

 : =;=; =-_. m.._, - r-g m em e.is n,= =. w- _- -

~-

p

.s,50 S t

'l FRotL (NWie, erg. s

(, Ag.ncy/ Plast)

Room No.-Stdg.

'.y hf

@ G

'e-1

/

O.PT.I.ONAL FOftM 41 St.v. 79 J

ses:-see

-. o -

p mas er ee e so, sens o - asi-s:s (see>

, Pressima crus s.n

+;.,

a.:taas u;c,5

[

F

- -...; n

. n,,;...

.a 4 *

}

t

'^

F01A4fMs.

4 8

~ 1.J V 7s-r

-.1..A_.._

..