W3P88-0073, Annual Radiological Environ Operating Rept for Louisiana Power & Light Waterford Steam Electric Station,Unit 3 for 1987
ML20151Y933 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Waterford ![]() |
Issue date: | 12/31/1987 |
From: | Burski R LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT CO. |
To: | NRC OFFICE OF ADMINISTRATION & RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (ARM) |
References | |
W3P88-0073, W3P88-73, NUDOCS 8805050150 | |
Download: ML20151Y933 (115) | |
Text
.-
AliNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR THE LOUISIANA POWER & LIGHT WATERFORD STEAM ELECTRIC STATION, UNIT 3 JANUARY 1 THROUGH DECEMBER 31, 1987 Docket Number: 50-382 License Number: NPF-38 88050?.01S0 871231 PDR ttDOCK 0500038' I R DCD I W390370SA
l ABSTRACT This report is issued pursuant to Waterford 3 SES Technical Specification 6.9.1.7. Its purpose is to discuss the Waterford 3 SES Radiological ;
Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP), present the results of the program for the year of 1987, and to evaluate the radiological impact on the 1 environment resulting from plant operation.
The Waterford 3 SES REMP collected data on environmental radioactivity levels around the Waterford 3 SES nuclear power plant. These levels were determined by analyzing samples of air, water, shoreline soil, fish, vegetation, and milk from various locations around the facility. Based on the evaluation of the environmental data collected, the operation of Waterford 3 SES exhibited no discernable impact on the levels of radioactivity in the environment during 1987.
i W390370SA
TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE ABSTRACT . . . . .... . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .... .. . . 11 TABLE OF CONTENTS . . . . . . . .. . . . . .. ..... ... . . . .. iii LIST OF TABLES . .... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . . . . v LIST OF FIGURES .......... .. .. .. ...... . . . . . . . vii
1.0 INTRODUCTION
. . . . . . . . . . .. . . . .. .. . .. . . . . . . I 1.1 Program and Report Objectives . . ... ... ... .. . . .. I 1.2 Plant and Site Description . . .. . .. .. . . .. . . . . . . 1 2.0 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . ... .. .. . . . . . 3 2.1 History and Development . . .. . .. . .. . .. . .... . . 3 2.2 Sample Collection and Handling Procedures . . .... .. . .. 3 2.2.1 Direct Radiation Exposure Pathway Samples . . .. . ... 4 2.2.2 Airborne Exposure Pathway Samples . . . .... .. .. . 4 2.2.3 Waterborne Exposure Pathway Samples . . ... . . . . . . 5 2.2.6 Ingestion Exposure Pathway Samples . . ... . . .. .. 6 2.3 Analyti51 Procedures . . .. . . . . ....... . . . ... 6 2.4 Laboratory Quality Assurance . . . . . ... . ... . . . . .. 7 3.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS . . . . . .... .. . . . . < , . .. . . . . . 22 3.1 Direct Radiation Exposuro Pathway .. . ... .... . .. . . 22 3.2 Airborne Exposure Pathway ... . .. . .. . .. .. . . .. . 22 3.2.1 Airborne Particulates . . . .... .. . ... . .. .. 22 3.2.2 Airborne Iodine . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 23 3.2.3 Gamma Isotopic Analysis . . . . ... . . . . . . .. .. 23 3.3 Waterborne Exposure Pathway .. . . .. ... . .. . . .... 23 3.3.1 Drinking / Surface Water . . . . ... . . .. .. .. .. 23 3.3.2 Groundwater . . . . .... ...... .... ... . . 24 3.3.3 Shoreline Soil .. ... . .. . ... ... . . . ... 25 3.4 Ingestion Exposure Pathway . .. . ...... ..... .... 26 3.4.1 Milk . . . . . . . . . . . .. . .. . . .. . ... . . 26 3.4.2 Fish . . . . . . . ... . .. ... . .... ..... 26 3.4.3 Broad Leaf Vegetation . . . .. . . . . .... . . . .. 27 3.4.4 Food / Garden Crops . . .. . .. .... ... . . . . .. 27 3.5 Deviations from the REMP . .. . .... ... . .. .... . . 27 3.5.1 Un3vailable Samples . .. . . . .... ... .. .... 27 3.5.2 Missed Lower Limits of Detection ... . .. . . ... . 28 3.5.3 Changes to the REMP . .. . .. . .. . .... . . .. . 28 3.6 Annual Land Use Census Results . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . .. 28
4.0 CONCLUSION
S . . .. . . . ... ... . .. .... ... . . ... . 32 iii W390370SA
TABLE OF CONTENTS (CONTINUED)
PAGE APPENDIX A REMP DATA
SUMMARY
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 33 APPENDIX B REKP DATA . ....... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . 41 APPENDIX C
SUMMARY
OF UNAVAILABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION . . . . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . . ... 87 APPENDIX D
SUMMARY
OF INTERLABORATORY COMPARISONS . . . .. .. . .. . . 93 APPENDIX E SYNOPSES OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES . . . . . . . . . . . .. . 97 E-1.0 ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FOR GROSS BETA ACTIVITY . . . .. . 98 E-1.1 Air Particulates . . . . .. . . . . . . . .. . 98 E-1.2 Water . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 E-2.0 ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR TRITIUM . . . . . . .. . 98 E-3.0 ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FOR IODINE-131 . . . . . . . . . . . 98 E-3.1 Milk and Water . . . . . . . . .. . . . ... . 98 E-3.2 Broad Leaf Vegetation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 98 E-4.0 GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 99 E-4.1 Milk and Water . . .. . .. . . . . . . ... . 99 E-4.2 Vegetation, Food and Garden Crops, and Fish . . . 99 E-4.3 Soils and Sediment . . . . . . . . .. . . . . . 99 E-4.4 Charcoal Cartridges (Air Iodine) . . . . . .. . 99 E-4.5 Air Particulates . . . . . . . . . . . . ... . 100 E-4.6 Computer Software . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 100 E-5.0 ENVIRONMENTAL DOSIMETRY .. . . .. . . . .. . . . .. 100 APPENDIX F STATISTICAL ANALYSES . . . . . .. . . .. . . . . . . . .. . 101 F-1.0 CALCULATION OF MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION . . . ... . 102 F-2.0 COMPARING IVO SAMPLE POPULATION MEANS . . . . . . . . . 102 F-3.0 TLD MEASUREMENTS . . . . . . . . ... . . . . . ... . 104 F-4.0 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY ON AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS . ... . 104 F-5.0 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN MONTHLY DRINKING WATER COMPOSITES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 104 iv W390370SA
LIST OF TABLES PAGE TABLE 2.1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM (REMP)
SUMMARY
,.. ..................... 8 -
TABLE
2.2 DESCRIPTION
OF REMP SAMPLING STATION LOCATIONS . . . . . . . . 9 TABLE 2.3 DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMEN7AL SAMPLE ANALYSIS, LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 18 TABLE 3.1 1987 DIRECT RADIATION DATA ORGANIZED BY COMPASS DIRECTION AND DISTANCE FROM WATERFORD 3 SES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 30 r
TABLE 3.2 1987 ANNUAL LAND USE CENSUS RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 31 i TABLE A-1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
. . . . . 34 TABLE B-1 QUARTERLY TLD EXPOSURES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 42 TABLE B-2 AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES:
GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 43 TABLE B-3 AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS: GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS OF QUARTERLY COMPOSITES ... . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 63 TABLE B-4 DRINKING WATER: 10 DINE-131 AN# LYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 64 TABLE B-5 DRINKING WATER: GROSS BETA AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS ON MONTHLY COMPOSITES . .................... 67 TABLE B-6 DRINKING WATER: TRITIUM ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES . . . 70 TABLE B-7 SURFACE WATER: IODINE-131 ANALYSIS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 71 TABLE B-8 SURFACE WATER: GROSS BETA AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS ON MONTHLY COMPOSITES .. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 74 TABLE B-9 SURFACE WATER: TRITIUM 4NALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES. . . . 77 TABLE B-10 GROUNDWATER: TRITIUM AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES . . . . . . . 78 TABLE B-11 SHORELINE SOIL: GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . 79 TABLE B-12 MILK: 10 DINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . 80 TABLE B-13 FISH: GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 82 y
W390370SA
LIST OF TABLES (CONTINUED)
PAGE i
TABLE B-14 BROAD LEAF '/EGETATION: IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES . . . . . .................. 83 TABLE B-15 FOOD / GARDEN CROPS: 10 DINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES ........................... 85 TABLE C-1
SUMMARY
OF UNAVAILABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION DURING THE PERIOD OF JANUARY 1 TO MARCH 31, 1987 .... ................... 87 TABLE C-2
SUMMARY
OF UNAVAILABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION DURING THE PERIOD OF APRIL 1 TO JUNE 30, 1987 ....................... 88 TABLE C-3
SUMMARY
OF UNAVAILABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED LOWER LIMITS OF DETECTION DURING THE PERIOD OF JULY 1 TO SEPTEMBER 30, 1987 . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 89 TABLE C-4
SUMMARY
OF UNAVAILABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED LOWER '
LIMITS OF DETECTION DURING THE PERIOD OF OCTOBER 1 IO DECEMBER 31, 1987 .................. ... 90
! TABLE C-5
SUMMARY
OF UNAVAILABLE TLD MEASUREMENTS FOR THE f j
PERIOD OF JANUARY 1 TO DECEMBER 31, 1987 ........... 91 '
I TABLE D-1 US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM RESULTS FOR 1987 . . . . . . . . . . 93 i
4 TABLE F-1 STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF TLD MEASUREMENTS FROM -
STATIONS GROUPED BY DISTANCE FROM WATERFORD 3 SES . . . . ... 104 TABLE F-2 STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF GROSS BETA ACTIVITY ON AIR !
PARTICULATE FILTERS FOR 1987 ................. 105 6
TABLE F-3 STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN MONTHLY DRINKING WATER COMPOSITES FOR 1987 .......... 106 6
a J
l i vi I
a, W390370SA
i I
LIST OF FIGURES i
PAGE i i
FIGURE 2.1 REMP SAMPLE LOCATIONS WITHIN 2 MILES OF !
WATERFORD 3 SES . . . . . . . . . . .... .......... 19 FIGURE 2.2 REMP SAMPLE LOCATIONS WITHIN 10 MILES OF WATERFORD 3 SES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 20 !
c FIGURE 2.3 REMP SAMPLE LOCATIONS WITHIN 50 MILES OF I WATERFORD 3 SES . . . . .............. ...... 21 -
i I
r i I a t I
a I
i
! t t
1 f l
l '
b f
t j vii k
W390370SA f e
j
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This report describes the Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for the Waterford 3 Steam Electric Station (SES) nuclear power plant and discusses the results obtained during the calendar year 1987.
The results discussed within this report were used to evaluate the radiological environmental impact resulting from the operation of Waterford 3 SES. The submission of this report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission fulfills the requirements pursuant to Waterford 3 SES Technical Specification 6.9.1.7.
1.1 Program and Report Objectives The overall objective of the monitoring program was to evaluate the radiological environmental impact of the plant. The evaluation included an assessment of actual or potential exposures of humans to radioactive materials or radiation resulting from plant operation. In order to conduct this evaluation, the data analyses and interpretations contained in this raport fulfilled the following specific objectives:
- a. identify if any radioactive materials or radiation in the environment was associated with plant operations
- b. compare the results obtained during the reporting period with past operational and preoperational data, when appropriate, to identify any trends or accumulation of radioactivity in the environment;
- c. estimate the maximum expostte to a member of the general public from any environmental data wh;ch indicates the presence of plant related radioactivity
, and
- d. verify compliance, when appropriate, with relevant federal requirements.
1.2 Plant and Site Description The Louisiana Pos er & Light Company, Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit No. 3 employs a pressurized water reactor for the production of approximately 1153 gross (1104 net) megawatts of electricity. The station uses a once through flow of water obtained from and discharged to the Mississippi River for condenser cooling, on March 4, 1985, the unit achieved initial criticality.
i 1
0390370SA
Waterford 3 SES is located on the west bank of the Mississippi River at River Hile 129.6 between Baton Rouge and New Orleans, Louisiana. The site is in the northwestern section of St. Charles Parish approxime.tely 3 miles southeast of the St. John the Baptist Parish boundary near the towns of K111ona and Taft. The Mississippi River is the closest prominent natural feature while others include Lac des A11 emends, about 5.5 miles southwest of the site, and Lake Ponchartrain, about 7 miles northeast of the site.
Most of the man-made features are located on the narrow strip of dry land between the Mississippi River and the wetlands. Near the Waterford SES site are several large industrial facilities, including Waterford 1 and 2 Steam Electric Stations (0.4 miles northwest of the site). Little Gypsy Steam Electric Station (0.8 miles northeast of the site, across the river from Waterford 3 SES), Beker Industries, a fertilizer manufacturer (0.6 miles east southeast). Occidental Chemical Company (0.8 miles east southeast),
and Union Carbide, a chemical manufacturer (1.2 miles east southeast). Louisiana Power & Light Company owns and operates the above mentioned steam electric stations.
Major urban centers in the region of the site include New Orleans (approximately 25 miles east of the site) and Baton Rouge (approximately 50 miles west northwest). Communities in St.
Charles Parish near the site include K111ona (0.9 miles west northwest), Montz (1.0 miles north), Norco (1.9 miles east),
Hahnville (3.7 miles east southeast), and Destrehan (6.3 miles east southeast). Laplace (4.7 miles north) is located in St. John the baptist Parish.
1 2
6390370SA
T l
2.0 PROGRAM DESCRIPTION !
A general summary of the REMP is given in Table 2.1. Brief descriptions of the sampling stations and their locations are given in Table 2.2. The ,
locations of the sampling stations with respect to the Waterford 3 SES ;
site are illustrated in Figures 2.1 through 2.3. A more detailed l
] description of the overall REMP is discussed in the following chapter.
1 2.1 History and Development
.; The Waterford 3 SES REMP was initiated in April of 1983. The program evolved from the Preoperational Environmental Radiological 4
Surveillance (PERS) program which was conducted from 1978 through 1982. The equipment, procedures, techniques, and many of the same j sampling locations used during the preoperational survey were ;
incorporated into the operational program. The environmental data i collected during the first two years of the REMP (1983 and 1984),
when Waterford 3 SES had not yet achieved initial criticality,
- were used to supplement the baseline data obtained during the PERS Program.
LP&L personnel were responsible for the proper implementation of I the REMP and insuring that the program complied with federal regulatory requirements and Technical Specification requirements.
. Specific responsibilities of LP&L personnel included collecting i 1
(with the exception of fish samples), preparing, and shipping of environmental samples; conducting environmental dosimetry measurements; reviewing analytical results reports; and preparing and submitting the annual Radiological Environmental Monitoring :
Report as well as any other relevant report to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission. l 1
The primary contractor, the Technical Services Department of ,.
i Arkansas Power & Light (AP&L) located in Little Rock Arkansas. [
l was responsible for performing radiological analyses; conducting ,
the initial data review; preparing monthly and annual results reports; and overseeing laboratory quality assurance and control.
d A separate contractor, the Fisheries Co-operative Extension Service of Louisiana State University, was responsible for the collection, and delivery to LP&L, of fish samples.
2.2 Sample Collection and Handling Procedures f The types of samples collected, the analyses performed, the sample collection frequencies, and the location of the sampling stations are summarized in Tables 2.1 and 2.2. The information contained in these tables is based on the requirements specified in Table 3.12-1 of Waterford 3 SES Technical Specification 3.12.1. The locations of the sampling stations with respect to the Waterford 3 SES site !
are illustrated in Figures 2.1 through 2.3. Any deviations from the REMP (i.e., unavailable samples and missed lower limits of 3
r 8390370SA l
h
_ _ _ _ ~ _ _ _ _ _ - - . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . .
detection) observed during 1987 are discussed in Section 3.5.
Changes made to the REMP during 1987 as a result of the annual land use census are also discussed in Section 3.5.
The environmental samples collected were classified into four general categories according to exposure pathways: direct radiation, airborne, waterborne, and ingestion. The collection and handling procedures used to obtain these samples are described in the following sections. The descriptions are intended to provide a concise overview of what was done rather than to be step-by-step procedures.
2.2.1 Direct Radiation Exposure Par.hway Samples Integrated external gamma exposures were determined using thermoluminescent dosimeters (TLDs). Multi-element TLDs manufactured by Panasonic were placed at thirty-one locations as follows:
- a. an inner ring of stations, one in each of the sixteen meteorological sectors in the general area of the site boundary,
- b. an outer ring of stations, one in ten of the meteorological sectors in the six to eight kilometer range from the site, and
- c. the balance placed in areas of special interest (e.g., population centers, schools, etc.) with one area serving as a control.
The TLDs were exchanged and analyzed quarterly by LP&L personnel.
2.2.2 Airborne Exposure Pathway Samples Samples of airborne particulates and radiciodines were collected at five locations. The locations included four indicator stations (APP-1, APQ-1, APG-1. APC-1) and one control station (APE-30). The samples were collected using low-volume air sampling devices. The devices were designed to sample air on a continuous basis and record the volume of air sampled. The pump and metering device were housed inside a weatherproof shelter.
Airborne particulate samples were obtained by passing air through a particulate filter using the device described above. The filters were collected weekly by LP&L personnel and sent to the contract laboratory for gross beta analysis. These filters were composited by the contract laboratory on a quarterly basis for isotopic analysis by gamma spectroscopy.
4 6390370SA
Airborne iodine sampling was done in conjunction with air particulate sampling. After the air passed through the particulate filter, it passed through a charcoal cartridge to collect airborne iodine. The cartridges were collected weekly by LP&L personnel and sent to the contract laboratory for iodine-131 analysis by gamma spectroscopy.
2.2.3 Waterborne Exposure Pathway Samples The Mississippi River is the major source of drinking water in the vicinity of Waterford 3 SES and it is also the surface water into which the plant discharges.
Therefore, water samples taken from the Mississippi River were designated as both drinking water and surface water samples.
Composite drinking / surface water samples were obtained from the Mississippi River using automatic composite samplers placed at one upstream (DWP-7/SWP-7) and at two downstream (DWG-2/SWG-2, DWE-5/$WE-5) locations from the plant. These composite water samples were collected biweekly by LP&L personnel. LP&L personnel acidified the samples with hydrochloric acid prior to shipment to the contract laboratory. The contract laboratory analyzed the biweekly samples for iodine-131. The biweekly samples were composited on a monthly basis by the contract laboratorf for gross beta and gamma spectroscopy analyses. The samples were also composited on a quarterly basis for tritium analysis.
Due to the high water table resulting from shallow aquifers in the vicinity of the site, groundwater discharge could be sampled from a drainage canal. Groundwater samples were obtained quarterly by LP&L personnel from one sampling location (GWJ-1) using a grab sampling technique. The samples were acidified with hydrochloric
! acid prior to shipment to the contract laboratory for tritium and gamma spectroscopy analyses.
Shoreline sediuent samples were obtained semi-annually by LP&L personnel from two sampling stations. One station was located on the shoreline of the Mississippi River (SRWE-3) and the other was located on the shoreline of the 40-Arpent canal (SHJW-1). The samples collected were shipped to the contract laboratory without further processing.
5 W330370SA
2.2.4 Ingestion Exposure Pathway Samples Milk samples were collected semi-monthly by LP&L personnel. Control samples were obtained through Louisiana Nuclear Energy Division personnel from the control station (MKQ-45) located in Denham Springs, Louisiana. Indicator samples were collected locally from one station (MKQ-5). Although two additional indicator locations were identified (MKQ-1 and MKE-4), no samplas were available from these locations during 1987 (see Section 3.5). All samples had formaldehyde added prior to shipment to the contract laboratory for iodine-131 and gamma spectroscopy analyses.
Fish samples were collected bi-annually upstream (FH-1) and downstream (FH-2) from the plant by a contractor. The fish were obtained by netting. The contractor segregated the samples by species and location sampled prior to delivery to LP&L. The samples were shipped frozen to the contract laboratory for analysis by gamma spectroscopy.
LP&L personnel collected broad leaf vegetation samples monthly by obtaining cuttings taken at least one inch above the ground. Samples were collected from two indicator locations (BLB-1, BLQ-1) and from one control location (BLK-15). The samples were shipped to the contract laboratory without further processing.
A food / garden crop sample (sugarcane) was collected at the time of harvest by LP&L personnel, from one location (FPP-2). The sample was collected by normal harvesting techniques at the time of harvest. This sample was taken in place of that from indicator location FPP-1 since no samples were available from this location during 1987 (see Section 3.5). The sample was sent to the contract laboratory without further processing for iodine-131 and gamma spectroscopy analyses.
2.3 Analytical Procedures Brief synopses of the analytical procedures used by AP&L and LP&L are given in Appendix E. These synopses are intendeel to provide an overview of what was done rather than to be stop-by-step procedures.
6 W390370SA
l The minimum sensitivities for the analytical procedures used in the REMP are reflected by the Lower Limits of Detection (LLD) values presented in Table 2.3. These valu6s are the same as the ones given in Table 4.12-1 of Watertord 3 SES Technical Specification 4.12.1. The LLD's are a prior,i estimates based on assumed sample volumes, counting times, detector efficiencies, etc. These values reflect the lower levels of detection that were to be attained for the majority of the analyses performed.
All analyses that could not achieve these lower limits of detection p.re discussed in Section 3.5.
2.4 Laboratory Quality Assurance During 1987 AP&L performed a variety of quality assurance analyses. Spiked and blank samples prepared in-house and Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) reference samples were analyzed. It was estimated that between 5% and 10% of all analyses were for quality assurance purposes.
AP&L also participated in the EPA radiological interlaboratory comparison (cross-check) program. Participation in this program involved a number of analyses on various sample media typically found in REN!'s. As a result of participation in the program, an objective measure of analytical precision, accuracy, and an estimation of bias were obtained. In the event that any results obtained by AP&L were not within control limits, as specified by the EPA, an investigation was conducted to determine the cause and corrective action was taken to prevent a recurrence. Appendix D lists the 1987 results of AP&L's participation in the cross-check program.
7 8390370SA
1 i l1 1
y e e e e l t t t t h i i ei ie t s s st s St n e o
p oio ei o e l psp ps m m p m
o mom opo mo oo y /
y y i md l rl t ae c cmc o cmo l a
l h
ol a t st c
T y y ycy yc y u t nu s ke C l l l l l l n n on e ll N r e ye r r yk ry r a o sn v yil E el e el e m m aa r l mo U t l t th e th t - - e- a h c Q r kr rt v rt r i i si h t n E
R a
u ea eu an-uoi an uo a
u m
e m
e nem t net oho F Q WQ QMB QM Q S S I s A MW n 1
2 1
3 c n i
p o
i o t t a 1 o 1 1 c 3 s 3 3 i
- 1 i 3 1 1 f
- - - - i
. G I T- H 1 1 c N e I . . . . . p
_ R ac a c c c c c c c S O a ti t i i i i i i i T S m ep e p p p p p p p l I m b o b o o o o o o o a
_ S a t t t t t t t t c gY Y L
g so ss s1 e3 o
s o
s o
s o
s o
s o
s o
s i
n
_ R A D oi 3 o1 3i i i i 1 i i h LA t N L r - r - - - - - - - c Ae T
A T C T- HGI HY (
T T 1 3 4 T
e I NIR 2
ES S E
S)
I S E O L
B RW I E 3
A VR d T N( r .
E 5 ol M 4 f a LA - rc AR .,,,, Q ei CG 1 1 1 55 t e t t I O - - - - - P an GR OP EKQEQ , , . 5 We d L , , , . ,5 1 7 7 1 1 fi O 221 561 - - - - - o I - - - - - - G P P Q K e D DJPDPE P W W t e L 1 r A N A D S P B - a R O . ,,,,, l 2 I 121469 ,0 , , - . , 1 s
_. T - - - - - - 1 3 5 5 J 5 2 1 e A CHNBNC - - - - W - - - 3l C 0 QE E E H Q 2 P B p
_ O L
, .,,,3 1 21 549 -
PP AA W
D W
S S t e
P N
- P F
L B
em l a
- - - - - - E , F b s BCMAGF ., . , 3 , . , a
_ . 1 1 2 2 l - 4 . 1 1 Tr
,,.,,,5 - - - - - E - 1 - - e 2211 461 PC G G J W E - P Q nt
_ - - - - - - - PP W W W H t e H P L i a AFLRFRJ AA D S G S P F F B s
w t e nc ea mf er
_ ru t is n u e qd d m en n r i ra a e r d s s t e r e t ng
_ E ee a t e S c oni P nt W a t u f
_ Y T
n i a g W a e n
d o
a dk en i
o dl ou n e W i r L o
si E t t l c i c d l P ar A L ca oi k a n e d BD S P ei it n f u r k h d a 0
_ M rd d r i r o o l s o o 7 A ia aa r u r h i i o r . . 3 S DR RP D S G S M F F B ab 0
_. 9 3
_ W a
a !
4
) TABLE 2.2 i
1 :
DESCRIPTION OF REMP SAMPLING STATION LOCATIONS [
, LOCATION LOCATION MILES FROM SECM R f i
NUMBER DESCRIPTION PLANT DIRECTION l j
DIRECT RADIATION (TLD) [
j b A-2 (Eastbank) On fence enclosure 1.1 N f
- surrounding water tower west of Little Gypsy opposite Etienne St.
Access from River Road (LA 628). , ,
The TLD's are located on the (S) ;
i fence opposite the entrance gate (
- to the water tower. F B-1 (Castbank) On fence enclosing the 0.8 NNE [
transmission tower 0.3 miles west I (up-river) from Little Gypsy. f Access from River Road (LA 628) . [
TLD's are located at SW corner of ;
fence enclosure. [
t C-1 (Eastbank) On fence enclosing the 0.8 NE !
Littly Gypsy Cool.ing Water Intake. f Access is from River Road (LA 628) !
across from Little Gypsy Power f
.I Station entranco. TLD's are on the ;
south side (inside) of the Cooling f
j Water Intake fence enclosure, j directly opposite the entrance gate. l D-2 (Eastbank) Incated at USGS Witness 1.1 ENE ,
i Post Survey Marker approximately [
l 0.3 miles east of Little Gypsy Power j j Station. Access from River Road ;
i (LA 628) near the west end of the Bonne Carre spillyway. tlc's are
. on the back of the Survey Marker l Sign (located on levee). !
[
E-1 (Westbank) located on utility pole 0.2 E along River Road (LA 18) approxi- l mately 0.3 miles east of Waterford I
. 3 plant entrance. Access from LA [
j 18. TLD's are on the third utility i I
pole east of the construction entrance road.
9 W390370SA
r __ _ _ _
TABLE 2.2 (CohTINUED)
IDCATION LOCATION MILES FROM SECTOR NUMBER DESCRIPTION PLANT DIRECTION F-2 (Westbank) Located on fence 1.1 ESE enclosure surrounding the LPGL substation on LA 3142. Access from LA 3142 approximately 0.2 miles south of LA 18. TLD's are on the routheast corner of the fence enclosure.
G-2 (Westbank) Located on utility pole 1.2 SE on East side of LA 3142 near Witco entrance gate (Next to Union Carbide Star Plant Gate 3). Access from LA 3142 (pproximately 0.2 miles north of railroad overpass.
H-2 (Westbank) Located on fence 1.2 SSE enclosure to shell road off of LA 3142. Access from LA 3142 south of railroad overpass on east side of LA 3142. TLD's are on the south side of the gate for shell road. (Just south of Texaco pipeline station)
J-2 (Westbank) Located on northeast 1.3 S corner of fence enclosing Texaco valve station south of LA 3127.
Access from LA 3127, approximately 0.6 miles west of LA 3127/3142 intersection.
K-1 (Westbank) Located bahind "Private 1.0 SSW Road" sign at Gate 8 entrance off of LA 3127. Access from LA 3127, approximately 1.3 miles west of LA 3127/3142 intersection. (Gate 8 is the access to the Waterford 3 switchyard station) 10 W390370SA
I i
l l
TABLE 2.2 l (CONTINUED) }
l t .
LOCATION LOCATION MILES FROM SECTOR
-NUMBER DESCRIPTION PLANT DIRECTION -
i i
L-1 (Westbank) Located behind "Private 1.0 SW Road" sign at LP&L Cate 9 entrance ;
- off of LA 3127. approximately 1.6
miles west of LA 3127/3142 inter- i section. (Gate 9 is an access road j for Waterford 3) r S i
! M-1 (Westbank) Located on south gate 0.7 WSW I i into the Waterford 1 and 2 fuel !
! oil storage tank enclosute. [
! Access is either thru LP&L Gate 8 {
- . Cate 9 off of LA 3127. the shall j access road from LA 18 between ,
I Waterford 3. or thru the Waterford !
i' 1 and 2 access road.
i N-1 (Westbank) Locates behind the "No 0.9 W !
j Trespassing" sign off of Short !
Strett. in Killona, just south of f the entrance so Killona Elementary ,
School. [
P-1 (Westbank) Located off Short Street. 0.8 WNW I i in Killona. TLD is on fence at !
) air sample station APP-1. j Q-1 (Westbank) Located on fance 0.8 NW I enclosing air sample station ;
! approximately 0.5 miles west of l l Waterford 1 and 2 on River Road >
c (LA 18). [
l R-1 (Westbank) Located on fence 0.5 NNW i enclosure for Waterford 1 and 2 Cooling Water Intake Structure.
, Access is from River Road (LA 18) !'
i opposite Waterford 1 and 2.
TLD's are on the southwest corner l of fence. [
i i
l 11 !
T t i
W390370SA .
[
TABLE 2. 2 (CCNTINUED)
LOCATION LOCATION HILES FROM SECTOR NUKBER DESCRIPTION PLANT DIRECTION i
A-5 (Eastbank) Located on utility 4.5 N pole just east of the Shady Nook Trailer Park on Hwy 61 in Laplace. ;
TLD's are on second utility pole cast of tra', ark on north side of Hwy 61 ( a . end of Laplace).
B-4 (Eastbank) 'ed on utility pola 3.8 NNE just east of shell access road to South Central Bell transmission tower on south side of Hwy 61. '
Transmission tower is just east of Weigh Station at St. John /St. Charlet Parish line. TLD's are on the firr,t utility pola east of access road.
D-5 (Eastbank) Located on fence gate 4.2 ENE on shell access road to Big 3 Chemical Plant. Shell access road is approximately 0.1 miles west of Hvy 61/48 intersection (at black -
and yellow gate). TLD's are on fence gate 0.1 miles north on ,
shell access road from Hwy 61.
E-5 (Eastbank) Located on the Norco 4.2 E ,
Substation fence enclosure.
Access from River Road (LA 48) onto Wesco St. (adjacent to Norco Shell Chemical Plant), take Wesco St. to the dead end. TLD's are located on sixth fence post south of the north substation gate.
F-4 (Westbank) Located on utility pole 3.5 ESE f behind blonde brick house on Aquarius St. in Hahnville. Access from River Road (LA 18) and turn onto Oak St. Follow cak St. to l Hickory St., turn right on Hickory '
St. and follow to Aquarius St. and turn left. Blonde brick house is second house on right (west) side of Aquarius St. heading south.
12 W390370SA i
n TABLE 2.2 (C0!iTINUED)
LOCATION . LOCATION MILES FROM SECTOR NUMBER DESCRIPTION PLANT DIRECTION G-4 (Westbank) Located on railroad sign 3.2 SE northwest side of LA 3160/ railroad track intersection. Access from either LA 3127 or River Road (LA 18) onto LA 3160.
H-6 (Westbank) Located on a construction 5.7 SSE sign on the southwest side of the second canal bridge east of LA 3160 along LA 3127.
P-6 (Westbank) Located on utility pole 5.5 WNW at southwest corner of LA 640/
railroad track intersection.
Utility pole is just west of LA 640 and east of radio transmission tower.
Q-5 (Westbank) Located on fence post 5.0 NW surrounding (green) river marker on levee just east of Edgard.
Fence post is located along River Road (LA 18) across from the Webre's house.
R-6 (Eastbank) Located on fence 5.3 NNW enclosing LP&L Laydown Yard on LA 3223 in Laplace. Access from Hwy 61 onto Elm St. (LA 3223),
take Elm St. to the northeast corner of LA 3223/ railroad intersection. TLD's are located on the southeast corner of fence enclosure.
F-9 (Eastbank) Located on entrance 8.2 ESE gate to Destrehan substation Access from River Road (LA 48),
approximately 0.3 miles east of Luling-Destrehan Ferry, onto Destrehan Road (west of Bunge Corp. Grain Elevator) , and proceed to substation gate.
13 W390370SA
l TABLE 2.2 )
(CONTINUED) 1 LOCATION LOCATION MILES FROM SECTOR NUMBER DESCRIPTIO!I PLANT DIRECTION G-9 (Wes tbank) Located on back fence 8.1 SE of LP&L District Offica in Luling.
Access via Ellington St. from either River Road (LA 13); or Second or Third St. frou Paul Mallard Rd. (LA 52) to Ellington St.
E-15 (Eastbank) Located on Kent.er 11.8 E Substation fence enclosure.
Access from either River Rcad (LA 48) or Hwy 61, turn onto Alliance Ave. TLD's are locsted on the north side of the fence enclosure, near a light pole.
J-15 (Westbank) Located on fence 12.0 S enclosure surrounding LP&L switchyard at LA 631/ Hwy 90 intersection in Des Allemands.
TLD's are on the northwest corner of fence. Access from LA 631 via shell road.
E-30* (Westbank) Located on fence at 27.0 E LP&L General Office on Delaronde St. in Algiers. TLD's are on the fence, facing the Mississippi River, in the passageway to the transformer shop.
AIRBORNE APP-1 (Wes tbank) Located in soybean 0.8 FRTd field at northwest corner of Short St. in Killona.
APQ-1 (Wes tbank) Located at northwest 0.8 NW corner of soybean field on east side of K111ona. Access from River Road (LA 18) approximately 0.6 miles east of LA 18/3141 intersection.
14 W390370SA
TABLE 2.2 (CONTINUED)
. LOCATION ~ LOCATION MILES FROM SECTOR NUMBER DESCRIPTION PLANT DIRECTION APG-1 (Westbank) Located at the north- 0.5 SE side of the Secondary Meteorological Tower.
APC-1 (Eastbank) Located inside the 0.8 NE Little Gypsy Cooling Water Intake Structure f ence enclosure.
APE-30* (Westbank) Located on the roof of 27.0 E the LP&L General Office building on Delaronde St. in Algiers.
' WATERBORNE DWG-2 (Westbank) Located at the Union 2.0 ESE SWG-2 Carbide drinking water canal.
Access from LA 3142 through Gate 28.
DRE-5 (Eastbank) Located at the 4.5 E SWE-5 St. Charles Parish Waterworks off of River Road (LA 48) near New Sarpy.
DWP-7* (Westbank) Located at the St. 6.5 NW SWP-7* John Parish Waterworks off of LA 18 in Edgard.
SHWE-3 (Westbank) Located at the Foot 3.0 E Ferry Landing off of LA 18 in Taft.
SHWJ.1 (Westbank) Located at the 40 Arpent 1.0 S Canal south of the Plant. Access from LA 3127 through Gate 8.
GWJ-1 (Westbank) Located at 40 Arpent 0.3 S Canal south of the plant. Access from LA 3127 through LP&L Gate 8.
The canal is northwest of the shell access road / railroad track intersection.
15 W390370SA
TABLE 2.2 (CONTINUED)
LOCATION LOCATION MILES FROM SECTOR NUMBER DESCRIPTION PLANT DIRECTION INGESTION MILK MKL-4 (Westbank) Located 0.8 miles vest 4.0 E of the Time Saver in Hahnville off of River Road.
MKQ-1 (Westbank) 1.0 miles west of 1.0 NW Waterford 3 at the corner of River Road and Post Street in Killona.
NKQ-5 (Westbank) Located at the Webre's 5.0 NW house, just across LA 18 from river marker, at the eastern end of Edgard.
MKQ-45* (Eastbank) Located off of I-12 in 42 NW Denham Springs, take LA 3002 south to LA 1034, then right to LA 1032, then left. Farm is 1 mile on the right.
FISH FH-1* Upstream of the plant intake NA** NA**
structure.
FH-2 Downstream of the plant intake NA** NA**
structure.
BROAD LEAF BLQ-1 (Westbank) Located between LA 18 0.8 NW and soybean field on eastern edge of Killona, near air sample station APQ-1.
BLB-1 (Eastbank) Located at wooded area 0.8 NNE at the southwestern corner of the LP&L Little Gypsy plant along River Road.
BLK-15* (Westbank) Located 3.5 miles SSW 15 SSW of Des Allemands on Hwy. 90.
16 W390370SA
TABLE 2.2.
(CONTINUED)
LOCATION LOCATION MILES FROM SECTOR NUMBER DESCRIPTION PLANT DIRECTION FOOD PRODUCTS FPP-1 (Westbank) Located in soybean 0.8 WNW field on eastern edge of Killona, between air sample station APP-1 and APQ-1.
FPP-2 (Westbank) Located in sugarcane 0.6 WNW field on eastern edge of Killona.
- DENOTES CONTROL LOCATION
- NA - NOT APPLICABLE 17 W390370SA
1 TABLE 2.3 DETECTION CAPABILITIES FOR ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLE ANALYSIS LOWER LIMIT OF DETECTION (LLD)
WATER AIRBORNEPARTICgLATE FISH MILK FOOD PRODUCTS SEDIMENT ANALYSIS (pCi/l) OR GAS (pCi/m ) (pCi/kg-wet) (pCi/1) (pCi/kg-wet) (pCi/kg-dry) gross beta 4 0.01 H-3 2000 Mn-54 15 130 ll Fe-59 30 260 00-58, 60 15 130 Zn-65 30 260 Zr-Nb-95 15 I-131 1 0.07 1 60' Cs-134 15 0.05 130 15 60 150 Cs-137 18 0.06 150 18 80 180 Ba-La-140 15 15
- a. From Table 4.12-1 of Waterford 3 SES Technical Specification 12.4.4.
- b. Applicable to broad leaf vegetation.
W390370SA
l
/ p* /
y r i
e
+
- =
/9.
l [Q 4
- i l/
% //
/
A
~
i B / 8
\" w >
l A
/
1 2
O- s FNs
(\ .
.)
I
, /
/
1 im j s gI /
s o, I D I P ,
l suuoma /
s \ ,,, nl i "". g .
.Il 4
'> w \ l SI ;pp, m = -
N'IFY 4e I
gg g RIV E gQ ~%%~'=&
FH2
/ t N .
,, 1 ~',- y'-
. .- ~
' , TAFT j F
_M im. * **
D.ue.
. .2 4
I d2 H, G N L
j HANNVILL E
~
! 0 K 2" H po
,, .cu u re. .... J
. . == . . . . . .
- m. .
+.,
S. Sud. FACE . ATE.
j FN FISes q et n.ono tsar wrecTaraon POWER 8 GHT CO. REMP SAMPLE LOC ATION S HGURE wEia'.ar'a<
c.,= si.5d'.*.*.'a WIT HIN 2 MILES OF WATERFORD 3 2.1 OOCM l
i 7 i so~ st l min
- A f R B
\
,.,, \ t. c PONTCH ART R AIN Q
j \
\
_mv . . . .
N g L ACE j
g "est.
$ witte E N nestag g
/
\
\
~~
f n p ,
s - -- - _ s . ~ i D -
t ts = l 4
\
s'
_ sur-r N
'( P M A
- m i
W Od E E
i i - .x T
,/
i 27,,, _ _ _ -
1
/ p\
i l ~ -] . / /
.. s ,
. ,. .Er
, tac ocs a cuamos'\ l ..,
*L sw'[
i s;
y g .OuTT aggtA I
,^ 'l,%
i LM-
, gg I
- TLD j esa tanta D%
'"" '" " " "' K "
H
!. Ow On ., Ten . tI se RAfWACE .afin l FP 7000 PnOOUCTS DL SnDAO LE AF V E GE TAT IO N
.i wu'5'*aa REMP SAM PLE LOCATIONS ncuRc d
POwc n a L sG HT CO j .....s,... G T HIN 10 MILES OF WATERFORD 3 2.2 ca.... si.....
i I
E R
U 3 G
I 2
F
. a_ ._
n _
- m. .
- -__ s m.
e m
S -
E ,
u r.
e l
E 2 &
A
- k l E
a i J
T S _
3 D
3 g=s I
T T AA hmg,,'Qp -
%, __ CW O
i,f -
- s. .
G' \ LF O
a _= P LE g
p==
=
MI
, g=
= _
, AM
,~
_ S
- y =-
E 8
- - _ 0
=- =_ E-8 =,_
8 L =r i.
~ P5 sp
~ k M N a= g a N
O T - m- -
H ; E I G
mM - RH 5 3 e
r
=- ~-
a M = T S .
L- I M-
=.
/
ef A
Y g-w - W A
+ 2- -
f e
e =_ 5 ,
"-7 m
i n
r =
a o l r
g E =
- rQ .*
N A t
.\
I iMgg. -
- M - w =.
E;j J *
==_
, , - =
A - N N e O T ==
E L
S 1=
E H
T k
A J
Cp ,
K S _v 1 N T l}-
A-4 S A
N / q
- N H
A f t a
DQ
/
n,-
p .
/A j -
_ TK /
SL A AE
_ EF TOG NE #. '
/
STU .
AAO L ,
cO EBR
- e. %
M = ~ Am';
N c 1, g_
/ - -
a S
I AuW Ia s T yam p L, T
s U
On"^ l, r/
/
A S a E
S
- & ag Lw o ;
D'j ;\
_ r n
6,w
,g %
(;- s<
a s ,
- 2 ;
' 1- 1a . ;I ,jif iil
3.0 DISCUSSION OF RESULTS Analytical results for the year 1987 are discussed in this section by exposure pathway, type of sample, and analysis performed. The analytical results of the REMP are summarized in Appendix A and data for the individual analyses are presented in the tables of Appendix B. All of the results discussed in this section and summarized in the appendices of this report focus mainly on man-made radioactivity.
3.1 Direct Radiation Exposure Pathway The average dose rates measured at all stations by both control and indicator Thermoluminscent Dosimeters (TLDs) were 14, 14, 14, and 14 mrem per standard quarter (90 days) for the first, second, third, and fourth quarters of 1987, respectively. The average of 115 indicator location TLD exposures was 14 mrem / standard quarter compared to 18 mrem / standard quarter for the average of four exposures at the control location. The lowest and highest individual exposures were 8 mrem / standard quarter (C-1, 4th quarter; M-1 second quarter) and 19 mrem / standard quarter (E-30, 1st quarter) for all locations.
Table 3.1 compares the TLD results by direction and distance from the facility. Of the 16 indicator sectors, Sector Q demonstrated the highest average of 16 mrem / standard quarter; however, this average exposure is less than the control's of 18 mrem / standard quarter. The average exposure rate from TLD's located within two miles from the plant was statistically identical to the average exposure from stations located more than five miles from the plant using the standard "t" test (see Appendix F). The average exposure rate from TLD's located between two and five miles from the plant was statistically the same as the average exposure rate from stations located within two miles of the plant. Therefore, Waterford 3 SES operation did not have a detectable impact on '
direct radiation exposures from gamma radiation.
3.2 Airborne Exposure Pathway 3.2.1 Airborne Particulates Gross beta activity ranged from 0.007 pCi/ cubic meter (APE-30, 6/29-7/06) to 0.043 pCi/ cubic meter (AFG-1, 3/09-3/16) with an average of 0.021 pCi/ cubic meter for 258 measurements from all five sampling locations. The average gross beta activity for the control location, APE-30, was 0.021 pCi/ cubic meter compared to 0.020 pCi/ cubic meter for the four indicator locations (APP-1, APQ-1, APG-1, APC-1).
The control station average is statistically the same as the average from each indicator station using the standard statistical "t" test (see Appendix F).
22 6390370SA
l i
i The gross beta activity results obtained during 1987 are consistent with those from 1986, 1985 and the preoperational program. During the preoperational sursey, in periods not significantly influenced by nuclear weapons detonations, the gross beta activity ranged between 0.02 and 0.04 pCi/ cubic meter. During the first two years of the REMP prior to Waterford 3 SES operction, the average gross beta activity for a11' stations was 0.021 pCi/ cubic meter with a range of 0.006 to 0.! pCi/ cubic meter.
During 1985 the average gross beta activity for the control location was 0.022 pCi/ cubic meter compared to 0.021 pCi/ cubic meter for the four indicator locations.
In 1986, during periods not influenced by the Chernobyl incident, the average weekly gross beta activities from the control and indicator stations were 0.020 and 0.021 pCi/eubic meter, respectively.
3.2.2 Airborne Iodine All of the 258 airborne iodine-131 results were below the lower limits of detection which ranged from 0.005 to 0.012 pCi/ cubic meter. The variabilit; of the lower limit of detection was due primarily to the difference between air sample volumes.
3.2.3 Gamma Isotopic Analysis Gamma spectroscopy results indicated detectable levels of cosmogenically produced bery111um-7 and naturally occurring potasium-40 in the twenty quarterly composites. No man-made radionuclides were detected above their respectivo lower limits of detection.
3.3 Waterborne Exposure Pathway 3.3.1 Drinking / Surface Water As mentioned previously, drinking water is considered synonymous with surface water. Results obtained from samples collected and analyzed as drinking water can be designated "surface water results". Therefore, the results of the monthly and quarterly gamma spectral analyses as well as the quarterly tritium analysis reported as drinking water results are the same as for those reported as surface water results.
Eighty-one composite drinking / surface water samples were analyzed by a radiochemical procedure for iodine-131. All indicator measurements were below the lower limits of detection however 2 of the control measurements indicated -
iodine at an average level of 0.6 pCi/1. The samples were composited on a monthly basis and analyzed by gamma spectroscopy. Only naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected. No man-made gamma emitters were detected above their respective lower limits of detection.
23 W390370SA
1 l
The monthly composites were analyzed for gross beta activity. Gross beta activity was detected in thirty-one of the forty-two composites with an average-activity of 6.1 pCi/ liter. The average activity for the control location was 5.1 pCi/ liter, compared to the averages of 8.2 and 4.2 pCi/ liter for indicator stations DWG-2 and DWE-5, respectively.
The average gross beta activity detected at indicator station DWG-2 is statistically the same as that of the control station DWP-7 using the standard "t" test (see Appendix F). The average gross beta activity at station DWE-5, five miles downstream, is also statistically the same as the control station average using the standard "t" test.
Drinking / surface water samples were also composited quarterly and analyzed for tritium. All measurements were below the respective lower limits of detection.
Although not required in the REMP the filters obtained from the gross beta analysis were composited monthly and analyzed by gamma spectroscopy. No man-made gamma emitters were detected above their respective lower limits of detection.
3.3.2 Groundwater Four groundwater samples were collected from one sampling location, GWJ-1, and analyzed for tritium and gamma ray emitters. Tritium was detected in one of the four samples at a concentration of 249 pCi/1 2211. Tritium is naturally occurring and during the preoperational program, tritium was frequently detected in groundwater samples at concentrations ranging between 50 and 180 pCi/1. Although the detected concentration is higher than these values, the detected concentration has a high degree on uncertainty associated with it. This value is also below the usual lower limit of detection. However, conservatively assuming that all of the tricium activity detected in the groundwater at station GWJ-1 originated from the plant, the maximum dose to a member of the general public was calculated. The methodology and assumptions used to calculate the maximum dose were based on the guidance provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109 (10/77). The dose to the maximum exposed individual, a child, was calculated by the following equation:
(1) R = (C) (U) (D) where R is the annual dose to any organ or the total body in mrem /yr; 24 W390370SA
C is the radionuclide concentration in the groundwater sample in pC1/1; U is the amount of water which is ingested, assuming that this groundwater is ingested without treatment, in 1/yr, given in Table E-5 of Regulatory Guide 1.109; 510 liters for a child; and D is the internal dose conversion factor for ingesting contaminated water given in Table E-13 of Regulatory Guide 1.109; the values for tritium for each organ or the whole body are identical and this value is 2.03E-7 mrem /pCi ingested.
Using equation (1), the maximum annual dose to a child drinking 510 liters of untreated groundwater was calculated to be 0.026 mrem /yr to any organ or to the total body. Therefore, any radiological impacts to the general public are inconsequential.
3.3.3 Shoreline Sediment Four shoreline soil samples were collected from two sampling locations: two samples from the Mississippi River shoreline downriver of the plant (SHWE-3) and two samples from the shoreline of a drainage canal into which turbine building sumps are discharged (SHWJ-1).
Naturally occurring potassium-40, radium-226, actinium-228, and other naturally occurring radioisotopes were detected in all of the samples. Man-made radioactivity, cesium-137, was detected in the sample obtained from station SEWJ-1 at a concentration of 21 pCi/kg(dry). No other man-made radionuclides were detected in any of the samples.
Radioactive release permits for the year 1987 show that no cesium-137 was discharged into the drainage canal from which the sample came. Therefore, the presence of the cesium-137 is most likely attributable to fallout from past nuclear weapons detonations or the Chernobyl incident.
This assumption is consistent with observations made during the preoperational survey for soil samples collected from the shoreline of the Mississippi River. During the preoperational program, cesium-137 was detected in 13 of 18 soil samples at concentrations ranging between 30 and 890 pCi/kg(dry) with an average concentration of 138 pCi/kg(dry). In 1985 and 1986 cesium-137 was detected at this site at levels of 99 and 65 pCi/kg (dry),
respectively, establishing a downward trend in activity.
25 W390370SA
However, conservatively assuming that all of the cesium-137 activity detected in the shoreline sediment at station SHWJ-1 originated from the plant, the maximum dose to a member of the general public was calculated. The methodology and assumptions used to calculate the maximum dose were based on the guidance provided in Regulatory Guide 1.109 (10/77). The dose to the maximum exposed individual, a teenager, was calculated by the following equation:
(2) R = (40) (C) (U) (D) where:
R is the annual dose to the skin or the total body in mrem / year; 40 is the area-mass conversion factor given in Appendix A of Regulatory Guide 1.109 in kg/ square meter; C is the radionuclide concentration in the shoreline soil sample in pct /kg; U is the maximum exposure time given in Table E-5 of Regulatory Guide 1.109; 67 hours7.75463e-4 days <br />0.0186 hours <br />1.107804e-4 weeks <br />2.54935e-5 months <br /> for a teenager; and D is the external dose conversion factor for standing on contaminated ground given in Table E-6 of Regulatory Guide 1.109; the values for skin and total body are 4.9E-09 and 4.2E-09 mrem /hr per pCi/ square meter, respectively.
Using equation (2), the maximum annual dose to a teenager spending 67 hours7.75463e-4 days <br />0.0186 hours <br />1.107804e-4 weeks <br />2.54935e-5 months <br /> at the shoreline of the canal was calculated to be approximately 0.003 mrea/yr to the skin and to the total body. Therefore, any radiological impacts to the general public resulting from cesium-137 detected in the shoreline soil are infinitesimal.
3.4 Ingestion Exposure Pathway 3.4.1 Milk Forty-nine milk samples were collected from two sampling locations and analyzed by a radiochemical procedure for iodine-131. All indicator station measurements were below the lower limits of detection; however, iodine was detected at the control station at a concentration of 0.2 pCi/1. The samples were also analyzed by gamma spectroscopy. Naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected in all samples. Cesium-137 was detected in two of the control samples from KKQ-45 at an average concentration of 4.5 pCi/L. This man-made activity is most likely attributable to fallout. All man-made gamma emitters were below their respective lower limits of detection.
26 W390370SA
3.4.2 Fish Sixteen fish samples, eight upstream and eight downstream of the plant were collected and the edible portions analyzed by gamma spectroscopy. Only naturally occurring potassium-40 was detected above the lower limits of detection in all samples.
3.4.3 Broad Leaf Vegetation Waterford 3 SES Technical Specification 3.12.1 requires broad leaf vegetation to be sampled in the event milk samples are unavailable. Since milk samples could be collected reliably from only one sampling location within five miles of Waterford 3 SES, broad leaf vegetation was sampled monthly at two indicator locations. Broad .'.eaf vegetation was also collected from one control location.
Thirty-three broad leaf vegetation samples were collected and analyzed by a radiochemical procedure for iodine-131.
All measurements were below the lower limits of detection. The samples were also analyzed by gamma spectroscopy. Naturally occurring radionuclides were detected in all of the samples, however no man-made radionuclides were detected above their lower limits of detection.
3.4.4 Food / Garden Crops One food / garden crop sample was collected and analyzed by a radiochemical procedure for iodine-131. Iodine-131 concentration was below the lower 41mit of detection. The sample was also analayzed by gamma spectroscopy. Naturally occurring potassium-40, radium-226, and te11urium-208 were the only radionuclides detected. All man-made gamma emitters were below their respective lower limits of detection.
3.5 Deviation from the REMP 3.5.1 Unavailable Samples During 1987 deviations from the REMP sampling schedule occurred. All of the deviations (with the exception of those associated with TLDs and the April broadleaf sample) were either the result of equipment malfunctions or *he result of natural events beyond the control of LP&L. With respect to equipment malfunctions, the causes leading to the malfunction were identified and maintenance or replacement performed to prevent recurrence of the event.
Deviations from the REMP associated with TLDs were beyond the control of LP&L and resulted from theft of a few of the dosimeters placed in the field. When a dosimeter was 27 W390370SA
l i
discovered missing during a monthly inspection, the TLD was replaced and the deviation noted. A listing of all unavailable samples for 1987 along with associated explanations of why the samples were not collected is given in Appendix C. . A more detailed explanation for milk and vegetation sample unavailability is discussed below.
Milk samples were not available during 1987 from the animal owners at station MKE-4 and MKQ-1 since neither the goats at MKE-4 nor the cows at MKE-1 are currently producing milk for human consumption. With the absence of milk samples at these stations, broad leaf vegetation sampling was performed.
Broad leaf vegetation was not sampled at a control location during the months of January, February, April and December of 1987. No broad leaf vegetation was present at the control location due to cold weather during January, i February, and December. In April, samples were improperly split between AP&L and the Louisiana Nuclear Energy Division (LNED). As a result LNED received two control samples and one indicator sample and AP&L received 3 h indicator samples. Milk samples were available from the control location during each of these months. Control station broad leaf vegetation was sampled even when control station milk samples were available.
- The typical food product sample FPP-1 (soybeans), was not available during 1987 since no crops were grown in this field during the year. This sampling station will remain as part of the REMP due to the proximity of the location ,
with respect to the plant. An alternate sample, FPP-2 i (sugarcane), was taken in place of FPP-1. A description of .
both locations is contained in Table 2-2.
l 3.5.2 Missed Lower Limits of Detection ;
All lower limits of detection specified in Table 4.12-2 of l Waterford 3 SES Technical Specification 4.12.1 were !
attained during 1987.
3.5.3 Changes to the REMP f
There were no changes to the RENP during 1987.
3.6 Annual Land Use Census Results [
In compliance with Waterford 3 SES Technical Specification 4.12.2, the annual land use census was conducted on August 25 and 26, 1987.
The nearest residence, garden, and milking animal in each sector within a five mile radius of the plant were found by visual l inspection and verbal inquiry. The results of the 1987 census are i given in Table 3.2. No new residences, gardens, or milking l animals were found. i 28 f
W390370SA l
The distance to the nearest vegetable garden in Sector R as well as the distances to the nearest residences in Sector E, F, N, and R were reported incorrectly in last year's census results. The correct values are given in Table 3.2 The owner of the animals at station MKQ-1 stated that the cows were not producing milk for human consumption. The owner of milking goats at location MKE-4 stated that the goats were not producing milk for human consumption. Although no samples were available from either location during 1987, the stations will remain as part of the REMP and the owners will be contacted periodically to determine the status of obtaining samples.
i i
i t
e i
i 29 l
B390370SA i
TABLE 3.1 1987 DIRECT RADIATION DATA ORGANIZED BY COMPASS DIRECTION AND DISTANCE FROM WATERFORD 3 SES BY COMPASS DIRECTION SECTOR COMPASS AVERAGE STANDARD NUMBER DIRECTION DOSE RATE DEVIATION IN (mrem /std qtr) (arem/std qtr) GROUP A N 15 0.9 8 B NNE 15 1.6 8 C NE 10 1.3 4 D ENE 15 2.4 6 E(a) E 13 1.6 12
. F ESE 15 1.6 12 G SE 15 1.7 12 H SSE 14 2.7 8 J S 14 1.3 8 K SSW 13 1.0 4 L SW 14 0.5 4 M WSW 11 3.1 3 N W 14 1.0 4 P WNW 14 2.5 8 Q NW 16 1.9 8 R NNW 13 2.1 8 ,
CONTROL E 18 0.5 4 BY DISTANCE FROM PLANT DISTANCE AVERAGE STANDARD NUMBER FROM PLANT DOSE RATE DEVIATION IN (MILES) (mres/std qtr) (cres/std qtr) GROUP 0-2 14 2.2 62
.-5 15 1.8 27 5(a) 15 1.6 28 CONTROL 18 0.5 4
- a. Does not include control station data.
30 V
W390370SA
1 f TABLE 3.2 1987 ANNUAL LAND USE CENSUS RESULTS
, SECTOR DIRECTION DISTANCE FROM' PLANT (MILES)
MILK COW MILK GOAT' GARDEN. RESIDENCE ;
A N - -
l.1 0.8 h B NNE - -
1.3 0.8 r
C NE - -
1.0 0.9 L D ENE - -
0.9 0.9
. t E E -
3.3" 3.2 2.2 r
F ESE - -
2.3 3.2 G SE - -
2.3 3.9 H SSE - - - -
t
> J S - -
0.9 - !
4 K SSW - -
0.9 -
i L SW - -
0.9 -
M WSW - -
0.9 -
[
l N W - -
1.1 1.0 '
' \
! P WNW - -
0.9 0.9 "
f l '#
Q NW 1.1 -
0.9 0.9 i
R NNW - -
2.5 3.0 l None found in sector within five mile radius of the plant.
- r
\
- a. Goats not producing milk. The owner will be contacted on a periodic basis !
, to determine the availability of samples. [
< t
! b. Cows do not supply milk for human consumption. The owner will be I contacted on a periodic basis to determine the availability of samples.
i
- c. Samples will also continue to be taken at 4.4 miles (MKQ-5), since this is ;
the only reliable milk sample within 5 niles of Waterford 3 SES. :
! 31 l
W390370SA I
)
i
l
4.0 CONCLUSION
S The radiological environmental data collected during 1987 are consistent with the data obtained during 1986, 1985 the Preoperation Environmental Radiological Surveillance (PERS) Program and during the first two years of the REMP prior to Waterford 3 SES initial criticality. The only man-made radionuclides detected out of all of the environmental samples analyzed during 1987 were cesium-137 and tritium. Cesium-137 was detected in one shoreline soil sample and two control location milk samples. The detected activity in all three instances was at levels less than required by the Technical Specification's lower limits of detection and far below levels which require prompt notification. The origin of this man-made radioactivity is most likely attributable to fallout from past nuclear weapons detonations and not Waterford 3 SES operation. Tritium was detected in one groundwater sample. Tritium is naturally produced and due to the large uncertainty associated with this result, the fact that tritium was detected at levels below the typical lower limits of detection and the presence of tritium in samples taken prior to Waterford 3 SES operation, it is not likely that it was reactor produced.
In conclusion, based on the evaluation of the REMP data collected during 1987 the operation of Waterford 3 SES had no observabic radiological impact on the environment.
32 6390370SA
APPENDIX A REMP DATA
SUMMARY
33 W390370SA
TABLE A-1 RADIOIDGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUPflARY Name of Facility Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 January I to Location of Facility St. Charles, Louisiana Reporting Period December 31, 1987 (Parish, State)
I f1EDIUPI OR PATNWAY ANALYSIS AND LOWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR IDCATIONS IDCATION WITH HIGHEST ANNUAI1MEAN NLMBER OF m
CONTROL I p TION SAftPLED TOTAL NIMBER OF IEAN" NAME MEAN" MEAN NONROLTTINE (UNIT OF PEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION * (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED EERFORMED (LID) . MEASUREMENTS
- 1. Direct Radiation TLD 119 (c) 14(115/115) D-2 17(3/4) E-30 0 (arca/Std. Qtr.) (8-18) 1.1 miles ENE (15-18) 18(4/4)
(18-19)
- 2. Airborne Gross 258 10 21(206/206) APG-1 20(52/52) APE-30 0 Part'culat Beta (8-43) 0.5 miles SE (8-43) 21(52/52)
(10 1/m$s
) (7-36)
Gamma 20 (d) < LLD (0/16) NA NA APE-30 0
(-) < LIS (0/4)
(-)
(-)
NOTE: Footnotes at end of table.
W390370SA
.1;
TABE A-1 (Cont.)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONPENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SLR9tARY Name of Facility Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 Location of Facility January I to St. Charles, Louisiana Reporting Period December 31, 1987 (Parish, State)
, MEDitti OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND w SAMPED LDER LIMIT ALL INDICATok mta'ATIONS TOTAL NIRfBER OF lEAM" LA'ATION WITH NICHEST ANNUA g CONTROL I p TION WIRIBER OF (tINIT OF MEASUREMENT) NArE FEAN OF ANALYSES DETECTION
- MEAN ' NONROUTINE (RANGE)
PERFOR7ED (Lla) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (R*.MGE) (RANGE) REPORTED MEASUREPENTS
- 4. Drinking Water Gross 42 4 (pci/1) Beta 6(21/28) DWG-2 8(10/14) DWP-7 0 (3-45) 2.0 miles ESE (3-45) 5(10/14)
(2-9)
I-131 81 1
< LID (0/54) NA NA DWP-7
(-) 0 0.6(2/27)
(0.5-0.7)
Gamma 42 (d) < LLD (0/28) MA NA DWP-7
(-) 0
< Lla (0/14)
(-)
Tritium 12 2000 < Lla (1/8) NA NA DWP-7
(-) 0
< LLD (0/4)
(-)
NOTE: Footnotes at end of table.
W3903705A
i TABII A-1 (Cont.)
RADIOIDGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SIDelARY Name of Facility W terford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 January I to Location of Facility St. Charles, Louisiana Reporting Period December 31, 1987 (Parish, State)
$ MEDit21 OR PATHWAY ANALYSIS AND IDWER LIMIT ALL INDICATOR, LOCATIONS IDCATION WITH NIGHEST ANNUA MEAN CONTROL y ATION NtflBER OF SAMPED TOTAL NtRISER OF lEAM" NAfE MEAN MEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF fEASIREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION * (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORMED (Lib) MEASUREFENTS
- 5. Surface W ter Gross 42 4 6(21/28) SWG-2 8(10-14) SWP-7 0 (pci/1) Beta (3-45) 2.0 miles ESE (3-45) 5(10/14)
(2-9)
I-131 81 1 < LLD (0/54) NA NA SWP-7
(-) 0.6(2/27)
(0.5-0.7)
Gamma 42 (d) < LLD (0/28) NA NA SWP-7 0
(-) < LLD (0/14)
(-)
Tritium 12 2000 < LLD (1/8) NA NA SWP-7 0
(-) < LLD (0/4)
(-)
NOTE: Footnotes at end of table.
W3903705A
TABLE A-1 (Cont.)
RADIOIDGICAL ENVILONENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM SUretARY Name of Facility Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 January I to Location of Facility St. Ca rles, louisiana Reporting Period December 31, 1981 (Parish, State)
E DIUM OR PATNWAY ANALYSIS AND IA ER LIMIT ALL INDICATO(IDCATIOES LOCATION WITN NIGNEST ANNUAk MEAN CONTROL p TION NIRIBER OF
- SAMPIED TOTAL NIDtBER OF LEAN" NAfE E.AN" LEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREFENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION * (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERHNtMED (Lla) MEASUREIENTS
- 6. Groundwater c-= 4 (d) < Lla (0/4) NA NA NONE O (pC1/I) (-)
Tritium 4 2000 249(1/4) GWJ-l 249(1/4) NONE O
(-) (-)
- 7. Shoreline Camma 4 Sediment Cs-137 180 21(1/4) SNWJ-l 21(1/4) NONE O (pci/kg-dry) (-) 0.3 miles S (-)
NOTE: Footnotes at end of table.
W)903705A
TABM A-1 (Cont.)
RADIGIDGICAL ENVIRONENTAL ttONITORING PROGRAM SulttARY Name of Facility Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 January I to Location of Facility St. Charles, Louisiana _ Reporting Period December 31, 1987 (Parish, State)
, fEDIUM OR PATNWAY ANALYSIS AND LOER LIMIT ALL INDICATO( LOCATIONS IDCATION WITH NIGHEST ANNUAlstEAN NUMBER OF
= SAMPED CONTROL 1pTION TOTAL NUMBER OF IEAN" NAPE FEAM" fEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREPENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION * (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REPORTED PERFORfED (LIS) PEASUREfENTS
- 8. ftilk I-131 49 1 < LID (0/25) NA NA IKQ-45 0 (pci/1) (-) 0.2(1/24)
(-)
Gamma 49 Co-137 18 < Lia (0/25) NA NA PEQ-45 0
(-) 5(2/24)
(-)
- 9. Fish Gamma 16 (d) < LID (0/8)
. NA NA FM-1 0 (pci/kg-wet) (-) < LIA (0/8)
(-)
NO TE: Footnotes at end of table.
W390370$A
9 TABLE A-1 (Cont.)
RADIOIDGICAL ENVIRONtENTAL MONITORIhG PROGRAM SIR 9tARY Name of Facility Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 January I to Location of Facility St. Charles. Louisiana Reporting Period December 31, 1987 (Parish, State)
MEDIUM OR PATNWAY ANALYSIS AND loner LIMIT ALL INDICATOR IDCATIONS SAMPLED m
IDCATION WITN HIGHEST ANNUAlsHEAN CONTROL IpTION NUMBER OF TOTAL NUMBER OF LEAN ~ NAlE REAN" IEAN NONROUTINE (UNIT OF MEASUREMENT) OF ANALYSES DETECTION * (RANGE) DISTANCE AND DIRECTION (RANGE) (RANGE) REl'ORTED PERFORMED (LID) IEASUREfENTS
(-) < LID (0/8)
(-)
Gamma 33 (d) < LLD (0/25) NA NA BIX-15 0
(-) < LLD (0/8)
(-)
- 11. Food / Garden Crop Gamma 1 (d) < LID (0/I) NA NA NOME O (pCi/kg-wet)
(-)
NOTE: Footnotes at end of table.
W390370SA
l TABLE A-1 (Cont.)
RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM
SUMMARY
FOOTNOTES a
Nominal Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) as defined in Waterford 3 Technical Specifications.
^ b O
Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parenthesis.
"Lower Limit of Detectin (LLD) not defined in Waterford 3 Technical Specifications, d
Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) for individual radionuclides using gamma spectroscopy are given in Waterford 3 Technical Specifications.
W390370SA
.. --+y,<
~
l 1
1 1
5 x
d i
APPENDIX B REMP DATA r
r i
1 41 W390370SA
TABLE B-1 QUARTERLY TLD DOSE RATES LOCATION IST QUARTER 2ND QUARTER 3RD QUARTER 4TH QUARTER AVERAGE (01/02-04/02) (04/02-07/02) (07/02-10/01) (10/01-01/07) DOSE RATE DOSE RATE DOSE RATE DOSE RATE DOSE RATE (arem/std qtr)
(ares /std qtr) (area /std qtr) (arem std qtr) (arem/std qtr)
A-2 16 15 16 17 16 A-5 14 15 15 15 15 B-1 14 15 15 11 14 B-4 14 16 15 16 15 C-1 10 11 10 8 10 D-2 NA 15 18 17 17 D-5 12 13 NA 13 13 E-1 12 11 12 13 12 E-5 13 12 14 13 13 E-15 14 15 16 16 15 E-30 19 18 18 18 18 F-2 13 14 13 12 13 F-4 17 16 17 16 17 F-9 14 14 14 14 14 G-2 16 17 16 17 17 G-4 14 14 12 12 13 G-9 16 15 16 16 16
, H-2 16 16 16 16 16 H-6 13 10 11 11 11 J-2 14 12 14 12 13 J-15 16 14 14 14 15 K-1 14 13 12 12 13 ,
L-1 14 14 14 13 14 H-1 NA 8 12 14 11 N-1 15 15 13 14 14 P-1 14 11 11 11 12 P-6 15 16 16 16 16 Q-1 14 16 14 13 14 Q-5 15 18 18 16 17 R-1 12 12 11 11 12 R-6 15 15 15 16 15 Avsrege 14 14 14 14 NA - Results not Available: See Table C-5 for Explanation 42 i W390370SA L
_e- e . - - - ,--e.-- nnr - - , , - - - , -
_ n- .-- - - - - - - - - - - --
TABLE B-2 AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARC0AL CARTRIDGES CROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES SAMPLE LOCATION: APC-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pCi/ CUBIC METER LAB NO. COLLECTION PERIOD CROSS BETA 870024 12/29/86 01/05/87 0.027+/-0.003 870086 01/05/87 01/12/87 0. 02 9 t/-0. o r,3 870147 01/12/87 01/19/87 0.023+/-0.003 01/19/87 01/26/87 SAMPLER MALFUNCTION 870225 01/27/87 02/02/87
- O.018+/-0.003 870266 02/02/87 02/09/87 0.014+/-0.003 870310 02/09/87 02/16/87 0.015+/-0.002 870367 02/16/87 02/23/87 0.014+/-0.003 b 870414 02/23/87 03/02/87 0.019+/-0.003 870451 . 03/02/8? 03/09/87 0.018+/-0.003 870523 03/09/87 03/16/87 0.028+/-0.003 870546 03/16/87 03/23/87 0.015+/-0.002 870594 03/23/87 03/30/87 0.016+/-0.003 870643 03/30/87 04/06/87 0.013+/-0.002 870711 04/06/87 04/13/87 0.021+/-0.003 870744 04/13/87 04/20/87 0.018+/-0.002 870790 04/20/87 04/27/87 0.016+/-0.002 870844 04/27/87 05/04/87 0.022+/-0.003 870897 05/04/87 05/11/87 0.014+/-0.002 870957 05/11/87 05/18/87 0.010+/-0.002 871003 05/18/87 05/26/87 0.012+/-0.002 871026 05/26/87 06/01/87 0.012+/-0.002 871113 06/01/87 06/08/87 0.013+/-0.002 871162 06/08/87 06/15/87 0.011+/-0.002 871217 06/15/87 06/22/87 0.008+/-0.002 071267 06/22/87 06/29/87 0.010+/-0.002 W390370SA
- Sampler Malfunction
'i <
R E
T E 2222 32332 3234 3333 33333 M 0000 00000 0000 0000 3332 0000 00000 0000 00000 0000 C A . . . . . .
0000 00000 0000 I T . . . . . . . .
E 0000 0000 . . .
B 00000 0000 00000 0000 U B - - - - - - - - - - /- - - - - - - - - - -
C / // - - - -
/
i C
S S
O
/+++
8986
/ / /+ /94168
+/+ ++ / / /+ ++++
8816 / /+ / /+ /+
+
1641
+ +/ /++ /+ / /+ /+++ //
p R 0011 11221 2123 99616 9743 2233 22121 3211 G 0000 00000 0000 0000 00000 0000 0000 00000 0000 . . . .
S 0000 00000 0000 T
I N
U S
E G
D I
R T
) RS d AE S
- CS E u Y T n LL A 7777 77777 7777 7777 i AA L 8888 88888 77777 7777 t ON U 8888 8888 88888 8888 n CA C D //// ///// //// ////
o c
R A1 I
T O 6307 I 0122 30741 01123 8528 5296 ///// 29630
//// 7419
( H3 R R //// 0122 0112 00123 0122
///// //// ////
A 0000 ///// ////
C1 E 7777 88888 2 - P P 0000 9999 11111 2222
- DE 00000 0000 1111 11111 1111 B NN R N AI I O E D A I L SO T 7777 77777 B RI C 8888 7777 7777 77777 7777 A E : E 88888 8888 8888 88888 8888 T TD E L //// ///// //// ////
LN I A P
Y L 9630 O 2012 73074 1852 8529 ///// 62963
//// 0741 F T 20112 3012 2011 20012 3012 C 6777
//// ///// //// ////9000 ///// ////
A 78888 ET E 0000 8999 01111 1222 TE L C0000 0000 0111 11111 1111 AB P L M US A CS S I O TR RC A
P R
I A
1 C
P A
N O .
9218 47764 9297 4248 01030 0934 I O 0647 27150 2938 8399 36293 8404 T N 55667 7788 9001 22334 4566 A 3344 C B 1111 11111 1111 1222 22222 2222 O A 7777 77777 7777 7777 77777 7777 L L 8888 88888 8888 8888 88888 8888 A S
E 0
. L 7 P 3
. M 0 A 9 S 3 W
t II ,l 1 Ilj I i]l { {: :), il ! ,!
_. - - - _ _ ~ . - - .- - . _ . . _ _ _ . . .. . . -- - - - - - _ . . . . .-
TABLE C-2 (continued)
AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES CROSS BETA AND 10 DINE-131 ANALYSES 4
i SAMPLE LOCATION: APG-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pC1/ CUBIC METER LAR NO. COLLECTION PERIOD GROSS SETA 870021 12/29/86 I
870083 01/05/87 0.035+/-0.003 870144 01/05/87 01/12/87 3.022+/-0.002 870174 01/12/87 01/19/87 0.019+/-0.003 01/19/87 01/26/87 0.022+/-0.003 870222 870263 01/26/87 02/02/87 0.017+/-0.002 870307 02/02/87 02/09/87 0.017+/-0.003 870364 02/09/87 02/16/87 0.016+/-0.003 02/16/87 02/23/87 0.017+/-0.003 870411 02/23/87
) 870448 03/02/87 0.020+/-0.003
- 870520 03/02/87 03/09/87 0.024+/-0.003 j 87054? 03/09/87 03/16/87 0.043+/-0.008 870591 03/16/87 03/23/87 0.021+/-0.003
[ 03/24/87 03/30/87 0.019+/-0.003 870640 03/30/87 l 870708 04/06/87 0.015+/-0.002 i
870741 04/06/87 04/13/87 0.024+/-0.003 870787 04/13/87 04/20/87 0.017+/-0.002 04/20/87 04/27/87 0.020+/-0.002 870842 870894 04/27/87 05/04/87 0.027+/-0.003 870954 05/04/87 05/11/87 0.016+/-0.002 871000 05/11/87 05/18/87 0.013+/-0.002 05/18/87 05/26/87 0.015+/-0.002 871023
- 871110 05/26/87 06/01/87 0.012+/-0.002
- 871159 06/01/87 06/08/87 0.015+/-0.002 871214 06/08/87 06/15/87 0.012+/-0.002 s71264 06/1F/87 06/22/87 0.008+/-0.002
, 06/22/87 06/29/87 0.013+/-0.002 W390370SA
TABLE B-2 (continusd)
AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES CROSS BETA AND 10 DINE-131 ANALYSES SAMPLE LOCATION: APG-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pC1/ CUBIC METER LAB NO. COLLECTION PERIOD CROSS BETA 871306 06/29/87 07/06/87 O.008+/-0.002 871359 07/06/87 07/13/87 0.010+/-0.002 871438 07/13/87 07/20/87 0.019+/-0.002 871475 07/20/87 07/27/87 0.014+/-0.002 871521 07/27/87 08/03/87 0.022+/-0.003 871574 08/03/87 08/10/87 0.017+/-0.002 871614 08/10/87 08/17/87 0.023+/-0.003
. 871653 08/17/87 08/24/87 0.026+/-0.003 871701 08/24/87 08/31/87 0.019+/-0.002 08/31/87, 09/08/87 871726 0$/08/87 09/15/87 0.026+/-0.003 871789 09/15/87 0.017+/-0.002 871836 09/22/87 0.022+/-0.003 09/22/87 09/28/87 0.037+/-0.004 871884 09/28/87 10/05/87 0.018+/-0.008 871981 10/05/87 10/12/87 0.028+/-0.003 872029 10/12/87 10/19/87 0.032+/-0.003 872091 10/19/87 10/26/87 0.029+/-0.003 872195 10/26/87 11/02/87 0.028+/-0.003 872227 11/02/87 11/09/87 0. 02 8 +/ -0. 003 872258 11/09/87 11/16/87 0.019+/-0.003 872317 11/16/87 11/23/87 0.020&/-0.003 872390 11/23/87 11/30/87 872427 0.010+/-0.002 11/30/87 12/07/87 0.038+/-0.003 872477 12/07/87 12/14/87 872546 12/14/87 12/21/87 0.027+/-0.003 872600 12/21/87 12/29/87 0.017+/-0.003 872641 0.012+/-0.002 W390370SA
TABLE D-2 (continued) i l AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDCES ,
l CROSS BETA AND 10 DINE-131 ANALYSES '
l SAMPLE LOCATION: APP-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pC1/ CUBIC METER i IAB NO. COLLECTION PERIOD CROSS BETA l 870023 12/29/86 01/05/87 0.033+/-0.003 870085 01/05/87 0.033+/-0.003 870146 01/12/87 01/12/87 01/19/87 0.022+/-0.003 870176 01/19/87 0.020+/-0.003 01/26/87 1
870224 01/26/87 0.018+/-0.003 l
870265 02/02/87
] 02/02/87 02/09/87 0.016+/-0.002 870309 02/09/87 0.016+/-0.002 870366 02/16/87 ,
02/16/87 02/23/87 0.017+/-0.003 870413 02/23/87 0.018+/-0.003 870450 03/02/87 J 03/02/87 03/09/87 0.020+/-0.002 i i
870522 03/09/87 0.029+/-0.003 870545 03/16/87 870593 03/16/87 03/23/87 0.020+/-0.003 03/23/87 03/30/87 0.019+/-0.003 1
j 870642 03/30/87 0.016+/-0.002 870710 04/06/87 i
' 870743 04/06/87 04/13/87 0.018+/-0.003 870789 04/13/87 04/20/87 0 017+/-0.003 04/20/87 04/27/87 0.024+/-0.005 ,
870896 04/27/87 05/05/87 j
870956 05/04/87 05/11/87 0.016+/-0.002
- i 871002 05/11/87 05/18/g7 0.011+/-0.002 05/18/87 05/26/87 0.013+/-0.002 l
! 871025 05/26/87 0.014+/-0.002 871112 06/01/87 871161 06/01/87 06/08/87 0.014+/-0.002 '
871216 06/08/87 06/15/87 0.010+/-0.002 '
0.008+/-0.002 871266 06/15/87 06/22/87
) 06/22/87 06/29/g7 0.011+/-0.002 1
1 W390370SA
.c_. - - - -,, - _ ---r - - ---- - ~ - r-e-,--e-- w- , - , < " ~ ~~ ~~=m , = * * ' " ' ' - - - - ~ ^ ' " ' '^ ^ - ^ ' ~ ^ ^ ' ^ ^ ^
_ - - - . _ _ _ _ - __ _ _ _ _ ._ _ _ = -_
TABLE D-2 (continued)
AIR PARTICUIATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES CROSS BETA AND 10 DINE-131 ANALYSES SAMPLE LOCATION: APP-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pC1/ CUBIC METER LAB NO. COLLECTION PERIOD CROSS BETA 871308 06/29/87 07/06/87 0.008+/-0.002 871361 07/06/87 07/13/87 0.008+/-0.002 871440 07/13/87 07/20/87 0.023+/-0.003 871477 07/20/87 07/27/87 0.015+/-0.002 1
) 871523 07/27/87 08/03/87 0.022+/-0.003 1 871576 08/03/87 08/10/87 0.016+/-0.002 l 871616 08/10/87 08/17/87 0.020+/-0.003
) 871655 08/17/87 08/24/87 0.026+/-0.003
$ 871703 08/24/87 08/31/87 0.019+/-0.002 4
j 871728 08/31/87 09/08/87 0.027+/-0.003 871791 09/08/87 09/15/87 0.017+/-0.002
- 871838 09/15/87 09/22/87 0.022+/-0.003
- 871886 09/22/87 09/28/87 0.036+/-0.004 i
871983 09/28/87 10/05/87 0.024+/-0.003 I 872031 10/05/87 10/12/87 0.028+/-0.003 872093 10/12/87 10/19/87 0.036+/-0.003 872197 10/19/87 10/26/87 0.031+/-0.003 872229 10/26/87 11/02/87 0.03O+/-0.003 872260 11/02/87 11/09/87 0.031+/-0.003 872319 11/09/87 11/16/87 0.017+/-0.003 872392 11/16/87 11/23/87 0.021+/-0.003 872429 11/23/87 11/30/87 0.015+/-0.003 872479 11/30/87 12/07/87 0.036+/-0.003 872548 12/07/87 12/14/87 0.029+/-0.003 872602 12/14/87 12/21/87 0.019+/-0.003 872643 12/21/87 12/29/87 0.011+/-0.002 W390370SA
TA;LE B-2 (contiaued)
AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES CROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANAI.YSES SAMPLE LOCATION: APQ-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pC1/ CUBIC METER LAB NO. COLLECTION PERIOD CROSS BETA 870022 12/29/86 01/05/87 0.034+/-0.003 870084 01/05/87 01/12/87 0.032+/-0.003 870145 01/12/87 01/19/87 0.023+/-0.003 870175 01/19/87 01/26/87 0.019+/-0.003 870223 01/26/87 02/02/87 0.017+/-0.002 870264 02/02/87 02/09/87 0.015+/-0.003 870308 02/09/87 02/16/87 0.016+/-0.003 870365 02/16/87 02/23/87 0.017+/-0.003 e
870412 02/23/87 03/02/87 0.017+/-0.003 870449 03/02/87 03/09/87 0.020+/-0.003 870521 03/09/87 03/16/87 0.029+/-0.003 870544 03/16/87 03/23/87 0.019+/-0.003 870592 03/23/87 03/30/87 0.016+/-0.003 870641 03/30/87 04/06/87 0.016+/-0.002 870709 04/06/87 04/13/87 0.023+/-0.003 870742 04/13/87 04/20/87 0.016+/-0.002 870788 04/20/87 04/27/87 0.021+/-0.003 870843 04/27/87 05/04/87 0.026+/-0.003 670895 05/04/87 05/11/87 0.016+/-0.002 870955 05/11/87 05/18/87 0.011+/-0.002 871001 05/18/87 05/26/87 0.013+/-0.002 871024 05/26/87 06/01/87 0.014+/-0.003 871111 06/01/87 06/08/87 0.011+/-0.002 871160 06/08/87 06/15/87 0.011+/-0.002 871215 06/15/87 06/22/87 0.008+/-0.002 871265 06/22/87 06/29/87 0.010+/-0.002 W390370SA
TABLE C-2 (continued)
AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES CROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES SAMPLE LOCATION: APQ-I SAMPLE TTPE: AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pC1/ CUBIC METER LAB NO. COLLECTION PERIOD CROSS BETA 871307 06/29/87 871360 07/06/87 0.009+/-0.002 07/06/87 07/13/87 0.010+/-0.002 871439 07/13/87 871476 07/20/87 0.018+/-0.002 07/20/87 07/27/87 0.013+/-0.002 871522 07/27/87 871575 08/03/87 0.023+/-0.003 08/03/87 08/10/87 0.015+/-0.002 871615 08/10/87 871654 08/17/87 0.020+/-0.003 o 871702 08/17/87 08/24/87 0.024+/-0.003 08/24/87 08/31/87 0.017+/-0.002 871727 08/31/87 871790 09/08/87 0.028+/-0.003 09/08/87 09/15/87 0.018+/-0.002 871837 09/15/87 871885 09/22/87 0.022+/-0.003 09/22/87 09/28/87 0.037+/-0.004 871982 09/28/87 872030 10/05/87 0.025+/-0.003 10/05/87 10/12/87 0.028+/-0.003 872092 10/12/87 872196 10/19/87 0.037+/-0.003 10/19/87 10/26/87 0.030+/-0.003 872228 10/26/87 872259 11/02/87 0.027+/-0.003 11/02/87 11/09/87 0.031+/-0.003 872318 11/09/87 872391 11/16/87 0.020+/-0.003 11/16/87 11/23/87 0.022+/-0.003 872428 11/23/87 11/30/87 0.011+/-0.002 872478 11/30/87 872547 12/07/87 0.041+/-0.003 12/07/87 12/14/87 0.025+/-0.003 872601 12/14/87 872642 12/21/87 0. 019 +/-0. 003 12/21/87 12/29/47 0.012+/-0.002 W390370SA
- TABLE B-2 (continued)
AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES CROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES SAMPLE LOCATION: APE-30 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pC1/ CUBIC METER LAB NO. COLLECTION PERIOD CR035 BETA 870025 12/29/86 01/05/87 0.035+/-0.003 870087 01/05/87 01/12/87 0.035+/-0.003 870148 01/12/87 01/19/87 0.022+/-0.003 870177 01/19/87 01/26/87 0.024+/-0.003 070226 01/26/87 02/02/87 0.020+/-0.003 870267 02/02/87 02/09/87 0.015+/-0.003 870311 02/09/87 02/16/87 0.018+/-0.003 g 870369 02/16/87 02/23/87 0.016+/-0.003 870415 02/23/87 03/02/87 0.021+/-0.003 870452 03/02/87 03/09/87 0.025+/-0.003 870524 03/09/87 03/16/87 0.028+/-0.003 870547 03/16/87 03/23/87 0.022+/-0.003 870595 03/23/87 03/30/87 0.018+/-0.003 870644 03/30/87 04/06/87 0.019+/-0.003 870712 04/06/87 34/13/37 0.024+/-0.003 870745 04/13/87 04/20/87 0.019+/-0.002 870791 04/20/87 04/27/87 0.020+/-0.002 870845 04/27/87 05/04/87 0.029+/-0.003 870898 05/04/87 05/11/87 0.018+/-0.002 870958 05/11/87 05/18/87 0.013+/-0.002 871004 05/18/87 05/26/87 0.013+/-0.002 871027 05/26/87 06/01/87 0.016+/-0.003 871114 06/01/87 06/08/87 0.012+/-0.002 871163 06/08/87 06/15/87 0.013+/-0.002 871218 06/15/87 06/22/87 0.007+/-0.002 871268 06/22/87 06/29/87 0.013+/-0.002 W390370SA
TABLE B-2 (continued)
AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHAPCOAL CARTRIDGES CROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES SAMLE LOCATION: APE-30 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR PARTICULATES UNITS: pC1/ CUBIC METER LAB NO. COLLECTION PERIOD GROSS sETA 06/29/s7 07/06/87 0.007+/-0.002 s713 7/06/s7 07/13/s7 0.00s+/-0.002 871442 / 07/20/s7 0. h /-0.002 871479 07/20/s7 07/27/s7 0.0174/-0.002 87152 7/27/s7 08/03/s7 0.025+/-0.003 371378 Os/03/37 08/10/87 0.017+/-0.002 s71613 Os/10/s7 Os/17/s7 0.023+/-0.003 s71657 OW/M Os/24/s7 0 N /-0. E
~
871705 os/24/s7 Os/31/s7 0.019+/-0.002
'717'0 Os/31/87 0,/Os/s7 0.025+/-0.002 717 3 09/08/87 09/15/87 0.01s+/-0.002 871s40 9/15/s7 09/22/37 0.027+/-0.001 871888 09/22/s7 09/2s/s7 0.036+/-0.004 09/2s/s7 10/05/s7 0.022+/-0.003 g.12 3 1 / 5/s7 10/12/s7 0.029+/-0.003 872095 10/12/87 10/19/37 0.035+/-0.003 872199 10/19/37 10/26/87 0.030+/-0.003 8 2231 10/26/87 11/02/g7 0.027+/-0.003 g.7 11/02/s7 11/09/s7 0 030+/-0.003 s72321 11/09/s7 11/16/s7 0.021+/-0.003 872394 11/16/87 11/23/s7 0.023+/-0.003 872431 11/23/87 11/30/s7 0.011+/-0.002 82 11/30/87 12/07/37 0.034+/-0.003 g.7 1 /07/87 12/14/g7 0.027+/-0.003 s72604 12/14/S7 12/21/g7 0.014+/-0.002 s72645 12/21/s7 12/2s/s7 0.010+/-0.002 W390370SA
TABLE B-2 (continued)
AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES l CROSS BETA AND 10 DINE-131 ANALYSES L
SAMPLE LOCATION: APC-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE La*IT3: pdi/ CUBIC METER IAB NO. COLLECTION PERIOD I-131 870024 i 870086 12/29/86 01/05/87 < 0.008 870147 01/05/87 01/12/87 < 0.007 01/12/87 01/19/87 < 0.011 01/19/87 01/26/87 SAMPLER MAIEUNCTION 870225
- 870266 01/27/87 02/02/87 * < 0.008 870310 02/02/87 02/09/87 < 0.008 u, 870367 02/09/87 02/16/87 < 0.011 w 02/16/87 02/23/87 < 0.005 i
870414 870451 02/23/87 03/02/87 < 0.012 870523 03/02/87 03/09/87 < 0.006 4
870546 03/09/87 03/16/87 < 0.007 870594 03/16/87 03/23/87 < 0.011 03/23/87 03/30/87 < 0.007 870643 870711 03/30/87 04/06/87 < 0.008 870744 04/06/87 04/13/87 < o.009 l 870790 04/13/87 04/20/87 < 0.009 04/20/87 04/27/87 < o.007 870844 870897 04/27/87 05/04/87 < 0.006 870957 05/04/87 05/11/87 < 0.007 871003 05/11/87 05/18/87 < 0.007
- 05/18/87 05/26/87 < 0.009 871026 871113 05/26/87 06/01/87 < 0.009 06/01/8'i
! 871162 06/08/87 < 0.006 871217 06/08/87 06/15/87 < 0.006
- 871267 06/15/87 06/22/87 < 0.011 l
06/22/87 06/29/87 < 0.008 W390370SA
- Sampler Halfunction
TABLE B-2 (continued)
AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES GROSS BETA AND 10 DINE-131 ANALYSES SAMPLE LOCATION: APC-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pC1/ CUBIC METER LAB NO. COLLECTION PERIOD I-13I 871309 06/29/87 07/06/87 371362 871441 07/06/37 07/13/87 ) .*0 07/13/37 07/20/87 < 0.008 871478 < 0.006 07/20/87 07/27/87 871524 07/27/87 08/03/87 871577 871617 03/03/37 03/10/37 )*$
< 0 008 m 871656 03/10/37 03/17/37
- 08/17/87 08/24/87 < 0 009 871704 < 0*007 08/24/87 08/31/87 871729 871792 08/31/37 09/08/87 < 0.005 871839 09/08/87 09/15/87 < 0.010 09/15/87 09/22/37 < 0.005 871887 < 0.007 09/22/87 09/28/87 871984 < 0.006 872032 09/28/87 10/05/87 872094 10/05/87 10/12/87 < 0.008 872198 10/12/87 10/19/57 < 0.009 10/19/87 10/26/s7 < 0.008 872230 < 0.006 872261 10/26/87 11/02/87 872320 11/02/87 11/09/87 < 0.007 872393 11/09/87 11/16/87 < 0.009 872430 11/16/87 11/23/87 < 0.007 11/23/87 11/30/87 < 0.007 872480 < 0.0C7 872549 11/30/87 12/07/87 12/07/87 12/14/87 < 0.010 872603 < 0.005 872644 12/14/87 12/21/87 W390370SA
TABLE O-2 (continued)
AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES CROSS BETA AND 10 DINE-131 ANALYSES SAMPLE LOCATION: APG-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pC1/ CUBIC METER Im No. COLLECTION PERIOD I-131 <
870021 12/29/86 870083 01/05/87 < 0.008 870144 01/05/87 01/12/87 < 0.007 870174 01/12/87 01/19/87 < 0.011 01/19/87 01/26/87 < 0.007 870222 01/26/87 870263 02/02/87 < 0.008 870307 02/02/87 02/09/87 < 0.008 870364 02/09/87 02/16/87 < 0.011 02/16/87 02/23/87 < 0.005 870411 02/23/87 870448 03/02/87 < 0.012 870520 03/02/87 03/09/87 < 0.006 870543 03/09/87 03/16/87 < 0.007 870591 03/16/87 03/23/87 < 0.011 03/24/87 03/30/87 < 0.007 870640 03/30/87 870708 04/06/87 < 0.008 870741 04/06/87 04/13/87 < 0.009 870787 04/13/87 04/20/87 < 0.009 04/20/87 04/27/87 < 0.007 l
870842 04/27/87 870894 05/04/87 < 0.006 870954 05/04/87 05/11/87 < 0.007 871000 05/11/87 05/18/87 < 0.007 05/18/87 05/26/87 < 0.009 871023 05/26/87 871110 06/01/87 < 0.009 871159 06/01/87 06/08/87 < 0.006 871214 06/08/87 06/15/87 < 0.006 871264 06/15/d7 06/22/87 < 0.011 06/22/87 06/29/87 < 0.008 W390370SA
TABLE B-2 (continued)
AIR PARTICUIATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES GROSS BETA AND 10 DINE-131 ANALYSES SAMPLE LOCATION: APG-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pCi/ CUBIC METER IAB NO. COLLECTION FERIOD I-131 871306 06/29/87 07/06/87 871359 07/06/87 07/13/87 < 0.005 871438 07/13/87 07/20/87 < 0.011 871475 07/20/87 07/27/87 0
( 06 871521 07/27/87 08/03/87 871574 08/03/87 08/10/87 < 0.007 871614 08/10/87 < 0.005 871653 08/17/87 < 0.008 08/17/87 08/24/87 g 871701 08/24/87 0 08/31/87 0 871726 08/31/87 09/08/87 371789 09/08/87 09/15/87 < 0.005 871836 09/15/87 09/22/87 < 0.010 871884 09/22/87 09/28/87 0 0.00 871981 09/28/87 10/05/87 872029 10/05/87 10/12/87 < 0.006 872091 10/12/87 < 0.008 872195 10/19/87 10/19/87 10/26/87 872227 10/26/87 872258 11/02/87 < 0.006 11/02/87 11/09/87 872317 11/09/87 < 0.007 872390 11/16/87 11/16/87 11/23/87 < 0.009 872427 11/23/87 11/30/87 )00 007 872477 11/30/87 872546 12/07/87 12/07/87 12/14/87 < 0.007 872600 12/14/87 < 0.010 872641 12/21/87 12/21/87 12/29/87 0 0
W390370SA
TABLE D-2 (continued)
AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDCES CROSS BETA AND 10 DINE-I31 ANALYSES SAMPLE LOCATION: APP-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pC1/ CUBIC METER LAB NO.
COLLECTION PERIOD 870023 1 131 870085 12/29/86 01/05/87 i
870146 01/05/87 01/12/87 < 0.008 870176 01/12/87 01/19/87 < 0.007 01/19/87 01/26/87 < 0.011
- < 0.007 870224 01/26/87 870265 02/02/87 870309 02/02/87 02/09/87 < 0.008 870366 02/09/87 02/16/87 < 0.008 3 02/16/87 02/23/87 < 0.011
< 0.005 870413 02/23/87 l
870450 03/02/87 870522 03/02/87 03/09/87 < 0.012 l
870545 03/09/87 03/16/87 < 0.006 i
870593 03/16/87 03/23/87 < 0.007 03/23/87 03/30/87 < 0.011
< 0.007 870642 03/30/87 870710 04/06/87 D4/06/87 < 0.008 I
870743 04/13/87 870789 04/13/87 34/20/87 < 0.009 04/20/87 C4/27/87 < 0.009
< 0.007 04/27/87 870896 05/05/87 870956 05/04/87 05/11/87 871002 05/11/87 CS/18/87 < 0.007 05/18/87 05/26/87 < 0.007
< 0.009 871025 05/26/87 871112 06/01/87 871161 06/01/87 06/08/87 < 0.009 871216 06/08/87 06/15/87 < 0.006 j 871266 06/15/87 06/22/87 < 0.006 06/22/87 06/29/87 < 0,011
< 0.008 W390370SA i
TABLE D-2 (continued) t.IR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES CROSS BETA AND 10 DINE-131 At:ALYSES SAMPLE LOCATION: APP-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pCi/ CUBIC METER W NO. COLLECTION FERIOD I-I3I 871308 06/29/87 07/06/87 < 0.005 871361 07/06/87 07/13/87 < 0.011 871440 07/13/87 07/20/87 < 0.008 871477 07/20/87 07/27/87 < 0.006 871523 07/27/87 08/03/87 < 0.007 871576 08/03/87 08/10/87 < 0.005 871616 08/10/87 08/17/87 < 0.008 g 871655 08/17/87 08/24/87 < 0.009 08/24/87 08/31/87 < 0.007 871728 08/31/87 09/08/87 < 0.005 871791 09/08/87 09/15/87 < 0.010 871838 09/15/87 09/22/87 < 0.005 871886 09/22/87 09/28/87 < 0.007 871983 09/28/87 10/05/87 < 0.006 872031 10/05/87 10/12/87 < 0.008 872093 10/12/87 10/19/87 < 0.009 872197 10/19/87 10/26/87 < 0.008 872229 10/26/87 11/02/87 < 0.006 872260 11/02/87 11/09/87 < 0.007 872319 11/09/87 11/16/87 < 0.009 872392 11/16/87 11/23/87 < 0.007 872429 11/23/87 11/30/87 < 0.007 872479 11/30/87 12/07/87 < 0.007 872548 12/07/87 12/14/87 < 0.010 872602 12/14/87 12/21/87 < 0.005 872643 12/21/87 12/29/87 < 0.005 W390370SA
~_. _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ . _ _ _ _ .
TABLE B-2 (continued)
AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES GROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES SAMPLE LOCATION: APQ-1 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pCi/ CUBIC METER LAB NO. COLLECTION PERIOD I-131 870022 12/29/86 01/05/87 < 0.008 870084 01/05/87 01/12/87 < 0.007 870145 01/12/87 01/19/87 < 0.011 870175 01/19/87 01/26/87 < o,co7 870223 01/26/87 02/02/87 < 0.008 870264 02/02/87 02/09/87 < 0.003 870308 02/09/87 02/16/87 < 0.011 g 870365 02/16/87 02/23/87 < 0.005 870412 02/23/87 03/02/87 < 0.012 870449 03/02/87 03/09/87 < 0.006 870521 03/09/87 03/16/87 < 0.007 870544 D3/16/87 03/23/87 < 0.011 870592 03/23/87 03/30/87 < o,007 870641 03/30/87 04/06/87 < 0.008 870709 04/06/87 04/13/87 < o,009 870742 04/13/87 04/20/87 < o,009 870788 04/20/87 04/27/87 < 0.007 870843 04/27/87 05/04/87 < 0.006 870895 05/04/87 05/11/87 < o,co7 870955 05/11/87 05/18/87 < 0.007 871001 05/18/87 05/26/87 < o,009 871024 05/26/87 06/01/87 < o,009 871111 06/01/87 06/08/87 < 0.G06 871160 06/08/87 06/15/87 < 0.006 871215 06/15/87 06/22/87 < 0.011 871265 06/22/87 06/29/87 < 0.008 W390370SA s
TABLE s-2 (continued)
AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES CROSS BETA AIS 10aINE-131 ANALYSES SAMPLE IACATION: APQ-I SAfrLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pC1/CUsIC IECTER LAB No. COLLECTION PERIOD I-131 s71307 06/29/s7 07/06/s7 < 0.005 371360 07/06/87 07/13/37 < o.011 371439 07/13/s7 07/20/37 < o.00s s71476 07/20/s7 o'/27/s7 < o.006 s71522 07/27/87 08/03/37 < 0.007 s71575 Os/o3/s7 03/10/87 < o.005 s71615 08/lo/s7 os/17/s7 < 0.oos ,
j 871654 Os/17/s7 Os/24/s7 < 0.009 s717o2 Os/24/s7 os/31/s7 < o.007 s71727 Os/31/s7 os/os/s7 < o.005 s71790 09/Os/s7 09/15/s7 < 0.010 s71s37 09/15/s7 09/22/s7 < o.005 s71sss os/22/s7 09/2s/s7 < o.007 a719s2 09/2s/s7 to/os/s7 < 0.006 s72030 10/os/s7 10/12/s7 < o.cos-a72o92 10/12/s7 10/19/s7 < o.009 s72196 lo/19/s7 10/26/s7 < o.cos a7222s 10/26/s7 11/02/s7 < 0.006 s72259 11/02/s7 11/os/s7 < 0.007 s7231s 11/os/s7 11/16/s7 < 0.009 372391 11/16/87 11/23/37 < 0.007 s7242s 11/23/s7 11/30/s7 < 0.007 s7247s 11/30/87 12/07/s7 < o.007 s72547 12/07/M7 12/14/87 < 0.o10 s72601 12/14/37 12/21/87 < 0.005 372542 12/21/s7 12/29/s7 < o.005 W390370SA
-- . - _ . . ~. . _ _ . _ - _ . . . .
TABLE B-2 (continued)
AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARCOAL CARTRIDGES CROSS BETA AND 10 DINE-131 ANALYSES SAMPLE LOCATION: APE-30 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS- pCi/ CUBIC METER LAB NO. COLLECTION PERIOD I-131 870025 12/29/86 01/05/87 < 0.008 870087 01/05/87 01/12/87 < 0.007 870148 01/12/87 01/19/87 < 0.011 870177 01/19/87 01/26/87 < 0.007 810226 01/26/87 02/02/87 < o 003 870267 02/02/87 02/09/87 < o 003 87031; 02/09/87 02/16/87 < 0.011 g O'iO 3 68 02/16/87 02/23/87 < 0.005 870415 02/23/87 03/02/87 < 0.012 870452 03/02/87 03/09/87 < 0.006 870524 03/09/87 03/16/87 < 0.007 870547 03/16/87 03/23/87 < 0.011 870595 03/23/87 03/30/87 < 0.007 870644 03/30/87 04/06/87 < 0.005 870712 04/06/87 04/13/87 < o.009 870745 04/13/87 04/20/87 < 0.009 870791 04/20/87 04/27/87 < 0.007 870845 04/27/87 05/04/87 < 0.006 870898 05/04/87 05/11/87 < 0.007 870958 05/11/87 05/18/87 < o 007 871004 05/18/87 05/26/87 < o,009 871027 05/26/87 06/03/87 < o,009 871114 06/01/87 06/08/87 < 0.006 871163 06/08/87 06/15/87 < 0.006 871213 06/15/87 06/22/87 < 0.011 871268 06/22/87 06/29/87 < 0.008 W390370SA
TABLE B-2 (continued)
AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS AND CHARC0AL CARTRIDGES CROSS BETA AND IODINE-131 ANALYSES SAMPLE LOCATION: APE-30 SAMPLE TYPE: AIR IODINE UNITS: pC1/ CUBIC METER IAB NO. COLLECTION PERIOD I-131 871310 06/29/87 07/06/87 < 0.005 871363 07/06/87 07/13/87 < 0.011 871442 07/13/87 07/20/87 < 0.008 871479 07/20/87 07/27/87 < 0.006 871525 07/27/87 08/03/87 < 0.007 871578 08/03/87 08/10/87 < 0.005 871618 08/10/87 08/17/87 < 0.008 e
871657 08/17/87 08/24/87 < 0.009 871705 08/24/87 08/31/87 < 0.007 871730 08/31/87 09/08/87 < 0.005 871793 09/08/87 09/15/87 < 0.010 871840 09/15/87 09/22/87 < 0.005 871888 09/22/87 09/28/87 < 0.007 871985 09/28/87 10/05/87 < 0.006 872033 10/05/87 10/12/87 < 0.008 872095 10/12/87 10/19/87 < 0.009 872199 10/19/87 10/26/87 < 0.008 872231 10/26/87 11/02/87 < 0.006 872262 11/02/87 11/09/87 < 0.007 872321 11/09/87 11/16/87 < 0.009 872394 11/16/87 11/23/87 < 0.007 872431 11/23/87 11/30/87 < 0.007 872481 11/30/87 12/07/87 < 0.007 872550 12/07/87 12/14/87 < 0.010 872604 12/14/87 12/21/87 < 0.005 872645 12/21/87 12/28/87 < 0.005 W390370SA f
TABLE B-3 AIR ? ARTICULATE FILTERS CAPMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES SAMPLE IACATION: ALL AIR SAMPLE SITES UNITS: pC1/ CUBIC METER LAB NO. IDCATION COLLECTION PERIOD Cs-134 Cs-137 870607 APG-1 01/05/87 03/30/87 < 0.0010 < 0.0009 870608 APQ-1 01/05/87 03/30/87 < 0.0008 < 0.0008 870609 APP-1 01/05/87 03/30/87 < 0.0009 < 0.0007 870610 APC-1 01/05/87 03/30/87 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 870611 APE-30 01/05/87 03/30/87 < 0.0010 < 0.0008 871423 APG-1 03/30/87 06/29/87 < 0.0009 < 0.0008 871424 APQ-1 03/30/87 06/29/87 < 0.0009 < 0.0009 871425 APP-1 03/30/87 06/29/87 < 0.0007 < 0.0006 871426 APC-1 03/30/87 06/29/87 < 0.0010 < 0.0009 871427 APE-30 03/30/87 06/29/87 < 0.0005 < 0.0004 872109 APG-1 06/29/87 09/28/87 < 0.0010 < 0.0009 872110 APQ-1 06/29/87 09/28/87 < 0.0005 < 0.0005 872111 APP-1 06/29/87 09/28/87 < 0.0008 < 0.0007 872112 APC-1 06/29/87 09/28/87 < 0.0010 < 0.0010 872113 APE-30 06/29/87 09/28/87 < 0.0018 < 0.0016 872685 APG-1 09/28/87 12/29/87 < 0.0006 < 0.0005 872686 APQ-1 09/28/87 12/29/87 < 0.0009 < 0.0007 872687 APP-1 09/28/87 12/29/87 < 0.0006 < 0.0005 872688 APC-1 09/28/87 12/29/87 < 0.0004 < 0.0003 872689 APE-30 09/28/87 12/28/87 < 0.0006 < 0.0005 W390370SA
I TABLE B-4 DRINKING WATER '
10 DINE-131 ANALYSIS SAMPLE LOCATION: DWG-2 UNITS: pCi/L LA8 No. COLLECTION PERIOD I-131 870026 12/22/86 01/05/87 < 0.3 870149 01/05/87 01/19/87 < 0.4 870228 01/19/87 02/02/47 < 0.4 870312 02/02/87 02/16/87 < 0.3 870416 02/16/87 02/23/87 *
< o,9 870525 03/02/87 03/16/87 < 0.4 870598 03/16/87 03/30/87 < 0.2 870713 03'30/87
/ 04/13/87 < o,3 870796 04/13/87 04/27/87 < 0.2 ,
870891 04/27/87 05/11/87 < o,3 871005 05/11/87 05/26/87 < o,3 871115 05/26/87 06/08/87 < o,3 871219 06/08/87 06/22/47 < o,3 871311 06/22/87 07/06/87 < o,4 871443 07/06/87 07/20/47 < 0.2 871526 07/20/87 08/03/87 < o,4 871619 08/03/87 08/17/87 < 0.2 871706 08/17/87 08/31/87 < 0.2 871794 08/31/87 09/15/87 < 0,4 871889 09/15/87 09/28/87 < 0,3 872034 09/28/87 10/12/87 < 0.2 872200 10/12/87 10/26/87 < o,3 872263 10/26/87 11/09/87 <o2 L 872395 11/09/87 11/23/87 < o,4 872482 11/23/87 12/07/87 < 0,3 872605 12/07/47 12/21/87 < 0,3 880009 12/21/87 01/04/88 < 0.2
- Sampler Ma.lfunction 64 V390370SA
TABLE B-4 (continued)
DRIlGtING WATER 10 DINE-131 ANALYSIS t SAMPLE LOCATION: DWE-3 UNITS: pCi/L LA8 NO. COLLECTION PERIOD I-131 870027 12/22/86 01/05/87 < 0.3 870150 01/05/87 01/19/87 < 0.3 870229 01/19/87 02/02/87 870313 < 0.4 02/02/87 02/16/87 < 0.4 870417 02/16/87 03/02/87 < 0.6 870526 03/02/87 03/16/87 < 0.3 870599 03/16/87 03/30/47 < 0.2 870714 03/30/87 04/13/47 < 0.4 870797 04/13/87 04/27/47 < 0.2 l l
870892 04/27/87 05/11/87 < 0.2 871006 05/11/87 05/26/87 < 0.3 I
871116 05/26/87 06/08/87 < 0.2 871220 06/08/87 06/22/87 < 0.3 871312 06/22/87 07/06/87 < 0.3 871444 07/06/87 07/20/87 < 0.2 871527 07/20/87 08/03/87 < 0.2
- 871620 08/03/87 08/17/87 < 0.2 871707 08/17/87 08/31/87 < 0.2 871795 08/31/87 09/15/87 < 0.4 871890 09/15/87 09/28/87 < 0.2 872035 09/28/87 10/12/87 <01 872201 10/12/87 10/26/87 < 0.3 872264 10/26/87 11/09/87 < 0.2 872396 11/09/87 11/23/87 < 0.5 872483 11/23/87 12/07/87 < 0.4 872606 12/07/87 12/21/87 < 0.3 880010 12/21/87 01/04/88 < 0.2 es I
W390370SA f
TASLE 8-4 (continued)
DRINKING WATER 10 DINE-131 ANALYSIS SAMPLE LOCATION: DWP-7 UNITS pCi/L LAS NO. COLLICTION PERIOD I-131 870028 870151 12/22/86 01/05/87 < 0.3 ,
01/05/87 01/19/87 ,
870230 870314 01/19/87 02/02/47 0.5+ 0.2 02/02/87 02/16 /87 870418 870527 02/16/87 03/02/87 0.7+/-0.4 870600 03/02/87 03/16/87 < 0.2 03/16/87 03/30/87 < ,
870715 870798 03/30/87 04/13/87 < 0.2 04/13/87 04/27/87 4 ,2 870893 871007 04/27/87 05/04/87 . < 0.4 05/11/87 05/26/87 ,
871117 < 0.3 871221 05/26/87 06/08/87 06/08/87 06/22/87 < 0.2 871313 871445 06/22/87 07/05/87 < 0.3
,3 07/06/87 07/20/87 471528 <0 871621 07/20 /87 08/03/87 g
, 871708 08/03/47 08/17/87 08/17/87 08/31/87 < 0.2 871796
- 871891 08/31/87 09/15/87 < 0.4 g
09/15/87 09/28/87 ,2 872036 < 0.2 872202 09/28/87 10/12/87 10/12/87 10/26/87 ,
- 872265 < 0.2 872397 10/26/87 11/09/87 11/09/87 11/23/87 < 0.5
! 872484 11/23/87 12/07/87 872607 12/07/47 12/21/87 )0.3 ,2 880011 < 0.2 12/21/87 01/04/88 i
' Sampler Malfunction 66 W390370SA
TAPIE B-$
DRIMING WATER CROSS BETA AND CAfgu ISOTOPIC ANALYSES ON N00mfLY C0ptOSITES SAMPLE 1A) CATION: DWG-2 UNITS: pC1/L seoss Lee up. rrm astiles Males SE14 fee-54 Ce-SS fe-59 Co-ee Za-65 ser-95 Zr-95 I-131 Cs-134 Co-13T es-14e Le-148 878031 12/88/06 01/M/ST 44.k/-4.1 < 5 = 5
- 9
- 5 4 1e < 5 4 ?1 < T < 5 < 5 < 21 < 5 870232 01/95/87 82/92/SF < 4 < 3 < 4
- T <3 < S
- 4
- 8 < 5
- 4 < 3 < 14 4 4
- S79622 02/02/87 82/23/S7 4.4*/-2.8 < 2 < 3 < 6 < 2 < 5 < 3 = 6
- le < 3 4 3
- 2
- 5 57e601 03/82/87 83/30/ST < 4 4 4
- 4
- 8
- 4 < S < 4 4 9
- 4 < 5 < 4 < 18 = 4 a.
4 STSF99 95/3S/8T M/27/ST < 3 4 2 < 2 < 4 = 2 = 4 4 2 < 5 < 3 4 3 < 2 < S < 4 871811 e6/27/ST 85/26/87 3.3+/-2.0 < 3 < 3 e 5
- 3 4 5 < 3 < 6
- 4 < 3 < 3 < 12 < 3 871245 95/26/8T 96/22/S7 2.6+/-2.2 < 2
- 2 < 4 = 2 < 4 < 2 < 6 < 4
- 3 < 3 < 18 < 3 ST1446 e6/22/ST 8F/28/87 < 3.0
- 3
- 3 < T < 4 < T e 3
- 8
- 5
- 4 < 4 < 14 < 4 871624 ST/29/ST te/1T/ST 5.k/-2.3 4 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 = 4 = 2 < 4 = 3 < 2 < 2 <9 < 2 ST179T SS/1T/ST 89/15/ST 3.5+/-2.2 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 2 < 5 4 2 = 5 < 4
- 3 < 3
- te < 3 872064 Wp/15/ST 18/12/87 4.4+/-2.4
- 2 < 2 < 4 e 2 < 4 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 2 < 2
- 8 < 2 ST226618/12/S7 11/89/87 4.1+/-2.6
- 2 < 2 = 3
- 2 4 3 4 2 < 4 < 2 < 2
- 2 < T < 2 ST2485 11/89/87 12/97/87 4.3+/-2.6 < 2 < 2 <4 4 2 < 5 e 2 < 5 < 4
- 3
- 3 < 9 < 2 .
800012 12/07/ST S1/06/08 4.6+/-2.5
- 2 *2 < 3 *2
- 3
- 2 < 4 4 2 < 2 < 2 <6 < 2
- Sampler Malfunction W3903705A
e g . . . . . . . . . - ~ . . ~
q 3 . .. . . . . . . . . . . . .
2 : :: e * * = c = e = z : :
E 3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
M
= ~
m m m . N . . . N . m N . . N 3 . . . . . .
f m n . ~ . . . ~ . m e . . e 3 . .
5 . . . . . . . . . . . . . -
4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
s . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
m 4 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
9 E l s h
~
e
~
~
~
~
m
. ~
5 !:! E e . . . . . ~ ~ ~ . . . . ~ ~ .
. E A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . !
A 3-(g!
w
- b A
~
~
e gg g..~..~~.~
5
. ., . ~ . . . ~ . ~ ~ . . ~
3 . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
8 O
$ m M . N M M M N M N N . . N i . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
~ n - s ~ ~
. ~ ~ ~ ~ ~ ~
~
n
~
s
~
e
~
s
~
" ( . (
4
. . (
4
( ( ( ( ( ( ( (
4 .
~
4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 <
g a g a a a a a a
? g:
- I g
(& a 5 4 B B ( E&2
[ f s
s i s2 E f f
~
9 :
~
e a e g g g ~, e 5 -
g , e e a i
i: a G B a s2~ E 5 E *
- 9
. - ~
n 3 s
g EE a a 5 I 5.
e.
68 l
TABLE B-5 (continued)
DRINKING WATER GROSS BETA AND CAP 9tA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES ON MONTHLY COMPOSITES SAMPLE LOCATION: DWP-7 UNITS: pCi/L GROSS LAS NO. COLLECTION PERIOD 8 ETA sen-54 Co-58 re-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ub-95 Zr-95 1-13t Cs-134 Cs-137 8a-140 La-140 870033 12/08/86 01/05/87 3.S+/-2.5 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 6 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 14 < 3 870234 01/19/87 02/02/87 < 4 < 5 '
< 5 < 10 < 5 < 11 < 5 < 12 < 8 < 6 < 5 < 24 6 i
870424 02/02/87 03/02/87 < 4 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3 370603 03/02/87 03/30/87 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 5 < 3 - 2 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 l
< 12 < 3 870801 03/30/87 04/27/87 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 6 < 3 < 8 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 13 a
< 3 1
<n 871013 04 4 7/87 05/26/87 2.0+/-1.9 < 3
- < 3 < 5 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 6 < 5 < 3 < 3 l < 12 < 3 l 471247 05/26/87 06/22/87 5.6+/-2.3 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 2 < 5 < 2 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 10 < 3 l
i
] 871448 06/22/87 07/20/87 0.8+/-2.5 < 2 < 2 < 5
- 3 < 5 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 10
< 3 471626 07/20/87 08/17/87 5.7+/-2.3 < 4 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 9 < 7 < 4 < 4 < 18 < 5 I.
j 871799 08/17/87 09/15/87 5.5+/-2.3 < 3 < 3 < 7 < 4 < 7 < 3 < 8 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 15 < 4 i
j 872046 09/15/87 10/12/87 5.8+/-2.5 < 4 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 8 < 5 < 4 < 4 i < 15 < 3 472268 10/12/c7 11/09/87 2.6+/-2.5 < 4 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 6 < 3 < 7 < 6 < 4 < 4 < 15 <4 I
472487 11/09/87 12/07/87 5.0+/-2.6 < 3 < 4 <8 <4 < 7 < 3 < 8 < 6 5 4 < 4 < 16 < 4 i 880014 12/07/87 01/04/88 5.8+/-2.6 < 4 < 4 < 6 < 4 < 8 < 3 < 8 < 5 < 4 < 4 i
< 15 < 3 W390370SA
TABLE B-6 DRINKING WATER TRITIUM ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES j SAMPLE LOCATION: ALL SAhPLE SITES UNITS: pCi/L
{ LAB NO. LOCATION COILECTION PERIOD H-3 8
- i 4
870604 j 870605 DWE-5 01/05/87 03/30/87 < 350 870606 DWG-2 01/05/87 03/30/87 < 350 gwp_7 01/05/87 03/30/87 < 350 871269 871270 DWG-2 03/30/87 06/22/87 < 355 871271 DWE-5 03/30/87 06/22/87 < 355 gwp_7 03/30/87 06/22/87 < 355 I
871829
- 871830 DWG-2 06/22/87 09/15/87 < 354 i DWE-5 06/22/87 09/15/87 871831 < 354 i DWP-7 06/22/87 09/15/87 < 354 880015
, 880016 DWG-2 09/15/87 01/04/88 < 374 880017 DWE-5 09/15/87 01/04/88 DWP-7 09/15/87 < 374
, 01/04/88 < 374 l
W390370SA
TABLE B-7 SURFACE WATER 10 DINE-131 MMLYSIS SAMPLE LOCATION: SWG-2 UNITS: pCi/L LAB NO. COLLECTION PERIOD I-131 870026 12/22/86 01/05/87 0l 870149 01/05/87 01/19/87 870228 01/19/87 02/02/87 o' 870312 02/02/87 02/16/87 < 0.9 870416 02/16/87 02/23/87
- 870525 870598 03/02/87 03/16/87 03/16/87 03/30/87
)h*
870713 03/30/87 04/13'87 / < 0.3 870796 04/13/87 04/27/87 < 0.2 870891 04/27/87 05/11/87 < 0.3 871005 05/11/87 05/26/87 < 0.3 871115 05/26/87 06/08/87 < 0.3 871219 06/08/87 06/22/87 < 0.3 871311 06/22/87 07/06/87 < 0.4 871443 07/06/87 07/20/87 < 0.4 871526 07/20/87 08/03/87 < 0.4 871619 08/03/87 08/17/87 < 0.2 871706 08/17/87 08/31/87 < 0.2 871794 08/31/87 09/15/87 < 0.4 871889 09/15/87 09/28/87 < 0.3 872034 09/28/87 10/12;'87 < 0.2 872200 10/12/87 10/26/87 < 0.3 872263 10/26/87 11/09/87 < 0.2 l
872395 11/09/87 11/23/87 < 0.4 872482 11/23/87 12/07/87 < 0.3 872605 12/07/87 12/21/87 < 0.3 880009 12/21/87 01/04/88 < 0.2
- Sampler Malfunction 71 W390370SA
TMlLE B-7 (continued)
SURFACE WATER IODINE-131 MiALYSIS SAMPLE LOCATION: SWE-5 UNITS: pCi/L LAB NO. COLLECTION PERIOD I-131 870027 12/22/86 01/05/87 < 0.3 870150 01/05/87 01/19/87 < 0.3 870229 01/19/87 02/02/87 < 0.4 870313 02/02/87 02/16/87 < 0.4 870417 02/16/87 03/02/87 < 0.6 870526 03/02/87 03/16/87 < 0.3 870599 03/16/87 03/30/87 < 0.2 870714 03/30/87 04/13/87 < 0.4 870797 04/13/87 04/27/87 < 0.2 870892 04/27/87 05/11/87 < 0.2 871006 05/11/87 05/26/87 < 0.3 871116 05/26/8" 06/08/87 < 0.2 871220 06/08/87 06/22/87 < 0.3 871312 06/22/87 07/06/87 < 0.3 871444 07/06/87 07/20/87 < 0.2 871527 07/20/87 08/03/87 < 0.2 871620 08/03/87 08/17/87 < 0.2 871707 08/17/87 08/31/87 < 0.2 871795 08/31/87 09/15/87 < 0.4 871890 09/15/87 09/28/87 < 0.2 872035 09/28/87 10/12/87 < 0.2 872201 10/12/87 10/26/87 < 0.3 872264 10/26/87 11/09/87 < 0.2 872396 11/09/87 11/23/87 < 0.5 l 872483 11/23/87 12/07/87 < 0.4 872606 12/07/87 12/21/87 < 0.3 880010 12/21/87 01/04/88 < 0.2 72 0390370SA
TABLE B-7 (continued)
SWTACE WATER IODINE-131 MIALYSIS SAMPLE LOCATION: SWP-7 UNITS: pCi/L LAB NO. COLLECTION PERIOD I-131 870028 12/22/86 01/05/87 < 0.3 870151 01/05/87 01/19/87 < o,4 870230 01/19/87 02/02/87 0.5+/-0.2 870314 02/02/87 02/16/87 < o,4 870418 02/16/87 03/02/87 0.7+/-0.4 870527 03/02/87 03/16/87 < 0.2 870600 03/16/87 03/30/87 < 0.2 870715 03/30/87 04/13/87 < 0.2 870798 04/13/87 04/27/87 < 0.2 870893 04/27/87 05/04/87 * < o,4 871007 05/11/87 05/26/87 < o,4 871117 05/26/87 06/08/87 < 0.3 871221 06/08/87 06/22/87 < 0.2 871313 06/22/87 07/06/87 < 0.3 871445 07/06/87 07/20/87 < 0.3 871528 07/22/87 08/03/87 < 0.3 871621 08/03/87 08/17/87 < 0.2 871708 08/17/87 08/31/87 < 0.2 871796 08/31/87 09/15/87 < o,4 871891 09/15/87 09/28/87 < o,2 A72036 09/28/87 10/12/87 < 0.2 872202 10/12/87 10/26/87 < o,4 872265 10/26/87 11/09/87 < 0.2 872397 11/09/87 11/23/87 < 0.5 1 872484 11/23/87 12/07/87 < o,3 872607 12/07/87 12/21/87 < 0.2 880011 12/21/87 01/04/88 < 0.2 l
- Sampler Malfunctiert 73 8390370SA i
TABLE B-8 SURFACE WATER j CROSS BETA AND CAMM ISOTOPIC ANALYSES j ON MONTHLY COMPOSITES St.MPLE LOCATION: SWG-2 UNITS: pCi/L Gaoss LAS No. COLLECTION PERIOD nri-54 SETA Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Mb-95 Zr-95 I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Sa-140 La-140 l 870031 12/08/86 01/05/87 44.6+/ 4.1 < 5 < 5 < 9 < 5 < 'O < 5 < 11 < 7 < 5 < 5 < 21
! < 5 870232 01/05/87 02/02/87 < 4 < 3 < 4 < 7 < 3 < 8 < 4 < 8 < 5 < 4 4
< 3 < 16 <'4 1
- 870422 02/02/87 02/23/87 4.4+/-2.8 < 2 < 3 < 6 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 6 < 10 < 3 < 3 < 2 < 5 y
s 870601 03/02/87 03/30/87 < 4 < 4 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 9 < 6 < 5 < 4 < 18 < 4
- 870799 03/30/87 04/27/87 < 3 < 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 3 < 2 < 8 < 4 871011 04/2/ 7 87 05/26/87 3.3+/-2.0 < 3 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 6 < 4 <'3
< 3 < 12 < 3 871245 05/26/87 06/22/87 2.6+/-2.2 < 2 < 2 <4 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 10 < 3 1
) 871446 06/22/87 07/20/87 < 3.0 < 3 < 3 < T < 4 < 7 < 3 < 8 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 14 < 4 871624 07/20/87 08/17/87 5.6+/-2.3 < 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 4 < 3 < 2 < 2 < 9 < 2
} 871797 08/17/87 09/15/87 3.5+/-2.2 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 2 < 5 < 2 < 5 < 4 < 3 I
< 3 < 10 < 3
] 872044 09/15/87 10/12/87 4.4+/-2.4 < 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 8 < 2 I
872266 10/12/87 11/09/87 4.1+/-2.6 < 2 < 2 < 3 < 2 < 3 < 2 < 4. < 2 < 2 < 2 < 7 < 2 4
872485 11/09/87 12/07/87 4.3+/-2.6 < 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 5 < 2 < 5 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 9 < 2 880012 12/07/87 01/04/88 4.6+/-2.5 < 2 <2 < 3 <2 < 3 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 2 < 2 < 6 < 2
- Sampler Malfunction W390370SA
TABLE B-8 (continued)
SURFACE WATER GROSS BETA AND CADMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES ON MONTHLY COMPOSITES SAMPLE LOCATION: SWE-5 UNITS: pCi/L caoss LA8100. COLLECTION PERIOD SE!A m-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 ub-95 Zr-95 l-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 8a-140 La-140 i
870032 12/08/86 01/05/87 8.8+/-2.7 < 3 < 3 < 5 < 4 < 6 < 2 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3 470233 01/05/87 02/02/87 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3 1
870423 02/02/87 03/02/87 3.9+/-2.3 < 4 < 4 <7 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 8 < 6 < 4 < 4 < 17 < 4 i
4 a
un 870602 03/02/87 03/30/87 < 4 < 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 2 < 2 < 9 < 3 l
i 1 870800 03/30/87 04/27/87 < 3 < 3 < 4 < 6 4 4 < 7 < 4 < 8 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 16 < 4 871012 04/2 7/87 05/26/87 2.9+/-2.0 < 3 < 3 < T < 4 < 7 < 3 < 8 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 15 < 4 871246 05/26/87 06/22/87 5.4+/-2.4 < 3 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 8 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 15 < 4 471447 06/22/87 07/20/87 3.1+/-2.2 < 2 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 4 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 2 < 2 < 8 < 3 871625 07/20/87 08/17/87 3.8+/-2.2 < 3 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 8 < 8 < 4 < 4 < 19 < 4 4
i 871798 08/17/87 09/15/87 3.1+/-2.1 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 5 < 2 < 5 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3 872045 09/15/87 10/12/87 3.8+/-2.3 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 5 < 2 < 5 < 4 < 3 < 2 < 10 < 2 1
872267 10/12/87 11/09/87 3.0+/-2.6 < 4 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 7
- 3
- 8 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 14 < 4 i
872486 11/09/87 12/07/87 4.6+/-2.5 < 4 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 8 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 14 < 3 880013 12/07/87 01/04/88 4.1+/-2.4 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 5 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 3 < 2 < 10 < 2 W390370SA
TABLE B-8 (continued)
SURFACE WATER GROSS BETA AND GAMfA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES ON MONTHLY COMPOSITES SAMPLE LOCATION: SWP-7 UNITS: pC1/L i
GROSS LAS NO. COLLECTION PERIOD 8 ETA sen-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 2n-65 ub-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 so-140 La-140 870033 12/08/86 01/05/87 3.8+/-2.5 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 3 < a < 3 < 6 t 6 < 3 < 3 < 14 < 3 870234 01/19/87 02/02/87 < 4 < 5 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 11 < 5 < 12 < 8 < 6 < 5 < 24 < 6 470424 02/02/87 03/02/87 < 4 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3 1
870603 03/02/87 03/30/87 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 12 < 3 1 470801 03/30/87 04/27/87 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 6 < 3 < 8 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 13 < 3 871013 04/2 7 87 05/26/87 2.0+/-1.9 < 3 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 6 < 5 < 3 < 3 < 12 < 3
, 471247 05/26/87 06/22/87 5.6+/-2.3 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 2 < 5 < 2 < 6 < 4 < 3 < 3 < 10 < 3 j 871448 06/22/87 07/20/87 8.8+/-2.5 < 2 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 5 < 2 < 5 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 10 < 3 871626 07/20/87 08/17/87 5.7+/-2.3 < 4 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 9 < 7 < 4 < 4 < 18 < 5
~
871799 08/17/87 09/15/87 5.5+/-2.3 < 3 < 3 < 7 < 4 < 7 < 3 < 8 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 15 < 4 872046 09/15/87 10/12/87 5.8+/-2.5 < 4 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 8 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 15 < 3 472268 10/12/87 11/09/87 2.6+/-2.5 < 4 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 6 < 3 < 7 < 6 < 4 < 4 < 15 < 4 872487 11/09/87 12/07/87 5.0+/-2.6 < 3 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 7 < 3 < 8 < 6 < 4 < 4 < 16 < 4 880014 12/07/87 01/04/88 5.8+/-2.6 < 4 < 4 < 6 < 4 < 8 < 3 < 8 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 15 < 3 i
W390370SA
TABLE B-9 i
SURFACE WATER TRITIUM ANALYSIS ON QUARTERLY COMPOSITES i
SAMPLE LOCATION: ALL SAMPLE SITES UNITS: pCi/L 1
IAB NO. M GTION COILECTION PERIOD H-3 i
i i O 870604 SWE-5 01/05/87 03/30/87 < 350
- 870605 SWG-2 01/05/87 03/30/87 870606 01/05/87 < 350 syp_7 03/30/87 < 350 871269 SWG-2 03/30/87 MW 871270 SWE-5 03/30/87 06/22/87 <m 871271 03/30/87 < 355 i
SWP-7 06/22/87 < 355 871829 SWG-2 06/22/87 09/15/87 i
871830 06/22/87 < 354 871831 SWE-5 09/15/87 < 354 swp_7 06/22/87 09/15/87 < 354 i
' 880015 SWG-2 09/15/87 01/04/88 880016 09/15/87 < 374
! 880017 SWE-5 01/04/88 < 374 swp_7 09/15/87 01/04/88 < 374 l
i W390370SA
TABLE B-10 CROUNDWATER TRITIUM AND GAMfA ISOTOPIC ANALYSIS SAMPLE LOCATION: CWJ-1 UNITS: pC1/L LAS Ho. COLLECTION PERIOD as-3 gen-54 Co-58 fe-59 Co-60 2n-65 ub-95 Zr-95 1-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 Sa-140 La-140 870180 01/27/87 < 360 < 2 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 6 < 3 < 6 < T < 3 < 3 < 15 < 3 870795 04/28/87 < 350 < 2 < 3 < 4 < 3 < 5 < 3 < 6 < 3 < 3 < 3 < 10 <'4 871400 07/16/87 249+/-211 < 3 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 8 < 4 < 9 < 7 < 5 < 4 < 18 < 4 872056 10/13/87 < 352 < 4 < 3 < 6 < 4 < 7 < 4 < 8 < 5 < 4 < 4 < 15 < 3 W390370SA
TABLE B-11 SHORELINE SEDIMENT CAlttA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES SAMPLE LOCATION: ALL SAMPLE SITES UNITS: pC1/Kg PERIOD Cs-134 Cs-137 LAB NO. IDCATION 870596 SHWJ-1 03/31/87 < 22 21+/-13
< 31 < 24 870597 SHWE-3 03/31/87 10/13/87 < 25 < 18 0 872057 SHWE-3 < 16 < 13 872058 SHWJ-1 10/13/87 W390370SA
a TABLE B-12 MILK IODINE-131 AND GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES LOCATION: MKO-5 UNITS: pCi/L COLLECTION LAB NO. PERIOD I-131* Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 -
870019 01/06/87 < 0.2 < 4 < 4 < 15 < 3 870142 01/20/87 < 0.3 < 3 < 3 < 9 < 2 870227 02/03/87 < 0.4 < 3 < 2 < 9 < 2 870261 02/10/87 < 0.3 < 4 < 3 < 12 < 3 870315 02/17/87 < 0.4 < 5 < 4 < 16 < 4 ;
4 870419 03/04/87 < 0.2 < 5 < 4 < 17 < 4 870528 03/17/87 < 0.3 < 4 < 3 < 12 < 3 4 870645 04/07/87 < 0.2 < 5 < 5 < 16 < 4 870746 04/21/87 < 0.2 < 3 < 3 < 9 < 2 870846 05/05/87 < 0.3 < 3 < 3 < 9 < 2 870970 05/20/87 < 0.3 < 5 < 5 < 17 < 4 871028 06/02/87 < 0.3 < 4 < 4 < 15 < 4 871173 06/16/87 < 0.3 < 5 < 4 < 15 < 4 871328 07/07/87 < 0.3 < 3 < 3 < 10 < 3 871459 07/21/87 < 0.4 < 3 < 3 < 12 < 3 871551 08/03/87 < 0.5 < 3 < 3 < 12 < 3 871622 08/18/87 < 0.2 < 3 < 4 < 12 < 3 871721 09/01/87 < 0.3 < 3 < 3 < 9 < 2 871814 09/16/87 < 0.3 < 2 < 2 < 8 < 2 871993 10/06/87 < 0.2 < 3 < 2 < 9 < 2 872130 10/20/87 < 0.3 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 2 872234 11/03/87 < 0.4 < 3 < 3 < 9 < 2 872335 11/17/87 < 0.3 < 2 < 2 < 8 < 2 872434 12/01/87 < 0.3 < 4 < 4 < 11 < 3 872564 12/15/87 < 0.3 < 3 < 3 < 10 < 2 i
- Low Level Iodine Analysis '
e 80 W390370SA l
TABLE B-12 (continued)
MIIJ 10 DINE-131 AND GANMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES LOCATION: MKQ-45 UNITS: pCi/L l COILECTION l IAB NO . PERIOD I-131* Cs-134 Cs-137 Ba-140 La-140 l
l 1
870020 01/05/87 < 0.3 < 4 < 3 < 12 < 3 870143 01/19/87 < 0.3 < 4 < 3 < 13 < 3 870262 02/09/87 < 0.3 < 5 < 5 < 18 < 4 870316 02/16/87 < 0.6 < 4 4+/- 3 < 14 < 3 3 870420 03/04/87 < 0.3 < 4 < 3 < 12 < 3 870529 03/16/87 < 0.3 < 5 < 5 < 19 < 4 870646 04/07/87 < 0.3 < 4 < 3 < 11 < 3 870747 04/21/87 < 0.2 < 4 < 3 < 12 < 3 870847 05/05/87 < 0.3 < 4 < 4 < 12 < 3 870971 05/19/87 < 0.3 < 4 < 4 < 12 < 3 871029 06/02/87 0.2+/-0.2 < 4 < 4 < 12 < 3 871174 06/16/87 < 0.2 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 3 871329 07/08/87 < 0.4 < 4 5+/-2 < 12 < 3 871460 07/21/87 < 0.3 < 4 < 4 < 16 < 3 871552 08/03/87 < 0.4 < 4 < 4 < 16 < 4 871623 08/17/87 < 0.2 < 7 < 6 < 23 < 5 871722 09/01/87 < 0.2 < 3 < 4 < 13 < 3 l 871815 09/15/87 < 0.4 < 5 < 4 < 17 < 4 l 871994 10/05/87 < 0.3 < 3 < 3 < 11 < 2 872131 10/19/87 < 0.3 < 4 < 4 < 15 < 4 872235 11/02/87 < 0.5 < 5 < 5 < 18 < 4 872336 11/18/87 < 0.4 < 3 < 3 < 10 < 2 872435 12/01/87 < 0.3 < 3 < 3 < 9 < 2 872565 12/15/87 < 0.3 < 4 < 4 < 16 < 3
- Low Level Iodine Analysis 81 W390370SA
TABLE B-13 FISH GAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES l
SAMPLE LOCATION: FH-1 UNITS: pCi/Kg i
l COLLECTION LAB NO. IDCATION PERIOD SAM. TYPE Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 870919 FH-1 05/11/87 FISH, BASS < 15 < 14 < 28 < 16 < 31 < 17 < 16 870920 FH-1 05/11/87 FISH, CARP < 5 < 5 < 12 < 7 0 870921 FH-1 05/11/87 FISH, CATFISH < 12 < 6 < 5
< 6 < 6 < 15 < 8 < 15 870922 FH-1 05/11/87 FISH, DRUM < 7 < 7
< 8 < 8 < 17 < 9 < 17 < 8 < 8 872398 FH-1 11/20/87 FISH, SHAD < 7 < 8 < 17 <
872399 FH-1 9 < 17 < 9 < 8 11/20/87 FISH, MULLET < 11 < 10 < 22 < 12 < 23 872400 FH-1 11/20/87 FISH, CATFISH < 13 < 11
< 9 < 9 < 22 < 12 < 20 872401 FH-1 11/20/87 FISH, DRUM <
< 10 < 9 7 < 8 < 18 < 9 < 19 < 9 < 8 W390370SA
TABLE B-13 (continued)
FISH CAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES SAMPLE LOCATION: FH-2 UNITS: pCi/Kg COLLECTION LAB NO. IDCATION PERIOD SAM. TYPE Mn-54 Co-58 Fe-59 Co-60 Zn-65 Cs-134 Cs-137 870923 FH-2 05/11/87 FISH, SHAD < 12 < 13 < 25 < 14 < 26 < 15 *
< 13 m 870924 FH-2 05/11/87 FISH, DRUM < 6 < 5 < 12 < 7 < 12 < 6 < 6 870925 FH-2 05/11/87 FISH, CARP < 5 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 10 < 5 < 5 870926 FH-2 05/11/87 FISH, BASS < 8 < 8 < 19 < 11 < 20 < 9 < 9 872402 FH-2 11/20/87 FISH, SHAD < 4 < 4 < 9 < 5 < 9 < 4 < 4 872403 FH-2 11/20/87 FISH,MUILET < 6 < 7 < 14 < 7 < 14 < 7 < 6 e72404 FH-2 11/20/87 FISH, CATFISH < 9 < 10 < 22 < 11 < 21 < 10 < 10 872405 FH-2 11/20/87 FISH, DRUM < 5 < 5 < 12 < 7 < 12 < 6 < 5 l
l l
l W390370SA
- s. .
e a
TABLE B-14 BROAD LEAF VECETATION 10 DINE-131 AND CAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES LOCATION: ALL SAMPLE SITES UNITS: pCi/Kg l
COLLECTION LAB NO. LOCATION PERIOD I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 870178 BLB-1 01/27/87 < 9 < 9 < 8 870179 BLQ-1 01/27/87 < 10 < 10 < 9 BLK-15 01/27/87 SAMPLE UNAVAILABLE 870369 BLB-1 02/24/87 < 23 < 21 < 19 I 870370 BLQ-1 02/24/87 < 15 < 14 < 14 BLK-15 02/24/87 SAMPLE UNAVAILIBLE 870548 BLB-1 03/24/87 < 23 < 20 < 18 870549 BLQ-1 03/24/87 < 11 < 10 < 10 870550 BLK-15 03/24/87 < 15 < 13 < 11 870792 BLQ-1 04/28/87 < 28 < 25 < 23 870793 BLB-1 04/28/87 < 17 < 14 < 14 870794 BLQ-1 04/28/87 < 23 < 21 < 18 871008 BLQ-1 05/27/87 < 20 < 20 < 17 871009 BLK-15 05/27/87 < 30 < 26 < 25 871010 BLB-1 05/27/87 < 22 < 16 < 17 871251 BLQ-1 06/25/87 < 27 < 17 < 16 871252 BLK-15 06/25/87 < 44 < 31 < 28 871253 BLB-1 06/25/87 < 22 < 16 < 15 W390370SA
TABLE B-14 (continued)
BROAD LEAF VECETATION 10 DINE-131 AND CAMMA ISOTOPIC ANALYSES LOCATION: ALL SAMPLE SITES UNITS: pCi/Kg l
l COLLECTION LAB NO. LOCATION PERIOD I-131 Cs-134 Cs-137 871504 BLQ-1 07/29/87 < 23 < 22 < 19 S
871505 BLK-15 07/29/87 < 34 < 29 < 25 871506 BLB-1 07/29/87 < 33 < 25 < 22 871666 BLQ-1 03/27/87 < 26 < 27 < 22 871667 BLK-15 08/27/87 < 36 < 16 < 14 871668 BLB-1 08/27/87 < 23 < 17 < 18 871870 BLQ-1 09/24/87 < 16 < 12 < 11 871871 BLK-15 09/24/87 < 29 < 25 < 24 871872 BLB-1 09/24/87 < 13 < 12 < 11 872203 BLQ-1 10/28/87 < 16 < 14 < 13 872204 BLK-15 10/28/87 < 22 < 21 < 19 872205 BLB-1 10/28/87 < 16 < 15 < 14 872407 BLQ-1 11/25/87 < 15 < 13 < 12 872408 BLK-15 11/25/87 < 26 < 19 < 19 872409 BLB-1 11/25/87 < 12 < 12 < 10 872625 BLQ-1 12/23/87 < 17 4 11 < 10 872626 BLB-1 12/23/87 < 18 < 12 < 11 BLK-15 12/23/87 SAMPLE NOT AVAILABLE W390370SA
l1ll g
K
/
i C
p S
T 7 I 3 6 N 1 U -
s <
C 4
3 7 1
S s <
E C S
Y L
A N
A C
- S B NI E 1 E DA 3 7 L Rt f 1 B Al A CA -
T / C I <
TO 8 E CI /
N I
TR T E 8
1 D TP /
0 O 1 1
_ C 1
. 8 O 4 N 3 2
B 7 A 8 L
2 P
P F
N A O S I 0 T 7 A 3 C 0 O 9 L 3 W
l l
~~
~~
APPENDIX C
SUMMARY
OF UNAVAILABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED LIMITS OF DETECTION O
W 87 W390370SA
ll Y
T I t . f f L on o o e I e noi . f l n B l t k k k el pe e A p e d t o c c e l a mk l L m l i p n a a e ph aa p .
I a p d m u
l l .w m st m7 A s m s D ad a8 V a ss t o o E g sn b e . s/
AD b s wn a t t N n o al 7 2 NL a oo o Li oc r p8 o0 UL r o cc g e e w N e G m/ N/
g n ; n u u yo s a3 3 ED ;
d d bl 0 LE PS n
n ea l m l e
e e d o l . e nh . n
.S0 /
2 n7 MS o o b u b l l ef otd o 0 o8 AI i i ah a b b t i o i7 i/
SM t t l l a a cd t gi t8 o t3 c c i r i l l ee cnr c/t c2 FR n n ao a i i l t nie n9 n/
OO u u vf v a a l c urp u1 7 u2 f f a a v v oe f u f/8 f0 N l l i a . a . cl ld g l1 / l O a a . sl s . n n l a n a09 am I
T m md e
ei lp m eg l n eo l i eo l i eo l c mdi el m
n/
1 mor <
A r . rt pi pt pt p rt p ro1 rf S N en ec my mt aa ma ma me ecm e 0 e T A l e l e al at at al l ea l n l n I L pk pl sp st se seg sp pl s pem pe M P ma ml p c g m ml mk o mk I X at ao ou oa oe oe oa aof aar aa L E S S c N s Nl N v N v NS S co S tf St R
E W
OF LO 7 7 7 7 7 7 DD7 8 8 h h 8 8 8 8 EO8 / / c c / / / /
SI 9 9 6 r r 2 2 3 2 SR1 1 2 a a 0 0 0 0 I E / / M M / / / /
MP , E 1 1 2 3 2 3 1 T 0 0 o o 0 0 0 0 DE3 A - - t t - - - - L NI I D 7 7 y 7 7 7 7 1 ATi l 8 8 y y y r 8 8 8 8 .
- C / / r r r a / / / /
C SGR 5 9 a a a u 6 6 5 3 ENA 0 1 u u u r 2 1 0 0 E LI M / / n n n b / / / /
L PR 1 1 a a a e 1 2 1 2 B MUO 0 0 J J J F 0 0 0 0 A ADT T S NI EO LI Y N BTR O ACA I 5 5 5 LEU T 7 1 1 4 1 1 4 2 7 2 I TN A - - - - - - - - - -
AEA C P C Q E K K Q G P G VDJ O W P K K L L K W W W A L D A M M B B M D D D NF UO F
O 1 a a Y 3 m m -
R 1 m m A - a a M I G G M a a a a a U S ,
m m m m m , ,
S I a m m m m m a a S t a a a a a t t Y e G G G G C e e L B B B A , , . . ,
N 1 s 1 1 1 1 1 1 s s A 3 s 3 3 3 3 3 3 s s 1 o 1 1 1 1 1 1 o o
- r - - - - - - r r %
I G I I I I 1 I C G #
e c
a 4 f r r r r e e e u c t t t A S i f n f n a a a I /
g r ao ao /W /W /W g
D e ei ei g g
_ E n h L t Lt ne ne ne M i p a a i c i c i c
_ k r s d t d t k a k a k a E ne o k k ae og ae og k nf nf nf
_ L i t m l l l i r i r i rA P ra t i i r e re i ru ru ruS a M UW A M M BV BV M DS DS DS0 A 7
_ S 3
. . . . . . . . . . 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 0 9
_ 1 3 W
TABLE C-2
SUMMARY
OF UNAVAILABLE SAMPLES AND MISSED LOWER LIMITS l OF DETECTION DURING Tile PERIOD OF APRIL 1 TO JUNE 30, 1987 EXPLANATION OF SAMPLE UNAVAILABILITY SAMPLE MEDIA ANALYSIS LOCATION DATE OR MISSED LLD
- 1. Atmospheric Cross Beta, 1-131 APP-1 04/27/87-05/04/87 Sampler malfunction. No sample collected.
- 2. Broad Leaf I-131, Camma BLK-15 04/28/87 Sample inadvertently sent to state.
, 3. Milk I-131, Camma MKQ-1 April to June No samples available; cows did not e supply milk for human consumption.
- 4. Milk I-131, Camma MKE-4 April to June No samples available; goats not lactating.
W390370SA
- '..y'
> , ll Y
T .
I t n L oo I ni B t t
- A d p o L i m n I d u A s s V sn t AD wo a o
NL oc g UL c n
ED ;a ;
LE em e PS l u l MS bh b AI a a SM l r l i o i FR af a OO v v ak a N l O si s .
I T l em eg l n A pe pi S N mc mt T A au aa I L sd st M P o c I X or oa L E N p Nl R
E W
OF LO r r DD7 e e EO8 b b SI 9 m m SR1 e e I E t t -
MP , E p p 0 T e e DE3 A S S NH D ,
3 ATR o o
- E t t C SGB ENM y y E LI E l l L PRT u u B MUP J J A ADE T S S N
EOO LI T N BT O AC1 I LE T 1 4 I TY A - -
AEL C Q E VDU O K J A J L M M NF UO F
O Y
R A
M M a a U S m m S I m m S a a Y C C L
A N 1 1 A 3 1
3 1
I I =
A I
D E
M E
L k k A -
P l l S M i i 0 A M M 7 S 3 0
. . 9 1 2 3 .
W 9
o $
ill
Y T . f I t n o L oo I ni k B t c A d p t a L im o l I d u n A s o V . sn s t ,
AD e wo oc t
a e NL l 1 UL b . c o u ad n g d ED l e ;a LE i s em ; e PS au l u e l MS v bh l b AI at a b a SM c l r a l t u i o l i FR cd af i a OO uo v a v d r ak v a N op l a .
O r si . sn I
T pe t l em eg l n eo l i A d a pt pi pt S N on mc mt ma T A or au aa at I L f e sd st se g M P t o c I X ol or oa oe L E NA N p Nl N v R
E W r r OF (
LO e e 7 b b DD8 m m EO9 e e SI 1 c c SR e e I E ,
D D MP1 E 3 T o o DE A t t NHR D 7 r g 4 ATE 8 r r e
- B / e e b C SGM 8 b b m ENE 1 o o e '
E LI C / t t c L PRE 1 c c e B MUD 1 O O D A AD T S O NT EO LI 1 N BT O ACR I 5 LEE T 1 1 4 1 I TB A - - - -
AEO C P Q E K VDT O P K K L A C L F M M B NFO UO F
O Y
R A
M M a a a U S m m m S I m m m S a a a Y G C G L
A , , ,
N a 1 1 1 A m 3 3 3 m 1 1 1 a - - -
C I I I t
A c I u f n D d ao E o oi M r Lt P a
- E d t L d k k ae og A
P o l l S M o i i re 0 A F M M BV 7 S 3 0
. . . . 9 1 2 3 4 3 W .
e" e
ill
TABLE C-5
SUMMARY
OF UNAVAILABLE TLD MEASURLMENTS DURING THE PERIOD OF JANUARY l TO DECEMBER 31, 1987 8
LOCATION QUARTER EXPLANATION D-2 First TLD Stolen.
J-15 First TLD Stolen; Replaced.
D-2 Second TLD Stolen; Replaced 6/2/87.
F-2 Second TLD Stolen; Replaced 6/2/87.
G-9 Second TLD Stolen; Replaced 6/2/87. s D-5 Third TLD Stolen.
B-1 Fourth TLD Stolen; Replaced 12/14/87.
C-1 Fourth TLD Stolen; Replaced 11/9/87.
i s
e 92 k'3903 70SA l
1 u _ _ , _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
l l
l l
l l
APPENDIX D
SUMMARY
OF INTERLABORATORY COMPARISONS 93 - '
W390370SA ,
TABLE D-1 US EPA CROSS-CHICK FROGRAM RESULTS Fot 1987 EPA PREP DATE EPA EPA AP&L NORM DEV OATE ISSUED RESULTS MEDIA NUCLIDE RESULTS RESULTS KNOWN 01/23/87 03/20/87 Water Gross a 11 10 -0.34 (pCi/t) Gross 8 10 11.66 0.58 02/06/87 04/13/87 Water Co-60 50 49.33 -0.23 (pci/t) Zn-65 91 92.67 0.58 Ru-106 100 89.67 -3.58***III Cs-134 59 53.67 -1.84 Cs-137 87 80.67 -2.19**
02/13/87 04/02/87 Water H-3 4209 4333.33 0.51 (pCi/t) 02/27/87 05/22/87 Milk I-131 9 9.33 0.64 s
(pC1/t) 03/20/87 06/03/87 Water Gross a 3 4 0.34 (pCi/t) Gross 8 13 15 0.69 04/03/87 06/18/87 Water I-131 7 7 0 (pC1/t) (Low-level) 04/10/87 07/02/87 Air Filter Gross a 14 16.66 0.92 (pC1/ filter) Gross s 43 43 0 Cs-137 8 7 -0.34 05/22/87 07/02/87 Water Gross a 11 8 -1.03 (pCi/t) Gross s 7 8.33 0.46 LT = Less Than
- Greater Than 2 2 Sigma
- Greater Than 3 Sigma 94
TABLE D-1 (Cent.)
US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM RESULTS FOR 1987 EPA PREP OATE EPA EPA AP&L NORM DEV DATE ISSUED RESULTS MEDIA NUCLIDE RESULTS RESULTS XNOWN 06/05/87 08/21/87 Water Cr-51 41 42.66 0.58 (pCi/t) Co-60 64 62.67 -0.46 Zn-65 10 12.66 0.92 Ru-106 75 73.67 -0.46 Cs-134 40 37.33 -0.92 Cs-137 80 74.33 -1.96 07/24/87 09/02/87 Water Gross a 5 2.66 -0.81 (pCi/t) Gross e 5 6.67 0.58 06/26/87 10/02/87 Milk I-131 59 63.67 1.34 (pCi/t) Cs-137 74 70 -1.34 s
K 1525 1613.33 2.00 08/07/87 11/03/87 Water I-131 48 44.33 -1.05 (pCi/t) 09/18/87 11/09/81 Water Gross a 4 3 -0.35 (pCi/t) Gross 8 12 7 -1.73 08/28/87 12/11/87 Ai ':'.ter Gross a 10 10.67 0.23 (pCi/ filter) Gross s 30 30 0 Cs-137 10 10.67 0.23 10/16/87 12/11/87 Water H-3 4492 4427 -0.25 (pCi/t)
LT = Less Than
- Greater Than 2 Sigma
\ *** Greater Than 2 3 Sigma 95
TABLE Dal (Cont.)
US EPA CROSS-CHECK PROGRAM RESULTS FOR 1987 DATE EPA EPA AP&L NORM DEV EPA PREP DATE ISSUED RESULTS MEDIA NUCLIOE RESULTS RESULTS KNOWN 10/09/87 12/15/87 Water Cr-51 70 73.33 1.15 (pCi/t) Co-60 15 16.33 0.46 Zn-65 46 48 0.69 Ru-106 61 67.67 2.31**
Cs-134 25 23 -0.69 Cs-137 51 48.33 -0.92 l
s LT = Less Than
- Greater Than 2 2 Sigma
- Greater Than 2 3 Sigma (1) Ru-106 is quantitated by accumulation of relatively few counts in the photo peak compared to the background baseline. This results in a large relative counting error. Because the other gama emitting isotopes in this sample were quantified within the 3 sigma control No limits, no errors in sample preparation or counting further action is planned.
efficiency are suspected.
96
l APPENDIX E SYNOPSES OF ANALYTICAL PROCEDURES 97 W390370SA
E-1.0 ANALY'IS OF SAMPLES FOR GROSS BETA ACTIVITY E-1.1 Air Particulates After a delay of three or more days, allowing for the radon-222 and radon-220 daughter products to decay, the particulate filters were counted in a gas-flow proportional counter.
E-1.2 Water A kaown volume of water, usually 200 milliliters was evaporated to near dryness, transferred to a two inch diameter planchet, and l then evaporated to dryness. The planchet was then counted for l 100 minutes in an automatic alpha-beta counter.
E-2.0 ANALYSIS OF WATER SAMPLES FOR TRITIUM A known volume of water, 5 milliliters, was added to a liquid scintillation solution, 15 milliliters, in a 15 milliliter vial. The sample was then counted for 500 minutes in a liquid scintillation counter.
E-3.0 ANALYSIS OF SAMPLES FOR 10 DINE-131 E-3.1 Milk and Water For samples sent to AP&L, up to four liters of a sample were thoroughly mixed with a stable iodine carrier solution. The sample was then eluded through an anion exchange resin column to remove iodine from the sample. The iodine was then stripped from the resin with sodium hypochlorit. solution, reduced with hydroxylamine hydrochloride, and then extracted into carbon tetrachloride as free iodine. It was then back-extracted as iodide into sodium bisulfite solution and precipitated as palladium iodide. The precipitate was precipitated as palladium iodide. The precipitate was weighed for chemical yield and mounted on a nylon planchet for low level beta counting. The chemical yield was corrected by measuring the stable iodide content of the milk or water with a specific ion electrode.
E-3.2 Broad Leaf Vegetation For samples sent to AP&L, the iodine analysis was performed using gamma spectroscopy. The time between sample receipt and analysis was minimized as well as the sample size and count times adjusted in order to attain the required lower limit of detection. Refer to Section E-4.2 for a description of gamma spectroscopy procedure.
98 W390370SA
E-4.0 GAMMA SPECTROSCOPY ANALYSIS E-4.1 Milk and Water For samples sent to AP&L, a 3.5 liter Marinelli beaker was filled with a representative aliquot of the sample. The sample was then counted for a minimum of 420 minutes with a shielded Germanium detector coupled to a computer based data acquisition system that performed pulse height analysis.
E-4.2 Vegetation, Food and Garden Crops, and Fish As much as possible (without drying) of a vegetation, food, or garden crop sample was loaded into a tared Marinelli beaker and weighed. The sample was then counted for a minimum of 420 minutes with a shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a computer based data acquisition system which performed pulse height analysis.
As much ao possible (up to the total sample) of the edible portion of a fish was loaded into a tared Marinelli beaker and weighed. The sample was then counted for a minimum of 420 minutes with a shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a computer based data acquisition system which performed pulse height
. analysis.
E-4.3 Soils and Sediment Soils and sediments were dried at low temperatures, less than 100 degrees Centigrade. The soil or sediment was loaded into a tared Marinelli beaker and weighed. The sample was then counted for at least four hours with a shielded Ge(Li) detector coupled to a computer based data acquisition system which performed pulse height analysis.
( E-4.4 Charcoal Cartridges (Air Iodine)
For samples sent to AP&L, charcoal cartridges were counted in a l Marinelli beaker, with one cartridge pocicioned on the face of a Germanium detector and up to six cartridges on the side of the Germanium detector. If no iodine-131 was detected, the detection limit for the batch of cartridges counted together was determined using the smallest sample volume of the individual cartridges within the batch. If iodine-131 was observed in the screening count of a set of cartridges, each cartridge was then counted separately, positioned on the face of the detector. A separate counting geometry was established for each Germanium detector.
99 W390370SA
l E-4.5 Air Particulates The weekly air particulate filters for a quarterly composite ,
from each field station were aligned one in front of another and !
then counted for a minimum of four hours with a shielded Ge(Li) !
{ detector coupled to a computer based data acquisition system i which performed pulse height analysis.
E-4.6 Computer Software A computer software program defined peaks by certain changes in the slope of the spectrum. The program also compared the energy of each peak with library of peaks for isotope identification and then performed the radioactivity calculation using the appropriate fractional gamma ray abundance, half life, detector efficiency, and net counts in the peak region.
E-5.0 EhTIRONMENTAL DOSIMETRY Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLDs) manufactured by Panasonic (model UD-814AQ) were used for environmental dosimetry. The Panasonic TLDs contained one lithium borate and three calcium sulfate phosphor elements. However, only the calcium sulfate phosphor elements were used. Two annealed dosimeters were placed inside a plastic bag and '
mounted in an aluminum frame prior to placement in the field. The dosimeters were exchanged every quarter. The exposures of the collected dosimeters were read using an automatic TLD reader manufactured by Panasonic (Model UD-710). '
I 100 I
L U390370SA
i i
l l
APPENDIX F STATISTICAL ANALYSES 101 H.190370SA
F-1.0 CALCULATION OF MEAN AND STANDARD DEVIATION The mean and standard deviation for different groups of analyses were calculated using the following equations:
n x I
(F-1) x = [*
i=1 "x "x 0.5 E *i - (n )g (R)2 I"
(F-2) s= , gy where:
x = mean of sample population, s = standard deviation of sample population, n*= number of samples in sample population, and x = value of the i'th sample.
F-2.0 COMPARING WO SAMPLE POPULATION MEANS The means of two sample populations can be compared for a statistical difference using the standard "t" test. The use of the test requires the assumption that the data within the populations are normally distributed and that the true standard deviations of the mean are equal f'r both populations. The standard "t" test tests the hypothesis that tue true means of both populations are equal. The "t" value can be calculated from the equation below (obtained from the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 26th Edition (1981)):
~
(F-3) t =
0.5 0.5 2
[(n, - 1)s,2 + (n y- 1)s y g 3 n n
( "x + "y - 2 x y where:
t = calculated "t" value, x = mean of first data set, y = mean of second data set, n = number of variables in first data set, s* = standard deviation of first data set, n* = number of variables in second data set, and s7 = standard deviation of second data set.
Y 102 6390370SA
If the data from both sample populations are treated as correlated pairs, the difference between individual measurements can be examined using the statistical "t" test. In this case, if the true means and true standard deviations for the sample populations are equal, the difference between the correlated data points should be normally distributed about a mean of zero. The "t" value can be calculated from the following equation (obtained from the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 26th Edition (1981)):
(F-4) t=
d (n) 0.5 s
d where:
d = the average of tha difference between the correlated data points frott the two sample populacions:
N d = E (x g- y g)/N i=1 x = the i'th data point from population x, yf= thel'thdatapointfrompopulationy, N = the number of correlated pairs of data points, n = degrees of freedom, for equation F-4, n=N-1, and sd= the standard deviation of the difference between the correlated data points.
The calculated "t" value in both cases is used to test the hypothesis that the true mean of the first population (g ) is equal to the true mean of the second population (4 ) assuming that the true standard deviations of both populations ate equal (r = o- The calculated "t" value is compared to a tabular "t" value suEh thl). t:
- a. if t,)t,,n then reject the hypothesis when A x g,
- b. if t(-e .nx then reject the hypothesis whenA ,
- c. if ltl > t d/2.n thenrejectthehypothesiswhen/4=4, x where e and t are the tabular "t" values, with a preselected error (5 dcent is,Ehis case), confidence level (1-*) or (1-*/2), and degrees of freedom n (n=n +n -2 for Equation F-3 and n=N-1 for F-4, respectively). Tabular values of the "t" were obtained from the CRC Standard Mathematical Tables, 26th Edition (1981).
103 W390370SA
F-3.0 TLD MEASUREMENTS The TLD measurements made during 1986 were grouped into categories based on distance from the plant. The means and standard deviations obtained for each category are given in Table F-1. The mean dose from the stations located more than five miles away from the plant were compared to the mean dose from stations located within two miles from the plant and to the mean dose from stations located between two and five miles from the plant using the standard "t" test. The "T" values were calculated using Equation F-3 and are given in Table F-1.
Comparing the calculated and tabular "t" values show that the mean dose for stations within two miles from the plant is statistically identical to the mean dose from stations located greater than five miles from the plant. The mean dose for stations located between two and five miles from the plant is statistically the same as the mean dose for stations located more than five miles from the plant.
F-4.0 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY ON AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS The means and standard deviations for airborne gross beta results obtained during 1986 from the control and indicator stations are given in Table F-2. The mean from each indicator station was compared to the mean from the control station using the standard "t" test to determine if there was a statistical difference. The calculated (using Equation F-3) and tabular "t" values for each indicator / control station comparison are given in Table F-2. Comparing the calculated and tabular values indicate that there is no statistical difference between the means from each indicator location and the mean from the control location.
F-5.0 GROSS BETA ACTIVITY IN MONTHLY DRINKING WATER COMPOSITES The mean and standard deviations for gross beta activity detected in the monthly drinking water composites obtained during 1986 from the control and indicator stations are given in Table F-3. The mean from each indicator station was compared to the mean from the control station using the standard "t" test to determine if there was a statistical difference. The calculated (using Equation F-3) and tabular "t" values for eacit indicator / control station comparison are I given in Table F-3. Comparing the calculated and tabular values indicate that there is no statistical difference between indicator stations DWG-2 and DWE-5 and control station DVP-7 means.
104 U390370SA
~1 TABLE F-1 STATISTICAL COMPARISON OF TLD MEASUREMENTS FROM STATIONS CROUPED BY DISTANCE FROM WATERFORD 3 SES 0-2 Mil 5s Stations Iocated 2-5 Stations Located more than from the Plant Miles from the Plant 5 miles from the Plant Mean 13.50(14) 14.63(15) 14.54(15)
(ares /std. qtr.)
Standard Deviation 2.2 1.8 1.6 (aren/std. qtr.)
S Number in Sample 62 27 28 Calcu!ated "t" Value to -0.664 -0.046 NA Comparisons with Stations Located more than 5 miles from the Plant Tabular "t" Valve at 1.993(a) 2.007(a) NA 95% Confidence
(*0.025 n)
- a. Used value for 0.025,n. Results indicate that the mean for stations located 0-2 miles from the plant and 2-5 miles from the plant are statistically identical to stations located more than 5 miles from the plant.
W390370SA
7
- 1 9 P 0 A A W 5 1 1 N N D
N 3 3 O 5 7 9 I - 2 7 3 0 T E 1 Y7 A W 4 1 1 0 2 k8 T D -
I9 S V1 I
SO SP OM RO 3 CC F FR 1 1 OE 2 2 0 E T - 1 8 3 1 L NA G 0 B OW W 8 2 1 0 2 A S D 1 T I G RN AI PK MN OI CR D
L AY CL I H TT SN I O TM A
TN SI n
o ni ot
_ n i a
_ o e t t
- i l aS t p et t a m uS r a i a l o
) v) S al t e 1 e1 V oa u n/ D/ n rc l
" ti
- a1 1 i ae eC dC t nd Vc Mp rp r " on n}
( a( e CI " e n.
d b d td
. n m ego " i 5 .
a u t nt f 2 t N ai rn 0 S l r7 ao ua-c pP l C 0 u
- l mW b%I aoD a5 CC( T9 A
S 0
7 3
0 9
_ 3 W
y3
TABLE F-2 STATISTICAL COMPARISONS OF GROSS BETA ACTIVITY ON AIR PARTICULATE FILTERS FOR 1987 STATION APC-1 APG-1 APP-1 APQ-1 APE-30 Mean 19.3 20.5 20.4 20.2 21.1.
(10- pCi/m )
Standard Deviation 7.4 7.7 1.6 7.8 7.5
- ~3 3 (10 pC1/m )
Number in Sample 51 52 51 52 52 Calculated "t" Value -0.235 -0.077 -0.089 -0.115 NA Comparing Control Station (APE-30) to Indicator Station Tabular "t" Value at 1.986 1.986 1.986 1.986 NA 95% Confidence 0.025,n}
NA Means Not Applicable W390370SA
-_. . , - ._ . - - _ _ - . , . _ - _ - _ , _ . _ _ - . . _ . _ _ - . - - ~ . . .- - ,. ,_ ,. . . - . _ _ . _ . __
e-LO U1SI POWE ANHT R & LiG A / 317 NEW BARONNE ORLEANS, LOUISlANSTREET
- P. O. BOX 60340 A 70160 * (504)595-3100 Ub!ONbsYES April 29, 1988 W3P88-0073 A4.05 QA U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission ATTN: Document Control Desk Washington, D.C. 20555
Subject:
Waterford 3 SES Docket No. 50-382 License No. NPF-38 Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report Enclosed is the subject 1987 annual report on radiological environmental monitoring which covers the period of January 1 through December 31, 1987.
This report is submitted per Section 6.9.1.7 in the Waterford 3 Technical Specifications (NUREG-lll7) of Appendix A to Facility Operating License No.
Very truly yours, W
R.F. urski Nuclear Safety & Regulrtory Affairs Acting Manager RFB:GEW:ssf Enclosure ec (w/ enclosure): R.D. Martin, NRC Region IV NRC Resident Inspectors Office cc (w/o enclosure): J.A. Calvo, NRC-NRR D.L. Wigginton, NRC-NRR f E.L. Blake j W.M. Stevenson Q
/
\\
"AN EQUAL OPPORTUNITY EMPLOYER"
>