ML20064L752

Review of Licensee Resolution of Outstanding Issues from NRC Equipment Environ Qualification SERs (F-11 & B-60), Public Svc Electric & Gas Co,Salem Nuclear Generating Station,Unit 1, Vols 1 & 2,Technical Evaluation Rept

ML20064L752
Person / Time
Site:	Salem
Issue date:	07/15/1982
From:	Crane C FRANKLIN INSTITUTE
To:	Le N, Shemanski P NRC
Shared Package
ML18087A640	List: ML20064L752
References
CON-NRC-03-79-118, CON-NRC-3-79-118 TAC-42467, TER-C5257-468, NUDOCS 8207270492
Download: ML20064L752 (714)

Text

-_ - _ - - _ _ - - _ - - _ _ _ _ - - _ _ _ _ _

Please SendSpy_of]JLiglDR TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT REVIEW OF LICENSEES' RESOLUTION OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES FROM NRC EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SAFETY EVALUATION REPORTS (F-11 and B-60)

PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 VOL. 1 0F 2 l

NRC DOCKET NO. 50-272 FRC PROJECT C5257 NRC TAC NO. 42467 FRC ASSIGNMENT 13 N!-C CONTRACT NO. NRC-03-79-118 FRC TASK 468 Prepared by Franklin Research Center 20th and Re 'e Streets Philadelphia, PA 19103 FRC Group Leader: C. J. Crane Prepared for Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Lead NRC Engineer: N. B. Le P. Shemanski July 15, 1982 This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency af the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, or any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or responsibility for any third party's use, or the results of such use, of any information, appa-ratus, product or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use by such third party would not infringe privately owned rights.

Please Send Copy of XA fo PDR

)

XA A

_ . . . Franklin Research Center

[_ '

A Division of The Franklin Institute ine Bengman Frankhn Parkwey. PNia . Pa 19103 (215)448 1000 w y.g

i TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT REVIEW OF LICENSEES' RESOLUTION OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES FROM NRC EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

[ SAFETY EVALUATION REPORTS (F-11 and B-60)

PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 VOL. 1 0F 2 L

NRC DOCKET NO. 50-272 FRC PROJECT C5257

- NRC TAC NO. 42467 FRC ASSIGNMENT 13 b

NRC CONTRACT NO. NRC-03-79-118 FRC TASK 468 Prepared by

. Franklin Research Center 20th and Race Streets

- Philadelphia, PA 19103 FRC Group Leader: C. J. Crane t

Prepared for L

Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Lead NRC Engineer: N. B. Le c P. Shemanski July 15, 1982

~

This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, or any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or impiled, or assumes any legal liability or J responsiollity for any third party's use, or the results of such use, of any information, appa-ratus, product or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use by such third l

L party would not infringe privately owned rights.

p Reviewed by: Approved by:

L C/k e / C%

Groyd t.eader teljitp

1. Department lrectfr

( <%

_ _ _ Franklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin institute

[ ne s.ngr n Fr.nxan P.rw..y. PNia . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000

L TER-C5257-468 I

l L

CONTENTS f

L Section Title Page 1 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . .- . . . . . . 1-1 L

1.1 Purpose of the Evaluation . . . . . . . . 1-1 1.2 Scope of the Evaluation . . . . . ., . . . 1-1 1.3 Generic Issue Background. . . . . .' . . . 1-2 1.4 Specific Issue Background . . .- . . . . . 1-10 2 NRC CRITERIA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATIM . . . . 2-1

• 2.1 Criteria Provided by the NRC. . . . . . . . 2-1 2.2 Staff Positions and Supplemental Criteria . . . . 2-1

[

2.2.1 Requirements and Applicable Criteria . . . . 2-1 2,2.2 Application of Recuirements and Criteria to TMI

( Lessons Learned Implementation Equipment . . . 2-3 2.2.3 Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review . . . . . . . . . . . 2-4

[ 2.2.4 Clarification of Qualification Requirements . . 2-5 L 2.2.5 Additional Clarification of Qualification Requiremer.ts . . . . . . . . . . 2-8

( 3 METHOECLOGY USED FOR THE EVALUATION . . . . . . . 3-1 3.1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . 3-1

( 3.2 Me thodology . . . . . . . . . . . . 3-2 3.3 NRC Qualification Categories and Definitions. . . . 3-8 3.4 Implementation Guide for Fulfilling NRC Criteria. . . 3-12 4 TECHNICAL EVALUATION . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1 4.1 Introduction. . . . . . . . . . . . 4-1

[ 4.2 Sumnary of tne Evaluation . . . . . . . . 4-2 4.3 Methodoloc Used by the Licensee. . . . . . . 4-14

{ 4.3.1 Completeness of Safety-Related Equipment List. . 4-14 4.3.2 Environmental Service Conditions . . . . . 4-15 4.3.3 Temperature, Pressure, and Humidity Conditions Inside Containment . . . . . . . . 4- 15

[ 4.3.4 Submergence . . . . . . . . . . 4-16 4.3.5 Chemical Spray . . . t . . . . . 4- 18 4.3.6 Aging and Qualified Life . . . . . . . 4-18

( 4.3.7 Radiation (Inside and Outside Containment) . . 4-19 .

[ A,'k iii h3 Franklin Research Center

, mm ao The raman m.aue

I TER-C5257-468 CONTENTS (Cont.)

Section Title Page 4.4 Equipment Environmental Qualification Evaluation. . .. 4-21 5 CONCLUSIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5-1 6 REFERENCES . . . . . . .

.f. . . . .. 6-1 APPENDIX A - ENVIRONMENTAL SERVICE CONDITIONS

]

APPENDIX B - LISTING OF SAFETY-RELATED ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT APPENDIX C - PLANT SAFETY-RELATED SYSTEMS AND DISPLAY INSTRUMENTATION APPENDIX D - REVIEW OF LICENSEE'S RESPONSE TO NRC EEQ .

FER CONCERNING JUSTIFICATION FOR INTERIM OPERATION APPENDIX E - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

)

]

]

J 1

J

)

&n IV -

J' EUd Franklin Research Center A >=a et m rr nnan m iue.

TER-C5257-468 FOREWORD This Technical Evaluation Report was prepared by Franklin Research Center under a contract with the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, Division of Operating Reactors) for technical assistance in support of NRC operating reactor licensing actions. The technical evaluation was conducted in accordance with criteria established by the NRC.

/

Principal contributors to the technical preparation of this report were C. J. Crane,' J. A. Murphy , K. E. Weise, D. J. Schmitz, and K. J. Iepson of the Franklin Research Center.

T. J. DelGaizo from WESTEC Se. vices, Inc. , R. Garrison from ORFI Systems, Inc., and M. A. Fedele from Evaluation Associates, Inc., also contributed to the technical preparation of this report through subcontracts with Franklin Research Center.

~ranklin

., ~ ,ewch Res C__ enter

~

l TE R-C5257-468 IDENTIFICATION OF PROPRIETARY INFORMATION Some of the information in this technical evaluation report was obtained from manufacturers' proprietary test reports. All proprietary test reports are identified as such in Section 5, References, of this report. Checksheets in Section 4 containing proprietary information have been replaced with a checksheet page stating that the proprietary information has been removed.

f vi i M&

an Franklin Research Center

• o ona m r.noninou.

~ . - ,

I i ,

TER-C5256-468 4

1. INTRODUCTION 2

1.1 PURPOSE OF THE EVALUATION .

The purpose of this report is to: .

o evaluate licensees' resolutions of outstanding issues related to i

safety-related electrical equipment environmental qualification (EEQ) discussed in the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) Safety Evaluation

, Reports (SERs) in accordance with NRC criteria. The objectiva is to

. identify all cases where a licensee's response has not resolved the significant qualification issues.

o evaluato licensees' qualification documentation of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments in accordance with criteria established by the NRC and to identify (1) equipment for which qualification documentation is adequate, i.e., substantiates that the equipment is capable of performing its specified design basis safety function when it is exposed to a harsh environment and (2) equipment for which qualification documentation is deficient, i.e.,

does not give reasonable assurance that the equipment is capable of performing its rpecified safety function.

o evaluate licensees' qualification documentation of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation. The objective is to evaluate qualification documentation of equipment within the scope of IE Bulletin 79-01B, Supplement 3 (item 2) [6],* in cecordance with criteria established by the NRC in a manner identical to the evaluation of all other safety-related electrical equipment.

1.2 SCOPE OF THE EVALUATION The scope of this report is limited to the evaluation of environmental qualification of electrical equipment that must function to mitigate the consequences of a loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) or high energy line break (HELB) and whose environment is adversely affected by that event.

• For References, see Section 6. Note that reference numbers are not presented in sequential order.

/,A I~I Ubd Franklin Research Center A Omsson of The FrenhanInsecute

TER-C5256-468 1

With respect to TMI Action Plan Implementation, the scope of this report is limited to those sections of NUREG-0737 [10] applicable to equipment having an inste'!ation implementation date of January 1,1981. Where applicable, a review is to be performed on installed equipment with implementation dates af ter January 1, 1981 if adequately identified by the Licensee.

The NRC has determined that the evaluation of environmental qualification of equipment items (1) located in plant areas whose environment is not adversely affected by the design basis event (DB2) (e.g., equipment located in

[

" mild" environments) or (2) required to achieve and maintain cold shutdown, is not to be included within the scope of this report. However, where the Licensee has identified these equipment items in the EEQ submittals to the NRC, these items have been listed in NRC evaluation Category III.b in this report (see Section 3 of this report for definition of NRC evaluation categories).

Qualification aspects not included within the scope of this evaluation are:

o seismic and dynamic qualification o equipment protection against natural phenomena o equipment operational service conditions (e.g., vibration, voltage, and frequency deviations)

I o equipment located where it is subjected to the outdoor environment o equipment protection against fire hazards o equipment protection against missiles o equipment located in plant areas whose environment is not adversely l affected by the design basis event o equipment required to achieve and maintain cold shutdown.

l 1.3 GENERIC ISSUE BACKGROUND Safety-related electrical equipment must be capable of performing design safety functions under all normal, abt.ormal, and accident conditions. The purpose of equipment qualification is to provide tangible evidence that equipment will operate on demand and to verify design performance, thereby establishing assurance that the potential for cornon-mode failure is minimized.

1-2 fA MJ Frankbn Research Center A o-.o., ce n,. n.wn m u.

(

TER-C5256-468 Of part ulac concern is the assurance that equipment will remain i '

operable durug and following exposure to the harsh environmental conditions (i.e., temperature, pressure, humidity [r.teami, chemical sprays, radiation, and submergence) imposed as a result of a design basis accident. These harsh environments are generally defined by the limiting conditions resulting from the complete spectrum of postulated break sizes, break locations, and single failures consequent to a LOCA, main steam line break (MSLB) inside the reactor containment, or a HELB outside the reactor containment (such as a main steam or feedwater line break). In addition, depending on specific plant design features, other postulated HELB locations may be associated with:

o the chemical and volume control system (CVCS) letdown line o the steam supply piping to

- the aux'iliary feedwater ( AFW) pump turbine the reactor core isolation cooling (RCIC) pump turbine

- the high pressure core injection (HPCI) pump turbine

- the isolation condenser o steam generator blowdown.

The NRC criteria for reviewing the safety of nuclear power generating stations include the requirement that the qualification of safety-related electrical equipment be substantiated by auditable documentation of the program that estab,lishes the ability of the equipment to function as specified in the station design. This report is restricted to a technical evaluation of the equipment's ability to function in harsh environmento resulting from DBEs.

Qualification criteria applied during the licensing of the older nuclear power plants have been modified over the years, and specific industry standards concerning qualification have been revised as the design of reactor systems has changed and as regulatory and operating experience has .

accumulated. Examples of such standards are IEEE Standards 279-71, 323-74, 383-74, 317-76, 334-80, 381-77, 382-80, 535-79, 627-80, 649-80, and 650-79.

NRC NUREG documents 0413 and 0588 have been developed to address this topic.

In particular NUREG-0588 (published for comment in December 1979 and reissued as Revision 1 in July 1981) formally presented the NRC staff positions regarding selected areas of environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment in the resolution of General Technical Activity A-24, 1

gh l~3 bd Franklin Research Center 4 cama a rh. ren m.one.

TER-C5256-468

" Qualification of Class IE Safety Related Equipment." The positions documented therein are applicable to plants that are or will be in the construction permit or operating license review process.

Although qualification standards and regulatory requirements have undergone considerable development, all of the currently operating nuclear power plants are required to comply with 10CFR50, Appendix A, General Design Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants,Section I, Criterion 4. This criterion states in part that " structures, systems and components important to safety shall be designed to accommodate the effects of and to be compatible with the environmental conditions associated with normal operation, maintenance, testing and postulated accidents, including loss-of-coolant accidents."

Qualification requirements are also embodied in (1) 10CFR50 Appendix A, s General Design Criteria 1, 2, and 23 and (2) 10CFR50 Appendix B, Quality Assurance Criteria for Nuclear Power Plants and Fuel Reprocessing Plants, Criteria III, " Design Control," and XI. " Test Control." These requirements are applicable to safety-related equipment located outside as well as inside containment.

The NRC staff has evaluated the licensees' equipment qualification I

programs by reviewing the qualification documentation of selected safety-related equipment as part of the operating license review for each plant. The NRC staff has also used a variety of methods to assure that these general requirements are met for electrical safety-related equipment. In the oldest plants, qualification was based on the fact that electrical components were of high industrial quality. After 1971, qualification was judged on the basis of IEEE Std 323-71; however, no regulatory guide was issued adopting this standard. For plants whose SERs were issued af ter July 1,1974, the Commission issued Regulatory Guide 1.89, which in most respects adopted the most recent standard, IEEE Std 323-74.

In November 1977, the Union of Concerned Scientists petitioned the NRC Commissioners to upgrade current standards for the environmental qualificction of safety-related electrical equipment in operating plants. Subsequently, the NRC staff instituted the Systematic Evaluation Program (SEP) to determine the degree to which the older operating nuclear power plants deviated from current gg 1-4 dd Franklin Research Center a on onor n. n.n.oin m.mw.

TER-C5256-468 licensing criteria. The subject of electrical equipment environmental qualification (SEP Topic III-12) was selected for accelerated evaluation as part of this program. Seismic qualification of equipment was to be addressed as a separate SEP topic. In December 1977, the NRC issued a generic letter to all SEP plant licensees requesting that they initiate reviews to determine the adequacy of existing equipment qualification documentation.

Preliminary NRC review of licensee responses led to the preparation of NUREG-0458, an interim NRC assessment of the environmental qualification of electrical equipment. This document concluded that "no significant safety deficiencies requiring immediate remedial actions were identified." However, it was recommended that additional effort should be devoted to examining the installation and environmental qualification documentation of specific electrical equipment in all operating reactors.

On May 31, 1978, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued IE Circular 78-08, " Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment at Nuclear Power Plants," which required all licensees. of operating plants (except those included in the SEP) to examine their installed safety-related electrical equipment and ensure appropriate qualification documentation for equipment function under postulated accident conditions.

Subsequently, on February 8,1979, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforce-ment issued IE Bulletin 79-01, which was intended to raise the threshold of IE Circular 78-08 to the level of Bulletin, i.e., action requiring a licensee response. This Bulletin required a complete re-review of the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment as described in IE Circular 78-08.

The review of the licensees' responses indicated certain deficiencies within the scope of equipment addressed, definition of harsh environments, and adequacy of support documentation. It became apparent that generic criteria were needed for evaluating the electrical equipment environmental qualification for both SEP and non-SEP operating plants. Therefore, during the second half of 1979, the Division of Operating Reactors (DOR) of the NRC issued internally a document entitled " Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Qualification of Class IE Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors" [2]. (The document is hereafter f% 1-5 Jb Franklin Research Center A Dumn d Dw Fruen emue

TER-C5256-468 referred to as the " DOR Guidelines.") The document was prepared as a screening standard for reviewing all operating plants, including SEP plants. It was originally intended that the licensees evaluate their qualification documentation in accordance with the DOR Guidelines. However, initial NRC review of this documentation, which was compiled to support licensee submittals, revealed the need for obtaining independent evaluations and for accelerating the qualifi-cation review program.

In October 1979, the NRC awarded Franklin Research Center a contract to provide assistance in the " Review and Evaluation of Licensing Actions for Operating Re ctors," which included an assignment for review of equipment environmental qualification documentation under SEP Tapic III-12. Tae assign-ment was to review equipment environmental qualification documentation and to present the results in the form of a Technical Evaluation Report for the 11 oldest plants (included in the SEP review). The plants included within the '

assignment were the Palisades, Oyster Creek, Ginna, Haddam Neck, Yankee Rowe, Lacrosse, and Big Rock Point plants and Zion Station Units 1.and 2, Indian j Point Units 2 and 3, Millstone Unit 1, Dresden Unit 2, and San Onofre Unit 1.

(This assignment was completed in April 1981.)

On January 14, 1980, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enfor ement issued the DOR Guidelines and IE Bulletin 79-01B, which expanded the sci pe of IE Bulletin 19-01 and requested additional information on environmental qualifica-tion of safety-related electrical equipment at operating facilities, excluding the 11 facilities undergoing the SEP review. This Bulletin cited the DOR Guidelines as the criteria to be used in evaluating the adequacy of the safety-related electrical equipment qualification. The scope of the review was expanded to include HELBs (inside and outside containment) in addition to equipment aging and submergence. The NRC advised the licensees thr.t the crtteria contained in the DOR Guidelines would be used in its review of -

licensee submittals; NUREG-0588 would be used ar a guide in cases where the DOR Guidelines do not provide suf ficient detail. 1 In early February 1980, the NRC decided that Indian Point Units 2 and 3 and Zion Station Units 1 and 2 should be included within SEP Topic III-12 for .

the purpose of equipment environmental qualification review.

1-6

]

MJ Franklin Research Center 4 Onnson of The Frane$n insature

TE R.-C5256-468 On February 21, 1980, the NRC and representatives of the SEP Plant Owners Group held an open meeting at NRC headquarters to discuss an accelerated review program in accordance with the DOR Guidelines. Representatives c' the Indian Point Units and Zion Station also attended this meeting. The NRC formally issued to all licensees represented at the meeting the DOR Guidelines document which included a second document, " Guidelines for Identification of That -

Safety Equipment of SEP Operating Reactors for Which Environmental ,

Qualification Is To Be Addressed" [2], together with the request that the licensees review their plant systems and provide additional equipment environL '

mental qualification information to the NRC on an accelerated schedule. '

For non-SEP plants, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement formed a task force including a principal reviewer in each region and a task leader from headquarters. The regional members were assigned responsibility for the technical review of the licensees' responses to IE Bulletin 79-01B, and the task leader was assigned responsibility for the overall coordination of the review effort with NRC staff to assure overall consistency. The regional reviewers held meetings with the licensees in their respective regions, which resulted in staf f positions being issued in a supplement to IE Bulletin 79-01B dated February 29, 1980.

In April 1980, the NRC organizational structure was modified and the Equipment Qualification 3 ranch was formed within the new Division of Engi-neering. Responsibility for reviewing the status of equipment qualification for all plants was assigned to this branch.

On May 23, 1980, the NRC issued Memorandum and Order CLI-80-21 { 7],

specifying that licensees and applicants must meet the requirements, set forth in the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 regarding environmental qualification of sa fety-related electrical equipment in order to satisfy 10CFR50, Appendix A, General Design Criteria,Section I, Criterion 4. This Order also established that the SERs en this subject, to be prepared by the NRC staff, must be issued on February 1,1981 and that all subsequent actions to be taken by licensees to achieve full compliance with the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 must be completed no later than June 30, 1982. The Memorandum and Order established the DOR Guideli~nes and NUREG-0588 as acceptable interpretations of the General As 1-7 n

f WJ Franklin A om.on or Tw. Fr., anResearch in Ceoe.ter

i TER-C5256-468 Design Criteria for an interim period. Rulemaking was proposed for the purpose of establishing a permanent interpretation of the General Design Criteria.

The staff held regional meetings with the licensees and interested parties during the week of July 13, 1980. The staff issued a second supplement to IE Bulletin 79-01B, a response to significant questions raised during the public meetings, and two Orders. The Order dated May 30, 19,80 required the licensees to comply with the previously issued Commission Memorandum and Order of May 27, 1980 (CLI-80-21). The above orders required the licensees to complete the tasks identified in IE Bulletin 79-01B no later than November 1, 1980 to allow the staff to comply with the February 1, 1981 date imposed by the Commission Order. The responses to the questions were issued on February 29, 1980; and the second and third supplements to IE Bulletin 79-01B, highlighting the staff positions affecting the licensees' responses, were issued on September 29 and October 24, 1980, respectively.

In October 1980, EG&G Idaho, Inc., awarded Franklin Research Center a contract to provide assistance in the equipment environmental qualification review for 13 of the plants whose licensees responded to IE Bulletin 79-01B.

The assignment was to evaluate the licensees' equipment environmental qualifi-cation submittals and to present the results in the form of a Technical Evaluation Report for each plant. The objective of this Technical Evaluation Report was to review the licensees' submittals to determine if safety-related electrical equipment was reviewed for environmental qualification in accordance with the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 as required by IE Bulletin l 79-01B. The NRC was to perform an audit of the qualification documentation references as part of its Safety Evaluation Program. If discrepancies were found, the audit was to be extended. The plants included within this assignment were Nine Mile Poix Unit 1, Millstone Unit 2, Salem Unit 1, Browns i Ferry Units 1, 2, and 3, Brunswick Unitc 1 and 2, Hatch Units 1 and 2, Dresden Unit 3, and Quad Cities Units 1 and 2. (This assignment was completed in June t

1981.)

In mid-1981, the NRC issued SERs on environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment to licensees of all operating plants.

pg 1-8 i

dd Franklin Research Center m s,anor m rwsanm m e I

\

{

TER-C5256-468 Where additional qualification information was required, the licensees were directed to respond to the NRC within 90 days of receipt of the SER.

In May 1981, under the licensing action assistance contract, NRC authorized Franklin Research Center to proceed with the review and evaluation of the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments, required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation on 71 operating plants.

In July 1981, the NRC conducted extensive meetings with the nuclear industry to address concerns and questions regarding qualification of safety-related equipment. In addition, the NRC provided licensees with detailed information with respect to the format and expected content of the licensees' 90-day responses to the NRC SERs. Draft outlines of the following proposed programs were also presented to the industry: environmental qualification of equipment located in " mild" environments, seismic and dynamic qualification, and environmental qualification of mechanical equipment.

On September 23, 1981, the NRC Commissioners considered a petition (SECY-81-486) to extend the deadline for actions to be taken by licensees to achieve environmental qualification of all safety-related equipment. On September 30, 1981, the NRC Commissioners extended this deadline to the second refueling outage af ter March 31, 1982.

In October 1981, the NRC authorized Franklin Research Center to include within the scope of the existing EEQ assignment (TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Equipment) the evaluation of licensees' resolutions of out-standing issues related to equipment environmental qualification discussed in the NRC SERs in accordance with NRC criteria. The assignment was to review the qualification documentation and to present the results in the form of a Technical Evaluation Report for 71 operating plants. (This report was devel-oped within the scope of this assignment.)

On January 7,1982, the NRC Commissioners approved the issuance of the proposed rule, " Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment' for Nuclear Power Plants," for public comment. The proposed rule was published in the Federal Register (Volume 47, No. 13) dated January 20, 1982. -

A~ 1-9 N ranklin Research Center

- w .- -.

TER-C5256-468 In February 1982, Proposed Revision 1 to Regulatory Guide 1.89,

" Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants,"

was issued for public comment. This regulatory guide was issued to (1) reflect current NRC positions on equipment qualification and (2) provide guidelines for meeting the NRC Commissioners proposed rule on eqaipment qualification.

The final rule, "Fnvironmer;tal Qualification of Electric Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants," was subsequently issued on April 16, 1982 by the NRC (to be published in the Federal Register) to clarify and strengthen the criteria for environmental qualification of electrical equipment. The final rule is to be incorporated into 10CFR50 as Section 50.49, " Environmental Qualification of Electric Equipment for Nuclear Power Plants." The l significant features of the rule are:

o Requalification of electrical equipment in accordance with the rule will not be required for equipment qualified or being. qualified in accordance with the DOE Caidelines and IE Bulletin 79-01B or NUREG-0588, provided the. qualification program commenced within 90 days af ter the effective date of the rule.

1 o The requirement to qualify equipment needed to complete one path of achieving and maintaining a cold shutdown condition has been deleted.

o A new section has been added, covering the qualification of equipment located in mild environments.

o The Commission deadline for actions to be taken by licensees to achieve environmental qualification of all safety-related equipment is

, extended to the second refueling outage after March 31, 1982.

On April 20, 1982, the NRC staff issued Generic Letter No. 82-09 [8] to all licensees, presenting the NRC's position and clarification of certain l

( aspects of the environmental qualification requirements.

l l

l 1.4 SPECIFIC ISSUE BACKGROUND on May 31, 1978, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued IE l Circular 78-08, " Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment at Nuclear Power Plants," which required all licensees of operating plants to examine their installed safety-related electrical equipment and gg 1-10 Ubranklin Research Center

]

4 om on ce n. n n.a.n m.tu.

TER-C5256-468 ensure appropriate qualification documentation for equipment function under postulated accident conditions. Subsequently, on February 8, 1979, the NRC Of fice of Inspection and Enforcement issued IE Bulletin 79-01, which was intended to raise the threshold of IE Circular 78-08 to the level of Bulletin, i.e., action requiring a licensee response. This Bulletin required a compl?te re-review of the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment as described in IE Circular 78-08.

On January 14, 1980, the NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement issued the DOR Guidelines and IE Bulletin 79-01B, which expanded the scope of IE Bulletin 79-01 and regt:-sted additional information on environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment at operating facilities.

This Bulletin cited the D0R Guidelines as the criteria to be used in evaluating the adequacy of the safety-related electrical equipment qualification.

The NRC staff held regional meetings with the licensees and interested parties during the week of July 13, 1980. The staff issued a second supplement to IE Bulletin 79-OlB, a response to significant questions raised during the public meetings, and two Orders. The Order dated May 30, 1980 required the licensees to comply with the previously issued Commission Mtmorandum and Order of May 27, 1980 (CLI-80-21). The above orders required the licensees to complete the tasks identified in IE Bulletin 79-01B no later than November 1,1980 to allow the staff to comply with the February 1,1981 date imposed by the Commission Order. The responses to the questions were issued on February 29, 1980; and the ,second and third supplements to IE Bulletin 79-01B, highlighting the staff positions affecting the licenseea' f responses, were issued on September 29 and October 24, 1980, respectively.

The NRC Office of Inspection and Enforcement performed a preliminary evaluation of the Licensee's response, documented in a technical evaluation report (TER). The NRC Of fice of Inspection and Enforcement (IE) performed an onsite verification inspection (November 5-6, 1980) of selected safety-related electrical equipment. Components associated with the component cooling water system, reactor coolant pump, drain tank, letdown heat exchanger flow and discharge control panels were intoected. The inspection verified proper installation of equipment, overall interface integrity, and manufacturers' ~~

jg 1-11 l} ranklin Resear ch Center

-n.n . .

TER-C5256-468 nameplate data. The manufacturer's name and model number from the nameplate data were compared to information given in the Component Evaluation Work Sheets (CES) of the Licensee's report. The site inspection is documented in report IE 50-272/80-29. No deficiencies were noted.

On October 31, 1980, PSE&G provided the NRC with an equipment environmental qualification submittal in response to IE Bulletin 79-01B for ,

the Salem Unit 1 plant [1].

PSE&G submitted further equipment environmental qualification information the NRC in response to IE Bulletin 79-01B on December 1, 1980 [11, 12].

The NRC issued a Safety Evaluation Report (SER) to PSE&G on June 8,1981

[15].

On June 8, 1981, FRC issued the Salem Unit 1 Technical Evalution Report

[13] to NRC.

Requests for information [71, 72] were transmitted to the NRC by FRC to obtain qualification documentation referenced by the Licensee in their submittals, TMI Action Plan information, and correlations to NUREG-0737 [10].

By letter dated September 10, 1981, PSE&G transmitted to the NRC a response to the SER [16].

On Februar;' 3., 1982 [17] and May 28, 1982 [64], PSE&G provided responses to the FRC requests for additional information.

gy 1-12 Ad Franklin Research Center m ona m rr.nonu.aw

TE'R-C5257-468

2. NRC CRITERIA FOR ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION 2.1 CRITERIA PROVIDED BY THE NRC The screening guidelines used to evaluate the electrical equipment environmental qualification program were:

o DOR Guidelines, " Guidelines for Evaluating Environmental Qualification of Class lE Electrical Equipment in Operating Reactors," November 1979

[2]

o NUREG-0588, Revision 1, " Interim Staff Position on Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment," July 1981 [9].

Other appropriate references used in the review of the licensees' electrical equipment environmental qualification submittals are:

o IE Bulletin 79-OlB, " Environmental Qualification of Class lE l

Equipment ," January 14, 1980; Supplement No. 1, February 29, 1980; t

Supplement No. 2, September 29, 1980; and Supplement No. 3, October 24, 1980 [3, 4, 5, 6]

o NUREG-0737, " Clarification of TMI Action Plan Requirements," November 1980 [10]. This document is applicable for the selection of equipment for the evaluation of the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation. The scope of the review is limited to equipment associated with specific sections of NUREG-0737 which have an installation implementation date of January 1, 1981. Where applicable, a review is to be performed on installed equipment with implementation dates after January 1,1981 if adequately identified by the licensee.

2.2 STAFF POSITIONS AND SITPPLEMENTAL CRITERIA The NRC identified the following staff positions and supplemental criteria to be used in conjunction with the referenced screening guidelines.

2.2.1 Requirements and Applicable Criteria Items 3 and 17 of Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-01B [5] describe the application of the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 to operating teactors (ors), _

g 2-1 Ub Frank lin Research Center A o m anor n. rr.,e n 5.on,.

1 TER-C5257-468 near term operating license applicants (NTOLs), and construction permit ,

j applicants (cps). The qualification requirements and applicable criteria are stated as follows:

[ Question 3] <

" Define the requirements and applicable criteria for ors, NTOLs, and OLs. Specifically address the NTOLs whose CP SER is prior to July 1974 and af ter July 1974. Can a CP whose SER is prior to 1974 use the DOR 1

guidelines?"

(NRCAnswertoQbestion3]

" Table 1 describes the application of each document. All operating i reactors as of May 23, 1980, will be evaluated against the DOR guidelines. In cases where the DOR guidelines do not provide suf ficient detail, but NUREG-0588 Category II does, NUREG-0588 will be used. I 1

TABLE 1  !

REQUIREMENTS ors OLs cps l CP SER CP SER a

DOR GUIDELINES Before 7/1/74 After 7/1/74 1 l

1 USE NUREG-0588 NUREG-0588 NUREG-0588 NUREG-0588 /

AS NECESSARY (CAT. II) (CAT. I) (CAT. I) or NEW RULE WHEN

- IN EFFECT i l

REPLACEMENT COMPONENTS USE NUREG-0588 (CAT. I) 1 All plants licensed after May 23, 1980, shall conform to NUREG-0588. In accordance with Regulatory Guide 1.89, all such operating licenses for facilities whose construction permit SER is dated July 1, 1974 or later, are to be reviewed against IEEE Std. 323-1974. Thus, for these licensees, the operating license applicant is to qualify equipment to the Category I column in NUREG-0588. For operating licenses issued after May 23, 1980, whose construction permit SER is dated before July 1, 1974, the operating license applicant is to qualify equipment to at least Category II column .

of NUREG-0538: unless the licensee made commitment in the construction permit record to use the 1974 standard, or unless the operating licensee application record indicates that the 1974 standard is to be used, in such cases Column I of NUREG-0588 is to be used. )

. While there are dif ferences between the Category II column of NUREG-0588 l and the DOR guidelines, the differences are in details and in the l

l f 2-4

]

dd Franklin Research Center A tw.an as rh. Fr.nnna in.oroe.

.w t. .x TER-C5257-468 optional part of the documents. The minimum requirements set forth by these documents are general and compatible. Thus, the minimum standards set by either of the two documents are equally applicable to ors and NTOLs."

[ Question 17)

" Define the requirements for ' replacement parts.' Are they the same for

' spare' parts? Clearly discuss the alternatives for existing inventories of parts / components. If equipment is ordered to meet IEEE Std. 323-1974 standard but lead time exceeds June 1982, can we use IEEE Std. .323-1971 qualified components in the interim?"

) [NRC Answer to Question 17]

"The requirements for ' replacement' and ' spare' parts are the same for the purposes of complying with the Commission order and memorandum.

After May 1980, all parts used to replace presently installed parts shall be qualified to Category I of NUREG-0588 'unless there are sound reasons to the contrary.' Nonavailability and/or the fact that the part to be l used as a replacement is a spare part purchased prior to May 23, 1980, and is in stock are among the factors to be considered in weighing whether there are ' sound reasons to the contrary. ' All replacement parts shall as a minimum conform to the requirements described in the answer to question 3. Justification for deviation from Category I of NUREG-0588 shall be documented by the licensee and records shall be available for audit, upon request by the NRC."

2.2.2 Application of Requirements and Criteria to TMI Lessons Learned Implementatioa Equipment The NRC requested an evaluation of the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation in accordance with criteria established by the NRC in a manner identical to the evaluation of all other safety-related electrical equipment. Additionally, Item 21 of Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-01B [5] states:

"TMI Lessons Learned instrumentation will be considered in the February 1, 1981 SER. This equipment is subject to the same requirements as other i

safety-related electrical equipment. The guidance and requirements of NUREG-0588 referenced daughter standards, and Reg Guides will be used by the staf f in assessing the adequacy of the qualifidation information."

Item 2 of Supplement 3 to IE Bulletin 79-01B [6] states:

"IEB 79-01B required a 90 day response which'was due in mid-April 1980.

Supplement 1 (Feb. 1980) informed licensees that equipment which was

( .g* 2-3 Ob nklin Research Center A Dmmon of The Frank 5n insatute

TER-C5257-468

' planned' to be installed as a result of lessons learned need not be addressed in that response. Some of this equipment has since been installed. Supplement #2 (Q.5, Q.21) identifie-d thac the staff position was that equipment which is installed should be treated in a manner similar to all other safety-related electrical equipment and be addressed in the November 1, 1980 submittal. This position represents no change in staff position regarding the scope of the review. However, since the staff position on this issue was unclear the following will apply:

a. Qualification information for installed TMI Action Plan equipment must be submitted by February 1, 1981.

i b. Qualification information for future TMI Action Plan equipment (ref.

NUREG-0737, when issued), which requires NRC pre-implementation review, must be submitted with the pre-implementation review data.

< l

c. Qualification information for TMI Action Plan equipment currently '

under NRC review should be submitted as soon as possible.

d. Qualification information for TMI Action Plan equipment not yet installed which does not require pre-implementation review should be submitted to NRC for review by the implementation date."

2.2.3 Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review Supplement 2 of IE Bulletin 79-01B [5] permits deferment of the review of environmental qualification for all safety-related equipment items located in plant areas where the equipment is not exposed to the direct effects of a high energy line break (HELB) or to nuclear radiation emanating from circulation of fluids containing radioactive substances. Supplement 3 of IE Bulletin 79-018

[6] permits deferment of the review of environmental qualification for all equipment required to achieve and maintain the plant in a cold shutdown condition. Supplements 2 and 3 of 79-01B originally permitted deferment until af ter February 1,1981 of the qualification review of equipment located in a mild environment or required to achieve and maintain the plant in a cold shutdown condition. Since the issuance of Supplements 2 and 3, the NRC has determined that the revicw of environmental qualification for this equipment is not within the scope of the present review program. ~

A 2-4 dd Franklin Research Center A Dusen of The Frenamn Instere

I I

TER-C5257-468 2.2.4 Clarification of Qualification Requirements 2.2.4.1 Service Conditions Inside Containment for a Loss-of-Coolant Accident (DOR Guidelines Section 4.1) j For pressurized water reactors (PWRs), the DOR' Guidelines state that the containment temperature and pressure conditions as a function of time should ba based on the most recent NRC-approved service conditions specified in the Final S'afety Analysis Report (FSAR) or other licensee documentation. In the specific case of pressure-suppression type containments, the following minimum high temperature conditions may be used

(1) boiling water reactor (BWR) i drywells -- 340*F for 6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and (2)* PWR ice condenser lower compartments --

340*F for 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br />. As stated in Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-01B [5],

"these values are a screening device, per the Guidelines, and can be used in lieu of a plant-specific profile, provided that expected pressure and humidity j conditions as a function of time are accounted for."

Service conditions should bound those expected for coolant and steam line ~

breaks inside containment with due consideration given to analytical uncertainties. The steam line break condition should include superheated l conditions, the peak temperature, and subsequent temperature / pressure profiles as fun.tions of time. If containment spray is to be used, the impact of the spray on required equipment should be assessed.

The adequacy of a plant-specific profile depends on the assumptions and design considerations at the time the profiles were developed. The DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 provide guidance and considerations required to determine if the calculated plant-specific temperature / pressure profiles s

encompass the loss-of-coolant accident (LOCA) and HELB accidents inside containment.

2.2.4.2 Submergence (DOR Guidelines Section 4.1, Subitem 3; and Section 4.3.2, Subitem 3)

Equipment submergence (inside or outside containment) should be addressed where the possibility exists that submergence of equipment may result from HELBs or other postulated occurrences. Suppler.nt 2 to IE Bulletin 79-OlB [5]

provides the following additional criterion: if the equipment satisfies :he 4 2-5 Udd Franklin Research Center A orm.on et m n.non %.

4 TER-C5257-408 guidance and other requirements of the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 for the LOCA and RELB accidents, and the licensee demonstrates that its failure will not adversely affect any safety-related function or mislead the operator after submergence, the equipment can be considered exempt from the submergence portion of the qualification requirements.

2.2.4.3 Simulated Service Conditions and Test Duration (DOR Guidelines Section 5.2.1)

The Guidelines require that the test chamber environment envelop the '

required service conditions for a time equal to the period from the initiation of the accident until the service conditions return to normal. Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-01B [5] provides the following additional criterion:

" Equipment designed to perform its safety-related function within a short time into an event must be qualified for a period of at least I hour in .

excess of the time assumed in the accident analysis. The staff has (

indicated that time is the most significant factor in terms of the margins raquired to provide an acceptable confidence level that a safety-related function will be completed. The 1-hour qualification requirement is based on the acceptance of a type test for a single unit and the sp2ctrum of accidents (small and large breaks) bounded by the single test."

1 2.2.4.4 Test Sequence (DOR Guidelines Section 5.2.3)

Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-01B [5] provides the following additional criteria:

"Secuential testing requirements are specified in NUREG-0588 and the D0R Guidelines. Licensees must follow the test requirements of the applicable document.

f

1. If the test has been completed without aging in sequence, s

justification for such a deviation must be submitted.

2. If testing of a given component has been scheduled but not initiated, the test sequence / program should be modified to include aging.

3. Test programs in progress should be evaluated regarding the ability to comply by incorporating aging in the proper aequence. These programs would then fall in the first or second category."

g 2-6 000d Franklin Research Center A DMs.on of The Frankhn insutute

45 - 4 TER-C5257-468 2.2.4.5 Radiatior.

(DOR Guidelines Sections 4.1.2, 4.2.2, and 4.3.2, Subitem 2)

Supplement 2 to IE Bulletin 79-01B [5] provides the following additional criteria:

"Both the D0R Guidelines and NUREG-0588 are similar in that they provide the methods for determining the radiation source term when considering LOCA events inside containment (100% noble gases /50% iodine /1%

particulates). These methods consider the radiation source term resulting from an event which completely depressurizes the primary system aad releases the source term inventory to the containment. s NUREG-0578 provides the radiation source term te be used for determining the qualification doses for equipment in close proximity to recirculating fluid systems inside and outside of containment as a result of LOCA.

This method considers a LOCA event in which the primary system may not depressurize and the source term inventory remains in the coolant.

) NUREG-0588 also provides the radiation source term to be used for qualifying equipment following non-LOCA events both inside and outside containment (10% noble gases /10% iodine /0% particulates).

! When developing radiation source terms for equipment qualification, the licensee must ensure consideration is given to those events which provide the most bounding conditions. The following table summarizes these 6

considerations:

LOCA Non-LOCA HELB Outside Containment NUREG-0578 NUREG-0588 (100/50/1 (10/10/0 in RCS) [*] in RCS)

Inside Containment Larger of NUREG-0588 NUREG-0588 (100/50/1 (10/10/0 in containment) in RCS) or

( NUREG-0578 .

[ (100/50/1 in RCS)

• The numbers in parentheses represent % noble gases /% iodine /% particulates.

RCS means reactor coolant system.

pg 2-7 dJ Franklin Research Center A Dmsson of The Frarman Instzee

v IER-C5257-468 Gamma equivalents may be used when consideration of the concibutions of beta exposure has been included in accordance with the guidance given in the D0R Guidelines and NUREG-0588. Cobalt 60 is one acceptable gamma radiation source for environmental qualification of safety-related equipment. Cesium 137 may also be used."

2.2.5 Additional Clarification of Qualification Requirements The NRC has worked with a number of licensees, at their requests, to provide further clarification on environmental qualification requirements. On January 20, 1982, the NRC issued Generic Letter No. 82-09 [8] presenting staff positions on certain aspects of the qualification requirements. Generic Letter No. 82-09 states:

"1. Operator Display Instrumentation Q. Given the interrelated activities associated with display ins trumentation (e.g. , NUREG-0700, NUREG-0799, proposed Regulatory Guide 1.97 and Equipment Qualification efforts), what display instrumentation referenced in emergency operating procedures must be identified in licensee submittal to the NRC?

A. All display instrumentation referenced in the emergency procedures need not be identified. The NRC requires that licensees need only f identify and have available qualification documentation on those operator display instruments which are safety-related (see Question 2). If licensees have previously supplied a listing of all display  !

instrumentation referenced in emergency procedures, licensees may identify (such as by the use of an *) which of those instruments are safety-related. The staff will defer review of the basis for this f safety-related classification until other NRC activitiesl have (

been implemented. When these other activities are implemented, additional instruments presently not requiring qualification may require upgrading to a safety-related status and/or may require qualification. Licensees will be required at that time to qualify this instrumentation in accordance with the following criteria:

o For new or upgraded instrumentation with a required operation date prior to the equipment qualification deadline, qualification must be accomplished by the equipment qualification deadline.

/

ISuch activities include preparation of new emergency procedures (NUREG-0799), control room design reviews (NUREG-0700), .and upgrading of accident monitoring instrumentation (Reg. Guide 1.97 and NUREG-0737).

fy 2-8

$J Franklin Research Center A o- m s n. reen s.ma.

- ~ . -

TER-C5257-468 o For new or upgraded instrumentation with a required operat. ion date after the equipment qualification deadline, qualification must be accomplished prior to equipment operation and plant acceptance.

! 2. Safety-Related Equipment Q. For Equipment Qualification purposes, what constitutes all safety-related electrical equipment?

A. The Commission, in CLI-80-21, required the environmental qualification of only safety-related electrical equipment.

Identification of the safety-related equipment installed at specific plants can be obtained from FSARs, Technical Specifications and other docketed correspondence setting forth NRC requirements or I

licensee commitments. Identification of safety-related equipment installed in harsh environments at specific plants muet be supplied i by the licensee. The necessity for upgrading nonsafety-related t system to safety-related status will be the subject of other NRC ,

reviews.

)

3. Replacement Parts L

1 Q. Please clarify the NRC requirements on replacement parts.

A. In CLI-80-21, the Commission stated that unless.there were sound reasons to the contrary, replacement equipment should be qualified to the standards set forth in Category I of NUREG-0588. The Commission's position was designed to promote the policy of

upgrading the environmental qualification and reliability of installed safety-related electrical equipment. To meet this overall goal, licensees must institute internal policy practices consistent with the Commission's statement. ,

Situations may arise in which upgrading to NUREG-0588, category I of replacement equipment qualified to NUREG-0588, Category II or the i

DOR Guidelines will not be compatible with overall station safety and performance goals. Licensees must review such situations on a case-by-case basis and determine that ' sound reasons to the contrary' do, in fact, exist which warrant the use of replacement j equipment (not necessarily in-kind) qualified to the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588, Category II. For equipment located in a harsh environment, licensees' procedures must provide for documentation and substantiation of such determinations.

/

g 2-9 Udd Franklin Research Center A o en at n. nman m.

TER-C5257-468 Conditions which reflect sound reasons why qualification standards for replacement of equipment in a harsh environment need not be upgraded to NUREG-0588, Category I include the following:

1. The licensee has replacement equipment in stock that meets the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588, Category II, and procurement actions regarding such replacement equipment had commenced prior to May 23, 1980.

2. Replacement equipment qualified to the NUREG-0588, Category I standards does not exist.

3. Replacement equipment qualified to the NUREG-0588, Category I standards is not available to meet installation and operation schedules. Equipment qualified to the DOR Guidelines or j NUREG-0588, Catetary II may be used for an interim period until Category I equipment is obtained and an outage of sufficient duration is available for replacement. Justification for use of the non-Category I qualified replacement equipment beyond this f interim period must be submitted to the NRC for approval prior to the end of the interim period and in sufficient time for

[

reasonable NRC review.

4. Replacement equipment qualified to NUREG-0588, Category I standards would require significant plant modifications to y accommodate its use, l

5. Operating performance and reliability data for the Category i equipment indicates poor overall equipment performance. For example, mean time to failure is significantly shorter for the Categpry I replacement equipment.

6. The use of replacement equipment qualified to NUREG-0588, Category I standards has a significant probability of creating human factor problems that will negatively affect plant safety and performance , e.g. , (1) knowledge, skills and ability of existing plant staff require significant upgrading to operate or maintain the specific Category I replacement equipment; (2) the j use of equipment qualified to Category I standards creates a l one-of-a-kind application; or (3) maintenance, surveillance or calibration activities are unnecessarily complex.

5. Submergence outside Containment Q. For equipment qualification purposes, what are the staff requirements concerning submergence of equipment outside containment?

4 2-10 Nbd FranWin Research Center '

A cem on a# The nwein wou,

TER-C5257-468 i

A. The Staff requires that the licensee submit documentation on the qualification of safety-related equipment that could be submerged due to a high energy line break outside containment.

6. Radiation Q. Is the staff screening value of 4 x 107 rads applicable to all operating reactors?

A. No. This screening value is applicable only to PWRs with dry type containments. However, for PWRs with dry type containments, the licensee may choose to use plant specific analysis instead of the screening value. For plants with other containment types, the licensee must use plant specific analysis.

Acceptable to the Staf f for equipment qualification purposes are radiation values developed as part of the plant licensing process provided that they are based on the TID 14844 source terms and are y

conservatively performed. In order to assure that the methodologies are appropriate, the' Staff requests two component specific sample calculations (one for inside and one for outside containment), and a brief written description of each of the methodologies used, their application and associated conservatisms. Such sample calculations and a statement by the licensee that the values of radiation exposure of components so derived are appropriate for environmencal qualification of equipment will satisfy the Staff's concern on the

' Radiation Specifi.ation Value' used during the qualification reviews.

7. Containment Service Conditions Q. Must the Staff value (identified in the SERs) of T SAT for PWRs and TSAT + 20*F for BWie be useo as the maximum in-containment temperature for the purpose of ecaipment qualification?

\

A. No. The Staff will accept the use of these values. However, an acceptable alternative to the NRC staff's temperature criterion used for the service conditions must base that service condition on the FSAR analysis or other NRC approved analysis, provided that the specific analysis, or a summary of that analysis, together with reference to the previous NRC acceptance of the analysis is submitted by the licensee. In addition, some of the information in the dssociated safety evaluation may require Clarification.

8. One Hour Minimum Operating Time Q. The Staff has previously indicated that certain exceptions to the one hour minimum operating time rule are permitted. Can further clarification be provided?

g 2-11 bf) Franklin Research .nter A Drnsson of The Frarmbn insatute

TER-C5257-468 A. With regard to plants subject to the qualification requirements of the DOR Guidelines or Category II of NUREG-0588, for those pieces of equipment tested prior to May 23, 1980, the test data and analysis may be used to qualify the equipment to the required operating time plus an appropriate margin. The one hour margin requirement need not be applied. However, subsequent failures should be shown not to be detrimental to plant safety.

The one hour time margin rule is not applicable to equipment whose safety function is performed prior to significant changes in the environment at the equipment location.

9. h -

Q. Must a qualified life be developed for all safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments?

A. Section 7 of the DOR Guidelines and Section 4.2, Category II of NUREG-0588, do not require a qualified life to be established for all safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments. A qualified life, in accordance with the provisions in IEEE 323-1974, is required for equipment," including replacement parts, qualified to Cr.tegory I of NUREG-0588 that is located in a harsh environment.

An acceptable method for addressing in-service degradation is through l a preventive maintenance / surveillance program with equipment and component refurbishment and/or replacement based on known {

eusceptibility to aging degradation, the results of inspections, or J manufacturers recommendations. These elements of the program lead to an understanding on a device specific basis of the nature and extent of the increased stress levels encountered during Design Basis Accidents and resultant degradation (if any) which may occur.

Arrhenius or other appropriate accelerated aging methodologies may be used to establish replacement and refurbishment schedules if the component's design and materials application are sufficiently simple and the necessary data are available to allow a meaningful applica-tion.

In plants subject to the qualification requirements of either the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 Category II, for equipment that has been identified as being susceptible to significant degradation due to thermal and radiation aging, the schedule for inspection of and/or replacement of the susceptible components in that equipment must be incorporated into the preventive maintenance and surveillance programs, and that information should be incorporated into the system component evaluation worksheets (SCEWS). For other equipment, the aging column in the SCEWS should be marked 'No Known Susceptibility'."

2-12

]

bd Franklin Research Center a orm.on om. n.nem.

TER-C5257-468

3. METHODOLOGY USED FOR THE EVALUATION

3.1 INTRODUCTION

As discussed in Section 1.3 of this report, the NRC issued Safety Evaluation Reports (SERs) on environmental qualification of safety-related equipment to licensees of all operating plants in mid-1981.

The SERs identified various equipment qualification deficiencies as indicated below:

LEGEND: DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY R - Radiation M - Margin T - Temperature I - HELB Evaluation Outside QT - Qualification Time Containment Not Completed RT - Required Time QM - Qualification Method P - Pressure RPN - Equipment Relocation or Replacement, H - Humidity Adequate Schedule Not Provided CS - Chemical Spray EXN - Exempted Equipment Justification A - Material Aging Evaluation, Inadequate Replacement Schedule, Ongoing SSN - Separate Effects Qualification Equipment Surveillance Justification Inadequate S - Submergence QI - Qualification Information Being (R) - Licensee has committed Developed to replace equipment RPS - Equipment Relocation or Replacement Schedule Provided The SERs directed licensees to "either provide documentation of the missing qualification information which demonstrates that safety-related equipment m2ets the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 requirements or commit to a corrective action (re qualification, replacement [etc.]) to establish qualification by June 30, 1982." Licensees were required to respond to the NRC within 90 days of receipt of the SER.

As stated in Section 1.1, the purpose of this report is (1) to evaluate licensees' resolutions of outstanding issues related to safety-related electrical equipment environmental qualification (EEQ) discussed in the NRC's SERs in accordance with NRC criteria, and (2) to evaluate licensees' qualification documentation of safety-related electrical equipment, including 4 3-1 0000 Franklin Research Center A Ornsson of The Frarmhn esamme

. _ _ . . - _ - . - - _ . - . _ _ _ .= ~ .- - _

4

)

TER-C525 7-468 TMI Lessons Learned Implementation equipment, located in harsh environments in l accordance with criteria established by the NRC (see Section 2 of this i

! report). The methodology used to evaluate (1) the Licensee's response to the NRC SER and (2) the equipment environmental qualification is presented herein.

3.2 METHODOLOGY I

! The Licensee, Public Service Electric and Gas Company, provided a response to the SER and additional qualification information in its submittals

[16, 17, 64] to the NRC for the Salem Unit 1 Nuclear Power Plant.

The following bases provided by the NRC were used to determine the relative completeness of the Licensee's submittals:

o Determine whether the Licensee provided specific responses to the SER l concerns.

o Determine whether the Licensee proposed corrective actions and a schedule for completion of the actions.

j o Determine whether the Licensee addressed the NRC's concern for margin with respect to the containment environmental conditions.

o Determine whether the Licensee revised the environmental parameters.

o Determine whether the Licensee's System Component Evaluation Work l Sheets (SCEWS) were updated to correct deficiencies and add supplemental information.

o Determine whether the Licensee provided justifications for interim operation for all unqualified equipment.

o Determine whether the Licensee addressed aging and incorporated the results into the equipment maintenance program.

The extensive list of safety-related elect-ical equipment

• in various locations of the plant identified by the Licensee was analyzed, and all identical equipment located within plant areas that are exposed to the same environmental service conditions was grouped together and designated an

• In this report, the term " safety-related electrical equipment" refers to che equipment defined by the two NRC Guidelines referenced in Section 2.1.

3-2 A@J Franklin Research Center A Dms.on of The Frankhn insatute n

l

TER-C5257-468

" equipment item." In this report, the term " equipment item" refers to a specific type of electrical equipment, designated by manufacturer and model, which is representative of all identical equipment in a plant area exposed to the same environmental service conditions (e.g., Flow Transmitter, Fischer &

Porter, Model 10B2496, located within containment). This analysis resulted in a reduced listing of equipment (equipment items) that formed the basis for the review.

Appendix A contains the environmental service conditions for each location. Appendix B contains the tabulation of the equipment items, locations, function, plant identification numbcrs, required operating time, and applicable qualification documentation references. Appendix C lists the plant systems identified by the Licensee and the NRC as being essential to safety.

Each item in the list of safety-related electrical equipment items was reviewed in relation to:

o the Licensee's response to the SER concerns o technical information received from the Licensee as a result of requests for additional information (Appendix E) o technical dat,1 derived from the Licensee's submittal o NRC DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 Revision 1 criteria o the Licensee's definition of harsh service environments (Appendix A) o documentation cited by the Licensee as evidence of qualification o applicable and available qualification documentation associated with the overall equipment environmental qualification program o the Licensee's analysis and/or justification of qualification

. o Licensee proposed corrective action for qualification deficiencies o the Licensee's equipment /part replacement schedules o the Licensee's technical arguments concerning the adequacy of equipment, based on system operational considerations o the Licensee's rationale concerning exemption of equipment from qualification.

nklin Research Center A Ome.on of The Franen insature

TER-C5257-468 Topics not within the scope of the evaluation are:

o completeness of the Licensee's listing of safety-related equipment o acceptability of Licensee-provided environmental service conditions.

The NRC requested an evaluation of the environmental qualification of safety-related electrical equipment located in harsh environments required for TMI Lessons Learned Implementation. The objective is to evaluate qualification documentation of equipment within the scope of IE Bulletin 79-01B, Supplement 3 (item 2), in accordance with criteria established by the NRC (see Section 2 of this report) in a manner identical to the evaluation of all other safety-related electrical equipment. The scope of this review is limited to TMI Action Plan equipment associated with those sectiona of NUREG-0737 which have an equipment installation implementation date of January 1,1982 (sections are identified below). Where applicable, a review was to be performed on installed equipment with implementation dates af ter January 1,1981 if adequately identified by the licensee.

II.B.3 (ALL/1-1-81) Post-Accident Sampling Capability of Reactor Coolant and Containment II.D.3 (ALL/1-1-81) Direct Indication of Relief and Safety Valve Position II.E.1.2 (PWR/1-1-81) Auxiliary Feedwater System Automatic Initiation and Flow Indication II.E.3.1 (PWR/1-1-81) Emergency Power Supply for Pressurizer Heaters (Safety-Grade Interfaces)

II.E.4.1 (ALL/7-1/81) Dedicated Hydrogen Penetrations II.E.4.2 (ALL/1-1-81) Containment Isolation Dependability II.F.2 (PWR/1-1-81) Instrumentation for Detection of Inadequate Core Cooling II.G.1 (PWR/1-1-81) Emergency Power for Pressurizer Equipment (Safety-Grade Interfaces)

II.K.2.10 (PWR/B&W/7-1-81) Safety-Grade Anticipatory Reactor Trip II.K.3.9 (PWR/W/1-1-81) PID Controller Modification (If Hardware Change Involved) 3-4 1

1. A J 0000 Franklin Research Center A OMuon of The Franahn insature

TE R.-C5257-468 II.K.3.12 (PWR/W/1-1-81) Anticipatory Reactor Trip upon Turbine Trip II.K.3.13 (PWR/GE/7-1-81) Separation of HPCI and RCIC Initiation Signals II.K.3.15 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Prevention of Spurious Isolation of HPCI and RCIC Systems II.K.3.19 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Interlock on Recirculation Pump Loop II.K.3.21 (BWR/GE/7-1-18) Restart of Core Spray and LPCI Systems (If Hardware Changed Out)

II.K.3.27 (BWR/GE/7-1-81) Provide Common Reference Level for Vessel Level Instrumentation (If Hardware Changed Out)

Licensees whose plants were included within the NRC Systematic Evaluation Program received a Technical Evaluation Report (TER) in addition to the SER.

The TER was based on a review of equipment environmental qualification documentation associated with the Licensee's EEQ submittals. The qualification deficiencies identified in the SER were derived from the TER. Plants included within this program were the Palisades, Oyster Creek, Ginna, Haddam Neck, Yankee Rowe, Lacrosse, and Big Rock Point plants nnd Zion Station Units 1 and 2, Indian Point Units 2 and 3, Millstone Unit 1, Dresden Unit 2, and San Onofre Unit 1. For these plants, the evaluation presented herein is based on (1) the result of the initial TER, (2) the Licensee's response to the NRC SER and the TER, and (3) the Licensee's updated EEQ submittal (s).

TERs were also developed for the following plants: Nine Mile Point Unit 1, Millstone Unit 2, Salem Unit 1, Browns Ferry Units 1, 2, and 3, Brunswick Units 1 and 2, Hatch Units 1 and 2, Dresden Unit 3, and Quad Cities Units 1 and 2. The objective of those TERs was to review the Licensee's submittals to determine if safety-related electrical equipment was reviewed for environmental qualification by the Licensee in accordance with the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588 as required by IE Bulletin 79-01B. For these 13 plants and all other plants, excluding the 14 plants associated with the Systematic Evaluation Program, the evaluation presented herein is based solely on (1) the Licensee's response to the NRC SER and (2) the Licensee's revised EEQ submittal (s).

This technical evaluation was conducted to identify (1) whether the Licensee provided an adequate response to the SER concerns (and TER concerns,

_ranklin Rese_ arch

. _ Center

TER-C525 7-468 where applicable), (2) major deficiencies within the equipment qualification program, and (3) whether the Licensee proposed adequate corrective actions to resolve qualification deficiencies and provided a schedule for completion of the corrective actions. The TER was written primarily to address deviations from the NRC criteria and requirements. Technical data or test results that satisfy the qualification criteria are not discussed herein.

The evaluation presented in Sec' tion 4 of this report includes completed equipment environmental qualification review checksheets (partially handwritten) which compile both the technical information necessary to conduct the review and the results of the evaluation. Parameters listed on these l i

checksheets were derived from the appropriate NRC screening criteria. The evaluation of each equipment item includes several checksheet pages. Only  !

l those checksheet pages necessary to complete the evaluation for each equipment '

item are included in this report. A complete listing of the checksheet pages is shown on the bottom of Checksheet la, reproduced here as Figure 3-1.

The checksheets contain the following information:

o Equipment item information (see Figure 3-1), for example:

Solenoid Valve Located in Turbine Building (Area #7)

Automatic Switch Co. (ASCO) Model LB8300B61U Actuates Feedwater Control Valves (V-4269, V-4270)

Licensee Rbference 839 Required Operating Time: Short term (SI signal)

TER Checksheet No. 1 Reference 59, Section 4.5.2.6 Licensee Submittal: Page 9 [62]; Table 3, Page 1 [1]; SCSW l o Qualification deficiencies identified in the SER (see Figure 3-1) o Licensee's response to the SER o Licensee's statements and rationale for qualification o Licensee's corrective action and replacement schedule o Evaluation of qualification including identification of all deficiencies o Evaluation of system considerations presented by the Licensee as a rationale for excluding equipment from qualification.

The results of the evaluation are summarized on Checksheet 2 (Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Form) for each equipment item. Checksheet tii_nkiin Research Center

TE R-C525 7-468 4 NRC Contract No. NRC43-79-118 Page dbu Franklin Research Center FRC Project No.CS257 A Dhneen of The FranWm inzuwe FRC Assignment No.13 lc Dh aad Race Sweets. Phda . Pa. 19103(215)448-1000 FRC Task No.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _

Equipment Item No. 1 Solenoid Valves Located in Turbine Building (Area #7)

Automatic Switch Co. (ASCO) Model LB8300861U Actuates Feedvater Control Valves (V-4269, V-4270)

Licensee Reference 1617 Required Operating Time: Short term (SI signal)

TER Checksheet No.1 Reference 59 Section 4.5.2.6 Licensee Submittal: Page 9 [62]; Table 3, Page 1 (1]; FRC SCZW l 1

l l

l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITDI(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for IAgend) l l R, T, QY, RT, P, H, CS, A. S, (R), M, I, @(, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CMECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item - la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Susanary Forma 2 Licensee Response to NBC SER 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, $b, Se, 5d, Se, 5f, 59, 5b, 51, 5)

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 6b Equipment Susumary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Susunary 7a, 7b, 7c Figure 3-1. Sample Checksheet Page la

" Equipment Item" g 3-7 N/J Franklin Research Center A Du oa or the rr.n a w anw.

TE R-C5257-468 2 specifically identifies any qualification deficiencies determined by the evaluation and identifies the NRC qualification category to which the equipment item was assigned. A sample Checksheet 2 is presented in Figure 3-2.

All information was reviewed for conformance to the NRC criteria referenced in Section 2 of this report. As requested by the NRC, all appli-cable and available qualification documentation associated with the overall Equipment Environmental Qualification (EEQ) program was used by the reviewers, whether referenced by the Licensee or not.

Upon completion of the review for each equipment item, an overall evaluation of the component and a specific conclusion with respect to its qualification was developed. Based on the evaluation, each equipment item was assigned to one of the generic qualification categories provided by the NRC.

The NRC category descriptions are presented in Section 3.3 of this report.

1 3.3 NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORIES AND DEFINITIONS o NRC Category I.a EQUIPMENT THAT SATISFIES ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DOR GUIDELINES OR NUREG-0588, OR HAS ACCEPTABLE DEVIATIONS FROM THE DOR /NUREG CRITERIA This category includes equipment items which are fully acceptable on the basis that all applicable criteria defined in the DOR Guidelines or NUREC-0588 are (1) satisfied and the equipment has been found to be l qualified or (2) sufficient information has been presented to determine that deviations from the criteria are acceptable or insignificant.

o NRC Category I.b EQUIPMENT FOR WHICH DEVIATIONS FROM THE D0R GUIDELINES OR NUREG-0588 ARE JUDGED CONDITIONALLY ACCEPTABLE PROVIDED THAT SPECIFIC MODIFICATIONS ARE MADE This category includes equipment items that do not satisfy one or more of the applicable criteria defined in the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588; however, the Licensee has stated that specific modifications will be made on or before a designated date. This equipment is considered by NRC to be conditionally acceptable provided that the specific modifications are made by the Licensee. When the modifications are completed as proposed, the Licensee states that the equipment will satisfy all applicable NRC requirements. Examples of specific modifications are (1) replacement of unqualified equipment with qualified equipment, (2) equipment hardware 3-8 3d Franklin Research Center Ao-oman.r.aammu.

TER-C5257-468 s

NRC Contract No. NRC43 79118 b FrankhnResearchCenter FRC Project No.CSIS7 PaGe )

A(>nnonof TheFranWininamme FRC Assignment No.13 2 1 2Dih and Race Seeset PMe.. Pa.19103 G154 4461000 FRC Task No.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _ l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SLMMARY FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) i Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation l Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Acequate l

0 Peak Pressure Adequate

( o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied

> Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Tima) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG4588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available Figure 3-2. Sample Checksheet Page 2

" Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Form" Oh 3-9 UUbd Franidin Research Center A om.cn a n. Fr.n.a m u.

TER-C5257-468 I

i modification, (3) equipment relocation above submergence level, (4) l relocation or shielding of equipment from radiation source, (5) verifica-i tion of qualification by additional testing, (6) equipment relocation to a l mild environment, and (7) qualification testing of equipment in progress.

o NRC Category II.a EQUIPMENT FOR WHICH QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION IS INSUFFICIENT TO

, ESTABLISH THAT THE EQUIPMENT IS OR IS NOT QUALIFIED IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE 4

DOR GUIDELINES OR NUREG-0588 The qualification of equipment items in this category, in accordance

with the requirements of the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588, is significantly j deficient or inconclusive based upon review of (1) the documentation j provided by the Licensee or (2) applicable and available qualification documentation associated with the overall equipment environmental qualification program. The qualification documentation indicates signifi-cant deficiencies, which can be categorized as follows

(1) appropriate documentation reflecting qualification has not been cited and made available i for review by the Licensee and there is no knowledge of applicable docu-

! mentation; (2) the Licensee is awaiting qualification from the equipment vendor; or (3) the qualification documentation indicates significanc l l deficiencies; however, where testing was conducted, no reported failures or j

! severe anomalies were observed which would unquestionably af fect the ability of the equipment to perform its design basis safety function (s).

o NRC Category II.b EQUIPMENT THAT IS UNQUALIFIED l

This category includes equipment items whose qualification documenta-

tion has been judged to be seriously deficient based upon review of (1) the documentation provided by the Licensee, or (2) applicable and available f qualification documentation associated with the overall equipment j environmental qualification program. The qualification documentation j indicates serious deficiencies reported during testing; for example, severe

! i anomalies or failure of the test specimen, which could affect the ability i

of the equipment to perform its safety function. NRC has requested immediate written notification when an equipment item is placed in this category during the course of the review.

o NRC Category II.c EQUIPMENT THAT SATISFIES ALL APPLICABLE REQUIREMENTS OF THE DOR GUIDELINES OR NUREG-0588 WITH THE EXCEPTION OF QUALIFIED LIFE This category includes equipment items that are acceptable on the basis that all applicable criteria defined in the DOR Cuidelines or NUREG-0588 are satisfied with the exception of the qualified life criterion. The .

Licensee (1) has not evaluated qualified life or replacement schedule, (2) has not adequately evaluated qualified life or replacement schedule, or (3) has not adequately intepreted qualified life in terms of calendar time.

[ Note: The component replacement schedule discussed in Section 7.0 of the g 3-10 )

bd Franklin Research Center A Dnamon of The Frannan ansesee

TE R-C5257-468 DOR Guidelines is, in effect, a qualified life. It is not essential to use the term " qualified life," but the replacement schedule must be justified.]

o NRC Category III.a EQUIPMENT THAT IS EXEMPT FROM QUALIFICATION This category includes equipment items that are exempt from qualification on the basis that (1) the equipment does not provide a safety function (i.e. , should not have been included in the equipment list submitted by the Licensee), or (2) the specific safety-related function of the equipment can be accomplished by some other designated equipment that is full 3 q ialified and satisfies the single failure criterion. In addition, a:4y f ailure of the exempt equipment must not mislead the operator l or degrade the ability of qualified equipment to perform its required l

safety-related function.

I o NRC Category III.b l EQUIPMENT'NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THE QUALIFICATION REVIEW This category includes equipment items addressed by the Licensee in the l equipment environmental qualification submittals which are (1) required to achieve and maintain the plant in a cold shutdown condition or (2) located in a mild environment. Supplement 2 of IE Bulletin 79-01B permits deferment of the review of environmental qualification for all safety-related equipment items located in plant areas where the equipment is not exposed to the direct effects of a high energy line break (HELB) or to l nuclear radiation emanating from circulation of fluids containing radioactive substances. Supplement 3 of IE Bulletin 79-01B permits deferment of the review of environmental qualification for all equipment required to achieve and maintain the plant in a cold shutdown condition.

Supplements 2 and 3 of IE Bulletin 79-01B originally permitted deferment until af ter February 1,1981 of the qualification review of equipment located in a mild environment or required to achieve and maintain the plant in a cold shutdown condition. Since the issuance of Supplements 2 and 3, the NRC has determined that the review of environmental qualification for this equipment is not within the scope of this report.

o NRC Category IV EQUIPMENT FOR WHICH QUALIFICATION DOCUMENTATION HAS NOT BEEN MADE AVAILABLE FOR REVIEW This category includes equipment items for which qualification documentation in accordance with the requirements of the DOR Guidelines or NUREG-0588 has been cited by the Licensee as evidence of qualifica-tion; however, this documentation has not been made available for review.

Therefore, a conclusion cannot be reached with respect to qualification of this equipment.

_nklin Rese_ arch

_. Center

TER-C5257-468 3.4 IMPLEMENTATION GUIDE FOR FULFILLING NRC CRITERIA The NRC has requested that a detailed implementation guide for fulfilling NRC criteria be prepared as part of this assignment. The implementation guide will present a fully detailed discussion of the principal qualification criteria presented in the DOR Guidelines and NUREG-0588. The primary emphasis will be to clarify technical points, eliminate possible misconceptions, and clearly provide definitive guidance to enable licensees to' understand and resolve, in an expeditious manner, qualification deficiencies identified as a result of this TER. The implementation guide (TER-C5257-532) has been prepared and issued to the NRC. The implementation guide is either appended

'~

to this TER or will be forwarded to the Licensee by the NRC under a separate letter. The Licensee is encouraged to review that document.

A 3-12 000hranklin Research Center A Onasson of The Frentdin Insetute

TER.-C5257-468

4. TECHNICAL EVALUATION

4.1 INTRODUCTION

The technical evaluation presented in this section represents the equipment environmental qualification (EEQ) assessment for each equipment item listed in Appendix B in accordance with the methodology presented in Section 3 of this report. The evaluations were conducted to identify any major daficiencies within the Licensee's equipment qualification program and to determine whether the Licensee (1) provided an adequate response to the SER concerns, (2) proposed adequate corrective actions to resolve qualification deficiencies, and (3) provided a schedule for completion of the corrective actions.

The evaluations are based on the available qualification documentation provided by the Licensee, complemented in several cases by other relevant technical information. The major qualification deficiencies that have been idsntified and the results of the evaluation are shown in the Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms (Tables 4-1, 4-2, 4-3, and 4-4) presented in Section 4.2.

Observations concerning the Licensee's qualification methodology prasented in response to the NRC SER are presented in Section 4.3.

Technical evaluations of the environmental qualification of the equipment items are presented in Section 4.4.

gg 4-1 bd Franklin Research Center A o==n a n. nwon mau.

TER-C525 7-468 4.2

SUMMARY

OF THE EVALUATION The following tabulations represent a summary of the results of the equipment environmental qualification evaluation conducted in accordance with the methodology presented in Section 3.

Table 4-1 summarizes the number of equipment items assigned to each NRC qualification category as a result of the evaluation.

Table 4-2 summarizes the number of equipment items found to have a specific qualification deficiency.

Table 4-3 summarizes the number of equipment items for which the Licensee has proposed a specific corrective action to resolve a qualification deficiency.

Table 4-4 consists of Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms for the equipment items, identifying (1) compliance with the qualification requirements defined in Section 2, (2) the resultant NRC qualification category, and (3) the Licensee proposed corrective action.

/%

dudU Franklin Research Center A ommn a nw neen mau.

TER-C5257-468 TABLE 4-1 NUMBER OF EQUIPMENT ITEMS IN EACH QUALIFICATION CATEGORY NUMBER OF NRC CATEGORY EQUIPMENT CATEGORY DESCRIPTION ITEMS sce=============================================================================

I.A EQUIPMENT QUALIFIED---------------------------------------- 7

[ EQUIPMENT ITEM NO(S).: 7, 39, 40, 41, 45, 46, 48, 48 3 I . B. EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION PENDING MODIFICATION----------~~~-- 51

( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 22, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 54, 57, 61, 62, 63, 64, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 89, 92, 93 )

II.A EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION NOT' ESTABLISHED---------------~~--- 14 C EQUIPMENT ITEM NOCS).: 1, 2, 18, 19, 35, 36, 38, 44, 47, 50, 65, 90, 91, 94 1

, II.B EQUIPMENT NOT QUALIFIED---~~------------------------------- 0 II.C EQUIPMENT SATISFIES ALL. REQUIREMENTS EXCEPT QUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE JUSTIFIED----------- 3

[ EQU1PMENT ITEM N0(S).: 42, 43, 52 )

III.A EQUIPMENT EXEMPT FROM QUALIFICATION------------------------ 15-

[ EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 6, 9, 10, 11, 20, 21, 23, 24, 53, 55, 56, 58, 59, 60, 88 )

III.B EQUIPMENT NOT IN THE SCDPE OF THE REVIEW------------------- 2

[ EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 33, 37 3 i

IV DOCUMENTATION NOT MADE AVAILABLE--------------------------- 2

[ EQUIP, MENT ITEM N0(S).: 49, 51 )

TOTAL 94

ne============================================================================

A, 4-3

!)N[F anklin Research Center A Omsson of The Franen insatute

TER-C5257-468 TABLE 4-2 QUALIFICATION DEFICIENCY

SUMMARY

NUMBER OF DEFICIENT EQUIPMENT NRC REQUIREMENT ITEMS

=========================================================== san ======azaz

l

1. DOCU'MENTED EVIDENCE.0F QUALIFICATION ADEQUATE------------- 51 j

( EQUIPMENT ITEM NOCS).: 1, 2, 8, 12, 13, 14, 17, 18, 19, 22, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, l 34, 38, 44, 50, 54, 57, 61, 62, 63, 64, 67, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 89, 90, 91, 92 3

2. ADEQUATE SIMILARITY BETWEEN EQUIPMENT AND TEST SPECIMEN ESTABLISHED-----~~~----~~~~~----~~---------- 16 l C EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 5, 15, 16, 18, 19, 25, l 44, 47, 50, 65, 66, 68, 69, 89, 93, 94 )

3. AGING DEGRADATION EVALUATED ADEQUATELY-------------------- 21

[ EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15,  !

16, 36, 38, 42, 43, 47, 52, 65, 66, 68, 69, 89,  !

90, 91, 93 )

l 4. QUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE )

ESTABLISHED (IF REQUIRED)--------~~----------------------- 19  :

C EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S) : 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 15, l 16, 36, 42, 43, 47, 50, 52, 65, 66, 68, 69, 89, 93 3 1

5. PROGRAM ESTABLISHED TO IDENTIFY AGING DEGRADATION-----~~-- 1

( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 50 )

6.. CRITERIA REGARDING AGINC SIMULATION (IF REQUIRED)---------------------------------------- 1

[ EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 52 )

i 7. CRITERIA REGARDING TEMPERATURE / PRESSURE EXPOSURE:

1 A . - PE AK TEM P ER ATURE AD EQU ATE----------~~----------- 0 B. - PEAK PRESSURE ADEQUATE-------------------------- 0 C. - DURATION ADEQUATE------------------------------- 4-( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 15, 16, 65, 89 )

l

, ================================================================================ ,

i l

i peds 4-4

,b nklin Research Center A Desman of The Frarmhn insutute

TER-C5257-468 Table 4-2 (Cont.)

QUALIFICATION DEFICIENCY

SUMMARY

NUMBER OF DEFICIENT

- EQUIPMENT NRC REQUIREMENT SCCUz=====z====z======a=====z===z====z==z=a=z===zzzzzzzz======z==z=== ITEMS

z=a

D. - REQUIRED PROFILE ENVELOPED ADEQUATE'.. ----------- 8 C EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 1, 2, 3, 4, 15, 16, 44, 89 )

E. - STEAM EXPOSURE (IF REQUIRED) ADEQUATE----------- 0

8. CRITERIA REGARDING SPRAY SATISFIED------------------------ 4

[ EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 1, 2, 36, 90 )

9. CRITERIA.REGARDING SUBMERGENCE SATISFIED------------------ 1 i ( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 35 1

10. CRITERIA REGARDING RADIATION SATISFIED-------------------- 1 i

( EQUIPMENT ITEM NO(S).: 50 1

11. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST SEQUENCE SATISFIED---------------- 0

12. CRITERIA REGARDING. TEST FAILURES OR SEVERE ANOMALIES (IF ANY) SATISFIED------------------------------------ 7 C EQUIPMENT ITEM NOCS).:

• 3, 4, 15, 16, 65, 66, 89, 89 )

13. CRITERIA REGARDING FUNCTIONAL TESTING SATISFIED-=--------- 3

[ EQUIPNENT ITEM N0(S).: 1, 2, 47 1 L 14. CRITERIA REGARDINO INSTRUMENT ACCURACY SATISFIED---------- 8 t

[ EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 1, 2, 15, 16, 65, 66, 68, 89 )

i

! 15. TEST DURATION MARGIN (1 HOUR + FUNCTION TIME) SATISFIED--- 0 I

16. CRITERIA REGARDING MARGINS SATISFIED (NUREG-0588, CAT. 1)- 0 l

l canonn===================z==============================

l i

-<T3&m 4-5 ddbd Franklin Research Center 4 5 on on m re. nan in.t ..

1

TER-C5257-468 TABLE 4-3 LICENSEE CORRECTIVE ACTION

SUMMARY

NUMBER OF CORRECTIVE ACTION EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION ITEMS C2333232232=33333=333=333=====33=33=3=332=3==32333333232323=32333333333333333=3 1.. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT WITH QUALIFIED EQUIPMENT----------------- 42

[ EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 2, 3, 4,. 8, 12, 15, 16, 22, 25, 26, 27, 28, 32, 34, 57, 61, 62, 63, 64, 66, 68, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 78, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 92 1

2. EQUIPMENT MODIFICATION-------~~~------~~~---------------------- 0

3. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION ABOVE SUBMERGENCE LEVEL------------------- O r

4. RELOCATE OR SHIELD EQUIPMENT FROM RADIATION SOURCE------------- 1

( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S) : 17 )

5. VERIFY QUALIFICATION BY ADDITIONAL TESTING / ANALYSIS------------ O f

G. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION TO A MILD ENVIRONMENT--------------------- 1

( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 67 )

7. QUALIFICATION TESTING OF EQUIPMENT IN PROGRESS----------------- 1

( EQUIPMENT ITEM NOCS).: 54 )

8. OTHER (FOR DETAILED DESCRIPTION SEE SPECIFIC' EQUIPMENT ITEMS)-- 10

( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 1, 5, 13, 14, 29, 30, 31, 69, 87, 93 1 SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION (S) HAS BEEN PROVIDED (SEE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT ITEM FOR COMPLETION DATE)-------- 49

( EQUIPMENT ITEM N0(S).: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 8, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 22, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 34, 61, 63, 66, 67, 68, 69, 70, 71, 72, 73, 74, 75, 76, 77, 79, 79, 80, 81, 82, 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 89, 92, 93 ) .

as======_;======3=======3==============t.2=========3=============================

ZA J Uddd Franklin Research Center m onan.n.enm m.

Table 4-4 EQUIPIEIT EFTIRONhENTAL QUALIFICATION SupuART FORM seassammessesseseemseeeeeeeeeeeesessessemesseesses j r

2; s e e n.. se ss me n.s ea mm e ss e.m o s se.ne s.e m me.s e e s.a oe s s e s s ee m m e.n e.

<=_

rRC E0uIPMENT ITEM NUneEps i

>n ses.. es.easses.mossessesses.emmmessessessessemmenes.es.o.aom Bj 3 8008800280038004800530068007800010098080808380128013801480158 EE sesse nes ses sesses sessess m annessessem I NRC REQUIREMENTS eseness essessessee m s o mosessessesesam mesesessenosessessessemoesesse ssee ssessessemaaneessessosomes (DEsIGNATIONg I E3 DErICIr=CT3 3 4 8 g 8 8 8 i L t g g g  :

, 3 ================ =======================. 9=== i i I

4 3. DOCUWENTED EVIDENCE OF QUALIFICATION ADEQUATE ====================3 I 3I I 3 3 3 1 8 8 8 8 3 3 8  : 8 8  :

I g@33 l l 3 3 8 8I I g 3 gI II3I g g 1

, 2. ADEQUATE $1MILARITT BETNEEN EQUIPMENT AND L i i t t i 1 3 3 3 3 3 3g i TEST SPECIMEN E5fASLISHED===================,======?==========...=g 8 l l gI g g g g g 3 3

g g 3

g 3

gI g 3

8 g

2[,[ t

3. AGING DEGRADATION EVALUATED ACE 00ATELT=================e**=======l

4. QUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE I II II!I II 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8I I

, ESTABLISMED (IF RE0UIRED)================**======================4t t 3 ( l 1 8 8 L

! l l l l l 3 l

f)

$e f

I I IIII II 8I3 3 8 8 I I 8 8 8 II 8 S. PROGRAM ESTABLISHED TO IDENTIFT AGING DEGRADAT10N===========?*===8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I ER I 6. CRITERIA REGARDING AGING SIMULATION SATISFIED (IF RE0pI9ED)======8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

3  : T. CRITERIA REGARDING TEMPERATURE / PRESSURE EIPOSUREg t t t t t t i 8 8 3 3 3 8 1 I

i B B t t t $ $ $

A. = PEAE TEMPERATURE ADE0UATE=*==*====*=====*==============8 I I I a s. = PEAE PRESSURE ADEQUATE =================================l 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I 8 I i t t t 8 I I I I I I 8 3 8 8 8 I C. DURATION ADE0UATE======================*====?=====?*===l I t I I t I i t t t t I t t tI I D.

• REQUIRED PROFILE ENTELOPED ADEQUATELT=============?*===8 I I I 8 I i I i 8 8 8 I I I I I I 8II I E.

• STEAN EIPDSURE (IF REQUIRED) ADEQUATE==================3 4 3 3 j 8 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 8. CRITERIA REGARDING SPRAT SATI5FIED======================?===?==*=8 I 8 I I I I I I l 8 8 8 8 I I I 8 9. CRITERIA REGARDING SUBNERGENCE 8ATISFIED======*=============?====t 4 4 t i t i I t t t l $ $ 3 1 1 10. CRITERIA REGARDING RADIATION SAT!3FIED===========================l l t l I I I l t  ! I i 1 8 8 8 3 11. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST SEQUENCE 3ATI5FIED=======================t i l i i t B I i t t 3 8 I t 4' i 12. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST FAILURES OR SEVERE ANOMALIES. 3 3 3 8 3 8 3 g a 3 1 8 3 8  : I (IF ANY) 34TISFIED===========================================8

8 24 3 8I II$ 8 8 8 8 8 8 I i 8 8I $

I II. CU37ERIA REGARDING FUNCTIONAL TESTING 84TISFIED=======?==========t I & I t t t t t 1 i t I L t t 5 3 8 14. CLaTERIA REGARDING INSTRUMENT,ACCURACT SATI8FIED============?====g I IIl 8 8 3 8 l 3 3 8 g 3 3 3II i 15. TEST DURATION MARGIN (t NOUR + FUNCTION TIME) 84TISFIED===?=?====t i 8 8 8 8 3 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 4 3 1 16. CRITERIA REGARDING NARGINS SAf!8FIED (NUREG=0560, CAT. 8)*=======4 8 8 8 8 4 4 3 4 8 I 1 8 8 1 3 messeseesusseesessessemesesammeneemmemmaessammessoassessessmenemmenessemesesesseesesammesenemoneeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesomeensemesseses

! NRC QUALIFICATION CATEG04T (DESIGNATION: I e CATEGORT) i I i I I I I i i 8 ========================== ===========================

1 8 8 8 i I 1 3 3 3 3 1 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 8 I.4 EQUIPMENT 0UALIFIED============= ===================?========8 8 8 l t t tI 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 I.B EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION PENDING N0DIFICATION================*l I 8 II.A EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION NOT E3fABLISHED===***================8 I 8I I 8 3I lI8II III 8 I II 3I II II i I I I I I I I 1 8 I 8 8 I I II.8 EQUIPMENT NOT 00ALIFIED======================================t t t I t I i 1 3 3 1 1 8 3 3 3 8 II.C EQUIPMENT SATISFIES ALL REQUIREMENTS EICEPT .1 8 8 8 3 3 3 I 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 8 8 QUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE JUSTIFIED ========?... I

! III.A EQUIPMENT EIEMPT FROM 0UALIFICATION==========================8 8 I i 1 1 8 8 8 8 I I i 8 8 8  !

8 4 I I II 3 I 8I 8I $I I I 3 $ 8 i

i III.B EQUIPMENT NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEN================?====t 8 i t t t 8 8 { l 3 1 I t 1 IV DOCUMENThTION NOT MADE AVAILA8LE=============================8 I i

8 8 8 8 8 8 I I 3 8 8 8 8

• esamenesessansenemonessessommensessemessenessenesseemassessessessenessmeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee$ eeeeeeessemessenesseessessessenemesessenemme ,4 pq l CORRFCTIVE ACTION SPECIFIED (DESIGNATION: Ie ACIION SPECIFIED) l I I I I I t =========================== 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 pc

=================================== 3 3 8 8 $ t t t t t 4 3 8 3

1. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT WITH OUALIFIED EQUIPMENT ===================8 8I II II I I I I IIi I 2. EQUIPMENT N0DIFICATION====*======================================$ 8 8 l l 8 8 II l 8 8 8

8 8

3 3 I I 3 8 8 3

()

g3 8

3. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION ABOVE THE SUBMERGENCE LEVEL ========. =======8 { t I l I 8 4. RELOCATE OR SHIELD EQUIPMENT FROM RADIATION 60URCE===============8 8 8 8 3 B 3 3 3 3 1 (n t

8 8 8 1 3 8 4 I I I I I I 8 3 %J I S. VERIFY QUALIFICATION ST ADDITIONAL TESTING /ANALT818-=============8 8 8 8 8 3 8 3 3 8 8 3 3 3 3 8 1

6. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION To A MILO ENVIR0kpENT==*====================t t t t 4, i T. QUALIFICATION TESTING OF EQUIPMENT IN PR0GRESS==?================t 1 8 8 i t 3 8 3 3 3 I I en I 8 3 3 8 3 3 3 3 3 I I I t 3 8 Do S. OTHER (===8EE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT ITER IF CHECEED===)==========*==8 I I 8 8 8I3 4 I I B $ 8 8III i 3 8

I I I I I I I I I 8 '8 l t 1 3 8 8 8CHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION (S) HA3 SEEN PROVIDED===8 I 8III II 8II I II 3 1 8I II II II I s m e s s a nea s e s s e n e s e s s e m a m e m o n e e se sse s s e s s e n esse em es e n s a n s s a m m en e mm a s s e s s e ma ssenessemessemenes ammenones ss e s se s seme s s e ss e s s e sses s

Tabic 4-4 (Cont.)

Eg, EQUIPMENT TNVIRONMENTAL OUALIFICATION SusMART FORM .

c essmaammeessemessemeenseemames.sessessmes.easazaan

,5/

enemmessansenessesseeen... messessenemme.e sessamme. eemseen.

Vg I FRC EQUIPMENT I 8

{ 2E see..e.a..e.....e.e..een.asse... ten es.....se... NUMBERS ... . e. ..seen.

,3 y 7n

.e.es....

....es...se.e.es........e...es.es.....e......es.

I NRC REQUIREMENT 3

.......se...3036303T308010101020I02880228823

.....es.o... .sesses.es.sene. 02480258020:02T4020:020:0304 es....smme..e.easee.e.e. ..e.

Ta I ================ (DESIGNATION: I e DEFICIENCT3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 mg ============================= 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 i

1. DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF QUALIFICATION ADE00 ATE ====================8 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 I 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 O 8IgIIII I II 1 l

i

2. ADEQUATE SIMILARITY BETNEEN EQUIPMENT AND ~

TEST SPECINEN t 3 I I 4 3 3 3 3

3 8I3I 8I 8III3II 3

g}8()

r i

1

3. AGING DECRADATION ESTABLI3HED=================*======================l I 1 EVALUATED ADEQUATELT**=========================8 I 3 4 8I$I 8

I 3

i 1 l l 3I 3 3 3 3

3 l

3 8

3 3

3 3

3 3 8 I 4. QUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE I I I 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4

• ($ ESTABLISHED (IF REQUIRED)**===================*==================1 1 I 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 3 3 3 g I 5I I L 3 3 1 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 m I 5. PROGRA4 ESTABLISMED TO IDENTIFT AGING DEGRADATION ===========?====8 8 8 3 3 3 $ 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

8 6. CRITERIA REGARDING AGING SIMULATION SATISFIED (IF REQUIREDi======8 8 8 8 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3

T. CRITERIA REGARDING TEMPERATURE / PRESSURE EXPOSURE 3 4 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 A. = PEAK TEMPERATURE ACE 0UATE==============================.33 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 i B.

• PEAR PRES 3URE ADEQUATE ==============*==================l8 1 $ 3 3 I l 3 g l 3 3 g g I C.

• DURATION 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 I ADE0UATE======================================l8 D.

• REQUIRED PROFILE EN. ELOPED ADE0UATELY==================l I I I l 3 8 8 g 3 3 g 3 g g 3

g 3 3 3 g

3 g

i I g 3 3 3 3 3 3 E.

• STEAN EXPO 5URE (IF REQUIRED) ADEQUATE ================.=l 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 g

. 8

8. CRITERIA REGaRDING SPRAT SAT!5FIED======*===***=*==============*=1 3 3 3 8 3 3 3 3 g I 3 g 3 3

9. CRITERIA REGA3 DING SUBMERGENCE $4TISFIED*==========*=============

8 8 4 5 I I I I 4 3 I I I 3 8 8 3 3 8 3 3 8 10. CRITERIA REGARDING RADIATION SATISFIED =======*===========*=======8 l 3 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 33 I 11. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST SEQUENCE 8ATISFIEDa======================8 3 3 $ 3 3 8 1 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 3 I 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 8 8 3 3 3 3 CD I1 12. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST FAILURES OR SEVERE ANOMALIES l 3 3 (Ir ANT) 3ATI5FIED======*===========*=================**=====3 8 8 8 8 3 3 l 3 3 3 3 3 3 l 8II g i 3 i l I I I. 3 I l I I i 13. CRITEhin REGARD 3NG FUNCTIONAL TESTING SATISFIED =*=====*==========3 8 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 4

8 14. CRITERIA REGARDING INSTRUMENT ACCURACT 3ATISFIEDe======== .. ====l I ( l l 3 3 3 3 3 3 i 15. TEST DURATION 1 3 3 3 3 3 g l 3 3 8 g 8 86. CRITERIA REGARDING MARGIN (8 MOUR MapGINS + FUNCTION TIME) 84TISFIEDa===*=====8 SATISFIED 8 8 8 3 3 3 8 8 8 3 l t 3 3 sammessenessesammessessenessemanassenessesma(NUREC=0500, CAT. 1)*=======l 3

l 8 I l 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 3 i NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORT (DESIGNATION: ssessessesessessessessenessessoassessessesseneseenesseeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeemonesseammene I e CATEGORTI l i I ========================== **====*========== =========

1 8 8 I I I I g 3 I g i I g 1 1.A EQUIPMENT 0UALIFFED===========.-==================.-=....-===1 3 3 I I I 3 3 3 3 8 3 3 1 3 3 8 3.b EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION PENDING MODIFICATION**=============*=8 I III g 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 II.A EQUIPMFNT GUALIFICATION NOT ESTA9LISHED========.... =========8 I I I II I I IIIIII$I II II $

8 II.B EQUIPMENT NOT 3 3I 3g3 3 3 3 3 3 i 00ALIFigD====.=====.=======.=====.=======.=====l 8 1 3 g 3 3 3 3 3 3 II.C EQUIPMENT SATISFIES ALL REQUIREMENTS EXCEPT 3 3 3 3 3 g 3 3 3 g i I 1 8 i I 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 I 3

t 3 8 III.A OUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE JUSTIFIED?======**====8 I EQUIPMENT EXEMPT FROM I I 3 8 8 8 3 $ I 8 8 8 8 8 l III.B 0UALIFICATION==========================l 8 8 8 IIII( 4III3 g IV EQUIPMENT NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEN=====================$ l t 5 8 8 8 8 8 pq DOCUMENTATION NOT MADE AVAILABLE=============== 8 3 3 3 l l 3 3 3 3 3 3 g pq l 8 1 1 3 8 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 pc s3I ===========================

a a mm eACTION CORRECTIVE ss e SPECIFIED n e s e s s e(DESIGNATION n e s s m aIena m a s s e s s e$ n e s eI s sI e Ie s I s ene s am mas e m m e s s=e=n=e=s=e=s=s=e=s=

ACTION.8PECIFIED) 8 5 g I 8 3 3 I =================================== 1 8 8 3 I I 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 8 (k

i 1. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT NITN QUALIFIED EQUIPMENT===================8 I 3 3 3 3 pa

2. EQUIPMENT 8 8 8 8 8 3I I 8 II8I 3I II3 5 8 kn 8 N0DIFICATION===========================================8 4 3 3 3 4 3 3 8 =4 1

3. EQUIPMENT PELOCATION ABOVE THE SUghERGENCE LEVEL ============?====l 8 1 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 8

4. RELOCATE OR SHIELD EQUIFMENT FRCN RADIATION SOURCE===========*===8 II I I 5 8 8 3 3 3 3 8 8 3 j3 1

5. VERIFT GUALIFICATION BT ADDITIONAL TE571NG/ ANALYSIS =============8 8 8 $

8 8 8 8 8 3 3 8 8 8 I Ch

$ $ 3

6. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION TO A MILD ENTIh0NMENT=======================8 4 3 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 OD I T. QUALIFICATION TESTING OF EQUIPMENT IN 3 3 8 8 8 8 I I 3 3 3 I I $ 3 1 8. OTHER (===SEE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT ITEN PROGRE55===================l IF CHECRED===)====*========g I l I l I I I I 3 3 8 8 8 8 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 I 8 3 5 I

3 4 8 4 3 3I IIl I SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION 8 3 8 8 8 3 3 I I I I I I semesammassammassamassemessommessoassessammessam(S) NAS SEEN PROVIDED===g I II 3 3 8 8 II I 3 3I8IgI 3IIIgI3 mesasemanessenese,seenssessenessessemasonesenememmenesessmeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeesome

--w __ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Table 4-4 (Cont.)

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SU'NART FORN o ..................................................

a3 c=

n ly FRC EQUIPMENT ITEN NUNDERS 8 8

S/

3

!E Lo .......................................................................103130321033303410358036803780301039304030414 (CESIGNATIONE Z . DEFICIENCT) 8 8 8 8 4 I I I I 4 8 8 8 8 8 8

[jf 3 kBC REQUIREMENTS g g g g g g g g g g g g t ================ ============================= g g g g

,, ====================t I II I II I 3* 3 3I 3 3 3 3 3 3I t I

($ $ t. DOCUuENTED EVIDENCE OF QUALIFICATION ADEQUATE i 2. ADEQUATE SIMILARITT SETNEEN EQUIPMENT AND

. 8 8 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8I 4 8 g gg TEST SPECIMEN ESTA8LISMED========================================t 8 3 3 3 8 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 3I II I 3

8 y :7 8 8 8I 8 8I t 3 8 3

3. AGING DEGRADATION EVALUATED ALEQUATELIa=========================*8 8 8 4 8

g () i

.8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 II II I 8 8 g4 8 4. QUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDUEE 8 8 8 8 3I 1 4 8 8 8 4 3

.R 3 ESTABLISMED (tF REQUIRED)=================*=*====================8

================8 I I I I I I I I i i i 8 8 8 8

% 8 5. PROGRAN ESTABLISHED TO 10ENTIFT AGING DEGRADATION 3 3 3 8 1 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 .8 8 8 8 6. CRITERIA REGARDING ACING SINULATION SATISFIED (!F REQUIRED)======iI I I 3 8 I l 8 I I I t i I I 8 i T. CRITERIA REGARDING TEMPERATURE / PRESSURE EIPOSUREI 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 A.

• PEAK TEMPERATURE ADEQUATE **=====*======*==========?**==8 8 8 8 8 8 8 i

8 I I t 8 I 4 8 8 I I I I i 1 i B.

• PEAK PRESSURE ADEQU4TE====================*============8 t i j j 4 3 2 3 3 5 4 3 8 C. = DURATION ADEQUATE ======================================t 3 1 1

I I I I I I I I 3 4 8 8I I I D. = REQUIRED PROFILE ENVELOPED ADEQUATELI==================8 8

i 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 8 3 3 3 3 I E. = STEAM EIPOSURE (IF REQOIRED) ADEQUATE ==================8 IIi 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

8. CRITERIA REGARDING SPRAT ;ATISFIED========*==================**=*3 8 8 8 1 8 8 8

8 1 II $ 8 l t t I I I i 8

9. CRITERIA REGARDING SUBMERGENCE 84TISFIEDa=======================*8 8

8 8 8 3 4 8

==========================*t t 3 8 8 4 3 3 3 3 4 8 10. CRITERIA REGARDING BADIATION SATISFIED *======================8 8 4 3 8 I i 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 jf I St. CRITERIA REGARSING TEST SEQUEhCE SATISFIED I 12. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST FAILUhES OR SEVERE ANOMALIES I

3 8

3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 3 3

8 3

8 3

3 3

3 3

3 8

(IF ANT) SATISF1ED================================== =======.3 ND 3 8 3 3 8 8 3 3 3

3 i 8 I I I i 8 8 3 3 3 8 8 8 3 8 13. CRITERIA REGARDING FUNCTIONAL TESTING SAT 18FIED=============?*===$ 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 14. CR1TERIA REGARDING INSTRUMENT,ACCURACT SATISFIED *================8 8 8 8 8 8 8 4 I I I I I I I 8

8 15. TEST DURATION MARGIN (1 NOUR e FUNCTION TIME) SATIBFIED==========8 (NOREG=0388, CAT. 11========8 -  ! 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 3 3 3 8 8 i 16. CRIT .e

...sm..sm.ERIA REGARDING MARGINS SATISFIED.sm...s.m..........m...m...m.s...sm............m.m.....es.am.....mem...........m.sm........................e...s.

8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I 8 3 3 1 8 8

! NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORT (DESIGNATa0NS I . CATEGORT3 4 4 8 g

=========================== t g g 8 4 8 8 1 3 8 8 8 II I 8 ========================== _

3 8 8 i  ! l 3 3I33 3I3 3 8 1.4 EQUIPMENT 00ALIFIED=======================**=================$ I I I I I I 4 4 8 8 4

I II I III I I I 3 I.B EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION PENDING MODIFICAT10N*================8 8I III III I I I tII EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION NOT ESTABLISHED ===*==================3 8 8 8 I II.A 3 3 3 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 8 8 8 3 I 13.8 EQUIPMENT NOT 0UALIFIED======================================l 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 EQUIPMENT SATISFIES ALL REQUIREMENTS EICEPT .8 4 4 8 8 8 8 8 I t 3 II.C .

8 8 8 8 3 8 8 8 8 8 8I II I I QUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE JUST1FIED======*======8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 III.A EQUIPMENT EXEMPT FROM OUALIFICAfl0N***==***===========**=====8 8 8

! l 1I 3 8 3 3I l 3 3 3 $ $ $ I 3 8 III.B EQUIPMENT NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEN=====================8 I t 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 I IV NOT MADE AVAILABLE=============================3 3

g

......ss.. DOCUMENTATION.s.........................s..............................................................................................

l 8 8 I I 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 po i CURRECTIVE ACTION SPECIFIED (DESIGNATIONS Ie ACTION SPECIFIED) 8g

=================================== g 8

g

-8 3 g g g 3 g i 8 8 g g e 3 f3 I =========================== 8I I II i 8 8 8 8 8 I 3 I I 3 8 i 1. EQUIPMENT MEPLACEMENT WITN OUALIFIED EQUIPNENT===================8 3 3 3 3 8 8 3 3 g 8 3 3 8 l h$

8 2. EQUIPMENT MODtFICAT10N===========================================8 3

I I I i 1 3 8 (n

=================8 3 3 8 8 8 8 3 8

• J 3 3. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION ABOVE THE SUNMERGENCE LEVEL 3 3 l l 3 3 3 3 3 8

4. RELOCATE OR SHIELD EQUIPMENT FADN RADIATION 50URCE===============t 3 3 8 8 3 8 8 8 8 8 3 3 j3 5, VERIFT GUALIFICATION ST ADDITIONAL TESTING / ANALYSIS ==============8 8 8 8 8 3 3 8 8 8 l

8 8 8 8 3 3 $ $ 5 3 1 1 8 gn

6. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION TO A MILD ENVIB0NMEhT====================*==8 8 8 3

8 8 8 8 I I i  ! 8 I 1 I t I co i T. QUALIFICATION TESTING OF EQUIPMENT IN PROGRESS ==?=T=====*========8 I I8 I t  ! I I I I t 3 3 8 8 8 8 I S. OTHER (===SEE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT ITEM IF CHECAED===)=============8I I I t i 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I II I I $ 3 I I I I i 3 3 8 i SCHEDUL CORRECTIVE ACTION (S) HAS BEEN PRCVIDED===3 I 3I I m...msn...EFOR COMPLETION OFs..s.ms.m..s.m.s..m.m...m.ms.s..ss.a.sms.m.s..es....sm..s..m.m.as..m............s..m.m..es.......s.........m...m..........

Table 4-4 (Cont.)

lFs c1 Dq / EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SumMART FORM

.sa....e....e.....ss..e..e............es..e.e...es ya 3 es.neame..s..s.....eas. .es..e.a..........seesse.sessene. ...

I ?; FRC NUusERS 13 .i ...........e.e.ee n s .E.Q.UI se.se. P MENT..I TEM....ssa.a..s...s...es...seen.3 y@20 1046804T804080498050805180528053805430558056505fl050805910608

,m

- menneemme.sassessa.sms ..seessesseessessessesse.m.eassessomsmemenesesseness. as.es....sossess.esee. .seessenmanesessnesessessa.ses 3 3 i NRC REQUIREMENTS (DESIGNATION: I ,e DEFICIENCTI I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 3 3 3 h% ====. .....==...========.==== i i  !  : 3 1 8  :  :  :  : i ag I ========. ==.=== 8I I 3I 3 8I 3 l l 3 I 1. DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF QUALIFICATION ADEQUATE====================l 3 4 3 3 3 4 7

• 7 )p .i 8 4 I i 3 3 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 8 ga I 2. ADEQUATE SIMILARITT BETWEEN EQUIPMENT AND 4I l l 3I 3 3 3 3 8 8 8 3 8 3 3 TEST SPECluEN ESTA8LISHED========================================8 I 83 8

3. AGING DEGRADATION EVALUATED ADEQUATELT===========================8g 8I I { l 8 4I l 3 { l 8 i 3 3 g 8 3 3 g g 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 8 8 4 4. QUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE 3I 3 3II 3I l g g g g g g g g 3 ESTABLISHED (IF REQUlpED)========================================8 8 3

g 3I4 3 3 3 3 3 8 8 3 I I 3

3 5. PROGRAN ESTABLISMED TO IDENTIFT AGING DECRADAT10N================8 8 8 8 8 8 8I I 4 3 3 3 8 8 8 8 I 6. CRITERIA REGARDING AGING SIMULATION SATISFIED (IF REQUIRED)======8I t t I t { 3 3 3 8 8 { 3 3 3 3 8 T. CRITERIA REGARDING TEMPERATURE / PRESSURE EXPOSUREI 8 3,  !  ! 3 3 3 8 3 A.

• PEAK TEMPERATURE ADEQUATE =========================?====l 3 3 3 8 8 8 i l l 3 3 3 3 3

8. = PEAK PRESSURE ADEQUATE ==****=========================**8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 3 5 3 3 3 5 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 3 3 3 i C.

• DURATION ADE0UATE======================================3 8 g 3 8 8 3 3 1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 D. = REQUIRED PROFILE ENVELOPED ADEQunTELT==================8 I I 8 8 3 3 3 E.

• STEA4 EXPOSURE (IF REQUIRED) ADE00 ATE ==================8 3 I 4 3 8 3 3 3 g3 1 3 I I I I I 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 i S. CRITERIA REGARDING SPEAT SAT 1SFIED===============================l l -l 8 3

>d 8 9. CRITERIA REGARDING SUBMERGENCE SATISFIED

=========**==============t l l 8 8 3 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 8 C3 3 30, CRITERIA REGARDING RADIATION SATISF1ED===========================l 3 3 3 8I I 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3 8 3 $

8 11. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST SEQUENCE SATISFIED =======================8 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 4 3

,8 l 3 3 8 { l I g 3 3 l l 3 3 g t 12. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST FAILURES OR SEVERE ANOMALIES ,

3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 8 3 3 3 3 3 I (IF ANT) 34TISFIEDa==========================================8 3

{ i I I 8 I l l 5 13. CpITERIA REGARDING FUNCTIONAL TESTING SATISFIED ==================8 8I I $ l 3 3 l g J 4 3 3 3 3 3 8-8 14. CRITERIA REGARDING INSTRUMENT,ACCURACT SATISFIED =================8 8 8 8 3 3 3 g l 8 3 3 g g 3 3 8 4 3 4 4 3 8 15. TEST DURATION NARGIN (t HOUR + FUNCTION TIME) SATISFIED ==========I { 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 1 16. CRITERIA REGARDING MARGINS SAT 18FIED (NUREG=0500. CAT. 3)========8 g 8 8 8 3 3 3 e s s s e m a n e s e s s e s s m a n e s s m e s s e s a m m a s s s me n e s ess e sI s ss I s eI s m l us8 e n8e m8 m es e 8s se8 e n8 sa 8m ma 8 es se am me s se m t NRC QUALIFICATION CATECORT (DESIGNATION: I e CATEGORY) 1 I I 8 g g g g 3 8 8 8 3 ========================== =========================== g g g 3 3 3 8 3 i I.A EQUIPMEHF 0UALIFIED==========================================l 34 8Il l 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 5 3 8 8 8 8 8I 3 8 8I i 8 i l 8 1.B LOUIPMENT GUALIFICATION PENDIhG NUDIFICATION====?============4 i 8I I 8 8 8 8 8 EQUIPMENT OdALIFICATION NOT ESTABLISHED======================t iI I 4 3 3 3 8 i II.A 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I II.B EQUIPMENT NOT GUALIFIED================================**====8 8 I I I I I EQUIPMENT SATISFIES ALL REQUIAEMENTS EXCEPT 8 8 8 8 8 '8 I a 8 $ $

8 II.C .

8 8 8 8 8 8I I I I I I I I 4 8 8 QUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE JUSTIFIED ========?====5 8 8 1I I { I III 3I IIII i hj 8

I III.A EQUIPMENT EIEMPT FRom 00ALIFICATION==========================8 8 8 8 I I I l 8 8 8 I I $ 8 p3 l III.B EQUIPMENT NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THE REV1EN=====================$ $ $ $

8II 8

$I I I I I l 8 8 8 I I e 8 IV DOCUMENTATION NOT MADE AVAILABLE=====================**======l 8 8 C4 sense am m e s sa s s e s sema s s a m a ss e s s e me s a ss a s s a s s e s s 8e ss a m m a i s eI s s$ a m ene s aI se Im ees s a s s e 8n e s s'A ee m s e ss e 8 CORRECTIVE ACTION SPECIFIED i ===========================

(DESIGNAT10NI Ie ACTION SPECIFIED)

==================.========. =. === 8, 8,  !

8, 8, i l i $, 8, I i I, 8, 8, i t:

%q 8 8 8 I l l l 4 4 8 8I I $ 3 I

1 1. EuUIPMENT REPLACEMENT WITH QUALIFIED EQUIP 4ENT===================$ I I y 8 3 4 8 3 3 3 3 8 3 I l 2. EQUIPMENT M001FICAT10N===========================================8 8*

l l 8 8 3 3 1 3 { l  ! l 8 3 3

$ I. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION ABOVE THE SUBMERGENCE LEVEL *=======?========l 3 3 8 8 l 8 3 0

4. RELOCATE OR SHIELD EQUIPNENT FROM RADIATION 80URCE===============8 8 8 3 3 8 8 8 4 1

8 8 8 I i 1 I I 4 3 8 8 8 3 3 1 5. VERIFT GUALIFICAT10N BT ADDITIONAL TESTING /ANALT838==============8 I I I 1 3 8 8 8 8 8 3 3

6. EQU1PMENT RELOCATION TO A MILD ENVIR0NNENT=======================I 8 8 i 1

===*===============8 1 5 1 8 8 8 8 II $ 3 8 8 8 3 4 5 ,T. QUALIFICATION TESTING OF EQUIPMENT IN PROGRESS CHECEED=.=)=============g 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 8. OTHER (===SEE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT ITEN IF . 8 I I I ( l 3 I I 3 3 3 8 8 3 8 8 .

3 8 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 8 3 3 3 i SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION (S) HAS BEEN PROVIDED===8 assassmassmeasseammeassasenessassamesessmannessemassenesessammesmassmeessameseemseessammeneemsmessessemassessmensmesmes e- - .

Table 4-4 (cont.)

FOUIPMEITENVIR02KEbf4LQUALIFICA

........s ...... eses.....se. ..T.ID3

. .seSU3 KART F022

..s.se.emse c7 emessenessemasemesessessemasoneseammessessenesammenesseemesmo

[p; I FRC EQUIPMENT ITEN Rum 8ERS 8 cn emessemeessnessessesemanesessesseessessese.seessuomesseeemens ya"9 8068806280631064306510668067106030691070807380728073807480758

. s.. . . . .. e . . m e . .s e e...s e s e....s e s s e...s e. . . s e . . s ..s e...e e s e.e s .se s. .. e e.e.e . e s..e a s e s e s..s e. .e..e s .s e..... .e... ..... e.. .e s . ....

8 hac REQUIREMENT 5 (CESIGNATION Ie DEFICIENCY)  ! I I I I I I I I I t l3C; i .. ============= ==..============...===.======

8 8 t 8 E3 8 8  : I 8  : 8 i  :  : $ 1 3 8 8 8. DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF CUALIFICATION ADE00 ATE ===================at I 8I II II I I 8I i 1 8I 8I 8I II 8I 3I 1

[jf 8 2. ADEQUATE SIMILARITT SETWEEN EQUIPMENT AND 3 3 3 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 3 8 mm i TEST SPEcluEN ESTA0L!$HED========================================8 g g i jI 3I 8 8I tI i i i  ! 4 8 1 g@ I 3. AGING DEGRADATION EVALUATED ADEQUATELT===========================8 I I I 3I II I II II i 3 $ 5 8 8 8 gg 8 4. QUALIFIED LIFE OR Rf9LACEMENT SCMEDULE I 8 8 8 3 8 8 8 8 I I 8 8 I I I I:r  ! ESTABLISCED (IF RErJERED)========================================8 8 8 8 8I II i 8I II I I I I I 4 I .

f3 3 5. PROGRAM ESTABLISMED 10 10ENTIFT AGING DEGRADATION================3 3 3 3 8 l l 8 8 I I 8 8 8 8 ha 3 6. CRITERIA REGARDING AGING SIMULATION SATISFIED (IF REQUIRED)======8 I I I I I I I  !  ! I I 8 I I I Cd 8 7. CAITERIA REGARDING TEMPERATURE / PRESSURE EXPOSURES  ! I I I I 3 I I I 3 8 8 8 3 I I Q I A. = PEAK TEMPERATURE ADEQUATE==============================8 1 3 8 I I 8 8 8 8 8 4 5 5 8 4 3 8. - PEAK PRESSURE ADEQUATE ==============================**=8 8 8 8 8 8 I 4 8 8 3 5 8 8 8 I C.

• DURATION ADEQUATE======**====*================*=======*8 I f 3 8I 8 8 8 8 8 I I I i 8 8 I D.

• REQUIRED PROFILE ENVELOPED ADEQUATELT==================8 8 8 8 8 I I I I I 3 8 i i I I I E. = STEAM EXPOSURE (IF REQUIRED) ADE004TE==================8 l t 3 8 8 8 8 I I I I I I 8 8 i s. CRITERIA REGARaING 3 PRAT 8ATISFIED=========a================?===?t 8 3 1 8 8 4 3 3 3 8 I I I I I I 9. CRITERIA REGARDING SUBuERGENCE 8AftSFIED====*=====?=====?========8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I I 8 8 I I I I i 10. CRITERIA REGARDING RADIATION SATI5FIED============*==============l 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 I i 8 8 II. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST SEQUENCE 3AT!5FIEDa======================8 8 8 8 8 8 1 1 1 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 12. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST FAILURES OR SEVERE ANOMALIES I I I  ! 3 $ 8 8 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 i SS l (IF ANT) SATI3FIED===========================================l 8 8 8 8I 3II I 4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

3 13. CRITERIA REGARDING FUNCTIONAL TESTING SATISFIED ===========?======8 8 8 3 3 3 8 3 3 3 3 8 8 8 I I

(( t 14. CRITERIA REGARDING INSTRUMENT,ACCURACT 84TISFIED=================8 8 15. TEST DURATION MARGIN (t HOUR + FUNCTION TINE) SAT!8FIED==========l 8 I I IIII8 8II I t 3 8 8 I 8 3 3 3 3 3 8 8 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 I i 16. CRITERIA REGARDING MARGINS SATISFIED (NUREG=OSSO, CAT. $3========8 l 8 3 I I 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 I senesessenes== meessemassammenemonenessesses....seemeneseemenemmenessessessessessesseneseemeneseenemonesee-amassessese... mas ..sesse

! NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORT (DESIGNAT10Ne I e CATEGORT) i I I I 8 8 I I $ 1 1 I i t 8 i

! =======*================== =========================== . t 3 8 I l 3 8 8 I i 8 8 I I I 3 8 1.A EQUIPMENT 00ALIFIEDe==========================,===============l 3 3 3 3 g l l 3 3 8 3 8 8 8 8 3 I.8 EQUIPMENT 00ALIFICATION PENDIhG MODIFICATION ==============*==8 I II II 4I 8 II II IN II II II 3I II II 8I I 4 II.A EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION NOT ESTA8LISHED=========?============8 3 3 3 3I3 $ 3 8 3 3 1 3 3 4 8 I II.8 EQUIPMENT NOT 0UALIFIED=========================*============l 8 I I I I I I I I I 8 8 8 8 8 8 II.C EQUIPMENT SATISFIES ALL REQUIREMENTS EXCEPT . 8 3 3 8 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 I OUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE JUSTIFIED =============8 8 l 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 3 3 8 8 8 8  !!I.A EQUIPMENT EXEMPT FROM 0UALIFICATION==========================8 8 3 3 3 3 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 $ 8 3 I III.8 EQUIPMENT NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEW =====================l 3 3 3 3 3 I I 3 8 8 8 8 3 8 3 I 17 DOCUMENTATION NOT MADE AVAILABLE======**=**==================8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 m u a ss m e nu s a s e m a m m a so n e s s n e s s e m a s se ss a s s e m a s s en e ss e s m e m o m m es o mese m e s m e s e s s e m e sse n es e s s a m mes s e n ese s s n es e sa m m es s eem e s s e n sess e n e s s e s seem 8 CORRECTIVE ACTION SPFCIFIED (DE83GNATICNg I e ACTION.8PECIFIED) $_ l 1 3 3 8 8 8 8 8 3 I I I I I >4 I =========================== =================================== 8 3 4 3 8 8 3 3 I 3 3 3 8 D8 I 1. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MITN OUALIFIED EQUIPMENT ===================3 I 8I II II 8 II I II I II $I II 8I II II I I 2. EQUIPMENT N0DIFICATION============*==============================l i I I 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 8 8 C) i 3. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION A80VE THE SUBMERGENCE LEVEL *=*=========*====4 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 l t  !  ! L t t LA 3

4. RELOCATE OR SHIELD EQUIPMENT TROM RADIATION SOURCE ==?=======?=*==8 8 8 l 3 3 3 3 3 $ 8 3 8 8 3 3

($

8 5. VERIFT CUALIFICATION DT ADDITIONAL TESTING /ANALT81Sa=============t l 3 l 8 3 8 8 8 I l l 3 8 8 3 4 5 6. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION TO A MILD ENVIR0NMENT=======================8 8 8 3 3 8 8I3 8 8 8 3 3 8 3 l J l 7. QUALIFICATION TESTING OF EQUIPMENT IN PROGRE58-==================8 3 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 g P I 8. OTHER (= SEE SPECIFIC EQUIPMLNT ITEM IF CHECEED=.=)=============8 8 3 3 3 3 8 3 3I g 3 8 8 8 3 8 I - 1 I I I 3 I I 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION (S) HAS DEEN PROVIDED===8 I I II I l I II IIII II II II II $I I messessmesessesseemssuemmesammeessosomenssenaammessessessenesamassessenessassamassommonslmessessomsmesmanmessenessassesenesam& menesses I

i l

Table 4-4 (Coat =)

l Eib ggq \ EQUIPMENT ENTIRONMENTAL OUALIFICATION SUNNARf FORM

> q gf masassssassessessmensmessasssemeesmessessesessmens gj a emessanssammenemmemmesasposessemeesseessammessemassessemessem

2C a rRC EQUIPnENT ITEM NUMeERS l l g Ei messemes.ame.. .assenesessememesessass en.sen amessemasses. e i

77n 10761077307e1079108030e14082

,' ag easm aemesseemseessn esse mese sem m sunesessessemassa.eese ssnessessees sne s sessen sm asse sssesanesensnesemossmosasassaamses i uke RE091REMENTS (DESIGNATION: I e DEFICIENCY 3 esessamass e e msees:00 31004 :005 4 086 8 08 7 8 0 80 8

? I ======*========= I i 1 1 1 I I I I I I I  !

=================.-=========== I i  ! 8 i

{mQ 3

1. DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF QUALIFICATION ADEQUATE 5 l l i I I I I I I I 8 8 I I i

3 y ((

t 2. ADEWfATE SIMILARITT SETNEEN EQUIPMENT AND

===============~====l I

X $X3I l XI l X3X 1 8 8 I I 3X I 3I II II IIl I X I+

4 3I l X j 1

TE S T S P EC l u E N E S T A B L I S H E D ==== === === = ==== = = ==- - == == = === === = ==.

=====l l i 8 1 8 I i U() 3

3. AGId4 DEGRADATION ETALUATED 8 3 3 l 3 3 l l

[s$ 1

4. QUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE ADEQUATELT========***================l 8 I I I

I I

I l

I I 3

I 3

I l 3

8 3

8I l IX $X3 1 ESTABLISHED (IF REQUIREDi==============**========================I $ $ 3 g 8 l l 3 8 j, 3 3 I 8 8 I I I

5. PROGRAM ESTABLISHED TD IDENTIFT AGING DEGRADATION ================l l 4 3 8 8 8 8 8 l lX1 3 1 8 3 3 ) 3 I I 3 3 I I I 8 6. CRIIERIA REGARDING AGING SIMULATION SATISFIED (IF REQUIRED)======l i I I I I I I I I i  !

3 3 T. CRITrRIA REGARDING TEMPERATURE / PRESSURE EXPCSURE: 8 8 3 8 3

A.

• PEAK TEMPERATURE ADEQUATE ==============================8 8 L l 8 8 8 I I I 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 I 8.

• PEAK PRE 35U2E ADEQUATE =================================l8 3 8 I I 3 3 l 3 l l 3 3 3 I 1

C. = DURATION ADEQUATE 8 I I l 3 3 4 3 3 I I I I 3 I *=====================================8 8 8 1 3 $ I I l 3

D.

• REQUIRED PROFILE ENVELOPED ADE0UATELT==============*===l i I I l 5 3 3 3 8I3 3 I E. = STEAN EXPOSURE (IF REQUIRED). ADEQUATE **================ l 8 8 l l 3 8 8 iX 3 8

• I

4. CRITERIA REGARDING SPRAT 8ATISFIED=====================*==*======l 8 1 3 3 8 l I l 3 l I 4 l 1 l I I I I I I I I 3

I 3

43 9. CRITERIA REGARDING SUBMERGEPCE 84TISFIED==*===========**========= I 8 8 IX l g

I 10. CRITERIA REGARDING RADIATION SATISFIED ===========================88 i l l 8 1 1 I I I 8 I I I $

r= l ll. CRITERIk REGARDING TEST SEQUENCE SATISFIEDe=====================.8 1 3 8 I I I 1 3 1 3 3 3 3 i bJ 8 8 3 3 3 3 3 3 8 3 3 l 3 B 12. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST FAILURES OR SEVERE ANOMALIES 3 3 l (IF ANT) SATI$r!ED=========================**================.I I I I I I I I I I i 8 3 8 l 3

I t i 1 8 8 I I I I I 8 I I IX3 I il 14.

13.CRITERIA CRITERIA REGARDING REGARDING FUNCTIONAL TESTING 8ATISFIED=================al INSTRURENT,ACCURACT i I I I I t  ! l I 84TISFIED=================L I I I 3 3 3 3 I I 1 15. TEST DURATION M.RGIN l 3 3 8 I 3 l 8 I l X l (1 NOUR + FUNCTION TIME) SATISFIED ==========8 8 8 8 4 I I l .8 3

i 16. CRITERIA REGARDaNG MARGINS SATISF 8 8 8 8 8 8 I essassenessesmosessesensumsmessomsomass=IED (NUREG=05es, CAT. 11========I- I l i 1 I I I I I I I 1 3 3 i i NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGOR I ==========================T ===========================

sessmenemmessessammessnesesseemasessesemesmosesesamoussemanasosasemesessemassemesso (DESIGNATIONS X e CATEGORY) i l I i i 1 I I 8 8 8 8 8 8 I I 3 1.A EQUIPMENT 5 3 1 1 I 3 I I I I 1.8 0UALIFIED==========================================$ l i I i i 1 3 3 1

EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION PENDING N0DIFICATION*================I X 4 7 1 3 4 3 3 I I 3 3 3 3 8

l 11.8 II.A EQUIPMENT GUALIFICATION NOT ESTA8LISMED ====================*l 8I IXiXlX !N II II II II III II3 8 EQUIPMENT NOT 8 8 8 1 1 I I I I I I I I II I II.C 00ALITIED======================================l I l 3 l l {

8 EQUIPMEK= SATISFIES ALL REQUIREMENTS EXCEPT .1 3 3 3 g g 8 l 3 3 8

. 8 8 5 1 1 I I I I I I I 8 111.A QUALIFIED EQUIPMENT EXEMPT LIFE OR FROMREPLACEMENT SCHEDULE JUSTIFIED =============8 I i 1 8 8 I I I I I I I I 3 8 00ALIFICATION==========================l l l I I I t >4 1 111.8 EQUIPMENT NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEW =====================l 1

l I I I I I l X l l I D1 I IV DOCUMENTATION NOT MADE AVAI I I 1 3 3 3 ) l I 3 3 3 3 3 3 m e . . . . a s s e s s = = = s m e e .s e . . .. a s I 3 3 3 3 3 I I I q3 I CORRECTIVE ACTION SPECIFIED g ===========================

.e. . . .L A B L E = = == == == ==l ===

_(DESIGNATION: I e ACTION SPECIFIED) ! l

= == = = = == = = === = == l sm o 8...........................

m m a m m e s e s"8g) 1 Ln mess

=================================== ; l 8 8 8 8 8 I I I I i 8 8 PJ i

1. EQUIPMENT R. PLACEMENT NITH GUALIFIED E0UIPMENT===================

l l 3 g g i j g g g g l g on 1

4

2. EQUIPdENT MupIrICAT!0N===========================================l

3. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION ABOVE THE SUSNERGENCE LEVEL-================l X lX1X lX IXlXlX 5: X 4X lX 4XIIIX3X3 1 1 3 3 3 3  : I I 'd j3 1 l l 3 I l i I I I

4. RELOCATE OR SHIELD EQUIPMENT FROM RADIATION SOURCE ===============8 i 8 8 8 I $ an 8 8 L 3 1 3 1 3 4 I I 3 3 3 00 I 5. VERIFT GUALIFICATION BT ADDITIONAL TESTING / ANALYSIS ==============8 8 8 8 8 l l l I I 3 3

6. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION TO A MILD ENVIR0NhENT*======================1 8 8 8 8 I I 1

7. QUALIFICATION TESTING OF EQUIPMENT IN PROGRESS===================8 1 8 8 8 8 8 8 I I l l l l l l 8 8. OTHER ( I l i i t i I SEE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT ITEM IF CHECKED = )=============8 8 8 8 8 3 3 3 I 3 3 3 4 8 I t 8 I l l X3 3 I I I l 8 I I I I I I I 8

I SCHEDULE FOR COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION 8 8 8 I I messenssenemanesammaammeensassmaassesseammamensm(S) HAS SEEN PROVIDED==*l X l I 1X1XlX IIIX lX4X lX 1I IXt iX i uessesammessemenmasmsmessessammenessessnessensemassessemassmessammamenemmensaseesse8

, + --., ..

- ~ _

Ttble 4-4 (cont.)

EQUIPXEXT EXVIRO'KENTAL QUALIFICATI03 SUPRART FORM

.e.as.sssessesses.m. sasses.sammaassas.ames.o...sse u=

gz3 e....e...m........m.ee.ne.... .m.....m.een...me...es..e. mass.

n n,y 1 FRC EQUIPMENT ITEM NuesERS

.. .s...e....e.............e...e.........m.es...........e....

I 75 / 30911092809310948 aa me...........s..e...m.sa..e..........mosome...m.es...es...o...... .me..me..m.s....e....s.m.....sm.ses...e.e.e.ame..m..se.nen....e.no 8

1

!! !E I NRC REQUIREMENTS (DE3IGNATIDMs I e DEFICIENCT) I I i ss I ====.=======..== =====.==========.=======.====

8 4 I 8 8 8 8 8 3 gjf I 1. DOCUMENTED EVIDENCE OF QUALIFICATION ADEQUATE===============**===8 X !X ! 8 8 8 mu  ! 2. ADEQUATE SINILARITY BETNEEN EQUIPMENT AND $ 8 8 8 8 g i TEST SPEC: MEN EsTAsLisMED.=============T================.========8 8 8I II I 8

I s g I ). AGING DEGRADAfiON EVALUATED ADE90ATELT===========================8 I I II I I I r 8 4. QUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE I I I l 8 I T f=3 8 ESTABLISMED (IF REQUIRED)========================================8 8 8I I I i fa

• R 8 5. PROGRAN ESTABLISHED TO IDENTIFT AGING DEGRADATION ================8 I 6. CRITERIA REGARJING AGING $1MULATION SATISFIED (IF REQUIRED)======8 8 I I

l 8 8 I I I I Q l 7. CRITERIA REGARDING TEMPERATURE / PRES 5URE EIPOSURE , I I l 8 8 8 8 A.

• PEAK TEMPERATURE ADEQUATE ********=****=====*==****?***=l 8 8 8 $ l ,

8 S.

• PEAK PRESSURE ADEQUATE ==========*======================8 8 8 8 8 8 I C.

• DURATION ADEQUATE =================**===================8 8 I l 8 I I D.

• REQUIRED PROFILE ENVELOPED ADEQUATELY ==================8 8 8 l l 8 I E. - STEAM EAPOSURE (IF REQUIRED) ADEQUATE ==================8 I i  ! l .I J l S. CRITERIA REGARDING SPRAT SATISFIED *==============================8 I I  !  !  !

! 9. CRITERIA REGARDING SUBMERGENCE 8ATISFIEDe===================?====8 8 8 l l 8 8 10. CRITERIA REGARDIdC RADIATION 34TISFIED.==========================8 i  ! I l  !

8 11. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST 8EQUENCE 8ATISFIEDa=*====================I I l t 1 I 43 8 12. CRITERIA REGARDING TEST FAILURES OR SEVERE ANOMALIES I 3 3 3 $ 8 8 8 (IF ANT) 3AT!$FIED===========================================8 8 8 8 8 l P'

'd S 33. CRITERIA REGARDING FUNCTIONAL TESTING 84T18FIED=======?===?======8 8 8 l l 8 i 14. CRITERIA REGARDING INSTRUNENT,ACCURACT SATISFIEDe================3 I I I I I i 15. TEST DURATION MARGIN (8 MOUR + FUNCTION TIME) 84TISFIED==========8 8 I I i l 8 16. CRITERIA REGARDING MARGINS SATISFIED (NUREG=0500, CAT. 1)========l  ! I I I I es..seassess.semesses.massese.nesseemmensessous...s. eses..esomem.. eses.ess.se.svemme.es.o.seammeessasseemassumessassesesseesse.assen l WRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORT (DESIGNATION: Ie CATECORT) l I I I I I I ========================.= ==.====================.=== g g g g 8 8 8 I.A EQUIPMENT 0UALIFIED========...===============================8 I I I  ! I I I.B EQUIPMEh? OUALIFICATIUM PLMDING MUDIFICATION============?====8 II II l 8 I I II.A EQUIPMENT QUALIFICATION NOT ESTA8LISMED======================8 N I I III l 8 11.8 EQUIPMENT NOT QUALIFIED======================================8 8 8 3 3 8 i

i II.C EQUIPMENT SATISFIES ALL REQUIREMENTS EXCEPT l l 8 I I I l 4 OUALIFIED LIFE OR REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE JUSTIFIED =============l 8 I I i i 1

III.A EQUIPMENT EIEMPT FROM QUALIFICATION =============?a===========8 8 I I I I

! !!I.B EQUIPMENT NOT IN THE SCOPE OF THE REVIEN================?====8 8 8 3 8 8 8 IV DOCUMENTATION NOT MADE AVAILABLE=============================8 8 8 8 8 4 a.mm.s.asse s s a.s e s e n e s.s e.s o s o m e s se s e s s e ss n e s s a.s e s.m.a m.as s u m a mm es.e a s n es s.ess e e s s e e.m a ss e s senet a moso m a a n.s e s s en e s sesem es s e n es s e s.e >4

! I CORRECTIVE ACTION SPECIFIED (DESIGNATIDN3 Ie ACTION SPECIFIED) l 8 l 8 8 8 UU l g ===.=======.=============== =============.==================.== g i y8 g g g l 8 8. EQUIPMENT REPLACEMENT MITH QUALIFIED EQUIPMENT =======**==========8 8I I I I l C5 l 8 2. EQUIPMENT N0DIFICATION===========================================8 8 8 I I I LA 4 4 3. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION A90VE THE SUBMERGENCE LEVEL =================8 l 4. RELOCATE OR SHIELD EQUIPMENT FROM RADIATION 30URCE===============8 8

8 8

8 8

8 4

8 8 (j 8 %a 8 5. VERIFT QUALIFICATION BT ADDITIONAL TESTING /ANALTS18==============8 8 8 8 8 I I I 6. EQUIPMENT RELOCATION TO A MILD ENVIR0NMENT=======================8 8 8 8 j l A I 7. QUALIFICATION TESTING OF EQUIPMENT IN PROGRE83==?=?==============8 8 8 8 8 i Ch I 8. OTHER (===SEE SPECIFIC EQUIPMENT ITEN IF CHECEED= )=============8 8 8I 4 I I 00 I . I I  ! 1 1 8 8 8CHFDULE FOR COMPLETION OF CORRECTIVE ACTIONIS) HAS BEEN PROVIDED*==8 8I1I I I a..e s s n e s s e s s e s s a m m a a s s.as.a m e s .e s.e ss e n a s.s e s s a s s a ma s s e s s n e s nesammenee.smen.as.emeenenesessmaa.eeeeeemme s a.a m e s s e s s e s.s a.e s a ss e e m s.I e

j TER.-C5257-468 I

4.3 METHODOLOGY USED BY THE LICENSEE This section includes observations concerning the Licensee's qualification methodology. presented in the response [16] to the NRC SER.

4.3.1 Completeness of Safety-Related Equipment List i

Section 3.1 of the NRC SER [15] expressed the following concern

i

" Display instrumentation which provides information for the reactor i operators to aid them in the safe handling of the plant was not I

specifically identified by the licensee. A complete list of all display l instrumentation mentioned in the LOCA and HELB emergency procedures must  ;

be provided. Equipment qualification information in the form of summary ehee ts should be provided for all components of the display 4

instrumentation exposed to harsh environments. Instrumentation which is

not considered to be safety related but which is mentioned in the i emergency procedure should appear on the list. For cheme instruments, '

. (1) justification should be provided for not considering the instrument l

[ aafety related and (2) assurance should be provided that its subsequent I failure will not mislead the operator or adversely affect the mitigation of the consequences of the accident. The environmental qualification of post-accident sampling and monitoring and radiation monitoring equipment is closely related to the review of the TMI Lessons-Learned modifications 4

and will be performed in conjunction with that review."

In response, the Licensee stated (16]:

I " Display instrumentation mentioned in the Emergency Operating Procedures ,

was included as part of te Salem environmental qualification review {

effort. This instrumentation was included in the master list and evaluation forms under the applicable systems. For example, steam generator level is included under Main Steam. A separate listing of all l the primary instruments and attendant cables, panels, terminal blocks, 1

etc., was not deemed necessary since all the devices were included in the j system performing the function. Other devices which do not perform a safety system function were included under ' Containment Parameters' or f

' Miscellaneous' in Section IV of the report. In the next revision to the Salem Environmental Qualification Report, a cross-indaxing of display j instrumentation will be provided.

I

! Those instrumentation items which were included in the Emergency Operating Procedures but are not required for any operator action do not require environmental qualification. The operating procedures have been

- revised to reflect potential inaccuracy of the devices. The operators will be aware of their potential failure. A discussion of these items was provided in the following Bases of Section VII of the report: 18B, 21, 23, 29, 33 and 37."

i The Licensee has resolved the NRC concern.

~

i .ef3bs

) M Franklin Research Center i A Oms on of The Franhan insature I

TER-C5257-468 4.3.2 Environmental Service Conditions Th s NRC SER [15} identified the following concern:

"The staf f has reviewed the qualification documentation to ensure that the qualification specifications envelope the conditions established by the licensee. During this review, the staff assumed that for plants designed and equipped with an automatic containment spray system which

- satisfies the single-failure criterion, the main-steam-line-break (MSLB) environmental conditions are enveloped by the large-break-LOCA

, environmental conditions. The staff rssumed, and requires the licensee to verify, that the containment spray system is not subjected to a disabling single component failure."

The Licensee response stated (16):

"The Salem containment spray system has been designed such that a single failure will not result in loss of spray capaoility. The containment spray system design bases are described in FSAR Section 6.4.1. The system has been designed in accordance with ECCS criteria of redundancy, single failure, etc. This item was addressed in Section VIII of our report."

The Licensee has resolved the concern identified by the NRC.

4.3.3 Temperature, Pressure, and Humidity Conditions Inside Containment The NRC SER [15] expressed the following concern:

f "The licensee'has provided the results of accident analyses as follows:

Max Temp (*F) Max Press (psig) Humidity (%)

LOCA 271 43.2 100 MSLB 350 42.8 100 The staf f has concluded that the minimum temy:rature profile for equipment qualification purposes should include a margin to account for

) higher-than-average temperatures in the upper regions of the containment that can exist due to stratification, especially following a postulated MSLB. Use of the steam saturation temperature corresponding to the total building pressure (partial pressure of steam plus partial pressure of air) versus time will provide an acceptable margin for either a postulated LOCA or MSLB, whichever is controlling, as to potential adverse environmental ef fects on equipment.

TN licensee's specified temperature (service conditions) of 271*F does not satisfy the above requirement. Furthermore, the licensee specified pressure is low as compared to the plants of similar design. The 4-15

1. A ,

l di Franklin Rewarch Center

- - - ~ _ .

TER-C5257-468 licensee is requested to verify that the pressure profile in the FSAR was calculated based on the code requirements defined in the NUREG-0588. If, by using these codes, the peak containment pressure is still 43.2 psig, then a saturation temperature corresponding to the pressure profile (283*F peak temperature at 43.2 psig) should be used. If, however, the calculated peak pressure is higher than 43.2 psig, then the saturation temperature corresponding to the new pressure profile should be used.

The licensee has provided the results of the analysis which was performed to predict the equipment surface temperature during the MSLB event. The staff needs the sample calculation--including bases and assumptions--and the confirmation that the temperature measured during the qualification testing was the surface temperature and not the ambient temperature to make the judgment on the acceptability of the equipment qualification."

The Licensee provided the following response [16]: *

"Wyle Labs Report 44439-2 for Salem Generating Station instrument panel 4 testing has already been submitted to the NRC Staff. Ten (10) copies of the original issue of 44439-2 were sent by letter, Mr. R. L. Mitti, PSE&G to Mr. Olan D. Parr, NRC on April 12, 1979 and ten (10) copies of Revision A of 44439-2 were sent by letter, Mr. R. L. Mitti, PSE&G to Mr.

Olan D. Parr, NRC on October 23, 1979. -

A lower tenperature profile for some items was established due to their k location within instrument panel enclosures inside the containment. The peak containment temperature for exposed equipment is 350*F. The 4 instrument panel testing demonstrates that when the containment temperature is 350*F, equipment within the panels see temperatures less i than 300*F. This ie due to the thermal protection afforded by the instrument panel during the in,itial temperature rise transient." {

It appears that the Licensee has not resolved the NRC concern. Since the Licensee is responsible for identifying the environments, the parameters identified by the Licensee have been used in the evaluations contained in this Technical Evaluation Report. These parameters are reproduced in Appendix A.

4.3.4 Submergence In the SER [15], the NRC expressed the following concern:

"The maximum submergence levels have been established and assessed by the licensee. Unless otherwise noted, the staff assumed for this review that I the methodology employed by the licensee is in accordance with the appropriate criteria as established by Commission Memorandum and Order CLI-80-21.

p 4-16 0

.nklin

_ Res,e_

o. , arch C_ enter

TER-C5257-468 The licensee's value for maximum submergence is 83 ft 1 in. Equipment below this level has been identified by the Licensee, along with the proposed corrective action. The licensee identified 17 types of safety-related electrical components as having the potential for becoming submerged after a postulated event.

The licensee proposes procedural modifications for some cases and indicates that the functional requirements of the potentially submerged components will be completed prior to submergence. The licensee should provide an assessment of the failure modes associated with the submergence of components. Assurance should also be provided that the subsequent failure of these components will not adversely af fect any i

other safety functions or mislead an operator. Additionally, the licensee should discuss operating time, across the spectrum of events, in relation to the time of submergence. If the results of the licensee's assessment are acceptable, then the referenced components may be exempt from the submergence parameter of qualificacicn.

It is not clear from the information submitted that submergence of safety-related electrical equipment outside of containment was addressed. The licensee should address this area more specifically in the 90-day response and upgrade the CES as appropriate."

The Licensee response [16] stated:

I "An evaluaton of submerged components and their effect on other equipment and safety functions was performed with the results presented in the i response to FSAR Question 6.28. The safety of the plant would not be jeopardized by the submerged components. As part of the environmental qualification review effort, submerged components were reevaluated to I assure the sa,fety function was performed prior to submergence. In all cases this would be accomplished in a timely fashion prior to submergence.

Bases 28 and 29 provide the discussion of this topic in our report.

Supporting documentation is included with our environmental qualification files in the corporate home of fice.

A high energy line break analysis was performed for equipment outside the containment at Salem. This analysis did not identify flooding outside the' containment as a safety concern. This was due to the use of drains outside the containment to take care of leakage, encapsulation of piping to limit mass release from breaks and direct it to acceptable areas and that major pipe breaks are in areas which are provided with relief panels to direct the mass release to the atmosphere. The high energy line break analysis is described in FSAR Section 14.5. Therefore, submergence of safety-related equipment outside the containment was not specifically addressed in the previous report."

The Licensee has not resolved the SER concern on submergence inside containment.

1 4-17 0000 Franklin Research Center C A om.on or ni, re w.

TER-C525 7-468 4.3.5 Chemical Spray The NRC SER [15] expressed the following concern:

"The Licensee's FSAR value for the chemical concentration is 0.2 wt%

solution caustic and 1.2 wt% boric acid, resulting in a pH greater than 8.5. The exact volume percent used by the vendors for qualification testing should be verified by the Licensee. Therefore, for the purpose l

of this review, the effects of chemical spray will be considered unresolved. The staff will review the Licensee's response when it 'is submitted and discuss the resolution in a supplemental report."

In response, the Licensee provided the following information [16):

l "The environmental qualification review of the acceptability of chemical j spray testing of equipment was based on the use of boric acid and sodium 1 l hydroxide in a solution creating a pH of greater than 8.5 for a duration j l greater than 22.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br />."

, 1 The Licensee response addresses pH and duration but does not identify I boric acid and sodium hydroxide concentrations. The Licensee should provide this information. l l

4.3.6 Aging and Qualified Life Section 3.7 of the NRC SER [15] indicated the following concern:

"Section 7 of the DOR guidelines does not require a qualified life to be established for all safety-related electrical equipment. However, the t following actions are required:

i (1) Make a detailed comparison of existing equipment and the ,

materials identified in Appendix C of the DOR guidelines. The

. first supplement to IEB-79-OlB requires licensees to utilize the table in Appendix C and identify any additional materials as the result of their effort. I (2) Establish an ongoing program to review surveillance and maintenance records to identify potential age-related I

degradations.

(3) Establish component maintenance and replacement schedules which include considerations of aging characteristics of the installed components.

The licensee identified a number of equipment items for which a specified qualified life was established (for example, 5 years, 15 years, or 40 years). In its assessment of these submittals, the staff did not review 4-18 4%

$U Franklin Research Center A Dews.on of The Frankhn insature I

TER-C5257-468 the adequacy of the methodology nor the basis used to arrive at these values; the staff has assumed that the established values are based on state-of-the art technology and are acceptable.

For this review, however, the staff requires that the licensee submit supplemental information to verify and identify the degree of conformance to the above requirements. The response should include all the equipment identified as required to maintain functional operability in harsh environe nts.

The licensee indicated that this phase of the response is outstanding and that the review is in progress. The staff will review the Licensee's response when it is submitted and discuss its evaluation in .s

supplemental report."

The Licensee response [16] stated:

"The Salem Aging Evaluation Program is described in Section X of the report. This information was included in Revision 2 update issued 1/16/81. Maintenance or replacement schedules were established for selected equipment based on this review. This information has been included in revised Qualification Evaluation Data Forms where appropriate

! in Section V of the report. In our discussion we indicated-that aging evaluation is an ongoing effort as part of the surveillance programs for j safety-related equipment and activities of the industry by the PWR and BWR owners groups, EPRI, licensee event reports, new testing and NRC Bulletins and Circulars. This information will be factored into an overall aging program."

The Licensee has adequately responded to the NRC concern.

4.3.7 Radiation (Inside and Outside Containment)

Section 3.8 of the NRC SER [15] stated the following:

"The licensee has provided values for the radiation levels postulated to 4

exist following a LOCA. The application and methodology employed to determine these values were presented to the Licensee as part of the NRC staf f criteria contained in the DOR guidelines, in NUREG-0588, and in the guidance provided in IEB-79-01B, Supplement 2. Therefore, for this review, the staff has assumed that, unless otherwise noted, the values provided have been determined in accordance with the prescribed criteria. The staff review determined that the values to which equipment was qualified enveloped the requirements identified by the licensee.

The maximum value required by the licensee inside containment is an integrated dose of 5 x 107 rads; however, the minimum value for inside containment has not been provided. This value may not envelope the minimum requirements of NUREG-0588. Therefore the licensee is requested 4-19 A

Uibd Franklin Research Center A Dnmon of The Frannhn inutute

TER-C525 7-468 to either provide justification for using the lower value or provide values established using the methodology of NUREG-0588. If the latter is chosen, then the analysis, including the basis and assumptions used and a sample calculation, should be provided.

Required values outside containment of 1 x 106 have been used by the licensee to specify limiting radiation levels for the RHR equipment within the auxiliary building. This value appears to consider the radiation levels influenced by the source term methodology associated with post-LOCA recirculation fluid lines and is therefore acceptable."

The Licensee provided the following information in response [15]:

"We are unaware of minimum radiation value used to establish adequate environmental qualification. The maximum value of 5 x 10 R 7has been used as the benchmark for qualification review. The Staff has established a different method for radiation exposure calculation for the Reactor Coolant System Temperature Monitors (RTD's). We have indicated that these will be replaced each refueling outage pending installation of qualified devices meeting Staff requiremento. TLis item was established in NRC Safety Evaluation for Salem Supplement 4 dated April, 1980." ]

1 l

i i

(

(

l i

4-20 JUb Franklin Research Center A man a m Frannan in.atu .

TER-C525 7-468 4.4 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION EVALUATION The evaluation presented in this section of the report includes, for each (quipment item, completed equipment environmental qualification review chtcksheets (partially handwritten) which present both the technical informatica necessary to conduct the review and the results of the evaluation.

e l

l g 4-21 g)$i U' Franklin Research Center A om or n. r,.n en m.ow.

l

.......s...................t............s l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONWFNTAL GUALIFICATION I cr i l'0UIPMENT ITEM CHFCESHEET INDEI I Eh3 1 SALEM I  !

crl ................................s...... 4

> q [j FRC ITEN EU-- No. COMPONENT MANUFACTURER N00EL NUMSER LOCATION

, ysp ....................................................................................................................................

,* i RfD ROSEMOUNT 176MF CONTAINMENT

• $ 2 RTD ROSEMOUpT 176MS CONTAINMENT h3 3 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER BARTON 763 I07 2 CONTAIN4ERT

} :T 4 D/P TRANSMITTER BARTON 744 LOT 2 CONTAINMENT

$ (1 5 PRES $URE TRANSMITTER ROSEMOUNT ll53AGA CONTAINMENT 6 SOLFN010 VALVE ASCO 821002 CONTAINMENT

{ @g 7 LIMIT SWITCH NAPCO EA100 CONTAINMENT

" $ D/P TRANS41TTFR BARTON 384 CONTAINMENT 9 1pANSDUCER, E/P FISHER GOVERNOR 546 INBOARD /0UTBOARD PENETRATION AREAS 10 PRES $URE TRANSMITTER FISCHER AND PORTEM 50EP1041 INBOARD / OUTBOARD PENETRATION AREAS 11 ELECTRIC MOTOR WESTINGMOUSE 77C272SF CONTAINMENT 12 LIMIT SWITCH MASONEILAN 4962 INBOARD /0UT80ARD PENETRATION AREAS 13 CONTROL SWITCH MICRO SWITCH 910PCD533 INP0ARD/0UTROARD PENETRATION AREAS 14 TERMINAL RLOCK CINCH JONES ND INBOARD /0UTBOARD PENETRATION ARJAS 15 D/P TRANSMITTER FISCHER AND PORTER 10B2495 INBOARD /0UT80ARD PFNETRATION AREAS 16 D/P TRANSMITTER FISCHER AND PORTER 1082495 VARIOUS 17 SOUARE ROOT EXTRACTOR FISCHER AND PORTER 50E53212 INBOARD /0UT80ARD PENETRATION AREA 8 S' 10 PUMP MOTORS WESTINGHOUSE ED AUXILIARY BLDC., ELEV. 04'=0*

[3 19 PUMP MOTORS WESTINGHOUSE NO AUKILIART BLDG., ELEV. 45'***

! pa 20 TRANSDUCER, E/P FISHER CONTROL 8 546 AUXILIART BLDG., ELEV. 45'*G" 21 FLOW TRANSMITTER BARTON 2094 AUX 1LIARY BLDC., ELEV. 45'-O' 22 SOLFNOID VALVE ASCO FTf328A2 INBOARD /0UTBOARD PFNETRATION AREAS 23 LEVFL TRANSMITTER BARTON 332352 AUXILIART BLDC.. ELEV. 04*=0*

24 ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR amp 4906R1478/4000R147P COFTRINMENT 25 SOLEN 0ID VALVE ASCO FT032tA4 INBOARD / OUTBOARD PENETRATION AREAS 26 LIMIT SWITCH NAMCO D2400IST MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

27 LIMIT SWITCH MASONEILAN 4962 MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

20 LIMIT SWITCH NAMCO D2400X MLCHAP.! CAL PENETRAT10N AREA, ElEV.

29 SOUARE ROOT ENTRACTOR FISCHFR AND PORTER 50ES3282 NECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

30 FLOW CONTROLLER FISCHER AND PORTER 53EC3000 NECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

i 31 TRANSDUCER, E/F FISCHER AND PORTER 53E!3C00 MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

l 32 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER BARTON 332/358 NECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV, l 33 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER BARTON 358 CONTAINMENT 34 LIMIT SWITCH NAMCO D2400X MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

35 SOLFNOID VALVE ASCO NP SERIES VARIOUS 36 LIMIT SWITCH NAMCO EAlts ND >3 37 PANEL, I AND C PSEEG 1,2,3,4 8AT VERTICAL NEMA 12 E VARIOUS 30 NOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LIMITOROUE SMB, CsASS R INSULATION OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT lgl 39 TERMINAL BLGCK BUCHANAN 28112N CONTAINMENT C1 40 ELECTRICAL CABLE SPLICE RAYCHEM WCSFN CONTAINMENT LA 41 ELECTRICAL PENETRATION CONAX CANISTER TYPE LVP/MVP CONTAINNENT (#

42 ELECTRICAL CARLE AMERICAN INSULATED NIRE ND CONTAINMENT g4 43 ELECTRICAL CARLE SAMUEL MOORE EPh (EPDM3 INSULAT!DN CONTAINMENT l 44 ELECTRICAL CARLE BOSTOM INSULATED NIRE COAXIAL TEF2EL/ETFE CONTAINMENT 45 Ch 45 ELECTRICAL CABLE TRIANGLE NO CONTAINMENT 46 ELECTRICAL CABLE ANACONDA WIFE AND CABLE ND CONTAINMENT 47 ELECTRICAL CARLE ROCNCESTOS NO CONTAINMENT 40 ELECTRICAL CABLE OKONITE NO CONTAINMENT 49 MOTOR CONTROL CENTER GENERAL ELECTRIC 7700 SERIFS AUX 1LIARY BLDC., ELEV. 04*=0' w- -

v -~ r m . . _ - ..A_ -- e__ ---s - - m-

- .~ ~ ~ , ---

s a a m a s s e s s e s s a s s e s a m o s a a m m a e s's e a s s e s s e n e n i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION I t=

I EQUIPMENT ITEM CHECFSHEET INDEA $

1 SALEM i a

[]f .

>q aussammassamassessessassessesameseassenes FRC k$5 ITEN ss No. COMPONENT MANUFACTURER MODEL NUMBER g;n LOCATION

• @ assessassnessamasseneseemsmassnessassssassesseoussassumeessassenssase-massammasseemsemeessessessmassessassammessnesa 50 ELECTRIC MOTOR WESTINGHOUSE SPIN SPSE.RCADCF CONTAIN4ENT, FLEV. 330'

[4 51 HYDROGEN RECL '8INER NESTINGHOUSC NO CONTAINMENT, ELEV. 130*

3% 52 ELECTRICAL CofNECTOR BURNDT NT LUG CONTAINMENT h[}

T 53 54 THERMOCOUPLE TEM TEX 304250tG12SA2tHCCTC CONTAthMENT LEVEL SWITCH CEMS LS000 Ek) 55 THERMOCOUPLE CONTAINNENT hESTINGHOUSE SPIN ORCRIUI (503F014) h3 56 HUMIDITT DETECTOR FOXRORO 2711AG CONTAINMENT

' 57 RADIATION MONITOR FOX 8080 TA634 CONT &lNMENT 50 REED SWITCH CONTAINMENT NFSTINGHOUSE EDO90512 CONTAIMMENT 59 RADIATION DETECTOR NESTINGHOUSE 60 ELECTRIC MOTOR SR SuL23706, IR ONL23707, PR $ CONTAINMENT NESTINGHOUSE TBFC CONTAINNENT 61 SOLENOID VALVE ASCO HT344A75 MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

62 HTDROGEN-OXYGEN ANALTTER SACHARACH ND 63 LIMIT SWITCH CONTAINMENT 64 LIMIT SWITCH NAMCO EAl?0ll302 MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

WAMCO D2400X CONTAIEhENT 65 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER FISCHER AND PORTER 66 50EP1048 PECHANICAL PENE1 RATION AREA D/P TRANSMITTER FISCHER AND PORTER 1082495 g3 67 SQUARE ROOT EXTRACTOR MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

FISCHER"AND PORTER 50ES3212 INROARD/0UTBOARD PENETRATIDM AREA 8 60 D/P TRANSs1TTTR FISCHER AND PORTER b4 69 1082496 ED

'd PRESSURE TRANSMITTER ROSEMOUNT lt53ACA 70 LIMIT SWITCH NAMCO IN00ARD/0UTROARD PENETRATION AREAS D2400X2 IN80ARD/0UT804RD PENETRATION AREAS 71 SOLENDID VALVE ASCO 72 L8831654 MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, EI.E V.

SOLENOID VALVE ASCO HTX0344475 73 SOLENotD VALVE ASCO MFCHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

74 HTXO34475 MECHANICAL PFNETRATION AREA, ELEV, SOLENOID VALVE ASCO 19342822 75 SOLENOID VALVE ASCO MECHANICAI, PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

76 HTX034477 MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, E l.E V .

SOLENOID VALVF ASCO H7834477 77 SOLENDID VALVE ASCO MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

70 HT036415 FECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

SOLENOID VALVE ASCO L8XN3146 79 30LEN0!D VALVE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV. ,

ASCO FT03J0Al01 80 SOLENGID VALVE ASCO PECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

FT0321A2 MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

Il SDLENDID VALVE ASCO 031454 82 SOLENGID VALVE ASCO MECHAM! CAL PENETRATICS AREA, ELEV.

19342922 NECHAN2 CAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

83 SOLENOID VALVE ASCO 84 F703I54 MEPHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV.

SOLENGID VALVE ASCO FT9114c3 05 SnLENGID VALVF NECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV. pq ASCO FT931654 06 LIMIT Sw!TCH NECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV. Dd MICR0 SNITCH L50055 MEC4hMICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV, 07 LIMIT SWITCH MASONEILAN 08 4T52 COMTAlhMENT }3 LIMIT SWITCH MICRO SWITCH LS0051 g) 89 PPESSURE TRANSMITTER CONTAIN4ENT (n FISCHER AND PORTER SOEP1931PCXANS COWfAINNENT b3 90 MOTORIZED WALVE ACTUATOR LIMITGROUE LM8, CLASS R IN&ULATICN 98 COMTAIMMENT LA MOTORIZED yALVE ACTUATOR LIMITORQUE SMS, CLASS M INPUL4t!ON 92 93 SOLEHOID VALVE PRES $URE TRANSMITTER ASCO ROSEMOUNT XR142022 CONTAINNENT fLECTRICAL PENETRATION AREA, ELEV. ][

43 115)AHA C0sIRINNENT Ch 94 ELECTRICAL CARL,E ROCK 8ESTOS ND CONTAINMENT 00

4% NRC C:ntrcct N D. NRC-03-79-118 P g3 dDi Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 A Dmsion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1(XX) FRC Task No. M,6

~-

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 1 RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE DETECTOR LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT ROSEMOUNT MODEL 176KF AC REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: MSLL, LESS THAN 30 SECS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 1 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 687, 25, 26, 27 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): TRIP INPUT FOR PROTECTION SYSTEM (TA0040, 41, 50, 51, 60, 61, 70, 71)

SERVICE: RC HOT / COLD LEG NARROW RANGE TEMPERATURE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 1 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): TRIP INPUT FOR PROTECTION SYSTEM (TA2437, 38, 40, 41, 43, 44, 46, 47)

SERVICE: RC HOT / COLD LEG NARROW RANGE TEMPEFATbTE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 1 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, i Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3c, W System Consideration Review 4., Ob, w, 40, k, if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, Sf, Sg,Sh,Si,Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6ay-6h Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary -7=, 7b, 70-

MA NRC C:ntr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 P;g]

du Frankhn Research Center FRG Prrject Nr. C5257 A Divmon of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignm:nt N3.13 lb

?oth and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. #4P /S/"7 ECUIPMENT ENVIPONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

[ Tne Licensee (has/hrr rt) provided a response to the SER concerns.

g The Licensee (has/ha; nct) specifically stated that the equipment -se.

~ " i " ~i " 'm will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. .

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are r.o outstanding qualification deficiencies. ,

g ,The Licensee (has/'-- -*) proposed a correctivo action for this equipment item vnose qualification has not been fully established.

V Justiticatien for interim operation (has/has .ct) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

K Cctrective action specified by the Licensee:

I Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level

' l Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source l Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) l Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of e ipme t in progress g Other i #do /fd - )

(/ O C/

f()

l The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation, g The Licensee (has/h2r not' rprovided a schedule for the proposed corrective act n. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action E, / 9/ 2. - .)

The Licensee states that the equipment- item does not require qualification

( and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt III.b Not in Scope Q Qualification Not Established IV Documentation Not Available II.b Not Qualified

AUO0hrtnkhn Rise:rch Cint:r NRC Contract NO. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Project N2. C5257 Page A Divmon of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. #(o P/f/~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SLMMARY FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate V, Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) V' Program Established to Identify Aging Degradaticn Criteric Regarding Aging Gimillation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposdre:

o Peak Teraperature Adequete o Pesk Pressure Adequate o Dur3 tion Adequato _

o Required Profile Er.veloped Adequately K, o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied _X _

Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied ,,

l Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied

! Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied X Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied 1 T@st Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

/ .

DESIGNATION:

, NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified y I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.b Equipment Not Qualified

)

II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirt nents Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available 1

A NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 000hranklin Rrse:rch Ccnter FRC Project N . C5257 Pag 3 A Dnnsen of The Frtnkhn Insatut FRC Assignm:nt Nn.1) 3a 20th and Race streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 16If517 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: RTD (Rosemount)

MODEL: 1761G A,C CC'iPONENT T.- TA0040, TA0041. TA0050, TA0051, TA0060, TA0061, TA0070, TA0071, TA2437, TA2438 TA2440. TA2441, TA2442 TA2444, TA2446, TA2447.

l NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: A PSEsG EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 1. ,

An aging review is being conducted for these devices. As of date a qualified life has not been established. Qualification is expected prior to 6/30/82.

Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 1 details our position and justification for continued operaticn.

PSE3G's evaluation of noted deficiency has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardized pending qualification.

\

t

A NRC Contract N r. NRC-03-79-118 000Er:nklin assench Cint:r FRC Project N;. C5257 A Diwon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.19 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phda. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRCTaskNo. V6#/J/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (CCMTlWCh --

Basis No. 1 Deficiencv: Incomplete Aging Review of Miscellaneous Equipment. .

Justification:

Wyle Laboratories is currently perfcrming an aging review for PSE&G in accordance with the requirements of NUREG 0588, of equipment for which aging data is inccmplete and the equipment has not been scheduled for replacement. This will encompass the identification of natorials which are suscep- ,

tible to aging mechanisms and which coule affect equipment operation. A qualified life will be determined and maint-enance programs established for the devices as required.

This matter is considered to have little safety significance for the time f rame in question. Aging degradatien, if it is a problem, is not expected to occur in this short period but on the order of years.

I This case has been classified as Group II.4 item (II.4.2).

I Corrective Action:

The aging review being performed by Wyle Laboratories is to be es.sentially complete by January 1,1981.

The Wyle review contains the following elements:

1- Existing qualification data is searched to deter-

. mine if documentation exists which satisfies the .

required LOCA/MSLB profiles and contains pre-aging i data.

Applicable data is compared with the Salem plant conditions. If the equipment qualified life is based on conditions similar to those appropriate for Salem, this value is used as the estimate of the equipment's qualified life for use at Salem.

i If the aforementioned estimated qualified life was calculated at a temperature significantly dif-ferent than the Salem plant conditions, the quali-f fied life for Salem is extrapolated by use of the Arrhenius equation.

A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 P 03 000hrinklin Rise:rch Cent;x FRC Project N3. C5257 A Division of The Franklin Institute 3C 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. V6INo.13[C/~)

i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /

LICENSEE RESPONSE 10 NRC SER (Continued) 2- If qualification data exists which does not in-I clude pre-aging, an attempt is made to demonstrate

! that the equipment is not subject to aging me-Sa-t I

nisms which would prevent it frca functioning at some future time during a LOCA/MSLB. ~

l Equipment materials are identified and the ther-mal and radiation aging characteristics are re-searched. If it can be shown that the thermal and radiation resistance results in ne significant aging for a -40 year service life, the mancrial can be exempted from aging considerations.

i l

l

- \

l l -

l l

l a l

I

/ ~s NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118 l!00 ranklin Reseuch Center FRC Project No. C5257 P g3 A Dwis on of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 1215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. #4 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /

Checksheets [ 4 [f have been removed due to the proprietary nature of information contained therein.

0

]

L

4%

Utuu Frankhn Research Center NRC C::ntract N2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Prcject N2. C5257 P;ga A Dus.on of The Frankhn Institute FRC Asaignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 lftX) FRC Task No. %9 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2 RESISTANCE TEMPERATURE DETECTOR LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT ROSEMOUNT MODEL 176 KS REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB TER CHECKSHEET NO. 2 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 687, 25, 26, 27 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): POST-ACCIDENT MONITORING (T0043, 53, 63, 73; TA2757, 58, 59, 60)

SERVICE: RC HOT / COLD LEG WIDE RANGE TEMPERATURE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 2 [64]

)

)

?

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, @, @ P, H , @, A , S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, h None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, I, Stf System Consideration Review .4af 44ri ae, 4&, ae, W Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, 5f, 5g, Sh, Si, Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ray %

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7a, hh

As NRC Ccntract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 00hrsnklin Rrse rch Center FRC Project N2. C5257 Pcg2 A Division of The Frankhn Institute lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 44& t000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. M fa%No.1}5 I M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _7::::.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

X Tne Licensee (has/ hie rt) provided a response to the SER concerns.

b The Licensee (ha s/has--no+-) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will functicn when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies,

___ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a correceive action for this equip.nent item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee: l k Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level l

Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has.-aet) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective l

1 action W L /M /f'A q~

.)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt Q Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.o Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

s NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 p0hFrtnklin l;0 RIserrch Centrr FRC Project N 3. C5257 Pag 3 A Dnnsen of N Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 44F/8/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2_

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate I Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established _

Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) 1,,

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation j Criteria Regarding Iging Sinulation Satisfied (If Required) _

[

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate __

o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Envelopud Adequately X o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied X Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied ,

Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied

( Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied I Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied )(

Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Crit.eria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) l DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established K_

II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available g

%;W 9mu4ted epp-d % h so 1491. -

V bepvbg bh iw U ceme.e's to to fih:. (ca tW s

dces wd aduedeg a&SS ens %g c!cticteccies ,

A NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 000lj Frinklin R:seIrch Center FRC Project NO. C5257 Pag 3 A Divmon of The Fr:nkhn Instituti FRC Asalgnment N2.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448,1000 FRC Task No. 44,778/7 9

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1=

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMEtiT: RTD (Rosemount, Inc.)

MODEL: 176 KS k

( ,

l CCMP0:4Et;T f:0.: TA0043, TA0053, TA0063, TA0073, l

TA2757, TA2758, TA2759 TA2760 i

tiRC IDEriTIFIED DEFICIEtiCIES: RT, QT, CS, RPS PSE3G EVALUATIO*: OF DEFICIEt:CIES:

Our submittai, Volume 1 Section V, page 7. addresses all the above f4RC noted deficiencies. Supporting data referenced is available in cur file EQ-10.

RTD's at Salem are being replaced every outage pending requalification by the manufacturer to more conservative guidelines dictated by itRC in letter dated 10/13/79. *5r1.C. ei as , to iartall Pa.lly ay *H 9.'ed W t'" by s/Softa deadle%e.

ec.r- ire _eas.ng r. cap . e c d. 8 PSE3G's evaluation of tiRC noted deficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardi;:ed pendirg a permanent solution to the problem.

I

{

/' NRC Contr;ct Ns. NRC-03-79-118 l

LO0f$nklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Paga A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC AssignmeJn ,No.13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phita., Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. 74 Y EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. cP-Checksheets b fv' have been removed due to the proprietary nature of information contained therein.

i

(

t I

A NRC Contr:ct N 3. NRC-03-79-118 P ga UNU Franklin Research Csnt:r FRC Pr: Ject Ns. C5257 A Divmon of The Franklin instituts FRC Assignm:nt No.13 72 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Ufor/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE SIMMARY The following information regarding the maintenance and replacement schedule (s) for components, sub-components, and materials has been provided by the Licensee.

l Tk wik ravga RT Os oe. f.eke J *t e*ra r esueling 2 f ewkag requalifica+ ion p., N9.C. fequireveds in NRC S E R for blem (Supp.t 4) NuREG. o s t-[,

W< 19so tg 3 -is ,

1 i

4% NRC C ntr:ct N2. NRC-03-79-118 dUu Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject N2. C5257 Pig 2 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila , Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4/o 9 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _3_

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN INSTRUMENi PANEL IN THE CONTAINMENT BARTON MODEL 763 PROD LOT 2 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB,120 DAYS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 3 LICENSEE REFEPINCE(S): 28, 1570 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): REACTOR COOLANT SYSicri PRESSURE POST ACCIDENT MONITORING (PA0039 & PA8088)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEU(S): 3 [64j i

1

)

l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, P, H, CS, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, h, ?:, 3d-System Consideration Review h, ti, 4, 4d, 4=, 4E-  !

.I Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Co, ;L, -m, Ja, 5e, 5f, Og, Oh, 31, 'j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation So, 55-Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Surunary h. 7h 7"-

A

As NRC C:ntract N 3. N RC-03-79-118 Paga dlfFr:nklin Rese:rch Cent:r FRC Project N .C5257 A Diws.on of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Fdef EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _2._

SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

E Tne Licensee (has/h;; not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

Y The Licensee (has/hus-not) specifically stated that the equipment is---

' qua.Lifica J/m will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstandir.g qualification deficiencies.

J The Licensee (has/hr W) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/h c act) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

I Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

] Equipment replacement with qualified equipment

• Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other 1 )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

J The Licensee (has/tus not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action m 30 /ML .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITE,4 ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Iegend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Q Modification III.a Exempt III.b Not in Scope II.a Qualification Not Established II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A NRC Contract N c. NRC-03-79-118 bO0lFrinkiin Rssench Cant:r FRC Project N2. C5257 Page A Dnnson of The Frankhn Inshrute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Sneets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Wl l

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2 l

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate

• Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Requited) X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) l Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate t

o Peak Pressure Adequate l

3 Duration Adequate

( o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately __ X t

o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Cricorin Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies l (If Any) Satisfied X Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied _

Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY l .

I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modificatioa f II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

)

NRC Contract N2. NRC-03 79-118

1. [jf)mUU Frcnklin Rzse rch Center FRC Project No. C5257 P g2 A om .c, of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race St cets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. #fJ EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1 l

l LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER l

EQUIPMENT: Pr, essure Transmitter (Barton)

MODEL: 763 Prod. Lot 2 CCMPONENT NO.: (PA0039, PA8088)

(Unit 1)

NRC IDEhTIFIED'0EFICIENCIES: RT, A, S 1

s

\

.f l PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES: 3' Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 3.qt These pressure transmitters will be replaced with qualified units prior to 6/30/82, Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 2, gives this schedule and our justificatio% f or continued oceration. nese, h-mi fers nor su'am er ged. ne evalacion ~mm ind;eare s T%sy ar t- 4we. M 9To<d knl.

PSE&G's evaluation of these deficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeccardized pending replacement.

l #- NRC Contract Na. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Prrject No. C5257 P g3 000 nklin Research Cent:r A Divmon of The Frtnkhn Instituti FRC AssignmInt No.13 5f 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-Imo FRC Task No. 4'6P EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _J _

NOTES:

• h u, /870 A n .J/ i A2/ l i'f cLeekkX .

1' a a/ a n.s A x ~-

e~ e!&# A nx

/

A1z.c .

4 J

gh NRC Crntr:ct N2. NRC-03-79-118 WSd Franklin Research Center FRC Pr; ject Ns. C5257 P;ge A Dmuon of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.1{ la 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4W S EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN INSTRUMENT PANEL IN THE CONTAINMENT BARTON MODEL 764 PROD LOT 2 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB,120 DAYS

( TER CHECKSHEET NO. 4 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 28, 1570 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PRESSURIZER LEVEL POST-ACCIDENT MONITORING (LA0086, j LA0087, LA0088)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): TRIP INPUT FOR PROTECTION SYS. AND POST ACCIDENT MONITORING LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 5 [64]

! SERVICE: STEAM CENERATOR NARROW RANCE WATER LEVEL TRIP INPUT FOR REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM AND POST ACCIDENT MONITORING (LA0005, LA0006, LA0007)

LICENSEE SUBMIT"'AL: SCEW(S): 12 [64)

DESIGNATION FOR DSFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable 1

LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, 3c, 3d l System Consideration Review h, it, L., 40, se, 4f-f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 54 Sb,Ecg 5A Se SV, 3 3 3 dg , Sh , 51, Sj Sw., 5.0 3

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 0e, $b-Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7;, 7L, 7;

/% NRC Cantr:ct N . NRC-03-79-118 d$nklin Resench Centu FRC Pr: Ject N2. C5257 P 0a A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignm:nt Nn.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 lC4X2 FRCTask No. %I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 SUMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Y- Tne Licensee (has/h;; ..si) provided a response to the SER concerns.

I The Licensee (has/" " e t) specifically stated that the equipment J.s 4 :lified "Mr will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

4 The Licensee (has/hc.; ..a) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

J Justification for interim operation (has/h;; not; been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

N Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

M Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above subme:gence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other 1 ) '

The Licensee has provided other information for this (quipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

N The Licensee (nas/ nee-net) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action du/

ds l3O f fl.'

.)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I_. a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency G.b Mod 111catto;p III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Estab:ished III.b Not in Scope ]

II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available j

& NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 000Er:nkhn Rxse rch Cant 2 FRC Project N3. C5257 PagD A Dwmon M The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. W.8 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. g EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate ,

Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Y Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate i o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately 1 o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarcing Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied X Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification 111.0 Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

Ap NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 P g9 00bu Frsnklin R:serrch Cant:r FRC Project N3. C5257 A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 30 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 44P EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Pressure Transmitter (Barton)

MCDEL: 764 Prod. Lot 2 l

COMPONENT NO.: (LA0086, LA0087, LA0088) '

(Unit 1) l i

NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: RT, A '

PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 5.

These pressure transmitters will be replaced with qualified units prior to 6/30/82.

Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 2, gives this schedule and our justification for continued operation.

PSE3G's evaluation of these deficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeccardi:ed pending replacement.

i

/* NRC Contract N D. NRC-03-79-118 lj002nuiin aeseerca center FRC pr: ject um.Cs2s7 Pig 3 A Dwision of The Franklin institute FRC Assignment No.13 5 20th and Race Streeh. Phila . Pa 19103(215)448 1000 FRCTask No. W4 Tr' EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. #

r Checksheets [a___ M (( have been removed due to the proprietary nature of information contained therein.

L l

I

gh N RC CentrIct No. N RC-03-79-118 BON Franklin Resea ch Center P:ga FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Diwson of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda-. Pa 19101 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 46I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 5 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN INSTRUMENT PANEL IN THE CONTAINMENT ROSEMOUNT MODEL 1153AGA REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB, LESS THAN 5 MIN [12]; POST-ACCIDENT MONITORING [29]

TER CHECKSHEET NO. 5 ,

LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 29, 30, 31, 32, 1764, 3297 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PRESSURIZER PRESSURE TRIP INPUT TO REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM (PA0082, PA0083, PA0084 & PA0087)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 7 [12]

l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (Tr, RT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Ob, 22, ?

System Consideration Review I;, Ib, 4c, If, I;, Of Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, Sb, Sc, 5d, Se, 5f, Sg , Sh, Si , Sj , fa, , 5b. )

^ 6e.) Efe) Q ,y Sh., SJ, j6 5.,

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 5;, L 51 4 s 3

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary  ?;, 7b, 7;

A NRC C ntrcct No. NRC-03-79-118 db Franklin Reserrch Center P g3 FRC Pr: Ject NO. C5257 A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4f/, fir /7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO_ THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

g Tne Licensee (has/h:2 c.s t.-; provided a response to the SER concerns.

1 The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment 6e F 4 " ~i :nUr will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

[ The Licensee (has/h ; ..c i) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Y Justification for interim operation (has/h;; not) been providad by the Licensee for this equipment item.

N Corrective action specified by the Licensee: .

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Eqdipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress R Other T En & A AN dt_ )

U UQ f V f / '

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim l operation. I E The Licensee (nas/"-

') provided a schedule for the proposed corrective act n. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action J d. /fh2._._ .)

The Licensee st es that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified _

II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

[ I.b ModificatioM III.a Exempt M Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II,b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 00bhrsnklin Rsse:rch Cant:r FRC Project N . C5257 A Dmsson of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phtia.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. W,P /J77 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J~

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adaquate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X i Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposute:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Ad.equately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified

[

III.s Equipment Exempt From Qualification

[ III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 UO0hrinklin R:se:rch Ccntr FRC Project NO. C5257 P gJ A DMson of The Fcnkhn In=uti 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment Nr.13,f/7 FRC Task No. 448f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Pressure Transmitters (Rosemount)

MODEL: 1L63AGA CCMPGNEriT tt0.- PA0082, PA0083, PA0084, PA0 7 I

tiRC IDEt4TIFIED DEF'CIENCIES: A PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fona page 7.

An aging review is being conducted for these devices. As of date a qualified life has not been established. These transmitters will either be qualified or replaced prior tc 6/30/82.

Jur sucmittal, '/clume I, Section '/II, basis 1 details our position and justification for continued operation.

PSE&G's evaluation of noted deficiency has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardi:ed pending qualification.

4 1, NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 d[Frankhn Rrsearch Centzr FRC Project Ns. C5257 P203 A Divisv;n of The Franklin Instit eie FRC Assignment No.13 5a 20th end Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 9& /J'/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EOUlPMENT ITEM NO. [

EQUIPMENT E!NIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW Criteria: DOR Guidelines 1 ; NUREG-0588, Cat. I  ; NUREG-0588, Cat. II .

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0 588-I/0 588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

!  ! O /FF E A EsrT/AL  !

EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION  !  ! PA6JJ U4 6 )

Equipment Type !fXfSSonE ! TRAAIS tsITT 2A  !

I ffjAssn/TifA!  !

Manutacturer's Name  !  ! A c 56 ff ou A/T  !

(5.2.2/-/-)  ! (off/fouNI!  !

!  !  ! g Model Number (5.2.2/-/-) '

j j fjggf 'y M/

Serial Numoer My fo g/ T4Au /06/M .

Features / Mounting  !  ! '

(5.2.6/-/-)  ! Kostn** A  ! its 3 SEA 1ES A

!bH&k&T  !  !

Connections / Interfaces  !  ! gg ypf  !

,,,g g,y(, gpacKET '

(5.2.6/-/-)

,5 ; c g fLynbfD .

Location / Elevation sEE fy/'* jau/)T/185Fh##16 ro Equipment ID No. '

. gj//f '

QUALIFICATION REPORT  !  !  !

(8.0/5.0/5.0)  !  !  !

Rrport IU Number ' gg379 '

RHT 3 788.

' [17(> 9]

.; //f ptc[ )]p / 77g Report Date 1 pp f ,'

I7 sued by

{ /A j gW l Prepared for

{ p/ g {

Rsferencea Reports .

N/A Rt1T 3792I i [ 41'2 1 3]

Qualification Method  !  ! '

(5.1, 5.3/2.1, 2.4/2.1, 2.4) '

-TE.I T  ! ggg 7 y37-QUALIFICATION TEST PROGRAM  !  !  !

Functional Test Description !  ! g y , T- ,Po u 6 8 0 0  !

(5.2.5/2.2.9/2.2.9) '

M '

g gA ESSvA f ? f D Operating Conditions  !  !  !

[ (-/2.2.10/2.2.10)  ! gg  ! C - 750 ,,MOA y !

l Load / Cycles / Voltage /  !  !  !

Cur r ent/Freq .  !  ! L/ - 2 0 #1a-  !

1. ~ NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 bdbnklin Rzsearch Csnt:r FRC Project N3. C5257 P g3 A Divmon of The Frankhn insoture FRC Assignment No.13 5b 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 lM FRC Task No. YdeP/f/2

/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. [

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)_

I E Acceptance Criteria  ! I! + 5 %o $0.5ffrMk 71Vo ffMJ!

j

( 5. 2. 5/ 2. 2.1/ 2. 2.1)  !  ! t #*4/ c'"#/##" JT I#J I '

Accuracy (5.2.5/-/-) .

N/p .N #"[

, , fja/. p o TE 1.

' gass e Anbt41/* .s + (, 15

• Number of Specimens gg .

g 37E4 Test Instruments Calibrated '

A//$  ! ffS///80 '

Safety Function (Active /  !  !  !

Passive) (-/ 2.1. 3/ 2.1. 3)  ! MN  ! A  !

Test Duration (5.2.1/-/-) //A g // g )o/f//V Accident Duration (Envir.  !  !  !

Above Normal) (5.2.1/-/-)  ! W dO ! 8  !

Required Function Time  ! 4 g g pp  !

Test Sequence (General)  !  !  !

O A /# /

( 5. 2. 3/2. 3.1/ 2. 3.1) '

jfg gy*

Test Sequence (NUREG-0588,  !  ! r /,,  !

Cat. I) (-/ 2. 3 .1/.-)  ! N/A-  ! [V/// '

1. Representative Sample  !  !  !

2. Baseline Data  !  !  !

3. Performance Extremas  !  !  !

4. Thermal Aging  !  !  !

5. Radiation Aging  ! -  !  !

6. Wear Ag ing  !  !  !

7. Vibration / Seismic  !  !  !

8. DBE Exposure  !  !  !

9. Post-DBE Exposure  !  !  !

10. Inspection  !  !  !

524, 7.0/4.0/4.0) .~

1. ~~

f'

! 4^^

Thermal Aging / Basis

!'PsR-30]!

Material Aging fo*C A i

• NoNE i'#X y Evaluation (7.0/-/-) ,

Materials Susceptible TMA } jVONE iX (Thermal) (5.2.4, 7. 0/ -/-)  !

!. # g ('

Radiation Ag ing , Type GgNU8 (c' .

1. NRC C:ntract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 P g]

LdNnkhn Heserrch Cantsr FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5c 2Uth and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448 lfm FRC Task No. FM /f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. f NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

Radiation Aging, Dose (ed) pg . SSE dcc /d ("I O*J8 ,

. . . l Radiation Aging, Dose Rate

.[ MA set #cc/dtyT Ow/ j

'. //((

Radiation Aging, Method .

7fff Materials Susceptible  ! - g (Radiation) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-) !//#l  !  !

! J7AIf D  !  !

Operational Aging  :  !  !

(-/4.2/-)  ! M/4  !  !

Other Age Conditioning  ! p  !

(-/4.2/-)  !

Qualified Life Claimed /

Established (5.2.4/4.10/-)

N8- 3 g g7g7gg  !

' g,g Normal Ambient Temperature r

Normal Amoient Radiation 1 p  !  !

Normal Ambient Humidity  !  !  !

On-Going Surveillance and  !  !  !

Preventive Maintenance  ! p  ! //oT SI8IId  !

(7.0/-/-)  !  !

On-Going Analysis of  !  !  !

Failures and Degradation  ! fp/g  ! goI 87j7go '

(7.0/-/-)  !  !  !

Margin (General)  !  !  !

(6.0/3.0/3.0)  !  ! /o'/o eN 8AD/A T/ou ;

Margin (NUREG-0588,  !  !  !

Cat. I) (-/3.2/-)  !  ! NM  !

1. Temperature (+15'F)  !  !  !

2. Pressure (+1G%,  !  !  !

10 psig max)  !  !  !

3. Radiation  !  !  !

(not required)  !  !  !

4. Time (+10%, +1 hour  !  !  !

+ f unction time minimum)  !  !  !

1. s NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N2. C5257 P:g]

00b rankhn Rrsearch Cant:r A Dwmon of The Franklin Insotute FRC Assignment No.13 5d 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. W#/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d' NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

ACCIDENT CONDITIONS 1 1  !

IDCA/MSLB/HELB/bncontrolled !  ! g[g  !

l (4.1, 4.2, 4.3.1, 4.3.3/  ! /, oC A  !  !

1.1, 1.2, 1.5/1.1, 1.2, 1.5) j ggg l l g,g g g (, S" Radiation Type } gggqA { {

Radiation Dose (ed) 7 g gjo 8AD (4.1.2/1.4/1.4)  ! k Y/8 $

Radiation Dose Rate (rd/hr) o ,f y 10 AMA Radiation Qual. Metnod !pv7 1  !

t (5.3.1/-/-)  ! ST/ITED T E s 7~

Proximity to Concentrated Radiation  ! p[  !

( 4.1. 2/1. 4 . 6/1. 4. 6)  !

Equipment Susceptible to  ! g  ! gjj Beta Radiation (4.1.2/-/-)  !  !

Radiation Dose (Normal + 1  !  !

// g/o7R  ! y g g /0 [,8 A O  !

Accident) (4.1.2/-/-)  !

~

Plateout Dose Considered

(-/1. 4 8/1. 4 8) 1  !  ! l

!  !  ! (

Gamma + Beta Dose (rd) 1  !  !

(4.1.2/1.4.7/1.4.7)  !  !  !

l

1. NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 P;g3 b nklin Rtse:rch C nt:r FRC Project N2. C5257 A owmon oe The rrankhn insi,iur. FRC Assignment No.13 5e 20th and Rac. Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. #41/f/7

/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. T NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY 111TH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE No.)

EINIRONMENTAL PROFILE  !  !  !

OF ACCIDENT CONDITIONS  !  !  !

^^';,**P'*""-

, ,, ;uSmA! 7 f 3 p, ng l Peak: *F/psig/RH/ Time CYCAES

!ggolfj.2ll .

3 5"l/dol/* *f 0 ~ /0N ! ss S hoM Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time ',7/([J[/a./J4 ' 303[88!/40/ [d8 'sNfftvA4 j

Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time Jf7[pe)/.fJ14 2 80[/f[/d [I E/$

Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time /ff[f[/De[._ 88*M T8 -

Equipment Surface Tempera-  !  !  !

ture (MSLB) (-/1.2.5.C,  ! g  ! 8'N  !

2.2.6/1.2.5.C, 2.2.6)  !  !  !

Spray Qualification Method  !  !  !

(5.3.2/1.3, 2.2.8/1.3,  ! Tfd b  ! N  !

2.2.8)  !  !  !

Spray Composition  !  ! 1 (4.1.4/1.3, 2.2.8/.  ! J  ! g3 g J fgg oo ggg  !

1. 3, 2. 2. 8) !N40# _,  ! NAOM M /O'  !

!D >Yh  ! $77'T  !

Spray Density (gpm/ft 2) 0 ./f" (( L'

. yyj,g f(

0'Y**'"*"

9 _ JO - p f fouR $ g3 Submergence Duration  !  !  !

( 4.1. 3/2. 2. 5/2. 2. 5)  ! /d  ! MO  !

In-Leakage Considered  !  !  !

(5.2.6, 5.3.2/-/-)  ! Nb  ! No 1 EA K &rf  !

!  ! O E TEcrib  !

Time to Submergence  ! N/j.  ! g/g  !

i . .

Dust Environment N!M k

(-/ 2. 2.11/ 2. 2.11)  :  !  !

d% NRC Contract NO. NRC-03 79-118 000Erinkhn R:se:rch Ccnt:r FRC Project N .C5257 Pag 3 A Diva.on of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 5L 20th and Race streets. Phita . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. //4Mf6 I  !

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. T

/.

Th b5 O

These test units are representative of the whole 1!53 Series A model  ;

line. The remainder of the model line differ by the spring constant (thickness) of the sensing diaphragm and by the process pressure l evel . The stiffness of the metal sensing diaphragm, whose movement is minute .004 inches, does not constitute a significant design difference. Radiation, vibration, and steam temperatures would not effect diaphragm stiffness to the extent that performance would exceed the specified acceptance criteria limits. Also, all transmitters within the model line have a design capability of withstanding a process pressure proof load of 10,000 psi. This is more than twice the maximum operating pressure range of any transmitter. Hence, process pressure is a static load which is well below the design proof load and the effects of this static loading would not be significantly enhanced by exposure to the qualification testing.

Thus, the entire 1153 Series A model line is qualified to the acceptance levels specified in this document by virtue of similarity to the test units.

Span Maximum Working Model No. Type Min. Max. 3r Maximum Static liS30A3 Differential 0-5" H 2O n-30" H 2O 2000 psig 11530A4 0-25" n2 0 0-150" H 2d "

1153DA5 0-125"H2 O 0-750"H 2O "

ll530A6 "

0-17 psid 0-100 psid "

ll530A7 "

0-50 psid 0-300 psid "

1153DA8 0-170 psid 0-1000 psid "

1. % NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-4118 UO0Erznklin Rrse:rch C:nter FRC Project N3. C5257 P:g3 A Omsson of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 5 20th and Race Streef t Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 lM0 FRC Task No. W M, f 8 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I NOTES:

ll53HA4 Differential 0-25' H2 0 0-150' H 20 4500 psig il53HA5 0-125" H 2O 0-750" H 2O ll53HA6 "

0-17 psid 0-100 psi.d "

1153HA7 0-50 psid 0-300 psid "

Absolute 9^ -

"9 2000 psig 1153AA5 1153AA6 0-17 psia 0-100 psia -

1153AA7 0-50 psia 0-300 psia ll53AA8 "

0-170 psia 0-1000 psia "

i ll53AA9 "

0-500 psia 0-3000 psia 4500 psig il536A3 Gauge 0-5" H 2O 0-30" H 2O 2000 psig Il53GA4 0-25" H2O 0-150" H 2O 1153GA5 0-125" H 2O 0-750" H 2O 1153GA6 0-17 psiG 0-100 psiG ll53GA7 "

0-50 psiG 0-300 psiG 1153GA8 0-170 psiG 0-1000 psiG w

Ql53 gap 0-500 psiG 0-3000 psiG 4500 psig ,,

)Jk .;,, p rand &$ & & & & W st [ WMMb

-C W 9}-

Summary of ation Results During the exposure period, the following worst case output signal deviations were noted: .6%,h7%,and+1.5%ofspanforserial numbers 106186,106187, and 106188; respectively. These results are well within the expected error band of 5% upper range limit. The post-test calibration check indicates that all transmitters returned to near normal performance; all transmitters were within 0.5% of the pre-test data. No changes worthy of noting were seen in liftoff voltage er time constant parameters in the before to after compari-son. The tenerature coefficient data do indicate that rt.diation does have an effect on this parameter; however, the macnitude of

@is effect is smil. The largest difference between the pre-to-0 post test data at the hot temperature (200 F) was only 1.3% of span.

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N2. C5257 Pag 2 J00hr nklin Risearch Ccntir I

A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5J3 20th snd Race streets. Phila-. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. FM./8/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _sC NOTES: I

}_

The deviation from procedure resulted from a problem with the filtra-tion system for the chemical spray. The plumbing for the spray became clogged such that units 106186, 106187, and 106188 were sprayed for 10, 21, and 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />; respectively. The procedure originally specified 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of chemical spray. This deviation does not impact the results of the test for three reasons. First, the transmitter design is one I in which all exposed surfaces are of ferrous material and are chemically compactable with the spray. Second, the strio chart data for signal I outout and past development testing indicate that the output signal is uneffected by the spray introduced into the chamber. Third, unit 106188 did experience the required amount of spray and, therefore, I demonstrates the design compactability with the 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of spray.

It is concluded from the results present that all tnree units met the requirements ,of the steam / chemical test.

V/$?~$ f $2 i CONCLUSIONS 1

l It is concluded from the data obtained from this type-test program,

, a summary of which is document in this report, that all three test 1

units have successfully demonstrated the Rosemcunt Model 1153 Series

! A pressure transmitter to be qualified for Class lE service in tnose applications requiring compliance with the 1971 IEEE standards.

& NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 c00lJ Franklin Resetrch Cent r FRC Prrject No. C5257 P:ga A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5.2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4'(#,/U7

~

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d NOTES:

b $ e. 80 fY l) Eh A

/

E G) h / m 2L. /0*A d D iMt JA nA & J incKl O l ?!

1)r # R i m 7s s

22 x CAU & /$ / O *('

a, wl '

~LLL MX A a ickl!61) a .

uh %. A. " 'n 4 A n cd I W VC+< A & ) 5 n

et rl W~ D d,A V M lh ." '

1

AA NRC CIntract NO. NRC-03-79-118 Pag]

000hrznkhn Rzseirch Center FRC Pr ject N3. C5257 A Dmen of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5 20th and Race Streets. PhJa . Pa 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. W8/5/7 f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I f40TES*

CoArcL vSlob! base 0 x REVIEW of REPAl i

Tnree differential range ll53DA5 transmitters were sequentially tested. These units are representative of the entire 1153 Series A model line. The remainder of the model line differs by the sensing diaphragm, spring thickness, and the process pressure rating. These differences are not significant with respect to qualification testing. Thus, the following model line is qualified by virtue of similarity: _

ll53DA3 through 8 1153HA4 through 7 1153AA5 through 9 NW,A n /f & llS Y Y '

The transmitters were exposed to a radiation exposure rate of 0.5 Mrd per hour for a total integrated dose of 44 Mrd. The maximum output signal deviation noted was +3.7% of span.

The three transmitters were LCCA tested in a steam temperature /

pressure / chemical-spray environment for ft/ hours. The maximum error exhibited was +6.95% of span.

^

&mL&r z s a - y w i) M A

p p 4 J1 c& 2^.- oo s c& )

W N *^7 h a n x a s. W d h Y 1 u

4 p& ,en y - WpMA A m2 & M ' %, b aJ.R A- [c.

9 J 4 1A ;1-. .

/A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N 2. C5257 P g3 0000 Franklin Rzsetrch Centxt A Dmsion of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 9'O /f/7 50' 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I EQUIPMFNT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW Criteria: .X)R Guidelines 1; NUREG-0588, Cat. I  ; NUREG-0588, Cat. II .

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0 588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION  !  !  !

Equipment Type  !  ! $ gggg ffESfuAf g

! 7AMNJM /TT ER  !

! }

Manufacturer's Name !4*  !  !

(5.2.2/-/-)  !  ! ROSE #00NT  !

! gA 1  !

Model Number (5.2.2/-/-)  ! p  ! //5 3 G A 7  :

Serial Number  ! 2 108[8 y f.

Features / Mounting  !  !  !

(5.2.6/-/-)  !  ! Nor s74 TED  ! ,u. 4 I Connections / Interfaces  !  !  !

(5.2.6/-/-)  !  ! NOT STATED Location / Elevation  !  !

gg  !

Equipment ID No.,  ! y QUALIFICATIOfi REPORT  !  !  !

(8.0/5.0/5.0)  !  !  !

Report ID Number  !  ! g/17 NO. 3 782 / BfV 8 : (1/p 3 Report Date 3 p 4/ gy6. 7g  !

Issued by

f. f. f OS6/fouN[ f.

Prepared for g g $ f g ,y p7 {.

Referencea Reports

{.

ggf90,3]yg { {;7Q}

Qualification Method  !  !  !

(5.1, 5.3/2.1, 2.4/2.1, 2.4) !  ! M  !

QUALIFICATION TEST PROGRAM  !  !  !

g Functional Test Description !  ! gg,7 gowgR4O ANO !*M 4 l (5.2.5/2.2.9/2.2.9)  !

• PR ESS v A I E SD

• g g3 operating Conditions  !  ! !MM7 f (-/ 2. 2.10/ 2. 2.10 )  !  ! O - 3000 fS/ 7  :

Ioad/ Cycles / Voltage /  !  ! '

Current /Freq.  !  ! pc7 s 7A TED l

/,iw NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 60Du rrinki,n ane:rch Ccnt:r FRC Project N3. C5257 P:g3 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assl0nment No.13 5b #

2thh and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19:03 (215; 448 1000 FRC Task No. Fs#/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. C NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WIT 11 SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

Acceptance Criteria

( 5. 2. 5/ 2. 2.1/ 2. 2.1)

! 4

! i 870 f 1

Accuracy (5.2.5/-/-)

!W!' gg 3,25 % G JpjpPA M T X **-

.r e, % p 1

l p -

Number of Specimens  ! ONN Test Instruments Calibrated  !

{. ,

VES .f Safety Function (Active /  !  !  !

Passive) (-/2.1. 3/ 2.1. 3)  !  !

M/[  !

Test Duration (5.2.1/-/-) '

gg goj,fjy, Accident Duration (Envir.  !  ! -

[ Above Normal) (5.2.1/-/-)  !  ! /V[

/  !

Required Function Time  ! .

Test Sequence (General)  !  !  !

( 5. 2. 3/2. 3.1/ 2. 3.1)  !  ! 6 TEAM IId  !

(

1

!  ! SfRoY  !

Test Sequence (NUREG-0588,  !  !  !

Cat. I) (-/ 2. 3.1/-)  !

//[/  !

1. Representative Sample  !  !  ! ,

2. Baseline' Data  !  !  !

i 3. Performance Extremes  !  !  !

l 4. Thermal Aging  !  !  !

l S. Radiation Aging  !  !  !

6. Wear Aging  !  !  !

7. Vibration / Seismic  !  !  !

8. DBE Exposure  !  !  !

9. Post-DBE Exposure  !  !  !

10. Inspection  !  !  !

i Ag ing  !  !  !

(5.2.4, 7.0/4.0/4.0)  !  ! /V O N b  !

l Thermal Aging / Basis  !  !  !

Material Aging  !  ! jg/o NM  !

Evaluation (7.0/-/-)  !

e e

l

]

Materials Susceptible k goT 8 TA I[b (Thermal) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-)  !  !

Radiation Aging , Type  ! /\/ j

NRC Contract N;. N RC-03-79-118 Pig ]

lb) Frankhn Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Dms.on of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 20th and Rac e Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 tmo FRC Task No. 94P/3~/7 Se' .

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _C NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE No.)

E!NIRONMENTAL PROFILE  !  !  !

OF ACCIDENT CONDITIONS  !  !  !

Rate of Temp./ Press.  !  !  !

Increase Petka 'F/psig/RH/ Time Ia- f, f*' *[g C.(7NJ!'J M

Decrease To: *F/psig/RH/ Time f"0[/po[/c o[0 -/o M j ,y, cgws Decrease To:

'F/psig/RH/Timej jgo3/fJ~//oe[QN D3 crease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time !  !$f0[/ /#"!!*I  !/y yhaud

!  ! goon ffMfS$)IVAS ! lN TfKVN Equipment Surface Tempera-  !  !  !

ture (MSLB) (-/1.2.5.C,  !  !  !

gg 7fg 2.2.6/1.2.5.C, 2.2.6)  !  ! 87  !

Spray Qualification Method  !  !  !

(5.3.2/1.3, 2.2.8/1.3,  !  !  !

2.2.8)  !  ! Nd  !

Spray Composition ,  !  !  !

(4.1.4/1.3, 2.2.8/  !  ! go R/C AC/D /foco /YN !

1.3, 2.2.8)  !  !  !

Spray Density (gpm/f t2) [ { O./[ G8d //T Spray Duration  !  ! g,7 g7A7f0 1 Submergence Duration  !  !  !

( 4.1. 3/2. 2. 5/2. 2. 5)  !  ! ///  !

In-Leakage Considered  !  !  !

(5.2.6, 5.3.2/-/-1 ' '

' 4A' '

!  !  ! h Time to Suomergence  !

1. [f 1 Dust Environment  !  !  !

(-/2.2.11/2.2.11)  !  !  !

1. N NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 Paga L0bhr:nkhn Rssearch Cent:r FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dwision of The Fr:nkhn Institure FRC Assignm:nt N3.13 5 f; 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. W//f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I NOTES:

l. Ad

/

W W

& A . M 0 '&

w M Aku~ IA. h h ' '

& w &zL A R".am L" m 'McM.

2. w" M S "Er D m n -

h At J d S* 5 A A A firoo #Aus ) . & ZA &

O 14. A s h 'w>J e 4.1 a a o !6

/

A /1 4 N os Jos).#' "

2. RAA&A ud dA 22d n s a~~ .zE d a zL !cx a a s J/'

h .4 aso( 30 s - -

Ms "F.

f V. R d 1k 11% AR nA m h?sR dk L 7tn 'M ) /M f x a A A A ust - 2: l ssof,L/on /3 o3 ~/ A > L fasov= %. / rk f

{

1

1. % NRC Contract N r. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Project N;. C5257 P g3 dNrtnk!!n R:se:rch Ccnter A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. //O/i"/7 I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. f NOTES:

r. A q J.D xL

'd M-

//

TEST RESULTS Accuracy deviations at the input pressures of 50 and 20% full scale (F.S.) are plotted versus time in Figures 2 and 3. These data indicate the maximum cutput signal deviation occurs during the 10 minute hold pericd at 350*F. The worst errors from the 50% and 20% full ' scale pressure tests during this period were

-3.25 and -2.60 percent of span, respectively. At the 303*F temperature, the accuracy deviations were less than +1.5 and

-0.8% of span for the 50% and 20% F.S. tests. At the 250 F temperature, the deviations were less than +1.8 and -0.6% of span. a 5- '

jA .

I

// .

Two anomalies developed during the testing. The first was a minor leak developed at the threads between the process fluid bleed valve body and the process flar.;e. This joint is sealed using a Loctite thread sealant. The leak was minimial, only a few drops of fluid per minute. The bieed valve assemal.v was removed and re-installed using a tape thread sealant in order to . expeditiously finish the performance testing. Subsequent to the steam testing, an evaluation was made to reaffirm the design adequacy of the Loctite thread sealant at 350'F and 3000 psig l

NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 phr:nklin UOb Rise:rch Cznt:r FRC Project N 3. C5257 Pag]

A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5 )>,

20th and Race streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. FicP/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I NOTES:

fluid pressure. A set of four flanges were assembled with bleed valves by the Prcduction Department per procedures for the Model 1153. These were :nen heated in an oven to 350'F for four hours.

They were removed from the oven and immediately pressurized to 3000 psig fo a period of 20 minutes. During the twenty minutes, l they were visually checked for leakage; none was detected. It was concluded that Loctite is an adecuate thread sealant for these conditions. #

$ WA

7. Tn.Z a& - Ack~ mu 4:

T'ne second anomaly involved the output signal at tne 100*; full scale pressure, i.e. 3000 psig. After the first test had been completed and the unit had cooled to room tenperature, a calibra-tion check was made at 20% F.S. intervals. The 100% F.S. signal exnibited anomalous behavior characterized by an erratic output to a level 1.25% of span below the expected reading. Immediate {

cycling between zero and full scale, 3 cycles, indicated the 100% F.S. output signal to be a normal steady value each time.

1 The transmit:ar was then reworked for the second phase of testing; new electronics and new 0-rings were installed.

1 A calibration check prior to subjecting the transmitter to the second steam test showed normal o::eration. Also, during the steam test the unit exhibited expected performance characteristics.

i l

However, af ter cooling at room temoerature, the 100% F.S. reading I

acain snowed abnormal behavior after pressure cycling.

l l

p- NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 Pag]

i JDDUr nklin Riseirch C:nter FRC Project N2. C5257 A Dwis on of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignnient No.13 Si, 20th and Race streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. /////f/7 Y

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. L NOTES:

ADDENDUM 1 INVESTIGATION INTO THE CAUSE OF THE PERFORMANCE ABN0?J',ALITIES i

Due to the abnormalities of the 100% output after the original steam test, an attempt was made to determine if the abnormalities were caused by the trans-mitter or by some other part of the test. ~

In an effort to determine what part of the transmitter wasn't working properly, the capacitance module was disconnected fromthe transmitter and its.

capacitance checked. While at room temoerature, it was cycled at 80% F.S.

pressure,100% F.S. pressure,110% F.S. pressure and 120% F.S. pressure; the cell acted erratically, changing its capacitance readings by up to 7.5% of the nominal readings. At the same time, a new capacitance module was subjected to the same test and performed perfectly. Thus , the aonormality can be traced to some problem with the original capacitance module used in the steam test.

After the electronics were replaced, the unit gave very smooth readings.

The largest error seen was -3.13% of F.S. during the 350* temperature spike The errors were .

.95% of span during the 303*F phase of the test and .44%

of span during the 250*F portion.

CONCLUSION The abnormalities that appeared in the original steam test were apparently caused by a defective capacitance module. An investigation was made to try to pinpoint the exact cause of the problem, but no conclusive results were ever obtained. However, due to the good performance of the new capacitance module when subjected to a steam test, it can be concluded that the problems with the original cell were of a random nature and that the transmitter will operate within the 18% of upper range limit specification. //

NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 4J0brsnklin R:seirch Cent:r FRC Project N . C5257 P g3 A Dwtwon of The Frenkhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5 apn and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 4481M0 FRC Task No. FM/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. T NOTES:

, $ ll53 Y k ll50$k?

G- n fm L=R k&

L 2AZ 2 cn d A-A& k 2P R d-i M && I m

EwEA dd A G

'/

l l

A NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 000hranklin R:setrch Canter FRC Project HD. C5257 P;ge A Division of The Frankhn Insnture FRC Assignment No.13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. WMJ/7 Y

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1 NOTES:

ad %% LJn & 4 nad mv x add.h X, 2L Gm %  %

V a sta b m /7CY &w N I A SY &Ib h LL d

//C 30/1C* &/ m ... t & // r 3 S A YNd A eO 4'- n - 1Au

~

/ 0 /

A mAu%OL

//

ed b O O A 00r DW $ $ &md b W cLA%: o~L & AW.rk II

_k ZEff -32 [7/) . TN

.aJJ U / "

Three differential range ll53TAS transmitters were sequentially tested. These units are representative of the entire 1153 Series A -

mod'el line. The remainder of the medel line differs by the sensing diaphragm, spring thickness, and the process pressure rating. These ~

differences are not significant with respect to qualification testing. Thus, the following mcdel line is qualified by virtue of similarity: ,

ll53dA3 through 9 il53HA4 thr0uen 7

., il53AA5 through 9 T1g/ h M d j

}] p ,,(jk<

//rx AGA .^OsQ f #<i ad

• The transmitters were exposed to a radiation exposure ra.e of 0.5 Mrd per hour for a total integrated dose of 44 Mrd. The maximum cutput signal deviation noted was -3.75 of span.

- The three transmitters were LCCA tested in a steam temperature /

pressure / chemical-spray envircnment for fy hours. The maximum error exnibited was -6.951 of span.

e h' W W23 h Y //[3 g,9 l7 K 74 m - 2 zA ??X - n "

ue3 <

A c~'L -

k aan Lr ML

$$ %W &k& J2<24% j

A NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 000EFranklin R: search Csntzr FRC Prrject N?). C5257 P ga A Dmsson of The Frankim institute FRC Assignment No.13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 941/8/7

/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. f NOTES:

• Ui M lh-I /

& au ; l~b-

r O

c// d J 2A- & A/nc A, o

. u st.sv- Lu~ MM V + y 6 hResecoun: testing to qualify a transnitter to mee: IEEE 323-974 require =ents has resulted in failure. A combination.of j, er:2- aging, irradiation and che:ical spray tes speci-

. car:.on parameters has resulted in f ailed components. The inicia failed element was an 0-r:.ng comprised of sulohur cured po yetnylene rubber. '"his allowed stea / chemical spray ~

to acfect electronic components. The C-ring mode of fai~.ure is attr:au:ec to nigh temperature vs. :ime necessary for the

<cr..en:.us quirements. /'

curve nine cc:pression to satisfy aging test re- g 0%h em W ,2A C Ykl' R ;L L A.JJ cD Rw L /

6s *

<). .

aLkL-(

a n A a z zi.

- psc A w

b Ja f$.- n et & W n l a 41 - w #

!sA~01~

CAld A A/R f 0

/h NRC C:ntrzet No. NRC-03-79-118 Ld EEnklin Research Center P ga FRC Prslect No. C5257 A Diwsion of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 446-1000 FRC Task No. 8I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6 SOLEN 0ID VALVE LOCATED IN THE CONTAIN!iENT ASCO MODEL 821002 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB TER CHECKSHEET NO. 6 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTROL (SV1198, SV1199)

SERVICE: AIR SUPPLY VALVE FOR PRESSURIZER PORV'S LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 8 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, Gr, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable -

LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a,-3L, Ow, 3J -

System Consideration Review 4a, 15, fr. Ad- da- AF Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 4=- Rh Mc- Rd- Ma- Sf-

.5 ; , 55 Si, :j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ou, 1 Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary _': , 7 5 .- 'c

As NRC Csntr:ct Ns. N RC-03-79-118 FRC Pr ject N3.C5257 P:ga brankhn Reserrch Center A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.14 lb 20th and Pace Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (215)44 4 1000 FRC Task No. 44f/8/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _di_

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

I The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.  !

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. I Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a canis for justification for interim operation.

f j

The Licensee (has/nas not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

1 The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency l III.a Exempt ]

~

I.b Modification II.a Qualification Not Established uI.b Hot in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

~s NRC Contract Ns. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 (BOO [ Franklin Rrserrch Centtr FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dwmon of The Frankim lnstitute 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask FRC Assignment No. 44f No.13 [s'/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .fa EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established

) Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfit:d Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Tast Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) i DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification Y '

III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

& NRC Contract N;. NRC-03 79-118 000Erankan a:se:rch Csntir FRC Project N2. C5257 Page A Dwmon of Tha Fu nkhn Instituti FRC Asalgnm:nt Nr.13 30 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-tmo FRC Task No. %P/f/ 'l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6 THE u ct.x6Ec Sctc&) zerces ro sasis A 3 Basis No. 3 Deficiency: Unavailable Qualification Data (PORV control)

Justification:

Environmental Qualification of the controls for the pres-surizer power operated relief valves was not previously re-quired. NRC IE Bulletin 80-18 has been issued which implies' that under certain accident conditions during which the PORV's do not operate (unqualified) that a problem could develop with the minimum flow capability of the centrifugal ,

charging pumps. The devices were included in this review to indicate they were not qualified and that the particular problem of Bulletin 80-18 may be applicable for Salem. An analysis has been completed which addresses Bulletin 80-18, The analysis confirms that the PORV's do not require quali-fication. This justification is applicable for both Salem units.

Our September 19, 1980 submittal provided additional ~infor-mation pertinent to the. Salem #2 valves 2PR47 and 2PR48 as follows:

The August 26 report listed this as a problem area because of the assumption that valves 2PR47 and 2PR48 could perform a pressure-relief function during high temperature operation. These valves, however, are part of the low-temperature, overpressure protection system (POPS) and are not used during design basis accident, or power operation transient conditions. The motive power for the solenoid is locked-out during normal operation and cannot open spuriously. Using these considerations, the valves can only be considered as auxiliary devices, not required for mitigation of accident conditions, and thus do not require qualification.

No changes are required for this case.

The September 19, 1980 submittal identified the above case as a Group II.1 item.

A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 000hrznklin Rsse:rch Cent:r FRC Project N2. C5257 Pcg2 A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 40 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. W/ fl 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _.G_

SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW ,

The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence /

. Don =eenewseenee-with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented below.

Rieson for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence

[ Equipment does not provide a Backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment / system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can g Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform Backup (equipment / system) is its specified safety function.

available which completely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

appears to meet single active failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluatian Category IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification.

\

=

4A N RC C:ntract N 3. N RC-03-79-118 P g2 U!lul! Franklin Research Center FRC Prcject N . C5257 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets Phila , Pa 19101(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. V6 P EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 LIMIT SWITCH LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT NAMCO MODEL EA 180 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB TER CHECKSHEET NO. 7 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 898, 33, 34 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): POSITION INDICATION OF PORV'S PR1,PR2 SERVICE: POSITION INDICATION FOR VALVES LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 10 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER A 2L, 2;, 2d _  :

System Consideration Review i;, th, I;, Id, !;, 4f -

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review R , 55, 0-, 50, Su, 5f, 5;, SL, 51, S j --

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation P ,

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary '2 75, 'c -

e% NRC C1ntrrct NO. NRC-03-79-118 bO0hranklin Research Centzr FRC Pr: Ject ND. C5257 PaQ3 A Dimion of The Frankiin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. WT/ fl 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 i

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/h .uM provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

d The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided otrer information for this equipirant item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified 3 II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

. Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available l

A NRC Contract N3. NRC43-79-118 000hrrnklin Rxseirch Cant:r FRC Project No. C5257 Pag 3 A Dhnsson of The Frankhn Insnture FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. W P / El 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 1

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately .

Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) )

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation 1 Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

)

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate ,

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately l o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate l Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION 3TEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified  % i I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available Q fl W 'J& ,

A NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Project N 2. C5257 Pag 3 ll0brrnklin Rese:rch Centtr A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 / 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. M de f/' 6/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Limit Switch

,(Namco) '

MCOEL: EA-180 CCMPONENT NO.: 1?R3, IFqa, !?R5, UlL12 U;L95, IVC 7, IVC 9, IVC 11, IVC 13 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: A, T, CS .

PSEM E'/AL'JATION OF' DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 61.

A - The aging evaluation review was ccmoleted with maintanance schedules established.

This information was added to the Evaluation Form in Revision 2.

T - The actual test resulted0 in a peak temcerature of 3490 F for 3 hcurs. The Salen recuired profile is 350 F for one minute. This is more than adecuate :c assure c:erability at Salem.

CS - This item was addressed in our submittal.

Further su;ccrting data is availacle in our file EQ-13.

J PSE?.G's evaluation of the NRC noted deficiencies was reaffir ed that Mamcc, EA-lSO limit switches, are cacaole of ::erfor .ing safety functions in a harsh envircnmen at Salem.

/h NRC C:ntract N;. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr: ject No. C5257 P:ga LNnklin Research Center A Dmsion of The Franklin Institute FRC A signm;nt No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4(sI EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Y EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN INSTRUMENT PANEL IN THE CONTAINMENT BARTON MODEL 384 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 8 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM GENERATOR WIC RANGE WATER LEVEL POST ACCIDENT MONITORING (LA0009, LA0015, LA0021, LA0027)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 14 [12]

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): ACCUMULATOR LEVEL INDICATION (LA0228, LA0229, LA0233, LA0234, LA0237, LA0238, LA0241, LA0242) i LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 14A [12]

(

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) ,

R, T, QT, P, H,CS,hS, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d System Consideration Review i;, Ib, 12, IS, 4u, 40 Equipment Environmental Qualification Review J:, 5b, 5-, 5d, ae, n, Sii , Sh, 51, s; Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ce, Ob- (

Equipment Summary [

Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7e, 7b, 7c -

As NRC CIntract N 2. NRC-03 79-118 Pcg2 0 rrnklin Reserrch Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Divmon of The Frankhn Insnture FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1(XX) FRC Task No. #69/8/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _8_

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has/L wL) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

1 The Licensee (has/ hec c. M proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

1 Justification for interim operation (has/h" P) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment-item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

1 Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other '( )

{ The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

[ The Licensee (has/h) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action M50 t~ So 4 /30 / 32 .)

i The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency CE. o Modificatton) III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Page A[

00bFranklin Rrserrch Csnt r FRC Project N3. C5257 A Divison of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 / 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1 2 0 FRC Task No. f4 F/,f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately i Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)  !

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation )

Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contract N D. NRC-03-79-118 000hrznklin Riseirch Cent:r FRC Project N2. C5257 P:g3 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13, 3a 20th and Race streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No.

44#ff/1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1 LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Pressure Transmitter (Barton)

MCOEL: 384 CCMPONENT NO.: LA0009, LA0015, LA0021, LA0027 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: RT, A PSElG EVALUATION OF OEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Cata Evaluation Form page 14. ,

These pressure transmitters will be replaced with qualified units prior to 6/30/82,

~

., Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 5, gives

nis ;cnedule and our justification for continued operation.

PSElG's evaluation of these deficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardi zed pencing replacement.

i

4N UOOU Fr:nklin Rise:rch C:nter NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N3.C5257 P gD A Dimen of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 3b 20th and Race streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-tmo FRC Task No. 4/of /S/7 I

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8 i l

I LICENSEE RESPONSE 'ID NRC SER (Continued)

EQUIPMENT: Pressure Transmitter (Barton)

MODEL: 384 l i

l CCMPONENT N0.: LA0228, LA0229, LA0233, LA0237, LA0238, LA0241, LA0242, LA0234 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: RT, A PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES: ,

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 14A.

These pressure transmitters will be replaced with qualified units prior to 6/30/82 {

Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 24, gives this schedule and our justification for continued coeration.

PSE&G's evaluation of these deficiencies has reaffimed that plant safety is not jeopardized pending replacement.

A NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 000hrinklin R:se:rch Crnter FRC Project N2. C5257 Pag 3 A Dtwson of Th2 Frnnklin Instrut2 FRC Assignment No.13 3c 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4481MO FRC Task No. 4'6/,/T/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. F LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER (Continued)

Basis No. 5 Deficiencv: Unavailable Qualification Data (Stm. Gen. Wide Range Level) l Justification:

The Steam Generator Wide Range instruments do not provide any protection system inputs. They had been used by the operator during accident recovery to verify increasing steam generator water level as noted in the Salem Emergency Operating Procedures. '

Although the wide range level may be lost due to an accident

.inside containment, the three qualified narrow range levels per.s. team generator will be available, as well as the auxil-

iary feedwater flow measurements outside of the containment.

No adverse environment will af fect the auxiliary feedwater flow channel due to an accident inside containment. Thes e diverse parameters provide suitable backup to assure a secondary heat sink following an accident.

Plant operation may proceed since the operators can maintain plant saf ety with diverse parameters. Reference to the wide-range , devices has been deleted f rom the procedures.

During accidents ocuirring outside containment, the vide-range levels are suitable for use as either primary or back-up indication.

This case has been classified as a Group II.2 item (II.2.B.1).

Corrective Action:

It is planned to replace these transmitters on a schedule contingent upon equipment availability and a suitable outage

( duration. They will be replaced no later than June 30, 1982. The installation schedule will be accelerated as .

equipment becomes available and plant operating conditions permit installation.

l A NRC Contr ct Nr. NRC-03-79-118 UO0hr:nklin R:se rch Centu FRC Project N3. C5257 P ga FRC Assignment No.13 A Division of The Frankhn Institute 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 466 /sI 7 3f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I l

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER Basis No. 24 Deficiency: Unavailable Qualification Data (Accumulator Instruments) , I l

Justification:

The accumulator injection system safety function is per-formed independently of the operability of the instrumenta-tion associated with the accumulators. The system is en-tirely passive and will inject the contents of the tanks when reactor coolant pressure decreases below the accumula-tor pressure which is maintained during normal operation.

Requirements for qualified accumulator pressure or level in-dication have been specified in Regulatory Guide 1.97.

Since operator actions are not based on these devices for either short or long term conditions, plant operation may continue until compliance with R.G.l.97 is achieved.

This case is classified as a Group II.1 item (II.1.C).

Corrective Action:

The accumula' tor instrumentation will comply with R.G.l.97 requirements by June 30, 1982. The installation schedule will be accelerated as equipment becomes available and plant operating conditions permit installation.

/% NRC C::ntract NO. N RC-03-79-118 pig 2 WISFranklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 Ia i

20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4Gf f

l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9 TRANSDUCER, E/P IDCATED IN THE INBOARD /0UTBOARD PENETRATION AREAS FISHER GOVERNOR MODEL 546 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: MSLB TER CHECKSHEET NO. 9 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED l FUNCTION (PLANT ID): ' CONTROL i SERVICE: CONTROL FOR ATMOSPHERIC RELIEF VALVES MS10'S LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 15 [12] ,

l

)  ;

1 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of ,this TER for Legend)

R, T, (fr, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM , RPN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la J Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Q.lalification Summary Forms 2

) Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3C, 2d -

System Consideration Review 4a, ?b, 4w, 4d, 50, 'f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review t, 55, Sc, 5d, 50 S E,

/ 5;, Sh, Si, Sj -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 10, Sh-

) Equipment Summary Ma intenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7c, 7b, 7c-

/,&_ NRC C ntrcct Na. NRC-03-79-118 U$ nklin Rescuch Cznter FRC Project N2. C5257 Paga A DMsion of The Frankhn Insnture FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 44fIM EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 SUt4 MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

N Tne Licensee (has/b = e ") provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

, The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the-Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification }

Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source ,

Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other '( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the pecposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

1 The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification @ Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

s NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 P gD A[Frsnklin l!Ob Rsserrch Centrr FRC Project ND. C5257 A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 44 FIT /7

'W EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adaquate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identity Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification X III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available 5

i A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 UOJ ranklin Rsse5rch Csnt:r FRC Project N . C5257 P:g]

A Dwision of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRO Task No. 4/,R/ 6 O EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER l

SALEM UNITS 1 AtiD 2 PSE3G RESPONSE TO NRC SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT EQUIPMENT: E/P Converter . .

l (F, cker > ?ot'Te.N i

MCDEL: 546 COM:CNENT NC. 11RH20, 11RH18, 12RH18

! NRC' IDENTIFIED CEFICIEtiCIES: EXN l

PSEIG EVALUATI0fi 0F DEFICIEhCIES:

Ref. Cualifica:icn Data Evaluation Form page 30.

By crecedural changes these units are rendered incacable of affecting accident conditions and no c::eratcr action is recuired during an accident.

This ;csi:icn is detailed in our su::mittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis it.

A PSElG is confident that clant safety is maintained with 'nis resciuticn.

As NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 bd Franklin R:se:rch Cantir FRC Project N;. C5257 A Dmsion of Tb Frank!!n Institute FRC Assignment No.13 3b.

20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. S/C.#/ fI 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9 LICENSEERESPONSETONRCSER[ )

Basis No. 6 -

Ceficiency: Insufficient Documentation (Main S' team power Cperated Atmospheric Relief Valve Control MS10's - E/P and Pressure Trahsmitter)

Justification: -

3is item was addressed in LER 79-58. It describes the

{ problem resulting from unqualified MS10 valve controls and the acceptability of such a condition. The procedure changes noted in the LER have been completed.

The main steam power operated atmospheric relief valves are operated by a steam pressure transmitter control signal through an electric / pneumatic converter. These are control grade instruments and are not required to be operable for accident mitigation. However, a malfunction could result in the inadvertent opening of the power operated relief valves.

t Each MS10 valve has an individual steam pressure transmitter and electric / pneumatic converter associated with it. The (11) 21M510 and (13) 23MS10 associated transmitters and electric / pneumatic converters are located in the inboard peratration area and the (12) 22MS10 and (14) 24MS10 associ-ated devices are located in the outboard penetration area.

These are physically separated areas in the plants, so that a high energy line pipe break (MSLB) in one area will not affect equipment in the other area.

The potential misoperation of the MS10 valves was discussed in LER 79-58. submitted for Salem 41. Although the analysis was written specifically for Unit 1, it is applicable to Unit 2. The analysis demonstrated that potential misopera-tion of MS10 valves in a particular penetration area due to postulated steam line or feedwater line breaks in that pene-tration area was not a safety consideration for Salem and

>does not invalidate any safety analyses performed for Salem.

Steam.line and feedwater line breaks inside the containment will not cause an adverse environment in the inboard /out-

. board penetration areas. A loss of coolant accident will not result in an adverse environment in the inboard / outboard penetration areas during the initial stages of the accident.

Curing long term recovery, the inboard / outboard penetration areas could be subject to radiation exposure.

NRC Contract N r. NRC-03-79-118 P;g3

1. @NUQ0 rinkan R:sench Ccnter FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dnnsson of The Franidin Instnute FRC Assignment No.13 3C 20th and Race Streets. Ptula.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4/fo 6 8 / ~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued)

It is believed that the devices would operate during the first few hours of recovery, however, a misoperation would i not pose a safety hazard'. The MS10 can be closed by turning l off the control power and/or air supply (fail closed valve) <

l thereby assuring that the valve cannot misoperate during

recovery. '

Existing procedure EI-I-4.6 incorporated results of the LER

• 79-58 analysis to provide assurance of capability to detect a need to close the valves. The procedural changes con- '

sisted of precautionary statements. regarding potential valve opening.

The indication of an open MS10 valve is provided by limit switches and qualified steam flow, steam generator level and pressure indication.

These cases have been identified as a Group I.1 item (I.l.A).

Corrective Action:

Since the f ailure of this equipment results in operator ac- j tions which are consistent with existing analyses, qualified (

equipment is not required.

l The existing limit switches will be replaced prior to June 30, 1982 as described in Basis 103. The installation schedule will be accelerated as equip;nent becomes available and plant operating conditions permit installation.

1. % NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 ij006rrnklin Rise:rch Centu FRC Project N2. C5257 P;.g3 A Dwmon of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No 40 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. NrO f/.13 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 9 SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does r.ot require -

snvironmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The -

Licznsee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence /

won-eeneverenee.-with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented below.

4 R7ason for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence I Equipment does not provide a Backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function, mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment / system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can 1 Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the primary equipment.

t' Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform Backup (equipment / system) is its specified safety function.

available which completely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

appears to meet single active failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environ:nental qualification.

/w NRC C:ntrcct No. N RC-03-79-118 LNnklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 P g3 A Dwmon of The FrankhnInshtute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4Hof EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /0 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 10 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE INBOARD /0UT0 BARD PENETRATION AREAS FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 50EP1041 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 10 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 639 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM PRESSURE CONTROL FOR ATMOSPHERIC RELIEF VALVES MSIO'S (PA8593, PA8596, PA8594, PA8595) (

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 17 [12]

b i

l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, Ncne, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 90, 2i System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 4c, 4J, eu, 4Z-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 50, 5b, 5;, 52, Co, Of, 5g, Sh, .,., s; Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 4, 'L-Squipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7;, 7L, 7C

/A NRC Cintrzct No. N RC-03-79-118 P:gD du Franklin Research Center FRC Prrject No. C5257 A Dmsx>n of The Franan Instaute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 f215) 4441000 l

FRC Task No. 4% f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. lO.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns. -

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE L environmental service conditions.

l The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the i Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

l Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level j Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim

, operation.

The Licensee (has/nas not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

J The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification Q Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118

~ '

Pag 3 LOOLIFrs'nkhn Rrsetrch Centxt FRC Project N2. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No 13 / 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda., Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. M4F[S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _/4 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate .

Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately i Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) )

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: /

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied (

Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

X = CATEGORY NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equip.nent Not. Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification K III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

{

NRC Contract NO. NRC-03 79-118

1. [AUb Franklin Rrsench Cent:r FRC Project N3. C5257 Pago A Dmsion of The Frankhn Inshtute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila. Pa 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. //[/,M/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /0 THE LicEfostf_ 6(10C0 P_ E P E R S To h (5 po, y rio tes:

A. TdE PLAR TEMPERATURE 3HOULD BEloWEK BECAUSE of rysnMAL l PloTZCTrodAffoRDED BY I It/5TRUMolr PAhleL(fisE7?ne).

0@ DOCUMENTATI0413 NOT A SEQuEdTIAL TEST Sti)WATEfff{cT3}

DATA i5 STiLL UM ER REYtEW p C045tDEflNG Tf/Eb/AL PRaffCT10H OFMNEL EEGARO/MG /YAg TEMPERATuM VffERfdCf 5

> C. REEEM 70 BASIS b

) Basis No. 6

)

Ceficiency: Insufficient Documentation (Main S' team power Operated Atmospheric Relief valve Control MS10's - E/P and Pressure Transmitter)

Justification: -

This item was addressed in LER 79-58. It describes the 1 problem resulting from unqualified MS10 valv.e controls and J the acceptability of such a condition. The procedure changes noted in the LER have been completed.

The main steam power operated atmospheric relief valves are operated by a steam pressure transmitter control signal through an electric / pneumatic converter. These are control

) grade instruments and are not required to be operable for J accident mitigation. Howeve r, a malfunction could result in 1

the inadvertent opening of the power operated relief valves.

Each MS10 valve has an individual steam pressure transmitter and electric / pneumatic converter associated with it. The (11) 21MS10 and (13) 23M510 associated transmitters and electric / pneumatic converters are located in the inboard penetration area and tb 12) 22M510 and '(14) 24MS10 associ-ated devices are located in the outboard penetration area.

) These are physically separated areas in the plants, so that

) a high energy line pipe break (MSL3) in one area will not affect equipment in the other area.

s f

1

A NRC Contract N t. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Project N2. C5257 Pag]

!!O n:nklin R:seach Ccnta A Dnemon of The Frankhn Institute 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. N[o J36//62 1

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO./_.Q.

~6A6n6 t4c. (o (.c u r# u c ct)

The potential misoperation of the MS10 valves was discussed in LER 79-58 submitted for Salem il. Although the analysis was. written specifically for' Unit 1, it is applicable to Unic 2. The analysis demonstrated that potential misopera-tion of MS10 valves in a particular penetration area due to postulated steam line or feedwater line breaks in that pene-tration area was not a safety consideration for Salem and does not invalidate any safety analyses performed for Salem.

Steam line and feedwater line breaks inside the containment will not cause an adverse environment in the inboard /out-

, board penetration areas. A loss of coolant accident will not result in an adverse environment in the inboard / outboard penetration areas during the initial stages of the accident.

During long term recovery, the inboard / outboard penetration areas could be subject to radiation exposure.

It is believed that the devices would operate during the  !

first few hours of recovery, however, a misoperation would not pose a safety hazard. The MS10 can be closed by turning off the control power and/or air supply (fail closed valve) (

thereby assuring that the valve cannot misoperate during J recovery.

Existing procedure EI-I-4.6 incorporated results of the LER 79-58 analysis to provide assurance of capability to detect a need to close the valves. The procedural changes con-sisted of precautionary statements. regarding potential valve opening.

The indication of an open MS10 valve is provided by limit switches and qualified steam flow, steam generator level and pressure indication.

These cases have been identified as a Group I.1 item (I.l.A).

Corrective Action:

s Since the f ailure of this equipment results in operator ac- l tions which are consistent with existing analyses, qualified equipment is not required.

The existing limit switches will be replaced prior to [

June 30, 1982 as described in Basis 103. The installation schedule will be accelerated as equipment becomes available {

and plant' operating conditions permit installation.

s A NRC Contract N 2. NRC 03-79-118 c00 Franklin arseirch Cent:r FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Dimon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 40 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa- 19103 (215) 448-tm0 FRC Task No. A68 /S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. lQ.

SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require -

environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The -

Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence /

) non-sensussence with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented below.

Reeson for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence 1 Equipment does not provide a Backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment / system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can

) Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment

, simultaneously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is l harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See note (1)

. on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other j safety-related equipment to perform

/ Backup (equipment / system) is its specified safety function.

available which completely per-i forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

appears to meet single active

) failure criterion. See note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Requirement for continued function-

) ing throughout the post-accident l

Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification. -

r I

L

A NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03 79-118 000hr:nklin Ruetrch Ccnter FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institus FRC Assignment NO.13 4b 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 468 /5/'l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. / 0 Reason for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence Tne equipment's accident miti- Although backup equipment is avail-gating function is completed able, it is not technically sound to prior to the onset of the hostile relinquish defense-in-depth for this environment. No subsequent function.

functions are necessary. Sec note (1) below. (NRC Qualifi- Backup (equipment / system) is not cation Evaluation Category IIIb) safety-related.  ;

X Other (see page O ) This equipment is necessary for the operator to ensure an ESF system is Resultant NRC Qualification performing its intended safety Evaluation Category (IIIa/IIIb) function.

X Note 1: The Licensee (has/ The rationale presented by the has not) stated that failure of Licensee is not supported by l the primary equipment will not objective technical evidence.

af fect other safety-related equipment or cause an operator Other (see page )

to be misled. (See page 3 4, )

LICENSEE STATEMENT '

See page 3a of this checksheet.

EVALUATION OF LICENSEE STATEMENT l

l Basis No. 6 provides sufficient a surance s that the power operated -

atmospheric relief valves are (1) not required for accident mitigation (2) do not pose a plant hazzard should misoperation occur and (3) can be isolated to prevent misoperation during accident recovery. Additionally, because of physical separation, all of the relief valves (pressure transmitters, E/P converters, etc.) are not exposed to a harsh environment simultaneously, there-fore, a number of valves are always available for use if desired.

l

( -

ghs NRC C ntr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 2 LdifFra'nkhn Rewarch Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dnosion of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment N .1h lc 20th an.J Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. A EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. l_l EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 11 ELECTRIC MOTOR IDCATED IN THE CONTAIh3ENT WESTINGHOUSE HODEL 77C27257 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: MSLB .

TER CHECKSHEET NO. 11 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MOTIVE POWER FOR FAN (CONTROL ROD DRIVE VENT FANS)

SERVICE: COOLING TO ROD DRIVE MECHANISMS LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 88B [64] .

l 1

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD((S) ONLY:

) (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (/f, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, I

Eotstat Not applicable MSTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Suneary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, E, L , Ed -

System Consideration Review 4a, A, L, id, f , if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review .5.e Sh "" Ed, 5;, Ef, 4 , R., Si, Mj-Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6, CL -

Equipmenc Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 72 7h. 7a-

/A NRC C ntr:ct N o. N RC-03-79-118 P:g3

$U Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Diwson of The Frsnklin Inst:tute FRC Assignm:nt N9.13f Ib 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 44 4 1000 FRC Task No. N ?ff/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _S

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipaent relocation above submergence level .

Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) -

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other 1 )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis tot justification for interim operation. _

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

N The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification GII.a Exemy II.a Qualification Not Established III.o Ict in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 P g]

1. -)nklin UO0hr Rase rch Canta FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. 4/,hC7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. //

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adaquate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluat.ed Adequately __

Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Pequired)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradaticn Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate 1 Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified __

II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification X III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

(

s NRC Crntr:ct NO. NRC-03-79-118 A,,br:nklin dJ R:se rch Centir FRC Project No. C5257 P:g2 A Dwmon of The Frtnkhn instituts 3a FRC Assignment J3 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. W N?[/N 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _,l./.

Q }&c.w SC/]WN / N $ $ N" M.

Basis No. 36 Deficiency: Documentation Unavailable (Nozzle Support Fans, Reactor Shield Vent Fans and Control Fod Drive Fans)

~

l Justification:

These ventilation fans are locatd inside the containment and j l are not required for accident mitigation. The Salem emer-i gency operating procedures call for the operator to start I

these fans following a loss of secondary coolant. The vent

( fans have not been qualified for steam breaks inside con-tainment and do not require qualification since safety is not affected. The operators will be notified that their use is not reuired and the procedures modified accordingly. '

Additional information submitted on September 19 classified this case as a Group II.1 item based on the following: )

The nozzle support fans, reactor shield vent fans and the control rod drive vent fans were listed only because they are mentioned in the emergency procedures. They are not required to perform a safety function, and inadvertent oper-ation (on og off) of these devices does not affect the proper course of actions in response to design basis acci-dents. The equipment does not require environmental qualification.

l 1

l f

I l

}

L

A # NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 000u F,rnkiin asserres cini:r FRC eroj.ct N2. Os257 P g3 A Dnnsen of The Frankhn Institute FRCTask Assignment 4a 20th and Rac. Streets. P$nla.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC No. 4/4No.1)f

// /7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. //

SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require -

environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The -

Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence /

.. . . w .m m . . . ith the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented below.

Ranson for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence N Equipment does not provide a Backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not

$ required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment / system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment

, simultaneously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See, note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform Backup (equipment / system) is its specified safety function.

available which completely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

appears to meet single active failure criterion See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification.

/N NRC C:ntract Ns. NRC-03-79-118 dNnklin Research Center Paga FRC Pr: Ject Ns. C5257 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRCTask Assignment

.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC No. 4fN, p/e f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1.1.

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 12 LUtIT SWITCH LOCATED IN THE INBOARD /0UTBOARD PENETRATION AREAS MASONEILAN MODEL 4962 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: MSLB TER CHECKSHEET NO. 12 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERAIUR INDICATION & VALVE CONTROL (11,12, 13MS7; 11, 12, 13, 14 GB4)

SERVICE: POSITION INDICATOR FOR VALVES LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 20 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN,) SEN,QI,( None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICADLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Rcrponse to NRC SER 3a, 3b,-10, 36 System Consideration Review $2 O, 0;, 44, 42 "

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52 Rh Sc. Sd, 50, 5f, u, ._ gh_ a -- c4 s

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6ar-4h.

Equipment Summary Maintenance ano Replacement Schedule Summary Ja, 7b, 7e

. 1

/A NRC C:ntract N3. N RC-03-79-118 du Franklin Research Center FRC Prrject No. C5257 Pag 3 A Dmwan of The Frankhn Inst:tute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 44 4 1000 FRC Task No. UP/D7I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /2 SUdMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

N Tne Licensee (has/L. e) provided a response to the SER concerns. -

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

g The Licensee (has/h:2 75) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not beea fully established.

[ Justification for interim operation (ha s/h - net' been provided by the Licensee for this equipner.t item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment I

Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress j Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

[ The Licensee (has/ nee-met) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action i

Drior le 4 /3o /82. .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

} I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

) C1.n Modifteation) III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

As NRC Contract N2. NRC-03 79118 Pag 3 000IFrrnklin Rsserrch C nt:r FRC Project N?. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-Im0 FRC Task No. 4 Pk/7 F

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /2 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENT 3 X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate I Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: 1 o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate _ , , , _

o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adeqdate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied .

Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies I (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied l Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied _

Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY l

I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 UO0hranklin Rise:rch Cantir FRC Project NO. C5257 P g3 A Dmpon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.1) 30 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. 46 F /S/'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. S._

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Limit Switch -

(Masoneilan)

MODEL: 496-2 l

CCMPONENT NO.: 11MS7, 12MS7, 13MS7, 13MS7 i

NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: EXN, RPS PSE3G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 20.

l These limit swjtches will be replaced with qualified switches prior to 6/30/82.

Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 10A states

~ " ~

Fur idHn'tions 'and "r'easining for continued operation. '. ~.' '.,'_'T.

PSE3G's evaluation of these NRC noted deficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardized pending replacement.

kie : underllntd items are c erecDoes to NGC SER.

Zs NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 000 rInklin R:seirch Ccnta FRC Project N3. C5257 P g3 A Divmon of The Frankha Institute FRC Assignment No.13 / 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. %f /S/~7 I

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /2--

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued)

EQUIPMENT: Limit Switch (Masoneila7) ,

l MODEL: 496-2 COMPONENT NO.: 11GB4,12GB4,13GB4,14GB4 l

l NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: EXN, RPS PSE&GEVALUATIbNOFDEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 44 Thes.e limit switches will be replaced with qualified switches prior to 6/30/82.

~ Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 18A states cui"intensions and reasoning ,for continued operation.

' ~~ ~ " ~ ~

PSE1G's evaluation of these, NRC noted, deficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardized pending replacenent.

l

NRC C:ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 g![i P g3 L.L Franklin Reseerch Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dmuon of The frankhn Inst:tute

• FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Stre its Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-lin) FRC Task No. 76 I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _L3 EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 13 CONTROL SWITCH LOCATED IN THE INBOARD /0UTBOARD PENETRATION AREAS MICR0 SWITCH MODEL 910 PGD533 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: MSLB TER CHECKSHEET NO. 13 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPEN VALVE CONTROL (CMC-MS167'S)

SERVICE: LOCAL CONTROL OF MS167 HYDRAULIC PUMP LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 21 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SUN,QI,EPS,f Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 'b, 3c, 't d 4=, '" - Ad de- 4f System Consideration Review ". 5 ,

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, Sh- "" "2, 5-, 5f, c

S, Eh, Sa, 2 3--

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation fr. 55 Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replace! rent Schedule Summary h. 'b, '? -

1

1. 4 N RC C:ntr:ct N2. N RC-03-79-118 dNnklin Reserrch Center FRC Pr ject No.C5257 P:g3 A Dnnsion of The Frankhn inst:tute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 191031215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. #4 f!f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .d.

SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

g The Licensee (has/h;; ..M proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

1 Justification for interim operation (has/L ..a) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

$ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in pro ress X Other ( h* A SC.<, '

)

< v The Licensee has provided o her information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation, j The Licensee (has/ h u s) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action -

/ $",~, 16 [b .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification  ;

and/or should ne exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW r

.-_ CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualifie_d II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

_T1_. b Moditication7 III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

1

1. % NRC Contract N D. NRC-03-79-118 P:g3 IS ifFrrnklin Rxse:rch Cent;r FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dnnsson of The Franklin institute FRC Asaignment No.13 / 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 tm0 FRC Task No. .. 44 f /S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. /3 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY -

Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate N Adequate Similarity BetwCen Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification K II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfles All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

l A NRC Contract ND. NRC-03-79-118 UNhr:nklin Rise:rch Cant r FRC Project Nr. C5257 P:g2 f A Diviston oi The Franklin !nstitute 30 l 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask FRC Assignment No. No.13 46f/ 'f/~1 1

• l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ./_3.

l L\C W 6tt *SCM % fLFLA- 'TO M SI b Do. t s l

Basis No. 11 Deficiencv: Documentation Unavailable (CMC and enclosure

. for local control of MS167) l Justification:

Each main steam isolation valve is equipped with a local control switch and an enclosed terminal block which are used

! for testing the valves during normal plant operation. The control switches operate a hydraulic pump motor to open and close the valves . The failure of these devices cannoc cre-vent the safety function of steamline isolation due to 'in-l terlocks with the plant protection system to prevent opera-l tion of the hydraulic pump motor. The hydraulic pump motor l is not needed for closing the valve under accident I

conditions.

, A reset of the main steam isolation signal removes the in-l terlock and could result in a valve opening if the switch ca.itacts were failed.

I

! This case has been classified as a Group I.1 item (I.l.3.3).

Corrective Action:

The control switch will be removed f rom the valve control circuit prior to exceeding the 5% power level (Unit ?2). -

Unit *1 will have the circuit changed by Decer,ber 15, 1980.

l l

4% NRC C ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 P:g3

!.UUSranklin Research Center FRC Prcject N3. C5257 A Dn.ision of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 44 & l000 FRC Task No. L/l [

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /4 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 14 TERMINAL BLOCK LOCATED IN THE INBOARD /0UTBOARD PENETRATION AREAS CINCH JONES, MODEL NOT STATED REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: MSLB _

TER CHECKSHEET NO. 14 '

LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION'(PLANT ID): CMC (MS167'S) CONTROL SERVICE: ELECTRICAL CONNECTION LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 22 (12] ,

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THis NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLYI (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (Tr, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I , QM , RPN, EXN, SEN,QI,RPS,[None,]

Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, OL, 5v, 5a -

System Consideration Review _ " _, OL, ,o, d, 4u, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review W 5L, 5v, 50, 5=, 5f,-

Es, Sh, Ci, Sj -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 4a, 6L -

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary J- , Tu, iv -

/% N RC C:ntr:ct NS. NRC-03-79-118 P;gI Ubranklin Research Center FRC Pr:j;ct No. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankhn in5ntwe FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 4481[MX) FRC Task No. 4l,f f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

( The Licensee (has/h:2 n;t) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

g Justification for interim operation (has/h:2 nat' been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

(CorrectiveactionspecifiedbytheLicensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress X Other T M M- Efie D V

)

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

JC The Licensee (hasbu . .n ) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. ' (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action / E /9fd .)

i The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency II.b %vii f i c 3 t ion 3 III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

1. % NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 l;00 rtnklin R:serrch Centtr FRC Project N2. C5257 P g3 A Dwisx>n of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 / 2 20th and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa 19103 (215) 44 & l000 FRC Task No. YSf/6/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIF! CATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /4 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate N Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified _

I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification W i II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II,b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 l)00hranklin R:seirch C:ntr FRC Project N3. C5257 P;g3 A Dwmon of The Frmkhn Intitut:1 FRC Assignm:nt N3.13/ 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1 2 0 FRC Task No. 449/S/7 EGUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d L.tC.f A35E L 5 C. M lS) f.E.T4.8 S TD MSN NO 1I Basis No. 11

~

Deficiencv: Documentation Unavailable (CMC and enclosure for local control of MS167) -

Justification:

Each main steam isolation valve is equipped with a local control switch and an enclosed terminal block which are used for testing the valves during normal plant operation. The control switches operate a hydraulic pump motor to open and close the valves . The failure of these devices cannot pre-vent the safety function of steamline isolation due to in-terlocks with the plant protection system to prevent opera-tion of the hydraulic pump motor. The hydraulic pump motor is not needed for closing the valve under accident conditions.

A reset of the main steam isolation signal removes the in-terlock and could result in a valve opening if the switch contacts were failed.

This case has been classified as a Group I.1 item (I.1.B.3).

Corrective Action:

The control switch will be removed from the valve control circuit prior to exceeding the 5% power level (Unit #2).

Unit *1 will have the circuit changed by December 15, 1980.

J J

Af1:. , NRC C:ntr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118

! Cud Frankhn Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 P g2 A Divmon e The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Nace Streets Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. W9 EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .!5_

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 15 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE INBOARD /0UTBOARD PENETRATION AREAS FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 10B2495 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 15 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 639 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): AUXILIARY FEEDWATER FLOW 11, 12, 14 SG POST ACCIDENT MONI'IORING (FA1087, FA1091 & FA1097)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 23 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, W, RPN, SEN, QI, None, Mot stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE dHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d-System Consideration Review " , 4L, k, -id, i . , i [

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Ss, Sk S(, Scl3 St., ff

5) ,5 SA,5j,CK Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 52, 'b Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary h. 7h- 7"-

/h NRC C:ntract No. NRC-03 79-118 Pag 3 dlFrankhn Reserrch Center FRC Pr: ject N3. C5257 A Dmsion of The Frankhn Institute lb 20th and Race Streets Phila Pa 19103 f215) 4441000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. 4/.No.13 T [8/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /f SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

g Tne Licensee (has/ b av w provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

[ The Licensee (has/h:2 n 3 proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

I Justification for interim operation (has/" v -^*) - been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

N Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

[ The Licensee (has/ h ) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Sghedule for accomplishing the corrective action Drier $c b/.10 l11 .)

/

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

6. b Moditication) III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III,b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available 1

1. % NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 Page NFr:nkhn Rzsench C nta FRC Project No. C5257 A owis.on of The Frankhn insatute 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. d'hNo.13[O7 5F EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /[

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY -

Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Mequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established _

Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately -

Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) ,

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Begarding Aging Simulation Sdtisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate X o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately X.

o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied I Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied 1 Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification Y II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available h fy [k W l

1. x NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 P:g3 cQ0Eranklin R:se:rch center FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dwisson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.14 3a 20th and Race Streets. Pht!a . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 44f/5/~1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /F LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMEtiT: Pressure Transmitters t

(Fischer & Porter)

MODEL: 1082495 l

l COMP 0!iEtiT NO.: FA1087. FA1091, FA1097 l

l l

l tiRC IDE!CIFIED DEFICIEtiCIES: EXti, RPS PSE1G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fom page 23.

l These pressure transmitters will be replaced with qualified units prior to 6/30/82, Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 12 gives l this schedule and our justification for continued operation.

PSE1G's evaluation of this. NRC noted deficiency has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardi:ed pending replacement.

3 1

1 , _.

A NRC Contract N;. NRC-03-79-118 000 nklin Resetrch Cantir FRC Prrject ND. C5257 Pag 3 A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Asalgnment No.,13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phda-. Pa- 19103 (215) 448-10m FRCTask No. #4 Y EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /_S Checksheets [ 4 N ff have been removed due to the proprietary nature of infonnation contained therein.-

g% I NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 bbU Frankhn Reserrch Centrr FRC Project No. C5257 P;ga A Dnnsen of The Frankhn Institute l FRC AsrignmInt No.13 lo 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 44810N FRC Task No. %8 I I

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.10 l

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 16 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT (LOCATION NOT STATED)

FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 10B2495 -

REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSEEET NO. 16 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 639 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MONITORS RHR PUMP DISCHARGE (FA1416, FA14919, FA0432)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MONITORS CONTAINMENT SPRAY ADDITION TANK HEADER (FA0218)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): FLOW CONTROL FOR SERVICE WATER VALVES (FA3160Z-1, FA31652-1, FA3169Z-1, FA31722-1, FA3176Z-1)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 58 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, r/f, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the W MJ lb Equipment Environmental Qualificat,ct,Lga m f Corms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, 2c, 24 System Consideration Review it, 4b, !c, id, I; , 4 f" Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5;, 55, Sc, Id, 5;, If, Sg. 55, Si, 5j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ga r Equipment Summary 4

Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 7e, 75, M -

/A NRC Cintr:ct NO. NRC-03-79-118 P:g]

d!} Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Diwsion of The Frankhn Inst:tute lb 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. 44f No.13[7/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. //e

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

/ Tne Licensee (has/h:2 no t) provided a response to the SER concerns. -

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which snows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/har =t) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

j_ Justification for interim operation (has/has net' been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for tais equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (nas/h:: -) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action D /~ie (' d o 4/3o /22. "

.)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should ce exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency C.b Mod i f ica t torp III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 tiOCFr:nklin Rise:rch Center FRC Project N2. C5257 A Dwison of The Franklin Instituti FRC Assignment N3.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1MO FRC Task No. 2/6c//477 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ./_d EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Y Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate X o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately X' o Stear " posure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Rcgarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied X

Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied l Criteria negarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied X j Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY l

I.a Equipment Qualified I,b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X ILa Equipment Qualification Not Established i

II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available g mcp JJ x y A.n *M i ,s2 /Y N" / '

im o u z w = /^9 #9< @>

W> M- ) .

1 A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 1 000 r:nklin Riserreh Cantir FRC Project No. C5257 Pr.g 3 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.1) 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. f69/E/~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /b LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Pressure Transmitters ~

(Fischer & Porter)

MODEL: 1082495 COMPONENT NO.: FA3160Z-1, FA316EZ-1, FA3169Z-1, FA3172Z-1. FA3176Z-1, FA1416, FA1419, JA0218, FA0432 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: EXN, RPS PSElG EVALUATION OI DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page Ea .

These pressure transmitters will be replaced with qualified units prior to 6/30/82.

Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 20ffT cives this senedule and our justification for continued operation.

PSE3G's evaluation of this, NRC noted, deficiency has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardi;:ed pending replacement.

Note: underUned i?cm3 art. correc.%n to NRC $ER

A% N RC C:ntract NO. N RC-03-79-118 P ga

!2LU Franidin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 A Dmsion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 46?

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.17 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 17 CONTROLLER LOCATED IN THE INBOARD /0UTBOARD PENETRATION AREAS FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 50ES3212 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 17 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED ,

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): AUXILIARY FEEDWATER FLOW #11, #12, #14SG, POST ACCIDENT MONITORING (FA3969, FA3970 & FA3972)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 25 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITE24 (S) OlmY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) 4--;

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, SEN, QI,'%j None, Not stated, Not appliccble i

LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

f Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 2c, 22 System Consideration Review h, 05, 0;, 03, k, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 50, 55, Sc, 5d, 5;, Sf, 5;, 51. , 51, Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ca, 0L-Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 7, 7L, Tw

1. % NRC C ntract N3. NRC-03-79-118 bdhrankhn Research Center FRC Pr; ject No. C5257 FCO2 A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 f215) 4441000 FRC Task No. 449/8/7 l

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _/_]

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

[ Tne Licensee (has/neo-net) provided a response to the SER concerns. -

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

K The Licensee (has/h'- ') proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fally established.

M Justification for interim operation (has/h:2 - " been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

d Corrective action specified by the Licensee: .

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level X Relocate ~ *i c'd equipment '---

Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

2 The Licensee (has/h ..s t 'rprovided a schedule for the proposed corrective acti . (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action _ 70 / M 7 -- .)

O The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW I - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency II.o Modit 1 cation ] III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

1. % NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 Pag]

000hrrnklin Rzserrch Cant r FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dwmon of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment blo.13/ 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. f48/8/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW CF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate )<,

Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Sdtisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied ,

Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied i

Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied l

Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satistled l

Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established l II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a 6quipment Exempt From Qualification l III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available I

l i

I l

& NRC Contr:ct NO. NRC-03-79-118 00f! ranklin R se:rch Cznt:r FRC Project No. C5257 PCg3 A Dnnsion of The Franklin Institure FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 4481MO FRC Task No. 46FfS/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /7 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Square Root Extractor MODEL: 50ES3212 COMPONENT NO.: FA3969 FA3970, FA3972 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: EXN, RPS PSElG E/A1.UATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 25

'~

These iristrum e.nT's will be - r elee.ahd prior to 6/30/82, as they become available. Our submittal, Volume I, section VII, basis 12 gives this scnedule and our justification for continued operation.

PSE1G's evaluation of this NRC noted deficiency has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardized pending aquipmenT r cloc.milort.

r .

w NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N;. C5257 Paga 000 Frinkiin R:serrch C:ntr A Diwson of The Franklin institute FRC Assignment No.13 3h 20th and RAe Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. M68/5/7 I

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. / 7 LICENSEE RESPOhSE TO NRC SER (Continued)

Basis No. 12 Deficiency: Documentation Unavailable (Steam Generator Auxiliary Feedwater Flow Transmitters and Signal Processing Equipment)

Justification: l Auxiliary feedwater flow measurement involves the use of transmitters and signal processing dev' ices which are located ,

outside containment in the penetration areas. Indication of auxiliary feedwater flow is a backup method of determining the existence of an adequate heat sink during transients or accidents which require auxiliary feedwater. The primary l indication of heat sink availability is the narrow-range steam . generator level measurement which is qualified for both. inside and outside containment line breaks.

An erroneous indication of auxiliary feedwater flow would not lead the operator to termination of auxiliary feed-water. Cutside containment line breaks cannot affect all of the flow indication; at least two auxiliary feedwater flow indications would be available. Alternate methods of deter-mi.ning auxiliary feedwater flow are also available (e.g.

pump running and valves open).

These cases have been classified as a Group II.2 item (II.2.B.3). ,

Corrective Action:

Qualified transmitters will be installed and the signal -

! processing equipment will be relocated by June 30, 1982.

The installation schedule w 11 be accelerated as equipment becomes available and plant operating conditions permit installation.

Z2% N RC C2ntrIct No. N RC-01-79-118 P:ga

!13 Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 489 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _/8 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 18 PUMP MOTORS LOCATED IN THE AUXILIARY BUILDING WESTINGHOUSE, MODEL NOT STATED REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: RECIRC., 120 DAYS -

TER CHECKSHEET NO.18 _

LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 604, 639, 35 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): DRIVES CHARGING / SAFETY INJECTION PUMP (llc /L, 12C/L)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 27 (64)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): DRIVES SAFETY INJECTION PUMP (llSI, 12SI)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 28 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, r/r, P, H, CS, S, (R), M, I , QM , RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS :

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Quali:fication Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b,3cm System Consideration Review d i, th, 00, id, h, 10 Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, Sb, Sc, 5d,.r ,, Sf, Sg, Sh, 51, 53 Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ca, 55-Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7a , -7 L , 7c

NRC C:ntrcct Nr. NRC-03-79-118 plf LUFranklin Research Center FRC PrJject Ns. C5257 P_g2 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Insrirute lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1(XX) FRC Assignment FRC Task No. No.13 [8/7 4/,f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8_

SUt4 MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Y Tne Licensee (has/M .~W provided a response to the SER concerns.

g the Licensee (has/h " M) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

_X_ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level l

i Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source l Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) l Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other t _

)

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should oc exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency [

I.b Modification III.a Exempt

{

h Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

Am NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118 P g2 000EFrs.nklin Research Centtr FRC Project N 2. C5257 A Dwmon of The Frankhninstitute FRC Assignment No.13 / 2 20th and Race Streers. Phila., Pa 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. #/,9 /f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _/8_

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL AUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately l o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.o Equipment Not Qualified

) II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life f or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available i

5

/

4UObu Franklin Rase:rch Centxt NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project Nr. C5257 P:g2 A Dwiston of The Frankhn Insutute FRC Assignment No.13 / 30 20th and Race streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4/ Y / 8/l I

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. R_

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMEtC: Pump tiotor - Charging / Safety Injection (Westinghouse)

I d Spin #PNGCSAPCH (Unit 2)

MODEL:

1. PSECSAPCH (Unit 1)

COMPONENT NO.: 11C/L ,12C/L NRC IDEtCIFIED DEFICIENCIES: A, P.T PSEAG EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fom page 27 i

Environmental Qualification of these motors has been demonstrated. Our submittal addresses the NRC noted deficiencies. 7he Required Time and Aging data was arrived at based on Westinghouse test data which envelopes our plant profile. The aging information was added in Revision 2.

)

l Succorting data is available in cur file EQ-16.

P5ElG's evaluation of these NRC noted deficiencies has reaffirmed that these motors are ca::able of perfoming their safety function in a harsh environment.

NRC Contr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 P gs 4:nklin ll00J Fr Rsse:rch Cent:r FRC Project N2. C5257 A Divmon of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 3b 20th and Race streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 468/5/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M_

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued)

EQUIPMErn: Pump Motor - Safety Injection (Westinghouse)

MODEL: 'i Spin #PMJ SIAPSI (Unit 2)

PSE SIAPSI (Unit 1)

COMPONENT NO.: 11SI, 125I NRC IDEICIFIED DEFICIENCIES: A. RT PSElG EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fom page 28 Environmental Qualification of these motors has been demonstrated. Our submitt.il" adcresses the NRC noted deficiencies. The Required Time and Aging data was arrived at based on Westinghouse test data which envelopes our plant profile. The aging infomation was added in Revision 2.

Su;:corting data is availaole in our file EQ-16.

PSElG's evaluation of these NRC noted deficiencies has reaffirmed that these motors are capable of performing their safety function in a harsh environment.

Ap NRC Contract N r. NRC-03-79-118 P g3 UOOU Fr:nklin R: search Csnt:r FRC Project NO. C5257 A Dmsion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment Np.13 3c 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 46F ~/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. $

LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER (Continued)

EQUIPMENT: Pump Motor - Chemical Spray i (Wes tinghouse) i l

MODEL: W Spin #PSESIAPCS (Unit 1)

~

1. PNISIAPCS (Unit 2) i i

l COMPDriENT NO.: 11CS, 12CS l

l l

N:C !DE.7:FIED DEFICIENCIES: A. RT PSEL3 EVALUATION OF DEFICIE?iCIES:

Ref. Cualification Data Evaluation Form page 79.

l invironnental Qualification of these motors has been demonstrated. Our submittal addresses the NRC noted deficiencies. The Required Time and Aging data was arrived at based on Westinghouse test data which envelopes our plant profile. The aging information was added in Revision 2. A required time of 12D days will be i laded in the next EQ sucmittal revision.

l Supoorting data is available in our file EQ-16.

?SE&G's evaluation of these NRC noted deficiencies has reaffimed that these motors are cacable of per#crming their safety function in a harsh envirorment.

l i

/ p:s NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118

!)000 Franklin Resetrch Center FRC Project N3. C5257 P g2 A Dwtsion of The Franklin institure FRC Assignment No.13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. W 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.&

Checksheetsd kf/5/ X-So have been removed due to the proprietary nature of information contaibd therein.-

)

/A NRO C:ntr ct No. NRC-03-79-118 Pags C0bu Franklin Research Center FRC Project No.C5257 A Dnnsion oi The Frankhn institute 7g 2thh and Race Meets. Phde. . Pa 19103 (215) 448-m FRC FRC Assignment Task No. Yhf/ No.1)f/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. / f MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE StMMARY The following information regarding the maintenance and replacement schedule (s) for components, sub-components, and materials has been provided by the Licensee.

p(t w4

1. 5%, NRC C;ntr:ct N D. NRC-03-79-118 LLhL5ankhn Research Center FRC Pr: Ject Na, C5257 pig 3 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4GI EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I9 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 19 PUMP MOTORS LOCATED IN THE AUXILIARY BUILDING WESTINGHOUSE, MODEL NOT STATED REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: RECIRC., 120 DAYS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 19 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 604, 639, 35 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): DRIVES RRR PUMP (11RHR,12RHR)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 29 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, P, H, CS, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, l Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summery Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Ob, 2c, 2P System Consideration Review 3 2, ib. Ic, G 4=, 4f-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, 9e, 5f, Sg,-5h, Si, b -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation f2 Sh --

Equipment Summary Maintenance ana Replacement Schedule Summary 7a, 7L, 7c

1. 4 NRC C ntr:ct Nc. NRC-03-79-118 d!j Franklin Research Center P;ga FRC Pr J:ct No. C5257 A Dmsion of The Frankhn Inst:rute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets Phita . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 46 7 / E/"7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has/h:2 .nc t ', provided a response to the SER concerns. -

M The Licensee (has/h2: ; ,t; specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented :.nformation which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment-item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective  ;

action .)

i The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should oe exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGOR'J BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) 1 1.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt h Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

As NRC Contract N:. NRC-03-79-118 P:ge 000Frrnkiin a:serrch Cent:r FRC PIject N . C5257 A Dmsson of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 / 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. #L7 /8/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL Ol'ALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Latablished (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) j Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

I o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submcrgence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied l Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied l

Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied i Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified _

I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.o Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies %1 Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification -

III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 UO0hrinklin R: search C:nter FRC Project N2. C5257 Pag 3 A Dnnsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment NO.13 / 3a 20.n and Race streets. Phda. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No.

46T/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER

~

EQUIPMENT: Pump Motor - RHR (Westinghouse)

MODEL: 1[- Spin #PSEACAPRN (Unit 1)

1. PJNACAPRN (Unit 2)

COMPONENT NO.: 11RHR. 12RHR NRC 10EtiTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: A. RT ,

PSE13 EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fom page 29.

Enviromental Qualification of these motors has been demonstrated. Our submittal addresses the NRC noted deficiencies. The Required Time and Aging data was arrived at based on Uestinghouse test data wnich envelopes our plant profile. The aging in-f:mation was added in Revision 2. A required time of 120 days will be added in the next EQ submittal revision.

Succorting data is available in our file EQ-15.

1 PSE1G's evaluation of these NRC noted deficiencies has reaffimed that these motors are capaole of perfoming their safety function in a harsh environment.

)

l

1. % NRC Contrcct N 3. NRC-03-79-118 P g2 000hranklin Reserrch Center FRC Pr; ject N2. C5257 A Dwision of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. #4 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /9 Checksheet@_16/((789 have been removed due to the C/ '

proprietary nature of information contained therein.

\

& NRC C:ntract N3. NRC-03-79-118 0000 Franklin Rsse:rch Csntir FRC Project Ns. C5257 Piga A Dnnsen of Ths Frtnklin institute 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRCTask AsIlgnm:nt N3.{3Yd(/f/7 7 FRC No.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /f MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE SIEMARY The following information regarding the maintenance and replacemeat cchedule(s) for components, sub-components, and materials has been provided by the Licensee.

cJ.

y 1

4% N RC C::ntr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118

'SdEnklin Rewarch Center FRC Pr: Ject Na, C5257 P:g2 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment o. (3 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. (* E EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.Je EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 20 TRANSDUCER, E/P LOCATED IN THE AUXILIARY BLDG.

FISHER CONTROLS MODEL 546 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: RECIRC. .

TER CHECKSHEET NO. 20 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE CONTROL (llRH20, llRH18, 12RH18)

SERVICE: CONTROL FOR VALVES 1RH20, llRH18, 12RH18 LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 30 (12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN,lEXNfSEN,QI, RPS, None, Mot stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

s Equipment Item la Summary of aicensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualificatica Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, k, 3d l System Consideration Review 4a, ab, !;, 4d, ic, if -

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review L, LL, Sc, 53, 5., Ef,-

5;, 55, Ei, Sj s

Installad TMI Lessons Learned Implementation so, GL Equipment Summary 72, '" 7" Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary

/

i A N RC C:ntr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 P g3 00hranklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject N2. C5257 A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institure FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4/,f[C/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 28

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

N Tne Licensee (has/h r M) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions. ,

l The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment i item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the  !

Licensee for this equipment item.

l Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other 1 )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/nas not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

X The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualificatica.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) l I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Ib Modification [III .a Exempt J II.a Qualification Not Established ~lII .b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

(

A NRC Contract N2. N RC-03-79-118 Pag 3 000hrsnklin Rxsetrch Csntxt FRC Project N2. C5257 A Divison c,I The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. 8F!S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.10 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY -

Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate ,

Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criterj a Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification I

II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified

) II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification X III.D Equipment Not in the, Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

/

A NRC Contr~ct N D. NRC-03-79-118 000hrrnklin R:serrch Cent:r FRC Project N3. C5257 P g3 A Dnnsion of The Frankhn Inshtute FRC Assignment No.14 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 45f /5/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2 0 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: E/P Converter (Fusc.ker > Porter)

MODEL: 546

)

l COMPCNENT NO.: 11RH20, 11RH18, 12RH18 1

i NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: EXN PSE3G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fom page 30.

By procedural changes these units are rendereo incapable of affecting accident conditions and no operator iction is required during an accident.

This position is detailed in our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 15. ,

PSElG is confident that olant safety is maintained with this resolution. '

As NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 000hrinkhn Rose:rch Cant:r FRC Project N:.C5257 P 03 A Dmsen of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 3h 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. V(ef/ fl'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. d!@

L.s c cioME. %l. 9 0 Nest. RE.Ff2s To ~B4616 blo. Ic, Basis No. 15

• Deficiency: Documentation Unavailable (E/P for RH2O (RHR

- Heat Exchanger Bypass Valve) and RH18 (Heat Ex-changers Outlet Valve)]

Justification:

Electric / pneumatic converters are used in the position con-trol for the RER system valves to -modula te flow through and around the RHR system heat exchangers for temperature con-trol during normal ecoldown. Modulation of these valves is not required during accident conditions. The position of RH2O is unimportant since manual valves upstream are closed during power operation. They are opened when the ER system is aligned for a normal cooldown.

A potential misoperation of the device causing valve move-ment during recirculation can be avoided. The control air supply to the RH18 valves can be isolated during normal power operation. This causes the RH18 valves to open'and remain open. Any subsequent misoperation of the electric /

pneumatic converter would not cause the valve to change po-

'sition. The air supply,would be restored only when the RER system is aligned for normal shutdown operation. No action is required by the operator during the initial stages of an The RH2O valve plays no accident or post-accident recovery.

part in safety at the Salem plant as presently designed and operated.

Administrative control is suitable as a final resolution since it renders the E/P devices incapable of affecting ac-cident conditions and requires no additional operator ac-tions during an accident.

This case has been classified as a Group I.1 item (I.l.C.1).

l Corrective Action:

The control air supply to the RH18 valves will be isolated j during normal power operatior to prevent valve misopera-

) t i.o n . This administrative control will be invoked by pro-cedure OI II.6.3.2. Restoration of control air to the valves for normal shutdown cperations will be governed by procedure OI II.6.3.3. Approved procedures will ce in ef-feet prior to exceeding 515 pcwer (Unit 42). The Un!.t il change will be made prior to Decemoer 15, 1980.

)

NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118

1. N%000 rinkiin Raetrch Ccnter FRC Project Nr. C5257 Page A Divmon of The FrinMn instruti FRC Assignment N;.13 40 20th and Race Streets. Phita . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRCTask No. Y(,F/b* 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. dt;)

SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence /

n n n -~- - ~ ~ with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented below.

Reason for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence K Equipment does not provide a Backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the ,

consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment / system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See. note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromiae the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform Backup (equipment / system) is its specifjed safety function.

available which completely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

appears to meet single active failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification.

g,21 NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 Pag]

Mf Franklin Research Center FRC, oject No.CS257 A Dmsion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 3hh and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 444 ItXX) FRC Task No. 44,f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4/

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 21 FIDW TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE AUXILIARY BLDG.

BAR' ION MODEL 289A REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: RECIRC.

TER CHECKSHEET NO. 21 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): RHR PUMP RECIRC. FIDW CONTROL (FA2569, FA2481)

SERVICE: NOT STATED LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 31 (12]

l 1

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

> Equipment Item la

) Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 l Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, A , Su System Consideration Review 4a, !b, '- 'f, -? ^ . If -

1 "^

1 Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 92- "h "" "A f f, I Eg, Ch, 1, j h Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 62, ft -

J Equipment Summary Ma intenance and Replacement Schedule Summary h , 7L, 7c

1. % NRC C ntract N3. NRC-03-79-118 Pag]

WSJ Frankhn Research Center FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 A Dwmon of The Frankhn Inst:tute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 f215) 4441000 FRC Task No. 4l, f/8/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. U SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

N Tne Licentee (has/L., ..M) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/os will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

1 Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the License % for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other 1 )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation, j The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed

! corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective j action .)

.N The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVISW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification lTTIa Exempt j II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in 3 cope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available '

1. x NRC Contract N r. NRC-03-79-118 L0fjNnklin R:serrch Cent:r FRC Project N2. C5257 Pag 3 -

A Dimion of The Frankhn Inatute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448 Im0 FRC Task No. 4/,?/477 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adiquate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY n

I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Estab]ished II.b Equipment Not Qualified j II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification X_

3 III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

NRC Contract ND. NRC-03-79-118 nklin RIseach Ccnta FRC Project NO. C5257 P:g3 A Dmson of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13/ 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. 4Sf/8/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Zl LICENSEE RESPONSE T3 NRC SER EQUIPMEtiT: Flow Transmitter (Barton)

MODEL: 289A COMPONEtiT NO.. FA2569, FA2481 NRC IDE?iTIFIED DEFICIEfiCIES: EXN PSElG EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES: '

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 31.

These devices do not see a harsh environment during nomal plant operation.

During the recirculation phase and post accident recovery phase of the accident they will be subject to high integrated radiation exposure. The operator has manual control capability of the RH29 valves associated with these flow trans-mitters. Procedural changes will assure that these valves are correctly position during an accident. Our position is detailed in our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 16.

PSElG is confident that plant safety is maintained with this resolution.

As NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 Pag]

l}0br:nkhn R seirch Ccnte FRC Project N2. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.1:1 3b 20th and rhee Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1 @ FRC Task No. S'4 f/5'/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. mL/

~

I uuosag arsmse Kuu:, ro wsts No. tg

. Basis No. 16 Ceficiency:, Documentation Unavailable (RHR Pump Recire Flow Control (RH29)]

Justificatione Each RH29 valve is controlled by a Barton 289A flow switch measuring RHR pump discharge flow. -

l These devices are located in an area of the plant which will not be subject to a harsh environment during the initial -

stages of an accident. The devices are in an area subject to high integrated radiation exposures during the recircula-tion, post-accident recovery phase.

The safety analysis for the plant considers the RH29 valves closed during recirculation. In addition, the Salem emer-gency operating procedures require the. operator to verify the closed statu's of the RH29 valves during recirculation.

This can be accomplished using qualified devices. A failure of the flow switch during recirculation could cause the, RH29 valves to open. The operator has the capability for manual override of the automatic control and therefore can close the valve. Once closed by manual action, a failure of the switch will not cause valve operation. The manual override portion of the circuit is not subject to a harsh environ-ment. The 3H29 valves are motor operated and have adequate qualification documentation for recirculation operation.

Plant emergency operating procedures will be revised to in-struct the cperator to manually close the RH29 valves from the control console and verify closure.

) Corrective Action:

Procedure EI-I-4.4 will be modified and in effect prior to f exceeding 51 power (Unit #2). The equi alent Unit $1 pro-cedure will be modified and in effect pr:.or to December 15, 1980.

As NRC Contract N2. NRC 03-79-118 1100Erinkiin R:serrch Cantir FRC Project N2. C5257 Page A Dwison of The Fiankhn institute FRC Assignment Not1J 40 20th and Race Streets. Phda Pa 19103 (215) 448.IOM FRC Task No. -(/ G 77f/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. #_/

SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence /

c--r- -- wi th the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented below.

Reason for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence X Equipment does not provide a Backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the l consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment / system) is not I lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can

Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform (

Backup (equipment / system) is its specified safety function. (

available which completely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which l

. environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

[

appears to meet single active failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification.

gr NRC C ntract N2. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 dir$nklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dmpon of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19110 (215) 4M 1000 FRCTask No. O8 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. dr3 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 22 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE INBOARD /0UTBOARD PENETRATION AREAS ASCO MODEL FT8321A2 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: MSLB LESS THAN 5 SEC.

TER CHECKSHEET NO. 22 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 1849 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV0269, 78, 79, 88; SV0581, 83, 85, 87)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVES FOR MAIN STEAM DRAIN & WARM UP LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 18A [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (5) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of ,this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R) , M, I,QL*,l EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, 7,

Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICA3LE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb 3

Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Th 'c, 3A .

System Consideration Review 2;, ib, 4-, 'd, =u, Of -

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 3? *b, 50, 5d, *^ 55,

't q, sw 44. =; j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 62, 55 -

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary '2, 'h 'C,

/A NRC C:ntr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 Pcg]

d) Franklin Research Center FRC Pr$ct No. C5257 A Dmsion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 44 4 1000 FRC Task No. fl f h/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Z2.

SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has/h:2 .m ) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

1 1 The Licensee (has/see-ase) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

,,i Justification for interim operation (has/h:2 r.: t) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment i Equipment modification i Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other '( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. '

N The Licensee (' M )provided a schedule for the proposed corrective act on. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective ,

action 34 / M "1 .)

b The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification k and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

/

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency G.o ModiticatioD III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

s NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 A[Ftrnklin

$0 Rsserrch Cantir FRC Project N . C5257 P_g3 A oms.on of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4% 7 /677 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 22.

I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate N_

Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergenet Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

1 NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not. Established II.b Squipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Rev,iew IV Documentation Not Made Available ,

k

I Ap NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 P g3 IMU Franklin Rrserrch C1sntir FRC Project N2. C5257 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment o.13 / 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) #48-Imo FRC Task No. Af/5/7 I

I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Z'2.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Solenoid Val'es (ASCO) l MODEL: FT8321A2 CCMPO!;E?iT t 0. :

M1 l (S,V0259, SV0279, SV0ud, SV0288, SV0578, SV0581, SV0585, SV0583)  ;

(Unit I Only)

!; .: IDE:;TIFIE3 DEFICIE:;CIES: RPN PSE13 EVALUATIO; 0F DEFICIEt!CIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Data Form page 18A.

These solenoid valves will be replaced with qualified valvcs prior to 6/30/82, I as they become available. Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 8A and SC gives this schedule and our justification for continued operation. Further supporting data is in cur file EQ-12.

PSE&G's evaluation of this NRC noted deficiency has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardized pending replacement.

M,i% N RC Cantrret N o. N RC-03-79-118 Ldl.!! Frankhn Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257

,, 9 2 A Dnnsion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 4481(XX) FRC Task No. 4(oI EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO.M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 23 LEVEL TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE AUXILIARY BLDG. , 84' ELEVATION BARTON MODEL 332/352 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: RECIRC.

TER CHECKSHEET NO. 23 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERATOR INDICATION (LA-0217)

SERVICE: CONTAINMENT SPPAY ADDITIVE TANK LEVEL INDICATION LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 53 [12] .

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, ! , CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, None,

, Not stated, Not applicable I

LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, L, 2d System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 00, Od, I-, 4f-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 50, 5b, Sc, Ed, 50, Ef, Eg, 55, Si, Ej

~ Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -6a r4 Equipment Summary

, Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 7;, 75, 7; -

/A NRC C:ntr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 P ga

$U Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: ject N2. C5257 A Dmsson ol The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 / lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 449/60 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2J SLIT 4ARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

l [ Tne Licensee (has/h;; c.si.i provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable T TE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item unose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other '( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. {

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective  ;

action .)

X The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency i I.b Modification l III .a _ Exemot j II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

/% NRC Contract N;. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project Nr. CS257 Pag 3 UO0hrinkiin Rsserrch Centu A Dwmon of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 / 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 447 /f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 23 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Requ!. red)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified k I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualificd II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification X f III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Noc Made Available 1

As NRC Csntrrct No. NRC 03-79-118 FRC Pr: ject No. C5257 P:ga C0bhranklin Rese rch Cantsr FRC Assignment No 13 3a A Dmsion sf The Frankhn Institute 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No.

4bf!f/7 1

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 23 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPME!1T: Level Transmitter MCDEL: Barton 332/352 C':MPCNENT NO.: LA-0217 aC ICE:CIFIED DEFIC ENCIES: RPS PSE&G EVAL'JATICN OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Data Form page 53.

Basis 23 of Section VII indicates that this instrument does not perfom a safety function needed by the coerator. Plant safety is not affected whether the device fails or not. Replacement is not required. '

?SElG's evaluation of this NRC noted ceficiency nas reaffirmed that plant safety is not depencent on this instrument.

As NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03 79-118 000hrinkhnR:se rchCenter FRC Project Na. C5257 P:93 A Divmon of The Frankhn Instreute FRC Assignment No.13 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4 M/ft7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. mL3 Lt CW_Ef ?EsToM h TO Wi5 hio 23 -

Basis No. 23 Deficiencv: Documentation Unavailable (Containment Spray. '

. Additive Tank Level Instruments)

Justification:

Current procedures instruct the operator to monitor tank level to assure that sodium hydroxide is added during con-tainment spray. Operator action is independent of the tank level reading since spray is continued until a low-low level is reached in the refueling water storage tank despite the spray additive tank level indication. The system used to inject the NaOH solution operates on a passive eductor prin-ciple. As long as the spray pump is pumping water. and the spray additive tank discharge line is open, the solution f rom the additive tank will be educted into the spray.

These conditions are indicated by qualified devices.

This case has been classified as a Group II.2 item ,

(II.2.E.2).

Corrective Action:

Qualification of the additive tank level instruments is not required since they do not perform a safety function.

Am NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 dhFrrnklin Rrseirch C:nt:r FRC Project NO. C5257 R93 A Diwuon of Thz Frrnklin inv.ute FRC Assignm:nft0.1) 40 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. V(o//W 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d_3 SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence /

non-eecewe+saee.with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented below.

Reason for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence g Equipment does not provide a Backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipm?nt/ system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See. note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of cther safety-related equipment to perform Backup (equip.nent/ system) is its specified safety function.

available which corpletely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

appears to meet single active failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification.

gx NRC Crntr:ct N3. N RC-03-79-118 Paga UEbnkhn Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1(MX) FRC Task No. M(of' EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. dY EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 24 ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT AMP MODEL 4806R147s 4800R147P REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB _

TER CHECKSHEET NO. 24 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED SERVICE: ROD POSITION INDICATION WIRE CONNECTORS LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 100 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I , QM , RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: .

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Respo1ses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qt.alification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, L, k, 3d-System Consideration Review 4a, 'l , L, L, w, E Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, 55, Sc M, h, LI, -

5;, Sh, :1, SF Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6=r, GL Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary b , 7L, 7; -

l Wh NRC C:ntr:ct No. NRC-03 79-118 P:g]

dUJ Frankhn Research Center FRC Pr j:ct N3.C5257 A Dwmon of The Frankhn Inst:twe FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. ___4 69 /O7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. D

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other (' )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

N The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUnLIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification {III.aExempt]

II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A., NRC Contract N2. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Project N3. C5257 Pag]

b00IFrankhn R serrch Cent:r A Divison of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4/,57IS77 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 24 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequat6 Adzquate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qur,lified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate

( o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisf'.ed Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied ._

Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established 1I.0 Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification X III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available 1

1

A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 Udhrtnklin Rise:rch Cint:r FRC Project NJ. C5237 P:g]

A Dwmon of The Fr:nkhn inatuti FRC Arsignment No.13 / 30 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. 4$Y /8/7

- 1 \

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 74 LiL4A.) S E.E. $Cf M P c FEW5 To W SLS No.3g Basis No. 38 Deficiency: Documentation Unavailable (Rod Position ~~

Indication)

Justification: ,

The existing Salem emergency operating procedures require the operator to verify reactor trip by monitoring the rod bottom lights.

If a successful trip is not indicated, a manual reactor trip is initiated in accordance with procedures. -

This case has been classified as a Group II .2 item (II.2.F) .

Corrective Action:

None required.  !

l

\

1. s NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 000 inklin Rrsetrch Cent:r FRC Project NO. C5257 Pcg3 A o.mion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 40 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4481m0 FRC Task No. _9GPl D 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. o2N SYSTD4 CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require '

environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence /

- with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are prssented below.

RSeson for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence

[ Equipment does not provide a _ Backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences oi a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment / system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified arid can Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform Backup (equipment / system) is its specified safety function.

available which completely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

appears to meet single active failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification.

{

l

r

1. ' NRC C:ntr:ct ND. NRC-03-79-118 P;g3

'S EYr nkhn Research Center FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448.Itxx) FRC Task No. WI EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 25 SOLEN 0ID VALVE LOCATED IN THE INBOARD /0UTBOARD PENETRATION AREAS ASCO MODEL FT8321A4 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: MSLB LESS THAN 5 SEC TER CHECKSHEET NO. 25 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 1849 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTROL (SV0270, 71, 74, 75, 80, 81, 84, 85)

SERVICE: CONTROL FOR MAIN STEAM ISOLATION VALVES

, LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 41 (64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITDi(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of ,this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, E, 2;, 2d -

h, '" 'A h,M-System Consideration Review Sh.

52, 5b. A" "A Ea- "#

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review --

50 Eh, Si, Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation E. , Gw -

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7-, 7L, 7;

1. h dd Frank;.n Resezrch Center N RC C:ntrcct N9. N RC-03-79-118 P g3 FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dmsion of The Frankhn Insuute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets Phi:a . Pa 19101(215) 44 4 1000 FRC Task No. 449 /C/'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2f SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

X Tne Licensee (has/h:; cd provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

M The Licensee (has, "' proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Y Justification for interim operation (has/hr -^t) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

N Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source

_,__ Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other '( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

N The Licensee (has/h:2 x 0 provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action pior fo A /:to / f 2_ .)

- i The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency (T. b Modirication) III.a Exempt II.a , Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope f IV Documentation Not Available II.b Not Qualified

1 1

NRC Contract N2. N RC-03-79-118 Pag 3 M

1. [~Nnklin Riseirch Centu FRC Project N . C5257 13 2 A oimx>n of The reankhn institute 20th and Race Streets. Phila-. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. 4 Nr'd8[R7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 25 EQUIPMENT EtNIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment ani Test Specimen Established X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Sdtisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Critoria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regardi.ng Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

X = CATEGORY NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.o Equipment Not Qualified .

II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 000 rinklin R2se:rch Cent:r FRC Project N3. C5257 Pag 3 A omson of The Frankhn institute .13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment No/>f!S/7 FRC Task No. ._ 4 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 78 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMEtiT.

Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

M00EL: FT8321A4 CC":0*;ENT N .: SV0274, SV0275, SV0280, SV0231, SV0270, SV0271, SV0284, SV0285

!;:: ::E:; :::E: CEF:'IEN:lES: RPN 05EE2 E'.'i' ;; :7; 0F DEFICIEN:IES:

Ref. Qualificatien Data Evaluation Form, page 41.

These solenoid valves will be replaced with qualified valves prior to 6/30/82 Our sutmittal, Volume 1,Section VII, basis 83 gives this s:nedule an'd our' justification for continued operation.

PSEM's evaluation of tnis NRC noted deficiency has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeccardized pending replace.ent.

l

l 4;1, NRC Crntract No. NRC-03-79-118 P:g3 L2LlFr~dnkhn Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A D vmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignm:nt N3.13 lc 2f)th and Race Streets Phda , Pa 191031215l 1441000 FRC Task No. @9 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 26 LIMIT SWITCH LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA NAMCO MODEL D2400XST REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 26 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERATION INDICATION & VALVE CONTROL (WL108,13, 97, 99; NT25; WR80)

SERVICE: POSITION INDICATION FOR VALVES LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 42 AND 43 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (tr, RT, P, !, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 2b, -? c, 24 System Consideration Review .h , ib, k, "d, t, 'f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review su, b, Su, 5d, 5e, %

5g, Eh, Si, Sj -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation I>ar-66 Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary h.  % M

1. w NRC C::ntr:ct N3. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Pr: Ject N;. C5257 Pag]

LNnkhn Reserrch Center

c. ausr>n of rhe rrankhn instituie FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 444 1000 FRC Task No. 4LY/S/"7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2/*

SUMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has/ hec .; t) provided a response to the SER concerns. -

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

I The Licensee (ha s/' z : *1 proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

[ Justification for interim operation (has/h" - R been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

N Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other 1 )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/c._ - , provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action kio r fo 6 l20 /22. '

.)

/

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

6. b Modification) III.a Exempt -

II.a Qua11rication Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

l A NRC Contract NO. NRC-03 79-118  :

FRC Project N 3. C5257 Pag]  !

000IFranklin Rssench Centu A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask FRC Assignment No. No.13 4/,9 [f/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 24 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately j Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) l Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied  !

l Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied _

Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfie.

Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Per. ding Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established ._

II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified =

III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Rcriew IV Documentation Not Made Available

NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 P g]

4~Frz UOOU nklin Rrsesrch Centr F'lC Project Nt. C5257 A Divmon of The rranklin institute FRC Assignment N .13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. Is3 /8/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER

~

EQUIPMENT: Limit Switch MODEL: 0-2400X-ST COMPONENT NO.: WL108, WL13, WL97, WL99, N!25, WR80 NRC IDEiri1FIED DEFICIENCIES: EXN, RPS PSE&GEVALUATIONbFDEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 42

.These limit switches will be replaced with qualified switches prior to 6/30/82

~----~, , [ '.

~

Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis SA states our intentions an'd reasoning for continued operation.

PSElG's evaluation of these NRC noted deficiencies has reaffir:1ed that plant safety is not je,opardi::ed pending replacement.

[

gh NRC Crntrrct No. NRC-03-79-118 g102 MJ Franklin Research Center FRC ProJ;ct No. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1(XX) FRC Task No. MG/f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. cM l

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 27 LIMIT SWITCH LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA MASONEILAN MODEL 4962 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 27 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERATOR INDICATION & VALVE CONTROL (11GB4,12GB4, 13GB4, 14GB4)

SERVICE: POSITION INDICATOR FOR VALVES LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 44 [12]

DESIGNA*lON FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 31, 2c, 25--

System Consideration Review 4e, 'm , '. ; , M, 10, -! f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review &, 5 'e , Sc, Cl, 5;, 5L 4 , 21. , i, Eb Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Se, Ob-Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary -72 , 7b, 71

AA NRC C:ntr:ct N3. N RC-03-79-118 P:g3 dl09 Frankhn Research Center FRC Proj;ct No. C5257 A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 f 215) 4M1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. 4 /a KNo.13 [S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 27 e-

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

X Tne Licensee (has/' e t) provided a response to the SER concerns. -

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

^^t' proposed a corrective action for this equipment

% The Licensee (has/W item whose qualification has not been fully established.

I Justification for interim operation (has/h; ?t' been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

[ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

[ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Eqaipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/h:: :M provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action  ;?fier he h l30 /32. .)

l The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I . a_ Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency C .b ModiticattorD III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b lbt in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available r

/A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N3. C5257 PZg2 bNU Franklin Research C<antir A Dnmion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 / 2 20th and Race Stree:s. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Y48 /f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF ECUIPMENT ITEM NO. U EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate N Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Sdtisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied i Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipr:. ant Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

{

t

& NRC Contrcct N3. NRC-03-79-118 00hrsnklin Rtsench Cant r FRC Project ND. C5257 P:g3 A Diwsson of The Frankhn Institute 3a

/

20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. Np[134 f/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 27 LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Limit Switch -

(Masoneilan)

MODEL: 496-2 CCMPONENT NO.: llG34,12GS4,13G34,14G34 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: EXN, RPS PSE&GEVALUATION5FDEFICIENCIES: .

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluatior. Fonn page 44 These limit switches wi.ll be replaced with qualified switches prior to 6/30/82,

._ , . _ . , Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII,_ basis.18A .s_tates our intentions,and reasoning ror continued coeration.

PSElG's evaluation of these, NRC noted, deficiencies has reaffimed that plant safety is not jeopardi:ed pending replacenent.

l

gA , NRC C:ntract N2. NRC-03 79-118 P;ga LLiju Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Duuon of The Frankhn Institure FRC AssignmentN, p.1p Ia 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 Ifxx) FRC Task No. 46o EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 28 LIMIT SWITCH LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA NAMCO MODEL D2400X REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 28 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERATOR INDICATION & VALVE CONTROL (ICC215, ICC113, ISJ53, ISJ60, INT 32, ISS49)

SERVICE: POSITION INDICATOR & VALVE CONTROL FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERATOR INDICATION & VALVE CONTROL (ISS64, ISS33, ISS27, IVC 8, IVC 10, IVCl2, IVC 14)

SERVICE: POSITION INDICATOR & VALVE CONTROL LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 45 [12]

l I

I DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, h S, (R), M, I , QM , EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la

, Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb l

Equipment Environmental Qualifi, cation Summary Forms 2 ,

Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, 3c, 2d System Consideration Review h, 'b,

. I, id, L, M ~

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review <= "" "" RA *^ Sf m 5 ch "i. Sj 7

~

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6 CL -

l i Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary h, 75, c

1. 4 N RC C:ntr:ct No. N RC-03-79-118 P;ga dEankhn Research Center FRC PrJject N2. C5257 A Divmon of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103(215) 444 1000 FRC Task No. 4LF!S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. If

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has/bc ..;d provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to'the applicable DBE l environmental service conditions.

l t

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no f

l outstanding qualification deficiencies.

I The Licensee (has/hu ..ee proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

M Justification for interim operation (has/*~ -^ti been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

[ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other (___ )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (n a s/- - .J provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action p/~ier l e fo /3 0 / f2. .)

i The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Lege.d)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

, G.b Moditication] III.a Exempt II.a Qualitication Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

1. % NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 000 r:nklin Rzse:rch Cent:r FRC Project NO. C5257 A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th .nd Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. IlF/S/7 W

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 22 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Sdtisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: l o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate 1 o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

h NRC Contract N D. NRC-03-79-118 00fbrenklin Resexrch Csntir FRC Project N3. C5257 P g2 A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 / 30 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4l.57 /f/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMEtiT: Limi Switches (Itamco)

MODEL: 0-2400X CCMP0 iE:;T 40.. ICC215, ICCll3, ISJS3,15J50,1:1T32, ISSa9, 15564, 15533, 15527, IVCS, IVC 10, IVC 12, l'/C14 4

NRC 10E 4TIFI ED -CEFICI Ei4CI ES: A RPM PSE3G EVALUATIO 4 0F DEFICIE:CIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fcm page 45.

These limit switches will be reciaced with cualified switches prior to 5/30/82.

Our sucait:al, Volume I,Section VII, basis 18A states our intentions and reasoning for continued operation.

PSEaG's evaluation of tnese NRC licted ceficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopartizac pencing replacement.

r L

An _. NRC Contract No. N RC-03-79-118 Pzg3

$dfranklin Research Center FRC ProKct No. C5257 l

A Dwesion of The Frmkhri institure FRC Assignment N,9 13 lc I 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-Itn) FRC Task No. 4/87 k

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 29 SQUARE ROOT EXTRACTOR LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 50ES3212 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 29 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): FIDW/ PRESSURE CONTROL (FA3165Z-2, 69Z-2, 72Z-2, 76Z-2; FA3160Z-2)

SERVICE: NOT STATED LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 47 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3c, M System Consideration Review Ac, -! b , !c, id, 4w, 4f l

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, 5b, Sc, 53, Sc, Of,

50. Eh Ri, Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 'a. 55-Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary b, 7L, 7c-

1. w NRC C:ntrcct N O. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Prajict Ns. C5257 P:g2 dbrznklin Research Center A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 f215) 4481000 FRC Task No. 46 f /S/~1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 29

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has/A- ..vis provided a response to the SER concerns. -

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

M The Licensee (has/" " " ) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

[ Justification for interim operation (has/h;; .. i; been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

[ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification tert ti,ng of eq ipment in progress

!  % Other -( A2 m )

0 V The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

M The Licensee (n as/ha c. ..n ) provided a schedule for the proposed l corrective act on. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action m 3 d , /N 2- .)

G The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should ce exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

) - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified __ II.c Qualified Life Deficiency G.b Modification] III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified -

IV Documentation Not Available

s NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 A{!000 Franklin asse rch Cent:r FRC Project N3. C5257 P:g3 A Dnmion of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 / 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 44(M/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2_9 i

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY l l

Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate K l Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established )

Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately (

Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate j o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate l Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied  ;

Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contract N:. NRC-0?79-118 000hr:nklin R:sench Centu FRC Project N9. C5257 P ga A Dwiston of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 / 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1.'A FRC Task No. 4k?/S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 79 LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Square Root Extractor (Fi:cher & Porter)

MODEL: 50ES3212 CCMPONENT NO.: FA3165Z-2, FA3169Z-2, FA3172Z-2, FA3176Z-2, FA3160Z-2 NRC IDENTIFIED. DEFICIENCIES: RPN PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 47.

These devices are not exposed to an adverse environment for initial stages of accident, therefore, actuation of fan cooler units can be accomplished.

During long tenn recovery high radiation ould cause failures. As an interim f measure the operator will procedurally be . equired to de-energize control power to the flow control devices to assure service water flow. Prior to 6/30/82 design cnanges will be incorporated to eliminate the need for any operator action. PSE&G's position is detailed in our submittal, Volume 1,Section VII, basis 20.

PSE&G is confident that plant safety will not be jeopardized pending final resolution of this problem.

l

A NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project ND. C5257 P g3 000banklin R:seach Ccnta A Division of The Franklin Institute 3h 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment No.1)Cl'7 FRC Task No. 46(/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. n28 vy.3. acte Rrr_s?o05E. 9T FEESTo 665 Ro t o Basis No. 20 Deficiency: Documentation Unavailable (Flow Control for SW223 valves, Fan Cooler Units) .

Justification:

These service water valves are provided with flow control equipment consisting of Fischer-Porter 53EG3000 flow con-trollers, Fischer-Porter 53EI3C00 electric / pneumatic con- )

verter, Fischer-Porter 50ES3212 square root extractor and j Fischer-Forter (1032495] A,C differential pressure trans-mi t te r. These devices are all located outside the containment. '

The safety functions of the fan cooler units can be accomp- i lished irrespective of flow control operability based on the following:

- Accidents (LCCA/MSLB) inside the containment will not 1 result in adverse environments in the area where the devices are located for the automatic actuation of the f an cooler units.

- Accidents outside the containment do not require high cooling capacity for the fan coolers.

. During long term recovery f rom accidents inside the containment, the devices will be exposed to high inte-grated radiation doses which could af fect service water flow. The operator can assure high flow by 'de-energizing control power to the flow control devices which will cause the valves to remain open. .

l The safety function of the containment f an ecclers will be i accomplished without the need for operator action. Long

! term recovery may require operator action to compensate for equipment failures.

This case has been classified as a Group !.1 item (I.l.G.2)

Corrective Action:

As an interim measure, Procedure EI-I-4.4 will be modified to assure long-term flow to fan ecclers. Procedure modif i-cation is to be completed prior to exceeding 5% pcwer (Unit 42). The Unit il change will be made prior to December 15, 1980.

A NRC Contract N c. NRC-03-79-118 000 rznklin Rzsetrch Cant:r P g]

FRC ProMct No. C5257 A Dimson of The Franklin Institute o.131 3C 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Assignmentp/e(/

FRCTask No. U C/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M The modified' procedure will instruct the operator to de-energize the valve control circuit which assures that the valve cannot be closed by controller failure. This action is covered by the procedure change for Item I.l.G.I.

(Basis 419). -

The final resolution of this item will be to redesign the flow control system before,or during first refueling outage (Unit 42). The Unit 41 change will be made prior to June 30, 1982. The installation schedule will be acceler-ated as equipment becomes available and plant operating con-ditions permit installation.

l

gx NRC C:ntract No. NRC-03-79-118

!.[LNnklin Research Center FRC Pr; ject N3. C5257 pig 3 A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lo 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Fa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4/6 I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.&

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 30 FWW CONTROLLER LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 53EG3000 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 30 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FJNCTION (PLANT ID): FWW CONTROLLER (FA3160C1, 2, 3; FA3165C1, 2, 3; FA3169C1, 2, 3)

SERVICE: NOT STATED l FUNCTION (PLANT ID): FWW CONTROLLER (FA3172-1, 2, 3; FA3176-1, 2, 3) i SERVICE: NOT STATED l LICENSEE SUBMITTAL. SCEW(S): 48 [12]

l l

l I

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, t. QM EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 l Licensee Response to NRC SER 3 a , 3b , 3c , 44- ---

System Consfderation Review ?a, '. b , ' 1, 'd, *c, 4 f-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review "2 SL, Sv, 50, 5e, 5f,'

2;, OL, 01, Oj -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 62 55 ,

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 72 'b, 70 -

1. A NRC C:ntr ct N 3. NRC-03-79-118 P:ga 500!} Franklin Research Center FRC Pr; ject No. C5257 A Dms on of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 44 4 1000 FRC Task No. 4Lf/S/'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 30

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has/W provided a response to the SER concerns. -

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

(TheLicensee (has/h r ^^*l proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

t

.Y Justification for interim operation (has/hr aa*J been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

X. Corrective ac* ion specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence 13 vel Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification esting of equipm t in progress Y Other '( C_.- )

U G The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

g The Licensee (h as/am uvG provided a schedule for the proposed corrective ac 'on. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action 3 0, . /N L .) i The Licensee st tes that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qaalification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Q.a aediticationf III.a Exempt III.b Not in Scope II.a Qualification Not Established II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N2. C5257 PJg]

000hrinklin Rsse:rch Cantir A Dumon of The Franklin Insntute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215)448-1000 FRC Task No. Y4 Y /fr7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 39 i

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FOR_M DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate d Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established I Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) ,

Program Established to Ideatify Aging Degradation f Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately ,

o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate l Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied ,

Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied j Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies J (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied ._

Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

As NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 P g]

000hr:nklin Rrseirch Csntir FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dwision of The Franklin Institute FRC Assl0nment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4LF/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3.9 LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER i

EQUIPMENT: Ficw Controller (Fischer & Porter)

!!ODEL: 53EG3000 CCMPONENT NO.: FA3160C-1, FA3160C-2, FA3165C-1, FA3165C-2, FA3165C-3, FA3169C-1, FA3169C-2, FA3169C-3, FA3172-1, FA3172-2 FA3172-3, FA3176-1, FA3176-2, FA3176-3, FAJf GCC-J NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: RPN PSE&G EVALUATION dF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Gualification Data Evaluation Form page 48.

These devices are not exposed to an adverse environment for the initial stages of the accident, therefore, actuation of fan cooler units can be accomplished.

During long term recovery high radiation could cause failures. As an interim measure, the coerator will procedurally be required to de-energize control power to the ficw control devices to assure service water flow. Prior to 5/30/82 design changes will be incorporated to eliminate the need for operator action. PSE3G's position is detailed in our submittal, Volume 1,Section VII, basis 20.

I PSEAG is confident that plant safety will not be jeopardia.ed pending final i resolution of this problem.

4N UOOU Frtnkhn R:sench Ccnter NRC Contract N3. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pag 3 A Desion of The Frank!!n Institute FRC Assignment No.13 3h jf /7 20th and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4481m0 FRC Task No. V/* ff EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. JA L.gCi c 5c.t. Ef5ME. IPEPER.s To $si5 lfo. T.,o Basis No. 20 Deficiencv: Documentation Unavailable (Flow Control for SW223 valves, Fan Cooler Units) , ,,

Justification:

1 1

These service water valves are provided with flow control equipment consisting of Fischer-Porter 53EG3000 flow con-trollers, Fischer-Porter 53EI3000 electric / pneumatic con-  ;

verter, Fischer-Forter 50ES3212 square root extractor and Fischer-Porter (10B2 495] A,C diff erential pressur,e trans- 1 mitter. These devices are all located outside the _

l containment.

l ,

The safety functions of the fan cooler units can be accomp- i lished irrespective of flow control operability based on the following:

- Accidents (LOCA/MSLB) inside the containment will not result in adverse environments in the area where the devices are located for the automatic actuation of the f an cooler units.  ;

- Accidents outside the containment do not require"high cooling capacity for the- f an coolers.

- During long term recovery from accidents inside the containment, the devices will be exposed to high inte-grated radiation doses which could af fect service The operator can assure high flow by de-

)

water flow.

i energizing control power to the flow control devices i

which will cause the valves to remain open. .

The safety function of the containment f an coolers will be accomplished without the need f or operator action. Lo ng term recovery may require operator action to compensate for equipment failures.

This case has been classified as a Group I.1 item (I.l.G.2)

Corrective Action:

As an interim measure, Procedure EI-I-4.4 will be modified to assure long-term flow to fan coolers. Procedure modifi- _

cation is to be completed prior to exceeding 5% pcwer (Unit 42). The Unit il change will be made prior to December 15, 1980.

L A NRC Contract N A NRC-03-79-118 P:gJ 00bhrsnklin Risetrch Cantir FRC Pro}ect N A C5257 A Division of The Franklin Insutute FRC Assignmenfto.17 3c 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Tank No. Y MIU 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.3d The modified procedure will instruct the operator to de-energize the valve control circuit which assures that the valve cannot be closed by controller failure. This action is covered by the procedure change for Item I.l.G.I.

(Basis s19.) -

The final resolution of this item will be to redesign the flow control system before or during first refueling outage (Unit #2). The Unit 41 change will be made prior to June 30, 1982. The installation schedule will be acceler-ated as equipment becomes available and plant operating con-ditions permit installation.

f .

f

4L NRC C:ntract N O. NRC-03-79-118 P ga lbM Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: ject N3. C5257 A Dnnsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.J3 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215)448 1000 FRC Task No. UST EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3_l.

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 31 TRANSDUCER, E/P LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 53E13000 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET No. 31 '

LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT LtTED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): FIDW/ PRESSURE CONTROL (FA3160, 65, 69, 72, 76; SW223)

SERVICE: NOT STATED i LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 49 [12] l l

l 1

l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R) , M, I, QM , EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la l Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3c, K System Consideration Review  !, 45, Sc. 4d. 40, if -

i Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 41, CC, SS, 50, Sf, 5;, Sh, 51 tj -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 50, Ch Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 'm' , L, 7c

1. A NRC C:ntr:ct N2. NRC-03 79-118 00branklin Resench Center P g3 FRC Pr: Ject ND. C5257 A Dwisu>n of The Frankhn Institute lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 44

• 1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. No.13 [fd 467 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _d /.

SUMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

$ Tne Licensee (has/hc; r.ct) provided a response to the SER concerns. -

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

N The Licensee (has/h n ..;;; proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Y Justification for interim operation (has/hr et) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

( Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress

" 1 Other '( 't' -

U )

W The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item

( that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

[ The Licensee (has/h;; ..st'-r provided a schedule for the proposed I corrective ac - n. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action _

3 a , / 9 f.2 .)

\

The Licensee st es that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency ll.b Mootfication) III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A% NRC Contract N r. NRC-03-79-118 cQUErznklin R:serrch Centr FRC Project N3. C5257 Pag 3 A Dmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 / 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda-. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. #68/S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY l

l Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately ,

Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) l l Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation i Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) j Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate

! o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately

(

! o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied )'

l Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied l

Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied l

Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied l Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) a DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified

. I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X l II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Nat in the Scopa of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

1. % NRC Contr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 P:g3 000hr:nklin R:se:rch Cs nt:r FRC Project Nt. C5257 A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 / 30 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. N2/8/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _3.[.

LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: E/P Converter -

(Fischer & Porter) ,,

MODEL: 53EI3000 .

CCMPONENT NO.: FA3160

[A3165 SW223

[ A p 2 Flow Control FA3176 NRC IDENTIFIED DEF!CIENCIES: RPN i

PSE&G EVALUATION OF 'OEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fom page 49.

The safety function of containment fan coolers can be accomplished regardless of flow control operability. The safety function of the fan coolers will be accomplished without need for operator action. Long tem recovery may require operator action to canpensate for potential failures.

As an interim measure procedural charges will suffice to assure long term ficw to fan coolers.

The final resolution will be to redesign flow control system so that operator action is not required to accomplish long term flow.

Cur submittal, Volume 1.Section VII, basis 20 details our schedule and justification for continued operation.

PSE1G's evaluation of noted deficiency has reaffimed that plant safety is not jeopardized pending final resolution.

A NRC Con *ract NO. NRC-03 79-118 000Er:nklin R:se rch C:nter FRC Project N3. C5257 P g3 A Divmon of The Frink!!n Incitut2 FRC A%ignment Nt 1:1 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 Imc FRC Task No. </6b/51~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. 33_I t.ub.3$M 7.ESbOLE. U.Ff E5 To BActs Mo. 2.e Basis No. 20 Deficiency: Documentation Unavailable (Flow Control for SW223 valves, Fan Cooler Units) .

Justification: 1 These service water valves are provided with flow control equipment consisting of Fischer-Forter 53EG3000 flow con- i trollers, Fischer-Porter 53EI3000 electric / pneumatic con- l Verter, Fischer-Porter 50ES3212 square root extractor and F ischer-Porter (10B2 49 5) A,C dif f erential pressur.e trans-I mitter. These devices are all located outside the _

containment.

The safety functions of the fan cooler units can be accomp-lished irrespective of flow control operability based on the following:

- Accidents (LCCA/MSLB) inside the containment will not result in adverse environments in the area whe.re the devices are located for the automatic actuation of the fan cooler units.

- Accidents outside the containment do not require'high cooling capacity f or the f an coolers.

. During long term recovery f rom accidents inside the containment, the devices will be exposed to high inte-grated radiation doses which could affect service water flow. The operator can assure high flow by 'de-energizing control power to the flow control devices which will cause the valves to remain open. ,

The safety function of the containment f an coolers will be accomplished without the need for operator action. Lo ng term recovery may require operator action to compensate for equipment failures, t This case has been classified as a Group I.1 item (I.l.G.2)

Corrective Action:

As an interim measure, Procedure EI-I-4.4 will be modified to assure long-term flow to fan coolers. Procedure modif i-cation is to be ccmpleted prior to exceeding 51 pcwer (Unit

$2). The Unit il change will be made prior to December 15, 1980.

~

1. x NRC Contract Ne. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N3. C5257 P ga dObhranklin Reseirch Crntir A Dtvmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignmen,t fio.19 3C 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 6 TIII~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J /

WS No 'zo (c.omooch)

The modifie'd procedure will instruct the operator to de-energize the valve control circuit which assures that the valve cannot be closed by controller failure. This action is covered by the procedure change for Item I.l.G.I.

(Basis fl9-)

The final resolution of this item will be to redesign the flow control system before.or during first refueling outage (Unit #2). The Unit 41 change will be made prior to June 30, 1982. The installation schedule will be acceler-ated as equipment becomes available and plant operating con-ditions permit installation.

)

{

f 4

4J _ , NRC C:ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 Pagg i Ifr'a~nkhn Research Center FRC Pr: Ject Ns. C5257 A Duuon of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets Pbda . Fa 19103 CIS) 448 lixo FRC Task No. M(, P EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 32 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA BARTON MODEL 332 351 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 32 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): NOT STATED (PA2344, PA2345, PA2346, PA2568)

SERVICE: NOT STATED LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 52 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) h T, QT, h P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3L, Oc, 2d System Consideration Review h, 45, !;, Id,  !;, if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, 5b, Er, 5d, 50, E f ,-

'O, 55, 51, Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6 Sb (

Equipment Summary (

Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 2-e , 7L, 7c=

/A NRC C:ntract N 3. N RC-03-79-118 FRC Prrject N3. C5257 P g3 bNnklin Research Center A Dimon of The Frankhn Inshtute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4laf/S/7 I

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _33-SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

^^*'

X Tne Licensee (ha s/h " provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/hez not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or wil function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

1 The Licensee (has/h- ~ -' proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

I Justification for interim operation (has/h:: e tl been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

[ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other T )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. .

The Licensee (has/. . . 4 provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action p io r -/ g f /po /f2_ .)

I The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency C.b Modification) III.a Exempt -

II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

1. x NRC Contract f13. NRC 03-79-118 000hr nklin Rxserrch Cener FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Divmon of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 44f,/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 32 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate M '

Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established '

Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressute Adequate ,

o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied j Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied _

Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) 1 l

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review l IV Documentation Not Made Available l

l J

)

As NRC Contract NO. NRC-03 79-118 lj00 r nklin R:se rch Ccznt:r FRC Project N3. C5257 P:g3 A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13/ 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC, Task No. 4L9 /S/'/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _3.2 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Pressure Transmitter (Barton)

MODEL: 332/351 CCMPONEtiT NO.:

PA2344, PA2345, PA2346, PA2568 NRC IDE:.'*IFIED DEFICIEliCIES: RT, R, RPS PSEiG EVALUATION OF DEFICIEtiCIES:

Ref. Cualification Data Evaluation Form page 52.

The subject transmitter will be replaced with a qualified unit prior to 6/30/82.

Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 22 details our intensions and gives our reasons for cent.inued operation.

PSE&G's evaluation of these NRC noted deficiencies has reaffimed that plant safety is not jeopardized pending reolacement.

Xh , NRC C:ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 ld d Frankhn Research Center Pag 3 FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dmuon of The Frankhn Instaure FRC Assignment No.13 lc 21)th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 1910H215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. %I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. $_3.

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 33 PRESSURE BELLOWS LOCATED IN THE CONTAIhHENT BARTON MODEL 351 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 120 DAYS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 33 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 687, 37 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT PRESSURE TRIP FUNCTION FOR REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM (PA2344-46, 2568)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 54 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

@h QT, P, H, S, (R), M, I, VM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, l

Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

l Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2

]

Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, 22, 2i System Consideration Review 42, ^5 A" dd, i, i f-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 0;, 55, 5, 50, Ou, O f, l 59, 5h, Si, 5p Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation i;, S Equipment Summary l

l Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7a, iu, 7v -

/A N RC C:ntr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr0j;ct N3. C5257 Pag 3 du Franklin Rese:rch Center A Diwsion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13/ ib 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215)44 4 1000 FRC Task No. Yhf/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 33 St14 MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

M Tne Licensee (ha s/L.. .~ i-) provided a response to the SER concerns.

[ The Licensee (has/h=e rt) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified andNg will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there au no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above suomergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other '( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OllALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established {lTCb')b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

1 l

1. % NRC Contract N3. NRC-03 79118 FRC Project N3. C5257 Pago LOOIFranklin Rzsearch Csnt:r A oms on of The rrankhn Institute FRC Assignm:nt N 7.13 / 2 2Gh and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19 03(215) 443 1000 FRC Task No. 4S7/S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 33 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequitely o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Pagarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satistied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review X IV Documentation Ndt Made Available

'W h4 *

{

(

A NRC Contract N3. NRC 03-79-118 Pc.g 3 000hrinklin R:se:rch Ccnt:r FRC Project Ns. C5257 A Dimion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.131 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4_kI /6/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 33 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EquipMEt4T:

Sensing)

(Barton Bellows MODEL: 351 CCMPONEriT rio.: PA2344, PA2345, PA2346, PA2558 NRC IDEtCIFIED DEF;CIEt1CIES: T, A, CS, R. RT PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIErCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 54. .

RT - The next upcate of our submittal will indicate a required time of 120 days.

A.R- The material comoosing this instrument is metalic and is insensitive to the effects of Aging and Radiation.

T - The next revision to our submittal will indicate a qualified temp of 350 F.0 This temoerature is arrived at based on Westinghouse test data which envelopes out plant profile.

CS - This item is addressed in our submittal. The EQ submittal will be revised to '

include information on the oil filled system.

Otner supporting data is available in our file EQ-28.

PSE1G's evaluation of these instrument has reaffirmed that they can perform their safety related function in a harsh environment.

4.Jb N RC Crntrcct N3. NRC-03-79-118 P ga LO!.hrankhn Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dwivon of The Franan Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 44 & l000 FRC Task No. M6 I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 34 LIMIT SWITCH LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA NAMCO MODEL D 2400X REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 34 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): :6T CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERATOR INDICATION & VALVE CONTROL (SJ78, SJ79, SJ108)

SERVICE: POSITION INDICATOR FOR VALVES LICENSEE SUBMITIAL: SCEW(S): 56 [12]

I l

l l

)

1 I

1 l

l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) l R, T, QT, P , 11, CS , A , S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable )

LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

l Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Re:ponses to the NRC SER lb i

Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 j Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, & , 3v, SG System Consideration Review Jo, 4L, tr, if, 4;, Of -

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, 55, 5^ "d, 5;, Of,-

b , L, Li, 5}

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -b , Ch-Equipment Summary Ma intenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 1, 7 b , 7;-

/% NRC C:ntr:ct N . NRC-03-79-118 dII Franklin Research Center FRC Prcject No. C5257 P g3 A Dwision of The frankhn Inst:tute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 f 2156 448-1000 FRC Task No. 44f/S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has/h:2 r.;t)- provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licennee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

j The Licensee (has/'- ~ ) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

X Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

[ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

[ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Cruipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other '( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (nas/inee-wee) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action & Joe de 6 /A o / 22. .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exertpted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY; (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency (I . b Macii t t ea t ion / III.a Exempt -

II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

+

h NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118

!j0bhrankhn Rrse:rch Csnt:r FRC Project N2. C5257 Page A Dwmon of The Frankhn Inshtute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 44 M<-/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .J_4 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate g Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification R II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established f II.o Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 tj00hr nklin Rese:rch Cent:r FRC Project N3.C5257 P;go A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment b 30 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. i .13!

7 877 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Limit Switches .,

(flamco) ,

MODEL: EA-170, 02400X CCMPONENT t10.: SJ78, SJ79, SJ108 NRC IDE?CIFIED.DEFICIE?tCIES: RT, RPS PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fom pages 56 and 90.

These limit switches will be replaced with qualified switches prior to 6/30/82.

Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 25 states our .i.rjteniions an'd reasoning for continued operation. '

PSE5G's evaluation of these NRC noted deficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardi::ed pending replacement.

e

4;2 N RC C:ntrcct No. N RC-03-79-118

~

P:ge LufFrankhn Research Center FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 A Dmsson of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.1 lc 20th and Race Streets, Phila . Pa 19101(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. U6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.JI EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 35 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT ASCO MODEL NP SERIES REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB AS NECESSARY TER CHECKSHEET No. 35 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 712, 1849, 36 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV0491, 492, 493, 427, 518, 521, 399, 397, 519)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVE FOR SAFETY-RELATED CONTROL VALVES FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV0401, 802, 803, 927, 759, 760, 920, 921, 922)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVE FOR SAFETY-RELATED CONTROL VALVES FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV0923, 924, SV1022, 026, 077, 079, 081, 083)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVE FOR SAFETY-RELATED CONTROL VALVES FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV0506, 520)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVE FOR SAFETY-RELATED CONTROL VALVES LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 60 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, P, H, h hh ( ;), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d,3e System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, N , K , ')af, f(

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 56, Sc, 5d, Se, 5f, 59, EP Ei, Si Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation  %, %

Equipment Summary Maintenance anc replacement Schedule Summary 7a, Jr.- n;

NRC C::ntr:ct N3. N RC-03-79-118

/[S$ Frankhn Research Center FRC Prrj;ct Ns. C5257 P;ga A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa Im3 (215) 4h-1000 FRC Task No. W F,IM EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3.f Stit4ARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECI'ED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

M Tne Licensee (has/h;; ..sL,- provided a response to the SER concerns.

1 The Licensee (has/.'.;; .~;) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

1 The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective acticn for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other '( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item 3at can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (nas/nas not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED IT7.4 ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt -

f Q Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

1. s NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03 79-118 00b ranklin R:se:rch Crnt:r FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Divmon of The FrankhnInstitute FRC Assignment No 13 2 20th and Race Streets. Ph6la-. Pa 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. M/,7/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SUMMulY FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY r

Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Idcntify Aging Degradation  !

Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposurer o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied 1 Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied _

Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied l Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) 1 DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified i

III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review '

IV Documentation Not Made Available I

i t

4~

UObu Franklin R:se:rch Cent:r NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N2. C5257 P g3 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment b o. j,3/ 3a.

20th and Race streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. LbJ/6/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7_f_.

LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

MODEL: NP Series COMPONE::T NO.: SV0491, SV0492, SV0493, SV0427 SV0518, SV0519, SV0Ji20, SV0521, SV0399 SV0397 SV0401 NRC IDENTIFIED ' DEFICIENCIES: RT, A, CS, S PSE13 EVALUATION OF DEFICIE!:CIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form, Page 50.

RT., Q - All NP series valves are fully cualified for adverse envircimental conditions. All NRC noted deficiencies are addressed in our sub-mittal. All supporting information for these valves is contain in our file EQ12.

A - These valves are cualified for a 40 year life provided coils and elastomers are replaced every 4.4 years.

S_ - These valves perfann their function. prior to being submerged. Basis 28 in Volume 1 Section VII states our position.

PSE3G's evaluation of NRC noted deficiencies has reaffirmed that ASCO NP series valves are capable of performing safety functions in a harsh environment.

1. % NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-7S 118 UbFranklin R:se:rch Crntir FRC Project No. C5257 Pag]

A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 36 20th and Race Streets. Phda 94.19103 (215) 4481000 FRC Task No. 46S/Sl7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3.E LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER RtFELS 'Te MLS Mo. 76 Basis No. 28 Deficiencv: Flooding of Containment Motor-Operated Valves, Isolation Valve Solenoids and Instrument Panels Just:*ication:

The motor-operated valves are Limitorque SMB's. The sole-noid valves are the ASCO NP series. Both devices have been qualified for post-accident operation inside the containment but the data does not support operability in a submerged scate. The devices are located at an elevation in the con-tainment that will not become flooded prior to performing their isolation functions. The valves close within 30 sec-onds. Afterwards when the devices become flooded, valve op-eration is not required. Operability in a submerged state for one hour as required by NUREG-0588 is not warranted under these conditions.

The solenoid valves are located in instrument panels which have been qualified for post-accident operation to assure that the solenoids perform their function but have not been proven in a submerged state. This is immaterial in this case also, since the isolation function is accomplished prior to submergence.

The electrical circuits are protected by Class lE breakers should shorts develop during submergence. The effect of a potential loss of control power on other devices fed from the same circuit has been analyzed for safety implications.

The results, as described in FSAR response to Cuestion 6.28, show that plant safety is not affected. This analysis has been reviewed by the NRC and found acceptable as reported in Safety Evaluation Report for Salem Units 1 and 2, Supple- I ment 1, June 1976.

This case has been classified as a Group I.1 item (I.l.E.1).

Corrective Action:

No additional qualification is required. ]

)

f

1. w NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 P g3 000kranklin Research Center FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dnnson of The Frankhn Institute FRC 3c 20th and Race Streets. Ph61a.. Pa.19103 (2151448-1000 FRC Assignment Task No. AlofNo.1}SG

/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER (Continued)

EQUIPMENT: Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

MODEL: NP Series CC'4 PONE!;T NO.: SV0802 SV0803, SV0927, SVC767, SVo7c0 NRC IDEtCIFIED DEFICI.E iC!ES:

A. RT, CS DSESG EV.aLUATION OF DEFICIEf;CIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 60.

All NP series valves are fully qualified for adverse environmental conditions. All NRC noted deficiencies are addressed in our submittal. All supporting information for these, valyes is contained in our file EQ-12. The- aa33 iJerma h m inelded m r e_v t s . o n .

?SElG's evaluation of NRC noted deficiencies, has reaffirmed that ASCO NP Series valves are capable of perfor ning sfaety functions in a narsh environment.

~

As NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 Ubrrnklin R:seirch Cent:r FRC Project N 2. C5257 A Division oi The Frankhn tnstitute FRC Assignment No.13 / 3d 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-tmo FRC Task No. 4/oI/S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E i

LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER (Continued)

EQUIFiiENT: Solenoic Valves (ASCO)

MODEL: NP Series CC'iPCNEi;T NO.: SV0924

\

l N:.: IDETC!?!ED DEF'.CIENCIES: RPS

PSEi3 EVILUATION OF DEFICIEf;CIES

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation For n page 60.

All NP series valves are fully qualified for adverse environmental conditions. All i

NRC noted deficiencies are addressed in our submittal. All suoporting information for these valves is contained in our file EQ-12. %;s <=he ia valve d*** ^

• r*Auir~e. ne tu.tM.

PSE1G's evaluation of NRC noted deficiencies, has reaffirmed that ASCO NP Series valves are capable of performing sfaety functions in a harsh envircr:nent, l

)

)

1. x NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 00 }hrtnWin Rxsench Ccnta FRC Project N2. C5257 P ge A Dwmon of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13/ 3e 20th and Race streets. Phita.. Pa. 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4to7/5/'7_

/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J.E LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER (Continued)

~

EQUIPMEffT: Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

MCDEL: itP Series COMP 0 tie:iT t10.* SV0920, SV0921, SV0922, SV0923. SV0924, SV1022, SV1025 SV1077, SV1079, SV1C81, SV1083, SV0506 t;RC IDEtiTIFIED DEFICIEl{CIES: A PSE3G EVALUATI0ti 0F DEFICIEflCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 60.

All tiP series valves are fully qualified for adverse environmental conditions.

All tiRC noted deficiencies are addressed in our submittal. All supporting in-femation for these valves is contained in our file EQ-12. This solenoid valve does not require replacement. These valves are qualified for a 10 year life provided coils and elastomers are replaced every 4.4 years.

PSE&G's evaluation of tiRC noted deficiencies, has reaffirmed that ASCO tiP series valves are capable of performing safety functions in a harsh environment.

l

Am NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 du Fr:nklin Rese:rch Cent r FRC Project N 2. C5257 P:93 A Dmsen of Th2 Frtnkhn inst tuti FRC Assignm^nt NO.13 4a 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448-10 % FRC Task No. 468/517 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 35 SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrenec/

non-concurrence with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented below.

Reason for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence Equipment does not provide a Backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment / system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See, note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform Backup (equipment / system) is its specified safety function.

available which completely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

appears to meet single active failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification.

~

{

{

A NRC Contract No. NRC 03 79118 UO Nr:nklin R: search Center FRC Project No. CS257 Page A Dan,rw of The Franklin Insenuo FRC Assignment No.13 4h 20th and Race streets. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 468/517 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 35 Reason for Concurrence _ Reason for Non-Concurrence The equipment's accident miti- Although backup equipment is avail-gating function is completed able, it is not technically sound to prior to the onset. of the hostile relinquish defense-in-depth for this environment. No subsequent function.

functions are necessary. See note (1) below. (NRC Qualifi- Backup (equipment / system) is not cation Evaluation Category IIIb) safety-related.

Other (see page ) This equipment is necessary for the operator to ensure an ESF system is Resultant NRC Qualification performing its intended safety Evaluation Category (IIIa/IIIb) function.

Note 1: The Licensee (has/ The rationale presented by the has not) stated that failure of Licensee is not supported by the primary equipment will not objective technical evidence.

affect other safety-related equipment or cause an operator X Other (see page O )

to be misled. (See page _)

LICENSEE STATEMENT See page 3a of this checksheet.

EVALUATION CP LICENSEE STATEMENT The Licensee states that the valves have not been proven in a submerged state but that electrical circuits are protected by Class lE breakers and that the effect of a potential loss of control power has been analyzed for safety implications. The Licensee also states that the analysis has been reviewed and approved by the NRC. FRC does not have any infomation regarding this analysis, however, and therefore an independent assessment of the status of these valves in a submerged state can not be perfomed.

1. % NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 LOONnklin Resezrch Centir FRC Pr; ject No. C5257 P g]

A Division of The Frank!m Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448 Imo FRC Task No. Y4 7 EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .JS Checksheets S o h g o have been removed due to the proprietary nature of information cont $ined therein.

l

1. ,_% NRC Contract N3. N RC-03 79-118 000U Franklin Research Centar FRC Pr; ject No. C5257 P g2 A Dwmon of The frankhn Inst:tute FRC Assignment No.13 7q 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. 468/5M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL. QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3_5 MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE SIEMARY The following information regarding the maintenance and replacement schedule (s) for components, sub-components, and materials has been provided by the Licensee;

//

These va.lves are. ca.liSed for a. 40 7. $ s k, provi ded ne. coils a.nd e a.sbnwes are re.Pld e.Ne q 4,4 y rs . "

4,h NRC C:ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 P g]

!AJ Frankhn Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dmsu>n of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No[.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. Ode .

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 36 LIMIT SWITCH LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT NAMCO H0 DEL EA 180 REQUIRED OPEFATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB, 120 DAYS TER CHECKSHEET No. 36 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 33, 34, 898 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERATOR INDICATION AND VALVE CONTROL (IPR 3, 4, 5; IWL12; IVC 7, 9, 11, 13)

SERVICE: VALVE POSITION INDICAIOR FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERATOR INDICATION AND VALVE CONTROL (ICV 3, ICV 4, ICVS, ISJ123, 1WL98)

SERVICE: VALVE POSITION INDICAIOR LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 61 [64]

l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R,h QT, RT, P, H, h S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3 b , .3er-3d-S'ystem Consideration Review 4e, 05, it, 4d, 4e, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, 5f, f3 55, Si, Sj -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ou, CL Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary ?2, ?b, ?L

/A NRC C:ntract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 P g3 d3 Frankhn Reserrch Center FRC Pr: Ject N2. C5257 A Dwision of The Frankhn Institute lb 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103(215) 44 4 1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. No.13

1. 47 /fj / 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3dt SUMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

M Tne Licensee (has/"" "i provided a response to the SER concerns. -

[ The Licensee (has/ wee-net) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified andres will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (aas/ bas not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other -( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/nas not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt -

tTTI.a Qualification Not Established ,/ III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

As llRC Contract Nr. NRC-03 79118 000 rznklin Risetrch C:nter FRC Project NJ. C5257 Page A Diwan d The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 / 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 46f/f/7 EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 36 i

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION: l NRC REQUIREMENTS X_= DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate i Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Establish ~d Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Identify Aging Cegradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate I o Peak Pressure Adequate ]

o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate i Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied X l Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied .

Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied _

Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.b Equipment Not Qualified f

II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 000Erinklin R:se:rch C:nnr FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phiia . Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Assignment FRC Task No. 4b8No.13[N EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. M LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Limit Switch .

(Namco)

MODEL: EA-180 COMPONENT NO.: IPR 3, IPR 4,1 PRS, l'JL12, l'.iL96, IVC 7, IVC 9, IVC 11, IVC 13 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: A T, CS ,

PSE3G "/ALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 61.

j A - The aging evaluation review was comoleted with maintenance schedules established.

This information was added to the Evaluation Fem in Revision 2.

T - The actual test resulted in a peak temperature of 349 FU for 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br />. The Salem required profile is 350 F0 for one minute. This is more than adecuate to assure c::erability at Salem.

C5 - This item was addressed in our submittal.

Further supporting data is available in our file EQ-13.

PSE5G's evaluation of the NRC noted deficiencies was reaffirmed that Namco, EA-180 limit switches, are capable of performing safety functions in a harsh environment at Salem.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 P:g]

4l}00U Frsnklin Rrserrch Cent:r FRC Project Ns. C5257 A Divisen of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.14 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-Imo FRC Task No. 4(,3/5M EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3/a LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER (Continued)

EQUIPMENT: Limit Switches (Namco)

MODEL: EA-180 CCMPONENT NO.: ICV 3, ICV 4, ICV 5, ISJ123, 1WL98 1

NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: A, S, T, CS PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 61.

l A - The aging evaluation review was completed with maintenance schedules established. This information was added to the Evaluation Form in Revision 2.

5 - The submercence issue was addressed in our submittal Section VII, basis 29.

Procedure changes were made to correct this problem. Physical location precludes installation of switch above flood level. The potential flooding of these switches does not affect plant safety.

T - The actual test resulted in a peak temperature of 3490 F, for 3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br />. The Salem required profile is 350 0F for one minute. This is more than adequate l to assure operability at Salem.

i l

CS - This item was addressed in our submittal.

1. % NRC Contr:ct N2. NRC-03-79-118 P:g3 l}00hrinklin Riserrch Cant:r FRC Project Nr. C5257 A Divisx>n of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 50 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 8 P'/T/ ~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _G_6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW Criteria: DOR Guidelines 1 ; NUREG-0588, Cat. I  ; NUREG-0588, Cat. II .

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0 588-I/0 588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION  ! -  !  !

Equipment Type

,- -_a  ! Limit Switch Manufacturer's Name  ! p#pnc o !NAMCO Controls  !

(5.2.2/-/-)  !  !  !

Model Number (5.2.2/-/-)  ! /_'~,/h -/PD  ! EA-180, Type 23  !

Strial Number  !  ! EA-180-ll302,Rev.-D Features / Mounting  ! d>t. /gfa.4. - !

• Hded b M@n (5.2.6/-/-)

Connections / Interfaces ' A/g Teflon Tape used to (5.2.6/-/-) .

seal conduit threads

• See Note 1 Location / Elevation {NotApplicable .

f. ,

Equipment ID No. .Not Applicable QUALIFICATION REPORT  !  !  !

(8. 0/ 5. 0/ 5. 0) 1  !  !

Report ID Number  ! # .2,[8.  !,No Report I/D Number . !

• fk

,

• September 5,1978

• W Issued by

• ACME CLEVELAND DEVELOPMENT

• COMPANY Prepared for !pgp  !

=

1 !NAMCO CONTROLS Referenced Reports '

! *7%vn-alNot Stated Qualification Method 4 ' Sequential Test I

(5.1, 5.3/2.1, 2.4/2.1, 2.4) ! /. ,

QUALIFICATION TEST PROGRAM  !  !  !

Functional Test Description !  !  !

(5. 2. 5/ 2. 2. 9/ 2. 2. 9)  ! A/[/- !Make/ break contact  !

Operating Conditions  !  !  !

(-/2.2.10/2.2.10)  ! -

,10.5 Amps @ 100 Vdc  !

Ioad/ Cycles / Voltage /  !  !  !

Current /Freq.  !  !  !

~s NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 u00[Frtnklin Rtserrch Cant.;r FRC Project No. C5257 Pag 3 A Dwmon of The FrrnMn Instituti FRC Assignment N7 33 5b 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. ff 8 / 577 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.J4 NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

Acceptance Criteria  !  !  !

(5.2.5/2.2.1/2.2.1,  !- Not Stated g Accuracy ( 5. 2. 5/-/-) M Not Stated e i i Number of Specimens . /f/ .

One (1)

Tee:. Instruments Calibrated . /V Yes Safety Function (Active /  !  !  !

Passive) (-/2.1. 3/2.1. 3)  !  ! Active  !

e i e Test Duration ( 5. 2.1/-/-) p[A1 30 days [

Accident Duration (Envir.  !

Above Normal) (5.2.1/-/-)  !  ! Not Applicable Required Function Time  ! /,2p / p Not Applicable i

l Test Sequence (General)  ! gM  !  !

( 5. 2. 3/ 2. 3.1/ 2. 3.1)  !  ! Inspection / Base line data g

!  ! Heat / Humidity Aging  !

Test Sequence (NUREG-0588,  ! g/  ! Mechanical Aging g Cat. I) (-/2.3.1/-)  ! Irradiation

gSeismic testing l 1. Representative Sample  ;  ;LOCA Simulation g

! 2. Baseline Data  !  !  !

l 3. Performance Extremes  !  !  !

4. Thermal Aging  !  !  !

5. Radiation Aging  !  !  !

6. Wear Aging  !  !  !

7. Vibration / Seismic  !  !  !

8. DBE Exposure  !  !  !

9. Post-DBE Exposure  !  !  !

10. Inspection  !  !  !

Ag ing  !  ; e (5.2.4, 7.0/4.0/4.0) '@ '

g200 hours @ 200*F per 3

X Thermal Aging / Basis  ! O g Note 2

ANSI draft std N278.2.1 Material Aging  !  !  !

Evaluation (7.0/-/-)  !

! Not Stated  ;

1  !  !

Materials Susceptible  !  !  !

(Thermal) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-) '

I W 'Not Stated n e

O .

Radiation Aging, Type !jd as! Gamma

4dU FranMin Rrsench C ntrr NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N D. C5257 P:g3 A Division of The Frankhn Institute .13 $ e' 20th and Race Ltreets. Phila.. h 191031215) 448-lM0 FRC FRC Assignment Task No. WPNo./M"7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. JS

. NRC REQUIREMENTS DFEICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0598-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE MO.)_

Radiation Aging, Dose (rd) #M 204 Megarads

• i Radiation Aging, Dose Rate !g#  !  !

. 0.7 Megarads/ hour .

Radiation Aging, Method A Materials Susceptible (Radiation) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-)

!g Not Stated  !

Operational Aging f100,000 Actuation Cycles

(-/ 4. 2/-) f. 8 k . .

Other Age Conditioning  ! jG  !

Not Stated

(-/4.2/-) 1 1 Qualified Life Claimed /  !! j, y  !

None Claimed 8 4 Established ( 5. 2. 4/4.10/-)

Normal Ambient Temperature  !  !

Not Applicable f Normal Amoient Radiation  !  !

Not Applicable Normal Ambient Humidity Not Applicable f 4

On-Going Surveillance and  ! ofh  !  !

Preventive Maintenance  ! '

(7.0/-/-)  ! jNot Applicable {

On-Going Analysis of !h  !  !

Failures and Degradation  !  ! .

(7.0/-/-)  !  !

Not Applicable j t

Margin (General)  !

• Not Stated / Not Appicable

[

( (6.0/3.0/3.0) 'g Margin (NUREG-0588,  !  !

Not Stated Cat. I) (-/ 3. 2/-)  !  !  !

1. Temperature (+15*F) 1

/V[/A  !  ! .

2. Pressure (+10%,  !  !  !

10 psig max)  !  !  !

3. Radiation  !  !  !

(not required)  !  !  !

4. Time (+10%, +1 hour  !  !  !

+ function time minimum)  !  !  !

• Radiation aging and accident doses were combined in a single l Exposure prior to the LOCA Simulation.

l l

A NRC Contract No. NRC 03-79118 000hr:nkhn Rise:rch Center FRC Project No.C5257 Page A Dwon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5d j 20th and Race Strws. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRCTask No. '//,P/,Ci~7 l

l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. %

l NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY l WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITIAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

ACCIDENT CONDITIONS  !  !  !

(

i IDCA/MSLB/HELB/ Uncontrolled  !

1 (4.1, 4.2, 4.3.1, 4.3.3/  ! OCA'18L8.LOCA/MSLB l' 1.1, 1. 2, 1. 5/1.1, 1. 2, 1. 5) !  !  !

, e .

Radiation Type M _ ;.. - Ga ma l Radiation Dose (rd)  ! 204 Megarads I g 7

• l (4.1.2/1.4/1.4) .  !  !  !

!  ! I l Radiation Dose Rate (rd/hr') pg ! 0.7 Megarads per hour I l l Radiation Qual. Method ,  !  !  ;

(5.3.1/-/-)  ! Test g  !

!  !  ! l Proximity to Concentrated  !  !

Radiation

( 4.1. 2/1. 4. 6/1. 4. 6) gM!  !

Not Applicable g Equipment Susceptible to y!  !

! Not Stated Beta Radiation (4.1.2/-/-)

• g Radiation Dose (Normal +  !  !

Accident) ( 4.1. 2/-/-) Stated  !

'2. #[ M 'Not 1

Plateout Dose Considered q  !  !

(-/1. 4 8/1. 4 8) ' /#' !N ot Applicable i

• =

l e l Gamma + Beta Dose (rd) * '

l (4.1.2/1.4.7/1.4.7)  ! Not Applicable  !

l l l l

l

• Radiation aging and accident doses were combined in a single 1 l

Exposure prior to the LOCA Simulation. l I

l

/A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N2. C5257 P;gJ LOOU Frrnklin Rise:rch Cent:r A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 Se 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4/ 4 P'lI/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.J.4 NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE No.)

E!NIRONMENTAL PROFILE  !  !  !

OF ACCIDENT CONDITIONS f  !  !

Rate of Temp./ Press.  !)J ' .3f/h!ll*F/8 psi /sec Increase  !

Peak 'F/psig/RH/ Time :yg/972 , fy 340/115/100/3h4s f

• 140/-/-/2h4r Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time g,rtGfAs[/$ 1 f 340/105/100/3 hrs Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time  !

. 2.89f2f/ .2/b! 300/57/100/lbr

! 320/76/100/2 hrs  !

Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time j g t] f f.,f ! 250/25/100/4 days  !

3  ! 150/10/100/25 days  !

Equipment Surface Tempera- e  !  !

ture (MSLB) (-/1.2.5.C, j 8  ! Not Applicable  !

2.2.6/1.2.5.C, 2.2.6) .  !  !

Spray Qualification Method  ! Test  !

(5.3.2/1.3, 2.2.8/1.3,  !  !

2.2.8)  !  !

3 Spray Composition f,Q Q ! Boric Acid / water / sodium X 3 2 2. )

$_ th g $

Al8 3 Spray Density (gpm/f t 2) 0.15 f Spray Duration

! 30 Days  !

{ 'A.) ,W ~n  !  !

Submergence Duration *

! Not Applicable  !

( 4.1. 3/ 2. 2. 5/2. 2. 5 )

• j(/ fy.

i ,

In-Leakage Considered -

' Not Applicable (5.2.6, 5.3.2/-/-) gg Time to Submergence  ! Not Applicable Dust Enyironment I  ! Not Applicable  !

) (-/ 2. 2.11/ 2. 2.11) /V4  !  !

(.

NRC Contract N3. NRC-03 79118 Page

@{l00hrinklin R: search Ccnter FRC Project No.C5257

• DMston of The Frinkhn Instituts FRC Assignment No.13 5f

.tth and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-tmo FRC Task No. VC9 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Jfe NOTES:

/, %M M 0 The switch was mounted in the chamber in a horizontal position such that the lever shaft pointed upwards.' The switch was attached by means of a threaded pipe. Teflon tape was used for sealing the pipe threads.*

i

+No attempt is made to qualify the connection method. These test procedures, are based on the assumption that the user will ensure that no steam enters the unit via this connection during an actual LOCA. "

l n w a- w w~m

2. bM V m l.c-

Heat aging . The heat aging test consisted of holding the -

I

_ unit suspended over water in a tank'at a temperature of 200 F -

_for 200 hours0.00231 days <br />0.0556 hours <br />3.306878e-4 weeks <br />7.61e-5 months <br />.*

+ heat aging conditions were taken from ANSI Draft Standard N278.2.1 l (Draf t 3, Rev. 0). The correlation between these conditions and l

I the qua2ified, life is not known. " (

/ 6 0 -13.6I15

~znf' a~ a s e )

GG U m _ ALA [ Ar#wre2 WO4 j_ -) 5' ci m $e  !$A A A ,A s d- L% ,

'JaLa,~ ~ NJ>4 m M ehu]J

() r biA'-A

'/

u ffa /h tw G

3.) Wa.u a afmdrLuU <

s y/ /

M~

b d -

v -

l

As NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 000Ersnklin Rzsetrch Csnter FRC Project Ns. C5257 P ga A Divmon of The Fr(nklin Instituts FRC Ass!gnm:nt N2.13 5g 20th and Race Streets. Phita . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Y48(/~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIF'. CATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M NOTES:

MM 3 N a rlf-u_. A~i &A 7t<< nd A s- A&m- .

M A -ozs 0 M.

& N(/ fd U {

[1 -c -& rA< bG O cr eAb, Lt Ayj/nw M y o -

p / v &

n.J A rt (Ai R o m C M-A &{NMAu h / / /

/8NE ' "

L,w D

e 4

l

. _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - _ 1

L NRC CrntrIct No. NRC-03-79-118

! 4'Jdu!! Franklin Research Center PJg2 FRCPr: Ject No. C5257 A Dmsion of The Frankhn lnstitute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19:03(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4/o Y EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3 7 EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 37 INSTRUMENTATION AND CONTROL PANEL LOCATED OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT PSE&G MODEL 1,2,3,4 BAY; VERTICAL NEMA 12 ENCLOSURES REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB PROVIDE SUITABLE PROTECTION FOR EQUIPT.

TER CHECKSHEET No. 37 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 38, 3297 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROTECTION FOR INSTRUMENTS (3 35, 445A-H, 444A-M, 684A-D, 685A-D, 686A-D) l SERVICE: ENCLOSURE FOR INSTRUMENTATION 1 t FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROTECTION FOR INSTRUMENTS (241, 245, 238, 6831A-D, 1 66 81A-D , 68 91A-D) 1 SERVICE: ENCLOSURE FOR INSTRUMENTATION l FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROTECTION FOR INSTRUMENTATION (687A-D, 691A-C, 215, 219, 202, 101, 102, 743) 1 SERVICE: ENCLOSURE FOR INSTRUMENTATION l

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROTECTION FOR INSTRUMENTATION (311, 233, 234, 235, 236, '

208, 325, 318, 713, 714)

SEEVICE: ENCLOSURE FOR INSTRUMENTATION

]

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PRMECTION FOR INSTRUMENTATION (317, 440A-F, 224A-C, 316A, 316B, RPI RACK, 690)

SERVICE: ENCLOSURE FOR INSTRUMENTATION FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PRMECTION FOR INSTRUMENTATION (237)

SERVICE: ENCLOSURE FOR INSTRUMENTATION l LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 64 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

i l Contents Checksheet Page No.

l Equipment Item la l Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER Ja, 30, 2c, 3d System Consideration Review is, !b, 00, 03, 4c, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 50, 5b, Sc, 5d, 52, 5 %

5p SP , Si, Ej Installed TMI Lessans Learned Implementation 5;, Ch-Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7m, 7b, 7c

l As NRC Contr ct No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr;jnt No. C5257 P:g2 -

branklin Research Center A Divmon of The Frsnkhn Inst:tute FRC Assignment No.13 lb  !

//, F /7 j 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 191031215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. -

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT 6 TEM NO. 31

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

d Tne Licensee (has/hac not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is .

qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipm2nt modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocata or shield equipment from radiation source

_ Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment g Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other '( )

l q

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTAN'T NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

/ - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

} I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established D Not in Scope i II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

1. A NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 lj0f] rrnklin Resench Cant:r FRC Project N2. C5257 A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute e 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask FRC Assignment No. N[o 13l,7 /S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 37 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) _

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied d

Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

- (

DESIGNATION:

l NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Panding Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified i

III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review y IV Documentation Not Made Available i

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 000hrsnklin R se rch Csntir Paga FRC Pr: Ject NO. C5257 A Dnnson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment 30 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. AlaiNo

/ 1)80 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 37 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Instrument Enclosures (PSE&G)

MCDEL:

.r CCMPONENT f10.: 241, 245, 238 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: S PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 62.

Submergence is not a problen. Panels will fill with water and cause instru-ments to be flooded. Flooding of instruments in these panels has been previously addressed and poses no problem since they perform their functions prior to flooding.

This item is addressed in our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 28.

Further supporting data is available in our file EQ-20.

PSE&G's evaluation of the NRC noted deficiency has reaffirmed that these Instrument Enclosures will perform their safety function in a harsh environment.

A NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 00brinklin Rise rch C:nt:r FRC Project N2. C5257 P:g 2 A Divmon of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13/ 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. OK /5/ ~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2 LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER (Continued)

ECUIPMENT: Instrument Enclosures (PSE3G) t MCOEL: 1, 2, 3, 4 Say Vertical & NE'iA 12 Enclosures l

1 l

COMPONE'iT NO.: 335, 445A-H, 444A-:1, 534A-0, 535A-0, 686A-0, 5821A-0, 6631A-0, 6891A-0, 587A-0, 591A-C, 215, 219, 202,101,102, 743, 311, 233, 234, 235, 236, 208, 325, 318, 713, 714, 317, 440A-F, 224A-C, 316A, 3163, RPI RACX,69C: )

Uni 2 only - 797A, 7973 Unit 1 only - 241, 237 l

! NRC IDE.'iTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: RT l FSEAG EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

I Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fcrm page 52.

Ins trumen: encicsures must only be acle to survive 2e initial pressure and tem:: era-ture transients. The time duratien is ac;rcximately 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />. After 24 hcurs cur ciant ::rofile shcws a steady state condition, anc these steelenclosures will not be affeC eC.

A 24-hour LCCA test was c::ncuctec by PSElG :o prove these instrument enclosures. '

Results of tests are available in ::ur file EQ-20.

1 PSE13's evaluation of :ne noted deficiencies nas reaffirmed tha: ?SElG instrument encicsures c::n :erfem safe y functions in a narsa envircnmen .

i I

t

A- NRC Contrzct NO. NRC-03-79-118 P ga ldIl!] Franklin Research Cent:r FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5f 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. N#/97 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M NOTES:

Referece 3 A luni+ 1 - re ference M fo r ani+2 sh4es + kod l 4(fL one mese. eC+1JL Uu Io 4-e st vis an4 4e a ua in [iSuv 4-bL i

g i a s4cumen4rdinn c o it 4n 'i n col i vt +ldL T e s f ewmo nd E n clat unt buA ra+kQA 4-o e 54AblKk alm 4 e avi m nntemk +ke_

i vis4c um e nh u o td1.s ee.

U i+k c e s. n e_ c-t- 4e i ns4cumenk +11 Condwi4 sea L CeFe ren( e 3 9 kw? 41T. st=Jfiin '.'

A ADDITIONAL CC.W.ENTS: coxis t pc-. sex urr ci.suo s!As-s ress -rye .umi:

J4 exer av fxE cs ess -r* rror r xs oss.ers"*x esss. 7pr's croar rne turrem af YMr CAdd .lecxf7~ e v CstC I ff A " 7' K G L E.a.st;r'st /s Kf4w tfo ***

ps w.cr s m m raer est. es a<.s o.am ss-c o m ,a i.. cs e m a ,a stE rx r sfs <- . se.scws sam <wn s er r.ur wirH cawa< 2*c:n '.7 (w. n.ok

~ , --enc e e.as,: . .

Tke f ree n s ee se slo c.1 x4 M Panets n9;341 a M E mut L A ,ec 4 ao sub -eeme n ce kme oe r i a- i s s4 -ful .k J G C t". S c. c e n ce_ 1 (o (u n i 4- 1) +k a i- + ki s IA n ot et c o n t e r- A ber etu.s e.

+ko- 'm A + r um e md't- km keen n e' c i/lo u s lu &AcIncaaod.

O Vo lum e. I Sec4to n r+,"

j huis 1R is ci4ed ca jus +1 Cich To e +k1A I;<e n se e 5 ooSI4 inn e >

.-- c+kis bois edistM5e5 -

( Li m / 4 n en , .<L rwo+ori e e-d udue e e4ufbtiM u

A.- W Y =_- v . f& _ x A XL- & W-

A NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03 79-118 UO0hrenk!!n Risench Cent:r FRC Pr4 ject Ns. C5257 Pag 9 A Diwsion of Thi Frtnkhn Insthuti FRC Assignm:nt N2.13 5g  !

20th and Race Ftreets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10 @ FRC Task No. W//5~D EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J7 1

j NOTES:

bcu2id a n 4 k; s Ce 0 ic 0 i 4- id c. owc l(A ed i- A M i a s+ cu.me ed e ne ins u.ce s o.ce me clan ; cd. emlowe d U n 1

i E4e ms ad +M N e Ak o 9 4 lfL s e noe o% 4 k; s PeuitG.

O 1 l

T M _s e d 2 d o we d i n ASS t ahe d 46 e &4e% r o IIT.E O i 0 J (~

jf k N A~JAL A A A ' l I

)

)

XfA NRC C:ntract N2. N RC-03-79-118 Pcg2 lbij Frankhn Research Center FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 A Divmon of The Frenkhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4(o I lc' EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 38 MOTORIZED VALVE ACTUATOR LOCATED OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT LIMITORQUE MODEL SMB, CLASS B INSULATION REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED -

TER CHECKSHEET NO. 38 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 639, 635, 1590, 59, 19 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MOTIVE POWER FOR VALVE OPENINGS / CLOSINGS (ISJ1, ISJ2, ISJ4, ISJ5, ISJ12, ISJ13,12SJ45)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MOTIVE POWER FOR VALVE OPENINGS / CLOSINGS (ICV 68, ICV 69, ICV 139, ICV 140, ICV 175, ICV 40)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MOTIVE POWER FOR VALVE OPENINGS / CLOSINGS (11SJ113, 12SJ113, ISJ30,12SJ40,11SJ134)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MOTIVE POWER FOR VALVE OPENINGS / CLOSINGS (12SJ134, IS13 5, 11RH4, 12RH4, 11SJ49)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MOTIVE POWER FOR VALVE OPENINGS / CLOSINGS (12SJ49, 11RH29, 12RH29, 11RH19, 12RH19)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MOTIVE POWER FOR VALVE OPENINGS / CLOSINGS (11CS36, 12CS36, 12CS36, 11CS2, 1CS14)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MOTIVE POWER FOR VALVE OPENINGS / CLOSINGS (ICS16, ICS17, 11CC16, 11CC117, 11CC18)

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, h P,  !, S. (R), M, I, RPN, EXN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la,,la g Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment. Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, Oc, 2d System Consideration Review 42, 45, t;, 4J, 4=, 4 Z-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Say 5by Scf5 d,, Se., Bd.s,5b ,

54.s%5c s .sts, % s, 5c ,9 3 ,%

( 5r,59, Sh,6 4,5, s9 , sk.

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 10, 55 Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary Ja, 7L, 7G -

4 Xh , NRC C:ntrret No. NRC-03-79-118 2

' 0U Frankhn Research Center FRC Pr; ject No. C5257 Pag 2 A Dimson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-IfXt) FRC Task No. 4d lc*

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3I EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 38 (CONTINUED)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MOTIVE POWER FOR VALVE OPEl:INGS/ CLOSINGS (ICC136, ICC131, ICV 116,11SJ44,12SJ44)

SERVICE: REFERENCE SPECIFIC SYSTEM FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MOTIVE POWER FOR VALVE OPENINGS / CLOSINGS (11SJ45,11SJ40)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 63-2 [12]

1 i

N g gg r e- ny rnu ego g ge r c y r w-v ygrumrevrp gy muy unc 939 - cIpcren ITru rg }

ee Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

/ Jr Y-RPS, None, l R, T, '

RT, P, 11, CS , A, S, (R), M, I , QM , RPN, EXN, SEN, QI Not stated, h applicable LISTING OF APPLICAB CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la l

~

Summary of Licensee Responses to th i C SER lb l

Equipment Environmental Qualific'a on Su Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SEK 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d System Consideration d

Review 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e, 4f

/

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, Sf, Sg, Si, Sj J

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 6b Equipm' Summary 1

intenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7a, 7b, 7c

/A NRC Contr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 000l] Frankhn Rrsearch Centu P:g2 FRC Pr: Ject N .C5257 A Dmsaon of The Frankhn Institute lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. 4/o8/No.1}6/ @

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 38

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

X Tne Licensee (has/heemise) provided a response to the SER concerns. -

X The Licensee (has/issousume) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other 4 )

The Licensee has provided other information for this eginipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b _ Modification III.a Exempt

.111.M Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 LO0hrsnklin Rzserrch Cint:r FRO Project Nr. C5257 Pag 3 A Divisu>n of The Frankhn Insntute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa- 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 448 h/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.38.

I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Acequate X l Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and 'Iest Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X l

Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) l Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) ]

l Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied i Criteria Regarding Radiation Jatisfied l Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Sutisfied

) Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0586, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUAuIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Except From Qualification III.o Equipment NJt in the Scope of the Qualification Review

• l IV Documentation Not Made Available i

5 NOTE: PSR A 's Cm -the O d o* 9 dre ceder e nced i n Tke WN M*1. f Re4ecence Lid h=e (Ow( lu 310 0 o^

(96

A NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118 l100Er nklin R: search Ccnter FRC Project N . C5257 Pag:

A Divien of The Frankhn Institute FRC AssignmentN .13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRCTask No. 4M hM EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.d.E.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Limitorque Motor Operated Valves MCOEL: SMB, Class 3 Insulation (Cutside Containment)

CCMPCNENT NO.: ISJ1, ISJ2, ISJ4, ISJ5, ISJ12, ISJ13,12SJ45, ICV 68, ICV 69, ICV 139,1CV140, ICV 175, ICV 40, ICV 141,11SJ113,12SJ113, ISJ30, 12SJ40, 11SJ134, 12SJ134, 15 135, 11RH4, 1?W A, 11SJ49, 12SJ 49, 11RH 29, 12RH 29 , 11RH 19 , 12RH19, 11CS36, 12CS 36, 11C S2, ICS14, ICS16, ICS17,11CC16,11CC117,11CC113, ICC136, ICC131, ICV 116, ilSJ44,12SJ44,11SJ4Si lisJ40 NRC 10ENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: QT, RT , CS , CM , S EN , A PSElG EVALUATICN OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Oa:a Evaluation Fcrm page 63-2. -

OT - These valves are only recuired to be ccerable in the initial stages of the

~

ac:icent. They have been qualified fc- S hcurs ccera icn.

-RT - The next revision of :he EQ submittal will indicate need for shcr: term coeracility.

g. These valves are leesf ed oofsde Oc Fawfamment and net ruhfect ?o dewical :prsy.

CM.SEN - Juring :ne varicus envircrmental tests that were :erfermed on the Limit:rcue me:cr c:: erat:rs, certain deficiencies nave c:me :: lign . Any materiai cr : m:enen: : a: nas ex:erienced 3 failure ia any f :ne :ests nas been reciacec wi n ne ia es: :ualified ma:eria er ::cccnen ina: nas succe s-fully :assec. This sncul: : rec!cce any failure cue to any icen:ified envircreental :arameter in :ne ac:icen envirernent c:nci icn :na: was resent in :ne varicus :ss* envir0rren;3.

m

NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118

1. [ALOO F nklin Rese:rch Center FRC Prgject N3. C5257 Pag 3 A DMsion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. #47 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M Checksheets5 /,2 a Mef 2 ghave been removed due to the proprietary nature of information contained therein.

9

NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 2[% LOO Franklin Research Cznter FRC Project N3. C5257 P.:ga j A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5 l 20th and Race Streets. Phila. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 94 7 EQUlF:AENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8I Checksheets f [ k v 6~ have been removed due to the proprietary nature of information contained therein.

/_% NRC C::ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 Sell Frankhn Research Center P2g3 FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment go, g lc, 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Y fa f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.,lS_

EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 39 TERMINAL BLOCK LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT BUCHANAN MODEL 2B112N REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB, 120 DAYS _

TER CHECKSHEET NO. 39 -

LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 39, 3306, 3305 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT (JN628 THRU JN635; JN661 THRU JN668; JT7)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE6G TERMINAL BOX / PANELS FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/0R JUNCTION POINT (JS168, JS170, JS682, JT57, JT525, JT578, 79)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE&G TERMINAL BOX / PANELS FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT (JT582, 83; JN145; JN148, 49; JN107; JN109)

SERVICE: CONMECTION POINT WITHIN PSE6G TERMINAL BOX / PANELS FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT (JN345 THRU JN349; JX94,95; JT9, 10)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE&G TERMINAL BOX / PANELS FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT (JN89 THRU JN92; JN94 THRU JN97; JT376, 77)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE&G TERMINAL BOX / PANELS FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT (JT350; JS618, 19; JN673, 74; JN610; JN613)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE&G TERMINAL BOX / PANELS DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, h QT, RT, P, H, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item f g i A) la,3 Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, A , 3d -

System Consideration Review de, IL, 4m, ed, eu, 4'~

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, 5f, Sg, % , Si, Sj

~

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 50, 65 -

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 20, 7b. 7c

l

/3x NRC C:ntract ND. N RC-03-79-118 P g3 d) Frar.klin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257  ;

A Division of The FrankLn Institute FRC Assignmentfjo.L3 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 44 S 1000 FRC Task No. 6f f, f lo#

l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J_7 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 39 (CONTINUED)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT (JS620; JT480; IVCl THRU IVC 4; JT528, 29)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE&G TERMINAL BOX / PANELS FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT (lVCS, 6; 448A , B,C , D; 684A, B,C ,D; 685A, B,C ,D)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE&G TERMINAL BOX / PANELS FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT (686A,B,C,D; JN666; JT631; 6831A,B,C,D)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE&G TERMINAL BOX / PANELS FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT (6891A, B,C,D; 6881A, B,C,D; 691A, B,C; 690)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE&G TERMINAL BOX / PANELS FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT (215; 219; 713; 714; 317; 101; 102; 211; 224A,B,C)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE&G TERMINAL BOX / PANELS FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT (216A, B; 241; 743; 311; 208; 233 THRU 236)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE&G TERMINAL BOX / PANELS FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT (325; 218; JT558 THRU JT561)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE&G TERMINAL BOX / PANELS h ~ , - nnn n corr vrum vnrumTcTrn nv mnv une' wn - CTuctsn ITEM (S) 0 (See d tion 3 of this TER for T.Jgend)

R, T, QT, R P, H, CS, A, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, S, None, Not stated, Not ap icable 7

LISTING OF APPLICABLE C KSHEETS:

i Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to th . RC R lb Equipment Environmental Qualif' tion Summary orms 2 Licensee Response to NRC S 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d System Consideration iew 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e, 4f Equipment Environ, ntal Qualification Review Sa, Sc, 5d, 5e, 5f, 59, Sh, , Sj Installe MI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 6b Equipr t Summary intenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7a, 7b, 7c

4,A NRC C:ntract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 UUU Frankhn Research Center P ga FRC Pr: Ject ND. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Instit ute FRC Assignment No.13 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. @ I lc3 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 33 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 39 (CONTINUED)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT

(#11 REF. JCT. BOX, #12 REF. JCT. BOX)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSESG TERMINAL BOX / PANELS _

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT ~

(JN120, JN139, JT536, JT362, JT534)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE&G TERMINAL BOX / PANELS FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINAfl0N AND/OR JUNCTION POINT (JT455 THRU JT459)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE&G TERMINAL BCA/ PANEL FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT

(#11 REF. JCT. BOX, #12 REF. JCT. BOX)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE&G TERMINAL BOX /PANNELS FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT (JN120, JN139, JT536, JT362, JT534)

SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE&G TERMINAL BOX / PANELS FUNCTION (PLANT ID): PROVIDE ELECTRICAL TERMINATION AND/OR JUNCTION POINT (JT455 THRU JT459 SERVICE: CONNECTION POINT WITHIN PSE&G TERMINAL BOX / PANEL LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 64 [64]

' q C: S 'T !C r rOn ;LT _ .._ _ . .~atir1EL Li Inu haC Sia - CinCLEL tim m O n u t. -

( S t. Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, Q1, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, G1, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, N ,

Not stated, No applicable LISTING OF APPLICABL CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the RC R lb Equipment Environmental Qualificatio uu ry Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3c, 3d System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 4c, 4d, 4e, 4f E.quipment Environmenta ualification Review , 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, Sf, Sg, h, Si, Sj Installed TMI essons Learned Implementation 6a, 6b Equipment mmary Ma' enance ana Replacement Schedule Summary 7a, 7b, 7c s

l

1. ^ NRC C:ntract N3. N RC-03-79-118 UUhr nklin Research Center Pag 3 FRC Pr: Ject ND. C5257 A Divisaan of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Stieets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. OP!r/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 37

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has/h;; -.2th provided a response to the SER concerns.

M The Licensee (has/h:2 net) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/bc will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (tecting/ analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. <

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective '

action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

W ualifiedj II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 p[~000 Frtnklin R:se rch Csnter FRC Project N2. C5257 P:g]

A Dimion of The FrankhnInstitute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4/of I/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALpICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY -

Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Durntion Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified X <

I.b Equipment Qualificatian Ocnding Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established i II-b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified ,

III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 000hrinklin Rase:rch Cantir FRC Project N O. C5257 P ga A Diwsion of The Frankhn Inst tute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 46F,/Sl7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 39 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Teminal Blocks (Suchanan)

MCDEL: 2B112N CCMPCNENT NC, lee attachment.

NRC IDENTIFIE0- DE:ICIENCIES: T, CS, A PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluatien Form cage 64 Subject ecuicment has been envircr. mentally cualified. The above refe/enced cage addresses all noted ceficiencies. Agiag inf h ud: ise L ded i~ xds ic^ Z.

Supccr:ing data on testing and analysis is available in our file EQ-19.

?SElG's evaluation of the NRC noted deficiencies has reafficed that Euchanan Terminal 31cck can perform safety functions in a narsn envircr=ent.  ;

=

+ ^

1. x NRC Contract N3. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Project No.C5257 P ge 1100hranklin Research Center A Desion of The Franklin Insuture FRC Assignment No.13/ 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 467 /E/~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. :37.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued) l l

l C2PONENT NO.: JN623, JN629, JN630, JN631, JN632, JN633, JN634, JN635, JN661, JN662. JN663. JN664 JN665, JN667, JN668, JT7, JS168, JS170, JS682, JT57, JT525, JT578, JT582 JT579, JT583. JN145, JN148, JN149, JN107, JNIC9, JN345, JN346, JN347, JN348, JN349, JX94, JX95, JT9, JTIO, JN89, JN90, JN91 JN92, JN94, JN95, JN96, JN97, JT376 JT377, JT350, JS618, JS619, JN673, JN674, JN610, JN613, 05620 JT480, IVC 1, IVC 2, IVC 3, IVC 4, JT523, JT529, IVC 5, IVCS, 448A, 4483, 448C, 4480, 684A, 6845, 634C, 5840, 685A, 6853, 685C, 6850, 686A, 6863, 686C. 6860. JN666, JT631, 6831A, 58313, 63210, 68310, 6891A, 68913, 6891C, 68910, 6881A, 68813, 6881C, 68810, 691A, 6913, 691C, 690, 215, 219, 713, 714, 317,101,102, 211, 224A, 2243, 224C, 216A, 2163, 241, 743, 311, 2C8, 233, 234, 235, 236, 325, 218 JT558, JT559, JT560 JT561, #11 Ref. Jct. Sex,

1. 12 Ref. Jct. Sex UNIT 1 CNLY JN120 JN139, JT536, JT362, JT534, JT455, JT456, JT457,' JT458, JT459

'JMIT 2 CNLY JN146, JN147, JN839, JN840, JX39, JT353, JT535, JT460, JT461, JT462, JT463, JT464

[ _ _

NRC Contract N D. NRC-03-79118

1. +$nklin LO0ff Resetrch Cent:r FRC Pr: ject N3. C5257 Pag 3 A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Aasignmen No.13 5 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. slf Checksheetsfo 189,[i67have been removed due to the proprietary nature of information contained therein.-

l l

l 1

l

gjx N RC C:ntract No. N RC-03-79-118

!.0LO Frankhn Rewarch Center FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 P'C2 A Dmsson of The Frankhn inst:tute FRC Asaignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-IlXX) FRCTask No. 4//./

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 40 ELECTRICAL CABLE SPLICE LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT RAYCHEM MODEL WCSF N REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB, 120 DAYS .

TER CHECKSHEET NO. 40 ~

LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 3570, 40, 41, 42, 815 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): ELECTRICAL INSULATION AND SEALING (335; 440A, B, C, D; 445A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H)

SERVICE: TERMINATION / JUNCTION OF ELECTRIC CABLES FUNCTION (PLANT ID): ELECTRICAL INSULATION AND SEALING (444A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I, J, K, L, M)

SERVICE: TERMINATION / JUNCTION OF ELECTRIC CABLES FUNCTION (PLANT ID): ELECTRICAL INSULATION AND SEALING (245; 238; 341; JN148; IVC 1, 2, 3, 4)

SERVICE: TERMINATION / JUNCTION OF ELECTRICAL CABLES FUNCTION (PLANT ID): ELECTRICAL INSULATION AND SEALING (241; 237; 797A, B)

SERVICE: TERMINATION / JUNCTION OF ELECTRICAL CABLES LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 65 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, S, (R), M, I , VM , RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la

( Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, W System Consideration Review 42, 4b, 4c. Ad- Ae, 4b Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, 5f, 5;, 5hf S i,, .S(

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 42, Sb Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary -7er -7br-7C

l l

/;h NRC G:ntrcct N3. N RC-03-79-118 PagJ d[ Frankhn Reserrch Center FRC Pr$ct N3. CS257 A Desion of The Frankhn inst.tute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103(215) 44 4 1000 FRC Task No. 4/,P/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 SUMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED, ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

h Tne Licensee (has/M; ..x) provided a response to the SER concerns.

[ The Licensee (has/h;; nt) specifically stared that the equipment is qualified and7%4; will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

t The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by '.rt Licensee: -

Equipcsnt replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualificatice. by additional (testing /analye.4.s)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other '( )

The Licensee has prov2ded other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (nas/nas noti provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should ce exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUAL '-NCATION EVAJ.,UATION CATEGO"Y BASED ON REVIEW (

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of tt.is TER for Legend) (

TI.a Qualified]

1.0 Modification II.c Qualified Life Deficiency III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not la Scope j l

II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not A'1ailable

{

NRC Contract N . NRC-03 79-118 Pag 3 A[Fr LOO nk!!n Rststrch Ccnter FRC Project No. C5257 A Dim.on of The rrenkhn institute 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Assignment FRC Task No. 4/,f No.1[3 f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 40 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

PORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY -

Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adrquate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life cr Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Pragram Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satiefied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anocalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfjed Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qu311fied X I.b Equipment Quali fication Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualificatica Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life ,

or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification _

III.o Equipment Not in the S.wpe of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available 4

As NRC Contract NO. NRC-03 79-118 P g3 00b ranklin Rise rch Ccnter FRC Project NO. C5257 A Dmsson of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. _ 4/oX/517 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _f0.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Cable Splices (Raychem)

MODEL: WCSF-N CCMPONENT NO.: 335, 440A, 4408, 440C, 4400, 445A, 445B, 445C, 4450, 445E, 445F, 445G, 445H 444A, 4448, 444C, 4440, 444E, 444F, 444G, 444H, 444I, 444J, 444K, 444L 444M, 245, 238, 341, JN-148, IVCI, IVC 2, IVC 3, IVC 4 Unit 1 only - 241, 237 Unit 2 only - 797A 797B NRC IDENTIFIED. DEFICIENCIES: A, CS PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 55.

The subject splices are fully qualified and are addressed in our submittal, Volume I,Section V, page 55. All noted deficiencies have been addressed and erting in supguaed in c.

inigmation evi s ion 1.

is available in our file EQ-01. Tke. amin *

$ WEem #on wa8 PSElG's evaluation of noted deficiencies has reaffirmed that Raychem Cable Splices can perform safety functions in a harsh environment.

e a

A~ NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 P g]

LOU!J Frznklin Rsseirch Csnter FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dimeon of The Frannn instue FRC Assignment No.13 5a 20th and Race Streets PMa . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRCTaskNo. 4/6 f/817 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3.0 EllIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW Criteria DOR Guidelines X ; NUREG-0588, Cat. I  ; NUREG-0588, Cat. II .

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0 588-I/0 588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION  !  !  !

Equipment Type . Electrical Cable Splice u ctu er's Name /f Raychem Corporation Model Number ( 5. 2. 2 /-/-) !tg c g p ,Al{ Raychem Thermofit I

• WCSF . . . N I Sarial Number A-

g Not Applicable 1 Features / Mounting  ! g  !  !

(5.2.6/-/-)  ! On Mandrel In Autoclave  :

Connections / Interfaces k k k (5.2.6/-/-)  !  ! Test Item Is a Cable  :

g - g Splice (Note 1 p 51 1651 2).

Location / Ele.vation  ![m1M !Not Applicable Equipment ID No.

. {.

//M f.Not Applicable f.

QUALIFICATION REPORT  !  !  !

(8.0/5.0/5.0)  !  !  !

Rsport ID Number ' F.4 y,33-3 { F-C4033-3 3 Rsport Date  ! f g 3-- January 1975  !

Issued by !pjgt g Franklin Institute g

Research Laboratories g Prepared for 7 1

. Raychem Corporation Rzferenced Reports ' Not Applicable I

, 16 O/2- led l !  ! .

Qualification Method  !  ! Simultaneous Test I (5.1, 5.3/2.1, 2.4/2.1, 2.4) !  !  !

QUALIFICATION TEST PROGRAM Functional Test Description ! p  !  ! -

(5.2.5/2.2.9/2.2.9)  !  ! Insulation Resistance / .

g gCurrent Car rying Capabilitty Operating Conditions  !  ! and HiPot .

(-/2.2.10/2.2.10)  !

VW  !  ;

[ See N te 1 p Sil & 512 i Ioad/ Cycles / voltage /  !  ! .

Cur r ent/ Freq . *

• g

1. A NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03 79118 Pag]

du Frankhn Rrseirch Cent:r FRC Project N2. C5257 A Divison of The Frenkhn Institute FRC Assignment No.1) 5b 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. W f / f/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFIOATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. V3 NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

Acceptance Criteria  !  !  !

(5.2.5/2.2.1/2.2.1)  ! //  ! Not Stated  !

Accuracy (5.2.5/-/-) p /4, . Not Applicable f

Number of Specimens // 30 f

Test Instruments Calibrated y . Yes ,f Safety Function (Active /

f. factive..Carrycurrent Passive) (-/ 2.1. 3/ 2.1. 3) .

Test Dura ion (5.2.1/-/-) M 30 Days

. .f .

Accident Duratic'n (Envir.  ! /,  !  !

Above Normal) (5.2.1/-/-)  !  ! Not Applicable  !

Required ? unction Time . /c9 d . Not Applicable Test Sequence (General)  !  !

(5.2.3/2.3.1/2.3.1)  ! '

! Visual Inspection -

!  ! Insulation Resistance I Test Sequence (NUREG-0588,  ! jt/4  ! Thermal / Radiation Aging  !

Cat. I) (-/ 2. 3.1/-)  !  ! Visual Inspection  !

!  ! Insulation Resistance  !

1. Representative Sample  !  ! LOCA Simulation  !

2. Baseline Data  !  ! Visual Inspection /  !

3. Performance Extremes  !  ! Insulation Resistance /  !

4. Thermal Aging  !  ! HiPot  !

5. Radiation Aging  !  !  !

6. Wear Aging  !  ! I

7. Vibration / Seismic  !  !  !

8. DBE Exposure  !  ! I

9. Post-DBE Exposure  !  !  !

10. Inspection  !  !  !

Aging  !  !  !

(5.2.4, 7.0/4.0/4.0)  !  ! 7 Days @ 150*C  !#M/

Thermal Aging / Basis ' # '

Not Stated f-[-

Material Aging  !  !  !

Evaluation (7.0/-/-)  !  ! Visual Inspection /  !

!  ! Insulation Resistance  !

Materials Susceptible  !  !  !

(Thermal) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-)  !  ! Not Stated  !

Radiation Aging, Type  ! !g '.

1. NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 bu0Nnkhn Rssearch Centr FRC Project N2. C5257 PC93 A Dimion of The Frankhn Insntute FRC Aasignment No.13 5c 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) #A81000 FRC Task No. N P/ W 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. D NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

8 I -

t Radiation Aging, Dose (rd) 5x107

{

Rrdiation Aging, Dose Rate . .

Not Stated Radiation Aging, Method . g fTest f Materials Susceptible !gp# .Not Stated (Radiation) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-)  !

e Operational Aging /

(-/4.2/-)  !  ! Not Stated  !

Other Age Conditioning . M

(-/4.2/-)  ! !Not Stated  !

Qualified Life Claimed /  !  !  !

Established (5.2.4/4.10/-)  !  ! Not Stated in Test  !

Normal Ambient Temperat'are .

!  ! Report  %

Normal Amoient Radiation  ! N OEAEElic!Ble  !

Normal Ambient Humidity  !  ! Not Applicable  !

On-Going Surveillance and Pr e Maintedance

!4

.Not Applicable f

1 1 i On-Going Analysis of Failures and Degradation

![

h  !

! Not Applicable I

(7.0/-/-)  !  !  !

!  ! Not Stated I Margin (General)

(6.0/3.0/3.0)  !

g  !  !

Margin (NUREG-0588,  !  !

Not Stated Cat. I) (-/3.2/-)  ! //I  !  !

1. Temperature (+15'F)  !  !

2. Pressure (+10%,  !  !  !

10 psig max)  !  !  !

3. hadiation  !  !  !

(not required)  !  !  !

{

( 4. Time (+10%, +1 hour  !  !  ! -

+ function time miaimum)  !  !  !

1. % NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 000lJ Frankhn R seirch Cent:r FRC Project N2. C5257 P g] j A Dwi<,n of ne Frankhn insn'ute FRC Assignment No.13 5d l 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. WUf /~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION . -

NOTE NO.)

ACCIDENT CONDITIONS  !  ! g i

l IDCA/MSLB/HELB/ Uncontrolled ! gjf?15 8  ! LOCA/ MSLB  !

(4.1, 4.2, 4.3.1, 4.3.3/  !  !  !

1.1, 1.2, 1.5/1.1, 1.2, 1.5) !  !  !

e , ,

Radiation Type d = w- " Gamma

[

j Radiation Dose (rd) !g yjpg  ! 197.7-20').8 Megarads  !

(4.1.2/1.4/1.4)  !  !  !

l  !  !  !

( Radiation Dose Rate (rd/hr)  !#p/M ! Not Stated  !

Radiation Qual. Metnod (5.3.1/-/-)

/[

V  !

! Ted g

Proximity to Concentrated  !  !  !

( Radiation  ! Not Applicable g

( 4.1. 2/1. 4 . 6/1. 4. 6)  !  !  !

Equipment Susceptible to /#FI "*

Beta Radiation (4.1.2/-/-)  !  !  !

Radiation Dose (Normal +  !

Accident) (4.1.2/-/-)  ! p[gg/l. Not Applicable I  ! e Plateout Dose Considered !M M, ! *

(-/1. 48/1. 4 8) /  ; Not Applicable ,

!  ! l Gamma + Beta Dose (rd)  ! '

(4.1.2/1.4.7/1.4.7)  !  ! N t Applicable I

I 1

/*s NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 LO! ranklin Rzse:rch Cent:r FRC Project N3. C5257 P 03 A Division of The Frankhn Insnture FRC 5e 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment No.13 Task No. VCf/ d ~l ~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. S_d

, NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE No.)

EINIRONMENTAL PROFILE  !  !  !

OF ACCIDENT COf;UITIONS  !  !  !

Hat f Temp./Ptess. JJ ((.3 fY/h. ,

p Patka *F/psig/RH/ Tis.a 350/c/J.Af */JM' 357/70/100%/10 hrs {

Decrease To: *F/psig/RH/ Time !"'" #[ 357-275/70-31/100%/2 hrs Decrease To: *F/psig/RH/ Tine '2.8 / .2d . 275/31/100%/4 days

• Dscrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time /5 / 212/10/100%/26 days Equipment Surface Tempera-ture (MSLB) (-/1.2.5.C, p-g .

' Not Applicable '

2.2.6/1.2.5.C, 2.2.6)  !  !  !

Spray Qualification Method  ! g[  ! Test  !

(5.3.2/1.3, 2.2.8/1.3,  !  !  !

2.2.8)  !

Spray Composition {, M M { 3000 ppm Boron {

(4.1.4/1.3, 2.2.8/-  ! ###  ! 0.064 Molar Nags 023 3

1. 3 , 2.2.8) !fN}M

! NaOH for pH of 10.5 Spray Density (gpm/f t2)  ! # M M ! 0.15 1 Spray Duration y;)4 M ! 30 days

. l {

Submergence Duration  !  ! Not Applicable '

( 4.1. 3/2. 2. 5/2. 2. 5)  !  ! -

In-Leakage Considered  !  ! Not Applicable  !

(5.2.6, 5.3.2/-/-)  ! N  !  !

. .' t

) Time to Submergence  ! M  ! Not Applicable  !

(  !  !  !

Dust Environment  ! g  ! Not Applicable '

(-/2.2.11/2.2.11)  !  ! -

e

/N, NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-5118 UObranklin R:se:rch Cantxt FRC Project N3. C5257 P g3 A Division of The Fenkhn Instituu FHC Assignm:nt N3.17 5f 29th and Race St.n ,. Phita . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4G F/ 6/ ~1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O o NOTES:

MM / - / 6 Dd2 'Z.0o I [3r 7 el Md '

Akt

/ 0 Heat of Activation = A H act = R x b where t2 = time to endpoint (100,000' hours)

- tt = time to endpoint (1000 hours0.0116 days <br />0.278 hours <br />0.00165 weeks <br />3.805e-4 months <br />)

T2 = OC + 273 corresponding to t2 T1 = CC + 273 corresponding to tt .

b = AH act/R

_ R = 1.98 cal mole 1 OC ~I .

_ 4. CONCLUSIONS

_ On the basis of the oven aging study described in this report and the use of a conventional Arrhenius analysis of the data, it is concluded that the useful service life of radiation ears at a l crosslinked continuous WCSF operating compound is predicted temperature to beof40 in excess 90gC. The heat of activation for the thermal oxidation of WCSF compound was calculated to be 29 kcal/ mole.

l L u h W E o oi.or .

e Y "*bd "4

/rJ/4 atno J/4 (XflO g,

1. % NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79118 Pag]

0 rznklin R2se:rch Ccnter FRC Project N2. C5257 A Dwmon ol The Frankhn inin+uie FRC Assignment No.13 Si 20th and Race Streets. Phila. 9a 19103 (215) 4481000 FRC Task No. WE/ r/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6(o NOTES:

2. TEST SPECDIENS tested and also shows the energizing veltage and ,

curtwnta levels.

Table 1 presents a descr; tion of the specimens Table 1 Test Specimens Specimen Electrical Imading Voltage Initial Curtent Desc ription

• Numberi f er/2, !ft/ (Vrms - 60 g (A)'

Raychem ThermoSt8 In-Containment 9X 20 600 0 Field Splice Cable - Raychem Adverse Service Coaxial Cable. AWG 22 conductor 1st insulation layer - 8 mil waB of Alkane-imide polymer 2nd insulation layer - 49 mil wall of Rayolin R* radiation cross-linked polyoleSn Bralded Copper Shield Raychem Flamtrol" Jacket - 34 mil nominal wall *

• Part No.10483 Run No. J7-5-10-72-6 Splice Components for one splice Raychem ThermontS WCSF-115-4-N Soldered connection C5ee Figure 1)

Maychem Thermont 8 n-Containment I 13 35 2000 70 Field Splices Cable AWG 4 insulated with EPR-neop ene (not a Raychem product)

Splice Compcnents for six splices (Note 1)

Raychem ThermofitS WCSF-200-6-N 2 cach of compression connectors:

Burndy ifylink YS4C-L T&B 2F-4 3M +4 Raychem Thermont8 In-Containment 14 37 1000 65 Field Splices Cable AWG 6 insulated with Raychem Flamtrol" .

Sp!!ce Components for six splices (Note 1)

Raychem WCSF-200-6-N 6 each of compression connectors:

Burndy Hylink YS6C-L g Raychem Thermont8 In-Containment 15 . 2 2000 25 Field Splices Cable AWG 12 insulated with EPR .

neoprene (not a Raychem pteduct)

Spbce Components for six splices (Note 1l Racchem WCSF-115-6-N 3 each of compression connectors:

Burndy Hylink YSV10 T& B 2C-10 Raychem ThermoSt? In-Containment 16 33 1000 25 Field Sphees. Six splices.

Same construction as Sample #15 except that Raychem Flamtml*

utre was used

1. A NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 00hrinklin Rzserrch Canter FRC Project NL C5257 Pag 3 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Instreute FRC Assignment po.14, Si 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 !M0 FRC Task No. Y t 8/f/ ~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Fo NOTES:

Table 1 Test Specimens (continued) -

Specimen Electrical loading Voltage Iruttal Cu rrent Desc ription

• Numbert Isngth (ft)' Nrms - 60 ffr) (AP 17 23 1000 65 Raychem Thermofit9 In-Containment Trsnsition Splices Cable AWG 6 insulated with Raychem Fiamtrol" spliced to three cables of AWG 12 insulated with Raychem Flamtrol" and reconnected to an .

AWG 6 cable insulated with '

Raychem Flamtrol" Splice Components for two splices (Note 1)

Raychem ThermoSt3 WCSF-200-6-N Raychem nermoSt3 heat-shrinkable 3-Sager cable breakout (Part Number 403A112-4/83) used to provide seal at the transition between the AWG 6 and the three AWG 12 cables.

2 each of compression connectors:

Barndy Ilylink YS6C-L 9 and

• Trademsrks of Raychem Corporation

• Description of specimens provided by Raychem i Specimens 1 thru 3 and to thru 12 were other test specimens supplied by Raychem, ne test results on these specimens are presented in report numbers F-C4033-1 and -2.

8 Specimens cut to lengths shown. Approximately 4 ft of the length extended outside of the test vessel (2 ft on each end of the specimen).

• Initial currents were applied at room temperature. and allowed to drop to a lower level during ccm-hined radiation and thermal ag;ng and simultaneous IOCA-simulation testing. See text for discussion.

Note 1 - Each in-line splice or transition was covered with tinned copper wire mesh to aid in providing a close proximity ground plane as shownin Figure 2.

1 I

q

1. A NRC Contr:ct ND. NRC-03-79-118 P g3 LOUU Franklin Research Center FRC Pr; ject N2. C5257 A Dmson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. %8 ____

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 I EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 41 ELECTRICAL PENETRATION LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT CONAX HODEL CANISTER TYPE LVP MVP REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB,120 DAYS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 41 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 5368, 1049, 5369, 44, 45, 46 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): NOT STATE D (1-1, 1-7, 1-8, 1-14, 1-15, 1-16, 1-17, 1-19)

SERVICE: PROVIDE ELECTRICAL FEEDS THRU CONTAINMENT BOUNDARY FUNCTION (PLANT ID): NOT STATZD (1-21, 1-23, 1-2 9, 1-3 4, 1-3 5, 1-3 7, 1-38)

SERVICE: PROVIDE ELECTRICAL FEEDS THRU CONTAINMENT BOUNDARY FUNCTION (PLANT ID): NOT STATED (1-3 9, 1-41, 1-4 3, 1-4 6, 1-4 7, 1-48, 1-49)

SERVICE: PROVIDE ELECTRICAL FEEDS THRU CONTAINMENT BOUNDARY FUNCTION (PLANT ID): NOT STATED (1-50, 1-53, 1-57, 1-5 9, 1-60, 1-61, 1-6 2, 1-63)

SERVICE: PROVIDE ELECTRICAL FEEDS THRU CONTAINMENT BOUNDARY FUNCTION (PLANT ID): NOT STATED (1-64, 1-65, 2-63, 1-El, 1-E2)

SERVICE: PROVIDE ELECTRICAL FEEDS THRU CONTAINMENT BOUNDARY LICENSEE 5 JBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 66 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3%, 3d System Consideration Review 42, 45, ^^ 2d ';, Of I Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, Sb, Sc, 5d, Se, 5f, Sg, 55, Ei, Ej-Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -0., GL Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary h , 7b, 7c

1. 4 NRC C:ntr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 P:g2

!NU Franklin Reserrch Center FRC Pr: Ject ND. C5257 A Dwision of The Frankhn Institute lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 4Mirm FRC Assignment FRC Task No. No.13 j /7

//fff EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Y/

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSFS TO TH2 NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

I Tne Licensee (has/hwrt-) provided a response to the SER concerns.

M The Licantee (has/; - .~ ' specifically stated that the equipment is qualified andNr will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justificaticn for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other '( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/nas not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

]I.a Qualifiedl II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.D Moditication III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope j II.b Not Qualified lV Documentation Not Available J l

/A NRC Contract Nr. NRC43 79-118 FRC Project NO. C5257 Pag 3 rrnklin Rsserrch Cante A Dnnsen of The Frankhn is ' e 4 FRC Aosl0nment No.13 / 2 20th and Race Streets. PMa Pa 19103(215)44812 FRC Task No. 44f /S77 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAL-IFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY -

Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment. and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Quelified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temparature/ Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Tast Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

} NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified 1

/ I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

Aw NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 P g3 0000 Fr:nklin R:sexrch Cent:r FRC Pr; ject N3. C5257 A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103(215)448 HJ00 FRC FRC Assignment Task No. 4(of No.13,

/S /1 1

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. $

LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Electrical Penetrations (Conax)

MODEL: Canister Type - LVP, MVP CCMPONENT NO.: 1-1, 1-7, 1-8, 1-14, 1-15, 1-16, 1-17, 1-19, 1 421, 1-23, 1-29, 1-34, 1-35, 1-37, 1-38, 1-39, 1-41, 1-43, 1-46, 1-47, 1-48, 1-49, 1-50, 1-53, 1-57, 1-59, 1-60, 1-61, 1-62, 1-63, 1-64, 1-65, 2-63, 1-El, 1-E2 -

NRC IDE.'CIFIED DEFICIENCIES: A, CS PSE3G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref Qualification Da'.2 Evaluation Form page 66.

These, NRC noted, deficiencies are addressed in our submittal on the above referenced page. Tie. ..ing inform.Tio n as adeled is revision. 4.

Documentation is available in our file EQ-02.

PSE1G's evaluation of _ NRC noted deficiencies has reaffirmed that Conax Penetra-tions are ca;:able of performing safety functions in a harsh environment.

A NRC Contrcct N3. NRC-03-79-118 LO7F nklin Research Center Pcg2 FRC Pr: Ject NO. C5257 A Dwision of The Franklin !nstitute FRC Assignment No.13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-10(y)

FRC Task No. #4 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .fZ Checksheets [ 4 h M~c;r have been removed due to the proprietary nature of information co[tained therein, i

1

4,_% NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03 79-118 L$d Fr:nklin R:se rch Cent:r FRC Project NJ. C5257 Pag 3 A Dm.on of The Frankhn Insneute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pe 19101(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. %I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 42 ELECTRICAL CABLE LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT AMERICAN INSULATED WIRE, MODEL NOT STATED REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB,120 DAYS -

TER CHECKSHEET NO. 42 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 1107, 47 FUNCIION (PLANT ID): VARIOUS, CARRY CURRENT LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 69 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITI:M(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, RT, P, H, (R) , M, I , QM , RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Sommary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb I

Equipment Environmental Qualification Sunenary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 2b, 2;, 2 d -

f System Consideration Review tc, 15, L, 4d, a, E Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Se, 5d, Se, 5 f , SI.

)

Os, Sh. Ei, )

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 0;, 0b -

Equipment Summary Maintenance ano Replacement Schedule Summary J-e , 7L, Tu

AA NRC Contr ct N . NRC-03-79-118 P ga du Frankhn Reserrch Center FRC Pr: ject N3. C5257 A Dmsion of The Frankhn insnrute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 191031215) 44 4 1000 FRC Task No. 4/of h/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _Nr

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

a^*) provided a response to the SER concerns.

1 Tne Licensee (ha s/h "

g The Licensee (has/h " ^^ti specifically stated that the equipment is qualified andM will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield eqJipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other '( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified (II .c OualifiedLifeDeficiency]

I.b Mdification III.a Exempt -

II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A NRC Contract N ?. NRC-03 79-118 Page 00Nnklin R:se:rch Ccnt:r FRC Project No. C5257 A Dmsvan of The Frankhn inshtute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. //f/D7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 42-EQUIPMENT EtNIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) 1 Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate l o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately I o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate l

Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification l

II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established i II.b Equipment Not Qualified l

II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified A III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l

l l

i

1. % NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 00 IFrtnklin Rxse:rch C:nt:r FRC Project Nr. C5257 Pag 3 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment No.13, /7 I FRCTask No. 46 ffS EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 97-LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMEtri: Electrical Cables MODEL: American Insulated Wire Co.

CCMPCilEtiT l10 :

tiRC IDEtiTIFIED DEFICIEt1CIES: T, CS, QT, A, S PSElG EVALUATI0ti OF DEFICIEt1CIES: '

T - PSEAG has perfor

~ ned a thermal analysis to justify the qualification ten-perature of 3a00 F as shown in the qualificatica data evaluation form.

This evaluation is containec in our fileEQ04.04)

A - Rev. 2 of the Environmental Qualification submittal contains aging data specifying an 11 year lif_e for this type cable. Supporting data is available in our file ~Q-04.05.

E, E, 5, - These items are addressed in our submittal. Supporting data is contained in our file EQ-04.

PSEAG's evaluation of flRC noted deficiencies has reaffirmed that American Insulated Wire Co. cable is capable of perfonning safety functions in a harsh environment at Salem.

1. % NRC Contract N o. NRC-03-79-118 00kFrinklin Rneirch Cent:r FRC Project NO. C5257 Page A o.vmon of The FrankLn institute FRC Assignmogt Ng. 3 5o

. 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRCTask No. YSI. f/ 7 lIQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .fd.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW Criteria: DOR Guidelines g ; NUREG-0588, Cat. I  ; NUREG-0588, Cat. II .

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION !g  !  !

l Equipment Type ' Electrical Cable Manufacturer's Name  !  !

American Insulated Wire (5.2.2/-/-)  ! y Model Humber ( 5. 2. 2/-/-)  !-FL/ J-A4 EPR insulation /Hypalon

. Jacket f. ee age Serial Number j 51

/A- .

Not Applicable Features / Mounting  ! p/4  !

Not Applicable (5.2.6/-/-)  !  ! f Connections /Interf aces  ! pg  ! I (5.2.6/-/-)

' ' Not Stated '

Location / Elevation ' g , h - - l . Not Applicable Equipment ID No. , g

• Not Applicable f QUALIFICATION REPORT  !  !  !

(8.0/ 5. 0/ 5. 0)  !  !  !

l Report ID Number p,Cf/ /f F-C51I5

• l I { l Report Date  ! . April 1979 Issued by l {* fFranklinInstitute f*

• Research Laboratories Prepared for  ! fpfg . American Insulated Wire f

Referenced Reports Q @ . Not Stated Qualification Method  !  ! Test I (5.1, 5. 3/2.1, 2. 4/2.1, 2. 4) !  ! I i

l l I i

QUALIFICATION TEST PROGRAM  !  ! I Functional Test Dercription !

A , Maintain Electrical 2

f (5.2.5/2.2.9/2.2.9) '

Loading, Insulation  ;

a

• Resistance,Hipot Operating Conditions  !  ! -

(-/ 2. 2.10/ 2. 2.10 )  ! VW ,

10Vac/1A e

Ioad/ Cycles / voltage /  !  ! 230Vac/10A 1 Current /Freq.  !  ! I

A,_. NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 0000 fr:nkhn R:se:rch Ccnter FRC Project No. CS257 Page A Dwen of The Frankhn Institute FRC Aseignment No. If $h 20%d Race Streets. PMa . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 tm0 FRC Task No. </6f/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .EA NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITl! SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

Acceptance Criterla  ! g/fd !g

( 5. 2. 5/ 2. 2.1/ 2. 2.1) f1 amp.

• f Accuracy (5.2.5/-/-) A/A

/ . Not Applicable Number of Specimens 12  !

A///d .

Tast Instruments Calibrated ' ////-

! Yes Safety Function (Active /

Passive) (-/2.1. 3/ 2.1. 3)

!4

! Not Stated Tast Duration (5.2.1/-/-)  ! g/S .

,f83 Days Note A Accident Duration (Envir.  !

Above Normal) (5.2.1/-/-)  ! g! Not! Applicable f.

R quired Function Time . / 2-# . Not Applicable Tast Sequence (General)  ! p  ! Thermal Aging  !

( 5. 2. 3/2. 3.1/ 2. 3.1)  !  ! Irradiation  !

!  ! LOCA Simulation  !

Tast Sequence (NUREG-0588,  ! p  !  !

Cat. I) (-/ 2. 3.1/-)  !  !  !

1. Representative Sample  !  !  !

2. Baseline Data  ! y /)-  ! Not Applicable 1

3. Performance Extremes  !  !  !

4. Thermal Aging  !  !  !

5. Radiation Aging  !  !  !

6. Wear Aging  !  !  !

7. Vibration / Seismic  !  !  !

8. DBE Exposure  !  !  !

9. Post-DB" Exposure  !  !  !

10. Inspection  !  !  !

Aging  !  !  !

(5.2.4, 7.0/4.0/4.0)  :  !  !

Thermal Aging / Basis '

My Hours @ 121*C 2

Material Aging  !  ! //

Not Stated Evaluation (7.0/-/-) !5 faY  !

Materials Susc(ptible  !  !

(Thermal) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-) !g  !

Not Stated Radiation Aging, Type  ! Gamma I Gamma *

1. s NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 bilbranklin Rsserrch Cint;r FRC Project Nr. C5257 Page A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignmer)t,No 1p 5c 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. Y6 /f /~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. &?

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.) 1 Radiation Aging, Dose (rd)  !  ! See Accident Dose Radiation Aging, Dose Rate See Accident Dose Radiation Aging, Method gg ' Test f Materials Susceptible  ! Not Stated  !

!pg  !

(Radiation) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-)  !" .

Operational Aging  ! jV(( I Not Applicable

(-/4.2/-)  ! . .f

. . i Other Age Conditioning  ! g .Not Applicable  ;

(-/4.2/-)  !  ; ,

Qualified Life Claimed /  !  !  ! 2

//

Established (5.2.4/4.10/-) '//  ! Not Stated i Normal Ambient Temperature  ! Not Applicable Normal Amoient Radiation  ! Not Applicable I Normal Ambient Humidity '

d {NotApplicable On-Going Surveillance and  ! .  ! Not Applicable  !

Preventive Maintenance  ! M  !

(7.0/-/-) .

On'-Going Analysis of  !  !  !

Failures and Degradation  !  ! Not Applicable I (7.0/-/-)  ! '

! I I Margin (General)  ! .  ! l (6. 0/3. 0 /3. 0) jYh {NotIdentified

{.

Margin (NUREG-0588,  !  !  !

Cat. I) (-/3.2/-)  ! jf/f/)-  ! Not Identified I

1. Temperature (+15*F)  !

2. Pressure (+10%,  !  !  !

10 psig max)  !  !

3. Radiation  !  !  !

(not required)  !  !  !

4. Time (+10%, +1 hour  !  !  !

+ function time minimum)  !  !  !

1. s NRC Contreet No. NRC-03 79-118 lbranklin Research Center FRC Project No.C5267 Pags A Dmson of The reanklin Institute FRC AssignmentNo 1 5d 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103(215) 448 10 % FRC Task No. U / fo(3 )f / 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O}

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

ACCIDENT CONDITIONS  !  !  !

IDCA/MSLB/HELB/ Uncontrolled !j 3  ! 1 (4.1, 4.2, 4.3.1, 4.3.3/  ! AOC# 184-8 ' LOCA '

1.1, 1.2, 1.5/1.1, 1.2, 1.5) !  !  !

i Radiation Type

[._ _ _ _ _ _ - ! Gamma I

Radiation Dose (Ed) 1 206 Megarads  !

(4.1.2/1.4/1.4) *

5 V/oyA  !  !

Radiation Dose Rate (rd/hr)  ! 0.66 Megarads per Hour I Radiation Qual. Method lA (5.3.1/-/-) f  ! Test g 1 1 Proximity to Concentrated  ! '

Radiation

• g[g ! ! Not Applicable {'

(4.1.2/1.4.6/1.4.6)  !

2  : ,

Equipment Susceptible to -

Beta Radiation (4.1.2/-/-) I8  ! Not Stated .

Radiation Dose (Normal +  !  !  !

Accident) ( 4.1. 2/-/-) 'p g .Not Applicable  !

Plateout Dose Considered  !  !  !

(-/1. 4 8/1. 4 8) ' );# Not Applicable Gamma + Beta Dose (rd)  !  !  !

(4.1.2/1.4.7/1.4.7)  ! Not Stated .

, = -

e

A N RC Contrcct No. NRC-03-79-118 LO0Erankhn Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 PcCa A 0%n of The Frankhn Insntute FRC Assignment No.17 5e 20th and Race Streets Pnde . Pa. 19103 (215) 4481m0 FRC Task No. 4(#/ f/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. # 2 NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE No.)

EINIRONMENTAL PROFILE  !  !  !

OF ACCIDENT CONDITIONS  !  !  !,

Rate of Temp./ Press.  !)g J[y/h,14*F;4 psi /second Increase  ! . .

Peak: 'F/psig/RH/ Time 286/40/100/2.8 Hours *  !

!Jg/9yn Decrease To: *F/psig/RH/ Time arc Ag/e/31/1 219/3/100/23 Hrs  !

Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time ,9 f ,2/ 209/0/100/92 days Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time .

j Equipment Surface Tempera-  !  !

ture (MSLB) (-/1.2.5.C,  ;

j(rM  ! Not Stated  !

2.2.6/1.2.5.C, 2.2.6) 1 1 Epray Qualification Method *

! Test  !

(5.3.2/1.3, 2.2.8/1.3, I

/[ Y  !  !

2.2.8)  !  !  !

Spray Composition  ! 2100 ppm Boron (1.6 wt  !

(4.1.4/1.3, 2.2.8/. -

g ,y j! % Boric Acid) Buffered  !

1.3, 2.2.8) -  ! with NaOH to pH 10 1

! f i4* .> W e e Spray Density (gpm/f t 2)  !  ! 0.15 1

! //d$ !  !

Spray Duration  !  ! 24+ hours  !

Submergence Duration

! >J abflm- ,

Not Applicable $.

(4.1.3/2.2.5/2.2.5) i  !  !

N&

In-Leakage Considered .  ! Not Applicable  !

(5.2.6, 5.3.2/-/-) .  !  !

, Ug  !  !

! Not Applicable Time to Submergence  !

Dust Environment 5 YA E

Not Applicable  !

(-/ 2. 2.11/ 2. 2.11) ,  !  !

1. 4

• During the initial tise temperature fluctuations up to 312*F occurred in the first 25 seconds.

4

A NRC Contr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 UO0hranklin Rese rch Centrr FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 P ga A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institure FRC Assignment No.13 5f 20th and Race Streets. Phila -. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. V(off'/fl 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. $

NOTES: 1A. -

DisCJ 0 : e Aiw w,it fo,-wa.ed. J d a- a.ed. A r <a e- s P\ot % st ou +o y.e.a.c 1 L_ .

possib@iu #

CAM N d"o (l d.cch2 Abo Pre a6'nc, log (e W p2n h e g a p j omAps carM.Av*

Conclusions:

show 4kd e Ole

% e. a b o v e. in b m 4 ion w (1 \

4- 0 y e e I**$<.

b5W in F - C. C 115- i s 3va.),'f.e d .fo e

( mrud c 90 c.) tzd t -

. bcmd em. inexs+W Jelca.Es E49

) f y "-

< v

/

YL -

s*5f u

h

Table 1. Identification of Test Specimens 8 C

m Es

~

T g>E]n E 9o m gs?

Z a&=

Thennal . Electrical

-8 j' [ $

Cable Cable Description (a) Aging (b) Energizing (c) g gg Number Unaged ,10 Vac/l A f f,, [ h C5115-1 2/C #16 Abt 7 x 0.0192-in Tinned Copper Conductor O 7fn 0.025-in Ethylene Propylene Rubber-(EPR) Insulation (00 = 0.108 in) Z C5115-2 0.015-in Hypalon Jacket Over Insulation (OD - 0.138 in) g *j}--

g!

C5115-3 0.0015-in Aluminum /Hylar Shield @ ,

168 nours 10 Vac/1 A

-l $

C5115-4 One #18 AhG 7 x 0.0152-in Tinned Copper Drain Wire C C5115-5 Flame Barrier Tape (s)

C E C5115-6 0.001-in Mylar Separator g I 0.060-in Overall Hypalon Jacket (00 = 0.435 in) -

a Unaged 230 Yac/10 A C5115-7. 2/C #14 AWG 7 x 0.0242-in Tlnned Copper Carcitctbr )>

C5115-8 0.03-in EPR Insulation (OD = 0.133 in) 0.018-in Hypalon Jacket Over Insulation (00 - 0.169 in)

O $$$h OOOO C5115-9 Z -43. o o Neoprene fillers 168 hours0.00194 days <br />0.0467 hours <br />2.777778e-4 weeks <br />6.3924e-5 months <br /> 230 Yac/10 A y hS.o@

0.001-in Mylar Separator C5115-10 h C5115-11 Flane Baerler Tape (s) '

h5 h e [og C5115-12 0.005-in Corrugated. Bronze Soleid (helically wrapped around-O 'I

• O P

conductor assembly) .

T hEZ 0.06-in Overall Hypalon Jacket (0D - 0.6 in) m - 50 m o e E d Actual FRC measurements Notes: (a) Cable descriptions and nominal dimensions were provided by the client. 'O d y of cable disnensions may be somewhat dif ferent. The nominal dimensions were used when calculating 3 test voltages and bend-test man'drel diameters.

., Z

-i i

(b) The specimens were thermally aged by the client.

(c}. The electrical potentials; were-provided between conductorsr The potentials'betweerr the conduc-tors and the ground (vessel) plane were 507 of- the ilsted potentials. (i.e., the potentials of g cables I througk 6:and cables 7 through'I2' were S r T.s Vac and.115'-; 5'Yac above the ground plane. respectively. O Y$*

h

1 I

g,;b NRC C ntract No. NRC-03-70118 Page

)

id Franklin Rewarch Center FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 A Dnasion of The Frankhn Listitute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4 toe EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3.5 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 43 ELECTRICAL CABLE LOCATED IN THE CONTAIhMNT SAMUEL MOORE, EPR INSULATION [51]

REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB,120 DAYS -

TER CHECKSHEET NO. 43 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 1802, 51 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CARRY CURRENT LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 68 [64]

I DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of thi:, TER fot Legend)

R, h RT, P, H, hh (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equirsent Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 2b, 2c, 2d System Consideration Review II, 'h,

- I, IS, Ou, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, Sb, Sc, 5d, Se, 6fr 59, Sh, Si, W -

Installed TMI Lessons L5arned Implementation $2, Cb Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 's, 75, 7 c--

4 2 s. NRC C::ntract Ns. N AC-03-79-118 P g')

NUU Franklin Research Center FRC PrIject No. C5257 A Dnnsion of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignmant No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 44 4 1000 FRC Task No. 44{IC/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .b.

ll SUMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Y Tne Licensee (has/ha e "O t ) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/h=e anH specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when e.cposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

_ _ The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deliciencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully establisned.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation 4bove submergenre level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other -( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim I operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) prWided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should ce exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATECORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified /II.c QualifiedLifeDeficiency)

I.b Modificatica III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

F

/% NRC Contract N?. NRC-03-79-118 LOhEFranklin Research Centsr FRC Project N3. C5257 P go A Divmon of The Franklin institute 2 1 2Gh and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. No.13 4/, f, [f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 83. j EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY -

Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately 1 Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) Y Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation _

Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperat ure/ Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate _

o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied ___

Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied ,,

Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified N III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

~

A NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 UObr:nklin Rxserr:h Cantir FRC Project N3. C5257 P:g3 A Omsion of The Frankhn bstitute 3a FRC Assignment No.13,<~/ ~7 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa.19103 GIS) 448-1000 FRCTask No. 4/,7f l

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d3. I LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Electrical Cable MODEL: Samuel Moore CCMPONENT NO.:

NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: T, CS, QT, A, S PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES: ,

1 - PSE&G has performed a thermal analysis to justify the qualification ten- l perature of 3400 F as shown on the qualification data evaluation form.

This evaluation is contained in our file EQ-21.01.

A - Rev. 2 of the E.Q. submittal contains aging data specifying a 40 year life for this type cable. Supporting data is available in our file EQ-21.02.

C_S., 01, S. - These items are addressed in our sutraittal . Supporting data is contained in our equipment qualification file EQ-21.

PSE&G's evaluation of "7.C noted deficiencies has reaffinned that Samuel Moore l caole is capable of pe.**orming safety functions in a harsh environment at l Salem. l 1

l l

A NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 000h3rtnklin Rtserrch Cantir FRC Projact N 2. C5257 Pag 3 A Divis.on of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 50 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-10N FRC Task No. 4(a? /f t"I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 93 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW Criteria: DOR Guidelines N;NUREG-0588, Cat. I  ; NUREG-0588, Cat. II .

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION  !  !

Equipment Type  ![/tJI

!  ! Electrical Cable I

!M  !  !

Manufacturer's Name  ! I (5.2.2/-/-)

!g w

,,4  ! Samuel Moore & Company Model Number ( 5. 2. 2/-/-)  ! 6 f'A.  !

, Seepage 51fordescriptiof Serial Number  ! jof cables tested  !

! N+  ! 1 Features / Mounting  ! g " 4 J!Not Applicable '

(5.2.6/-/-)  !  !

• Connections / Interfaces g g M ! otN Stated  !

(5.2.6/-/-)  !  ! I Location / Elevation ( ,d= = # In Autoclave Equipment ID No.

g.

• Not Applicable QUALIFICATION REPORT  !  !  !

(8. 0/ 5. 0/ 5. 0)  !  !  !

Raport ID Number  ! /d N.  ! Report has No I/D No. I Rsport Date  ! g hf'  ! June 1978 I r  ! '

I. sued by *

.Isomedix Prepared tor '

I Samuel Moore & Company

• DEKORON Division

• l R3ferenced Reports !j,g M ! Not Stated  !

l 1 1  !

Qualification Method  ! j  ! Sequential Test '

i (5.1, 5.3/2.1, 2.4/2.1, 2.4) !  ! .

l QLALIFICATION TEST PROGRAM  !  !  !

l Functional Test Description ! jp  ! -

(5.2.5/2.2.9/2.2.9)  !  ! nsulation Resisitance I i

!  ! HyPot  ;

I Operating conditions  ! g, f-  !

600 Vac/ 0.5 Amp

(-/ 2. 2.10/ 2. 2.10 )  ! sh 2  ;

Ioad/ Cycles / Voltage /  !  !  !

Current /Freq.  !  !  !

____ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ I

A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 1 UOObnklin R: set:ch Cent:r FRC Project No. C5257 P g3 A Dmsx>n of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 5b i 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. W /Y/7 l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

Acceptance Criteria  !  !  !

(5.2.5/2.2.1/2.2.1) .

P s @ x Vdv

. Withstand Test (80Vac/ mil) f Accuracy (5.2.5/-/-) g .Not Applicable

• Number of Specimens  ! V l ./h . 12 .

l Test Instruments Calibrated .

/1/k .

Yes Safety Function (Active /  ! !Not Applicable l

Passive) (-/ 2.1. 3/ 2.1. 3)  !  ! f.

Test Duration (5.2.1/-/-) / 30 days Accident Duration (Envir.  !  !  !

Above Normal) (5.2.1/-/-)  ! g g !Not Applicable  !

1 Required Function Time . / ~2.0 .Not Applicable Test Sequence (General)  ! [  !

Core Thermal Aging fSeeNoteA (5.2.3/2.3.1/2.3.1) f fIrradiation ;Page Sg

• Thermal Aging Test Sequence (NUREG-0588,  ! g  ! Irradiation f

Cat. I) (-/ 2. 3.1/-) .

LOCA Simulation

1. Representative Sample  !  !  !

2. Baseline Data  !  !  !

3. Performance Extremes  !  !  !

4. Thermal Aging  !  !  !

5. Radiation Aging  !  !  !

(. Wear Aging  !  !  !

7. Vibration / Seismic  !  !  !

8. DBE Exposure  !  !  !

l

9. Post-DEE Exposure  !  !  !

l 10. Inspection  !  !  !

Aging  !  !  !

(5.2.4, 7.0/4.0/4.0)  !  ! For Core Aging See Sg I N Thermal Aging / Basis '% c'-

hables11&16: 7D@150*Cf

• Material Aging 1

• All Others : 7D @ 121*C

. g).

. fj Evaluation (7.0/-/-)  ! !Basis was not Stated I 1  !  !

Materials Susceptible !pp  !  !

(Thermal) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-) . Stated . )

{N t Radiation Aging, Type  !  ! Gamma

• A- NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 lj00hr nklin Resench Csnt:r FRC PrIject N2. C5257 Pag?

A Divivon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.17 5c 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10M FRC Task No. VM/ f/ ~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. V3 NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATICN (K OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

R:diation Aging, Dose (rd) M .

25 megarads Rtdiation Aging, Dose Rate  ! .

0.75 Mrgarads per hour Radiation Aging, Method MM! hst Materials Susceptible  !  !

N j 7;, ' !!Not (Radiation) (5.2. 4, 7.0/-/-) ! f Stated 1 Operational Aging !N M  !

(-/4.2/-)  !

Not Applicable Otaer Age Conditioning .M

(-/4.2/-)  ! Not Stated  !

Qualified Life Claimed /  !  !  ! g Established ( 5. 2. 4/ 4.10/-)  ! Not Stated !j/N /

! b  !  !

Normal Ambient Temperature  ! ot Applicable Normal Amoient Radiation  ! M ot Applicable Normal Ambient Humidity Not Applicable f On-Going Surveillance and Preventive Maintenance Not Applicable  !

!p (7.0/-/-) 9 9 9 On-Going Analysis of I Failures and Degradation  ! [ p Not Applicable  !

(7.0/-/-)  ! U  !  !

Mar <pn (General)  !  !

(6.0/3.0/3.0)

A  ! Not Stated 1 Margin (NUREG-0588,  !  !  ! }

Cat. I) (-/3.2/-)  ! g -

! Not Stated  !

1. Temperature (+15'F)  !  !  !

2. Pressure (+10%,  !  !  !

10 psig max)  !  !  !

3. Radiation  !  !  !

(not required)  !  !  !

4. Time (+10%, +1 hour  !  !  !

+ function time minimum)  !  !  !

Ap lj00U Frinklin Riseirch Cent:r NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Page FRC Project N2. C5257 A Divmon of The Fr nkha instituti FRC Asrignmen,$N213 5d 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. V 6 f/ f/~)

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. @

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

ACCIDENT CONDITIONS  !  !  !

IDCA/MSLB/HELB/ Uncontrolled (4.1, 4.2, 4.3.1, 4.3.3/ {d6C#$15//JfLOCA/MSLB 1.1, 1.2, 1.5/1.1, 1.2, 1.5) !  !  !

Radiation Type M1 = v Gamma I# I 5 Y/0 25 Megarads (Samples 11,16 1 4/1 ) ,175 Megarads (all others) j ,

Radiation Dose Rate (rd/hr) g j,,fM 0.3 Megarads/hr (11 & 16)f Radiation Qual. Method (5.3.1/-/-)

! gA 10.75 Megarads/hr (all otheds)

Proximity to Concentrated i  !  !

Radiation {/74# !Not Applicable  !

( 4.1. 2/1. 4. 6/1. 4. 6) .  !  !

Equipment Susceptible to e gf fpC-C/!  !

Beta Radiation ( 4.1. 2/-/-) i

!Not Stated  !

Radiation Dose (Normal + '

N t Stated Accident) (4.1.2/-/-) jM .

Plateout Dose Considered 9 '

./ t Applicable ,

(-/1. 48/1. 4 8)

!  ! j Gamma + Beta Dose (rd)

(4.1.2/1.4.7/1.4.7)

{

M . ot Applicab'le  !

I 1

1 1

4 NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 Page

!!0bil Frinklin Riserrch Center FRC Project Nr. C5257 A Divmon of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5e 20th and Race Streets. Phda , Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. 4/4/'/ft ~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _9 3 NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE No.)

!  !  ! ~

ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE  !  !

OF ACCIDENT CONDITIONS  !

~

Rate of Temp./ Press.

!)J l

' .3f [63 40*F/20 Psi / Minute  !

Increase  !  ! .

PaJtk a *F/psig/RH/ Time 13 cfJ.t n%! 340/105/100/3 hrs

! 1140/-/-/2 hrs .

Decrease To: "F/psig/RH/ Time 3,7P4fh[/d3b!340/105/100/3 hrs {-

! 2 320/75/100/3 hrs Decrease To: "F/psig/RH/ Time 12 #9 e2/I1! 300/55/100/4 hrs  !

!  ! 250/15/100/4 days  !

Decrease To:

• F/psig/RH/ Time .

gjg f)/ .' 200/10/-/25.5 days .

{

Equipment Surface Tempera-  !  !

ture (MSLB) (-/1.2.5.C,  ; 8 !Not stated I 2.2.6/1.2.5.C, 2.2.6) .

Spray Qualification Method (5.3.2/1.3, 2.2.8/1.3,

{

pp  !

! Test 2.2.8)

• Spray Composition ~

. M M 13000 ppm Boron as boric !

(4.1.4/1.3, 2.2.8/, 4pacy  ! acid, 0.064 Maler Sodium !

1. 3, 2. 2. 8)

• g/f 3 p.y 1Thiosulphate,+NaOH to  !

! !Maka pH 10  :

l Spray Density (gpm/f t 2)

/M .

0.15 .

Spray Duration  ! 30 days  !

• % W b^o !  !

Submergence Duration *

.Not Applicable

( 4.1. 3/2. 2. 5/2. 2. 5) f g ff. .

In-Le m ge Considered f h

'Not Stated (5.2.6, 5.3.2/-/-)

• gg '

Time to submergence '

Dust Environment I

(-/2. 2.11/ 2. 2.11) /V4  !  !

O

)

As NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pag]

000Lhrenklin R:serrch Centir A Divisen of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignm:nt N3.13 5g 20th and Race Sreets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. '/6I/f/ '1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 55 NOTES:

0NL h GL E WA (itc Q Core Thermal Aging

_ 2.2.1 Phase I -

The cores of cable .;amples 2, 4, 5, 8, 9 and 10 were _

thermally aged at the facilities of Samuel Moore and Company _

_ Cable samples 2, 5,-8 and 10 were aged at 1630 C for 7 days _

_ and cable samples 4 and 9 were aged.at 1500C for 7 days. _

At the conclusion of this phase, the cable samples _

_ were jacketed and forwarded to Isomedix for furtber tests. _

_ The core thermal' aging records were also forwarded and are _

_ available for inspection at Isomedix.

Q c.e'1 5'aC- 0 W (_s Q ct CQ.bL2 fajrn-P i2D -u r'^R. (3M ~CLY d % t;;^ -

wtet.de+h h am cuem, c# ial c for I6& hAn. 3hermaJ ArYLH1L0 cmd w u-c-m+- Q Q u.0 9  % >>t<.re (msd 6 lupatt - Arreh m d.c2c. a.va.Ucub L2- f0L M a^- cow % chbv (pejt. mdst.,) --. md _

t a D 9. hw pr.cv-i d.a d .

Conelusions:

D G.,h CL N- N P A Ct.M. h (

C-Qthkh_da4+v; 40 ye /4 g , 9 et. d -

a _ .

O kkcL ble. - &3 4 0 - su % A.e.:h>tL&

% f .uta.6 p-b -

&C-a.ddaum.ctL CL-Mf a-9e 6%-CmL beim

%CWd o-P prepared: r2/ t td/P@ l Verified: . A .

u%dio l

NRC Contract N2. NRC-03 79118 FRC Project N2. C5257 Pcg]

00 Fr nklin R:seirch Center A Dwison of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment N2.J1 5h 20in .nd Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1

• FRC Task No. V4 r/ (7 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. V3 NOTES:

1 - r K P_+_ s/

- v

&M  %

_ - _ , . wwL Voon 0 i xx M" Q~

Ll SC L) &

asPb l

f L

i l

1 l

1 NRC Contract N2, NRC-03-79-118 pdb' rinklin R se rch Ccnter FRC Project Nr. C5257 Pag 3 A Dnns6on of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5i 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448 10 @ FRC Task No, _ (/(sP /I' ~7 l

l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _? ~i NOTES:

1 I

TABLE 1 ac3 FT::4 r c A a.t ;A o; 4 (Phase !) (Phase !!) (Phase III) (Phase IV) f* Core

?nereal Therwal Agtag first AqLao secesd Samuel (CC/tays) Padiataan Temp./ Radiatton Isosefta roare at fa.uel Oose Duration Oose SAMTLE Tag ::o. Tat ro.,  ? ore f. Meg a r ad s ) (OC/ Cays) (Mega rad el OtSCRIPT CN 2 In 163/7 25 121/7 175 2/C 16 ga. 1 stranded tirre:

copper, 30 mais .r:ss;traed polyolefss, 11 gr. dras- at shield. 45 sti Nypa.cn la xa 4 2A 150/7 2S 121/7 175 2/C 16 ga. 7 strassed .. ne:

copper, 33 mala crossit.xed polyole*La, 16 ; a. draan t.

shield, 45 mil 5 ypa;:n ;a:z.a S 23 163/7 2S 121/7 175 2/C 16 ga. 7 stra?ded tirrei copper, 23 Pala cresait-.e:

polyotefin, 16 g a . ira.r. a-shield, il sti My p a l s ?. ;a:<e 7 3A Mone al 121/7 175 2/C Elack and White 15 ra.

7 stranded tarned c;;.ser 1*

mil EPCM primary ins alat :-

with 13 mais Fypalon prtrar-jacket. 16 ga. drain ar.d shield 45 mit Mypalen ;ac.:st 3 4A 163/7 25 121/7 175 2/C 16 ga. 7 stranded tt:na; copper, 30 sits rR-t?tM, 16 ga, drain and sPield. 45 mal Nypalon ;acket.

SA 150/7 25 121/7 175 2/C 16 ga. 7 stranded tir s.

copper, 30 mils TR-173M,

{ 16 ga. drain and .sP.aold, 45 mil Nypelon jaceet. l i

10 Sa 162/7 25 121/7 171 2/C 16 go. 7 straeded ste e, l copper. 30 mais TR-t?:M. l 16 ga. drain and s9seld. 45 i mit Nygalon jactet I 11 SC None 25 153/7 23 2/C 16 ga. 7 stranded str.as:

copper 30 mais TR-t7 .1 16 ga. drann and shteid 45 mil Mypelon jacaet l 12 4A Mone 25 121/7 17S 2/C 10 ga. 7 stranded tiree I copper. 33 mile rR-Ep;:t pramary insulation atti 15 alls Nypalon prinary ;segg; l 10 ga. dratn and sateld. '

4S mil nypelon jacaet.

I 13 7A None 25

' 121/7 175 2/C 16 ga. 7 stranded tarre e

copper, 20 mais E?CA prt?. arf insulation witn la este Nypalon ertmary ;acket, 16 ga. eraan and smas1d, el st! wyraton jacaet.

14 75 None 25 121/7 175 2/C 16 ga. 7 stranded tier.e copper. 20 mLis E70= attrar insulatton ,ats . 9 tis Hypalon pra-ary ;atset.

14 ga. draan ars ssagie, 4S 841 Mypalon ;4c a e t.

16 33 pone 25 153/7 25 1/C 16 ga. 7 straeded tinr.

ecPp*r 33 mais TR-EPCM.

I l

4%

!00j Frankhn Research Center NRC C::ntrcct No. NRC-03-79-118 Pcga FRC Pr: Ject Ns. C5257 A Dnnson of The Frankl.n Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4(D 8 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 44 ELECTRICAL CABLE LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT BOSTON INSULATED WIRE AND CABLE MODEL COAXIAL TEFZEL ETFE INSUL REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCASISLB,120 DAYS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 44 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 674, 1705, 1706, 48, 1770 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CARRY CURRENT LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 69, 69A, 69B [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICII:NC'l IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, h RT, P,11,h (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la l

Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2

{ Licensee Response to NRC SER 3 a , 3 b , 3 c , System Consideration Review -h, ^5, 'c. 'd.-

'" ^#

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5;, 55, Sc, Ed, 5 , 5f, Sg,Sh,Si,Ej l

Installed TMI Lestons Learned Implementation $;, 55 Equipment Summary L

! Ma traenance and 'taplacement Schedule Summary 7;, 7b, 7;

.__________ ___ J

MA NRC C::ntrcct No. NRC-03-79-118 P:g2 NWJ Franklin Research Center FRC Pr; ject N3. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Inst:tute lb 20th and Race Streets Phrta . Pa 19103 (215) 4441(xx' FRCTask FRC Assignment No. No.13 [#/ 7 447 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. U

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

g Tne Licensee (has/W et-) provided a response to the SER concerns.

g The Licensee (has/h:2 ot) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no ,

outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Correctise action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Re?.ccate or shield equipment from radiction source Verify qualification by additional (teating/enalysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim .

operation. l The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed 1 corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the ca rective j action .) '

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. I DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATECORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualitied II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt lII.a Quallrication not rstablished] III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

fMC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 6'J00h' ranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 468 b/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 44 EQUIFMI, sit ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS { = DEFICIjNCy, Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate I

Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established 1 Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Kequired) .

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequats o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately X o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment QJalification Not Established X II.O Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.O Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available S .

I

NRC C:ntrcct No. NRC-03-79-118 I As P:go 000d Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: ject No. C5257 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment Nn.13 / 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4/R,/S/ /

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 44 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Electrical Cables MODEL: Boston Insulated Wire Co.

CCMPCNENT NO.:

NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIEtiCIES: T, CS, QT, A, S PSElG EVALUATION OF DETICIENCIES:

T - PSE&G has perfomed a thermal analysis to justify the qualification tem-

~

perature of 3400 F as shown on the qualification data evaluation fom.

This evaluation is contained in our file EQ-05.02.

A_ - Rev. 2 of the E.Q. submittal contains aging data soecifying a 20 year life for this type cable. Supporting data is available in our file EQ-0504.

CS,, E, S_ - These items are addressed in our submittal. Supporting data is contained in our equipment qualification file EQ-05.

PSE&G's evaluation of NRC noted deficiencies has reaffimed that Boston In-sulated Wire Co. cable is capable of perfoming safety functions in a harsh environment at Salem.

l

1. p NRC Contract N3. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Project N2. C5257 P:gD UO U Frrnklin R:sench Csnta A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-l @ FRC Task No. 46K/517 B

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 44 LICENSEE RESPONSE '10 NRC SER (Continued)

EQUIPMEtiT: Electrical Cable .

MCDEL: Boston Insulated Wire Co.

Coaxial - XLPE Insulation CCMPONENT NO..

NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: T, CS, QT, A. S PSE&G E'/ALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

T - PSE&G has performed a thermal analysis to justify the qualification tem-perature of 3400 F as shown on the qualification data evaluation fonn.

This evaluation is contained in our file EQ-27.02.

A - Rev. 2 of the E.Q. submittal contains aging data specifying a 40 year life l for this type cable. Supporting data is available in our file EQ-27.04.

, g,, E, S_, - These items are addressed in our submittal . Supporting data is contained in our equipment qualification file EQ-27.

PSE1G's evaluation of NRC noted deficiencies has reaffinned that Boston In-l sulated Wire Co. cable is capable of perfonning safety functions in a harsh environment at Salem.

i

- - - - - _ - -_ - ___________-_____._____ ______m_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _

Ar NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project Nr. C5257 P g3 U000 Franklin Rase rch Csnt:r A Divinon of The Franklin Institute 3c 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC FRC Asaignment Task No. 4LT No.13[El'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued)

EQUIPMENT: Electrical Cable MODEL: Soston Insulated Wire Co.

Coaxial - Tefzel EFTE Insulation COMPONENT NO.:

NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: T , CS , QT , A , S PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

_T, - PSE3G has performed a ther:1al analysis to justify the qualification tem-perature of 340cF as shown on the qualification data evaluation form.

This evaluation is contained in our file EQ-24.01.

A - Rev. 2 of the E.Q. submittal contains aging data specifying a 40 year life for this type cable. Supporting data is available in our file  ;

EQ-24.03.

CS, OT

- , ~S ~ - These items are addressed in our submittal. Supporting data is contained in cur equipment qualification file EQ-24. l PSE3G's evaluation of NRC noted deficiencies has reaffinled that Boston In-  :

sulated Wire Co. cable is capable of performing safety functions in a harsh environment at Salem.

& NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 UO0hrenklin Rtse:rch Csnttr FRC Project NO. C5257 P;g3 A Dwisaon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5f 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448 10 @ FRC Task No. V4F/I/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4^/

NOTES:

Report B912 [1705] is a test summary which discusses test results on Triaxial cable. The test profile does not Envelop the Salem profile. [

The report also discusses test results on a coaxial cable. The reported test duration exceeds the Salem acccident duration but the reported peak temperature is 50*F below the peak temperature described by the Salem required profile 75-OPM TRIAXIAL CABLE ~ . -

Conditioning - I r 10E rads ganua prior to LOCA cycle &

Cable Construct 1rn -

Conductor -420 AWG 19/32 tir:ned copper-Insulation -Crosslinked polyethylene Inner Shield -433 AWG tinned ce cer braid. 90% coverage Insulation between Shields - -Crosslinked colyethylene .

Outer Shield ' 433 AhG tinned cooper braid 90% coverage.

Jacket -Bost ad 7 CIPE cnloresulfonated polyethylerw Time Temo Relative Press IR - Cond-Shld IR-Shl-Sald- *

(After LOCA) OJ__

Humidity t osie Steem Mn/L MA s 0 75 0 20 x 105 8 x 105 .'

15 min. 3C3 100 60 2.5 x 104

• T r 104 I day . 25 2 100 - 16 6 x 105 3' r 104 5 cayr 252 100 16 20 x 105+ T' r 103 9 days 25Z 100 16 20 x 105+ z x 104 13 days 252 *100. 16- 20 x 103+ Z r 104-17 cays 200 loc 0 20 x 10 5+- 20 x 1055 + (1) 51 days 200 10J 0 20 x 103+ 20 x 10 ,

104 days 200 100 0 20 x 10 +S, 20 x 105+ (2) ,

62-OHM COAXIAL CABLE Conditionina - Aged 168 hourt at T2TC fol. lowed.by 1 x 108 rads ganna prior

• ts LCCA cycle Cable Cons *rve*1cn Conductor - 822 AWG 19/34 tinned copper Insulati:n - Cross 11nked polyethylene Shield - #34 AWG tinned coccer braid 90% coverage Jacket - Bestrad 7 CSPE calorosulfonated polyethylene Time Temo Relative Pressure

( Afts- LOCA) 0F Hutidi*y t esic Ste w 0 to 10 see 300'

-~

100- 50 10 to 200 :ec 30G , 100 50 2C0 see to 15 mirr 300 100 30 15 min to 50 min 300 100 30 1 50 min to 240 min 300 100 30 240 min to 24 hr 230 100 30 24 he to 4 days 230 100 30

l A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Prcject No. C5257 P:g3 l UNnkhn Reserrch Cent:r A Diws.on of Ths Franklin Instituts FRC AssignmInt No.13 5g 20th and Race St.nts. Phda . Pa. 19103(215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. W P/f /~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. W NOTES:

Report B913 is summary report of information concerning Coaxial and triaxial cable with BIWF Fluoropolymer insulation. The Document refers to tests reported in F-C3859-1 which are discussed on pages Sh and 51.

Report B910 is a report which provides test data on cables having EPR Insulation and Bostrad 7 CSPE jackets as follows:

IACA SIMULATION DATA Ared Cable Conditioning Aged 168 hours0.00194 days <br />0.0467 hours <br />2.777778e-4 weeks <br />6.3924e-5 months <br /> at 121C followed by 2 x 100 rads, gn==a, prior to LOCA cycle.

Cable Construction Conductors -- 2/C #16 AWG 7/.0192" tinned copper Insulation -- Ethylene propylene rubber with Bostrad 7 CSPE jacket Binder Tape -- Flame retardant Shield - Aluminum / polyester tape with #18 A'40 7/.0152" TC drain wire Odter Jacket -- Bostrad 7 CSPE ,

Test Recuire-ents , ,

Environmental Simulation Cycle per Appendix A, IEEE Std.

323-1974, combined cycle for FWR/BWR IOCA SIMULATION DATA New Cable Conditioning -- 2 x 100 rada, gaena cable Construction Conductors -- 2/C #16 AWG 7/.0192" tinned copper Insulation -- Ethylene propylene rubber with Bostrad 7 CSPE Jacket Binder Tape -- Fla=e retardant -

Shield -- Aluminun/ polyester tape with #18 AWG 7/.0152" TC drain wire Jacket -- Bostrad 7 CSFE .

Test Recuirements .

Environ =antal Simulation Cycle per ' --- 323-1974, Appendix A, combined cycle for FWR/BWR The report states that the cables passed the testine and provides a summary of test data. The report also refers to F-C3859-1 for test cesults.

NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 00 Fr:nklinResearchCanter FRC Project N 2. C5257 Pa0')

A Div6sion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5h 20th and Race Streets. Phde.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4/c // 617 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. W NOTES:

Report F-C3859-1 isa report of testing conducted on various BIW cable constructions in accordance with IEEE 383-74 and IEEE 323-74. The cables tested and the results of the tests are reproduced on page 51.

The report indicates that some constructions successfully passed test while other cable constructions did not.

The licensee has not provided information either on the SCEWS or in analysis EQ05 to establish that the installed cable constructions are the same as those constructions which successfully passed a test which envelopes the required Salem Parameters. Therefore Qualification has not been established. EQ05 states:

Descriptient

" ~ 9 g)W -be vtN S7 "u dl pg mr ,5  ; A W .1  % ma ba I 5 Ff b'E Am T. S . E . b. G.

Discussient tenclustenst Wdct IC Alppf.Lf- %wpLL W h l

pM %&b

) ed NMW Cov E mion: This equipment is assig ted to NRC category iia becs pe the I

Licensee has not demonstrated that the installed cable is the same as cable which has been successfully tested and qualified.

l - . .

. _ _ ._ - - . _ _ _ __ s_ _ . _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - _ _ _ _ - - - - - - - - - - - - _ _ - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -

a

' NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 s0,A00 U Fr:nklin R:serrch center FRC Project N3. C5257 Pag 2 A on,ision of The Frankhn Institute 13 5i 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC FRC Task Assignment No. #(o No.Nf /~)

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. VF 1

n. , des manimae .,

s. i.e.,et.e. ees,siences seeere sun se resi see.e.

ee e ees,e a e ee m. . . . .

NOTES: e ..., , e ee , . een m.o ,e,,,e ,,,,e , e,,e, ,e,, ue,,se e, ,. w - =mc om--ee. c.em e.ma.e e. e,e ..ee _e. = e.ea. _ee .e4 ee vese.ee. e., ,es,* r. is e ie,, e ,,m ,,e, cuenei ,ee e, ,es, %

es sem. si.e. . . se.e. 8. e.e. a.sem a ee. e. e. ee *r e.e .y ,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, ,,,,,,,,

e one.e . u .* es. ese eveseses. ... e, eene . .

_ _ eees , - e me.

The eaa seersee ame samma estes mee eseouse eF ere y g g., , ,e

"""""****I ";""

"M*""""

. pn

.= ss=e mes-e =e = == === == ma. tue,-senae me Erssa - e e e e .: j asenee es een me se ein s.oe se pese 3-3. e is e d eo e 4eu m esse e.e =a# e.e .* e e , m eies to-oes sie e-e ==. e. , . e .e s i s., e e i.=e e e, s . .'. :1. re 'm Sm e'" '""

e ae # w a ued

-a as.* aa n--* w y ,s , j ..e, uc e.. we wae=ese.

seaw - M* aos e'"e*n e , e mm ana- .e emese = aer, it eeste e . . e ie s 4 eu *

• • • a Pla t - '"em"e I"sho"" f , e,. e e i-o ~ s e. e u m am.e.rs .n . c3.eme e es't e aed er=w den" s-a u.e us-ame c==sem . n ese er.em- e e e =8 i sa e =

m na ===

seewnia . s,.n.o.e .

m n==ese 7 cm , e ,,j , , , , , , , ,

s e.e e e miene esseee

- eis aus te eme nam e

a e es,' y , g,,,

rsupe .= si e eseeeesee s teer use Jeemse . eneseee 9 CsFW e es e M e 5.3 e se s-s to.3 un imre c e.om Memmit.em eta e aed a sa e e us ese aus seemeesee see no enesese 7 csps be e aeu 8 e eoe=

maeae .s=. =

2,em, .we ee e m 84 e e eu * .

ese ese aus Ps.etsr it s4 s 4.1 o u m stesse . deem esse temae se e e.e M Jammee . Flaes enesees senaremme t cars seee ,,,, ,,,,,,

3 " '88 '"

• p'a'**== e. touk ao =< e==- ha e.s.e.me.

tam-seeis fic sta nos emmem.eme sessa is . ese aim ti.e263=ase te _ ~' * ' " " " ' -

-- t

• • m .et a w' sneene . rt.ee mme so".~tH.'i."e #

ansees . name e= eves emmene e cars ease en, , j e4 ena m , , , ,,s e-e m-e eur **j w4ee,m -

is.s ***

m en om eme.em.e anse.m s mne

. eie aos nesse w

.- na.

n-eson-o.a m.eame..nas e.a.e e.e aie reto n

. e ease e4 c .' # 'd ** "'

ued i uee a s esenw . sees

=8*

ria essasieme esse me a sa e es' M 8 *eM m

"";* : .eese ones _ - . _ ~ de"*

, ,,. , s . ..u a s-e u.r senesesee .e a tes a eassed sa 8 aan e j om e eeu m us-t.

n-- ion m m

esima unae somweense mis . soe.ra im e.m.w =e,a e.e se e O h'e es e o e ,,,

mine ,, , eeee

.. em aos ec ==** M ' *e#

a e u *

sam.e as es e. Peaweeee same

, , , , , , e saaessew . ere .es t/m esasse s anex 8 ,,,

e a e e.se s.e so.e iss is-e.a.sses m ea , g, , ,,e a e eu

• enes sense in an . e.iece voeameeme men ,eeee so-se .ene m te seene no eoe e e sneese .seavenne ease ,,, ,,, ,,,,,a ti.e ese eoed ame e4 . Boes .e r cow ,, ,, ,,,,.i.

s .ise e 4 s-e 10.e ueLeente same se e-a eneses peu-sees fue Sse is.e

'"* *" ' j se.e ee**

us eu am mosee essee s. '34, ' ' ' ,,, ,,, ,,,,,,,

se e is' s-as ts.e tae-ima **'**j n.. e,. a e e.e m 5

• a==

arc #as ans camenem . are same.a aim .esense esosee ma lasekettes . eeneesseease sesamesegreesmeese at e

. easee mas same eae ==== att resetase tease ceasecter s tee see ses seteattee, issue se noieast w +eis for I somete. estees emaeae .tes eineemw.

es seem-emaese aus vs.sts: Tc _. .ecs en einer se.e emeterecomectee se eseessee sees ce==asse es -

ereen ease ese ,si te,emi seg. goo,eems teveenen emine nadiatee staseesse.

• s"e"*a*se**am*'**ee'**"*

, s (t) a# tee nestwaten se 100 fee.

(t) 4* tee esettcattee se se war.

v-u 17.3 a.se-mre esse se s. seen pen esed ese m m e une'ecue e geoises troisteel e* wwr.

arc eis ase sse esses as aos c.

(4) este seiene sere nect.ee, one caele tesy comesses te geoems ta-a no.a us-seets c nemem . e:S aus tr.eaer= w uneenen es t .

e arc ene em: i.oe eta = . nem veimene ass

. Flam eesareene emme .

stesse P . close fleer a.t2 emLees . esmead caen Teete s. etes esteetten esteetene int neeeseM Is.3 Is.e ue te69 Comesseere . Me anG ter29 TC asemans ome . Memo veteresse alps g gaseg gag 3/C ese safs Pee esse see hete . ein aos TC nesse seenne aset Lee esse t.amamos 3ae ese as essene . rname weeeremme sese Sasete on, feet tese Leew t ' oe oot e see f at t Caecest 'el les s Joseos =

eat t 3 stee/22ee et/s.3 E1 3 38.e sete-e.en5 comemes.

• 3 I Ofee/2300 d/t.2 Leae Imenassase Era. ese M2essegue ane .eID9" ? CsPWW

• " 3**" e6 s 3.3.e.5.L 7 Isse/Itse 3.7/5.3 Cseemetee . eM aus f t.etet* ft 3 g,3,e,p.e f g3ggftges g , gjg,g the 17.e us-tome

= as - i-- -e-,se =,- - = , . ... e.,4 , ,,es,,see ..e,...

e.ys.e 0 1.8.3 2 = eats /tese 33.s 1e.3 e46e-e 414 comemeene = eu ase F#.ete!" tt $ E *I*IAE*I IIOO#ISOE I.7/I.e .

r* ett ans & assesses e eastees I C3PB e 4.2.3 A 5.7 taessioen e.g/g.a 13 4 16.7 us-tent need comessee . eu ans lette it 7 1.3. l A5.e IIGe# sees 3.3/s.9 1/8 Me ass loseaes4em - r1ame seeacemme Est

- - .M .~ e. e. .

, .. us.m.,

-e m

.e .

=.ame o..ee . . m. . .

e.e .. .o... _ e.,.,

1 IHO E 3 eas# 9.5/=

8 9 13es#ese f.e/9.9 esPg tre . emas,seemassemeed e een senseseMean ases evesesome emene le*9 (and. es ereed 139e/b**e - 3.1/3.9 TC 3 e. stomed eussee ON* E8'e* es OM W" 9.0/*

ELFeeemesstasse eTs3. . este sweeee eenensee

• . aan.

peausseelene M teneteases see essested eseete.geles es efee ses ese e eesuetog eeelemme air se es

• eessie se6e to saeben ease etemeteos

&h3 ensame M es* 900e see Me h Se III C es eII e'eer M MN seg gag,seeenepe geg; . se !?se ese ter gpogg p te ge gg ggggg g ggggg gy ese ease, ennese e-e 8-an ene st-4 se scene essee. es,e, gg3 gegeven k ggpg een Jeaheed ese elese .8 esse

• idee eseseed seseeen de lose ease ee toe 9,4 er ftM ge, g, egg ggg, gg Sees e8 en este esmedelee one Inseessasse steendene la Oglace, t

A NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 000h$:nklin Rtse:rch Crntr FRC Project Nr. C5257 Fage A Divmon of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.1p 5j 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTaskNo. 4// TIIO EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 5L/

v NOTES:

Overall Evaluation and conclusions:

1.

The licensee has referenced several reports which describe results of qualification tests on Cables manufacturtd by Boston Insulated wire.

2. Some of the tests envelope the Salem environmental profile while other tests do not.

3. Descriptions of cable constructions contained in the referenced test reports do not correspond to descriptions provided by the licensee on the SCEW sheets or in Analysis EQ05.

4. The Licensee has stated (See page Sh) that correlation between the installed cables and the applicable test reports has been requested.

Therefore Documented eveidence that the installed cables are qualified has not yet been provided, relationship between tested and installed cables has not been established, and for some of the cables it has not been established that a test enveloping the Salem environmental parameters has been performed.

TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT REVIEW OF LICENSEES' RESOLUT!ON OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES FROM NRC EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SAFETY EVALUATION REPORTS (F-11 and B-60)

PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 VOL. 2 0F 2 NRC DOCKET NO. 50-272 FRC PROJECT C5257 NRC TAC NO. 42467 FRC ASSIGNMENT 13 N RC CONTRACT NO. N RC-03-79-118 FRC TASK 468 Prepared by Franklin Research Center 20th and Race Streets Philarielphia, PA 19103 FRC Group Leader: C. J. Crane Prepared for Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Lead NRC Engineer: N. B. Le P. Shemanski July 15, 1982 This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States l

Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, or any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or implied, or assumes any legal liability or l responsibility for any third party's use, or the results of such use, of any information, appa-ratus, product or process disciosed in this report, or represents that its use by such third party would not infringe privately owned rights.

1 al

._ Franklin Research Center A Division of The Franklin institute The BoAmen Frarddin Parkwey. PNia . Pa 19103 (21S)448-100o

. A

TECHNICAL EVALUATION REPORT REVIEW OF LICENSEES' RESOLUTION OF OUTSTANDING ISSUES FROM NRC EQUIPf3ENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SAFETY EVALUATION REPORTS (F-11 and B-60)

PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION UNIT 1 VOL, 2 0F 2 NRC DOCKET NO. 50-272 FRC PROJECT CS257 NRC TAC NO. 42467 FRC ASSIGNMENT 13 l NRC CONTRACT NO. NRC-03-79-118 FRC TASK 468 Prepared by Franklin Research Center 20th and Race Streets Pniladelphia, PA 19103 FRC Group Leader: C. J. Crane Prepared for Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555 Lead NRC Engineer: N. B. Le P. Shemanski July 15, 1982 This report was prepared as an account of work sponsored by an agency of the United States t Government. Neither the United States Government nor any agency thereof, or any of their employees, makes any warranty, expressed or impiled, or assumes any legal llat;ility or respcr.:lbility for any third party's use, or the results of such use, of any information, appa-ratus, product or process disclosed in this report, or represents that its use by such third party would not infringe privately owned rights.

Reviewed by: Approved by:

O$ 0Y Groth Leader Projectja ager

1. F -

' Department DI ctor l

4 l __ . Franklin Research Center i A Division of The Franklin Institute j The Ben,arnin Frankhn Parkway, PNia . Pa 19103 (21S)448 1000 l

Mi% NRC C:ntr:ct N 3. NRC-03-79-118

$!J Franklin Research Center Pag 3 FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dmuon ol The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. YS7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E i

EQUIFMENT ITEM NO. 45 ELECTRICAL CABLE LOCATED IN TPE CONTAINMENT TRI/.RGLE MODEL, NOT STATED REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB,120 DAYS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 45 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 52, 3365 FUNCTIOF (PLANT ID): CARRY CURRENT LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 70 [64]

l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITDi(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, RT, P, H, (R), M, I , QM , RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Mot stated, Not applicable LISTIN'G OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sur: mary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 2c, 30 Systeis Consideration Review 4e , Ob, 00, 02, 4s, 4f-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, 5f, 5,5 Sh, 51, Sj-Installeo TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -5;, 55 Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7a, 7b, 70-

1. ,_% NRC Crntract N3. NRC-03-79-118 lJ000 Franklin Research Cent:r FRC Pr; ject Na. C5237 P:ga A Dn, mon of The Franklin Instituie FRC Asslanment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phil a . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 148/6/7 W

EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Af

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/h:2 .~ W provided a response to the SER Joncerns.

[ The Licensee (has/h2: net} specifically stated that the equipment is qualified andAr will function when exposed to the applicable DBE ,

environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other '( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. .

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

l The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification I and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

(I.a cualifiedd II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available l

l

NRC Contract N D. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3

1. [A000 Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 a Dmson of The Frankhn Insrirute FRC Assignment No.13 / 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 447/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding .argins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified '

X I.b Equipmen' Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available 1

- _ _ _ _ - - - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __. _____J

~

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 000hrrnklin R:serrch Cxnt:r FRC Pr: ject Ns. C5257 P gD A Division of The Franklin institute FRC Assignment No.13 f 3a 20th and Race Streets. PMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Al,?/8/7 -

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAUFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _41~

LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER l

EQUIPMENT: Electrical Cable MODEL: Triangle - PWC, Inc.

l 1

l CCMPONENT NO.:

l

)

NRC ICEtiTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: T, CS, QT, A, S PSElG EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

T - PSE&G has performed a thernal analysis to justify the qualification ten-1 perature of 3460F as shown on the qualification dati evaluation fann. l This evaluation is contained in our file EQ-06.04.

1 A - Rev. 2 of the E.Q. submittal contains aging data specifMng a 40 year life l for this type cable. Supporting data is available in our file EQ-06.05.

Q, E, S., - These items are addressed in our submittal . Supporting data is )

contained in our equipment qualification file EQ-06.

1 PSE&G's evaluation of NRC noted deficiencies has reaffirmed that Triangle - i PWC, Inc., cable is capable of performing safety functions in a harsh environ- I ment at Salem.  ;

l l

A NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 000 ranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 P:g2 A Dmsion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5a 20th and Rue Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 6/4f/5/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW Criteria: DOR Guidelines  ; NUREG-0588, Cat. I  ; NUREG-0588, Cat. II .

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0 588-I/0 588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION  !  !  !

Equipment Type  !  !

!N  !  !

bG

• ,'",G" ,5 7/2/ks'G.L6 ,$

! ruo .

YY($ $

Model Number ( 5. 2. 2/-/-) '

/ C. -//jy /c g j </  ! g Serial Number g,y 7,,,. p bM [

Faatures/ Mounting  ! jy ,4.  ! pp5L  !

(5.2.6/-/-)  !  !  !

"jr/

2 j l Location / Elevation Opp:a/n ce;7 Equipment ID No. '

j 4/[A '

/2//4 QUALIFICATION REPORT  !  !  !

(8.0/5.0/5.0) 1  !  !

R port ID Number  !/pt/

! /t/ # 1 Z/O  ! jd/p J./p 6.!

1

1. 9* "

[g /q'2 *'") h / A ~7 )

{

Issued by '

,g,y-g ed/k

• l Prepared for 7/a'"5'/* { '/%/##4Id i R3ferenced Reports jt/p /// #

( . . .

Qualification Method (5.1, 5.3/2.1, 2.4/2.1, 2.4) !

! jf  !

pg  !

(  !  !  !

QUALIFIL?. TION TEST PROGRAM  !  !  !

Functional Test Description ! 19  ! gp% !

(5.2.5/2.2.9/2.2.9)  !  !  !

Operating Conditions  !  !  !

(-/2.2.10/2.2.10)  !

/V A  !  !

Ioad/ Cycles / voltage /  !  ! 6 s -s /g.<  !

Current / Freq .  !  ! fy ,  !

mm i is i..... ...

A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 000hr:nklin Rtserreh C4nter FRC Project N2. C5257 P:g2 A Divmon of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 5b 20th and Race %eets. Phna . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. #$ f/f/ ~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _5/_s' NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (NR/0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

2 2 . 1 . M e . - e Accuracy g3.2.5/-/-) .g . # b Number of Specimens '

A .'

/

Test Instruments Calibrated . j/ .

Pa s e .3/ 3 k Test Duration ( 5. 2.1/-/-) '

y y M(V '

Accident Duration (Envir.  !  !  !

Above Normal) (5.2.1/-/-)  !>dI  !

7  !

Requirei Function Time

. gg T . .

M .

Test Sequcnce (General)  !  !

(5.2.3/2.3.1/2.3.1)  !

![

Test Sequence (NUREG-0588, -

Cat. I) (-/2.3.1/-)  !  !  !

1. Representative Sample I

! L [0CA fr

$ 1

2. Baseline Data  !  !  !

3. Performance Extremes  !  !  !

4. Thermal Aging  !  !  !

5. Radiation Aging  !  !  !

6. Wear Aging  !  !  !

7. Vibration / Seismic  !  !  ! ,

8. DBE Exposure  !  !  !

l 9. Post-DBE Exposure  !  !  !

10. Inspection  !  !  !

I

, 5 4, 7.0/4.0/4.0) .

g / 76 /k l

Thermal Aging / Basis  !

e

! p fd e

Material Aging (( M Evaluation (7.0/-/-)  !  !  !

Materials Susceptible  !  ! r g  !

(Thermal) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-)  !  !  !

i e e Radiation Aging, Type '.

NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 A[branklin lj0 Reserrch Cent:r FRC Pr; ject N2. C5257 P;g^s A DMsion of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 5c 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. V/of /f' 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUA'.lFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _ff NRC REQUIRE:iENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0 588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

Radiation Aging, Dose (rd) [ h Radiation Aging, Dose Rate f- . .

Radiation Aging, Method *

[ ' '

Materials Susceptible  !

(Radiation) ( 5. 2. 4, 7. 0/-/-) 1-  !  !

Operational Aging jY jd- M

(-/4.2/-)  !  !  !

Other Age Conditioning

(-/4.2/-)

1

! [ /f  !

[h  !

Qualified Life Claimed /  !  !  !

Established ( 5. 2. 4/4.10/-)  ! Yd C'M!  !

! [  !  !

Normal Ambient Temperature  ! g  !,  !

F.ormal Amoient Radiation  !  !  !

Normal Ambient Humidity I  !  !

On-Going Surveillance and  ! N / <r._.  !  !

Pretrentive Mainte' nance  !  ! /V [  !

(7.0/-/-)  !  !  !

1/  !  !

On-Going Analysis of 1  !  !

Failures and Degradation (7.0/-/-)

[8  !

Margin (General)  !  !  !

(6.0/3.0/3.0) 1 M  !

[4  !

Margin (NUREG-0588,  ![k 1

Cat. I) (-/3.2/-)  !  !  !

1. Temperature (+15'F)  !  !  !

2. Pressure (+10%,  !  !  !

10 psig max)  !  !  !

3. Radiation  !  !  !

(not required)  ! kjV  !  !

4. Time (+10%, +1 hour  !  ! h/  !

, + function time minimum)  !  !  !

I l

A NRC Contract N . NRC-03 79-118 000hrrnklin Rese:rch Csnt:r FRC Project No. C5257 P g2 A DNision of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 5d 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. //6P/5/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Wf NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/Ci88-II) SUPMITTAL

~

DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

ACCIDENT CONDITIONS  !  !  !

IDCA/MSLB/HELB/ Uncontrolled !  !  !

(4.1, 4.2, 4.3.1, 4.3.3/  !

dC/r[#1SLg . [ dCM g/81 b .

1.1, 1.2, 1.5/1.1, 1.2, 1.5) !  !  !

Radiation Type M _ __ _

i Radiation Dose (rd) * '

(4.1.2/1.4/1.4) [ Y/O N Radiation Dose Rate (rd/hr)

N II'  !

g, 7 f M  !

Radiation Qual. Method (5.3.1/-/-) f

/V[A  !

[M  !

Proximity to Concentrated  !  !

Radiation

( 4.1. 2/1. 4. 6/1. 4. 6)

I

[ g,

[I  !

I  !  !

Equipment Susceptible to I  !  !

Beta Radiation (4.1.2/-/-) I[  !  !

l  !  !  !

'p gg.'

l Radiation Dose (Normal +

l Accident) (4.1.2/-/-) .

Plateout Dose Considered  !  ! [  !

(-/1. 4 8/1. 48) ')g '

l Gamma + Beta Dose (rd)

(4.1.2/1.4.7/1.4.7) f

[  !

l l I J

A NRC Contract N;. NRC-C3-79-118 00hr:nklin Rssetrch Cant;r FRC Project N2. C5257 P:go A Dwision of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5e 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. //6 f /51~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATICN REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Ef' NF.C REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE No.)

ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE  ;  !  !

OF ACCIDENT CONDITIONS  :  !  !

Rate of Temp./ Press. p j ,

~~) #

• 3,f Increase . .

i  !  !

Paakt *F/psig/RH/ Time  !

ygg j gg(

Decrease Tot *F/psig/RH/ Time * ,, jq 3 h ' y yM j

Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time f j yk Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time p 4f/2f[/p4/'J.f '

Equipment Surface Tempera-

! .t isw pr< / as -

ture (MSLB) (-/1.2.5.C, pf  !  !

2.2.6/1.2.5.C, 2.2.6)

• 1 1 Spray Qualification Method 'I  !  !

(5.3.2/1.3, 2.2.8/1.3, I jV[  !  !

2.2.8)  !  !  !

f  !  !  !

1 4/1 2 /. !4 *

! Od # M  ! ##0, N #

1.3, 2.2.8) 7 -'

t g/4' .) M !g j #.24# !

Spray Density (gpm/f t 2)  !  !

[/-/ p 7;~//  !

Spray Duration  : gp d./Tff Submergence Duration *

( 4.1. 3/ 2. 2. 5/2. 2. 5)

! #M//  !

, N#  !  !

In-Leakage Considered ,  !  !

( 5. 2. 6, 5. 3. 2/-/-) , . .

, #g I I Time to Submergence *

g/ '

Dust Environment

(-/2.2.11/2.2.11) ,  !  !

l /V4 A~~V*p.A} me , . W A f YW"M

& NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 000hranklin Rese:rch Cent:r FRC Pr; ject N3. C5257 Paga A Dwe un of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5f 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRCTask No. 4/&#/ f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. F NOTES:

phi en A~% M-

't fhacteung d urva ctdb.a ac.pA cci t@kn.c/150C Jbo prea.c g urtg bad cn Amu.b.wo ple+

- e ppnhi Ao a.p p w x u m c i d y 40 vecato oA. 7e c. " Cs c3

/r44 2-rs'da O

3. Mke Evaluation E:Pr2, wwc.uJLccte.t.

U cahf r ~tbr:z.C enm hm t 5W -

( Ad mn +N.u. _1. vL'fTZ McM '

(ac e a ,

w a s . or . w cto. x jg} -

e

1. _% NRC C:ntr:ct NO. NRC-03-79-118 P:g2

!;C JU Franklin Research Center FRC Pr;Joct N3. C5257 A Dmsson of The Franklin Ir. titute FRC Assignment No. 3 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. bY EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. $

EQUIPMENT ITFM NO. 46 ELECTRICAL CABLE LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT ANACONDA WIRE AND CABLE, EPR INSULATION REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB, 120 DAYS TER CHECKSHEET No. 46 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 54, 1347 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CARRY CURRENT LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 71 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of ,this TER for Legend)

R, QT, Kr , P , H, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Ect stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NPC SER 3a, 35 M. 2d-bystem Consideration heview ?u, OL, Ou, 4d, '; , 4 f-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, S f , 5')

b , Oh, Li, Oj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 12, 00-Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 72, 7b, 7e

c ph NRC C ntract N2. NRC-03-79-118 I

!.LfJ Franklin R2serre! Gnter FRC Pr ject N2.C5257 Paga A Divison of The Franklin institure lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda-. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC FRC Assignment Task No. 44f No.13[f/~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N SUMARY 0F LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

I Tne Licensee (has/h .. .~4 provided a response to the SER concerns.

1 The' Licensee (has/h " t) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and)%u; will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) propused a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licencee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) l Equipment relocation to a mild environment I

Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

1 The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment it6a does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from enviroraental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a 7 . .a Qualified]

n Tofication II.c Qualified Life Deficiency III.a Exempt l

l .II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available l

l

&ljbrinklin Rew::rch Csnt:r NRC Contract NO. NRC-03 79-118 Pag 3 FRC Project Nr. C5257 A Dnnsion onhe Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-10 @ FRC Task No. 44 Th/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRCNMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 44 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similari;y Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Establisned to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Tast Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified >(

I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfles All Requirements Except Quclified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Hot in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available J

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 000hr:nklin R:seirch Cant:r FRC Project No. C5257 P:g]

A Dwiston of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 / 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4l,f/Sl~I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Electrical Cables MODEL: Anaconda CCMPONENT NO.: -" ,

1 . ~ Zl_ , -

NRC IDEffi!FIED DEFICIENCIES: T, CS, A, S l PSE&G EVALUATION 0F DEFICIENCIES:

1

-T - PSE&G has perfomed a thermal analysis to justify the qualification tem-perature of 3460 F as shown in the qualification data evaluation form.

This evaluation is contained in our file EQ-03.04.

A - Rev. 2 of the Environmental Qualification submittal contains aging data specifying a 40 year life for this cable. Supporting data is contained in our file EQ-03.05.

E - These items have been addressed in our submittal. Supporting data is contained in our file EQ-03.

PSE&G': evaluation of NRC noted deficiencies has reaffimed that Anaconda cable is capable of performing safety functions in a harsh environnent at Salem.

I

A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 000FFranklin Rise:rch Centir FRC Project N3. C5257 P:g3 A Dwmon of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No. 33 50 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4'68/ f /7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8.6 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW Criteria: DOR Guidelines X ; NUREG-0588, Cat. I  ; NUREG-0588, Cat. II .

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/O 588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION !p  !  !

Equipment Type Electrical Cable Manufacturer's Name .e l f-Anaconda (5.2.2/-/-) * {

o gy -  ?~

Model Number (5.2.2/-/-) !f , g g.,,, -

S ee Page 51 k "O Sarial Number 1%w! jf-

• Not Applicable

a A-

, e Q a.

Features /Mountin9 (5.2.6/-/-) -

M6N3 ,

Not Applicable Connections / Interfaces (5.2.6/-/-)  ![I*

fNotStated Location / Elevation . .

Not Stated f

Equipment ID No. . //[jG- ' Not Applicable '

QUALIFICATION REPORT  !

(8.0[5. 0/5. 0)  ! I

• R* port ID Number { pc,y3 po-J F-C4350-3

. i Raport Date

• 7/ M July 1976 Issued by f fFranklinInstitute f

Research Laboratories Anaconda  !

Raferenced Reports ' g/A f.NotApplicable f Qualification Method  !  !

p Sequential Test f (5.1, 5. 3/2.1, 2. 4/2.1, 2. 4) !  !

• QUALIFICATION TEST PROGRAM  !  !  !

Functional Test Description !  ! Carry Current / Insulation (5.2. 5/2. 2.9/2. 2.9) 4 resistance /Hipot Operating Conditions  ! 480Vac/25 amps

!y f

(-/2.2.10/2.2.10) -

2900Vac/170 amps

• Ioad/ Cycles / Voltage /  !  ! 480Vac/17.5 amps  !

Current /Freq. I  ! I

w NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79118 00 Franklin arsearch Cant 2r FRC Project N3. C5257 Page A Dtvmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5b 20th and Race Streets. Phila. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. (-/G f /C s'")

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. u4

.NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OP.

(DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

Acceptance Criteria  ! gm /!  !

Not Provided (5.2.5/2.2.1/2.2.1) l'  ! g Accuracy (5.2.5/-/-)  !

g p/A,  ! -

g Not Applicable g

Number of Specimens '

g/jp. .

5 Test Instruments Calibrated '

A//J.  ! Yes '

Safety Function (Active / !p  ! Not Stated  !

Passive) (-/2.1. 3/2.1. 3)  !  !  !

Test Duration (5. 2.1/-/-) / 30 days Accit!ent Duration (Envir. 1  !  !

Above Normal) (5.2.1/-/-) !MY g

! Not Applicable Required Function Time  ! ,.' ~2 # . Not Applicable Test Sequence (General)  !  !  !

( 5. 2. 3/ 2. 3.1/ 2. 3.1)  !  ! Thermal Aging .

l . . Irradiation .

Test Sequence (NUREG-0588, jvp LOCA Simulat. ion {

Cat. I) (-/ 2. 3.1/-)  !  !  !

1. Representative Sample  !  !  !

2. Baseline Data  !  !  !

3. Performance Extremes  !  !  !

4. Thermal Aging  !  !  !

5. Radiation Aging  !  !  !

6. Wear Aging  !  !  !

i 7. Vibration / Seismic  !  !  !

8. DBE Exposure  !  !  !

l 9. Post-DBE Exposure  !  !  !

l

10. Inspection  !  !  !

Ag ing  !  !  !

(5.2.4, 7.0/4.0/4.0)  !  !  !

Thermal Aging / Basis  ! 7 days @ 150*C i l Material Aging  !  !

A Evaluation (7.0/-/-)  !  !

en us Evaluation '{

Materials Susceptible  !  !  !

l l (Thermal) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-)  !

g  !

Not Applicable Badiation Aging, Type Gamma

e As NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Pag]

b00hrcnklin Rrsench Cantir FRC Project N . C5257 A Dwision of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 $C 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-tm0 FRC Task No. 66 f/T' /7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. f4 NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

Radiation Aging, Dose (rd)  ! # ,l M . See Accident Dose f Radiation Aging, Dose Rate fSeeAccidentDose f

Radiation Aging, Method .

/V/A  ! Test Materials Susceptible !gf/pdedtis! Not Stated I

(Radiation) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-) !  !

Operational Aging Not Applicable

(-/4.2/-)  !  !  !

Other Age Conditioning  ! fd  ! Not Stated I

(-/4.2/-)  !  !  !

Qualified Life Claimed /  !  ! I See Page l 40 Years Established (5.2.4/4.10/-)  !.y {. l. Sf Normal Ambient Temperature  ! /V4M / ! Not Applicable I Normal Amoient Radiation  !  ! Not Applicable I Normal Ambient Humidity W Not Applicable f

On-Going Surveillance and  ! Cy  ! Not Applicable I Preventive Maintenance  !  !  !

(7.0/-/-)  !  !  !

w :=s On-Going Analysis of  !  !  !

Failures and Degradation  !  ! Not Applicable I

! (/  !

(7.0/-/-)  !

Margin (General)  ! [M  ! Not Stated I

(6.0/3.0/3.0)  !

j  !  !  !

l Margin TUREG-0588,  !  ! Not Stated Cat. I) i-/3.2/-)  ! / /),,  !  !

1. Temperature (+15'F)  !  !  !

2. Pressure (+10%,  !  !  !

l

! 10 psig max)  !  !  !

l

3. Radiation  !  !  !

(not required)  !  !  !

4. Time (+10%, +1 hour  !  !  !

l + function time minimum)  !  !  !

1

-N

A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N;. C5257 Page 000Erinkrin asse:rch Dcnter '

A Division of The Frankhn Institut > FRC Assignm:nt No.13 5d 20th and Race Streets. Ehda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-I000 FRC Task No. Vr#/5/7 EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6/.4 NRC REQUIREMEN73 DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

ACCIDENT CONDITIONS  !  !  !

IDCA/MSLB/HELB/ Uncontrolled !j  ! LOCA/MSLB  !

(4.1, 4.2, 4.3.1, 4.3.3/  :^ dC4[-/igLg 1.1, 1.2, 1.5/1.1, 1.2, 1.5) : 1 1 i  !  !

Radiation Type [_ _ ;,_ __

Gamma Radiation Dose (rd) 2x10 (4.1.2/1.4/1.4)

• 8 Y'/0 A  !  !

8 Radiation Dose Rate (rd/hr) 0.35x10 /hr Radiation Qual. Method I##Y  ! Test  !

(5.3.1/-/-)  ! V

/[4  !  !

Proximity to Concentrated *

! Not applicable  !

! Radiation *

( 4.1. 2/1. 4. 6/1. 4. 6)  !  !

l  !  !  !

Equipment Susceptible to  !

! Not Stated  !

Beta Radiation (4.1.2/-/-) I[  !  !

Radiation Dose (Normal +  !  ! Not Applicable I Accident) (4.1.2/-/-) 'p  ! '

Plateout Dose Considered  !  ! Not Applicable I

(-/1. 48/1. 48) 'M Gamma + Beta Dose (rd)  :  !  !

( 4.1. 2/1. 4. 7/1. 4. 7)  !  ! Not Applicable  !

l l

1. s NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 000 ranklin Rise rch Center FRC Project Nr. C5257 P:g3 A Dnnson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No,1# 5e 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 Iom FRCTask No. (/fof/fl7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 44 NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE No.)

ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE  !  !  !

OF ACCIDENT CONDITIONS  !  !  !

Rato of Temp./ Press.  !)g '# / 14*F, 7 psi / second  !

Increase  ! . .

l Pack 'F/psig/RH/ Time / f,,

! 346/113/100/8 hours  !

, /  ! 335/96/100/3 hours  !

Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time 315/69/100/3.5 hrs  !

jpg pffq;)k !! 265/28/100/3.33 days  ! ,

Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time 9 af 212/0-5/100/26 days '

Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time '

Equipment Surface Tempera- l  !  !

ture (MSLB) (-/1.2.5.C,  ; j(/ ,d-  ! Not applicable  !

2.2.6/1.2.5.C, 2.2.6)  ;  !  !

Spray Qualification Method  ! Test  !

(5.3.2/1.3, 2.2.8/1.3, I

/ Y[  !  !

2.2.8) '

Spray composition  ! 3000 ppm Boron 1 (4.1.4/1.3, 2.2.8/ - -

! 0.064 Molar Sodium  !

1.3, 2.2.8)  !  ! Thiosulfate  !

!FN)#  ! pH 10.5 using NaOH  !

! Spezy Density (gpm/f t 2)  !  ! 0.15 1 1//d M !  !

Spray Duration  !  ! 30 Days  !

Submergence !)uration  ;

)) Ad ^o $.

• Not Applicable

( 4.1. 3/ 2. 2. 5/ 2. 2. 5)  :  ! .

! ## 1  :

In-Leakage Considered ,  ! I Not Stated (5. 2. 6, 5. 3. 2/-/-) ,  !  !

Hg  !  !

Time to Submergence l  ! Not Applicable  !

pj  !  !

Dust Environment ,  ! Not Applicable  !

(-/ 2. 2.11/ 2. 2.11) ',  !  !

/4V J

i t

4iMU Frznklin R:seirch Csnter NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N2.C5257 Pag]

A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institus.2 FRC Assignment No.13 5f 20th cnd Racs Streets. Phila. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUk lFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.

NOTES:

Attachment 1 to the referenced test report states bB. Arrhenius Plot _

- The te=perature 6 time relationship is plotted as shown in "Line a" ,

Figure 4. The line obtained shows that the' insulation possesseg

- 40 years life, if the insulation is continuously aged around 98 C. .

A.straiggt line (Figure 4, "Line b") is drawn passing the point

- i.e. 150 C with 168 hours0.00194 days <br />0.0467 hours <br />2.777778e-4 weeks <br />6.3924e-5 months <br />, utilizing the slope of the straight line obtained from "Line a". It is shown in Figure 4, "Line g"

- that the straight line also passes the point 40 years at 90 C.

C. Conclusion (Qualified Cable Life)

Based on Arrhenius technique, Anaconda EPR insulated cable possesses more than 40 years qualified life, provided the cable. is operated at 9C'C.

Furthermore, also based on Arrhenius Plot, the aging at 150 C

~

with 168 hours0.00194 days <br />0.0467 hours <br />2.777778e-4 weeks <br />6.3924e-5 months <br />, is equivaleng to the life of 90 C for 40 years.

This is the basis to use 150 C with 168 hours0.00194 days <br />0.0467 hours <br />2.777778e-4 weeks <br />6.3924e-5 months <br />, as aging condition for qualified life simulation as shown in FIRL Technical Report F-C4350-3. '

- D. Remarks:

1. As stated in IEEE 383-1974, Section 2.3.2, " Aging data should be submitted to establish long term perfomance of the insulation".

This is the reason that dumbbell fom of insulation procured from EPR insulated cable was used in the aging test.

The ' method adopted by IEEE Standard 383-1974 to determine

^

2.

the end-point of cable life is 1) bending the aged sample around a mandrel with 40 times the cable 0.D. , then 2) immersing in water at room temperature 3) applying ac stress of 80 VPM

1. or 5 minutes. The method was utilized in our LOCA qualifi-cation test as reported in FIRL Technical Report F-C4350-3.

- However, the life influenced not only by status of aging, also it will be effected by other factors involved in the testing.

- Based on these reasons, we trust that the slope developed based on elongation is a better and reproducible method for the prediction of cable life. #

A NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 000hnnklin RtseIrch Csnter FRC Project NO. C5257 Pag 3 A Divisu>n of The Frtnkhn Instauti 2 Si 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (2i5) 448 1000 FRCTask FRC Assignm:nt3(o.14 No. V P/O'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N NOTES:

2. TEST SPECIMENS A description of the cable speci= ens is presented below. The descriptions were provided by The Anaconda Company. Table 1 lists the cable specimens tested and shows their energizing voltage and current levels.

A. Low Voltage Power Cable (Durasheath EP)*

Specimens: 18.11, 18.12

- 1/C, No. 12 AWG 7/W Tinned Copper Conductor, 30 mil Ethylene

( ,

Propylene Rubber Insulation,15 mil Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene

.J.acke t B. Control Cable (Flameguard EP)*

Specimen: 20.11 7/C No.12 AWG 7/W Tinned Copper Conductor, 30 mil Ethylene Propylene Rubber Insulation, 15 mil Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene l Jacket, Cabled, Asbestos Tape, 60 mil Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene Overall Jacket

.C.' Medium Voltage Power Cable (Uniblend EP)*

Specimen: 19.21 1/C No. 2 AWG 7/W Copper Conductor, Extruded Semi-Conducting Strand Shield, 90 mil Ethylene Propylene Rubber Insulation, 30 mil Extruded l Semi-Conducting Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene Insulation Shield,

! Copper Tape, 60 mil Chlorosulfonated Polyethylene Jacket D. Medium Voltage Power Cable (Unishield EP)*

Specimen: 19.11 l

1/C No. 2 AWG 7/W Copper Conductor, Extruded Semi-Conducting Strand 1 Shield, 90 mil Ethylene Propylene Rubber Insulation, Six Corrugated l Copper Drain Wires Embedded in a 75 mil Semi-Conducting Chlorinated Polyethylene Jacket l

l l

l

4% NRC C ntract ND. NRC-03-79-118 P:g2 Ubd Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dmsion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc .

20th and Race Streets. P5da.. Pa 19103 (215) 4481000 FRC Task No. V6T EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. D EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 47 ELECTRICAL CABLE LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT -

ROCKBESTOS, MODEL NOT STATED REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB, 120 DAYS-TER CHECKSHEET NO. 47 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 55, 676 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CARRY CURRENT SERVICE: NOT STATED LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 72 [6 43 DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of ,this TER for Legend)

R, h QT, RT, P, H, (R), M, I , QM , RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, ?c, 3d System Consideration Review ic, it, ic, If, I;, if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, Sb, Sc, 5d, Se, Sf, 59, 5h, Li, j -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation M. "_

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 3=- 7b. 7c ~

N A N QRC C:ntract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 P:g3 i!Nnklin Research Center r RC Pr: Ject N .C5257 A Dmsson of Ths Frankhn Ininture FRC'Assignm:nt N2.13 Ib 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No.

N 44 7/ S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 47 b_UMMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has/h) provided a response to the SER concerns.

X The Licensee (has/nugiliH5t) specifically stated that the equipment is .

qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

I 1 The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no -

outstanding qualification deficiencies.

l The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

I Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item. ,

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment l Equipment modification s Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification l and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available i

I J

t ABOO rznkhn Rzse:rch Cintu NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N2. C5257 Pag)

A Divmon of The Franklin Institute .13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phita. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. N/UM/7 k

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Y7 CQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adeqilate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Teraperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding-Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied _,_

Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied 1 Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margir (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied -

Criteria Regardine M.trgins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Squipment Qualification Not Established 1 II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Txempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 000Erznklin R: search Ccntr FRC Project No'. CS257 P:g3 A Desion of The Frankhn Institute 3a l 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC FRC Assignment Task No. 4 t,F No.13[Si ?

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _f.7.

LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMEfE: Electrical Cable MODEL: Rockbestos/Cerro l

CCMPONENT NO.:

a NRC ICENTIFIED CCFICIENCIES: T, CS, A, S, PSElG EVALUATION'0F DEFICIENCIES:

I- PSElG has performed a themal analysis to justify the qualification tem-perature of 1400F as shown on the qualification data eval;Jation form.

This evaluation in contained in our file EQ-08.01.

A._ - Rev. 2 of the E.Q. submittal contains aging data spe-ifying a 40 year life for this type cable. Supporting data is available in our file EQ-08.02.

CS,-S - These items are addressed in our submittal. Supporting data is con-tained in our equipment qualification file EQ-08.

PSE1G's evaluation of NRC noted deficiencies has reaffir=ed that Rockbestos/

Cerro cable is capable of performing safety functions in a harsh enviroment a t Salem.

J

/A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 lj0E!I$nklin Research Center FRC Project N3. C5257 P g3 A Division of The Franklin institute FRC Assignment No.13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phila Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. #47 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. fJ'

~

Checksheets S _ h WI have been removed due to the proprietary nature of information contained therein.

4 NRC Contract Na. NRC-03-79-118 P g3 WJ5nklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Dmson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4la I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. $

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 48 ELECTRICAL CABLE LOCATED IN THE CONTAINHENT OKONITE, MODEL NOT STATED REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB,120 DAYS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 48 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 56, 2103, 65 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CARRY CURRENT LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEU(S): 73 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (3) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of .this TER for Legend)

R, h Gr, RT, P, H, h h h (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKCHEETS_:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, GL, Se, 56 System Consideration Review Oe, ti, !;, OS, I- , If Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, Sf, Sg , %, 31, &

Installed TMI Lossons Learned Implementation Ce, '., L Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 7;, 7L, 7w

_. J

1. A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr; ject N3. C5257 P:g3 du Franklin Rssearch Centrr A DMsion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment N2.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-Irm FRC Task No. 449$77 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. If.l.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (ha s/'. ; ~ 3 provided a response to the SER concerns.

[ The Licensee (has/Le; .:S specifically stated that the equipment is qualified andAr will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other .( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

[I.a Qualifiedj II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.D Moditicar.lon III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

l s NRC Contract N r. NRC-03-79118 Pag 3 (LO0h~ ranklin Rxserrch Csnt:r FRC Project NO. C5257 A Dmson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Asaignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 447/f/~7 i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. $_

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established l

Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation l

Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

! Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate l o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied l

Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.o Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified l III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available I

1

1. h, NRC Contract ND. NRC-03-79-118 lj0 ranklin Research Center FRC Project N2. C5257 Pag]

A Dnnsum of The Frankhn Institure FRC Assignment No.13 / 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. AloS/ S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4I LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPME!!T: Electrical Cable MODEL: Okonite -

COMP 0tlE!4T tt0.:

tiRC IDEtiTIFIED DEFICIEtiCIES: T, CS, A, S PSE&G EVALUATI0ti 0F DEFICIEfiCIES:

-T - PSE&G has perfonned a thennal analysis to justify the qualification tempera-ture of 3450F as shown on the qualification data evaluation fann. This evaluation is contained in our file EQ-09.03.

A - Rev. 2 of the E.Q. submittal contains aging data specifying a 40 year life for this type cable. Supporting data is available in our file EQ-09.04 CS,S 5, - These items are addressed in our subnittal. Supporting data is contained in our equipment qualification file EQ-09.

PSE&G's evaluation of 74RC noted deficiencies has reaffirmed that Okonite cable is capable of performing safety functions in a harsh environment at Salem.

A NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 Uf!brznklin R:se:rch Ccnter FRC Project N2. C5257 Page A Dtws on of The Franklin Instrun FRC A:signment Nr.13 5a 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 1910J (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. //4P/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW Criteria: DOR Guidelines 1 ; NUREG-0588, Cat. I  ; NUREG-0588, Cat. II .

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0 588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION  !  ! I Equipment Type  ! I Electrical Cable f i

Manufacturer's Name l

,g .fOkoniteCompany f (5.2.2/-/-) . *

!#/ Ld# C ! I Model Number (5. 2.2/-/-)  ! pa_ 3 See page 5f (Note A) f Serial Number

• A. Not Applicable f

Features / Mounting  ! 3 p,f , Not Applicable f (5.2.6/-/-) .

Connections / Interfaces  !  ! Cable Splice (Note A) I (5.2.6/-/-)

!ggg!  !

(  !  !  !

Location / Elevation f.de,hfadme.nf { Not Applicable

. f.

Equipment ID No. Not Applicable 4 .f,g f

l QUALIFICATION REPORT  ! .  !  !

l (8.0/5.0/5.0)  !  !  !

Report ID Number 7; 4 j,g j . E.R.141 f

Report Date  ! I j,/ yt .,I'ebruary 29,1972

. f.

Issued by

! Q! Okonite

• Prepared for

{g 2

,Okonite f l

Referenced Reports dM F-C3094/F-C3171

!I  !  !

Qualification Method (5.1, 5. 3/2.1, 2. 4/2.1, 2. 4) !

![  ! Test I

QUALIFICATION TEST PROGRAM  !  !  !

Functional Test Description ! g,f- f  ! Maintain electrical

( 5. 2. 5/ 2. 2. 9/2. 2. 9)  !  ! Loading @ rated Voltage, f -

.!  ! Insulation Resistance & I Operating Conditions  ! .

! Hypot I

(-/2.2.10/2.2.10)  ! Y M -

s=  ! I Ioad/ Cycles / voltage /  !  ! Not Applicable  !

Current /Freq.  !  !  !

- -~ _. _ _ . _ . _

1. A NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page 000branklin R:se:rch Ccnter A Demson of The FrankPn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 $h 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. YC f/ fI7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. T NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITli SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOH/0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

Acceptance Criteria  !.  ! I -

Not Stated

( 5. 2. 5/2. 2.1/ 2. 2.1)  !  !  !

Accuracy (5.2.5/-/-) g j_ . Not Applicable f

Number of Specimens jf/4 6 T ct Instruments Calibrated j j4//A jyes j

Stfety Function (Active /  !  ! Not Applicable I Paesive) (-/2.1. 3/ 2.1. 3) 1  !  !

e e e Tact Duration (5.2.1/-/-) /VM- 100+ days Accident Duration (Envir.  !  ! Not Applicable I Above Normal) (5.2.1/-/-)  !  !  !

R: quired Function Time .

/2o . Not Applicable Tazt Sequence (General)  !  ! Thermal Aging I

( 5. 2. 3/2. 3.1/ 2. 3.1)  !

fIrradiation f

• LOCA (PWR Conditions)

Test Sequence (NUREG-0588,  ! / I Cat. I) (-/ 2. 3.1/-)  !

g!g  !

• LOCA (BWR Conditions)  !

1. Representative Sample  !  !  !

2. Baseline Data  !  !  !

3. Performance Extremes  !  ! Not Applicable I

4. Thermal Aging  !  ! 1

5. Radiation Aging  !  !  !

6. Wear Aging  !  !  !

7. Vibration / Seismic  !  !  !

8. DBE Exposure  !  !  !

9. Post-DBE Exposure  !  !  !

10. Inspection  !  !  !

Ag ing  !  !  !

(5.2.4, 7.0/4.0/4.0)  !  !  !

Thstmal Aging / Basis 184 '/'M! 168 hrs @ 121'C Basis IA /4 /

! I Not Stated I Material Aging  !  !  !

Evaluation (7.0/-/-)  !! [65  ! Not Stated I

Materials Susceptible  !  ! Not Stated I (Thermal) (5. 2. 4, 7. 0/-/-)  !  !  !

Radiation Aging, Type  !

l l

t A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 I i

dhr nklin Rrse rch Cent:r FRC Project NO.C5257 Page '

I A Dnmon of The Franklan Institute FRC Asaignment No.J3 5e i

20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. 46f/S~/7 l

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. J./f l

I DEFICIENCY

( NRC REQUIREMENTS WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO. )

(DOR /0588-I/0588-II)  !

Radiation Aging, Dose (rd) 1 ,  ! See Accident Dose  !

Radiation Aging, Dose Rate  !  !

See Accident Dose  !

Radiation Aging, Method ,t//A

{. Test f.

I Materials Susceptible  !

/g

/  ! Not Stated  !

(Radiation) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-) !  !

4 Operational Aging

( ~/4'. 2/-)

k/

Not Applicable Other Age Conditioning /

jM Not Stated

(-/4.2/-) 1 Qualified Life Claimed /  !  ! Not Stated I# 4 /

Established ( 5. 2. 4/4.10/-)

Normal Ambient Temperature I /r,/.573, fad ! Not Applicable I Normal Amoient Radiation  ! i, !Not Applicable I Normal Ambient Humidity s'

{. f.NotApplicabic f.

On-Going Surveillance and  !  !  !

Preventive Maintenance  ! !Not Applicable I (7.0/-/-)

On-Going Analysis of 1

871 !Not Applicable 1

I Failures and Degradation  !  !

(7.0/-/-)  ![

'. 7 ' . .

Margin (General)  ! g !Not Applicable I (6. 0/3. 0/3. 0)

Margin (NUREG-0588,  !  !  !

! !Not Applicable I Cat. I) (-/3.2/-) /

1. Temperature (+1S*F)  ! /g  !  !

2. Pressure (+10%,  !  !  !

10 psig max)  !  !  !

3. Radiation  !  !  !

(not required)  !  !  !

4. Time (+10%, +1 hour  !  !  !

+ function time minimum)  !  !  !

As NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79118 FRC Project NO.C5257 Page 000hr:nklin R: search Ccnter a Dim.on of The Frankhn in.rttute FRC Assignment No.13 5d j 20th and Race Streets. Phda., Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. t,I4#/ f/~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. S7 l

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0538-II) SUBMITIAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

ACCIDENT COiOITIONS  !  !  !

IDCA/MSLB/HELB/ Uncontrolled  !/  !LOCA 1 (4.1, 4.2, 4.3.1, 4.3.3/  !^6hMLg g  ;

1.1, 1.2, 1.5/1.1, 1.2, 1.5) !  !  !

Radiation Type d _ _ _ ; ,1 Gamma g

Radiation Dose (Ed) !2x108

( ( 4.1. 2/1. 4/1. 4)

• 8 Y'/0 /d  !  !

. I*  !  !

!300,000 rd/hr  !

Radiation Dose Rate (rd/hr)

Radiation Qual. Method 8/  !  !

(5.3.1/-/-)  ! /[4 V  ! Tes:

g

{

Proximity to Concentrated

• Radiation  ! Not Applicable g

( 4.1. 2/1. 4. 6/1. 4. 6)  !  !

I  !  ! ~

i Equipment Susceptible to I '

Beta Radiation (4.1.2/-/-) #  ! Not Stated .

Radiation Dose (Normal +  !  !  !

Accident) ( 4.1. 2/- /-) 'p .Not Applicable Plateout Dose Considered  !  !  !

(-/1. 48/1. 4 8) ' );p7, g .Not Applicable Gunna + Beta cose (rd) i Not Applicable .

(4.1.2/1.4.7/1.4.7)  !

A NRC Contract NO. NRC-03 79-118 Pago 000hrinkhn R:se:rch Ccnter FRC Project N2. C5257 A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.17 5e 20th and Race Streets. Phtta , Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. C'(e#/ f/ ~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Y NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE No.)

ENVIRONMENTAL PROFILE  !  !  !

OF ACCIDENT CONDITIONS  !  !  !

Rate of Temp./ Press. !J.f ' .3f/h! 25'F, 8 Psi / second  !

Increase  !  !  !

Peakt *F/psig/RH/ Time  ! cjy A u  ! 324/80/100/3.3 hrs  !

,  ! 252/16/100/7 days  ! 4 Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time',,2tgp//+o/3b! 345/104/100/4 hrs  !

,  ! 320/75/100/4.5 hrs  !

Dacrease To: *//psig/RH/ Time  !

p9 / f a/h !! 256/15/100/20 hrs 272/7.5/100/3.5 hrs  !

Decrease To: "F/psig/RH/ Time

• j __

212/0/100/100 days Equipment Surface Tempera-  !  !

ture (MSLB) (-/1.2.5.C, *

/A8"  ! Not Stated  !

2.2.6/1.2.5.C, 2.2.6)  ! l

!  ! l Spray Qualification Method  !  !

est (5.3.2/1.3, 2.2.8/1.3, f/Y  ! 3 2.2.8)

• Spray Composition

{4 10000 ppm Boric Acid (4.1.4/1.3, 2.2.8/

• g ,y 6 O . buffered with NaOH to a l'3' *0) *

, g/4- ) f.s* ,fpHof10.5 j Spray Density (gpm/f t 2)  !  !  !

! g/dM ! 0.15 ,

Spray Duration  !  ! 7 days  !

Submergence Durati'on  !

% ,18 b . .

l

( 4.1. 3/2. 2. 5/2. 2. 5) i

! Not Stated  !

[ MI  !  !

I In-Leakage Considered .  !

(5. 2. 6, 5. 3. 2/-/-)  ! Not Applicable  !

Time to submergence

{! A/ rf

! Not Applicable Dust Environment k YA I

1 Not Applicable E

l

(-/ 2. 2.11/ 2. 2.11)  !  !

}/e V

mW Y '

a M W- -

l

A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 lj00hranklin Research Center FRC Project Ns. C5257 P ga A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5f 20th and Race Streets. PNia.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 10 @ FRC Task No. 96 //S/~">

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALI.':lCATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Of l

NOTES: .4, CAB LE SAMP LES TESTED:

One sample of each of the following types of cable and splice was tested. The samples were designated as shown in Table I.

l Table I Samole No. Cable De siena tion i

A-4 1/C #14 0. 030" Okonite, 0. 015" Okoprene

D-4 4/C #14 0. 030" Okonite, 0. 015" Okoprene, 0. 045" Okoprene E-4 7/C #14 0. 030" Okonite, 0. 015" Okoprene. 0.045" Okoprene B-4 1/C 4/0 0. 055" Okonite, 0. 045" Ckoprene F-4 4/C #12 0. 047" Okonite, 0. 015" Okolon, 0. 045" Okolon C-4 1/C 4/0 c.140" Okoguard, O. 065" Okolon with T-95 splice ind T-35 jacketing tape i

H< AL<t: W e o m,-ra 2 ue E pe. no s t c a w .e phh CUu CldLE h -OU M ( b p ut) M o M b - ov-c h C W p d w d E k O 6us p . y M $ d- 2 P R-

.bCLo W -i

• k f~

w rq ,muu k a.:.p cx t.

(EGB.CD r&

h.*M ;to QcJt-t 141 kCt dC&W [W" c.cJc4 .t.M bu.it 6Em W h cicu2- b6L pm /uac e d*'"*

(W ese,g s%

v -

A NRC Ccntract N2. NRC-03-79-118

!iDDErsnkiin R:sench Cantir FRC Project N3. C5257 P;g3 A DMson of The Frank lin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5g 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Waf/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M NOTES:

Nh h W _

v

'PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC & GAS COMPANY -

. SALEM CABLE LOCA QUALIFICATION .

60b VOLT POWER AND CONTROL CABLE ~

NUCLEAR QUALIFICATION REPORT-for

_ OKONITE INSULATED CABLES . . __

This report is The Okonite Company's nuclear qualification document for Okonite insulated. cables. It complies literally with 1EEE Standard -

383-1974, Seetion 1. 4 " Documentation". Section 1. 4 documents the ,

parameters specified in Section 1. 3.

Included in this report are nine Appendices which serve to further clarify Okonite's test procedures and results. These Appendices are as follows:

ha /

w f w m J 66 n -

u-(f(/

wm ,- e w0 a0 m n v hr_ $+1 M & n V6 4'+ -

&A /d'& N2 L W aA ~-

m, u W,

m m - $

Z.A NRC C*.ntract Nc. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 2 LULU Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 A Dnwon of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 1a 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4(.08 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. W EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 49 MOTOR CONTROL CENTER LOCATED IN THE ELECTRICAL PENETRATION AREA IN THE AUXILIARY BLDG. 84' ELEVATION GENERAL ELECTRIC MODEL 7700 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: RECIRC. 120 DAYS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 49 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): POWER TO VARIOUS MOTOR OPERATED VALVES (A,B,C EAST / WEST VITAL VALVE CONTROL CENTERS)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 74 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DFPICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

T, QT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3 a , 3 b. --?,; , 2 d -

System Consideration Review 42, 15, 10, id, I;, 4f-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review La, LL, Oc, Od, Se, 5f, Lii , Oh, 51, Lj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 60, Eb-Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7;, 7L, 7c

A_ s NRC C:ntr:ct N2. NRC-03-79-118 9000 Frankhn Research Center FRC Prcject No. C5257 P:ga A Dwmon of The Franklin Instituie FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 f S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. If

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

.)(_TneLicensee (bas /'r -^M provided a response to the SER concerns.

[ The Licensee (has/L ., uvi ) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and N will function when exposed to the applicable DBE j environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualif,1 cation testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) ,

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified Documentation Not Available

U '

A NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 lj00hrinkiin Rtscuch Canta FRC Project NJ. C5257 Pag]

A Dwmon of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment N7.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. #7.h/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS, X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adtquate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence. Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY ,

X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available Y 0

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 000 rtnklin Rise 1rch Cant:r FRC Project NO. C5257 Paga A Dnnsion of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment N 3.13 30 20th and Race Streets. PN!a-. Pa 19iO3 (215) 4481000 FRC Task No. kb8/8/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Motor Control Centers - 230V (General Electric Co.)

MODEL: 7700 Line CCMPONENT NO.: 1A East 1A Wert 18 East 1B West 1C East 1C West NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: RT, R, QI PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

These units will only see a radiation environment. We were confident that the units were capable of withstanding radiation and we did not see any problems in the short term. Out confidence was based on the fact that these type MCC's had been tested to 1 x 100 rads and had passed. However, the manufacturer could not guarantee that the units tested were composed of the same identical caterials in the Salem Units.

Since our previous submittal, actual componeats from the Salem Motor Control Centers were subjected to a radiation test of 1 x 100 rads by Isomedix, Inc. and passed.

This dosage is equivalent to accident dosage at the end of 40 years. Detailed test data will be included in our file EQ-14 when received frcm Isanedix, Inc. The EQ submittal will be updated with the new test infor:r.ation Therefore, NRC's identified deficiencies RT, R, QI have been addressed.

NOTE: Underlined items are correction to NRC SER.

4N UOOU Franklin Research Center NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 P:g3 A Dimen of The Franklin institute FRC Assignment No.13 3b 20th and Race streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. 448 /5/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. if._

LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO FRC R47.

The attached information is in response to the NRC request for additional environmental qualification data for a Franklin Research Center review.

This information has been taken from PSE&G's Central File of Salem Environ--

mental Qualification Data. Copies of the requested information have been

~

furWi We~dlihere possible. Some information has_b_egn classified by manu-

~

facturers/ suppliers as proprietary and may not be released tolird parties by us. The data is available in our files and may be rev.ievted in our office.

Note 1 - Basis 7 of Section VII of the Environmental Qualification Review Report indicates that the referenced test report is not directly applicable to the Salem motor control centers due to non certi.fi -

cation of materials. A radiation test of the motor control centers at Salem has been performed and the results indicate that the equipment at Salem will perform under its particular harsh environ-ment conditions. A review of non-applicable GE data serves no useful purpose. It was used to provide a justification for con-tinued operation until our tests were completed. The results of the Salem motor control' center test will be added to the report in the next revision.

A NRC Contract Nn. NRC-03-79-118 liObranklin Reserrch Cente P;g3 FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5f 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. '/4 A/w/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 49 NOTES:

Tke Iice utsee re te_ ee s e ed + L1- ao e s e c t ~e et e e. wm o rr +s -

u ate.ta h c e se, c4 do. 43 7n - A d.Md 9/>n a

6; . R . le Hex +o es G w& cGrad it/n/en PSE+6 Do cu.m e,tML s v &f d - E n iv.co TA e < o M u e.,t m e Ad i ce re.m o s v i , n u -

D,t ,t s7 & lue n zee a -Idd +L2 + k >n d -k wece s. co n i~ te_kw y & J mell*~

i o GL> d enn d' lie d G ee- mC 3&

1 1

/,.A NRC C:ntrcct N2. NRC-03-79-118

$U Franklin Research Center Pcg2 FRC PrrJect No. C5257 A Dwis.on of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. %I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. &

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 50 MOTOR LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT EL.130' WESTINGHOUSE SPIN NO. PSE RCADCF REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LOCA/MSLB,1 YEAR T"2 CHECKSHEET NO. 50 LICENSEE REFERfNCE(S): 553, 604, 640 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): DRIVES CONTAINMENT FAN COOLER MOTOR (11,12,13,14,15)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 75 [64] ,

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEN(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of ,this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, A, L,'A _

System Consideration Review c,

-L, II. M. I-r- C -

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, Sb, Sc, 5d, Se, Sf, 59, Sh, 51, b Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation A, -

Equipment Summary 7a, 75 "

Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary

/A NRC C:ntract N 0. NRC-03-79-118 P;ga 00branklin Research Center FRC Paject N 3. C5257 A Dmson of The Franklin institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Struts. Phila.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. Yl?If/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. SO SUMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (hcafn: rM provided a response to the SER concerns.

[ The Licensee (has/ima m) spo'cifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/%g will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environ.1ent Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exempt h Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

& NRC Contract ND. NP.C-03-79-118 Page 000 ranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-Im0 FRC Task No. 4/f/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 50 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SURMARY FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation X Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Fstisfied X Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a EqJipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacerent Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 P g3 UO0hrinklin R:se:rch C4ntir FRC Project N D. C5257 A Dmson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment bio.[3/O7 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. d 68/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 50 1 l

LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Motor (Westinghouse)

MODEL: Spin #PSE-RCADCF (Unit 1)

PNJ-RCADCF (Unit 2)

CCMPONENT NO.: 11, 12, 13, 14, 15 l

NRC IDENTIFIED -DEFICIENCIES: A, CS PSE5G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 75.

Environmental Qualification of these motors has been demonstrated. Our submittal l

addresses the noted deficiencies. The Aging and Chemical Spray data was arrived at, based on Westinghouse test data yh,ich envelopes our plant profile. The. aginc3 intbrmate*c m *J 4 5 Ad dtal in f*f Y t S I C A 2*

Supporting data is available in our file EQ-15.

PSE5G's evaluation of these noted deficiencies has reaffimed that these motors are capable of performing their safety function in a harsh environment.

l i

1. x NRC C::ntrzct No. NRC-03-79-118 I UE$nklin Research Center Piga J FRC Pr: Ject ND. C5257 A Dwtston of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. #4 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.So Checksheets_ f m 81 have been removed due to the proprietary nature of information contained therein.

1. 4 NRC Contr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 C0bbnklin Research Csnt:r FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 P:ga A Dtvisen of The Frtnan Instituta FRC Assignment No.13 7a 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 442/5/7I EQUlFMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.50 MAINTENANCE AND REPLACEMENT SCHEDULE

SUMMARY

The following information regarding the maintenance and replacement schedule (s) for components, sub-components, and materials has been provided by the Licensee. ,

? bC IWhfic.4-vi e.det p gj g, _

D e

e e

2- - NRC Contract N 3. NRC43 79-118 4]b!!

U Frankhn Research Center FRC Przject ND. C5257 P:g2 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignm:nt N3.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila Pa 19103(215)448 1000 FRC Task No._M6 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. T/

EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 51 HYDROGEN RECOMBINER IDCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT WESTINGHOUSE MODEL NOT STATED REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET No. 51 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): LIMIT COMBUSTIBLE GAS BUILD-UP INSIDE CONTAINMENT (WESTINGHOUSE /STURTEVANT 11,12)

SERVICE: POST LOCA LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 76 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY Tile NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, h h RT, P, H, h@ S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

l Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 34, M, M, 4 System Consideration Review M, A M, Me %M Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sql, % , SC, 54, M, 5f, 51[, S , 54 , 54 Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6(, %

( Equipment Summary Maintenance and Raplacement Schedule Summary M , 7th, M

/A NRC CIntract N2. NRC-03-79-118 NN nkhn Reserrch Centrr FRC Pr! ject Nr. C5257 Pag]

A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 44f/4~/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. S/

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

[ Tne Licensee (has/1. ; ..0 6) provided a response to the SER concerns.

1 The Licensee (tazzs/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified cr.d/s a lli tunction nnu.. e+;;d i , u.o .giir 91e "

c.d w mauar.ai uut vm w..d i t i c r. ; .

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment frora radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis, Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other i )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification III.a Exampt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified @ Documentation Not Available l

A NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 Ubranklin Riseirch C nter FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.17 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4 4 f /. C 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 44 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Dvcumented Evidence of Qualification Adequate ,

j Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established i Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

! Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate ,

o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Envaloped Adequately __

o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied _

Criteria Regardiag Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrusaent Accuracy Satisfied _

Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DFJIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY i

I.a Equipment Qualified l I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfiec All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt Frca Qualification

l. III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available X l

l L

A~ NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 Page USU Franklin R: search C:nter FRC Project No. C5257 A oimen or The rrankhn inititute FRC Assignment No.13 30 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 449,/f/1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Sl LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Hydrogen Recombiners (Wes tinghouse/Sturtevant)

MODEL: None CC'iPONENT NO.: 11, 12 -

lC IDEN'IFIED DEFICIENCIES: QT, T, CS, A PSE3G EVALUATION O'F DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Forn page 76.

The above referenced page located in Section V of our submittal address the above noted deficiencies. The aging deficiency is supported by basis 1 of the submittal.

PSE3G is still awaiting results frem Westinghouse on aging specs. of this equipnent.

Qualification prior to 6/30/82 is expected.

PSE3G's evaluation of the noted deficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardized pending qualification for aaing.

The attached information is in response to the NRC request for additional environmental qualification data for a Franklin Research Center review.

This information has been taken from PSE&G's Central File of Salem Environ .

mental Qualification Data. Copies of the requested information have been furriishedihere poss1 tile. Some information_has_b.een classified by manu-facturers/ suppliers as propri'etary and may not be released tolird parties by us. The data is available in our files and may be reviewed'in our office.

CIT _m

As NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 LOO rinklin Rsse:rch Cent:r FRC Project Nr. C5257 P:g3 A Dwision of Ths Frenun Instituta FRC Assignm:nt N2.13 5f 20th and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4ft, B /r/ 7 EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. f_/

NOTES:

A/+ko un k +La lic e nw o- re.fe c e n te<L ues4ieta L ugo -

o a G (1R L-3n S/ cl #4 v/21/no 4kg eloc M ou nn+

mn de aved la}A % 4Lo re u te a. ta 1 +L s naa a s+ 4s 44La I

. W +b hcenus. Afafd +1er/-JA wao e Aed oresoeieb ' '

V 0 bu e ,x4ina 6,a o a e &u.i(nLIe cet- cuul;+ a.-f 41.

l U d Is e die,a o g 4 G ce ,L O c;(es .

4 l

l l

i

1. N NRC CIntract NO. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr; ject N3. C5257 P g]

LNnklin Research Center A Divmon of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment]jo.13 lc 2k and Race Streets. Phila , Pa 191(G (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Ydf EQU;PMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. D EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 52 ELECTRICAL CONNECTOR LOCATED IN THE PENETRATION AREA BURNDY MODEL HY LUG REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 52 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 3305, 39 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONNECTIO*! 0F ELECTRICAL CABLES AT EQUIPMENT TERMINAL BLOCKS SERVICE: NOT STATED LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 78 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, t stated Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents ,

Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER A, 3b, 3c, 3d -

System Consideration Review 12, Ib, Oc, If, I;, If Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, Se, Sf, 5g , 9, 51 Si Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 10, 6h Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary L , 7L, 7v i

A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 d rankhn Rssench Center FRC Project N3. C5257 P;ga A o~ision of Thi rrankhn lastitute FRC AssignmInt Na.13 / lb 2Mh and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 i2d' 448-1(n) FRC Task No. 447/f/J EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 52.

~ -

g SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO T11E NRC SER - ONLY CrtECT.E0 ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

_ Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

d'1eLicensee (has/hcc .ct) specifically stated that the equipment in qualified andfaq, will function when exposed to the applicable DBE '

environmental service conditions.

'The Licensee hes presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justifiestion for interim operation (has/has not' been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

~

Corrective actica specified by the Licensee:

_ _ Ectipmenc replacemant with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate. or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipetent relocation to a mild environment Qualitication testing of equipment in progress

_,_ Other ( )

_ The LiceMee has provided other information for this equipment item that can t.e construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. .

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed correO.ive action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification -

and/or shou.Ld be exemptec from environmental qualification.

I DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC SUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASiT ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified '

h Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification. III.a Exempt II.a QualificatMn'Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

&UO0hrtnklin R:seirch Crnter NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pag 3 A Dmsaon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Asef gnment No.14 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. #4F/.f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 52.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFIC'" 'UMMA

• FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REOUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequete Similarity Detween Equipment and Test Spect tr. ,cablished Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately _g Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Ideatify Aging Degr adation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation S4tisfied (If Required) X Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure s o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Tast Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II . .s Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified N III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification l III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l

l l

I

/# % NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 LOIMranklin Research Center P gi FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 A Dwision of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 44810M) fRCTask No. 94 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QU ALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. SA Checksheets f o 1 50 have been removed due to the V

proprietary nature of inf onnation contained therein.

k

/A NRC C:ntr:ct N 3. NRC-03-79-118 P:g9 LO!) nklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 44 & l000 FRC Task No. M67 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 53 THERMOCOUPLE LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT TEM TEX MODEL 304 250 TG 12 SA2 1H CC TC REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 53 LICENSEE REFERENCA(S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CONTAINMENT AIR TEMPERATURE (TA4312 THRU 4321; TA4348)

SERVICE: NOT STATED LICENSEE SUBMITTAL,: SCEW(S): 80 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Eqaipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, A , 2d -

System Consideration Review 4a, th, tc, td, I:, if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review M *b, L, 53, 50, Ef, 53, 55, Si, ;j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 62 Sb Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sammary '2, 3,'~

A~ NRC Cnntr ct N 3. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 0 b000 Franklin Resezrch Center FRC Pr: Ject N .C5257 A Dnnsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignm:nt N2.13 lb 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 44 M f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 53

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

M Tne Licensee (has/h:: -"' _provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE

- environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no out. standing qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other T )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

1 The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted frca environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c _ Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification J III.a Exemptj II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified - IV Documentation Not Available

NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 LOO rznkhn R:serrch Canta FRC Project Nr. C5257 P 03 A Divmon of The Franklin institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4 7/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. S EOUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adrquate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o S te a.1 Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Pagarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified l I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification l II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification 1 III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l

l

& NRC Contract N a. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 000Er:nklin asse:rch Canta FRC Project N2. C5257 (

A Dnnsen of The Frankhn Instituti FRC Assignm:nt N .13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask No. 46 /C/"7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 53 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Thermocouples (Tem Tex Co.)

MODEL: 304-250 T-3-12-SA2-1H-CC-TC COMPONENT NO.: TA4312, TA4313, TA4314, TA4315, TA4316. TA4317, TA4318, TA4319, TA4320 TA4321. TA4348 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: EXN PSE&G EVALUATION 0F DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 80.

These particular instruments provide backup infomation for- the operatcr on containment accident conditions. Since there are other parameters which provide the required infomation for diagnosis, the coerators can maintain plant safety.

A of procedural temperature change has been made to alert the coerators of potential inaccuracy inoication.

This issue is addressed in our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, !; asis 32.

PSE&G's evaluation of this NRC noted deficiency has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardi:ed by the potential loss of this temperature indication.

a 4000U Frtnklin R;sexrch C:nter NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project Np. C5257 P g]

A Dwisen of The Franklin instnute FRC Assignment No.17 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 4481m0 FRC Task No. d 6 P/ 60 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.S.3 LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER (Continued)

Basis No. 32 Deficiency:

Documentation Unavailable (Containment Tempera- '

ture)

Justification: -

Current procedures instruct the operator to monitor contain-ment temperature as a guide in determining the type of acci-dent which has occurred. The thermocouples have been speci-fied for suitable operation up to 400'F with a maximum ex-pected containment temperature of 350'F. It is anticipated that the thermocouples will operate properly even though en-vironmental documentation is not available to verify tnis.

Since backup parameters are available to determine the t.ype of accident, the operators will be advised of the potential for incorrect temperature information and the procedures will be suitably modified. This procedural change will be sufficient to ensure proper diagnosis of the accident.

Accident diagnosis will be based upon containment pressure (qualified for this function), reactor coolant system pres-

.sure, steamflow, steamline pressure, and narrow-range. steam

. generator level.

This case has been classified as a Group I.2 item (I.2.B).

Corrective Action:

Procedure EI-I-4.4 will be revised prior to exceeding 5%

power (Unit #2) to reflect potential inaccuracy of the te m-perature indication. The indication may be used as backup-information to determine the occurrence of an inside-con-tainment accident. This change will be made on Unit $1 prior to December 15, 1980.

4s 000u Fr:nklin Rise:rch Cint:.r NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N3. C5257 Pag 3 A Dwmon of Thi Frtnklin Institut2 FRC AssignmenJt2.13 40 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10 @ FRC Task No. Y6f/f/*7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.O s

SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW 1

The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence /

nnn..nnnno,,a"a- with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented below.

Reason for Concurrence heason for Non-Concurrence

/ Equipnent does not provide a Backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR G11de- Backup (equipment / system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

l mitigate. See. note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform Backup (equipment / system) is its specified safety function.

available which completely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

, appears to meet single active I

failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification.

l

/,_% NRC Crntract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 9300 Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 A Divisw>n of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment N .13 lc 2"t and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 4481(XX) FRC Task No. 67 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 54 LEVEL SWITCH LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT CEMS MODEL LS 800 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 54 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): NOT STATED (LA0223 & LA0224)

SERVICE: CONTAINMENT SUMP LEVEL LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 81 {12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED Cf THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

~

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (tr, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equiptunt Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 2h, 2;, 29 System Consideration Revies AA '5,

- L, 40, 4=, 'a i Rh CA Equipment Environmental Qualification Review ,5 = ; 9 52, 5 5, ,

C;. Sh, 51, ;j -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 50, Sh Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Su cary 7= 'h 'O -

r

& NRC C:ntrcct N o. NRC-03-79-118 00branklin Resesrch Center FRC Pr; ject Nc. C5257 P:gD A Divmon of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignmint No.13 lb

) 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 41.9If/'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUiFMENT ITEM NO. 54

~

\

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

i I Tne Licensee (has/ic .m-) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

g Tha Licensee (nas/ht), proposed a corrective action for this equipment iten whose qualification aos not been fully established.

3,Justificationforinterimoperation (has/h' nc Q been provided by the Liceasee for this equipnent item.

d Corrective itction spscified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacercent with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

_ Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_2$ Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other 1 )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

1 The Licensee (eee/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective

action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. j l

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW l

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) l I

I.a Qualified _ II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

'U . o Modificationl III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b lbt in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

As NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 lj00hrinklin R:setrch Cent:r FRC Project Nr. C5257 P g3 A Dwmon oi The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. _ 4MI/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 84 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate N Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Ragarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteri a Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposurer o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate _

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate _

Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Rega;ling Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Padiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding '.'est Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

X = CATEGORY NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of th,e Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 000hrtnklin Rsse rch Ca:nt:r FRC Project N3. C5257 P g3 A Dmson of The Frin'dtn Institut2 FRC AIlgnm:nt Nc.13 3o Mh and Race Streett Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10 @ FRC Task No. 4/of /f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. S'/

M ENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMEta: Level Switch (GEM)

MODEL:

CCMPONENT NO.: LA0E23, LA0224

( Replac.e.d L- - qse on d CP-9'Th

\

l l

NRC IDEtCIFIED DEFICIENCIES: EXN, RPS PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES: .

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 81,(109,110 l l

l A new level indication system has been installed. As of date it is not environmentally cualified. The manufacturer is in the process of qualification. This new system is listed on pages 109 and 110 of our sutrnittal, Rev. 3. Our basis for continued opera-tion is detailed in Volume I,Section VII, basis 31 and in Section XI.

PSE&G is confident that plant safety will n t be jeopardized pending qualification.

/,A NRC C;ntr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr; ject No. C5257 P:ga UlllJ Franklin Research Center A Dmsion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13[ lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4la EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. SI i

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 55 THERMOCOUPLE LOCATED IN THE CONTAIhMENT WESTINGHOUSE SPIN NO. RCRIUI 583 F014 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 55 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): NOT STATED SERVICE: INCORE TEMPERATURE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 82 [64]

f DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RP3, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents .

Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a,-35, 2, 34-System Consideration Review 4a, % , i , gu, se, 4C Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 50, 55, 50, Ed, 5;, Sf, 5;, Sh, Si, "j-Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ca, Ob Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7; 75, h

Am NRC C:ntract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 Ub Franklin Research Centrr FRC Pr; ject N2. C5257 P g2 A Dtwsion of The Frankhn Institute FRC As;ignm:nt N2.13 / lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 447/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6 SUttMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

_,,_ Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

l The Licensee has presented iaformation which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

_ The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress

, Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

l The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

[ The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION O$' RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified _II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification ]III.a Exempt)

II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not-Available

~s NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 (lj00hnnklin R:serrch Cant:r FRC Project ND. C5257 Pag 3 A Dimson of The Franklin Inshtute FRC Asaignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. #4f I/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ST EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established -

Aging Degradation Evaluated Mequately Qualified Life or Replaces.ent Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Establishe:1 to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Re wrding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Fegarding Temperature /Presa.nre Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate __

o Peak PressLre Adequate c Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adaquataly o Steam Exposure (If Required) Ade.quate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Critesria Regarding Sabrergence Satisfied Criteria Eegarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Rega ding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Pagarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Tsst Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGt!ATION:

l

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY l

I.a Equipment Qualified _,_

I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification 1 III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available _

A NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 000hrrnidin Riseirch Cantir FRC Project NO. C5257 P:g2 A Dmsion of The Fran%n inctuu FRC Assignment Nr.13 30 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4inf/S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _6 ucLNJ$EE 5<tcO 2rcycr_ To 'E6 ts Mo. 33 Basis No. 33 Deficiencv: Documentation Unavailable (Incore Thermo- '

couples)

Justifica' tion:

Current procedures instruct the operator to monitor the in-core thermccouples as a guide to determining the existence of adequate core cooling. Despite a lack of avai'lable dccu-mentation in our possession, Westinghcuse information and

operating history of these devices indicat? that they would function. If these devices were to fail, back.up parameters, such as , P.CS pressure and temperature, steam generator level, and auxiliary feedsater flow are available .to enable determination of adequate core ccoling. These backup de-vices are qualified and are described in the procedure which also alerts the operator to potential errors in the incore temperature readings. , ,

The existing procedure and availability of alternate' indica-tions is sufficient to ensure proper determination of core-cooling adequacy.

This case h'as been classified as a Group I .2 item (I.2.C) .

Corrective Actions:

None required.

4000u Frrnklin a:seirch Csnter NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-116 FRC Project N3. C5257 PaSe A Dwmon of The Frtnkhn Instauts FRC A:signment No.13, 40 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-tmo FRCTask No. 4(mI/f/7 EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. L5' SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The -

Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence /

nee- eravserenee with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are prosented below.

Re son for Concurrerce Reason for Non-Concurrence j Equipment does not provide a backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accide.nt. Equipment. Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qaalification is not required by the DOR Guide- Bacnup (equipment / system) is not lines. (NPC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultar.cously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See, note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform

% Backup (equipment / system) is its specified safety function.

"available which completely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

! appears to meet single active

, failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification.

I l

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 d id Franklin Research Centu FRC Pr ject No.C5257 P2g3 A Division of Ths Frtnkhn institute FRC AOilgnm:nt NO 13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. 4/6b EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. f.6 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 56 HUMIDITY DETECTOR LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT FOXBORO MODEL 2711AG REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET No. 56 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MEASURES HUMIDITY IN CONTAINMENT (TA6356 THRU 6360Z)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 83 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITDi(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, r/r, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 2c, 2d-System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, 4w, 4d, se, 42 Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52 55, 5:, Ed, 50, 5' _

4 , Sh, Si. Ej -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 52, 2 Equipment Summary 72  % h Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary _

A NRC C ntract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Przject No. C5257 Pag 3

$J Frankhn Resetrch Center A Dwmon of The Franklin Institure FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila , Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4/.P./07 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. SS l

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

X Tne Licensee (has/h ^ ^ e t) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee han presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this.squipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other -( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (nas/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

X The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification FIII.a Exempt [

II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 000hrrnklin Riseuch C, tnt:r FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankim Inst tute FRC Assignment No.13 s 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 448 /O 7 EQUIPdENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8b l

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY l

Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) _

Criteria Regarding 'Iemperature/ Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Ducation Adequate --

o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steun Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satitsfied Criteria Regaroing Test Sequence Satisfied <

Criteria Regarding Tes: Failures or Severe Anomalies f (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) l DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification j II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified l l

II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life l or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification K III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l

l 1

i

A~ NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 P:g3 U000 Franklin R seirch Centr FRC Project No. C5257 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 467/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. SS LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIRiENT: Containment Humidity Detectors (Foxboro)

MODEL: 2711 AG C NFONEl:T NO.: TA357-Z, TA358-Z, TA359-Z, TA360-Z, TA356-Z NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIE!!CIES: EXN PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Rcf. Qualification Data Evaluation Fonn page 83.

These devices are not required for any safety function. Accident diagnosis is based on ~

t contairrnent pressure, reactor coolant system pressure, steamflow, steamline pressure and narrow range steam generator level. Therefore, these devices do not require qualificati on.

Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 37' details our position.

PSE&G's evaluation of the noted deficiency has reaffinned that plant safety is not jeopardi:ed upon failure of detectors.

1 l

I

l A NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 000hrinklin R:.se:rch Ccnter FRC Project N 2. C5257 P:03 A Divmon of The Frank!ki lnstitute FRC Assl0nment No.13 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. //S(/fl7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4/-

\

Lt CEM sE E hWe**L h*  % ~d4 sis %.37 Basis No. 37 i

' Deficiency: Documentation Unavailable (Containment Humidity ~

Detectors)

Justification:

l These devices are not requiaed for any safety actions. Cur-l rent procedures instruct the operator to monitor humidity as j a guide to determining the cccurrence of an inside-contain-i ment accident. As discussed under Basis 32, other direct l indicationc are available to readily identify an i'cside-con-I tainment accident. Accident diagnosis will be. based upon containment pressure, reactor ecolant system pressure,

, steamflow, steamline pressure, and narrow-range steen gene-

! rator level. This negates a need for qualified humidity I detectors.

This case has been classified as a Group I.2 item (I.2.D).

l Corrective Action:

Procedure EI-I-4.4 will be modified prior to exceeding 5%

power (Unit $2) to reflect potential inaccuracy of the .

humidity indication. It may be used as backup information to determine the occurrence of an inside-containment acci-dent. The same change will be made for Unit 41 prior to December 15, 1980.

t I

l I

t

As NRC Contract N O. NRC-03-79-118 cCDEr nklin Rueirch Cantar FRC Project N3. C5257 P ge A Dmson of The Frankhn Instreure FRC Assignment No.13 40 20th and Race Strests. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. Y6 f/f/'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Ell SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require snvironmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The Licensee's rationale has been ovaluated and the reasons for concurrence /

- with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are prscented below.

R1rson for Concurrence Rea.90n for Non-Concurrence Equipment does not provide a Backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Enriron- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- 3ackup (equipment / system) is not ,

lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See, note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform Backup (equipment / system) is its specified safety function.

available which completelf per-forms the safety function. The _ F)ilure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

appears to meet single active failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification.

/;% NRC C:ntr ct N O. NRC-03-79-118 L003 Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 P:g3 A Division of The Frmkhn Institute FRC Assignm:nt N?.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. Y6 V EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 57 RADIATION MONITOR LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT TRAPELO MODEL TA 63A REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 57 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): (RA-4314)

SERVICE: CONTAINMENT RADIATION DETECTOR HIGH RANGE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 84 [64]  ;

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable l

QSTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

l Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, Oc, ;d System Consideration Review a, ,w, 4-, 40, 4s, 4f -

i Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5;, CL, Sc, Ed, 5 7. , 5 f ,-

1 5;, " 44 Mj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 52, Ch l Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schet'ule Summary A, 7u, h

I A NRC Contr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 000Nnklin Threcrch Cent:r FRC PrIject No. C5257 P:gs A Div:sion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 46I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O l

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has/" "^S provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service condition.s.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

E The Licensee (has/her -^S proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

[ Justification for interim operation (has/trao .ast) been provided by the Licensee for tnis equipment item.

1 Corrective action specified by the Licensce:

j Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

j The Licensee 4hae/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipmet.t item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) pa Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency J I.b Modificationl III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available -

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 000hrinkhn Riserrch Canter FRC Project NO.C5257 Pag ')

A D6vmon of The Frrnkhn Instrun FRC Assignment No.13 2 20W and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. W67 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. i.7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X l Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately _

Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation t

Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) ,

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

[ o Peak Tenperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate l c Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately l o Steam Expcsure (If Required) Adequate l Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied l Criteria Eegarding Submergence Satisfied l Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Pegarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied l Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification  %

II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

1 NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Prcjact ND. C5257 Pag 3 u00 Frznklin Rise:rch Cant:r A Dwision of The Franklin institute o 3a 20% and Race Streets. PMa . Pa. 1910 1(215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment 6[.13.

FRC Task No.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O l

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER SALEM UNITS 1 AND 2

. PSEAG RESPONSE TO NRC SAFETY EVALUATION REPOP.T i .

EQUIPMENT: Radiation Monitors (Trapelo}

r .

M00iL: TA-63A i;

CCMPONENT NO.- (RA-4314,1R21)

(Unit 1)

NP : ICENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: RPS PSEaG EVALUATION OF OEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fem page 84.

?cr our submittal this device was to be replaced in S:: ring,1981. Due to cualification and delivery Preblems insta-lation at that time was not acccc::lished. At tnis time cualifica-ion nas been established and ne units will be installed once delivered. Our sucmittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 35 cetails cur intentien,s and justifica:icn for centinuec c::eration. ! c Da h w ill 'ee. ace cm c !! sed m accor i.w c. w i n TMI

• c.J.A %t m (AP w ckcd.44 C .

PSE3G's evaluation cf no:ed deficiencies has reaffimed that plant safety is not jeo::ardi::ec rencing replacement cf :nese units.

NRC Cordract N3. NRC-03 79-118 4UNU Frinklin R:sefech Center '

FRC Proj 2t NO. C5257 P g3 A Dmsen of W Fran:Jin Instuute FRC Assigr.mont No.L3 3b 20th and Race f,treets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRO Task No. Y6a Y_ .

EQUIPMENT ENVI.t ONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .d_?

i Ltc.f usee R G6Pt>OSC. 9.Eff.46 TV M6ts 2.35 Basis No. 35 l

Deficienev- Docume.entation Unavailable (Containment ,-

Padiation Monitor Unit 1) -

Ju s tifi_qa tion :

The analysis for continued plant operation described in Eacls No. 34 is also applicable to Unit 1. There is no documentation to support operation of this monitor during tne initial stages of the transient but the alternate indi-cations and methods are available.

This case has been classified as a Group II.2 item (II.2.G).

C_orrective Action:

As an interim solution, Procedure EI-I-4.4 will be modified prier to December 15, 1980 to eliminate its use f or long--

term, post-LOCA conditions. This procedure modification will instruct the operator to use sampling methods to deter-mine radiation levels during long-term, post-LOCA condi-tions. The final resolution of this item will be to install new monitors in the Spring of 1981 to meet the requirements for long-term use.

r i

v==

s

4% NRC Contrcct N A NRC-03-79-118 pig 2

!,!lld Franklin Rese:rch Cent:r FRC Pr: Ject N1 C5257 A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignmentjo.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215)448-1000 FRC Task No. Y67 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.8 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 58 REED SWITCH IDCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT WESTINGHOUSE MODEL KD 8805 12 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET No. 58 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VARIOUS SERVICE: ROD POSITION INDICATION LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 86 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (fl', RT, P, 11, CS , A, S, (R), M, I, QM , RPN, EXN, SEN, QIe RPS, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la l

Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, h, ?, ?f ,

l

'" AA Aa '#

! System Consideration Review 4a, Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 50, 55, Sr. "A 52, 5f, 9, "h ci, Ej Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation b, 6u -

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 1, 7 ' , 7: -

& NRC C:ntr:ct Ns. NRC-03-79-118 Pago c0Ersnklin Rssetrch Cantzr FRC Project Ns. C5257 A Dmsaan of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignm:nt N3.13 lb 20th and Race Streers. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 44 f h/7 i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment' relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other i )

Tne Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

1 The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified .II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification ]III.a ExemptJ II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

,- ,s- y w e -y - _ . - .

1. % NRC Contract N r. NRC-03-79-118 Page LOOFFr:nklin R:se:rch Ccnt:r FRC Project No. C5257 A Dim on of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13/ 2 20th an/ a-<= streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448 1 2 0 FRC Task No. 44F 6/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 5 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Aro.aalies (If Any) Satisfied l Critaria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Tast Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified Ib Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification X III.b Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Project N2. C5257 Pag 3 UO0hrinklin R: search Center A Dwis on of The Frankhn Instrut2 FRC Assignment N2.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 447 /E/7,-

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. SI l

LIG05CE SCWQ EEFTES TO libf 646 No. 33 Bas _is No. 30 Deficiencv:~ Documentation Unavailable (Rod Position ,_ ,

Indication) .

Justification:

The existing Salem emergency operating procedures require the operator to verify reactor trip by monitoring the rod bottom lights.

If a successful trip is not indicated, a manual reactor trip is initiated in accordance with procedures. .

This case has been classified as a Group II.2' item (II . 2 . F )'.

Corrective Action:

None required.

l I

i l

1 l

l 1

l

1. A NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03 79-118 0000 Fr1nklin atseirch Cant:r FRC Project N . C5257 Pg A Dmien of Th2 Fr:nkhn Instituti FRC Assignment Nr.1/ 40 20th and Race Streets. PMa . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRCTask No. Y/ofIfl7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d SYSTD4 CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence /

mm-eenemssense with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented below.

Reeson for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence j Equipment does not provide a _ Backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment / system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See. note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform

.,__ Backup (equipment / system) is its specified safety function.

available which completely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which j environmencally qualified and could mislead an operator.

appears to meet single active failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-

! on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification.

l l

l 1

l

1. A NRC C:ntract N c. NRC-03 79-118 ldU Franklin Research Centzr FRC Pr: ject N2. C5257 P g3 A Dnnson of The Frtnkhn Instaute FRC Assignm:nJt9. l2 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. Y 6o)1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. 37_f EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 59 RADIATION DETECTOR LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT WESTINGHOUSE MODEL SR WL23706 IR WL23707 PR WL23708 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 59 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): NOT STATED SERVICE: NEUTRON DETECTION LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 87 (64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (11', RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, ou, 5u, 3a System Consideration Review 4a, b, b, a, e, er Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5., Ob, C., OJ, 54 5Z,

, Oh, 21, Si Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation ^=- Ah Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 7;, 7L, 7e -

8 As NRC C:ntrcct N3. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr ject No.C5257 P:ga dhranklin Reserrch Centsr A Dmsson of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 j lb I 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. MS T8/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - Of6Y CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

. Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equips.ent in progress Other ( )

Tne Licensee has provided cther information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

g The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON itEVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification (III.a Exempt [>

II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

l l

1. 5 NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N:. C5257 P g3 c00&rinklin Rrse:rch Csntar A Dmsson of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 / 2 i 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103(215) 448-1 2 0 FRC Task No. #$//f/7 1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 57 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY I Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate l Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately l

Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate __

o Duration Adequate o Required Pr; file Enveloped Adequately _

o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate t

Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied

[ Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied l Criteria ?.egarding Radiation Satisfied

! Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied . ,

Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies l (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

X = CATEGORY l NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY l

l l I.a Equipment Qualified

( I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification  !

l II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established

! II.b Equipment Not Qualified

, II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification &

III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review ,

IV Documentation Not Made Available f l

l l

l i

l I

l l

i l

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 PCg3 0006rtnklin arse:rch Cant:r FRC Project NO. C5257 A Division of The Fr::nkhn Institut 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignm:nt FRC Task No. Nr.13,f/~7 447/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M uanse-e hde eute w m3:s go. a Basis No. 13 Deficiency: Documentation Insufficient (Ex-core neutron detectors) -

Justification:

This item is no longer considered applicable since analysis ,

shows that the devices do not perform a safety function as described in LER 79-58. This case had previously been clas-sified as a Group I.1 item (I.1.H). This classification is no longer appropriate. -

Corrective Action: . . . _ _.

None required.

l

i A NRC Contract N O. NRC-03-79-118 000 rinklin R:se:rch Cant:r FRC Project N;. C5257 P 02 A Divmon of The Fnnun Instituti FRC Assignm:nJt3.1g 40 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. v(. P/s/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAL IFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 59 SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence /

l non-eenetrrrentT with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented below.

Reason for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence g Equipment does not provide a Backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function 0: accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment / system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is harsh environment by the subject to a po~entially c disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See. note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform Backup (equipment / system) is its specified safety function.

available which completely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

appears to meet single active failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification.

M S~ NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 2 L0bbnklin Rese:rch Cent:r FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No Ib la 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1(XX) FRC Task No. Md5 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4_d_

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 60 ELECTRIC MOTOR LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT WESTINGHOUSE MODEL TBFC REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 60 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): MOTIVE POWER TO FAN (N0ZZLE SUPPORT FANS)

SERVICd: N0ZZLE SUPPORT COOLING LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 88 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFI2D BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD((S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, l

Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

l Equipment Item la Sumary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Sumary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 22, ?L l System Consideration Review 4a, 4L, Oc, 02, tu, 4f -

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 3- 55, Sc, 53, 50, 55, l (c. 55, Si, Sj -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 52, 55 ~

Equipment Sumary l

l Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Sumary 7., 7b, h -

l

1. A NRC C:ntract N3. NRC-03 79-118 .

FRC Project N2. C5257 Pag 3 '

branklin Resetrch Centir A Divmon of The Frinkhn Instituie FRC Assignm:nt N .13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 447/S/7 j EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I@

l l

SUt4 MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLEt 1 Tne Licensee (has,'M "^ t) provided a response to the SER concerns.

- The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. ,

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment' item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

Tne Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

,,X,The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION 01' RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification }III a Exempt i II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

1. % NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 UO0hrrnklin Rssench Ccnt:r FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19:03 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. No.13 >S/7 46f/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. lef EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL OtJALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Sat.sfied (If Required) i Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Srtisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Tast Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification X III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contract N;. NRC-03-79-118

!!00hr:nk!!n Rrse:rch Cant:r FRC Project N3. C5257 PaQ3 A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 30 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. 4LR ,/ C/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. U LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Fan Motor (Westinghouse)

MODEL: TBFC CCMFONENT NO.: None

'iRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: S PSElG EVALUATION OF DEFICIEt;CIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 88.

Subject motors do not require environmental qualification. They do not perfonn a safety function. Failure of these motors does not affect the course of action in response to a design basis accident. Therefore, submergence is not a consideration.

This item is addressed in our submittal, volumet i se e M o#-- i bd'IS E -

PSE&G's ev0'Jation of the noted deficiency has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardized due to motor failures.

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 P g]

l!0bFrinkhn R:se:rch Ccnter FRC Project N . C5257 A DMsen of The Frankhn Institute FRCAsaignmenfto.17 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215)448 tm0 FRCTask No. V6 f/O~7F EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O L l C.,W 5 E q PE570usg, ggpgg3,7o pMSl5 A)O . (o o Basis No. 36 Deficiencvi Documentation Unavailable (Nozzle Support Fans,

, Reactor Shield Vent Fans and Control Red Drive Fans)

Justification:

The nozzle support fans, reactor shield vent f ans and the control rod drive vent fans were listed only because they are mentioned in the emergency procedures. They are not required to perform a safety function, and inadvertent oper-

~

ation (on or off) of these devices does not affect the proper course of actions in response to design basis acci-dents. The equipment does not require environmental qualification.

This case has been cle.ssified as a Group II.1 item (II.l.B),

Corrective Action: ,

None required.

I

As NRC Contract N A NRC-03-79-118 UO0hrinklin Rise:rch Cint;r FRC Project N3. C5257 Page A Division of The Frrnkhn Institut FRC Assignm:nt NO.13s 40 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215)448 1000 FRCTask No. V47/f/')

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4_P I

SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence /

nees eeneweeenee-with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented below.

Reason for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence Equipment does not provide a Backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment / system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is

( harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling i accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can

, Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other l safety-related equipment to perform l Backup (equipment / system) is its specified safety function.

avail'able which completely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator, appears to meet single active j failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-I on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-eccident Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification.

l l

1 l

i l

1

/% NRC C:ntract N2. NRC-03-79-118 Paga dbnklin Research Centir FRC Pr: Ject Na. C5257 A Dimion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 Ia 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 447 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. S/

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 61 SOLEN 0ID VALVE LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA ASCO MODEL NT 344A75 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LESS THAN 10 SEC TER CHECKSHEET NO. 61 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV0928)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVE FOR CONTAINMENT ISOLATION VALVE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 94 (12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (/1', RT, P, !, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, ot state Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Rceponse to NRC SER 3a, 25, 2;, 3d System Consideration Review I;, IL, 4u, If, 12, if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5, LL, L, Od, Ce, O r, Sg. Eh, Si, Sj-Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation to, Cb-Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7e, 7L, 7; -

A NRC Ccntr:ct N D. NRC-03-79-118 lj rankhn Resench Center FRC Pr:J;ct N3. C5257 P:g2 A Dwmon of The Frankhn Insntute 13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. 4/oNo.MS/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .dr./_

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/has not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

N The Licensee (has/h :2 et) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

1 Justification for interim operation (has/h r W) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

N Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

] Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other T )

l The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item l that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim l operation.

l g The Licensee (has/h;; .~aprovided a schedule for the proposed corrective acti n. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action / 9 8 2--- .)

The Licensee sta that the equipment item does not require qualification  ;

and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW i

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) l I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

~

TT. b Modif ica tion _] III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A NRC Contract N O. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N A C5257 Page 000 rrnklin Rsserrch Canter A Dwisson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 44f/O7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. /,/_

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate 1 Adrquate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Critoria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins 3atisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X - CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II,b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt Frora Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A- NRC Contract NO. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Project N2. C5257 P g]

000U Fr:nklin R:se:rch Cant:r A Dimion of The Frrnkhn Institut2 30 20th and Race Streets. Ph6la.. Pa.19103 (215) 44810m FRC Assignm:nt FRC Task No. Ns.13 [S/7 46 F ,

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I.l_

4 "* SC. sos RP.ScA -ro SAsis ca i? ,

Basis No. 17 Deficiency: Documentation Insufficient (Containment Isola-

. tion Solenoids Outside the Containment) -

Justification:

The solenoid valves must only operate for a very short period of time. They deenergize in order to close their re-spective containment isolation valve. Operability is based on a failure analysis performed by Westinghouse (NS-CE-755) which indicates that the failure mode of this type of sole-noid valve is in the closed (fail safe) position thereby as-suring isolation valve closure. These solenoids are located in enclosures which provide thermal protection and minimize thermal rise transients.

l The outside containment isolation valves' solenoids function to provide control for closing the redundant isolation l valves during accidents inside containment. The out. side is-I olation valves' solenoids are not subjected to the contain-ment environment. The valves could be exposed to harsh en-vironments caused by high energy line breaks in the penetra-tion area. These brer.ks, however, do not require complete containment . isolation.

The postulated breaks in question are small steam breaks; steam' generator blowdown and steam feed to auxiliary feed-water pump turbine. Following the postulated break, temp-eratures do not exceed 200*F until af ter ten minutes. Se-lected lines for isolation may be required and operability should occur within this time span. .

Existing information indicates that these valves would close in the environment caused by high-energy line breaks, and that any subsequent failure would tend to keep the valve closed. Because of this, and the protection afforded by the solenoid valve anclosures, we conclude that the valves would remain in the safe position. l This case has been classified as a Group II.3 item (II.3.A).

l l Corrective Action:

l l These solenoid valves will be replaced with qualified de-l vices prior to June 30, 1982. The installation schedule will be accelerated as equipment becomes available and plant operating conditions permit installation.

/% NRC Contract N s. NRC-03-79-118 l.Nnidin Reserrch Cent:r FRC Project ND. C5257 Pzg3 A Dwmon oi Ths Frtnkhn instnute FRC As:Ignm:nt,t)(?.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215)448 1000 FRC Task No. V oI EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. fr_%-

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 62 HYDROGEN-OXYGEN ANALYZER LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT BACHARACH MODEL ND REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED _

TER CHECKSHEET NO. 62

~

LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): NOT STATED (XA8650, XA8651)

SERVICE: COMBUSTABLE GAS DETECTOR LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 98 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(Sne Section 3 of this TER for Legend) h S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, x, 4 System Consideration Review 'u, "b,

. ', ' ' ' ^^ ' #-

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Co, L, Oc, 52, 5;, Of,-

Og, ', h , ." i , 'j -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 0-, GL Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 2, 75, 7c-

1. x N RC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118

'dNnklin Rsserrch Csntar FRC Project N2. C5257 Pag]

A Division of The Funkhn Instituie FRC Assignment N .13 ib 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 444 1000 FRC Task No. ASf!6/7 W

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .dfr

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

M Tne Licensee (ha s/b " net) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented 17 formation which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

g The Licensee (has/"" mt) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

M Justification for interim operation (has/hae *1 been provided by the Licensae for this equipment item.

X corrective action specified by the ticensee, d Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim l

operation.

[ The Licensee (nee /r;as not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective l action . )

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

l l DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) I I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency j ll.b Moditication 1 III.a Exempt

! II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope l II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 Page UO0hr:nklin R: search Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Dmmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Asaignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 469 /S 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EOUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6L EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adrquate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established k

Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qur,lified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Tcat Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review

'IV Documentation Not Made Available

As NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 00br:nkhn R:se:rch Ccnter FRC Project NO. C5257 Page A Dwmon of The Frankhn In2run FRC Assignment N3.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. 46E /f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: H2 Analyzers MODEL: Bacharack CC'*30NENT ';;. : XA8650, XA8651

• ' ICEIr!E: DEFI;I E*;;1 ES:

RT, QI, QT, T, P, H, CS, R, A CiE;'. EVC.'.'l~ ;. CF ;EF !;! E*,;1 E :,:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 98.

This ecuipment is not qualified and it is the intention of PSE&G to replace with mialified units in accordance with the TMI requirements time frame. At this time the H 2 Analyzers are not being used as a guide for actuating the hydrogen recombiners.

They will be operated during the recirculation chase, independent of H A"*IY 8" readings. This position is stated in our sucmittal, Volume I Section 2VII, basis 30.

Al NRC Crntract N3. NRC-03-79-118 P:g3 L0blIFranklin Rese rch Csnttr FRC Prrjoct N 3. C5257 A Dmuon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. VS T EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 63 LIMIT SWITCH LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA NAMCO MODEL EA 170 11302 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 63 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERAIOR INDICATION AND VALVE POSITION (SJ78, SJ79, SJ108)

SERVICE: VALVE POSITION INDICATION LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 90 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(Ste Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, h P,Ike CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, L, h, ?d --

System Consideration Review  ;!: , th. 10, ed, i;, Of ,

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52 "5 "". "A "- "F __

b , "h 54 "j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ce, L -

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 72 '" h

/% NRC C;ntr ct N2. NRC-03-79-118 lbrsnklin Reserrch Centzr FRC Pr; ject No. C5257 P g2 A Dmsson of The Frankhn institute lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215)448-1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. No.13 [f/7 447 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Id

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

[ Tne Licensee (has/h:^ a^t) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

k The Licensee (has/- "i proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

_j( Justification for interim operation (has/" a^*) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

[ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modif Aation Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source l

Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

l i The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item l that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim l operation.

1 N The Licensee (has/h) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action

,sr/ar }c 4,/_10,/22 .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

1 DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency CI .o Modification)

III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified - IV Documentation Not Available

i e'

LO0hr:nklin Rase 1rch Center NRC Contract N 0. NRC-03 79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Page A Divmon of The Fr nkhn Instnut2 FRC Assignment N;.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. OfIS7'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 43 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Ad:quate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established

[

Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Mai gins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified

- III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

r _

1 A NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 I

UO0hr:nklin Rise:rch Csntir FRC Project Ns. C5257 P g3 A Dwmon of The Fr;nkiin Institut:i FRC Asi'gnment N ? 3 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 48!8/7 ,

l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M I

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMEffT: Limi t Swi+ches (Namco)

MODEL: EA-170, 02400X COMPONE!C NO.: SJ78, SJ79, SJ108 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: RT, RPS PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form pages 56 and 90.

These limit switches will.be replaced with qualified switches prior to 6/30/82,

.. Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 25 states our intentions and reasoning for continuec coeration.

?SE&G's evaluation of these NRC noted deficiencies has reaffirmed tnat plant safety is not jeocardized pending replacement.

A_% NRC C:ntract N2. NRC-03-79-118 PigD hU Franklin Research Center UI FRC Project N;. C5257 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Arsignmint,Np(a.137 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Y EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 64 LIMIT SWITCH LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT NAMCO MODEL D 2400X REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 64

~

LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERATOR INDICATION & VALVE CONTROL (SS110, SS107, SS104, SS103)

SERVICE: POSITION INDICATION FOR VALVES LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 99 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(Sse Section 3 of this TER for Legenci j R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A,h (R) , M, I, W:, RPN SEN, QI, RPS, None, 1

l Not stated, Not applicable 1

l LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

1 l

Contents Checksheet Page No.

l 1

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb i Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 l

l Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, A, 3d ,

System Consideration Review 4a, 4b, L, '. 2 , I:, 'f, Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, Si, L, CJ, L, Cfr-

% , Su, n, 3) -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6, ~%

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7= h. '"

l

Am NRC C:ntr:ct NO. NRC-03-79-118 Paga ]

U rankhn Research Centrr FRC Pr: ject No. C5257 A Divmon of The Frankhn institute FRC A;signmInt N .13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4/. F En

\

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M 1

I SUr4 MARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHLCKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Tne Licensee (has/ haw) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated tnat the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies. )

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully establi.ahed.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

[ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

1 Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. ,

j_ The Licensee (*trsfhas not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

1 The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Q Modification III.a Exempt III.b Not in Scope II.a Qualification Not Established II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

p NRC Contract ND. NRC43-79-118 FRC Project N . C5257 Page 000 rsnkhn R: search Center A ravison of The Fr.nkhn Insruure FRC Assignment No.13, 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215)448 1000 FRC Task No. 44f/S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Sinulation Sdtisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Tent Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Tant Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification g II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Av2ilable

l

1. x NRC Contract N3. NRC-03 79-118 P g3 c00Eranklin Riserrch Cant:r FRC Project N3. C5257 l A Dmson of The Frinkhn Inctuu FRC Assignm:nt N2.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-l @ FRC Task No. 4/,7/S/7 I

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIF! CATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .Id LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIFMENT: Limit Switch (Namco)

MODEL: 0-2400X i

CCMPONENT NO.: 55110, SS107, SS104. 55103 1

l l

NRC IDENTIFIED' DEFICIENCIES: EXN, S l PSE&G EVALUATION 0F DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 99 l

These switches do not recuire qualification. This situation was resolved in our l response to FSAR Question 7.35 and 6.28.

Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 188 states our position.  !

PSE&G is confident that plant safety will not be jeopardized by failure of these switches 3 ' y ever to

at m aualimed e,r,ses .

ulunu. ce.lia'm ility we esill re. place tkest scoi & s l

l I

l l

s NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 4uCDU Funkiin Rise;rch Ccnter FRC Project N 3. C5257 P g]

A Divmon of The Fr nklin Instruti FRC Asilgnment N7.14 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1M FRC Task No. V68fil7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N u cwa t e ts m t. a v u s ,o w s co.isa Basis No. 18B Deficiency: Documentation Unavailable (Limit Switches for '

Some Inside Containment Isolation Valves) -

Jujgtification:

Current procedures instruct the operator to verify the closed position of isolation valves. The limit switches provide this indication. Loss of- indication will not cause cae operator to take any action contrary to safety cf the plant. ,

This situation has been analy=ed in the response to FSAR Question 7.35 and has been accepted by the NRC staff in Sup-plement 4 to the Salem 42 Safety Evaluation Report, Section 3.11(5). Qualification of these switches is not required.

This case has been identified a.s a Group II.2 item (II . 2. D) .

Corrective Action:

None Required.

i l

l t

( '

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 UO0hranklin RIserrch Qnter FRC Project N3. C5257 Pag 2 A Dwmon of The Fren!dw instnut FRC Arignment N2.13 40 20th and Race Streers. Phila.. Pa- 19103 (215) 4481m0 FRC Task No. 4M /587 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require environmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for eeeeeeeeeee/

non-concurrence with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented below.

Reason for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence Equipment does not provide a Backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function.

mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment / system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform Backup (equipment / system) is its specified safety function.

available which completely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator, appears to meet single active failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environmental qualification. l l

)

J l

l 1

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 000 ranklin R serrcr.Centrr FRC Project N2. C5257 P g3 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Asaignment No.13 4h 20th and Race Streets. Phile.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 46& /S,7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6 Y Raason for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence Tne equipment's accident miti- Although backup equipment is avail-gating function is completed able, it is not technically sound to prior to the onset of the hostile relinquish defense-in-depth for this _

environment. No subsequent function.

functions are necessary. See note (1) below. (NRC Qualifi- Backup (equipment / system) is not cation Evaluation Category IIIb) safety-related.

Other (see page ) X This equipment is necessary for the operator to ensure an ESF system is Resultant NRC Qualification performing its intended safety Evaluation Category (IIIa/IIIb) function.

Note 1: The Licensee (has/ The rationale presented by the nas not) stated that failure of Licensee is not supported by the primary equipment will not objective technical evidence.

affect other safety-related equipment or cause an operator )( Other (see pageh) to be misled. (See page )

LICENSEE STATEMENT See pJ7e 3a of tr.is checksheet.

EVALUATION OF LICENSEE STATEMENT

&Lu sos. '1.3 S $ % S a a. F.3Ak ass nd m3 dia_,

w payo sts Es Musa . Now an, 'ct des p>ua.bu4 w a. . a N% s% u e -sa c.a o. a uta-um La sc>acu sM k g a f' " -

ea]us acans u s- ,. s r l cen is c.n; da u

.6 y

am S Nct;osi 4 sa.

wa; ycmo Or 31 m .

i,,, na l

b h I

i

X,_% NRC Contrcct N 2. N RC-03-79-118 l blud Franklin Research Center FRC Pr.? ject NO. C5257 P:g2 j A Dwmon of The Franklin Institute FRC Astignm:nt N2.13 1a 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4G8 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 65 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 65 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT (LOCATION NOT STATED)

FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 50EP1041 AC REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 65 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 639 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): BORON INJECTION TANK, SAFETY INJECTION PUMP DISCHARGE PRESSURE (PA0227, PA7461, PT0942)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 51 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I , QM , ITN , EXN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No, i

i Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, h, 3d-System Consideration Review  ?;, it, 4-, eu, en, 4f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review  !;, 55,  ;, Ed. Se, 5f, 4 , Sh, 31, j installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 50, Cb-Jguipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 72, 7b, 7-

A NRC C: Intr ct N2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr ject No. C5257 PcgD UNranklin Research Centrr A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20tn and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 44 4 1000 FRC Task No. 4/a2 /f/'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

3 Tne Licensee (has/ L ..:t) provided a response to the SER concerns.

g The Licensee (has/6 ua) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/br will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

d Justification for interim operation (has/L un) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shiold equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment

_ Qualification tencing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/has not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should ce exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BTSED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) l I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency i I. Modification III.a Exempt I.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified -

IV Documentation Not Available l

A NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 000hrtnklin Rxserrch Csntr FRC Project Na. C5257 P:g3 A Dmsu>n of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Dhda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. f4f/f/7 i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E i

I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate X o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied

. Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied X Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied X Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY l

I I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established X l

1 II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified

( III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review

• IV Documentation Not Made Available

} $ /[ Y '

1 A k L jz a s.Z.1 # 2 A &

u a n ,6C Sc&s y eA n l pby CE S Fn W n p f;4 l

A

A NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 000 rsnklin R:sezrch C2nter FRC Project Ns. C5257 P:g3 A Dwmon of The Fri.nklin inntuti FRC As:Ignm:nt N .13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4/of!S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. 6 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT:

• Pressure Transmitters (Fischer & Porter) -

MODEL: 50 EP1041 CCMPONENT NO.: PA0227, PA7461, PT0942 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: RPS PSE1G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 51.

Replacement of these transmitters is not anticipated. Inaperabil ty of these devices would not result in tennination of safety injection,ar a P ,ola d Sa NY-Our justification for acceoting these devices as they new exist is detailed in cur sucmittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 21.

PSE1G's evaluation of noted deficiences has reaffirmed that these transmitters will perform their function.

A NRC Contract N t. NRC-03-79-118 P g3 UO hrinklin R:seirch Ccnter FRC Project N . C5257 A Divmon of The Fr:nkhn instruti 3h 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC A:signment N3.13,f/7 FRC Task No. //4 ff EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E u tw Sit. ELs%AaSE EEFMS. To 643i$ No. El Basis No. 21 Ceficiencv: Qualification Test Method (Pressure Measure-

, ments; Baron Injection Tank, SI Pumps) -

Justification:

Current procedures instruct the operator to check ECCS op-eration by observing boron injection tank and safety inject-ion pump discharge pressures during the initial phase of an accident. Inoperability of these devices would not result in termination of safety injection. Alternate indications are also available to verify ECCS status (e.g. pumps runn-ing, open valves, etc.)

Existing qualification is based on separate effect's testing in lieu of sequential ef fects testing. Due to the type of service required of these devices, the separate ef fects test method is acceptable to qualify the devi.nes. Additional qualification is not required.

This case has classified as a Group II.2 item (II.2.E.1).

Corrective Action:

None required.

1 1

I

/* NRC C2ntr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 000$nklin Research Center FRC Prrject N2. C5257 Piga A Divisson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment o.,1} 5 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. - Y EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .d5 Checksheets [#__. M (( have been removed due to the proprietary nature of information contained therein.

1. - NRC C:ntrEct N3. NRC-03-79-118 b'hbnklin Hesearch Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 P :gs A Dwmon of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-Imm FRC Task No. 40I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 66 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA - 78 FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 10B2495 -

REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED -

TER CHECKSHEET NO. 66 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 639 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): AUXILIARY FEEDWATER FLOW #13SG, POST ACCIDENT MONITORING (FA1095)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 24 [64}

l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(Sne Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, VM, RPN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3t, Sw, 3d System Consideration Review J, 4b, Sc, M, ';, Of Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5;, LL, Sv, 3d, 64 32, 5,5 SL, 5i, Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation <=. Sb Equipment Summary Maintenance ana Replacement Schedule Summary B . 7b, 7; -

1. % N RC C*,ntr:ct N 2. N RC-03-79-118 P:g3 brenkhn Reserrch Centrr FRC Pr: Ject Ns. C5257 A Divmon of The Frankhn instztute FRC Assignm;nt No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 44 4 1000 FRC Task No. #4f /7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. [de.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

Y Tne Licensee (has/ M : z L' provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) spe cifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will functios when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

[ The Licensee (has/h;; n;-Q proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (ha s/h w "^ t) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

M Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

[ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other (- )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim i operation. .

The Licensee (has/ m ) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action Mr a /* }o la/20ff2,

.)

f The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency CI,b Moo i t ica t ioD III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope l II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 00brrnklin Rise:rch Csntir FRC Project NO. C5257 Pago A Dnwon of The Frankhn Institute 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215) 448-1000 FRCTask FRC Assignment No. No.13 Y6Y [6/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .dr.k EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualificstion Adequate Ad2quate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established }'

Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied R Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied -

Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied 1 Tast Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

I DESIGNATION:

! NRC 00ALIFICATIOr4 CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l

)g 5 s .

$ Ju &

pxan~LJ gynxAn

& 4E "d y /n z4. 2 a~4L:<~ S 4 A U

4UOOU Fr:nklin Rrsench Csntu NRC Contract NL NRC-03 79-118 FRC Project Na C5257 P 02 I

A Dnnsion of Tha Fr:nkhn Insntutz FRC As.;i Q nment Ns.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4LF!S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6/c LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Pressure Transmitters (Fischer & Porter)

MODEL: 1082495 COMPONENT NO.: FA1095 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: EXN, RPS PSE3G E'/ALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES.

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form pa9e 24.

These pressure transmitters will be replaced with qualified units prior to 5/30/82, Our submittal Volume I,Section VII, basis 12 gives this schedule and our justification for continued operation.

PSE3G's evaluation of this NRC noted deficiency has reaffimed that plant safety is not jeopardized pending replacement.

( I l l l

I t

i

/h N RC Contrict No. NRC-03-79-118 Pig 3 bhFranklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.1 5 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1(xx) FRCTask No. M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d_4 Checksheets [o have been removed due to the proprietary nature of information contained therein.

s NRC C*.ntract NO. NRC-03-79-118 d

A[5nklin Research Cantxt FRC Project NO. C5257 P g3 A Dnnsson of The Frankhn insnrure FRC Assignment o.1 lc 20th and Race Streers. Phda.. Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. .G .

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _G7 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 67 SQUARE ROOT EXTRACTOR LOCATED IN THE INBOARD /0UTBOARD PENETRATION AREAS FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 50E53212 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 67 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): POST ACCIDENT MONITORING (FA3971)

SERVICE: #13SG AUXILIARY FW. FII)W LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 26 (12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QH, RPN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Susanary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, OL, Om, 3d -

System Consideration Review ti, k, if, I-, 40 Equipment Environmental Qualification Review h, 'L, $v, Ju n

, 3e, n, 5;, 5h, 5i, Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation k, 5b -

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary h . "' t , 7- ~

t I

t

i A NRC C::ntract NO. NRC-03-79-118

'M ranklin Research Center FRC Pr: ject Ns. C5257 P g3 A Dwmon oi The Frankhn instaure FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phla . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 447 D 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .d.2

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

[ Tne Licensee (haa/t: net) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the. applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Lic.nsee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

I The Licensee (has/ :: c.; G proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

X Justification for interim operation (has/M: :t) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

K Correcti.ve action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) 1 Equipment relocation t^ ; iaild cr;i;;n: nt Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

g The Licensee (has/hmo avd-provided a schedule for the proposed corrective ac on. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action /&L .)

The Licensee s ates that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency IT o Mod i t ica t. lar) III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

I A NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118 000&rsnklin Rrse:rch Cant:r FRC Project N2. C5257 Pag 3 A Dwmon of The Franklin Institute 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. No.13[8/'7 Yl,f l

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. fa3.

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM j DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate N Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY l I.a Equipment Qualified

( I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life l or Replacement Schedule Justified l III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l

l l

1

4lj0bu Frankhn Rrsetrch Cantir NRC Contr;ct No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N3. C5257 P g2 A Divison of The Frankhn Institute 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask FRC Assignment No. 442 No.1[3 f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Square Root Extractor (Fischer & Porter),

MODEL: E0ES3212 9

COMPONENT NO.: FA3971 l

NRC IDENTIFIED. DEFICIENCIES: EXN, RPS I

PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Rcf. Qualification Data Evaluation Fonn page 25 These insTi uments ~ will be i-clod. ate.a ~ -' prior to 6/30/82, as they become available. Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 12 gives this senedule and our justification for continued operation.

l PSEAG's evaluation of this NRC noted deficiency has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardized pending equiPmeAP P elec4iom . '

l l

~

l NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 A((FInklin LO Research Center FRC Pralect No. C5257 P;09 i A Division of The Frankhn institute FRC Assl0nment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. %I l l

l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 6 f EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 68 DIFFERENTIAL PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED OUTSIDE CONTAINMENT (LOCATION NOT STATED)

FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 10B2496 A C REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 68 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 639 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): CHARGING FLOW TO BORON INJECTION TANK, SAFETY INJECTION PUMP DISCHARGE (FA7464, FA0226, FA7462)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): RHR PUMP DISCHARGE FLOW (FA1422, FA1423)

LICENSEE SUDMITTAL: SCEW(S): 59 [64]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 35, 2;, 2d System Consideration Review 4e, ti, I;, 4d, k, if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, Sb, M 5d, 5g, Sh, y , )( g , 5f, Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 42 "

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary -7e, 7b, 7; I

NRC C:ntract N3. NRC-03-79-118 pktImFranklin Reserrch Centsr FRC Project ND. C5257 P g3 A Diwsuan of The Frankhn Inst:tute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1(XX) FRC Task No. 4/of./D 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. II

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee ' ;as/"'- .

-^U provided a response to the SER concerns. -

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

g The Licensee (ha s/" '" ^^ M proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

X Justification for interim operation (has/h " ^^d been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

[ The Licensee (*ee/nas not) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action Am 3 0. / hP L--

.)

C7 The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

I

! DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency G.b Mod i t ica t ior/ III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b tbt in Scope II,b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available 1

A NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 000 ranklin Rrsetrch Canta FRC Project No. C5257 Pag 3 A Divmon of The Frtn%n Institut> 2 20th and Race Streets. Ph61a.. Pa.19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment FRCTask No. N .13[8/7 448 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. di EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) )(

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied 1 Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established I

II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.O Equipmerit Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review l IV Documentation Not Made Available j 1

l A NGC Contract Nr. NRC-03 79-118 UO0hrrnklin R: search Center FRC Project N2. C5257 Pag 3 A civ. son of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13, 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4/,f Lf/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRO SER EQUIPMENT: Pressure Transmitters (Fischer & Porter) .

MODEL: 10S2496 CCMPONENT NO.: FA7464, FA0226, FA1422, FA1423, FA7462 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: EXN, .RPS PSE13 EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fom page 59.

These pressure transmitters will be replaced with qualified units prior to 6/30/82, as they become available. Our submittal, Volume I Section VII, basis 27 gives tnis senedule and our justification for continued operation.

PSEiG's evaluation of this NRC noted deficiency has reaffimed that plant safety is not jeopardi

ed pending replacement.

1 l

1. A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 000 nklin Research Center FRC Pr; ject No. C5257 P;ga A Dwision of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No). 3 5 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask No. #45 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. d Checksheets [( 6 , SC Mf]have been removed due to the i proprietary nature of information contained therein.-

As NRC C ntract N2. NRC-03 79-118 LQU Frankhn Heserrch Canar FRC Project N3. C5257 Pag 3 A Div en of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment No.13 lo 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 443-tmo FRC Task No. %I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. Ca'l EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 69 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN INSTRUMENT PANEL IN THE INBOARD /0UTBOARD PENETRATION AREAS ROSEMOUhT MODEL 1153AGA REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: 14 DAYS TER CHECKSHEET NO. 69 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): 29, 30, 31, 32, 1764, 3297 FUNCTION (PLANT ID): STEAM PRESSURE TRIP INPUT FOR REACTOR PROTECTION SYSTEM

& POST ACCIDENT MONITORING (PA0667 THRU 674; PA0734; PA0736; PA0738; PA0740)

LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 16 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, h P, H, CS h S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

l Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 2b, 2c, 2d System Consideration Review Ce, 05, $0 4d. t, if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa, 5b, Sc, 5d, 5e, 5f, 5g, Sh, Si, Sj,Sr., L ,)

A-5t.

3 Cb-353 S ,ys Sh, Si,,

Inatalled TMI Lessons Learned Implementation if, Sm ,3in Equipment Summary Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary h , 7b, 7c

AA N RC Csntrcct Ns. N RC-03-79-118 Pag 2 dUil Franklin Research Center FRC Prcj::ct NO. C5257 A Dmuon of The Frankhn Institute lb 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC FRC Task Assignment No. No.13 [8/7 46f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Si SU.t4ARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (ha s/' . :: . t} provided a response to the SER concerns.

[ The Licensee (has/" " s M ifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

Ihe Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

[ The Licensee (has/h2: c.;;) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

% Justification for interim operation (has/h:2 netl been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

, 1 Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress

)(. Other (M M eL+/ )

y v '

p '

u Tne Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

_M,The Licensee (h a s/h 2_' st)-provided a schedule for the proposed corrective acti . (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action 3 c)> / V<fd_ .)

The Licensee sta s that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency jl.b Modification] ';I.a Exempt ualtrication Not Established AII.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available i

l As NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03 79-118 f FRC Project No. C5257 Page LO r:nklin R:se:rch Ccnter A Div:sion of The Fran%n Instruts FRC Asaignment Nr.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. #4Ph/7 .

l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. fa_?

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established X Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately X Qualified Liie or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) X Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) _

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.O Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

1. A NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118

{!ll rtnklin R:se:rch Center FRC Project N2. C5257 PaQ3 A owan of Th. Fr nkhn institure FRC Aesignment No.13 3a 20ih .nd Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4 LP/S/~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Id LICENSEE RESPONFE 'IO NRC SER EQUI?-tE:iT: Pressure Transmitter (Rosemcunt)

'!CD EL :

1153AGA C ;" ?CriEli? Tic. ?A0667, PA0671, ?A0734, 3A0670, PA0674, PA0736, PA0668,

?A0672, ?A0738, PA0669, ?A0673, PA0740

'i?.C IDE!iTIFIED CEFICIEtiCIES: QT, RT, A 35E'.0 EVALUATIOi 0F QEFICIEt:CIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation ?crm page 16. .

07 RT - The data in our suomittal states a *.ime of ( 10 days). This doesn't

~ , ~

meet :ne 14 days recuirement. This value is based on a ttSL3 in the inocard/cutbcard penetration. The break will affect transmitters in

nat area alone (inocard or cutbcard). Therefore, two staam generator

ressures will always be available. Furthermere, after 10 days, any failures can be repairec.

A - Regarding aging; these items are considered to have little safety significance for One time frame in question until replacement er evaluaticn.

?SE3G will eitner determine One @alifiec life of these transmitters or replace them witn cualified ones ; rice to 6/30/82.

Furtner su;;ccr ing data is availaole in cur file EQ-11.

Our evaluation of the NRC noted deficiencies. has reaffirmed :na plant safety is not jeccarci:ed pending completion cf ne aging review.

?iCTE: Underlinec item is a correction to t4RC SER

/h NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 dfFrankhn Rzse:rch Center FRC Project No. C5257 A D.vmon of The F rankhn instituis FRC Assignment N2.13 50 2f th and Hace Strevis. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. f'd//8/7

/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVII.'.W Criteria: DOR Guidelines j ,; NUREG-0588, Cat. I  ; NUREG-0588, Cat. II .

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0 588-I/0 588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION , NOTE NO.)

!  ! c tff E A fsrT/ AL  !

EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION  ! fp  ! PA6JJV46  !

Equipment Type '

_ #-' , ' 78dNS M II N '

Manufacturer's Name /qo$gMOUA/7~

(5.2.2/-/-)  ! $ 0Ji/I8'##I !  !

!  !  ! k

' y /7tsb-/

Model Number ( 5. 2. 2/-/-)  !

jj g' fjg3 g g' "U **

M9 lO G/f f, ThEU l0 Sl&

Features / Mounting  !  !  !

(5.2.6/-/-)  !  ! //I3 NA '# 8  !

!M  !  !

Connections / Interfaces  !

go yfjfoppI C K 7~ '

1 (5.2.6/-/-)

MovNI/#I#' O spog PLMW Location / Elevation { ,,_ {ja ,7 ,gsg 7j9,gp34Afc Equipment ID No.  ! ,  ! A////  !

QUALIFICATION REPORT  !  !  !

( 8. 0/ 5. 0/ 5. 0)  !  !  !

Report 1D Number

{R11T37/P{

RMT 3 788 l [17 C,0 Report Date  !

! 7);& ) l f *ff *

. . . i Issued by

{

{ gW Prepared for '

Referencea Reports 1

gg7 3 fp A /

![//y23 Qualification Method  !  !  !

(5.1, 5.3/2.1, a 4/2.1, 2.4) '

f fj 7- 7 yjog f gJ'T QUALIFICATION .EST PROGRAM  !  !  !

Functional Test Description !  ! v p : T- Pow 6A60  :

(5.2.5/2.2.9/2.2.9) '

~

gNO [A ESIDA 82 8 0 Operating Conditions  !  !  !

(-/2.2.10/2.2.10)  ! -  ! O - 780 ,, //'d A P!

Load / Cycles / Voltage /  ! ,  ! '

Current /Freq.  !  ! L/ - J o /fM - f

N RC C::ntract N2. NRC-03-79-118 SI- Research Centxt 4Nnkhn FRC Project No. C5257 P go A Dimion of The Franklin instrtute FRC Assignment No.13 5b 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103(215) 444 1000 FRC Task No. //lef/i/7

/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO, _N NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITil SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

! l- $ l*o {0.5//fAdh>ifo mmh Acceptance Criteria  ! /  !

(5.2.5/2.2.1/2.2.1)  !

Nk  ! g f*/o cluRING- S Tro TfJ I~ .

u vT sic,Not-

• A Accuracy (5.2.5/-/-)  !

.06 T/*# o 'I IA#^' #

Number of Specimens  !  ! pin R A g +37[o+f.ffff)*

DtHi* .

37E4N !

Test Instruments Calibrated /VA )'FS /8 80 1  !  !

Safety Function ( Active /  !  !  !

Passive) (-/2.1. 3/2.1. 3 )  ! Ac.7/Ff ! N  !

Test Duration (5.2.1/-/-) '

M .

{ ffr /;g g a /f / /V '

Accident Duration (Envir.  !  !

Above Normal) (5.2.1/-/-)  ! ) ( b!. g/A { g Required Function Time f b

! If h Test Sequence (General)  !  !

( 5. 2. 3/2. 3.1/ 2. 3.1)  ! # A. !8AO/A[/0M/88/0UIC!

! $ffA/1 -/WfESVAL/SMAY j Test Sequence (NUREG-0588,  ! p4 1 r/  !

Cat. I) (-/ 2. 3 .1/.-)  !  !  !

1. Representative Sample  !  !  !

2. Baseline Data  !  !  !

3. Performance Extremes  !  !  !

4. Thermal Aging 1  !  !

5. Radiation Aging  !  !  !

6. Wear Aging  !  !  !

7. Vibration / Seismic  !  !  !

8. DBE Exposure  !  !  !

9. Post-DBE Exposure  !  !  !

10. Inspection  !  !  !

Agin]  !  ! og  !

(5.2.4, 7.0/4.0/4.0)  !  !

Thermal Aging / Basis  !

SA-30]  !

!  ! Mg f Material Aging yQf g 1 N oPg }X_

{

Evaluation (7.0/-/-)  !

SNL Sf M 4 !

Matertals Suscepttble f/a*C d A/0NE i X- ,

(Thermal) D (5.2.4, 7. 0/ -/-;  !

. 1. p Radiation Ag ing , Type GAN//8 bo '

l gy.s. NRC C:ntract N c. NRC-03-79-118 LUM! Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 P g]

A Dwision of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignm:nt Nn.13 5c 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1(m FRC Task No. VS//8/') '

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. If s

NRC REQUIRFLENTS DEFACIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0 588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATIOU NOTE NO.)

Radiation Aging, Dose (rd) NA 888 MC'd#"I l

Radiation Aging, Dose Rate  !

1. 4  !

ggg gccfsfuT OufE Radiation Aging, Method / ffff I  !  !  !

Materials Susceptible  !

p,7  !' g f (Radiation) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-) ' ggggy Operational Aging  !  !  !

(-/4.2/-)  !  !  !

Other Age Conditioning  !  !  !

(-/4.2/-)

Qualified Life Claimed /  ! pgy_j o  ! pay g7g7/0 1 g, Established (5.2.4/4.13/-)  ! gj  !  ! l 1 1 1 7 -

Normal Ambient Temperature  !  !

yp ' \

Normal Amoient Radiation  ! .

Normal Ambient Humidity  !  !  ! ,

On-Going Surveillance and  ! jt/q  !  !

Preventive Mainteriance  !  ! NOT IId7 0 1

)

(7.0/-/-)  !  !

(. On-Going Analysis of  ! jy)).  !  !

l l Failures and Degradation  !

goT g7g7go  :

(7.0/-/-)  !  !

Margin (General)  !  !  ! l (6. 0/ 3. 0/ 3. 0) 1  ! /o Io eN 8AE/A I/ * # !  !

Margin (NUREG-0 588,  !  !  !

Cat. I) (-/3.2/-)  !  ! 8//  !

1. Temperature (+15'F)  !  !  !

2. Pressure (+10%, ,  !  !

10 psig max)  !  !  !

3. Radiation  !  !  !

(not required)  !  !  !

4. Time (+10%, +1 hour  !  !  !

+ function time minimum)  !  !  !

1. x NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 D2b$nklin Research Centsr FRC Pr2 ject Ns. C5257 P:ga A Diusion of The Franklin institute 13 5d 20th and Race Streets Phda . Fa 19s03 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask FRC Assignment No. WNo.MI/7 W

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ((_

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

ACCIDENT CONDITIONS 1  !  !

IOCA/MSLD/liELB/ Uncontrolled !

(4.1, 4.2, 4.3.1, 4.3.3/  !

p/g  !

jg3f,g 1.1, 1.2, 1.5/1.1, 1.2, 1.5) !  !  !

Radiation Type '

Q g[j A ' gpffg C[" '

Radiation Dose (rd) g g/o 8/)O (4.1.2/1.4/1.4) ' ' '

e e e Radiation Dose Rate (rd/hr) o ,g y /0 8/fA .

Radiation Qual. Method  !  !  !

(5.3.1/-/-)  !  ! TE S T~  !

Proximity to Concentrated  !  !  !

Radiation  !  !  !

( 4.1. 2/1. 4 . 6/1. 4. 6)  !  !  !

Equipment Susceptible to  !

! pg  !

Beta Radiation ( 4.1. 2/-/-)  !  !

Radiation Dose (Normal +  !  ! f 1 Accident) (4.1.2/-/-)

gj.I4! if 1/ g /0 8AO '

Plateout Dose Considered  !  !  !

(-/1. 4 8/1. 4 8)  !

Gamma + Beta Dose (rd)

(4.1.2/1.4.7/1.4.7) g  !

gh NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 FRC PrIject N3. C5257 P pI d!!J Franklin Rssezrch Ca:nta A Division of Thi Franklin Instituis FRC Assignm:nt N.S.13 5e 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Idef M/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO M NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE No.)

E!NIRONMENTAL PROFILE 1  !  !

OF ACCIDENT CONDITIONS  !  !  !

j Rate of Temp./ Press.  !  ! ,  !

l Increase  !

!! f. $~ Ys }l0.6 7 P')/f ! -y-!

Peak: *F/psig/RH/ Time  ! 3a.gs/f../2f ! 3I //>o//o */ o - /oM ! J, c yc4 EJ

!  !  ! s1 3 hoM Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time !)d7

• • [J-43! 3o3/ff[/do[ [d8 1 sNffruh l Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time lh /~[sf p 8('[/fj/ /d fI k W

M(

Decrease To: *F/psig/RH/ Time 8o*M T8M-Equipment Surface Tempera-  !  !  !

ture (MSLB) (- /1. 2. 5.C ,  !  ! 8  !

2.2.6/1.2.5.C, 2.2.6)  !  !  !

Spray Qualification Method (5.3.2/1.3, 2.2.8/1.3,  ! #4  ! N7  !

2.2.8)  !  !  !

e Spray Composition  !  !

(4.1.4/1.3, 2.2.8/.  !  ! N 80 3 y /f0M fM  ;

1.3, 2.2.8)  !  ! g/f c// f // /o. I {

l  ! $ 72 *f  !

Spray Density (gpm/f t2) g o 's~ 3f"'5 g ;

1 Spray Duration

! g!  !

! . Io - D Y havn s  ; , ,,,,z 3 e

Submergence Duration  !  !

( 4.1. 3/2. 2. 5/2. 2. 5)  ! g/f 2 NONb [

! In-Leakage Considered  !  !  !

l (5.2.6, 5.3.2/-/-)  !

NI  ! No 2 6A N Frf  !

! O S TEcTE b  !

Time to Submergence  !

pg  !

///@  !

Dust Environment #

(-/ 2. 2.11/ 2. 2.11)  !  !  !

A NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 P:g]

UO0hr .nklin R:se5rch Csntir FRC Project N 2. C5257 A Deusson of The Franklin Institute 20th and Race stree t Phifa . Pa. 19103 (215) 448- N FRC Assignment FRC Task No.

13 FNo. Mf/7 5g

[

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M I

ff /. 7~ h W These test units are representative of the whole 1153 Series A model line. The remainder of the model line differ by the spring constant (thickness) of the sensing diaphragm and by the process pressure l evel . The stiffness of the metal sensing diaphragm, whose movement is minute .004 inches, does not constitute a significant design difference. Radiation, vibration, and steam temperatures would not effect diaphragm stiffness to the extent that performance would exceed the specified acceptance criteria limits. Also, all transmitters within the model line have a design capability of withstanding a process pressure proof load of 10,000 psi. This is more than twice the maximum operating pressure range of any transmitter. Hence, process pressure is a static load which is well below the design proof load and the effects of this static loading would not be significantly enhanced by exposure to the qualification testing.

Thus, the entire 1153 Series A model line is qualified to the acceptance levels specified in this document by virtue of similarity to the test units.

Span Maximum Working Model No. Type Min. Max. or Maximum Static 1153CA3 Differential 0-5" H 2O 0-30" H 2O 2000 psig 1153DA4 0-25" H2 0 0-150" H 2O "

ll53CA5 0-125"H2 O 0-750"H 2O "

il53DA6 0-17 psid 0-100 psid "

ll53DA7 "

0-50 psid 0-300 psid "

ll53DA8 "

0-170 psid 0-1000 psid "

1. A NRC Contract N c. NRC-03-79-118

!1000 Frsnklin Rzserrch Csnter FRC Project No. C5257 P:ga A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215)448 tmo , FRC Task No. Y 6<P[5'/7 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. df

)

NOTES:

ll53HA4 Differential 0-25" H2 O 0-150" H 20 4500 psig il53HA5 0-125" H 2O 0-750" H 2O il53HA6 "

0-17 psid 0-100 psid "

1153HA7 0-50 psid 0-300 psid "

0-10" HgA 0-55" HgA ll53AA5 Absolute 2000 psig  ;

ll53AA6 "

0-17 psia 0-100 psia .

ll53AA7 0-50 psia 0-300 psia I ll53AA8 "

0-170 psia 0-1000 psia "

1153AA9 0-500 psia 0-3000 psia 4500 psig ll536A3 Gauge 0-5" H 2O 0-30" H 2O 2000 psig 1153GA4 0-25" H2O 0-150" H 2O 1153GA5 0-125" H2O 0-750" H 2O ll53GA6 "

0-17 psiG 0-100 psiG "

ll53GA7 "

0-50 psiG 0-300 psiG "

ll.53GA8 0-170 psiG 0-1000 psiG 0-500 psiG 0-3000 psiG 4500 psig Ql53 gap g, Q Zh. W - 7=~ irrw4A //C3dfA )

5 Y (m ((

a Summary

.% pL m rA A% u H u .JQ Kr~r~t A:

of Radiation Results 7

During the exposure period, the following worst case output signal deviations were noted: .6%, h7%, and +1.5% of span for serial numbers 106186, 106187, and 106188; respectively. These resul,ts are well within the expected error band of :5% upper range limit. The post-test calibration check indicates that all transmitters returned to near normal performance; all transmitters were within 0.5% of the pre-test data. No changes worthy of noting were seen in liftoff voltage or time constant parameters in the before to after compari-son. The temerature coefficient data do indic ate that radiation does have an effect on this carameter; however, the magnitude of 9is effect is scull. The largest difference between the pre-to-U post test data at the hot temperature (200 F) was only 1.3% of span.

1. # NRC Contract N O. NRC-M-79-118 lj00U Fr:nklin Rise:rch Cent:r FRC Project NO. C5257 P g3 A Dmson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.1* 5 J, 20th and Race Streets, Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. F4 '/i/7 I

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M NOTES: I

],

Tne deviation fecm procedure resulted from a problem with the filtra-tion system for the chemical spray. The plumbing for the spray became clogged such that units 106186,106187, and 106188 were sprayed -for 10, 21, and 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br />; respectively. The procedure originally specified 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of chemical spray. This deviation does not impact the resuits of the test for three reasons. First, the transmitter design is one in wnich all exposed surfaces are of ferrous material and are chemically compactable with the spray. Second, the strio chart data for signal outout and past development testing indicate that the output signal is uneffected by the spray introduced into the chamber. Third, unit 106138 did experience the required amount of spray and, therefore, demonstrates the design compactability with the 24 hours2.777778e-4 days <br />0.00667 hours <br />3.968254e-5 weeks <br />9.132e-6 months <br /> of spray.

It is concluded from the results present that all tnree units met the requirements ,of the steam / chemical test.

7/df-N [ M5 CONCLUSIONS It is concluded from the data obtained from this type-test program, a summary of which is document in this report, that all three test units nave successfully demonstrated the Rosemcunt Model 1153 Series A pressure transmitter to be qualified for Class lE service in those applications requiring compliance with the 1971 IEEE standards.

4000U Frinklin R:seirch Canter NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N3. C5257 Pag 3 A Dtvisen of Thi Frtnklin Instnuti FRC Assignment NO.13 Si 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 94[/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENfAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ( ?

l NOTES:

(d) I? L so Ok i ) J ap (JAD Ebs/ mn ZA /o % L D eddt A n.A 2k J incKJ 4/. #

r A m d i a 7e /I'd.

s

)f x C l2$ / O *('

a- d ~LL u mAE

-A a leh kn.

ran 'a n && a a A m,&

iktcm 1

% w.

n u v$ -

D ad +,,JL V Od AA ." "

.O

A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 P ga 000J Frank!!n Rrsetrch Csnt r FRC PrIject N2. C5257 A Divmon of The Franklin Insneute FRC Assignment No.13 5j l 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 4481mo FRC Task No. W//f/)

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .fi.1 t m ess g n& Af&b 1Y&j n A Zh N~

G. T.A.

n cyn. i  ;

a Lf : 2 %. 23 huko  := /o &

l$4ak-u/maf19'& & Y At bd 4btd Aw/nausad-4Aes* ~Lfawtute. M btMA wN'l n8 bks 5 WaM4&'18M

% s& a f $tMwipasufe a th da,ouetuten Q wuwurxufsj'a/du.Y 2 n.L.,aauan aaam/dd afa /0 &as eu deayma/- aanamAlb faflewn udtl> saddedwd ugfduw$2ajuEbnaczlyadoutAdr dmww amim&mwwar7/ rust. dluf basAo w.u&

> 2 aa6 ha

-deordQ, whingauea &%x, budthaal)adpaya Auaallyxadj'fra>ioo9 4

[3- _] ua i znaes clZ A N [ d( W )

6 J~yJ d.J~ -

Q A IN

& A-3 -o

~

x a. n _

,gh ,t]

z z. @5,&

A p ~f ' &. ~

h) y Mw 4 an -F t~t Ar #/ "-

l

1. A NRC Contract N D. NRC-03-79-118 00bhrtnklin Rzse:rch Center FRC Pr: ject No. C5257 Pcg3 A Divisen of The Frinkhn Institute FRC As:lgnm:nt NT.13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-Im0 FRC Task No. #$//fO (

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. S 7 Notes: -

BASED p ggy;&w F EPoR 1 CONCLvS/0N Three differential range ll53DA5 transmitters were sequentially tested. These units are representative of the entire 1153 Series A model line. The remainder of the medel line differs cy the sensing diaphragm, spring thickness, and the process pressure rating. These differences are not significant with respect to qualification testing. Thus, the following model line is qualified by virtue of similarity:

1153.A3 through 8 ll53HA4 througn 7 ll53AAS througn 9 MA,A MA // M N The transmitters were exposed to a radiation exposure rate of 0.5 Mrd per hour for a total integrated dose of 44 Mrd. The maximum output signal deviation noted was +3.7% of span.

The three transmitters were LCCA tested in a steam temperature /

pressure / chemical-spray environment for fy hours. The maximum error l exhibited was +6.95% of span. '

I .

) .

7~ m&

Zfff-P3(N)& . f ad c& . A box OR WM -

A JAk a p a n x ~u. . . <

y 7 u~t, p &, J ~t MJ Ww sr-x & 6~en~a,Lr M M*M&M d/ .

{

1. x NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 d$nklin Rese:rch Centir FRC Project N3. C5257 P;g3 A Dms.on ol The Franun instituie FRC Assignment No.13 50' 20th and Race Streets. F hda . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4%F ((/~/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW Criteria: DOR Guidelines  ; NUREG-0588, Cat. I  ; NUREG-0588, Cat. II .

NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (** OR (DOR /0 588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOld NO.)

EQUIPMENT DESCRIPTION  ! 4  !

Equipment Type  ! 16 /fv65 IdI W '  !

Manufacturer's Name p 2 7BMNJM/TTEA (5.2.2/-/-)  ! h !ROSErfovNI  !

Model Number ( 5. 2. 2/-/-)  !  ! //53 GA 7  !

Serial Number jogggy .

Features / Mounting  !  !  !

(5.2.6/-/-)  !  ! NOT Sin TED  ! p,. 4 I Connections / Interfaces  !  !  !

(5.2.6/-/-)  !  ! NOT STATED Location / Elevation ' '

j /g g

Equipment ID No. . .

f QUALIFICATION REPORT  !  !  !

(8. 0/ 5. 0/ 5. 0)  !  !  !

Raport ID Number  !  ! gM T NO. J 7f 2 / BEV 6 ! {yy2 3]

Rsport Date '

! .2 Y //# 6- -78 I

. . 1 Issued by

• f OJE /10 uN /

Prepared for RojfM00NI

{

. f.

Rsferenced Reports '

yf go, j /gg '{j7fy}

Qualification Method  !  !  !

(5.1, 5.3/2.1, 2. 4/2.1, 2. 4) !  ! MI  !

QUALIFICATION TEST PROGRAM  !  !  !

Functional Test Description  ! !pg,y gowfR5O A ^r D !'# g (5.2.5/2.2.9/2.2.9) ' '

• PRESS v A / E SD g g3 Operating Conditions  !  ! !MM7

(-/2.2.10/2.2.10)  !  ! O - 3000 fJ/ 7  !

Ioad/ Cycles / Voltage /  ;

Current /Freq. h' h' goT $ TA TE0

• I

1. s NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 b0 rankhn R sesrch Canta FRC Project No. C5257 P:g3

)

A Dewsion of The Frank!m institute FRC Assignment No.13 5b #

20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 4481M0 FRC Task No. 84M5/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 5 7 NRC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY l WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /058e-I/0 586-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE NO.)

!  !  ! i Acceptance Criteria  !

! i [ fa

( 5. 2. 5/ 2. 2.1/ 2. 2.1) 3,25 7, Accuracy (5.2.5/-/-)  ! J pp PA M.3,I,% *-

% pe) 3p Number of Specimens  !  !

ONN  !

Test Instruments Calibrated Safety Function (Active /  !  !  !

Passive) (-/2.1. 3/ 2.1. 3 )  !  ! Mh  !

Test Duration ( 5. 2.1/-/-) ' '

]fg goj,fjy, 1 Accident Duration (Envir.  !  !  ! -

Above Normal) (5.2.1/-/-)  !  ! 8  !

!  ! I acquired Function Time  !  !

Test Sequence (General)  !  !  !

( 5. 2. 3/2. 3.1/ 2. 3.1)  !  ! 5 TEMM Cd8d/d  !

!  ! sinny  !

Test Sequence (NUREG-0588,  !  !  !

Cat. I) (-/2.3.1/-)  !  ! pp  !

1. Representative Sample  !  !  !

2. Baseline Data  !  ! -

1

3. Performance Extremes  !  !  !

4. Thermal Aging  !  !  !

5. Radiation Aging  !  !  !

6. Wear Aging  !  !  !

7. Vibration / Seismic  !  !  !

8. DBE Exposure  !  !  !

9. Post-DBE Exposure  !  !  ! l

10. Inspection  !  !  !

Ag ing  !  !  !

(5.2.4, 7.0/4.0/4.0)  !  ! NONb  !

Thermal Aging / Basis  !  !  !

Material Aging  !  ! goN6  ! ,

Evaluation (7.0/-/-)  !  !  ! l 1 l Materials Susceptible  !

//vT 8 IA E b I (Thermal) (5.2.4, 7.0/-/-) k Radiation Aging , Type M

• d .s NRC CIntr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118

!.0!ju Franklin Reserrch Csnt:r FRC Prrject N3. C5257 P ga A Dms on of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 20th and Race Sirvets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-lom FRC Task No. #4cP/f/7 5e#

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. IA

!!RC REQUIREMENTS DEFICIENCY WITH SECTION REFERENCE LICENSEE QUALIFICATION (X OR (DOR /0588-I/0588-II) SUBMITTAL DOCUMENTATION NOTE No.) -

EtNIRONMENTAL PROFILE  !  !  ! -

OF ACCIDENT CONDITIONS  !  !  !

Rate of Temp./ Press.  !  !  !

Increase  !  !  !

Peak 'F/psig/RH/ Time /,[*/g C C '7 II#7/J Dscrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time h(0[/po[/o o[o -/oM

+

' ,y, cycws Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time ' j ]o 3/g[/oe[ @ N

!880[/I!/"!!*

Decrease To: 'F/psig/RH/ Time !  !/N 8AduR

!  ! }{o u/1 ff/'ll'f/AI VAS ! lAt! TEKVAl-Equipment Surface Tempera-  !  !

ture (MSLB) (-/1.2.5.C,  !  !  !

2.2.6/1.2.5.C, 2.2.6)  !  ! 87 g 7fg 1 Spray Qualification Method  !  !  !

3 2/1.3, 2.2.8/1.3, .

7 Spray Composition  !  !  !

Bo g/C. AC/D /foco l'/'N !

(4.1.4/1.3, 2.2.8/  !  !

1.3, 2.2.8)  !  !

Spray Density (gpm/f t 2) {

{

O./[ MU /[I .

Spray Duration k k g,7 g 7,f Tf 0 Submergence Duration  !  !  !

(4.1.3/2.2.5/2.2.5)  !  ! //  !

In-Leakage Considered  !  !  !

(5.2.6, 5.3.2/-/-) ' '

!  !  ! d Time to Suomergence  !  ! #[d  !

Dust Environment  !  !  !

(-/ 2. 2.11/ 2. 2.11)  !  !  !

1. NRC C::ntract N2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC PrJject No. C5257 P ga l.Nhranklin Research Centsr A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignm:nt N3.13 5 f, 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 94c /f/2 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 89 NOTES:

/. A m,Z i

$N WWMM

+4A &N' & w 0 -k '

n M Atu~ 2L M M oJ w t-,. zL A Lt ". W L" W Yd 'Ces.25 .

2. RA e W /b "kr D m n -

n J 4 .st & & W J at d'o N N d [/dro c> /3/9 ) .

A&

O 2A A N J A m 'd ar Jo % O& dos /D$" ) .

/

2. R A A N /A s,vl d 24.

& nK m- .zE d _a zL M w a a &f d 3 J'o . 3o3. -

dd's ~f .

y 4'. R A & 2 % t J.JJ & m A! a n sk L L ' M A./ M ./

x a. 4 A A ' u s t n .:4 ":

350 f,L /oM f3 03 *f f

.k)

}n ,,ba260'? ,

/ ,f K 1

A~ NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 Pcg9 J' EU Franklin Rese:rch Cent:r FRC Project N . C5257 A Dmsion of Thi Frtnkhn instituts FRC Assignmint No.13 5 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. V&/f/') i EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _f_7 NOTES:

A g ,x J rd DL M

r. ""^~"7-H TEST RESULTS Accuracy deviations at the input pressures of 50 and 20% full scale (F.S.) are plotted ver sus time in Figures 2 and 3. These data indicate the maximum output signal deviation occurs during the 10 minute hold period at 350 F. The worst errors from the 50% and 20% full scale pressure tests during this period were

-3.25 and -2.50 percent of span, respectively. At the 303*F temperature, the accuracy deviations were less than +1.5 and

-0.8% of span for the 50% and 20% F.S. tests. At the 250*F temperature, the deviations were less than +1.8 and -0.6% of span. 4 6

,& h5

//

Two anomalies developed during the testing. The first was a minor leak developed at the threads between the process fluid bleed valve body and the process flarge. This joint is sealed using a Loctite thread sealant. The leak was minimial, only a few drops of fluid per minute. The bleed valve asse-biy was removed and re-installed using a tape thread sealant in order to . expeditiously finish the perfor ance testing. Subsequent to the steam testing, an evaluation was made to reaffirm the design adequacy of the Loctite thread sealant at 350 F and 3000 psig

NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 0 OU Franklin Rrse:rch Centr FRC Project N2. C5257 Pcgo A Divmon of Tha Fr:n%n Instituti FRC Assignm:nt N3.13 5 )),

20th and Race streets. Phita . Pa 19103 (215) 448-tm0 FRC Task No. 947/IT2 ,

EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. if 1

1 NOTES:

fluid pressure. A set of four flanges were assembled with bleed valves by the Production Department per procedures for the Model 1153. These were then hdted in an oven to 350'F for four hours.

They were removed from the oven and immediately pressurized to 3000 psig for a period of 20 minutes. During the twenty minutes, I they were visually checked for leakage; none was detected. It was concluded that Loctite is an adequate thread sealant for these cor.di ti ons. /'

i 1

7. T.uZ $ $A- '

ad E '

e cu l 4

//

The second anomaly involved the output signal at the 100% full scale pressure, i.e. 3000 psig. After the first test had been completed and the unit had cooled to room temperature, a calibra-tion check was made at 20% F.S. intervals. The 100% F.S. signai exhibited anomaicus benavior characterized by an erratic output to l a level 1.25% of span belcw the expected reading. Immediate cycling between zero and full scale, 3 cycles, indicated the I a uu r.

3. output signal to be a normal steady value each tima l The transmitter was then reworked for the second phase of testing; new electronics and new 0-rings were installed.

4 l

l A calibration check prior to subjecting the transmitter to the second steam tesc showed normal o;;eration. Also, during the steam test the unit exhibited expected perforance characteristics.

However, af ter ccoling at room temoerature, the 100% F.S. reading again shewed abnormal behavior af ter pressure cycling.

l l

1. 5 NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N2. C5257 Pcg3 d5Frinklin Rneirch Ccnter A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 Si, 20th and Race streets. Phila.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-tmo FRC Task No. MP/iB EQUlPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. sf t40TES:

ADDENDUM 1 INVESTIGATION INTO THE CAUSE OF -

THE PERFORMANCE ABNO3f' ALIT

• ES Due to the abnor:ralities of the 100% output after the original steam test, an attempt was made to determine if the abnormalities were caused by the trans-mitter or by some other part of the test. -

In an effort to determine what part of the transmitter wasn't working properly, the capacitance module was disconnected fromthe transmitter and its capacitance checked. While at room temoerature, it was cycled at 80% F.S.

pressure,100% F.S. pressure,110% F.S. pressure and 120% F.S. pressure; the cell acted erratically, changing its capacitance readings by up to 7.5% of the nominal readings. At the same time, a new capacitance module was subjected to the same test and performed perfectly. Thus , the aonormality can be traced to some problem with the original capacitance module used in the-steam test.

After the electronics were replaced, the unit gave very smooth readings.

The largest error seen was -3.13% of F.S. during the 350 temperature spike.

The errors were

.95% of span during the 303 F phase of the test and .44%

of span during the 250 F portion.

CCNCLUSION The abnormalities that appeared in the original steam test were apparently caused by a defective capacitance module. An investigation was made to try to cinpoint the exact cause of the problem, but no conclusive results were ever obtained. However, due to the good perfor ance of the new capacitance module when subjected to a steam test, it can be concluded that the problems with the original cell were of a random nature and that the transmitter will operate within the !a% of upper range limit specification. //

NRC Contract No. NRC-03 79-118 hl}00hranklin R:se:rch Center FRC Project N3.C5257 Pc03 A Division of The Franklin Institute 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Asalenment No.13 FRC Task No. VQf/f/7 5f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _6.f NOTES:

.3 f $ ll53 Y k llS3$b? .

v i 2AZ 2 cn & A-DL & k 1PR 4 I

mi M & edt hwEA dd& L

'/

NRC Contract NT. NRC-03-79-118

1. $7nk..n LQ0 aesetrch Centrr FAC Project N2. C5257 P g')

A oms.on of The Frankhn inshture FRC Assignment No.13 5 zoth and Race Streets Phda Pa 19103 (215) 448-l%0 FRC Task No. 9sMfD EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _f.f_

NOTES:

AJ C& J~,1n & al nna mv

, ~uh x, n. u- ad:

V a nobwx /7iY s !b N f

A SY Y Y J

//f 3 n/IS~ d a d /A

/

//r3 i A &k&

& c%

v "'

^%,./ m

/ 0 /

in h%//UN 0$

ed ZA- D o R (A8L Md /n/A.G+ & b W d A't: anA &A>f . TA. I NA A UJ:

zm -zA(wS E4 . rA "

A Three differential range ll53DA5 transmitters were sequentially tested. These units are representative of the entire 1153 Series A -

medel line. The remainder of the model line differs by the sensing diapnragm, spring th;cy. ness, and the peccess pressure rating. These differences are not significant with respect to cualification testing. Thus, the following nodel line is qualified by virtue of s imila r i ty': , ,

ll53dA3 through 9 il53HA4 througn 7 il53AAS tn:cugn 9 4G

y e , 2 A . i 2 J Z' X'3 X'- ~X M9iln MA . TM,,,

• The transmitters were exposed to a radiation exposure at of 0.5 Mrd per hour for a total integrated dose of 44 Mrd. The maximum output signal deviation noted was -3.7% of span.

- The three transmitters were LCCA tested in a steam temperature /

pressure / chemical-spray envircnment for fy hours. The maximum errer exhibited was -6.95% of span.

O A VY A 3 / / [ 2 (2 d ?

A~LU nm & ZA t 2X v& '

r e

&cuk (%fa -A am ZJ' &

i o Omdum L1%a /mi /& .

1. ^ , NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03 79-118 b00hr nkhn Rsse rch Ccnt:r FRC Project N2. C5257 Pag 3 A Diviuon of The Frtnkhn Instituts FRC Assignment NO.13 5,n.

20th and Race Streets Phita . Pa 19103 (215) e48-in FRC Task Nc. 94//f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 4 I i

1 i

NOTFS:

• Ux /rrZu lh-u,u%JL d -

/A&dM

// O '

(LY $ N A/RC._ M V r e +

AD M he I y e

/eRe secoun: testing to qualify a transmit:cr to tee:.IEEE 323-974 requirements has resulted in iai;ure. A c0 biration of therta aging, :.rradiatien and cht ical spray tes: sp eci- .

fication parameters has resulted in failed compenen:s, The in:.::.a. f ailed elemen vas an 0-ring comprised of sulphur cured polyethylene rubber. "~is n allowed steam / chemical stray

o a:fec: ele :renic eceponents. The C-ring =cde of faidare is attr.:uted to high temperature.vs. time necessary for the Arrhenius curve ti=e cc:pression Oc satisfy aging test re-quire =ents. /'

($w$ <~ /L CAW' ,2A C 2Af .

/L /<Am '

sA,~ff Cd2 AM $ /

- cb$']t J 2K- OmJ fu . Jm

<sLbk-(& FAc K N{

. a n 24 -m > IA w Ja

- A$ - n Aw 7' #1' 7%.-. WP n l ~ r 4 1 w#~ L J.~ 0 L .

C~U A ()

b'R 'l-

/x NRC C:ntract N3. NRC-03-79-118 b$nkhn Research Center P g3 FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dmsson of The Franklin Inshtute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. %I EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. @

l l

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 70 LIMIT SWITCH LOCATED IN THE INBOARD /0UTBOARD PENETRATION AREAS NAMCO MODEL D2400X2 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 70 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPE RATOR INDICATIO N (11MS167, 12MS167, 13MS167, 14M S167)

SERVICE: POSITION INDICATOR FOR VALVES LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 20A [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY:

(Sse Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, OL, Ow, 3d System Consideration Review 42, 45 '" ^A  %. if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review {2, y , h , Od, Lu, 0 2 ,-

n, .a u , u, n Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation S, Cb-Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7=, 7b, 76

/% N RC C:ntrcct NO. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr:J;ct N2. C5257 P go dI[Frankhn Research Center A Dmsson of The Franklin Inst:tute FRC Assignm:nt N9.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phsta . Pa 19103 (215) 44+ 1000 FRC Task No. dif/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _2.9 I

SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

[ Tne I.icensee (has/h:2 .: S provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no  !

outstanding qualification deficiencies.

I The Licensee (has/L- . 4 proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

% Justification for interim operation (has/h;.. ..a) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment i Equipment modification j Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

Tne Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (nas/ hee ==ree) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action drior }a (o/3o /82 '

.)

V The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON RFVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency G. b Modification) III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project NO. C5257 PZg]

bbFranklin Rxse:rch Cent:r A Dmsaon of The Frankhn instaure FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. #4f Mn EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 70 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adequate' Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Sdtisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II'.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

i c4RC Contrrct NO. NRC-03-79-118 000hrinklin Rrsetrch Centxt FRC Pr; ject N3. C5257 Pag 3 A Dwmon of Th1 Frtnkhn insututi FRC Assignm:nt N3.13 / 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. 44J /5 /~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _26 LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMEriT: Limit Switch (Namcc)

MCOEL: 0-24COX-2 COMPCNENT NO.: 11MS 167 , 12iS 167 , 13MS 167 ,-.1 @S 167 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: EXN, RFS PSElG EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluatien Fcra page 20A.~

These limit switches are used for positicn indication cnly. Verification cf steamline italation can be made using inf:mation such as steamline cressure and ficw measurements. Our submit:al . '/ 'c e :, Secticn VII, basis '108 ce: ails cur reasoning for centinued c5 si :.1 2.nd cur intensions to reolace

nese swit:hes with cualified cr.er . . - - 5/30/32.

PSE1G's evaluation of the NRC not w ced.,'encies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jec:arci:ed pending replace.en- '

l 1

1

____.________.___2_ _ _ _ ___ -

4% NRC C ntr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 dd Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject N3. C5257 A Dwisson of The Frankhn Institute FRC AsIlgnm;nt No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 44 & l000 FRC Task No. Nf EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _71 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 71 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA ASCO MODEL LB831654 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LESS THAN 10 SEC TER CHECKSHEET NO. 71 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S',: NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): , VALVE OPERATION (SV1078, SV1080, SV1082, SV1084, SV0114)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVE FOR CONTAINMENT ISOL. VALVE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL; SCEW(S): 32 AND 89 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, Q1, None, l.b. -se. syso.yg, sj g ogg,5 q a og 7, ,gy , o gp Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, A , Od System Consideration Review 22 '5, I, id, 40, Of-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, 55, Sc, 53, 5;, 5f, 5;, L , Oi, Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -6u , 6b Equipment Summary l

l Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary 72, 7L, 7c-l

1. 1. NRC C ntr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 P:gs dUU Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 191031215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 4d9/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. T SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has/t.a; . 2) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditic..s.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

M The Licensee (has/hs r.ct) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

I Justific=* ion for interim operation (ha s/h * *) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

[ Corrective action specified by the Licensee: .

[ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other 1 ) <

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim l

operation.

[ The Licensee (has/M : - J provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action ,cr~I n h o $, /1D /RL .)

i The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency (f. b ma t r ication) III.a Exempt II.a Qua11rication Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A NRC Contract N r. NRC-03-79-118 000hrtnklin Rssetrch Cent:r FRC Project N2. C5257 Pag 3 A Dwmon of The Franklin institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda., Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 44 7 /4*/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adrquate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regy. ding Aging Simulation S4tisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGodY I.a Equipment Qualified I,b Equipment Qualification Pendirig Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established l II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review l IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contract N 2. NRC-0J-79-118 000hrenklin Rrse:rch Ccntir FRC Project N2. C5257 P ga A Dwison of The Frtnkhn Instituti FRC Assignm:nt Nc.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. 4 L7,/3M EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

MODEL: LB831654 (Unit 1)

X 8342B3 (Unit 2) ,

l l

l l

CCMPONEtiT NO.: SV1078, SV1080, SV1082, SV1084 l

'iRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: RPS, RT r

l PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIEl:CIES:

[

i Ref. Qualification Data Evaluttion Forn page 32, 89 These solenoids will be replaced with qualified valves prior to 6/30/82. [ .' . . ..

Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 17, gives this schedule t.nd our justification for continued operation.

l PSE&G's ev aluation of these deficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not

accardi

ed pending replacement.

I l

l .-

NRC C:ntr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 nklin Research Cant 2r FRC Project No. C5257 P ga A civmon of The Franklin institute 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215n 4481m0 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. No.13[5/ 7 4 4,F 1

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICAT!ON REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _2/_

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER (Continued)

EQUIPMENT: Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

MODEL: LS831654 CCMPONENT NO.- SV0114, SV0575 SYo42F 3

Gk;T {

0^k .

NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: US PSEM EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 32 These solenoids will be replaced with qualified valves prior to 6/30/82 _ ._

Our sutstittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 17, gives this sc.1edule and cur justification for continued coeration.

?SEM's evaluation of these deficiencies has reaffirmed tnat plant safety is not jeopardized pending replacement.

I de NRC C ntr ct N2. NRC-03-79-118 P ga LCdFranklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject N 3. C5257 A Dmsion of The Frankhn Institure FRC Assignm:nt,Np.1[ lc l blth and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 44 & l000 FRC Task No. vsf '

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M i

1 l

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 72 1 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA l ASCO MODEL HTX8344A75 REQUIRED OPERATING TD : LESS THAN 10 SEC TER CHECKSHEET NO. 72 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV1023)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVE CONTROL FOR PURGE AIR INLET OUTSIDE ISOLATION LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 34A [12) i DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - C.RCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, C , (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, Nonef

( Not stated, Not applicable l

LISTING OF APPLICABLE CF"CKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Enviconmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3v, 3v, 3b System ConsMero, tion Review A. , L, k, '. d , L, 4Z -

Rh 4" LZ, l

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 3a "A, 5-,

ma ch 54. 9t l

1 Installed TMI Lessons Lear:ned Implementation ifL ^"

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary h , 7b, '

4 NRC C ntrrct No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr j;ct N2. C5257 P g2 bLTU Franklin Research Center A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 191113 f21% 44+ trxx3 FRC Task No. 4/, f I477 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 72- <

l

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

N Tne Licensee (ha s/' : P) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

1 The Licensee (has/h - ~ ") proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

NJustificationforinterimoperation (has,'M r ^^ t) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item

! that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (nas/ :; . 4 provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action Dr~r'or $0 fo / 2 n /' 2 2., .)

f The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a_ Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency l 6b Modificatiod III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

I -

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 00011 errnkiin a: set,ch c nic, eRC proi.ct N3. Cs2s7 ,

A Dwmon of The Franklin Insntute FRC Assignm:nt N3.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. P# 19103 (215) 448-1000 FHC Task No. #4 TM/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 72.-

E0IPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM l

DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate N Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate

o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate

' o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied l Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied i

Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

! Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I) t I

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.O Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirem nts Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification ]

III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Nde Available l

l

A NRC Contr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 u00Errnklin Rzsearch Crntzr FRC Project N 2. C5257 P g3 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institure FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 4 /J,/S17 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1 LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

MODEL: HTX 8344A75 (Unit 1)

HT8344A77 (Unit 2)

CCMPONErc rio.: SV1023 NP.: IDEtCIFIED DEFICIENCIES: RPS PSE13 EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fcrm page 34A, 93 These solenoids will be replaced with qualified valves prior to S/30/82 - ~~

Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 17, gives this -

~

schedule and our justification for continued operation.

PSE3G's evaluation of these deficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardized pencing replacement.

XA, N RC Ctntrzet N3. NRC-03-79-118 pig 3 LOL!) Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Diwsion of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignm:nt N .14 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 73 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA ASCO MODEL HTX834475 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LESS THAN 10 SEC TER CHECKSHEET NO. 73 LICENSES. REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV1025)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVE CONTROL FOR PRESSURE-VACUUM RELIEF DAMPER LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 35A [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, None,

\

Not stated, Not applicable j

. I LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 I

Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, L, kr 20-System Consideration Review Jr, '.v, ,w, *u, c, 4f-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 4= ,

50, M , Ju, SE, 50, 55, Si, Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation -L, O Equipment Summary Maintenance ana Replacement Schedule Summary 7= 7h 'c

A NRC Contrzet No. NRC-03-79-118 Pcg2 U000 Franklin Research Center FRC PrIject N3. C5257 A Diwsion of The Frankhn instituie FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 44 f /S/~1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7.3 SUt4:4ARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC CF.R - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

g Tne Licensee (has/h:2 mt) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

g The Licensee (has/hs; c.;: ) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

1 Justification for interim operation (has/h;; n;t) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective' action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment ceplacement with qualified equipmen' Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

l Tne Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item

( that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim

! oceration.

[ The Licensee (has/aee eee) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action ,ds~ict~ $0 6 /30/ 22. .)

f The Ltcensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification l

and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

l DESIGN ATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY B ASED ON RCVIEW i - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualitied II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

( CI.n Moditication) III.a Exempt II.a Qualitication Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Q'lalified IV Documentation Not Available l

{

NRC Contract N2. NRC-03 79-118 P:go (

A(100 rrnklin Riserrch Csnt:r FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. 44N2.13[#/7 7

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7.3 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

X = DEFICIENCY NRC REQUIREMENTS Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure: l j

o Peak Temperature Adequate I

o Peak Pressure Adequate l

o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regardir ! Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied  !

Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

X = CATEGORY NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life j

/

or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available f

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 000hrenklin Research Csnt:r FRC Project N2. C5257 P;ga A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-tm0 FRC Task No. 4LF/Sh a

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 3 LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

MODEL: HT834475 CC'90NitC NO.- SV1025 (Unit 1)

NC IDE:C!?:E0 DEF:C:El;;!ES: RPS FSEM E'vi'.U' TIM 0F DEFICIEt:CIEE:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluaticti Form page 35A.

i i

l hese solenoids will be replaced with cualified valves prior to 6/30/82 Our submittal Volume I.Section VII, basis 17, gives *~' tis senecule and our justifica:1on for continued oceration.

o se j,

iuat n of : e e ciencies has reaffir::ed that plant safety is no:

Wh- NRC C';ntr ct No. NRC-03-79-118 P g2 Sud Franklin Research Center FRC Pr;; ject Ns. C5257 A Dmsion of The Frankhn Institute FHC AssignmIntf)m.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 191tG (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. P 7 l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _7M 1

l EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 74 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA ASCO MODEL X8342B22 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LESS THAN 10 SEC TER CHECKSHEET No. 74 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPE'1ATION (SV0558, SV0559)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVE FOR CONTAINMENT ISOL. VALVE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 33 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Sectivr. 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, vi, C3 , A , S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 3a, 26, '" 'A Licensee Response to NRC SER 4=, 4b, 00, 'd. ^^ AF System Consideration Review -

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 9- Sb, "" - 5d. %5f, 4,5 Oh, Ci, Sj -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation h, 55 -

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary A , 7u, -77

4% N RC Contract Na. N RC-03-79-118 P gs

!.0L!l Frankhn Research Center FRC Pr:jrct No. C5257 A Dwision of The Frankhn Insntuie lb 20th and Race Streets. Phils . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. OFNo.13 [S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

^^*)

1 Tne Licencee (has/h r provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

I The Licensee (has/h: _ proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

K Justification for interim operation (has/hn nn) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

N The Licensee (nas/;_ , provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action /.7/*/a r Ma A,/_76./R7_

.)

f The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency C .b ModiticattunJ III.a Exempt Il.a qualitication Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available i

As NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N 3. C5257 P;g2 UObhranklin Rzsezrch Czntir A Dnnuon of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa_ 19103 (2151 448-1000 FRC Task No. #6//f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 74 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate N Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Estaolished Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Prc,2ile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Pequired) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied _

Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X l II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established l II.D Equipment Not Qualified

! II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life l or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

A NRC Contr::ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 000hrrnklin Rawtrch Cantir FRC Project N3. C5257 P;ga A Division of T e Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 447,/5/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. W LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMEt6: Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

MODEL: X8342B22 9

CCMPONENT N0.: 570558, SV0559 NRC IDEtCIFIED.DEFICIEtiCIES: RPS PSE3G EVALUATION OF DEFICIEtiCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 33.

l These solenoids will be replaced with qualified valves prior to 6/30/82. '

Our sutaittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 17, gives this schedule anif our justification for continued operation.

?SE3G's evaluation of these deficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardized pending replacement.

i I

4% NRC C ntrzet No. NRC-03-79-118 Pzg3 DIU Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject Na. C5257 A Dimion of The Franklin Insntute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. d L f' EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. W EQUIPMENT ITEM No. 75 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA ASCO MODEL HTX834477 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LESS THAN 10 SEC TER CHECKSHEET NO. 75 LICENSEF REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV0804)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVE CONTROL FOR PURGE AIR INLE1 OUTSIDE ISOLATION LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): '45B [12]

l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

i (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la j Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb l l

Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3L, 3m, 3d System Consideration Review ', *b,

-, 4d, 4u, 42 -

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review *2 55, Sr. 52, 5, 5' c c. 55, 5i, Sj-l Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Co, 1-l Equipment Summary I Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7;, 7b, 7L

/A NRC C ntr.cct No. NRC-03-79-118

!j000 Franklin Research Center FRC Project No. C5257 Pzg2 A Dmsion of The Frankhn institute lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 44& l000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. I/,No.13[D7 f

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _7I

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - OhLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has/M; notif provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

g The Licensee (has/h;; ..e;.7 proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

1 Justification for interim operation (has/h: ne i been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment itea that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/h :0 provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action 4%'o r 'f o fo / 3 0 / X 2. .)

/

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should ce exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency U.o nad i t ica tion) III.a Exempt II.a Qualitication Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A~

lj000 Frrnklin Rrserrch Center NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 P ga FRC Project N2. C5257 A Dmson of The Frankhn Insntute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. f4 fIs~/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. ~7f E_QUJPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequue Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately i

Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required) __

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation ,,

Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied. (If Required)

Cri teria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied l Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NOREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY l I.a Equipment Qualified l I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X l II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life

! or Replacement Schedule Justified

! III.a Equipment Exempt From QJalification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review l IV Documentation Not Made Available

)

A NRC Contr'ct No. NRC-03-79-118 00hranklin Rese:rch Center FRC Pr: ject N3. C5257 P:g2 A Dmsion of The Franklin Institute 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10N FRC FRC Task Assignment No. 4lo7 No.13,SIl

/

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. I LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

MODEL: HT834477 CCMPONE::T NO.: SV0804 (Unit 1)

NRC IDE!C'FIED DEFICIE iCIES: RPS PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fom page 3EB.

These solenoids will be replaced with qualified valves prior to 6/30/82 Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 17, gives this schedule and cur justification for continued operation.

PSE3G's evaluation of these deficiencies nas reaffimed that plant safety is no**

jeopardi::ed pending replacement.

i

i (

l MA NRC C:;ntr:ct N3. N RC-03-79-118 P g2 luLiFranklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dusion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.14, Ia 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 44&l(XX) FRC Task No. Y65 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2I EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 76 SOLENOID VALVE T.0CATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA ASCO MODEL HTB34477 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LESS THAN 10 SEC TER CHECKSHEET NO. 76 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV1024)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVE FOR CONTAINMENT ISOL. VALVE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 35 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I , QM , RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la l Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 )

1 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3 a , atr7- 3 v , 3d System Consideration Review h, 4L, 4-, ,u, *e N

" "A Ra- 9'-

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 5= "h 5;, 55, 5', _ Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 62 Cb Equipment Summary h, 'h - 7" Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary

/A NRC C::ntr ct Ns. NRC-03-79-118 bikj Frankhn Research Center FRC Prrject N2. C5257 N93 A Divmon of The F ankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 44f/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 76

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

[ Tne Licensee (ha s/.M - ^^ t ) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

N The Licensee (has/h:2 ~'M proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whoce qualitication has not been fully established.

1 Justification for interim operation (has/'.;; ..c t) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

[ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

N Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/muunmame) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective l

action %!Aer +c & ./T o } A 7-. .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environsental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC OUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency Cl.D Modification] III.a Exempt II.a Qualitication Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

l A NRC Contract N . NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N3. C5257 Pag 3 UO0ktrnklin R:sesrch Canta A ow. ion of The FrtnMn Institute FRC Asaignment N7.13 2 20th 6,'.J Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 46F/S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAU/ICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM l

DESIGNATION:

l NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate k l Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Sati.sfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Cualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification l III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available 1

l l

A NRC Ctntract No. NRC-03 79-118 lj0Nranklin Reserrch Center P:g2 FRC Pr: lect N3. C5257 A Dmsion of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.14 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10 @ FRC Task No. AloS /s/~7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.1 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

MODEL: HT834477 CCMPONENT NO.: SV1024 NRC IDE E!FIED DEFICIENCIES: RPS PSE3G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 35.

- ~ ~ ~

These solenoids will be replaced with qualified valves prior to 6/30/82 Our sutr'ittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 17, gives thi's --

scnedule and cur justification for continued operation.

PSE13's evaluation of these deficiencies has reaffirmed .nat plant safety is not jeopardi:ed pending replacement.

Zh N RC C:ntr:ct N o. NRC-03-79-118 pig 3 L$Nnklin Research Center FRC Prrject No. C5257 A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. M6#

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMEN T ITEM NO. 77 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 77 SOLEN 0ID VALVE LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA ASCO MODEL HT834475 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LESS THAN 10 SEC TER CHECKSHEET NO. 77 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV0805)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVE FOR CONTAINMENT ISOL. VALVE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 36 [12}

l i

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, (fr, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, VM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

I Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la l

Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 2b, 2c, 2d l

l System Consideration Review "O, 15, it, 13, ic, 'f -

"" " ' ' Ma "#

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 9 "d, 5;, EP, Ei, Sj-1 l

! Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 52, $b -

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary L, 7L, 7; l

As NRC C;ntr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 dU Frankhn Research Center FRC Pr ject N3. C5257 P ga A Dmson of The Frankhn Institute lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1(xx) FRC Assignment FRC Task No. No.13[f/

44, T 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 7~7 SUMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

A Tne Licensee (has/h;; an) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE

environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

g The Licensee (has/ha 6) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

g Justification for interim operation (has/h- P been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

1 Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

l g The Licensee (has/h2 . W -provided a schedule for the proposed I

corrective ac on. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action -A- /TE2 .)

The Licensee s s that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

I DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW I - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c .Jalified Life Deficiency fL b Modificatik III a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

As NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project N3. C5257 Page 000hrinkiin Rrserrch Csnter A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Asalgnment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Ph6la . Pa 191031215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 44f /S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2.2 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate I '

Adequate Similarity Detween Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposures o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification d II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

)

4' NRC Cor* 1ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 bb)I Franklin R setrch Cantsr FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dnnsen of The Frankhn Institute FRCTask Assignment 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1 2 FRC No. 44No.13 FZ j(/'7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER SALEM UNITS 1 AND 2 PSE3G RESPONSE TO NRC SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT EQUIPMENT: Solenoid Valves (ASC))

MODEL: HT834475 CCMPONENT NO.: SV0805 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: apS PSI &G EVklUATICN OF DEFICIENCIES:

l Ref. Qualification Dan Evaluation Form page 35 These solenoidsyill be replaced with qualified valves prior to 5/30/82, ~~-

.. Our sutmitul, Volume I,Section VII, basis 17, gives this -

senecule and cur justification for continued operation.

l PSE&G's evaluation of these deficiencies has reaffirmed ca: plant safety is no:

jeccarci:ed pencing replacement.

l

/,_i NRC C;ntr:ct No. NRC43-79-118 Pag 3 dd Franklin Research Center FRC PrJJect N3. C5257 A Dus on of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignment N 1) lo thh and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 191tn (215) 444.ItxX) FRC Task No. d EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .Zf EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 78 SOLENOID VALVE WCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA ASCO MODEL LBX83146 REQUIRED OPERATIN 3 TIME: LESS THAN 10 SEC TER CHECKSHEET NO. 78 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV0505, SV0514, SV0515, SV0516, SV0517)

SERVICE: PIWT VALVE FOR CONTAINMENT ISOL. VALVE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 37 [12]

f DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 2b, 2c, 2d System Consideration Review Aa g- ?L, 4w, 40, !;, if -

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Se, 5L, Sw, 3d, Su, 5f,-

-59 , Oh, 31, 3j -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 4o , GL ~

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7 er- 7 b , 7-

1. N N RC C:ntr:ct No. N RC-03-79-118 d$nkhn Research Center P g3 FRC Pr$ct N3. C5257 A Desion of The Frankhn inst:rute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 4M lfMMi FRC Task No. 44 7hD EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2[_

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has/L - .~4 provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

1 The Licensee (has/h x 20 proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not b 2en fully established.

[ Justification for interim operation (has/12 r.s t ; been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

M Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other 1 )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/m) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action Miar 40 fo/Te /22 .)

y a The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should oe exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW l - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) l l I.a Oualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency l CT. b Modification) III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available l

t a

1. % NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 Page L0bhrinklin Rueirch Csnter FRC Project Nr. C5257 A Division of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 448-Im0 FRC Task No. 16F/S/7 v

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 21 i

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC OUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY l

l I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification )L, II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Oguipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review

IV Documentation Not Made Av'ailable l

1 l

As NRC Contcet N2. NRC-03 79-118 UODJ Frenklin Raseirch Centtr FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 P:g]

A Division of The Frankhn Institure 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (2151 448 1000 FRC FRC Assignment Task No. 4Lf No.13 [f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _22.

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPME?6: Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

MODEL: L3X83146 CCMPONENT NO.: SV0514. SV0515, S70516. SV0517. SV0505

'ua F 11 Cab 1 NRC IDE:CIFIED CEFICIENCIES: RPS PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 37.

These solenoids will be replaced with qualified valves prior to 5/30/82, - -'

~~

Our sutaittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 17, gives 'this-senedule ~an'd our justification for continued operation. ,

?SElG's evaluation of these deficiencies has reaffir :d t1at plant safety is not jeopardi:ed pending replacement.

gn NRC C:ntr ct N2. NRC-03-79-118 VMirankhn Research Center P g3 FRC Pr: Ject Ns. C5257 A Desion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignm:nt No.13 la 20th and Race Streets Pbda . Pa IHu3 (215) 448-lax) FRC Task No. YbI _

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 79 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA ASCO MODEL FT8320A101 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LESS THAN 10 SEC TER CHECKSHEET NO. 79 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITE" FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV0510, SV0511, SV0512, SV0513)

SERVICE: PIIDT VALVE FOR CONTAIHMENT ISOL. VALVE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 38 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

)

R, T, QT, RT, P , tt , CS, A, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable i LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

l Conterts Checksheet Page No.

l Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, L, C +

{

System Consideration Review h ^ IC, M, 'u,

- if Equipment Environmental Qualification Review !a, Si, 5;, 55, 5;, %, -

4 , Sn, 51, 5;-

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Cu, CL Equipment Summary

^

Maintenance anc Replacement Schedule Summary o, 7b, t

h NRC C ntr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 A]Uhrankhn Research Center P:g2 j U FRC Pr:J:ct Ns. C5257 A Dmuon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb ]

20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103(215) 44 4 1000 FRC Task No. 4/57.h/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _21

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has/* " e) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

1 The Licensee (has/h2: r.ct.) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

[ Justification for interim operation (has/.h n mH been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

Y Equipment replacement with qualified equipmcat Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( _)

Tne Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that car. ce construed as a basis for justification for interim operation. ,

The Licensee (nas/eenwvear) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action f

Af*Io t' 4 0 $,/76 /f2. -

.)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

l D83IGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a_ Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency C1.b Modirication) III.a Exempt II.a Qua11rication Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available N }

A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 P g2

! lj00 r:nklin Risetrch Cant:r FRC Project N . C5257 A omision of The Frankhn institure FRC Assignment No.14 2 20th and P. ace Streets. Phtia.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-INO FRC Task No. #49 /6/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. U EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) ,

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Pegarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied I Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied _

l Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification .,,,,JL, II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.b Equipment Not Qualified l II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

4 NRC Contr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 UL$ Franklin Resetrch Center FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dmsion of The Frankhn insnrure FRC Assignment No.13 / 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa. 19103(215)448 tm0 FRC Task No. 46 T/f/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUlPMENT ITEM NO. 79 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMEtC: Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

MCDEL: r78320A101 CCMPONENT NO.: SV0510, SV0511, SV0512, SV0513 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: RPS PSElG EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 38.

These solenoids will be replaced with qualified valves prior to 6/30/82, ~~ ' ~

~

_ _ . ' Our sutmittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 17, gives liiis ~

'~

senedule and our justification for continued oceration.

PSE1G's evaluation of these deficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardi:ed pending replacement.

l t

t i

i

gh s NRC C ntr:ct N3. NRC-03-79-118

!.UW Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: ject No. C5257 P gs A Dwmon of The Frankhn Inst:tute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . P9 19193 (215) 448-10 x) FRC Task No. M5f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUA IFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. fQ EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 80 SOLEN 0ID VALVE LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA ASCO MODEL FT8321A2 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LF S THAN 10 SZC TER CHECKSHEET NO. 80 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED l, FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (VARIOUS ID NUMBERS)

SERVICE: PIIDT VALVE FOR CONTAINMENT ISOL. VALVE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 39 [12]

i i

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIFNCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable l

LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

f I

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, 2;, ?d-4e, ?b, 4;, $d, ^^ ^#

System Consideration Review Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Se, CL, k, 5d, 5;, 5fi Eg, Sh, Si, Ej-l Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Se, Sb l

Equipment Summary l

l Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7;, 75, 7--

1. A NRC Crntrcct Nc. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr: ject N3. C5257 Pcg]

3000 Frankhn Research Center A Dnasion of The Franklin Instituie FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Ps 1911J (215) 448 If") FRC Task No. 44f/8/7 v

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. f0

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE_ APPLICABLE:

I Tne Licensee (has/hc.; =t) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

M The Licensee (has/h;c et) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

gJustificationforinterimoperation (has/hc; =W been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

N Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

g Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

X The Licensee (nas/n u uv d provided a schedule for the proposed i corrective tion (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action _ / f [ '7- . )

C/

TheLicenseestatesthGtheequipmentitemdoesnotrequirequalification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency JI.b Modification ( III.a Exempt C a wualitication Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

As NRC Contract Nr. NRC-03-79-118 ]

FRC Project No. C5257 P;g3 dFranklin Rssetrch Cantir A Dwmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Asalgnment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phita.. Pa 19103 (215)448 1000 FRC Task No. #/,f MM EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 2S EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION SUMMt.RY FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate 'X Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required) l Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies t (If Any) Satisfied Criteria xegarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria' Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Curation Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Cri'.eria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY l

2.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life l

or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipr.ent Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available i

l l

l l

1 I i l

NRC C;ntract N3. NRC-03-79-118 E

I hrenkhn Rsse:rch Centrr FRC Prcject N3. C5257 Pago A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa. 19103 (215,448-tmo FRC Task No. 449 !S/'7 L

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 70 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER

_ SALEM UNITS 1 AND 2

. PSE&G RESPONSE TO NRC SAFETY EVALUATION REPORT EQUINENT: Scienoid Valves (ASCO)

MODEL: FT3321A2 COMPCNENT NO.: 5V0706, SV0707, SV0708, 570709, SV0402, SV0398, SV0396

%:tt

.. C a b ..

NRC IDEhTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: RPS PSEAG EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualifica:icn Dan Evaluation Fcrm page 39.

~

These .sciencics will be reclaced with cualified valves cricr to 6/30/32. _ '. " ~

. . . . . . Cur sur.itul, Volume I,Section VII, basis 17, gives :nis senecule anc cur _ justifica:icn for continued coeration.

PSElG's evaluation of these deficiencies has reaffir ed O.at plant safety is nc:

jeccardi:ec cenci g reclacement.

A

1. A s NRC C:ntr ct No. NRC-03-79-113 Pig 3 tddu Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dmsion of The Franklin institute FRC AssignmInt N .13y lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103(215) 44 5 1000 FRC Task No. S5 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 81 SOLEN 0ID VALVE LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA ASCO MODEL 831654 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LESS THAN 10 SEC TER CHECKSHEET NO. 81 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV0249, SV164)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVE FOR CONTAINMENT ISOL. VALVE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 91 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 2t, h, 3d -

System Consideration Review sa. Sh, 40 4d, S;, If-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review k, LL, Sw, Su, 5=, Sf, m ,,

sw mi mj ._

Installed TMI Lesscns Learned Implementation 6ar-6tr--

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary h, 7b,4

1. h NRC C:ntract No. NRC-03 79-118 Paga dNnkhn Research Center FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Damon of The Frankhn Institute FPC Assignment No.13, lb 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 4441(m FRC Task No. 4 4 F / S ! 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. El.

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THF_NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

t

[ Tne Licensee (has/hes noth provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

M The Licensee (ha s/b " me t] proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

1 Justification for interim operation (has/h:2 not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

N Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

[ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify quaiification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

Tne Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

[ The Licensee (has/n; na t) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action.

1 action nrin e ha(Schedule 6 / R ofor l R accomplishing

2. the corrective .)

/

j The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification l and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

1 DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency O.b Moaltication) III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available l

l

A  % NRC Contract N r. NRC-03-79-118 Pag]

LOObtnklin Risetrch Center FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dwmon of The Fnnthn Instituti 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila-. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Arignment FRC Task No. 14f/ N2.13,f/ 7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIRSMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Y '

Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied .

Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Sat.lsfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

X = CATEGORY NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification 1 II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available

1. ~ NRC C ntract No. NRC-03-79-118 CdU'J Franklin Reserrch Center FRC Pr ject N3.C5257 Pago A Dw.sion of The Frankhn institute FRC Assignrnent No.13 / 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phils . Pa 19103 (215) 448-tmo FRC Task No. 469/8/_7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. D.

LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

, MODEL" 831654 COMPONENT NO.: SV0249, SV0164 F04.i1 f. l

_ Only J, NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: RPS PSE&G EVALUATION 0F DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation For a page 91.

~ ' ' ' ~

These solenoids will be replaced with qualified valves prior to 6/30/82

~ ' ~

~, ~ ~ Our subnittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 17, gives this~

schedule and our justification for continued operation.

l PSE1G's evaluation of these deficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardized pending replacement.

i i

l

.%Frankhn Research Center N RC C:ntr;ct No. N RC-03-79-118 l g' Ltd

. FRC Pr: Ject ND. C5257 Pig _e  ;

A Diwuon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignm:nt N3.14 lc 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103(2151 448 1000 FRC Task No. Obd J i

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. &

EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 82 SOLENOID VALVE LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT ASCO MODEL X8342822 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 62 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SVil20 THRU Svil24: SV1115 THRU SVil19)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV0621, 0624, 0627, 0630, 0633)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVE FOR CONTAINMENT ISOL. VALVE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 92 (12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, h None, l Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la l Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Ob, 3c, 3d-System Consideration Review h, 'L, 4v, 40, k , L#

l Equipment Environmental Qualification Review Sa-

• 50, 5d, Se; C l  % SL, si, Sj l

~

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation da, 65 Equipment Summary 1

Maintenance ano Replacement Schedule Summary 70, 7L, 7c -

4A N RC Crntract ND. N RC-03-79-118 30 Frankhn Research Center FRC Prrj;ct Na. C5257 P 02 A Divmon of The Frankim Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 468/S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQ'UIPMENT ITEM NO. R

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - CNLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has,'5;; no t i -provided a resporGe to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically star.ed that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

% The Licensee (has/hac act} Troposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

1 Justification for interim operation (has/hr net) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

[ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

[ The Licensee (nas/.m .~ J provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action kier -l n 6 l30 lX'L

.)

/

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should oe exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency G.b Modification] III.a Exempt II.a qualitication Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

As NRC Contract N O. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 3 l!0bunklin Rxsetrch Cantir FRC Project N2. C5257 A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 2% and Raca Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. #4 R/C/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. &

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIRLF.ENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate ,4 Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradatiott Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Raquired)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Recarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria r<garding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.o Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified i III.a Fquipment Exempt From Qualification )

III.o 2quipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review ]

IV Documentation Not Made Available

As NRC Contract NO. NRC-03-79-118 UO0krznklin R:seirch Cint:r FRC Project N 2. C5257 P'03 A Divmon of The Frankhn Institute 3a FRC Assl0nment No.13 /

20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. 449/S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. FL LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

MODEL: X8342B22 CCMPONENT NO.: SV1120 SV1115 SV0621 SV1121 SV1116 SV0624 SV1122 SV1117 SV0627 SV1123 SV1118 SV0630 SV1124 SV1119 SV0633 NRC IDENTIFIED. DEFICIENCIES: RT, RPS PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fonn, page 92.

These solenoi.d valves will be replaced with qualified valves prior to 6/30/82, Our submittal, Volume 1 Section VII, basis 19 gives this senedule and our justification for continued operation.

PSE&G's evaluation of these deficiencies has reaffimed that plant safety is not jeopardi::ed pending replacement.

l l

l l

l l

i

1. h, N RC C:ntr:ct No. N RC-03-79-118 FRC Prcject NO. C5257 P g3

$f5nkhn Research Center A Dmuon of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 191031215) 44+1000 FRC Task No. 96P EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. f.3' EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 83 SOLEN 0ID VALVE LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA ASCO MODEL FT831654 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LESS THAN 10 SEC TER CHECKSHEET NO. 83 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED I FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV0688)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVE FOR CONTAINMENT ISOL. VALVE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 96 (12]

{

l DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE Cl'.ECKSHEETS :

I l

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, Oh, 3c, 3d -

System Consideration Review 40, S, 'c, 40, 4=, 4f

" "^

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review R=- Eh- R" "# -

33 , Sh, 5i, Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 6a, 6b -

Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 72, 'h- 7" ,

1 1

AA NRC C:ntr:ct N3. NRC-03 79-118 P:g3 bU Franklin Research Canter FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dmseon of The Franklin Insntute lb 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 19110 (215) 4M 1000 FRCTask FRC Assignment No. 4l,fNo.13 [r/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. El

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

[ Tne Licensee (has/" -- -") provided a response to the SER concerns.

_ The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

[ The Licensee (has/"" etl proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

k Justification for interim operation (has/hc net) .been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

h Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification

_ Equipment relocation abvve submergence level

_ Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

l The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim l operation.

N The Licensee (has/m) provided a schedule for the proposed i

corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .srio r $o (o /20 lR2_ '

.)

l l l The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW l

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) l I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency (1.b Moultication] III.a Exempt l II.a Qualitication Not Established III.b Not in Scope l II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

Aw NRC Contract N O. NRC 03-79-118 Page 1

LO0fFrtnklin R:serrch Center FRC Project No. C5257 j A %sion of The rranun Insneues FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 44 fIM EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 83 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate N Adequate Similarity Between Eqt.ipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required rrofile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied r Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification M II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.D Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available i

As NRC Contract N r. NRC-03 79-118 UO hr:nklin R:se:rch Cent:r FRC Project N3. C5257 Page A Dmson of The Frankhn Institute 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRC FRCAssignmentpo.)<3 Task No. Wf / /7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATICN REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Solenoid Yalves (ASCO)

MCDEL: FT831654 CCMPONENT NO.: SV0688 e

NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: RPS PSE3G EVALUATION OF CEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 96.

~These solenoids will be replaced with qualified valves prior to 6/30/82 ~

~

~

Our sutraittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 17, gives shis"'

scheduliand' 50r~lustification for continued operation.

PSE5G's evaluation of these deficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not l

jeopardi:ed pending replacement.

i

4h NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 P g]

LULIFrankhn Research Center FRC Pr: Ject Na. C5257 A Dmsson of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignm:n)p .13 lc 20th and Race Streets Phila . Ps 19103 (215) 44M 1n00 FRC Task No. 76[

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. M EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 84 SOLEN 0ID VALVE LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA ASCO MODEL FT8314B6 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: LESS THAN 10 SEC TER CHECKSHEET No. 84 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV0400, SV0423)

SERVICE: PILOT VALVE FOR CONTAINMENT ISOL. VALVE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 97 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, None, l Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLIC.\BLE CHECKSHEETS :

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 25, 20, 3d -

A=- 4b, 40, 40, 4w, 4f-System Consideration Review l Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 50, 5b, Sc, 5d, 50, 5f,-

Sg, Sh, Si, Sj -

62, 'h Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation _

l Equipment Summary 1

Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 72. 7b. 7e l

i

1. % NRC C:ntr:ct No. NRC-03-79-118 P!go

!,b Franklin Research Center FRC Pr: Ject ND. C5257 A Dmseon of The Frankhn Institute lb 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 44 + 1000 FRCTask FRC Assignment No. 468No.13[R7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. .li SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

l Tne Licensee (has/h-n nee) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

I The Licensee (has/w ^^ t ) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

[ Justification for interim operation (has/hr n%been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee: .

Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment nWification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (has/h) provided a schedule for the proposed

! corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action de s u Yo 6 NC /82_

.)

f The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should ce exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW l - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) l I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency (1.0 Moditication) III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.D Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available l

l

A NRC Contract N O. NRC-03-79-118 Paga 000hnnklin Rssezrch Cant:r FRC Project N:. C5257 A Dmston of The Frtnkhn Institut e FRC Assignment N2.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 46 f /W7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUAllFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8Y EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate g Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established l Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Keplacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate j

o Peak Pressure Adequate

o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied

! Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied ~

l Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied

! Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Cr..teria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATECORY I.a Equipment Qualified i

i I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification X II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.o Equipment Not Qualified II c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l

I l

A NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 Paga UOUU Franklin Rese:rch Centxt FRC Prclect No. C5257 A Dmsson of The Franklin Institute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-10m FRC Task No. 4l,f!S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. P4 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

MODEL: FT831486 CCMPONENT NO.: SV0400, SV0423 NRC IDENTIFIED. DEFICIENCIES: RPS PSElG EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 97.

These solenoids will be replaced with qualified valves prior to 6/20/82, [_."

.. . _ Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 17, gives this schedule and our justification for continued operation.

PSE3G's evaluation of these deficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardi:ed pending replacement.

/A N RC Cantr:ct N3. N RC-03-79-118 d$nklin Research Center P:ga FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dmsion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignm;nt No.13 !a 20th and Race Streets Phila . Pa 1910H215) 4481(xx) FRC Task No. lu, T EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. g EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 85 SOLEN 0ID VALVE IDCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA ASCO MODEL FT831654 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 85 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV0ll7, 118, 119)

FUNCTION (PLANT ID): VALVE OPERATION (SV0575)

SERVICE: PIIAT VALVE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 57 [12]

DESIGNATION "DR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, H, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, 3G, 3d-System Consideration Review le, Ob, 0;, *d,

- '0,

- *f Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 3' Ch, Su, Od, 5c, UT

-5 0 . Kb Si, Sj Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 62; Ah Equipment Summary Maintenance ana Replacement Schedule Summary 3a r-E 'G

/w NRC Crntr:ct NO. NRC-03 79-118

!jdbnklin Research Center P:ga FRC Pr:Jsct No. C5257 A Diwsion of The Frankhn inst:tute lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Assignment FRC Task No. No.13 [f/7 Y49 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO TPE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

N Tne Licensee (has/h:2 not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

g The Licensee (has/h;; nct) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

M Justification for interim operation (has/hae-4.4L been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action apecified by the Licensee:

X Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

I The Licensee (nas/h2c 7:t) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action Ar~io o- 4o lo / f O / }? 2_. .)

y a -

, The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

l

( DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW i - CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) l I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency C 1. 0 Moditication) III.a Exempt II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available i

l

h NRC Contract N r. NRC-03 79-118

(!00 rtnklin Rsseirch Canter FRC Project N 2. C5257 Pago A Dwmon of The FrrnkhnInstituti FRC Assignment N7.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phlta . Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. #4 9 h/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Y

! EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate , N '

Adequate Similarity Bet'een Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradatica Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied

! Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification (

II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.o Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification IIT.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l -

l 1

l

4NUOOU Frsnklin Raseirch Centu NRC Contract N 2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr: Ject NS. C5257 P g3 A Division of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment Ng.13 / 3a 20th and Race streets, Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No.

4bff.f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. F l

LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMEtiT: Solenoid Valves (ASCO)

MODEL: FT831654 CCMP0tlE IT t10. : SV0117, SV0118, SV0119, SV0164, 3V0575

% L/ #'

Wi? C % ;tt gg t. 0alji'0^11 tiRC IDE:1TIFIED DEFICIE?lCIES: RPS PSE&G EVALUATI0t1 0F DEFICIE!1CIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 57.

These solenoids will be replaced with qualified valves prior to 6/30/82. T _-]

. . . . ,_ Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 25, gives this schedule and our justification for continued oceration.

l

PSElG's evaluation of these deficiencies nas reaffirmed ::iat plant safety is not

! jeopardized pending replacement.

I I

i

4% NRC C:ntrret ND. N RC-03-79-118 P:g2 Ujuu Frankhn Research Center FRC Prcject No. C5257 A DMs4on of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 44810m FRC Task No. U(,7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _f4 EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 86 LIMIT SWITCH LOCATED IN THE MECHANICAL PENETRATION AREA MICR0 SWITCH MODEL LSQ051 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 86 LICENSEE REFFP:NCE(S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): LIMIT SWITCH FOR 1PR18 SERVICE: POSITION INDICATION LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 102 [12]

DECIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, d,CS,A, S, (R), M, I , QM , RPN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS: l l

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 l Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a,25, 3c, 3d _

System Consideration Review Mb , 4, 4d, 4c M Equipment Environmental Qualification Review .Se , SL, Su, 5d, 3c, Sf, 53 , Sh, ai, 5j Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation 40, $N Equipment Summary Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 3, 7b, 7c _

~ NRC C ntract Na. NRC-03-79-118 P:ga

1. [3rankhn Research Center FRC Pr j;ct No. C5257 A Dmsson re f The Frankhn insntuie FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Strevis. Phda . Pa 19103 f 215) 448 Ifm FRC Task No. 44F/r/7 I

EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _E _

SUAMARY OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

[ Tne Licensee (has/hac act4 provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

1 The Licensee (has/ L . W proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

d Justification for interim operation (has/M; act}- been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

[ Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( )

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (nas/M; .,c t) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action M of- Yo /o d?o /f L '

.)

f The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should ce exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Iegend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency C_I_ . h Modificatio3 III.a Exempt II.a Qualitication Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A NRC Contract N O. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 9 000E,:nklin Research Canter FRC Project Nn. C5257 A Dwisen of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 j 2 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa 19103(215)448 tm0 FRC Task No. O f/f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. N EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualification Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established

(

Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied i Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification Y' II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.o Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified i III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification i III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l

1

A 3 NRC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 1100Nranklin Resetrch Cantsr FRC Project N3. C5257 P:g]

A Dnnson of The Frankhn Insutute FRC Assignment No.13 3a 20th and Race Stree's. Phila.. Pa.191t 's (215) 4481M FRC Task No. 4b F /S/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 75 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMEtE: Limit Switch *

(Microswitch)

MODEL: LSQ051 COMPONEf6 NO.: IPR 18 NRC IDE!CIFIED DEFICIENCIES: EXN, RPS PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 102 This limit switch will be replaced with a qualified switch prior to 6/30/82 Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 18A states our intentions and reasoning for continued coeration. Further sup-l PSE&G's evaluation of these NRC noted deficiencies has reaffirmed that plant safety is not jeopardized pending replacement.

l

i% NRC C:ntr:ct N . NRC-03-79-118 g]!ju U Frankhn Research Center FRC Praject N 3. C5257 P:ga A Dwisicn of The Frankhn Instaute FRC Assignment No.13 . Ia 20th and Race Streets. Ph;!a . Pa 19103 (215) 448-Itxx) FRC Task No. Uh7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QU;.LIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 87 LIMIT SWITCH LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT MASONEILAN MODEL 496 2 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 87 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): OPERATOR INDICATION (LIMIT SWITCH FOR WL16 VC2 VC3 VC6)

SERVICE: POSITION INDICATOR FOR VALVES LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 77 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR GEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITEM (S) ONLY:

(See Section 3 ot this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, 11, CS , A,h (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, SEN, QI, RPS, None, l

Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la l Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, k, M -

System Consideration Review M 2, eh, 10, ed, 42, i f-Equipment Environmental Qualification Review R2- Rh- 4" RA- Ra- S f_,

Eg, Sh, 51, Sj -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation k, CL Equipment Summary .

Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summe.ry 72, 7b. 7c _

l

E 4A NRC Contrcct No. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr: ject No. C5257 Paga NUU Frankhn Research Center A Dmsion of The Frankhn Inst:rute FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. //7hD W EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. O

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES 'IO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

M Tne Licensee (has/ hec not) provided a response to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/h c noth proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

g Justification for interim operation (ha s/h ' e tt been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

j Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis)

Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress

_)(,Other ( mk M A !s4/6, / VC (3 d

)

/ / I The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim operation.

The Licensee (haS/i=*-=* ) provided a schedule for the proposed corrective action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action doNc 30,19 0 .)

The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification.

DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency

(,,L. o Modification] III.a Exempt II.a Qualitication Not Established III.b Not in Scope II.b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

A NRC Contract N2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Project No. C5257 Pag 3 000Ersnkiin asse:rch Crnta A Dwmon of The Frznklin I",ttura FRC A;signment N7.13 2 20th and Race Streets. Phk . Pa 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. 86f/97 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 87 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented 2vidence of Qualification Adequate V '

Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisiied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification )(

! II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established l II,b Equipment Not Qualified ,

I

( II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Justified III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification III.D Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l

A NRC Contract N3. NRC-03-79-118 00bbrrnklin Rrsetrch Centtr FRC Project Na. C5257 P;03 A Dnnsen of The Franklin Institute 3a 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448-1000 FRCTask FRC Assignment No. No.l3A f!I/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. f7 LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMENT: Limit Switch (Masoneilan)

MODEL: 496-2 COMPONENT NO.: WL16 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: EXN , S PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Form page 77.

These switches do not recuire qualification. This situation was resolved in our response to FSAR Question 7.35 and 6.28.

Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 188 :*,ates our position.

PSE&G is c::nfident that plant safety will not be jeopardized by failure of these switches h owever ra a n hance. e.elia6;(ity we a;ff , eplace. tkage sw; tela, wiL a.a,ali9; eel ,on es.

olcTe - uncler-llae) lik.m ;s a ecrr e.c.T;oa to NQC s2R .

1. x NRC Contract N3. N RC-03-79-118 )

UO0hrinklin R:se:rch C;nter FRC Freject N2. C5257 Pcg2 A Division of Tha Fr:nkline Instituts 3b 20th and Race Streets. PMa.. Pa. 19103 (215) 448 1000 FRCTask FRC Assignm:nt No. _d&7 N2.1[3 d-/ '7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. _Q LICENSEE RESPONSE 'IO NRC SER (Continued)

EQUIPMENT: Limit Switch MODEL: Masoneilan 496-2 1

l COMPONENT NO.: IVC 2, IVC 3, IVC 6 NRC IDENTIFIED DEFICIENCIES: EXN, S PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fonn page 77.

S - The limit switches for the VC2, VC3 and VC6 are not below the flood level as noted in the Evaluation Form. This will be corrected in the next revision to the report.

l EXN - The limit switches for these valves are inside the containment. VC2 l and VC3 valves are the containment isolation valves for the Contain-l ment Purge System. These valves by license requirements (tech Specs) i are required to be closed and under administrative control during power operation. The valve is known by the operator to be closed by procedure and it cannot reopen due to the effects of the accident or failure of the limit switch. Therefore, the -limit switches do not perform a safety function for the operator during accident conditions

! and do not recuire environmental qualification. The replacement of l

these switches does not result in any direct increase in safety.

1 The VCS valve is the containment isolation valve for the Containment Pressure - Vacuum Relief System. This system is used minimally during power operation. The limit switches do not perform a control function but only provide position indication to the operator. Upon an accident, i the VCb valves will close. A redundant outside isolation valve will also I close. A redundant outside isolation valve will also close. The l potential f ailure of the limit switch will not result in the operator (

taking action contrary to safety. This limit switch will be replaced with a fully qualified limit switch as available by 6/30/82.

Our evaluation of this item indicates that plant safety is not jecpardized pending installation of the new limit switch. j l Ine SER indicates NAMCO limit switches for these valves although they i are Masoneilan 496-2 as indicated in the Salem EQ Repor 1

1

/,h NRC C ntract ND. NRC-03-79-118 blfNnkhn Research Center FRC Pr; ject No. C5257 P;ga A Dwision of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 la 20th and Race Streets Phda . Pa 19103(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Eld P EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Y EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 88 LIMIT SWITCH LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT MICR0 SWITCH MODEL LSQ051 REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET NO. 88 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): NOT STATED (LIMIT SWITCH FOR 1PR17)

SERVICE: POSITION INDICATION

• LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 101 [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITD4(S) ONLY:

(Sse Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, yr, RT, P, H, CS, A,h (R) , M, I, QM, RPN, EXN SEN, QI, RPS, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING OF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, Gu, 3d System Consideration Review 4a, 4L, ou, 4d, ac, Of Equipment Environmental Qualification Review 52, 55, R. Sa_ C^ Sf, Si;, Sh, Si, Sj -

Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation is , Sb Equiprrent Summary Maintenance ana Replacement Schedule Summary A- 7h- 7t t

1

gh N RC Contract No. NRC-03-79-118 dbu Franklin Research Center P:g2 FRC Pr: Ject No. C5257 A Dnnson of The Frankhn Inst:ture FRC Assignment No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa 19103 (215) 444 IfXX) FRC Task No. 4(AF EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REV!EW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. &

SUMMARY

OF LICENSEE RESPONSES TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

1 Tne Licensee (has/hr = t) provided a response to the SER concerns.

Tha Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

The Licensee (has/has not) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

Justification for interim operation (has/has not) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

g Ce am -action specified by the Licensee:

1 Equipment replacement with qualified equipment Equipment modification Equipment relocation above submergence level Relocate or shield equipment from radiation source r Verify qualification by additional (testing / analysis) l Equipment relocation to a mild environment Qualification testing of equipment in progress Other ( ,

)

The Licensee has provided other information for this equipment item that can be construed as a basis for justification for interim I operation.

X The Licensee (mrs/nas not) provided a schedule for the proposed

- "r* Me-action. (Schedule for accomplishing the corrective action .)

N The Licensee states that the equipment item does not require qualification l and/or should be exempted from environmental qualification. I DESIGNATION OF RESULTANT NRC QUALIFICATION EVALUATION CATEGORY BASED ON REVIEW l

- CIRCLED ITEM ONLY: (See Section 3 of this TER for Legend) l I.a Qualified II.c Qualified Life Deficiency I.b Modification TIII.a Exemptj II.a Qualification Not Established III.b Not in Scope l II b Not Qualified IV Documentation Not Available

1. % NRC Contract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 Pag 2 dEFrrnklin Rrsearch Centrr FRC Project N3. C5257 A Dwison of The t ra skhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 2 20th and Recs Streets. Phda.. Pa 19103(215)448-1000 FRC Task No. #/a8 /f/7 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 88 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION

SUMMARY

FORM DESIGNATION:

NRC REQUIREMENTS X = DEFICIENCY Documented Evidence of Qualificat. ton Adequate Adequate Similarity Between Equipment and Test Specimen Established Aging Degradation Evaluated Adequately Qualified Life or Replacement Schedule Established (If Required)

Program Established to Identify Aging Degradation Criteria Regarding Aging Simulation. Satisfied (If Required)

Criteria Regarding Temperature / Pressure Exposure:

o Peak Temperature Adequate o Peak Pressure Adequate o Duration Adequate o Required Profile Enveloped Adequately o Steam Exposure (If Required) Adequate Criteria Regarding Spray Satisfied Criteria Regarding Submergence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Radiation Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Sequence Satisfied Criteria Regarding Test Failures or Severe Anomalies (If Any) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Functional Testing Satisfied Criteria Regarding Instrument Accuracy Satisfied Test Duration Margin (1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> + Function Time) Satisfied Criteria Regarding Margins Satisfied (NUREG-0588, Cat. I)

DESIGNATION:

NRC QUALIFICATION CATEGORY X = CATEGORY I.a Equipment Qualified I.b Equipment Qualification Pending Modification II.a Equipment Qualification Not Established II.c Equipment Not Qualified II.c Equipment Satisfies All Requirements Except Qualified Life

! or Replacement Schedule Justified l III.a Equipment Exempt From Qualification 1 III.o Equipment Not in the Scope of the Qualification Review IV Documentation Not Made Available l

l

A~ NRC Contrict N3. NRC-03-79-118

!JfjEjd Franklin Raserrch Cent:r FRC Pr: Ject No. CS257 P;g's A D.wsion of The Frtnklin Institun 30 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103 (215) 44810m FRC FRC Assignment Task No. 4 L,Y No.13 [</'l EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 8.E LICENSEE RESPONSE TO NRC SER EQUIPMEffi: Limit Switch (Microswitch) ,

MODEL: LSQ-051 i

COMPONENT NO.: IPR 17 NRC IDE?EIFIED DEFICIENCIES: EXN, S PSE&G EVALUATION OF DEFICIENCIES:

Ref. Qualification Data Evaluation Fom page 101.

These switches do not require qualification. This situation was resolved in our response to FSAR Question 7.35 and 6.28.

Our submittal, Volume I,Section VII, basis 188 states our position.

PSE3G is confident _t.Sa;_21. ant . safety.xj_1_L.ngs be jeopardir.ed byjall_ure of these SW

1. yhes, howcr*p h kanc.e. niidit;Yy we will e.eptae.g. flg.ge_ g n; Q e, m apalife,ea ones e

A NRC Contract Ns. NRC-03-79-118 P:g2 ll0 hrinkhn Reserrch Ccnt:r FRC Project No CL67 A Division of The Franklin institute FRC Aasigr.. ent No.13 3b 20th and Race Streets. Phila.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. 44 f EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. f_g L\ c/c NM C. f_E 5?cr05E. df.7tES 7D M'alb 00 IBO Basis No. ISB Deficiencv: Documentation Unavailable (Limit Switches for Some Inside Containment Isolation Valves)

Justification:

Current procedures instruct the operator to verify the closed position of isolation valves. The limit switches provide this indication. Loss of- indication will not cause the operator to ta%e any action contrary to safety of the plant.

This situation has been analyzed in the response to FSAR Question 7.35 and has been accepted by the NRC staff in Sup-plement 4 to the Salem 42 Safety Evaluation Report, Section 3.11(5). Qualification of these switches is not required.

This case has been identified as a Group II.2 item (II.2.D).

Corrective Action:

None Required.

I l

I

A~ NRC Contract N:. NRC-03-79-118 i lj000 Franklin R:setrch Csnt:r FRC Project N2. C5257 P;ge '

A Dnnsen cf Ths Frrnkhn Instituts FRC Assignment No.1L 40 20th and Race Streets. Phda.. Pa. 19103(215) 448 1000 FRC Task No. U/of EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. Y l

SYSTEM CONSIDERATION REVIEW The Licensee has stated that this equipment item does not require envircnmental qualification and/or should be exempted from qualification. The Licensee's rationale has been evaluated and the reasons for concurrence /

nnn.cnneurrnnca with the technical basis of the Licensee's position are presented below.

Reason'for Concurrence Reason for Non-Concurrence KEquipmentdoesnotprovidea Backup (equipment / system) is not safety function or mitigate the fully capable of performing the consequences of a design basis intended safety function or accident accident. Equipment Environ- mitigating function, mental Qualification is not required by the DOR Guide- Backup (equipment / system) is not lines. (NRC Qualification environmentally qualified and can Evaluation Category IIIa) be exposed to a hostile environment simultaneously with the primary equipment.

Equipment is not exposed to a Backup (equipment / system) is harsh environment by the subject to a potentially disabling accident it is intended to single active failure.

mitigate. See, note (1) on page 4b. (NRC Qualification Failure of the primary equipment can Evaluation Category IIIb) compromise the ability of other safety-related equipment to perform Backup (equipment / system) is its specified safety function.

available which completely per-forms the safety function. The Failure of the primary equipment can backup (equipment / system) is result in erroneous indication which environmentally qualified and could mislead an operator.

appears to meet single active failure criterion. See note (1) Requirement for continued function-on page 4b. (NRC Qualification ing throughout the post-accident Evaluation Category IIIa) period necessitates environmerdal I qualification.

1 s

A% NRC Crntract N 3. NRC-03-79-118 P;g2

!,U'2 0 Franklin Research Center FRC Project Nc. C5257 A Draion of The Frankhn Institute FRC Assignment No.13 lc 20th and Race Streets. Phila . Pa l's h 3(215) 448-1000 FRC Task No. Waf EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. E I EQUIPMENT ITEM NO. 89 PRESSURE TRANSMITTER LOCATED IN THE CONTAINMENT FISCHER AND PORTER MODEL 50EP1031BCXA NS REQUIRED OPERATING TIME: NOT STATED TER CHECKSHEET No. 89 LICENSEE REFERENCE (S): NOT CITED FUNCTION (PLANT ID): ACCUMULATOR INSTRUMENTATION (PA230, PA231, PA235, PA236, PA239, PA240, PA243, PA244)

SERVICE: ACCUMULATOR PRESSURE LICENSEE SUBMITTAL: SCEW(S): 14B [12]

DESIGNATION FOR DEFICIENCY IDENTIFIED BY THE NRC SER - CIRCLED ITDi(S) ONLY (Ste Section 3 of this TER for Legend)

R, T, QT, RT, P, !, CS, A, S, (R), M, I, QM, RPN, EXN, SEN, QI, None, Not stated, Not applicable LISTING CF APPLICABLE CHECKSHEETS:

Contents Checksheet Page No.

Equipment Item la Summary of Licensee Responses to the NRC SER lb l Equipment Environmental Qualification Summary Forms 2 l Licensee Response to NRC SER 3a, 3b, L , 30-i System Consideration Review I;, th, Ic, Id, Ic, if-

[

Equipment Environmental Qualification Review -Se, LL, Om, 50, Os, Of, h, 55 Si, Sj

! Installed TMI Lessons Learned Implementation Ce, Ob-Equipment Summary j Maintenance and Replacement Schedule Summary 7e, 7b, 7c

(

l l

A_m. NRC C:ntr:ct N 2. NRC-03-79-118 FRC Pr ject No.C5257 P g2 du FrznMin Rxsearch Centrr A Dms.on of Ths Frankt:n Institute FRC Assignm:nt No.13 lb 20th and Race Streets. Phda . Pa 19103 (215) 4481(XX) FRC Task No. 44 //f/~1 EQUIPMENT ENVIRONMENTAL QUALIFICATION REVIEW OF EQUIPMENT ITEM NO.11 SUr4 MARY OF LICENSEE RESFJNSE.S TO THE NRC SER - ONLY CHECKED ITEMS ARE APPLICABLE:

[ Tne Licensee (has/has c.aT.) provided a re.sonse to the SER concerns.

The Licensee (has/has not) specifically stated that the equipment is qualified and/or will function when exposed to the applicable DBE environmental service conditions.

The Licensee has presented information which shows there are no outstanding qualification deficiencies.

/ The Licensee (has/h; .a) proposed a corrective action for this equipment item whose qualification has not been fully established.

[ Justification for interim operation (has/ M i.aT.) been provided by the Licensee for this equipment item.

[ Corrective action specified by the Licensee:

M Equipment replacement with