ML20049H915
| ML20049H915 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Salem  |
| Issue date: | 03/03/1982 |
| From: | FRANKLIN INSTITUTE |
| To: | NRC |
| Shared Package | |
| ML18086B401 | List: |
| References | |
| CON-NRC-03-79-118, CON-NRC-3-79-118, RTR-NUREG-0737, RTR-NUREG-737, TASK-2.B.3, TASK-2.D.3, TASK-2.E.1.2, TASK-2.E.3.1, TASK-2.E.4.1, TASK-2.E.4.2, TASK-2.F.2, TASK-2.G.1, TASK-2.K.3.09, TASK-2.K.3.12, TASK-TM IEB-79-01B, IEB-79-1B, RFI-C5257-517, RFI-C5257-517-R01, RFI-C5257-517-R1, NUDOCS 8203080384 | |
| Download: ML20049H915 (10) | |
Text
_... _
,o _. _ _.
REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL :lFOK4ATICN 1
j EQUIPMENT E:NIRO!1 MENTAL QUALIFICATION (EEQ) j i REVIEW OF LICENSEES' RESOLUTION OF CUTSTA!1 DING ISSUES FRCM NFC EQUIPMENT E:NIRO!@iENTAL QUALIFICATION SAFETY
' EVALUATICN REPORTS (SER) AND TMI ACTION PLAN INSTALLED EQUIPMENT l
l Public Service Electric and Gas Company Salem Unit 2 NRC Docket No. 50-311 November 19, 1981 NRC TAC No. 42533 Rev. 1, March 3, 1982
(
I..
. Franklin Research Center
}afc o y.2o30f03y/
A DiMsim of De Franklin Institute
- n. s,n,.
r,-n >.n rs,w. oe swa axu us.,ox x
at:-C5057-517 Rev. 1, Ma rch 3, 19 82 i
BACKGTCUND Franklin Research Center (FRC) of Philadelphia, Pa. is providing assis-tance to the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) for the equipment enviror. mental qualification (EEQ) review of operating reactors.
FRC will perform an EEQ review of the Licensee's 90-day response to outstanding issues from the NBC (quipment Environmental Qualification Safety Evaluation Report (SER) and the installed TMI Action Plan equipment.
The review will be limited to safety-related equipment potentially exposed to a harsh environment. The results will be presented in the form of a technical evaluation report for each plant.
This request for additional information (RAI) is the result of an evaluation of the information provided by letters dated September 10, 1981 (1]
and December 1,1980 (2].*
Dn Feoruary 8, 1982, Public Service Electric and Gas Company (PSE&G) submitted a response to the FRC RAI [51 This submittal contained those items that were recuested with the exception of the following (
13 proprietarv test reports and technical information (RAI items A.l.a, A.l.q, A.l.i, A.l.i. A.l.1, A.l.m, A.l.n, A.l.o, A.l.p, A.l.aa, A.1.hh)(1)
- 2. test reports referenced but not apolicable to installed icuipment at Salem Units 1 and 2 (RAI items A.l.h, A.l.aaa, A.l.bbb) (1)
- 3. qualification data which have been deleted from the Licensee's list of references (A.l.x, A.l.vl ill A.l.x-PSE&G Analysis EQ 16.03(1)
A.l.y-PSE&G Analysis EQ 16.06(1) 4.,two letters referenced incorrectly in the previous RAI (A.l.qq, A.l.ss)l1J
- Numcers in brackets refer to citations found in the list of references.
- Throughout the text, superscript numbers in parentheses indicate the revision in which the underlined material preceding the superscript was added.
4 dU' d FrankJin Research Center a:>
.a n. r m
+...
arI-C52 57-517 Rev. 1, March 3, 1ss2 5; the specified operating times that were missing from numerous SCCW sheets.
( A.2.C-the Licensee stated that this information was irrelevant since the equipment either lacked suf ficient qualification data or was located in a non-harsh environment) (1) 6.,the specific locations and plant identification nos. ( A.2.d) (1)
With respect to the proprietary documents, FRC has continued to maintain a system of controls over proprietary material which has been acceptable to both the NRC and industry; therefore, FRC requests a single legible copy of l
the documents identified in item 1 above. Il}
A.
FRC REVIM CF THE LICENSEE'S 90-DAY RESPONSE M THE NBC EEQ SER INFORMATION REQUESTED DATE RECEIVED BY FIC***
1.
In reference to the Licensee's 90-day response [1] to the NRC SER [3], a legible single copy of each of the following qualification documents is requested in order that the FRC evaluation may proceeds
- a. Westinghouse letter report NS-TMA-212 0, Septemher 14, 1979, Table 1-2 (SCEW 13) [2 ]
(Proprietary - as stated by Licensee) (5) (1)
- b. Wyle Report No. 44439-2, Rev. A; Figure 2 / 8/82 [5) (1I III-4B (SCEW 3) [2 ]
- c. Wyle Laboratories Report No. 44439-1, March 2 / 8 /82 [ 5) (1) 23, 1979 (SCIW 60) [2 ]
- d. Thermal Analysis, Stone & Webster, January 2 / 8 / 82 [51 (1) i l
25, 1979 (SCEW 63-1) [2 ]
l
- e. CONAX Report IPS-400 (SCEN 64) [2 ]
2 / 8 / 82 [51 (1)
- f. Wyle Laboratories Report No. 17448-1 (SCEW 2 / 8/ 82 [51 (1)
- 64) [2 ]
l
- 9. CONAX Report IPS-422A (SCIW 66) [2 ]
(Proprietarv - as stated by Licensee) [51 (1)
- This column will be completed by FRC as the requested information is received.
i 1
~~
l jbu_ Franklin Research. Center 4on wmr
hil-C52 57-517 Rev. 1,:taren 3, 1982 DATE RECEIVED BY FRC***
- h. Wyle Test Report No. 43757-2 (SCEW 23)(1) [2 ]
(Proprietary - Report Not Aeolicable to olant as stated by Licensee) [5] (1
- i. Westinghouse Letter SE-SAII-868 (SCEW 75) (1) [2 ]
(Proprietary - as stated by Licensee) (5) (1)
- j. Westinghouse BURL-3851, July 21-1980 (SCEW 76) (1) [2]
iProprTetary' - as stated by Licensee) (51(1)
- k. Wyle Report 44152-1, Rev. A (SCDf 85) (1) [2 ]
2 / 8/82 [51 (1)
(Information for justification for interim ooerations as stated by Licensee (51)(1)
- 1. Westinghouse Letter Peport NS-TMA-1950, September 29, 1978 (SCEW 13) [2 ]
(Preprietary - Information for justification for interim operations as stated by Licensee [ 51 ) (1)
- m. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation - EQ 10.00 2 /8/82 f 51 (1)
(SCEW 1) [2 ]
(Not including croprietary data) [51(1)
- n. PSE&G Calculation - EQ 10.02 (SCIW 1) [2 ]
2 /8/82 [ 51 (1)
(Not including proprietary data) [51 (1) 2 /8/82 [5) (1)
- o. PSE&G Analysis - EQ 10.03 (SCEW 1)
(2 {I l
(Not including croprietary data) [Si
- p. PSE&G Documentation - EQ 2 6.00 (SCEW 3) [2 ]
2 / 8/ 82 [51 (1)
(Information for justification for interim operations - net including proorietary information (51) t4
- q. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation - EQ 11.00 2 / 3/ 82 [51(1)
(SCEW 7) [2 ]
- r. PSE&G Calculation - EQ 11.01 (SCIW 7) [2 ]
2 /3/82 (51(1)
- s. PSE&G Analysis - EQ 11.03 (SCIW 7) [2 ]
2 / 8 /82 (5] III
- t. PSE&G Analysis - EQ 11.02 (SCIW 16) [2 ]
2 / 3 /82 (51(1)
- u. PSE&G Evaluation - EQ 13.00 (SCIW 10) (2 )
2 / 8 /82 (5 ] I1)
- v. PSE&G Calculation - EQ 13.01 (SCEW 10) [2 ]
2 /3/82 (51(1) dU Franklin,n.esearch Center R
aw.
r,
- t RFI-C32 57 ~ 17 Rev. 1, Maren 3, 19e'2 DATE RECEIVED BY FRC'**
- w. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation - EQ 16.00 2 / 8/82 [5] (1)
(SCEW 27) (2 ]
- x. deletec (5)(1)
- y. deleted [5](1)
- z. PSE&G Analysis - EQ 12.00 (SCEW 10,) (1) (2 )
2 / 8/82 [5](1) 0 aa. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation - EQ 28.00 2 / 8/ 82 [5](1)
(SCEW 54) (2 ]
(Not including proprietary data) [5](1) bb. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation - EQ 20.00 2 / 8/ 82 [ 5] (1)
(SCEW 62) (2 ]
cc. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation - EQ 19.00 2 / 8/ 82 [5] Ill (SCEW 64) [2 ]
dd. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation - EQ 01.00 2 / 8 /82 [ 5] (1)
(SCEW 65) (2 ]
ee. PSE&G Calculation - EQ 01.03 (SCEW 65) [2 ]
2 / 8/82 [5] (1) ff. PSE&G Calculation - EQ 01.05 (SCEW 65) [2 ]
2 / 8/ 82 [5](1) gg. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation - EQ 02.00 2 / 8/ 82 [5] (1)
(SCEW 66) [2 ]
hh. Conax Report IPS-414 (SCEW 66) (2 ]
(Proprie tary - as stated by Licensee) [ 5] (1)
- 11. PSE&G Calculation - EQ 02.06 (SCEW 66) (2 )
2 / 8/ 82 [5 } (1) j]. PSE&G Calculation - EQ 02.07 (SCEW ee) (2 )
2 /8/ 32 [5] (1) kk. PSE&G Figure - EQ 02.08 (SCEW V>
[ l 2 / 8 /82 [5] (1)
- 11. PSE&G Documentation Evaluat c.->
24.00 2 / 8/82 [5] (1)
(SCZW g) (1) [2 ]
mm. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation - EQ 05.00 2 / 8/ 82 [5] (1)
(SCZW 69) (1) (2 ]
nn. PSE&G Documentatien Evaluation - EQ 2 4.00 2f~j 82 [5]II' (SCEW 69A) (1) (2 ]
d rank!in Research Center
~ w,- -
RFI-C5257-517 Rev. 1, March 3, 1982 DATE RECEIVED BY FRC***
oo. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation - EQ 27.00 2 / 8/82 [51 (1)
(SCIW 698) (1) [2 ],
pp. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation - EQ 21.00 2 /8/82 [51 (1)
(SCEW 68,) (1) [2 ]
qq. Samuel Moore Letter dated June 1978 (SCEW 68,) (1) [2 ]
rr. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation - EQ 06.00 2 /8/82 [51 (1)
(SCEW 7J[) (1) [2 ]
ss. Triangle - PWC Letter dated 2/77 (Sm 70,) (1) [2 ]
0 tt. PSE&G Document - M 03.02 (SCEW 3) (1) [2]
2 / 8/82 [5] (1) uu. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation - EQ 03.00 2 / 8/ 82 [51 (1)
(SG H) (1) [2 ]
vv. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation - EQ 08.00 2 / 8 / 82 [51 (1)
(SCEW 72) [2 ]
sw. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation - EQ 09.00 2 / 8 / 82 (11(1)
(SCIW 73) [2 ]
xx. Salem Environmental Qualification Review Report - Rev. 2, January 16, 1981 (Page 53) [1]
yy. Salem Environmental Qualification Review Report - Rev. 3, February 9,1981 (Page 53) [1]
- . PSE&G Document Evaluation - EQ 07.00 2 / 8/ 82 [51 (1)
(SCIW 72 A) (1) [2 ]
aaa. GE Letter to PSE&G dated November 17, 1980 (SCEW H) (1) [2 ]
(Procrietary - report not applicaole to clant
- as stated by Licensee) [5]LA) bbb. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation -
EQ 14.00 (SCIW E) (1) [2 ]
(Report not applicable to clant - as stated by Licensee ( 51 LM 4 3dhu Franklin, m r, arch Center Rese aw.
RFI-252 57-517 Rev. 1, Ma rch 3, 1982 DATE RECEIVED BY FRC***
ccc. PSE&G Documentation Review - EQ 15.00 2 / 8/ 82 [ 51 (1)
(SCZW 75) (1) (2 ]
ddd. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation -
2 / 8/ 82 [5}(1)
EQ 2 9.00 (SCZW 63-2 ) (1) [2 ]
eee. PSEGG Documentation Evaluation -
2 / 8/ 82 [51(1)
EQ 17.00 (SCEW 63-1) (1) [2 ]
f ff. PSE&G Documentation Evaluation -
2 / 8/ 82 [51 III EQ 18.00 (SCEW 13) (2 ]
(Information for iustification for interim operations as stated by Licensee [51)(1J 2.
- a. FRC requests a legible copy of the four 2 / 8/ 82 [ 5] I1) plant layout drawings which were contained in Section III of Reference 2.
- b. FRC requests temperature / pressure time-2 / 8 / 82 [51(1) dependent environmental profiles or equivalent for inboard / outboard penetration areas and mechanical penetration areas (elevation 78' and 100').
- c. Numerous SCEW sheets in Reference 2 do not contain information on the specified operating time.
FRC requests this information.
(Licensee has committed to submit this information in the next submittal [51) (1)
I j
- d. FRC requests the specific location and 1
full model nu:tber for ASCO NP series
[
solenoid valves referenced on SCEW 60 in Reference 2.
(Licensee submitted model nos. without olant ids and locations g (l) 3.
A review of the information submitted on Feb.
i 8, 1982 [5] resulted in a list of references I
not oreviously recuested.
FRC requests a I
single legible copy of the following documents so that the review may be comoleted:li)
- a. Okonite Reoort No. 0379-1 (referenced in PSE&G EQ 09.00 [51)(1) l
^
s
-s-00branklin Research Center A Chaman ad The homen eumane i
~
PEI-C".,2 ;7- ' O Rev. 1, March 3, 198; DATE RECEIVED BY FRC"*
b Conax Report No. IPS-422 (referenced in 2
E Isemedix Inc. Report dated February 1977 (referenced in PSE&G EQ 06.00 [51)(1) d Boston Insulated Wire Company Report No.
2 B912 (referenced in PSEEG EQ 027.00 g il) o Boston Insulated Wire Company Report No.
g B913 (referenced in PSE&G EQ 24.00 g) ll)
PSE&G EQ 2 8.05 [5](1)
,f2 E PSE&G EQ 2 8.02 [5] III h
PSE&G EQ 2 8.03 [5]Ill 2
B.
FRC REVIEW OF INSTALLED M I ACTION PLAN ITEMS INFORMATION REQUESTED DATE RECEIVED BY FRC***
1.
References 1 and 2 do not provide adequate detail with respect to identification of MI Action Plan equipment installed as of 1/1/81.
a.
Identification of all m I Action Plan equipment installed as of 1/l' 81 is
/
requested.
b.
Identification of m I Action Plan equipment installed with implercentation dates after 1/1/81 is requested.
c.
The correlation of these equipment items with the specific sections of NUREG-0737 (4] presented below (an applicable) is requested.
IIEl.2, IIE4.2, IIE3.1, IIG1, IIF2, IID3, IIK3.12, IIK3.9, II33, IIE4.1.
l
-M ilbhrank!!n Research Center A Qumumm of The Fresuen poemane
I RFI-CS257-517 Rev. 1, March 3, 196 DATE RECEIVED BY FRC*"
[The correlation is needed to ensure that all items are included in the
- review, e.g.,
if a transmitter is identified as a m I Action Plan item, are the cable and terminal blocks associated with the device also identified?]
d.
For all installed MI Action Plan equipment identified, a System Component Evaluation Worksheet (SCEW) (in accordance with 79-01B format) is requested.
e.
The approximate installation date for the mI Action Plan equipment items is requested so that the appropriate qualification criteria (NUREG-0588 or DOR Guidelines) can be used in the EEQ evaluation.
2.
The qualification documents, e.g., the actual test reports and associated correspondence cited as evidence of qualification listed on the SCEW sheets, for all identified MI Action Plan equipment are requested.
(The identification of those reports considered to be proprietary is requested so that proper control of documents can be maintained.]
3.
Where the Licensee has a standard Owners' Group position with respect to a NUREG-0737 technical area or has requested extensions of implementation dates, this information is requested in order to incorporate it into the review. @ b Frankfin Research Center 4m=
.e w r w
u l-C 52 !.7-517 Rev. 1, Maren 3, 1982 REFERENCES 1.
Letter to S. A. Varga, NRC.
Subject:
Response to SER for Environmental Qualification of Electrical Equipment for Salem Nuclear Generating Station Unit No. 1 Public Service Electric & Gas, 10-Sep-81 2.
Salem Generating Station Units 1 & 2 Environmental Qualification Review Report, Volume I, Rev. 1 Public Service Electric & Gas, 01-Dec-80 M-P80-118-02, Proprietary 3.
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Safety Evaluation Report for Salem Unit 1 Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment NRC, 08-Jun-81 4.
NUREG-0737, " Clarification of MI Action Plan Requirements" NRC, November 1980 5
E.
A.
Liden 2
Letter to C. J. Crane, FRC.
Subject:
Environmental Qualification of Safety-Related Electrical Equipment: Transmittal of Requested Information on Salem 1 & 2 ; with Attachment Public Service Electric & Gas, 08-Feb-81(1)
J g
_9_
bd Franklin Research Center ac=wNr- -
-.