ML20295A408

Ile Forms ES-201-2

ML20295A408
Person / Time
Site:	Dresden
Issue date:	07/13/2020
From:	Exelon Generation Co
To:	Chuck Zoia NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
Zoia C
Shared Package
ML19121A250	List: ML20295A408 ML20295A434 ML20295A440 ML20308A402 ML20308A412 ML20308A415 ML20308A418 ML20308A424
References
Download: ML20295A408 (2)

Text

ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Facility: Date of Examination lnitials Item Task Description a b- c**

a. Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N. Ht4 uo?

R

b. Assess whether the outline was Systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(/A categories are appropriately sampled.

ftn w) o nn r)

I T

T

c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or topcs.

E N

d. Assess whether the iustfications for deselected or rejected l(A statements are appropriate. Hn ry

2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of S

normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specfcations, and major transients.

Mn ry I

b.

M U

L Assess whether there are enough scenarlo sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expecled crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the t4 q

A T applcants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days o

I To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and R

quantitative crtera specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, "specific lnstructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"'of ES-301 (including

• ilil overlap).

3. a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:

(1 ) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant lasks distributed W

A among the safety functions as specified on the form.

(2) Task repetition from the last tlvo NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form. ú7 L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audlt test(s). 'll'1 K (4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.

T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.

R o b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:

(1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form. c*V U

G (2) At least one task is new or significantly modified. Hh H

(3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.

c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days. a l4M Y

4. a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual P ttn w G

b.

plant examination insiqhts) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.

Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41 , 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropri ate. e t"lM wç E

N E

c Ensure that llA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) al9 1!!999!? i _ Hh w R d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams. Hrl cw A

L e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage v1Yl w

øry

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO). HU Printed Date

a. Author Derek Siuda / tt /øln

b. Facility Reviewer (.) ew Mccorm tt/zz/tt

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)

t( '/< I t1 it '

d. NRC Supervisor I r:/,uj

. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines. @ A1or. d lø lZn n ,-- dh "l*l

1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrenc s requlred.

D..sJ¿.

ES-201 Examination Outlne Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 NOTE: This ES-201-2 is for the íVRC developed Written Examination Outline senú to the ONLY Facility: Date of Examination:

lnitials Item Task Description a b* c#

1 a. Verify that the outline(s) ft(s) the approprate model in accordance wth ES-401 or ES-401N N/A orry W

R

b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(A categories are appropriately sampled.

N/A ry B

I T c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. N/A qtor T

E N

d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected llA statements are appropriate.  % N/A c.7

a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifcations, and major

\ transients.

I M b. whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test the projected number and U m applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule L exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at A least or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the T applicants' test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.

o c. To the extent assess whether the outline(s ) conforms with the qualitative/d R

quantitative criteria on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D al6 in Section D.5, "Specific I for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"' of ESø1 (including overlap). ,/

3. outline meets the criteria on Form ES-301-2:

number of control in-plant tasks distributed W among the safety functions as on the form A (2) Task repetition from the last two inations is the limits specified on the form L (3) No tasks are duplicated from the a K (4) The number of new or modif ed tasks mee the minimums specified on the form.

T (5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, , and radiologically controlled area H tasks meets the criteria on the form.

R o b. Verify that the administrative outline spe}hQ on Form ES-301-1:

U (1) The tasks are distributed amo4gr'fhe ^"t{*"criteria topics as specified on\e form.

G (2) At least one task is new or syinificantly modified. \

H (3) No more than one task is,ópeated from the last two NRC licenshg examinations.

c. Determine whether enough different outlines to test the projectsumUer and mix of applicants and no items are duplicated on subsequent days. \

4. a. Assess wnemernt-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment anlngividual plant examinfron insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections. \

G E b. Arr"rr.#th",. the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.

N E

c. Ee thatl(A importance ratinos (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.

R /Cn""Xfor duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.

A

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.

,/ f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (RO or SRO).

Printed Date

a. Author B, c4 l lol?lacq

b. Facility Reviewer (*) N/A

c. NRC Chief Examiner (#) C, t.te\n

d. NRC Supervisor I tl-Bl'd\

• Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.

1. The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.