ML20295A408
| ML20295A408 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Dresden  |
| Issue date: | 07/13/2020 |
| From: | Exelon Generation Co |
| To: | Chuck Zoia NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB |
| Zoia C | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML19121A250 | List: |
| References | |
| Download: ML20295A408 (2) | |
Text
ES-201 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 Date of Examination Facility:
lnitials a
b-c**
Item Task Description
Ht4 uo?
Verify that the outline(s) fit(s) the appropriate model in accordance with ES-401 or ES-401 N.
a.
ftn w)
Assess whether the outline was Systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(/A categories are appropriately sampled.
b.
nn r)
- c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or topcs.
Hn ry R
I T
T E
N
- d. Assess whether the iustfications for deselected or rejected l(A statements are appropriate.
Mn ry
- a. Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specfcations, and major transients.
t4 q
- b. Assess whether there are enough scenarlo sets (and spares) to test the projected number and mix of applicants in accordance with the expecled crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at least one new or significantly modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the applcants' audit test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days ilil I 2.
S I
M U
L A
T o
R To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and quantitative crtera specified on Form ES-301-4 and described in Appendix D and in Section D.5, "specific lnstructions for the 'Simulator Operating Test,"'of ES-301 (including overlap).
'll'1 ú7
- a. Verify that the systems walkthrough outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-2:
(1 ) The outline(s) contains the required number of control room and in-plant lasks distributed among the safety functions as specified on the form.
(2) Task repetition from the last tlvo NRC examinations is within the limits specified on the form.
(3) No tasks are duplicated from the applicant's audlt test(s).
(4) The number of new or modified tasks meets or exceeds the minimums specified on the form.
(5) The number of alternate-path, low-power, emergency, and radiologically controlled area tasks meets the criteria on the form.
Hh c*V
- b. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified on Form ES-301-1:
(1) The tasks are distributed among the topics as specified on the form.
(2) At least one task is new or significantly modified.
(3) No more than one task is repeated from the last two NRC licensing examinations.
a l4M Y 3.
W A
L K
T H
R o
U G
H
- c. Determine whether there are enough different outlines to test the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are duplicated on subsequent days.
P ttn w
- a. Assess whether plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insiqhts) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
e t"lM wç
- b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropri ate.
Hh w Ensure that llA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) al9 1!!999!? i _
c
Hrl cw
- d. Check for duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.
v1Yl w
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage HU
øry 4.
G E
N E
R A
L
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (.)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor tt /øln tt/zz/tt
'/< I t1 r:/,uj it '
t(
I Date Printed Derek Siuda /
ew Mccorm
. Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines. @ A1or. d lø lZn n,-- dh "l*l
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrenc s requlred.
o
D..sJ¿.
ES-201 Examination Outlne Quality Checklist Form ES-201-2 NOTE: This ES-201-2 is for the íVRC developed Written Examination Outline senú to the ONLY Date of Examination:
Facility:
lnitials a
b*
c#
Item Task Description
N/A orry Verify that the outline(s) ft(s) the approprate model in accordance wth ES-401 or ES-401N a.
N/A ry
- b. Assess whether the outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with Section D.1 of ES-401 or ES-401N and whether all l(A categories are appropriately sampled.
B N/A qtor
- c. Assess whether the outline overemphasizes any systems, evolutions, or generic topics.
N/A c.7 W
R I
T T
E N
1
- d. Assess whether the justifications for deselected or rejected llA statements are appropriate.
Using Form ES-301-5, verify that the proposed scenario sets cover the required number of normal evolutions, instrument and component failures, technical specifcations, and major transients.
a.
whether there are enough scenario sets (and spares) to test applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition exam integrity, and ensure that each applicant can be tested using at modified scenario, that no scenarios are duplicated from the test(s), and that scenarios will not be repeated on subsequent days.
b.
or significantly m
the projected number and and rotation schedule least applicants'
\\
I M
U L
A T
o R
) conforms with the qualitative/d described in Appendix D al6 in Operating Test,"' of ESø1 (including
,/
assess whether the outline(s on Form ES-301-4 and for the 'Simulator quantitative criteria
- c. To the extent Section D.5, "Specific I overlap).
a (4)
(5) on Form ES-301-2:
outline meets the criteria number of control in-plant tasks distributed on the form inations is the limits specified on the form the minimums specified on the form.
, and radiologically controlled area tasks meets the criteria on the form.
among the safety functions as (2) Task repetition from the last two (3) No tasks are duplicated from the The number of new or modif ed tasks mee The number of alternate-path, low-power, Verify that the administrative outline ^"t{*"criteria spe}hQ on Form ES-301-1:
(1) The tasks are distributed amo4gr'fhe topics as specified on\\e form.
(2) At least one task is new or syinificantly modified.
\\
(3) No more than one task is,ópeated from the last two NRC licenshg examinations.
b.
3.
W A
L K
T H
R o
U G
H to test the projectsumUer subsequent days. \\
and mix of
- c. Determine whether enough different outlines no items are duplicated on applicants and
- a. Assess wnemernt-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment anlngividual plant examinfron insights) are covered in the appropriate exam sections.
\\
Arr"rr.#th",. the 10 CFR 55.41, 55.43, and 55.45 sampling is appropriate.
b.
Ee thatl(A importance ratinos (except for plant-specific priorities) are at least 2.5.
c.
/Cn""Xfor duplication and overlap among exam sections and the last two NRC exams.
- e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage.
A
,/
4.
G E
N E
R
- a. Author
- b. Facility Reviewer (*)
- c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
- d. NRC Supervisor C,
Printed I
N/A t.te\\n tl-Bl'd\\
B, c4 l
Date lol?lacq
- Not applicable for NRC-prepared examination outlines.
- The independent NRC reviewer initials items in column "c"; the chief examiner's concurrence is required.