ML20209E274

From kanterella
Revision as of 11:34, 11 January 2021 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Review of Seabrook PRA, Monthly Mgt Ltr 10 for Feb 1985
ML20209E274
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 03/29/1985
From: Cummings G, Ariuska Garcia
LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY
To: Davis S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20209C800 List:
References
CON-FIN-A-0801, CON-FIN-A-801, FOIA-87-6 RARE-85-062, RARE-85-62, NUDOCS 8504180134
Download: ML20209E274 (5)


Text

..

' Lawrence Uvermore National Laborator3 1 NUCLEAR SYSTEMS SAFETY PROGRAM RARE 85-062 March 29, 1985 Ms. Sarah M. Davis Reliability and Risk Assessment Branch Division of Safety Technology U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C. 20555

SUBJECT:

Monthly Management Letter #10 Month of February 1985 NRC FIN-A0801 Review of the Seabrook Probabilistic Risk Assessment

Dear Ms. Davis:

1. Project Description and Objective The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation is conducting a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) review program in which PRAs performed and submitted to the NRC by license applicants and licensees receive comprehensive review and evaluation. The program is the responsibility of the Reliability and Risk Assessment Branch (RRAB).

A PRA of the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant (Seabrook PRA) has been submitted to the NRC by Public Service Company of New Hampshire, an operating license (OL) applicant. The review of this document, whose title is "Seabrook Station Probabilistic Safety Assessment," is being performed as one project in the larger NRC program.

The objective of this project is to perform an expeditious and cost effective review of those aspects of the Seabrook PRA leading to the estimates of the frequencies of each plant damage state and the associated uncertainty spread to determine the accuracy of these estimates. The review will cover method-ology, assumptions, data, information sources, models, plant understanding, completeness of the analysis and other areas where inconsistencies may arise which could affect the quantitative or qualitative results.

! 2. Progress for Period l

None.

l l

3. Work to be Accomplished Next Month c
a. Work on the project is essentially stopped pending an NRC decision on an option for completing or terminating the contract. ,

f~t):/?- b l*Cd D S/ts 8504180134 th pp.3

...~.. - gryy;1',a

\

'Y ,Q l

f A*Eq.2Cttwury E"tvy i.ne sep o!Caryne

  • PO Bw 839 Lwernye Castvne 94550
  • Tese;tme <4,5 4:2moc . Tu 9n 3Y n3- La. a .

I I

l

.p.

RARE 85-062 March 29, 1985 4

4. List of Subcontractors and Consultants
a. Subcontractors (1) Applied Risk Technology Corporation (ARTECH); P. J. Amico (2) Jack R. Benjamin and Associates, Inc. (JBA); J. W. Reed, M. W.

McCann, Jr.

b. Consultants (1) P. R. Davis
5. Concerns None.
6. Other The total expenditures noted in Attachment A, including liens, are approximately S190.3K. This amount exceeds the $121.9K carryover from FY84 by

$68.4K, but this last number includes subcontractor liens (for work not yet executed or authorized) of about $29K, so that the correct total is approximately $161.3K, or about $40K more than the carryover from FY84. A request for immediate funding in the amount of $40K was made to the NRC in the Monthly Program Report for January 1985.

Abel A. Garcia

. /.A Principal Investigator

! o ,. ', c:~

l "l $i

'e .

_-jpg C

,.j.,vw wg q)

Garth E. Cummings i Program Leader Nuclear Systems Safety Program sr l

L

o RARE 85-062 March 29, 1985

-6 Enclosures (2)

Distribution:

NRC DOE LLNL R. Frahm, DST W. J. Gallagher G. E. Cuaunings J. Halvorsen, DST J. M. Johnson g.

F. Rowsome, DST C. A. Meier L. Solander, NRR A. C. Thadani, DST t

l l

l l

l l

p e RME 85-062 March 29, 1985 i

ATTACHMENT A ESTIMATED PROJECT FINANCIAL STATUS:* Fet-55 (Ficures given in thousande.)

FIN A0801 Summary Cost Analysis

  • Feb-85 Year to Date

! Direct Staff Effort ( FTE 's ) 0.7 1.1 **

II Direct Labor Costs 2.8 43. 0 Material & Services 0.0 U.?

ADP Support 0.0 E. e Subcontracts 4.3 47.5 Travel Expenses -0.3 2.4 Indirect Labor Costs 2.E 4 E: . 5 '

Other ( Recharge ) 0.6 4.:

Other (FY84 Unbilled Cortc) 0.0 0.0 General & Administrative 6.6 19. ..

Total Costs 16.6 16 0 . . .

Liens 29.7 Co.7 Total Costs & Liens 46.5 1 '- .?

Percentage of Available Funds t L. . t r III Funding Status Prior Year FY 1985 Projected FY 1985 Funds FY 1955 Funding Carryover Funding Level Rec'd to Date Ba1. Needed 121.9 261.9 0.0 140.0

  • Note: These figures are for cost analysis only, and may differ slightly from final billing figures.

RARE 85-062 March 29, 1985

,6 ATTACHMENT B FEE RECOVERY COST STATUS FIN: A0801 TITLE: Review of the Probabilistic Risk Assessment for the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant PERIOD: February 1985 Docket Costs Facility Name Number Period Cumulative Seabrook 50-443 $16.8K $190K Common Costs 50-900 $ 0.0 0 Total Expenses $16.8K $190K l

l l

I e

L