ML20211D178
| ML20211D178 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Seabrook  |
| Issue date: | 05/01/1985 |
| From: | Cummings G, Ariuska Garcia LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY |
| To: | Davis S Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20209C800 | List:
|
| References | |
| CON-FIN-A-0801, CON-FIN-A-801, FOIA-87-6 RARE-85-086, RARE-85-86, NUDOCS 8702200343 | |
| Download: ML20211D178 (5) | |
Text
'.
s i
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory NUCLEAR SYSTEMS SAFETY PROGRAM RARE 85-086 May 1, 1985 Ms. Sarah M. Davis Reliability and Risk Assessment Branch Division of Safety Technology U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D.C.
20555
SUBJECT:
Monthly Management Letter #12 Month of April 1985 NRC FIN-A0801 Review of the Seabrook Probabilistic Risk Assessment
Dear Ms. Davis:
- 1. Project Description and Objective The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation is conducting a probabilistic risk assessment (FRA) review program in which PRAs performed and submitted to the NRC by license applicants and licensees receive comprehensive review and evaluation. The program is the responsibility of the Reliability and Risk Assessment Branch (RRAB).
A PRA of the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant (Seabrook PRA) has been submitted to the NRC by Public Service Company of New Hampshire, an operatir.g license (OL) applicant. The review of this document, whose title is "Seabrook Station Probabilistic Safety Assessment," is being performed as one project in the larger NRC program.
The objective of this project is to perform an expeditious and cost effective review of those aspects of the Seabrook PP.A leading to the estimates of the frequencies of each plant damage state and the associated uncertainty spread to determine the accuracy of these estimates. The review will cover method-ology, assumptions, data, information sources, models, plant understanding, completeness of the analysis and other areas where inconsistencies may arise l
which could affect the quantitative or qualitative results.
- 2. Progress for Period None.
~
- 3. Work to be Accomplished Next Month N
None.
8702200343 870211 PDR FOIA SHOLLYB7-6 PDR M Egant Cttxvtinty EW. lkswvskyof CaMorraa. PO Box 806 Lnermore Canma 94550. Tekchone (415) 422 1100. Twx 910-386-8339 UCLLL LWp
_.. _ _ _. _ ~ -. - _ _ _
l 1
RARE 85-086 May 1, 1985
- 4. List of Subcontractors and Consultants
- a. Subcontractors (1)
Applied Risk Technology Corporation (ARTECH); P. J. Amico (2)
Jack R. Benjamin and Associates, Inc. (JBA); J. W. Reed, M. W.
McCann, Jr.
- b. Consultants (1)
P. R. Davis
- 5. Concerns See note on March 1985 Monthly Management Letter.
l
- 6. Other None.
8d W Abel A. Garcia Principal Investigator Ga'rth E. Cuaunings f
Program Leader Nuclear Systems Safety Program er jlp i
t
-_.__m t
RARE 85-086 May 1, 1985 Enclosures (2)
Distribution:
NRC DOE LLNL R. Fraha, DST W. J. Gallagher G. E. Cummings J. Halvorsen, DST J. M. Johnson F. Rowsome, DST C. A. Meier L. Solander, NRR l
A. C. Thadani, DST i
i D
+
i o
i t
RARE 85-086 May 1, 1985 ATTACHMENT B FEE RECOVERY COST STATUS FIN:
A0801 TITLE:
Review of the Probabilistic Risk Assessment for the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant PERIOD: April 1985 Docket Costs Facility Name Number Period Cumulative Seabrcok 50-443
$ 1.4K
$201.6K Common Costs 50-900
$ 0.0 0.0 Total Expenses
$ 1.4K
$201.6K
,,_,,-,-.c
-,n.-,
w.LL.
.,s RARE 85-085 May 1, 1985 1u i
s u.
ATTACHMENT A ESTIMATED PROJECT FINANCIAL STATUS **
Apr-85 (Figures given in thousands.)
FIN A0801 Summary Cost Analysis
- Apr-85 Year to Date I
Direct Staff Effort ( FTE 's )
0.0 1.5 **
II Direct Labor Costs 0.0 43.0 Material & Services 0.1 1.7 ADP Support 0.0 0.0 Subcontracts 0.0 55.7 Travel Expenses 0.0 2.4 Indirect Labor Costs 0.0 43.5 Other ( Recharge )
0.0 4.5 Other ( FY84 Unbilled Costs) 0.0 0.0 General & Administrative 1.3 21.1 Total Costs 1.4 171.9 Liens 29.7 29.7 Total Costs & Liens 31.1 201.6 Percentage of Available Funds 124.5%
III Funding Status Prior Year FY 1985 Projected FY 1985 Funds FY 1985 Funding a
Carryover Funding Level Rec'd to Date Bal. Needed 121.9 261.9 40.0 100.0
- Note: These figures are for cost analysis only, and may differ slightly from final billing figures.
- FTE average.
-