ML20211D068

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Review of Seabrook PRA, Monthly Mgt Ltr 7 for Nov 1984
ML20211D068
Person / Time
Site: Seabrook  NextEra Energy icon.png
Issue date: 01/25/1985
From: Cummings G, Ariuska Garcia
LAWRENCE LIVERMORE NATIONAL LABORATORY
To: Davis S
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Shared Package
ML20209C800 List:
References
CON-FIN-A-0801, CON-FIN-A-801, FOIA-87-6 RARE-85-014, RARE-85-14, NUDOCS 8702200316
Download: ML20211D068 (4)


Text

-

)i 7

I  ;

Lawrence Livermore National Laborator 3 NOCLEAR SYSTEMS SAFETY PROGRAM RARE 85-014 January 25, 1985 Ms. Sarah M. Davis Reliability and Risk Assessment Branch Division of Safety Technology U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington 0.C. 20555

SUBJECT:

Monthly Management Letter #7 Month of November 1984 NRC FIN-A0801 Review of the Seabrook Probabilistic Risk Assessment

Dear Ms. Davis:

1. Project Description and Objective The Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation is conducting a probabilistic risk assessment (PRA) review program in which PRAs performed and submitted to th.a NRC by license applicants and licensees receive comprehensive review and evaluation. The program is the responsibility of the Reliability and Risk Assessment Branch (RRAB).

A PRA of the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant (Seabrook PRA) has been submitted to the NRC by Public Service Company of New Hampshire, an operating license (OL) applicant. The review of this document, whose title is "Seabrook Station Probabilistic Safety Assessment," is being performed as one project in the larger NRC program.

The objective of this project is to perform an expeditious and cost effective review of those aspects of the Seabrook PRA leading to the estimates of the frequencies of each plant damage state and the associated uncertainty spread to determine the accuracy of these estimates. The review will cover method-ology, assumptions, data, information sources, models, plant understanding, completeness of the analysis and other areas where inconsistencies may arise which could affect the quantitative or qualitative results.

2. Progress for Period
a. Work continued at steady pace during the month,
b. A. Garcia and G. Cumings (LLNL), and P. Amico ( ART) attended a meeting with A. Thadant and S. Davis at the NRC offices in Bethesda on November 28, 1984.
3. Work to be Accomplished Next Month
a. Work on the review will continue at a much' higher rate in order to complete and deliver to NRC a draft report in the month of December.

0702200316 070211 Fe.Z // - E 'N('

13Dif FOIA GHULLYU7-6 pipr4 m a u v..re,t~,. w .v> ~ .v u. m ..co o m e n c... m a ree. m c. w . w

. v ....-

. -[;

,1-s I

  • RARE 85-014 January 25, 1985

.~

4. List of Subcontractors and Consultants
q. E a. Subcontractors I (1) Applied Risk Technology Corporation (ARTECH); P. J. Amico

~

(2) Jack R. Benjamin and Associates, Inc. (J8A); J. W. Reed, M. W.

McCann, Jr.

b. Consultants

, (1) P. R. Davis

5. Concerns The concerns noted in previous monthly program reports have not been, and are

< not now expected to be fully resolved. The direction to be taken in the

- process of completing the draft report will be to do what we can with the information available to us, and to identify areas where the absence of information may be important to the results.

6. Other Not Applicable p arcE

~

Abel A. Garcia Principal Investigator

~ 't l y a c Lu~.h,, s ~ . ..

Garth E. Cunnings 'J/

Program Leader

  • Nuclear Systems Safety Program sr Enclosures (2)

Olstribution: 1

~

g 00E LLNL

',- 'R; Frahm, OST W. J. Gallagher J. Halvorsen, OST G. E.Johnson J. M. Cunnings [f f

F. Rowsome. 0$T C.A. Meter (k L. Solander, NRR t A. C. Thadant, OST I

y -9 9

ff 6 Ir . . RARE B5-014 3-- January 25, 1985

- 5 ATTACHMENT A ESTIMATED PROJECT FINANCIAL STATUS: November FY 1985 i

FIN AOB01 .I Summary 1

i 3

)

COST ANALYSIS

  • November Year to Date

, I Direct Staff Efforts 2.3 FTE-Mo 2.4 FTE-Yr

, Il ' Direct Labor Costs $ '9.4K $ 21.5K i i MaterialsI& Services 0.0 0.0

- ADP Support!- O.O O. O SubcontEacts 5.7 7.6

@T . Travel Expensos O.4 0.4 Indirect Labor Costs 9.3 21.S I- Other (Recharges) O.7 1.4 Other (FY84 Unb111ed Costs) 0.0 0.0 General & Administrative , 4.1 4.1

' Total Costs $ 29.7K 4 57.OK Liens $ 69.1K

,r 3 I Total Costs + Liens $ 116.1K Percentage of Available Funds 95.27.

j

-}' -

3 1,. .,

e 'y

.III Funding Status:

4-(--------________---_____.

' ^

Prior Year  !~Y 1985 Pro.iected FY 1985 Funds FY 1985 Funding-7 Carryover. Funding Level Rec'd to Date Ba1. Needed

.(

$121.9K $261.9K $ O.OK $140.OK x;

~

- - - = - - - - - - - - - - . - - --___--__- _. _ - - - _ _ - - - - - - - - _ - - - - - ____---_-

h i

  • Note: These figures are for cost analysis only, and may differ slightly from final billing figures.

I  %

It c

, , , . - - - - - - - . , . _ - ,. . . _ , _ ,_ _ _ -. _ _ ~

~4.

' January 25, 1985 RARE 85-014 ATTACHMENT B FEE RECOVERY COST STATUS FIN: A0801 TITLE: Review of the Probabilistic Risk Assessment for the Seabrook Nuclear Power Plant PERIOD: November 1984 Docket Costs Facility Name Number Period Cumulative Seabrook 50-443 $29.7K $116K Common Costs 50-900 $ 0.0 0 Total Expenses $M TIIR i

(  :

l l

l

- . _ , . . -. _ _ , _ . - _ . - - - .