ML20199G116

From kanterella
Revision as of 16:20, 19 November 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submits Results of Review of Allegation Items 17,2 & 9,per 850503 Request.No Action Required by Technical Review Team
ML20199G116
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date: 06/11/1986
From: Livermore H
NRC
To: Noonan V
NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
Shared Package
ML20197J178 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8606250079
Download: ML20199G116 (2)


Text

(

. . % n. A

  • 7 '

UNITED STATES T-

  • 8 o NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION r, wasMincrow. o. c.20ssa

[ \ ..... )g MEMORANDUM FOR: Vincent S. Noonan Director

. Comanche Peak Project I FROM:. Herbert H. Livennore

! QA/QC Group Leader

SUBJECT:

RECORD REVIEW GROUP FINDINGS I

j' As requested in your letter of May '3,1985, the QA/QC Group has reviewed the listing of allegation identified by the Records Review Group. Three items were identified as being potentially applicable to the QA/QC Group. These l three items (Nos. 17, 2 & 9) were reviewed with the following results:

?

I Item No. 17: "NRC inspectors spent insufficient time on i each hanger inspection."

This testimony was not related to the TRT, but involved three individuals from Region IV (i.e.,

Taylor Smith and Gilbert).

No TRT action required. ,

, Item No. 2: "ASME audit team rejected ASME N-Stamp for Brown &

Root."

This deposition is inaccurate as renewal of B&R's

. N-Stamp was delayed on one occasion for two months .

! but was not rejected. ,The TRT had already looked

.{ at this subject and it is explained in our SSERs (AQ5).

No TRT action required.

]

j Item No. 9: "NRC was not finding the problem."

! , "NRC was not investigating all allegations." .

"NRC was not monitoring construction."

khetestimonyindicatesthatthesubjectwas i Region IV personnel (i.e., Taylor) not the TRT.

No TRT action reqtired.

In conclusion, two of the three items above do not relate to the QA/QC group, and the other one has already been addressed.

8606250079 860611 PDR FOIA W #L h _.

ARDE85-59 Herbert H. Livermore PDR QA/QC Group Leader 2

cc: C. Poslusny

<-....n.+mm.-m.,,,-__ ,..,,m .- , . , - - ~ .-,--v, . y , _. .- _ . m- , m- . ,- - . .

':.=

i '/ UNITED STATES

! g NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION l g j WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 i

\,...../

t a

MEMORAh0VM FOR: Vincent S. Noonan, Director Comanche Peak Project FROM:. ' Herbert H. Livermore h QA/QC Group Leader 1

SUBJECT:

RECORD REVIEW GROUP FINDINGS l

i I

As requested in your letter of May 3,1985, the QA/QC Group has reviewed the listing of allegation identified by the Records Review Group. Three~ items

, were identified as being potentially applicable to the QA/QC Group. These i three items (Nos.17, 2 & 9) were reviewed with the following results:

l l Item No. 17: "NRC inspectors spent insufficient time on j each hanger inspection."

)

i This testimony was not related to the TRT, but i involved three individuals from Region IV (i.e.,

Taylor, Smith and Gilbert).

3 No TRT action required. ,

j Item No. 2: "ASME audit team rejected ASME N-Stamp for Brown &

l Rcot."

1 1

This deposition is inaccurate as renewal of B&R's

$ N-Stamp was delayed on one occasion for two months

? but was not rejected. .The TRT had already looked j at this subject and it is explained in our SSERs (AQS).

~

{ IfoTRTactionrequired.

{. ..

j Item No. 9: "NRC was not finding the problem."

j . "NRC was not investigating all allegations."

"NRC was not monitoring construction."

i The testimony indicates that the subject was Region IV personnel (i.e., Taylor) not the TRT. _

)

No TRT action required.

! In conclusion, two of the three items above do not relate to the QA/QC group, j and the other one has already been addressed.

i Wf Herbert H. Livermore

<4u< c% _

QA/QC Group Leader -

1 cc: C. Poslusny .

4

-- =

-_ -- - _ _ _