ML20151Y172

Provides Rev to Proposed License Condition as Required to Address Scheduling of New or Revised Surveillance Requirements.Changes Necessary to Improved Ts,To Resolve Items Identified by Util During Review,Encl

ML20151Y172
Person / Time
Site:	Catawba
Issue date:	09/15/1998
From:	Tuckman M DUKE POWER CO.
To:	NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
Shared Package
ML20151Y176	List: ML20151Y172 ML20151Y182
References
TAC-M95298, TAC-M95299, NUDOCS 9809180139
Download: ML20151Y172 (5)

Text

- , - -

gw 4 gg Duk) Energy C rporati:n bg, 526 South Church Street P.O. Box 1006 (EC07H)

Charlotte, NC 28201-1006 M. S. Tutkman (704)382-2200 om Executin Vice President (I04) 382'4360 MX Nudcar Generation September 15, 1998 U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, DC 20555 Attention: Document Control Desk

Subject:

Duke Energy Corporation Catawba Nuclear Station I Docket Numbers 50-413, and -414 Improved Technical Specifications, Supplement 10 TAC Nos. M95298 and M95299 By letter dated August 11, 1998, the NRC transmitted the draft i Safety Evaluation (SE) for the conversion to Improved Technical Specifications. The letter requested comments on the draft SE l and also requested that the licensee propose appropriate license  !

conditions for the relocated material from the current technical l specifications and for the scheduling of new more restrictive I requirements. Finally, the letter requested a certified copy of l the proposed Technical Specifications and Bases. By letter dated I September 8, 1998, Duke Energy provided comments to the draft SE along with proposed license conditions, and certified TS and '

Bases as requested. i i

Based on conversations with the NRC staff and Duke's internal -

review, additional information is provided concerning the draft SE. Enclosure 1 of this letter provides a revision to the proposed license condition as requested to address the scheduling l of new or revised surveillance requirements. Enclosure 2 of this l letter provides the changes necessary to the ITS submittal, as amended, to resolve items identified by Duke Energy during the review.

The proposed changes are administrative in nature and have been determined to be within the scope of the original PORC and NSRB ,

reviews.

Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.91(b) (1) , a copy of this amendment has been l provided to the appropriate State of South Carolina officials.

pb 9809180139 980915  ?

PDR ADOCK 05000413 P PM a i

O"PQ3 2vu-

a." 's

~

l JU. S. . Nuclear Regulatory Commission

.' SeptemberL15,c1998 i Page 2 i

L ).If any additionaliinformation is needed, please call Lee-A. l

'Keller at1704-382-5826.

l i

! -1Very truly'yours, i

M.-S. Tuckman 1

Enclosure p :xc: 'w/ enclosures 1

Mr. L'. A. Reyes

' Administrator, Region II' 1 U.-S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission:

Atlanta' Federal' Center 61 Forsyth St.,JSW, . Suite 23T85 1

l. ' Atlanta,LGA: '30303' l l

o :Mr.-P. S.. Tam.

l U. S.1 Nuclear' Regulatory Commission Mail Stop;O-14 H25 Washington, DC. 20555 -!

.Mr. D. J. Roberts I

! . Senior Resident Inspector L Catawba Nuclear' Station l

\,

Max Batavia, Chief , .

Bureau'of Radiological Health -\ ,

! S. C. Department of Health & Environmental Control l 2600 Bull Street .

i p Columbia, SC 29207 '

l

)

i, u

i

, + , -, , , - -- ,c- . - - - - - , .

l

,,- 'o- ]

l i

i U. S. Nuclear-Regulatory Commission September 15, 1998 Page 3 1

I M. S. Tuckman, being' duly sworn, states that he is Executive Vice  !

President-of Duke Energy Corporation; that he is authorized on the '

c-part of said Company to sign and file with the Nuclear Regulatory Commission revisions to the Facility Operating Licenses of Catawba Nuclear Station; and that all the statements and matters set forth

{

herein are true'and correct to the best of his knowledge.

K b. &  ;:

M. S. Tuckman, Executive Vice President i

1 Subscribed and sworn to before me this 1998 lh day of d ,.

i l

~

L )

- NotaEy Ptiblic My Commission Expires:

GeJ 22 2001 i

l .-

\. .

= >

! l l

4 l

l l

l  !

i l

l 1

l l

l l

l l

ENCLOSUREl 1 l

CATAWBA NUCLEAR STATION ,

1 i

PROPOSED LICENSE CONDITIONS i l

i i

I 1

\

l l

i 1

l l

l l

l l

l I

- - .. - - _ - - . . _ - - _ . . . - - . - . - . . - - - . . ~

4 PROPOSED LICENSE CONDITIONS Section 2.C (2) of the Facility Operating License, NPF-35 and NPF-52, should be revised to include the following additional subparagraph:

For Surveillance Requirements (SRs) that are new in Amendment [ ] to Facility Operating License NPF-35 (NPF-52 for Unit 2}, the first performance is due at the end of the first surveillance interval that begins at implementation of Amendment [ -]. For SRs that existed prior to Amendment [- ], including SRs with modified acceptance criteria and SRs whose intervals of performance is being extended, the first performance is due at the end of the first surveillance interval that begins on the date the Surveillance was last performed prior to implementation of Amendment [ ]. For SRs that existed prior to Amendment [ ], whose intervals of performance are being reduced, the first reduced surveillance interval begiis upon completion of the first surveillance performed after implementation of Amendment [ ].

Appendix D of the Facility Operating License, NPF-35 and NPF-52, should be revised to include the following additional paragraph:

Amendment Additional Condition implementation Number Date The licensee is authorized to relocate certain This amendment is requirements included in Appendix A to licensee- effective controlled documents. Implementation of this immediately and amendment shallinclude the relocation of these shall be requirements to the appropriate documents, as implemented by described in the licensee's letter dated May 27, January 31,1999.

1997 and amended by letters dated March 9, 1998, March 20,1998, April 20,1998, June 3, 1998, June 24,1998, July 7,1998, July 21,1998, August 5,1998, and September 8,1998 evaluated in the NRC staff's Safety Evaluation enclosed with this amendment.

l g: -yy , g ;,.y- - - r ,-e , - *-

mr. 3 - -