ML20128L071

Rev 1 to QC Instruction 2, Smud Nuclear Operations QA Audit Program

ML20128L071
Person / Time
Site:	Rancho Seco
Issue date:	11/01/1984
From:	SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT
To:
Shared Package
ML20128L011	List: ML20128L008 ML20128L040 ML20128L050 ML20128L071
References
2, NUDOCS 8505310280
Download: ML20128L071 (22)

Text

- - _ - , _ . _ _ _ m -- ___.___;,. 2 _- .c. _ _ u- 2;. ; : _----- - - _- - _ _- c_ _-- :------ - - - ,

7-3 .

f. ,

QCI NO. 2 7Q '

$SMUD~

SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT C 6201 S Street, P O. Box 15830. Sacramento, CA 95813; 1916) 452 3211 AN ELECTRIC SYSTEM SERVING THE HEART OF CALIFORNIA RANCHO SECO NO. 1 QUALITY CONTROL INSTRUCTION APPROVAL SHEET REVISION NO. O APPROVED BY:

MANAGER OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING ) 4!/1!@4 MANAGER OF NUCLEAR OPERATIONS &

'Ni I 'h MAtlAGER, QUALITY ASSURA? ICE M .aDjo W9 9 .- F fV MSRC CIIAIRMAN \ <b As 7 / "7

- \

)\ y i Crate, 1 REVISION NO. 1 APPROVED BY: 3 MAtlAGER OF flUCLEAR ENGINEERIllG d (, ,

MANAGER OF NUCLEAR OPERATIONS h 10 Cate 0

I-[m4fA1 MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE VM @ - ) - My Da;e

)

iiSRC C?!AIRtWI \(^:i

\ \! ,u.

/

s*-

, Cate v' \N }r " ' \

REVISICil NO. APPROVED BY:

MAtlAGER OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING Cate MAtlAGER OF NUCLEAR OPERATIOils Date MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE Cate Date REVISION NO. APPROVED 3Y:

MANAGER OF NUCLEAR ENGINEERING Cate MAtlAGER OF tiUCLEAR OPERATIONS

. Date MANAGER, QUALITY ASSURANCE Date Date r

% "i88!!! g ,

_g - ._ - -: - ___ _- -

e'

?. - QQI No. 2 Rev. 1 LRANCHO SECO UNIT N0. 1

h. QUALITY CONTROL INSTRJCTION (QCI)

Effective Date 11/1/84 TITLE: SMUD NUCLEAR OPERATIONS QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT PROGRAM

1. INTRODUCTION 1.1 Purpose The purpose of this progran is to provide for systematic, plannec audits of nuclear safety-related aspects of operation, mainten-ance, inspection, testing, modification, administration and the nuclear operations quality assurance program to verify that they are-in accordance with their respective license requirements.

1.2 Scope The audit progr.am described herein shall apply to nuclear safety-l related phases of work at the Rancho Seco No. 1 nuclear power plant during the operational life of the plant.

• ~

, 1.3 Referenced Documents

~

l This audit program complies with the guidance found in the follow -

ing documents: *

a. SMUD Nuclear Operations Quality Assurance Manual QAP F19, System Auditing

b. ANSI N18.7-1972, Administrative Controls for Nuclear Power Plants

c. ANSI N45.12, Requirements for Audi ting of Quality Assurance Program for Nuclear Power Plants

d. ANSI N45.2-1977, Quality Assurance Program Requirements for Nuclear Facilities

e. ANSI N45.2.,73-1978, Qualification of Quality Assurance Pro-gram Audit Personnel for Nuclear Power Plants

f. Management Safety Review Committee Charter 1.4 Definitions l Definitions of terms used in this procedure are defined in the following documents:

! < s l (s.

2-1 l

l

. _ . . - . . _ .. -- --_~~ - - - . - - = - . - - - -

~. .

[ '

1 (y QUALITY CONTROL' INSTRUCTION L NO. 2

a. ANSI N18.7-1972, except for the definition of Licensee Event-Reports which is found in NUREG 1022.

ANSI'N45.2.10, Quality Assurance Terms and Definitions

~b.

1.5 Review of' Audit' Program The-.results of audits and corrective action are reported t c top management in the following ways:

a. Management Safety Review Committee (MSRC) reviews the-audit findings and corrective actions done under their direction,

b. Audits made by the-Quality Assurance-group are trans-mitted to the Manager of Nu: lear Operations,~ Manager of Nuclear Engineering, MSRC msmbers, and other departmant managers whose areas were audited for their review-and action, and the Executive Director, Nuclear for review,

c. The Management Safety . Review Committee minutes a're sent to the General Manager and Chief Enginear for

. review.

d. -The Manager, Quality Assurance normally meets weekly with the Executfve Director, Nuclear to apprise him of the Quality Assurance Program,

e. Audit reports conducted by Quality Assurance and re-viewed by the MSRC shall be forwarded to the General Manager and Chief Engineer via the Audit Summary Repor' included 1tn the MSRC minutes.

The distribution of audits to all MSRC members, plus the audit summary documented in the minu.tes of eacn MSRC meeting provide objective evidence that the MSRC is reviewing the QA Audit Program.

2. AUDIT PERSONNEL I

2.1 Responsibility The Manager, Quality Assurance shall be responsible for establishing, planning, scheduling, implementing, report-ing, recording and providing followJp of this audit pro-gram.

.R 2-2 k

n-- -

~. . u ==n =-- -

( -

~

g f m._9 -QUALITY CONTROL INSTRUCTION NO. 2 2.2 Audit Team '

Audits of specific areas of nuclear plant or facilities

-activities shall be performed by audit teams.

2. 2.1: Membership The membership of audit teams shall be made up of the following:

a. Recuired

1) Au d i t team leader

b. Optional

1) Audit team members

2) Supplementary technical specialists who do not have organizational duties or responsi-bilities within the specific area being audited.

- O .

' \s,) 2.2.2 Education and Experience

a. Audit teaf leaders shallmeet the following quali-fications:

1) Participated in five Quality Assurance audits in the last three years, one of which shall be a nuclear quality assurance audit within one year of the-date of qualification.

2) Meet the qualifications listed in ANSI N45.2.12 and ANSI N45.2.23 which are based on the following:

i) Knowledge of NDE methods, auditing techniques, and code requirements and interpretations and/or

11) General knowledge of nuclear steam supply system concepts and operations and/or iii) Working knowledge of the area or acti-vity to be audited as evidenced by passing the qualifying examination for e'"'S that area or activity and/or U

2-3 m

-. _= - -- - - - - .

l s QUALITY CONTROL INSTRUCTION NO. 2 iv) On-the-job experience such as review -

of quality documents, providing ini-tial development of QA procedures or' audit checklists and attendance at QA or nuclear relhted meetings and seminars.

3) A point system shall be used- for evaluating lead auditor qualifications. The scoring of this evaluation, and the minimum accept-able score for lead auditor qualification, shall be.in accordance with section 2.3.1 of ANSI N45.2.23-1978.

b. . Audit team members (including team leaders) qualifications shall require an Associate or 1 Bachelors' degree in Engineering, Science, Mathematics, or Quality Assurance or equivalent in' experience.

c. . Supplementary technical specialists may be chosen to assist an audit team leader if the

"?Y person maintains the knowledge needed to per-s ,/ form a particular audit,

d. Auditorf that are not qualified by a training-program are selected on their background experience, basic, QA knowledge,.and on-the-job training.

e. An examination shall be given to all prospec-tive lead auditors to evaluate 1) oral and written communication skills, 2) knowledge of codes, standards, and regulations, 3) the Nuclear Operations Quality Assurance Manual, and 4) audit plannin'g and auditing techniques.

This examination may be oral or written, but in either case the content and results of the examination shall be documented and on file in the Quality Assurance office.

(

f. Lead auditor qualifications shall be reviewed annually to verify that requalification is-unnecessary. This review shall be documented.

Requalification shall include retraining, reexamination, and participation as an audit team member in at least one nuclear quality assurance audit.

b-v .

2-4 ,

3 _

W.

! =

M <.

I' 1c O . '

QUALITY CONTROL INSTRUCTION N0. 2

._ ,3 2:3 Authority LIn order to perform the audits required by-the applicable

-docu'ments procerly and judiciously, the audit team shall-be empowered with authority and. sufficient organizational freedom to accomplish the following:

a. Establish the existence and adequacy of documentation.

governing phases of the operation,- maintenance,- manage-ment administration and qual.ity assurance of the nuclear plants and the facilities in support of'these plants,

b. ' Audit selected proceduresrused by persons performing nuclear safety-related activities to verify that they adequately =descr'ibe the activity.in accordance-with quality assurance requirements.

c. Evaluate' activities "in process" to verify compliance with approved procedures.

'd. Evaluate-the training and qualification of operating,

. maintenance, quality assurance and support personnel,

e. Evaluate plant, activity following reportable occur-rences, including long-range programs designed to.

prevent the repetition of such occurrences. -

f. Initiate and recommend tentative solutions to defici-encies or nonconformances detected during the audit.

g. Verify-implementation of corrective actions.

h. Establish audit and re-audit requirements and sche-dules.

3. AUDIT COVERAGE 3.1 -General All activities, organizations, documentation, maintenance and modification activities, and personnel directly concerned with the' nuclear safety-related aspects / opera-tion of a functioning nuclear plant or acting in support thereto shall be subject to audit under this program.

While this document primarily-concerns itself with on-site activities, certain off-site functions such as management-

.j, policy decisions or independent review of documentation L , .

2-5

,.a- ,-p ex e .w--w-- m wwp .-

• 6e4 s *f=N- -aw

.____m

mm .

a . -s i.

_c QUALITY CONTROL INSTRUCTION NO. 2 i

directly- af fecting the design Land operation of' the nuclear

' facilities are also subject to audit.

3 '. 2 Audit Subje' cts'

~

Audits shall be conducted with specific attention-to the subjects (Attachment No. 1) at the required frequencies.

3.3 Compliance Safety-related activities affecting the Rancho Seco plant shall comply with and shall be audited against the follow-ing. requirements:

-3.3.1 Quality Assurance-Instructions

a. SMUD Nuclear Operations Quality Assurance Manual

b. Rancho Seco Unit No. 1 Quality Control Instruc-tions (QCIs)

.3.3.2 Plant Procedures-

.fx ;j a. Administrative Procedures

b. Surveilhance Test Procedures

c. Maintenance Procedures

d. Emergency Procedures

e. Security Plan-(Security Plan Implementing Procedures)

. f. Plant Operations Manual

g. Engineering Configuration Procedure, ECP-1 3.3.3 Regulations

a. Title 10, Code of Federal Regulations, Part 2,

" Rules of Practice"

b. Title 10, Code of rederal Regulations, Part 20,

" Standards for Protection against Radiation"

c. Title 10, Part 50, " Licensing of Production and Utilization Facilities,," including append-2-6

t _

~

M: ,

A~~

_.,; QUALITY CONTROL INSTRUCTION NO. 2

d. Title 10, Part 55, " Operators Licenses"

e. Title 10, Part 70, "Special Nuclear Material"

f. Title 10, Part 71, " Packaging of Radioactive Material for Transport and Transportation of Radioactive Material under Certain Conditions"

g. Title 10, Part 73, " Physical Protection of Plants and Materials"

h. Title 49, Parts 170-179,'" Packaging of Low-Level Radioactive Waste for Transportation and Burial" 3.3.4 License Requirements

a. Nuclear Plant Updated Safety Analysis Report

b. Nuclear Plant Technical Specifications 3.3.5 Operations-Qual.ity Assurance Organization The Manager, Quality Assurance shall provide for-an audit-of,his own organization by the following:

a. Assign this responsibility to another.gr.oup-in SMUD, and/or

b. Assign this re:ponsibility to a joint utilities management audit team and/or

c. Assign this responsibility to an outside con-sultant, and/or

d. Make arrangements for a subcommittee of the MSRC to conduct such an audit The results of this audit shall be reported to-the MSRC.

4. AUDIT SCHEDULING 4.1 Program Planning A systematic, documented program of routine scheduled audits shall be prepared and maintained by the Manager, Quality Assurance or his designated agent. The program of scheduled audits shall be coordinated with the Manager 2-7

e , _..- _ -- m. m_.__. -----__-

. s g' %

Q i_/ QUALITY CONTROL INSTRUCTION NO. 2 of. Nuclear Operations and other groups _or activities affecting_ nuclear plant safety. (Presented in Attachment' No. 1) 4.2' Frequency of Scheduled Aud'its All activities and. organizations responsible for the operation,-maintenance, control, administration or quality assurance of nuclear plants or facilities shall be subject to audit under this_ program not less frequently _than that shown on Attachment No. 1. The frequency of audits given in Attachment No. 1 can be varied by 30 days,.

'4.3 Unscheduled Audits Normally, audits shall be performed in accordance with the schedule discussed above; however, these scheduled audits '

may be supplemented by random, unscheduled audits. These audits will be conducted at-the discretion of the Manager, ,

Quality AssJrance or his agent on the basis of the follow-ing criteria:

O '

a. Af ter reportable occurrences or unusual events when directed by the MSRC Chairman (Licensee Event Reports

-and Spec i al ' Regorts )

o

b. After notification of finding of substandard perform-ance based on audits or reviews by governmental or regulatory agencies

c. After significant changes are made in functional and organizational structures, including reassignment or changes of key personnel

d. After expedient.or non-routine changes in plant design suspected to be unauthorized-or unapproved

e. After significant emergencies or natural disturbances.

calling for implementation of the Station Emergency plan

f. After strikes or work disruptions causing temporary reassignment of personnel

g. As'a result of special circumstances (Examples: An event that~causes major damage to property or equip-ment; changes in transportation or radioactive mater-n ial) 2-8

-[ ,

p,- ,

/"~) ~

._ ~ QUALITY CONTROL INSTRUCTION NO. 2

h. After significant changes in procedures or the QA program

i. When a condition arises.where safe operation:may be in jeopardy due to a deficiency in the QA program

j. When necessary to requalify a vendor or contractor due to uncertainty arising in his qualifications

k. Upon the suspicion, based on a review of plant opera-tions, that reportable occurrences or malfunctions have assumed a repetitive or non-routine nature

'5. ' AUDIT-IMPLEMENTATION 5.1 General Implementation of audits conducted under this program shall incl ude prepara tion, performance, reporting and f o l l )wup . The s.ignificant features of these steps are described in1the following paragraphs:

~

"(V ) 5.1.1 Special Audit NOTE: Special audits are those audits which are sepa7 ate from the regularly scheduled audits found in Attachment No. 1. Special audits may be directed by the MSRC or.the Manager, Quality Assurance.

Upon notification of his assignm'ent', the au'dit team leader shall prepare a written audit plan. As a minimum, this plan should include the following:

a. Audit activity

b. Identification of areas to be audited

c. Listing of applicable documents or classes of documents (e.g., manuals)

d. Identification of audit team members or supple-mentary technical specialists with a listing of any special assignment during the audit.

5.1.1.1 Exception Unscheduled audits, if performed in imme-

$[ O diate response to an emergency or report-

\; / able occurrence shall follow the' steps 2-9 L

s ,- ' .

QUALITY CONTROL INSTRUCTION NO. 2 outlined'by the Plant Review Committee -

(PRC).for the resolution of the problem-which precipitated the audit.

5.1.1.2 Routine Scheduled Audit The' routine scheduled audit (Attachment No. 1) covering repetitive functions at the operating site, may be performed without detailed planning but will' pro-vide for notification of. impending audit and exit meeting._ These audits are sent

~

to the MSRC as part of their audit pro-gram.

5.1.1.3 Updating Audit Checklists Audit checklistsoor procedures shal-I be, developed to provide guidance in auditing a particular area or activity. These checklists shall be based on requirements of the QA Manual and applicable code and

~N Changes in the QA

~

license provisio'ns.

~k/.

Program shall be promptly evidenced in the QA Manual. Changes in code or license previsions shall be transmitted to affectel QA group members by the Manager, Quality Assurance. These changes shall be reviewed by the responsible persons for knowledge and used in' developing or updating any audit checklists affected. In addition, the QA personnel may' hold seminars to acquaint auditors with up-to-date require-ments to be used in the audit program.

1 5.1.2 Team Orientation The team leader shall insure that the audit team members or supplementary' technical specialists are sufficiently prepared prior to the implementation of the audit. Team members should be provided with copies of the written audit plan and applicable standards,_ codes, regulatory requirements and background information as appropriate.

5.1.3 Audit Notification Notification of an impending audit shall be made

^#~N to the audited organization by the audit team

!- ks "

2-10 m __ _ . . _ _ _ , _ . _

_.  ; _ 7 .. - . . .

t

)

O .

_.. QUALITY CONTROL INSTRUCTION NO. 2 leader prior to th? conduct of the audit. Random, unscheduled audits may be conducted without prior notification except for prior agreement between the audit team leader and the Manager of Nuclear Operations.

5.2 Conduct of the Audit 5.2.1 Pre-Audit Conference The audit team leader of special. audits shall conduct a pre-audit meeting at the audit site with the audit team members and supplementary technical specialists and the cognizant supervisor of the audited organization .vhen practical, but it is not a requirement.

The purpose of this pre-audit meeting shall be to:

a. Introduce auditors

b. Meet counterparts

c. Outline the audit plan

[s, d. Discuss audit sequence

(,,/ e. Review previous audit results, when applicable

f. Arrange gost-audit conference 5.2.2 Audit Performance 5.2.2.1 The checklists or procedures prepared by the audit team leader shall be used to insure adequate depth and continuity of the audit. The checklist should call out s checking an adequate number of documents (i.e., NCRs, WRs, etc.) to insure'poten-tial problem areas are resolved.

5.2.2.2 The checklist may have two sections; major and minor i tems. Major is defined as those items that should be checked if at all possible. Minor items will be at the discretion of the auditor (s).

5.2.2.3 The checklists or procedures are to be used as guidelines and additional items may be added or deleted as deemed neces-sary by the audit team.

5.2.2.4 The depth of the audit shall depend upon f*' the present activities being performed.

2-11 w,_ ,4_., n <,eoe,. -,e - mm - ~ ~ * - - = -

w-

~.

.s- , .

10i -

" (.s QUALITY CONTR0L' INSTRUCTION.NO. 2

-and the results of previous audits and surveillances. .

-5.2.2.5 The audit shall include the evaluation of work areas, procedures, processes and items (where applicable), and the review of documents and records.

-5.2.2.6 Items not identified as; discrepancies, but indicating areas where work practices coulc be improved shall be brought to the atten-tion of-the responsible supervisor for his consideration. No. formal responses are necessary for these items.

5.2.2.7 Discrepancies found in procedures or manualsEduring audits shall tue reported as audit findings.

~

5.2.2.8 When any nonconformance-is found by an audit, further investigation shall be conducted in an effort to identify.the.-

O .

b& sic cause and effect of the nonconform-ance and to determine the extent of the cogrective action required.

5.2.2.9 Nonconformances shall be recorded as audit findings and acknowledged by a member of the audited organization.

5.2.3 Post-Audit Conference 5.2.3.1 A post-audit conference shall be conducted by the audit team leader with the respon-sible supervisor of the audited organiza-tion when deemed necessary by the audit team leader.

5.2.3.2 The objective of the post-audit confer-ence shall be to:

. a. Discuss the audit findings

b. Determine if there have been any errors or misunderstandings regarding the findings.

c. Clarify any misunderstandings and

. F.,$ reach an agreement on findings which

,s/ constitute a nonconformance.

12

i u ,

lD A_/ . QUALITY ASSURANCE DIRECTOR NO. 2,

d. Recommend improvements to responsible '

supervi,sor of the audited organization

e. Establish a commitment-to corrective action 5.3 Reporting and-Records 5.3.1 The Audit Report The formal' audit report shall be reviewed and approved by the audit team leader and should pre-ferably be issued no later than two weeks after completion of the audit. The report shall contain

, as a minimum, the following:

a. Summary of audit results

b. Detailed findings with respect to appropriate' subjects as delineated in Sections 3.2 and 3.3, i

respectively J'~5 c. Recommended corrective actions as appropriate

.h

d. Summary gf team leader of the audit team 5.3.1.1 Distribution Copies of the audit report shall be sent to the management-head of the organization which was audited and to the Manager, Qualit~y Assurance. The Manager, Quality Assurance is responsible for providing an audit summary with recommendations and

. comments to inform the MSRC on the status of the audit program. The Manager, Qualit/

Assurance shall notify the Executive Director, Nuclear concerning any signifi- x cant deficiencies in the Nuclear Opera-r tions Quality Assurance Program or i ts implementation.

5.3.2 Records Quality. Assurance shall maintain records of all audit reports including reports or re-audits, as appropriate. This QCI is the audit plan (refer-

/~

O 2-13

1. *eguw8eeseg> -m _ +-=---w,. .w .%... ...-

- - - - . -- .- - - - - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - - -

,c.:  :.

1;; f ., QUALITY CONTROL INSTRUCTION NO.~2 ence' ANSI'N45.2.12), the' individual plan i s the

• checklist, which is usually included as individual items insthe. audit report. The responses-to the-audit report.-including written replies and comple-tion'of. corrective action, will be filed with'the-audit-report or included in the followup audit.

in 5. 4' Audit Response and Followup Action 5.4.1- The audited group is responsible for deciding

-corrective action to be taken to resolve any non-

. conformances~ identified by QA audits.

5.4.2 The status of the followup action will be reported as follows: ,

.. a. Report by audited group

b. Monthly Followup Action Report developed by

. Quality Assurance 5.4.3 The Manager, Quality Assurance may provide for

.\- , audits of followup action for deficiencies in the j' following manner:

I

a. Utilizinf the next scheduled audit

b. Performance of the Closure of QA Followup Items Audit-(Attachment No. 1, Item 45)

c. Performing certain.special audits' based on scheduling, manpower capabilities and on the l magnitude or significance of the deficiency

d. The MSRC Chairman will direct a: memo t'o the appropriate department manager if a corrective action response has not been received within 30 working days of'the distribution date,

e. If a response is not received by the due date, the lack of' response will be added.to the MSRC agenda for discussion at the next scheduled MSRC meeting.

s Audit responses will be reviewed for accept-

3 ' f.

ability by the lead Auditor. His acceptance

, is identified by so stating, dating and i nitial-t ing the response.

C e

"(. .

2-14

, , g. ,y,-- ,.w=: -- % e>- 4%-..a ' s -

l

__ _ _ _ . _ . . . _ _ _ . . _ _ ~ _ - - - -

r ..

p -.

.. i

[l

._ QUALITY CONTROL INSTRUCTI0il NO. 2 9 Unacceptable responses are given to the Manager .

of-Quality Assurance for resolution. If resolu-tion is not reached with the audited organization ,

the problem is brought.to the MSRC for resolution .

'"E The MSRC minutes will' document the resolution.

'5.5 ' Analysis of Audit Trends and Corrective Action The MSRC shall determine if any trends deleterious'to plant. safety have been established and effect'any emedial action. This determination shal1~be based on their analy-sis of audit reports and comments provided by the Manager, Quality Assurance-and day-to-day. operational activities at the Rancho Seco No. 1 plant.

5.5.1 Corrective Actions .

The results of all actions taken to correct defici-encies occurring in facility equipment, structures, systems or method of operation that affect nuclear safety shall be' reviewed at least once per six (6) months.

4 )' 5 .'5 . 2 Trend Analysis

a. The MSRC shall direct a trend analysis to be conducted annually to the requirements of'QCI No. 13 to cover:

1) NCRs.

2) ECNs

3) LERs

4) NRC violations

5) Audit:

6) Radiological inci dent reports

7) Security degradation reports

8) Plant operation history

9) Serialized work requests

b. The report shall be given to the MSRC.

c. The report shall be given to the General Manager and Chief Engineer after MSRC review and approva' ,

'5.6 The performance of all activities required by the Quality Assurance Program to meet the criteria of Appendix 8, 10CFR50, at least once per two years.

O 2-15 W e4N *'m"-'*W a===&- -- "'4*O" '

4'*O 'WW "'

R

s..

' QUALITY CONTROL INSTRUCTION N0'. 2 5.6.1 .The MSRC s'ha11 annually: .

a. Assign an outside organization to review the

' Quality Assurance Program for compliance

.b . A report shall be given to the MSRC including all corrective-actions taken

c. '.A report'shall'be given to the General Manager and Chief Engineer after MSRC review and appro-val e

~

O -

8 O 2-16

'g' r

N-

r O O O

~

1 > ,

MSRC QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT. PROGRAM SCHEDULE SUGGESTED 1st 2nd '3rd 1th 2nd 3rd ACTIVITY AUDIT TO FREQUENCY Qtr Qtr Qtr Qtr Year Year

1. Records .NQA-1, Supplement 17-51 Yearly X*

2. Records of Personnel ANSI N45.2.12.5.3 Yearly X

, Performing Audits t

3. Audit Implementation ANSI N45.2.12.4 Yearly X*

QCl No. 2, QAP No.'19

4. Selection and Training ANSI N18.1. AP.700 Yearly X of Facility Staff Tech Spec 6.3 & 6.4 6

[ 5. Surveillance Program ANSI N18.7.5.1.7, AP. 303 Yearly X and Records SPs 200 through 214 sc

Tech Spec 6.8.1(c) M x -4 6a. Plant Security 10CfR73.55 6 months X X M*

Security Manual 5@

Tech Spec 6.8.1(d) gj

• O j b. Fence Barrier W Hanmond Memo 9/25/79 6 months X X [

t 5

c. Contingency Plan 10CfR50.54(p)(3) Yearly X g j 10CTR73.55(g)(4) g

, 10CfR73.40(d) H E

7. Maintenance Program ANSI N18.7.5.3.5 6 months X X 2 AP.3, QAP No. 6, P

QAP No. 13 m O

8. Radiological Safety ANSI N18.7 5.3.7 Yearly .

X and Control 10CFR20, 10CFR70 (Continued)

• MSRC Conmittee M tA-frRad Eipa i rf)A & Purchasing

o o _

a;,

MSRC QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT PROGRAM SCHEDULE

~

SUGGESTED 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 2nd 3rd ACTIVITY AUDIT TO FREQUENCY Qtr Qtr Qtr- Qtr Year Year Reg. Guide 1.21 Radiological Control Manual

~

IS 6.11 and 6.13

9. Inservice Inspection s

a. Power Piping ASME Section XI l 15 3.1.2.1, 4.2.2, 4.13 Refueling or o ajor

b. Steam Generators TS 4.17 Outage. Audit should Reg Guide 1.83 he concurrent with actual inspect ion

c. RX Building Tendons IS 4.4.2 wo

> Reg Guide 1.35 5 years

• 15-L RC

10. Materials Control .10CFRSO, Appendix B Yearlya X jQ Procedures & Documen- ANSI N18.7.5.3.9 m tation ANSI N45.2.13 Q2 QAP No. 4 QCI No. 4 2 2

on

11. Qualification of Inspec- ASME Section III, V & IX Yearly X O tion, Examination, & Reg Guide 1.58 -

". ,_ f, Testing Personnel IS 6.3.1, 6.4.1 2

^

U

12. Licensee Event Reports NUREG 1022 6 Months X X E

& Special Reports TS 1.8, 6.6,.6.9.4, 6.9.5 n 10CFRSO.72, 10CFRSO.73 '

2

13. Minutes of PRC PRC Charter 6 Months X X TS 6.5.1 i

14. Minutes of MSRC MSRC Charter 611onths X X N 7 TS 6.5.2 l 15. Safety Systems ilydrau- TS 4.14, 3.12 Yearly X

lic Snubbers

• Next inspection scheduled 1987

~

nv-- -

i- .

~

f -o MSRC QUAL 11Y ASSURAIKE AUDIT PROGRAM SEHEDULE IVITY M IT TG SliffiKTCD ist 2nd 3rd 4th 2nd 3rd FREQUENCY Qtr Qtr Qtr Qtr Year Year

16. Envirorunental Monitor- TS App. B 5.1.C 6 ffonths XA XA 1 ing Program TS 6.5.2.8.K .

17. Operational Logs & records TS 6.10 Yearly X j

?

AP.23 ,

!' 18. Operational Reporting TS 6.6, 6.7, 6.9 Yearly X Requirements Reg Guide 1.16, App A

19. Control & Accountability AP.16 Yearly X for Special Nuclear Mat'l 10CFR70

, 20. Logging of Operational AP.17 Yearly X

3 Transients e l

'i L, -}

, 21. Special Test Procedures AP.302 Yearly X

22. General IJarehousing AP.605 Yearly X r

QAP Nos. 10, 15, 17 gg

23. Configuration Control QAP No. 7, ECP-1 Yearly Y?

l X g;

24. Control of Measuring &

M*

j Reg Guide 1.33, AP.33 Yearly X

$8

! Test Equipment QAP 14, 2$

,i ANSI N18.7.5.3.6 Pg l' .

f l 25. Clearance Procedures QAP No. 25, AP.4 Yearly X E 4

ll' 26. Emergency Plan Ec:ergency Plan Manual Yearly X g TS 6.8.1(e) Q

. g ,

=e

. 5

~ >

l

.i

-r .y,.. . 7 - n - , , - . . - .-

c - ---

.j -

l' MSRC QUALITY-ASSURANCE AUDIT PROGRAM SCHEDULE SUGGESTED 1st- 2nd 3rd 4th 2nd 3rd ACTIVITY AUDIT TO FREQUENCY Qtr Qtr. Qtr ' Qtr Year Year '

I

27. Fire Protection QAP No. 28 Reg Guide 1.120 ANI Requirements TS 3.14 & 4.18 --

a. Compliance with Require- TS 6.5.2.h 2 Years X* .

,. ments & Implementing Procedures *

b. Inderendent Fire Protec- TS 6.5.2.8i Yearly X tion & Loss Prevention l c. Independent Fire Protec- TS 6.5.2.8j 3 Years X**

tion & Loss Prevention i by Outside Consultant

• t w b 28. Design Review QAP 2 QCI 5, ECP-1 Yearly X 3. o ,

ANSI N45.2.11 Qsi 10CFR 50.59 MC V-<

29. Backshift & Weekend Visit QCI No. 8

, Program 6 Months X X

'{g

, s.

on

! 30. Packaging of Low-Level 49CFR170-179 Yearly X ~P-Radioactive Waste for

[ 10CFR71

Transportation & Burial g l m.

m

31. Nonconformances QAP 17 QCl 1 3

6 Months X X h{

r>

32. (Combined with Item No. 4)  ; t

• E g

f%) .

i 33. Corrective Action TS'6.5.2.8c 6 Months X X QCI 7, QAP 27

34. Ilousekeeping QAP 23 Yearly X

• Next scheduled audit 1984

• • Next scheduled audit 1984 -

j

=-

i

;. l.

'(j 5

'16 i .4 f MSRC QUALITY ASSURANCE AUDIT PROGRAPI SCllEDULE ' I 1

i SUGGESTED 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 2nd 3rd-

• j ACTIVITY AUDIT 10 Qtr FREQUENCY Qtr Qtr Qtr Year Year

35. Operational QA Program Tech Specs (as required) Continual X X X X

36. Closure of Audits ANSI M45.2.12 . Yearly' X l 37. Cleanliness Reg Guide 1.37 -Yearly X ANSI R45.2.1-1973

38. Preventive Maintenance AP.650 Yearly X

39. Inspection QAP ho. 16 Yearly X

40. Special Processes QAP 9, QCis 101, 104, Yearly X

105, 106, 108, 109, 111, 112, 114 & M-113 e i I

r.

/,, 41. Document Control, QA QAP 18, QCI 9 Yearly X Manuals, Tech Specs & g CCL qE je;C

42. ALARA Program Reg Guide 8.8 Yearly J 50 X dn

43. MSRC Reconmendations MSRC Minutes Yearly 43 X gM f

.p

44. Vendor Audit Program Appropriate Standards As Required -

45. Closure of QA followup  % i Quarterly X X X X 'M

Items *

[~*

46. Abnormal Tags AP.26 Yearly X .E

47. Software Changes AP.52 Yearly X

! 48. Offsite Dose Calculation .TS 6.5. 2.8L , Of fsite

- 2 Years 1986 j Dose Calculation Manual

49. Process Control Program IS 6.i.2.'E 2 Years 1985 for Solidification of-Radioactive Wastes-NOTE:

a en Item 35 will be a combination audit / surveillance of Nuclear Operations -

. . , - ..,,.., , , ,~i na ar + 4. r,. i w , i s e e

34

.t r- s s

. r ., > 'i

\> > .1, MSRC quat.ITY ASSIRANCE AUDIT M10 GRAM SCHEDULE grMSIED 1st 2nd 3rd 4th 2nd 3rd

. ACTIVITY AUDIT TO FREQUENCY Qtr Qtr Qtr Qtr Year Year 1 .

l 50. Architech/ Engineers QA Program Annual

• 51 Pre-INPO Audit ** .

-t i

P

• ME

' CP 9 a.<

m xn

• E 52 p

z I l M

- g l 8 2

o l

t 5 m

l, -

• Will be en an annual basis for each Architech/ Engineer

• • Audit to be conducted 8 weeh, prior to scheduled INPO aut it l

l t

I l =

_