|
---|
Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS
MONTHYEARML20059C1861993-12-22022 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Amend 186,rev 1 Re Nuclear Organizational Changes ML20058L4371993-12-0909 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Amend 187 Including Changes Making PDTS Consistent W/New 10CFR20 Regulations ML20127N3671993-01-19019 January 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Section D6.0,administrative Controls for Proposed Amend 186 ML20246F1241989-07-0505 July 1989 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting App B in Entirety ML20245H5781989-06-22022 June 1989 Proposed Tech Specs for Amend 109 to License DPR-54 ML20245L0461989-04-27027 April 1989 Proposed Tech Specs for Proposed Suppl 1 to Amend 134 Re Application for Amend to License DPR-54,clarifying Unacceptability of Analysis Allowing Imperfections Greater than 40% of Nominal Tube or Sleeve Wall Thickness ML20235Y6071989-03-0606 March 1989 Proposed Tech Spec Page 4-17,including one-time Extension for Certain Surveillances Required to Be Performed by 890329 ML20245H8911989-02-28028 February 1989 Revised Proposed Tech Specs,Including Pages 3-30a,3-30b, 3-40a,3-45,3-46,4-18a & 4-75 Re Addition of Operating Requirements Designed to Provide Proper Limitations & Conditions on Reactor Bldg Pressure Equalization Operations ML20195F7701988-11-18018 November 1988 Proposed Tech Spec Section 3.4, Steam & Power Conversion Sys ML20206F2881988-11-15015 November 1988 Proposed Tech Specs 4.6.4.f (Page 4-34i) Re Surveillance of Equipment Required to Verify Vital 120 Volt Ac Bus Operability ML20205R8681988-11-0404 November 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Re Local Leakage Rate Tests & Reactor Bldg Containment Integrity ML20205M8971988-10-28028 October 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Re Nuclear Svc Battery Operability & Surveillance Requirements ML20205L2661988-10-25025 October 1988 Proposed Tech Spec Table 3.14-3, Carbon Dioxide Suppression Zones ML20155G2201988-10-0707 October 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Clarifying Operational Mode Applicability of Tech Spec 3.4 & Definition of Auxiliary Feedwater Sys Train ML20155B4591988-09-30030 September 1988 Proposed Tech Spec Sections 1,3,4,5 & 6,reflecting Numerous Editorial Corrections & Administrative Changes ML20155B8481988-09-30030 September 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reactor Protection Sys Trip Setting Limits,Rcs High Point Vents,Leakage & Leak Detection,Reactor Coolant Inventory & Auxiliary Electric Sys ML20154J5611988-09-19019 September 1988 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Local Leak Rate Test Requirements for Containment Penetrations ML20154D7591988-09-0808 September 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Controls,Onsite & Offsite Organizations & Facility Staff ML20153E6481988-08-31031 August 1988 Proposed Tech Specs on Limiting Condition for Operation Re Containment Isolation Valves ML20207C0831988-07-27027 July 1988 Revised Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Rev 1 to Proposed Amend 102,deleting App B ML20196A2281988-06-21021 June 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Providing Proper Limitations & Conditions on Reactor Bldg Pressure Equalization Operations During Power Operation & Modifying Existing Purge Sys Operation Requirement ML20155K0971988-06-14014 June 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Making Minor Corrections to Table 3.5.5-1, Accident Monitoring Instrumentation,Items 5 & 14 & Table 4.1-1 Items 65 & 92 & Adding Second Note to Table 4.1-1,Item 80 ML20195J4921988-06-10010 June 1988 Proposed Tech Spec Pages 4-69 Through 4-85a,modifying Radiological Effluent Tech Specs to Reduce Count Time Required for prebatch-release Sample Analysis ML20150D1861988-03-17017 March 1988 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting Typos & Making Further Editorial Changes to Proposed Amend 139,dtd 860129 ML20196G5131988-03-0101 March 1988 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Tech Spec 4.1-1,Item 44.c & Tech Spec 4.10.1.E.2 Re Total Quantity of Gaseous Chlorine in Restricted Area ML20147F0771988-02-25025 February 1988 Revised Proposed Tech Spec Table 4.1-1 & Tech Spec 4.10.1.E.2,requiring Performance of Surveillances Only When Gaseous Chlorine Onsite ML20149K8621988-02-12012 February 1988 Proposed Tech Spec 6.5.1.6.d,identifying Items Not Requiring Plant Review Committee Review ML20196D9091988-02-11011 February 1988 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding Term Dewatering to Process Control Program ML20149G1781988-02-0808 February 1988 Proposed Page 3-19 to Tech Spec 3.3, Emergency Core Cooling,Reactor Bldg Emergency Cooling & Reactor Bldg Spray Sys ML20196B8071988-02-0101 February 1988 Proposed Tech Spec Figure 6.2-2, Nuclear Organization Chart ML20148J3531988-01-13013 January 1988 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Proposed Amend 165,adding Ventilation Radiation Monitor to Interim Onsite Storage Bldg.Related Info Encl ML20149E5971988-01-0606 January 1988 Proposed Tech Spec 3.6,consolidating Applicability Requirement for Containment Integrity in Applicability Statement ML20149E1591987-12-23023 December 1987 Proposed Tech Specs Incorporating Accident Monitoring Instrumentation Recently Installed or Upgraded ML20149E8591987-12-22022 December 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Establishing New Set Lower Limits of Detection for Prebatch Release & Composite post-release Analyses ML20237D1171987-12-15015 December 1987 Proposed Tech Spec Section 3.5.5, Accident Monitoring Instrumentation & Table 3.5.5-1, Accident Monitoring Instrumentation Operability Requirements, Changing Page Ref & Wording,Respectively ML20236W8671987-12-0303 December 1987 Proposed Tech Spec,Combining Tech Specs 3.3.1.E & 3.3.1.F for Nuclear Svc Cooling & Raw Water ML20236V7961987-11-25025 November 1987 Proposed Tech Spec Figures 6.2-1 & 6.2-2,reflecting Util Corporate Support of Nuclear Safety & Nuclear Organization Chart,Respectively ML20236U3361987-11-25025 November 1987 Proposed Tech Specs Page 1-2b,adding Words to Effect That 3.25 Factor Applicable to Three Consecutive Time Intervals Will Be Reset to Begin After Next Surveillance ML20236U0821987-11-25025 November 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Suppl 1 to Rev 0 to Proposed Amend 164 ML20236S0881987-11-17017 November 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Suppl 2 to Rev 2 to Proposed Amend 147,concerning Diesel Generators ML20236P3511987-11-0606 November 1987 Proposed Tech Specs Re Limiting Condition for Operation of Instrumentation Sys ML20236K3921987-11-0202 November 1987 Proposed Tech Spec Table 6.2-1, Shift Crew Personnel & License Requirements & Pages 6-7 & 6-8,adding non-licensed Personnel,Statement Re Limiting Representation to Minority of Quorom & Lers,Respectively ML20236D6601987-10-23023 October 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Providing Exception to Requirement That key-operated Shutdown Bypass Switch Not Be Used During Reactor Power Operation ML20235R4261987-10-0303 October 1987 Proposed Radiological Effluent Tech Specs,Incorporating Clarifications & Correcting Editorial Errors ML20235Q5111987-10-0101 October 1987 Proposed Tech Specs Re Comparison of Plant Tech Specs to STS ML20235F5301987-09-22022 September 1987 Proposed Tech Specs Consisting of Supplemental Info to Proposed Amend 147,Rev 2 Re Diesel Generator Outages ML20235F4641987-09-21021 September 1987 Proposed Tech Specs Changing Requirements Re Concentration of Oxygen in Waste Gas Holdup Sys to Provide for When Sys Free of Potentially Explosive Gases,For Example,During Maint ML20234D6591987-09-16016 September 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Reflecting Addl Organizational Changes Due to Need for Addl Mgt Staffing for Present Outage & from Expansion of long-term Mgt Function ML20238E8351987-09-0808 September 1987 Corrected Tech Spec Page 4-47c to Proposed Amend 151 to License DPR-54,adding ...Will Be Exceeded Prior to Next Scheduled Snubber Svc Life... to Last Paragraph of Tech Spec 4.14f ML20236M3531987-07-31031 July 1987 Proposed Tech Specs,Clarifying Proposed Limiting Conditions of Operation & Addl Surveillance Requirements for Emergency Feedwater Initiation & Control Sys 1993-12-09
[Table view] Category:TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS & TEST REPORTS
MONTHYEARML20203H7501997-08-19019 August 1997 Rev 10 to Radiological Environ Monitoring Program Manual ML20203H7351997-02-10010 February 1997 Rev 9 to CAP-0002, Off-Site Dose Calculation Manual ML20203H7231997-01-21021 January 1997 Rev 9 to Radiological Environ Monitoring Program Manual ML20059C1861993-12-22022 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Amend 186,rev 1 Re Nuclear Organizational Changes ML20058L4371993-12-0909 December 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Amend 187 Including Changes Making PDTS Consistent W/New 10CFR20 Regulations ML20127N3671993-01-19019 January 1993 Proposed Tech Specs Section D6.0,administrative Controls for Proposed Amend 186 ML20059E0191990-08-0303 August 1990 Rev 0 to CAP-0002, Odcm ML20059E0141990-01-31031 January 1990 Rev 0,App a to CAP-0002, Odcm ML20059E0241989-11-22022 November 1989 Rev 3 to Environ Monitoring & Emergency Preparedness ML20246A4081989-08-16016 August 1989 Rev 5 to Inservice Testing Program Plan ML20245L7281989-07-18018 July 1989 Rev 5 to Administrative Procedure RSAP-0101, Nuclear Organization Responsibilities & Authorities ML20246F1241989-07-0505 July 1989 Proposed Tech Specs,Deleting App B in Entirety ML20246A5221989-06-30030 June 1989 Closure Plan ML20245H5781989-06-22022 June 1989 Proposed Tech Specs for Amend 109 to License DPR-54 ML20246E8551989-04-30030 April 1989 Analysis of Capsule RS1-F Smud Reactor Vessel Matl Surveillance Program ML20245L0461989-04-27027 April 1989 Proposed Tech Specs for Proposed Suppl 1 to Amend 134 Re Application for Amend to License DPR-54,clarifying Unacceptability of Analysis Allowing Imperfections Greater than 40% of Nominal Tube or Sleeve Wall Thickness ML20235Y6071989-03-0606 March 1989 Proposed Tech Spec Page 4-17,including one-time Extension for Certain Surveillances Required to Be Performed by 890329 ML20245G1941989-02-28028 February 1989 Procurement Engineering Assessment Plan Final Rept ML20245H8911989-02-28028 February 1989 Revised Proposed Tech Specs,Including Pages 3-30a,3-30b, 3-40a,3-45,3-46,4-18a & 4-75 Re Addition of Operating Requirements Designed to Provide Proper Limitations & Conditions on Reactor Bldg Pressure Equalization Operations ML20195F7701988-11-18018 November 1988 Proposed Tech Spec Section 3.4, Steam & Power Conversion Sys ML20206F2881988-11-15015 November 1988 Proposed Tech Specs 4.6.4.f (Page 4-34i) Re Surveillance of Equipment Required to Verify Vital 120 Volt Ac Bus Operability ML20205R8681988-11-0404 November 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Re Local Leakage Rate Tests & Reactor Bldg Containment Integrity ML20205M8971988-10-28028 October 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Re Nuclear Svc Battery Operability & Surveillance Requirements ML20205L2661988-10-25025 October 1988 Proposed Tech Spec Table 3.14-3, Carbon Dioxide Suppression Zones ML20155G2201988-10-0707 October 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Clarifying Operational Mode Applicability of Tech Spec 3.4 & Definition of Auxiliary Feedwater Sys Train ML20155B8481988-09-30030 September 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Re Reactor Protection Sys Trip Setting Limits,Rcs High Point Vents,Leakage & Leak Detection,Reactor Coolant Inventory & Auxiliary Electric Sys ML20155B4591988-09-30030 September 1988 Proposed Tech Spec Sections 1,3,4,5 & 6,reflecting Numerous Editorial Corrections & Administrative Changes ML20206A8151988-09-28028 September 1988 Rev 0 to, Effluents & Water Mgt Project Action Plan ML20154J5611988-09-19019 September 1988 Proposed Tech Specs,Changing Local Leak Rate Test Requirements for Containment Penetrations ML20154D7591988-09-0808 September 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Re Administrative Controls,Onsite & Offsite Organizations & Facility Staff ML20153E6481988-08-31031 August 1988 Proposed Tech Specs on Limiting Condition for Operation Re Containment Isolation Valves ML20151K1041988-07-28028 July 1988 Rev 0 to Special Test Procedure STP.668, EFIC High/Medium Decay Heat Test ML20207C0831988-07-27027 July 1988 Revised Proposed Tech Specs,Consisting of Rev 1 to Proposed Amend 102,deleting App B ML20151H6131988-07-15015 July 1988 Rev 0 to Matl Control Dept Action Plan for Rancho Seco Nuclear Generating Station ML20196A2281988-06-21021 June 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Providing Proper Limitations & Conditions on Reactor Bldg Pressure Equalization Operations During Power Operation & Modifying Existing Purge Sys Operation Requirement ML20155K0971988-06-14014 June 1988 Proposed Tech Specs Making Minor Corrections to Table 3.5.5-1, Accident Monitoring Instrumentation,Items 5 & 14 & Table 4.1-1 Items 65 & 92 & Adding Second Note to Table 4.1-1,Item 80 ML20195J4921988-06-10010 June 1988 Proposed Tech Spec Pages 4-69 Through 4-85a,modifying Radiological Effluent Tech Specs to Reduce Count Time Required for prebatch-release Sample Analysis ML20151R0641988-04-15015 April 1988 Rev 0 to STP.1154, Remote Shutdown Panel Test ML20151X3211988-04-0606 April 1988 Rev 1 to Procedure Development Project Action Plan for Temporary & Interim Procedure Change Incorporation as Procedure Rev ML20151V5871988-04-0202 April 1988 Rev 1 to Sys Engineering Action Plan SYSTEM-012, CRD Breaker Action Plan ML20151X2871988-03-31031 March 1988 Rev 0 to Sys Engineering Action Plan SYSTEM-009, Letdown Cooler Thermal & Hydraulic Shock Prevention ML20150D1861988-03-17017 March 1988 Proposed Tech Specs,Correcting Typos & Making Further Editorial Changes to Proposed Amend 139,dtd 860129 ML20196G5131988-03-0101 March 1988 Proposed Tech Specs,Revising Tech Spec 4.1-1,Item 44.c & Tech Spec 4.10.1.E.2 Re Total Quantity of Gaseous Chlorine in Restricted Area ML20147F0771988-02-25025 February 1988 Revised Proposed Tech Spec Table 4.1-1 & Tech Spec 4.10.1.E.2,requiring Performance of Surveillances Only When Gaseous Chlorine Onsite ML20147B1761988-02-15015 February 1988 Rev 0 to RECM-6878, Radiological Effluent Control Manual ML20148D9931988-02-12012 February 1988 Post-Trip Transient Investigation,Assessment & Reporting ML20149K8621988-02-12012 February 1988 Proposed Tech Spec 6.5.1.6.d,identifying Items Not Requiring Plant Review Committee Review ML20196D9091988-02-11011 February 1988 Proposed Tech Specs,Adding Term Dewatering to Process Control Program ML20149G1781988-02-0808 February 1988 Proposed Page 3-19 to Tech Spec 3.3, Emergency Core Cooling,Reactor Bldg Emergency Cooling & Reactor Bldg Spray Sys ML20196B8071988-02-0101 February 1988 Proposed Tech Spec Figure 6.2-2, Nuclear Organization Chart 1997-08-19
[Table view] |
Text
- - _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ - _ - _ . - _ _ _ _ _ _ _ . . _ ._
RANCHO SECO UNIT 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Surveillance Standards 4.17- STEAM GENERATORS Applicability Applies to inservice inspection of the steam generator tubes.
Obiective To verify the operability and structural integrity of the tubing as part of the reactor coolant boundary.
Specification Each steam generator shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by performar.ce of the following augmented inservice inspection program and the requirements of Specification 1.3. .
4.17.1 Steam Generator Samo*,e Selection and Insoection Steam generator tuting shall be demonstrated OPERABLE by selecting and inspecting steem generators as specified in Table 4.17-1.
4.17.2 Steam Generator Tube 3 amole Selection and Insoection The steam generator tube minimum sample size, inspection result classification, and the corresponding action required shall be as g
specified in Table 4.17-2A. The inspection result classification and the corresponding action required for inspection of " specific limited areas" (see paragraph 4.17.2e) shall be as specified in Table 4.17-28. The inservice inspection of steam generator tubes shall be performed at the frequencies specified in Specification 4.17.3 and the inspected tubes shall be verified acceptable per Specification 4.17.4. The tubes selected for these inspections '
shall include at least 3% of the total number of tubes in both steam generators and be selected on a random basis except:
- a. If experience in similar plants with similar water chemistry indicates critical areas to be inspected, then at least 50% of the tubes inspected shall be from these critical areas.
- b. The first sample inspection during inservice inspection (subsequent to the first inservice inspection) of each steam k.. generator shall include:
$ 1. All tubes that previously had detectable wall 48 penetrations (>20%), that have not been plugged or sleeve repaired in the affected area, o
O 2. All sleeves that previously had detectable wall penetrations (>20%) that have not been plugged, and Amendment No. 13, 76, 706, 109 4 4-51
RANCHO SECO UNIT 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS i l
Surveillance Standards
~
4.17.2 (continued)
- 3. Tubes in those areas where experience has indicated ,
potential problems.
- c. The second and third sample inspections during each inservice inspection may be less than a full tube inspection by concentrating (selecting at least 50% of the tubes to be inspected) the inspection on those areas of the tube sheet array and on those portions of the tubes where tubes with imperfections were previously found,
- d. A tube inspection (pursuant to Specification 4.17.4.5) shall be performed on each selected tube. If any selected tube does not permit the passage of the eddy current probe for a tube inspection, this shall be recorded and an adjacent tube shall be selected and subjected to a tube inspection. (" Adjacent" is interpreted to mean the nearest tube capable of being inspected.) Tubes which do not permit passage of the eddy current probe will be considered as degraded tubes when classifying inspection results.
- e. Tubes in specific limited areas which are distinguished by unique operating conditions and/or physical construction (for example, tubes adjacent to the open inspection lane or tubes whose 15th tube support plate hole is not broached but drilled) may be excluded from random samples if all such tubes in the i specific area of a steam generator are inspected. No credit will be taken for these tubes in meeting minimum sample size requirements.
The results of each sample inspection shall be classified into one of the following three categories:
CAtR90ly 1H1p3ction Re_siti C-1 Less than 5% of the total tubes inspected are degraded tubes and none of the inspected tubes are defective.
C-2 One or more tubes, but not more than 1% of the total tubes inspected are defective, or between 5% and 10% of the total tubes inspected are degraded tubes. ,
C-3 More than 10% of the total tubes inspected are degraded tubes or more than 1% of the inspected tubes are defective.
Note: In all inspections, previously degraded tubes mus exhibit significant (>10%) further wall penetrations to be included in the above percentage calculations. l Amendment No. 13, 76, 106, 109 4-52
RANCHO SECO UN8T 1 TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS Surveillance Standards 4.17.4 Definitions
- a. As used in this Specification:
' 1. Imperfec11pn means an exception to the dimensions, finish or contour of a tube from that required by fabrication drawings or specifications. Eddy-current testing l
L indications of less than 20% of the nominal tube wall thickness, if detectable, may be considered as imperfections.
- 2. Degradation means a service-induced cracking, wastage, wear or general corrosion occurring on either inside or outside of a tube.
- 3. Dearaded Tube means a tube in the pressure boundary l containing imperfections 120% of the nominal wall thickness caused by degradation.
- 4. Defect means an imperfection 140% of the nominal tube or sleeve wall thickness. A tube or sleeve containing a defect in its pressure boundary is defective and shall either be plugged or repaired by sleeving. Tube sleeving must be in accordance with the methodology approved by NRC for use at Rancho Seco.
- 5. Tube Insoection means an inspection of the steam
- generator tube from the point of entry completely to the point of exit (except as noted in 4.17.2c and 4.17.4a.6).
- 6. Soecial Area Tubes include those tubes which have shown a significant amount of degradation throughout their operating history. These include peripheral tubes and lane region tubes designated in Tables 4.17-4 and 4.17-5.
b, The steam generator shall be determined OPERABLE after completing the corresponding actions required by Table 4.17-2A (and Table 4.17-2B if provisions of paragraph 4.17.2e are utilized). - i
- c. Each steam genernor shall not have more than 5,000 tubes repaired by sleeving.
4.17.5 Reports
- a. Following each inservice inspection of s' team generator tubes, the number of tubes plugged or repaired in each steam l l generator shall be reported to the Commission within 30 days.
- b. The results of the steam generator tube inservice inspection shall be included in a Monthly Operating Report for the period in which this inspection was c-ompleted. This report shall include:
Amendment No. 13, 66, 76, 106, 109 4-54
l
~
RANCHO SECO UNIT 1 TECHNICAL SPECZF! CATIONS
- Surveillance Standards Baiel The Surveillance Requirements for inspection of the steam generator tubes ensure that the structural. integrity of this portion of the RCS will be maintained. The surveillance requirements of steam generator tubes are l
based on a modification of B&W - Standard Technical Specifications dated June 1, 1976. Inservice inspection of steam generator tubing is essential
'in order to maintain surveillance of the conditions of the tubes in the event that there is evidence of mechanical damage or progressive degradation due to design, manufacturing errors, or inservice conditions that lead to corrosion. Inservice inspection of steam generator tubing also provides a means of characterizing the nature and cause of any tube degradation so that I corrective measures can be taken. For example, historical data has shown that certain areas of the steam generators are particularly susceptible to
'~
corrosion and degradation. Consequently, the inservice inspection now includes provisions for a more in-depth inspection of a Special Area group of tubes specified in Table 4.17-4 and Table 4.17-5. The surveillance requirements for inspection of the steam generator tubes are applicable to all tubes, including those previously repaired by sleeving.
Operational. experience has shown that tube defects can be the result of unique operating conditions or physical arrangements in certain areas of the steam generators. A full inspection of all of the tubes in such limited areas will provide complete assurance that degraded or defective tubes in these areas are detected. Because no credit is taken for these distinctive tubes in the constitution of the first sample or its results, the requirements for the first sample are unchanged. This requirement is Essentially- equivalent to and meets the intent of the requirements set forth 9 in NRC Regulatory Guide 1.83, Revision 1 and does not reduce the margin of safety provided by those requirements.
Hastage-type defects are unlikely with AVT chemistry treatment of the se:ondary coolant. However, even if a defect should develop in service, it will be found during scheduled inservice steam generator tube examinations. ,
Repair or plugging will be required for defective tubes. Steam generator l tube inspections of operating plants have demonstrated the capability to reliably detect degradation that has penetrated 201. of the original tube wall thickness.
Degraded steam generator tubes can be repaired by the installation of sleeves which span the area of degradation and serve as a replacement pressure boundary for the degraded portion of the tube, thus permitting the tube to remain in service. Total tube sleeving is limited to 5,000 tubes in each steam generator due to cumulative increased pressure drop through the steam generator tubes as more and more are sleeved. I Whenever the results of any steam generator tubing inservice inspection fall into Category C-3, the Commission will be notified within 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> and the results shall be reported pursuant to Specification 6.9.5P. Such cases will I be considered by the Commission on a case-by-case basis and may result in a requirement for analysis, laboratory examinations, tests, additional eddy current inspection and revision of the Technical Specifications, if necessary.
Amendment No. 13, 66. 76, 106, 109 4-55a
_ tt r
_ cci eaf f
d emf e dro r s o N i re rft O u e i b rl I q A A n o
au iaeu pps A A A
/
A
/
T e / / pt / /
C R N N N e e e N N N N E re rd r P n v n s S o ri ra3 d N i ot o - e r I t c sCl
_ a c ge ge p ub rm d E A uf
_ n L l e l uoa a P Pd Ptf s t M
_ S A S
e c D n R a 3 l
l i t e l v u A A 1 2 3 A A A A r s / / - - - / / / /
u e N N C C C N N N N S R d d r es eso .
t e t e s cb cbge e e eud eeuub v v e ft n bftl u i i 2l f a f pt
- p t
c e t
c t
l Cm b eal l a .tal o lde e h e u a nae snnanv f t . f s rs na rrena ai et G.
eme d rr o
fd a
coc taiba aucoc t
.tc d dcf e eoS o e n t ed pt t e r rp rf3l no s pee s e p G. f N i s5s r p oc tdst retd sSe N
O O
I iuq e an4i pi h iaeCm pp a e i e ts cenc ezieriezis vcen d I T e A n e lt e rs n c fi f otfi ,i hi r S T C R j/ o rda rdo o af el ,f cel N C E N nnn nft N o d aaagedaat a O E P n l
raoi ra s m ce uf ce p 1 I F S o o i o nr rt f ornl ef orne Il a i pd Il ai r T S N i st s geif soi ol TA N I t g ei e f u IC A I c ubdb ubt rf ) )
NI 2 E A l ud u l ucf 4e a b UF - E L Ptat Pt ao Pr ( (
I 7 B P -
OC 1 U M CE T A EP 4 S r r r SS R e e e E O D hs h s h s OL L T N ti ti ti HA CC B
A A
R 2 t l
o . o. o.
NI E u A 2 3 he G.1-T he G. 3-1 AN N s / - - - he G. 2-RH F e N C C C TSC TSC TSC C G R E
T M A
E T
S e e evo l v cot l o i . s nb at t re aad h .
c G. obs d e stP e S ue rei C n5 eohl Rda d
e f
et s gtb u u . nh ct p N nu9 r c p as i
d cfi eoh sl epv e t G. o t -
afo a . o r6 u rp t su u ,i5Swnoin t b q i s5 sA rpn e an2 n t .t2c rl i sa2 nu o R pi et el s t - oodi 5 G. f ch on i
e l .l n7 ih et n rdas 6Seetf o G. s i uo1 t t a o nre dpo i a4 rc i raob ts s mtSet4 c oi t o i u ci r ner c rc i npf c stt ehiih oer ee fi ei A e gei pt a tf p se h p'b t
ihr c n ubdG s pd rsht tt e o l udh nnennenti na oiep N Pt at Ii raiPi owiT N wbS N
O I
T t C l E u 1 2 3 P s - - -
S e C C C N R I
E L
P f M e o A z S
iS mer uh e T mt p S e I l p
inf s i oe .
m m bu G.
a S ASTS
s y d f r ib e .
a t P d
n
nl a A a9 t E dh S R ns6 A a e tn c D s sro s n E e eoi e a T b b pt b l I u uea u l M t trc t i I i e L e eaf e v v v i v r C i idc i u I d t t ne t S F e c cap c I r e e S e C f f s f E iuq e ero d
e P d d ut S e o
" R A A A A r rht r
/ / / / i i n i A n N N N N a a4a a o p p u p F i e ens e O t r rir r c h u N A r rt p r O o oi o I wd T e g g e e g C n u uCl n u E o l lRi o l P N P PNf N P S
N I
N E O L t I P l S T M u A A A A 1 2 3 1 2 N C A s / / / / - - - -
O E S e N h N N C C C C C 1 I P R T S D TA N N IC B I 2 NI 2 t UF - E n I 7 B sa da OC 1 U ru g ne CE T us n ar EP 4 .or i aot SS R s sh u sd s t r M 3L E
L O
T b e e b4 p en b o up eg bnnp o
KA B A u u d ui o e tdi ro CC A R A" t t ne t s NI T E E il e nt t AN N R e ehi . er eoaa RH E A v vtfP vr vpc sid n t
C G i ii 5 i o E D t t we t c it ef na .
T M E c c b9 c criauP A T e eC ef . ert s5 E I d f fRl5 f oG f oorr T M e e eNl e S ecNru9 up S I r d d an d%T d o
L i oh o 0O f 6 u r rt si r0 ro .hd en C q i t i1 r i G I e iap ant a porc a
pth e a%S4l o p0T F R ii I e eioi ect e0Onf t C n r rt pf reo r1 a E o aei p rhi ec P i r rcrc rs n rt etbi S t o oi e oni ochi f
" c f ap i et wli A e g gi S e g a gpo l c A n u utd n ud e us Cae o l l ono o l nr l nnRh p F N P PNat N P aa PiiN sS O
N O
I T t 1 2 3 1 2 3 C l - - - - - -
E u C C C C C C P s S e N R I
E L
P s M e aG a A r eS eG S i sT rS S AO AT T O S e fh f I l ot oe p o n m %b %o a 0 0 S 0n 1 i _ 0n 1i