ML20206A815
| ML20206A815 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Rancho Seco |
| Issue date: | 09/28/1988 |
| From: | Kemper W, Melancon S, Yochheim E SACRAMENTO MUNICIPAL UTILITY DISTRICT |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20206A775 | List: |
| References | |
| PROC-880928, NUDOCS 8811150269 | |
| Download: ML20206A815 (29) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ - _ _ _ _ _ .
, , , '/ '
o e ATTACl2DTP A EFFLUENTS & WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT ACTION PLAN Revision 0 September 28, 1988 i
do 7f j 'v Stepheh Melancon, Project Manager k'
Eric Yochheim, Manager, Chemistry !
.//y x Vf -
/~'
William Kemper/ , Manager, Nuclear Operations
- /
// lAA.1 "
w_ ~~
r I/
Roge Huebner, Manager , Nuclear Projects l 1
j
/ Bob Croley, AGM T chnical Services i
(
I pp 6i k .
P u'
. b
.. i.
, e EFFLUENTS & WATER MANAGEMENT PROJECT ACTION PLAN "
J TABLE OF CONTENTS I
6 EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 SCOPE 2.1 PROJECT TEAM i
2.2 NUCLEAR ENGINEERING 2.3 MAINTENANCE 2.4 PLANT PERFORMANCE 2.5 OPERATIONS I
2.6 CHEMISTRY 3.0 SCHEDULES '
4.0 RESOURCE REQUIREMENTS !
5.0 PROJECT CONTROLS 6.0 APPENDICES l
l l
l l
I t
.I 3
i 1
l l
i V
. _ _ . _ . _ _ _ _ . _ _ . . _ _ __ _ , _ _ ~ , _ _ _ _ . _ . _ ___ . _ , _ . . _
i 4
\
EXECUTIVE
SUMMARY
i
- ^:'::: :::: .":::c ::::':::::1::::::::"::::: :: :'::::::
f . . t Management" (E&WM). Most of the actions specified in the first two action plans have been completed. The nature of these actions was predominantly remedial and oriented toward alleviating specific concerns. These actions included procedure and surveillance development, program development, assignment of line organization responsibilities, etc. The latest Action Plan (May 1988), although still oriented toward specific concerns, tentatively addressed prograramatic concerns and r3 commended some d
major plant modifications.
All of the individual issues and concerns designated in the 9
previous action plans ara further specified by cognizant Rancho j Seco personnel (as well as outside agencies), however, can be consolidated into three basic issues:
)
i 1. Current Storm Drain and Effluent System Drain design does not sufficiently prohibit th'a unplanned release of liquids containing (albeit in extremely small I
! quantities) hazardous material or radioactivity, i
i
- 2. Current secondary plant design is inadequate to manage, with sufficient margin (10 CFR 50 APP I guidelines), the waste water generated during normal plant operation.
- 3. Current secondary plant design is inadequate to manage the waste water generated during plant operation under Steam Generator Tube Leak conditions.
After reviewing the current status of the E&WM effort, Project ~
Management initiated efforts on a number of the items identified in the previously approved action plans and assumed the l coordination responsibilities for those items that were already in progress. Current project activities, in consolidated form, are outlined in Table E.1. (The individual tasks and a brief status of each are outlined in Appendix III.)
Although the major E&WM areas of concern are identified, specific issues in addition to those currently being addressed may arise in the process of or as a result of project execution. Should additional issues ariue, they will be investigated and assessed as to whether the resolution should be added to the scope of this
- project.
1
)
t I
4
, . '. 4 ' i l
l The sbort and near term tusks associated with this project (outlined in Appendix I) are scheduled for completion within six months. The long term modifications (outlined in Appendix II)
- are scheduled for completion in 1990. None of the currently :
t projected modifications require plant refueling outage conditions t for implementation. Entry into "LCOs" will likely be required, however, for final tie-in type work on several of the projected
- tasks.
i 4
The total costs for the entire project are presently estimated to be $12,900,000. The estimated expenditure (actual-to-date l r
included) for 1988 is $1,800,000. The remaining $11,100,000 is
] slated for 1989 and the first half of 1990. At this time the major plant modifications anticipated as a result of this project are still in the conceptual stages and the current "Best Guess" l
\
estimate of $10,000,000 (as indicated in Appendix II) accounts i l for the majority of the estimated $12,900,000 total. (
I 1
i e
a I
l f
f f
I i
TABLE E.1 EFFLUENTS & WATER MANAGEMENT TASK OUTLINE TASK DESCRIPTION BUDGET TARGET COMPLETION 1-A Drawing, procedure & $ 115,000 10/15/88 surveillance program upgrades 1-B Physical component & $ 850,000 2/28/89 system upgrades 1-C Solidification pad S 500,000 3/30/89 enclosure b1dg.
1-D Tank Farm Upgrade $ 4,200,000 12/31/89 1-E Hazardous material $ 1,500,000 not yet determined storage site upgrade 2-A Waste water volume $ 970,000 3/31/89 reduction mods.
(short & near term) 2-B Waste water activity $ 150,000 10/30/88 reduction mod. (90%)
2-C REIMS development S 65,000 1/30/89 3-A Tube Leak Recovery $ 250,000 12/1/88 Short term (MO-Flow system) 3-B Waste water treatment $ 4,300,000 6/30/90 system upgrade Estimated Total $ 12,900,000 Items 1-A thru l-E address the unplanned offsite release issue.
Items 2-A thru 2-C address short term water management during
! normal operation. Items 3-A & 3-B address water management during steam generator tube leak conditions.
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The objectives of this project are:
- 1) To eliminate (or reduce to an acceptable level) the possibility of unplanned offsite releases of liquids containing hazardous material or radioactivity.
Specific areas of concern include:
e Tank Fara Area (potential for non contained spills and inconsistency in discharge routing of drains) o RHUT Area (potential for non contained spills) o Solidification Pad (potential for non contained spills) o Normal Effluent (multiple discharge paths and criteria exist for the same types of liquids) o Non Radioactive Hazardous Materials Storage &
1 Handling (potential for inadvertent entry lo;o stora drains) 4 1
l
}
}
- 2) To modify current plant design and operating methods to adequately manage the vaste water generated during normal operations to comply with 10 CFR 50 APP I.
Specific areas of concern include:
o Secondary waste water generation rate (present rate is 28-30 gpm vs. 10 gpa for similar plants) o Activity Cluan-up "LERTS" (The Liquid Effluent Radwaste Treatment System capacity is very limited l
(
and physical arrangument is vulnerable to spills) o condensate Handling Methodology (original plant design allowed for rejecting of condensate to the .
CST - Contaminated secondary has precluded this option) ;
NOTEt Current discharge limits aret Volume - 20 million gallons per year (mgpy) l Dose - 3 mr/yr The current projections for year and are 70% of the volume limit and 33% of the do1e limit. Although at i first glance these numbers may look quite satisfactory, it is important to consider that since RESTART the plant has run extremely smoothi system perturbations [
P have been almost non-existent. Even moderate perturbations could siqnificantly affect these margins, i .
2 i
1
- 3) To modify plant design and operating methods to adequately manage the contaminated waste water resulting from continued operation under SGTR conditions. Specific areas of concern includes o Short term plan of action (current SCTR recovery plan does not include waste water handling plan) o Waste water management is limiting factor for i
plant operation (current plant design does not provide for high capacity clean up)
The near term charter of the Project Team (PT) will include:
t o coordinating and expediting tasks outlined in Appendix III o Making further assessments and participating in studies as becomes necessary during projuct execution o Execute appropriate closure of action items identified in the previous action plans, o Develop consolidated Action Plan after the long term plant modifications are formulated i
I
{
i
. . r
. ", l
(
2.0 SCOPE 2.1 PROJECT TEAM (PT) [
(The project team consists of the project manager and representatives from Chemistry and Systens Engineering ,
who have full time dedication to the project for the remainder of 1988.) l I
2.1.1 Coordination i
)
j Coordinate and expedite modifications and remedial j actions already in progress as well as those resulting ,
from the studies and assessments currently in progress.
coordinate (and perform) the additional studies and f
' t assessments required for near and long tera .
I modifications to the plant.
1 I
l.
2.1.2 Studies / Assessments !
I Participate in the studies / assessments necessary to j
' t
< identify options and assist in the development of the ,
i conceptual designs for each Design change Package (DCP) assigned to the project. l s
4
[
Proiact Action Plans i 2.1.3 1
! Effect appropriate closure of previous action plans.
i
- Develop revisions to the current action plan after long i
term modification plans are formulated. {
I i i I
t
t 2.2.3 Proiect Closure This consists of the engineering effort to close out the engineering activities on the project such as
- records turnover,
- design basis document review and draft,
- calculation reviews and updates, and
- project closeout and archiving tasks.
2.3 MAINTENANCE (INCLUDING MODIFICATIONS)
The maintenance scope is limited to providing resources for installation of the modifications originated by Nuclear Engineering as Design Change Packages under Work orders assigned to this project.
Maintenance scope chargeable to this project specifically excludes, preventive maintenance, surveillance support or corrective maintenance resulting from surveillance findings, corrective maintenance, and deficiency-generated work requests.
2.4 PLANT PERFORMANCE The Plant Performance Department scope includes assignment of adequate System Engineering personnel to support
- conceptual and detailed design,
- procurement, receipt and bench testing of components,
- planning and scheduling of installation activity,
- coordination with operations and Maintenance, j - developoent of Special Test Procedures, performance of the tests, and evaluation of test results, and
- closeout of project documentation.
4 2.5 OPERATIONS i
l Plant operations scope includes participation in a l
consultive role in the conceptual design phase, detailed f design phase, the installation phase and the testing phase 1
l to ensure that the specific needs of the plant are fully i
understood and are met by the efforts of this project.
~
FIGURE 3.1 .
DTIDDfIS & WMYR MMGCDDir 190IECT HIG{LIGfIS SOEUIE 1988 l 1989 { 1990 I I S O N D J F M A M J J A S O N .) J F M A M J l i I I I I I l-! I I I I I I I I I I I I I Short & Near hm Mads
............ .... ...... ..o (Du3r & Implememtation)
Solidificaticm Pind Encl. Bldg.
.................... ......o 1
i Tanit Fana I;pgrade
.....g....................g.....................................................o (Stadf) (Dmip Du3r.) (Implemuantation)
Weste Water testamt Systems Upgrade
.............g. ................. ..g....... . ......... ......................**.........o (Study) (Design thgr.) (Impleummtation) i I Hazardous mterial Site Upgrade
..........g.................. . .. ............****...**........***...o
] (Study) (Engr & Implementation) 3
4.0 RESOURCE REOyIREMENTS 4.1 BUDGET P
The total costs for the entire project are presently estimated to be $12,900,000.
l The estimated expenditure for 1988 is $1,800,000. This number, although still an estimate, reflects expenditures to date plus those anticipated for short and near term f
modifications currently in progress. Monies for Tank Faru I i
Upgrade, Waste Water Treatment and Hazardous Material Site l
Upgrade studies are included in this amount. l I
The remaining $11,100,000 is slated for 1989 and the first l r
half of 1990 to complete work currently in progress and for the major plant modifications anticipated as a result of the studies. At thi~ time, the major plant modifications f f
expected as a result of this project are still in tne conceptual stages and the "Best Guess" cost estimate 15 as !
follows:
[
Tank Fara Upgrade $4,200,000 f i
Waste Water Treatment Facility $4,300,000 {
l Misc. Hazardous Material Site Clean-up }1.500.000 g i
_ _ Total $10,000,000 l f
l i
~
. l
.. . l
- r. .
I 4.2 MANPOWER
{
The majority of the manpower requirements for the next six f
months will be from Nuclear Engineering and the Project s
- Team. Once the detailed designs nre completed and in the l j field for implementation the emphasis will shift from i 1 ,
3 Nuclsar Engineering to Modifications. !
k i l 2 :
An organization chart showing the designated project leads ;
j and department functions is presented in Figure 4.1. !
) ,
l Although not shown on the chart, adequate office space for i the project team (project island), dedicated clerical 4
support and part time engineering technician support are
\
- mandatory to the effective execution of the project.
l !
t 1
i i i i
i i
i I !
s
\
I i
l l
i
,wn.. - . - , - - - - ~- - - - - - . ,,w r,_----,--- -, , - - , . - - - , . - ,.__n, . _ - - --,-
PROJECT MANAGER STEVE MELANCON
~s o ACTIO?J PLAN AN/sen [d[th"&
/,
8 C
o RESOURCE MANAGEMENT o PROJECT ACTIVITY C00RDIf;ATION >
FRED EELLIE 's-jL (NAALITY bANLEGERE LIC m ING RICHARD MANKEIMER o OC/0C SUPPORT o LIC. SliPPORT SYBT m MAIN OPERATI M CEMEISTRY ENGIM M ING PhIL TERRY CHUCK ROWLAND JOHN ATWELL l JERRY T.UZALA PETER MURPHY 8 AL FRASER ,
RUSS CUMERFORD o PROJECT TEAM o CONCEPTUAL DESIGNS o PROJECT TEAM o MODIFICATIONS o CONSULTATION SUPPORI SUPPORT o PROCEDURES & o DETAILED DESIGN 5 o PROBLEM RESOLUTION o TESTING SUPPORT o TESTING SUPPORT SURVEILLANCES o CONSULTATION o FIELD SUPPORT o STP DEVELOPMENT PERFORMANCE &
s CLOSURE
i' 5.0 PROJECT CONTROIE Project Control tools to be used will include the Action Plan, project schedules (P-2), project budget, issues of Project Task Approvals to responsible departments. Frequent review of progress vs. schedule and expenditure vs. budget will be performed by Project Management.
Project Management assumet responsibility for execution of the project in accorder 0+ sith the Plan and commits to periodic reforecast of resource requirements as the project develops.
Departments responsible for task execution will be held accountable for deliverables according to the commitments made using the tasking process. (Where scope is not fully developed, allowance estimater will be provided until the scope is sufficiently developed to enable its estimation with high confidence.)
Finally, a contingency fund will be ut.lized to allow for the uncertainties expected during project execution. This reserve will be distributed by the PM when mi or perturbations to the Action Plan are encountered. The objective of the reserve is to minimize the impact of unanticipated resource requirements on the total Nuclear Pudget for the next year.
APPENDIX I SHORT & NEAR TERM ACTIVITIES DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY TARGETED COMPLETION Storm & Eff. Drn Dwg Update 10/15/88 Proc & Surv. Prgs Development 10/15/88 Procedure Development (Ops) Complete Training Program 11/30/8C Basin Diucharge Valves 1/31/89 Effluent Inst. Upgrade 2/28/89 Aux Stm Sump Pump Upgrade 3/31/89 ,
MSR Drain Reroute 10/30/88 Hypochlorite System Upgrade 2/28/89 Solidification Pad Enclosure 3/30/89
)
Reroute R-15016 sample flow 12/15/88 Reroute AE sample flow 12/15/88 Reroute AE-77609 discharge 3/30/89 Recycle polish sapi discharge 3/30/89 Rscycle cold lab samples 3/30/89 Dog Bone & cond pump seal reroute 11/15/88 Reroute AFW mini flow to CST 12/15/88 CST Overflov Mod 2/28/89 ,
l
.-. ,c ., . . , . , . , , , , -- , - - - - . - - , - - . , ,,
APPENDIX I (cont)
SHORT & NEAR TERM ACTIVITIES DESCRIPTION OF ACTIVITY TARGETED COMPLETION Oil Skimmer Modifications 10/30/O.0 l
Polisher sluice water domins
- 10/30/88 REIMS Development 1/30/89 ,
I
- Analysis indicates a 90% reduction in RHUT activity ,
- i I
{
h l
l .
3 F
4 l '
,3 .. .'
APPENDIX II LONG TERM MODIFICATIONS The long term modifications outlined below are still in the conceptual design stages. The cost estimates given are "Best Guess" and the completion dates specified are PM targets.
DESCRIPTION EST. COST COMPLETION Tank Farm Upgrade $4,200,000 12/31/8'9 Waste Water Treatment Facility $4,300.000 6/30/90 Hazardous Mtl Site Upgrade $1,500,000 12/31/89 TOTAL $ 10,000,000 i
1
APPD OIX III QERD(P EFFIIENIS & HAIER MANAGEMENT TASIG ,
1 IESCRIPTICN OF ACTIVITI BENEFIT QERENT SINIUS 1.0 Unolanryu Offsite Relaam Tm_e Storm & Eff. Drain DWg. Verification Risk Parhv+ ion (ER) In pupass with avrw+M i
I empletion of 10/15/88.
(Civil Engr.)
Prrvwirre & Spillance Piupaa PR In pupass with avmw+M cmpletion of 10/15/88.
(Q =mistry)
Prrwwtn Development RR Oompleted (OPS)
Training Piup.an RR In sugass with avmw+M cx2pletion of 11/30/88.
(Training) -
Basin Distarge Valve Upgrade RR In pupass with awrw*M -
ocupletion of 1/31/89.
(Ntac. Errrr.)
Effluent Instrumentaticn Upgrade RR In progress with avrw+M completion of 2/28/89.
(Nuc. & IEC Engr.)
Auoc Stmm Strp Ptap Upgrade RR In progass with avrw+M-coupletion of 3/31/89.
(Ntac Engr.)
1
1 y
APPDIDIX III GRRENT EFFIL'DfIS & i@GTR MANAGEMENT TASES BENEFIT GRRENT SIKIUS
[ESCRIFFICN OF ACITVITY 1.0 Urolamed Offsite Release Iscue MSR Drain Bercute RR 1hysical modification work in pu.mpess with aWM-ocupletion of 10/30/88.
(Pr/10 0)
Solidification Pad 2nclosure BlckJ . RR C5R (with specs) goirg out for bids. Targeted ocupletion date is 3/30/89. (Civil Engr.)
Tank Farm Upgrade RR Study is essertially ocuplete. Dethiled Design Fagr. sdnilled to begin by 11/14/88.
(Pr/Nuc Eng) -
Misc Hazardous Material Site Upgrade RR Study to ar m requi tw and applicability to this project is slated to begin 10/15/88. (Pf/Chen)
Hypochlorite System Upgrade RR Material minition in PL y s . Target ocupletion 2/28/89 (Pr/NE)
APEDiDIX III CNT EFTIIHNIS & WKER MANAGEMENT TASES DESGIFrION OF ACTIVI'IY BENEFIT GERENT SIKIUS 2.0 mter Manaaenent Issue CSr overflow reralte W Being evaluated in licfit of intended Tank Farm t%xpade. (FF/NE)
Polisher sluice water danins Activity Relaction (AR) Contract with Pac-Nuc is currently being amended to include danineralimm.
W delivery by 10/30/88. (FF/h-te)
Wasta water treatment system tyh M Sttrfy to be performed in om1 junction with long term Ibbe Imak recovery plan -
W11dt is actwbled to begin by 10/15/88.
EETE Development M In sup=:ss with articipated cxmpletion by 1/30/89. ((hen) t i Oil skinner installation M In sup=:ss with
- M etion 1 by 10/30/88.
- O O O e e .
h
APPENDIX III .
CERENT EFFIEDFIS & WER MANAGDIENP TASES h1CN OF ACTIVITY BENEFIT QERENT SDGUS 3.0 Tobe Tek Damvery Issue Short tens Plan of Action W Plan is fonallated with M 'I ""'t. order by 10/1/88. Rwpaw+ai delivery is 11/15/88. (Pf) long tens idaste idater treatment systen W Study (for ua #
design) should begin by 10/15/88. Targeted oc pletion of systen is 6/30/90. (Pf/NE)
O
- e
- O O
.-.a
g ATDOMENT I -
~
QJRRENT EFMIEFIS & NMER MANAGEMENT TN25 OESGIFfl0N OF ACTIVITY CORRESPONDDE CJRRDff SDGUS ACTIN PIAN (AP)/IEK A. Urmlanned Offsite Bel a<:a Tas=_m__
1.A Storm & Effluent Drain Verification AP 1/ATf 1, AP 3/3S Riysical verificatial and tedate. (voltane study to follow) work in progress with drawing update targeted - 10/15/88.
Volume Study by 11/30/88. (Civil Erigr.) y 2.A IHJr Domins Enclosure AP3/13S Completed vs D
3.A Procedure & Surveillance P g asa AP3/3S, 4S,14S In progress with 4 avmw+M gletion m of 10/15/88.
Approval by 10/30/88.
(0-istry) - .
4.A Prrrwtrre DevelW AP3/5S Otzspleted (OPS)
- 5.A Training P w a. AP3/4S In progress with av=w+M caugletist of 11/30/88.
(Training)
G.A Easin Discharge Valve Upgrade AP3/9N In Desicpt Dig. with expected implesment-atica by 1/31/89.
(mm:. Engr.)
ATDOMENT I ,
CURRENT DTIEDGS & IRIER MANAGDENT 'DGES IESGIITION OF ACTIVITI OOPRESREDING QJRRENP SDGUS ACTIQi PIAN / TASK A. Urolamed Offsite Release Issue 7.A Effluent Flcw Instrtamentaticn Upgrade AP3/11S, 12S Design effort in psup==6 with a=w+al completion of 2/28/89. (Ntac. & IEC Dgr.)
8.A Aux Stevun Sump Rap Upgrade AP3/15S Design effort in progress with av=w+M completion of 1/31/89. (Nuc Engr.)
9.A PER Drain Beruute AP3/2N, 3N Ihysical modification work in progrees with ===+M ocupletion of 10/30/88.
(PF/)0D) 10.A Solidification Pad Enclosure Bldg. AP3/8N Task award 10/7/88.
Targeted ocupletion date -
is 3/30/89. (Civil Byr.)
11.A Tank Farm Upgrade AP3/7N Study is complete.
Detailed Design Engr.
sctwwhled to begin by 11/14/88. (PF/Ntac Eng) 12.A Misc Hazardous Material Site Upgrade Ebllow-up to AP1 Study to assess requirements and applicability to this project is slated to begin 10/15/88.
(PT/Oumn) 13.A Hypochlorite Systen Upgrade New Itan Target completion 2/28/89 (PF/NE)
, , . .-~
ATDOMENT I ,
CASENT EFTIIENIS & 10GER MMGCDENT TASES CCERESKMDING CERENT SDGUS IESCRIPTION OF ACr1VIlY ACTICN PIAN /IRSK D. Water Manaaessent Issue 1.D Reroute R-15016 sanple flow AP3/1G Desigra effort in gayai s with expected completion of 11/15/c8. (Rc Ehgr.) ,
2.0 Hercute AE circ meter sample flow AP3/17S Design effort in progress with expected completion of 11/15/88. (Rc Engr) 3.D Reroute AE-77609 discharge AP3/10N Effort presently on hold pending IEC mod reptiottizing.
(Pr/NE) 4.D Beroute polisher sample di<rharges AF3/11N Effort _ presently on hold l
I pending I&C Engr mod -
reprioritizing. (PF/NE) 5.D Recycle Cbld Lab samplm AP3/12N Effort presently on hold ending I&C- Engr mod I reprioritizing. (FI/NE)
G.D Dog Bcme Seals & Cond hk Hercute AF3/6S Ihysical modificatimt work in progress with expected completion of 11/15/88.
(Pf/7006) 7.B Rerot:tc AFW mini flow to CW AP3/6N Desigri effort in pLtgress with expec?.ed completion by 12/15/86. (Madt Ehgr) l
.;~ .
4 ATIAC19tENE I QERENT EETIIENIS & )@Ta MANAGEMENT DSICS ngl OF ACf1VI1Y CORRESPONDING QERENT STMUS ACTICH PIAN /BSK B. 5hter Manaament Issus 8.E CST cverflow reroute AF3/1L Being evaluated in 11#
- of intended Tank Fana I
%A. (Pf/NE) l l C.D Ack11 tion of Filters and AP3/9S Contract with Pac-Nuc has 4
Demineralizer to Polisher been amended. W sluice water disdiarge dalivery by 10/30/88.
3 (Pf/Rhs:te) i j' 13.B Waste water treatment systeun tpgrade AP3/7S, 8S, 10S, 13S, Study to be performad in 1N, 2L, 3L conjunction with Img tern Tube Isak reowery plan whidt is schechaled to i begin by 10/15/88.
11.B RED 6 Development AP2/2.8 In sy==is with -
anticipated ccupletion by 1/30/89. (Chm) 12.0 Oil skimmer installation AP3/SN In progress with i
ampletion by 10/30/88.
i
v ,.
ATDOMENT I )
QERENf EFFINNIS & 10EER MANAGEMNT 'D6ES MSCRIPITCN OF ACrlVIlY CCERESIQOING 3ERENT SDGUS ACITCM PIAN /D6K C. 'Ibbe Isak Racovery Issue i
- loc Short tern Plan of Action AP3/1S Plan 33 formalated with j equipment order by 10/1/88. Expected delivery is 11/15/88. (Pf) 2.C 'ong
. term waste water treatment systen AP3/3L Study (for conceptual design) should begin by j 10/15/88. Targeted ocupletion of system is 6/30/90. (PF/NE)
]
N7IE: Previous Action Plan Items not listed above are awaiting (or in the prmaaa of) foram1 paper closure. ,
l i
1 i
__ _ , __ _