ML20098F142

Rev 1 to Procedure BTP 100-19, Shift Advisor Training Program

ML20098F142
Person / Time
Site:	Byron
Issue date:	08/20/1984
From:	COMMONWEALTH EDISON CO.
To:
Shared Package
ML20098F127	List: ML20098F126 ML20098F134 ML20098F139 ML20098F141 ML20098F142
References
BTP-100-19, NUDOCS 8410020376
Download: ML20098F142 (14)

Text

.

BTP 100-19 R; vision 1 SHIFT ADVISOR TRAINING PROGRAM A. STATEMENT OF APPLICABILITY:

The purpose of this procedure is to outline how the Byron Station Shift Advisor Training Program is to be conducted.

B.

REFERENCES:

1. Licensed Operator Training Lesson Plans.

2. Shift Advisor Certification Guide, BTP 100-T107.

3. Shift Advisor Oral Exam Document, BTP 100-T108.

C. MAIN BODY:

1. The Byron Station shif t Advisor Training Program shall be conducted by the Byron Station Training Department.

2. Personnel to receive Shif t Advisor training shall be identified by l

the Byron Station Operating Department.

3. The Shif t Advisor Training Program will consist of three phases and will be concluded with the certification of the trainee as a certified Shif t Advisor,

4. Phase I of the Shif t Advisor Training Program under the direction of the Byron Station Training Department shall consist of:

a. Classroom instruction covering:

1). Reactor Coolant System 2). Reactor Coolant Pumps 3). Pressurizer System 4). Nuclear Fuel 5). Excore Nuclear Instrumentation System 6). Reactor Rod Control System

/). Digital Rod Position Indication 8). Reactor Make-up Control System

,. Chemical Volume and Control System 10). Boron Thornal Regeneration System 11). AC/DC Electrical Distribution

12) Main Generator 13). Emergency Diesel Generators 14). Emergency Core Cooling System 15). Containment Spray System 16). Component Cooling Water System 17). Essential Service Water System 18). Non-Essential Service Water System APPROVED 19), Circulating Water System 20). Main Steam System AUG 201984 B. () C -

g0h0Sho V

' BTP 100-19 R: vision 1 21). Steam Dump System 22). Condensate /Feedwater Systems 23). Auxiliary Feedwater System 24). Turbine Controls and Auxiliary System 25). MSR Control 26). Reactor Protection System 27). Engineered Safety Features Actuation System 28). Radiation Monitoring Systems 29). Fuel Handling 30). Gaseous Radwaste System 31). Liquid Radwaste System 32). Byron General Operating Procedures (BGP's) 33). Byron Abnormal Operating Procedures (BOA's) 34). Generating Station Emergency Plan (GSEP) 35). Radiatirn Standards 36), Reactor Trip Root Cause Determination 37). Byron Emergency Procedures (BEP's) 38). Byron Administrative Procedures (BAP's) 39). BOS LC0AR 40). Byron Technical Specification

b. Phase I is to be conducted in two segments, the first being 20 days with a written quiz being conducted following each 5 days, as a maximum, of classroom instruction. The second segment of Phase I shall be 5 days in length and is comprised of a comprehensive written final exam and an oral exam.

1). The oral exam review board shall be comprised of two training department personnel, one operating department person, and one trainee. The oral exam requires all examiners to agree on the trainee passire the SHIFT ADVISOR ORAL EXAM.

2). The Shif t Advisor Oral Exam Document, BTP 100-T108, shall be used to document the trainee's oral exam. BTP 100-T108 l is comprised of three sections.

a).Section I -

is used to document the topics covered during the oral exam. Each topic must be identified as being discussed satisfactorily / unsatisfactorily in the S/U column provided.

b).Section II -

is the " Comments" section for the examiners to note any strengths / weaknesses of the trainee, c).Section III - will be used to indicate the results of the oral exam and also provide a location for the signatures of the examinars. The Training Supervisor's signature is required for final approval.

KPPROVED ,

AUG S 01984 (4158P) B. O. S. R.

. BTP 100-19 Revision i S. Phase II of the Shift Advisor Training Program shall be under the direction of Byron Station Operating Department Phase II shall-be 10 days in length with the trainee being assigned to a shift or shif ts as -appropriate to complete the Shif t Advisor Certification Guide BTP 100-T107.

6. Phase III shall be conducted by either Byron Training Department or Production Training Department.

7. Phase III shall be five days of simulator training at Production Training Center. The intent is to faniiliarize the Shif t Advisors with the Byron controls and plant responses.

8. The simulator training program shall cover the following areas:

e SYSTEMS KNOWLEDGE e RX THEORY, NUCLEAR POWER DIST, PWR CONTROL & THERMAL SCIENCFS e GOOD OPERATING PRACTICES (COMM., LOGS, PLANT AWARENESS, ETC.)

e NORMAL OPERATING PROCEDURES e ABNORMAL (OFF-NORMAL) AND EMERGENCY PROCEDURES e TECHNICAL SPECIFICATIONS e ABILITY TO OPERATE 1HE CONTROL BOARD -

e ABILITY TO SUPERVISE NORMAL PLANT OPERATION e ABILITY TO SUPERVISE OPS UNDER STRESS OR IN EMER. SITUATIONS e OBSERVED ATTITUDE TOWARDS: 1] OPS 2] SFTY 3] CO-WRKRS 4] TRNG e LEADERSHIP

9. Upon successful completion of the three phases, the trainee shall be recognized by the facility as a certified Shif t Advisor,

a. Successful completion of Phase I is determined by the trainee having:

1). Achieved an overall examination score average of 80% or higher with no one examination score less than 70%.

2). Passed Oral Exam,

b. Successful completion of Phase II is to be determined by both -

the completion of the Shif t Advisor Certification Guide BTP 100-1107 and the submission of this guide to the Byron Training Department,

c. Successful completion of Phase III shall be determined by a satisfatory evaluation completed by the Shif t Advisor's

• respective Simulator Instructor.

10. The Shif t Advisor shall participate in the Shif t Advisor Requalification Training Program. This program will be conducted during the first aeck of the Shif t Advisors respective shif t's requalification training program, and will include:

APPROVED AUG 201984 (415BP) B. C). Ei. R.

BTP 100-19 Rgvision 1

a. 1.) LER's 2.)- INPO SOER's 3.) Current Industry Information 4.) Procedure Revision

-5.) Plant System Modification

b. Annual participation on the Byron /Braidwaood simulator.

11. Upon sucessful completion of the course, a certificate shall be l issued to each trainee.

12. The course shall be documented using course code Y-STAP, file number 1.6.1001 and Keyworded Shif t Advisor XX-XM.

l

• XX-X - represents the last two digits of the calendar year followed by the sequential number of the class in that year.

e F

NPPROVED AUG 2 01984

n. o. s R.

(4158P)

FINE _ _ ._ _ . _ _ _ , . - _ - -

5 Appendix E Revised Shift Advisor Exam Results 4

3- -

SHIFT ADVISOR 84-2 CLASS WK 1 WK2 WK3 WK4 FINAL (AVE-91.3)

Bob Femal 88.2 94.8 -89.2 93.1 (AVE-85.6) 1 Bob Glaze 81.5 88.8 85.7 86.3 f9 tp (AVE-84.8)

Brian Hughes 95.3 89.2 86.4 81.0 60 (AVE-84.1)

Ermal Morris m.b78.3 96.4 85.1 88.4 84.4 (AVE-95.2)

R.Tefertiller 95.4 94.8 94.4 96.2 AVERAGE 85.2 90.5 88.8 88.2 l.

4

.v %s

+

);,(e* e '<*1- '

, .a , ., ,.

.y . .

Appendix A Rev. O

< 1:-+t

,~ .

pW ,M i &q % gQpa:M%i+;ut

"?nm$arNe ;.' c % f $ OComanrEnts M T Edison M PnomrCTION CCmPANT TRAINING Nib;%3$7 hip,<M STUDWT SIELATOR TRAINING EVALUATION CEECILIST MAas Rodger' Anderson class 30, 8 4-1 DATE 0~17~04 COURSE mass Shift Advisor ETEUATION 1.ETEE. C 20 O se= l 2

STA ,  !

R.t e . N .

, 5 4 3 2 1 /g IVALUATED AREA 8 1 g sTsTsus INOW1. EDGE 2 x RI TEIORT, NUCLEAR POWER DIST, PWR CONTROL A TEEMAL SCIENCES 3 y 000D OPERATING PRACTICES (COIEE., LOOS, PLAarF Amannumfas, BTC.)

4 x NORNAL OPERATING PROCEDURES "^

'5 X AaWORMAL (OPP-NORMAL) AND EMI:ROINCY PROCEDURES 6 y TECENICAL SPECIPICATIONS 7 y ABILITY TO OPERATE TIE CONTROL BOARD j 8 x ABILITY TO 8t'PERVISE NORMAL PLANT OPERATICIt-9 y ABILITY TO SUPERVISE OPS UNDER STRESS OR IN MER. SITUATIONS 10 x OBSERVED ATTITUDE TOWARDS 13 OPS 2] 3FTT 3] CO-WRERS 4] TRNO

. 11 y LaamammrrP 5=Exce1Ient 4=Above Average 3= Average 2=Below Average 1= Poor N/0= Net Observed C0aWEENTS: (Strengths, Weaknessee, Arese Needing Improvements, etc.)

• Written Commente Required i

The 84-1 class simulator program consisted of 5 days, 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of class and 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of simulator operation. Rodger Anderson's

.:n knowleepe of Byron Station's Systems was impressive. His leadership

..m x,y u - ..

l abimDtyS,wasjexcellent

. ,~

during abnormal and emergency conditions.

' ,* 'I( 4 l

b' I

a QA4AitionalPagesofComments k

INeTRecTOR

/, e , q '," -

j . _

t _

i jU c.-

'm  :; .'e. 6" ,u fik ex ..' ,

r <,

)

4 qw ., 8 .- c -

l S;;ki$k..w%. W- 'L

~

m

. \

aw. 4 ,

50 M ) 9 g: ~- '. not. 0 n~* n.,u g .v. u y, :

.;4 <  ! Q;..n  ::.

w s , ,

m. . , , . qt -

.'? M (,;g(.. w

,. SummuuB&f.TE Eerson Couras?

PagesCTI0s TRAINING

- 4

pw or

, "m*xv. -

sessert stuuLATOR Ta&INING EVALRATION CEBCELIs?

, n#4 Bill Minerich class u0. 84-1 nATE 8-17-84 00sasE mAuE Shift Advisor nyag.uATICs LEVEE.

C.no an0 O=CRs Om .

Re, e .

, 5 4 3 2 1 ./, .

Ev&LsATED areas 1 X sTsTanE ENOWLEDGE 2 y RE TIEORT, NUCLEAR POWER DIst, PWR 001FFROL & TEIRMAL~ sCIElfCEs 3 'y 0000 OPERATING PRACTICES (COIBI.,1400. PLANT AM, Etc. )

4 X NOMIAL OPERATING FROCEDUREs I

'5 X AsWOMIAL (OFF-II0dlllAL) AND EIIIIIGENCY PROCEDURES 6 x TECEf1 CAL sPECIFICATI0Ils 7 y ABILITT TO OPERATE TER COIITROL BOARD i 8 x ABILITY To SUPERVISE II0lutAL PLAarf OPERATICIf

• 9 y asILITY TO sUrEnvIs3 Ops UiroER sTitsss OR In ElsER. sITUATICIls 10 y CesERVED ATTITUDE TOWARDS 1] ops 2] sFTT 3] CO-WRERs 4] TIUfG 11 y LEAS m sEIP 3= Excellent 4=ADeve Average 3= Average 2=5elow Average 1= Poor K/0= stet Oteerved COInterrs: (strenstas, veenswesee, Areas Needins Improvements, etc.)

• Written Comments l Restuired The 84-1 class simulator program consisted of 5 days, 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> i -

of class and 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of simulator operator. Bill Minerich

.. . .. su displayai definitie' experience at the Senior Reactor Operator Level

, m._,. ._,&

by'his e w$11ty.. tis direct and control plant operations during abnormal and emergency conditions.

,,p4.-- e

5 # 1 j

" 4 7 F b 6 0 ,EE g 1

o

• 9 4

^

, t. # 8 K

D AL.D

i . . ,%

o usa.,si.. .aC _ t. "' *

.J '

BusTaufr0R e4 .

. s - '

3:p q .

< - - , z. ~y <.y :: ,-! U. T,, .  ; .u.

i ru : ,

e.g .t 1

if). , ;q > . . -

+

l "'. ,

Y,, "

a;.

,,0 - -

i

,y m;

~-

o.. p., a_ .

no ,, e n

, ,*g w v*'%m ay -  ;

gdg'f,

' ' 1 n). . ColemNvEALTs EDIs0N COMPANT

o *J k FRODUCTION TRAINING

, 9 ;? ~ < .g. 'D SNM SIWLATOR TRAINING EVALUATION CIBCELIST MAIM Jim Hassinger CLASS NO. 04-1 D&TE 0-17-04 1

Comess mane Shift Advisor EVALUATION LEVEL C. 20 Sn0 CSCRE D= .

Ree e e N .

4 a N UA m AREAS

, 5 3 1 /g 1 X SYSTEIS ENOWLEDGE 2 x RE TIBORT, NUCLEAR POWER DIST, PWR CONTROL & TREIRIAL SCENCES 3 y 000D OP"RATINO PRACTICES (COIM. , LOSS, PLANT Awammedme, Etc.)

4 y if0RIBAL OPERATING PROCEDURSS

-5 x AaNORsIAL (OPP-NO.1NAL) AND EXEROENCY PROCEDURES i

6 y TECENICAL SPECIPICATIONJ 7 X ABILITY TO CPERATE TIII CONTROL BOARD 8 x ABILITY TO SUPERVISE NORMAL PLANT OPERATIW- 5 9 y ABILITY TO SUPERVISE OPS UNDER STRESS OR IN IIIER. SITUATIONS 10 X OSSERVED ATTITUDE TOWARDa 1] 0P8 2] SPTT 3] CO-WRERS 4] TRNO 11 y LEADERSEIP 5=Escellent 4=Above Average 3= Average 2 5elow Average 1= Poor N/0= Net Observed COIOlmPFS: (Strengths, weakneeses, Arese NeedinE Improvemente, etc.) Written Commente Required The 84-1 class simulator program consisted of 5 days, 4 hourn of class and 4 hours4.62963e-5 days <br />0.00111 hours <br />6.613757e-6 weeks <br />1.522e-6 months <br /> of simulator operation. Jim Hassinger's

? . '

confid,ence.;andfexcellent operating ability was observed during

., . . . . ~ . .. .

nosnelp abnormal, and emergency operations.

\

+

,-

. =/ S w % . e 11

, c. . . . .

I

, .s

/[ '-- i,

, _ , i. .

l Addittenal Pages er Ca - nte 4&= - - >

l INernUCTOR v

I

. Appendiz A

-4; e A ,

Rev. 0

• Q

. .p i ensuSNnmALTE mISON CouPANT PRODUCTItNI TRAINDO

.+q STranNT SIuULATOR TRAINING EVA4,UATION CEECELIST NamE Brian Hughes CLASS NO. 84-2 DATE 8-17-84 COURSE Nams Shift Advisor EVALUATION LEVIL 320 ^

SRO SCRE STA ,

"[

5 4 3 2 1 "/,

• EVALUATED AREAS 1 x SYSTEIN INOWLEDGE 2 y RI TIBORT, NUCLEAR POWER DIST, PWR CONTROL & TEEIUBAL SCIENCES j 3 y GOOD OPERATING FRACTICES (CCIBI. , LOOS, PLANT AWARENWS, ETC. )

4 y if0RIIAL OPERATING PROCEDURES 5 y AENORIBAL (OFF-af0lDIAL) AND EMERGENCY. FROCEDURES 6 y TECEf1 CAL SPECIFICATI0If3

~

7 x ABILITY TO OPERATE TEE CONTROL 30ARD 8 y ABILITY W SUPERVISS NORIIAL PLANT OPERATION 9 y ABILITY To SUPEltVISE OPS UNDER STRESS OR IN EllElt. SITUATIONS 10 x OBSEllTED ATTITUDE TOWARDs 1] OPS 2] SPTT 3] CO-WRERS 4] TRNO 11 y LatBERSEIP l 5= Esse 12ent 4=Above Average 3=AveraSe 2=Below AveraSe 1= Poor N/0=Not Observed C0lWEElrFS (StrenSths, Wealtneeses, Areas Needing Improvements, etc.) ' Written Comments Required The 84-2 Class simulator procfram consisted of 5 days, 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> per I

day of simulator operation. Brian Hughes displayed an excellent

,. .w .c ability;;to^ direct operations during abnormal and emergency operations.

-a I

1 Aum dP .cC t. V #' .A' LIllSTRUCTOR

.Appendia A Rev. O

_ ; m:4?f(;A.s -:

. .Jgj %"M M:M ?y JTNi[INIO&'

,f if 4 -

CanoNWEALTm EDIs0N CenPAmT FRODUCTICH TRAININO

" , '5Le @9.' ~.h' 4 STUDWT SINULATOR TRAINING EVALUATION CEECELIST I

NAME Ermal Morris class 30. 84-2 DATE 8-17-84 COURSE mauI Shift Advisor EVALUATION LEVEE.

C. R0 SRO C3CRE Om .

=, e e N .

4 3 2

, 5 1 /g EVALUATED AREAS

1 X sTsTIns ENOWLEDGE 2 x RE TIBORT, NUCLEAR POWER DIST, PWR CONTROL & TIERNAL SCIENCES 3 y 000D OPERATING PRACTICES (CCIOt., LOOS, PLANT AWARWESS. ETC.)

4 y NORNAL OPERATING PROCEDURES '

'5 X A590RNAL (OPP-NORAAL) AND ENERGENCY PROCEDUMS 6 x TECElfICAL SPECIFICATI0If8 7 y ABILITY TO OPERATE TER CONTROL BOARD 8 y ABILITY TO SUPERVISE NORNAL PLANT OPERATICII 9 X ABILITT TO SUPERVISE OPS UNDER STRESS OR IN IIEER. SITUATI0lf5 10 X OBSERVED ATTITUDE TOWARDat1] OPS 2] SPTY 3] CO-URERS 43 TRNO

. 11 y LEADERBETF 5= Excellent 44beve Average 3= Average 2=Below Average 1= Poor N/0=IIet Observed ColeIIlfrS: (Strengths, Weaknesses, Areas Needing Improvements, etc.)

• Written Comments Required The 84-2 class simulator probram consisted of 5 days, 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> l

~

per day of simulatter operation. ,

Ermal Morris showed a good wor [n.h,knowledgeoftheByronProceduresandhisexcellent

.. .mn .. ,

abilityyto-direct his co-workers during abnormal and emergency conditions.,

O Addit a P ... .e C _ t. U# A<% INSTRUCTOR c

(-" * -- -

-.,--y_ , , - . , .,, ,.~.-_..,_r. my,,,,,,,cm w., , , , . ,.._m.ycy.,y .c._ . , _ . , - - . . - - , - .m....-.,m. ,,.ye,-

g v:9 , L ,

y7 < p, w .w; <

3[~c d

ee (1- ,

a,,,,.m 4 s .

• y : , s gt . - 3.,. Rev. 0

!  % .gri. QL .. g -

' %c$U;#%:

- wp : JMeR.. c r OmMIDNWBALTE EDISON CONFANY T n -I m ,[',li fC -

PRODUCTION TRAININO STUDENT sIMsLATOR TRAINING EVALUATION CEECELIST

. , l l

NAME Bob Glaze egang yo,84-2 DATE 8-17-84 005asE NAME Shift Advisor EVALUATION LEVIL O. R0 1

Om ^

l D SCRE

, D= .

' Ref 4

• N .

, 5 3 2 1 /g ETALUATED ARIAS 1 X SYSTENE ENOWLEDGE

} 2 X RE TIBORT, NUCLEAR F0WER DIST, FWR CONTROL A TIERNAL SCIENCES 3 X 000D OPERATINO FRACTICES (CONN. , LOG 4, PLANT AWARENESS. ETC. )

4 x NORNAL OPERATINO PROCEDURES 5 y - *=a' (OFF-NORMAL) AND ENER0ENCY FROCEDURES 6 y TECINICAL SPECIFICATIONS 7 x ABILITY TO OFIRATE TER CONTROL BOARD l 8 X ABILITY TO SUPERVISE NORNAL PLANT OPERATION-9 y ABILITY TO SUPERVISE 073 UNDER STRESS OR IN ENER. SITUATIONS l

10 x OBSERVED ATTITUDE TOWAnnar 1] OPS 23 SFTT 3] CO-WRERS 4] TRNO 11 y f.EABERSETF 5=Ezee11ent 4=Above Average 3= Average 2=Below Average 1= Poor N/0=Not Observed CO35EINTS: (Strengths, Weaknesses, Areas Needing Improvements, etc.) *Writtec Comments i Retsired

The 84-2 Class simulator program consisted of 5 days, 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br />

! per day of simulator operations. Bob Glaze's ability to direct

.t m... .v. ~zs plint eparations/during abnormal and emergency conditions was

. ,~v impreseiv ..N,,He . . .- .

always demonstrated complete control from .

identification ~'through recovery during these conditions.

1

• i l

i . .

l l

haddittenalPageisofComments ,

" ^

~

INSTRUCTOR

.'r

. ~ - - , - _ _ . . - - . . - - - - - ~ -~~-+----~~~-=-,-~N'~- -- ~ ''**'"~""*~'~"'~""'""'~"'"~' " ~ '

l

. Appendix A '

Rev. O i

. M I COIBIONWEALTE EDISON COMPANT PRODUCTION TRAINING STUDWT SIIEFLATOR TRAINING EVALUATION CIECILIST NAME Rich Tefertiller CLASS NO. 84-2 DAfg 8-17-84 COURSE NAME Shift Advisor EVALUATION LEVEL QRO SRO SCRE STA ,

Ret *

• N .

t

, 5 4 3 2 1 /g IVALUATED AREAS 1 X SYSTINE ENOWLED05 2 y AE TEBORT, NUCLEAR POWER DIST, PWR CONTROL & TIERNAL SCIENCES 3 y 000D OPERATING PRACTICES (COIEE. , LOGE, PLANT A6, ETC. )

4 x NORIEAL OPERATING PROCEDURES 5 y AaNORNAL (OPP-NORMAL) AND ENERGENCY PROCEDURES

, 6 y TECENICAL SPECIPICATIONS I

7 y ABILITY TO OPERATE TBE CONTROL BOARD 8 y ABILITY TO SUPERVISE NCANAL PLANT OPERATION I 9 y ABILITY TO SUPERVISE OPS UNDER STRESS OR IN ENER. SITUATIONS .

10 x OsSERVED ATTITUDE TOWARDS 13 OPS 23 SPff 3] CO-WRERS 4] TRNO j 11 y LEADERSEIP -

5=Ezee1Ient 4=Above Average 3= Average 2=Below Average 1= Poor N/0=Not Observed  !

i. CO3EEENTS: (Strengths, Wo.knesses, Areas Needing Improvemente, etc.)

• Written Co.mente Required The 84-2 Class simulator program consisted at 5 days, 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> per day of simulator operation. Rich Tefertiller's performance on the simulator.was impressive. His past experience indicates expertise in good operating practices, and leadership qualities.

2 a

1

^Ad - 1. iP . .f C t. LdAu AL INSTRUCTOR

. . _ _ _ ~ ~ . _ . _ _ _ - . _ - _ . _ _ _ . _ _ _ - , _ - _ . _ _ _ _ , _ . _

s -(

, ( ,

,e 4:

j . '

/' '

l 4 L ,. '

. 1 Appendia A Rev. 0

c , t .  ?

ry&

,l .

,h

- n #;?9 4.;j'Fy ;p^ - '

• COImmev5&LTE EstSou ComPA:vy s r-2 ,

PR0ccCTICs TRA.YNING

g. ,

STuner? SImpLATOs, TRAINING EVALUATITAf CEBCILIST t

/ .

/.

t l naam Bob Femal CLAsg 30, 84 2 DAfg 8-17-84

, 4 00gasE mAus Shift Advisor ' -

s avALgATION LEVEL C. 30 1

/ OM ..

s

( O Se=

r , i STA

'[

-; p / ,

Ret I *

• N .

4 2- . *TLLEATED A1AAA

5 3 1 1 8 //

-: G. -

1 x ) SYSTME INOWLENE S y ] AI TER3R1, EUC1.2AR POWER DIST, PWR CONTROL & TEEMIAL SCIENCES

{

3 y l0GC3OPERATINGPRACTICE3 (COIEE. . LOOS, PLANP AWARWIE' S, ETC. )

4 y l1108114. OPERATT40 ' PROCEDURES

5 X -

{e;MIONIAL (OPP-NORMAL) AlfD ENERGalCT PROCEDURSE

[ 6 \

X TECEf1 CAL SPECIPICATIONS

, 7 y o . ABILITY TO OPERATE TER COIFT.ROL BOARD j s r AsIttTY TO SUPERVISE mORmAL PLArr OPERATIost-9 y ASILITY TO CUPERVIFE OPS UNDER STRESS OR IN EIER. SITUATICIf8 10 y i 05 SERVED ATTITUDE TCVARDSt1] OPS 2] SFTY 3] CO-URERS 4] TRNG 11 y lLEADERSEIP 5= Excellent 4=Above Average 3= Average S=seleer Average 1= Poor N/0=IIet Oteerved COISIIIITS: (Strengthe, Weakneesee, Arese Needit.g Improvemente, etc.)

• Written Comente 1 ,

/

Required i

The 84-2 Class Simulator prostam' consisted of 5 days, 8 hours9.259259e-5 days <br />0.00222 hours <br />1.322751e-5 weeks <br />3.044e-6 months <br /> per day c,f simulatcr operations Bob Femal

. ., . s performed well and i

displayedjexcellent leadership qualities.

6e ~) ,

f ,

i

• pg s ,

, \ .

/

p

,a..

• /

d s -

' 0

' \ l' ,

UAAR aaast1 1Fe

.ee - ta tc l '

o I., ,.R I

U

. . , - - _ . - -._,,n.,, . - ~ ~-*w~~~~~~

O5-g

,l ' ,

""' ~~ * *~' #~ ~~~""~" * ~

l l