ML021000415

From kanterella
Revision as of 07:45, 27 March 2020 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
EOC Meeting Slides
ML021000415
Person / Time
Site: Quad Cities  Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 04/02/2002
From:
NRC/RGN-III
To:
References
Download: ML021000415 (34)


Text

ANNUAL ASSESSMENT MEETING Nuclear Regulatory Commission

Agenda

! Introduction

! Review of Reactor Oversight Process

! Discussion of Plant Performance Results

! Licensee Response and Remarks

! NRC Closing Remarks

! Meeting with the Licensee adjourned

! NRC available to address questions from the public

Region III Organization Jim Dyer Regional Administrator Jim Caldwell Deputy Geoffrey E. Grant John (Jack) Grobe Director Division of Reactor Projects Director Division of Reactor Safety Steven Reynolds Roy Caniano Deputy Director Deputy Director Mark Ring Regional Specialists Branch Chief Robert Lerch Project Engineer Karla Stoedter John Adams Senior Resident Inspector Resident Inspector George Wilson Mike Kurth Acting Senior Resident Resident Inspector (6/2/02)

NRC Representatives

! Mark A. Ring, Chief, Projects Branch R (mar@nrc.gov (630) 829-9703)

! Karla Stoedter, Senior Resident Inspector R (kkb@nrc.gov (309) 654-2227

! George Wilson, Acting SRI until 5/4 R (gaw1@nrc.gov (309) 654-2227

! John Adams, Resident Inspector (departs 4/6)

R (jta@nrc.gov (309) 654-2227)

! Mike Kurth, Resident Inspector (arrives 6/2)

R (mfk@nrc.gov (309) 654-2227

Reference Sources Reactor Oversight Process http://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/

index.html Public Electronic Reading Room http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html Public Document Room 1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free)

NRC Activities

! Ensure nuclear plants are designed, constructed, and operated safely

! Issue licenses for the peaceful use of nuclear materials in the U.S.

! Ensure licensees use nuclear materials and operate plants safely, and are prepared to respond to emergencies

NRC Performance Goals

! Maintain safety and protect the environment

! Enhance public confidence

! Improve effectiveness, efficiency, and realism of processes and decision making

! Reduce unnecessary regulatory burden

NRC Oversight Activities

! Provides assurance plants are operating safely and in accordance with the regulations

! Risk informed process

! Objective indicators of performance

! Inspections focused on key safety areas

! Defines expected NRC and licensee actions

Reactor Oversight Process Strategic Performance Areas Safety Cornerstones Baseline Inspection Performance Indicator Results Results Significance Significance Threshold Threshold Action Matrix Regulatory Response

Strategic Performance Areas Safety Cornerstones

! Reactor Safety P Initiating Events P Mitigating Systems P Barrier Integrity P Emergency Preparedness

! Radiation Safety P Occupational Radiation Safety P Public Radiation Safety

! Safeguards P Physical protection

CROSS-CUTTING AREAS MAY AFFECT ALL CORNERSTONES

! PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION & RESOLUTION

! HUMAN PERFORMANCE

! SAFETY CONSCIOUS WORK ENVIRONMENT

NRC Resident and Regional Inspectors Conduct Safety Inspections Baseline Inspections at all reactor sites to monitor plant safety performance in each of the Strategic Performance Areas Event Follow-up and Supplemental Inspections when required

Key Aspects of Baseline Inspection Program

! Conducted at all plants

! Objective evidence of safety in all cornerstones

! Emphasizes safety significant systems, components, activities, and events

! Monitors licensee effectiveness in finding and fixing safety issues

! Standardized inspection report format to describe significant findings and non-compliance

! Inspection reports are publicly accessible

Examples of Baseline Inspections

! Plant safety tours

! Plant control room tours

! Maintenance and alignment of equipment

! Operator response during simulated emergency conditions

! Plant security

! Controls for radiation releases

! Worker radiation protection

Examples of Baseline Inspections

! Equipment Alignment - ~ 70 hrs/yr

! Annual Fire Protection - ~ 35 hrs/yr

! Trienniel Fire Protection - ~200 hrs every 3 yrs

! Operator Response - ~ 125 hrs/yr

! Plant security - ~40 hours/yr

! Emergency preparedness - ~60 hrs/yr

! Rad release controls - ~100 hrs every 2 years

! Worker radiation protection - ~125 hrs/year

! Corrective action program - 10% every inspecton

! Corrective action program - ~200 hr every 2 yrs

Inspection Areas Radiation Safety Safeguards Reactor Safety Emergency Occupational Public Initiating Mitigating Barrier Events Systems Integrity Preparedness Radiation Radiation Safety Physical Protection Safety Inspection Procedures

! Adverse Weather  ! Operability Evaluation  ! Excercise Evaluation  ! Sec Authorization

! Evaluation of Changes  ! Operator Workarounds  ! Alert and Notice Access

! Equipment Alignment  ! Permanent Mods-Online  ! ERO Augment  ! Sec Search

! Fire Protection  ! Permanent Mods  ! EAL  ! Sec Response

! Flood Protection  ! Post Maintenance Test  ! EP Preparation  ! Sec Plan change

! Heat Sink  ! Refueling Outage  ! Drill Evaluation

! In Service Inspection  ! SSDI  ! RAD Access

! Operator Requalification  ! Surveillance Testing  ! ALARA Plan

! Maintenance Rule Imp  ! Temporary Modifications  ! RAD monitoring

! Maintenance Risk Assessment  ! PI&R  ! RAD Effluents

! Non-Routine Events  ! Event Follow-up  ! RAD Transport

! PI Verification  ! RAD Environmental

Event Follow-up and Supplemental Inspections

! Review events for significance

! Follow-up significant inspection findings

! Determine causes of performance declines

! Provides for graduated response

Performance Indicators

! 18 Performance Indicators

! Covers all cornerstones

! Licensee submits data to NRC quarterly

! Baseline Inspection program verifies accuracy

! Available on Reactor Oversight Program Web site

Relationship of Strategic Performance Areas, Safety Cornerstones and Performance Indicators Radiation Safety Safeguards Reactor Safety Initiating Mitigating Barrier Emergency Occupational Public Events Systems Integrity Preparedness Radiation Radiation Safety Physical Protection Safety Performance Indicators Emergency AC Power System Unavailability Reactor Coolant Occupational Drill/Exercise RETS/ODCM Protected Area System Specific Performance Exposure Control Equipment High Pressure Activity Effectiveness Radiological Injection System Effluents Unplanned Unavailability Scrams ERO Drill Personnel Participation Screening Heat Removal Reactor Coolant Program System System Scrams with Unavailability Leakage Loss of Normal Alert and Heat Removal Notification FFD/Personnel Residual Heat System Removal System Reliability Unavailability Program Unplanned Power Change Safety System Functional Failure

Significance Threshold Performance Indicators Green: Only baseline Inspection White: May increase NRC oversight Yellow: Requires more NRC oversight Red: Requires more NRC oversight Inspection Findings Green: Very Low safety issue White: Low to moderate safety issue Yellow: Substantial safety issue Red: High safety issue

Performance Indicator Key Aspects of Assessment Program

! Objective assessment of performance

! Action Matrix to determine agency response to performance P Inspection level increases P Management involvement increases P Regulatory action increases

! Plant specific assessment letters

! Information on NRC public web site

Action Matrix Concept Licensee Regulatory Degraded Multiple/Degraded Unacceptable Response Response Cornerstone Cornerstone Performance Increasing Safety Significance Increasing NRC Inspection Efforts Increasing NRC/Licensee Management Involvement Increasing Regulatory Actions

An Action Matrix is used to assess overall plant safety performance and specify thresholds for NRC Enforcement Actions L ic e n s e e R e s p o n s e R e g u la to r y R e s p o n s e D e g ra d e d C o rn e r s to n e M u lt ip l e / R e p e titi v e U n a c c e p ta b le C o lu m n C o lu m n C olum n D e g ra d e d C o rn e r s to n e P e r fo rm a n c e C o lu m n C o lu m n R A ll A s s e s s m e n t In p u ts O n e o r T w o W h i te O ne D e grad ed R e p e tit iv e D e g ra d e d O ve ra ll U n a c c e p ta b l e E ( P e rf o rm a n c e In p u ts (i n d iff e r e n t C o rn e r s to n e ( 2 W h i te C o rn e rs to n e , M u l tip le P e rfo rm a n c e ; P l a n ts S In d ic a t o rs ( P Is ) a n d c o r n e rs to n e s ) in a In p u ts o r 1 Y e ll o w D egra de d N o t P e rm itte d to In s p e c tio n F i n d in g s ) S tra te g ic P e rfo rm a n c e In p u t) o r a n y 3 W h it e C o rn e rs to n e s , M u lti p l e O p e r a t e W ith i n t h is U

G r e e n ; C o rn e r s to n e A r e a ; C o r n e rs to n e In p u ts i n a S tra t e g ic Y e l lo w In p u ts , o r 1 R e d B a n d , U n a c c e p ta b le L O b je c t iv e s F u l ly M e t O b je c t iv e s F u l ly M e t P e rfo rm a n c e A r e a ; In p u t; C o r n e r s to n e M a rg in to S a fe ty T C o rn e r s to n e O b je c t iv e s O b je c ti v e s M e t w ith S M e t w it h M in im a l L o n g s ta n d i n g Is s u e s o r R e d u c t io n in S a f e ty S ig n if ic a n t R e d u c t io n in M a rg i n S a fe ty M a rg i n R R e g u l a to ry N on e B r a n c h C h i e f (B C ) o r D D o r R e g io n a l R A (o r E D O ) M e e t w ith C o m m is s io n m e e t in g E P e rfo rm a n c e D iv is io n D ir e c t o r ( D D ) A d m in is tra to r ( R A ) S e n io r L ic e n s e e w ith S e n i o r L ic e n s e e S M e e tin g M e e t w ith L ic e n s e e M e e t w ith L ic e n s e e M a na gem en t M a nag em en t P L ic e n s e e A c tio n L ic e n s e e C o rre c ti ve L ic e n s e e r o o t c a u s e L ic e n s e e S e lf L ic e n s e e P e rfo r m a n c e O A c tio n e v a l u a tio n a n d A s s e s s m e n t w i th N R C Im p ro v e m e n t P l a n w ith N c o r re c ti v e a c tio n w i th O v e rs ig h t N R C O v e r s ig h t S N R C O v e rs ig h t E

N R C In s p e c t io n R is k - In fo rm e d B a s e lin e B a s e l in e a n d B a s e l in e a n d B a s e l in e a n d In s p e c tio n s u p p le m e n ta l s u p p le m e n ta l s u p p le m e n ta l P ro g ra m in s p e c tio n p ro c e d u re in s p e c tio n p r o c e d u r e in s p e c tio n p ro c e d u re 95 00 1 95 002 95 003 R e g u l a to ry A c ti o n s N on e S up plem ental S u p p le m e n ta l - 1 0 C F R 2 .2 0 4 D F I O rd e r to M o d i fy ,

in s p e c tio n o n l y in s p e c tio n o n ly - 1 0 C F R 5 0 .5 4 (f) L e tte r S us pen d, or R ev ok e

- C A L /O rd e r L ic e n s e d A c ti v i tie s C A s s e ss m e n t L e tte rs B C o r D D re v i e w /s ig n D D re v ie w /s i g n R A re v ie w /s i g n R A re v ie w /s i g n O a s s e s s m e n t r e p o rt (w / a s s e s s m e n t re p o rt a s s e s s m e n t re p o r t a s s e s s m e n t r e p o rt M in s p e c tio n p la n ) (w / i n s p e c ti o n p la n ) (w / in s p e c tio n p la n ) ( w / in s p e c tio n p la n )

M C o m m iss io n In fo rm e d U

N I A n n u a l P u b l ic S R I o r B C M e e t w ith B C o r D D M e e t w it h R A (o r d e s ig n e e ) E D O (o r C o m m is s io n ) C o m m is s io n M e e t in g C M e e tin g L ic e n s e e L ic e n s e e D is c u s s P e r f o r m a n c e D is c u s s P e rf o rm a n c e w ith S e n i o r L ic e n s e e A w ith L ic e n s e e w ith S e n io r L ic e n s e e M a nag em en t T M a na gem en t I

O N

IN C RE AS I NG S AFE TY S IG N IFI CA NC E ---------->

National Summary of Plant Performance -103 Plants End of Calendar Year 2001 Licensee Response 74 Regulatory Response 24 Degraded Cornerstone 4 Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone 1 Unacceptable 0

National Summary Fourth Quarter Calendar Year 2001 Performance Indicator Results Green: 1834 White: 8 Yellow: 0 Red: 0 Total Inspection Findings (April 2001 - December 2001)

Green: 660 White: 23 Yellow: 2 Red: 0

Quad Cities 1 4th Qtr 2001 - Performance Summary

Quad Cities 1 4th Qtr 2001 - Performance Summary

Quad Cities 2 4th Qtr 2001 - Performance Summary

Quad Cities 2 4th Qtr 2001 - Performance Summary

QUAD CITIES INSPECTION RESULTS FOUR GREEN FINDINGS (INITIATING EVENTS AND MITIGATING SYSTEMS CORNERSTONES):

TRANSFORMER DEGRADATION SAFETY EVALUATION FOR RAINBOW PUMPS HPCI NOT ADEQUATELY FILLED BATTERY ROOM VENTILATION FAILURES FOUR NO COLOR FINDINGS (CROSS CUTTING ISSUES NOT READILY ASSESSED FOR SIGNIFICANCE):

PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION & RESOLUTION LICENSED OPERATOR EVALUATION

QUAD CITIES INSPECTION RESULTS (CONTINUED)

PERFORMANCE INDICATOR REPORTING:

ONE NO COLOR FINDING FOR INACCURATE PI REPORTING ONE VIOLATION FOR INACCURATE PI REPORTING INSPECTION HOURS:

ABOUT 2000 TOTAL INSPECTION HOURS MAJOR INSPECTION ACTIVITIES:

2 SUPPLEMENTAL INSPECTIONS MODIFICATIONS & SAFETY EVALUATIONS PROBLEM IDENTIFICATION INSPECTION

Quad Cities Annual Assessment (April 1 -Dec 31, 2001)

! Operated safely

! Fully met all cornerstone objectives

! Licensee Response Band of Action Matrix P No inspection findings greater than very low safety significance (Green)

P All performance indicators Green P Supplemental inspection results acceptable

! NRC Plans to conduct baseline inspections

NRC Response To 9/11

! Activated NRC Response Centers

! Closely Coordinated Response With:

-- Our Licensees

-- FBI

-- Military, State, & Local Authorities

-- Law Enforcement

-- Intelligence Communities

! Issued Security Advisories

-- Increased Patrols

-- Augmented Security Capabilities

-- Added Barriers and Posts

-- More Limited Access

-- Enhanced Security Awareness

! Issued Order on Security

! NRC Monitored Enhanced Security