ML040210757
| ML040210757 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 01/15/2004 |
| From: | Ernstes M Operator Licensing and Human Performance Branch |
| To: | Stall J Florida Power & Light Co |
| References | |
| 50-250/03-301, 50-251/03-301, ES-201 50-250/03-301, 50-251/03-301 | |
| Download: ML040210757 (33) | |
See also: IR 05000250/2003301
Text
Ad ministrative Documents
TURKEY POINT DEC. 2003
EXAM 50-25012003-301
DECEMBER 3 15,2003 -
Exam Preparation Checklist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-201-1 J
Exam Outline Quality Checklist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-201-2 /!
s D k W Y Si//At)P)rL
Exam Security Agreement . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-201-3-/
Administrative Topics Outline (Final) . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-1c/
Control Room Systems and Facility Walk-through Test Outline
(Finai) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-302-2 d
Operating Test Quality Check Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-3. J
Simulator Scenario Quality Check Sheet . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-4d
Transient and Event Checklist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-5 / ,
A. Competencies Checklist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-6 J
J.43 Written Exam Quality Check Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-401-26J
Written Exam Review Worksheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-401-9
--E?-Written Exam Grading Quality Checkkt . . . . . . . . . . ES-403-1 l/
/l;y Post-Exam Check Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-501-1
..... .......-
ES..2(;1.... ... .....Exammtion
.... ...
Preparation Ciiecklist ....- ....... Form ES-201-1 -
Facility: Turkev Point Date of Examination: 4&%W+%+
/?/3-+r/rdo3
Examinations Developed by: Operating by Facility / Written by NRC
Task Description / Reference
-120 I 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e) I w-
i-901 I 15. Reference material due (C.l .e; C.3.c)l I --+
7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided
to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)
-45 1 8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and
reference materials due (C.1 .e, f, g & h; C.3.d)
ons due and assignment sheet prepared
-14 1 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee
review (C.2.h: C.3.f)
-14 1 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1 .j; C.2.f 8 h; C.3.g) I a
reting tests approved by
14. Final applications reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver
letters sent (C.2.g, ES-204)
16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions
distributed to NRC examiners (6.3.i) I
Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.
They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination
with the facility licensee.
[ ] Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.
23 of 25 NUREG-1021, Draft Rpvision 9
-
Fsciii
ltRm Task Description
1.
w
R
I
T
T
E
N
2. a. Using Form ES-301-5, verity that the proposed scenario Sets cover the required number of
s
I
M mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule Without
licants' audit test s *
3.
w
I
1\1 I
T
low-power or shutdown condition,
of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (") I
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Supmisor /0-1-"3
Note: * Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
. .. .
'.": 24of26 NUREG-1024, Draft Revision 9
~ .--.-
ES-209 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Form ES..20:-2
Task Description
the tasks are distributed a
Implement an alternate path
b. Fadlity Reviewer r)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRCSuper&x
NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 24 of 25
1. Pre-Examination
I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensin
date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information ab
by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate. or p
esdback to thase appl
PRINTED NAME
-
25 of 25 NUREG-1021, DraR Revision 9
1. Pre-Examination
I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing ex ons s4
date of my sianature. I aaree that I will not kmwinalv divuloe anv informatin about tb
authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measure 'racility licensee's
procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may k and/or an enforcement
action against me OF the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility manag RC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that
examinatian security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination
To the best of my knowledge, I did nat divulge to any unauthorized persona RC licensing examinations administered
during the week@)of&i-'2xCsFrom the date tt n of examination administration. I did not
instruct, evaluate, or provide perforrnanc iE licensing examinations, except as specifically
noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTED NAME JOB TITLE I RESPQNSlBlLl DATE SIGNATLIRE (2) DATE NQTE
led below and
authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measure
procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may and/or an enforcement
action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility manag indications or suggestions that
examination security may have been compromised.
2. Post-Examination
noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTEQ NAME JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBIL DATE NOTE
25 Of 25 NUREG-1021. Draft Revision 9
Fi d A h
ES-301 - Topics Outline
Administrative F Q ES-301-1
~
Facility: Turkey Point Units 3 S: 4 Date of Examination: December, 2005
Exam I.ere1: SRO (I) Operating Test Xumber: 1
Administrative Topic Describe activity to he performed
(See Note)
G.2.1.7 (3.714.4)
In preparation OF a planned reactor power change, perform a reactivity management
calculation to determine the correct volume of boric acid to be added to the RCS t o
Conduct of Operations achieve the desired power change. (M) (15 min.)
G.2.1.12 (294.0)
Evaluate the applicable Technical Specificationfs) in the event of the unexpected outage
of the IJnit 4 Startup Transfomr when Unit 4 is at 100% power and IJnit 3 is in Mode
Conduct of Operations 4. List all Limiting Conditions for Operations affected, Action Statement required
operator responses, options and time limits. (N) (30 min.)
-
G.2.2.18 ( 2 3 3 . 6 )
Determine Contingency Actions due to loss of a CCW pump during RCS reduced
inventory operation and Phase I1 decay beat load conditions. (M) (15 min.)
Equipment Control
G.2.3.6 72.1~3.1)
__ I .-_ -__-
Review for the purpose of approving a radioactive liquid release permit. Identify all of
the embedded errors. (M) (15 min.)
Radiation Control
_,_I_ - .-.-.
( 2 4 . 4 0 (2.3/4.0)
Review for the purpose of approving the Florida Nuclear Plant Emcrgency Notification
Form. Identify all of the embedded errors. (M) (20 min.)
NOTE: A11 i t e m ( 5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless t h e y are retaking only
the administrative topics, %,hen5 are required.
__
-PL haw-
- --
a
I
ES-301 I _ Control Roomh-Plant Systems Form ES-301-2
._ -- I_ - .
. _ - - _ I_ _ _
Faciiity: Turkey Point Units 3 & 4 Date of Examination: December, 2003
Exam Level: SRO (1) (u) Operating Test Number: 1
Control Roomastems (8 for RO: 7 for SRO-I; __-
2 or 3 for SRO-U) I I _
SystendJPM Title Safety
Function
a. 006/ Transfer to Akernate Hot Leg Recirculation (15 m h )
2
(Rased on HHSI Hot Leg path valve failure)
h. 005/ Respond to Loss of Residual Heat Removal (30 rnin.)
4
(RHR Pump Trip & FCV-605 failure)
C. 004/ CVCS Respond to FCV-113A Failure During 1
(Requiring use of emergency boration valve)
-
d. 0101 Respond to a Pressurizer Pressure Control 3
(PT-444 failure + spray valve stuck open requiring reactor trip)
e. 015/ Place Power Range N-44 in Servlce/Respond to loss of Power
0 -
Range Channel N-44 (15 min.) 7
f. 061/ Shutdown 2 AFW Pumps with Start Signals Present Whii-Z 4
the EOPs (25 min.1
-~~ ~
g. 062/ Restore Power to 3B 4KV Bus (10 min.)
6
(Restores degraded CCW System)
__ ____
h.
_ _ _ ~
In-Plant Systems ( 3 for RO; 3 for SRO-I; 3 or 2 for SRO-U)
__ -_l_r__
i. 028/ Locally Place Unit 4 Hydrogen Monitor in Service Post-LOCA 1 5
(2Q min.)
j. 008/ Split CCW Headers in Response to Leakage on 4A GCW
8
Header (20 min.)
k. 062/ Respond to a Loss of Vital Instrument Bus 4P08 6
(1,ccally swap to spare inverter) (30 mh.) (N)
_____I -
a *Type Codes: (@)ired from bank, (M)odifed from bank, @)emp, (A)lternatePath, (C)eontrol
room, (S)imulator, (L)ow Power, (R)CA Bold Print - JPMs performed by SRO-U
I -
ES-301 Operating Test Qcality Checklist f3rm ES-301.-3
FdCdIty ZrL% PO , k % Rate of Examination Id3-I LfhBperatin
/
1. GENERAL CRITERIA
ay repetition between this and other operating
initial conditions
initiating cues
references and took, including associated
reasonable and validated time limits (av@(@@ time allow
designation if deemed to be time cri
specific performance niteria that incluqii:
- detailed expected actions wi@:
The associated sim tests scenario sets h a w been reviewed in accordance with
d. NRC Siipen4sar
._ NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9 24 of 27
FidA-6
ES-301 Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist Form ES-301-4
3. Each event description consists of
point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
have sufficient time to carry wt expected a d i
m n t l ' modified scenario. All
25 of 27 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
- ES-301 Transient and Event Checklist Form ES-301-5
Tufkeq Po:* OPERATING TEST NO.: -d
A licant E lution Mnimum
%w Yfipe dumber
0th instrument and component malfunctions should
e that require verifiable actions that provide insight
petence count toward the minimum requirement.
Author: , G....rn%.6U&BL ______
NRC Reviewer:
- ~.
NUREG-1022, Draft Revision 9 26 of 29
GFJi%-
ES-301 Competencies Checklist Form ES-301-6
I
c&me type and enter one OT more event numbers that will aliow the
he every applicable competency for every applicant.
NRC Reviewer:
27 of 27 NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-6
Quality Checklist
Initial
- b*
IjI
-
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
...
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
5. Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as
indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
.... the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or
the audit exam was completed before the license exatn WRS started; or
the examinations were developed independently; or
- the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or
ore than 75 percent
comprehensionianalysis level; the SRO exam
mav exceed 60 percent if tho randomly selected
Bate
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer r) .. .........
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Regional Supervisor
Note. * The laci t:y reviewer 8 init'als,stynat,,re ale not applicable tor NRC-devclo,,cd exurninnti0:ls.
_-. ..............-
.............. -
P :iidnpendent NRC rewewet in'tial items 111Coiumn :E1::.4!!i~!exnm~~rco!!~ilrrencc
.............~
........- rewired
30of 34 NUREG-1021. Draft Revision 9
ES-401 Written Examination Form ES-401-9
Turkey Point Review Worksheet
Explanation
Instructions
[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
Enter the level of knowledge (LOU) of each question as either (F)undamenlal or (H)qher cognitive level
. Enter the level of difficulty (LO51 of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - diffcultj rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
The stem lacks sufficient focus l o elicit the correct answer (e.g., undear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
The Stern or distractom rmtain w e s (i.e., dues, Specific determiners, phrasing. length. etc).
The answer choices are a wllection of unrelated truetfalse statements.
One or m e tkwmedistractors is not credible.
One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g.. if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stern).
Check the appropriate box i f a job Mntent error is identified:
The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the qiiestion has a valid KIA but, as written, is not Operational in content).
The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e.. it is not required to be known from memory),
The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
The question requires reverse logic M application compared to the job requirements.
. Check questions that are sampled for wnfonance with the approved KIA and thoso that are desiqnated SRO-only (WA and l i e n s level mismatches are unacceptable).
Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (V)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need ~f (E)ditodai enhancement, or (S)atisfadory?
Explanation
001K3.01,CIA 2.913.0,Bank
10/29103 RFA Suggest "Pressurizer level _ _a n d letdown Row -"
then RII in the blank with choices of increase or decrease.
Page 1 of 17
3. Psvchometric Flaws
6.
IiEiS
II 7.
Explanation
E 003K3.04, CIA 3.9I4.1,New
1Ql29103RFA Typo in the stem. RPS system should be just RPS.
Either say if the high ... or if a high ... not if the a high.
Suggest distractw "C"read RPS will see a high flow signal on one
channels of "B" loop. NO reactor trip will occur.
Move "RPS will see a. to the stem.
s 10/3QMSSDR Comment accepted
11/28/03Facility requested minor wording change and added "only t o
response "c"to ensure incorrect.
1215103 TCK Requested changes incorporaied.
- _I
E 004A4.19. CIA 3.1i2.8. New
10129103 RFA Distractor "D"is noi plausible. Suggest: Tihe letdown
isolation vale will not auto close on a loss of control air or loss of 125
S 005A4.02, CiA 3.413.'. Bank
10129/03RFA Question is system knotuledge. LOK + F
10/30/03 SDR Comment not accepted. According to direction from
Usova. the operator has to know multiple pieces of information, so this is
CIA.
E : X K G . C J . I.IE-M 3.e :$.S @ a r k
102tiiC3 RFA Scs!raxor 'C" 'scn! pladsik e
S.q;esl: 'DeFrsssLnze m e RCS IC 61:cv. lo#, nead sa!avi injoc!ion:
S !0130;03 5DR Cimm;.r: dcci.clea.
11/28/03Facility requested editorial change.
1215/03 TCK Requested changes incorporated.
E 007A1.01,CIA 2.913.1, New
10/30103 RFA Since the question solicits an action:
Reword didstractoss to Redlice PRT temDorature. reduce PRT iwel.
i
RedJce W T pressb:e Cb'sin a Qfan3ampte
S ~O!30!03 S3R Comrren: accepted
11.28103 Faci pi fnqdestei eamna mange
- 2/5103 TCK Req1ies1ec chanses hcjrwmteo
007EK2.02. CIA 2.6t2.8. New
10/29/03 RFA OK
11/28/03 Facility requesteC editorial cnange.
12/5/03 TCK Requested changes incorporated.
Page2of 17
w (0 w (0 I I m
P z z
>
X X
m
X s I r
3 R 9
P r
c
7
I
$m
i
-6mB
ru"
3 0)
2 P
I! 6
0 2 t >
X
Im
I
N N
I= u I
P M (D
N N N
T
3 VI 3 VI
> z
>
N
D
3 (0
w * I u l * I
r-
e
m
Li
0
> P.
X
E
- I
n
=
imetflc Flaws 1 4. Job Content Flaws 5. other 7.
Explanation
_I
E 056aA1.24.MEM 2.913.0, Bank
10129103 TCK, Remove "occurs" in stem. Remove "indications" and
change '"indicator" to "indication" in the stem.
to be themaking
Suggest most obvious
distractor "D"correct and "C" incorrect since "C" seems
answer.
S j0/31/03 SDR Incorporatedcomments except changing correct
answer. This would take question away ranK/A topic.
11128103 Facility reqllested revising stem to indicate successfuk natural
circulation.
1215103 TCK Requested changes incorporated.
S 057AA2.19,MEM 4.014.3,Bank
$0129103 TCK, OK
11/28/03 Facility proposed a rewrite of the qtrestmn since it was a level f
qlJt?stLOn.
1215103 TcK Requested chaogos incorporated.
0 5 W . 0 3 , MEM 3.S3.9.Modified
10129103 TCK. Move "3D01" in the stem afler "DC Bus'. Suggest
revising distractor "D"since 3A load SeqirencerwiU be Iost which
prevents some Safeguards equipment from starting. This could be
int6rpreted as a correct answer.
S 059K4.16. MEM 3.113.2, Bank
.10129/03 TCK. OK
11128/03 Facility requested minor editorial changes.
12/5/03 TCK Requested changes incorporated.
E 061A1.01, C/A3.3/3 6, New
10129103 TCK. Change distractor "A" from 22% to 32% to make the
dislraclm m r e even and this one m e plausible.
S 1Oi3Q103 SDR Requested change incorporated.
1112&/03Facility requested minor editorial changes.
1215103TCK Requested changes incorporatad.
Page 8 o f 17
I-:
z
>.
I
N
<
N
I
r N
n m
__
N
.-
.-
6
m
r-: -em
a
x
W
9 ln W l n w t
z z z > c.
> > > t > -..
N
0
X
X
X
N N
U
-
I
~
3. Psvchwnetric Flaws 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Other 7.
-
artial iE1S
6' Explanation
IJ WE04EG2.4.18, MEM 2.7i3.6. New
10129103 TCK, Replace question or revuse question to RO knovrledgo
level. Also. distractors "B" and "D"are not plausible since the break is
outside containment (Der stem) and containment isolations would not b'
I121srn3 TCK deaueitted chawaes incorwTated
WEOSEA1.1, MEM 4.114.0,New
10129103 TCK, Thjs question may not be suitable for KO knowledge.
Ask site for their opinion. Distractor "D" needs to have 'Thermal Couplm
changed to "thermocouple".
11110103 TCK Added tit!e to stem for FR-H.I. FaciliW aarees that
lqauestion is acceptable for KO knowledge
WEOREK3.2, MEM3.6l4.0. New
10/29/03 TCK. Need to check with utilitv to see if this is RO knowleda,
IMake distract& more qeneral and identh a5 maior event 0.e.. Loss 61
U WE+OEKZ.Z,C/A 3.613.9.Nevr
10/29/03 TCK, Reword l a d paragraph since this is copied out ofthe
text word for word. Nureg 1021 states this should not be done Since it
not discriminatin due to person could recognize paragraph.
s 11H3/03 TCK 8uestion revised to aet rid of minutia.
E RE!>E<l.2, C1.4 3.614.1, Kew
10129:03 TCY. heed IOm a m '2:' CEF tehzed and bc ::in tne s t m 10
c;ffeienliaie betmen tno 2 sets af ni.m!xrS .Aud a stalBiit.nt Sayany
- 're!crcnce ~IOV.OEII" a m provide .ma!? fer reference. Bel ebe qies!:on
/?ho.::n ne C'A:ns!e:so of MEhl.
S :lo134103 TCK *3?r d s beei Er&?lmx? 0 6 fcr RZ sr.m rc!erence
chart is being given. Changed to'C1A.
11/28/03 Facility proposed new question since question 100 gane a c l ~
t" the answer
.. -. .-. .
Ii2i5iIi TCK Reauested chanaes incormrated
Page 13 of 17
x
-
__
.OK
1. &
1-5)
k3. Stem
Psychometlic Flaws
-
zlb
4. Job Content Flaws
-
inutii
I 5. Other 6.
'/E/S
7.
Explanation
- -
- - Focus ink
-
74 F ? WEIZEK2.2, MEM 3.613.9. New
10/29/03 TCK. Distractor "A'reauires "level" to be inserted aAer
i1215103 TCK
- - - - - Reauisted manses incorwrated:
75 n ? VuE14EK3.3,CIA 3.513.5, New
10/29/03 TCK. May not be RO knowledge level. Answer is same
wording as in the basis documents.
S 11113103 TCK Question remains as-is but we know that it is wordv.
I Cac :y n.: pfowse afferent q:mel:oi
.?I128103Fac lit,, :eq..esled r.ror Ed;13r1aldian:e
j 12/5!03 TCK Req!.esteu changes i n a ~ m r a e c
-
........... ............
_I ......... .. .. ... .. .. .........
..........
-............
..... ...................................
-....
.............. -.. .................. . .. . . . .
........................ .... .......
- ......
....... I _
....................................................
............ -.................. ... ..... ......... .. .... . .
- ....... _
.....
............................
..... I
....................... ......
1 H S 004A1.04, CIA 3.9j4.1, Bank
11/12/03 TCK, Made minor spelling changes. OK now.
11/28103 Facility requested minar wording changes in stern and answeR
12/5/03 TCK Requested changes incorporated.
- - _ I - -
2 F
- - - - -
3 ti
- - - -
4 ti E 1022AA2.02, ClA 3.213.7. New
S 11/12/03 TCK Moved Dart of the answers unto the stem and corrected
some spelling. OK
11128103 Facility requested minor wordsmithing.
12/5/03 TCK Requested changes incorporated.
Page 14of 17
2. I 3. Psvchomctric Flaws I 4. Job Content Flaws 5. Qthw 7.
Explanation
E 026A2.03. CIA 4.114.4. New
S llllZh13 TCK Restructured stem and placed in bullet form for ease of
reading. OK
11128103 Facility requested minor wordsmithing.
12/5/03 TCK Requested changes incorporated.
g the basis for a caution statement in a
be the operation of the components.
nslire the answers are related to the question.
E 029EG2.1.7, CIA3.7/4.4. Bank
S 11112103 TCK Bolded 'do not' to ensure no ambiguity. OK
11128103 Facility eliminated unnecessary words and minor wordsmithing.
l Z 5 M 3 TCK Reauested chanaes incorwrated.
/I
U 033AG2.1.20. CIA4.3I4.2, New
11/12/03 TCK All answers are correct. Re-wlite or replace quostion.
S 11112103 TCK New question developed that meets criteria. OK
Ill28103 FaciCitv reworded distractor "D" and reauested some boldina.
I1215103 TCK Riauested chanaes mcwrowrated.' " II
3 G34G2 1.7, R E M 3 7 4 . 4 . Ne*. OK.
lli28103F 3 c : q removed dnnecessar, wcids ir: stem
125103 TCK R e q x s t i d cnaiges ncotpo'ates.
E 041A2.02,C/A 3.6/3.9, Bank
S 11/12/03 TCK Revised stem to state that "One condenser dump valve
remains full open" instead of '"condenser dump valve fails to dose.
11/28/03 Facility revised condition in Stem to be 1W% power and one
steam dump valve open. Revised answers for new conditions.
1215/03 TCK Reouested chanaes lnmwrated.
S 055EG2.4.22, C/A 3.014.0.Bank
1111Z03 TCK OK.
11128103 Facility requested minor wordsmithing.
12/5/03 TCK Requested changes incwpotated.
S 061AA2.05.CIA 3.5/4.2. New
1i112/03 TCK OK
11128103 Facility requested new question since system was wrong for
the associated KIA.
12/5/03 TCK Requested changes incwporated.
Page 15 of 17
(I)
a
N
Di
r
r-
4-
0
r-
3
--+
E§-403 Written Examination Grading Form ES-403-1
Quality Checklist
Facility: Turkey Point Date of Exam: Dec. 3-15, 2003 Exam Level: SRO
changes 8nd question deletions justified and
a. Grader
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
d. NRC Supervisor (*)
(*) The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the
NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
5of5 NUREG-IO21, Draft Revision 9
ES-501 Post-Examination Check Sheet Form ES-501-1
Task Description Date
Complete
1. Facility written exam comments or graded exams. received and 12118/03
verified complete
2. Facility written exam comments reviewed and incorporated and 12118/03
NRC grading completed, if necessary
1 3. Operating tests graded by NRC examiners 1/I 2/04
NRC Chief examiner review of written exam and operating test 1/13/04
1/I 3/04
1 6. Management (licensing official) review completed 1/I 3/04
1I1 5/04
8. Facility notified of results 1/I 3/04
)I 9. Examination report issued (refer to NRC MC 664-8-0612) 1IZ 5/04
N/A
21 of 23 NUREG-1021, Qraft Revision 9