ML040210757
| ML040210757 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Turkey Point  |
| Issue date: | 01/15/2004 |
| From: | Ernstes M Operator Licensing and Human Performance Branch |
| To: | Stall J Florida Power & Light Co |
| References | |
| 50-250/03-301, 50-251/03-301, ES-201 50-250/03-301, 50-251/03-301 | |
| Download: ML040210757 (33) | |
See also: IR 05000250/2003301
Text
Ad mi n is t rative Docu men ts
TURKEY POINT DEC. 2003
EXAM 50-25012003-301
DECEMBER 3 - 15,2003
Exam Preparation Checklist
J
Exam Security Agreement .....................
ES-201-3-/
....................
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-201-2
Exam Outline Quality Checklist
/!
s D k W Y Si//At)P)rL
Administrative Topics Outline (Final) . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-1 c/
Control Room Systems and Facility Walk-through Test Outline
Operating Test Quality Check Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-3. J
Simulator Scenario Quality Check Sheet . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-4d
/
Transient and Event Checklist . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-301-5
(Finai)
ES-302-2 d
....................................
,
A. Competencies Checklist
ES-301-6 J
. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
J.43 Written Exam Quality Check Sheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-401-26 J
Written Exam Review Worksheet . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . ES-401 -9
--E?- Written Exam Grading Quality Checkkt
ES-403-1 l/
. . . . . . . . . .
/l;y Post-Exam Check Sheet ......................
.....
.......-
....
...
..... Exammtion
....
Preparation
...
Ciiecklist
... .-
Form ES-201-1
-
ES..2(;1
.......
Facility:
Turkev Point
Date of Examination: 4&%W+%+
Examinations Developed by:
Operating by Facility / Written by NRC
/?/3-+r/rdo3
Task Description / Reference
-120
I 2. NRC examiners and facility contact assigned (C.1.d; C.2.e)
I w-
i-901
I 15. Reference material due (C.l .e; C.3.c)l
I --+
7. Examination outline(s) reviewed by NRC and feedback provided
to facility licensee (C.2.h; C.3.e)
-45
1 8. Proposed examinations, supporting documentation, and
reference materials due (C.1 .e, f, g & h; C.3.d)
ons due and assignment sheet prepared
-14
1 11. Examination approved by NRC supervisor for facility licensee
review (C.2.h: C.3.f)
-14
1 12. Examinations reviewed with facility licensee (C.1 .j; C.2.f 8 h; C.3.g) I a
reting tests approved by
14. Final applications reviewed; assignment sheet updated; waiver
letters sent (C.2.g, ES-204)
I
16. Approved scenarios, job performance measures, and questions
distributed to NRC examiners (6.3.i)
Target dates are keyed to the examination date identified in the corporate notification letter.
They are for planning purposes and may be adjusted on a case-by-case basis in coordination
with the facility licensee.
Applies only to examinations prepared by the NRC.
[ ]
23 of 25
NUREG-1021, Draft Rpvision 9
Fsciii -
ltRm
1.
w
R
I
T
T
E
N
2.
s
I
M
3.
w
I
T
Task Description
a. Using Form ES-301-5, verity that the proposed scenario Sets cover the required number of
mix of applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule Without
licants' audit test s *
1\\1 I
low-power or shutdown condition,
of the tasks require the applicant to implement an alternate path
a. Author
b. Facility Reviewer (")
I
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Supmisor
/0-1-"3
Note:
- Not applicable for NRC-developed examinations.
.
..
.
'.":
24of26
NUREG-1024, Draft Revision 9
~
.--.-
Examination Outline Quality Checklist
Form ES..20:-2
Task Description
the tasks are distributed a
Implement an alternate path
b. Fadlity Reviewer r)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRCSuper&x
NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
24 of 25
1.
Pre-Examination
I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensin
date of my signature. I agree that I will not knowingly divulge any information ab
by the NRC chief examiner. I understand that I am not to instruct, evaluate. or p
esdback to thase appl
PRINTED NAME
-
25 of 25
NUREG-1021, DraR Revision 9
1.
Pre-Examination
I acknowledge that I have acquired specialized knowledge about the NRC licensing ex
date of my sianature. I aaree that I will not kmwinalv divuloe anv informatin about tb
ons s4
authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measure
procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may
action against me OF the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility manag
examinatian security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination
'racility licensee's
k and/or an enforcement
RC chief examiner any indications or suggestions that
RC licensing examinations administered
n of examination administration. I did not
To the best of my knowledge, I did nat divulge to any unauthorized persona
during the week@) of&i-'2xCsFrom
the date tt
instruct, evaluate, or provide perforrnanc
noted below and authorized by the NRC.
iE licensing examinations, except as specifically
SIGNATLIRE (2)
DATE NQTE
PRINTED NAME
JOB TITLE I RESPQNSlBlLl
DATE
led below and
and/or an enforcement
indications or suggestions that
authorized by the NRC. Furthermore, I am aware of the physical security measure
procedures) and understand that violation of the conditions of this agreement may
action against me or the facility licensee. I will immediately report to facility manag
examination security may have been compromised.
2.
Post-Examination
noted below and authorized by the NRC.
PRINTEQ NAME
JOB TITLE / RESPONSIBIL
DATE NOTE
25 Of 25
NUREG-1021. Draft Revision 9
Fi d A h
Administrative
- Topics Outline
F
Q
~
Facility: Turkey Point Units 3 S: 4
Exam I.ere1: SRO (I)
Date of Examination: December, 2005
Operating Test Xumber: 1
Administrative Topic
(See Note)
Conduct of Operations
Conduct of Operations
Equipment Control
Radiation Control
_,_I_
Describe activity to he performed
G.2.1.7 (3.714.4)
In preparation OF a planned reactor power change, perform a reactivity management
calculation to determine the correct volume of boric acid to be added to the RCS to
achieve the desired power change. (M) (15 min.)
G.2.1.12 (294.0)
Evaluate the applicable Technical Specificationfs) in the event of the unexpected outage
of the IJnit 4 Startup Transfomr when Unit 4 is at 100% power and IJnit 3 is in Mode
4. List all Limiting Conditions for Operations affected, Action Statement required
operator responses, options and time limits. (N) (30 min.)
-
G.2.2.18 (233.6)
Determine Contingency Actions due to loss of a CCW pump during RCS reduced
inventory operation and Phase I1 decay beat load conditions. (M) (15 min.)
-__-
_ _
I.-_
G.2.3.6 72.1~3.1)
Review for the purpose of approving a radioactive liquid release permit. Identify all of
the embedded errors. (M) (15 min.)
-
.-.-.
( 2 4 . 4 0 (2.3/4.0)
Review for the purpose of approving the Florida Nuclear Plant Emcrgency Notification
Form. Identify all of the embedded errors. (M) (20 min.)
NOTE: A11 item (5 total) are required for SROs. RO applicants require only 4 items unless they are retaking only
the administrative topics, %,hen 5 are required.
a
0
a
-
PL haw-
__
I
- --
ES-301 I_
Control Roomh-Plant Systems
Form ES-301-2
--
I_- ..
_--_I___
._
Faciiity: Turkey Point Units 3 & 4
Exam Level: SRO (1)
(u)
Operating Test Number: 1
Date of Examination: December, 2003
Control Roomastems (8 for RO: 7 for SRO-I; __-
2 or 3 for SRO-U)
SystendJPM Title
a. 006/ Transfer to Akernate Hot Leg Recirculation (15 m h )
(Rased on HHSI Hot Leg path valve failure)
h. 005/ Respond to Loss of Residual Heat Removal (30 rnin.)
(RHR Pump Trip & FCV-605 failure)
C. 004/ CVCS Respond to FCV-113A Failure During
0101 Respond to a Pressurizer Pressure Control
(Requiring use of emergency boration valve)
(PT-444 failure + spray valve stuck open requiring reactor trip)
e. 015/ Place Power Range N-44 in Servlce/Respond to loss of Power
Range Channel N-44 (15 min.)
f. 061/ Shutdown 2 AFW Pumps with Start Signals Present Whii-Z
-
d.
-
the EOPs (25 min.1
-~~
~
g. 062/ Restore Power to 3B 4KV Bus (10 min.)
____
(Restores degraded CCW System) __
h. _
_
_
~
In-Plant Systems (3 for RO; 3 for SRO-I; 3 or 2 for SRO-U) -_l_r__
__
i. 028/ Locally Place Unit 4 Hydrogen Monitor in Service Post-LOCA 1
(2Q min.)
j. 008/ Split CCW Headers in Response to Leakage on 4A GCW
Header (20 min.)
(N)
k. 062/ Respond to a Loss of Vital Instrument Bus 4P08
(1,ccally swap to spare inverter) (30 mh.)
-
_____I
II_
Safety
Function
2
4
1
3
7
4
6
5
8
6
- Type Codes: (@)ired from bank, (M)odifed from bank, @)emp, (A)lternate Path, (C)eontrol
room, (S)imulator, (L)ow Power, (R)CA Bold Print - JPMs performed by SRO-U
I -
Operating Test Qcality Checklist
f3rm ES-301.-3
FdCdIty Z r L % P
O , k %
Rate of Examination Id3-I LfhBperatin
/
1. GENERAL CRITERIA
ay repetition between this and other operating
initial conditions
initiating cues
references and took, including associated
reasonable and validated time limits (av@(@@ time allow
designation if deemed to be time cri
specific performance niteria that incluqii:
- detailed expected actions wi@:
The associated sim
tests scenario sets haw been reviewed in accordance with
d. NRC Siipen4sar
NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
24 of 27
._
FidA-6
Simulator Scenario Quality Checklist
Form ES-301-4
3.
Each event description consists of
point in the scenario when it is to be initiated
have sufficient time to carry wt expected adi
mntl ' modified scenario. All
25 of 27
NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
Transient and Event Checklist
Form ES-301-5
-
OPERATING TEST NO.: - d
Tufkeq Po:*
Mnimum
dumber
E lution
Yfipe
A
licant
%w
0th instrument and component malfunctions should
e that require verifiable actions that provide insight
petence count toward the minimum requirement.
Author:
,
G
.
... .rn%.6U&BL
______
NRC Reviewer:
NUREG-1022, Draft Revision 9
26 of 29
- ~.
GFJi%-
Competencies Checklist
Form ES-301-6
I
c&me type and enter one OT more event numbers that will aliow the
he every applicable competency for every applicant.
NRC Reviewer:
27 of 27
NUREG-1021, Draft Revision 9
Written Examination
Form ES-401-6
Quality Checklist
5.
Question duplication from the license screeninglaudit exam was controlled as
indicated below (check the item that applies) and appears appropriate:
.... the audit exam was systematically and randomly developed; or
the audit exam was completed before the license exatn WRS started; or
the examinations were developed independently; or
-
the licensee certifies that there is no duplication; or
ore than 75 percent
comprehensionianalysis level; the SRO exam
mav exceed 60 percent if tho randomly selected
Initial
b* -
IjI -
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
.......
....... ...
a. Author
c. NRC Chief Examiner (#)
d. NRC Regional Supervisor
b. Facility Reviewer r)
..
Bate
.........
Note.
- The laci t:y reviewer 8 init'als,stynat,,re ale not applicable tor NRC-devclo,,cd exurninnti0:ls.
P :iidnpendent NRC rewewet in'tial items 111 Coiumn :E1::.4!!i~!exnm~~rco!!~ilrrencc rewired
_ .............. --
....... .-
~
-.
..............
.............
30of 34
NUREG-1021. Draft Revision 9
Written Examination
Form ES-401-9
Turkey Point Review Worksheet
Explanation
Instructions
[Refer to Section D of ES-401 and Appendix B for additional information regarding each of the following concepts.]
Enter the level of knowledge (LOU) of each question as either (F)undamenlal or (H)qher cognitive level
Enter the level of difficulty (LO51 of each question using a 1 - 5 (easy - diffcultj rating scale (questions in the 2 - 4 range are acceptable).
Check the appropriate box if a psychometric flaw is identified:
.
The stem lacks sufficient focus lo elicit the correct answer (e.g., undear intent, more information is needed, or too much needless information).
The Stern or distractom rmtain wes (i.e., dues, Specific determiners, phrasing. length. etc).
The answer choices are a wllection of unrelated truetfalse statements.
One or m e
tkwmedistractors is not credible.
One or more distractors is (are) partially correct (e.g.. if the applicant can make unstated assumptions that are not contradicted by stern).
The question is not linked to the job requirements (i.e., the qiiestion has a valid KIA but, as written, is not Operational in content).
The question requires the recall of knowledge that is too specific for the closed reference test mode (i.e.. it is not required to be known from memory),
The question contains data with an unrealistic level of accuracy or inconsistent units (e.g., panel meter in percent with question in gallons).
The question requires reverse logic M application compared to the job requirements.
Check the appropriate box ifa job Mntent error is identified:
.
Check questions that are sampled for wnfonance with the approved KIA and thoso that are desiqnated SRO-only (WA and l i e n s level mismatches are unacceptable).
Based on the reviewer's judgment, is the question as written (V)nacceptable (requiring repair or replacement), in need ~f (E)ditodai enhancement, or (S)atisfadory?
Explanation
001K3.01,
CIA 2.913.0, Bank
10/29103 RFA Suggest "Pressurizer level _ _and letdown Row -"
then RII in the blank with choices of increase or decrease.
Page 1 of 17
3. Psvchometric Flaws
6. I
7.
IiEiS I
Explanation
E
s
-
003K3.04, CIA 3.9I4.1,
New
1Ql29103 RFA Typo in the stem. RPS system should be just RPS.
Either say if the high ... or if a high ... not if the a high.
Suggest distractw "C" read RPS will see a high flow signal on one
channels of "B" loop. NO reactor trip will occur.
Move "RPS will see a. to the stem.
10/3QMS SDR Comment accepted
11/28/03 Facility requested minor wording change and added "only'
response "c" to ensure incorrect.
1215103 TCK Requested changes incorporaied.
'to
_I
E
004A4.19. CIA 3.1i2.8. New
10129103 RFA Distractor "D"
is noi plausible. Suggest: Tihe letdown
isolation vale will not auto close on a loss of control air or loss of 125
S
005A4.02, CiA 3.413.'. Bank
10129/03 RFA Question is system knotuledge. LOK + F
10/30/03 SDR Comment not accepted. According to direction from
Usova. the operator has to know multiple pieces of information, so this is
CIA.
E
- XKG.CJ. I.IE-M 3.e :$.S @ark
S
!0130;03 5DR Cimm;.r:
dcci.clea.
102tiiC3 RFA Scs!raxor 'C" 's cn! pladsik e
S.q;esl: 'DeFrsssLnze m e RCS IC
61:cv. lo#, nead sa!avi injoc!ion:
11/28/03
Facility requested editorial change.
1215/03 TCK Requested changes incorporated.
10/30103 RFA Since the question solicits an action:
Reword didstractoss to Redlice PRT temDorature. reduce PRT iwel.
E
007A1.01, CIA 2.913.1, New
RedJce W T pressb:e Cb'sin a Qfan 3ampte
11.28103 Faci pi fnqdestei eamna mange
i
- 2/5103 TCK Req1ies1ec chanses hcjrwmteo
S
~O!30!03 S3R Comrren: accepted
007EK2.02. CIA 2.6t2.8. New
10/29/03 RFA OK
11/28/03 Facility requesteC editorial cnange.
12/5/03 TCK Requested changes incorporated.
Page2of 17
w
(0
w
(0
I
I
m
P
z
z
>
X
X
m
s
I
r
X
3
P
R
r
9
c
7
I
$
m
6
m
B -
ru"
i
3
0)
2
P
I! 6
0 2 t
>
X
N
I m
N
I
u
I
I =
(D
N
M
N
P
N
T
3
VI
3
VI
>
z
>
N
D
3
(0
m
>
X
E
-I
n
w
I u l
I
r-
Li
0
P.
e
_I
imetflc Flaws
1
4. Job Content Flaws =
5. other
7.
Explanation
E
056aA1.24.MEM 2.913.0, Bank
10129103 TCK, Remove "occurs" in stem. Remove "indications" and
change '"indicator" to "indication" in the stem.
Suggest
to be the making
most obvious
distractor
answer.
"D" correct and "C" incorrect since "C" seems
answer. This would take question away ran K/A topic.
11128103 Facility reqllested revising stem to indicate successfuk natural
S
j0/31/03 SDR Incorporated comments except changing correct
circulation.
1215103 TCK Requested changes incorporated.
S
057AA2.19, MEM 4.014.3,
Bank
$0129103 TCK, OK
11/28/03 Facility proposed a rewrite of the qtrestmn since it was a level f
1215103 TcK Requested chaogos incorporated.
qlJt?stLOn.
0 5 W . 0 3 , MEM 3.S3.9.
Modified
10129103 TCK. Move "3D01" in the stem afler "DC Bus'. Suggest
revising distractor "D"
since 3A load SeqirencerwiU be Iost which
prevents some Safeguards equipment from starting. This could be
int6rpreted as a correct answer.
S
059K4.16. MEM 3.113.2, Bank
.10129/03 TCK. OK
11128/03 Facility requested minor editorial changes.
12/5/03 TCK Requested changes incorporated.
E
061A1.01, C/A 3.3/3 6, New
10129103 TCK. Change distractor "A" from 22% to 32% to make the
dislraclm m r e even and this one m
e
plausible.
1Oi3Q103 SDR Requested change incorporated.
1112&/03 Facility requested minor editorial changes.
1215103 TCK Requested changes incorporatad.
S
Page 8 of 17
I-:
z
>.
N
I
<
r
n __
N
N
m
L L
I
N
.- 6
.-
m
e
m
a
x
W
-
r-:
w
t
9
ln
z
W
l
n
z
z
>
c.
0
N
>
>
>
t
>
.. -
X
X
X
N
N
U
~
3. Psvchwnetric Flaws -
artial
4. Job Content Flaws -
5. Other
iE1S
6' I
7.
Explanation
I J
WE04EG2.4.18, MEM 2.7i3.6. New
10129103 TCK, Replace question or revuse question to RO knovrledgo
level. Also. distractors "B" and "D" are not plausible since the break is
outside containment (Der stem) and containment isolations would not b'
I121srn3 TCK deaueitted chawaes incorwTated
WEOSEA1.1, MEM 4.114.0,New
10129103 TCK, Thjs question may not be suitable for KO knowledge.
Ask site for their opinion. Distractor "D" needs to have 'Thermal Couplm
changed to "thermocouple".
11110103 TCK Added tit!e to stem for FR-H.I. FaciliW aarees that
lqauestion is acceptable for KO knowledge
WEOREK3.2, MEM3.6l4.0. New
10/29/03 TCK. Need to check with utilitv to see if this is RO knowleda,
I Make distract& more qeneral and identh a5 maior event 0.e.. Loss 61
U
WE+OEKZ.Z,C/A 3.613.9.Nevr
10/29/03 TCK, Reword lad paragraph since this is copied out ofthe
text word for word. Nureg 1021 states this should not be done Since it
not discriminatin due to person could recognize paragraph.
11H3/03 TCK 8uestion revised to aet rid of minutia.
s
E
RE!>E<l.2, C1.4 3.614.1, Kew
10129:03 TCY. heed IO mam '2:' CEF tehzed and bc :: in tne s t m 10
c;ffeienliaie betmen tno 2 sets af ni.m!xrS
.Aud a stalBiit.nt Sayany
- 're!crcnce ~IOV.OEII"
a m provide .ma!? fer reference. Bel ebe qies!:on
/?ho.::n ne C'A:ns!e:so of MEhl.
S :lo134103 TCK *3? rds beei Er&?lmx? 06 fcr RZ sr.m rc!erence
chart is being given. Changed to'C1A.
11/28/03 Facility proposed new question since question 100 gane a c l ~
t" the answer
.. -. . -. .
I i2i5iIi TCK Reauested chanaes incormrated
Page 13 of 17
x
-
-
74
-
75
-
....
...
....
...
...
...
...
....
. . -
1
-
2
-
3
-
4
-
__
1.
.OK
-
-
F
-
n
_I
.....
....
...
....
.....
....
. . . .
....
.....
....
I_
H
-
F
-
ti
-
ti
. . . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
& k3.
Psychometlic Flaws
1-5) Stem
Focus
-
-
....
.....
...
.....
....
.....
....
.....
....
..... -
_I
-
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . .
4. Job Content Flaws I 5. Other
-
zlb
ink -
-
-
-
....
...
....
...
....
...
....
...
...
....
... -
-
-
-
-
inutii
-
-
....
......
....
......
.....
......
.....
......
.....
......
.....
_I
-
-
-
.
.
.
. . . .
. . . . . . . . . . .
. . . . . . . . . . . .
6.
7.
'/E/S
Explanation
?
WEIZEK2.2, MEM 3.613.9. New
10/29/03 TCK. Distractor "A' reauires "level" to be inserted aAer
i 1215103 TCK Reauisted manses incorwrated:
?
VuE14EK3.3,CIA 3.513.5, New
S
10/29/03 TCK. May not be RO knowledge level. Answer is same
wording as in the basis documents.
11113103 TCK Question remains as-is but we know that it is wordv.
Cac :y n.: pfowse afferent q:mel:oi
I .?I128103 Fac lit,, :eq..esled r.
ror Ed;13r1al dian:e
j 12/5!03 TCK Req!.esteu changes i n a ~ m r a e c
.
...........
S
004A1.04, CIA 3.9j4.1, Bank
11/12/03 TCK,
11/28103 Facility requested minar wording changes in stern and answeR
12/5/03 TCK Requested changes incorporated.
Made minor spelling changes. OK now.
E 1022AA2.02, ClA 3.213.7. New
S
11/12/03 TCK Moved Dart of the answers unto the stem and corrected
some spelling. OK
11128103 Facility requested minor wordsmithing.
12/5/03 TCK Requested changes incorporated.
Page 14of 17
2. I
3. Psvchomctric Flaws
I
4. Job Content Flaws
5. Qthw
7.
Explanation
E
026A2.03. CIA 4.114.4. New
S
llllZh13 TCK Restructured stem and placed in bullet form for ease of
reading. OK
11128103 Facility requested minor wordsmithing.
12/5/03 TCK Requested changes incorporated.
g the basis for a caution statement in a
be the operation of the components.
nslire the answers are related to the question.
E
029EG2.1.7, CIA3.7/4.4. Bank
S
11112103 TCK Bolded 'do not' to ensure no ambiguity. OK
11128103 Facility eliminated unnecessary words and minor wordsmithing.
lZ5M3 TCK Reauested chanaes incorwrated.
/I
U
033AG2.1.20. CIA4.3I4.2, New
S
11112103 TCK New question developed that meets criteria. OK
11/12/03 TCK All answers are correct. Re-wlite or replace quostion.
Ill28103 FaciCitv reworded distractor "D" and reauested some boldina.
I1215103 TCK Riauested chanaes mcwrowrated.'
" II
3
G34G2 1.7, R E M 3 74.4. Ne*. OK.
lli28103 F 3 c : q removed dnnecessar, wcids ir: stem
125103 TCK Reqxstid cnaiges ncotpo'ates.
E
041A2.02,
C/A 3.6/3.9, Bank
S
11/12/03 TCK Revised stem to state that "One condenser dump valve
remains full open" instead of '"condenser dump valve fails to dose.
11/28/03 Facility revised condition in Stem to be 1W% power and one
steam dump valve open. Revised answers for new conditions.
1215/03 TCK Reouested chanaes lnmwrated.
E
041A2.02,
C/A 3.6/3.9, Bank
S
11/12/03 TCK Revised stem to state that "One condenser dump valve
remains full open" instead of '"condenser dump valve fails to dose.
11/28/03 Facility revised condition in Stem to be 1W% power and one
steam dump valve open. Revised answers for new conditions.
1215/03 TCK Reouested chanaes lnmwrated.
S
055EG2.4.22, C/A 3.014.0.
Bank
1111Z03 TCK OK.
11128103 Facility requested minor wordsmithing.
12/5/03 TCK Requested changes incwpotated.
S
061AA2.05. CIA 3.5/4.2. New
1i112/03 TCK OK
11128103 Facility requested new question since system was wrong for
the associated KIA.
12/5/03 TCK Requested changes incwporated.
Page 15 of 17
(I)
N
Di
r
a
--+
r-
4- 0
r-
3
E§-403
Written Examination Grading
Form ES-403-1
Quality Checklist
Exam Level: SRO
Facility: Turkey Point Date of Exam: Dec. 3-15, 2003
changes 8nd question deletions justified and
a. Grader
b. Facility Reviewer(*)
c. NRC Chief Examiner (*)
d. NRC Supervisor (*)
(*)
The facility reviewer's signature is not applicable for examinations graded by the
NRC; two independent NRC reviews are required.
5of5
NUREG-IO21, Draft Revision 9
Post-Examination Check Sheet
Form ES-501-1
Task Description
1.
Facility written exam comments or graded exams. received and
verified complete
2.
Facility written exam comments reviewed and incorporated and
NRC grading completed, if necessary
11 3.
Operating tests graded by NRC examiners
NRC Chief examiner review of written exam and operating test
11 6.
Management (licensing official) review completed
8.
Facility notified of results
)I 9.
Examination report issued (refer to NRC MC 664-8-0612)
Date
Complete
1211 8/03
1211 8/03
1 /I 2/04
1/13/04
1 /I
3/04
1 /I 3/04
1 I1 5/04
1 /I
3/04
1 IZ 5/04
N/A
21 of 23
NUREG-1021, Qraft Revision 9