Similar Documents at Byron |
---|
Category:AFFIDAVITS
MONTHYEARML20098G8741984-10-0101 October 1984 Affidavit of Br Shelton Re Integrated Design Insp ML20098G8821984-10-0101 October 1984 Affidavit of Kj Green Re Integrated Design Insp Concerning Mechanical Engineering Work ML20098G8881984-09-29029 September 1984 Affidavit of RW Hooks Re Integrated Design Insp Concerning Structural Design ML20098G8871984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of EM Hughes Re Idvp ML20098G8811984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of Cw Dick Re Independent Design Review ML20098G8831984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of W Faires Re Findings 3-15 & 3-16 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Rept ML20098G8791984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of RP Tuetken Re Readiness for Fuel Loading ML20098G8781984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of RW Manz Concerning Findings 3-11 Through 3-14 & 3-17 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Re Westinghouse ML20098G8851984-09-27027 September 1984 Affidavit of Rl Heumann Re Costs of Delay in Startup & Operation of Unit 1 ML20095F1071984-08-18018 August 1984 Affidavit of KT Kostal Re Prefiled Testimony of C Stokes. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20094S6421984-08-16016 August 1984 Affidavit of Gt Klopp Re Wh Bleuel Proposed Testimony Concerning Need for Failure Modes & Effects Analysis. Certificate of Svc & Svc List Encl.Related Correspondence ML20080L0601984-02-13013 February 1984 Affidavit of LO George Re Date Accumulated by Reinspection Program Final Rept.Evaluation Will Clearly Indicate That Quality of Work Performed Is Satisfactory.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20079N3971984-01-24024 January 1984 Affidavit of C Reed Re Const Status & Target Fuel Load Dates ML20079N4081984-01-24024 January 1984 Affidavit of Rl Heumann Re Costs of Delay in Startup & Operation.Notice of Appearance for Pp Steptoe,Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance for G Herrin,Rg Fitzgibbons & P Murphy & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083J6231984-01-0606 January 1984 Affidavit of L Delgeorge Re Reinsp Program.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080R1101983-10-10010 October 1983 Affidavit of DD Ed,Clarifying Testimony Re EPA Rept, Protective Action Evaluation Part Ii,Evacuation & Sheltering as Protective Actions Against Nuclear Accidents Involving Gaseous Releases ML20076J1091983-06-14014 June 1983 Affidavit of DC Thomas Supporting Extension Until 830628 to File Proposed Findings of Fact & Conclusions of Law Re Contentions 22 & 9(c).Time Needed Due to Heavy Trial & Teaching Schedule.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20074A7711983-05-11011 May 1983 Affidavit of RP Tuetken on J Hughes Allegations Re Welding. Welding of Brace to Pressure Pipe Proper,If Performed Per Design Specs.Util Conducting Reinsp of Work Performed by Contractor QC Inspectors ML20064N4211983-02-10010 February 1983 Affidavit of KA Ainger Re Changes to Plant Design to Mitigate Potential for KRSKO-type Bubble Collapse Water Hammer in Feedwater Bypass Line.Westinghouse Ltr, Bypass Drawing & Notice of Appearance by Vg Copeland Encl ML20028B9051982-11-0808 November 1982 Affidavit Re Westinghouse Application for Withholding Proprietary Info Encl in App C to FSAR in TR Tramm 820818 & 0902 Ltrs to NRC Concerning Turbine Missiles ML20027C5431982-10-0505 October 1982 Affidavit of La Bowen.Util Does Not Intend to Install Temp Sensors on Feedwater Bypass Sys Piping.Existence of Constant Feedwater Flow Precludes Water Hammer Event Similar to Event at Krsko ML20058G8601982-07-30030 July 1982 Affidavit Consisting of Documents Supporting Response in Opposition to NRC Motion for Summary Disposition of Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinnissippi Alliance for Environ Contention 9c.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20058E2291982-07-26026 July 1982 Affidavit of Jc Petersen on Waiver of or Exception to Financial Qualification Regulations.League Petition & Exhibits Do Not Demonstrate Special Circumstances Warrant Exception to Financial Qualification Regulations ML20058E2011982-07-26026 July 1982 Affidavit of DA Nash.Rockford League of Women Voters Exhibits Do Not Substantiate Claim of No Need for Power or Existence of Alternative Energy Sources.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20069C8941982-07-19019 July 1982 Affidavit of DD Malinowski on Contention 9c Re Various Phenomena Affecting Steam Generator Tube Integrity & Water Chemistry Measures to Be Taken to Eliminate or Minimize Adverse Effects of Phenomena ML20069C8991982-07-19019 July 1982 Affidavit of EM Burns on Contention 9c Re Flow Induced Vibration & Tube Wear in Preheater Section of Westinghouse Model D Steam Generators ML20058G9571982-07-19019 July 1982 Affidavit of Ej Sternglass.Cumulative Affects of Radioactive Release from Reactors Located in Northern Il Should Be re-evaluated.EPA Min Dose of Radiation Probably Cannot Be Met for Some Local Populations ML20054M9411982-07-0909 July 1982 Affidavit of MP Phillips Re Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinissippi Alliance for Environ Contention 3(e) on Worst Case Weather Evacuation Planning. Util Committed to Provide Revised Evacuation Time Estimates ML20054M9431982-07-0909 July 1982 Affidavit of Aw Serkiz Re Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinissippi Alliance for Environ Contention 9(a).NRC Has Not Completed Evaluation of Krsko Plant Water Hammer Event.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054M9281982-07-0101 July 1982 Affidavit of Wl Forney Re Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinissippi Alliance for Environ Contention 1.Util Performance Compares Favorably W/Other Licensees ML20054E7771982-06-0707 June 1982 Affidavit of Rj Netzel Re Contention 9(d).Steam Generator & Reactor Coolant Pump Support Design Took Into Account Fracture Toughness Properties of Matls Making Up Supports. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20054E7511982-06-0707 June 1982 Affidavit of GP Lahti Re Contention 2.Describes Regulatory Criteria Considered in Analyzing Cumulative Routine Releases from Plant & Other Nuclear Plants in Il.Design Objectives Considered Described ML20054E7531982-06-0707 June 1982 Unexecuted Affidavit of Ji Fabrikant Re Contention 2 on re-evaluation of Health Effects of Projected Routine Release of Radioactivity for Residents of Dekalb,Sycamore & Rockford Areas ML20054E7551982-06-0707 June 1982 Affidavit of G Klopp Re Contention 2A.Incremental Risk from Nuclear Accidents to Area Residents Cannot Be Zero.Risk Should Be Determined by Risk from Byron.Other Plants Pose Insignificant Risk ML20054E7601982-06-0707 June 1982 Affidavit of T Tramm Re Contention 7 That Util Will Comply W/New Regulatory Requirements on Hydrogen Control/Generation Matters ML20054E7671982-06-0606 June 1982 Affidavit of La Bowen Re Contention 9(a)on Water Hammer. Possible Courses of Action Being Discussed,Including Westinghouse Recommendations Re Krsko Plant Events ML20054E7571982-06-0404 June 1982 Affidavit of Jc Golden Re Contention 3.Plant Emergency Plan Provides Reasonable Assurance Prompt & Effective Actions Will Be Taken to Protect Public Health & Safety ML20054E7581982-06-0404 June 1982 Affidavit of G Klopp Re Contention 4.Intervenor Interpretation of Single Failure Demonstrates Misunderstanding of NRC Requirement on Accident Analysis ML20054E7591982-06-0404 June 1982 Affidavit of Hm Ferrari Re Contention 6.Concerns Raised Carefully Considered & Reviewed in Fsar.Sufficient Assurance Exists to Assure Containment of Radioactive Matls Under Worst Postulated DBA ML20054E7631982-06-0404 June 1982 Affidavit of Jc Blomgren Re Contention 8.Primary Sys Decontamination Would Result in No Significant Adverse Impact to Human Environ Quality ML20054E7661982-06-0404 June 1982 Affidavit of RW Carlson Re Contention 9(a) on Water Hammer. Steam Generator Bypass Sys Design,W/Listed Mods,Is Adequate to Minimize Likelihood of Bubble Collapse Waterhammer Events in Steam Generators to Acceptable Level ML20054E7681982-06-0404 June 1982 Affidavit of R Pleniewicz Re Contention 9(a).Operating Procedures Re Operation of Feedwater Bypass Sys Will Implement Westinghouse Recommendations ML20054E7721982-06-0404 June 1982 Affidavit of Rj Netzel Re Contention 9(b).Reactor Vessel Supports Designed for Asymmetrical Blowdown Loads & Stress Limits within ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Allowable ML20054E7391982-06-0303 June 1982 Affidvait of Wl Stiede That Specific Incidents Listed in Contention 1 Do Not Prove Util Unable or Unwilling or Lacks Technical Qualifications to Operate Plant Safely ML20054E7731982-06-0303 June 1982 Affidavit of WT Bogard Re Contention 9(b).Asymmetric Blowdown Loads Adequately Addressed in Plant Design ML20054E7501982-06-0303 June 1982 Affidavit of R Querio Re Personnel Qualifications,Personnel Commitment to Plant Safety & Plant Plans for Packaging & Transport of Waste Matls.Plant Has Necessary Technical Qualifications ML20054E7471982-06-0303 June 1982 Affidavit of Wj Shewski Describing Util QA Program.Util History of Compliance W/Applicable QA Criteria Does Not Indicate Util Unwilling or Unable to Operate Plant Safety ML20054E7331982-06-0303 June 1982 Affidavit of C Reed Re Contention 1.Expresses Util Strong Commitment to Safe Plant Operation to Protect Public Health & Safety & to Operate Plant within NRC & Other Requirements ML20054M9331982-05-25025 May 1982 Affidavit of Jr Creed on Dekalb Area Alliance for Responsible Energy/Sinissippi Alliance for Environ Contention 1(f).Allegations Re Security Violations at Quad Cities Resolved ML20069B0721981-12-21021 December 1981 Affidavit of Mi Miller Re Failure of Rockford League of Women Voters Failure to Comply W/Issued Subpoenas 1984-09-29
[Table view] Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20207E0051999-03-0202 March 1999 Transcript of 990302 Public Meeting with Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-104.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20236H9381998-06-30030 June 1998 Transcript of 980630 Meeting W/Commonwealth Edison in Rockville,Md.Pp 1-123.Supporting Documentation Encl ML20198P3001997-11-0404 November 1997 Transcript of 971104 Public Meeting W/Ceco in Rockville,Md Re Measures Established by Ceco to Track Plant Performance & to Gain Understanding of CAs Put Into Place to Improve Safety.Pp 1-105.W/Certificate & Viewgraphs ML20149M2951996-11-29029 November 1996 Exemption from Requirements of 10CFR50.60 Re Safety Margins Recommended in ASME Boiler & Pressure Vessel Code Case N-514 TXX-9522, Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources1995-08-26026 August 1995 Comment Opposing Proposed GL on Testing of safety-related Logic Circuits.Believes That Complete Technical Review of All Surveillance Procedures Would Be Expensive & Unnecessary Expenditure of Licensee Resources ML20059C2351993-12-17017 December 1993 Comment Supporting Petition for Rulemaking PRM-21-2 Re Commercial Grade Item Dedication ML20044A8111990-06-27027 June 1990 Comment Opposing Closure of Lpdr of Rockford Public Library ML20245J0191989-04-14014 April 1989 Comment Re Proposed Rule 10CFR50 Re Ensuring Effectiveness of Maint Programs for Nuclear Power Plants ML20214X1871987-06-11011 June 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $25,000 Based on Four Severity Level III Violations Noted During 860721-0808 Insp ML20205Q1711987-04-0202 April 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $25,000. App Re Evaluations & Conclusions Encl IR 05000812/20100311987-02-26026 February 1987 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $100,000 Based on Violations Noted During Insps on 850812-1031 ML20210T7321987-02-11011 February 1987 Unexecuted Amend 6 to Indemnity Agreement B-97 Substituting Item 3 of Attachment to Indemnity Agreement in Entirety W/ Listed License Numbers,Effective 870130 ML20209J3251987-01-30030 January 1987 Transcript of 870130 Commission Discussion/Possible Vote on Full Power OL for Facility.Pp 1-72.Supporting Viewgraphs Encl ML20213G4381986-10-24024 October 1986 Unexecuted Amend 5 to Indemnity Agreement B-97,substituting Item 3 of Attachment to Agreement in Entirety W/Listed License Numbers,Effective on 861106 ML20211B0841986-08-0505 August 1986 Transcript of 860805 Meeting Between Region Iii,Computer Interference Elimination & Util in Redmond,Wa Re Plant as-built Drawing Review.Pp 1-200 IR 05000506/20070221986-05-0202 May 1986 Order Imposing Civil Monetary Penalty in Amount of $25,000 for Violations Noted During Insp on 850506-0722.Violations Noted:Failure to Establish Radiological Safety Procedures & to Adequately Train Personnel ML20138C7301985-12-0909 December 1985 Order Imposing Civil Penalty in Amount of $25,000 Per 850606 Notice of Violation & Proposed Imposition of Civil Penalty.Licensee May Request Hearing within 30 Days of Date of Order ML20205E8741985-10-28028 October 1985 Exemption from GDC 4 of 10CFR50,App a Requirement to Install Protective Devices Associated W/Postulated Pipe Breaks Primary Coolant Sys.Topical Rept Evaluation Encl ML20102A2981985-01-0707 January 1985 Petition Requesting Aslab Grant Intervenor Appeal & Order Further Hearings on Safety of Plant ML20099L2581984-11-27027 November 1984 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20099G5381984-11-23023 November 1984 Supplemental Appeal Brief in Response to Intervenor 841106 Supplemental Brief on Appeal & in Support of ASLB 841016 Supplemental Initial Decision Authorizing Issuance of Ol. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20100K0411984-11-22022 November 1984 Submits Concerns Re Safety of Local Residents in Event of Accident & Excessively High Cost of Projected Operation of Facility ML20107H7841984-11-0606 November 1984 Supplemental Brief on Appeal of ASLB 841016 Supplemental Initial Decision Granting Authority for Issuance of Ol. Decision Should Be Reversed.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20140E4081984-10-31031 October 1984 Executed Amend 1 to Indemnity Agreement B-97,deleting Items 2A & 3 in Entirety ML20098G8841984-10-0202 October 1984 Joint Statement of RW Manz & W Faires Re Findings 3-11 Through 3-17 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Rept. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20098G8681984-10-0202 October 1984 Answer to Intervenor Motion to Reopen Record Re Bechtel Independent Design Review.Motion Should Be Denied ML20098G8901984-10-0202 October 1984 Joint Statement of Kj Green & RW Hooks Re Integrated Design Insp ML20098G8911984-10-0202 October 1984 Joint Statement of Cw Dick & EM Hughes Re Independent Design Insp ML20098G8821984-10-0101 October 1984 Affidavit of Kj Green Re Integrated Design Insp Concerning Mechanical Engineering Work ML20098G8741984-10-0101 October 1984 Affidavit of Br Shelton Re Integrated Design Insp ML20098G8881984-09-29029 September 1984 Affidavit of RW Hooks Re Integrated Design Insp Concerning Structural Design ML20098G8831984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of W Faires Re Findings 3-15 & 3-16 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Rept ML20098G8811984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of Cw Dick Re Independent Design Review ML20098G8791984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of RP Tuetken Re Readiness for Fuel Loading ML20098G8781984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of RW Manz Concerning Findings 3-11 Through 3-14 & 3-17 of NRC 830930 Integrated Design Insp Re Westinghouse ML20098G8871984-09-28028 September 1984 Affidavit of EM Hughes Re Idvp ML20098G8851984-09-27027 September 1984 Affidavit of Rl Heumann Re Costs of Delay in Startup & Operation of Unit 1 ML20098E2371984-09-24024 September 1984 Reply to Intervenor 840918 Proposed Supplemental Initial Decision.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20097E7221984-09-13013 September 1984 Agreed Motion for Time Extension Until 841101 to File Petition for Hearing Re Emergency Planning Commitment W ML20097C5311984-09-12012 September 1984 Motion to Reopen Record to Include Plant Design as Issue. Supporting Documentation & Certificate of Svc Encl ML20097B7791984-09-10010 September 1984 Proposed Supplemental Initial Decision Re Reinsp Program. Certificate of Svc Encl ML20096A6391984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of RW Hooks Re Validity of Info in Attachment 7 to Stokes Testimony Concerning Design Assumption for Plant.Stokes Info Inapplicable to Plant. Related Correspondence ML20096A6191984-08-30030 August 1984 Rebuttal Testimony of B Erler Re Stokes Allegations Concerning Evaluations of Discrepancies in Calculated Actual Stress Performed by Sargent & Lundy.Related Correspondence ML20096A6261984-08-30030 August 1984 Summary of Rebuttal Testimony & Testimony of ML Somsag, Eb Branch,D Demoss,Mr Frankel,Bf Maurer & Jk Buchanan Re Plant QC Inspector Reinsp Program & C Stokes Allegations Re Welds.Related Correspondence ML20096A6441984-08-28028 August 1984 Notice of Withdrawal of Appearance in Proceeding.Related Correspondence ML20112D5271984-08-24024 August 1984 Applicant Exhibit A-R-4,consisting of Feb 1984 Rept on Bryon QC Inspector Reinsp Program ML20112D5031984-08-24024 August 1984 Applicant Exhibit A-R-5,consisting of June 1984 Suppl to Rept on Bryon QC Inspector Reinsp Program ML20112D7441984-08-23023 August 1984 Intervenor Exhibit I-R-1,consisting of Undated List of Teutken Safety Category Insp Types ML20112D7511984-08-21021 August 1984 Staff Exhibit S-R-1,consisting of 840813 Instruction for Walkdown of Cable Tray Hanger Connection Welds ML20112D4641984-08-21021 August 1984 Intervenor Exhibit I-R-11,consisting of Undated Chronological Date Listing of Util Responses to Interrogatory 12.VA Judson to Mi Miller Re Interrogatory 12 & Supplemental Responses Encl 1999-03-02
[Table view] |
Text
9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD In The Matter of )
)
)
COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY ) Docket Nos. 50-454 OL
) 50-455 OL
)
(Byron Nuclear Power Station, )
Units 1 & 2) )
AFFIDAVIT OF LESLIE A. BOWEN The attached questions and answers constitute my testimony in the above-captioned proceeding. The testimony is true and accurate to the best of my knowledge, information and belief.
Lesli6 . Bowen Subscribed and syor to before me this rV . day of ks. ,. < _
. , 1982.
swam 'OA '<u L Notary Public l
(S) ,
R206140190 820607 iDR ADOCK 05000454 0 PDR
I g TESTIMON'1 OF LESLIE A. LOWEN ON DAARE/ SAFE CONTENTION 9a Q. Please state your name, present position and present occupation.
A. My name is Leslie A. Bowen. I am employed by Common-wealth Edison Company as Lead Licensing Engineer in the Byron /Braidwood Project Engineering Department.
Q. Could you please describe your educational and profes-sional background?
A. I received a Bachelor's Degree in Physics from Mount Holyoke College. I joined Commonwealth Edison in July 1974 as a training instructor in the Zion Station Training Department. After receiving a Senior Rc, actor Operator's License for Zion Units 1 and 2 in July 1976, I was appointed to the position of Shift Foreman. In July 1978, I was transferred to the position of Staff Assistant to Byron Lee, Jr., then Vice President. In February 1979, I was transferred to my present position.
Q. Describe your duties and responsibilities as Lead Licensing Engineer.
A. As Lead Licensing Engineer, my basic function is to ensure that issues that are raised during any portion of the licensing process by the NRC, by events that O
occur at operating nuclear power plants or by contractors to Commonwealth Edison for the Byron Project that may impact the safety aspects of the design of the Byron Station are reviewed and evaluated. If safety signifi-cance is determined, I also ensure that responses to these issues are forwarded to the Nuclear Licensing Administrator for Byron for review and transmittal to the NRC or to other licensing bodies or for incorpora-tion into the FSAR. In this capacity, I also ensure that any design changes necessitated by the evaluation of these issues are incorporated into the plant design.
Q. To which contention is this testimony addressed?
A. DAARE/ SAFE Contention 9a.
Q. Have you reviewed the testimony of Robert Carlson per-taining to Contention 9a?
A. Yes, I have.
Q. Are you familiar with the water hammer event that occurred at the KRSKO plant?
A. Yes, I am. Westinghouse has informed us of this event by the attached letter.
Q. What actions has Commonwealth Edison Company taken with respect to the information and Westinghouse recommenda-tions provided in the letter?
()
s, A. We performed an initial evaluation to determine the reportability, under 10 CFR 50.55 (e), of the letter.
We determined the information was not reportable for two reasons. The first reason pertains to differences between the KRSKO and Byron bypass system designs. The Byron design has a check valve upstream of the aux-iliary nozzle which is not present in the KRSKO design in addition to check valves in the auxiliary feedwater and bypass system piping. Thus, backleakage would have to occur through two check valves for steam to enter the bypass system piping. Secondly, we determined that, contrary to the statement in the Westinghouse letter, Byron FSAR criteria allow for blowdown of two steam generators without adverse nuclear consequence,s.
Thus, even if one postulates a bubble collapse water hammer in the main feedwater bypass line of damaging proportion with a main steam line break in another steam generator, Byron FSAR criteria would not be violated.
A. Are you aware of the recommendations proposed by West-inghouse in response to the KRSKO incident?
Q. Yes. Commonwealth Edison has evaluated these recom-mendations and believes that, for plant reliability purposes, the feedwater bypass system design should be modified so that the plant operator is made aware of CE) i, i
G(m the potential existence of steam in the bypass system piping. This would permit action which would very significantly reduce the likelihood of bubble collapse water hammer events in the bypass system. Edison will install temperature sensors on the bypass system piping to detect backleakage of hot water or steam and the temperature measurements will be indicated and alarmed in the control room.
Q. Are the modifications you just described the same modifications recommended by Westinghouse?
A. In essence, yes. However, we are currently evaluating the possibility of placing the temperature sensors in a location other then the one recommended by Westinghouse.
Nonetheless, any plant modifications to reduce the likelihood of a bubble collapse water hammer in the bypass system piping will be made only with the assur-ance from Westinghouse that the concerns raised by the KRSKO incident have been fully addressed.
l 'N h [
l pl, O d /f N
' N CAW-3855 CBW-3193
/ -
i 3 -
Westinghouse Water Reactor acomemai
. Electric Corporation Divisions * *" ***"
Box 355 PittsDurgnPennsy!vania 15230 November 4,1981 S.0. NO: CAE/CCE- 4705 Mr. J. D. Deress Project Engineering Manager Byron & Braidwood Projects Comonwealth Edison Company P. O. Box 767 Chicago, Illinois 60690 COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY BYRON AND BRAIDWOOD STATION - UNITS 1 AND 2 AUXILIARY FEEDWATER/ MAIN FEEDWATER BYPASS SYSTEM STEAM BACKLEAKAGE A recent incident during hot functional testing at a Westinghouse plant which damaged the auxiliary feedwater piping has raised a concern over backleakage of steam from the steam generator through the auxiliary feedwater nozzle on the preheat type steam generator into the main.
feedwater bypass line. This backleakage could occur if check valves in the auxiliary feedwater or main feedwater bypass system leak and the steam generator water level is below the point of discharge from the auxiliary nozzle in the steam generator. Should steam enter a horizontal portion of the line, restoring flow of cold feedwater could -
create a bubble collapse water hammer of damaging magnitude.
sulting daage could compromise the safety-related functions ofThe.re- the auxiliary feedwater system. Additionally a water hammer in ^he aux-iliary feedwater/ main feedwater bypass sys, tem could allow more than i one steam generator to blow down following an accident, in violation '
of SAR criteria. .
Westinghouse has reviewed this issue for the Byron /Braidwood Plants, and concluded that itjsJotenVi. ally fepontable'.iinder_ title 10CFR50.55(e).
The licensee should determine reportability based on his own evaluation of the auxiliary feedwater/feedwater bypass system in his plant.
Westinghouse will not notify the NRC of this issue. I Based on an evaluation of the aforementioned incident, Westinghouse has identified plant modifications which could be implemented to minimize the potential for this mechanism for bubble collapse water hammer in the auxiliary feedwater/ main feedwater bypass system. Other approaches for minimizing the potential for this water hamer mechanism could be developed.
Any approach should include a review of leak tightness /
inservice testing requirements for check valves in the auxiliary feedwater/
l
V 4 CAW-3855 CBW-3193 November 4,1981 feedwater bypass systems. The Westinghouse proposed modifications, whii:h consist of adding instrumentation and modifying operating pro-cedures, are described in Attachment 1 to this letter.
If Westinghouse can be of further assistance in this matter, please
, contact the undersigned.
Very truly yours, WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC CORPORATION
/
W. E. Kor er,Manageh Commonwealth Edison Projects FC0iAgostino/dh J. D. Deress, 2L cc: W. C. Cleff, 2L -
\
N.
.ATTAC!iMENT 1 -
y G WESTINGHOUSE RECOMMENDED MODIFICATIONS AUXILIARY FEEDWATER SYSTEM STEAM BACKLEAKAGE WATER HAKMER To minimize the potential fEr"the' interaction of steam and cold water in the bypass / auxiliary feedwater piping as a result of steam backleakage into the piping from the steam generator due to leaking check valves, Westinghouse recomends temperature measurements upstream of the auxiliary feedwater nozzle, in the adjacent vertical section of piping connected to this upper nozzle, to detect any backleakage of steam. (1) These temperature measurements can be obtained from surfacemounted thermocouples or RTD's on the exterior pipe wall. A series of such temperature sensors mounted along the pipe can indicate the extent of any steam migration.
The formation or backleakage of steam in this section of main feedwater bypass piping will be indicated by an increase in indicated temperature or by differences in temperatures from the sensors mounted along the same pipe. The temperature measurements should be indicated and alarmed in the Control Room.
Following are recommended procedures for monitoring the main feedwater bypass line temperature signals during plant heatup and cooldown, and pcwer oparation.
Plant Heatup and Cooldown The temperature recorded by the bypass feedline mounted sensors should be no more than slightly above the ambient temperature while the plant is at hot zero power. Temperatures should be observed to drop when auxiliary feedwater is flowing through the line. The normal temperatures ~
indicated by these sensors should be recorded during the first heatup after the sensors are installed. These temperature values can be used as a reference during future heatups.
The minimum steam temperature of concern will 5e 212*F (100*C) corresponding to steam at atmospheric pressure in the generator. During heatup, the bypass feedline mounted sensors should be monitored every 15 minutes.
If the temperatures are observed to increase 20*F (ll*C), or more, above the previously-determined reference (normal) value, this may be an indication of minor backleakage. In this case, continue with the heatup, but start one auxiliary feed pump and supply a minimum flow to the steam generator as required to maintain the surfacemounted sensor temperatures at approximately the reference normal values and at least below 180*F (82*C).
(1) Previously, theory and experiences had indicated a dependence of water hamer intensity on the length of horizontal piping adjacent to the nozzle. Therefore, Westinghouse had recomended the installa-tion of a 90* elbow directed vertically downward as close to the steam generator as possible to limit the length of feedline which could drain when the steam generator water level could be below the nozzle.
(]
v ,
Attachment 1 . . Cmtinued t
N If the temperature indicated by the bypass line sensors suddenly increases (s above 212*F (100 C) and approaches the saturation temperature of the steam in the generator, this may be an indication of significant backleakage.
In this case, determine whether the steam generator water level has .
dropped below the top of the auxiliary feedwater discharge pipe in the generator.
If the water level has not dropped below this elevation, then initiate auxiliary feed at a minimum value as indicated above to restore normal auxiliary feedline temperature, and proceed to cold shutdown to investigate and correct the source of the backleakage. If the water level has '
' dropped below the top of the discharge pipe, then it must be assumed that the main feedwater bypass line and the auxiliary feedline for the affected steam generator are steam filled and should be isolated.
P_tpceed c to cold shutdown using the unaffected steam generators for the I coolfoW.~5 tart the au'xTliary feed pump for the unaffected steam generators as a precaution against backleakage in these loops and verify that the water level in these generators is maintained above the top of the auxiliary feed discharge pipe. When cold shutdown conditions have been established, allow nitrogen or air into the steam-filled auxiliary feedline to prevent water hamer in the line, and correct the source of the backleakage. .
The temperature alarm set rp for heatup and cooldown and for operation at hot zero power should have a setpoint of 20*F (ll*C) above the maximum normal temperature determined for the bypass feedline surface mounted sensors at these operating conditions.
Power Operation During power operation, either main feedwater flow or tempering flow should always be passing through the auxiliary nozzle into the generator, and backleakage of steam from the generator into feedwater bypass line and auxiliary feedline is, therefore, vary unlikely. The bypass feedline surface mounted sensors can be used to detect backleakage if flow to the auxiliary nozzle is interrupted by a lack of flow in the feedwater system. If the temperature recorded by the surface mounted sensors is observed to increase by 20*F (ll*C), or more, above the maximum feedwater temperature, this may be an indication of backleakage. Slowly restore flow to the affected feedline to reduce the temperature of the line. If the feedwater temperature is below 250*F (121'C), and the steam generator l level is observed to have dropped below the top of the auxiliary feedwater discharge pipe, do not restore flow to the affected auxiliary line, but, rather, proceed to cold shutdown, following the same precaution; as are outlined above in the procedure for dealing with backleakage during heatup and cooldown or hot-zero-power operation. -
~
V .