ML16340C359

Progress Rept of Seismic Svc-Related Contracts Prior to June 1978, Project 105-4,Progress Rept 8 for Work Period 820213-26

ML16340C359
Person / Time
Site:	Diablo Canyon
Issue date:	02/26/1982
From:	ROBERT L. CLOUD ASSOCIATES, INC.
To:
Shared Package
ML16340C358	List: ML16340C357 ML16340C359 ML17083A989 ML19264C781 ML19264C782
References
105-4, NUDOCS 8203020660
Download: ML16340C359 (90)

Text

4 PROGRESS REPORT OF SEISMIC SERVICE-RELATED CONTRACTS PRIOR TO JUNE 1978 DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT r

'I

( 4 I "f,tI' I

4 I

I I 4 ~

It

~ * ~

4

~ 44 4 4 I I'

~ I ~

t' I~

", .;Project 105-4 Progress Report No. '8

\

Work Period from 2/13/82 to 2/26/82 4

I t

~

Report of work performed for Gas and Electric Company by

'acific Robert L. Cloud Associates, Inc.

4 Robert L. Cloud Associates, Inc.

125 University Avenue Post Office Box 687

,-Berkeley, CA 94710 West Falmouth, MA 02574 (415) 841-9296 (617) 540-5381 I 8203020660 I ADOCK 0500027g 82022'CF

~ f, II 't'f CF P

V l

1

\ > lt 4

J

+PROGRESS REPORT NO. 8 OF SEISMIC SERVICE-RELATED CONTRACTS PRIOR TO JUNE 1978 DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT.

Work Period from 2/13/82 to 2/26/82 TABLE OF CONTENTS Page

't 'Pe h e,'

1. 0 ~Work Accomplished t

~

g 1.*l Task 1 Review of Seismic Design Chain 1, 2 -,,-Independent Requalification e

1.2 Task 1

'"".:1.2.. 1 Auxiliax'y Building t

>'-"."1.2.2 Piping Ruris and Pipe Supports

.;;,:,;,'.1,2,3', Equipment .

- -";,,'-"-'-'",-:1.2..4 .'onduit and.'HVAC Duct Supports

,.1.,2,5 -'mall Bore Piping Runs and HVAC-

. Components

=

-.Field Verification e

1.3 .Task 3 '.0 1.4 Task 4 PaandE and,Its Contractors'

.QA/QC Procedures 1.5 Error and Open Item (EOI) Report Significant Results and Findings ~

4 3.0 .Scheduled Work for Next Work Period h

t t 3.1 Task 1 - Review of Seismic Design Chain 3.2 Task 2 Independent Requali;fication

~ I Auxiliary Building ee 3.2. 1

3. 2..2 Piping Rusna,and Piping Supports 3.2. 3 Equipment t t

3.2.4 Conduit and HVAC Duct Supports'mall 5 '."

~

3.2.5 Bore Piping Runs and HVAC Components e ~

e e, h

e ~

h

0 0 A

Page 3.3 Task, 3 Field Verification 3.4 Task 4 '- PGandE and Its Contractors; QA/QC Procedures 6 3.5 Errox and Open Item (EOI) Report 6

4. 0 Conclusion I'DT Correction to Progress Report I'.0 g7 8 D

S

"":;-:",6. 0 -

Inspection Visits, "fi

'D I I

. '9

'I TI ID

'I L I

I

~ DIDD

'I

'.;,-;.',",.:"";"Attachment A Pxogress'eport on Quality Assuxance by, RFR, Inc.

I I ~

';Attachment B - Error and Open Item Classification Revision 2 (2/24/82)

Attachment C - Error and Open Item Proceduxe Revision 3 (2/24/82)

D I

,;Attachment D EOI Reports for work pexiod from 2/13/82 to 2/26/82 I

l Attachment E EOI Reports revised during work period from f to 2/g,6/82 '/13/82 D'

\

.I:ebruary 26, 1982 I'I "1. WORK ACCOMPLISHED:

There are four tasks of the subject reverification progam; I The work accomplished for each task in the report work period is described below:

'

• I II I I ~ '," I"

~ N 1.1 'ask r 1 Revi'ew of Seismic Design Chain I I I

t ..

.::..',The work 'scope review of.all seismic serv'ice-related

~, II I

contracts I,

,.; ':;.:pe'rformed prior to June, 1978 is continuing. I Six have been

-"., ';-identified'. URS/Blume, EES (Cygna), EDS Nuclear, ANCO, -V Wyle and I ~, )$

,', .:.;Harding-.-Lawson= Associates.

I

~ *

• +f I

"-.-I. 2 -Task 2 -'ndependent Requalification II The work accomplished I

for each item in this work period is given below. 'I=

I 'I 1.2.1, Auxiliary Building The shear area, weight, structural steel stiffness, center of mass, mass moment of inertia, gross area, moment- of inertia, torsional ri.gidity and ceter of rigidity have been calculated and checked. An EOT. was issued because of discrepancies between properties calculated by RLCA and those used by URS/Blume for the Auxiliary.'Building analysis.

• 'I

l. 2. 2 Piping Runs and. Pipe Supports The analysis of the Pressurizer and Charging Pump Line is continuing on a provisional basis. An EOX has been issued

r 4

.February 26, 1982 involving each line

Containment spectra above elevation 140 )

feet (EOI 1009) and the Separator/Stabilizer (EOI 1019).

.1.2.3 4

Equipment I-4 4

I 4 ~ , 4ll 4(

The Boric Acid Tank analysis is finished'and. checked. An EOI

'".'.,'-' has been issued for the following items: buckling stresses in

~-

,'the skirt and sloshing on the roof were not evaluated and an area

.formula used by PGandE was in error. Additional verification ih 4

.";",~j:;";,.'planned:to covex these .items.

4

.",".~',;<<.:.jl."The'Pt'est r'eponse'spectra used in the qualification testing for

'g:".g>'.-"..-'Groups:,I, 'II, III, IV, V and VII Electrical Equipment has been 44 4 In all cases 4

,".'<>J~compPared to the required Hosgri response spectra.

~

,"-.-.-"~,".-the 'test response "spectra'enveloped the Hosgri response spectra.

i~ i, 4

1.'2.4 .Conduit and HVAC Duct Supports 4

4 The Raceway Support P calculations have been tempoxarily suspended.

.-';.'-pending-resolution .of EOI 4 ~ ~

930 (Raceway Criteria).

I 44 1.2.5 -Small Bore Piping Runs and HVAC Components 4 4 4

4 4 The analysis -for Supply Fan S31 has been temporaxily suspended

'* ', pending additional information. J

~ I of the small bore piping criteria is nearly complete.

~ 4 The examination 4 ~ -,, rg ~

gP

1. 3 Task 3 Field Verification I 4

A field inspection of valves and the Fuel Handling Building connections xefexenced in EOI'1027 was conducted.

4 I'

• 4 \

r

.February 26', 1982

l. 4 Task 4 PGandE and Its Contractors QA/QC Review and Audit See Attachment A

. 1.5 Error and Open Item (EOI) Report 4, *4

,Thirteen EOI Reports and QA Findings and Observations were

',i,', '.- issued in this work period and are given in Attachment D.

,';,",. One. EOI Report was resolved during this work period and is given *

,'in.-Attachment h 4 P,

I

,>',~.',.",'.The.'Error and Open Item procedures and classifications.;have~,been '

'.,',".';~";;='j,*'rrevised. ~

To avoid confusion, all EOI changes will be reflected

....,".',~>,.by -a",,,sequential revision number. EOI 1030, Revision 0, reflects 44

-.; "".".-;this '.cha'nge" in procedure. I I 4 ~ 4

~

~

~

See Attachment B,. C, D and E.

P P

4 I

I

'I 4 4 I pr ~" T P I

r. I 4 I P

I I 4

I',I P4, PT ~

I February 26, 1982 2.0 SIGNIFICANT RESULTS AND FINDINGS I'I No significant results or findings other than those listed in '

1~

the EOI Report, QA Findings and QA Observations are reported 1

for the tasks performed in this work period.

I I '1,<<1 I

~

1 ~

, <<P*><< I I P 'll t'tr

-14 I~ P I>

I I

)r

• tf 'P >'

It

'I "I

,I tet I

~ >> II I'l l

Iltt Vr at I

I' I

1

~

tf I e

'I, I. t er. 'I 1

1

I 1<<

February 26, 1982 3.0 SCHEDULED WORK FOR NEXT WORK PERIOD 3.1 Task 1 Review of Seismic Design Chain The report will be completed for the review of sesimic service-related contracts performed prior to June 1978.

3.2 Task 2 - Independent Requalification 3.2.1 Auxiliary Building The independent calculations for the soil springs will be checked and the time history plotted. The computer model will be run to calculate the mode shapes, frequencies and the

. dynamic response culminating in floor response spectra.

Prof. Holley will continue review of the Auxiliary Building

'ynamic model.

3.2.2 Piping Runs and Piping Supports Four piping analyses.,will be..completed and checked by 3/1/82.

Comparison with PGandE analyses will start. Pending receipt of information from PGandE, the remainder of the generic sample piping will be computed.

3.2.3 Equipment The analysis for the CCW Heat Exchanger, CCW Pump and Hot Shutdown Remote Control Panel will be checked.

3.2.4 Conduit and HVAC Duct Supports The independent calculations of the two HVAC duct samples will continue.

R

. February. 26, 1982 3.2.5 Small Bore Piping Runs and HVAC Components The completion of independent calculation of the HVAC damper will be completed if additional design information is gathered.

II, The independent calculations" <if some of the small bore piping runs

-.6I" be completed.

willE 'l be accomplished and the evaluation of the criteria I ELI will I

f <<I,

-'Pi.eld <<Verification

.'",;. '".3. 3'-.

-.Zask 3

-"'";."f.,'".At "least -one'"field trip to the plant is planned to inspect

.':,'j~:,"-'aixd.to".everify. the small, bore piping runs and electrical equip-1

.".-+>':,'meant.'-mounting. It is expected. that the NRC Diablo Canyon Resident f

'-'.".."";In'spector'nd possibly,a few:Teledyne,.engineers;will::,accompany. =.

'-.:;the 'P -CA Engineers on this txip.

i, 3.4; Task 4 PGandE and Xts Contractors; QA/QC f

Review and Audit See Attachment A 'for the 'schedule and the planned work fox the next work period.

I

3. 5 Error-..and.Open Item,.Report

~

L L

• Errors and/or open items will continue to be reported as they are identified.

• IL l t I I K ~

• II ~I

'V ee 'L,f E

~ ~

1'abxuaxy 26, 1982

4.0 CONCLUSION

The work progress of the seismic reverification program has been affected by inadequate equipment drawings.

II Several analyses have bein temporarily suspended and several others are proceeding on a proviyional basis.

~, II' '

- ~

I

."- EOI 1029.shows I

differences exceeding 15% between the calculated

-.-.jRLCA Auxiliary Building properties and those used in the URS/Blume

\~

~, ".=-,"'."".'analysis QI yl in'=selected cases. 'The'ignificance of these differences

\

,'.."<".will .be assessed after the building response has been determined.

XI,,

I meet ing wi11 be held with PGandE to discuss t he di fferences.

As with all EOI I

'--"'-;.:;-;,-;Teledyne 'personnel are scheduled to attend.

meetings, minutes will be taken and filed with the speci- '--;.~"';;.related

"'ic.EOI. I I

~

'I l*h h il as" 9 r M a

h I

'I iI r h

h. ~ ~

I*

I h h

P I' I

~ ~

I I

h i

I I

I I

~ ~ ', ',C h

rl I

-'h~ tiuJ6'h OiIIu'IhJ hr+a

L

. Fabruary 26, 1982 5.0 CORRECTION EOI 1013 issued because the test reponse spectra for the Group Vl Electrical Equipment qualified by test did not envelope the required Hosgri response spectra was labeled an open item not a Class A error as noted in report g7.

When the significance of the item is established it will be further classified.

'h Bebrhhary 26, 1982

~ 'P h

6. 0 INSPECTION VISITS P. Morrill, J. Fair and K. Herring conducted an unannounced NRC inspection on February 22 and 23, 1982. The RLCA calcu-lations for the Diesel Fuel Oil Priming Tank and the Main Annunciator Cabinet were reviewed. In addition, technical and criteria were discussed.

J ,'h  !

'xpansion I!

-"i..W. Cooper and R. Wray of Teledyne conducted an inspection on. P

",,;;<<;"',"February 24. and 25, 1982.. Portions of RLCA piping and

'."'",: "equipment 'analyses were'eviewed.

I

/  !

P P  !

h h ~  !'

P

,P

~

P

,y ~

~ l h

P P

~ !

P

~ ~

P P

~,h!

P

,P P

I' P

I, P P

V N~

~ ~

~ ~

4 r

,i/ 'I I'N

!4 ,4 J-I'j

',r j,~,, -. "

~

" 'I 4~. ~

I ~

~

@4! I

/4/'/t It ATTACmZNT A I

I!t Progress Repor t on Quality 5" ' Assurance by RPR, Inc.

! "~

N.

~ ~

4 ~

I'/

444

]~

eti'r/ tt!4/mt

. R. P. REEDY, INCORPORATED 286 N. Santa Cruz Avenue Los Gatos, CaHfornta 9o080 ~ (408) 854'-9110 February 23, 1982 FEB 2 4 !982 ROBERT L. CLOUD AND ASSOCIATES ~ INC.

125 University Avenue Berkeley,'alifornia 94710

Subject:

Biweekly Report of RFR, Ines Activities

. Regarding PGSE Independent Audit, Phase I, February 9, 1982 through February 23, 1982

-1 ~ A

Dear Mr. Cloud:

P This report covers our activities through February 23, 1982, with 'regard to our independent Quality Assurance reviews of the Diablo Canyon Unit 1 Plant.

~ ~

To summarize our activities to date, we have completed

.the 'ollowing steps in our review of the quality assurance programs of PGKE and the six primary organizations performing seismic safety-related design work under subcontract to PGEE:

(1) We have completed our reviews of PGSE's and the six subcontractors'uality assurance program manuals and procedures, using the Program Review Checklist included in our December 19, 1981 biweekly progress report.

(2) Lists of questions were generated as a result of the program reviews, and were presented to PGKE and the subcontractors, in preparation for program implementation audits. The questions were designed to clarify non-specific areas of the program manuals and to assist the audited organizations in understanding the scope of the audits to be performed. The lists of questions.

were included in our December 19, 1981 and January 4, 1982 biweekly progress reports.

(3) Detailed Audit Checklists were generated in preparation for our program implementation audits

'of PGSE and the six subcontractors. The Audit Checklists for ANCO Engineers and EDS Nuclear were included in our January 4, 1982 biweekly progress report, and the Audit Checklists for EES (Cygna), WYLE, URS/Blume, and Harding Lawson Roger I'. Rcccly, P.H. Englllccflllg Colllllllullg

~ ~

Robert L. Cloud February 23, 1982 Page Two Associates were included in our January 12, 1982 biweekly progress report. The Audit. Checklist for PGKE was included in our February 9, 1982 biweekly progress report.

(4) We have completed the design service contractor implementation audits. The Audit Reports for EDS ahd ,Harding-Lawson Associates were completed and forwarded on -January 26, 1982. 'he Audit Reports for EES, URS/Blume, WYLE, and ANCO are currently in preparation, and are nearly complete. The implementation audit of PGSE is also nearing completion..-

--Appendix A shows our schedule for completion of the implementation audits and audit reports for Phase X, as of this date.

Very truly yours, Roger F. eedy, P.E.

R. F. REEDY, XNC.

RFR:na Encl.

APPENDIX A R. F. REEDY INC.

PHASE I SCHEDULE Februar 23 28, 1982

1. Complete Audit. Reports for EES, NYLE, and ANCO.

M'arch 1 3 1982 for P

1. Complete Audit Report URS/Blume.

, 2. Complete implementation audit of PGGE.

March 4 8, 1982

1. Complete Audit Report for PGSE.

I 4

~ ~

~4 44 r'I 4 ~

I 'I I 4, I

i,h'II 4

I 4 I

Ij 4

4 "4 4

'I II ATTACH I 4 I

4 Error'and Open Xtem Classification, Revision 2 (2/24/82) 4 4 4

~ I

'I 4

4 ~

~'

~

4 444'

0 '1

~g

Revision 2 P105-4 February 24, 1982 Error and Open Item Classification 1.0 Definitions An Open Item is a possible error or inconsistency that has not been veri'fied, fully understood and its signi-ficance assessed.

-1.2 An error is an incorrect result that has been verified as such. It may be due to any of. several reasons:

mathematical mistake use of wrong analytical method omission of data use of inapplicable data 1.3 Class'A An error is considered Class A if design criteria or operating limits of safety related equipment are exceeded as a result, and changes in design or operating procedures are required.

1.4 Class B An error is considered Class B if design criteria or operating limits of safety related equipment are exceeded, but are resolvable by means of more realistic calculations or retesting-~

1.5 Class C An error is considered Class C if incorrect

~ ~

t A

R'evision 2 P105-4 February 24, 1982 engineering or installation of safety related equipment is found, but no design criteria or operating limits are exceeded.

1.6 Class D An error or Open Xtem is considered Class D if safety related equipment is not affected.

~r/r~

Project Engineer Date Approved

0 f I

~ h Ct'4" I V I

~

)r tfiitl I I

I

~

I I ~ i'fil jl I tfi ~ 'r)~,. li t

I )

t ATTACHMENT C I

-I" l '4 ~

I tr -Error and Open Item Procedure Revision 3 (2/24/82) t I, I ~ fi 4 lt

~,-;

~ I'

) ~

I I" I 1 ll ~ ill

l 0

a

~

'evision 3 Q

'ebruary 24, j.982 '

ERROR AND OPEN XTEH PROCEDURE APPLICATION A. An Error and'pen Item Repoxt (EOI Repox.t, see Appendix 2)

-wil.l be fox l5% or;,greater differences in, analysis after'he RLCA'analysis has been checked and compaxed to the PGandE woxk.

An EOI Report will be filled out for differences (defined separately) between PGandE design and RLCA. as-built in-P formation after t:he specific item has been checked in the I'C field. In addition, the incorrect value will be checked I for use in the PGandE qualification calculation or against the'GandE as-built drawings.

C. An EOI Report will be filled out in other situations (spectxal differences, examination of PGandH criteria, allowables. exceeded, etc.) as necessary.

REPORT PROCEDURES (These same basic procedur'es are applicable to QA Findings and Observations)

A. The EOI classification will be determined by the criteria in the "Error and Open Item Classification".

B- A list of items needed to close'resolve) an open item will be included in the EOI Report.

Revision 3 P105=4 February 24, 1982 C. All EOI Repoxts will be signed by an RLCA engineer. The Project Engineer will check all EOI Reports.

D.. A separate:sequential file number .will.be assigned to each EOI Report. Each EOI Repoxt is a logged and controlled document.

E. All EOI Reports will be issued as Revision 0. Any'ub-sequent changes ,. to the EOI Report will be noted by the issuance of a revision. This revision will be reported in the same manner as an EOI Report Revision 0.

'. DOCUPIENTATION A.. Each EOI Repoxt will have an individual file.

B. Each EOI Report will be released immediately to PGandE under a transmittal cover. The transmittal date will be noted on the report.

C. All EOI Reports will be attached and noted in the following RLCA Progress Repoxts.

D. All meetings and telephone convexsations wherein resolu-tion information is discussed will be documented and included in the file.

E. Copies of all documents used to resolve the error or.

open item will be included in the file.

FINAL RESOLUTION A. Resolution information will be sent to RLCA pxior to Final Resolution.

j r 'i c

1'M ~'S 0

Revision 3 + P 105- iI Rebruaxy 24, 1982 B. The Project:Engineer -; will checkc the EOX Report for resolution and adequate documentation. klis signature will appeax on the sheet and indicate RLCA approval Vi W of the resolution.

V %  !

C. The Final Resolution of an EOI will either be an error, deviation or closed item.

The error definitions are contained in the "Error and Open Item Classification"..

2.. A deviation is not an exxox in analysis, design or construction, it is a departure from standaxd procedure.

3. A closed item will result when the item identified in the EOX is found to be correct.

Q~.L Project Engineer Date Approved

J

'I

~ $

I Vl (V I

I I

I 111 I

~ I I

I gl

', I,2 1 4 IV*

~

g

• I '

I A I .

\

I V I'I V'

. ATTACHMENT D

~ I

'j, I

'I

,V EOX Reports for Work Period I

From 2/13/82 to 2/26/82

~ V,

'r I 'I I I'l ~

.~

ll I IS r

-,rfI '

I

~ I 'll '

I~

I *

,I

I

Pile No.

L'OR AND OPEN XTEH SHEET

1. Classif ication Exxox Error C lassif ication or Q Class (AB, C, ox D)

Open Item

2. Desex'iption THE 2> XNCH CHANNEL SHOWN QN PGandE DRAWXNG DC 6633 99-3-2 XS SHOWN AS A 4 INCH CHANNEL IN BOTH THE BUFFALO FORGE AND EDS NUCLEAR CALCULATIONS.

L I

3 .. 'ignificance ~, I "THE SIGNIFICANCE OF THIS XTEY CAN BE BETTER ASSESSED UPON CON-.

'ESULTS I I

PLETXON OF THE RLCA. ANALYS S AND COMPARISON WXTH EDS NUCLEAR

~

r I

4 .: Recommendation

A RECONMENDATION WILL BE PROVIDED UPON COHPLET ION OF THE =

RLCA ANALYSXS~

5. Reported.

QX PGandE Transmi.teal Date 2 1 8 82 NRC Ref . R Data

6. Final Resolution Signed /Date j Pro ec t Engineex/Data Prior to l Re eas e ect Administrator Data Pro3 l l Pri or to F j.na P.aso lite.oil

0 0 Pile No. 1019 ERROR AND OPEN ITEN SHEET

1. Classif ication Error Error Classification or Q Class (4, B, C, or'D)

Dx Open Xrem

2. Description Separator/Stabilizer in the CVCS System RLCA has been unable to obtain documentation for the following items necessary to model the equipment for the piping and skirt. thickness, nozzle diameter and thickness, and analysis:'hell support 'configuration.

~ e

.=

Significance ~

In lieu of documentation, PG and E's Separator/Stablizer model will be used in the RLCA piping analysis on a provisional basis. RLCA understands that the Separator/Stabilizer qualifi-

.cation is based on the piping analysis. The significance of this item will be determined after RLCA receives the necessary documentation..

.Recommendation PG & E to,provide the necessary documentation.

C

5. Reported PGanBE Transmit'tal'ate 2/18/82 ERG Ref. & Date

6. Final Resolution Sig ed/Date Project Engineer/Date Z Ppp Prior to Release Project Administrator Date Prior to Final Resolution

Pile No. 1020 ERROR AND OPEN XTEH SHEET

1. Classification Error Error Classification or Q Class (A, B, C, or Dj X Open item

2. .Description Auxiliary Saltwater Pump The Hosgri s'pectra attached to the PG and E analysis (File 116.31,. Rev', 0 , 12.27.77) Jie preliminary spectra (4/5/77).

A

"-'=':3 =

Significance

~

'-.: Report 4~

The',preliminary spectra are identical to those in the Hosgri

. ';: and therefore 'the results of.

~ ~

the calculation are valid.

'"The"-question of control of design spectra will be addressed.

4 4'.,'ecommendation A,:recommendation Audit of PG and trill he provided upon completion of the QA E internal interfaces.

5. Reported PGandE Transmit'tal Date 2/18/82 ERC Ref. & Date

6. Final Resolution v (te 5'L Sighted/ te Project Engineer/Date Prior.to Release

.Pxoj ect A ministrator Date Prior to Final Pesolution

t, yl

Fz.le No. 1021 ERROR AND OPEiil ITEN SHEET

1. Classification Erxor Error Classification ox Open Item P Class (A, B, C, or D)

2. Description PG and E piping analysis number 4-3 (Revision. 16, 3/4/80) repxesents the Component Cooling Water Heat Exchanger as a rigid anchor. The Hosgri Report (Table 7-5) lists natural frequencies of 9 hertz (horizontal and vertical) for, this heat exchanger.

'3. Significance The mo'deling of a nonxigid piece of equipment as a rigid anchor may not be conservative,

4. Recommendation A recommendation wi11 be provided upon completion of the RLCA

.-analysis.

5. Reported Qx PGandE Transmit'tal'ate 2 18 82 NRC Ref. 6 Date

6. Final Resolution Signed/Date Pxoject Engineer/Date Prior to Release Pxoject A ministrator Date Prior to Final Resolution

Pile No. 1022 ERROR AND OPEN ITEM SHEET

1. Classification Error Error Classification or Open Xrem P Class (A, 3, C, or D)

Qx

2. Description Auxiliary Salt Water Pump The upper pump support is located ten feet above'levation --2.1

'eet. Spectra applicable at -2.1 feet were used as input for the upper pump support.. (PG and E analysis, File 116.31, Rev.

0, 12/27/77)

3. 'ignificance The-use of spectra at elevation -2.1 feet as input to the support at elevation 8'9" may not be conservative.

s 4'. Recommendation 1 L

'.A recommendation

'LCA analysis.

will be provided upon completion of the

5. Reported PGandE'RC Transmittal Date 2/18/82 Ref. &, Date

6. Final Resolution Signed Date Project Engineer Date Prior to Release Project Administrator Date Prior to Final Resolution,

File No. 1023 ERROR AND OPEN LTEH SHEET

1. Classification Error Error Classification

.or =

item P Class (A, B, C, or D)

X Open

2.

Description:

~ormation concede~ a 3".Velan Valve in the RLCA piping analysis is not available. PGandE drawing 447119-Revision 12 and piping schematic 102003-sheet 4-Revision 9 refer .to item 15 on 102039. This drawing (102039-sheet 41-Revision 9) shows the 3" Velan Valve to be described on drawing 663317-52. Only four and six inch Vegan Valves are described on drawing 663317-sheet 52-Revision l.

3. Significance Tn lieu of this information RICA will assume valve properties in order to

'complete the piping analysis. The significance of this item will be assessed at the completion of the generic sample.

4. Recommendation PoandE to resolve the drawing inconsistence and provide the 3" Velan Valve information to RICA.

5. Reported PGandE Transmi t'tal Date 2/19/82 NRC Ref. & Date

6. Final Resolution Signed Date j Pro ect Engineer/Date Prior to Release Proj ect A ministrator Date Prior to Final Resolution

File No. 1024

~

~

ERROR AND OPEN ITEM SHEET

1. Classification Error Error Classification or Class (A, 8, C, or D) x Open litem

2. Description I

PGandE Design Review Isometric 449317 Revision 3 shows line 1917-4" rigidly restrained by a support labeled 85S-40R. The qualifica-tion analysis shows this restraint to be labeled 85S-40V.

Several lines are supported by this restraint: 5 rigidly and one by a spring hanger.

r n

3.. Significance

...::,-This specific item has no significance for the pipe or support qualification. however, could potentially

.'ead to supports This nomenclature, being mislabeled.

G Recommendation PGandE to identify and clarify the support nomenclature.

RLCA to address the potential for misinterpretation of the PGandE support nomenclature.

5. Reported PGandE Transmittal Date 2/20/82 NRC Ref. &, Date

6. Final Resolution igned Dat Project Engineer/Date Prior to Release Prospect A ministratox Date Prior to Final Resolution

J 0

s ~

1ile No 1025 ERROR AND OPEN ITEN SHEET

,l. Classification Q Error Error Classification or Q Class (A, E, C, or D) x Open Item

2. Description The Hosgri Report does not include vertical s'pectra for Turbine Building elevation Spectra for the the'04'ents.16-20..

Cardox Tank. Support may not be applicable for the entire region-

/

bents 16-20

//

='3.';"-;," Significance

,.'-" '"::.RLCA, will envelope the Card ox Tank .Support and ben'ts 5-15

" ..-',:,:,.'--:-spectra for..-piping an/alysis in this region.

o ~

4 .. Recommendation

.,'" PG'andE .to;-either generate vertical spectra for this region or s'how, the Cardox Tank Suppor t spectra to be conservative for the'ntir'e. region.

5. Reported PGan dE Transmi t'talI Date 2/20/82 ERC Ref. R Date 6.'inal Resolution Z-Zo - z, Signe Date Project Engineer Date Prior to .Release Prospect A rninistrator Date Prior to Final Resolution

J' File No. 1026 ERROR AND OPEN ITEM SHEET

1. Classification Error Errox Classification ox Q Class (A, E, C, or D) g Open Xrem 2, Description The Hosgri Report--does not include spectra for several areas of

the Turbine Building that support Class I electrical conduit.

The March'980 Blume Turbine Building Report contains spectra for these areas.;.

1 t

.II >

.; ':;3.""'ignificance .

H

.',',;;-"-.:"'", RLCA'to.'ddress, this item at the completion of the generic

'k 1

"4 .,a Recommendation

5. Reporte'd

'GandE Transmit'tal Date 2/20/82 NRC Ref. R Date

6. Final Resolution

'20(P l.

Signed Da e Pxoject Engineer Date Prior to Release Project A ministrator Date Prior to Final Resolution

l

~,

File No. 1024 RROR AND OPEN XTEM SHEET

1. Classification Exrox Error Classification ox Q Class (A., B, C, on D)

X Open, Item 2., Descxiption 4-166 in the Hosgri, Report shows modifications to the l'igure Fuel Handling Cxane support str'ucture. This'igure'ndicates bolt holes to pexmit lateral movement. PGandE Drawing 'lotted 451598 Re~ision 1 does not show the slotted bolt holes xn details 2, 4 and 6. -".: .'

Pl f

. - .-';;. '-"."'3. ".;, Signifi'cance," '.=:.-'..-"- ", "

s'

-."RLCA will'assume slotted. bolt. hole s in the independent Auxiliary.

'.  ;-;:='-,-Euilding'nalyst.s on a provisional basis.'

C

~ ~

I

*4. Recommendation

~.

PGandE to provide documentation for Figuxe .4-166 in the Hosgri

. Report..:

p RLCA to examine these connections in the field.

5- Repoxted ~ ~ s PGandE Transmittal, Date 2/23/82 NRC Ref. & Date

6. Final Resolution

~ r Signed Date Ec~(.~pl Project 9 ~

Engineex/Date 2 z9 8'L Pxz.ox to Release Project A ministrator Date Prxo lAR' to ~rale 1 z.nal Resolute.on

', awly,

~ t e-s sewl e~sjl

J' Pile No. 1025 ROR AND OPEN XTEH SHEET

1. Classification Error 'r Error Classigicati'on .

Q Class (A, E, C, or D)

Open Xtem

2. Description

• h e

e The URS/Blume Auxi'liary Building Report-Octobe'r 1979-page 14 appe'ars to,specify a methodology for calculating AH that differs from the Hosgxi Repoxt. Xn the 1979 Blume Repoxt, an additional codirectional response 'is to be combined with AHeon the SRSS

basis.'A ':maximum'horizcont'al acceleration) n h'S ~

- -".;,-."..-3.. 'Signi.f icance '-.

";-,""',c,-".The'.'methodo'1ohgy".'for 'calculating AH in the Hosgri Report ma'y have

-',:..~;~::,'beeen revised.;::jn-:.the. final.Blume Repoxt.

~, e

.".4. "'ecommendation

e,, e PGandE to .clarify the methodology to. be used for calculating AH xn'the .Hosgri and October 1979 Auxiliary Building Re'ports.

.5. Reported J 'e

' . ~

X PGandE Transmittal< Date '2/23/82 ERC Ref. & Date

,6. Final Resolution

~ e L Signed Date Project Engineer/Date e

I Pxior to Release Project Administrator Date Prior to 1 inal Pesolution e e

e File No. 1027 ERROR AND OPEN ITEN SHEET

l. Classification Error Error Classification or Class (A, E, C, or D) g Open Xtesih.,

2. Description '

Figure 4-166 in the Hodgri. Report shows modifications to the ',

J Fuel Handling Crane.suppor't", structure. This figure indicates slotted bolt holes to,"permit lateral movement. PGandE Drawing 451598 Revision 1 does,not show the slotted bolt holes in details

,2, 4.and 6.

h *h >

," ';;-i';-"--"..RLCA w'ill assume sl'otted bolt .holes in the, independent Auxiliary

.,,:j'.-.-.,.=":,'uilding analysis on a provisional basis.

rh

, 4. Recommendation h

PGandE,.to provide documentation for Figure 4-166 in the Hosgri

- ',.Report-. -, h h h K RLCA to-examine these connections hl in the field.

h

5. Reported h e

x PGandE I'ransmittal'ate 2 23 82 NRC Ref 6 Date

6. Final Resolution Signed ate Project Engineer Date

'Prior to Release h

h

-Project Administrator Date h

Prior to.,Final Resolutionh h

rr 7

l

File No.

ERROR AND OPEN XTEH SHEET

1. Classification Error Error Clas ification x

or Open Xrem g Class (A, E, C, or O)

2. Description The URS/Blume Auxiliary Building Report-October 1979-page 14 appears to specify a methodology for calculating AH that differs from the Hosgri Report. Xn the 1979 Blume Rap port, an response is to be combined with AH on the SRSSadditional'odirectional basis. (AH = maximum horizontal acceleration).

'",,=3. Significance

"-The methodology for calculating AH in the Hosgri Report may have

.been revised in the final Blume Report.

I W

I Recommendation PGandE to clarify the methodology to be used for calculating'AH in the Hosgri and October 1979 Auxiliary Building Reports.

5. Reported x PGandE Transmittal Date 2/23/82 NRC Ref. 6 Date

6. Final Resolution Signed ate Project Engineer/Date Prior to Release Prospect A ministrator Date Prior to Final Resolution

I 0: ~ t D

s V

File No. 1029

~

ERROR AND OPEN ITEM SHEET

1. Classification Error ~

Error. Classification or Open Xresl P Class (A, E, C, or D) z I 4

2. Descxiption Discrepancies that d'iffer by moxe than 15K are found between the dynamic model properties in'dependently calculated by RLCA.

and used by URS/Blume (See,four page attachment:).

14 4 ~

7 7} ~ lr f r

• ' ~ '

I, I 'I

'I 4 4 4

." ."".',3; <'.Signif icance ".:."",,',"""".",* ~,:, 7 I

,I

-;"-,"',.-',,-'-'.'The sigrnificance of the*above discrepancies can b'e assessed

.".:::;...'.after,.the,--frequency and xespon se analyses are performed.

t I

, ~

I Recommensdation I',RLCA discuss with PGandE to determine the basis 4

for the differences.

1 'I I

'Perform frequency and response analyses U7 ~,r

5. Reported =

I PGandE . Transmittalf Date 2/25/82 4

NRC 1 4-Ref. R Date

6. Final.Resolution X5'2.

Sig ed Dat Project Engineex Date Priox to Release Project A ministratox Date Prior to Final Resolution

I r 5

k C

t

~<g S

t-4 C

f I I, e I 7C I" W O 1

I+

I W 4

Vle<g l.t I

f c4v~k'on

)ass.'Point (,i<i f s )

<.'T-~ )

/9L'ov z

.'URs Rt cA l-j 249 /.

1

88. 660.

isa. o

'/S'3'5. /9 I 7.8'9 C~

I

'V 7P, T

A h 2 Q,o I p5. 0 U

S2. g4 J 2.72i-I 0 l>

0 ll l /

J 5 8,8/2,. Q

-i l~

7)

P A Z

o

~ I O

~i i

1 I h

I t i

P

tV I

~

4

~

4 4

4 4

4 1 4 4

ii t O 4

I 4

4 j m i

%bender Area lC F4 g > &on)en'f 2nev~'p,t j ~ F4 4+Io 3

~ ~ 4

~ 4 E-W ~Dr V I  ;:, .g->V; ROD'.

1 I i tf Dgs/ ~

URS 0 LC( t Bkln)C Bk<<mg R(<<me.

à 7g & SZ. 2 B9.

t 4' 3 I r, A

27 6 0. I'4t oo'.

4 Smitt; 448'I'J. 0 o C U

Pl 0 S Btm(. 2 /7 9',3 3Q

.0 Q

3 1&4.

BO6. 4 Ip,7 42. ~g422 ~ p,>i@

oCG.

I 4 cqJ>< (ky k E-.QI l%4akl LCA 'URs) ALu jc ~ Luud-O A z 02 o

J l)~

P tq i I 4

'I I t

a nZ f

I t

l i I I (F, ('F+ )' j

<3A 5 Cerk~w ogl Hoss

~

v ke,vol>un Neeb SY.>;- C8 14%8 Yf yo'n4 UPS I O'P.Sj

'.BL JHC t8 -Bl!

) r s 1.G I

-8 l.b H :

0 t 0 9~ 1 T

0 9,

'I S

A f

0. 0 r

'r(

0 Il C

0 p l~

9 p l < -Z-3.o 2.7 g 5 CA y ~

i J

0 g./ Q

'g/ Qo.32 J

L I 4'2

@./ Mo i

Z Cl Z

II o 9 t

'I

• /

l p.

1 O I l

'J c

E, V

1

~ 41m e

I I ee 0

1 I

I i

f Mass )Ho men<

o$

Sec~

)

Tweak +

~ lcj~ Member

~opsi on a Q.

'i)i dt,tq F+ (, Ikip; F4/Ra8) + lo I, ~

I

~~ISA .,'U RS 8t UR S/Bkumu P,"t3- rg I

7g I

86 %. C

%IT A

7,.'73; Qj O 0 n C

~ 785 O g g5'g: 8o94 0

)C5 u 4/o,s 00 0

'l48- 9- Q

~C 0 go .

2/,2o . 9 n  :

71 33 t. 78)~ 2SO z

0 e

,e

I C

ERROR AND OPEN ITEYi SHEET File'o.

Revision No. 0

1. Classification Error Class (A, B, C, or D)

Open Item

2. Description BORIC ACID TANK Stresses differ by more than 15%

Buckling of tank skirt not evaluated Sloshing loads on roof not evaluated (PGandE analysis 104.051 5/4/78, pg. 7) incorrect -formula was used to calculate the area of the skirt

'n (PGandE analysis 140.051 G 3/9/78, pg. 1)

~

3. Significance

'Ph sicall 'nsi'ficant g .

stresses low Conceivable the above sections were evaluated by inspection'.

4.:-Recommendation PGandE No action required on this item RLCA verify that other Hosgri Tanks analyses are not

=-affected by the above".items.

5. Reported to PGandE Transmittal Date 2 26 82

6. Final Resolution igned/Dat Project

~~~~

Engineer Date E 25 fZ Project .Enpin'eer Date'o Indicate RLCA Final Resolution

sz 1 4 v

'I 'I I

4 h

ht, I

4 ( I

t. 74 ~ f I' "I'J 4

Jg I

. Ih I

-14 ATTACHMENT, E,

'\ 4 1 J Reports Revised During Work

'OI

'7 5 'I Period from 2/13/82 to 2/26'/82 4

4

• I II

]

- ht, I I Ih 4 ~ I 'I 7

tP~', I W.

1 4 . ~

r I

h I

7 hh I 7

I' 4'

I .'<<4 I '" I 4

7 J 4

I I J ~

~ 7,1 ~ 4 I

"17 Jl I JJIJ

0 ~ t Pile No. 1015 j.'RROK AID QPEH ITEM SHEET

1. Classification Rrror Error Classificat:ion.

or tCj Class (A., B, C,. or D)

Open Tsem

)

'. 2. Descxipti.on I

-"r Generator Oil Priming Tank

'iesel P

The PGandE quali:fication analysis (Pile 129.10, Revision'0, 12/27/77) .speci. fied. 4% damping.. R egulatory Guide le61 specific's 3% damping

-'-. for equipment.'" E e

I

Significance

.:;..-: -';~::,';,.q3.",'",;":. '.'

r

.';.:::~.-."-.she;

.;"..-ji~RT C'A

.calcluated'.: PGandE results are E'ess examination".showed, only a slight change in 'the PGandE result:s f

'han half. o the allowable.

. '.~-";-.;;with'. rev'is'ed'damping vdalqe.

~

~

4; Recommendation .

'A recommendation .will be provided, upon completion of the indepen-

,'I dent calculations for,'he'eneric equipmeqt. sample.

~ ~

I ~ ~ ~

5. Reported, QZ pGandE Transmittal Date I

~,

Ref. R Date

6. Pxnal Resolute.on Section 5.2.1 of the Hosgri Report permits 4% damping. for

"...components (excluding reactor pressure vessel internals)..;"

Therefore the damping value, used by PGandE is correct:

z Lj@Z Z II'/NIP Sz.gned Date Proj ect Engineer/Data Prior'o, Release + gc.c

, project Administrator Dat

~:a~~ n-. to Final Resolution-

P- Wi 0 0 a "p

I'i tr