ML20023A935
| ML20023A935 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 09/24/1982 |
| From: | TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML16340C902 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8211010114 | |
| Download: ML20023A935 (79) | |
Text
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ -
- m WM I
MN L
I DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT b
INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM SEMIMONTHLY, REPORT
(
IDVP - SM - SEPTEMBER SEPTEMBER 24, 1982
,,, ->, (fj$
,.c
yy,;,./ * -
PREPARED BY:
TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES IDVP PROGRAM MANAGER l
l 8211010114 821006 DR ADOCK 05000275 PDR
e, e
IDVP-SM-SEPTEMBER _1982 QM ENGMERNG SOMCES TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE EXECUTIVE SLM4ARY
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1 2.0 PHASE I PROGRAM 3
2.1 Program Plans 3
2.1.1 Management Plan 3
2.1.2 Engineering Program Plan 3
2.1.3 Other Program Procedures 3
2.2 Program Reports 4
2.2.1 Error or Open Item Files 4
2.2.2 Interim Technical Reports 4
'2.2.3 Phase I Final Report 4
2.3 RLCA Efforts 6
2.3.1 Design Chain 6
2.3.2 Initial Sanple 6
2.3.3 Additional Verification and Additional Sangling 7
2.3.4 Verification of DCP Corrective Action 9
2.3.5 Interim Technical Report Actions 2.3.6 EDI File Actions 10 11 2.3.7 Visits and Meetings 11 2.4. RFR Efforts 11 2.5 TES Technical Efforts 12 2.5.1 PG&E NSSS Interfaces 12 2.5.2 Containment Annulus Structure 12 2.5.3 Additional Piping Verification 12 2.5.4 Interim Technical Report Action 2.5.5 E01 File Actions 12 12 3.0 PHASE II PROGRAM 13 3.1 Program Plans 13 3.1.1 Management Plan 13 3.1.2 Engineering Program Plan 3.1.3 Other Program Procedures 13 13 3.2 Program Reports 13 3.2.1 Error or Open Item Files 3.2.2 Interim Technical Reports 13 3.2.3 Phase II Final Report 13 13
1 e
o IDVP-SSEPTEMBER 1982 9MENG NIE M G N TABLE OF CONTENTS (Contt)
,PAGE 3.3 SWEC Efforts 14 3.3.1 Design r,nain 14 3.3.2 Mechanical / Nuclear 14 3.3.3 Electrical 16 3.3.4 Instrumentation and Controls 18 3.3.5 Analysis 19 3.3.6 Licensing 21 3.3.7 Interim Technical Report Actions 21 3.3.8 E01 File Actions 21 3.3.9 Visits and Meetings 21 3.3.10 Summary and Comments 22 3.4 RFR Efforts 23 3.4.1 Design Chain 23 3.4.2 QA and Design Control Practices Evaluation 23 3.4.3 QA Audit and Review Reports 24 3.4.4 E0I File Actions 24 3.4.5 Visits and Meetings 24 3.5 RLCA Efforts 24 3.5.1 Analysis 24 3.6 TES Technical Efforts 25 3.6.1 Interim Technical Report Actions 25 3.6.2 E01 File Actions 25 4.0 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM 26 5.0 TES PROGRAM MANAGEMENT EFFORTS 27 5.1 TES Related 27 5.1.1 PG&E Technical Program IDVP Interface 27 5.2 RLCA Related 5.3 RFR Related 28 5.4 SWEC Related 28 29 5.5 Project Administration 29 l
5.6 Quality Assurance Activities 29 6.0 IDVP SCHEDULE 30 APPENDICES:
1.
E01 FILE STATUS 2.
INTERIM TECHNICAL REPORT STATUS 3.
IDVP SCHEDULE f
i
TN ENGBEERNG SOMCES EXECUTIVE SUM 4ARY This IDVP Semimonthly Report presents a sumary of activities during the period August 27, 1982 through September 24, 1982 and the status of the IDVP at the end of that time period.
Phase I efforts directed toward low power operation, are progressing. Work on the initial sanple as defined in the program plans is essentially complete. Seven Interim Technical Reports, (ITR), of an anticipated 25-30 have been issued.
Two of these are programatic and five are technical. Of the 193 Open Item Files opened to date for Phase I and II,13 errors considered to be significant have been identified, 33 files have not yet been resolved and 147 files have been closed.
The present plan for such additional work is in progress in accordance with ITR-1.
Based upon the IDVP and Project work performed since that ITR was issued, a. revision is being prepared.
The Phase II Program Plan has been submitted for NRC approval and work has been initi ated.
Design chains have been temporarily identified, QA and Design Control Reviews are complete and are being evaluated, safety systems and analyses reviews have started, and the mechanical and structural evaluation work is started.
The IDVP has not yet achieved the development of a meaningful schedule for the completion of Phase I or Phase II.
This aspect continues to receive attention.
o 2
WM IDVP-SM-September 1982 u
1.0 INTRODUCTION
The Independent Design Verification Program (IDVP) for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant (DCNPP) is defined as consisting of two phases:
Phase I is responsive to NRC Order CLI-81-30 dated November 19, a.
1981, is related to restoration of the low power license and con-siders the seismic-related efforts of the Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) and of their service-related contracts prior to June 1, 1978.
b.
Phase 11 is responsive to an NRC letter to PG&E dated November 19, 1981, is related to operation above 5% power, and considers non-seismic service-related contracts performed prior to June 1978, PG&E internal design activities and all service-related contracts post-January 1978.
Bcth Phases:
Consider only safety-related structures, systems and components.
a.
b.
Are conducted in accordance with documented Program Management Plans which include associated Engineering Program Plans and other Program Procedures, all of which have been approved by or are subject to the approval of the Nuclear Regulatory Comission (NRC).
Are reported on simultaneously to PG&E and the NRC by means of c.
Semimonthly Reports, Error or Open Item File Reports, Interim Technical Reports and a Final Phase Report.
In addition, an Adjunct Construction Quality Assurance Program is being conducted in accordance with a specific request to the IDVP from PG&E.
The organizations phrticipating in the IDVP are:
Teledyne Engineering Services (TES) - Program Manager a.
b.
Robert L. Cloud Associates, Inc. (RLCA) - Seismic, Mechanical, and Structural f
R. F. Reedy, Inc. (RFR) - QA and Design Control c.
d.
Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC)
Safety Systems and Analyses and Adjunct Construction Quality Assurance (Phase II Only) t l
TM IDVP-SM-Septeder 1962 g,g Beginning in July 1982, the IDVP Semimonthly Reports are issued as follows:
On the second Friday of the month, each IDVP participant (TES, RLCA, a.
RFR, and SWEC) compile and issue all Open Item Reports, Program Resolution Reports, Error Reports, and IDVP Corr.pletion Reports prepared since the last such compilation.
b.
On the fourth Friday of each month. TES prepares and issues a report, without E01 reports, on the status of the IDVP work.
O Q
3 IDVP-SM-Septeder 1982 WM MM h
2.0 PHASE I PROGRAM 2.1 PROGRAM PLANS
?
2.1.1 Management Plan No change in status.
2.1.2 Engineering Program Plan (DCNPP-IDVP-PP-001) 2 No change in status.
2.1.3 Other Program Procedures DCNPP-IDVP-PP-005, Rev. 2 " Potential or Apparent Conflicts of Interest of Individuals" has been prepared in response to the changes requested by the NRC approved letter of September 8,1982, and was issued on Scptember 17, 1982 to all IOVP participants.
The only changes requested by the NRC were:
2 Clarification that the procedure applied to engineering a.
management personnel, which was the previous intent.
b.
Inclusion of Bechtel Power Corporation, Inc. with respect to financial interests and the employnent of family members.
DCNPP-IDVP-PP-007, Rev.
1
" Interface Between IDVP Participants and PG&E" is still in preparation pending clarification of the requirements for informing interested persons with respect to specific types of meetings.
DCNPP-IDVP-008, Rev.1 " Piping Support Baseplate and Anchor Bolt Evaluation (I&E Bulletin 79-02) has been prepared in response to the changes requested by PG&E via DCNP-TES-247, and was issued on September 17, 1982 to all IOVP Participants.
NRC has informed TES that they will be requesting a procedure for inclusion in semimonthly reports of scheduled meetings and other significant events in addition to those included in Section 5.0.
Such a procedure will be prepared when specific requirements are established by the NRC.
IDVD-SM-September 1982 4
TM M
2.2 PROGRAM REPORTS 2.2.1 Error or Open Item Files The Error or Open Item File System has been developed as a tracking system for possible technical concerns.
The sequence of forms originates with an Open Item Report which is assigned a sequential number from the set of such numbers assigned to each IDVP participant. That file number is used to identify the subject undir consideration through several revision numbers until the /ile is closed by issuance of an IDVP Completion Report.
The present status of the Phase I E01 Files is described by Appendix 1.
During the period covered by this Semimonthly Report, since August 27, 1982, a total of two new Phase I files have been opened, making a total to date of 183 files.
r As of this report, 23 Phase I files have not been closed or identified as an error.
13 Phase I files have been identified as indicating a significant error.
(See Table 2 of Appendix 1.)
File actions are reported by the Semimonthly Report issued by each IDVP participant on the second Friday of each month, r
2.2.2 Interim Technical Reports Interim Technical Reports are prepared when a program participant has completed an aspect of their assigned effort in order to provide the completed analysis and conclusions.
These may be in support of an Error, Open Item or Program Resolution Report, in support of a portion of the work which verifies acceptability, or in support of other IDVP action.
The present status of draft and issued Interim Technical Reports is described by Appendix 2.
During the period covered by this Semimonthly Report, since August 27, 1982, ITR-5 " Design Chain" was issued.
Approximately 30 Phase !
Interim Technical Reports are anticipated.
2.2.3 Phase I Final Report This report will either include documentation regarding each l
Error Report identified during Phase I or will sumarize the documentation and reference the applicable Interim Technical Reports.
The IDVP presented an outline for this report at the September 1, 1982 NRC-PG&E-IDVP meeting.
The presently expected outline is as follows:
9
o IDVP-SM-September 1982 TM
[
1.0 INTRODUCTION
1.1 Scope 1.2 Program Plan Sumary 1.3 Criteria 2.0 METHODOLOGY 2.1 Initial Sample 2.2 Additional Verification and Additional Sample 2.3 Verification of Corrective Action 2.4 E01 File System 2.5 ITR System 3.0
SUMMARY
OF RESULTS 3.1 Design Chain 3.2 Quality Assurance 3.3 Structures 3.4 Large Bore Piping and Supports 3.5 '.Small Bore Piping and Supports 3.6 Conduit and HVAC Suports 3.7 Equipment 4.0 SIGNIFICANT FINDINGS 4.1 Specific Errors 4.2 Physical Modifications 4.3 Generic Concerns 4.4 Root Causes 4.5 Corrective Action
5.0 CONCLUSION
S 5.1 Regarding Fuel Loading 5.2 Regarding NRC Order 6.0 REFERENCE 5 7.0 APPENDICES.
TES has prepared a first draft of 1.0 of this report and has circulated it within the IDVP for coments.
Draft preparation has started for 2.0, 3.1 and 3.2.
Drafts for the remaining sections will be prepared when the technical work has proceeded further.
It is presently anticipated that the sections will be issued as they are completed by the JVP so as to permit early review.
A final decision on th.i is expected early in the next report period.
IDVP-SM-September 1982 Y l
NM 2.3 RLCA EFFORTS 2.3.1 Design Chain This task has been completed and RLCA issued an Interim Technical Report on the Design Chain (ITR-5).
2.3.2 Initial Sample a.
Buildings An Interim Technical Report on the Auxiliary Building (ITR-6) was issued to all parties on September 10, 1982.
b.
Piping The independent analysis of the ten piping problems is complete. A partial Interim Technical Report on Piping has forwarded to TES on September 3, 1982.
c.
Pipe Supports The initial field walkdowns have been completed.
Analysis criteria and procedures have been prepared to reflect the licensing criteria.
In addition, the frequency calculations are nearing completion.
r d.
Small Bore Piping This task has been completed.
An Interim Technical Report on Small Bore Piping will be forwarded to TES for approval in the next work period, e.
Equipment Analysis e Valves The independent analysis of the one remaining valve in the initial sample, FCV-41, is continuing.
e Electrical Equipment l
This task has been completed.
A partial Interim Technical Report on Electrical Equipment Qualified by Analysis was forwarded to TES for review on August 6, 1982.
i
TM IDVP-SM-September 1982 7
MM l
e Tanks This task has been cog leted, and reported in Interim Technical Report (ITR-3) issued to all parties on July 16, 1982.
e Heat Exchanger Review of CCW HX analysis is still in progress in response to TES comments, E01 1088.
o Pumps The independent analysis of the one remaining pump in the initial sample, the Component Cooling Water Pump, is continuing.
e HVAC Cogonents This task has been cogleted and results reptrted in Open Item Reports.
f.
Equipment Qualified by Shake Table Tes?.,
7 This task has been completed, and portions of the work have been reported in an Interim Technical Report (ITR-4).
g.
Raceway Supports This task has been completed and results are reported in an Interim Technical Report (ITR-7) issued to all parties on September 17, 1982.
h.
HVAC Duct Supports The HVAC Duct Support calculations are continuing.
2.3.3 Additional Verification and Additional Sampling RLCA is preparing a Rev.
1 to ITR-1 on Additional Verification and Additional Sampling to reflect the changes in this effort as a result of the transfer of work to Verification of the Diablo Canyon Project (DCP) Corrective Action, Section 2.3.4.
The work described in this Section 2.3.3 is that which was defined by ITR-1, Rev. O and which is not presently planned to be transferred to Verification of Corrective Action in response to the Internal Technical Program.
5 IDVP-SM-September 1982 gg b
a.
Buildings and Structures
~
Transferred to Verification of DCP Corrective Action, Section 2.3.4.
b.
Piping RLCA has selected the five additional piping problems.
The final walkdowns for three of the lines were co@ leted on June 24, 1982 and the modeling is continuing.
The final field verification for the fourth line was completed on July 28, 1982.
Three problems will be completed by September 20, 1982.
The fourth analysis is dependent on RLCA requests for information numbers 303 and 304 (8/24/82).
Review of the PG&E Internal Technical Program for piping is tranferred to Verification of Corrective Action, Section 2.3.4.
c.
Pipe Supports Transferred to Verification of DCP Corrective Action, Section 2.3.4.
d.
.Small Bore Piping Transferred to Verification of DCP Corrective Action, r
Section 2.3.4.
e.
Equipment e Electrical Equipment PG&E has informed RLCA that the main control board was analyzed by the NSSS vendor.
The ITR on Additional Verification and Additional Sampling (ITR-1) will be revised to reflect this, e Tanks The review of the Outdoor Water Storage Tanks and the Diesel Fuel Oil Tanks is included in the l
Structures review which is transferred to l
Verification of DCP Corrective Action, Section 2.3.4.
i
IDVP-SM-Septenter 1982
.g.
YM M
e Pumps The review of the two pumps is continuing.
e HVAC Conponents RLCA has selected the two additional HVAC Components and completed the initial field verification, f.
_ Equipment Qualified by Shake Table Test v
This task is dependent on PG&E information.
g.
Raceway Supports Transferred to Verification of DCP Corrective Action, Section 2.3.4.
h.
Soils A program for review of the Harding-Lawson soils work has been completed.
Dr. R. McNeill has completed several portions of the review and forwarded the results to RLCA for checking.
An Interi.n Technical Report on several aspects of the soils review will be forwarded to TES in the next report period.
i.
Hosgri Spectra i
RLCA has conpleted a preliminary review of "DCM C-17 Revision 2, Hosgri Response Spectra for Structures, Systems and Congonents, Units 1 and 2, Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant".
Results of this review were transmitted to PG&E.
In addition, RLCA has reviewed the control leg at PG&E and found DCM C-17 to be issued in a controlled manner. An Interim Technical Report on Hosgri spectra inputs will be forwarded to TES for approval.
2.3.'
Verification of DCP Corrective Action RLCA presented a draft ITR for IOVP Review of the Internal Technical Program (ITP) to TES on August 31, 1982.
This review plan addresses buildings and structures, large and small bore piping and supports; and raceways.
The plan involves examination of the PG&E scope, criteria and methodology.
O O
IDVP-SM-September 102 gg MM The plan outlines three basic approaches to be employed by RLCA to ensure implementation of the ITP.
First, in cases where sanples were chosen for review in the ITP, RLCA will examine the sampling approach and samples. Second, in cases where a complete review is followed by reanalysis by PG&E of the deficient segments, RLCA will audit the review process and design review the reanalyses.
Third, in cases where a complete reanalysis is planned in the ITP, RLCA will design review portions of the reanalysis.
RLCA anticipates TES review and approval of this ITR in the next report period.
2.3.5 Interim Technical Report Actions a.
Interim Technical Report on Additional Varification and Additional Sampling Revision 0 of the Interim Technical Report (ITR-1) on Additional Verification and Additional Sampling was issued by RLCA for the Independent Design Verification Program on June 9,1982. A draf t of Revision 1 to this report was issued to TES on August 6,1982 for review and approval; a second draft of Revision 1 that reflects the transfer of work to Verification of Corrective Action is now in preparation.
7 b.
laterim Technical Report on Tanks Revision 0 of the Interim Technical Report on Tanks (ITR-3) was issued to all parties on July 16,1982.
c.
Interim Technical Report on Equipment Qualified by Shake Table Testing RLCA issued Revision 0 of ITR-4 to all parties on July 23, 1982.
f d.
Interim Technical Report on the Auxiliary Building RLCA issued Revision 0 of ITR-6 to all parties on September 10, 1982.
Interim Technical Report on the Design Chain e.
RLCA issued Revision 0 of ITR-5 to all parties on August 19, 1982.
f.
Interim Technical Report on Electrical Equipment Qualified by Analysis RLCA issued a partial report to TES on August 6,1982 for review. Completion of this report is dependent on RLCA request for information number 300 (8/23/82).
IDVP-SM-September 1982 11-WM MN p
g.
Interim Technical Report on Piping RLCA issued a partial draft report to TES on September 3,1982.
p h.
Interim Technical Report on Raceway Supports RLCA issued Revision 0 of ITR-7 to all parties on September 17, 1982.
i.
Interim Technical Report on Hosgri Spectra Inputs RLCA anticipates issuance of this report for TES review and approval in the next report period.
2.3.6 E01 File Action Open Item Reports are included in the RLCA September Semimonthly Report.
2.3.7 Visits and Meetings RLCA and TES met on August 24, 1982 and again on August 27, v
1982 at the RLCA offices to review the Auxiliary Building draft ITR.
Additional items such as pipe supports and the BNL review work were discussed on August 27, 1982 as well.
RLCA and TES met at the RLCA offices on August 31, 1982 to discuss the soils review work.
1 RLCA and TES met on August 31, 1982 to discuss the IDVP plan to review the PG&E Internal Technical Program.
RLCA attended the meeting at PG&E offices on September 1, 1982 called by the NRC to discuss the IDVP and ITP status.
The NRC staff met with RLCA personnel on September 8-10, 1982 to review the ITRs on Tanks and Shake Table Testing.
A field verification trip was conducted on September 8,1982 to examine Pipe Supports and HVAC Duct.
2.4 R.F. REEDY, INC. EFFDRTS The QA Audit and Review of the currently identified safety-related service contractors involved in design work during the Phase I time period has been completed.
o P
IDVP-SM-Septenber 1982 Y P
2.5 _TES TECMICAL EFFORTS 2.5.1 PG&E - NSSS Interface TES has prepared an Interim Techni;al Report on the PG&E -
NSSS seismic interface based on an IDVP audit of Westinghouse.
2.5.2 Containment Annulus Structure The detailed review of the Brookhaven Study Report on the annulus structure and selected piping systems is still in progress.
TES has received the information packages requested from both the E C and PG&E that were noted in the August Semimonthly Report. TES is presently reviewing these data.
A site visit has been conducted to review the annulus y
structure.
A second site visit was made to record the as-built conditions of the two piping systems evaluated in the Brookhaven Report.
Additional requests for information on the piping models have been sent to PG&E.
2.5.3 Additional Piping Verification v
Based on the PG&E presentation on August 6,1982 at the NRC and the more detailed presentation at PG&E on August 26, 1982 on the piping work being performed in the ITP, TES has deci4d to drop the design review effort for the five piping models.
This review was to be performed 'on design analysis prior to November 31, 1981.
Since all large bore piping is being reylewed and reanalyzed as required under the ITR, TES and RLCA will instead verify the corrective action being taken.
2.5.4 Interim Technical Report Action TES has reviewed and approved the ITR-6 on the Auxiliary Building and ITR-7 on the Electrical Raceway Supports this month.
TES is presently reviewing partial or preliminary ITR drafts for Piping, Electrical Equipment Qualified by Analysis, and Verification of Corrective Action.
2.5.5 E01 File Action TES has issued no Open Items during this period.
1
10VP-SM-September 1982 WMM6 3.0 PHASE II PROGRAM 3.1 PROGRAM PLANS 3.1.1 Management Plan No change in status.
3.1.2 Engineering Program Plan (DCNPP-IDVP-PP-002)
No change in status.
3.1.3 Other Program Procedures Program Procedures with the exception of those covering the Engineering Program Plans and the final phase reports are common to both phases and are reported in 2.1.3 of this Semimonthly Report.
3.2 PROGRAM REPORTS 3.2.1 Errors or Open Item Files The Error and Open Item File system is described briefly by 3.2.1 and the present status of the E01 Files is described by Appendix 1.
During the period covered by this Semimonthly Report, since August 27, 1982, a total of ten new Phase 11 files have been opened, making a total to date of ten Phase II files.
As of this report, no files have been closed or identified as an File actions are reported by the Semimonthly Report error.
issued by each IDVP participant on the second Friday of each month.
3.2.2 Interim Technical Reports No Interim Technical Reports have yet been issued for Phase II.
Approximately 15 Phase II Interim Technical Reports are anticipated.
3.2.3 Phase II Final Report Planning for this report has not yet been started.
IDVP-SM-September 1982 WMM MA P
3.3 SWEC EFFORTS 3.3.1 Detign Chain No action this reporting period.
3.3.2 Mechanical / Nuclear The review of the FSAR and other pertinent DCNPP-1 licensing documents in SWEC's possession has been completed.
a.
Auxiliary Feedwater System The following work was completed:
e Hydraulic calculations of system flow and head for various design modes of ' operation.
Calculations still require checking.
Review of system and equipment design tenperature e
and pressure.
e Review of internally generated missiles and their effects on the AFW system.
Identification of high energy line break locations e
and targets in the AFW system.
Field verification of high energy line break effects e
to the AFW system.
e Review of high energy line cracks and the effects on the AFW system.
[
e Review of design modifications to protect AFW equipment from the effects of moderate energy pipe cracks.
Review of AFW system water supply capacity.
e Field verification of the AFW system design.
t e
l ThefollowingtasksareinprogresN-e Review of fire protection provided for the AFW f
system.
Review of results of high energy line break work l
e completed to date.
i
IDVP-SM-September 1982 gg e Review of Technical Specifications.
Review of AFW system functionability and redundancy, e
Review of AFW pump adequacy.
e b
Review of AFW pump NPSH available, e
Review of steam supply / exhaust to/from the turbine e
driven AFW pump.
Review of turbine driven AFW pump / turbine bearing e
cooling water.
To be performed during next reporting period:
Complete the review of all items identified in the AFW System as being in progress.
Comence writing the ITR on the AFW System.
b.
Control Room Ventilation and Pressurization The following work was completed:
e Review of system air flow for all modes of operation.
Review of the air conditioning equipment capacity.
e e Review of the inputs associated with CRVP system design into the control room toxic gas and radiological calculations.
Review of the charcoal filter design.
e Review of internally generated missile effects on e
the CRVP system.
Identification of high energy line break locations e
and targets in the CRVP system, Field verification of high energy line break effects e
to the CRVP system.
Review of high energy line crack and the effects to e
the CRVP system.
i Y
5 t
f, IDVP-SM-September 1982 TM g
w e Review of design modifications to protect the CRVP equipment from the effects of moderate energy pipe cracks.
e Review of the adequacy of the CRVP fans, dampers and duct design for all modes of operation.
t e Review of the Technical Specifications.
Field verification of the CRVP system design.
e The following tasks are in progress:
e Review of the operability /functionability and redundancy of the CRVP system.
Review of the fire protection provided (or the CRVP y
e system.
To be performed during next reporting period:
Complete the review of all the items identified in the CRVP system as being in progress.
Comence writing the ITR on this system.
3.3.3 Electrical The review of th' FSAR and other pertinent DCNPP-1 licensing documents for identification of design commitments is in progress. The review of the relay and protective device coordination and settings has been completed.
4160V Safety Related Electrical System a.
a The voltage profile and short circuit calculations are in progress.
Diesel generator loading capability has been analyzed.
To be performed during the next reporting period:
Complete the review of DCNPP-1 pertinent design and licensing documents.
Complete the voltage profile and short circuit calculations and tabulate the significant values.
Comence writing the ITR on this system.
f
y IDVP-SM-September 1982 9 E :im 6o M6 z
b.
Auxiliary Feedwater System The calculation of terminal voltages and ampacities of power circuit feeders to this equipment has been completed.
The determination of separation and redundancy of power supplies is in progress.
Additional electrical targets required for the HELB and pipe crack review have been identified.
Electrical equipment affected by the fire protection review has been identified.
To be performed during the next reporting period:
Complete the review of DCNPP-1 pertinent design and licensing documents. Conplete the determination of the adequacy of separation and redundancy for power supplies. Complete the field verification for selected system characteristics such as protective device
- settings, equipment separation and redundancy.
Comnence writing the final report for this system.
The writing of the ITR on this system will start during the next reporting period.
Control Room Ventilation and Pressurization System c.
The calculation of terminal voltages and ampacities of power circuit feeders to this equipment has been completed.
The determination of separation and redundancy of power supplies is in progress.
Additional electrical targets required for the HELB and pipe crack review have been identified.
Electrical equipment affected by the fire protection review has been identified.
To be performed during next reporting period:
Complete the review of DCNPP-1 pertinent design and licensing documents. Complete the determination of the adequacy of separation and redundancy for power supplies. Complete the field verification for selected system characteristics such as protective device
- settings, equipment.
separation and redundancy.
Comnence writing the ITR for this system.
l 1
0
?
IDVP-SM-September 1982 WM MM P
3.3.4 Instrumentation and Controls a.
Auxiliary Feedwater System The review of pertinent DCNPP-1 licensing documents and design drawings for design comitments is in progress.
The identification of AFW components for the fire protection review has been completed.
Additional I&C targets for the HELB and pipe crack review have been identified.
The review of electrical schematics for separation and redundancy and agreement with logic diagrams is in progress.
The review of I&C installation detail diagrams is in progress.
The review of electrical schematics associated with the safety-related 4160 V electrical. system has been completed. A list of instrument racks and panels that wiring diagrams are needed for has been compiled.
To be performed during next report period:
Continue review of licensing correspondence and other 5
design documents including panel and rack wiring diagrams.
Complete review of AFW pump runout control system.
Complete review of system design for operation, separation, redundancy and technical specification requirements. Complete the review of I&C environmental qualifications and vendor data and drawints.
Complete the field verification of the I&C installation.
b.
Control Room Ventilation and Pressurization System The review of licensing documents and correspondence, CRVP instrumentation and control diagrams including interccnnection and wiring diagrams for Control Room Ventilation and Pressurization System Panels has been completed.
The review of safety related instrumentation to identify missile and HELB targets has been completed.
The review of vendor information to determine adequacy of instrumentation and controls is in progress.
To be performed during next reporting period:
Complete review of licensing correspondence and other documents, CRVP installation drawings and vendor system information.
Determine adequacy of equipment environmental qualification.
Comence field verification of CRVP system.
l
IDVP-SM-September 1982 WM 3.3.5 Analysis a.
Pressure /Te g erature Environments The sensitivity calculation which compared the results between the computer codes CONTEMPT and THREED, y
utilizing to the maximum extent possible identical input data, has been documented and checked and is complete.
Open Item Report Number 8001. Rev. O, and Potential Error Report 8001, Rev.1, have been issued based on this calculation.
2 The review of the methods, assumptions, inputs, and results utilized in the Nuclear Services Corporation (NSC) analysis whicn determined the pressure and tem erature environments in the areas designated GE/GW that resulted from a main steam line rupture is complete. Documentation of this review is in progress.
Open Item Report Numbers 8004 and 8006 have been issued based on this review.
The review of the methods, assumptions, inputs, and results utilized in the NSC analysis which determined the mass and energy release data resulting from main steam line ruptures in area GW and the turbine building is complete.
Documentation of this review is in progress. Open Item Report Number 8002 has been issued based on this review.
Review and documentation of the review of the inputs and results utilized by NSC to calculate the pressure ad tewerature transients in the turbine building is complete to the extent currently possible.
PG&E has indicated that they are not able to provide the NSC analysis for the turbine building, thus SWEC is restrained from co@ leting the review of the assumptions and methods.
Open Item Report Numbers 8003, 8004, and 8006 have been issued based on the results'of this review to date.
The independent calculations of the pressure and g
temperature transients in the turbine building (above elevation 140'-0") and the areas designated GE/GW have been documented and are in checking.
The review of the methods, assumptions, inputs, and results utilized in the NSC analysis which determined L
the flood heights in the areas designated GE/GW has been completed.
Documentation of this review is complete. Open Item Report Number 8005 has been issued based on this review.
U IDVP-SM-Septenber 1982 WM MM L
To be performed during next reporting period:
Complete documentation of the review of the Nuclear Services Corporation (NSC) analyses which determined the pressure and temperature environments in the turbine building (above elevation 140'-0") and the areas designated GE/GW. Complete documentation of the review of the NSC analysis that calculated the mass and energy release data into area GW and the turbine 3
building resulting from main steam line ruptures.
Complete the independent calculations that determined the pressure and temperature transients in the turbine building and the areas designated GE/Gll.
b.
Radiation Environments 1.
Source term calculations have been checked and submitted to project for filing af ter having been reviewed by the supervisor.
2.
The sensitivity calculation has been checked and is in process of being reviewed by supervisor prior to submittal to project.
3.
QADM00 dose rates and integrated doses have been documented.
TM calculation has been checked and is in the process of being reviewed.
7 4.
Comparison of results with PG&E and/or service related contractors is in progress.
5.
Review ar d docuraentation of review of methods, assumptions and inputs of PG&E and/or service related contractors calculations is in progress.
To be performed during next reporting period:
l 1.
Comparison of SWEC-QADM00 results with PG&E/RRA results will be completed using the sensitivity calculation to determine the significance of any differences.
2.
Sensitivity and QADM00 calculations will be completed.
3.
Interim Technical Report will be generated.
IDVP-SM-September 1982 gg MN 4.
Confirmation of radiation environment results and/or comparisons will be provided to lead electrical engineer.
5.
Complete review and documentation of review of methods, assumptions and inputs of PG&E and/or service-related contractors calculations.
3.3.6 Licensing The Applicable Licensing Document Index was updated August 23, 1982 to include additional requested material
- that was received from PG&E.
Also, material was obtained from the NRC Public Document Room and SWEC Licensing Division files to provide a complete Applicable Licensing (AL) file in accordance with Project Procedure S-3-1.
The documents listed on the index have been used for reference by project personnel to cite specific licensing commitments for subsequent verification.
a To be performed during next reporting period:
Update the Applicable Licensing Document Inde.x as required to support the IDVP project.
3.3.7 Interim Technical Reports No action during this reporting period.
3.3.8 E01 File Actions E01 File Numbers 8001 to and including 8010 have been issued.
E0I 8001 File Rev.1, Potential Error Report has been issued.
3.3.9 Visits and Meetings The following meetings took place:
On August 24, 1982 - SWEC met with representatives of TES and i
Alexander Kusko Consulting Engineers in SWEC's office to discuss the scope of the Electrical effort.
t On September 1,1982, SWEC joined members of the IDVP to attend an NRC meeting at PG&E offices in San Francisco on the status of the program.
On September 7,1982, SWEC met with representatives of TES
~
to discuss status of SWEC work.
s
IDVP-SM-September 1982 WM MM l
On September 14-15, 1982, NRC performed an audit at SWEC's offices of the IDVP.
On September 17,
- 1982, SWEC engineers met with TES representatives to discuss the scope of the Nuclear Technology Division related work.
On August 23-27, 1982, TES and SWEC engineers visited the site for a field verification of Power Systems related equipment.
On August 31, September 1 and 2,
1982, SWEC engineers visited the site for a field verification to determine the following:
a.
The relays, circuit breakers, fuses and overload P
heaters of each generic type were of the proper rating, used the proper settings, and were consistent with the design documents.
b.
The as-built conditions for raceway in the 480 V switchgear, 4 KV switchgear, and 4 KV cable spreading rooms are in accordance with design and licensing commitments in regard to separation between redundant trains.
c.
The as-built conditions for raceway were generally observed, in the Diesel Generator, Hot Shutdown Panel, Cable Spreading and Auxiliary Feedwater Pump Rooms, in regard to separation between redundant trains.
On September 14, 15, and 16, 1982 - SWEC Engineers visited the site for a field verification to determine the following:
r a.
Effects of high energy line break on AFW and CRVP systems.
b.
Fire protection provided for the AFW and CRVP systems.
t c.
The AFW system.
d.
The CRVP system.
3.3.10 Sumary and Coments System schedule updates, as of September 17, 1982 show that SWEC's portion of the Independent Design Verification Program will be completed during the second half of October 1982 instead of the originally scheduled completion date of October 1,
1982.
Further, maintenance of the attached
IDVP-SM-September 1982 T M MO r
schedules is contingent on the receipt by 10/1/82 of the items SWEC has previously requested of PG&E/Bechtel, Document Request 16, Item 4a and Document Request 32.
PG&E has committed to provide this information on time.
3.4 R.F. REEDY, INC. EFFORTS 3.4.1 Design Chain 2
The final draft of Interim Technical Report describing the
+
design chain development, is being reviewed by TES and will be issued during the next report period.
3.4.2 QA and Design Control Practices Evaluations
?
The status of the QA Program Review of the PG&E contractors is as follows:
(i) Completed:
Radiation Research Associates b
EDS Nuclear Quadrex (Nuclear Services Corp.)
Garretson-Elmendorf-Zinov-Reuben PG&E The status of audits of the contractors for the purpose of evaluating the effectiveness of implementing their QA and Design Control Practices is as follows:
(i)
Initiated:
Radiation Research' Associates Quadrex Garretson EDS Nuclear Results:
PG&E audits of the respective parties' implementation of their QA Programs have been conducted. Final evaluation at the design interface control exercised between these contractors and PG&E is still under cvaluation.
IDVP-SM-September 1982 WM MM 3.4.3 QA Audit and Review Reports The QA Audit and Review Report for Radiation Research Associates, Quadrex, Garretson, EDS Nuclear, and PG&E are being drafted in accordance with the Phase II Program Management Plan.
Once all of the design interfaces have been evaluated fom both the Contractor point of view and the PG&E point of view, the reports will be finalized and submitted for TES review.
3.4.4 E01 File Action No E01 action has been initiated by RFR.
3.4.5 Visits and Meetings No meetings, other than those conducted as part of the audit activities, were conducted.
3.5 RLCA EFFORTS l
RLCA has initiated a review of seismic, structural and mechanical l
l aspects of samples of the piping, pipe supports, components and cogonent supports included in the SWEC samles.
The seismic aspects include only those not considered in Phase 1.
3.5.1 Analysis a.
Piping Two piping samples included in the RLCA Phase I activities are within the SWEC auxiliary feedwater sample.
These samples are being analyzed by RLCA for DE and DDE seismic and thermal loadings using the existing models.
In addition, field verifications are planned for the remaining portions of the AFW system, b.
Equipment l
The motor and turbine driven auxiliary feedwater pumps have been field verified.
It is anticipated that the DE and DDE analyses will be completed in the next report period.
RLCA is reviewing the SWEC samples to determine the full extent of cooling
- coils, valves,
- dampers, electrical panels, fans and filters included in the Phase II sample space.
Following the identification, l
sa@ les will be chosen for the Phase II analysis.
l
IDVP-SM-Septer6er 1982 gg MM r
c.
Pipe Supports t
During the field verification of the AFW system, twenty supports will be chosen for independent analysis.
g 3.6 TES TECMICAL EFFORTS 3.6.1 Interim Technical Report Actions 9
No ITR actions have been initiated during this period.
3.6.2 E0I File Actions No E01 file actions have been initiated.
f i
1 t
i I
I 1
?
IDVP-SM-September 1982 TN MM 4.0 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM On September 8, 1982 SWEC engineers met with representatives of TES and PG&E to seek the SWEC's consent to participate in the Independent y
Construction Quality Assurance Evaluation of the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant-Unit 1.
On September 14, 1982 TES hand carried to SWEC's offices a draft of the Program Plan to define the task labeled above.
This task-is defined as an " Adjunct Program for Evaluation of Construction Quality Assurance DCNPP-1 (CQAP).
On September 15, 1982 SWEC sent to the IDVP participants a draft of the Scope and Purpose of the CQAP.
The Scope and Purpose will be incorporated in the TES " Program Plan" and this will be issued by September 24, 1982 to the PRC, PG&E, and the IDVP participants. To get the program implemented SWEC and TES engineers will be visiting the plant site on the week of September 27, 1982.
=
l l
t
IDVP-SM-September 1982 WM MM 5.0 TES PROGRAM MANAGEMENT EFFORTS 5.1 TES REI.ATED The status with respect to Program Plans and Reports is discussed in 2.1. and 2.2. and 3.1 and 3.2 for Phase I and II, respectively.
Other than those actions and the technical actions reported else-where in this Semimonthly Report, the major TES program management efforts during this report period are described in the following.
5.1.1 PG&E Technical Program - IDVP Interface The PG&E Semimonthly Report has indicated a number of Open Items which are being resolved by the Diablo Canyon Project Team. Similarly, that Team takes action upon the IDVP Open Items which are transferred to PG&E (PRR/0IP), because of additional information which must be provided before the IDVP can resolve the file.
Progress in all such matters is reflected in the PG&E Semimonthly Reports which are monitored by IDVP particpants for possible impact on the IDVP.
In accordance with the Project Plan, the IDVP is required to verify PG&E Corrective Action taken in response to an IDVP file and PG&E may, as their option, request the IDVP to review their Corrective Action at any time.
The first major interface meeting between the Diablo Canyon Project Internal Technical Program (ITP) and the IDVP was held on July 14-16,
- 1982, considered the ITP Civil Engineering
- efforts, and was reported in the IDVP Semimonthly Report for July.
The second and third such meetings were held on August 6,1982 and August 26, 1982 and were discussed in the August IDVP Semimonthly Report.
The last such meeting was held on September 1,1982 and included issuance by PG&E of several sections of their Final Report.
The IDVP program plan requires IDVP verification of PG&E corrective action taken in response to IDVP findings.
That plan does not require IDVP verification of PG&E corrective actions taken solely in response to internal findings.
i i
1
IDVP-SM-September 1982 WM MM However, PG&E indicated during the August 6,1982 meeting that whatever the ITP does will be brought back to the IDVP for verification and enphasized the need for IDVP and NRC planning to be prepared to perform their reviews in a timely manner. The detailed and specific presentation as to scope, criteria, methodology, procedures and documentation will continue to be considered by the IDVP to determine the means of terminating the present rampling approach and initiating the verification of corrective action.
Verification of the ITP Corrective Action is discussed in 2.3.4.
5.2 RLCA RELATED t
TES continues to review and disposition the IDVP E0I Files.
a.
The E01 Files dispositioned this month are either attached to the first Semimonthly for September or will be attached to the first Semimonthly for October 1982.
See Appendix 1 for current E01 File status, b.
The detailed review of the RLCA initial piping model sample results is near completion.
The design review of the CCW Heat Exchanger is still in c.
progress to resolve File 1088.
Discussions with RLCA have led to further review of the load results.
d.
TES is reviewing the RLCA analyses for the HVAC Volume l
Damper 7-A and the S-31 Supply Fan before dispositioning the corresponding E01 Files 1102 and 1096.
i l
e.
TES accompanied RLCA engineers on a
site visit on l
September 8,1982, and also was present at RLCA office on September 8-9, 1982 for the NRC staff review of ITR's 3 and l
4.
f.
TES is reviewing the DCP submittals of September 1,1982 and September 17, 1982 for the Phase I Final Report for the design verification program and will issue conments.
1 5.3 R.F. REEDY, INC. RELATED TES involvement in RFR activities encompassed the following ac-tivities:
(1)
Review and conment on RFR draft ITR on Design Chain Development for Phase II activities.
(ii)
Observation of RFR Audit of PG&E internal design control practices for Phase II activities.
S IDVP-SM-Septenber 1982 gg MM 5.4 SWEC RELATED The TES Evaluation Teams have continued their review of SWEC's work related to the IDVP.
5.5 Project Administration All basic contracts and purchat. orders are now in place with all TES subcontractors.
y 5.6 QUALITY ASSURANCE ACTIVITIES 5.6.1 TES completed an internal project audit on September 9, 1982. Audi,t was completed on schedule.
5.6.2 Scheduled audits of RLCA and RFR are to be performed for the week of October 18, 1982. Subject of this audit will be the implementation of vendor QA Program to activity on IDVP.
4 w
IDVP-SM-September 1982 WMM %M w
6.0 IDVP SCHEDULE The present IDVP schedule for Phase I efforts is included in Appendix 3.
With respect to the initial sample, note that many of the ITR dates include a symbol "P",
indicating that the date shown is the PG&E scheduling information release date as stated in Table 3:
status of open E01s (Reference PG&E letter to PRC-Eisenhut dated September 15, 1982).
No schedule dates are included for the Additional Verification and Additional Sanple actions pending revision to ITR-1 and establishment of a program for the verification of corrective action, with exception of the use of the symbol "P" and the inclusion of the ITR relative to fuel loading and the Phase I Report.
A detailed schedule is not included covering the combined Phase II IDVP efforts pending Program approval. As presently scheduled, all Phase II ITR drafts are expected to be received by TES by the second half of October.
?
7 e
TN ENGNEMNG SOMCES
?
APPENDIX 1 IDVP SEMIMONTHLY REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER STATUS OF E01 FILES AS OF SEPTEMBER 24, 1982 The status is sumarized by Table 1.
Table 2 sumarizes the status of all thirteen (13) errors identified to d6,e which are, in the opinion of the IDVP, significant.
The remaining tables are printouts from the TES program LISTLOG as described by Attachment 3 to the IDVP Semimonthly Report for July 1982 (also, see Table 15).
Table No.
Description 3
Lists the E01 Files on which all IDVP work has been completed as indicated by the issuance of an IDVP Completion Report.
4 Lists all Files which are presently Error Reports being con-sidered by PG&E.
(Also see Tables 12,13 and 14.) An IDVP Completion Report can be issued for Class C Error Files if the IDVP is informed that no modifications will be under-taken in direct response to that File.
All others must be referred back to the IDVP for verification of the corrective action and modification.
When PG&E informs the IDVP, an Open Item Report (0IR) will be issued by TES with the same File Number and the next highei revision number.
5 Lists all Files which are presently Deviation Reports being considered by PG&E to determine if physical modifications will be undertaken in direct response to that File.
If PG&E informs the IDVP that no such modifications will be made, TES will issue an IDVP Completion Report.
If PG&E informs
~
the IDVP that such modifications will be undertaken, an Open Item Report will be issued by TES with the same File Number and the next higher revision number.
6 Lists Open Item Reports transferred to PG&E because the IDVP requires additional technical information before the IDVP may resolve the File.
When PG&E provides this information to the IDVP, TES will issue an Open Item Report, with the same File Number and next higher revision number, and con-tinues with the IDVP resolution of the File.
TN r
ENGNEERNG SEMCES Table No.
Description 7
Lists the Files which are presently the responsibility of TES.
In each case, the first letter in the " status" column is "P" for Potential.
That is, TES has received a recom-mended position from one of the IDVP participants and will either agree with the recomendation (indicated by issuing the next higher revision with the first "P" in the status symbol deleted) or disagree with the recomendation (indicated by issuing an Open Item Report with the next higher revision number) and sending the item back to the IDVP organization for further study.
8 Lists the Files which are presently the responsibility of RLCA.
These are all Open Items which RLCA will study and prepare a recomendation for TES review and approval.
9 Reserved for Files which are the responsibility of RFR; none at present.
10 Lists the Files which are presently the responsibility of SWEC.
These are all Open Items which SWEC will study and F
prepare a recomendation for TES review and approval.
11 Lists those Files for which PG&E has determined that modifi-cations will be, or have been, made. Only the last revision of tha File is listed in order that the present status may be indicated.
If an IDVP Completion Report has been issued, tnc IDVP has verified the modification, and the File is also listed in Table 3.
12 Lists all revisions of all Files which, in any revi., ion, have been classifieo as a Class A Error.
The last revision indicates the present status.
If the last revision indi-cates ER/A as the status, the File is also listed in Table 4 and is under active consideration by PG&E.
If the last revision indicates CR as the status, the IDVP has verified the PG&E corrective action and the File is also listed in Table 3.
If there is a YES in the column headed MODS, PG&E has determined that physical modifications will be, or have been, made and the File is also listed in Table 11.
If the
" STATUS" is other than ER/A or CR, the PG&E corrective i
action is under review by the IDVP, the responsible organi-zation is that indicated under the column headed "0RG" and the File is also listed in the appropriate table.
13 Similar to Table 12, but for Class B Error Reports.
14 Similar to Table 12, but for Class A or Class B Error Re-ports.
15 Defines the nomenclature used in the printouts.
I
i P
TN SM Report for September 1982 6M P
Table 1 Present Status of E01 Files P
IDVP Action 24 Open Items:
18 Potential Program Resolution as:
Closed Item 1
Transfer to PG&E 1
Deviation 0
Potential Error, Class:
A 1
B 1
C 2
D 0
PG&E Action 28 Program Resolution as:
Transfer to PG&E 8
Devi ation*
1
. Error, Class:
A 3
A/B 5
8 1
C*
10 D*
0 IDVP Completion 147 Total:
193
- IDVP Completion Reports can be issued for these files if PG&E informs TES that Physical modifications will not be applied.
TM SM Report Septenber 1982 APPENDIX 1 Table 2 The reviews to date have resulted in the following conclusions with respact to errors where, in the opinion of the IDVP, design criteria or operating limits of safety related equipment are exceeded and physical modifications, changes in operating procedures, more realistic calcula-tions or retesting are required.
STATUS NO IN ERROP. CLASS A
AmB B
PG&E ESTABLISH CORRECTIVE ACTION 3
5 1
h IDVP VERIFY CORRECTIVE ACTION 0
1 0
CORRECTIVE ACTION VERIFIED BY IDVP 1
0 2
TOTAL 4
6 3
I i
e l
i
TM ENGNERNG SEMOES APPENDIX 1 TABLE 2 (Cont'd)
CLASS A 932: Support 58S-23R - Containment Spray correct to vertical from deadweight.
~
983: Raceway Supports - 9 of 20 evaluated with incorrect spectra.
Correct spectra.
1069:
Valves LCV113 and LCV115 - Aux. F.W. unsupported causes pipe overstress. PG&E adding supports and confirming acceptability to valve afr.
1092:
Fuel Handling Building Seismic reanalysis and physical modifications (Includes Files - 990,991,1027,1091).
CLASS A OR B 949: Main Annunciator Cabinet - reanalyze with correct stiffness.
1014: Containment seismic reevaluation (Includes Files 977 and 1009).
1022:
Intake structure seismic reevaluation (Includes Files %7 and 988).
1026: Turbine Building seismic review (Includes Files - 982, 984, 989, 1010,1025).
1097: Auxiliary Building seismic reevaluation (Includes Files -920, 986, 1029, 1070, 1093).
1098:
Piping seismic reevaluation (Includes Files %1, 1021, 1058, 1059, 1060, and 1104).
CLASS B 963:
Support 58S/32R - Containment Spray - reanalyze to determine if gaps acceptable.
1002:
Supply fans S67, S68, S69 qualified with incorrect spectra.
Requalified to proper spectra.
l 1013: Shake Test Group VI spectra failed to envelope below 15 Hz. All l
equipment greater than 29 Hz, so qualification OK (see ITR-4).
y p-.
=.....
s APPENDIX 1 TABLE 3 v
COMPLETION REPORTS ISSUED DCHPP IDVP STATUS REPORT 24-SEP-82 14:29:20 PAGE 1
REV. O LATEST REV.
ACTION PG1E ITR
' FILE M.
DATE BASIS REV. DATE BY STATUS ORG TES MODS NO.
SUBJECT 910 820104 FID 7 820723 TES CR NONE RCW NO 7 RACEWAY SUFTS. AUX. R DG, 1 CONTA!NMENT EXTERIOR.
920 820106 SID 6 820722 TES CR NONE RDC N0 4 AUX RDS FLOOR RESP SPECTRA DIFF 930 820106 SID 6 820723 TES CR NONE RCW NO 7 RACEWAY CRITERIA 931 920106 FID 3 820524 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 VALVE 9001A ORIEN. LINE 264 AUX BUILDINS.
932 820106 FID 6 820510 TES CR NONE RDF YES 103 CONTAINMENT SPRAY SUPT. 58S-23R DIRECTICW 933 820120 FtB 3 520524 IES CR NCNE RDF NO 103 R $ LINE 110 DIMENSION.' AUXILIARY BUILDINL 934 820120 FID 3 S20524 TES.CR NONE RDF NO 103 rdet SUPT.72-11R DIRE. LINE 110 AUX. 3UILDING.
933 S20120 FID 2 820409 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 RNR LINE 931 CONNECTIDW TO LINE 1971. AUX. R DG.
924 820120 FID 4 S20524 TES CR NONE OF NO 103 RWt LINE 1971 DINENSION. AUXILIARY BUILDING.
937 820120 FID 3 B20707 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 CHEM. VOL. CONTROL LINE 44 FLANGE. AUX. KDG.
939 820120 FID 3 820708 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 SUPT.73-72R DIRECTION. LIE 1988: AUX. BUILDING.
940 820120 FID 3 820708 TES CR NONE RDF ~ NO 103 LINE 103 DIMENSION. TUR3INE BUILDING.
941 820120 FID 3 S205:4 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 SUPT. 18-4R DIRECTION. LINE 104. TURBINE BUILDING.
942 820120 FID 3 S20524 TES CR NCE RDF NO 103 SUPT. 18-7R LOCATICN. LINE 2277, TURIINE R DG.
943 820120 fit 3 820524 TES CR
.JNE RDF NO 103 SUPT. 5006/V LOCATION. LINE 102, TURBINE R DG.
944-820120 FID 3 B20524 TES CR NONE RDF G 103 SUPT. 5003/V LOCATION. LIE 101: TURBINE RDG.
943 820120 FID 3 820524 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 SUPT. 555-20R DIRE.8 ID.NO.LINE 104 EAUX. R DG.
946 820120 FID 3 820524 TES CR NONE CF NO 103 LINE 1980 DIMENSION. AUXILIARY BUILDING.
947 820120 FID 3 820524 TES CR NCNE RDF ND 101 VALVE 8821A ORIEN.LINE 3849, AUX. BUILDING.
948 820120 FID 3 ?20524 TES CR NONE OF NO 103 SUPT. 13-23SL DIREC.LINE 314, CONTAINMENT BLDG.
950 820128 FID 7 820701 TES CR NONE JCT YES 108 VALVE FCV 95 PLATE THICKNESS. AUX. BU 951 820129 FID 3 820524 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 SUPT. 1-27 LOCATION.LINE 592 AUL BUILDIk3.
952 S20129 FID 3 820524 TES CR NONE RDF ND 103 SUPT 3-27 LOCATION.LINE 593 AUX BUILDING.
953 820129 FID 3 820703 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 SUPT. 53S-69R DIREC.LINE 574, AUX. BUILDING.
954 820129 FID 3 820708 TES CR NONE OF ND 103 SUPT. 585-56R LO~ATION. LINE 574 EAUX. RDG.
955 820129 00 2 820409 TES CR NONE EF ND 103 SUPT. SSS-57R IDENT.LINE 574 AUX. BLDS.
956 820129 FID 3 820524 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 SUPT. 58S-69R LOCATION.LINE 574, AUX. BLDG.
957 820129 FID 6 820723 TES CR HONE RDF YES 103 LINES 577 1 578 INSULATION, AUX. BUILDINL 959 820129 FID 5 820708 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 SUPT. 55.3-55V LOCATION.LINE 577, AUX. RDG.
959 820129 FID 3 320625 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 SUPT. 11-495L LOCATION.LINE 20 CONTAINMENT B 960 320129 F!D 3 820524 TES CR NONE RDF ND 103 LI E 19 DIMENSION, CONTAINMENT BUILDING.
961
'B20129 FID 6 B20921 TES CR NONE RDF 103 SUPT. 11-595L DIREC.LINE 19, CONTAINMENT R DG.
962 S20129 FID 3 820621 TE3 CR NONE RDF HO 103 SUPT.48-44R DIREC.LINE 21, CONTAINMENT RDG.
965 820129 FID 4
820619 TES CR HONE RDF NO 103 SUPT. 555-128V LOCATION.LINE 279 AUX. BUILDING
~
946 820!?9 F:D 3 820524 TES CR NONE RDF ND 103 SUPT. 14-33SL LOCATION.LINE 279, AUX. BUILDING.
967 320130 SID 6 820910 TES CR NONE RDC NO 118 INTAKE STRUCTURE ACCELERATIONS 48 320130 OG 2 820524 TES CR NCNE MAR NO 129 HARDING LAWSON ASSOC. 0A FICING 969 320130 DAR 2 820524 TES CR HCNE MAR ND 129 HARDINS LAWSON ASSOC. GA FINDING 970 920130 CAR 2-820524 TES CR NONE MAR NO 129 HARDING LAWSON ASSOC. GA FINDING 971 820130 QAR 2 820409 TES CR NONE MAR NO 2 EDS NUCLEAR DA OBSERVATION 972 820130 QAR 2 820409 TES CR NONE MAR NO 2 EDS HUCLEAR DA OBSERVATION 973 820130 CAR 2 820409 TES CR NONE MAR C
2 EDS NUCLEAR GA OBSERVATION M
820130 OAR 2 S20409 TES CR NONE MAR NO 2 EDS NUCLEAR DA OBSERVATION 93 820130 GAR 2 820409 IES CR NONE MAR NO 2 EDS N1JCLEAR GA OBSERVATION 97/
S20206 SID 2 S20417 TES CR NONE RDC NO 126 CONT. BLDG. - EXTERIOR SPECTRA.
977 820206 00 6 820910 TES CR NONE RDC NO 127 ANNULUS AREA REEVALUATION 978 820206 SID 3 820621 TES CR NONE PPR NO 126 REGEN. HEAT EXCN.SPECT CONT. INTERIOR STR 97?
820206 ICD 2 820417 TES CR HONE RDC NO 118 CONT. STRUCTURE EQUIPMENT REVIEWED.
930 820206 OD 2 820417 TES CR NONE RDC ND 118 ASWP COMPARTMENTS QUAL. DOCUM. INTAKE STR
-931 320206 ICD 3 820511 TES CR NONE RDC NO 126 BURIED PIPELINE. INTAKE STRU.TO TURBINE BUI r,
4 m
v
' APPENDIX 1 TABLE 3 COMPLETION REPORTS CONTINUED DCNFP IDVP STATUS REFORT 24-SEP-82 14:29:20 PAGE 2 REV. O LATEST PEV.
ACTION PG1E ITR FILE NO.
DATE BASIS REV.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES MODS NO.
SUPJECT m
982 820206 LE 6 520723 TES CR NONE RDC NO
!!B TURB BLEG BLUME TRANSMITTALS W
K0206 LMD 6 S20723 TE3 CR NONE RDC ND 11S TUR3 BLDG' INTERFACE PROCEDURES VS5 S2M06 CD 2 820417 TES CR NONE RDC NO 6 AUX ELDG WEIGHTS 86 820206 SIL 6 S20722 TES CK NONE RM NO 6 CONTROL RM. SPECTRA 957 920206 OD 2 820417' TES CR NONE RDC NO 6 AUX BLDG QUAL DETAILE2 REVIEW w
988 920206 CD 6 S20910 TES CR NONE RM NO 119 INTAKE STRUCTURE CRANE REVIEW 989 920206 !K 6 S20723 TES CR NONE RDC NO 118 TURP PLDS CRANE REVIEW 990 820204 ML 6 S20723 TES CR NONE RDC NO 6 FH PLDG CRANE DESIGN INFO 191 E20206 D3 6 820723 TES CR NONE RDC NO 6 'FH ILDG CRANE MODIFICATIONS
'92 S20206 OD 6
920909 TES CR NONE RDC NO 122 CD WATER STORAGE TANKS-DESIGN N O V94 P20206 CD 2 820409 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 P! PING CONSULTANT INTERFACE 995 820206 OD 2 E20409 TES CR NONE RIF NO 103 EES TRANSMITTAL COVER SHEETS 996 520206 OD 3 B20510 TES CR NONE FIF NO 103 BLUME PIPING CORRESPONDENCE 997 S20206 OD 2 820429 TES CR h0NE JCT NO 103 PG1E VALVE TRANSMITTALS TO EES 9?S S20206 00 2 620409 TES CR NONE JCT NO 108 FG1E VALVE TRANSMITTALS TO EDS 999 E20206 OD 2 820409 TES CR NONE IT NO 100 EDS VALVE TRANSMITTALS TO PG1E.
_ 1000 S20206 03 2 820ti? TES CR N0hE JCT NO 103 VALVE TRANSMITTALS TO WESTINGHCUSE 1001 520206 SID 2 S20417 TES CR NONE JCT NO 103 VALVE VERIFICATION OF ACCELERAT!0NS 1002 820206 SID 5 B20622 TES CR NONE CHK NO 111 SUFfLY FANS S67: 6516? IN'UT 1004
!"0206 OD 6 820622 TES
".R NONE RW NO 110 WESTINS900SE CCNTAINMENT ELEC EUI*
1006 S20206 OD 2 S20417 TEE CR W E RRB N0 4 WYLE LAPS TRAhE C TAL OF SFECTFA 1006 320206 CC
.2 820421 TES CR NONE CHr. NO 110 ELEC EQUIP QUAL BY ANALYSIS 1007 S20206 SID 2 820421 IES CR NONE CHN N2 4 ELEC EQUIP TRANSMITTAL OF IhFC 10 0 52M0? 00 6 E2091C TES C5 NONE RDC NO 103 CONTAINMENT INTERIOR AB0VE 140 3rg;7g4 101^
120209 OD 4 E20723 TES CR NONE RDC NO 7 TURB BLDG ABOVE 140 SFECTRA 1011 E20209 SID 3 920709 TES CR N0hE PPR N0 3 DG OIL FRIMIN3 TANK SPECTRA. idi:NE LDO.
1012 820209 ICD
-1 E2C421 TES CR NONE PPR N0 3 DG O!L FRIMINS TANK 15X DIFF 1013 S202C9 00 7 82072? TEE CR NONE RRB N0 4 WTLE LAS SPECTRA 1015 320211 cID 2 820417 TES CR NONE PPR N0 3 DG OIL FRIMING IANK DAMP!NG. TURBINE ILEG.
1017 520211 DMD 3 920709 TES CR NONE PPR N0 3 DG OIL PRIMING TANK SG WEIGHT. TURPINE BLDG.
101E S23218 It.E 3
920712 TES CR NOME RC2 NO 111 SUPPLY FAN S-31 SUPPCRT.
.el?
820216 Cr 2 820409 TES CR NONE RDF NO 102 CVCS SYSTEM SEFARATOR/ STABILIZER In TEE CUCS.
Ir0 32C218 SID 3 S20629 TE3 CR NONE JCT ND 109 AUX SALTWATER PUMP FRELIM SPECT.!NTME $70CT.
1021 820219 OD 6 820921 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 CCWHX ANALYSIS AS R!GID ANCHOR. TUR21NE BL E 1022 820219 OD 6 820717 TES CR N0hE RLF NO 103 3' VALVE DOCUM. LINES 577 1 578, AUX. ILPG.
v 1r4 820"20 FI2 3 820607 TES CR NONE RDF NO 105 PIPE SUFT. NOMEN.LINE 1917, AUX BUILDING.
10
S200 3 CD 6 020723 TES CR NONE RDC NO 103 VERTICAL SFECTRA FOR TURB BLDG ELEV 104' l02' 320223 FID 6
820?22 IES CR NONE RDC NO 6 FUEL HANDLING CRANE SUSFORT W
800225 i"']
3 820722 TES CR NONE RDC NO 6 AUX BLDG-MODEL DISCREPAhCIES 10):
S20:25 LhD 3 820709 TES CR NONE FPP N0 3 BORIC ACID TAN 5 ANALYSIS. AUXILIARY SUILDING.
1031 520302 CD 7 820717 TES CR NONE RDF ND 103 VALVES FCV-371 LCV!!5, LINES 59? 1577/578, AUX.1.
'07 310302 TD 5 820707 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 CVC SUPT. 73/70R DIREC LINE 44. AUX. BUILDING.
10 920302 OAR 2 82040Y TES CR NONE MAR NO 2 EES (CYGNA) DA-0BEERVA!!0NS 1034 820302 OAR 2 920409 TES CR NONE MAR NC 2 EES (CYONA) GA-0BSERVATIONS 10.0 220302 uAR 2 32040!
TEC CR NONE MAR NO 2 EES (CYGNA) O4-0BSERVATIONS 103c 920302 QAP 2 S2040? TES CR NONE MAR NO 2 EES (CYGNA) GA-0BSERVATIONS h 1037 220 02 DAR 2 S20409 TFS CR NONE MAR NO 2 EES (CYGNA) DA-0BSERVATICNS 1023 820302 DAE 2 82040!
TES CR N3NE MAR NO 2 EES (CYGNA) QA-0BSERVATIONS 102*
S20302 U.R 2 B2009 TES CR NONE MAR NO 2 EES (CYBNA) DA-0BSERVATICNS 1040 320302 QAR 2 820524 TES CR NONE MAR NO 2 EES (CYGNA) CA-FIND!NGS k
o APPENDIX 1 TABLE 3 COMPLETION REPORTS CONTINUED DCNFP IDVP STATUS REPGRT 24-SEP-22 14:29:20 PAGE 3 REV. C LATEST R2V.
A2 TION
!G1E ITR FI'.E E LME LASIS REV. DATE BY STATUS ORG TES MODS NO.
SUBJECT w
1041-E2030 DAR 2 920524 TES CR NONE MAR NO 2 EES (CYGNA) GA-FI C INGS 10 0 '
N N
2 EX524 TES CR NONE MAR NO 2 ANCO OA-FINDINGS 1043 C03M FII-4 0072S TES CR NONE RCW NO 105 PIPE SUPPORTS 512/7R 1 512/4R LOCA!!3N.
1044 920303 FID 6 E20611 TES CR NONE RCW NO 105 SMALL BORE LINES LOCATION 1045 820309 FID 6 C072S' TES CR NOME RCW NO 105 SUPPORT 99/9R DIRECTION 1046 00308 FID 6 82072S US CR NOME RCW NO 105 SUPPORTS 99/7R 1 99/9R DIMENSION.
1048 820308 CID 3 S20410 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 SUPT. 99/101R LOCATION.LINE 52 AUX. PUILDING.
104?
S20305 FID 9 820723 TES CR NONE RRB NO 4 MAIN ANNU E IATOR TYFEWRITER SFEC. CONTROL ROOM.
1050 920308 FIS 3 S20708 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 RHR LINE 279-8 IN3ULATION AUXILIARY IUILDING.
1M1 82030S CD 3 820607 TES CR NONC RCF NO 103 INSUL. SPEC. FOR LINES 244-8 1 2519-Se A'iX. BLDG.
1052 320309 CAR 2 E2C524 TES CR NOC MAR NO 125 WYLE LAB QA FICING 1053' 820309 SID 3 820709 TES CR NONE PPR NO 3 DIESEL GEN START. AIR RECV. IANK 2ATIN1.TURB.2LD3 10G 820309 DMS 4 820622 TES CR t@ I FPR NO 3 DIESEL GEN START. AIR KECV. TANK ANAL.TUR31NE BLOG.
- 10P, 820310 SID 3 S20524 TES CR NC:lE RDC dC 127 CONTAINMENT ANNULUS SPECTRA 1056 820310 OAR 3 S20524 TES CR NCNE PPR NO 2 N1 S10 NATURES ON SEVERAL PG1E CALCS.
167 S20315 13 2 C0417 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 ANAL. 106 DIFF. FR0n THE PG1E ANAL. CONTAIN. LLDG.
IFE 820315 Dnu 6 3'0921 TES CR ENE RCW NO 120 SMALL B]RE PIPING LUG DESIGN.
105?
B20315 LMD 6 220921 TES CR NONE RCW NO 105 SMALL BORE PIFE REP 2RT DVERSTRESS 1060 320315 ICD 4 C0921 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 FIPESD AG ADLPIFE C0!ES 1061 820215 CD 3 S20511 TES CR NONE CHK NO 111 HVAC FAN S31 FABRICATION DRW.
10M C0315 Uh 1 E20524 TES
'S NChE MAR NO 2 PG1E GA FINDINGS 1045 C0315 GAR 1
S:0524 TES CR NCNE MAR NO 2 PG1E GA FI CINGS 1066 8203:5 GAh 1 S20524 TES CR NONE MAR NO 2 PG1E DA FINDINGS 1067 D 115 2AR 1 220524 TES CR NONE MAR NO 2 URS/BLUME DA FINDINGS 10!E S20215 CAR 1
820$24 TES CR NONE PM NO 2 URS/BLUME DA FINDINGS 1C70 8203:5 DM2 3 B20722 TEL CR NCNE SDC NO 6 AUX. BLDG. HORIZONTAL E,0Il S?R!N3 CALC.
107*
320323 ICD 4 E209M TES CR NONE RDF N0 103 RLCA PIFIN3 ANALYSIS 109 STRES3 ;!FF.
1072 B20323 1CD 3 B20910 TEE CR NCNE JCT NO 109 TURBIhE DRIVEN AUX FW. POV. AUX. PUILDING.
- 073 820323 ICD 3 S20709 TES CR MNE JCT N3 109 AUX. SALTWATER FUMP 10LT STRESSES. INTAKE STRUCT.
1975 820330 FID 3 820619 TES CR N0hE RIf NO 103 CCW SUPTS. 5007-R 118-5R DIR.LINE 104, TURB. BLM
!CD 33330 FID 3 820524 TES CR NONE RLF ND 103 CCW SUPTS. 55S-3R DIR.LINE 103, AUX. EUILDING.
1072 820419 FID 3 E20713 TES CR fl0NE CHK NC 0 VENTILATION SYSTEM LOGIC FANEL F0V160V2 IN9 S20419 IID 6 820723 TES CR N2NE RDC N0 6 AUX BLDG FUEL HANDLING STRUCT6E 1082 320422 ~ Itti 3 820701 TES CR NONE JCT NQ 108 VALVE FCV-95 ANALYSIS. AUXILIARY EUILDING.
1033 C0422 FID 5 E20910 TES CR NONE CHK ND 111 HVAC VOLUME DAMPER 7A. AUX. BUILDING.
b 1087 820514 IC3 4 220623 TES CR NONE CHK NO 110 HOT SHUTDOWN REMOTE CONTROL PANEL. AUX. BLDG, 10 5 320521 CD 3 S20!!? TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 PIPE SUPT. 3/30A. LINE 593. AUY. BUILDING.
E 820521 P5 3 820619 TES CR NONE RDF NO 103 PIPE SUPT.11/92SL.LINE 593ePIFE F.ACKeAliX. BLDG.
10 %
S20521 ICD 6 820S10 TES CR NGNE RDC NO 6 AUXILIARY BLDG - FUEL HANDLING BLDS 1093 320613 ICD 6 820722 TES CR NCHE RDC NO 6 AUXILIARY BUILDING-FAN RM 1 VENTILATION RM.
1104 320903 FID 3 820922 TES CR NONE RDF NO 119 RL'CA PIPING ANAL.110 LINES 426013078eC0NT. BLDG 3 00 93524 3R 2 820622 TES CR NONE WEC NO 116 HARDING LAWSON ASSOC. DA REPORT 2M1 CZ24 GAR 2 820622 TES CG NONE WEC NO 116 EES (CYGNA) DA REPORT 3002 82Z74 UAR 2 820622 TES CR NONE WEC h0 116 ANCO DA REPORT TM CM24 QAR 2 820622 TES CF NONE WEC NO 116 WYLE LAB OA REPORT 3M4 920524 DAR 2 820622 TEC CF NONE WEC N0' 116 PG1E DA REPORT 20 %
82624 GAR 2 E20622 TES CR NONE WEC NO 116 URS/BLUME GA REPORT s
. ICIAL FJrPER OF FitE!i LISTED !S 147 5
4 i
o APPENDIX 1 TABLE 4 ERROR REPORTS BEING CONSIDERED BY PG&E DCMf? IDVP'1TATUS REPORT 24-SEP-S2 14:2?:20 PAGE 1
REV. O LATEST REV. k.
ACTION PGLE ITR FILE NO.
bTE MS!i REV.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES MODS NO.
SUBJECT
.963 520129 FID 5 S20719 TES ER/B PGLE RDF 103 SUPT. 5SS-32R LIREC. CONT. EFRAY LINI 279, AUX PLDG.
964 820129 FID 3 S20510 TES ER/C PG1E RDF YES 103 LINE 2519 SUPT. ILENTIFICATICNi A2X. IUILDISG.
983 S20206 SID 2 S20910 TES ER/A PG1E RCW 7 RACEWAY SUPPORT REANALYSIS 10CS C0209 OD 2 820606 TES ER/C PG1E CHK 110 MAIN AWJNCIATOR CABINET SFECTRA 1014 CO20? OD 7 S20?10 TES ER/A3 FG1E RDC 103 CONTAINMENT REEVALUATION.
1022 S20213 S!D 5 :20910 TES ER/A3 FC1E ROC 109 INTAKE STRUCIURE REEVALUATION.
1026 82C:20 3D L 820723 TES ER/AP PG1E RDC 7 TURBINE PdIL2!N3 REEVALUATION.
1062 820315 ice 3 S2CS05 TES ER/C FSIE RIF 103 RLCA P! PING ANALYSIS 100-STRESS 21FF.
1063 B23315 I;D 2 820722 TES ER/C PG1E RDF 103 RLCA PIPING ANALYSIS 107-STRESS D!FF.
1049 923315 FI!
3 S20630 TES ER/A PG1E RDF 100 VALVE LCV 113/115 UNSUFT. AFW LINES 577/578 AUX. B.
1074 820323 ICD 2 520305 TES ER/C PGLE RDF 103 RLCA PIPING ANALYSIS 101 STRESS DIFF 10D 220422 ICD 2 820903 TES ER/C FG1E RDF 103 EtCA PIFING ANALYSIS 103 STRESS 0 FF 1081 S20402 ICD 2 820831 TES ER/C PG1E RIF 103 RLCA PIPING ANALYSIS 104 !!RESS D:FF.
1081 S20514 ICD 3 E20910 TES ER/C FGLE RDF 103 RLCA ?! PIN 3 ANALYSIS 102 SIRESS IIFF.
1085 820514 100 3 820831 TES ER/C PG1E RDF 103 R'.cA PIPING ANALYSIS 105 STRESS DIFF.
1036 820514 ICs 2 S20910 TES ER/C PG1E RDF 103 ktCA PIPING ANALYSIS 108 STRESS DIFT.
1C92 820611 FID 6 32C810 TES ER/A PG1E RDC 6 FUEL HANDLING BUILDING 1C97 B20713 SID 4 C0722 TES ER/A3 PSIE RLC 6 AUXILIARY BUILDING REEVALUATICN.
1098 820714 ILI:
5 820922 TES ER/AE PGLE RDF 103 PIPING REEVALUA!!0N.
TOTAL VJMBER CF FILES LISTED IS 19 D
b
\\
s o
b
?
- u. :
' APPENDIX ~1 TABLE 5 DEVIATION REPORTS BEING CONSIDERED BY PG&E DCNFP IEVF STATUS REFORT 24-SEF-S2 14:29:20 FASE 1 REV. O LATESTREV.
ACTION PG1E ITR FILE NO.
.IATE PA!!S REV.
DATE BY STATUS ORG " TES.90DS NO.
SUBJECT
'1100 820S15, CD 2 0 94J TES PRR/IEV FGIEROC 129 HLA SOIL RP/IEW 00TD00R DATER STORACE ?AN.
TOTAL D PER OF FILES LISTED IS - !
s t
.Y e
N
%=
b 6
3
APPENDIX 1 TABLE 6 OPEN ITEMS REQUIRING ADDITIONAL INFORMATION FROM PG&E DCNFP IDVP STATUS REPORT 24-EEF 62 14:29:20 TAGE 1
EEV. O LATEST REV.
ACTION PSIE ITR FILE NO.
DATE BASIS REV. DATE BY STATUS ORG TES MODS NO.
SUBJECT
?35 S20120 Pl!
3 820619 TE5 Pfdt/01F PG1E RDF 103 VALVE SS05B ORIEh!. L!hE !?SS, AUX. BUIL3!NG.
?93 920206 CL 5 820909 TES FRR/CIP PSIE RPC 122 Cr WATER STORAGE TAv.S.
1016 820211 Dr.L 2 B20621 TES PRR/0IP P61E RCW 0 BOLT ALLOWABLES 1029 920223 PMD 5 520713 TES PRR/ DIP PG1E RDC 6 RESPONSE CCP.BINATION CRITERIA. AUXILIART IUILDING.
1077 S20406 ICL i
0S11 TES PRR/CIP PS1E RCW 113 HVAC IUCT SUPT. CALCULATICN DATING.
1024 S20705 3 920709 TES PRL'31P PGIE RDC 129 INTANE STRLCTURE S0!LS REVIEW 1099 92C904 P!P 2 S20920 TES PRR/01P FG1E FFR NO 107 COMP 0NEht COOLING WATER HEAT EXCH. Ti.131NE ELOG.
1101 S20916 ED 2 S20910 TES P.W O!P PG1E RDC 129 HLA SOIL REVIEW CUTIOCR LATER STORAGE TANKS.
s TOTAL NUMBER OF FILES LISTED IS S
w M
7 1
L
APPEN0!X 1 TA8LE 7 s
E01s WHICH ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF TES DChPP IDVP STATUS REPCRT 2
24 SEP-82 14:2H20 FA3E 1 REV. O LATEST REV.
TION PGLE ITR FILE NO.
DATE BASIS REY. DATE BY STATUS ORG TES MOSS NO.
SUBJECT
.i_
1003 S20205 CD 4 S22825 RLCA PER/C TES RCW 113 4 KV SW RM HVAC DLti SL'PI 1047 820303 FID 4 S20711 PICA FFRR/CI TES RCW 105 SMALL BORE LINES LOCAi!DN 1096 920709 ICD 1
52N13 RLCA FER/A TES CHK 111 SUPPLY FAN S-31. AUX. WILDING.
1102 S20819 D"I-1 S20619 RLCA PER/t TES CHK~
111 HVAC DAPIER 7A. AUX. WILDING.
1103-820831 Dh!
1 S20031 RtCA PPRR/0!P TES JFM 104 PIPE SUPPORTS ATTACHED TO AUXILIARY STEEL.
8001-8209C9 D2 1 020909 SWEC FER/AB TES DCS 0 EVALUATICN OF EWIRONPENT IN C:ffARTME.iT SW TOTAL NLRLER OF FILES LISTED IS 6
v b
v W
b' w
I
v APPENDIX 1 TABLE 8 E01s WHICH ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RLCA ENFP IDVP STATUS REFORT 4-3EF-62 14::F:20 F;.GE A
REV. C LATEST REV.
gTION PG8E ITR 5
FILE NO.
DATE PASIS REV.
DATE 3Y STATUS ORG TES - MODS NO.
SUBJECT 14?
32012C ICD 2 3:0903 TES DIR RLCA CHK YES 110 MAIN ANNUNCIATOR CABINET, AUX 1LD3.,RIGIIITY 1 FRED.
1083 920514 ICD 2 S20EI7 TES DIR RLCA FFR 107 CCMPCNENT CLS WATER HEAT EXC % C-ER 10?';
S20709 SI2 0 S20709 RLCA OIR RLCA RK INPUT TIME-HISTCRY. AUXILIARY l'UILD!N3.
TOTAL MJM3ER OF FILES LZTED IS 3
h
- %sP 1
1 4*w F
l w
i 1
D
s l
)
l}
ll APPENDIX 1 TABLE 9 E0Is WHICH ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF RFR i
This Page Intentionally Left Blank f
No RFR Files at Present I
i';
v i
o APPENDIX 1 TABLE 10 E0Is WHICH ARE THE RESPONSIBILITY OF SWEC
- CNFP ILVP STATUS REPLRT 24-SEi-D:
14:2':20 H.GE I
REV. O LATEST REV.
F.IION PGL
...-... _. h.._.
. E ITR FILE N0.
IWE PA!!S REV. DATE BY STATUS ORS TES MODS NO.
SUBJECT S002 S20?09 100 0 S20909 SWEC OIR SWEC DCS 0 ENLUATION OF ASSUd.'TICNS IN COPJARTP.ENT CU 8003 820909 ICD 0 S20909 SWEC OIR OEC DCS 0 EVALUATICH CF ENVIRC OENT IN TJ !!hE EUILDING 8004 820909 ICD 0 S20909 SWEC OIR SWEC DCS 0 EVALUATIDW OF ASSUMED INITIAL TEP.F. IN DE/0W 800C S20909 Dr.D 0 2209')9 SWEC OIR SWEC DCS 0 EVALUATION OF EFFECT OF WATER INVENIORY IN SW S005 820909 OI' 0 8:0909 SWEC O!R SWEC DCS 0 LACK OF PIFERENCE MATER!t.L TO EVALUATE EWIRONMENT 8007 820?i3 fit 0 ;2;713.SWEC OIR SWEC DCS 0 EFFECT OF THE PF.EAK-PIFE RUFid E RE!*!AINI 1030-14R 8003 S2:713 12 0 820913 SWEC OIR SWEC DCS 0 EFFECT OF THE PREAK-P!FE E'; fibre RESTRAINT 1031-::R SOC 9 020?!3 !M 0 320913 EWEC OIR SWEC DCS 0 EVALUAT:CN OF COMPLIANCE M/Ah!I CODE OF AFW ?:P!hG SON B20i 3 Ir.D 0 620913, SWEC OIR SWEC DCS 0 EVAL. OF COMPLIANCE W/ ANSI CODE OF BEAhlNG HEAT EXC s
M IL W h?ER OF FILES LISTED :S 9
k b
e P
P
APPENDIX 1 TABLE 11 PG&E DETERMINED MODIFICATIONS
,DCNff IDVP Fi.'TUS REf'CR1 24-SEP-82 14:29:20 fA0E 1 REV. O LATEST REV.
ACTION I"lE ITR FILE NO.
DATE PASIS REV.
DATE BY STATUS CRG TES MODS NO.
SUBJECT 732
?20106 Fl[
6 E20510 TES CR NCNE RPF YES 103 CONTAINFINT SFRAT SU'T. 'AS-23R MREC!!ON 749 E20120 ICD 2 820903 TES CIR RLCA ChK YES 110 MAIN ANNUNCIA!CR CASINET, AUX.PLPG.rRISILITY l FREG.
?50 220:28 FID 7 520701 TES CR NCNE JCT YES 109 VALVE FCV 95 FtATE THICKNESS. AUX. BUILDINS.
957 820129 FIL 6 E20723 TES CR NONE Rtf YES 103 LINES 577 1 578 INS'JLATION, AUX. IUILLING.
?!4 52012? FID 3 S20510 TES ER/C PSIE RDF YES 103 LINE 2519 SUFT. IDENTIFICATION: AUX. PUILDING.
TOTAL CMER OF FILES LISTEL IS 5
+
N V
w I
e f l l
APPENDIX 1 TABl.E 12 Ct. ASS A ERRORS LCNFP IDV? STATUS REP 0fi 24 ';EP-E2 14:2i*:0 FACE LATEST REV ER ACTION PGL S'. O
... S..........E ITF.
- r!LE h0.
DATE BASIS REV.
DATE BY STATUS CEG TES MCDS ND.
SutJEC1
?!2 S20106 ?!L 0 S20106 E CA O!R RLCA RDF 103 CCNTAINMENT SPEAY SL?T. ISS-23R DIREC? ION
~ " 06 FIL 1 E20319 RLCA FER/A TES RrF 103 CONTAihhENT SFRAY EUPT. 585-23E 2! RECT:0N 432 623106 FI!
2 820417 TES ER/A PGLE RLF 103 CONTAINMENT SPRAT SUPT. 583-23R DIRECf!CN 932 S20106 FID 3 S20417 TES. GIR RLCA RDF YEE 103 CONTAINMENT SFRAY SUPT. 585-23P. D!RECTION 937 S20106 FID 4 8?0430 RLCA FPRR/CI TES RF YES 103 CONTAINMENT SPRAY SUFT. 58S-23R DIRECTICh 972 P20:06 C!-
5 E20510 TES FRR/CI TES Rtf YES 103 CONTAINMENT STRAY SST. SSE-23R ?IREC*!C's 932 52:1C6 FIP 6 820510 TES CR NCNE RIF TES 103 CONTAIhMIrli SPRAY SUPT. !S!- 3R DIRECT *0h
~
?B3 620206 SID 0
- 5. w s UA resA Its hw
/
hw. twat wnLh1 KtANA. ins 7E' 820206 SIC 1 E20421 TES ER/A Pd1ERCW 7 RACEVAY SUFFORT REANALYSIS M:
9202M W 2 o20710 TEE ER/t.
PGIE RCV 7 RACEWAY SUFf0RT REAhALYS!?
1069 923315 FID 0 820315 RLCA DIR RLCA R1F 106 VALVE LCV 113/115 UNSUFT. AFW LINES 577/579 ALL P.
106?
020311-FID 1 920426 F1CA FFRR/CI TES CF 10E VALVE LCV 113/115 UHSUPT. G W LINES 577/578 r,UX. P.
1057 620315 FD 2 820511 TES 2iR ELCA RIf 108 VALVE LCV 113/115 UNSUPT. AFW :.!NES 577/57S Aut. !.
- C6Y E20315 Fl!
3 S20517 RLCA FER/A TES OF 103 VALVE LOV 113/11: UNSUPT. AFW LINES 577.572 ALL P.
1069 320315 FI; 4 S20407 TES ER/A PG1E Ef 108 VALVE LCV 113/115 UNSUFT. AFV LINES 577/57S AUX. S.
,10l /
S20315 F '.
5 8:!s33 TES ER/4 PGLE RDF 10S VALVE LCV 113/115 UNSUPT. AFW LINES 577/575 AUX. B.
10Y; S20611 FID 0 820611 RLCA CIR htCA RIC 6 FUEL HAN!tlNG BLDG 10?;
820611 FID 1 220611 RLCA FPPi/0!P TES EC 6 FUEL HANDLIhG BLDG 1092 S20611 FIS 2 820621 TES FtR/DIF FG1E CC 6 FUEL HANDLING BUIL2!NG 1092 52h!1 r!)
3 820720 TES CIR RtCA EDC 6 FUEL HA CLING BUILI!NG 1092 E20611 FID 4 B20721 RLCA FLP/A TES RDC 6 FUEL HACLIhG BUILPINS 1092 S20611 F;2 5 820723 TES ER/A PG1E Rlt 6 FUEL HANDLING BUILDING 1092 820611 F 1.'
6 620S10 TES ER/A FU1E RDC 6 FUEL HAhDLING BUILDING e
4 FF Y
I l
~
APPENDIX 1 TABLE 13 CLASS B ERRORS DCFPP IDVP STATUS REPCRT 24-EEF-22 14:29:2:
FME 1 REY. O
~
LATEST REV. ER ACTION FG1E IIR
- 8..
."lLL N3.
DATE 3 ASIS REV. DATE BY STATUS ORG TES MODS N3.
SUBJECT 962 320129 FIL 0 82C129 RLCA O!R RLCA RDF 103 SUFT. SSS-32R DIREC. CONT SeRAY LINE 279, AUX. BLDG.
943 S20129 FID 1
S20316 RLCA DIR RLCA RDF 103 SLTT. SSS-32R DIKEC. CONT. SFRAY 'INE 27h AJI.RDG.
763 820129 FID 2 820510 RLCA FER/C TE RDF 103 SUPT. 585-32R DIREC. C0hT. SFRA) LINE 27i,A'2X.RDG.
963 820129 FID 3 820709 TES DIR RLCA RLF 103 SUPT. Ses-32R DIREC. 00hi. SPRAY LIhE 279. G.FLDG.
163 S20129 FID 4 S20713 F.tCA PER/B TES RLF 103 SUPT. 585-32R DIREC. CONT. SFRAY LIhE 2'9. AUX. BLDG.
963 320129 HS 5 620719 TES ER/2 PG1E RDF 103 SUPT. 585-32R DIREC. CCNT. SPFAY LINE 279, W.PLD3.
1002 82?206 S;L 0 S20206 FACA rwe a5 CMA ut snu rm so/, ou 6 n ism IC{2 S20206 SID 1 320417 TIS ER/3 PG1E CHh 111 SUFPLY FANS $67 68,169 INFUI IN2 820206 SID 2 220417 TES DIR RLCA CEK NO 111 SUFFtY FANS 567, 68, 1 69 Ih?UT 1002 B20206 SID 3 S20:21 RLCA PFRR/CI TES CHK N3 111 SUPPLY FANS S67, 68, 1 6* Iri?UT 10^2 820206 SID 4 B20e23 TEE PRR/CI TES Chh N3 11 SUFFtY FANS S67: dSe 169 INF1)?
1002 SM206 Sit 5 B20623 TES CR NONE CHK N3 111 SUPPLY FANS S67, 63169 INF'JT
'IDI3 8202M DD 0 5202M %CA 0;h KLLA AM 4 WILL LAli WLU.%
1012 22'.208 02 1
820$27 R.CA ?EFJIc TES RRB 4 WYLE LAB SPECTRA 1013 820209 CD 2 2006:3 RLCA FER/I TES RRB 4 L'YLE LAB SPECTRA 1011 8202CS CD 3 820610 TES ER/3 P01E RRB 4 WYLE LAB SFECTRA 1013 320009 OP 4 220723 T!S CIR RLCA RFS 4 WYLE LAB SPECTRA 10;;
320209 CD 0 S207'.:3 EtCA F?RR/CI TES RRB N3 4 WYLE LAB SFECTRA 1012 820209 OL 6
S2C723 TES FER/C1 TES REP h0 4 WYLE LAB SFECTRA 1013 320209 CD 7 B2t? 3 TES CR NONE RRB N3 4 WYLE LAP SPECTRA y
Y 7
4
3 APPENDIX 1 TABLE 14 9
CLASS A or CLASS B ERRORS DCNPP IDVP CIATUS REPORT i
24-CEP-82 14:2? 20 fAGE 1 RiV. 0 LATEST REV. ER ACTION PG1E ITR A/8 W FILE NO.
DATE BASIS REV.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES N005 NO. ' SUBJECT 949 820120 ICD 0 S20120 RLCA PER/AE TES CHK 110 MIN ANNUNCIATOR CABINET, AUX.KDS. RIGIDITY l FREO.
949 820120 ICD 1
S20421 TES ER/AB PG1E CHK YES 110 MAIN ANNUhCIATOR CABINET, AUX.?LD2.,EISIDITY 1 FRE3.
AU E20120 ICD 2 820903 TES DIR RLCA Clx YES 110 NAIN ANNUNCIATCR CABINET AUX.BLDO. RIGIDITY 1 FREQ.
1014 S20209 OD 0 620209 RLCA DIR RLCA RL:
103 CONTAINMENT KttVALUA!IUM.
10M 220209' OD 1
820322 RLCA FfRPJDEV TES RDC s s
103 CONTAINMENT REEVALUATION.
1014 820:09 OD 2 C20417 TES PRE /0IP PG1E RDC,
103 CONTAINP.ENT REEV%LUATION.
1014.
22020? C3 3 B20903 TES OIR RLCA RD h 103 CONTAINMENT REEVALUATION.
1014 E20209 OD 4 820907 KLCA PPRR/01P TES RE 103 CONTAINMENT REEVALUATION.
=
t 1014 820:09 OD 5 320?09 TES DIR RLCA RDC 103 CCNTAINNENT REEVALUATION.
' 1014 620209 03 6 820909 RLCA FER/AB TES RDC s 103 CONTAINMENT REEVALUATION.
f 1014 820209 OL 7 820910 TES ER/AB PG1E R!fC-103 CONTAINMENT REEVALUATION.
1022 82021S SID 0 22021E RLCA OIR RLCA RDC 109 INTAKE STRUCTURE REEVALCATION.
1022 820212 SID 1 820430 RLCA PPRP10!P TES RLC 109 INTAKE STRUCTURE REEVALUATION.
-1022 82011E EID 2 820510 TES PER/0!P FG1E RK' '
109 INTARE STRUCTURE REEVALUATION.
1021 520:18 SI' I 820903 TES DIR RLCA RiC 109 INTAKE STRUCTURE: REEVALUATION.
1022 S202!t:- SID 4 E20907 RLCA PER/AB TES E C 109 INTAKE STRUCTURE REEVALUATION.
p 1022 220219 SIF 5 E20910 TES ER/AB POLE RDC 109 INTAKE STRUCTURE REEVALUATIDN.
1026 320220 SID 0 820220 RLCA 01R ELCA.RDC 7 TURBINEBUILDINGREEVALUATION.
1C2 S20:20 5ID 1 820319 RLCA FPRP/DEV TES RDC 7 TURBINE BUILDING REEVALUATION.
102 820220 SID 2 820417 TES PRR/0:P PS15 RDC 7 TURBINE BUILDING' REEVALUATION.
1026 520220 SID 3 E20720 TES DIR RLCA RDC 7 TURBINE BUILDING REEVALUATION.
105 823220 SII 4 820721 RLCA PEPJAB TES ELC 7 TURBINE I:UILDING REEVALUATION.
JM4 820:20 S!D 5 820723 TES ER/AB PGtE RDC 7 TURBINE BUILDING REEVALUATION.
7 1297 82071? S:D 0 820713 RLCA DIR RLCA RDC 6 AUXILIARY BUILDING REEVALUATION.
e 10 %
320?!3 SID 1
E20714 RLCA PPR'JOIP TES RDC 6 AUXILIAkT BUILSING REEVALLATICN.
1097 32;713 SID 2 820720 TES DIR RLCA RDC 6 AUXILIARY BUILDING REEVALCA!!0N.
10i?
820?!3 S!3 3 820721 RLCA PER/AB TES RDC 6 AUXILIARY PUILDING REEVALUATION, 1097 S20713 SIC 4 E20722 TES ER/AB PGli RDC 6 AUXILIARY BUIL31hG REEVALUATION.
i 1 93 820714 ICD 0 820714 RLCA DIR RLCA RDF 103 FIFING KLtVALUAIION.
(
M95 322714 ICD 1 9^0714 RLCA PPER/0!P TES EDF 103 DIPING REEVALUATION.
Ks S20714 ICE 2 820723 TES ?RPJ0!P PG1E RDF 103 PIPING REEVALUATICN.
i 1;?3 820714 ICD 3 820910 TES 015 RLCA RDF 103 PIPING PEEVALUATION.
w98 820714 ICD 4 820913 RLCA FER/AB TES RDF 103 PIPING REEVALUATION.
109S 820714 ICD -
5 820922 TES ER/AB PG1E RDF 103 PIPING REEVALUATION.
f, i
}
f h
t g
l' f
a F
r a
TN ENGSEERNG SBMCES APPENDIX 1 4
TABLE 15 Nomenclature Used in Printouts FIELD DESCRIPTION vFILE NO.
File number assigned to the item in the OPEN ITEM REPORT by the IDVP participants
(
REV.0 DATE Date of the OPEN ITEM REPORT in international date format (last two digits of year, numerical identification of month, numerical identification of day)
REV. O BASIS Abbreviation of what the Open Item resulted from:
i FID =
field inspection deficiency QAR =
Quality Assurance audit and review ICD =
independent calculation deficiency l
DMD =
v design methodology deficiency
)
SID =
seismic input deficiency 0D i
other deficiency (explanation should be entered
=
in the COMMENT field)
PGE =
responsive to PG&E Technical Program Action
.vtATEST REV.
Revision of report-type from which input data is being taken; REV.
see description of STATUS field LATEST REV.
Revision date (in international date format of report-type DATE from which input data is being taken; see description of STATUS field Note:
If this is Rev. O the program will automatically enter the information provided under the Rev.
O field LATEST REV.
Abbreviation for organization submitting the report:
3Y TES Teledyne Engineering Services
=
RLCA =
R.L. Cloud, Associates RFR R.F. Reedy, Associates
=
SWEC =
Stone & Webster Engineering Corporation PG&E =
Pacific Gas & Electric BCP Bechtel Power Corporation
=
LATEST REV.
Type of report / qualifier:
STATUS OIR Open Item Report
=
PPRR =
Potential Program Resolution Report PRR v
Program Resolution Report
=
PER Potential ERROR Report
=
ER Error Report
=
CR Completion Report
=
NCR All reports which are not CR's
=
u
.i_______________.___..__
w w.ame ENGNEERNG SOMCES APPENDIX 2 IOVP SEMIMONTHLY REPORT FOR SEPTEMBER ITR STATUS as of September 24, 1982 The tables included in this attachment detail the status of Interim Technical Reports identified by the IOVP ta date.
Tables 1 and 2 are printouts from the TES computer p ogram LISTITR, as described by Attachment 3 to the IDVP Semimonthly Report for September 1982.
TABLE N0.
DESCRIPTION 1
Lists the ITR's issued to date, and the status of any revisions to those documents.
2 Lists ITR's which have been scheduled and their present status.
Comnents are included to identify the E01 Files presently considered to be included in each ITR and to indicate the schedule-limiting work which must be completed.
3 Defines the nomenclature used in the printouts.
i
ENGSEEEMNG SEMACES FIELD DESCRIPTION e
Type of Qualifiers CI Closed Item
=
DEV Deviation
=
OIP Open Item with future action by PG&E
=
A Class A Error
=
B Class B Error
=
C Class C Error
=
D Class D Error
=
Note:
(1) CI, DIR, CR are entered without report type (for CI) or qualifier (for OIR or CR)
(2) If ER is entered without any qualifiers, all error classes will be listed ACTION ORG.
Organization where current responsibility for action is; same abbreviations as used for entrees in LATEST REV. by field. Enter NONE if item is closed ACTION TES Persen responsible within TES for monitoring action PG&E MODS.
Indication if modifications will be performed by PG&E ITR NO.
Number of the ITR (See Appendix 2) which most significantly reports on the FILE NLNBER SUBJECT Description of item C0fEENTS Any applicable conments which apply to the revision being entered Note:
If desired, the C0fEENTS can be omitted from any hard copy listing.
O b
t APPENDIX 2 TABLE 1 ISSUED ITR's DCNFP IDVP ITR STATUS REPORT 24-SEP-32 14:27:30 PAGE 1 ITR REVISION ACTION DRAFT FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS CRG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 1
0 S20609 RLCA ISSUED NCNE RW 101 ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION AND ADDITIONAL SAPJLING COMENT: FROGRM D'CUPINT DEFINING WORK BEYCND INITIAL SAMPLE DEFINED BY PROGRAM FLAN. SUBJECT TO REVISION AS WORK FROCEEDS.
ITR REVISION ACTION DRAFT
=_
FILE NO.
NC.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 1
1 B20306 F1CA DRAFT RLCA RW 101 ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION AND ADDITIONAL EAMPLIh3 CCMMENT: SCHEDULED DRAFT REVISION.
ITR REVISION ACTION DRAFT FILE NO.
Nt.
DATE SY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 1
1 820606 RLCA LRAFT TES RW 101 ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION AND ADDITIONAL SAMPLING COMENT: DRAFT REVISION FOR TES REVIEW.
ITR REVISIDri ACTICN DRAFT FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 1
1 820827 TES DRAFT RLCA RW 101 ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION AND A!DIi!CNAL SAM' LING.
COM ENT: TES C09ENTS TO RLCA AT MEETING.
ITR REVISION ACTION DRAFT FILE NC.
NO.
PATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 2
0 82062T TES ISSUED NONE WEC 116 00ALITEASSURANCEFROGRAMANDIMPLEMENTATIONREVIEW C0hST: EEVIEW AND EVALUATION OF RFR PHASE 1 WORK, SUMARIZES PUFJOSES, DEFINES TES REVIEW PITHODr E"ALUATES WORK RELATIVE TO NRC ORDER AND RELATI'd TO P; ANNED ADDIIIONAL YERIFICATION.
ITR REVISION ACTION DRAFT FILE NO.
iU. DATE PY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 3
0 820716 RLCA ISSUED NONE PPR 106 EVALUATICN 0F INITIAL TANK SAMPLE COMMENT; INCLUTES CONSIDERATION OF EDI FILES 1011,1012,1015,1017:1030,1053,1054.
!!R REVISION ACTION DRAFT FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO [ SUBJECT 4
0 820723 RLCA ISSUED NONE RRB 114 EVALUATION OF ELECTRICAL EGUIFMENT GUALIFIED BY TEST COMENT: INCLUDES CONSIDERATION OF EDI FILES 1005,1007:1013:1049.
APPENDIX 2 TABLE 1 ISSUED ITR's CON'T DCNPP IWP ITR STATUS REPORT 24-SEP-82 14:27150 PAGE 2 ITR REVISION ACTION DRAFT FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 5
0 820S19 RLCA ISSUE 3 NONE RW 115 SEISMIC DESIGN CHAIN.
COMMENT: PROGRAM DOCUMENT IDENTIFYING PARTICIPATING ORGANIZATIONS.
ITR PEVISION ACTION DRAFT FILE NC.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 6
0 820910 RLCA ISSUED NONE RDC 102 AUXILIARY BUILDING COMMENT: INCLULES CONSIDERATION OF E0!S: 920e 985, 986 987, 990: 991,1027,1028,1029,1070s 1079 1091, 1092,1093,1095,1097 ITR REVISION ACTION DRAFT FILE NO.
NC.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 7
0 B20917 RLCA ISSUED NOME RCW 112 ELECTRICAL RACEWAY SUFPORTS COMENT: INCLUDES CONSIDERATION OF EDI FILES: 910e 930, 933 1010e 1026, 1093, 1097 TOTAL NUMBER OF FILES LISTED 15 10 t
~~_
APPENDIX 2 TABLE 2 DRAFT ITR's DCNFP IDVP DRAFT STATUS REPORT 24-SEP-82 15:18:36 FAGE 1 DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 101 3 820610 RLCA ISSUED NONE RW 1
PHASE I ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION AND ADDITICNAL SAPIL COMMENT! PROGRAM DOCUMENT DEFINING WCRK BEYDND INITIAL SAMPLE DEFINED BY PROGRAM PLAN. SUBJECT TO DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
n0.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 102 0 821009 RLCA ISSUED NONE RDC 6
AUXILIARY BUILDING COMMENT: INCLUDES CONSIDERATICA 0F E0IS: 920, 985, 986, 987, 990: 991, 1022, 1027, 1028, 1029, 1070 1079, 1091,
,1092,1093,1095,1097.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE Sh STATUS ORG TES REF NO [ SUBJECT 103 1 820903 RLCA DRAFT TES RDF 0
PIPING INITIAL SAMPLE EVALUATION COMMENT: EDIS: 931-948i951-964if65-966i994-997;1000-1001;1009-1010i1014i102531031-1032i104811050-10513 1057;1062-1063i1069i107111074-107611000-108111084-1086i1089i1090i1098 SCHEIULE DEFENDING ON TES, RLCA,1 PG1E. PARTIAL DRAFT FOR TES REVIEW.
DRAFT REVISIGN ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ort TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 104 0 821015 RLCA RLCA JFM 0
PIPING SUFFORT EVALUATION CCMMENT: E0IS: 1103 DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS CRG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 105 0 821015 RLCA ELCA RCW 0
SMALL PORE PIPING INiilAL SAMPLE E E UA!Ich COMMENT: EDIS: 1024,1043,1044,1045,1046,1047,1059 DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR
=_
FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 106 2 820716 RLCA ISSUED NONE PPR 3
EVALUATION CF INITIAL TANK SAMFLE COMMENT: INCLUDES CONSIDERATION OF EDI FILES: 1011,1012,1015,1017,1030,1053,1054 DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 107 0 821022 RLCA PG1E FPR 0
CCW HEAT EXCHANGER EVALUATION.
COMMENT: E0IS: 978, 1088, 1099, PG1E LIMITING ON 1099.
APPENDIX 2 TABLE 2 DRAFT ITR's CON'T DCMP IDVP I4tAFT STATUS REFORT 24-SEP-82 15:18:36 PAGE 2 DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 10B 0 821015 RLCA RLCA JCT 0
VALVE SAFLE EVALUATION (TO INCLUDE 2 SAMPLES)
COMMENT: E0IS: 950 997: 998, 999, 1069e.1082, FCV-41 ANALYSIS TO E COMPLETE BY RLCA.
DRAFT itEVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORS TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 109 0 821022 RLCA RLCA JCT 0
INITIAL PUMP SAMPLE EVALUATION COMMENT: EDIS: 1020e 1072, 1073 CCW P'JMP ANALYSIS TO BE COMPLETED BY RLCA.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
E.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 110 1 820830 RLCA DRAFT RLCA CHK 0
INITIAL ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT SAMPLE EVALUATION.
CCMMENT: EDIS: 949,1004,1006,1007,1008,1018,1078,1087. SCHEDULE DEPENDS ON RESPONSE OF RLCA ON 949.
PARTIAL DRAFT FOR TES REVIEW.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FZLE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 111 0 B21015 RLCA TES CHK 0
INITIAL HVAC COMPONENT SAMPLE EVALUATION CCMMENT: EDIS: 1002,1018,1061,1083,1096,1102. SCHEDULE DEPENDS ON TES W/1096.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 112 2 820917 RLCA ISSUED NONE RCW 7
ELECTRICAL RACEWAY SlFPORTS COMMENT: INCLUDES CONSIDERATION OF E0IS: 910e 930, 983, 1010e 1026, 1093,~1097 DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 113 0 821022 RLCA PGIE RCU 0
EVALUATION OF HVAC DUCT SUPPORTS COMENT: EDIS: 1003,1077: PGIE LIMITING ON 1077.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 114 2 820723 RLCA ISSUED NONE RRB 4
EVAL. 0F ELEC EQUIP OUAL BY SHAKE TABLE TEST.
COMMENT: INCLLTES CONSIDERATION OF E01 FILES: 1005,1007,1013,1049
=:
APPENDIX-2 TABLE 2:
' DRAFT.ITR's CON'T-DCWP IDVP DRAFT STATUS REPORT 24-SEP-82 15:18:34 PAGE 3 14 AFT.
REVISION.
ACTION ITR FILE NO.
- NO.
DATE SY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBKCT 115 2 820819 RLCA 'ISSIB NONE RW 5
SEISMIC DESIGN CHAIN STUDY COMENT: PROGRAM DOCUMENT IDENTIFYIN6 PARTICIPATINS 36ANIZATIONS.
s DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY..
STATUS ORG TES REF No. SUBECT 116' 2 820623 TES ISSUED NONE WEC 2-GUALITY ASSURANCE PROGRAM AND IMPLEMENTATION REV!E l
COMMENT: EDIS: 3000: 3001, 3002, 3003, 3004, 3005: REVIEW AND EVALUATION OF RFR PHA TES REVIEW METH09 EVALUATES WORK RELATIVE TO NRC ORDEli AND RELATIVE TO PLANNED ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.~
N;.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBACT 117 0
0 0
INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK.
1 COMMENT:
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBKCT 118 0
0 RLCA RLCA RDC 0
ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION - BUILDING COMMENT: E0IS:.967,976,979,980,981,982,984,988,989,992,993,1010,1014,1018,1022,1025,1026.
1027,1028,1029,1070,1079,1091,10c4,1095. RLCA TO SCEDLLE. ISSUED AS ITR ON JUNE 9e 1982.
}
DRArT '
REVISION ACTION ITR FILE Nr).
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBICT FICAT W - PIPING
[
CD T: EDI: 1060, 1104 RL TO SCHEDULE.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS OR6 TES REF NO.
SUBKCT 120 0
0 RLCA RLCA RCW 0
COMMENT: EDI: 1058, RLCA TO SCHEDULE.
ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION - SMALL BORE PIPING l
1 IRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR 1
FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBXCT I
121 0
0 RLCA RLCA CHK 0
ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION - ELECTRICAL EQUIPMENT l COMMENT: RLCA TO SCHEDULE.
-.-,---,----,,,y
.-,,,--v..
,--w._-m-,,~,~,..-i---.,
,-,,,..w%-,
APPENDIX 2 TABLE 2 DRAFT ITR's CON'T DCNPP IDVP DRAFT STATUS REPORT 24-GEP-32 15:18:36 FAGE 4 DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FlLENO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 122 0
0 RLCA RLCA PFR 0
ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION - TANKS COMENT: E0IS: 992, 993,1100,1101.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 123 0
0 RLCA RLCA IT 0
ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION - PUMPS COMENT: RLCA TO SCHEDULE.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
~k0.
DAfE BY STATUS ~bkb'TESREF NO.
SUBJECT 124 0
0 RLCA RLCA CHK 0
ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION - HVAC COMPONENT COMENT: RLCA TO SCHEDULE.
DRAFT REVISION ACTIDH ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORS TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 125 0
0 RLCA RLCA RRB 0
ADDITIONAL VERIFICATION - TEST 00ALIFIED EQUI'.
COMENT: E01' 1052. RLCA TO SCHED'LE.
J DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BV UfkiU5 bRG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 126 0 820924 TES TES RW 0
PG1E NSSS SEISMIC INTERFACE CCMENT: EDIS: 976,978,981,1004. FIRST DRAFT SCHEDULED.
DRAFT REVISION ACTIDH ITR
. FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS bRhfEh REF hb[ SU$ JECT 127 0 821112 TES TES RDC 0
CONTAINMENT ANNULUS STRUCTURE COMEhT: EDIS: 977,1009,1055. SCHEDULE DEFENDS ON TES REVIEW OF BNL 1 P61E ANNULUS ANALYSIS.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 128 0 821024 TES TES WEC 0
RELATIVE TO FUEL LOADING.
COMENT: FARTIAL FHASE I REPCRT. TES TO SCHEDULE.
l l
l
3 N
nrrenua e Inm.t e DRAFT ITR's CON'T DCNPP IDVF DRAFT STATUS REPORT 24-SEP-82 15:18:34 PAGE 5 DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 129 0 821015 RLCA RLCA RDC 0
VERIFICATION OF SOILS.
CCMMENT: EDIS: 968: 969, 970, 1070, 1094, 1100, 1101. MC NEILL REVIEW 0F HARDING - LAWSON WORK. RL DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
"J.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 130 0 821015 RLCA RLCA RDC 0
HOS6RI, SPECTRA COMMENT FIRST DRAFT SCHEDULED.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 131 2 820915 RLCA DRAFT RLCA RW 0
VERIFICATION OF CORRECTIVE ACTION.
COMENT:
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 201 0 820910 RFR RFR MAR 0
DESIGN CHAIN-NON SEISMIC PRIOR TO 78X COMMENT: FIRST DRAFT SCHEDULED. ITR SCHEDULED FOR 821015.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION IIR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 202 0-0 SWEC SWEC LCN 0
DESIGN CHAIN-SWEC SAMFtES COMMENT! SWEC TO SCHEDULE.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 203 0 821027 TES TES MAR 0
QA AND DESIGN CONTROL EVALUATION COMMENT: TES TO SCHEDULE.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT I
204 0 821015 SWEC SWEC LCN 0
AFS 8 CRVP I/C DIVISION REPORT.
t COMMENT: FIRST DRAFT SCHEDULED.
i i
i
APPENDIX 2 TABLE 2-DRAFT ITR's C0!!'T DCNFP IDVP DRAFT STATUS REPORT 24-SEP-82 15:18:36 PAGE 6 DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.-
DATE BT STAT E ORG TESREF NO.
SUBJECT 205 0 821C15 SWEC SE C LCN 0
ES POWER DIVISION REPORT.
COMENTI FIRST IMAFT SCEDLLED.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR l
FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 206' 0 821015 SEC SWEC LCN O
AFSs' ELECTRICAL DIVISION REPORT.
COMMENT: FIRST DRAFT SCEDULED.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR l
FILE NO.
h;.
DATE SY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SlfoJECT 207 0 821015 SEC SWEC LCN 0
CRVPi POER BIVISION REPORT.
j COMMENT: FIRST DRAFT SCEDULED.
i l
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT l
208 0 821015 SWEC SWIC JWW 0
CRVP, ELECTRICAL DIVISION REPORT.
l COMMENT: E015: 8007, 8008: 8009, 8010. FIRST DRAFT SCHEDUi.ED.
l t
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE h0.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS CRG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 209 0 821015 SWEC SWEC LCN 0
4160 V DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM - REPORT.
COMMENT: FIRST DRAr7 SCEDILED.
DRAFT REVISICN ACTION ITR l
FILE NO.
NO.
DATE BY STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 210 0 821015 SWEC SWEC DCS 0
RADIATION: PRESSURE / TEMPERATURE ANALYSIS REPORT.
COMMENT: ECIS: 8001,8002,8003,8004,8005,8006. FIRST DRAFT SCHEDULED.
DRAFT REVISION ACTION ITR FILE NO.
NO.
DATE Bf STATUS ORG TES REF NO.
SUBJECT 211 0 821015 SLEC SWEC LCN 0
l COMMENT: FIRST DRAFT SCHEDULED.
DESIGN CHAIN DEVELOPMENT 1 EVALUATION REPORT.
TM ENGNERNG SEMCES APPENDIX 2 TABLE 3 NOMENCLATURE USED IN PRINT 0UTS FIELD DESCRIPTION i
FILE NO.
Numbers assigned to each ITR.
All Phase I Draft ITR's are numbered sequentially beginning with 101.
All Phase II Draft ITR's begin with 201.
Issued Reports are assigned sequential numbers 1 - 99 REY. NO.
The definition of the designations for Draft ITR's are as follows:
"0" Used for scheduling purposes "1"
Indicates written material under review "2"
Major revisions made to the text An ascending number indicates a redraft of text, as opposed to review conments The designations for Issued ITR's are as follows:
"0" Indicates Revision 0 of the Report "1"
Indicates the Stage of draft, as above when " DRAFT" appears in the Revision Status Column "1"
Indicates the Revision number of the report when
" ISSUED" appears in the Revision Status Column And ascending numbers as needed REV. DATE Date, in international format on which the input data is being taken REV. BY The abbreviation for the organization submitting the report:
TES = Teledyne Engineering Services RLCA = R.L. Cloud Associates RFR = R.F. Reedy, Associates SWEC = Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation REV. STATUS Status Designated as either " Draft" or " Issued" ACTION ORG.
Organization where current responsibility for action lies ACTION TES Individual within TES responsible for monitoring necessary action i
Ap endix 2 Y
Ta le 3 (Con't)
MM FIELD DESCRIPTION t
ITR REF. NO.
For cross reference purpose.
For Draft ITR's in process a "0" will appear.
Once an ITR has been issued, the Draf t report will designate the Issued File No.
The Issued Report will designate its Draft File No.
SUBJECT Description of item COMENTS Any applicable coments which apply to the revision being entered Note:
If desired, the COMENTS may be omitted from any hard copy listing.
I F
i r
e
ENGDEERNG SEMCES P'
APPENDIX 3 IDVP SCHEDULE r
0 4
s l
l
- - - - - - - - ~ - - - - - - ' - - ~ '
w w
u o
t PHASE ~ ID'.t. INITIAL SANFLE 3CHEDULE AS JF SEPTEM5ER 04, 1982 f 10 1 GTGAN t SUBJECT II JULT I
AUGUST I SEPTEMBER I OCTOBER I
NOVEMDER I DECEMBER I JANUART I
................................I I........... _..............................................................................._....I I
e a
i i a ib l'a 20 27 1 3 to 1 1
.....................................1862D.0.................... 11 2 4......... 81.Faa M i 5 12 19 2(,
I 3 10 312431 1 7 I42128 i
..I I
I I
I 1
e i I RLCA 1 LESIGN CHA!N is 11 5 5
I I
I t
1 I
i 26 TES I DA AUDIT & REVIE.11 I
I l
I 3 8 ricA : AV4. BLDG.
IS B
10 1 b
a i
I I
4 i :.tcA 6 P:rINs IS-a los
I
?
I I
i 51 ;LCA e p PE SLrr0RTS IS B
P
- -lot - - - -I I
I I
I i & I FLCA : SnALL PORE PIPS. IS B
105 - - - - - - - I.
3 I
I i
I I
i 7 I KLCA I EQUIP.(ANAL.)
I I
I I
I I
~
I 7.18 RLCA I VAL *;ES IS
- - - - -l og - -I.
1 I
I I
I I
I i 7.21 KLCA I CLECT. EQUIPitENT 35 II3 - P llo - - - - -L I
I i
l I 7.13 RLCA I TA1r.S IS
- )6-3 I
I I
I I
I 7.48 RLCA 4 HEAT EXCHANGER 18 p
g--I 8
I I
I I
I I 7.51 RLCA I PUNPS is
- - - - - 101- -1 I
I I
I I
I I 7.61 RLCA I HVAC COMPONENTS I$
lll-*-**-1 I
I I
I I
I I 9 I RLCA I EQUIPMENT (TEST) 85 II +- 4 i
i I
i 6
I ? I RLCA ! 20X2UIT !CPPORT IS l11--7 I
I I
I i
i IC 1 RLCA h74C LUCT SUPT. 17, p
g- - - -ll3 - --l I
I l
I I
I i 18 1 !ES I FGIE TO NSSS INT.1S (26----[
l I
e i
t I 12 1 TE3 I C*NTAIN. AMIJLi!S e S4
.. - - - - - - - P - 12 7 - - -I 6
8 I
s:IL,
,s
- - P -119 - - - I II
- c.
4 i
I 1
8 I
iESZ.13.-
e i
100- 1d19 DRAFT ITR I
I l-99 IS30ED ITR i
B PML REPCRT S START TELEt mE I
i P PGIE SCNEDULEB Ihr0;*ATICN RELEASE :)TE.
(N'illlEERING TEh!CES I
I N DESENCENT CN NRC A-*:CW s
1 SE*~". DENT CN IDVP :C"9 3
i l
y-y e-t FnMi
- A* III.:f.F._ is 9LL. ADI T
- 3tt tTf ;r;tg re,,g; tryrycg7;cy r-r;: crc :
A; ;;. ;;..; 7;.cp.j;,r 4;. c: tritggg;r ;4, ; p; AC I OEG4k i SU3 JECT I i JJL) i AUGUS?
I SEPTEnPEF 1 DETORES i
F3VEM6f? I DECTMBEF I JANUA3 i
8.............l.............l.........................
.............:.............l..............
l' 8 3 28 u. 233 16 in 20 27 1 3 10 1 8 I 12 11 24 I 310 lT 24 3: 8 7 142i?*
._.g.......g..................;....0..g.
..l.
..7 24....:.. 8 152221 5
..l_
..l....... 8.
....I l
1 l
l
! M OS 8 APD. VEE F. 1 11 1
f i SAftLE I
I i
I 8:LCA I UEGIF.C0f%ECTIVE I I
I i ACTION I
3 j y - - -.. -l - - - -
3A I ELCA ? A!.D. VERIF. -
I e
I I BUILDING.
3
p----
8 4A I RIIA t ATP. VEP!F. -
t i
1.IFINE.
5
- - - - - - -P - - - -
g i
!a : RLCA. ADL. VEAIr.. FIPE.
i s EuPFGRTE I
_p----
g oA I R6CA 4 ads. VEkif. -
I g
I l
i snALL s0cE PIPINGl S
p----
i 37.IAI RLCA I ADD. VERIF. -
I g
i i VALVES l
P----
i 7.2A1 RLCA I ADD. VERIF. -
1 I
-.---------P----
I I ELECT. COUIP.
I s
1 17 3Al RLCA I AfD. VERIF. -
1 I
s'
P----
i i
i TANS I
i 17.4A1 RLCA ! ADP. VERIF. -
i i
i I
I NEAT DCNANGER 1
P - - -- --
1 I?.5Al RLCA I APD. VERIF. -
1 i
I s euneS i
s
P----
i IT.dAI RLCA I ADD. VERIF. -
1 I
i I
i wvAC C0arowthi i
s
P----
i I 84 i RLCA 1 APD.UEFIF. - TESTI I
I GUAL. EQUIP.
I 6
4-----
1 i ?A I R.CA I Art. VERIF. -
I s
I i
- CcNDu:T SUPPORTS I s
P-~--
i l 104: RLCA I A*D. VERIF. -
1 I
I l
l hVAC DUCT SUFP0ETI S
p----
8 i
I TES I REL. TO FUEL i
I I
I I LDAPING I
6
- - - - 128 - - - -I.-
1 I
I TES I PHASE I REPORT
!S
- - - - - - - - - hi 8
I I
I I
I s...........................................__......................................................................................I LEGENt :-
t 100 -l %
I.F ae ? ITS l-99 IS!UEP ITE S STAtt TELEs 4E I
M MAJCS INTERNAL TECHw! CAL PEOGRAM TO ITP-IDVP MEETINS.
ENGl>EERING SEEVICEE I
I P F3tE sCNEbutED :NrcEnATIGN RELEASE DATE I
I N DEFENDENT ON NRC ACTIO81 I
i I DEFENI.ENT cil IDVP ACTION I
a...................................................................................................................................l
"A'TELEDYNE s
ENGINEERING SEFNICES 130 SECONO AVENUE WALTMAM. M ASSACHUSETTS 02254 461D 890-3350 Twx(710t 324 7508 September 25, 1982 5511-149 Mr. G. A. Maneatis, Senior Vice-President Facilities Development Pacific Gas and Electric Co.
l '
' ~ ' "
77 Beale Street San Francisco, California 94106 Mr. H. R. Denton, Director M2fMA Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation CATI _
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. C.
20555 Mr. R. H. Engelken, Regional Administrator Region V U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission 1450 Maria Lane, Suite 210 Walnut Creek, California 94596 Re:
Docket No. 50-275 Diablo Canyon Unit 1 License No. DPR-76
Subject:
Program Pian for Construction Quality Assurance Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant - Unit 1 Gentlemen:
Enclosed is a copy of the subject document.
This document is submitted to NRC for information and comments and to PG&E for approval.
Very Truly Yours, TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES 7
William E. Cooper Project Manager l
WEC:cfr i
Enclosure cc:
H. E. Schierling (NRC)(2)
R. R. Fray (PG&E)
R. L. Cloud (RLCA)
R. F. Reedy (RFR)
F. Sestak (SWEC)
H. B. Brown, Esq.
D. F. Fleischaker, Esq.
J. Reynolds, Esq.
B. Norton, Esq.
A. C. Gehr, Esq.
ENGl!JEE:,5 AND METALLURG!STS
a TF M Transmittal-Please Sign and Return Acknowledgement Request for information (RFI) 1 When Requested Assign Control Number Page_1_of Receipt (TES Use Only)
Control No.
Mr. H. E. Schierling Originator W. E. Cooper Transmit To:
5511 Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Project No.
U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Cormiission Date. Septe.mber 25. 1999 Client PO 5-2-82 7920 Norfolk Ave.
Transmitted Under Separate Cover To:
N/A Bethesda, MD 20114 NOTE: Furnish complete identification for items transmitted (below).
9U OTY TYPE ITEM IDENT NO.
REV OESCRIPTION - Title and Number of Sheet 9/PaGes 2
Rpt 0
IOVP Program Plan. Revisinn n
" Adjunct Program for Evaluation of Construction Quality Assurance",
dated September 15,1982 Ltr 5511-149 Transmittal Letter 7
\\ \\ f'I
\\/
l I
m ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF RECEIPT BY I
')
NI TITLE III DATE 9 I ' / d l/
DISPOSITION FOR PREVIOUS REVISIONS J
l O Return to TES O Mark Void ODestroy O Uncontrolled NOTE TO ADDRESSEE: Unless stated otherwise the listed items are furnished to you as Controlled Documents. Please sign and return the number 2 copy to:
l TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES l
130 Second Avenue Waltham, Massachusetts 02254 l
Attention: Document Control, Project DISTRIBUTION: 1 and 2-Addressee 3-Document Control 4-Originator / Project Manager l
4/81
TN ENGEERNG SEmOES DIABLO CANYON NUCLEAR POWER PLANT INDEPENDENT DESIGN VERIFICATION PROGRAM PROGRAM PLAN REVISION 0 ADJUNCT PROGRAM FOR EVALUATION OF CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE SEPTEMBER 24, 1982 TCLEDYFI E?"' EN'!G SERVICES
_ g//
Shf/K PREPARED BY TELEDYNE ENGINEERING SERVICES AS PROGRAM MANAGER, TES PROJECT 5511 Docket No. 50-275 License No. OPR-76 1
_.,-.r.n.,e-
~a TN ENGN3iR!NGSERVK' S E
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION
2.0 OBJECTIVES AND ORGANIZATION 2.1 Objectives 2.2 Organization 3.0 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE (CQA) PLAN 3.1 Scope 3.2 Task A - Quality Assurance 3.2.1 Objective 3.2.2 Subtasks 3.3 Task B - Construction Verification Review 3.3.1 Objective 3.3.2 Subtasks 3.4 Task C - Processing of Findings 3.4.1 Objectives 3.4.2 Subtasks 3.5 Task D Report 4.0 TES METHODOLOGY AND PROJECT ORGANIZATION 4.1 TES Methodology 4.2 Project Organization 5.0 PG&E ACTIONS 6.0 PROGRAM REPORTING 6.1 Types of Reports 6.2 Semimonthly Interim Technical and Final Reports 6.3 Application of Open Itc... Rcport Systems 7.0 DOCUMENTATION
TN ENGNEERNG SERVICES ADJUNCT PROGRAM FOR EVALUATION OF CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE SEPTEMBER 24, 1982
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Program Plan defines the management and technical aspects of an evaluation of construction Quality Assurance being conducted by the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant (DCNPP) Independent Design Verification Program (IDVP) as an adjunct
- to the Phase II Program. The Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PGLE) advised the Nuclear Regulatory Comission-Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRC-NRR) of their intent to proceed with such an evaluation by letter of September 7,1982, Reference 1.
The objective is to complete the evaluation and issue an interim report prior to mid-November 1982 and to issue a final report prior to mid-December 1982.
The " Adjunct Program for Evaluation of Construction Quality Assurance" is a programatic Quality Assurance audit of a
representative sample of construction activities.
It is termed as " Adjunct Program" to the Phase II Program because it is to be performed under the direction of the IDVP Program Manager, Teledyne Engineering Services (TES); by an organization which is participating in the IDVP, Stone and Webster Engineering Corporation (SWEC);
in accordance with the applicable portions of the Phase II Program Management Plan, Reference 2; in the general time frame of the Phase II Program; but, is not design related nor required by the NRC Order or Letter so it is not an essential part of the IDVP Phase II Program.
This construction Quality Assurance Program was voluntarily proposed by PG&E at an NRC-PG&E-IDVP meeting of September 1,1982 to " Lay this unwarranted public concern to rest, and to avoid further delay in the licensing of Diablo Canyon..." (Tr, Pg.11, 13-15).
The Program Management Plans for the performance of an Independent Design Verification Program (IDVP) for the Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Unit 1 (DCNPP-1) are intended to respond to an NRC " Order" and
" Letter,"
respectively. The program is being ccnducted in two phases, corresponding to the NRC requirements for restoration of the low-power license (" Order") and for operation above 5% power
(" Letter"),
respectively.
These NRC requirements relate to the design efforts performed internally by the PG&E, or on behalf of PG&E by service-related contractors, on safety-related structures,
- systems, and components.
Phase I
is restricted to seismic-related efforts of PG&E and of their service contracts performed prior to June 1, 1978.
Phase II includes non-seismic service-related contracts performed prior to June 1978, PG&E internal design activities, and all service-related contracts post-January 1978.
- Webster:
"Something joined or added to another thing but not essentially a part of it."
IDVP-PROGRAM PLAN-CQA WM ENGNEERNG SEFMCES Each IDVP phase is conducted in accordance with a Program Management Plan which includes a number of Program Procedures as appendices. For each phase, the corresponding procedure provides an Engineering Program Plan which defines the technical work to be performed. The text of the Phase II Program Management Plan itself, separate from the appendices, includes the following sections:
1.0 Introduction (references NRC Order and Letter) 2.0 Background and Objectives (NRC requirements, general organization and participant scopes) 3.0 Engineering Program Plan (sumarizes methodology, criteria and performance guidelines) 4.0 TES Methodology and Project Organization (identifies senior individuals and sumarizes technical and management assignments) 5.0 PG&E Actions (sumarizes PGLE Internal Technical
- Program, relationships with IDVP) 6.0 Reporting (defines the types of reports including the Open Item Report System) 7.0 Documentation (requires that all results be documented and based upon documented information)
The " Adjunct Program for Evaluation of Construction Quality Assurance" (CQA) is to be performed in accordance with the technical "CQA Program Plan" which is defined by 3.0 of this document in accordance with the objectives defined i r.
2.0.
The remainder of this document, 4.0 through 7.0 invokes and supplements, the similarly numbered sections of the Phase II Program Management Plan for management of the CQA.
2.0 OBJECTIVES AND ORGANIZATION i 2.1 Objectives This review is intended to assess whether the construction of Diablo Canyon was performed in accordance with quality requirements appropriate for the time of plant construction.
The approach is to evaluate the work of two of the principal contractors which performed work important to safety at the plant.
The review is structured to provide reasonable confirmation that the construction quality program meets the applicable standards for the time of nuclear power plant construction.
The review will start with an evaluation of whether the construction documentation gives confidence that the construction work correctly incorporates essential design features.
To confirm this, samples of actual construction will be used to verify that the facilities were correctly built and that other construction requirements were met.
2.2 Organization In addition to the TES and SWEC scopes defined in 2.3 and 2.4, of Reference 2:
l
- +
IDVP-PROGRAM PLAN-CQA Y M M6 a.
TES shall perform the additional scope defined in 4.0 of this document.
b.
SWEC shall perform the CQA scope of work defined in 3.0, shall report the work in accordance with 6.0 and document the work in accordance with 7.0 to satisfy the objectives of 2.1.
All cited numbers being those contained in this document.
3.0 CONSTRUCTION QUALITY ASSURANCE (CQA) PLAN 3.1 Scope Construction work of two major construction contractors has been selected as the subject area for the evaluation. The contractors and the work performed by them, to be covered by the review, are as follows:
e Guy F.
Atkinson Co. (GFA) civil / structural work on the containment building e
Wismer and Secker (W-B) -- installation of NSSS piping.
An appropriate sample for evaluation will be selected from the work of each contractor to provide evidence of his quality practices in each major area of activity. The sample shall be submitted for approval to TES prior to use.
This review will be conducted in accordance with the applicable provisions of Stone & Webster " Standard Nuclear Quality Assurance Program -SWSQAP l-74A".
However, the documents to be used during this review, in determining the extent of compliance with the requirements, will be those applicable to the contractors when their work was performed.
A QA Plan and appropriate detailed procedures will be developed for this work by SWEC and be submitted for approval to TES Program Manager and for cormient to PG&E.
Detailed descriptions of tasks A through D included in this program are in the following subsections.
Potential Findings, as identified in Tasks A and B will be processed in Task C and reported as required by Task D.
3.2 Task A - Quality Assurance 3.2.1 Objective Evaluate the two designated contractors' quality programs to determine if adequate controls and practices to assure the quality of construction and the incorporation of essential design features into the completed plant were evident and to dete'rmine if controls were consistent with applicable NRC requirements at the time the work was performed.
DVP-PROGRAM PLAN-CQA TN N NES 3.2.2 Subtasks a.
Develop procedures and checklists, as appropriate, to:
Evaluate each contractor's quality program and procedures to determine if practices adequate to assure that construction requirements (i.e. drawings, instructions, specifications) were met by those responsible for the construction activity.
e Evaluate each contractor's quality program to determine if practices covering audits and inspections were adequate.
e Evaluate each contractor's quality program to determine if practices governing the identification, control and dispositioning of construction nonconformances were adequate.
b.
Conduct the specified evaluations utilizing experienced auditors qualified and certified in accordance with ANSI N45.2.23.
Areas and items examined and the results of the examination shall be identified and documented on checklists so as to be repeatable.
c.
All Potential Findings identified in conjunction with the accomplishment of Task A shall be processed and reported in accordance with Tasks C and D, respectively.
3.3 Task B - Construction Verification Review 3.3.1 Objective Evaluate if physical installation of selected components of safety system and structures conforms to the requirements of design drawings and specifications; and that required inspections were performed.
3.3.2 Subtasks a.
Develop procedures and checklists as appropriate to:
e Verify that construction of selected components reflects essential design features.
e Verify that appropriate documentation was provided to record variations, and, where required, as-constructed conditions.
b.
Choose items for physical verification of key elements from work of the contractors and specify these in a walkdown list. The list of items and attributes to be verified will be sufficiently representative to permit conclusions to be drawn as to the adequacy of installation work.
IDVP-PROGRAM PLAN-CQA WM N NES c.
Conduct the specified walkdowns and verifications utilizing experienced personnel certified in accordance with ANSI N45.2.6 in the discipline being examined.
Areas and items examined and the results of the examination shall be identified and documented so as to be repeatable. The walkdown shall be primarily a visual verification of component installation to provide confidence that dimensional requirements have been met.
d.
All Potential Findings identified in conjunction with the accomplishment of Task B shall be processed and reported in accordance with Task C and D, respectively.
3.4 Task C - Processing of Findings 3.4.1 Objectives Review all Potential Findings identified during the review and provide for evaluating and classifying the significance of Potential Findings.
3.4.2 Subtasks a.
SWEC will establish a Findings Review Comittee composed of several senior SWEC personnel with broad experience in nuclear power plant engineering, quality assurance and construction management and a similar TES employee.
b.
The Comittee shall define criteria for determining the degree of impact that Potential Findings have on plant adequacy for DCNPP-1.
c.
The Comittee shall establish a procedure to process Potential Findings.
This procedure shall provide an opportunity for PG&E to coment on the definition and accuracy of Potential Findings.
d.
The comittee shall review each Potential Finding for definition and accuracy and will assess its impact on the adequacy of the plant. The comittee shall recomend classification of Potential Findings to TES in accordance with the following:
Comittee Determination Classification 1.
Finding accurate and has potential Finding for significant impact on adequacy of Diablo Canyon Unit 1 (DCNPP-1) 2.
Finding accurate but does not have Observation potential for significant impact on i
adequacy of DCNPP-1 3.
Finding not accurate Invalid
IDVP-PROGRAM PLAN-CQA gg EIEMNEERING SEFMCES 3.5 Task D Report Reports shall be prepared in accordance with 6.0.
4.0 TES METHODOLOGY AND PROJECT ORGANIZATION 4.1 TES Methodology In addition to the contents of the similarly numbered section of Reference 2, TES shall assure that the CQA Program is performed in a technically competent, independent and timely manner which is consistent with its objectives.
4.2 Project Organization In addition to the contents of the sections 4.2 through 4.7 of Reference 2:
a.
Dr. W. E. Cooper, as Project Manager for TES shall review the recomendations of the Findings Review committee for compliance with established criteria and, when criteria have been properly applied and documented, he shall declare the Potential Finding as a Finding or Observation as recomended by the Findings Review Committee and transmit and report the item in accordance with this plan.
In addition, he shall be responsible for the verification of PG&E Corrective Action taken in response to a Finding and the reporting of resolutions.
b.
Mr. L. C. Noriega's scope is increased to include the efforts of SWEC in performance of their CQA activities.
c.
Mr. J. A. Flaherty will serve as the TES employee on the Findings Review Committee.
This will be Mr. Flaherty's only IDVP assignment and he will not be under the direct supervision of Dr. Cooper.
5.0 PG&E ACTION In addition to the contents of the similarly numbered sections of Reference 2, PG&E shall comment on the definition and accuracy of Potential Findings in accordance with the procedure established by the Findings Review Comittee for the processing of Potential Findings. Review by the Guy F. Atkinson, Co.
(GAF) and Wismer and Becker (W-B) shall be requested and coordinated by PG&E.
~.
IDVP-PROGRAM PLAN-CQA pg ENGNEERNG SERVICES 6.0 PROGRAM REPORTS 6.1 Types of Reports The following types of reports will be prepared:
(1) Semimonthly Report (2)
Interim Technical Report on Construction Quality Assurance (ITR-CQA)
(3) Final Report on Evaluation of Construction Quality Assurance.
In addition, the Error or Open Item (E01) report system used in Phase II, and described in Ref. 2, Appendix E, will be adapted to the CQA effort in the manner defined in 6.3 of this document.
6.2 Semimonthly, Interim Technical and Final Reports Each of these is defined as follows:
(1) Semimonthly reports shall be prepared in accordance with 6.2 (1) of Reference 2.
(2) The ITR-CQA shall have the same intent and content as does the Final Report and will only be issued if the Final Report can not be completed prior to fuel loading and low power operation.
(3) The Final Report on Evaluatior. of Construction Quality Assurance will compile all evidence
- reviewed, Potential
- Findings, Observations and Findings, including their description, coments, assessment of impact, results of the Findings Review Committee, results of the review of PG&E corrective action plans, and will assess the PG&E QA Program for construction of DCNPP Unit 1.
The report will include a description of the work performed, an identification of documents used in or generated by this project, the results of the review, and the conclusions drawn from each task.
6.3 Application of Open Item Report System The E01 System described by 6.3 of Reference 2 and by DCNPP-IDVP-PP-003, Revision 1 will be utilized as a tracking system, using the following interpretations, a.
Open Item Reports (0IR) shall be issued by SWEC to report Potential Findings.
The file number shall be assigned in seqt.ence from the range of numbers 9000-9999.
b.
Issuance of the OIR will initiate PG&E action in accordance with 5.0 to verify the definition and accuracy of Potential Findings.
PG&E shall report their results to TES and SWEC by use of a PG&E Resolution sheet.
IDVP-PROGRAM PLAN-CQA yg ENGNEERING SERVICES i
e c.
The Findings Review Comittee shall report their recomendation to TES, with a copy to PG&E, as follows:
(1) A Potential Error Report as a Class A Error (ER/A) sha?! be used for recomended Findings.
(2) A Potential Error Report as a Class C Error shall be used for recomended Observations.
(3) A Potential Program Resolution Report as a Closed Item shan be used for recomended invalid Potential Findings.
d.
When the recomendation of the Findings Review Comittee are considered by TES to be in compliance with established criteria:
(1) An Error Report as a Class A Error shall be issued for Findings.
(2) An Error Report as a Class C Error shall be issued for Observations.
(3) A Program R2 cold. ion Report as a Closed Item shall be issutid' for invalid Potential Findings If the recomendations of the Findings Review Comittee are not -
considered by TES to be in compliance with established criteria, TES will issue an Open Item report, keeping the same File Number.
referring the item back to the Findings Review Committee.
e.
In response to a Finding (ER/A), PG&E shall develop and implement corrective action. They may consult with the IDVP,'through TES, in the development and implementation of such action. Following
(
completion of the corrective action, PG&E will so notify TES and SWEC by issuance of a PG&E Completion Report; TES will issue an Open Item Report, keepfng the same File number; and SWEC will verify the corrective action.
f.
When SWEC verifies the corrective action, including review by the Findings Review Committee, the Findings Review Committee will report its recomendation to TES, with a copy to PG&E as follows:
(1) A Potential Error Report as a Class A Error shall be used if the PG&E Corrective Action is not acceptable.
(2) A Potential Program Resolution Report as a Closed Item when the PG&E Corrective Action is acceptable.
g.
The recomendations of the Findings Review Comittee will be reviewed and reported by TES as follows:
(1) An Error Report as a Class A Error if TES concurs that the PG&E Corrective Action is not acceptable..
(2) A Program Completion Report as a Closed Item when the PG&E corrective action is acceptable, so that the Finding is deemed to be resolved.
1
IDVP-PROGRAM PLAN-CQA $P M ENGINEERNG SERVICES h.
An IDVP Completion Report will be issued by TES following issuance of an Error Report as a Class C Error (Observation) and following issuance of a Program Resolution Report as a Closed Item (invalid Potential Findings or resolved Finding).
7.0 DOCUMENTATION The principles of 7.0 of Reference 2 apply to the CQA program.
i l
i
. _,