ML20039G253
| ML20039G253 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Diablo Canyon  |
| Issue date: | 08/31/1981 |
| From: | Battelle Memorial Institute, PACIFIC NORTHWEST NATION |
| To: | |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20039G244 | List: |
| References | |
| NUDOCS 8201150425 | |
| Download: ML20039G253 (21) | |
Text
(
)
PAGE: 1 r
m r =re EMERGENCY PLAN EVALUATION REPORT ON Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Pacific Gas and Electric Company Emergency Plan Dated August, 1981 EVALUATION
SUMMARY
The Diablo Canyon Emergency Plan dated August, 1981 was evaluated using the sixteen Planning Standards and the 96 supporting criteria in NUREG-0654. The evaluation shows that, of the sixteen standards, five were satisfied and eleven were satisfied except as noted.
The Planning Standards rated as satisfactory except as noted were so rated because the Emergency Plan failed to address, provided insufficient informa-tion about or was unclear regarding some of tiie pertinent points enunciated in the Planning Standards' evaluation criteria. Coc:ments were made on each of the deficiencies noted.
In the pages that follow, findings on each Standard and its evaluation criteria are presented. A synopsis of criteria that are properly addressed is given, an evaluation of the degree of satisfaction provided by the plan is made and a set of coc:ments noting deficiencies within criteria is provided.
(
)
8201150425 820112 PDR ADOCK 05000275 0
. ?.DR
PAGE: 2
(
EMERGENCY PLAN EVALUATION REPORT ON:
Diablo Canyon FINDINGS ON STANDARDS & CRITERIA A. ASSIGNMENT OF RESPONSIBILITY (ORGANIZATIONAL CONTh0L)
Planning Standard Primary responsibilities for emergency response by the nuclear facility licensee, and by State and local organizations within the Emergency Planning Zones have been assigned, the emergency responsibilities of the various supporting organizations have been specifically established, and each principal response organization has staff to respond and to augment its initial response on a continuous basis.
Synopsis:
The Federal, State, local and private sector organizations that are intended to be part of the overall response organization for Emergency Planning Zones are identified.
The licensee's concept of operations and its relationship to the total effort is specified.
P The interrelationships among emergency organizations are illustrated in a block diagram (Figure 5.2-3).
The Site Emergency Coordinator (Shift Foreman, until relieved) is identi-fied as the individual who shall be in charge of the emergency response.
24-hour per day emergency response, including 24-hour per day manning of communications links is provided for.
Written agreements referring to the concept of operations developed between Federal, State and local agencies and other support organizations having an emergency response role within the EPZs are included.
The corporate Recovery Manager (Manager, Nuclear Plant Operations or his designated alternates) is the individual who will be responsible for assuring continuity of resources.
Evaluation: The plan satisfies Planning Standard A.
Y
f 3
PAGE:
3 Diablo Canyon B. ONSITE EMERGENCY ORGANIZATION Planning Standard Onshi f t facility licensee responsibilities for emergency response are un-ambiguously defined, adequate staffing to provide initial facility accident response in key functional areas is maintained at all times, timely augmenta-tion of response capabilities is available, and the interfaces among various onsite response activities and offsite support and response activities are specified.
Synopsis:
The onsite emergency organization of plant personnel for all shifts and its relation to the responsibilities and duties of the normal staff complement are specified.
The Site Emergency Coordinator (Shift Foreman, on-shift at all times) is designated as the individual with the authority to direct and coordinate emergency actions, including making protective action recommendations to of fsite authorities.
A line of succession for the Site Emergency Coordinator is identified, as are the conditions under which higher level utility officials will assume this function.
The functional responsibilities assigned to the Site Emergency Coordinator are established. The responsibilities that cannot be delegated, including the decision to notify and recommend protective actions to authorities responsible for of fsite emergency measures, are listed.
The interfaces between and among the onsite functional areas of emergency activity, licensee headquarters support, local services support, and State and local government response organizations are specified (Figures 5.2-2 and 5.2-3).
The corporate management administrative and technical support personnel who will augment the plant staff are specified in the Corporate Emergency Response Plan which is included as Appendix A of the site plan.
The contractor and private organizations who may be requested to provide technical assistance to and augmentation of the emergency organization are listed.
The services to be provided by local agencies for handling emergencies are identified. Copies of letters of agreement are appended to the plan.
N
]
f
)
PAGE:
4
(
Diablo Canyon B. ONSITE EMERGENCY ORGANI7ATION,(Cont.)
Evaluation: The plan satisfies Planning Standard B except as noted.
Criterion 5: The information presented in Sections 5.1.7 and 5.2.1 and Table 5.2-1 is not sufficient to allow an evaluation of the staffing requirements of NUREG-0654, Table B-1.
The requirements of Table B-1 should be explicitly addressed.
F N
)
L
l D
PAGE:
5
(
Diablo Canyon C. EMERGENCY RESPONSE SUPPORT AND RESOURCES Planning Standard Arrangements for requesting and effectively using assistance resources have been made, arrangements to accommodate State and local staf f at the licensee's near-site Emergency Operations Facility have been made, and other organiza-tions capable of augmenting the planned response have been identified.
Synopsis:
The Site Emergency Coordinator is authorized to request Federal assistance.
The expected Federal resources are specified, including expected times of arrival.
Licensee resources available to support the Federal response are specified.
A licensee representative will be dispatched to the principal offsite governmental EOC.
Radiological laboratories and their general capabilities and expected availability are identified.
Organizations that can be relied upon in an emergency to provide a: sis-tance are identified.
Evaluation: The plan satisfies Planning Standard C.
l I
l
\\w-
,)
6 (PJAC3E:
)
6
('
Diablo Canyon D. EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM l
Planning Standard A standard emergency classification and action level scheme, the bases of which include facility system and ef fluent parameters, is in use by the nuclear facility licensee, and State and local response plans call for reliance on information provided by facility licensees for determinations of minimum initial offsite response measures.
Synopsis:
An emergency classification and emergency action level scheme compatible with the schemes in Appendix 1, NUREG-0654 has been established.
The initiating conditions listed in the plan include all of the exemple initiating conditions listed in Appendix 1, NUREG-0654 as well as covering all postulated accidents in the FSAR.
Evaluation:
The plan satisfies Planning Standard D except as noted.
Criterion 1: The licensee has prepared a good set of EALs. The EAL sets are acceptable except as follows:
Unusual Event: Unusual Event No. 2 (radiological effluents) - the requirement for a confirmatory ef fluent analysis should be dropped.
Unusual Event No. 4 (abnormal coolant temperature or pressure)
--The requirement of both a high T and pressurizer low pressurizer alarm ave is improper. Either one suffices for an Unusual Event.
Unusual Event No. 9 (loss of engineered safety feature)
--The relevant sections of the technical specifications should be listed.
Alert:
Initiating Condition No. 12 (fuel damage accident)--The requirement for visual observation ought to be dropped--it may not be possible to conduct a visual observation. To avoid a delayed response a limit should be placed upon the time allowed for conducting a survey.
Site Emergency:
Initiating Condition No. 1 (LOCA)--The licensee does not describe the instrumentation that will be used in sufficient detail. What does " verification of Loss of Coolant Accident" mean? The suggestions of PNL-3880, which is based on the Westinghouse Owners group's recommendations, should be considered in drawing up an EAL set.
Site Emergency Nc. 2: (degraded core with possible loss of coolabic geometry)
--The licensee refers to General Emergency Condition No. 8.
That EAL set is adequate. Does the licensee plan to call a General Emergency if Site Emergency No. 2 is reached?
\\s-
,)
(
)
PA6GiE:
7 r
Diablo Canyon D. EMERGENCY CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (Cont.)
Initiating Condition No. 8 (their No. 7) (Loss of any function required for hot shutdown). An EAL for SCRAM system not operable should be included.
Initiating Condition No. 13 (their No. 12) (Radiological Ef fluents)--The alarms and monitors should be listed.
General Emergency:
Initiating Condition No. 2 (two out of three fission product barriers lost with potential loss of third barrier)--The case of loss of cladding and primary coolant boundary with potential loss of containment is adequately covered. However EAL sets for the other two permutations should be prepared.
These two permutations are:
loss of cladding and containment with potential loss of primary coolant boundary loss of primary coolant boundary and containment with potential loss of cladding.
Initiating Condition No. 3 (loss of physical egntrol of facility--Loss of physical control should be clearly defined.
Some licensees have required loss of the control room before calling a General Emergency which is nonconservative.
Initiating Conditions 5a through 5e (their 4a through 4e) (Example PWR Sequences)--EAL sets should be provided for Sa, 5b, 5d, and Se.
The suggestions given in PNL-3880 should be considered.
The EAL set given for Se is adequate if an EAL for failure of the SCRAM system is added to the EAL set of site Emergency Initiating Condition No. 7.
l l
t l
t
(PAGE:
)
8 l
(~
Diablo Canyon E. NOTIFICATION METHODS AND PROCEDURES Planning Standards Procedures b ave been established for notification, by the licensee of State and local response organizations and for notification of emergency personnel by all response organizations; the content of initial and followup messages to response organizations and the public has been established; and means to pro-vide early notification and clear instruction to the populace within the plume exposure pathway Emergency Planning Zone have been established.
Synopsis:
Procedures are established which describe mutually agreeable bases for notification of response organizations consistent with the emergency classification and action level scheme.
Procedures for alerting, notifying and mobilizing emergency response personnel are established.
The contents of the initial emergency messages to be sent from the plant are established.
Provisions are made for follow-up messages from the facility to of fsite authorities.
The administrative and physical means for notifying and providing prompt instructions to the public within the plume exposure pathway EPZ are established.
The licensee will provide supporting information for the protective action messages to be communicated to the public by local authorities.
Evaluation: The plan satisfies Planning Standard E except as noted.
Criterion 4: The forms and specific contents of the followup messages are not described.
Criterion 7: The formats of the public messages are not described.
N
)
f
)
PAGE:
9 t'
Diablo Canyon F. EMERGENCY COMMUNICATIONS Planning Standard Provisions exist for prompt communications among principal response organiza-tions to emergency personnel and to the public.
Synopsis:
24-hour notification to and activation of the State / local emergency response network are provided.
Communications with contiguous State / local governments within the EPZs are provided.
Communications as needed with Federal emergency response organizations are provided.
Communications between the plant, the EOF, local EOCs and radiological monitoring teams are provided.
The alerting or activating of emergency personnel is provided for.
Communications by licensee with NRC Headquarters and NRC Regional Of fice EOCs are provided.
A communication link for fixed and mobile medical support facilities exists.
Periodic testings of communications systems are provided.
Evaluation: The plan satisfies Planning Standard F.
C
f
)
PAGE:
10 r
Diablo Canyon C. PUBLIC EDUCATION AND IFFORMATION Planning Standad Information is made available to the public on a periodic basis on how they will be notified and what their initial actions should be in an emergency (e.g., listening to a local broadcast station and remaining indoors), the principal points of contact with the news media for dissemination of informa-tion during an emergency (including the physical location or locations) are established in advance, and procedures for coordinated dissemination of in-formation to the public are established.
Synopsis:
A coordinated yearly dissemination of information to the public regarding how they will be notified and what their actions shculd be in an emergency is provided.
Provisions are made for written material that is likely to be available in a residence during an emergency and for written material that is likely ta be available to any transient population.
The points of contact and physical locations for use by news -media during an emergency (Emergency Response Pedia Center) are designated.
The PG&E Corporate Emergency Response Plan identifies the Media Center Manager as the Company Spokesperson at the Cresta College Media Center.
Arrangements for timely exchange of information among designated spokes-persons are established.
Provisions have been made for coordinated arrangements for dealing with rumors.
Anaual programs to acquaint news media with the emergency plans, informa-tion concerning radiation and points of contact for release of public in-formation in an emergency are provided.
Evaluation: The plan satisfies Planning Standard G except as noted.
Crite,rion 1:
The special needs of the handicapped are not addressed.
Criterion 3b: The licensee's EOF is a small, temporary facility.
News media briefings will be conducted at the Emergency Response Media Center at Cresta College.
[PJAC3E: 11
(
Diablo Canyon H. EMERGENCY FACILITIES AND EQUIPMENT Planning Standard Adequate emergency facilities and equipment to support the emergency response are provided and maintained.
Synopsis:
Onsite monitoring systems are identified including geophysical phenomena, radiological and process monitors as well as fire and combusion detectors.
Facilities and equipment for offsite monitoring are identified including geophysical, radiological and laboratory facilities. Provisions have been made for offsi?.e radiological monitoring equipment to be near the plant.
The plan appears to meet the criteria in Appendix 2 of NUREG-0654 con-cerning meteorological instrumentation and procedures.
An instrurent surveillance, testing, and maintenance program has been established. A listing of emergency equipment and supplies is given in the plan.
Evaluation:
The plan satisfies Planning Standard H except as noted.
Criterion 1: A Technical Support Center snd onsite Operations Support Center have been established; however there is insuf ficient information to determine whether the TSC and OSC meet NUREG-0696 requirements.
Criterion 2: An Emergency Operations Pacility (EOF) has been established; h owever, there is insufficient information to determine whether the EOF meets NUREG-0696 requirements.
Criterion Sa: Hydraulic monitors are not identified in the plan.
Criterion 5b: Wound monitors are not addressed in the plan.
Criterion 6a:
Hydraulic monitoring is not addressed.
Criterion 6b:
The Diablo Canyon Plan does not state that onsite dosimetry meets the NRC Radiological Assessment Branch Technical Position for the Environmental Monitoring Program.
Criterion 12:
The plan does not clearly specify that a central point has been established for the receipt and analysis of field monitoring data.
Nw-
)
f 3
PJAC3E:
12 r
Diablo Canyon I. ACCIDENT ASSESSME_NT Planning Standard Adequate method, systems, and equipment for assessing and monitoring actual or potential offsite consequences of a radiological emergency condition are in use.
Synopsis:
The plan discusses onsite capability and resources to provide assessment ot' radiological releases during the course of an accident.
The plan describes a computer system, Zmergency Assess and Response System (EARS) which inputs data from onsite and of fsite monitors to a central site-based minicomputer for data aquistica and dispersion dose calcula-tions.
s A description of the capability and resources for field monitoring on and of fsite is provided in the Diablo Canyon Emergency Plan.
Evaluation: The plan satisfies Planning Standard I except as noted.
Criterica 1: This criterion is sctisfied except as noted in Planning Standard D.
Criterion 3: The plan should provide more information on methods and techniques for determining the source term of releases of radioactive material within plant systems.
Criterion 8: The plan does not clearly specify means of notification, field team composition, transportation, communication, and estimated deployment times of the field monitoring teams.
Criterion 9: The plan states that radiciodine concentrations can be measured in the range of 1X10E-09 and IX10E-6 pCi/cc. This range is not adequate.
In addition, interference from the presence of noble gas and background radiation is not addressed.
Criterion 10: The plan does not discuss established means for rclating measured parameters to dose rates for key isotopes and gross radioactivity measurements.
s
PAGE:
13 r
Diablo Canyon J. PROTECTIVE RESPONSE Planning Standard A range of protective actions have been developed for the plume exposure pathway EPZ for emergency workers and the public. Guidelines for the choice of protective actions during an emergency, consistent with federal guidance, are developed and in place, and protective actions for the ingestion exposure pathway EPZ appropriate to the locale have been developed.
Synopsis:
The Dicblo Canyon Emergency Plan describes the means and time required to warn all onsite individuals of an emergency.
The licensee has p ovided for radiological monitoring of people evacuated from the site.
Ncn-essential personnel will be evacuated from the site during a Site or General Emergency, and in some cases, during a Site Alert.
All site personnel are to be accounted for within 30 minutes.
Individuals remaining onsite will be provided with protective clothing, respiratory protection and radieprotective drugs if the.need arises.
The plan contains evacuation time estimates which appear to be in accordance with Appendix 4 of NUREG-0654.
In addition, maps of evacuation routes and population distributions are in the plan.
Evaluation: The plan satisfies Planning Standard J except as noted.
Criterion 2: The means of evacuating onsite personnel are not clear. The plan implies that individuals will leave in their own vehicle. No provision is made for persons without personal transportation.
Criterion 10a:
Radiological sampling stations are not identified on the map with evacuation routes; however, the sites are identified in the plan.
Criterion 10c: Means for notifying all segments of the transient and resident population are not identified. The plan states that this is the County's esponsibility and the means of notification are stated in the County Plan.
Criterion 10m: The plan does ot address expected local protection af forded in residential units or other shelters.
N
)
PAGE:
14
(
Diablo Canyon K. RADIOLOGICAL EXPOSURE CONTROL Planning Standard Means for controlling radiological exposures, in an emergency, are established for emergency workers. The means for controlling radiological exposures shall incluce exposure guidelines consistent with EPA Emergency Worker and Life-saving Activity Protective Action Guides.
Synopsin:
The plan identifies exposure guidelines for removal of injured persons, undertaking corrective actions, providing first aid, and performing personnel decontamination.
The licensee has an onsite radiation protection program which will be implemented during emer gencies.
The Emcrgency Coordinctor can authorize emergency workers to receive doses in excess of 10 CFR Part 20 limits.
Provisions have been made for issuing personnel dosimetry and maintaining dose records for emergency records.
Means for decontamination of onsite personnel and offsite relocated personnel have been provided for.
Contamination control is addressed in the plan.
Evaluation: The plan satisfies Planning Standard K except as noted.
Criterion le g: Onsite exposure guidelines were not discussed for performing personnel deccatamination, providing ambulance service or providing medical services.
Criterion 2: The plan does not address procedur~es for permitting onsite volunteers to receive radiation exposures in the course of carrying out lifesaving and other emergency activities.
Criterion Sa: The emergency pisn does not state the action Icvels for determining the need for decontamination; however, levels have been established.
Criterion 7:
The plan does not address provisions for extra clothing for relocated onsite personnel that may be contaminated.
]
(
Ps4(3E:
15 f~
Diablo Canyon L. MEEICAL AND PUBLIC REALTH SUPPORT Planning Standard Arrangements are made for medical services for centaminated injured indivi-duals.
Synopsis:
Local and backup hospital and medical services having the appropriate capabilities are arranged for.
Onsite first sid capability is provided.
Arrangements have been made to transport victims of radiological accidents to medical support facilities.
Evaluation: The plan satisfies Planning Standard L.
,/
f 3
PAGE:
16 f'
Diablo Canyon M. RECOVERY AND REENTRY PLANNING AND POST-ACCIDENT OPERATIONS Planning Standard General plans for recovery and reentry are developed.
Synopsis:
General plans and procedures for reentry and recovery are developed, and the means are described by which decisions to relax protective measures are reached.
The structure, functions and membership of the facility recovery organiza-tion are described.
Evaluation:
The plan satisfied Planning Standard M except as noted.
Criterion 2:
Figure 9.2.1, referred to in the plan, {s not contained in the plan.
Criterion 3:
No means for informing members of response organizations that a recovery operation is to be initiated ate specified.
Criterion 4: No method for periodically estimating total population exposure is discussed.
)
[P;4(3 E:
17
(~
Diablo Canyon N. EXERC,ISES AND DRILLS Planning Standard Periodic exercises are (will be) conducted to evaluate major portions of.
emergency response capabilities, periodic drills are (will be) conducted to develop and maintain key skills, and deficiencies identified as a result of exercises or drills are (will be) corrected.
Synopsis:
An emergency preparedness exercise that simulates an cuergency thst
'n results in of fsite radiological releases is provided.
The annual exercise will include mobilization of' State and local personneI' and resources.
Critiques of all scheduled exercises will be held soon after'the comple-tion of the exercise.
m The scenarios will be varied from. year to year as will st arting~ t t es for the exercises. Variations in weather con,ditions and pre-announcement will also be included.
Required communications drills are provided.
Fire drills will be conducted quarterly.
5 Required medical drills are included.
Required radiological monitoring drills are provided.
Required health physics drills are included.
The scenarios for use in exercises and drills include the required information.
A critique by official observers, resulting in a formal evaluation is provided.
Organizational means for evaluating the results of the post-exercise critique and implementing corrective actions are established.
Evaluation: The plan satisfies Planning Standard N.
N
)
s-
[PAGE:
\\
18 Diablo Canyon O. RADIOLOGICAL 34ERGENCY RESPONSE TRAINING Planning Standard Radiological emergency response training is provided to those who may be I
- called on to assist in an emergency.
Synopsi'si~
~
Plant personnel, participate in a program of lectures, demonstrations, written assignments, and drills designed to familiarize them with fire protection procedures, first aid techniques, radiation protection principles, and their actions in the event of a plant emergency.
During practical - drills on-the-spot corrections are made by the drill instructor for erroneous performance.
Corporate support personnel are provided with special training when persons are required to fulfill new or unique tasks.
PG&E provides supplemental training to suppott agencies on radiation protection, of fsite monitoring and other topics related to the Emergency Plan.
Evaluation:
The plan satisfies Planning Standard D except as noted.
Criterion 3: The plan does not state that first aid training is equivalent to Red Cross Multi-Media.
Criterion 4a: Training for directions or coordination of the response organi-zations is not specifically addressed.
Criterion 4d: Training of security personnel is not stated.
Criterion 4e: A training program for onsite repair and damage control correc-tion teams is not addressed.
Criterion 4g: Training for the Civil Defense / Emergency Service is not specified.
Criterion 4j: Training for communications is not addressed.
Criterion 5: Annual retraining of personnel with emergency response duties is not specified.
f D
PAGE:
19 r~
Diablo Canyon P. RESPGNSIBILITY FOR THE PLANNING EFFORT:
DEVELOPMENT, PERIODIC REVIEW AND DISTRIBUTION OF EMERGENCY PLANS Elanning Standard Respons.bilities for plan developdent and review and for distribution of emergency plans are established, and planners are properly trained.
Synopsis:
The Vice President, Nuclear Power Generation, is the individual charged
~
with overall authority and responsibility for radiological emergency response planning.
The emergency planning function is the responsibility of the Technical Assistant to the Plant Manager.
Periodic revisions of the plan as needed, including changes identified by drills and exercises are provided.
Provisions are made for the distribution of plans and approved chsnges to all organizations and appropriate individuals.
Supporting emergency plans are listed.
A listing of implementation procedures is included.
A. table of contents is provided, together with a cross-reference to the criteria of NUREG-0654.
Independent reviews of the emergency preparedness program are provided.
Quarterly updating of telephone numbers in emergency procedures is provided.
Evaluation: The plan satisfies Planning Standard P except as noted.
Criterion 1: Training for individuals responsible for the planning effort is not discussed.
1
VI:ITED Sil.HS CT : T ::n
!!UCLEAR REGULATORY CO" *:SSION BEFORE THE ATOMIC SAFETY A!.D LICENSING BOARD In the Matter of
)
PACIFIC GAS A!!D ELECTRIC COMPANY Docket Nos. 50-275 0.L.
50-323 0.L.
(Diablo Canyon Nuclear Power Plant Uait !!os.1 and 2 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify th'at copies of."NRC STAFF SUPPLEMENTAL RESPONSE TO JOINT INTERVENOR'S INTERROGATORIES" in the above-captioned proceeding have been served on the following as indicated below, this 13th day of January,1982:
- NRC Internal Mail
- Express Mail
- Delivery b[ Messenger
- United States Mail, First Class John F. L'olf, Esq., Chairman Richard E. Blankenburg ****
Administrative Judge Co-publisher Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Wayne A. Soroyan, News Reporter U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission South County Publishing Company Washington, D.C. '20555
- P.O. Box 460 Arroyo Grande, California 93420 Glenn 0. Bright, Er.q.
Administrative Judge Atomic Safety and Licensing Board U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comission Washington, D.C.
20555
- Dr. Jerry Kline Mr. Gordon Silver ****
Administrative Judge Mrs. Sandra A. Silver Atomic Safety and Licensing Board 1760 Alisal Street U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Washington, D.C.
20555
- Arthur C. Gehr, Esq. ****
Elizabeth Apfelberg****
Snell & Wilmer 1415 Cozadero 3100 Valley Center San Luis Obispo, California 93401 Phoenix, Arizona 95073 Philip A. Crane, Jr., Esq.
Paul C. " Valentine, Esq. ****
Pacific Gas and Electric Company 321 Lytton Avenue P.O. Box 7442 Palo Alto, California 94302 San Francisco, California 94120 ***,
Bruce Norton, Esq.
Mr. Frederick Eissler****
3216 North 3rd Street Scenic Shoreline Preservation Suite 202 Conference, Inc..
Phoenix, Arizona 85012***
4623 More Mesa. Drive Santa Barbara, California 93105 Andrew Baldwin, Esq. ****
124 Spear Street Mrs. Raye Fleming ****
San Francisco, California 94105 1920 Mattie Road Shell Beach, California 93449
Atomic Safety and Licensing Appeal Panel Joel R. Reynolds, Esq. ***
U.S. fluclear Regulatory Commission John R. Phillips, Esq.
Washington, D.C.
20555
- Center for Law in the Public Interest Atcmic Safety and Licensing Board 10951 West Pico Boulevard Panel.
Third Floor U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Los Angeles, CA 90064 Washington, D.C.
20555
- Byron S. Georgiou****
Docketing and Service Section Legal Affairs Secretary U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Governor's Office Washington, D.C.
20555
- State Capitol ~
Sacramento, California 95814 Mark Gottlieb****
California Energy Comission Dav.id_S. Fleischaker, Esq. ***
MS-18 P. 0. B_o_x _.l l 78 1111 Howe Avenue OklahomLa CitL. Oklahoma 73101 Sacramento, California 95825 Richard B. Hubbard****
MHB Technical Associates 1723 Hamilton Avenue - Suite K San Jose, California 95125 John Marrs, Managing Editor ****
San Luis Obispo County Telegram-Tribuoe 1321 Johns ~on Avenue P.O. Box 112 San Luis Obispo, California 93406 Herbert H. Brown & Larry Lanphar***
Hill, Christopher & Phillips, P.C.
1900 M Street,fl.W.
Washington, D.C.
20036 ***
Harry M. Willis****
Seymour & Willis 601 California St., Suite 2100 San Francisco, California 94108 Janice E. Kerr, Esq. ****
Lawrence Q. Carcia, Esq.
i 350 McAllister Street l
San Francisco, California 94102 I
Mr. James 0. Schuyler ****
t t!uclear Projects Engineer Pacific Gas and Electric Company
[
Pa<
77 Beale Street 581 Francisco, California 941C5 Donald F. Hassell Counsel for tiRC Staff