ML20006G117

Motion for Reconsideration of Time Extension.* Petitioners Ask That Board Reconsider 900208 Request for Extension of Time Until 900305 to File Amended Petition & Contentions Based on Parties Agreement.Certificate of Svc Encl

ML20006G117
Person / Time
Site:	Turkey Point
Issue date:	02/21/1990
From:	Saporito T NUCLEAR ENERGY ACCOUNTABILITY PROJECT
To:	Atomic Safety and Licensing Board Panel
References
CON-#190-9980 90-602-01-OLA-5, 90-602-1-OLA-5, OLA-5, NUDOCS 9003050073
Download: ML20006G117 (3)

Text

- ._. _ _ _ _

i. i h f) J i LOCKElED c

USNP.C i

L -

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA l NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 10 fab 27. A9 52 ATOMIC SAFETY AND LICENSING BOARD L

c,r HCE GI EECC.'A,'N Before Administrative Judges i Peter B. Bloch, Chair DOCKII$*lhdN]"

l

[ Dr. George C. Anderson L Elizabeth B. Johnson

('

r In the Hatter of ) Docket Nos. 50-250-OLA-5 L

) 50-251-OLA-5 FLORIDA POWER & LIGHT ) ,

! COMPANY ) ~ Technical Specifications lurkey Point Plant ) Replacement (Unit Nos. 3 and 4) )

) ASLBP No. 90-602-01-OLA-5 -

Facility Operating )

Licenses Nos. OPR-31, DPR-41) February 21, 1990

)

MQTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF TIME EXTENSION On February 8, 1990, Petitioners Thomas J. Saporito, Jr.,

and the Nuclear Energy Accountability Project requested an extension of time within which to file an amended petition and contentions. The requested extension was from February 20, 1990 to March 20, 1990.

On February 17, 1990, Petitioners received the Board's MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting Petitioners an extension of time but only until March 1, 1990.

Pursuant to the suggestion of the Board, in their February 14, 1990 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER granting the partial (Extension of Time), in the footnote at page 2, Petitioners contacted the Applicant through their counsel John Butler, Esq. and also the NRC Staff counsel, Janice Moore, Esq. and Patricia Jehle, Esq.

concerning a further extension of time until March 5, 1990 in which Petitioners could file their amended petition and 9003050073 900221 )D603 >

PDR ADOCK 05000250 v O PDR

e h:

e t

contentions.

All parties agreed to the extension of time and to the alternative schedule for the Board's consideration as delineated below:

e Date: Event:

March 5, 1990 Petitioners File Amended Petition 1/

March 19, 1990 Applicant Files Response 1/

NRC Staff Files Response 1/

l March 22, 1990 Limited Appearance Session March 23, 1990 Prehearing Conference Since all parties have agreed to the above schedule,

, Petitioners ask that the Board reconsider Petitioners request for an extension of time until March 5, 1990 to file their amended petition and contentions.

I l

l l:

1/ The term " file" means that the document must be in the hands of the Board and the parties on the date specified, or that the document is placed in the hands of an overnight delivery service.

2 -

i

, C. .

lf (3.

V i I. ' ;c  ;

i Additionally, Petitioners will- place their best efforts forward to meet with the Applicant, in the spirt of cooperation, to dir, cuss technical concerns relevant to these proceedings in a good faith attempt to narrow the issues at hand.

-l j

s Respectfully submitted,

"*A C/ , 4 ::S ~q g Thomas J. Saporito, Jr.

Executive Director, NEAP 1202 Sioux Street i Jupiter, Florida 33458 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that copies of the foregoing MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION FOR TIME EXTENSION, have been served upon the-following persons by U.S. mail, first class.

Peter B. Bloch, Chair ASLB Patricia Jehle, Esq.

U.S. Nuclear: Regulatory Comm. Office of the General Councel Washington, D.C. 20555 -U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

Washington, D.C. 20555 George C. Anderson j 7719 Ridge Drive, NE Steven F. Franz, Esq.

Seattle, Washington 98115 Newman & Holtringer, P.C.

1615 L Street, NW ElizabethBJlohnson Washington, D.C. 20036 Oak Ridge National Laboratory 1 P.O. Box X, Building 3500 Atomic Safety and Licensing Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830 Appeal Board

) l U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Comm.

Washington, D.C. 20555 l f Executive Directqpi NEAP 3 -

1