ML062790242

From kanterella
Revision as of 14:26, 23 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search

RAI Related to Safety Limit Minimum Critical Power Ratio
ML062790242
Person / Time
Site: Dresden Constellation icon.png
Issue date: 10/12/2006
From: John Honcharik
NRC/NRR/ADRO/DORL/LPLIII-2
To: Crane C
Exelon Generation Co
honcharik , J NRR/DORL, 415-1157
References
TAC MD2706
Download: ML062790242 (5)


Text

October 12, 2006 Mr. Christopher M. Crane, President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555

SUBJECT:

DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 3 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO SAFETY LIMIT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (TAC NO. MD2706)

Dear Mr. Crane:

By letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated July 21, 2006, Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a request to revise the technical specifications to provide a cycle-specific safety limit minimum critical power ratio (SLMPCR) for operation of Dresden Nuclear Power Station (DNPS) Unit 3, Cycle 20.

The NRC staff is reviewing your submittal and has determined that additional information is required to complete the review. The specific information requested is addressed in the enclosure to this letter. During a discussion with your staff on October 12, 2006, it was agreed that you would provide a response within 10 days from the date of this letter.

The NRC staff considers that timely responses to requests for additional information help ensure sufficient time is available for staff review and contribute toward the NRCs goal of efficient and effective use of staff resources. If circumstances result in the need to revise the requested response date, please contact me at (301) 415-1157.

Sincerely,

/RA R. Kuntz for/

John Honcharik, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-249

Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: See next page

October 12, 2006 Mr. Christopher M. Crane, President and Chief Nuclear Officer Exelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555

SUBJECT:

DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 3 - REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION RELATED TO SAFETY LIMIT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO (TAC NO. MD2706)

Dear Mr. Crane:

By letter to the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) dated July 21, 2006, Exelon Generation Company, LLC submitted a request to revise the technical specifications to provide a cycle-specific safety limit minimum critical power ratio (SLMPCR) for operation of Dresden Nuclear Power Station (DNPS) Unit 3, Cycle 20.

The NRC staff is reviewing your submittal and has determined that additional information is required to complete the review. The specific information requested is addressed in the enclosure to this letter. During a discussion with your staff on October 12, 2006, it was agreed that you would provide a response within 10 days from the date of this letter.

The NRC staff considers that timely responses to requests for additional information help ensure sufficient time is available for staff review and contribute toward the NRCs goal of efficient and effective use of staff resources. If circumstances result in the need to revise the requested response date, please contact me at (301) 415-1157.

Sincerely,

/RA R. Kuntz for/

John Honcharik, Project Manager Plant Licensing Branch III-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Docket No. 50-249

Enclosure:

Request for Additional Information cc w/encl: See next page DISTRIBUTION:

PUBLIC LPL3-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl3-2 RidsNrrPMJHoncharik RidsNrrLADClarke RidsAcrsAcnwMailCenter RidsOgcRp RidsRgn3MailCenter RidsNrrDorlDpr RidsNrrDssSbwb BParks ADAMS Accession Number: ML062790242 *Concurred via email 10/4/06.

OFFICE LPL3-2/PM LPL3-2/LA* SBWB/BC LPL3-2/BC NAME JHoncharik;mw DClarke GCranston DCollins (RKuntz for)

DATE 10/12/06 10/12/2006 10/4/06 10/12/06 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY

Dresden Nuclear Power Unit 3 cc:

Site Vice President - Dresden Senior Vice President - Midwest Operations Exelon Generation Company, LLC Exelon Generation Company, LLC 6500 N. Dresden Road 4300 Winfield Road Morris, IL 60450-9765 Warrenville, IL 60555 Plant Manager - Dresden Nuclear Power Station Director - Licensing & Regulatory Affairs Exelon Generation Company, LLC Exelon Generation Company, LLC 6500 N. Dresden Road 4300 Winfield Road Morris, IL 60450-9765 Warrenville, IL 60555 Manager Regulatory Assurance - Dresden Vice President - Regulatory & Legal Affairs Exelon Generation Company, LLC Exelon Generation Company, LLC 6500 N. Dresden Road 4300 Winfield Road Morris, IL 60450-9765 Warrenville, IL 60555 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Assistant General Counsel Dresden Resident Inspectors Office Exelon Generation Company, LLC 6500 N. Dresden Road 200 Exelon Way Morris, IL 60450-9766 Kennett Square, PA 19348 Chairman Manager Licensing - Dresden Grundy County Board Exelon Generation Company, LLC Administration Building 4300 Winfield Road 1320 Union Street Warrenville, IL 60555 Morris, IL 60450 Regional Administrator, Region III U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Suite 210 2443 Warrenville Road Lisle, IL 60532-4351 Illinois Emergency Management Agency Division of Disaster Assistance &

Preparedness 110 East Adams Street Springfield, IL 62701-1109 Document Control Desk - Licensing Exelon Generation Company, LLC 4300 Winfield Road Warrenville, IL 60555

REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION SAFETY LIMIT MINIMUM CRITICAL POWER RATIO DRESDEN NUCLEAR POWER STATION, UNIT 3 DOCKET NO. 50-249 In reviewing the Exelon Generation Company LLCs (Exelons) submittal dated July 21, 2006, related to a request to revise the technical specifications to provide a cycle-specific safety limit minimum critical power ratio (SLMPCR) for operation of Dresden Nuclear Power Station, (DNPS) Unit 3, Cycle 20, the NRC staff has determined that the following information is needed in order to complete its review:

1. Section 2.0 of Attachment 4 to the July 21, 2006, submittal provides a justification on why the GE14 fuel analysis for Cycle 19 remains applicable and bounding for Cycle 20 operation. However, the NRC staff needs additional clarifying information concerning how the fact that "the SLMCPR was established by contributions from GE14 fuel assemblies during Cycle 19" provides an adequate basis for concluding that the minimum critical power ratio for once-burned GE14 fuel assemblies remains valid.

(RAI Category 2.c)

ENCLOSURE

RAI CATEGORIES (Select only one, most dominant category for each RAI question)

1. More information is needed because of:
a. complexity of request
b. first-of-a-kind nature of request
c. NRC change in regulatory significance or focus
d. NRC questions on previously used methodology or guidance
e. licensee change to previously used methodology
f. licensee reduction in current safety margin
2. The review can not be completed without additional explanation or clarification of:
a. input variables or analytical assumptions
b. methodology used or results obtained
c. applicability or bounding nature of third party analyses or data correlations
d. differences from NRC guidance documents (SRP, RG, etc.)
e. no significant hazards consideration discussion
f. environmental considerations discussion
g. applicable regulatory requirements discussion
h. information that appears to be incorrect and needs to be corrected
i. response to previous RAI appears inadequate
3. Reviewer requesting information even though the question is, or the question asks for:
a. not directly related to the request
b. inconsistent with applicable codes, standards, RGs, or SRP sections
c. information accessible from readily available sources and was explicitly referenced
d. information does not appear needed given the precedent cases discussed in the request
e. information that is not safety significant or pertinent to the regulatory finding
f. information that is known to engineers who work in the general technical area
g. going beyond the current licensing basis and doesnt need to be asked
h. a formal commitment
4. Other (please specify)