ML12164A330
| ML12164A330 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Kewaunee  |
| Issue date: | 06/11/2012 |
| From: | Ann Marie Stone NRC/RGN-III/DRS/EB2 |
| To: | Heacock D Dominion Energy Kewaunee |
| References | |
| IR-12-009 | |
| Download: ML12164A330 (8) | |
See also: IR 05000305/2012009
Text
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
REGION III
2443 WARRENVILLE ROAD, SUITE 210
LISLE, IL 60532-4352
June 11, 2012
Mr. David A. Heacock
President and Chief Nuclear Officer
Dominion Energy Kewaunee, Inc.
Innsbrook Technical Center
5000 Dominion Boulevard
Glen Allen, VA 23060-6711
SUBJECT: KEWAUNEE POWER STATION REQUEST FOR INFORMATION FOR AN
NRC TRIENNIAL BASELINE COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
(CDBI) INSPECTION REPORT 05000305/2012009(DRS)
Dear Mr. Heacock:
On October 1, 2012, the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) will begin a triennial
baseline Component Design Bases Inspection (CDBI) at your Kewaunee Power Station.
A team of six inspectors will perform this 3-week inspection. This inspection will be performed
in accordance with NRC Baseline Inspection Procedure (IP) 71111.21.
The CDBI focuses on the design, maintenance, and operation of risk significant components
associated with one or more accident scenarios. The components to be reviewed during this
baseline inspection will be identified during the in-office preparation week that occurs prior to the
first on-site inspection week. In addition, operating experience issues, associated with the
component samples, will also be selected for review.
The inspection will include three weeks on-site. The inspection team will consist of six NRC
inspectors, of which five will focus on engineering/maintenance, one on operations. The current
inspection schedule is as follows:
On-site weeks: October 1 through 5, 2012;
October 15 through 19, 2012; and
October 29 through November 2, 2012.
The team will be preparing for the inspection, mainly during the week of September 24, 2012, as
discussed in the attached enclosure. A Region III Senior Reactor Analyst may accompany the
inspection team during the week of October 1, 2012, to review probabilistic risk-assessment
data, and assist in identifying risk significant components and/or specific component functions,
which will be reviewed during the inspection.
D. Heacock -2-
Experience with previous baseline design inspections of similar depth and length has shown
that this type of inspection is extremely resource intensive, both for the NRC inspectors and the
licensee staff. In order to minimize the inspection impact on the site and to ensure a productive
inspection for both parties, we have enclosed a request for information needed for the
inspection.
It is important that all of these documents are up to date and complete in order to minimize the
number of additional documents requested during the preparation and/or the on-site portions of
the inspection. Insofar as possible, this information should be provided electronically to the lead
inspector. The information request has been divided into three groups:
- The first group lists information necessary for our initial inspection scoping activities.
This information should be provided to the lead inspector no later than August 20, 2012.
By September 10, 2012, the lead inspector will communicate the initial selected set of
approximately 20 components.
- The second group is needed to support our in-office preparation activities. This set of
documents, including the calculations associated with the initial selected components,
should be provided to the lead inspector at the Regional Office no later than
September 17, 2012. During the in-office preparation activities, the team may identify
additional information needed to support the inspection.
- The last group includes the additional information mentioned above, as well as plant
specific reference material. This information should be available to the team on-site on
October 1, 2012. It is also requested that corrective action documents and/or questions
developed during the inspection be provided to the lead inspector as the documents are
generated.
The lead inspector for this inspection is Mr. George M. Hausman. We understand that our
licensing contact for this inspection is Mr. Richard P. Repshas of your organization. If there are
any questions about the inspection or the material requested in the enclosure, please contact
the lead inspector at (630) 829-9743 or via e-mail at GeorgeHausman@nrc.gov.
This letter does not contain new or amended information collection requirements subject to the
Paperwork Reduction Act of 1995 (44 U.S.C. 3501 et seq.). Existing information collection
requirements were approved by the Office of Management and Budget, control number 3150-
0011. The NRC may not conduct or sponsor, and a person is not required to respond to, a
request for information or an information collection requirement unless the requesting document
displays a currently valid Office of Management and Budget control number.
D. Heacock -3-
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and
its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document
Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Ann Marie Stone, Chief
Engineering Branch 2
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 50-305
License No. DPR-43
Enclosure: Component Design Bases Inspection Document Request
cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ'
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
DOCUMENT REQUEST
Inspection Report: 05000305/2012009(DRS)
Inspection Procedure: Inspection Procedure (IP) 71111.21 Component Design Bases
Inspection
Inspection Dates: October 1 through 5, 2012; October 15 through 19, 2012; and
October 29 through November 2, 2012
Lead Inspector: George M. Hausman, Lead Inspector
(630) 829-9743
George.Hausman@nrc.gov
I. Information Requested Prior to the On-Site Information Gathering/Inspection
Week
The following information is requested by August 20, 2012, or sooner, to facilitate
inspection preparation. If you have any questions regarding this information, please call
the team leader as soon as possible. (Please provide the information electronically in
pdf files, Excel, or other searchable formats, preferably on some portable electronic
media (e.g., CDROM, DVD, flash drive, etc.). The portable electronic media should
contain descriptive names, and be indexed and hyperlinked to facilitate ease of use.
Information in lists should contain enough information to be easily understood by
someone who has knowledge of light water reactor technology).
1. Risk ranking of top 250 components from your site specific probabilistic safety
analysis (PSA) sorted by Risk Achievement Worth (RAW). Include values for
Birnbaum Importance, Risk Reduction Worth (RRW), and Fussell-Veseley (FV)
(as applicable).
2. Risk ranking of top 100 containment-related components from your site specific
PSA sorted by Large Early Release Frequency (LERF).
3. Provide a list of the top 200 cut-sets from your PSA.
4. Provide a list of the top 100 cut-sets for each initiator modeled in the PSA that
contributes more than 5 percent to the baseline plant core damage frequency
(CDF).
5. Copies of PSA system notebooks and latest PSA summary document.
6. List of time critical operator actions. Identify those actions that do not have job
performance measures (JPMs).
7. Provide copies of the emergency operating procedures (EOPs).
1 Enclosure
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
DOCUMENT REQUEST
8. If you have an External Events or Fire PSA Model, provide the information
requested in Items 1 and 2 for external events and fire. Provide narrative
description of each coded event (including fire, flood zone description).
9. Electronic copy of the site IPEEE, if available.
10. Any pre-existing evaluation or list of components and associated calculations
with low design margins, (i.e., pumps closest to the design limit for flow or
pressure, diesel generator close to design required output, heat exchangers
close to rated design heat removal etc.).
11. List of available design (setup) margins in both the open and closed direction
(identify safety-related direction) for valves in the motor-operated valve (MOV)
and air-operated valve (AOV) programs. Identify the basis for how the margin
was determined.
12. List of high risk Maintenance Rule systems/components based on engineering or
expert panel judgment (i.e., those systems/components not identified in the
PRA).
13. Structures, systems, and components (SSCs) in the Maintenance Rule (a)(1)
category for the last three years.
14. Site top ten issues list (if applicable).
15. A list of operating experience evaluations for the last three years.
16. Information of any common cause failure of components experienced in the last
five years at your facility.
17. List of Root Cause Evaluations associated with component failures or design
issues initiated/completed in the last five years.
18. List of open operability evaluations.
19. List of components/systems considered operable but degraded/nonconforming.
20. Current management and engineering organizational chart.
21. Electronic copies of Updated Final Safety Analysis Report, Technical
Specifications, Technical Specifications Bases, and Technical Requirements
Manual.
22. Major one line electrical drawings (ac and dc) and key diagrams (paper copies).
23. Electronic copy of P&IDs (if available).
2 Enclosure
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
DOCUMENT REQUEST
II. Information Requested (for the approx. 20 selected components) to be Available
by September 17, 2012, (will be reviewed by the team in the Regional Office during
the week of September 24, 2012)
This information should be separated for each selected component, especially if
provided electronically (e.g., folder with component name that includes calculations,
condition reports, maintenance history, etc.).
1. List of condition reports (corrective action documents) associated with each of
the selected components for the last four years.
2. The maintenance history (corrective, preventive, and elective) associated with
each of the selected components for the last ten years. Identify the frequency of
preventive maintenance activities.
3. Copies of calculations associated with each of the selected components (if not
previously provided), excluding data files. Please review the calculations and
also provide copies of important referenced material (such as drawings,
engineering requests, and vendor letters).
4. System Health Reports, System Descriptions, Design Basis Documents, and/or
Training Lesson Plans, associated with each of the selected components.
5. A list of modifications, including equivalency evaluations and setpoint changes,
associated with each of the selected components. This list should include a
descriptive paragraph on the purpose of the modification. Please ensure this list
only includes design completed (not canceled) modifications.
6. Copies of operability evaluations (opened/closed for last three years) associated
with each of the selected components and plans for restoring operability, if
applicable.
7. Copies of selected operator work-around evaluations associated with each of the
selected components and plans for resolution, if applicable.
8. Copies of any open temporary modifications associated with each of the selected
components, if applicable.
9. Trend data on the selected electrical/mechanical components performance for
last three years; (For example, pumps performance including in-service testing,
other vibration monitoring, oil sample results, etc., for valves: stroke time and
leak rate results, etc.).
10. Copy of latest completed surveillance tests for each component (for example, for
pumps this would include: comprehensive test; quarterly test; flow balance etc.;
for valves: stroke time testing; diagnostic testing; and leak testing, etc.).
Acceptance criteria basis calculations should also be included.
3 Enclosure
COMPONENT DESIGN BASES INSPECTION
DOCUMENT REQUEST
11. Provide copies of the normal and abnormal operating procedures associated with
the selected components.
12. A copy of any internal/external self-assessments and associated corrective
action documents generated in preparation for the inspection.
13. A copy of engineering/operations related audits completed in the last two years.
III. Additional Information to be provided on October 1, 2012, on-site (for final
selected components)
During the in-office preparation activities, the team will be making final selections and
may identify additional information needed to support the inspection. The lead inspector
will provide a list of the additional information needed during the week of
September 24, 2012.
IV. Information Requested to be Provided Throughout the Inspection
1. Copies of any corrective action documents generated as a result of the teams
questions or queries during this inspection.
2. Copies of the list of questions submitted by the team members and the
status/resolution of the information requested (provide daily during the inspection
to each team member).
3. One complete set of P&IDs (paper copies).
4. Reference materials such as:
- IPE/PRA report;
- Procurement documents for components selected (verify retrievable);
- Plant procedures (normal, abnormal, emergency, surveillance, etc.); and
- Vendor manuals.
If you have questions regarding the information requested, please contact the lead inspector.
4 Enclosure
D. Heacock -3-
In accordance with 10 CFR 2.390 of the NRC's "Rules of Practice," a copy of this letter and
its enclosure will be available electronically for public inspection in the NRC Public Document
Room or from the Publicly Available Records System (PARS) component of NRC's Agencywide
Documents Access and Management System (ADAMS), accessible from the NRC Web site at
http://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm/adams.html (the Public Electronic Reading Room).
Sincerely,
/RA/
Ann Marie Stone, Chief
Engineering Branch 2
Division of Reactor Safety
Docket No. 50-305
License No. DPR-43
Enclosure: Component Design Bases Inspection Document Request
cc w/encl: Distribution via ListServ'
DISTRIBUTION:
RidsNrrDorlLpl3-1 Resource
RidsNrrPMKewaunee
RidsNrrDirsIrib Resource
Chuck Casto
Cynthia Pederson
DRPIII
DRSIII
Patricia Buckley
DOCUMENT NAME: Ltr 06-11-12 Kewaunee CDBI RFI GMH.docx
Publicly Available Non-Publicly Available Sensitive Non-Sensitive
To receive a copy of this document, indicate in the concurrence box "C" = Copy without attach/encl "E" = Copy with
attach/encl "N" = No copy
OFFICE RIII E RIII
NAME GHausman:ls AMStone
DATE 05/31/12 06/11/12
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY