ML13057A612

From kanterella
Revision as of 21:46, 4 November 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
NRC Meeting with Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC Briefing Slides on Oconee Site Flood Protection
ML13057A612
Person / Time
Site: Oconee  Duke Energy icon.png
Issue date: 11/05/2008
From:
Office of Information Services
To:
References
FOIA/PA-2012-0325
Download: ML13057A612 (3)


Text

".1 4jnf. "..

Oconee Site Flood Protection NRC Meeting with Duke Energy Carolinas, LLC November 5, 2008 r~jU.S.NRC ý_.r'R.ýtn.

Purpose

  • Discuss concerns with SSF licensing basis
  • Discuss short-term interim measures for ONS operation
  • Discuss a long-term solution to the question of flood protection at the ONS site
  • i-IU.S.NRC - se - ae mat2 offiuiat U-se oiiVy -Se/6uA eI'te44fo Fol~i 1

6f'ic I a0 y- ý cr* tl Iýn mi o Qllfat 'e t Concerns With SSF Licensing Basis SSF has protection against 5-ft or lower flood heights

- The only inundation study on record had calculated flood heights in excess of 5 feet

" NRC issued 10 CFR 50.54(f) letter

" Licensee response insufficient based on:

- Assertion that dam failures are not part of licensing basis

- Duke's response in dismissing various credible failure modes of Jocassee Dam

<ý*U ,S.NRC ýa Short-term Operation

  • Basis for continued operation

- Low initiating event frequency

- Accident sequence progression timelines

  • Additional information

- Plans for further modeling

- Interim guidance

- Bases for the proposed February 2009 modifications 1ýjU.S.NRC %u -bSei..t.y RIaorr kn off~ioiad UseQn`@\SecuLriWke'at ýdlnf~orml'al } 2 2n

KýficalU~se\ - Siecar-ityRela d lnf raOn-a I6I>

Long-term Operation

" Technical arguments in 10 CFR 50.54(f) response are, insufficient

- Argument on probabilities of failure inadequate

- Inundation study not sufficient for licensing basis

" Technical basis needs to be re-established

- Submittal from Duke in 1 year

- NRC review in 1 year

  • Analytical approach, if proposed, needs to follow current NRC guidance or have a clear basis for any deviation

" Engineered approach, if proposed, must have an adequate, conservative technical basis.

eQOI <>S RUetejin tmNR,

,Offi/ciUse n1-'Se e dn ai'ion 3