ML17332A244

From kanterella
Revision as of 12:45, 22 October 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(diff) ← Older revision | Latest revision (diff) | Newer revision → (diff)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Responds to Unresolved Item Noted in Insp Rept 50-315/94-04 Re Event on 940217 & 18 During Draining of Unit 1 RCS in Preparation for Refueling.Operators re-trained on PMI-4090 During 940328-0506 Training Cycle
ML17332A244
Person / Time
Site: Cook American Electric Power icon.png
Issue date: 08/09/1994
From: Fitzpatrick E
INDIANA MICHIGAN POWER CO. (FORMERLY INDIANA & MICHIG
To: Martin J
NRC OFFICE OF INFORMATION RESOURCES MANAGEMENT (IRM)
References
AEP:NRC:1212A1, NUDOCS 9408160233
Download: ML17332A244 (12)


Text

(ACCELERATED RIDS PROCESSli 4G)

REGULATORY INFORMATION DISTRIBUTION SYSTEM (RIDS)

ACCESSION NBR:9408160233 DOC.DATE: 94/08/09 NOTARIZED: YES DOCKET "ACIL:$0-315 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Power Plant, Unit 1, Indiana M 05000315 AUTf'.. NAME AUTHOR AFFILIATION ITZPATRICK,E. Indiana Michigan Power Co. (formerly Indiana & Michigan Ele RECIP.NAME RECIPIENT AFFILIATION MARTIN,J.B. Document Control Branch (Document Control Desk)

SUBJECT:

Responds to unresolved item noted in Insp Rept 50-315/94-04 re event on 940217 & 18 during draining of Unit 1 RCS in preparation for refueling. Operators re-trained on PMI-4090 during 940328-0506 training cycle.

DISTRIBUTION CODE: IE01D COPIES RECEIVED:LTR ENCL SIZE:

TITLE: General (50 Dkt)-Insp Rept/Notice of Vio ation Response NOTES:

RECIPIENT COPIES RECIPIENT COPIES ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL ID CODE/NAME LTTR ENCL PD3-1 PD 1 1 HICKMAN,J 1 1 1NTERNAL: AEOD/DEIB 1 1 AEOD/DSP/ROAB 1 1 AEOD/DSP/TPAB 1 1 AEOD/TTC 1 . 1 DEDRO 1 1 NRR/DORS/OEAB 1 1 NRR/DRCH/HHFB 1 1 NRR/PMAS/IRCB-E 1 1 NUDOCS-ABSTRACT 1 1 O~D1R 1 1 OGC/HDS2 1 1 G F 02 1 1 RES/HFB 1 1 3 FILE 01 1 1 ERNAL EG&G/BRYCE I J ~ H ~ 1 1 NRC PDR 1 1 NSIC 1 1 NOTE TO ALL"RIDS" RECIPIENTS:

PLEASE HELP US TO REDUCE WASTE! CONTACTTHE DOCUMENT CONTROL DESK, ROOM Pl-37 (EXT. 504-2083 ) TO ELIMIVATEYOUR NAME FROM DISTRIBUTIONLISTS FOR DOCUMEVTS YOU DON "I NEED!

TOTAL NUMBER OF COPIES REQUIRED: LTTR 19 ENCL 19

Indiana Michigan Power Company P.O. Box 16631 Columbus, OH 43216 INDINA NlCHIGAN POWER AEP:NRC:1212A1 10 CFR 2.201 Donald C. Cook Nuclear Plant Unit 1 Docket No. 50-315 License No. DPR-58 NRC INSPECTION REPORT NO. 50-315/94004(DRP)

REPLY TO REQUEST FOR WRITTEN RESPONSE TO UNRESOLVED ITEM:

RCS DRAINDOWN OPERATOR TRAINING U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk Washington, D. C. 20555 Attn: Mr. J. B. Martin August 9, 1994

Dear Mr. Martin:

This letter is in response to an unresolved item identified in Inspection Report 50-315/94004(DRP). The inspection report was written about an event which occurred on February 17 and 18, 1994, during draining of the Unit 1 reactor coolant system in preparation for refueling. The unresolved item (50-315/94004-03(DRP)) is regarding training operators for infrequently performed plant evolutions (in particular, the reactor coolant syst: em draining evolution as performed via procedure ~1-OHP 4021.002.005.) Our response to the unresolved item is contained in the attachment to this letter.

In addition, we take this opportunity to correct an apparent misinterpretation reflected in Inspection Report 50-315/94004(DRP). The third item in a list in Section 7, Page 12, "Licensee Immediate Corrective Actions," reads:

"A'dministrative controls for reactor coolant system operation at 'reduced inventory'ill be reviewed against lessons learned from this event and will be continuously reviewed against industry operating experience information."

The wording of the corrective action, as provided to the inspector at the exit meeting, was:

"Administrative controls governing reactor coolant system operation at 'reduced inventory'evels will be reviewed against lessons learned from the February 17-18 reactor coolant system indication/inventory event and will be rereviewed against industry operating experience information."

The intent of the corrective action was to "review again," i.e.,

to perform a single additional review; commit to continuous or multiple reviews.

it was not intended to 7 6."; I-r, 9408ih0233 940809 PDR Q

ADDCK 050003i5 PDR

~pl r i(

Mr. J. B. Martin AEP:NRC:1212A1 This letter is submitted pursuant to 10 CFR 50.54(f) and, as such, an oath statement is attached.

Sincerely, E. E. Fit atrick Vice President ar Attachments CC; A. A. Blind G. Charnoff NFEM Section Chief NRC Resident Inspector - Bridgman, MI NRC Resident Inspector - Big Rock Point Nuclear Plant J. R. Padgett W. T. Russell, NRC - Washington, D.C.

STATE OF OHIO)

COUNTY OF FRANKLIN)

E. E. Fitzpatrick, being duly sworn, deposes and says that he is the Vice President of licensee Indiana Michigan Power Company, that he has read the forgoing NRC Inspection Report No, 50-315/94004(DRP) REPLY TO REQUEST FOR WRITTEN RESPONSE TO UNRESOLVED ITEM: RCS DRAINDOWN OPERATOR TRAINING and knows the contents thereof; and that said contents are true to the best of his knowledge and belief.

Subscribed end sworn to before me this ~N day of NOTARY PUBLIC RITrE D. HILl TIOTARY PUBLIC. STATE OF OHIO

QS ATTACHMENT TO AEP: NRC: 1212A1 REPLY TO UNRESOLVED ITEM 50-315/94004-03

ATTACHMENT TO AEP:NRC:1212A1 Page 1 Inspection Report 50-315/94004(DRP) documents the conclusions of a special inspection performed in response to reactor level perturbations that occurred on February 17 anZ 18, 1994, during draining of the Unit 1 reactor coolant system. Section 5(b) of the report, entl.tied "Training,"

addresses reactor coolant system pressure, air eductor installation, reactor coolant system venting, loss of level indication, inventory draining, and the associated operator knowledge and actions. The third paragraph of this section establishes the inspectors'oncern with regard to operator training and .identifies the concern as an unresolved item.

Although the unresolved item is worded in generic terms, it was confirmed with one of the inspectors that the unresolved item is directed at the reactor coolant system draining evolution in particular. With regard to any potential generic concerns, guidance for training of infrequently performed evolutions is provided in PMI-4090. Operators were re-trained on PMI-4090 during the March 28 to May 6, 1994, training cycle.

Operation training was scheduled to strengthen operator knowledge of the reactor coolant system draining process, the associated procedure, instrumentation and system characteristics, and the difficulties experienced during the Unit 1 reactor coolant system draining activities.

A completion date of August 1, 1994, was originally scheduled to allow training of all operating crews prior to the commencement of the Unit 2 refueling outage. On April 19, 1994, however, Unit 1 was emerging from a refueling outage when a "motor differential trip" signal of reactor coolant pump ¹13 was received. It was determined that the Unit 1 reactor coolant 'system would have to be partially drained to facilitate repairs to the coolant pump. To support this activity, the planned operator training was provided ahead of schedule; between April 22 and April 27, 1994, all operating crews received this training.

The lesson plan has since been updated (Revision 1) to incorporate additional information about equipment and procedure changes, and is being presented again in operator requalification training, preparatory to the draindown evolutions in the upcoming Unit 2 refueling outage. This training is currently underway and is scheduled to be presented to all operating crews by September 9, 1994. Lesson Plan RQ-C-02Pl, "Draining RCS to Half Loop," provides training on:

(1) the August 5, 1993, RCS draining event documented in Condition Report CR-93-1267;,

(2) the February 17 and 18, 1994, RCS draining event documented in Condition Report CR-94-0281; (3) reactor vessel level indication, the importance of pressure interconnections, and the effect of valve operations on indicated and actual level; (4) steam generator tube drainage; (5) recent changes to the RCS draining procedure and the reasons for them; and (6) potential problems with alternate level indications.

We currently plan to incorporate this training in the replacement training program for new licensed operators.