ML101230627

From kanterella
Revision as of 03:42, 1 May 2019 by StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Submittal of Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009
ML101230627
Person / Time
Site: River Bend Entergy icon.png
Issue date: 04/30/2010
From: Lorfing D N
Entergy Operations
To:
Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
References
Download: ML101230627 (46)


Text

SEntergy Ah5 Entergy Operations, Inc.River Bend Station 5485 U.S. Highway 61 N St. Francisville, LA 70775 Tel 225381 4157 David N. Lorfing Manager-Licensing

'A C'April 30, 2010 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Document Control Desk 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738

Subject:

Radiological Envirdnmental Operating Report for 2009 River Bend Station -Unit 1 License No. NPF-47 Docket No. 50-458 File Nos.: G9.5, G9.25.1.5 RBG-47022 RBF1-10-0055

Dear Sir or Madam,

Enclosed is the River Bend Station (RBS) Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report for the period January 1, 2009, through December 31, 2009. This report is submitted in accordance with the RBS Technical Specifications, Section 5.6.2.Should you have any questions regarding the enclosed information, please contact Mr. David Lorfing at (225) 381-4157.Sincerely, David N. Lorfing DNL/tjb enclosure I iZ!Z~5 H/ZYC A Radiological Environmental Operating Report for 2009 Page 2 of 2 cc: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (w/o Enclosure)

Region IV 612 East Lamar Blvd., Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011-4125 NRC Resident Inspector (w/o Enclosure)

PO Box 1050 St. Francisville, LA 70775 Mr. Alan B. Wang, Project Manager U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission MS 0-8 B1 11555 Rockville Pike Rockville, MD 20852-2738

)

RIVER BEND STATION ANNUAL RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL OPERATING REPORT FOR 2009 Compiled By: Al_ Z,-._/ jq Victr A. Huffstatler Effluent & Environmental Monitoring Specialist Reviewed By: A 1 (4)V "Bradford L. Houston Manager -Radiation Protection Robert W. Heath Manager -Chemistry Approved By: Eric W. Olson General Manager Plant Operations TABLE OF CONTENTS

SUMMARY

1.0 INTRODUCTION

5 1.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program 5 1.2 Pathways Monitored 5 1.3 Land Use Census 5 2.0 INTERPRETATION AND TRENDS OF RESULTS 15 2.1 Air Particulate and Radiolodine Sample Results 15 2.2 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Sample Results 15 2.3 Water Sample Results 16 2.4 Sediment Sample Results 16 2.5 Milk Sample Results 17 2.6 Fish and Invertebrate Sample Results 17 2.7 Food Products Sample Results 17 2.8 Land Use Census Results 17 2.9 Interlaboratory Comparison.

Results 18 3.0 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

21 3.1 2009 Program Results Summary 21 i LIST OF TABLES TABLE 1.1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL SAMPLING PROGRAM 6 TABLE 2.1 LAND USE CENSUS RESULTS 19 TABLE 3.1 RADIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAM

SUMMARY

22 ii LIST OF FIGURES FIGURE 1-1 FIGURE 1-2 FIGURE 1-3 FIGURE 2-1 FIGURE 2-2 EXPOSURE PATHWAYS SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES -NEAR FIELD SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES -FAR FIELD TLD INDICATOR RESULTS VERSUS CONTROL DATA GROSS BETA INDICATOR RESULTS VERSUS CONTROL DATA 12 13 14 20 20 iii LIST OF ATTACHMENTS ATTACHMENT I 2009 RADIOLOGICAL MONITORING REPORT

SUMMARY

OF MONITORING RESULTS 26 iv Summary The Annual Radiological Environmental Operating Report presents data obtained through analyses of environmental samples collected for the River Bend Station (RBS)Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program (REMP) for the period January 1, 2009 through December 31, 2009. This report fulfills a requirement specified in RBS Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) 5.6.2 as required by Technical Specification 5.6.2 of Appendix A to RBS License Number NPF-47. During 2009, REMP results remained at background levels as has been the case in previous years.All required lower limit of detection (LLD) capabilities were achieved in all sample analyses during 2009. No measurable levels of radiation above baseline levels were detected in the vicinity of River Bend Station. The 2009 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program thus substantiated the adequacy of source control and effluent monitoring at River Bend Station with no observed impact of plant operations on the environment.

Radiolouical Environmental Monitoring Pro-gram RBS established the REMP prior to the station's becoming operational (1985) to provide data on background radiation and radioactivity normally present in the area. RBS has continued to monitor the environment by sampling air, water, sediment, fish and food products, as well as measuring direct radiation.

RBS also samples milk if milk-producing animals used for human consumption are present within five miles (8 km) of the plant.The REMP includes sampling indicator and control locations within an approximate 20 mile radius of the plant. The REMP utilizes indicator locations near the site to show any increases or buildup of radioactivity that might occur due to station operation and control locations farther away from the site to indicate the presence of only naturally occurring radioactivity.

RBS personnel compare indicator results with control and preoperational results to assess any impact RBS operation might have had on the surrounding environment.

In 2009, environmental samples were collected for radiological analysis.

The results of indicator locations were compared with control locations and previous studies. It was concluded that overall, no significant relationship exists between RBS operation and effect on the area around the plant. The review of 2009 data, in many cases, showed radioactivity levels in the environment were undetectable in many locations and near background levels in significant pathways.Harmful Effects or Irreversible Damaae The REMP monitoring did not detect any harmful effects or evidence of irreversible damage in 2009. Therefore, no analysis or planned course of action to alleviate problems was necessary.

I*

Reporting Levels RBS's review indicates that no samples equaled or exceeded reporting levels for radioactivity concentration in environmental samples, as outlined in RBS Technical Requirements Manual Table 3.12.1-2, when averaged over any calendar quarter.Therefore, 2009 results did not result in any Radiological Monitoring Program Special Reports.Radioactivity Not Attributable to RBS The RBS REMP detected no radioactivity attributable to other sources during year 2009.Following the radioactive plume release due to reactor core degradation at the Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant in 1986, RBS REMP detected 1-131 in water, vegetation, and air samples. 1-131 was also detected during 1998 in the wastewater treatment plant effluent.

This was attributed to the medical treatment of a RBS employee.

In 2006, Cs-137 was detected in upstream and downstream Mississippi River sediment samples. This activity was not present in the 2009 samples.Comparison to Federal and State Programs RBS personnel compared REMP data to federal and state monitoring programs as results became available.

Historically, the programs used for comparison have included the U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) TLD (Thermoluminescent Dosimeter)

Direct Radiation Monitoring Network and the Environmental Radiological Laboratory

-Department of Environmental Quality Laboratory Services Division (ERL-DEQLSD).

The NRC TLD Network Program was discontinued in 1998. Historically these results have compared to those from the RBS REMP. RBS TLD results continue to remain similar to the historical average and continue to verify that plant- operation is not affecting the ambient radiation levels in the environment.

The ERL-DEQLSD and the RBS REMP entail similar radiological environmental monitoring program requirements.

These programs include co-located air sample locations, and splitting or sharing sample media such as water, fish and food products.Both programs have obtained similar results over previous years.Sample Deviations

  • Milk The REMP did not include milk sampling within five miles (8 km)' of RBS in 2009 due to unavailability of milk-producing animals used for human consumption.

The RBS Technical Requirements Manual requires collection of milk samples if available commercially within 8 km (5 miles) of the plant. RBS personnel collected vegetation 2

samples to monitor the ingestion pathway, as specified in RBS Technical Requirements Manual Table 3.12.1-1, because of milk unavailability.

  • Required Lower Limit of Detection (LLD) Values All LLDs during this reporting period were more conservative than the acceptable limits required by the RBS Technical Requ2irement Manual (TRM).* Sampling Deviations Listed below are sampling deviations that occurred during 2009. No LLD values were exceeded in the air sampling deviations.

As described in footnote (a) to RBS Technical Requirements Manual Table 3.12.1-1, deviations are permitted from the required reasons.sampling schedule due to malfunction of equipment or other legitimate Station Sampling Period Problem Comment___Description TGS 1" Quarter TLD Missing TLD missing due to vandalism.(CR-RBS-2009-1526)

AGC 03/24/09 to 03/26/09 Power Outage Air sampler location AGC was vandalized (power cord was severed).Volume of sample was adequate to achieve required LLD for 1-131.(CR-RBS-2009-1526)

ANI 0515109 to 05119/09 Power Outage Air sampler locations AP1 and AN1 AP1 were short 3.6 hours6.944444e-5 days <br />0.00167 hours <br />9.920635e-6 weeks <br />2.283e-6 months <br /> and 3.3 hours3.472222e-5 days <br />8.333333e-4 hours <br />4.960317e-6 weeks <br />1.1415e-6 months <br /> due to local power interruptions caused by the loss of Grant Substation during sampling period 5/5/09 to 5/19/09. Volume of sample adequate to achieve required LLD for 1-131.(CR-RBS-2009-2323)

AGC 06/02/09 to 06/12/09 Power Outage Discovered the RBS air sampler for Environmental Service air sample location "AGC" in Entergy Zachary lay-down yard de-energized.

The power cord was unplugged and the outlet was removed from the pole where it was originally installed.

Volume of sample adequate to achieve required LLD for 1-131.(CR-RBS-2009-2702)

AP1 06/02/09 to 06/15/09 Power Outage Air sampler location API had a 1.1 hour1.157407e-5 days <br />2.777778e-4 hours <br />1.653439e-6 weeks <br />3.805e-7 months <br /> sample time deviation due to local power interruptions for sampling period 6/2/09 to 6/15/09. Sampler operating normal at time of sample change out. Sample volume adequate to achieve required LLD for 1-131.(CR-RBS-2009-2778) 3 Station Sampling Period Problem Comment Description ANI 06/15/09 to 06/30/09 Power Outage Air sampler location AN1 (site boundary) had a loss of 17 hours1.967593e-4 days <br />0.00472 hours <br />2.810847e-5 weeks <br />6.4685e-6 months <br /> due to local power interruptions during sampling period 6/15/09 to 6/30/09.Sampler operating normal once tripped breaker was reset. Volume of sample adequate to achieve required LLD for 1-131.(CR-RBS-2009-2952)

AQS2 12/16/09 to 12/29/09 Power Outage Air sampler location AQS2 had a run time duration delta of 106.5 hours5.787037e-5 days <br />0.00139 hours <br />8.267196e-6 weeks <br />1.9025e-6 months <br /> due to loss of power during the sampling period. Sampler operating normal at time sample change out. Volume of sample adequate-to achieve required LLD for 1-131.(CR-RBS-2009-6507)

Missed Samples No samples were missed during 2009.Unavailable Results Results of one TLD from the first quarter 2009 from location TGS was unavailable due to the TLD being missing. This deviation is noted above.Program Modifications RBS made no modifications to the REMP during the year 2009.Attachments Attachment 1 contains results of air, TLD, water, sediment, fish, food products and special samples collected in 2009. TLDs were analyzed by AREVA. All remaining samples were analyzed by RBS Environmental Laboratory.

Attachment 1 also contains RBS' participation in the Interlaboratory Comparison Program during the year 2009.4 1.0 Introduction 1.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program RBS established the REMP to ensure that plant operating controls properly function to minimize any associated radiation endangerment to human health or the environment.

The REMP is designed for the following: " Analyzing important pathways for anticipated types and quantities of radionuclides released into the environment.

  • Considering the possibility of a buildup of long-lived radionuclides in the environment and identifying physical and biological accumulations that may contribute to human exposures." Considering the potential radiation exposure to plant and animal life in the environment surrounding RBS.* Correlating levels of radiation and radioactivity in toe environment with radioactive releases from station operation.

1.2 Pathways Monitored The airborne, direct radiation, waterborne and ingestion pathways, as seen in Figure 1-1, are monitored as required by the RBS Technical Requirements Manual 3.12.1. A description of the RBS REMP sample locations utilized to monitor exposure pathways are described in Table 1.1 and shown in Figures 1-2 and 1-3. RBS may occasionally supplement this program with additional sampling in order to provide a comprehensive and well-balanced program.Section 2.0 of this report provides a discussion of 2009 sampling results with Section 3.0 providing a summary of results for the monitored exposure pathways.1.3 Land Use Census RBS personnel conduct a land use census biannually as required by RBS Technical Requirements Manual 3.12.2. The last land use census was performed in 2008. The next scheduled Land Use Census will be performed in 2010. Section 2.8 of this report contains a narrative on the results of the 2008 land use census.5 Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Airborne Radioiodine and Particulates 2 samples from close to the 2 SITE ANI (0.9 km W) -RBS site Hwy 965; 0.4 Continuous sampler operation Radioiodine Canisters 131 BOUNDARY locations, in different km south of Activity Center. with sample collection every analysis every two weeks.sectors, of the highest calculated annual average ground level DIQ. API (0.9 km WNW) -Behind River Bend two weeks, or more frequently Station Activity Center. if required by dust loading. Air Particulate

-Gross beta radioactivity analysis following filter change.Radioiodine and Particulates I sample from the vicinity of a AQS2 (5.8 km NW) St Francis community having the highest Substation on US Hwy. (Bus.) 61 in St calculated annual average ground level Francisville.

D/Q.Radioiodine and Particulates I sample from a control location, as for AGC (17.0 km SE) -Entergy Service example 15 -30 km distance and in the Center compound in Zachary. (Control)least prevalent wind direction.

Direct TLDs Radiation One ring of stations, one in each Quarterly mR exposure quarterly.

meteorological sector in the general TAe (1.7 ki N) -River Bend Training area of the SITE BOUNDARY.

Center.TBI (0.5 km NNE) -Utility pole near River Bend Station cooling tower yard area.TCI (1.7 km NE) -Telephone pole at Jct..US Hwy. 61 and Old Highway 61.6 Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, -Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Direct TLDs Radiation One ring of stations, one in each Quarterly mR exposure quarterly.

meteorological sector in the general TDI (1.6 km ENE) -Stub pole along WF7, area of the SITE BOUNDARY.

150m S of Jct. WF7 and US Hwy. 61.TEl (1.3 km E) -Stub pole along WF7, 1 km S of Jct. WF7 and US Hwy. 61.TFI (1.3 km ESE) -Stub pole along WF7, 1.6 km S of Jct. WF7 and US Hwy. 61.TG1 (1.6 km SE) -Stub pole along WF7, 2 km S of Jct. WF7 and US Hwy. 61.THI (1.7 km SSE) -Stub pole at power line crossing of WF7 (near Grants Bayou).TJI (1.5 km S) -Stub pole near River Bend Station Gate #23 on Powell Station Road (LA Hwy. 965).TKI (0.9 km SSW) -Utility pole on Powell Station Road (LA Hwy. 965), 20 m S of River Bend Station River Access Road.TL1 (1.0 km SW) -First utility pole on Powell Station Road (LA Hwy. 965) S of former Illinois Central Gulf RR crossing.7 Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Direct Radiation TLDs One ring of stations, one in each meteorological sector in the general area of the SITE BOUNDARY.TMI (0.9 km WSW) -Third utility pole on Powell Station Road (LA Hwy. 965) N of former Illinois Central Gulf RR crossing.TN1 (0.9 km W) -Utility pole along Powell Station Road (LA Hwy. 965), near garden and AN1 air sampler location.TPI (0.9 km WNW) -Behind River Bend Station Activity Center at API air sampler location.TQ1 (0.6 km NW) -Across from MA-1 on RBS North Access Road.TRI (0.8 km NNW) -River Bend Station North Access Road across from Main Plant entrance.Quarterly mR exposure quarterly.

+TLDs The balance of the stations (8) to be placed in special interest areas such as population centers, nearby residences, schools, and in 1 or 2 areas to serve as control locations.

TAC (15.8 km N) -Utility pole at Jct. of US Hwy. 61 and LA Hwy. 421,. 7.9 km north of Bains. (Control)TCS (12.3 km NE) -Utility pole at gate to East Louisiana State Hospital in Jackson.(Special)TEC (16.0 km E) -Stub pole at jct. of Hwy.955 and Greenbrier Road, 4.8 km North of Jct. of Hwys 955 and 964. (Control)8 Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Direct TLDs Radiation The balance of the stations (8) to be TGS (17.0 km SE) -Entergy Service Center Quarterly mR exposure quarterly.

placed in special interest areas such compound in Zachary. (Special)as population centers, nearby residences, schools, and in 1 or 2 TNS (6.0 km W) -Utility pole with electrical areas to serve as control locations.

meter at west bank ferry landing (LA Hwy.10). (Special)TQSI (4.0 km NW) -Utility pole front of Pentecostal church (opposite West Feliciana Parish Hospital) near Jct. US Hwy. 61 and Commerce Street. (Special)TQS2 (5.8 km NW) -St. Francis Substation on business US Hwy. 61 in St. Francisville.(Special)TRS (9.2 km NNW) -Stub pole at Jct. of US Hwy. 61 and WF2 near Bains (West Feliciana High School). (Special)Waterbome Surface Water 1 sample upstream and 1 sample SWU (5.0 km W) -Mississippi River about 4 Grab samples quarterly Gamma isotopic analysis, and downstream.

km upstream from the plant liquid discharge tritium analysis quarterly.

outfall, near LA Hwy. 10 ferry crossing.SWD (7.75 km S) -Mississippi River about 4 km downstream from plant liquid discharge outfall, near paper mill.9 Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Waterbome Groundwater Samples from 1 or 2 sources only if WU (-470 m NNE) -Upland Terrace Aquifer Semiannually Gamma isotopic and tritium likely to be affected, well upgradient from plant. analysis semiannually.

WD (-470 m SW) -Upland Terrace Aquifer well downgradient from plant.Sediment From Shoreline 1 sample from downstream area with SEDD (7.75 km S) -Mississippi River about Annually Gamma isotopic analysis existing or potential recreational value. 4 km downstream from plant liquid discharge annually.outfall, near paper mill.Ingestion Milk If commercially available, I sample Currently, no available milking animals Quarterly when animals are Gamma isotopic and 1-131 from milking animals within 8 km within 8 km of RBS. on pastureQ analysis quarterly when animals distant where doses are calculated to be greater than 1 mrem per year. are on pasture.1 sample from milking animals at a control location 15 -30 km distant when an indicator location exists.Fish and Invertebrates 1 sample of a commercially and/or FD (7.75 km S) -One sample of a Annually Gamma isotopic analysis on recreationally important species in commercially and/or recreationally important edible portions annually vicinity of plant discharge area. species from downstream area influenced by plant discharge.

1 sample of similar species in area FU (4.0 km WSW) -. One sample of a not influenced by plant discharge.

commercially and/or recreationally important species from upstream*

area not influenced by plant discharge.

10 Table 1.1 Radiological Environmental Sampling Program Exposure Requirement Sample Point Description, Sampling and Type and Frequency Pathway Distance and Direction Collection Frequency Of Analyses Ingestion Food Products 1 sample of one type of broadleaf GNI (0.9 km W) -Sampling will be Quarterly during the growing Gamma isotopic and 1-131 vegetation grown near the SITE performed in accordance with Table 3.12.1-1 season. analysis quarterly.

BOUNDARY location of highest Section 4.a of the Technical Requirements predicted annual average ground level Manual.D/Q if milk sampling is not performed.

1 sample of similar broadleaf GQC (32.0 km NW) -One sample of similar vegetation grown 15 -30 km distant, vegetables from LA State Penitentiary at if milk sampling is not performed.

Angola. (Control)11 FIGURE 1-1 (S _-~- -~-~-~12 FIGURE 1-2 SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES -NEAR FIELD 13 FIGURE 1-3 SAMPLE COLLECTION SITES-FAR FIELD I I B (NNE)C (NE)I I I I D (ENE)N E (E)F N(ESE)M WSW)I N// 1~1 Bek..N N.!.G.(SE: L SW)K (SSw)I.aston Rawg"/Fat -field Radlogical Environmental Moritor"n Locations AC Air Sampler Control AS Air Sampler Special T_ 1 TLD Indicator TC TLD Control T_S_ Special TLDs GOC Vegetation Control SWU Upstream Surface Water SWD Downstream Surface Water SEDD Downstream Sediment FU Upstream Fish/Invertebrates FD Downstream Fish/Invertebrates I I I.o 5 10 kilometers I J (S)14 2.0 Interpretation and Trends of Results 2.1 Air Particulate and Radioiodine Sample Results Iodine-131 was not detected in the radioiodine cartridges during 2009 as has been the case in previous years. Indicator gross beta air particulate results for 2009 were similar to preoperational and operational levels as seen below. Results are reported as annual average pCi/m 3 (picocuries per cubic meter).Monitoring Period Result Preoperational 0.030 2009 0.023 2008 0.023 2007 0.024 2006 0.024 2005 0.022 Table 3.1 provides a comparison of the indicator and control location mean values which further emphasizes that the airborne pathway continues to remain at background levels.Figure 2-2 also shows a comparison of indicator results from 2009 versus control location data from 1986 to 2008. Sixteen indicator results for 2009 were out of the three-sigma levels. A review of the gross beta counter quality control data indicated no anomalies that would account for these readings.

River Bend results for the last five years and the 2009 results from three other nuclear facilities were reviewed.

The data was comparable to the 2009 River Bend results and indicated that the results that were above the three sigma level are due to seasonal meteorological conditions.

2.2 Thermoluminescent Dosimetry Sample Results Gamma radiation exposure in the reporting period compares to previous years. Figure 2-1 compares quarterly indicator results for 2009 with control location data from 1986 to 2008. One third quarter indicator result was above the upper control three-sigma level.The averages for the indicator, special, and control locations were slightly elevated in the third quarter. The control TLDs are located at a distance that they will not be influenced by the station, and are an indication of the background radiation level. Since the control locations were elevated during the third quarter, this indicates that the background radiation level was slightly elevated and not attributable to River Bend Station, therefore the indicated TLD result is not considered to be abnormal.RBS normalizes measured exposure to 90 days and relies on comparison of the indicator locations to the control as a measure of plant impact. RBS's comparison of the inner ring and special interest area TLD results to the controls, as seen in Table 3.1, indicates that 15 the ambient radiation levels are unaffected by plant operations.

Therefore, levels continue to remain at or near background.

The results of one TLD from the first quarter 2009 from location TGS was unavailable due to that TLD being missing at change out. This deviation is noted in the appropriate section above.2.3 Water Sample Results Analytical results for 2009 surface water and groundwater samples were similar to those reported in previous years.Surface water samples were collected from two locations (indicator and control) and analyzed for gamma radionuclides and tritium. Gamma radionuclides were below detectable limits at the indicator and control locations.

Tritium was also below detectable limits at all locations.

Listed below is a comparison of 2009 results from the indicator location as compared to the preoperational and previous operational years. Results are reported as annual average pCi/I (picocuries per liter).Radionuclide 2009 2003 -2008 Preoperational Gammas <LLD <LLD <LLD Tritium <LLD <LLD <LLD Groundwater samples were collected from two locations (indicator and control) and analyzed for gamma radionuclides and tritium. Gamma radionuclides and Tritium were below detectable limits at the indicator and control locations.

Listed below is a comparison of 2009 results from the indicator location as compared to the preoperational and previous operational years. Results are reported as annual average pCi/l.Radionuclide 2009 2003 -2008 Preoperational Gammas <LLD <LLD <LLD Tritium <LLD <LLD <LLD Based on these comparisons, the operation of RBS had no impact on this pathway during 2009, and levels of radionuclides monitored for this pathway continue to remain similar to those obtained in operational and preoperational years.2.4 Shoreline Sediment Sample Results A shoreline sediment sample was collected from the indicator location in 2009 and analyzed for gamma radionuclides.

RBS also samples a non-REMP upstream control sediment sample. A review of historical indicator and upstream sediment samples periodically shows Cs-137. No Cs-137 was indicated on the samples in 2009.16 Therefore, based on these measurements, RBS operations had no significant radiological impact upon the environment or public via this pathway.2.5 Milk Sample Results Milk samples were not collected during 2009 due to the unavailability of indicator locations within 5 miles (8 km) of RBS. Since there are no dairies within five miles of the RBS site, it is concluded RBS's operation had no impact on this pathway in 2009.2.6 Fish and Invertebrate Sample Results Fish samples were collected from two locations (indicator and control) and analyzed for gamma radionuclides.

In 2009, gamma radionuclides were below detectable limits which is consistent with the preoperational and operational monitoring periods. Therefore, based on these measurements, RBS operations had no significant radiological impact upon the environment or public by this pathway.2.7 Food Product Sample Results Food product samples were collected when available from two locations (indicator and control) in 2009 and analyzed for gamma radionuclides in accordance with Table TRM 3.12-1. The 2009 levels remained undetectable which is consistent with previous operational years. Therefore, since levels continue to remain at background, it can be concluded that plant operations is not impacting this pathway.2.8 Land Use Census Results The Land Use Census for 2008 was conducted in accordance with procedure ESP-8-051, as required by Technical Requirements Manual (TRM) (TR 3.12.2).A garden census is not conducted pursuant to the note in the TRM (TLCO 3.12.2) that allows the sampling of broadleaf vegetation in.the highest calculated average ground-level D/Q sector near site boundary in lieu of the garden census.The milk animal census identified no milk animals within 8 km (5 miles) of River Bend site. This information was verified by the County Agents from West Feliciana, East Feliciana, and Pointe Coupee parishes.The resident census changes are noted in Table 2.1. Changes are primarily due to the use of a GPS instrument during field observations and satellite imagery in locating the resident's bearing and range from the reactor building as compared to previous methods used in this process. See the comments in Table 2.1 for specific information regarding changes.17 No locations were identified in 2009 that would yield a calculated dose or dose commitment greater than those currently calculated in Requirement TSR 3.11.2.3.Table 2.1 contains data from the most recently completed Land Use Census.2.9 Interlaboratory Comparison Results RBS' Environmental Laboratory analyzed interlaboratory comparison samples to fulfill the requirements of Technical Requirements Manual 3.12.3. Attachment 8.1 contains these results. The interlaboratory comparison results indicated that 100% of the sample results for accuracy and precision were within the acceptable control limits.18 Table 2-1 Land Use Census Results 2008 Item Sector Nearest Range Comment Sector Nearest Residence Range Milk# (km) Animal (km) #5498 Hwy 61 I A (N) St.Francisville, LA 70775 1.9 1 4549 Old Hwy 61 2 B (NNE) St.Francisville, LA 70775 1.4 ." 2 4553 Old Hwy 61 3 C (NE) St. Francisville, LA 70775 1.5 3 12657 Powell Station Rd.4 D (ENE) St.Francisville, LA 70775 1.4 4635 Hwy 61 5 E (E) St..Francisville, LA 70775 2.6 1 12019 Fairview Way 6 F (ESE) Jackson, LA 7748 2.6 1 4 3319 Hwy 964 7 G (SE) Jackson, LA 70748 3.7 _ _" 4 11813 Powell Station Rd.8 H (SSE) St.Francisville, LA 70775 1.7 1 11649 Powell Station Rd.9 J (S) St.Francisville, LA 70775 1.9 1 8909 Hwy 981 10 K (SSW) New Roads, LA 70760 6.5 11 L (SW) 5 12 M (WSW) 5 13 N (VV) " 6 10426 Old Field Rd.14 P (WNW) St.Francisville, LA 70775 3.7 _ r 9537 Hwy 965 15 Q (NW) St.Francisville, LA 70775 1.3 9794 Hwy 965 16 R (NNW) St.Francisville, LA 70775 1.6 4# Comment Change in distance from previous land use census due to using actual residence versus mailbox location.Residence previously in sector C. Moved to sector B due to using actual residence location versus 2 mailbox location.3 New residence listing due to moving previous census residence to sector B.New residence identified by satellite imagery and field observation.

Coordinates marked per GPS or 4 satellite imagery.5 No residence located within 8 km distance in sectors L or M.6 Address in previous census is no longer a residence.

No other residence in this sector within 8 km.19 FRGUlJ 2-1 TLD Indicator Results (2009) Versus Control Data (1986-2008) 20.00 18.00 ~ ~14.00 .TAl rB1 TCl TEl TF1 TG1l 11 T J1 T Kl 1 "1 T~ Mi TN1 IPi TO1 TR1 TLD Locations-+ 3-sigma Control --- sligma Control

  • 1St otr.09 UI 2nd Qtrg A9 3rd QtrO 9 X 4th Qtr09 j FIGURE 2-2 Gross Bets Indicator Results (2009) Versus Control Data (1986-2008) 0.050 0.040 E0D3 0.020-0.010-/ '*
  • 3
  • 4_. .., .

..,,,, .7 , , 0.ý000 .4 01/01/09 02101/09 03(01/09 04101/09 05/1/0M9 0601lM 07/01/9 ON/1/09 09/10 10,0/09 I1/W/09 12/1/0R9[ AM $ API A AQS2 -UPPER CONTROL --LOWER CONTROL 20 3.0 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary 3.1 2009 Program Results Summary*Table 3.1 summarizes the 2009 REMP results. RBS personnel did not use values reported as less than the lower limit of detection

(<LLD) when determining ranges and means for indicator and control locations.

21 TABLE 3.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Name of Facility:

River Bend Station Location of Facility:

West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana Docket No: Reporting Period: January -December 2009 Sample Type Type & Number LLD a Indicator Locations Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of (Units) of Analyses Mean (F) b Mean ( F) b Nonroutine" Range Range .Results d Mean ( F) b Location

  • j Range I_ ....Air Particulates Gross Beta 104 0.01 0.023 (78 / 78.) AQS2 0.023 ( 26 / 26 ) 0.022 ( 26 / 26) 0 (pCi/m3 [0.009 -0.046] (5.8 km NW) [0.009 -0.046 ] [0.012 -0.043]Airborne Iodine 1-131 104 0.07 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 (pCi/m3)Indicators TLDs Gamma 64 (e) 13.99 (64/ 64) TG1 16.54 ( 4 / 4) N/A 0 (mR/Qtr) [10.67- 19.17] (1.6 km SE) [16.01 -17.41]Special Interest TLDs Gamma 23 (e) 14.78 ( 23 / 23) TQS1 16.35 (4 / 4) N/A 0 (mR/Qtr) [ 13.09-17.11 (4.0 km NW) [15.80- 17.11]Control TLDs Gamma 8 (e) N/A N/A N/A 15.60 ( 8 / 8) 0 (mR/Qtr) [14.22 -17.29].-Al.22 TABLE 3.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Name of Facility:

River Bend Station Location of Facility:

West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana Docket No: 50-458 Reporting Period: January -December 2009 Sample Type Type & Number LLD a Indicator Location Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of (Units) of Analyses Mean ( F) b Mean ( F) b Nonroutine Range ] [ Range I Results d Mean (F) b Location c Range I Surface Water H-3 10 3000 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 (pCi/L)Gamma 10 Mn-54 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-58 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Fe-59 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-60 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Zn-65 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Zr-95 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Nb-95 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 1-131 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-134 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-137 18 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Ba- 140 60 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 La-140 15 <LLD N/A N/A .<LLD 0 23 TABLE 3.1 Radiolozical Environmental Monitoring Program Summary Name of Facility:

River Bend Station Location of Facility:

West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana Docket No: 50-458 Reporting Period: January -December 2009 Sample Type Type & Number LLD a Indicator Locations Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of (Units) of Analyses a Mean(F)b Mean ( F) b Nonroutine

[Range [Range] Results d Mean (F) b Location c [ Range ]Groundwater H--3 8 3000 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 (pCi/L)Gamma 8 Mn-54 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-58 15 <LLD N/A N/A. <LLD 0 Fe-59 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-60 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Zn-65 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Zr-95 30 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Nb-95 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 1-131 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-134 15 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-137 18 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Ba-140 60 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 La- 140 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Shoreline Sediment Gamma 2 (pCi/kg) Cs-134 150 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-137 180 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 24 TABLE 3.1 Radiological Environmental Monitoring Proaram Summary Name of Facility:

River Bend Station Location of Facility:

West Feliciana Parish, Louisiana Docket No: 50-458 Reporting Period: January -December 2009 Sample Type Type & Number LLD a Indicator Location Location with Highest Annual Mean Control Locations Number of (Units) of Analyses Mean ( F) b Mean ( F) b Nonroutine I Range M (F_ b Range I Results d___________

_________

________ ___________

Loatin*Mean (F)hb Lcation I Range ]Fish Gamma 5 (pCi/kg) Mn-54 130 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Fe-59 260 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-58 130 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Co-60 130 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Zn-65 260 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-134. 130 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-137 150 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Food Products 1-131 8 60 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 (pCi/kg)Gamma 8 Cs 134 60 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 Cs-137 80 <LLD N/A N/A <LLD 0 a b c d e f LLD = Required lower limit of detection based on RBS Technical Requirements Manual Table 3.12.1-3.Mean and range based upon detectable measurements only. Fraction of detectable measurements at specified locations is indicated in parenthesis (F).Locations are specified (1) by name and (2) direction and distance relative to reactor site.Non-routine results are those which exceed ten times the control station value. If no control station value is available, the result is considered non-routine if it exceeds ten times the preoperational value for the location.LLD is not defined in RBS Technical Requirements Manual Table 3.12.1-3.Control location for sediment is upstream surface water sample.25 Attachment 1 2009 Radiological Monitoring Report Summary of Monitoring Results 26 TABLE OF CONTENTS ATTACHMENT 1.1 ATTACHMENT 1.2 ATTACHMENT 1.3 ATTACHMENT 1.4 ATTACHMENT 2.1 ATTACHMENT 3.1 ATTACHMENT 4.1 ATTACHMENT 5.1 ATTACHMENT 6.1 ATTACHMENT 7.1 ATTACHMENT 8.1 AIR SAMPLE LOCATION ANI AIR SAMPLE LOCATION API AIR SAMPLE LOCATION AQS2 AIR SAMPLE LOCATION AGC THERMOLUMINESCENT DOSIMETERS SURFACE WATER GROUNDWATER SHORELINE SEDIMENT FOOD PRODUCTS FISH AND INVERTEBRATES INTERLABORATORY COMPARISON RESULTS 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 27 Attachment 1.1 Sample Type: Analysis: Units: Air Particulate and Charcoal Cartridge

-Indicator Location ANI Gross Beta and Iodine pCi/m 3 LLD (pCl~m 3)LAB ID 20090020 20090076 20090114 20090139 20090189 20090251 20090306 20090364 20090435 20090479 20090526 20090568 20090675 20090.719 20090811 20090856 20090902 20090934 20091002 20091045 20091110 20091152.20091191 20091241 20091341 20091369.START DATE 12/30/2008 1/13/2009 1/27/2009 2/10/2009 2/24/2009 3/10/2009 3/24/2009 4/7/2009 4/21/2009 5/5/2009 5/19/2009 6/2/2009 6/15/2009 6/30/2009 7/14/2009 7/28/2009 8/12/2009 8/24/2009 9/8/2009 9/22/2009 10/6/2009 10/20/2009 11/4/2009 11/17/2009 12/1/2009 12/16/2009 END DATE 1/13/2009 1/27/2009 2/10/2009 2/24/2009 3/10/2009 3/24/2009 4/7/2009 4/21/2009 5/5/2009 5/19/2009 6/2/2009 6/15/2009 6/30/2009 7/14/2009 7/28/2009 8/12/2009 8/24/2009 9/8/2009 9/22/2009 10/6/2009 10/20/2009 11/4/2009 11/17/2009 12/1/2009 12/16/2009 12/29/2009 0.07 1-131< 0.009< 0.009< 0.007< 0.007< 0.009< 0.009< 0.009< 0.009< 0.009< 0.007< 0.008< 0.009<' 0.008< 0.008< 0.009< 0.009< 0.008< 0.008< 0.009< 0.010< 0.008< 0.008< 0.010< 0.009< 0.009< 0.008.0.01 GROSS BETA 0.032 +/- 0.0007 0.031 +/- 0.0007 0.025 +/- 0.0006 0.032 +/- 0.0007 0.031 +/-0.0007 0.019 +/-0.0006 0.020 +1-0.0005 0.017 +/-0.0005 0.019 +/-0.0005 0.015 +/-0.0005 0.016 +/- 0.0005 0.020 +/- 0.0006 0.025 +/- 0.0006 0.022 +/- 0.0006 0.022 +/- 0.0006 0.023 +/- 0.0006 0.014 +/-0.0005 0.021 +/- 0.0005 0.014 +/-0.0005 0.011 +/- 0.0004 0.012 +/-0.0004 0.015 +/- 0.0005 0.040 +/- 0.0008 0.035 +/- 0.0007 0.025 +/- 0.0005 0.034 +/- 0.0007 Totals: Average: Maximum: Minimum: 0.023 0.040 0.011 28 Attachment 1.2 Sample Type: Analysis: Units: Air Particulate and Charcoal Cartridge

-Indicator Location API Gross Beta and Iodine pCi/M 3 LLD (pCiIm 3)LAB ID 20090019 20090075 20090113 20090138 20090188 20090250 20090305 20090363 20090434 20090478 20090525 20090567 20090674 20090718 20090810 20090855 20090901 20090933 20091001 20091044 20091109 20091151 20091190 20091240 20091340 20091368 Totals: Average: Maximum: Minimum: START DATE END DATE 12/30/2008 1/13/2009 1/13/2009 1/27/2009 1/27/2009 2/10/2009 2/10/2009 2/24/2009 2/24/2009 3/10/2009 3/10/2009 3/24/2009 3/24/2009 4/7/2009 4/7/2009 4/21/2009 4/21/2009 5/5/2009 5/5/2009 5/19/2009 5/19/2009 6/2/2009 6/2/2009 6/15/2009 6/15/2009 6/30/2009 6/30/2009 7/14/2009 7/14/2009 7/28/2009 7/28/2009 8/12/2009 8/12/2009 8/24/2009 8/24/2009 9/8/2009 9/8/2009 9/22/2009 9/22/2009 10/6/2009 10/6/2009 10/20/2009 10/20/2009 11/4/2009 11/4/2009 11/17/2009 11/17/2009 12/1/2009 12/1/2009 12/16/2009 12/16/2009 12/29/2009 0.07 1-131< 0.007< 0.009< 0.007< 0.006< 0.009< 0.007< 0.008< 0.008< 0.010< 0.008< 0.010< 0.011< 0.009< 0.008< 0.008< 0.009< 0.012< 0.008< 0.010< 0.008< 0.009< 0.007< 0.009< 0.011< 0.007< 0.009 0.01 GROSS BETA 0.025 +/- 0.0006 0.026 +/- 0.0006 0.025 +/- 0.0006 0.030 +/- 0.0007 0.023 +/- 0.0006 0.022 +/- 0.0006 0.017 +/-0.0005 0.021 +/- 0.0006 0.021 +/- 0.0006 0.017 +/-0.0006 0.018 +/-0.0006 0.020 +/- 0.0006 0.022 +1- 0.0006 0.024 +/- 0.0007 0.025 +/- 0.0006 0.017 +1-0.0005 0.016 +/- 0.0006 0.028 +/- 0.0006 0.016 +/- 0.0005 0.017 +/- 0.0005 0.012 +/- 0.0005 0.018 +/- 0.0005 0.033 +/- 0.0007 0.027 +/- 0.0006 0.025 +/- 0.0006 0.033 +/- 0.0007 0.022 0.033 0.012 29 Attachment 1.3 Sample Type: Analysis: Units: Air Particulate and Charcoal Cartridae

-Indicator Location AQS2 Gross Beta and Iodine pCi/m 3 LLD (pCi/m 3)LAB ID 20090021 20090077 20090115 20090140 20090190 20090252 20090307 20090365 20090436 20090480 20090527 20090569 20090676 20090720 20090812 20090857 20090903 20090935 20091003 20091046 20091111 20091153 20091192 20091242 20091342 20091370 START DATE 12/30/2008 1/13/2009 1/27/2009 2/10/2009 2/24/2009 3/10/2009 3/24/2009 4/7/2009 4/21/2009 5/5/2009 5/19/2009 6/2/2009 6/15/2009 6/30/2009 7/14/2009 7/28/2009 8/12/2009 8/24/2009 9/8/2009 9/22/2009 10/6/2009 10/20/2009 11/4/2009 11/17/2009 11/30/2009' 12/16/2009 END DATE 1/13/2009 1/27/2009 2/10/2009 2/24/2009 3/10/2009 3/24/2009 4/7/2009 4/21/2009 5/5/2009.5/19/2009 6/2/2009 6/15/2009 6/30/2009 7/14/2009 7/28/2009 8/12/2009 8/24/2009 9/8/2009 9/22/2009 10/6/2009 10/20/2009 11/4/2009 11/17/2009 11/30/2009 12/16/2009 12/29/2009 0.07 1-131< 0.007< 0.009< 0.010< 0.009< 0.006< 0.008< 0.009< 0.009< 0.008< 0.009< 0.009< 0.007< 0.008< 0.007< 0.006< 0.007< 0.007< 0.007< 0.007< 0.007< 0.007< 0.008< 0.008< 0.007< 0.008< 0.013 0.01 GROSS BETA 0.032 +/- 0.0007 0.030 +/- 0.0007 0.026 +/- 0.0006 0.032 +/10.0007 0.028 +/- 0.0006 0.022 +/- 0.0006 0.009 +/- 0.0004 0.018 +/-0.0005 0.018 +/- 0.0006 0.022 +/- 0.0006 0.017 +1-0.0005 0.017 +/-0.0006 0.027 +/- 0.0006 0.021 +/-0.0006 0.020 +/- 0.0006 0.016 +/-0.0005 0.014 +/- 0.0005 0.025 +/- 0.0006 0.016 +/- 0.0005 0.017 +1- 0.0005 0.012 +/- 0.0004 0.018 +/-0.0005 0.034 +/-0.0007 0.028 +/- 0.0006 0.029 +/- 0.0006 0.046 +/- 0.0010 Totals: Average: Maximum: Minimum: 0.023 0.046 0.009 30 Attachment 1.4 Sample Type: Analysis: Units: Air Particulate and Charcoal Cartridge

-Control Location AGC Gross Beta and Iodine pCi/rn 3 LLD (pCiIm 3)LAB ID 20090022 20090078 20090116 20090141 20090191 20090253 20090308 20090366 20090437 20090481 20090528 20096570 20090677 20090721 20090813 20090858 20090904 20090936 20091004 20091047 20091112 20091154 20091193 20091243 20091343 20091371 Totals: Average: Maximum: Minimum: START DATE 12/30/2008 1/13/2009 1/27/2009 2/10/2009 2/24/2009 3/10/2009 3/24/2009, 4/8/2009 4/21/2009.5/5/2009 5/19/2009 6/2/2009 6/15/2009 6/30/2009 7/14/2009 7/28/2009 8/12/2009 8/24/2009 9/8/2009 9/22/2009 10/6/2009 10/20/2009 11/4/2009 11/17/2009 12/1/2009 12/16/2009 END DATE 1/13/2009 1/27/2009 2/10/2009 2/24/2009 3/10/2009 3/24/2009 3/26/2009 4/21/2009 5/5/2009 5/19/2009 6/2/2009 6/12/2009 6/30/2009 7/14/2009 7/28/2009 8/12/2009 8/24/2009 9/8/2009.9/22/2009 10/6/2009 10/20/2009 11/4/2009 11/17/2009 12/1/2009 12/16/2009 12/29/2009 0.07 1-131< 0.008< 0.008< 0.007< 0.010< 0.007< 0.007< 0.048< 0.007< 0.007< 0.007< 0.009< 0.012< 0.006< 0.008< 0.007< 0.007< 0.008< 0.006< 0.009< 0.008< 0.009< 0.006< 0.007< 0.007< 0.007< 0.008 0.01 GROSS BETA 0.030 +/- 0.0007 0.024 +/- 0.0006 0.024 +/- 0.0006 0.030 +/- 0.0007 0.024 +/- 0.0006 0.043 +/- 0.0008 0.017 +/-0.0016 0.017 +/-0.0005 0.017 +/-0.0005 0.017 +/-0.0005 0.017 +/-0.0005 0.019 +/-0.0006 0.024 +/- 0.0005 0.023 +/- 0.0006 0.019 +/-.0.0005 0.015 +/- 0.0004 0.016 +/-0.0005 0.020 +/- 0.0005 0.017 +/-0.0005 0.016 +/-0.0005 0.012 +/-0.0004 0.016 +/- 0.0005 0.029 +/- 0.0006 0.032 +/- 0.0006 0.020 +/- 0.0005 0.031 +/- 0.0007 0.022 0.043 0.012 31 Attachment 2.1 Sample Type: Analysis: Units: INDICATOR S TA1 TBI TCI TDI TEl TF1 TGI THI TJ1 TKI TLI TMI TNI TP1 TQ1 TRI Thermoluminescent Dosimeters (TLD)mR Exposure mR/Qtr 1ST QTR 11.81 16.09 16.04 15.26 14.19 14.74 16.01 12.81 13.62 14.90 14.57 13.10 12.66 12.75 11.67 11.93 2ND QTR 10.67 15.41 15.26 15.55 14.28 14.32 16.18 11.86 13.23 14.74 14.40 12.31 12.14 12.63 10.85 10.97 3RD QTR 13.23 16.47 16.08 19.17 15.47 15.37 17.41 13.53 14.41 15.37 15.75 12.87 12.82 13.30 10.92 11.71 4TH QTR 11.67 16.20 15.64 16.12 14.70 14.66 16.54 12.92 14.07 14.72 15.46 12.79 13.06 13.54 11,18 11.33 MEAN 11.85 16.04 15.76 16.52 14.66 14.77 16.54 12.78 13.83 14.93 15.04 12.77 12.67 13.06 11.16 11.49 MAX 16.09 16.18 19.17 16.54 16.54 AVG 13.89 13.43 14.62 14.04 13.99 MIN 11.67 10.67 10.92 11.18 11.16 SPECIAL INTEREST 1ST QTR 2ND QTR 3RD QTR 4TH QTR MEAN TCS 13.55 13.28 13.79 13.09 13.43 TGS 15.38 17.09 16.19 16.22 TNS 14.29 13.17 14.76 13.55 13.94 TRS 15.79 15.08 15.58 15.28 15.43 TQSI 16.66 15.80 17.11 15.83 16.35 TQS2 13.93 13.22 13.69 13.73 13.64 MAX 16.66 15.80 17.11 16.19 16.35 AVG 14.84 14.32 15.34 14.61 14.84 MIN 13.55 13.17 13.69 13.09 13.43 CONTROLS 1ST QTR 2ND QTR. 3RD QTR 4TH QTR MEAN TAC 15.81 15.47 17.29 16.18 16.18 TEC 14.56 14.22 16.05 15.22 15.01 MAX AVG MIN 15.81 15.18 14.56 15.47 14.84 14.22 CONTROL 17.29 15.60 14.22 17.29 16.67 16.05 16.18 15.70 15.22 16.18 15.60 15.01 MAX AVG MIN INDICATOR 19.17 13.99 10.67 SPECIAL 17.11 14.78 13.09 32 Attachment 3.1 Sample Type: Surface Water Analysis:

Gamma Isotopic and Tritium Units: -pCi/I LLD (pCi/I) 15 LAB ID LOCATION DATE MN-54 20090071 20090072 20090073 20090074 20090438 20090439 20090835 20090836 20091172 20091173 LLD (pCi/l)LAB ID 20090071 20090072 20090073 20090074 20090438 20090439 20090835 20090836 20091172 20091173 swU SWU dup SWD SWD dup swU SWD sWU SWD swu SWD 1/27/2009

< 1.79 1/27/2009

< 5.15 1/27/2009

< 433 1/27/2009

< 3.18 15/5/2009

< 6.61 5/5/2009 < 7.29 8/4/2009 < 5.39 8/4/2009 < 4.26 11/12/2009

< 5.87 11/12/2009

< 4.64 15 30 is 30 15 30 15 15 18 60 CO-58 FE-59 CO-60 ZN-65 NB-95 ZR-95 1-131 CS-134 CS-137 BA-140< 3.94 < 11.14 < 4.62 < 11.60 < 6.34 < 8.81 < 5.97 < 5.20 < 5.93 < 16.37< 5.18 < 7.27 < 3.73 < 8.17 < 6.12 < 8.27 < 5.52 < 5.32 < 7.57 < 15.18< 3149 < 7.66 < 5.69 < 11.81 < 5.79 < 8.53 < 5.48 < 5.61 < 5.31 < 13.59< 3.94 < 7.53 < 5.22 < 7.52 < 4.54 < 7.68 < 4.81 < 4,35 < 5.55 < 12.83< 3.80 "< 9.97 < 3.84 < 14.41 < 5.79 < 7.73 < 5.31 < 5.61 < 5.03 < 17.69< 4.55 < 10.29 < 5.65 < 8.02 < 6.10. < 9.43 < 5.20 < 6.01 < 5.68 < 15.97< 5.06 < 9.23 < 5.06 < 10.01 < 4.06 < 6.86 < 5.67 < 4.19 < 4.24 < 16.85* 4.41 < 8.04 < 3.16 < 8.33 < 5.17 < 7.51 < 4.37 < 4.46 < 5.17 < 13.22* 4.95 < 9.55 < 5.74 < 11.45 < 5.68 < 6.68 < 4.47 < 4.05 < 6.04 < 17.98* 5.01 < 6.50 < 6.25 < 13.01 < 5.46 < 6.95 < 4.75 < 5.94 < 3.55 < 14.97 Is LA-140* 8.61* 8.25* 5.87* 4.67* 14.18* 8.30* 4.56* 5.12* 6.07* 4.80 LOCATION swu SWU dup"SWD SWD dup swu SWD swU SWD swU SWD DATE 1/27/2009 1/27/2009 1/27/2009 1/27/2009 3000 TRITIUM< 576.38< 574.71< 570.16< 569.37< 540.00* 557.99< 550.14< 552.40.< 530.34< 524.29 5/5/2009 5/5/2009 8/4/2009.8/4/2009 11/12/2009 11/12/2009 33 Attachment 4.1 Sample Type: Analysis: Units: Groundwater Gamma Isotopic and Tritium pCi/I LLD (pCi/I)LAB ID LOCATION 20090202 GWU 20090203 GWD 20090588 GWU 20090589.

GWD 20090782 GWU 20090802 GWD 20091087 GWD 20091088 GWU DATE 3/12/2009 3/12/2009 6/17/2009 6/17/2009 7/23/2009 7/23/2009 10/14/2009 10/14/2009 is MN-54* 8.40* 8.12* 6.87* 4.89* 7.66* 5.34* 5.22* 6.72 15 CO-58* 7.20* 7.82* 6.69* 5.35* 5.20* 4.04* 6.40* 7.57 30 FE-59* 12.46* 13.69< 13.78* 11.93* 13.83* 8.76* 13.31<16.16 15 CO-60< 6.73* 7.49* 7.17* 4.84* 6.25< 4.01< 5.31* 5.77 30 ZN-65* 14.07< 16.16< 13.86* 12.98* 13.30* 10.64* 13.30* 13:56 15 30 15 15 18 NB-95 ZR-95 1-131 CS-134 CS-137* 7.91* 11.52* 7.36* 8.97* 9.69* 6.78* 7.51* 11.37 14.05 13.92 10.92 11.26 9.81*9.92 9.45 14.11 7.32 8.25 7.67 6.67 7.61 5.31 5.29 7.87* 7.23* 7.89* 6.34* 6.67* 7.34* 5.34 K 6.67* 7.14 8.36 5.37 7.17 6.97 6.76 5.95 6.07 8.02 60 15 BA-140 LA- 140* 23.52 < 9.42* 22.77 < 6.99* 24.39 < 5.80* 21.59 < 6.54* 20.89 < 10.03* 18,70 < 5.90<*24.83 < 8.95< 26.43 < 9.37 LLD (pCi/I)LAB ID 3000 TRITIIIM LOCATION DATE 20090202 20090203-20090588 20090589 20090782 20090802 20091087 20091088 GWU GWD GWU GWD GWU GWD GWD GWU 3/12/2009 3/12/2009 6/17/2009 6/17/2009 7/23/2009 7/23/2009 10/14/2009 10/14/2009

< 551< 549< 542< 544< 549< 549< 533< 529 34 Attachment 5.1 Sample Type: Analysis: Units: LLD (pCi/kg)lA AI lD Shoreline Sediment SEDD Gamma Isotopic pCi/kg, dry 150 180 Cq-117 nATV CR-1 34 LAB 1D 20090723 7/14/2009<25.15< 28.90 Sample Type: Analysis: Units: LLD (pCi/kg)LAB ID Shoreline Sediment SEDU Gamma Isotopic pCi/kg, dry 150 CS-134 180 DATE CS-137 20090722 7/14/2009< 21.75< 21.58 35 Attachment 6.1 Sample Type: Analysis: Units: LLD (pCi/kg, w LAB ID Food Products Gamma Isotopic pCi/kg, wet et)LOCATION 60 1-131 60 CS-134 DATE 20090030 20090031 20090346 20090349 20090837 20090838 20091113 20091211 GNI GQC GQC GNI GQC GN1 GNI GQC 1/15/2009 1/14/2009 4/14/2009 4/16/2009 8/4/2009 8/4/2009 10/20/2009 11/23/2009

< 51.95< 40.14< 36.34< 44.53< 49.75< 42.08< 54.25< 33.07< 58.92< 47.34< 28.82< 56.53< 57.64< 40.64< 58.21< 36.62 80 CS-137<69.40< 48.49< 35.39< 56.51< 30.67< 76.56<46.41< 35.91 36 Attachment 7.1 Sample Type: Fish Analysis:

Gamma Isotopic Units: pCi/kg, wet LLD (pCi/k LAB 20091034 20091035 20091127 20091128 20091129 9g)LOCATION FISHDOWN Drum FISHDOWN Catfish FISHUP Buffalo FISHUP Catfish FISHUP Mullet DATE 9/30/2009 9/30/2009 10/22/2009 10/22/2009 10/22/2009 130 MN-54< 21.71< 40.86< 18.94< 19.27< 25.10 130 CO-58< 21.38< 30.06< 24.22< 22.84< 20.80 260 FE-59< 62.03< 71.01< 46.81< 51.20< 41.48 130 CO-60< 16.01< 35.68< 25.24< 23.73< 24.77 260 ZN-65< 53.85< 72.88< 7.12< 56.63< 59.08 130 CS-134< 20.92< 29.74< 22.59< 18.90< 20.48 150 CS-137< 17.12< 32.71< 21.40< 18.14< 27.54 37 Attachment 8.1 Sample Type: Interlaboratory Comparison Analysis:

Gross Beta, Iodine- 131, Tritium, and Gamma Isotopic Analytics Gamma in E6674-125 Water March 19, 2009 RBS RBS Ref Lab Ref Lab Resolution RBSIRef Lab Pass/Mean 1-s Value Uncertainty Ratio Fail Nuclide pCI/L dev pCI/L 1-s dev 1-131 73.3 0.13 69.0 1.15 60 1.06 Pass Ce-141 126 2.54 120 2.01 59.7 1.05 Pass Cr-61 371 10.9 387 6.46 59.9 0.96 Pass Cs-134 118 2.11 119 1.98 60.1 0.99 Pass Cs-137 151 2.91 141 2.36 59.7 1.07 Pass Co-58 154 2.65 151 2.52 59.9 1.02 Pass Mn-54 173 4.05 162 2.70 60 1.07 Pass Fe-59 134 2.84 127 2.11 60.2 1.06 Pass Zn-65 199 2.71 197 3.30 59.7 1.01 Pass Co-60 189 0.31 180 3.01 59.8 1.05 Pass Gross Analytics Beta in E6675-125 Water March 19, 2009 Water RBS RBS Ref Lab Ref Lab Resolution RBS/Ref Lab Pass/Mean I-s Value uncertainty Ratio Fall Nuclide pCI/L dev pCiIL l-s dev Cs-137 240 2.66 235 3.92 59.9 1.02 Pass Analytics 1-131 E6676-125 cartridge March 19, 2009 RBS RBS Ref Lab Ref Lab Resolution RBSIRef Lab Pass/Mean 1-s Value uncertainty Ratio Fail Nuclide pCi dev pCi 1-s dev I II___d 1-131 76.0 2.75 78.6 1.31 60.0 0.97 Pass Analytics Gamma in E6677-125 Milk March 19, 2009 RBS RBS Ref Lab Ref Lab Resolution RBS/Ref Lab Pass/Mean 1-s Value uncertainty Ratio Fail Nuclide pCl/L dev pCI/L 1-s dev 1-131 74.0 4.10 79.3 1.32 60.1 0.93 Pass Ce-141 91.2 3.91 94.9 1.58 60.1 0.96. Pass Cr-S1 283 20.9 305 5.10 59.8 0.93 Pass Cs-134 95.5 2.04 93.7 1.57 59.7 1.02 Pass Cs-137 107 0.95 111 1.86 59.7 0.96 Pass Co-68 111 2.80 119 1.99 59.8 0.93 Pass Mn-54 136 3.79 128 2.13 60.1 1.06 Pass Fe-59 109 5.85 99.9 1.67 59.8 1.09 Pass Zn-65 159 6.00 156 2.60 60.0 1.02 Pass Co-60 143 1.22 142 2.38 59.7 1.01 Pass 38 Attachment 8.1 Sample Type: lnterlaboratory Comparison Analysis:

Gross Beta, Iodine- 13 1, Tritium, and Gamma Isotopic Analytics H-3 E6707-125 in water June 18, 2009 RBS RBS Ref Lab Ref Lab Resolution RBS/Ref Lab Pass/Mean 1-s Value uncertainty Ratio Fall Nuclide pCI/L dev pCiL 1-s dev H-3 12591 368 13300 223 59.6 0.95 Pass Analytics Gross E6708-126 Beta filter June 18, 2009 RBS RBS Ref Lab Ref Lab Resolution RBS/Ref Lab Pass/Mean 1-s Value uncertainty Ratio Fall Nuclide pCI dev pCl 1-s dev I I Cs-137 91.6 0.59 86.5 1.44 60.1 1.06 Pass Analytics Gamma E6709-125 Filter June_18,_2009

___________

___________

RBS RBS Ref Lab Ref Lab Resolution RBSlRef Lab Pass/Mean 1-s Value Uncertainty Ratio Fall Nuclide pCI dev pCi 1-s dev Ce-141 119 2.5 120 2.0 60 0.99 Pass Cr-S1 172 11.1 169 2.82 59.9 1.02 Pass Cs-134 66.9 1.2 69.8 1.17 59.7 0.96 Pass Cs-137 83.3 0.8 80.8 1.35 59.9 1.03 Pass Co-58 40.1 0.6 38.7 0.646 59.9 1.03 Pass Mn-64 60.5 1.4 57.7 0.964 59.9 1.05 Pass Fe-59 55.5 1.3 51.5 0.860 59.9 1.08 Pass Zn-65 80.4 1.7 73.9. 1.23 60.1 1.09 Pass Co-60 136 2.4 131 2.19 59.8 1.04 Pass Analytics Gamma E671 0-125 Soil June 18, 2009 RBS RBS Ref Lab Ref Lab Resolution RBS/Ref Lab Pass/Mean 1-s Value Uncertainty Ratio Fail Nuclide pCilgram dev pCilgram 1-s dev Ce-141 0.461 1.99e-3 0.462 7.72e-3 59.8 i 1.00 Pass Cr-61 0.631 5.69e-3 0.652 1.09e-2 59.8 0.97 Pass Cs-134 0.269 1.32e-3 0.270 4.51e-3 59.9 1.00 Pass Cs-137 0.428 4.94e-3 0.406 6.78e-3 59.9 1.05 Pass Co-58 0.144 2.26e-3 0.150 2.51e-3 59.8 0.96 Pass Mn-54 0.231 1.99e-3 0.223 3.72e-3 59.9 1.04 Pass Fe-59 0.201 1.50e-3 0.199 3.32e-3 59.9 1.01 Pass Zn-65 0.299 4.70e3 0.286 4.78e-3 59.8 1.05 Pass Co-60 0.509 3.72e-3 0.507 8.47e-3 59.9 1.00 Pass 39