ML061030486

04/11/2006 NRC CY2005 Annual Assessment Meeting - Crystal River - Presentation Slides

ML061030486
Person / Time
Site:	Crystal River
Issue date:	04/11/2006
From:	Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
To:
Shared Package
ML061030476	List: ML061030486 ML061030506
References
Download: ML061030486 (18)

Text

NRC CY2005 Annual Assessment Meeting CRYSTAL RIVER Crystal River, Florida Crystal River, Florida April 11, 2006 April 11, 2006 Purpose of Today's Meeting

• • A public forum for discussion of Crystal River A public forum for discussion of Crystal River performance performance

• • NRC will address Crystal River performance NRC will address Crystal River performance issues identified in the annual assessment letter issues identified in the annual assessment letter

• • Crystal River management will be given the Crystal River management will be given the opportunity to respond to the information in the opportunity to respond to the information in the letter and inform the NRC of new or existing letter and inform the NRC of new or existing programs to maintain or improve their programs to maintain or improve their performance performance Agenda*Introduction

• Review of Reactor Oversight Process

• National Summary of Plant Performance

• Discussion of Crystal River Plant Performance Results*Crystal River Management Response and Remarks

• NRC Closing Remarks

• Break*NRC Available to Address Public Questions Region II OrganizationWilliam TraversRegional Administrator Loren PliscoDeputy Regional AdministratorCharles CastoDirector Division of Reactor Projects Joseph Shea Deputy DirectorVictor McCreeDirector Division of Reactor Safety Harold Christensen Deputy Director Joel MundayBranch Chief Regional Specialists Crystal RiverResident InspectorsTom MorrisseyRoger Reyes Project Engineers Son Ninh NRC Performance Goals Ensure protection of the public health and safety and the environment Ensure the secure use and management of radioactive materials PRIMARY GOALS OTHER GOALS

• Ensure openness in NRC regulatory process

• Ensure that NRC actions are effect ive, efficient, realistic, and timely*Ensure excellence in NRC management to carry out the NRC's strategic objective Reactor Oversight ProcessSafetyCornerstonesBaseline Inspection ResultsSignificance ThresholdAction MatrixSignificance ThresholdPerformance IndicatorResultsRegulatory ResponseStrategicPerformance AreasSafetyCornerstonesBaseline Inspection ResultsSignificance ThresholdAction MatrixSignificance ThresholdPerformance IndicatorResultsRegulatory ResponseStrategicPerformance Areas Examples of Baseline InspectionsEquipment Alignment ~80 hrs/yr Triennial Fire Protection ~200 hrs every 3 yrsOperator Response ~125 hrs/yrEmergency Preparedness ~80 hrs/yrRad Release Controls ~110 hrs every 2 yrsWorker Radiation Protection ~90 hrs/yrCorrective Action Program ~250 hrs every 2 yrs Corrective Action Case Reviews ~60 hrs/yr Performance Thresholds Safety Significance Green:Very low safety issue White:Low-to-moderate safety issue Yellow:Substantial safety issue Red:High safety issue NRC Inspection Efforts Green:Only Baseline Inspections White:May increase NRC oversight Yellow:Increased NRC oversight Red:Increased NRC oversight and other NRC actions Action Matrix ConceptLicenseeResponseRegulatoryResponseDegradedCornerstoneMultiple/Rep.DegradedCornerstoneUnacceptablePerformance Increasing Safety Significance Increasing NRC Inspection Efforts

Increasing NRC/Licensee Management Involvement Increasing Regulatory Actions National Summary of Plant Performance Status at End of CY 2005Licensee Response 84Regulatory Response 12 Degraded Cornerstone 4Multiple/Repetitive Degraded Cornerstone3Unacceptable 0Total103 Crystal River CY2005 Inspection Activities

• 3544 hours of inspection related activities

• Resident inspector daily inspections

• Fire protection inspection

• Emergency preparedness inspection

• Safety system design and performance capability inspection

• Maintenance inspections

• Reactor operator initial exam

• Radiation protection inspections

• Engineering modifications inspection Crystal River CY2005 Assessment Results

• Crystal River performance was within the Licensee Response Column of the NRC'sAction Matrix for the

first two quarters but transitioned to the Regulatory

Response column in the third quarter.

• All Unit 3 inspection findings were classified as very

low safety significance (Green) except for one white

inspection finding in the Mitigating System

Cornerstone (Fire Protection) originating in the third

quarter.*All performance indicators were Green Crystal River White Finding One White inspection finding in the Mitigating System Cornerstone (Fire Protection) originating in the third quarter

• Unprotected Post-Fire Safe Shutdown Cables and Related Unfeasible Local Manual Operator Action Crystal River Assessment Summary

• Progress Energy operated Crystal River in a manner that preserved public health and safety

• All cornerstone objectives were met

• NRC plans baseline inspections at Crystal River

for the remainder of CY 2006 Crystal River CY2006 Scheduled Inspection Activities

• Resident inspector daily inspections

• Supplemental Inspection (95001 for Fire Protection White Finding in 3 rd Qtr 2005)*Licensed operator requalificationprogram inspection

• Emergency preparedness inspection

• Problem identification and resolution inspection

• Engineering modifications inspection

• Radiation protection inspections

• Maintenance inspections NRC CY2005 NRC CY2005 Annual Assessment Meeting Annual Assessment Meeting CRYSTAL RIVER Crystal River, FL April 11, 2006 Contacting the NRC Report an emergency(301) 816-5100 (call collect) Report a safety concern: (800) 695-7403 Allegation@nrc.gov General information or questionswww.nrc.govSelect "What We Do"for Public Affairs Reference Sources Reactor Oversight Processhttp://www.nrc.gov/NRR/OVERSIGHT/ASSESS/index.html Public Electronic Reading Roomhttp://www.nrc.gov/reading-rm.html Public Document Room1-800-397-4209 (Toll Free)