ML14247A248

2014 Byron Nuclear Station Initial License Examination Form ES-301-3

ML14247A248
Person / Time
Site:	Byron
Issue date:	06/13/2014
From:	Walton R NRC/RGN-III/DRS/OLB
To:	Exelon Generation Co
Shared Package
ML14140A562	List: ML14247A248 ML14247A257 ML14247A270 ML14248A490 ML14248A493 ML14248A499 ML14248A505 ML14248A514 ML14248A531 ML14248A542
References
Download: ML14247A248 (1)

Text

ES-301 Operating Test Quality Checklist Form ES-301-3 Facility: &.JV"- Date of Examination: "/t/~'1'Operating Tesfffu~~t:(b:¥~

0 Initials

1. General Criteria a b* c#

a. The operating test conforms with the previously approved outline; changes are consistent with sampling requirements (e.g., 10 CFR 55.45, operational importance, safety function distribution).

5/1P J7c- ~~

b. There is no day-to-day repetition between this and other operating tests to be administered during this examination.

~ Jt- £\AW

c. The operating test shall not duplicate items from the applicants' audit test(s). (see Section D.1.a.) 1111' ~ ~~

d. Overlap with the written examination and between different parts of the operating test is within acceptable limits.

rl:NJ Q1- ~

e. It appears that the operating test will differentiate between competent and less-than-competent tfl:HJ 6t-- ~w applicants at the designated license level.

2. Walk-Through Criteria -- -- --

a. Each JPM includes the following, as applicable:

• initial conditions initiating cues

• references and tools, including associated procedures

• reasonable and validated time limits (average time allowed for completion) and specific designation if deemed to be time-critical by the facility licensee t1fl It- (MtJ

• operationally important specific performance criteria that include:

- detailed expected actions with exact criteria and nomenclature

- system response and other examiner cues

- statements describing important observations to be made by the applicant

- criteria for successful completion of the task

- identification of critical steps and their associated performance standards

- restrictions on the sequence of steps, if applicable

b. Ensure that any changes from the previously approved systems and administrative walk-through outlines (Forms ES-301-1 and 2) have not caused the test to deviate from any of the acceptance criteria (e.g., item distribution, bank use, repetition from the last 2 NRC examinations) specified

'# ~

~\,;)

on those forms and Form ES-201-2.

3. Simulator Criteria -- -- --

The associated simulator operating tests (scenario sets) have been reviewed in accordance with 124' ~~

Form ES-301-4 and a copy is attached.

Printed Nam~~ature ~

Date

a. Author ~/3cfJqf VE"f"C2.Sc.N j[K".r£;-~ ~...------ 'I/J7//Y J

b. Facility Reviewer(*) S/Z(I'.N LE--*AJ/~ r~Jr

c. NRC Chief B<amloe' (#) ~I) lli.c"i4 ~!,:fAy</~' j) M / J.'J)J;r.. ~;;;

d. NRC Supervisor If* .

'/nt/{I)F/ ft. ~>r5/1Y .~/:::..

/, y v

-~ SJ J ~/.

NOTE:

• The facility signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. Independent NRC reviewer initial items in Column "c"; chief examiner concurrence required.