ML23325A010

Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist (Byron 2023 Ile)

ML23325A010
Person / Time
Site:	Byron
Issue date:	05/31/2023
From:	Jack Giessner NRC/RGN-III/DORS/OB
To:	Constellation Energy Generation
Travis Iskierka-Boggs
Shared Package
22122A028	List: BYRON 2023-0026, Ile Oct 2023 Exam Outline Ltr ML23325A010 ML23325A011
References
Download: ML23325A010 (1)

Text

Form 2.3-1 Examination Outline Quality Checklist Facility: ,8/flON Date of Examination: lt>//f# /23 c

(Y)es / (N)o Item Task Description

a. The outline was systematically and randomly prepared in accordance with the z

w instructions in Section B of ES-4.1, and all knowledge and ability (KIA) categories are Y appropriately sampled.

y Y

b. The outline does not overemphasize any systems, evolutions, or generic topics. 'I

c. Justifications for deselected or rejected KIA statements are acceptable. y '1 Y

a. Using Form 3.4-1, Events and Evolutions Checklist, verify that the proposed scenario y y

set contains the required number of normal evolutions, reactivity evolutions, instrument Y

and component failures, manual control evolutions, technical specifications, and major transients.

a:: b. There are enough scenarios (and spares) for the projected number and mix of y applicants in accordance with the expected crew composition and rotation schedule without compromising exam integrity. Ensure that scenarios will not be repeated on

'! Y subsequent days.

en C. Ensure that all scenarios are new or significantly modified in accordance with ES-3.4 y Y

and that no scenarios are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s). 7

d. To the extent possible, assess whether the outline(s) conforms with the qualitative and y quantitative simulator set criteria specified on Form 2.3-2. '/ Y

a. Verify that the administrative outline meets the criteria specified in the instructions on y Y Form 3.2-1 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants' audit test(s). y

b. Verify that the control room and in-plant systems outline meets the criteria specified in y V) the instructions on Form 3.2-2 and that no tasks are duplicated from the applicants* '/ Y

-, audit test(s).

C. Determine whether the number of job performance measures (JPMs) and JPM types is y sufficient for the projected number and mix of applicants and ensure that no items are Y duplicated on subsequent days.

y

a. Assess whether the appropriate exam sections cover plant-specific priorities (including probabilistic risk assessment and individual plant examination insights).

y Y

b. Assess whether the 10 CFR 55.41, 10 CFR 55.43, and 10 CFR 55.45 sampling is y Y

...J appropriate. '/

y y Y 0::: c. Check whether KIA importance ratings (except for plant-specific priorities) are greater w than or equal to 2.5.

C) d. Check for duplication and overlap across the exam and with the last two NRC exams. y y Y

e. Check the entire exam for balance of coverage. y y Y y Y

f. Assess whether the exam fits the appropriate job level (reactor operator or senior reactor operator). y Printed Name/Signature; Date

a. Author BarQ£ Mingus / .,,--:P 5/18/23

b. Facility Reviewer (*) Mike Wilde I 5/18/23

c. NRC Reviewer (#) Travis D. Iskierka-Boggs Digitally signed by Travis D. Iskierka-Boggs Date: 2023.05.30 10:51:54 -04'00' NRC Chief Examiner Travis D. Iskierka-Boggs Digitally signed by Travis D. Iskierka-Boggs Date: 2023.05.30 10:52:18 -04'00' NRC Supervisor April M. Nguyen Digitally signed by April M. Nguyen Date: 2023.05.31 07:39:16 -05'00'

• The facility licensee signature is not applicable for NRC-developed tests.

1. An independent NRC reviewer performs the steps in column "c." This may be the NRC Chief Examiner if he/she did not develop the outline under review.