Testimony of Wj Ferguson Re Engineering,Qa & Const Project Organizations.Qa Program Is Autonomous & Objective.Bechtel Has Primary Responsibility for Review of Design & Procurement DocumentsML19207B485 |
Person / Time |
---|
Site: |
Skagit |
---|
Issue date: |
06/29/1979 |
---|
From: |
Ferguson W PUGET SOUND POWER & LIGHT CO. |
---|
To: |
|
---|
Shared Package |
---|
ML19207B482 |
List: |
---|
References |
---|
NUDOCS 7908300034 |
Download: ML19207B485 (14) |
|
|
---|
Category:LEGAL TRANSCRIPTS & ORDERS & PLEADINGS
MONTHYEARML20082F7771983-11-23023 November 1983 Motion for Order Approving Encl Withdrawal of Application & Terminating Proceeding ML20082F7881983-11-23023 November 1983 Withdrawal of OL Application.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080L9431983-09-28028 September 1983 Second Request for Addl Extension Until 840115 to Answer Intervenor Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 1. Portland General Electric Co Expects to Decide on Plant Termination by End of 1983.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20080G0731983-09-13013 September 1983 Request for Extension Until 831014 to Answer Intervenor Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 1.Motion May Be Moot If Other Owners Concur W/Util Decision to Terminate Proceeding.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071Q7201983-06-0303 June 1983 Response Opposing Applicant 830525 Request for Extension Until 830930 to Answer Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 1.No Good Cause Demonstrated.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20071M0781983-05-25025 May 1983 Request for Extension Until 830930 to Answer NRDC Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 1.Time Needed to Consider Implications of Final Northwest Conservation Electric Power Plan & Licensing Alternatives.Certificates of Svc Encl ML20023C4571983-05-12012 May 1983 Memorandum of Points & Authorities Supporting Intervenor Motion for Summary Disposition Since Contention 1 No Longer Controversial Issue.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20023C6971983-05-12012 May 1983 Affidavit of DB Goldstein Supporting NRDC Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 1 Re Need for Power.Four Forecasts for Energy Needs Refute Need for Power Justification Developed by Util.Prof Qualifications Encl ML20023C3741983-05-12012 May 1983 Statement of Matl Facts as to Which There Is No Genuine Issue Re Contention 1 ML20023C3691983-05-12012 May 1983 Motion for Summary Disposition of Contention 1 Re Calculation of Demand for Electrical Energy Negating Need for Plant.No Genuine Issue of Matl Fact Exists ML20064N6681983-02-10010 February 1983 Motion to Suspend Health & Safety Prehearing Schedule Pending Adoption of Final Regional Energy Plan or Until Conclusion of Evidentiary Hearings on Need for Power. Applicant Appears Ready to Absorb Facility Costs ML20071A6671983-02-10010 February 1983 Certifies Svc of Intervenor Motion to Suspend Safety & Health Schedule on 830210 ML20070T0661983-02-0404 February 1983 Motion for Order Suspending Health & Safety Prehearing Schedule,Pending Adoption of Final Regional Power Plan & Further Order of Aslb.Suspension Would Be in Best Interest of All Concerned.W/Certificate of Svc ML20083N8101983-01-31031 January 1983 New Contentions Based on New Info in SER Suppl.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20083N1991983-01-26026 January 1983 Notice of Appeal & Exceptions to ASLB 830118 Memorandum & Order.Memorandum & Order Fails to Recognize Yakima Indian Nation Sovereignty & Treaty Rights Which Are Supreme Law of Land.Affidavit of Svc Encl ML20028F1831983-01-25025 January 1983 Notification of Intent to File New Contentions Based on New Info in SER Suppl.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028E9701983-01-19019 January 1983 Reply to NRC & Applicant Response to Natl Wildlife Federation/Or Environ Council,Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission & Coalition for Safe Power 821213 Motion to Clarify & Amend Certain Contentions.W/Certificate of Svc ML20072A6731983-01-18018 January 1983 Motion for Extension of Time Until 830210 to File Answer to Natl Wildlife Federation/Or Environ Council 830105 Motion to Compel Discovery.Parties Attempting to Settle Matter by Informal Agreement.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028C9581983-01-0505 January 1983 Memorandum Supporting Natl Wildlife Federation/Or Environ Council 830105 Motion to Compel Discovery.Applicants Misinterpreted 10CFR2.740(b)(1) Relevancy Std.Discovery Requests Are Relevant.W/Certificate of Svc ML20028C9501983-01-0505 January 1983 Motion to Compel Applicants to Respond in Full to Natl Wildlife Federation/Or Environ Council 821201 Interrogatories & Request for Production of Documents ML20028C3221983-01-0303 January 1983 Suppl to DOE 821126 Limited Appearance Statement.Doe Position Is That Hanford Site Is Not Open,Unclaimed Land as Defined in 1855 Treaty W/Yakima Indian Nation,Article Iii. ASLB Is Wrong Forum for Resolving Issue ML20070L5411982-12-27027 December 1982 Answer Opposing Yakima Indian Nation 821210 Motion for Reconsideration of ASLB 821029 Memorandum & Order Re Suppl to Petition to Intervene.Aslb Rejection of Contentions 7,8 & 9 Well Founded ML20070L4901982-12-27027 December 1982 Affidavit of Mv Stimac Supporting Applicant Answer to Yakima Indian Nation Motion for Reconsideration.Describes Plant Site & Location of Casements.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20079J6021982-12-23023 December 1982 Response Supporting Intervenor 821213 Motion to Clarify & Amend Contentions 7 & 8.Quantification of Environ Impacts Not Practicable Due to Subjective Nature.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20023B3081982-12-20020 December 1982 Response to 821201 Discovery Requests.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20079H3711982-12-13013 December 1982 Motion to Clarify & Amend Contentions 7 & 8.Contentions Should Be Reorganized to Facilitate Coordinated Evidentiary Presentations for Environ Matters ASLB Set Out as Contentions 4,7 & 8.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20070D1181982-12-10010 December 1982 Affidavit of R Jim Supporting Yakima Indian Nation Brief on Admissibility of Nation Reworded Proposed Contention 10 & Motion for Reconsideration.Nation Has Right to Pasture Horses & Gather Roots Even Though Us Holds Title to Land ML20070C9121982-12-10010 December 1982 Notice of Counsel New Law Firm Affiliation,As of 820901 ML20070C8181982-12-10010 December 1982 Motion for Reconsideration of ASLB 821029 Memorandum & Order Re Yakima Indian Nation Contentions 7,8 & 9.Nation Right to Enjoy Reservation Peacefully Given by 1855 Treaty Should Be Protected by ASLB ML20070C7691982-12-10010 December 1982 Certifies Svc of Brief on Admissibility of Reworded Proposed Contention 10,motion for Reconsideration of ASLB 821029 Memorandum & Order,R Jim Affidavit & Notice of Counsel Law Firm Change on 821210 ML20070C7981982-12-10010 December 1982 Brief Supporting Admissibility of Yakima Indian Nation Reworded Proposed Contention 10.Attempt to Terminate Reserved Rights of Yakima Indian Nation Violates Fifth Amend.Land Cannot Be Taken by Inverse Condemnation ML20028B9251982-12-0101 December 1982 Brief Re Admissibility of Yaking Indian Nation Proposed Contention 10.Clarification Needed on Procedural Rule of Commission & Scope of Contention.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20028B8971982-12-0101 December 1982 Request for Production of Documents & Interrogatories,Per 10CFR2.740(b) & 10CFR2.741.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20028B2631982-11-26026 November 1982 Limited Appearance Statement.Hanford Site Is Not Part of Yakima Indian Nation Reservation Established by 1855 Treaty. Indian Privilege of Hunting,Gathering Roots & Berries & Grazing Animals Does Not Extend to Hanford Site ML20066K9761982-11-22022 November 1982 Motion to Alter Lead Party Designation Established for Contention 3 in ASLB 821102 Memorandum & Order.All Intervenors Concur That NRDC Should Be Designated Lead Party,Since NRDC Demonstrated Greatest Expertise on Issue ML20066L0101982-11-22022 November 1982 Motion to Amend Accepted Contention 3.Proposed Amends Would Conform Contention 3 to Earlier Admitted NRDC Contention on Which Contention 3 Is Partially Based.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20023A8301982-10-15015 October 1982 Response to 820910 First Set of Production Requests. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20023A8141982-10-14014 October 1982 Response to Yakima Indian Nation 820930 Suppl to Petition to Intervene,Containing List of Contentions.Objects to Contentions 4-10.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20027C1591982-10-0606 October 1982 Response to 820917 First Set of Interrogatories ML20063P4011982-10-0606 October 1982 Response to Columbia River Inter-Tribal Fish Commission 820923 Notice of Appeal of ASLB 820903 Memorandum & Order Denying Intervention.Applicants Will Not Oppose Appeal in Order to Maintain Schedule for Proceeding ML20071N3791982-10-0404 October 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20065H5451982-09-29029 September 1982 Supplement to Petition to Intervene,Consisting of Contentions & Bases for Contentions ML20065H5481982-09-29029 September 1982 Applicant Response to Coalition for Safe Power 820910 First Set of Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20065J1601982-09-28028 September 1982 Responds to Util 820917 First Set of Interrogatories. Certificate of Svc Encl.Related Correspondence ML20069F9541982-09-23023 September 1982 Memorandum Supporting Appeal of ASLB 820908 Memorandum & Order Denying 820505 Petition to Intervene or Alternatively, to Remand Petition to ASLB for Further Clarification on Question of Standing.Certificate of Svc & Exhibit Encl ML20069F9491982-09-23023 September 1982 Notice of Appeal of ASLB 820908 Memorandum & Order Denying 820505 Petition to Intervene.Supporting Brief Encl ML20027B5661982-09-17017 September 1982 Response to First Set of Interrogatories.Certificate of Svc Encl ML20137F8001982-09-17017 September 1982 Amended Subagreement 2 Between State of Wa Energy Facility Site Evaluation Council & NRC Re Protocol for Conduct of Joint Hearings on Facility Project ML20027B5631982-09-17017 September 1982 First Set of Interrogatories ML20027B5571982-09-15015 September 1982 Motion for Extension of Time Until 821004 to Respond to Applicant Interrogatories.Counsel Was Unavailable When Interrogatories Arrived. Certificate of Svc Encl 1983-09-28
[Table view] Category:TRANSCRIPTS
MONTHYEARML19210E1281979-10-18018 October 1979 Prefiled Testimony.Bechtel 1979 Geology Map Cannot Be Used as Tool for Seismic Evaluation of Area.Supporting Documentation,Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19276H5781979-10-18018 October 1979 Prefiled Testimony.Applicants' Inference That No Significant Northwesterly Trending Fault Exists Between Lummi Island & Clark & Matia Islands Cannot Be Substantiated.Prof Qualifications Encl ML19276H5801979-10-18018 October 1979 Prefiled Testimony.Two east-west Trending Faults Can Be Found Along Plant Site Vicinity ML19276H5831979-10-18018 October 1979 Prefiled testimony.Auger-Hole Investigation Conducted by Bechtel Did Not Provide Sufficient Evidence Approving or Disapproving Origins of Sediments Deformation ML19276H5751979-10-17017 October 1979 Prefiled Testimony.High Frequency Seismic Methods Inadequate to Locate Fault Traces Existing in Area.Interpolation Between Spaced Seismic Lines Is Speculative ML19210C1631979-10-0808 October 1979 Testimony of Nm Newmark Re Conservatism of Seismic Design Criteria & Seismic Design Provisions for Facility.Biography Encl ML19210C1601979-10-0808 October 1979 Testimony of Ba Bolt Re Correlation Between Peak Acceleration & Magnitude & Intensity.Biography,Publication List & Supporting Documentation Encl ML19256E3281979-10-0303 October 1979 Supplemental Testimony of J Kelleher Re NRC Methods Used to Estimate Strong Ground Motion ML20136C5211979-08-30030 August 1979 Transcript of 790830 Hearing in Seattle,Wa. Pp 14,802-15,048 ML20136C5271979-08-27027 August 1979 Transcript of 790827 Hearing in Seattle,Wa. Pp 14,388-14,573.Exhibits 213-15 Encl ML19249E1561979-08-0808 August 1979 Testimony Re Financial Qualifications Submitted by J Lazar on Behalf of Intervenor Skagitonians Concerned About Nuclear Power.Asserts Applicant Will Be Unable to Secure Financing. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19207B4771979-07-12012 July 1979 Supplemental Testimony of Es Cheney Re Alternative Site Comparison,Submitted on Behalf of Skagitonians Concerned About Nuclear Power.Goshen,Hanford & Pebble Springs Are Better Sites than Skagit ML19209B0681979-07-10010 July 1979 Testimony of ML Darland on Behalf of Intervenor Skagitonians Concerned About Nuclear Power,Re Evacuation Planning.Professional Qualifications Encl ML19209B0691979-07-10010 July 1979 Testimony of Pr Weber on Behalf of Intervenor Skagitonians Concerned About Nuclear Power,Re Ranney Wells.Prof Qualifications & Bibliography Encl ML19209B0721979-07-10010 July 1979 Testimony of J Lazar on Behalf of Intervenors Skagitonians Concerned About Nuclear Power,Re Financial Qualifications. W/Supporting Documentation ML19247B2871979-07-0202 July 1979 Testimony of RB Eastvedt Re Bulk Transmission Sys Requirements Associated W/Alternate Sites ML19207B4841979-06-29029 June 1979 Testimony of JW Ellis Re QA Program.Util Has Implemented QA Program That Fully Complies with All State & Federal Regulations ML19207B4811979-06-29029 June 1979 Testimony of Je Mecca Re Amended License Application & Complete Psar.Verifies Application as Amended Through Amend 4 & PSAR as Amended Through Amend 20 & Suppl 18 ML19207B4851979-06-29029 June 1979 Testimony of Wj Ferguson Re Engineering,Qa & Const Project Organizations.Qa Program Is Autonomous & Objective.Bechtel Has Primary Responsibility for Review of Design & Procurement Documents ML19207B4901979-06-29029 June 1979 Testimony of Ev Padgett Re QA Program.Qa Program Was Developed to Meet Requirements of 10CFR50,App B & ANSI N45.2 as Set Forth in Chapter 17 ML19207B4911979-06-29029 June 1979 Testimony of Rn Hettinger Re QA Program.Describes Current Level of QA Activities.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19246C4681979-06-0101 June 1979 Submits Joint Testimony of Re Olson,Me Coberley,Ls Pack & Jm Coombs.Util Does Not Have Reasonable Assurance of Obtaining Funds for Const & Fuel Cycle Costs.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19242D2021979-06-0101 June 1979 Supplements Testimony Presented at 780217 Proceeding Re Util Use of Piping Test Data to Predict Yield of Proposed Ranney Collector Sys & Drawdown Effects of Ranney Collectors on Nearby Red Cabin & Muddy Creeks ML19241A6171979-06-0101 June 1979 Testimony Re Ranney Collector Sys.Sys Is Sufficient to Provide Plant Water Needs Under Varying Conditions W/Minimal Impact on Water Resources 1979-08-08
[Table view] Category:DEPOSITIONS
MONTHYEARML19210E1281979-10-18018 October 1979 Prefiled Testimony.Bechtel 1979 Geology Map Cannot Be Used as Tool for Seismic Evaluation of Area.Supporting Documentation,Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19276H5781979-10-18018 October 1979 Prefiled Testimony.Applicants' Inference That No Significant Northwesterly Trending Fault Exists Between Lummi Island & Clark & Matia Islands Cannot Be Substantiated.Prof Qualifications Encl ML19276H5801979-10-18018 October 1979 Prefiled Testimony.Two east-west Trending Faults Can Be Found Along Plant Site Vicinity ML19276H5831979-10-18018 October 1979 Prefiled testimony.Auger-Hole Investigation Conducted by Bechtel Did Not Provide Sufficient Evidence Approving or Disapproving Origins of Sediments Deformation ML19276H5751979-10-17017 October 1979 Prefiled Testimony.High Frequency Seismic Methods Inadequate to Locate Fault Traces Existing in Area.Interpolation Between Spaced Seismic Lines Is Speculative ML19210C1631979-10-0808 October 1979 Testimony of Nm Newmark Re Conservatism of Seismic Design Criteria & Seismic Design Provisions for Facility.Biography Encl ML19210C1601979-10-0808 October 1979 Testimony of Ba Bolt Re Correlation Between Peak Acceleration & Magnitude & Intensity.Biography,Publication List & Supporting Documentation Encl ML19256E3281979-10-0303 October 1979 Supplemental Testimony of J Kelleher Re NRC Methods Used to Estimate Strong Ground Motion ML20136C5211979-08-30030 August 1979 Transcript of 790830 Hearing in Seattle,Wa. Pp 14,802-15,048 ML20136C5271979-08-27027 August 1979 Transcript of 790827 Hearing in Seattle,Wa. Pp 14,388-14,573.Exhibits 213-15 Encl ML19249E1561979-08-0808 August 1979 Testimony Re Financial Qualifications Submitted by J Lazar on Behalf of Intervenor Skagitonians Concerned About Nuclear Power.Asserts Applicant Will Be Unable to Secure Financing. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19207B4771979-07-12012 July 1979 Supplemental Testimony of Es Cheney Re Alternative Site Comparison,Submitted on Behalf of Skagitonians Concerned About Nuclear Power.Goshen,Hanford & Pebble Springs Are Better Sites than Skagit ML19209B0681979-07-10010 July 1979 Testimony of ML Darland on Behalf of Intervenor Skagitonians Concerned About Nuclear Power,Re Evacuation Planning.Professional Qualifications Encl ML19209B0691979-07-10010 July 1979 Testimony of Pr Weber on Behalf of Intervenor Skagitonians Concerned About Nuclear Power,Re Ranney Wells.Prof Qualifications & Bibliography Encl ML19209B0721979-07-10010 July 1979 Testimony of J Lazar on Behalf of Intervenors Skagitonians Concerned About Nuclear Power,Re Financial Qualifications. W/Supporting Documentation ML19247B2871979-07-0202 July 1979 Testimony of RB Eastvedt Re Bulk Transmission Sys Requirements Associated W/Alternate Sites ML19207B4841979-06-29029 June 1979 Testimony of JW Ellis Re QA Program.Util Has Implemented QA Program That Fully Complies with All State & Federal Regulations ML19207B4811979-06-29029 June 1979 Testimony of Je Mecca Re Amended License Application & Complete Psar.Verifies Application as Amended Through Amend 4 & PSAR as Amended Through Amend 20 & Suppl 18 ML19207B4851979-06-29029 June 1979 Testimony of Wj Ferguson Re Engineering,Qa & Const Project Organizations.Qa Program Is Autonomous & Objective.Bechtel Has Primary Responsibility for Review of Design & Procurement Documents ML19207B4901979-06-29029 June 1979 Testimony of Ev Padgett Re QA Program.Qa Program Was Developed to Meet Requirements of 10CFR50,App B & ANSI N45.2 as Set Forth in Chapter 17 ML19207B4911979-06-29029 June 1979 Testimony of Rn Hettinger Re QA Program.Describes Current Level of QA Activities.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19246C4681979-06-0101 June 1979 Submits Joint Testimony of Re Olson,Me Coberley,Ls Pack & Jm Coombs.Util Does Not Have Reasonable Assurance of Obtaining Funds for Const & Fuel Cycle Costs.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19242D2021979-06-0101 June 1979 Supplements Testimony Presented at 780217 Proceeding Re Util Use of Piping Test Data to Predict Yield of Proposed Ranney Collector Sys & Drawdown Effects of Ranney Collectors on Nearby Red Cabin & Muddy Creeks ML19241A6171979-06-0101 June 1979 Testimony Re Ranney Collector Sys.Sys Is Sufficient to Provide Plant Water Needs Under Varying Conditions W/Minimal Impact on Water Resources 1979-08-08
[Table view] Category:NARRATIVE TESTIMONY
MONTHYEARML19210E1281979-10-18018 October 1979 Prefiled Testimony.Bechtel 1979 Geology Map Cannot Be Used as Tool for Seismic Evaluation of Area.Supporting Documentation,Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19276H5781979-10-18018 October 1979 Prefiled Testimony.Applicants' Inference That No Significant Northwesterly Trending Fault Exists Between Lummi Island & Clark & Matia Islands Cannot Be Substantiated.Prof Qualifications Encl ML19276H5801979-10-18018 October 1979 Prefiled Testimony.Two east-west Trending Faults Can Be Found Along Plant Site Vicinity ML19276H5831979-10-18018 October 1979 Prefiled testimony.Auger-Hole Investigation Conducted by Bechtel Did Not Provide Sufficient Evidence Approving or Disapproving Origins of Sediments Deformation ML19276H5751979-10-17017 October 1979 Prefiled Testimony.High Frequency Seismic Methods Inadequate to Locate Fault Traces Existing in Area.Interpolation Between Spaced Seismic Lines Is Speculative ML19210C1631979-10-0808 October 1979 Testimony of Nm Newmark Re Conservatism of Seismic Design Criteria & Seismic Design Provisions for Facility.Biography Encl ML19210C1601979-10-0808 October 1979 Testimony of Ba Bolt Re Correlation Between Peak Acceleration & Magnitude & Intensity.Biography,Publication List & Supporting Documentation Encl ML19256E3281979-10-0303 October 1979 Supplemental Testimony of J Kelleher Re NRC Methods Used to Estimate Strong Ground Motion ML20136C5211979-08-30030 August 1979 Transcript of 790830 Hearing in Seattle,Wa. Pp 14,802-15,048 ML20136C5271979-08-27027 August 1979 Transcript of 790827 Hearing in Seattle,Wa. Pp 14,388-14,573.Exhibits 213-15 Encl ML19249E1561979-08-0808 August 1979 Testimony Re Financial Qualifications Submitted by J Lazar on Behalf of Intervenor Skagitonians Concerned About Nuclear Power.Asserts Applicant Will Be Unable to Secure Financing. Certificate of Svc Encl ML19207B4771979-07-12012 July 1979 Supplemental Testimony of Es Cheney Re Alternative Site Comparison,Submitted on Behalf of Skagitonians Concerned About Nuclear Power.Goshen,Hanford & Pebble Springs Are Better Sites than Skagit ML19209B0681979-07-10010 July 1979 Testimony of ML Darland on Behalf of Intervenor Skagitonians Concerned About Nuclear Power,Re Evacuation Planning.Professional Qualifications Encl ML19209B0691979-07-10010 July 1979 Testimony of Pr Weber on Behalf of Intervenor Skagitonians Concerned About Nuclear Power,Re Ranney Wells.Prof Qualifications & Bibliography Encl ML19209B0721979-07-10010 July 1979 Testimony of J Lazar on Behalf of Intervenors Skagitonians Concerned About Nuclear Power,Re Financial Qualifications. W/Supporting Documentation ML19247B2871979-07-0202 July 1979 Testimony of RB Eastvedt Re Bulk Transmission Sys Requirements Associated W/Alternate Sites ML19207B4841979-06-29029 June 1979 Testimony of JW Ellis Re QA Program.Util Has Implemented QA Program That Fully Complies with All State & Federal Regulations ML19207B4811979-06-29029 June 1979 Testimony of Je Mecca Re Amended License Application & Complete Psar.Verifies Application as Amended Through Amend 4 & PSAR as Amended Through Amend 20 & Suppl 18 ML19207B4851979-06-29029 June 1979 Testimony of Wj Ferguson Re Engineering,Qa & Const Project Organizations.Qa Program Is Autonomous & Objective.Bechtel Has Primary Responsibility for Review of Design & Procurement Documents ML19207B4901979-06-29029 June 1979 Testimony of Ev Padgett Re QA Program.Qa Program Was Developed to Meet Requirements of 10CFR50,App B & ANSI N45.2 as Set Forth in Chapter 17 ML19207B4911979-06-29029 June 1979 Testimony of Rn Hettinger Re QA Program.Describes Current Level of QA Activities.Certificate of Svc Encl ML19246C4681979-06-0101 June 1979 Submits Joint Testimony of Re Olson,Me Coberley,Ls Pack & Jm Coombs.Util Does Not Have Reasonable Assurance of Obtaining Funds for Const & Fuel Cycle Costs.Prof Qualifications & Certificate of Svc Encl ML19242D2021979-06-0101 June 1979 Supplements Testimony Presented at 780217 Proceeding Re Util Use of Piping Test Data to Predict Yield of Proposed Ranney Collector Sys & Drawdown Effects of Ranney Collectors on Nearby Red Cabin & Muddy Creeks ML19241A6171979-06-0101 June 1979 Testimony Re Ranney Collector Sys.Sys Is Sufficient to Provide Plant Water Needs Under Varying Conditions W/Minimal Impact on Water Resources 1979-08-08
[Table view] |
Text
.
Ska~ git Nuclear Power Project June 29, 1979 Docket Nos. 50-522 & 50-523 TESTIMONY OF W. J. FERGUSON bdBJECT: SKAGIT NUCLEAR PROJECT QUALITY ASSURANCE My name is Warren J. Ferguson. I hold the office of Vice President, Engineering and Construction, and report directly to the President and Chief Executive Officer of Puget Sound Power and Light Company.
This testimony is offered in response to the Licensing Board's request posed during the April 24, 1979, prehearing conference in Seattle, Washington.
My responsibilities at Puget Power include executive direction of the Company's engineering, quality assurance, and construction project organizations.
I have 27 yo rs in nuclear plant systems work. This experience involves significant periods of time in inspec-tion, pre-operational terting, and operation of nuclear equipment and systems. I began as a test engineer with General Electric in Schenectady, New York, inspecting and testing naval nuclear propulsion systems, and later moved to the H:nford Project, where I spent 15 years in nuclear plant construction end operation. In 1967 I left Hanford and became Vice President and Genera' Manager of United Nuclear Corporation, Naval Products Division, where for rix years I 1 ,; 908800 O 3 y 852 008
was responsible for the manufacturing process, quality assurance, fabrication, and assembly of fuel and reactors for the nuclear navy.
The Skagit Nuclear Project, Quality Assurance, and Generating Plant Engineering Departn.ents report directly to me. I also have the responsibility to coordinate inputs and services of all Company organizations supporting the Skagit Nuclear Project, including Records and Purchasing, which report to the Vice President, Administration, and Nuclear Plant Operations and Nuclear Fuels, which report to the Vice President, Power Supply (see Figure 1).
The Quality Assr ance Department is separate from the Skagit Nuclear Project and Generating Plant Engineering and the other service groups that report to me. As such, it retains complete autonomy and objectivity in administering the Skagit Nuclear Project Quality Assurance program. The Manager Quality Assurance has unilateral stop work authority and has direct access to the President if required to resolve conflicts. Puget Power's quality assurance policies and procedures are detailed in our Quality Assurance Manual.
Responsibilities are clearly defined in job descriptions, including specific authorities. For example, the position description for the Manager Quality Assurance cites both the
,
position's stop work authority and direct access to the President for communication on quality assurance subjects.
2 852 009
.
I review the effectiveness of Puget's Quality Assurance program through personal inspection of facilities, equip-ment, and records and maintain frequent contact with the Bechtel engineering, procurement, and quality assurance personnel. In addition to my personal overview, I have initiated a program of third party audits and e aluationE of Puget Power's Quality Assurance Program.
Mr. E. Victor Padgett, Jr., Puget Poner's Manager Qual-ity Assurance from September 1973 to May 1979, was promoted May 1, 1979 to another position within the Company. Until a replacement for Mr. Padgett is selected, Mr. Hettinger, our Quality Assurance Specialist, has been named Acting Manager Quality Assurance, reporting directly to me. Mr. Hettinger is qualified to perform as Manager Quality Assurance and meets Puget's experience requirements as committed in Chap-ter 17 of our PSAR. In addition to Mr. Hettinger, our Qual-ity Assurance staff currently includes a Quality Assurance Auditor.
Bechtel was contracted by Puget Power to provide architect engineering, procurement, and Quality Assurance /
Quality Control services for the design and procurement phase of the project. The interface with Bechtel on the project is through our Director, Skagit Nuclear Project.
Puget Power's interface with Bechtel concerning Quality Assurance procedures and audit activities is between our 852 010
'.
Manager Quality Assurance and Bechtel's Project Quality Assurance Engineer. Bechtel has been assigned the task to perform Quality Assurance surveillance and auditing func-tions on the NSSS.
Although Bechtel has primary responsibility for the required independent review of design and procurement doc-uments, Puget Power also performs an overview. This over-view consists of review and approval of designated Bechtel design and procurement documents by the Skagit Nuclear Proj-ect, Generating Plant Engineering, Purchasing, and Quality Assurance. Through this process we are involved and have a direct influence on the work of Bechtel and other contrac-tors, to assure that they are responsive to our corporate commitment to design, build, maintain, and operate the Skagit Project in a safe, reliable, and efficient manner.
Bechtel also has been assigned to provide construction management and Quality Assurance / Quality Control services during construction. Our quality program is structured on the basis that the contractors, who perform the work, are responsible for the quality of their work. We require our Construction Contractors to have a first line inspection system that is capable of effectively evaluating the accept-ability of work as it progresses and an effective corrective action system when deficiencies are detected. For this reason, we have given considerable attention to assuring 4 852 011
.
that only qualified contractors are selected to perform the work and that each contractor performing safety-related activities at the site has a Quality Assurance / Quality Con-trol Program that meets tha requirements of 10CFR50, Appen-dix B, and ANSI N45.2.
I will now describe the Quality Assurance organization as I envision it will be during construction. (See Figure 2.) Later, I will explain how the staffing will proceed for the construction phase.
The Manager Quality Assurance will be responsible for directing the development, administration, and implementa-tion of the overall Quality Assurance Program. The Manager Quality Assurance will also evaluate the effectiveness of the existing programs through feedback from the Audit Sec-tion and the Site QA/QC Manager. The Puget Power Quality Assurance Organization will be responsible for coordinating the overa' quality assurance effort and for monitoring Bechtel, the Construction Contractors, and the various Puget Power organizations that support ti.e Skagit Project.
In addition to the Manager Quality Assurance, the cor-porate headquarters' Quality Assurance staff will include the Quality Assurance Specialist and the Audits Section.
The Quality Assurance Specialist will report to the Manager Quality Assurance and be responsible for providing adminis-5 852 012
. .
trative assistance; maintaining the Corporate Quality Assurance Manual; developing necessary procedures; Quality Assurance indoctrination at the corporate level; and 10CFR50. 55 (e) and Part 21 evaluations.
The individual auditors in the Audits Section will report to the Manager Quality Assurance and be responsible for routinely performing (etailed procedural audits of Puget Power, including Site Construction; Bechtel; and major con-tractors, to verify compliance with their procedure and regulatory requirements. Audits will be performed in accordance with ANSI N45.2.12. Site QA/QC discipline engi-neers will also assist during on-site audits conducted by the Audit Section.
The Site QA/QC Manager will report to the Manager Qual-ity Assurance and will be responsible for planning, direct-ing and implementing the Puget Power QA/QC activities at the construction site. The Site QA/QC Manager will also main-tain liaison with Puget Power's Site Senior Construction Engineer, who is part of the Skagit Nuclear Project. Puget Power's Quality Assurance / Quality Control activities at the Construction Site will be in addition to and independent of Bechtel's Quality Assurance / Quality Control activities.
The Site QA/QC organization will ir.clude personnel who will be responsible for QA Records Control, Vendor ~and Material 6
852 013
.
.
Control, Site QA Systems, and NDE Evaluation as shown in Figure 2.
1, I consider that an indepe 4ent surveillance system is essential if we are to effectively exercise our responsi-bilities to assure that the Construction Contractors and Bechtel are properly carrying out their responsibilities during construction. For that reason, our Site Quality Assurance / Quality Control organization will be staffed by various engineering disciplines as shown in Figure 2. They will be required to review the documentation relating to their discipline, including specifications, contractor procedures, field drawingr. Field Change Requests, and
@ Change Orders. During construction, Nonconformance Reports will normally be issued by Bechtel and/or the various Con-struction Contractors, but may also be issued by Puget Power. All Nonconformance Reports and Corrective Action Requests will be reviewed by Puget Power's site QA/QC organ-ization.
Planned and documented surveillance will be performed by the discipline engineers in their areas of expertise. In addition'to monitoring the work, the Construction Contrac-tors' ability to eftectively perform the work from a quality standpoint will be reviewed, as well as the contractor's first line inspection system. Where feasible, inspections by Puget Power's personnel will be performed after the Con-7 852 014
struction Contractors' work has been accepted by first line inspection. Thus the Construction Contractors' insp'ection capability will also be evaluated. Surveillance will also be aimed at evaluating Bechtel's second line inspection of the Construction Contractors' work.
When we receive an LWA, I plan to promptly add the Quality Assurance Specialist, Site QA/QC Manager, Site Qual-ity Assurance Systems Engineer and a Civil Engineer certi-fied as a Level II Inspector for cc. crete. Quality Assur-ance Records Control, and Vendor and Material Control per-sonnel will be added prior to the arrival of Quality Assur-ance records and/or material at the site. The various engi-neering disciplines and an NDE engineer will be added prior to the start of construction work in those disciplines.
Prior to pre-operational testing, Quality Assurance Engi-neers will be assigned to provide surveillance of startup testing. Our planned Quality Assurance organization, when construction is at its peak, is indicated on Figure 2.
In regard to the availability of experienced quality assurance personnel for the construction build-up, I can say that interest in the Skagit Project, and the region, is high. We will have no difficulty in attracting capable people, once the Project is underway. As to my recruiting philosophy, I look for proven performance on work of similar scope. In this case we will require direct site-related 8
852 015
.
.
nuclear quality assurance experience. When appropriate, I have also assigned personnel to other utilities' projects to enhance their qualifications and to obtain the experience we need in specific aspects of design and construction. I intend to continue this approach in staffing the Site QA/QC organization.
Our Quality Assurance Program requires that appropri-ate indoctrination and training be provided for all person-nel connected with the project, including Construction Con-tractors' personnel. Each organization is responsible for training their personnel and assuring they are adequately qualified to satisfactorily perform their duties. Inspec-tion and test personnel will be certified as specified by ANSI N45.2.6. Nondestructive Examination (NDE) personnel will be certified to the requirements of SNT-TC-1A Person- .
nel performing special processes such as welding, heat treatment, and hydro testing will be qualified to procedures approved by Bechtel. Our Quality Assurance organization will provide surveillance and audits of these organizations to assure that the various training programs are properly implemented.
To facilitate the Board's inquiry into Puget Power's Quality Assurance Program, both Mr. Padgett, the former Manager Quality Assurance, and Mr. Hettinger, the Acting Manager Quality Assurance, have provided prefiled testimony 9
.
.
'
and will be available, along with Mr. Ellis and myself, to
.
answer the 3oard's questions.
852 017 10
.
PUCET POWER ORGANIZATION CilART Presicent and Chief Fxecutive Officer Vice President Vice President Vice President Administration Engr. & Construction Power Supply Purchasing Nuclear Plant 9} Operation Planning c
C
-s d)
Corporate Nuclear Fuels es Records Supervisor and Special Studies Engr. & Construction Quality Assurance Administration Skagit Nuclear Project Transmission and Distribution Engr.
Project Engineering Project Control
_
(DC) Cenerating Pla L Il Nuclear Licensing Contract I's) and Safety Administration C: ) ___
Con on Office Supervisor h i
.
d d d n e e a l l i i g a a n t t i
p e e d d P r r n o o o f f i
I l rn a
v uw go uw go E id id
- Fk Fk a a ee ee er er Sb Sb ts
"
o *
"
n f
l S o
dt r f" nn s
ao
ol d da N u ni O A er I Ve T t A T a Z C e
- M I E c N J n A O C l G R a Q a R P r /r c O ru A e i R es Qg n ERA gs a a COE aA cn h NFL n ta c A C ay iM e R U Mt S M U N i
.
l S
a S T u
_ T K t
I S s As L Qm A i
i e U et Q i
ts iy SS e
p l S
i r
t c
e l
E
rl oo cr et R n o
AC Q
l
u C v
e l e
? C
O n )CUI-J 2eCS N :C s
~
6 .
QA Records Site QA Vendor and NDE Control Systems Material Control Evaluation Site Record 5 Construction Vendor Surveillance NDT Surveillance
, Surveillance QC Pror9dures
(
g Records Turnover Site Systems Source Inspection Film Interpretation a and Retention Surveillance Receiving and Procedure ' reparation Storage Surveillance &' Review (ruget)
Microfilm and Deficiericy and Computer Control Trend Analysis Spcre Parts Calibration Control Stormge Centrol Startup Surveillance Inservice Inspection Program Purchase Order Program Review (Puget)
QA Training and Qualification Co U9 N
N SITE QUALITY ASSURANCE ENGINEERING CD SURVEILLANCE AND FUNCTIONS SKAGIT NUCLEAR PROJECT
.
.
Civil Electrical . Mechanical I&C Welding Civil Insp. Electrical Insp. Mechanical Insp. I & C Insp. Piping Inspection '
,
- ?. Materials Labr Component Insp. Eq'uipmen't Installation Rad. Monito. ring Welder Qualification a ,
s Vendor Qual. Component Qual. .: Equipment. Qualification Intrusion Alarm Weld Procedures m
a Cadweld Certs. New Fuel Insp. PGCC Nucienet Material Control Documentation Process Control ALL DISCIPLINES Provide audit assistance Review NCRs & CARS in area of discipline Ln N
SITE QUALITY CONTROL f($
URVEILLANCE ACTIVITIES FOR SKAGIT NUCLEAR PROJECT
-