Revision as of 20:27, 1 August 2018

Text

Attachment 4: SG Tube Wear Analysis for Unit-2/3
	ML12285A267
Person / Time
Site:	San Onofre
Issue date:	10/01/2012
From:	; Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd, Southern California Edison Co
To:	; Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation, NRC Region 4
References
	L5-04GA564
	Download: ML12285A267 (239)
	v • d • e

{{#Wiki_filter:I Non-proprietary Version I) (P.10-1)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Appendix-1 0 SG Tube Wear Analysis for Unit-2/3 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 368 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version () (P.10-2)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) AW~1. Purpose The purpose of this analysis is to evaluate the tube wear depth at the U-bend region due to fluid elastic instability in order to verify the estimated mechanism of the tube wear observed in both of Unit-2 and Unit-3 as mentioned in Section 6.1 and 6.2 of the main report.A single tube, R1 06C78 (that leaked in Unit-3) was selected for analysis. Only the tube support boundary conditions were varied to produce a set of wear depths along the tube, that was similar to what was measured by ECT from Unit-2 and Unit-3. The R106C78 tube wear indications (i.e.wear depths reported by ECT at TSPs and AVBs) are replicated analytically.

2. Conclusion The analysis results indicate followings, which are consistent with the mechanistic causes described in Section 6 of the main report;-When consecutive AVB support points are inactive and in-plane FEI occurs, the tube vibrates to be in contact with the adjacent tube. The calculated wear depths at the contact point with the adjacent tube, AVBs and the top tube support plates are equivalent to the wear depths measured in Unit-3 SGs.-When consecutive 6 or 8 AVB support points are inactive and in-plane FEI does not occur, the calculated tube wears at AVB support points due to only the turbulent flow force are equivalent to the wear depths measured in Unit-2 SGs.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 369 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I) (P.10-3)Document No.L5-04GA564(9)

At 3. Assumption Following assumptions are applied for this analysis.1) Flow characteristics The U-bend fluid velocity, density, void fraction, and hydrodynamic pressure distributions are supplied by the ATHOS / SGAP thermal hydraulic analysis program for the. normal operating conditions with T-hot =( ] as shown in Appendix-1 2.2) Damping ratio The structural damping ratio is assumed to be 0.2%, which is a minimum value based on MHI test results. The relationship between the two-phase damping and void fraction is based on Pettigrew's test results and is described in Section 6.1, paragraph (5).3) Boundary conditions at tube supports The support condition at TSPs #1 through #6 is assumed to be pinned. "Pinned" means free to displace parallel to the hole and free to rotate, but prevented from lateral movement by the TSP.The support conditions at TSP #7 and the AVBs are variables in the parametric evaluation.

4) Number of support points All AVB supports for the Unit-3 free-span simulation are assumed to be inactive with tube support only provided by the TSPs. Number of AVB support points is a parameter for case study of the Unit-2 simulation.

All TSP supports are assumed to be active.5) Contact force at TSP #7 and the gap between TSP and tubes The tube support condition at TSP #7 (hot and cold sides) is assumed to be a ) ]compressive contact force based on thermal expansion at operating conditions. The tube-to-TSP diametral clearance is assumed to be ( ), based on the maximum manufacturing tolerances. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 370 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version () (P.10-4)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ao 6) Length of tube-to-tube wear The measured length of the tube-to-tube wear on a typical tube was about ( 3. Since the wear depth is not uniform, the length of tube-to-tube wear (assuming to be uniform over the length) is assumed to be[ ) to simulate the actual wear depth.7) Modeling of the adjacent tube for Unit-3 simulation. The gap elements are used at the impact locations in order to consider sliding and impact vibration of the adjacent tube. Tube to tube gap is assumed to be [ )( ), since the displacement of the tube which has free span wear indication is assumed to be more than the half of the nominal tube-to-tube gap in-plane (25.4mm -19.05mm = 6.35 mm). This is considered as a parameter of case study and assumed to be[ (.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 371 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I () (P.10-5)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) At 4. Acceptance criteria Acceptance criterion is to simulate the trend of the wear of both of Unit-2 and Unit-3. The tube of Row 106 Column 78 of Unit-3 #B SG and the tube of the same address of Unit-2 #A SG are selected as a representative tubes for this analysis since R106 C78 of 3B SG is the leakage tube and R1 06 C78 of 2A SG has some wear at AVB locations and since the support condition can be compared without considering the flow characteristics. Table 4-1 Wear depth of R106 C78 of 2A SG and 3B SG Wear depth of Wear depth of Location 2A SG, % 3B SG, %#1 to 6 TSP (hot & cold) r#7TSP at Hot side B01 B02 B03 B04 tube to tube B05 B06 B07 B08 B09 tube to tube B10 Bll B12#7TSP at Cold side MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 372 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I) N (P.10-6)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak 5. Design Inputs 5.1 Geometry of tube bundle region The tube bundle consists of 34-inch diameter, thermally treated Alloy 690 U-tubes that are arranged in a 1.0-inch equilateral triangular pitch and are supported by the tubesheet, seven tube support plates, and six sets of anti-vibration bars (AVBs). Tube support plates (TSPs) have broached trifoil tube holes. All the contacting support structures above the tubesheet are made of[ ]J. The nominal dimension of tube, TSPs and AVBs are listed in Table 5-1.5.2 Thermal and hydraulic flow of steam generator secondary side The ATHOS thermal hydraulic analysis program was used to determine the distributions of fluid velocity, fluid density, void fraction, and hydrodynamic pressure (see Appendix 12). Fig 5-1 shows the normal operating, full power, loading conditions that were applied to the tube for the wear analysis.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 373.of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I () (P.10-7)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Al Table 5-1 Nominal dimensions of tubes, TSPs, and AVBs Part Item Value Material Thermally treated SB-163 UNS N06690 Outside diameter 0.75 in.Thickness 0.043 in Tubes Number of tubes 9727 Tube pitch 1.0 in Tube arrangement Triangular Material Thickness TSPs Number of TSPs Tube support span (between TSP centers)Tube support span (from tubesheet to TSP-1)Material Type AVBs Thickness Width MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 374 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I) (P.10-8)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) ,,A&Fig.5-1 Flow distribution of Row 106 Column 78 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 375 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version 0 ( J (P.10-9)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) 5.3 Vibration calculation input The calculation inputs are derived as follows by using the values obtained from the flow analysis code (ATHOS).Modulus of elasticity of tube E and shear modulus of tube G are interpolated for the tube T + T average temperature of 11 2 from table of ASME Boiler and Pressure Vessel Code, Sec II, 2 Materials, 1998 Edition, 2000 addenda.Tav Primary side average temperature (OF)T, *Secondary side temperature (OF)Tube mass distribution per unit length m is calculated according to the following equation.1 m=-(A,p,l+pAd,+Aco) ............................................... (3)where, A .= ' D 2 (in2) ................................................................................... (4 )1 4 A t -D , 2) (in 2)............................... ............................................ (5 ),D 2 Ae = --(in 2) ................................................................... (6)4 De/D o = 1+ I PI/Do PIDo .................................................................. (7)D0 tube inside diameter (in)DO tube outside diameter (in)pi Density of water inside the tube (Ibm/ft 3)Po Density of tube material (Ibm/ft 3)po Density of water outside the tube (Ibm/ft 3)P Tube pitch (in)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 376 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I ()(P.10-10) Document No.L5-04GA564(9) A ' 1 5.4 Wear coefficient Wear coefficient of AECL data (AItoy800/SS410, which is similar combination to TT690 tube/SS405) at[ )F is used for this analysis in order to evaluate the effect of the temperature is assumed to be(Wear coefficient of tube to tube is 35 times as large as that of 690/SUS405 based on MHI test results (Fig.5-2). Fig.5-2 Impact Wear Coefficients (MHI internal data)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 377 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I () (P.10-11)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak 5.5 Operating duration Unit 2 completed a cycle of 628 effective full power days (EFPD). Unit 3 shut down after operating 338 EFPD.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 378 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I () (P. 10-12)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) A&L 6. Methodology 6.1 Evaluation Flow Chart The leaking tube assuming all inactive AVB supports is evaluated. Wear analysis methodology is described in Figure 6.1 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 379 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I II) (P.10-13)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) A&Collect information on geometry Calculate flow data (ATHOS)-Cross flow velocity-Void fraction-Fluid density Identify critical tubes-Fluid-elastic vibration analysis for the leakage tube with all inactive AVB supports Generate time history of flow induced forces-Turbulence induced forces using CPSD-Fluid-elastic forces based on experimental data System damping-Structural damping, Two-phase damping and Friction coefficients -Squeeze film damping is not considered because of high void fraction.Time history response (FEM)-Tube displacement -Tube-to-support reaction force-Sliding distance Wear Calculation -Tube metal volume reduction from work rate-Tube thickness reduction Fig. 6-1 Wear Evaluation Flow Chart MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 380 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version](P.10-14) Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak (1) Collect Information on Geometry Refer to Section 5.1. The gaps between tube and AVBs are a parameter to be evaluated. (2) Calculate Flow Data Refer to Section 5.2. The distribution of flow through the steam-generator tube bundle has an influence on the turbulence-induced loads and fluid-elastic instability. The ATHOS thermal and hydraulic analysis code provides the distribution of local cross-flow velocity, fluid density and void fraction. The turbulence-induced loads, fluid-elastic forces, added mass are obtained by analysis.(3) Identify Critical Tubes A linear screening analysis is usually used to identify the potential for fluid-elastic instability of the tubes at different locations in the tube bundle and to choose the most unstable tube for wear analysis. However the Unit-3 leaking tube R1 06C78 is selected for this wear analysis.(4) Generate Time History of Flow Induced Forces Turbulence induced forces- are obtained by considering spatial correlations of theturbulence forces using the cross-correlated power spectral density (CPSD) functions. The turbulence induced forces in the U-bend portion are determined from the CPSD function from test data.The CPSD (cross power spectral density) is taken from a reference by Axisa, et al (Ref.5).'Z)= (ýU-l v 2) 10- (Ul iv)-,;' -J* , :; .. )2e* , '4 Where, (PSD :C1".S poei" sl3ecri-al d' iiy fifctiofi betweeii elernents p and q:Ratio between tube gap velocit :at'e1imehts j to U.Uq :Ratio betweejt !:be-ga"p e! Ciiy:ait t jitm s q to tJ , :separtfii61i ditai~ice aloi-on tube 1eii~ih b~retkeen cehitr:ids ofelieis ; (-:C6rrelatifio 1ntlf4,f ti-tibuilenie (asumiied to be 4D)Cf :CtnTe'ation ficiCoi-, fi fujiitleieniit ,'appi"iiati6fi MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 381 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version I)(P.10-15) Document No.L5-04GA564(9) A&Fluid-elastic forces are those induced on the tubes by a coupling between the tube vibratory motion and the flowing fluid. The fluid-elastic forces are defined by a feedback loop in which the tube forces are calculated from the tube vibratory amplitude through an analytical model based on experimental correlations of fluid-elastic forces in tube bundles.Fluids-force components were measured as functions of imposed harmonic displacements of a cylinder. These experimental data were reduced by Chen into fluid-damping and fluid stiffness coefficients which were functions of the reduced-flow velocity (U/fD) (Ref.6).fa j + jR U t- U r2/1 + -: M 2.L(PPU ~ ;+ (~R~, 2 1+ CZr.u+j=1L " j These data can be used directly to accurately predict the fluidelastic response in linear cases where the response frequency usually coincides with one of the fundamental frequencies. However, in nonlinear cases where the tube supports have clearances, the tube response can be at a number of frequencies. Such cases require a fluidelasitc modeling procedure that accounts for the presence of different frequencies. Transfer function method is used for this purpose.This approach recognizes that fluidelastic stiffness and fluid damping coefficients are functions of reduced flow velocity and, therefore, functions of frequency. The transfer function method converts these frequency dependent functions into time dependent differential equations. --d '2 ., Td ý,, -; l* i +.a- i 'I -dt, f bv, bi + b3 i :O) i, 'A;i -' i b ,'i; ) -o Where, MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 382 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I (](P.10-16) Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak 0 DI/9fJU a 0 ,a 1 a 2., a 3 ,b b 1; 2 3#Cisa U.R vi Forces adtinzip6n thI cyliiders in the X and Y diiections. iespecfivv1y Fluid density*Tube. g.ap vel1ocity::-Radius of tuingbi Number of nibhin.:-Displaceinent in x-direcionm 'NDipiacimnefir in y-diection Vi a'"pa.C.( .i:Added-inass coefficient

FlUid-cdamlpin cqbefficient a .-" :Fluid-stiffness i:oefficient

~ g. , i ,i; ;Visk.otus dampilg.coefficient. The fluid damping and fluid stiffness coefficients are derived for the single flexible tube surrounded by rigid tubes as constraint conditions. Fluid damping and fluid stiffness. coefficients measured by MHI experiment are used for this evaluation. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 383 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I ()(P.10-17) Document No.L5-04GA564(9) A&(5) System Damping Damping ratio consists of structural damping, two-phase damping, viscous damping and squeeze film damping in the crevices between the tube and its support. Although ASME Sec.III Appendix N-1330 suggests that the damping ratio 1.5% as a sum of structural and two-phase damping, more reliable values based on experimental data is used in this evaluation. For structural damping, MHI test results show 1.0% average (0.2% in minimum) as shown in Figure 6-2 (from Ref.2), therefore 0.2% is assumed for the conservative evaluation. For two-phase damping, Pettigrew's test result of Figure 6-3, which is the function of superficial void fraction, is used as the effective two-phase damping along the tube length by considering vibration mode (Ref.4).Since the viscous damping is negligible in high void fraction (Ref.3), it is neglected in this analysis.Since the void fraction is high and the support condition at AVB is considered to be dry, the squeeze film damping is assumed to be zero.(6) Time History Response A finite element model of the tube with support clearances is formulated. The tube vibratory response consists of tube displacements and tube support interaction characteristic of impact and sliding is calculated. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 384 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version (.Document No.L All 10 0)E C.)5. 0 4.5 4.0 3. 5 3. 0 2.5 2.0 1. 5 1.0 0. 5 0. 0 Mean =1.0%, ca=0.37 Minimum = 0.2%A0 0 SA AO A ,) (P.10-18)_5-04GA564(9) 2 0.0 0. 1 Amplitude(mm) 0.Fig.6-2 Structural damping test data by MHI Ak-Water Steam-Water Fmon* Normal Triangle A Normal Triangle

Freon-22 (NT)* Rotated Triangle T Rotated Trdangle 0 Freon-22 (RT)1 Normal Square N Normal Square
Frcon-l I (RrT)Rotated Square 7 r- 6 E co 5 r4)4 3 03 S2 E Z:)-0 A..5 ~-'V*0 A 9s 0* i.V.0 0~ 0 0 w 0 0 V&AA 0 20 40 60 80 100 Void Fraction (%)(Tre)D = 'Crp(pDl / u)-i' {I + (D

-(D/D,)2]2 1-1 Fig.6-3 Two phase damping and superficial void fraction MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 385 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version I)(P.10-19) Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak (7) Wear Calculation Using the time history response of the tube displacements and tube support interactions, a set of wear parameters (work rate parameter, sliding distance, impact forces and contact time) is calculated. The work rate parameter is calculated by integrating the incremental work (the product of support reaction and incremental sliding).The metal loss is calculated using Archard's wear law.dV/dt = K'W Where, dV/dt Volume wear rate W Work rate parameter K' Specific wear coefficient for tube/AVB material combination Experimental correlations between the metal loss and the work rate are used to calculate tube metal volume reduction. The relation between wear volume (V) and wear depth (h) is represented as follows.(a) Tube to AVB wear and Tube-to-Tube wear The tube thickness reduction is then calculated using the wear properties and work rate parameter as assuming the wear configuration as shown in Fig.6-4.The wear width of tube to AVB wear is assumed to be the same as the width of AVB.The measured length of the tube-to-tube wear was about [ ) Since the wear depth is not uniform, the length of tube to tube wear is assumed to be( ) in this calculation to simulate the actual wear depth.v=2= cos'-I- hi x 2 V: Wear volume R: Tube radius h: Wear depth L: Wear width 0: Wear angle MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 386 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I (] (P.10-20)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) At V h Fig. 6-4 Wear shape of tube at the contact point with AVB (b) Tube to TSPL contact wear We use the following equation which shows the relation between wear volume and wear depth.This equation is obtained by 3 dimensional geometry model.V =(V Wear volume (mm 3)h :Wear depth (mm)I Tube W rion Fig. 6-5 Wear volume evaluation (Wear depth 1.0mm)The relation between the work rate and wear depth of each unit is calculated based on the equations above, the wear coefficients and the effective full power operating days as shown in Fig.6-6 and Fig.6-7.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 387 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I (] (P. 10-21)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) mt I-Fig.6-6 Relation between Work Rate and Wear Depth of Unit-2 (628 EFPD)Fig.6-7 Relation between Work Rate and Wear Depth of Unit-3 (338 EFPD)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 388 of.474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I S) (P.10-22)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) 6.2 Analysis Model Analysis model is shown in Figure 6-8.(1) Support Condition with AVB All AVB support points for Unit-3 are assumed to be inactive (to offer no support of the tube).The 2 -12 central AVB support points for Unit-2 are assumed to be inactive (For example, the 2 central AVB support points are B06 and B07). Gap elements are used at the inactive support locations in order to produce sliding distance and impact loading information for the wear analysis. The tube-to-AVB clearance is an analysis variable.(2) Support Condition with TSP Gap elements are used at the support locations to determine the sliding and impact values at the support locations. The intersection with the top TSP (TSP #7) hot and cold sides is represented by a gap element based on the tube-to-TSP drawing clearance. The initial position of the tube is assumed to be in contact with an assumed contact force against one side of the broached hole.(3) Impact location with adjacent tube For the simplicity of the calculation, the wear volume is calculated by using single leaking tube model. The gap elements are used at the impact locations in order to consider sliding and impact vibration adjacent tube. The tube to tube gap is assumed to beI ). This means that the tube must travel across that distance before wear can occur.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 389 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version I) (P.10-23)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Fig. 6-8 Analysis Model for Tube Wear Evaluation MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 390 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version I ( )(P.10-24) Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak 6.3 Evaluation cases 6.3.1 Simulation of Unit-3 tube wear To simulate the tube-to-tube wear, tube-to-TSP wear, and tube-to-AVB wear of Unit-3, following cases are evaluated. (1) Evaluation of gap effect To evaluate the effect of the tube-to-AVB gap, 3 cases 'shown in Table 6-1 are analyzed. All AVB supports are assumed to have small gaps as described in Section 4.5 of the main report.(2) Evaluation of contact force To confirm the contact force between tube and AVB can prevent the in-plane fluid elastic instability of tube, the case studies shown in Table 6-2 are performed. (3) Evaluation of distance to the adjacent tube To evaluate the effect of the distance to the adjacent tube on tube-to-tube wear, the case study with changing the location of the gap element is performed. In Case 1-3-2, the location of the gap element is changed to( )to evaluate the effect of the distance by comparing Case 1-3-1 in which the distance is((4) Evaluation of random vibration effect In order to confirm that the energy and frequencies associated with turbulence are not sufficient to produce large displacements necessary for tube-to-tube wear, the case study without fluid elastic instability force is performed. In Case 1-3-3, the fluid elastic force is not taken into account to evaluate the vibration due to the turbulent flow force by comparing Case 1-3-1 in which both of the fluid elastic force and turbulent flow force are considered. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 391 of 474 S023-617-1 -M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I () (P.1 0-25)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) A&6.3.2 Simulation of Unit-2 tube wear (1) Number of active support points To simulate the Tube-to-AVB wear Unit-2, the case studies shown in Table 6-3 are performed when only the turbulent flow forces are taken into account. The fluid elastic force is not taken into account because MHI concludes the cause of AVB wear is random vibration as described in Section 6.2 of the main report. The number of inactive support points is changed from 2 to 12.) )of contact load that is sufficient to restrain the tube at these supports are used to simulate the active supports. And the number of active supports is reduced until in-plane instability occurs.The tube is assumed to be the center between the AVBs in order to evaluate the effect of the active support number.(2) Evaluation of gap effect and contact force To evaluate the effect of the contact between tube and AVB in one side and contact force, the case studies shown in Table 6-4 are performed. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 392 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Table 6-1 Unit-3 Gap Effect Wear Evaluation Cases 1-1 to 1-3 Case #1-6 #7 TSP B01 B02 B03 B04 B05 B06 B07 B08 B09 B10 311 B12 #7 TSP TSPs at hot at cold Gap Pined 1-1 A**Gap Pined B**I Gap Pined 1-2 A**Gap Pined B**1-3-1 Gap Pined*** A**1-3-2*** Gap Pined 1-3-3 B***** ------ ----CD a C Fn SA z 0-o 0~0 CD"-D in 0,*: Contact force**: The gap is the distance between AVB and tube in each side as shown in the figure below***: Tube is in contact with the AVBs on one side.In Case 1-3-2, the location of the gap element is changed from( ) to(In Case 1-3-3, only turbulence flow force is taken into account.AVB Tube AVB Gap A Gap B) to evaluate the effect of the distance.0 C: CD CD 100 0-(C)Page 393 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Table 6-2 Unit-3 Contact Force Wear Evaluation Cases 2-1 to 2-3 Case #1-6 #7 TSP B01 B02 B03 B04 B05 B06 B07 B08 B09 B10 Bll B12 #7 TSP TSPs at hot at cold Gap Pined 2-1 ***Gap Pined B**Gap Pined A**2-2***A*Gap Pined B**Gap Pined 2-3***A*Gap Pined-B** -- --*: Contact force**: The gap is the distance between AVB and tube in each side as shown in the figure below***: Tube is in contact with the AVBs on one side...C m z a C CO,--I Xi mi z 0 T 0~0 0 0 C CD N CD-40 AVB Tube AVB_a<-> P<-->Gap A Gap B Page 394 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Cn C 2 Cn C Cn--I X Table 6-3 Unit-2 Wear Evaluation Cases 3-1 to 3-6 Case #1-6 #7 TSP B01 B02 B03 B04 B05 B06 B07 B08 B09 B10 Bll B12 #7 TSP TSPs at hot at cold Gap Pined Gap Pined B**Gap Pined A**3-2 Gap Pined-**Gap Pined A** I _Gap Pined B**'Gap Pined B**Gap Pined 3--Gap Pined A**Gap Pined-Gap Pined A** __ __3-6 Gap Pined B**-n n n rn rn rnlrnrn r z 0 0'o M.CD cn 0:3*: Contact force**: The gap is the distance between AVB and tube in each side as shown in***: Tube is in contact with the AVBs on one side.the figure below AVB Tube <-> AVB Gap A Gap B 0 0 0 CD CD 0) 0 coor~Page 395 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I ()(P.10-29) Document No.L5-04GA564(9) AO 7. Results The following results supersede the tube wearevaluation performed at the design stage (Ref.8).7.1 Simulation of tube wear in Unit-3 The analysis model and the natural frequency are shown in Fig.7-1. The analysis results are shown in Fig 7-2, 7-3, Tables 7-1, 7-2 and 7-3. It can be seen from Fig 7-1, that the effect of the tube-to-AVB gap is small when the all support points are inactive in-plane direction. It is consistent with the actual phenomenon of the tube wear at Unit-3. As shown in Fig 7-3, when the tube-to-AVB contact force is large( ), the in-plane vibration can be prevented. Under a condition where small gaps are present in all AVB support points, small contact forces are loaded on each of the inactive support points and all tubes are supported on one side by the top TSP #7 (Case 1-3-1), a free span fluid elastic instability is simulated. The wear depth obtained from the simulation has a consistent trend with the actual measurement results of tube wear in Unit-3.Case 1-3-2 simulates tube-to-tube wear does not occur when the distance between the tubes in columns is larger than the in-plane amplitude. The result of Case 1-3-3 indicates the energy and frequencies associated with turbulence are not sufficient to produce large displacements necessary for tube-to-tube wear.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 396 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I ()(P.10-30) Document No.L5-04GA564(9) AO Fig7-1 Verification analysis for Unit-3 free span wear MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 397 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 II Non-proprietary Version 1)(P.10-31) Document No.L5-04GA564(9) A&Fig.7-2 Wear analysis results of Case 1-1 to 1-3-3 Fig.7-3 Wear analysis results of Case 1-3-1 to 2-3 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 398 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Table 7-1 Wear analysis results of Case 1-1 to 1-2 Case #1-6 #7 TSP B01 B02 B03 B04 Tube B05 B06 B07 B08 B09 Tube B10 B11 B12 #7 TSP TSPs at hot To To at cold Tube Tube Unit-3 wear Gap 1-1 -A Gap B WR. mW Wear depth*Gap 1-2 A Gap WR mw Wear depth force*:Contact force Cn C W m Cn--I m z 0 ,=3 0-o CD*C_.0C°0 0 0 0-0) ->0o C-nD 'Page 399 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Table 7-2 Wear analysis results of Case 1-3-1 to 1-3-3 CA m Case #1-6 #7 TSP B01 B02 B03 B04 Tube B05 B06 B07 B08 B09 Tube B10 311 812 #7 TSP TSPs at hot To To at cold Tube Tube Unit-3 wear Gap 1-3-1 A Gap B WR mW Wear depth Gap 1-3-2 A Gap B WR mW Wear depth %Gap 1-3-3 A Gap B WR mw z 0 0 CD 0n Wear depth K J*: Contact force 10 0 C)0 coPk, Page 400 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 m Cn--X Fn SO Table 7-3 Wear analysis results of Case 1-3-1 to 2-3 Case #1-6 #7TSP B01 B02 B03 B04 Tube B05 B06 B07 B08 B09 Tube B10 Bl1 B12 #7TSP TSPs at hot To To at cold Tube Tube Unit-3 wear Gap 1-3-1 A _____ __ __Gap , B .____WR mW Wear depth*Gap 2 -1 A'Gap B WR mW Wear %depth __%Gap 2-2 A _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _Gap WR mW Wear depth %Gap 2-3 A Gap B __WR mW Wear depth II z 0 0c_0 M3.0 0 0 C)3 0 Cn O)c Page 401 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version 1 (J (P.10-35)Document No.L5-04GA564(9)-A 7.2 Simulation of tube wear in Unit-2 The analysis model and the natural frequency are shown in Fig.7-5.The analysis results are shown in Fig 7-6, Tables 7-4 and 7-5. The analysis results of the wear depth due to random vibration, when 6 or 8 consecutive AVB support points are inactive (Case 3-3 and 3-4), show consistent trends with the actual measurement results of tube wear in Unit-2.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 402 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I () (P.10-36)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Fig 7-5 Verification analysis for Unit-2 AVB wear MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 403 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I j (P. 10-37)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) AJ Fig. 7-6 Wear analysis results of Case 3-1 to 3-6 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 404 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Table 7-4 Wear analysis results of Case 3-1 to 3-3 depth % zGap "F a_ _ _ __ _0 3-2 Ao C Gap A- B=B _ _CD m-WR mW Wear C<z depth ,-_0 0 C Gap*-A~3-3 mGap CO B-'-WR mW p Wear ___depth % 0_*: Contact force C-3 C-D C))0 0) 0 Jx0 Page 405 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 cn C m Cn--i m cn Table 7-5 Wear analysis results of Case 3-4 and 3-6 Case #1-6 #7 TSP B01 B02 B03 B04 B05 B06 B07 B08 B09 B10 B11 B12 #7TSP TSPs at hot at cold Unit-2 wear Gap 3-4A Gap B WR mw Wear depth _Gap A 3-5A Gap B WR mW Wear depth %Gap 3-6 A Gap B WR mW Wear depth ____z 0-7_0~0 CD 0 0_0 CD C)0-.ý0) 0 CD CD*: Contact force Page 406 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I I) (P.10-40)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak 8. References 1 ) (Deleted)2) T. Nakamura, et al., "An advanced method to estimate fluid elastic instability of steam generator U-bend tube bundle.", ASME PVP 2001 3) S. M. Fluit and M. J. Pettigrew, "Simplified method for predicting vibration and fretting-wear in nuclear steam generator U-bend tube bundle", ASME PVP 2001 4) M.J. Pettigrew.,et.al.,2003,"Vibration analysis of shell-and-tube heat exchangers" Journal of Fluids and Structures 18 (2003) 469-483 5) F. Axisa, J. Antunes and B. Villard, "Random excitation of heat exchanger tubes by cross-flows", Journal of Fluids and Structures (1990)4, 321-341 6) S. S. Chen, Instability Mechanisms and Stability Criteria of a Group of Circular Cylinders Subjected to Cross-Flow, Part 2: Numerical Results and Discussions, J. of Vibration, Acoustics, Stress, and Reliability in Design, April 1983, Vol. 105, pp. 253-260 7) Design of AVB, L5-04GA428 Rev.5 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 407 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version]}(P. 11-1 )Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Appendix-11 (Deleted)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 408 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, RE\/.0 I Non-proprietary Version (Document No.L5-04GA564(9) JAW Appendix-12 Thermal Hydraulic Evaluation of Area Plugging MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 409 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, RE V. 0 Non-proprietary Version 1) (P.12-2)Document No.L5-04GA564(9)

1. Purpose This appendix provides evaluation of flow characteristics of tubes in U-bend region of San Onofre Units 3 Replacement Steam Generators (RSGs) after area plugging.

The results of this evaluation are also applicable to the smaller plugging area in the Unit 2 SGs 2. Conclusion It has been confirmed that the maximum quality and void fraction during reduced power operation are lower than during 100% power operation in Cycle 16. Additionally, the location of the area with high T/H parameters does not change. The results are summarized in Table 2-1 and the contour is shown in Fig. 7-1 and 7-2.Table 2-1 Summary of quality and void fraction distribution in U-bend region (3-D contours are shown in Fig. 7-1 and 7-2.)T/H parameters C RTS at 70%Cycle 16 in U-bend region J power Max. quality _Max. void fraction 3. Assumption (1) As shown in Table 6-1, the operating condition for Cycle 16 is assumed to be the design condition (Ref.22) and the operating condition for RTS is assumed to be identical to 70%thermal power condition of Unit-3 (Ref.21).(2) The void fraction is analyzed utilizing the "ATHOS/SGAP" code (Ref. 1). Therefore, the assumptions used in the ATHOS/SGAP code apply to this document. Two-phase flow is represented by using a drift flux model which is the standard model of two-phase flow analysis. The mathematical models in the ATHOS/SGAP are constituted under the following assumptions: (Ref. 1)(3) All dimensions in analysis are assumed in the cold metal condition because the effect of heat expansion of metals on the calculation results is negligible. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 410 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I] (P.12-3)Document No.L5-04GA564(9)

4. Acceptance criteria Void fraction and flow velocity will be lowered by operating the plant upon return to service (RTS) at reduced power.5. Design Inputs The nominal dimensions are obtained from the design drawings (Ref.2 to'19) and the manufacturing tolerances are not considered.

The geometrical inputs are identical to those used in reference 20 and 21.6. Methodology Based on the design input of the operating conditions, the calculation of the circulation ratio is performed by evaluating the pressure loss and the recirculation head with SSPC, which is a 1 dimensional Thermal and Hydraulic parameter calculation code (Ref.22). Using ATHOS/SGAP (Ref.1), the thermal hydraulic analysis is performed to obtain the 3 dimension flow distribution which includes the void fraction.Design Input.Operating conditions SSPC , Circulation Ratio Calculation by evaluating pressure loss and recirculation head ATHOS I Thermal Hydraulic Analysis 3 dimensional flow distribution-Void fraction Fig.6-1 Flow of the evaluation MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 411 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version I) (P.12-4)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak 6.1 Thermal and Hydraulic Conditions The operating parameters used for the calculation are shown in Table 6-1. the primary flow rate when 420 tubes are plugged is calculated by interpolating the flow rate specified in Ref.20 and the operating parameters shown in Table 6-1 are calculated by the steady-state performance calculation code. The overlapping plugged tubes as described in Sec. 6.4 are not taken into account for the calculation of the boundary conditions mentioned above.Table 6-1 Operating parameters for calculation Cycle 16 RTS at 70% power Thermal power (MWt/SG)Plugging RCS flow rate(gpm)Tcold ('F)Tsg-out ('F)Thot (Tsg-in) (°F)Tfeedwater (0 F)Saturation Steam Pressure (psia)Steam Mass Flow (lb/hr)Circulation ratio 6.2 Modeling The cell structure model is ( ) cells in vertical and horizontal directions as shown in Fig.6-2(a) and Fig.6-2(b), respectively. The model simulates from the top of tubesheet to the bottom deck plate and this model is symmetrical to the center of tube columns. AVBs are modeled to take into account of the flow resistance. However, the pressure loss due to the resistance of AVB is negligibly smaller than that of the tube bundle. The horizontal tube pitch refers to the average spacing of the sections of tubes that lie horizontally in the U-bend region. Since U-bends of SONGS RSGs start at different elevations for each tube row (U-bend has index), the horizontal pitch is set to a representative average value in the U-bend.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 412 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, RE\)1.0 Non-proprietary Version J) (P.12-5)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) At 6.3 Boundary conditions The boundary conditions are shown in Fig. 6-3. 5 Pa of the maximum pressure correction and ( )of the under relaxation factor are used for the convergence of the solution, which is the same as "Run-5" of L5-04GA565 (Ref.20).6.4 Tube plugging Fig.6-4 shows the the address of tubes to be plugged of 3B SGs. Since ATHOS can only created a symmetrical half model of the tube bundle in referece to the center column of the SG, the asymmetrical plugged tubes can not be modeled. Therefore the pluggged tubes are assumed to be overlapped as shown in Fig.6-5.(see Ref.22)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 413 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, RE V. 0 ( Non-proprietary Version 1) (P.12-6)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Aw Fig. 6-2 (a) Vertical sectional calculation mesh at center of column MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 414 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 r 1 I Non-proprietary Version I) (P.12-7)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak Fig. 6-2 (b) Cross-sectional calculation mesh MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 415 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, RE V. 0 Non-proprietary Version 1) (P.12-8)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) At Fig. 6-3 Boundary conditions of ATHOS/SGAP MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 416 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 t I Non-proprietary Version I) (P.12-9)Document No L5-04GA564(9) x 6 Tubes to be plugged of 38 SG 306 012 121 116 712 S 58 41 41 21 2~~- --------2 -.. I , I i~ ~ ------.. .---, -* -, -, --I- -----.... --r--r-110 Ill 66/ 101 t50 151 140 141 636 131 126121,1 I II Ill G 101 66 $l 60 II 7 710 I 66 Clt 66 SI 46 41 26 31 20 I1 16 II 6 COL Fig.6-4 Tubes to be plugged of 3B SG Fig.6-5 Tube plugging model of ATHOS for RTS at 70% power MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 417 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I) (P.12-10)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) At 7. Results The flow characteristics of U-bend region obtained from the analysis are shown in Fig.7-1 to 7-2. The region where the void fraction is high is concentrated on the region of center columns and the outer rows. Although the trend of 100% power operation is similar to 70% power operation, the maximum void fraction of 70% power operation is lower than that of 100%power operation and the concentrated area is almost identical. The difference of void fraction between 100% power operation and 70% power operation is described as follows: The higher saturation steam pressure causes the lower void fraction. Since the thermal power of 70% power operation is lower than that of 100% power operation, the saturation pressure of 70% power operation is higher than that of 100% power operation despite tube plugging condition. For this reason in addition to the lower heat flux, the maximum void, fraction of 70%power operation is lower than that of 100% power operation. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 418 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, RE\/.0 I Non-proprietary Version )Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak Fig. 7.-1 (a) Contour of vertical sectional quality distribution of Cycle 16 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 419 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, RE V. 0 Non-proprietary Version 1) (P.12-12)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) AW Fig. 7-1 (b) Contour of vertical sectional quality distribution of RTS at 70% power MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 420 of, 474 S023-617-1-M1538, RE\(.0 I Non-proprietary Version I) (P.12-13)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Art Fig. 7-2 (a)Contour of cross-sectional quality and void fraction distribution at the height of the maximum quality in U-bend region of Cycle 16 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 421 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version ) (P.12-14)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) At Fig. 7-2 (b)Contour of cross-sectional quality and void fraction distribution at the height of the maximum quality in U-bend region of RTS at 70% power MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 422 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version 1) (P.12-15)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) A&References

1) Analysis of Thermal Hydraulics of Steam Generators/Steam Generator Analysis Package, Ver.3.1, 1016564, EPRI 2) L5-04FUO01 the latest revision, Component and Outline Drawing 1/3 3) L5-04FU002 the latest revision, Component and Outline Drawing 2/3 4) L5-04FU003 the latest revision, Component and Outline Drawing 3/3 5) L5-04FU021 the latest revision, Tube Sheet and Extension Ring 1/3 6) L5-04FU022 the latest revision, Tube Sheet and Extension Ring 2/3 7) L5-04FU023 the latest revision, Tube Sheet and Extension Ring 3/3 8) L5-04FU051 the latest revision, Tube Bundle 1/3 9) L5-04FU052 the latest revision, Tube Bundle 2/3 10) L5-04FU053 the latest revision, Tube Bundle 3/3 11) L5-04FU111 the latest revision, AVB assembly 1/9 12) L5-04FU 112 the latest revision, AVB assembly 2/9 13) L5-04FU113 the latest revision, AVB assembly 3/9 14) L5-04FU114 the latest revision, AVB assembly 4/9 15) L5-04FU115 the latest revision, AVB assembly 5/9 16) L5-04FU116 the latestrevision, AVB assembly 6/9 17) L5-04FU117 the latest revision, AVB assembly 7/9 18) L5-04FU118 the latest revision, AVB assembly 8/9 19) L5-04FU119 the latest revision, AVB assembly 9/9 20) L5-04GA565 the latest revision, Selection of Thermal Hydraulic Analysis (ATHOS) Model 21) L5-04GA566 the latest revision, Case study of the input parameters and tube plugging impact on internal SG thermal -hydraulics parameters

22) L5-04GA510 the latest revision, Thermal and Hydraulic Parametric Calculations MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 423 of 474 S023-61.7-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I)(P.13-1)Document No.L5-04GA564(9)

Ak Appendix-1 3 (Deleted)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 424 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version J (P14-1)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ar Appendix-i4 Analytical evaluation of the impact on the Tube Support Plate and Tube Bundle due to Tubesheet deflection during Divider Plate detachment MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 425 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, RE V. 0 I Non-proprietary Version ) (P.14-2)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak 1 Purpose This document demonstrates that even with the SONGS Divider Plate detachment condition at Hydrostatic test, the heat exchanger tube deformation due to tube sheet deformation would not be the cause of the tube wear and thickness reduction since there is no change in the adjacent tubes' gap.2 Conclusions For the U-bend portion, the displacements in the X and Y directions are negligible small. As for the Z direction displacement, it is about the same as the Tubesheet towards the upper direction. As for the neighboring tubes, in comparing the displacement results in all three directions (X, Y & Z), it was found that they are approximately the same and that the gap on the adjacent tubes have no effect.3 Assumptions and Open Items Deformation of tubesheet on the secondary side is equivalent to deformation of tubes at the secondary side surface of the tubesheet. 4 Acceptance Criteria Deformation due to detachment of the divider plate during the hydrostatic test does not have impact on the U-bend portion.Tube Support Plate (TSP) and Stay Rod do not plastically deform.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 426 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 ( I Non-proprietary Version ) (P.14-3)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) AO 5 Design Input 5.1 Geometry The dimensions are obtained from the design drawings. Major dimensions are shown in Fig 5.1-1 through 5.1-6.Divider Plate detachment condition: Detachment between Divider Plate and Flat Bottom of Channel Head.5.2 Loading Conditions 5.2.1 Test Condition Primary side Hydrostatic test Pressure:[ )Temperature:( )MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 427 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, RE'V. 0 I Non-proprietary Version J] (P.14-4)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Fig. 5.1-1 Major dimensions of Tubesheet model (1/5)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 428 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, V. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I) (P.14-5)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak J Fig. 5.1-2 Major dimensions of Tubesheet model (2/5)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD. -Page 429 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 ( Non-proprietary Version 1) (P.14-6)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Fig. 5.1-3 Major dimensions of Tubesheet model (3/5)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 430 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, RE%(.0 t Non-proprietary Version (P.14-7)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) AO.2 Fig. 5.1-4 Major dimensions of Tubesheet model (4/5)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 431 of 474 S023-'617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version I) (P.14-8)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) At r~Fig. 5.1-5 Major dimensions of Tubesheet model (5/5)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 432 of 474 SO23-(617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version 1 (P.14-9)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak Fig. 5.1-6 Major dimensions of TSP and Stay Rod MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 433 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 r I Non-proprietary Version I)(P.14-10) Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak 5.3 Material Properties Material properties used in the analysis for each part are shown in Table 5.3-1 through 5.3-6.Table 5.3-1 Material Properties for C E (ksi) v (-)[)Table 5.3-2 Material Properties for [) (Tubesheet perforated area)-Eil") (ksi) v.* 1) _ E2. 1) (ksi) v2" 1) H_Note 1) Ej* and vl* are equivalent properties in radial and hoop directions of the tubesheet, and E 2* and v 2 are equivalent properties in thickness direction. Table 5.3-3 Material Properties for (E (ksi) v(-)C) (Divider Plate)))(TSP)Sy (ksi)Table 5.3-4 Material Properties for C Note 1) E Table 5.3-5 Material Properties for [E (ksi) v (-)C) (Stay Rod)Sy (ksi)Table 5.3-6 Material Properties for [E (ksi) v(-)F) (Tube)Sy (ksi)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 434 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 £ I Non-proprietary Version I)(P1411)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) 6 Methodology 6.1 Analytical Model The following three models used in each analysis are shown in Fig.6.1-1, 6.1-2, and 6.1-3.(i) Tubesheet, Channel Head, and Lower Shell (ii) Tube Support Plate and Stay Rod (iii) Tube Fig. 6.1-1 Tubesheet model (Tubesheet, Channel Head, and Lower Shell)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES," LTD.Page 435 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, RE V. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I) (P.14-12)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) At (i) Bird's-eye view (ii) Top view Fig. 6.1-2 TSP model (Tube Support Plate and Stay Rod)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 436 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, RE\/.0 I Non-proprietary Version ) (P.14-13)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) A,, Row104 Column78(Neighboring tubes with the leaked tube)Row106 Column78(Leaked tube)Row140 Column89(Tubes adjacent to the outermost tube)Row140 Column89(Outermost tube)Fig. 6.1-3 Tube model MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 437 of 474-2 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version ) (P.14-14)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) 6.2 Mechanical Boundary Condition 49 Mechanical boundary condition for each model is shown in Fig.6.2-1 through 6.2-4.6.3 Method To simulate the tube deformation due to tubesheet deformation as a result of the hydrostatic test, the following three models are used: (i) Tubesheet, Channel Head, and Lower Shell (ii) Tube support plate and Stay Rod (iii) Tube At first, the primary side internal pressure is applied on model No. (i) to get the tubesheet deformation. Then the tube sheet deformation results from model No. (i) are input to model No. (ii) to cause the tube support plate deformation. At last, the deformation results from both models No. (i) and (ii) are input to model No. (iii) to analyze the deformation of tubes. The tubes to be analyzed are the following tubes which include the leaked tube and one outermost tube together with the neighboring ones.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 438 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I) (P.14-15)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) At Fig. 6.2-1 Boundary condition for Tubesheet model (1/2)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 439 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, RE V. 0 Non-proprietary Version ) (P.14-16)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) A~l Fig. 6.2-2 Boundary condition for Tubesheet model (2/2)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 440 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I] (P.4-17)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) At Fig. 6.2-3 Boundary condition for TSP model MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 441 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, V. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I] (P.14-18)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) At Fig. 6.2-4 Boundary condition for Tube model MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 442 of 474 S023-61;7-1-M1538, RE\, 0

Non-proprietary Version I) (P.14-19)Document No.L5-04GA564(9)

At 7 Computation Results 9 7.1 FE Analysis Results The tube displacement analysis results for the hydrostatic test effects with divider plate detachment are as follows.(1)The tubesheet is swelled out upward with minimal deformation in horizontal direction. Displacements of the stay rod and the tube at the tubesheet on the secondary side surface are shown in Table 7.1-1 and 7.1'-2 respectively and related Node No. is shown in Fig. 7.1-1. Displacement of TSP is shown in Table 7.1-3 and 7.1-4.(2)Due to this tubesheet deformation, the tubes are displaced a little in horizontal direction at the vicinity of the tubesheet and displaced towards the upper direction over its entire length.The deformation figures for the tube sheet by the primary side pressure, and the ones-for the tube support plate and the tube deformation due to the tubesheet deformation are shown in Figures 7.1-2 though 7.1-7.From these figures, the following is concluded. (1) Displacement of the leaked tube For Row 106 Column78 tube, the maximum displacement along the whole-tube is;0 [ )inch in the X direction* ( ) inch in the Y direction* ( )inch in the Z direction Regarding the U-bend portion of this tube, the displacement in the X and Y direction is /9\negligible small. As for the neighboring tubes, in comparing the displacement result in all three directions (X, Y & Z), it was found that they are approximately the same and that the gaps on L9\the adjacent tubes have no effect towards the upper direction. (See Fig. 7.1-8)(2) Comparing two sets of neighboring tubes ý9\To look at the tube gap change due to the tube deformation, the following two sets of neighboring tubes are checked.I. Leaked tube and the neighboring tube II. One outermost tube and the neighboring tube Fig. 7.1-8 shows that their displacement in all three directions (X, Y & Z) is approximately the same among the sets. Therefore it was found that the gap between the adjacent tubes would not be affected by the hydrostatic test with the divider plate detachment. Contour plots of Tresca stresses for the TSP model are shown in Fig. 7.1-9 and 7.1-10, and calculated stress results of TSP and Stay Rod are shown in Table 7.1-4 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 443 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version ) (P.14-20)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ar Table 7.1 -1 Displacement of Stay Rod at Tubesheet on the secondary side surface Displacement Node *1) Transition (inch) Rotation (rad)x y z x y 4 + 4 + -_______4 +/- 4 t I Note 1) See Fig. 7.1-1.Fig. 7.1-1 Node No. of the Stay Rod at the Tubesheet on the secondary side surface MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 444 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 ( Non-proprietary Version 1) (P.14-21)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Table 7.1-2 Displacement of Tubes at Tubesheet on the secondary side surface Tube Displacement Side Transition (inch) Rotation (rad)Row Col. X Y Z X Y 106 78 104 78 Hot 140 89 142 89 106 78 104 78 Cold 140 89 142 89 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 445 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version J) (P.14-22)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Table 7.1-3 Displacement of TSP (Hot side)Tube Displacement Side Transition (inch) Rotation (rad)Row Col. X Y Z X Y#1#2#3#4 104 78#5#6#7#1#2#3#4 106 78#5#6#7#1#2#3#4 140 89#5#6#7#1#2#3#4 142 89#5#6#7 Note: only transitions in X and Y directions are used as input to Tube analysis.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 446 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version I) (P.14-23)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ar Note: only transitions in X and Y directions are used as input to Tube analysis.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 447,of 474 S023-617-1-M 1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version 1)(P.14-24) Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak-/Fig. 7.1-2 Tubesheet deformation (primary side: 1 ksi, secondary side Oksi) (x300)2 Fig. 7.1-3 TSP Deformation (xl0)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 448 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version (-2 L.....j ( P .1 4 -2 5 )Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak Fig. 7.1-4 Tube Deformation Row104 (xl0)Fig. 7.1-5 Tube Deformation Row106 (xl0)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 449 of 474 S 023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version ) (P.14-26)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak I,-Fig.7.1-6 Tube Deformation Row1 40 (xl 0)Fig.7.1-7 Tube Deformation Rowl42 (xl0)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 450 of 474 S 023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 f 1 I Non-proprietary Version J) (P.14-27)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) AO Fig.7.1-8 Tube displacement MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 451 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, RE V. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I) (P.14-28)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak-/Figure 7.1-9 Contour plots of Tresca stresses for TSP model (1/2)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 452 of,474 S023-617 M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I)(P14-29) Document No.L5-04GA564(9) A,,.r Note) Stress results in regions 1 through 3 in the figure is shown in Table 7.1-5.Fig.7.1-10 Contour plots of Tresca stresses for TSP model (2/2)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 453 of 474 S023-617-1-MI 538, REV. 0 Non-proprietaryVersion ) (P.14-30)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Table 7.1-5 Stress results of TSP and Stay Rod Membrane +Region(*1) Parts P/h2) K2) bending stress Sy (ksi)(ksi)1 TSP 2 TSP(perforated) 2)3 Stay Rod Note 1) See Fig.7.1-8 and 7.1-9.Note 2) Calculated in accordance with ASME Sec. III App. A-8142.1 using the stress value derived from the FEA results. K=2 is the max value shown in A-8142.1 conservatively. ]MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 454 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version ) (P.14-31)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) 7.2 Evaluation A As long as the tube gaps are uniformly (regularly) spaced, there is no direct relation to the observed thickness reduction wear. In relation to the divider plate's detachment condition at hydrostatic test, the tubes' deformation analysis shows that although there is a slight deformation of the tubes close to the tubesheet in the horizontal direction as a result of the tubesheet deformation and some displacement towards the upper direction due to tubesheet deformation, adjacent tubes displacement value is approximately the same and the gaps remain uniform. Also the U-bend tube displacements in the horizontal directions are minimal and are negligible The calculated stresses of the Tube Support Plates and the Stay Rods at the hydrostatic test are lower than the yield strength Sy as shown in Table 7.2-1. Therefore plastic deformation does not remain after hydrostatic test and there is no impact on the U-bend portion.Therefore, the divider plate's detachment at hydrostatic test is considered not related to the observed tube wear phenomenon. Table 7.2-1 Stress results of TSP and Stay Rod Parts Membrane + bending Sy(ksi)Parts_________ Stress (ksi) Sy_ ksi)TSP TSP(perforated) Stay Rod]MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 455 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I) (P.14-32)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) AO 8 Reference 49[1] MHI document, L5-04GA401 Rev.7, Design Report of the Tubesheet Region (Tubesheet, Extension Ring, Lower Shell, Divider Plate).[2] MHI document, L5-04GA411 Rev.7, Design Report of the Tubes Support Plate and Stay Rod.[3] MHI document, L5-04GA418 Rev.5, Design Report of the Tube.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 456 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I)(P.1 5-1)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) At Appendix-15 (Deleted)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 457 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version ( ) (P.16-1)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Appendix-1 6 Fatigue Evaluation of the Tube due to In-Plane Vibration MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 458 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version I (P.16-2)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak 1. Purpose The purpose of this document is to show that the stress of the tube in SONGS RSG due to in-plane vibration is under the fatigue limit.2. Conclusions The stress on the tube due to in-plane vibration is 4.2ksi and is under fatigue limit (13.6ksi). The tube has structural integrity for the stress due to in-plane vibration from the view point of fatigue evaluation.

3. Assumptions and Open Items The tube deforms in-plane until contacting with the outer next tube in Row direction due to in-plane vibration.

The stress due to in-plane vibration is high cycle fatigue 4. Acceptance Criteria The fatigue limit is 13.6ksi according to the following design fatigue curve.1-9.2.2 199R III. DIVISION I -APPENDICES 0 24 ]tCunse A 14 -E -.11 Curve C 106 107 108 l09 1010 1011 Numtber of cycles. N Figure 4-1 Design Fatigue Curve for Tube 5. Design Input 5.1 Geometry The leaked tube (Row106 Column78) dimensions are used.5.2 Loading Conditions 5.2.1 Normal Operating Condition The temperature is as follows.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 459 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version )Dcmn (P.16-3)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Thot:I Tcold: Tsteam:l 1 I I 5.3 Material Properties Tube temperature:I Young's modulus: I I (=((Thot+Tcold)/2+Ts)/2) I 6. Methodology 6.1 Analytical Model The tube of Row106 Column78 is modeled (Figure 6-1).Figure 6-1 Analysis Model MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Page 460 of 474 Non-proprietary Version () (P.16-4)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak 6.2 Mechanical Boundary Condition The tube is fixed on secondary side of the tube sheet and pin supported at each TSP (Figure 6-2).Figure 6-2 Analysis Model MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 461 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version )J (P.16-5)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) At 6.3 Method The stress to contact next tube is calculated and fatigue evaluation is performed with the stress in the following steps.(1) A unit force due to gravity 1G is applied on the U-bend tube (Figure 6-3) and the tube deformation (61) (Figure 6-4) and the tube stress (al) at #7TSP are calculated by FE analysis.(2) The tube deformation to contact the next tube (62) is calculated using the drawing (Figure 6-4).(3) The tube stress to contact next tube is calculated by multiplying 01 by the ratio of 62/61.(4) The stress obtained in (3) is compared to the fatigue limit and is confirmed under the fatigue limit.Unit Force due to 1 G Tube Deformation by the unit force Tube NextTube (Row108)Tube in Row106 1 TSP #7 Tube Deformation to contact next tube Figure 6-4 Deformation Figure 6-3 Loading Condition MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Page 462 of 474 Non-proprietary Version I (Document No.L5-04GA564(9)

7. Computation Results 7.1 FE Analysis Results The deformation of the tube when unit force is applied is shown in Figure 7-1. The deformation by the unit force (61), and the deformation required for the tube to contact the next tube (62), is shown in Table 7-1.Table 7-1 Location and Deformation of the Tube Contact Location of the Contact (0"1)Deformation by Unit Force (61)Deformation required for Tube Contact (62) _____________

Ratio of 62 / 61 Note *1 The definition of e is shown below Unit Force (1G)---Figure 7-1 Tube Deformation when Unit Force is applied (xl00)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 463 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I (Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak The tube stress to contact next tube (a2) at TSP #7, which is calculated based on al and the ratio of 61 and 62, is shown in Table 7-2. The tube stress due to in-plane vibration is I land is under the fatigue limit of 13.6ksi.Table 7-2 Tube stress at TSP #7 due to in-plane vibration Stress by Unit Force (l)Stress to contact next tube Fatigue Limit Note*1 Calculated as follows o2 = olx62/61 Where, ol Tube Stress at TSP #7 by Unit Force o2 Tube Stress at TSP #7 during In-plane Vibration 61 Deformation by the Unit Force 62 Deformation Required for Tube Contact J 7.2 Evaluation The stress on the tube due to in-plane vibration is1 land is under fatigue limit (13.6ksi). The structural integrity of the tube is confirmed from the view point of fatigue due to in-plane vibration. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 464 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 -Non-proprietary Version )( ] (P.16-8)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Attachment 1: Fatigue Evaluation of the Wear Tube due to In-Plane Vibration 1. Purpose The purpose of this attachment is to show that the stress of the wear tube in SONGS RSG due to in-plane vibration is under the fatigue limit.2. Conclusions The stress on the tube due to in-plane vibration isi land is under fatigue limit (13.6ksi). The structural integrity of the tube is confirmed from the view point of fatigue due to in-plane vibration.

3. Assumptions The tube deforms in-plane until contacting with the outer next tube in Row direction due to in-plane vibration.

The stress due to in-plane vibration is high cycle fatigue.Thickness of the tube is reduced conservatively with flat surface, which makes the smaller sectional area, at the contact location with the land area of TSP tube hole.4. Acceptance Criteria The fatigue limit is 13.6ksi according to the following' design fatigue curve.5. Design Input 5.1 Geometry Nominal tube dimensions are considered and tube is wornI in thickness 5.2 Loading Conditions The member forces from the result of the beam model analysis shown in Figure 7-1 are used.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 465 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version ) (P.16-9)Document No.L5-04GA564(9)

6. Methodology 6.1 Analytical Model Part of the tube Row106 Column78 worn J in thickness at #7TSP is to be evaluated.

Modeling methodology of cross section of the tube is shown in Figure A6.1-1. Analysis model is a half sector model considering symmetric configuration and is generated using quadratic solid element as shown in Figure A6.1-2. The thickness of the tube is 0.0429inch for the general part, and the outer diameter is 0.75inch. The height of the model is 1 inch.6.2 Mechanical Boundary Condition Displacement of the bottom surface of the tube model is constrained in all directions. Boundary condition of the model is shown in Figure A6.2-1.6.3 Method Stress of the worn tube is calculated and fatigue evaluation is performed with the stress in the following steps.(1) Member forces of the tube at #7TSP due to unit force are derived from the analysis result of the beam model shown in Figure 7-1.(2) The member forces are loaded on the top of the model as shown in Figure A6.3-1. The member forces have to be loaded on the node at the center of the tube coupled with the tubes on the same cross section. Tube stresses are influenced locally by this coupling.To avoid the influence, the loading point must be put far away from the evaluated point, therefore tube stresses evaluated on a section at the middle elevation of the model and the member forces are loaded on the top. To evaluate tube stresses on a section at the middle elevation, a counter moment is added to the loading point to cancel the cantilever effect by the shear force, which is loaded above the evaluated point. Pressure stresses are not considered because pressure does not contribute the stresses for the high cycle fatigue due to in-plane vibration. (3) Peak stress is calculated by multiplying membrane plus bending stresses derived from FE analysis by a stress concentration factor.(4) In addition, the peak stress calculated in (3) is multiplied by the ratio of 62/61 (Table 7-1).(5) The stress obtained in (4) is compared to the fatigue limit and is confirmed under the fatigue limit.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 466 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version )Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak Figure A6.1 -1 Modeling Methodology of Tube Cross Section MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 467 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I) )(P.1 6-11)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Figure A6.1-2 Analysis model MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Page 468 of 474 (I Non-pi roprietary Version I(P.1612)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) A&I Figure A6.2-1 Mechanical Boundary Condition Length from evaluated section to loading point is 0.5inch and is larger than 2.5/(Rt) = 0.31inch.When the evaluated point is. far from the loading point more than 2.5'!(Rt), local influence of the loading point does not reach the.evaluated point.Elevation of evaluated section 7777/Figure A6.3-1 Loading Condition MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 469 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 I Non-proprietary Version I)(P.1 6-13)Document No.L5-04GA564(9)

7. Computation Results 7.1 FE Analysis Results Member forces at #7TSP derived from the analysis result of the beam model due to the unit force are provided in Table A7.1 -1. Half of each force is loaded on the top of the half model of the worm tube shown in Figure A6.3-1. Deformation of the model is shown in Figure A7.1-1, and contour plot of tresca stress on the evaluated section, which is at middle elevation of the tube model, is shown in Figure A7.1-2. The maximum stress occurred at the worn thickness on the asymmetric boundary.Stresses on the inner surface resulting from FE analysis is dealt with as membrane plus bending plus peak stress by unit force since there is no discontinuity on the inner surface of the tube. On the outer surface, stress concentration factor shall be applied considering discontinuity of the shape due to the wear. The'stresses resulting from FE analysis through the thickness are classified to membrane plus bending stresses, then membrane plus bending plus peak stresses are obtained by multiplying membrane plus bending stresses by a stress concentration factor. Calculated results of the tube stresses at the severest point are provided in Table A7.1-2. The tube stress due to in-plane vibration isi land is under the fatigue limit of 13.6ksi.7.2 Evaluation The stress on the tube due to in-plane vibration isi land is under fatigue limit (1 3.6ksi).The structural integrity of the tube is confirmed from the view point of fatigue due to in-plane vibration.

MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 470 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version )( J(P.16-14) Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak Table A7.1 -1 Member forces derived from the beam model analysis at #7TSP Axial force In-plane force Bending moment Element Node Fz (kips) Fy (kips) Mx (kips-in.) I Table A7.1-2 Worn tube stress at TSP #7 due to in-plane vibration Items Outer Inner surface surface Membrane plus bending stresses by unit force Stress concentration factor Membrane plus bending plus peak stresses by unit force Ratio of 62 / 61 Membrane plus bending plus peak stresses Fatigue limit (*1)The stress concentration factor is derived from Ch'art 3.5 of Ref. [3], which is a chart for a thin tube with fillet. Value t/h (t: thinner thickness, h: thicker thickness) for the tube model is I Although a curve for t/h : I ]is not drawn in the chart, it is obvious that a curve for tlh =I I become lower than the t/h = I Icurve in the chart, therefore the t/h =1 I curve is used conservatively for evaluation. Parameter t/r is 1.33, where r is fillet radius assuming equal to be t-h =1 Itherefore stress concentration factor is less than 1.5.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Page 471 of 474 I Non-proprietary Version I)(P.1615) Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak Figure A7.1-1 Deformation of the worn tube due to the member forces (x500)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 472 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-DroDrietarv Version I L I.(P.16-16) Document No.L5-04GA564(9) K J Figure A7.1-2 Contour plot of tresca stress on the evaluated section MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 473 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 Non-proprietary Version I)(P.1 6-17)Document No.L5-04GA564(9) Ak 8. Reference[1] MHI drawing, L5-04FU051 Rev.1, Tube Bundle 1/3.[2] MHI drawing, L5-04FU108 Rev.3, Tube Support Plate Assembly 3/3.[3] Walter D. Pilkey, Peterson's Stress Concentration Factors Second Edition, John Wiley &Sons, Inc., 1997.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 474 of 474 S023-617-1-M1538, REV. 0 JSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON An LPI)ISO,\ IT!RN\ 11\ALZ Company SONGS Unit 2 Return to Service Report ATTACHMENT 5 MHI Document L5-04GA571, Screening Criteria for Susceptibility to In-Plane Tube Motion[Proprietary Information Redacted] I 3/4 .1 Non-proprietary Version)(1/62)San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 & 31---kREPLACEMENT STEAM GENERATORS Screening Criteria for Susceptibility to, In-Plane6 TbeMotion Supplier StatusStamp N.L.SO23.617.1-M1540 No: IRQC: QcN DIDESIGN DOCUMENT -ORDER NO. 800R734RR KREFERENCE DOCUMENT-INFORMATION ONLY IJVIRP IOM MANUAL MFG MAY PROCEED: OIYES [-INO DN/A.STATUS -A status Is required for design documents and Is optional for reference documents, Drawings are reviewed and approved for arrangementas and conformance to specification only. Approval does not relieve the submitter from the responsibiilty of adequacy and suitability of design, materials, and/or equipmentrepresented. El-. APPROVED or e n represented [12. APPROVED'6XCEPT AS NOTED -Make chrQne- end rfesubmnL n13. NOT APPROVED -Correct and resubmit for review. NOT for field use.r APPROVAL: (PIIINTISIGN/ XAE)fA(FLS: .SCE DE(123) 5 REV. 3 07111

REFERENCE:

S0123-XXIV-37.8.26 Purchase Order No. 4500024051 Specification No. S023-617-01 R3 ORDER No. DATE Nuclear Plant Component PURCHASER Designing Department ITEM No. REFERENCE Steam Generator Designing Section Edison 2591012 APPROVED BY CHECKED BY (MNES) 1002 DESIGNED BY DRAWN BY ISSUE DATE 9!~_C) Z iz DWG. No.L5-04GA571 Rev.No.6 1iii ! 1 1 1li1ii1 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 1 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Non-proprietary Version 1(2/62)Document No.L5-04GA'571 (6)Ak Revision History No. Revision Date, jApproved Checked' Prepared 0 Initial issue See cover sheet-Revised in accordance with SCE comment to L5-04GA571 Rev. 0 (RSG-SCE/MHI-12-5690)-Revised in accordance with SCE comment to 2 L5-04GA571 Rev. 1 (RSG-SCE/MHI-12-5691)-Revised in accordance with SCE comment to L5-04GA571 Rev. 2 (RSG-SCE/MHI-12-5693)-Revised in accordance with SCE comment to L5-04GA571 Rev. 3 (RSG-SCE/MHI-12-5702)-Revised in accordance with SCE comment to L5-04GA571 Rev. 4 (RSG-SCE/MHI-12.-5746)-Revised in accordance with SCE comment to 6 L5-04GA571 Rev. 5 (RSG-SCE/M HI- 12-5755)W IlI TSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LT Li.Page 2 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 I Non-proprietary Version I II) (3/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) iFAl__Table of Contents 1 P u rp o s e .........................

.. ...................................................................................

I ................... 4 2 Background .............................................................................. ................................................. 4.3 Proposed screening criteria based on Unit 3 results .......................................................... 5 4 Screening Level Selection ................................................................................................. 24 5 Screening results of Unit 2 steam generators ................................................................. 32 6 References ............................................................................................................................. 44 Appendix-1 Screening results for Unit 3 Steam Generators .................................................. 45 Appendix-2 Evaluation of Void Fraction Distribution of U-bend Region .................................. 53-Appendix-3 Additional details about the number of tube wear indications ............... 59 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 3 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Non-proprietary Version)(4/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) I Purpose This document describes steam generator tube screening criteria that can be used as the basis for a return to service strategy. The criteria are designed to identify tubes that are susceptible to in-plane tube motion and freespan wear. Applying the screening criteria to the Unit 2 steam generators will enable Southern California Edison (SCE) to identify tubes that should be preventatively plugged before the steam generators are returned to service.2 Background Recent inspections of the San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS) Unit 2 steam generators during the first refueling outage following steam generator replacement (SGR)identified the following number of tubes with wear indications (Ref.1): 2A-SG (Steam Generator 2E089): 861 tubes (See Note 1)2B-SG (Steam Generator 2E088): 734 tubes (See Note 1)Tubes adjacent to the retainer bars (94 tubes / SG) were plugged in both steam generators. In addition, four tubes in 2B-SG were plugged: two tubes that had wear indications with depths at or above 35% and two tubes that had wear indications with depths at or above 30% and less than 35%.Inspections of the SONGS Unit 3 steam generators after approximately eleven months of operation following SGR identified more numerous and more severe tube wear indications than Unit 2. In particular, Unit 3 steam generators both experienced tube wear in the U-bend caused by contact with adjacent tubes. This free span tube-to-tube wear (FSW) occurred in 326 tubes (165 tubes in 3A-SG and 161 tubes in 3B-SG) (Ref.1). The consensus from industry experts is that the tube-to-tube contact was caused by in-plane fluid-elastic instability. This caused the tubes to move parallel to the anti-vibration bars (AVBs) and contact one another on the intrados and extrados of the tubes. The conclusion of in-plane tube motion was also confirmed by evidence of wear scars at AVB intersections that are longer than the width of the AVB.The inspections of SONGS Unit 2 steam generators have identified a single pair of tubes with indications of FSW motions in 2A-SG: Column 81, Rows 111 and 113. The region of Unit 2 tubes affected by AVB wear is similar to the region in the Unit 3 steam generators that experienced AVB wear. MHI has developed empirically-based criteria based on Unit 3 results to identify MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 4 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0

Non-proprietary Version](5/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6)

A_tubes that are susceptible to in-plane motion. Since the criteria are developed from Unit 3 wear data, the criteria are directly applicable to Unit 3; however, they may also be conservatively applied to Unit 2 to preventatively plug tubes as a defense-in-depth measure against tube-to-tube wear. This document describes the basis for these screening criteria.(Note 1)These values for number of tubes with wear indications are according to the SONGS Unit 2 In-Service Inspection (ISI) records. For the analysis performed in this report, two additional tubes in 2B-SG are included based on MHI's review of the eddy current examination. In addition, tubes that had been previously plugged (6 tubes in 2A-SG and 16 tubes in 2B-:SG) are removed from consideration because they are unrelated to FSW and therefore not relevant to the screening criteria. The analysis that follows considers855 tubes in 2A-SG and 720 tubes in 2B-SG, as shown in Table 13 and 14. For additional detail, see appendix-3. 3 Proposed screening criteria based on Unit 3 results FSW tubes identified in the Unit 3 steam generators are shown in Figures 1 and 2. The FSW tubes are located in a well-defined, contiguous region of the tube bundle from row "X" through row "Y" consecutively for each column. In addition, FSW tubes exhibit specific characteristics in terms of the wear indications in affected tubes. Criteria proposed to select tubes for plugging that are potentially susceptible to FSW (in-plane motion tubes) are based on identifying the specific characteristics in the eddy current inspection data and the steam flow characteristics that could lead to potential susceptibility to the FSW phenomenon. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 5 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Non-proprietary Version ]( ) (6/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__COLUMN No.. N) N 7U(7) Wt- fla) 'r N ;30 0 Ccr-l 0 .1 J) IOlO Co o 0U 00 LU wU (UO LU L CO r- 1".rt 1 --------105 101-Wý93 89 881F tb in n3 64 Figure 1 FSW tubes in Unit-3A C z C a COt UMN No., 0 r- toin r cJ-4 0 LU C~ (U (0 r- r- r- r- ~-I'125 124---A------ I --t -,----t------I m ~FIt iu aiii, 13 112 C194 i 97 96 93 92*X*Xe 0-0 L Figure 2 FSW tubes in Unit-3B MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1 -M 1540, Rev 0 Page 6 of 62 Non-proprietary Version I ( ] (7/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__MHI developed preventive plugging screening criteria by evaluating the condition necessary to cause the FSW observed in Unit 3. Although the specific causes that resulted in tubes being susceptible to fluid-elastic excitation are not yet completely known, MHI's understanding of fluid-elastic instability and motion of the tubes is sufficient to correlate the observations from the inspections of FSW tubes with the conditions necessary to produce the vibration mechanism. The following conditions are required for, or indicative of, in-plane tube motion in the: U-bend of a steam generator: .Low friction with AVBs -Low friction allows the tube to move freely in the fundamental mode. Lower contact force between a tube and AVB will minimize friction causing high AVB wear rates to develop at these locations. Low vibration frequency -The critical velocity determined using Conner's equation is proportional to the vibration frequency of the tube.. A low frequency of vibration decreases the velocity threshold for the onset of fluid-elastic instability. Low fluid damping -Loss of fluid damping contributes to instability. High steam void fraction reduces squeeze film damping between tubes and the AVBs and increases the potential for fluid-elastic excitation. High fluid velocities -The onset of fluid-elastic instability occurs when the steam velocity exceeds the critical velocity. Reducing the steam velocity decreases the potential for fluid-elastic instability and tube in-plane motion.MHI created nine criteria to identify tubes that have potential for fluid-elastic instability and in-plane tube motioh. Each of the nine criteria relates to one of the following characteristics of in-plane fluid-elastic vibration: (1) tube-to-AVB friction, (2) vibration frequency, (3) in-plane tube motion, (4) high void fraction, (5) regional effect, and (6) coupling effect. A screening approach was developed based on assigning a score using steam generator tube inspection data and analytically derived flow conditions. The scoring criteria are based on the FSW probability among all tubes exhibiting wear. A description of each is given below: Tube-to-AVB friction Tubes that experience in-plane motion must have low friction with the. AVBs, otherwise tubes could not move parallel to the AVBs. Low contact force between tubes and AVBs contributes to in-plane motion leading to FSW. Tubes with wear indications at multiple AVB intersections may have reduced friction. Two criteria are proposed for identifying tubes with low tube-to-AVB MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 7 of 62 S023-617-1-M 1540, Rev 0 Non-proprietary Version)(8/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__friction. The name of each criterion and a description of how they are calculated are given in Table 1.Vibration Frequency Steam generators are designed with multiple AVBs. to minimize the span length between successive AVBs. This raises the fundamental frequency of the span between the two support locations, assuming displacements. are restrained at the AVBs. The presence of AVB wear indications at the first two AVB intersections above the straight-leg portion and the presence of AVB wear indications at several successive AVB intersections suggests that the tube has limited support over the top of the tube U-bend region. Table 1 provides two criteria used to quantify susceptibility due to low tube vibration frequency. In-Plane Tube Motion Inspection data from the Unit 3 steam generators show a strong correlation between tubes with tube-to-tube wear indications and either TSP wear or extended AVB wear length. In FSW tubes, the largest TSP indications occur at the 7th TSP intersections; however, wear depths are similar on the hot and cold leg sides of the steam generator. Extended AVB wear length occurs as a result of differential movement between the tube and AVB. Both of these effects are associated with post-instability behavior, in that the TSP or extended AVB wear develops after the tubes have already experienced in-plane motion. Table 1 provides two criteria proposed to identify tubes that have experienced in-plane tube motion.Void Fraction The void fraction is equal to the volume of steam in the fluid normalized by the total volume of the steam/water mixture. The tubes in Unit 3 that 'exhibited FSW pass through a region of the U-bend where the void fraction is relatively high. , High void fraction reduces vibration damping and increases a tube's susceptibility to fluid elastic instability. MHI calculated the fluid void fraction in the U-bend during power operation. The results of the analysis are included in Appendix 2. A criterion is proposed to identify tubes that are located where steam void fractions are high in the U-bend thus increasing the potential for in-plane vibration. Table 1 describes this screening factor.Regional Effect The majority of tubes with AVB wear indications exist in tubes that are located within a defined region in the center of the steam generator tube bundle. The boundaries of this AVB wear region MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 8 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540, Rev 0 Non-proprietary Version II ) (9/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) vary slightly for each steam generator, which may reflect slight differences in the mechanical configuration of the tube bundle or thermal hydraulic conditions. The FSW tubes exist in an area that is near the center of theAVB wear regions of each steam generator. MHI developed a screening criterion to more heavily weight tubes in the center of the AVB wear region as being more susceptible to in-plane motion and FSW. Table 1 describes the regional effect screening factor.Coupling Effect According to laboratory test results, in-plane vibration tends to occur in groups of tubes simultaneously. The Unit 3 FSW phenomenon is also strongly regionalized, to the extent that all FSW tubes are within a contiguous, bounded region. An additional screening criterion is applied to take this coupling effect between adjacent tubes into account when screening FSW tubes.Table 1 describes this screening factor.Tables 2 through 9 include a column that calculates the ratio of FSW tubes with the screening criterion attribute (that is, the number of true positive results) to the total number of tubes in 3A/3B with the attribute. A point value is assigned, approximately equal to 1 point for each 10 percent of the calculated ratio. Additional tubes are selected by a final weighting factor, COUPLING, added to the point total after summation of the points from the first eight criteria. The point value for COUPLING is assigned based on the number of tubes previously screened in by the point system that are. adjacent to the tube in question.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 9 of 62 -S023-617-1-M 1540,Rev 0 (Non-proprietary Version 1)(10/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) AF*L_Table I Summary of Steam Generator Tube Screening Criteria Technical Basis Criterion Screening Factor Tube-to-AVB COUNT AVB wear trends in the Unit 3 steam generators indicate friction that FSW tubes tend to have many AVB wear indications (See Figure 3), which indicates low contact forces at these intersections. The value assigned to COUNT is equal to the number of AVB intersections in each tube with a wear indication (See Table 2).HOT COUNT AVB wear trends in the Unit 3 steam generators indicate that FSW tubes tend to have many AVB wear indications on the hot side (See Figure 4). This criterion is calculated similarly to the COUNT criterion described above; only the number of AVBs with wear indications at B01 to B06 are considered (See Table 3).Vibration HIGH/LOW AVB wear trends in the Unit 3 steam generators indicate frequency that many tubes have wear indications at the low (B01/B02) and high (B131/B12) AVB intersections (See Figure 5 and Table 4.).CONTINUOUS AVB wear trends in the Unit 3 steam generators indicate that FSW tubes tend to have a large number of consecutive AVB wear indications (See Figure 6 and Table 5).In-plane tube TSP TSP wear trends in the Unit 3 steam generators indicate motion that most FSW tubes have wear indications at the 5th through 7 th TSPs (See Figure 7 and Table 6).LENGTH A review of AVB wear trends in the Unit 3 steam generators indicates that FSW tubes tend to have longer wear indications (See Figure 8 and Table 7).Void fraction VOID The tubes with FSW indications in the Unit 3 steam generators are located where the secondary side fluid void fraction is relatively high. Void fraction and fluid damping significantly influence the vibration behavior of steam generator tubes during operation. The value assigned to VOID is theaverage void fraction in the U-bend (See Figure 9 and Table 8).Regional effect REGION Tubes located close to the center of the AVB wear region in each steam generator tend to be more susceptible to FSW wear. The value assigned to REGION is the distance to the center of the AVB wear region (See Figure 10 and Table 9).Coupling effect COUPLING As shown in Figures 1 and 2, FSW tubes exist in groups (both in row and column directions). Tubes adjacent to a group of susceptible FSW tubes have increased potential for fluid-elastic instability due to fluid coupling with susceptible tubes (See Table 10).MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Page 10 of 62 Non-proprietary Version ])(11/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__17677 500 SI i i i 450 .....-- -------------------------

.I i i I i i i i I I I I II i 400 --- ------ -.....- -----------

, 350 --- ---- ,-I 300 -------5 -------FSW E Not FSW E S200 --100--------------------------------- ---I50 I I -' r IA _-__. ..I. ....i.... ._ - --0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of indications Figure 3 AVB wear indications (COUNT)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M 1540,Rev 0 Page 11 of 62 (Non-proprietary Version 1)(12/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__17989 600 4W --7 ---I -- -I ------ --r- ---500 -------- --------L I I~ 300 -Not FSW 200 ---- ----.--------------10 E I I 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 Number of indications Figure 4 AVB wear indications at hot side (HOT COUNT)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 12 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Non-proprietary Version (j(13/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) _A__200 180 ..160 ------------------------ 140 _-_ ---.... .120 0 FSW S100 ----------

U o S m~ Not FSWj E z 80 ----------..- ----.. ..zi 40 --- ------ ----20 -- --- ----- -- --0 0 1 2 Number of indications Figure 5 AVB wear indications at B01/B02 or B1 1/B12 positions (HIGH/LOW) MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 13 of 62 S023-617-1 -M 1540, Rev 0 (Non-proprietary Version)(14/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__17677 700-ST ---I I* 4 I I I I J I I -500 D FSW N*Not FSW E 300 -* L ---2 LJ II 200 1300-- --0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Number of indications Figure 6 AVB continuous wear indications (CONTINUOUS) MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Page 14 of 62 II Non-proprietary Version 1)(15/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__19039 19075 19097 400 350 ------ -- ----------

II Ii-20-3I FSW o I 00 .Not FSW.0 E _z= 150,.. .500 I-----.. .,---i F. .. .#7TSP No #7TSP Yes #6TSP No #6TSP Yes #5TSP No #5TSP Yes Indication on TSP Figure 7 TSP wear (TSP)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1 -M1540, Rev 0 Page 15 of 62 I Non-proprietary Version ]()(16/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6)

A__1000 900 800 700 2 600" 500E zz 400 300 200 100 0 17985 Fi-T ----------I ----7 ---j -------L -L--L--------I-

----- -------------I--J-~-- ----L- --F -F I I I F F F F I F F.. .. ... .. ..[.. ..L ... .l Not FSW<20 20<=, <25 25 26 27 Maximumn wear length (mm)28 29 30<=Figure 8 AVB Wear length (LENGTH)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1540, Rev 0 Page 16 of 62 II Non-proprietary Version I)(17/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6)

A__Fiqure 9 Void fraction (VOID)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Page 17 of 62 (Non-proprietary Version 1)(18/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__17727 0 E z 1400 1200 1000 800 600 400 200 0 Reff < di---------- T Reff/2 < di <= Reff di <= Reff/2 Regional Range O3 FSW N Not FSW Figure 10 Regional effect (REGION)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 18 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540, Rev 0 Non-proprietary Version)(19/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__Table 2 Number of AVB indications (COUNT)Unit Unit Number of 3A/3B [B]/[A] Points*AVB 3/B FSW Total F 1%] Awarded Indications Tubes [A] Tubes[131 0-3 18736 11 0 0-4-6 395 47 12 1 7-9 144 91 63 6 10-12 179 177 99 10 Total 19454 '326 Table 3 Number of hot side AVB indications (HOT COUNT)Unit Unit Number of 3A/3B [B]/[A] Points*AVB 3/B FSW Total [S] Awarded Indications Tubes [A] Tubes________ ~ [B] ____0-2 18887 25 0 0 3-.4 331 80 24 3 5-6 236 221 94 9 Total 19454 326 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Page 19 of 62 ti Non-proprietary Version)(20/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) AllAW.Table 4 AVB wear indications at B01/B02 or B131/B12 positions (HIGH/LOW) Number of Unit 3A/3B Unit 3A/3B [B]/[A] Points AVB Total Tubes FSW Tubes Indications [Al] [q] ; I'%] Awarded 0 19220 98 1 0 1 94 88 94 9 2 140 140 100 10 Total 19454 326'Table 5 Number of continuous AVB indications (CONTINUOUS)' Number Unit Unit of AVB 3A/3B 3A/3B [B]/[A] Points Indication Total FSW [%] Awarded s Tubes [A] Tubes [B]0-2 18725 19 0 0 3-5 431 91 21 2 6-8 163 85 52 5 9- 12 135 131 97 10 Total 19454 326 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M 1540,Rev 0 Page 20 of 62 II Non-proprietary Version I](21/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A&Table 6 TSP wear (TSP)Indication Unit 3A/3B Unit 3A/3B [B]/[A] Points at #7TSP Total Tubes FSW Tubes [B]/ Awarded[A] [B]3 No 19050 11 0 0 Yes 404 315 78 8*1 Total 19454 326 1 1 Indication Unit 3A/3B Unit 3A/3B [B]/[A] Points at #6TSP Total Tubes FSW Tubes Awarded[A] [B]No 19106 31 0 0 Yes 348 295 85 8*1 Total 19454 326 Indication Unit 3A/3B Unit 3A/3B [B]/[A] Points at #5TSP Total Tubes FSW Tubes [%] Awarded[A] [B]3 No 19148 51 0 0 Yes 306 275 90 9*1 Total 19454 326 1*1: These points are allocated for "TSP." Only the maximum value of these points.is used for screening. Table 7 Wear length (LENGTH)Max. AVB Wear Unit 3A/3B Unit 3A/3B [B]/[A] Points Length for Each Total Tubes FSW Tubes [B] Awarded Tube [mm] [A] [Aad<20 17990 5 0 0 20<=, <25 942 16 2 0 25 103 11 11 1 26 62 11 18 2 27 45 10 22 3 28 41 21 51 5 29 31 21 68 7 30<= 240 231' 96 10 Total 19454 326 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Page 21 of 62 (Non-proprietary Version 1)(22/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) Table 8 Void fraction (VOID)Void Fraction Unit 3A/3B Rage ToalTues Unit 3A/3B [B]/[A] Points Range Total Tubes W Tubes [B] [%] Awarded FSW Tue[[3A[]Awre Table 9 Regional effect (REGION)Unit Unit Regional Range 3A/3B 3A/3B [B]/[A] Points[-] Total* FSW [%] Awarded Tubes [A] Tubes [B]di <= Reff/2 422 250 59 6 Reff/2 < di <= Reff 1305 76 6 1 Reff < di 17727 0 0 0 Total 19454 326 UNIT Reff [inch]3A-SG 15.46 3B-SG 15.57 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Page 22 of 62 I Non-proprietary Version 1)(23/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__Table 10 Coupling effect (COUPLING) After selection of screening level from the first eight criteria, additional points are added by the following process which accounts for "coupling effect." See Section 4 for details of this process.0 points 5 points 10 points 00 000 00 00 O0 0 0 00 00000000 000 0 0 0 0 No adjacent tube One adjacent tube Two or more adjacent tubes O: Tube under consideration for coupling effect O" Screened tubes with more than 16 points MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Page 23 of 62 Non-proprietary Version t )(24/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__4 Screening Level Selection The screening effectiveness using the point system for Unit 3 ECT data is checked in the following manner: (1) The points for each of the first eight criteria are summed for each tube. Then, the number of tubes and FSW tubes for each point category are counted to give the number of tubes falling in each point range. Table 11 shows the number of tubes with wear, the number of FSW tubes, and the number of tubes without FSW in each point range.(2) A screening level is selected, based on the results shown in Table 11, such that a high percentage of tubes exhibiting FSW is above the screening level.(3) Additional tubes are selected considering coupling effect.(4) A false negative check on the screening level is performed by ensuring that the point total, including coupling effect, for all tubes exhibiting FSW is above the screening level. This conservatively assures that the false negative rate for the final screening level is zero.A listing of all tubes in the Unit 3 steam generators with tube scores greater than 16 and added tubes for the coupling effect is included in Appendix-1 with the point breakdown. Table 12 shows the non-FSW tubes in 3A-SG and 3B-SG that were screened in. Figure 12 shows that the final screening, including the coupling effect, covers all FSW tubes; that is, the false negative rate for the final screening level is zero.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 24,of 62 S023-617-1-M1540, Rev 0 (Non-proprietary Version 1)(25/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) JA__Table 11 (1/2) False negative / positive check unit 3A without coupling effect Total Tubes I Tes Tubes with rVIIA1 25 points + 158 24 points 2 23 points 3 22 points 4 21 points 4 20 points 6 19 points 2 18 points 4 17 points 14 16 points 10 15 points 9 14 points 24 13 points 10 12 points 9 11 points 13 Tubes without FSW 1 2 4 5 2 3 12 9 8 22 9 8 12g i IU points 1 4 U 4 9 points 43 0 43 8 points 19 0 19 7 points 8 0 8 6 points 39 0 39 5 points 39 0 39 4 points 28 0 28 3 points 215 0 215 2 points 37 0 37 1 points 47 0 47 0 points 143 0 143 Total 894 165 729 Note 1: Tubes with FSW with fewer than 16 points are False Negatives Total False Negatives = 6 Note 2: Tubes without FSW with 16 points + are False Postivies Total False Positives = 48 Note 3: Previously plugged tubes related to retainer bar wear (1 tube in 3A-SG) are not included in total tubes.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 25 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540, Rev 0 Non-proprietary Version I ( )(26/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) Table 11 (2/2) False negative / positive check unit 3B without coupling Total effectwith without FSW FSW 25 points + 155 19 .24 points 7 4 23 points 3 1 22 points 75 2;1 points 43 20 points 44 19 poinrts 10 !7 18 points 12 1 17 points 16 1 16 poi nts 7 5 ..15 points 9 8 14 points 20 19 13 points 3 216 11 points 32 30 10 DintS 15 0 15 9points 45 0 45 8 points 35 0 35 7 Doints 24 0 24 6 points 19 0 19 5 points 21 0 21 4 points 27 0 27 3 points 192 0 192 2 points 38 0 38 1 points 47 0 47 0 Doi nts 149Q 0 149 Total 918 161 757 Note 1: Tubes with FSW with fewer than 16 points are False Negatives Total False Negatives = 6 Note 2: Tubes without FSW with 16 points + are False Postivies Total False Positives = 70 Note 3: Previously plugged tubes related to retainer bar wear (3 tubes in 3B-SG)are not included in total tubes.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 26 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 (Non-proprietary Version 1)(27/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__Unit 3A* SCREENED TUBES WITHOUT COUPUNG EFFECT* NOT SCREENED TUBES 141 -.--r----------------------1--.---- 131 ' j ...I ..... , , .I _ / i~ ~I I I r I I * * ' ' I i I i 12 -------126 ------ ---~ --16 .-.....106 ---- ----- -----96 rI I 8 1 ... ... ..71 ............."- * " ......... .." ; -" ' -...' -- J-I --66 ...." .. ."-0 61 -~5 1 ...-... ..- * , * ,. .. .... ...-36 .. ... .. ... ... ... ... ..... ..... ... ........ .......... 31 26, 2---------- --- --- -- ----- ------- -31 26 170 171 166 161 156 151 146 141 136 131 126 121 116 1l1 106 101 96 91 86 81 76 71 60 61 56 51 46 41 36 31 26 21 16 II 6 1 COL 0 SCREENED TUBES WITHOUT COUPUNG EFFECT* NOT SCREENED TUBES 120 ~ 1~~115 F 110 -105 1 100-0 695F 90 -85 F---------------------------- ---. -* '* 0" 0* 9 0 0-0 0 0 0 0-0 0 0 0 0* '* S I* 9* 0 0.-- ----4-* 0* 9* 0** 0 0

0-I.- --- 4 4-*0* * ¶'. 0-1 -;-- ---0--: -- I-;-- -* 0 0 0* 0 0 0*0 0 0* 0 S --- ~---0--* 0 0* 0 0 0* 0 0 0---. -- ---- ---- ---** 0---------------------------80 -.----._--.__100 95 90 85 80 75 70 COL Figure 11 (1/2) False negative check (Unit 3A)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 27 of 62 S023-617-1-M 1540,Rev 0 I Non-proprietary Version I II)(28/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6)

A__Unit 3B* SCREENED TUBES WITHOUT COUPUNG EFFECT* NOT SCREENED TUBES 141 ---- --------- -------4 i11.. .T...131, J 126 -- T T 121 6-- --- --- ------T-----T--------- lo- F-- ------106-T-T-T 96 lt t 3: 1 -- -, ---- ----I F---81 -I- -F- -F- .. .I .. .--76 l. i. "F 068 61T 56 -' ----LL ....---------51 46 4 1 36 3 1 21 -16 1--- -- --- --176 171 166 161 158 151 146 141 136 131 128 121 11F 111 106 101 88 91 8 81 74 71 88 61 56 51 48 41 36 31 20 21 16 11 6 1 COL 0 SCREENED TUBES WITHOUT COUPUNG EFFECT j_

NOT SCREENED TUBES 140 1- T 135 -130 ----------

-------125 ---.. ....................... -- ---120 -- -.-.-.-.-.-.......---------

-.--------115 --.-.---- ---.--- --- -.. .. ...---...

-.-.-.- -- -- ------ --------1 0 ...........-.......- ---------....-*- ------ ------0100 9 0 ..- .75 7.951- .....LA- -60 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 COL Figure 11 (2/2) False negative check (Unit 3B)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 28 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540, Rev 0 (Non-proprietary Version)(29/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__Unit 3A* ADDED TUBES WITH COUPLING EFFECT* SCREENED TUBES WITHOUT COUPUNG EFFECT 141 FSW 13 --------13.1 126 .....- ---, ...2. ............... .........T ..16 ..--7 -T- 7-106 96 L -L 91 7-76 .. ..71 1 L 66 .... --- ----- -- -..... ........061 0: 56 46 36 ....... .. ..... ....31 ... ...: ...i. ... ... .: ..-J ...... ..........26 -... ., ,-" .... ....... .... ..............21 16." ""... .......... ......... .............................. , 16 6 _-------__ ". ._.. .... .-........ ........ ........ ..6-I ----------------------------------

--------------------

176 171 166 161 156 151 146 141 136 131 126 121 116 111 106 101 96 91 86 81 76 71 66 61 56 51 46 41 36 31 26 21 16 11 6 1 COL 9 ADDED TUBES WITH COUPLING EFFECT 0 SCREENED TUBES WITHOUT COUPUNG EFFECT* FSW tN*"II 0 I 4 ** I6 105 F------------ , *---------~-- .. -- ---- -#--.. .. ---,--I 12 0 *105 ---...- ------- -. --A 10 ----o -' -4 .-" -----------.-----0 --0. -, ---r 6- ---------00 4 6-9 -76 0 6 6 0 0 0 00 85 80 70 COL Figure 12 (1/2) False positive check (Unit 3A)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 29 of 62 S023-617-1-M 1540,Rev 0 I Non-proprietary Version ()(30/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__Unit 3B* ADDED TUBES WITH COUPUNG EFFECT* SCREENED TUBES WITHOUT COIPUNG EFFECT* FSW 131 ".. .....1.. ... .. ........I3 I j- -------- :- ---I- ---L -, -----J ---126 .. .4...- 2 ------, L._. L ...L .,_ _, 4, 4 _.121 .L _1 _ __ J._. ,,' , :,; i l ; L -_ _ _ __i _ _J 110 106 710 6166- { '1 -I- -i --- 71 4 1 356 31 36--31 26 21 16 I1 ---------------------- -------------------176 171 166 161 156 11 146 141 136 131 126 121 116 Ill 106 101 96 91 86 61 76 71 66 COL 61 59 5t 46 41 36 31 26 21 1 11 6 1: ADDED TUBES WITH COUPUNG EFFECT* SCREENED TUBES VITHOUT COUPUNG EFFECT* FSW 131 .------- ---.-.-.-.-.----

-- -- --- ---.........-.-----

-.-.-.-- --- ---------- ---* 6 11o --.. ..--.. .. .. .. ----------------

-, -l -l- ---- -i -. ...--10-1 .-....-. ..-- ---------- ---- ---96 ------ ----- .. ..... ....- -7 -0- e-0i- '- - 4- 411 4i -46 "-911 ... --.. -"- ---* -- ......* , * .*.* .9.0."., .+/- ...0_-_. _ 6--6. 0... .....9106----------------

a-J- .... 4---t05 100 95 90 85 80 75 70 COL Figure 12 (2/2) False positive check (Unit 3B)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 30 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 (Non-proprietary Version)(31/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) MA__Table 12 (1/2) False positive check (Unit 3A)3A Number of tubes Number of Number of (incl. FSW FSW tubes NOT FSW tubes FSW/AII tubes tubes) FSW/AIItue tumbes Number Cumulative Number Cumulative [B/A]Number of FSW ratio of NOT ratio[A] J13 [%] FSW [N]Tubepoint16 207 159 96 48 7 77 or over Coupling 68 6 4 62 9 9 effect I I II Total 275 165 100 110 15 60/894 /165 100 /7291 Table 12 (2/2) False positive check (Unit 3B)3B Number of tubes Number of Number of (incl. FSW FSW tubes NOT FSW tubes FSW/AII tubes tubes) F [B/AIItue tumbes Number Cumulative Number Cumulative [B/A]Number of FSW ratio of NOT ratio Tube point 16 225 155 96 70 9 69 or over Coupling 88 6 4 82 11 7 effect Total 313 161 100 152 20 51_ /918 /161 /757 1 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 31 of 62 S023-617-1-M 1540,Rev 0 (Non-proprietary Version 1)(32/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) At 5 Screening results of Unit 2 steam generators MHI selected a value of 16 points to apply as the screening criteria for the Unit 2 steam generators. Table 13 shows the number of tubes that screened-in without the coupling effect.Table 14 shows the number of tubes that screened-in, including tubes added with the coupling effect. A listing of all tubes in the Unit 2 steam generators with tube scores greater than 16 points and tubes added with the coupling effect is included in Tables 15 and 16 with the point break down. The screened tubes are shown in Figure 13.The number of screened tubes for each point category on each criterion is counted and compared to the number of tubes with wear indications. If a tube has a high number of points the tubes were screened-in (See Tables 17 to 24.)Table 13 Number of screened tubes of Unit 2 without coupling effect 2A 2B without coupling TA Toa effect Total Total Tubes Tubes 16 points + -15 points 9 8 14 points 31 24 13 points 13 8 12 points 19 14 11 points 28 33 10 points 13 18 9 points 38 67 8 points 33 86 7 points 10 18 6 points 57 37 5 points 36 33 4 points 39 19 3 points 168 157 2 points 56 32 1 points 33 20 0 points 157 110 Total 855 720 Note: Previously plugged tubes related to retainer bar wear (6 tubes in 2A-SG and 12 tubes in 2B-SG) and over 30% AVB wear (4 tubes in 2B-SG) are not included in total tubes in both steam generators. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 32 of 62 S023-617-1-M 1540,Rev 0 Non-proprietary Version)(33162)Document No.L5-04GA571 (6)A__Table 14 (1/2) Number of screened tubes of Unit 2A with coupling effect 2A Number of tubes Number of Number of ratio of (ind. FSW FSW tubes NOT FSW tubes FSW/AlI tubes) tubes Number Cumulative Number Cumulative [B/A][A] of FSW ratio of NOT ratio [%][ [B] N FSW [%]Tube point 16 115 0 0 115 13 0 or over Coupling 88 2 100 86 10 2 effect I Total 203 2 100 201 24 1/855 /2 /853 Table 14 (2/2) Number of screened tubes of Unit 2B with coupling effect 2 3 Number of tubes (incl. FSW tubes)Number of FSW tubes Number of NOT FSW tubes ratio of FSW/AII tubes[B/A][%]Number S I I Tube point 16 or over Coupling effect Total Number[A]36 63 99/720 Number Cumr of FSW r FR1 nulative Number atio of NOT FSW 36 63 99/0 /720 Cumulative ratio[%]5 9 14 0 Additional tubes in 2A-SG and 2B-SG were selected for preventative plugging even though they were below the screening level of 16 points (see Tables 15 and 16). These tubes were selected for preventative plugging because they had seven or more AVB indications. All other tubes with seven or more AVB indications screened in.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 33 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540, Rev 0 Non-proprietary Version ()(34/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) AF*L_Table 15 Tubes recommended for plugging in Unit 2A T E tABfi Vi ti [r In-I..oW. ~..~ti.. Void fraction I R .onal e~ffect I C-coinff fft I... .wl q..wnuuy No.Ro.I Co)COUNT HOT P.I--N TSP TP MAX LENGTH (Max Weor ate on AVA WEAR*t 05-NTTSP)HIGH/LOW CONTINOUS VOn)REGION COUPLING TýtI MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 34 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 ii Non-proprietary Version ])(35/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__finn Tube Thbe-toAV3 friction Vibjtion freq,,ncy_____ tr b __ _I I .-Row Col COUNT COUNT HIGH/LOW I CONTINOUS a, Rat, MAX LENGTH VOn REGION ICOUPNG on AVB WEARI OPN~Total 11 5j A*This tube is additionally selected.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M 1540,Rev 0 Page 35, of 62 Non-proprietary Version) (36/62)(Document No.L5-04GA571 (6)A__Table 16 Tubes recommended for plugging in Unit 2B Tube-t-AVB frkicon Vibration ftequency u 4IU r l fO i 4U 4 l pneC0 Ro. I Col COUNT I1UI HIGH/LOW CON..NOUS I " -MULNOTH (Max W.a. Rat. MAV WEAR at E5-E7TSP) I AV8 -R VOID REGION COUPUNG Total t7 18 1L7 18 33 AS ii LO*This tube is additionally selected.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M 1540,Rev 0 Page 36 of 62 (Non-proprietary Version 1)(37/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__Unit 2A*ADDED TUBES WITH COUPLING EFFECT*SCREENED TUBES WITHOUT COUPUING EFFECT*FSWI 141 134 310 126 012 91" ADDED TUBES WITH COUPUNG EFFECT I" SCREENED TUBES WITHOUT COUPUNG EFFECTI* FSW I I I I+ -+ -L~~~ ~ ~ ~ L .1LL ---~-- -------I - --- ... ..I .t I I----.---71-61 01 4-31--- ---- --- ---- --- --- --- -- ---------

--- -- -- -- ---- --- --1 1741 7116 I fil 1 56 16 1 1 41 1 41 4 36 1 31IO I 126 121 116 IlI 106 101 66 61 66 61 78 71 66 61 56 51 46 41 06 31 206 21 16 I1 16 COL ADDED TUBES WITH COUPLING EFFECT SCREENED TUBES WITHOUT COUPLING EFFECT* FSW"I ------------

134 ----129 ------ -- --124 -. -.- ..- .- ...11-- -... .-.-.114 -----104 0-- -_6 i 0*--- -- a -* ** S 0 0 0 S 0~~0 0 S-0--0 0 46-0---------4 4* 0 I a I*I-----I I-------" 94 ---. ..--. ...-.. .--------46-- -----------101 4 COL 41 Figure 13 (1/2) Screened tubes (Unit 2A)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 37 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0

(Non-proprietary Version)(38/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A_Unit 2B* ADDED TUBES WITH COUIPUNG EFFECT* SCREENED TUBES WITHOUT COUPLING EFFECT 141 ---------------------------- 136 _ _ I._ 6._ L J_ _ -131 -._ 4. ._ _ L ._L- 6 I.I 12 26 2,.. ... .121 I 116 76l -'---T-T- -; -+: 711 3: ---------- ------ -*-106 46 86 61 71 o 61 176 171 14$ 161 156 151 146 141 136 131 126 121 116 111 106 101 96 91 80 01 76 71 66 61 56 51 46 41 36 31 26 21 If I1 6 1 CO5L ADDED TUBES WITH COUPLING EFFECT* SCREENED TUBES WITHOUT COUPUNG EFFECT 141 ------.. ...- --7 136- -- -- --- ----- ------ ------- ----- ----------- --- -------- ------- ----- -----------

------------

---_-_-131---------

---- -S- ------------

0 116 --.-.-.-.-.-.-.--

-- -----' ----103 1 --. -. -.- .-- -.-.-.-.- --.-. ..6. .-.-. .-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. -. -. -.- .- .--I 4 I 106 9-- ..... 86 .. 7 COIL* 0

a *121... ... .. ... ... .. ... ... .. 0- .. .0. .e ....10 ------------ ---------** ---,- -------.o ..... ........* ..... * *01 .. ..6.. ... ... 1o -66 .I CO Figure 13 (2/2) Screened tubes (Unit 2B)MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1540, Rev 0 Page 38 of 62 (Non-proprietary Version)(39/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6)

Ak Table 17 Number of AVB indications (COUNT)2A 2B Break down Break down NubrNumber o Number of of of Rate of of Rate AVB Tubes screened [B1]/[A1] % Tubes screened [B2]/[A2] %Indications Tue Tubes Tb [ [[A1] [B1] [A2] [B2]0. 8923 0 0 9136 0 0 1 207 1 0 176 2 1 2 131 3 2 110 6 5 3 136 13 10 98 10 10 4 127 36 28 75 14 19 5 87 51 59 74 23 31 6 63 48 76 37 25 68 7 32 30 94 17 15 88 8 20 20 100 4 4 100 9 1 1 100 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 1 _0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 9727 203 ____......9727 99 _....Table 18 Number of hot side AVB indications (HOT COUNT)2A 2B Number Break down Number Break down Number of of of VBof scend Rate of scend Rate AVB Tubes screened [Bl1/[Al1 % Tubes Tubes [B2]/[A2] %Indications [Al] Tubes [A2] [821.0 9103 0 0 9302 5 0 1 285 14 5 200 11 6 2 195 65 33 137 32 23 3 84 68 81 69 41 59 4 55 51 93 19 10 53 5 5 5 100 0 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 9727 203 9727 99 1 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Page 39 of 62 II Non-proprietary Version)(40/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__Table 19 AVB wear indications at B01/B02 or B131/B12 positions (HIGH/LOW) 2A 213 Break down Break down Number of Number of Rate of Number oofoRate AVB Tubes screened [B1]/[A1] % Tubes screened [B2]/[A2] %Indications [All Tubes [A21 Tubes[All [81311___ [2 [1321 0 9727 203 2 9727 99 1 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 9727 203 9727 99 Table 20 Number of continuous AVB indications (CONTINUOUS) 2A 2B Break down Break down Number of N b of Rate Numer of Rate of Raeof Rt AVB Tubes screened [BI]/[Al] % Tubes screened [B2]/[A2] %Indications [Al] Tubes [A21 Tubes 0 8923 0 0 9136 0 0 1 260 4 2 226 7 3 2 165 9 5 136 11 8 3 114 25 22 92 18 20 4 101 37 37 51 8 16 5 66 38 58 45 20 44 6 56 48 86 25 19 76 7 25 25 100 13 13 100 8 17 17 100 3 3 100 9 0 0 0 0 0 0 10 0 0 0 0 0 0 11 0 0 0 0 0 0 12 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 9727 203 9727 99 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M 1540,Rev 0 Page 40 of 62 I Non-proprietary Version ])(41/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__Table 21 TSP wear (TSP)2A 2B Break down Break down Number ofNumber o Indication of Rate of Rate at #7TSP Tubes screened [B1]/[A1] % Tubes screened [B2]/[A2] %Tubes Tubes[Al] [B1l] _[A2] [B21]YES 40 23 58 32 8 25 NO 9687 180 2 9695 91 11 Total 9727 203 9727 99 !'>Number Break down Number Break down Nubr of Nubr of Indication of Rate of Rate at #6TSP Tubes screened [Bl]/[A1] % Tubes screened [B2]/[A2][Al] Tubes [A21 Tubes[A1] [B1] [B2]YES 30 18 60 40 1 3 NO 9697 185 2 9687 98 1 Total 9727 203 , 9727 99 ......_____Break down Break down Number ofNumber o Indication of Rate of Rate at #5TSP Tubes screened [Bl]/[A1] % Tubes screened [B2]/[A2][Al] Tubes [A2] Tubes[AI] [B1 [A2] [B2] 1 YES 30 12 40 47 6 13 NO 9697 191 2 9680 93 1 Total 9727 203 ,.-52,Y, 9727 99 _MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Page 41 of 62 (Non-proprietary Version)(42/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__w Table22 Wear length (LENGTH)2A 2B 2A 2B Max. AVB Break down Break down Wer Number ofNumber o Wear f of .Rate of of Rate Length Tubes screened [B1]/[A1] % Tubes screened RB2]/[A2] %for Each Tube Tubes [A21 Tubes Tube [mm] [Al] [B] [A2] [82]1<25 9576 112 1 9623 61 1 25 73 36 49 59 20 34 26 41 23 56 23 9 39 27 26 21 81 15 6 40 28 6 6 100 4 1 25 29 5 5 100 3 2 67 30 or over 0 0 0 0 0 0 Total 9727 203 ________ 9727 99 _Table23 Void fraction (VOID)2A 213 Break down Break down Void Fraction N b of Nube of Rneof scend Rate of scend Rate Range Tubes screened [B1"]/[A1] % Tubes screened [B2]/[A2] %[Al] Tubes [A21 Tubes[-1 All B1l [13A] 21 I I 4 4 4 I I I I I I I I I 4 4 1 I_____________________________________ I _________________ I _________________ [_________________ I _________________ I _________________ IK2~~K MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 42 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 (Non-proprietary Version 1)(43/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) Ak Table 24 Regional effect (REGION)2A 2B Number Break Number Break Regional of down of Rate of down of Rate Range Tubes screened [Bl]/[A1] Tubes screened [B2]/[A2]e Tubes s Tubes %[Al] [BI] u[B2e 0 8958 0 0 9078 0 0 1 570 39 7 486 17 3 6 199 164 82 163 82 50 Total 9727 203 _ 9727 99 _MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-Mi1540,Rev 0 Page 43 of 62 Non-proprietary Version 1)(44/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) AtL_6 References

1. Letter RSG-SCE/MHI-12-5749, from D. Calhoun (SCE) to T. Kodama (MHI), August 3, 2012,

Subject:

"Updated ECT Data for Input to Return to Service and Repair Design Documents." 2. Letter RSG-SCE/MHI-12-5688, from D. Calhoun (SCE) to T. Kodama (MHI), March 22, 2012,

Subject:

"ECT Data for Input to Return to Service and Repair Design Documents." MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 44 of,62 S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0

Non-proprietary Version II )(45/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) IAoDendix:-I Appendix-1 Screening results for Unit 3 Steam Generators A listing of ail tubes in the Unit 3 steam generators with tube scores greater than 16 and added tubes with the coupling effect is included in Table A-1, A-2 with the point break down.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 45 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Non-proprietary Version)(46/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__IAppendix-i Table A-1 Screened tubes for Unit 3A T~b I ~ ý ABfit. I Vb .f..n I I-l. 1-s b- -b- I~o Void fr-cion [ RwiiomoRRefftIC] f.... ... .Vv i No.Ro.I Col COUNT COUNT TSP TMSP W- Rýte MAX LENGTH.t W5-4TTSP) on AVB WEAR VOID HIGH/LOW CONTINOUS REGION COUPUNG Totol RC La 10 61 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Page 46 of,62 (Non-proprietary Version I)(47/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__70-1-M2 1 07 1 04 109 114 107 lie]in.1201 1M3.127 20.135 143.145 414 1471 141 148 151 652 154 150 716 761 717 179 17a lei lal B 2 JA95.90 T Fb Tk.-OoAVB ffit~oin V~bGH- f-yoo 1 -1 u. Iooo 4 Void tration I WeGioml eNNeoI Cm,[ffoI Row Col COUNT HOT 1- T HIGH/LOW CONTINOUS cm-o R_, .I MAXl LENGTH I OU-0-100 a AV8 HEAR REGION COUPLING Total MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1540, Rev 0 Page 47 of 62 II Non-proprietary Version 1)(48/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) I ppnix-1 Tube.Tu1b-Oo-AVB friti.on Vibra-on fequency Voi I t No.Ro- Col COUNT HOT (M.' Wea- R Ite MAX LENGTH I V..on AVB WEAR HIGH/LOW CONTINOUS REGION COUPLING ToeI 10 10 10 10 10*This-tube is additionally selected.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M 1540,Rev 0 Page 48 of 62 Non-proprietary Version)(49/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__Appendix-i Table A-2 Screened tubes for Unit 3B T I ABf!1 i if In-olo..o.,,,tub.'." Void f-toion I Resonal efHfectI Couofin,ýffot I Iub, I CtrI I , .. No.Ro-w Col COUNT HOT HIGH/LOW I CONTINOUS (M" TSP MAX LENGTH W. R5-#7TSPI onAVB WEAR VOID REGION COUPLING 10 10 5 5 T-Il MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Page 49 of 62 Non-proprietary Version) (50/62)(Document No.L5-04GA571 (6)Appendix-i 1~. T,b-O-AVB fcriab, 1 uVc,=ec,, fr, .c In-otn. tcb. motoo Void fration I eolonal aeffc I Cocin eff,,tj............ ______ ______ 4 No.Row Co.COUNT COUNT HIGH/LOW CONTINOUS TSP (MT; W- AX LENGTH V at M5-47TSP) A WEAR REGION COUPLING Total ,i MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1 -M 1540, Rev 0 Page 50 of 62 (Non-proprietary Version)(51/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) I Appendix-1i 162 63 T64 765 160 67 170 171 172 173 174 175 186 177 178 191_L83 184 195 216 127 163 269 log 190 191 128_L93_L94 195 196 197 198 199 200 201 203 204 240, 206 20O7 2X01 209 210 212 214 215 219 221 222 2L23 224 225 2L26 227 L226 229 230 231 232 233 234 23.Tob. T lb.-S-AVR frialio VI 090000 ftu~~ I-I. otub .bn- VoIA freion 1 R,0001 ff.ýt Coo0In eff..t R-w IC.COUNT HOT HIGH/LOW CONTINOUS M._ Wer Rate WEAR VOID REGION COUPUNG Total 7(.M M0 10 10 10 10 1o io Lo IO MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1540, Rev 0 Pages51 of 62 II Non-proprietary Version)(52/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) Appendix-1i Tab. I Tube-.o-AVB friotion Vibration ft.Tquenoy 1 In-oene te 1 otobn Void fraction Regional effect Coupling e.ff No.Row Co.COUNT HOT (Mao Wear Rate VOAXLEID.+ eo-aoncr on AV. WEAR HIGH/LOW I CONTINOUS REGION COUPUNG Tol MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Page 52 of 62 Non-proprietary Version* Ii *)(53/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) Appendix-2 Evaluation of Void Fraction Distribution of U-bend Region MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 53 of 62 S023-617-1-M 1540,Rev 0 Non-proprietary Version I ( )(54/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__Appendix-2

1. Purpose This appendix provides evaluation of void fraction distribution of tubes in U-bend region of San Onofre Units 2 and 3 Replacement Steam Generators (RSGs)2. Conclusion The distribution of the void fraction is shown in Fig.6-1.3. Assumption (1) The void fraction is analyzed utilizing the "ATHOS/SGAP" code (Ref. 1). Therefore, the assumptions used in the ATHOS/SGAP code apply to this document.

Two-phase flow is represented by using a drift flux model which is the standard model of two-phase flow analysis.The mathematical models in the ATHOS/SGAP are constituted under the following assumptions: (Ref. 1)(2) The analysis is performed at the steady state conditions of 100% power (1729MW/SG) and the beginning of life (BOL). That is, the steam pressures are 838 psia for 598 deg.F of the primary inlet temperature. (3) All dimensions in analysis are assumed in the cold metal condition because the effect of heat expansion of metals on the calculation results is negligible. MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 54 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540, Rev 0 Non-proprietary Version I)(55/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) Akk 4. Design Inputs The nominal dimensions are obtained from the design drawings (Ref.2 to 19) and the manufacturing tolerances are not considered. Flow characteristics are obtained from 3 dimensional thermal and hydraulic analysis.5. Methodology Based on the design input of the operating conditions, the calculation of the circulation ratio is performed by evaluating the pressure loss and the recirculation head with SSPC, which is a 1 dimensional Thermal and Hydraulic parameter calculation code (Ref.20). Using ATHOS/SGAP (Ref. 1 and 21), the thermal hydraulic analysis is performed to obtain the 3 dimension flow distribution which includes the void fraction.Design Input F _ Operating conditions SSPC 4 Circulation Ratio Calculation by evaluating pressure loss and recirculation head Thermal Hydraulic Analysis 3 dimensional flow distribution-Void fraction Fig.5-1 Flow of the evaluation MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.S023-617-1 -M 1540, Rev 0 Page 55 of 62 ti Non-proprietary Version)(56/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) A__5.1 Evaluation cases The operating parameters used for the calculation are shown in Table 5-1.Table 5-1 Basic parameters for calculation Plugging Thermal power (MWt/SG)i i TCoId (OF)Tsg.-.ut (OF)Thot (Tsg-in) (OF)Tfeedwater (oF)Saturation Steam Pressure (psia)Steam Mass Flow (lb/hr)Circulation ratio 6. Results The average value of the void fraction of U-bend region of each tube is calculated and the distribution is shown in Fig.6-1. The region where the void fraction is high is concentrated on the region of center columns and the outer rows.MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 56 of 62 S023-617-1 -M1540,Rev 0 r Cn C:--I m C', 9 Cl, 0 NA)(Ai CD 0~0 0)0) N 0 CD.2 0 Fig.6-1 Distribution of average void fraction Non-proprietary Version)(58/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6)

7. References I 1) Analysis of Thermal Hydraulics of Steam Generators/Steam Generator Analysis Package, Ver.3.1, 1016564, EPRI 2) L5-04FU001 the latest revision, Component and Outline Drawing 1/3 3) L5-04FU002 the latest revision, Component and Outline Drawing 2/3 4) L5-04FU003 the latest revision, Component and Outline Drawing 3/3 5) L5-04FU021 the latest revision, Tube Sheet and Extension Ring 1/3 6) L5-04FU022 the latest revision, Tube Sheet and Extension Ring 2/3 7) L5-04FU023 the latest revision, Tube Sheet and Extension Ring 3/3 8) L5-04FU051 the latest revision, Tube Bundle 1/3 9) L5-04FU052 the latest revision, Tube Bundle 2/3 10) L5-04FU053 the latest revision, Tube Bundle 3/3 11) L5-04FU 111 the latest revision, AVB assembly 1/9 12) L5-04FU1 12 the latest revision, AVB assembly 2/9 13) L5-04FU1 13 the latest revision, AVB assembly 3/9 14) L5-04FU1 14 the latest revision, AVB assembly 4/9 15) L5-04FU1 15 the latest revision, AVB assembly 5/9 16) L5-04FU1 16 the latest revision, AVB assembly 6/9 17) L5-04FU117 the latest revision, AVB assembly 7/9 18) L5-04FU 118 the latest revision, AVB assembly 8/9 19) L5-04FU 119 the latest revision, AVB assembly 9/9 20) L5-04GA510 the latest revision, Thermal and Hydraulic Parametric Calculations

21) L5-04GA565, the latest revision, Selection of Thermal Hydraulic Analysis (ATHOS) model MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 58 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540, Rev 0 I Non-proprietary Version)(59/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6)

JA__'Appendix-3 Additional details about the number of tube wear indications MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 59 of 62 S023-617-1 -M 1540, Rev 0 Non-proprietary Version ( )(60/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) JA__Appendix-3 This appendix explains the number of tube wear indications used in the analysis. In the In-Service Inspection records, SCE included only bobbin ECT data for AVB and 'TSP indications in Unit-2 and Unit-3 SGs as follows, informed by the project letter (Ref.1).SCE inclusion method-AVB Indications: Evaluation only by bobbin ECT-TSP Indications: Evaluation only by bobbin ECT-FSW Indications, Retainer Bar (RB) Indications, Foreign Object Indications: Evaluation only by rotated ECT The numbers of tubes with wear indications counted based on SCE inclusion method mentioned above are summarized in Table (a).Table (a) Numbers of tubes with wear indication by SCE*SG 2A SG 2B SG 3A SG 3B Total Total Wear Type Pick-up manner (2E -089) (2E -088) (3E -089) (3E -088) (Unit-2) (Unit-3)Type 1 (FSW) Evaluation only by Rotational ECT 2 0 165 161 2 326 Type 2 (AVB wear) Evaluation only by Bobbin ECT 802 595 706 735 1397 1441 Type 3 (TSP wear) Evaluation only by Bobbin ECT 53 135 15 20 188 35 Type 4 (RB wear) Evaluation only by Rotational ECT 4 2 1 3 6 4 Foreign Obiect Evaluation only by Rotational ECT 0 2 0 0 2 0 Total 861 734 887 1 919 1595 1806*: Each tube is only counted once with the priority given to Type 1 followed by Type 2, Type 3, Type 4 and Foreign Material.On the other hand, MHI uses both bobbin ECT and rotated ECT data for AVB and TSP indications, because any tubes with wear indications based on only rotated ECT data are not included in the data for AVB and TSP indications. MHI considered that both bobbin ECT and rotated ECT data should be included for more conservative treatment than only bobbin ECT data.The numbers of tubes with wear indications in Unit-2 and Unit-3 SGs are based on the following inclusion method by using both bobbin ECT and rotated ECT data as follows, informed by the project letter (Ref.2).MHI inclusion method-AVB Indications: Evaluation by bobbin ECT and rotated ECT, larger one is used-TSP Indications: Evaluation by bobbin ECT and rotated ECT, larger one is used-FSW Indications, Retainer Bar (RB) Indications, Foreign Object Indications: Evaluation only by rotated ECT MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 60 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0 Non-proprietary Version II )(61/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6) The numbers of tubes with wear indications counted based on MHI method mentioned above are summarized in Table (b).Table (b) Numbers of tubes with wear indication by MHI*W SG 2A SG 2B SG 3A SG 3B Total Total Wear Type Pick-up manner (2E -089) (2E -088) (3E -089) (3E -088) (Unit-2) (Unit-3)Type 1 (FSW) Evaluation only by Rotational ECT 2 0 165 161 2 326 Type 2 (AVB wear) Evaluation by Bobbin ECT and 802 595 714 737 1397 1451 Rotational ECT, larger one is used Type 3 (TSP wear) Evaluation by Bobbin ECT and 53 137 15 20 190 35 Type___3__TSP _ wa Rotational ECT, larmer one is used Type 4 (RB wear) Evaluation only by Rotational ECT 4 2 1 3 6 4 Foreign Obiect Evaluation only by Rotational ECT 0 2 0 0 2 0 Total 1 861 736 895 921 1597 1816*: Each tube is only counted once with the priority given to Type 1 followed by Type 2, Type 3, Type 4 and Foreign Material.In the comparison between Table (a) and (b), the tubes selected by MHI method which are not selected by SCE method are listed below.(AVB Wear)OUnit-3A Row.83 Col.95 Row.86 Col.94 Row.95 Col.73 Row.99 Col.73'Row.103 Col.73 Row.105 Col.75 Row.106 Col.76 Row.111 Col.77 oLUnit-3B Row.89 Col.89 Row.110 Col.90 (TSP Wear)OUnit-2B Row. 118 Col. 134 Row. 126 Col. 128 MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 61 of 62 S023-617-1-M 1540,Rev 0 (Non-proprietary Version 1)(62/62)Document No.L5-04GA571(6)) Lenix-3 Reference 1. Letter RSG-SCE/MHI-12-5749, from D. Calhoun (SCE) to T. Kodama (MHI), August 3, 2012,

Subject:

"Updated ECT Data for Input to Return to Service and Repair Design Documents." 2. Letter RSG-SCE/MHI-12-5688, from D. Calhoun (SCE) to T. Kodama (MHI), March 22, 2012,

Subject:

"ECT Data for Input to Return to Service and Repair Design Documents." MITSUBISHI HEAVY INDUSTRIES, LTD.Page 62 of 62 S023-617-1-M1540,Rev 0

I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON An nOI;ON /"/.RNI'/0\1L (ompany SONGS Unit 2 Return to Service Report ATTACHMENT 6 SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment [Proprietary Information Redacted] 10/3/2012 I 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA.jEDISONAn EDISON INTERNATIONAL Company SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON An EDISON INTERNATIONAL Company SONGS U2C17 STEAM GENERATOR OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT Page 1 I: S)LIIIIF\ ( IIORNM__EDISON 10/3/2012 SONGS U2C1 7 Steam Generator Operational Assessment I, If 4-_/b/.34-2-Prepared by: Richard A. Coe Steam Generator Recovery Project f Reviewed by: Allen L. Matheny Integrity Assessment Program Element Manager Steam Generator Program;K~ aJ4~10/-3)/,2-Reviewed by: Reviewed by: Tom Yackle " Steam Generator Recovery Project St2ea Pr Short Steam Generator Recovery Project r~ i\ { (,'I/Reviewed by: Approved by: David I Calhoun' .Steam Generator Recovery Project Ste~p eft Chun Manner, Systems Engineer-Mechanical Steam Generator Program SL2 Page 2 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON~An EDIS\% Ilk IR N TI , CumpanýSONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment 10/3/2012 Record of Revision Revision PageslSectionsl No. Paragraphs Changed Brief Description I Change Authorization 0 Initial Issue Initial Issue___ I ______ I ________________ i I.d &Page 3 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 10/3/2012 EDISON°An EDISON INTERNATIONAL_ CmpanýSONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment Table of Contents Page RECO RD O F REVISIO N .......................................................................................................................... 3 LIST O F TABLES ..................................................................................................................................... 5 LIST O F FIG URES ................................................................................................................................... 6 LIST O F APPENDICES ............................................................................................................................ 7 ABBREVIATIO NS AND ACRO NYM S .................................................................................................. 8 EXECUTIVE SUM MARY .......................................................................................................................... 9 1.0 PURPO SE ..................................................................................................................................... 9 2.0 SONGS STEAM GENERATOR DESIGN FEATURES ............................................................ 9 3.0 O PERA TIO NAL ASSESSM ENT ............................................................................................. 12 3.1 OA for Degradation M echanism s Other than TTW .................................................... 14 3.2 TTW OA Using Tube-to-AVB Support Conditions and Contact Force ....................... 15 3.3 "Traditional" Probabilistic OA for TTW ........................................................................ 16 3.4 Determ inistic TTW OA ............................................................................................... 17 3.5 Evaluation of Leakage Integrity ................................................................................. 18 3.6 Sum m ary of All OA Conclusions ................................................................................. 19

4.0 REFERENCES

............................................................................................................................ 20 Page 4 SOULHERN cALIFORNIA 10/3/2012 EDISON A\n EDISON INTF\.i7I()\ 11 ConipanýSONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment List of Tables Page TABLE 3-1: OA APPROACH AND RESULTS COMPARISON ...................................................... 19 Page 5 v SOuthERN CALIFORNIA 10/3/2012 EDISON 0 An EDISO.1 INTERN.ATIONALO CumpansýSONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment List of Figures Page FIGURE 2-1: AVB ARRANGEMENT FOR SONGS STEAM GENERATORS ................................... 10 FIGURE 2-2: DETAILS OF AVBS, RETAINING BARS, BRIDGES, AND RETAINER BARS ....... 11 FIGURE 3-1: TRADITIONAL OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT RESULTS ....................................... 17 Page 6 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 10/3/2012 EDISON An EDISON, I\TfR\"ATIOh\ ID Cupamn SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment List of Appendices Appendix-A: SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment* Appendix-B: SONGS U2C1 7 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear*Appendix-C: Operational Assessment for SONGS Unit 2 SG for Upper Bundle Tube-to-Tube Wear Degradation at End of Cycle 16 Appendix-D: Operational Assessment of Wear Indications in the U-bend Region of San Onofre Unit 2 Replacement Steam Generators

[Proprietary Information Redacted]Page 7 D sothen cai~on~a10/3/2012 SSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA10322 EDISON°An EDISON INTERNATIONALD CumpanýSONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS 2E-089 Unit 2 Steam Generator E-089 AILPC Accident-Induced Leakage Performance Criteria ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers ATHOS Analysis of Thermal-Hydraulics of Steam Generators AVB Anti-Vibration Bar CE Combustion Engineering ECT Eddy Current Testing EFPY Effective Full Power Year EOC End of Cycle (fuel)EPRI Electric Power Research Institute ETSS Examination Technique Specification Sheet FEI Fluid Elastic Instability FOSAR Foreign Object Search and Retrieval gpd Gallons Per Day gpm Gallons Per Minute MHI Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Ltd.NEI Nuclear Energy Institute NODP Normal Operating Differential Pressure NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission OA Operational Assessment POB Probability of Burst RCS Reactor Coolant System SCE Southern California Edison SIPC Structural Integrity Performance Criteria SG Steam Generator SONGS San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station SR Stability Ratio T/H Thermal-Hydraulic TS Technical Specifications TSP Tube Support Plate TTW Tube-to-Tube Wear U2C17 Unit 2 Cycle 17 UNS Unified Numbering System WEC Westinghouse Electric Company Page 8 1 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 10/3/2012 JEDISON An EDISON\ I\FtRV\'AOTI( Cunmpan SONGS U2C1 7 Steam Generator Operational Assessment EXECUTIVE

SUMMARY

On January 31, 2012, a leak was detected in a Unit 3 Steam generator (SG) at San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station (SONGS). Southern California Edison (SCE) operators promptly shut down the unit in accordance with approved operating procedures. The resulting small radioactive release to the environment was well below the allowable federal limits. Subsequently, on March 27, 2012, the Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) issued a Confirmatory Action Letter [1] to SCE describing actions that the NRC and SCE agreed would be completed prior to returning Units 2 and 3 to service. Since that time, SCE's technical team supplemented by a team of experts in the field of thermal-hydraulics and in SG design, manufacture, operation, and maintenance have performed extensive investigations into the causes of the tube leak and have assisted in the development of compensatory measures and corrective actions that will prevent a loss of SG tube integrity. As required by the SONGS Technical Specifications (TS) [3], SONGS SG Program [2], and industry guidelines [51, an Operational Assessment (OA) must be performed to ensure that SG tubing will meet established performance criteria for structural and leakage integrity during the operating period prior to the next planned inspection. Because of the unusual and unexpected nature of the SG tube-to-tube wear (TTW) at SONGS, SCE commissioned three independent OAs [Appendices B, C, and D] by experienced vendors applying diverse methodologies. The non-TTW degradation mechanisms have been addressed by a separate OA included in this report [Appendix-A]. Each of these methodologies demonstrates that SCE has implemented compensatory measures and corrective actions to ensure that Unit 2 will operate safely with substantial conservative margin.This report contains the OAs that have been performed to demonstrate that those compensatory measures and corrective actions will prevent a loss of SG tube integrity. 1.0 PURPOSE In accordance with the SONGS SG Program [2] an OA is performed to ensure that SG tubing meets established performance criteria for structural and leakage integrity during the interval prior to the next planned inspection. The OA projects and evaluates tube degradation mechanisms which have affected the SGs. The performance criteria are defined in plant TS [3] [4] and are based on NEI-97-06 [5].This summary of the OAs establishes operational limits for Unit 2 and provides reasonable assurance, as required by NRC regulations, that Unit 2 will operate safely.2.0 SONGS STEAM GENERATOR DESIGN FEATURES The steam generator is a recirculating, vertical U-tube type heat exchanger converting feedwater into saturated steam. The steam generator vessel pressure boundary is comprised of the channel head, lower shell, middle shell, transition cone, upper shell and upper head. The steam generator internals include the divider plate, tubesheet, tube bundle, feedwater distribution system, moisture separators, steam dryers and integral steam flow limiter installed in the steam nozzle. The channel head is equipped with one reactor coolant inlet nozzle and two outlet nozzles. The upper vessel is equipped with the feedwater nozzle, steam nozzle and blowdown nozzle. In the channel head, there are two 18 inch access manways. In the upper shell, there are two 16 inch access manways. The steam generator is equipped with six (6) handholes and 12 inspection ports providing access for inspection and maintenance. In addition, the steam generators are equipped with several instrumentation and minor nozzles for layup and chemical recirculation intended for chemical cleaning (See Figure 2-1 and Figure 2-2).Note: The SG design information is provided in References [6] [7] [8] [9] [10] [11] [12].Page 9 ESOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISONC An EDISOS SmINrTERaoOprTIONALto CAtsspane n SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment 10/3/2012 Figure 2-1: AVB Arrangement for SONGS Steam Generators Anti-Vibration Bar (AVB)Tube Tube Support Plate (TSP)Page 10 JSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA EDISON An EIDON h\TERVITIONAL Cuin\pa\SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment 10/3/2012 Figure 2-2: Details of AVBs, Retaining Bars, Bridges, and Retainer Bars Page 11 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 10/3/2012 EDISON°An EDISON INTERNATIONAL CumpanN SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment 3.0 OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT As defined in NEI 97-06, the OA is a forward looking evaluation of the SG tube conditions that is used to ensure that the structural integrity and accident leakage performance will not be exceeded during the next inspection interval [5]. The CA projects the condition of SG tubes to the time of the next scheduled inspection outage and determines their acceptability relative to the TS tube integrity performance criteria.As documented in the "SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Condition Monitoring Report" [13], the Unit 2 SGs satisfied the three performance criteria specified in the TS for the previous operating period. The SG Program requires an OA to be completed for the next inspection interval within 90 days after initial entry into MODE 4 (MODE is defined in the station TS). This summary of the OhAs establishes operational limits for Unit 2 and provides reasonable assurance, as required by NRC regulations, that Unit 2 will operate safely.The structural integrity performance criteria (SIPC) and accident-induced leakage performance criteria (AILPC)applicable to wear mechanisms are [14]: Structural Integrity -"All in-service steam generator tubes shall retain structural integrity over the full range of normal operating conditions (including startup, operation in the power range, hot standby, and cool down and all anticipated transients included in the design specification) and design basis accidents. This includes retaining a safety factor of 3.0 against burst under normal steady state full power operation primary-to-secondary pressure differential and a safety factor of 1.4 against burst applied to the design basis accident primary-to-secondary pressure differentials. Apart from the above requirements, additional loading conditions associated with the design basis accidents, or combination of accidents in accordance with the design and licensing basis, shall also be evaluated to determine if the associated loads contribute significantly to burst or collapse. In the assessment of tube integrity, those loads that do significantly affect burst or collapse shall be determined and assessed in combination with the loads due to pressure with a safety factor of 1.2 on the combined primary loads and 1.0 on axial secondary loads." Accident-Induced Leakage -"The primary to secondary accident leakage rate for the limiting design basis accident shall not exceed the leakage rate assumed in the accident analysis in terms of total leakage rate for all steam generators and leakage rates for an individual steam generator." The acceptance standard for structural integrity is [14]: The worst-case degraded tube shall meet the SIPC margin requirements with at least a probability of 95%at 50% confidence. The acceptance standard for accident leakage integrity is [14]: The probability for satisfying the limit requirements of the AILPC shall be at least 95% at 50% confidence. The OA may utilize either a deterministic (also known as simplified arithmetic) or a probabilistic methodology. SCE has assessed all tube wear mechanisms in Unit 2, including TTW. Given the significance of TTW observed in Unit 3, SCE used the experience and expertise of multiple independent companies that routinely perform OAs for the US nuclear industry. AREVA, Westinghouse Electric Company (WEC), and Intertek developed independent OAs to address the TTW found at SONGS. These diverse analyses fulfilled the TS requirement to ensure that SG tube integrity is maintained until the next SG inspection. Page 12 I SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 10/3/2012 EDISON1/2n EDIS\ IN\MTRV\ TIO',,L Cumrnpamn SONGS U2C1 7 Steam Generator Operational Assessment" Section 3.1 provides a summary of the OA prepared by AREVA evaluating all degradation mechanisms found in Unit 2 SGs with the exception of TTW. This OA demonstrates there is reasonable assurance that the SIPC and AILPC for non-TTW will be satisfied for 18 months at 100% power.* Section 3.2 provides a summary of the OA prepared by AREVA. This OA deterministically evaluates the potential for TTW for the limiting condition of no in-plane support. The OA also evaluates probabilistically the potential for in-plane Fluid Elastic Instability (FEI) occurring in Unit 2 based on an analysis of the contact forces between tubes and AVBs. The deterministic results demonstrate all tubes are stable (will not experience Thermal-Hydraulic (T/H) conditions that cause FEI) at 70% power for 18 months of operation without relying on the AVBs for in-plane support. Therefore, this OA demonstrates that the SIPC and AILPC for TTW will be satisfied for 18 months at 70% power. The probabilistic results demonstrate a low probability of FEI at 70%power for approximately 8 months of operation even when additional conservatisms are introduced.

Section 3.3 provides a summary of the OA prepared by Intertek following "traditional" industry guidelines for assessing SG tube degradation.

This OA evaluates the probability that TTW caused by FEI will not exceed the SG SIPC. This OA demonstrates there is a reasonable assurance that the SIPC and AILPC for TTW will be satisfied for 16 months at 70% power level.* Section 3.4 provides a summary of the OA prepared by WEC based on an alternate interpretation of the inspection results. This OA determines the TTW in Unit 2 was caused by out-of-plane vibration between two tubes in close proximity. The OA evaluates the potential for in-plane instability and concludes the Unit 2 SG tubes were stable in-plane at 100% power. This OA demonstrates there is reasonable assurance that the SIPC and AILPC for TTW will be satisfied for 18 months at 70% power.Page 13 SOutHERN CALIFORNIA 10/3/2012 EDISON 0 An E0DISOGIN fTER TIO\AI Cumpan, SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment 3.1 OA for Degradation Mechanisms Other than TTW The "SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment" report [Appendix-A] addresses all degradation mechanisms found in Unit 2 SGs with the exception of TTW. Due to the relatively large number of AVB and TSP wear indications, identified during the U2C17 outage, a probabilistic approach was used to complete the OA for these mechanisms, which included: " Tube Wear at AVB Locations" Tube Wear at TSP Locations" Tube Wear at Retainer Bar Locations" Tube Wear as a Result of Foreign Object Wear The objective of this OA is to ensure that structural and leakage performance criteria will be met over the length of the upcoming inspection interval. The OA tube structural integrity requirement is that the projected worst case degraded tube for each existing degradation mechanism shall meet the limiting structural performance parameter with a 95% probability at 50% confidence [3].AVB and TSP Wear Because the tube wear indications are flat and long in the axial direction, the limiting requirement for the inspection interval length is structural integrity (i.e. tube burst at 3x NODP). The projected accident-induced leak rates for tube wear will not be limiting since leakage due to ligament pop-through will not precede burst condition at 3x NODP.The OA uses a probabilistic method to calculate the growth at End of Cycle (EOC) of each indication by randomly sampling from the growth rate distribution yielding one estimate of the EOC depth for each indication. The burst pressure of the worst case degraded tube is calculated and compared with the value of 3 times NODP. This process is repeated thousands of times in order to develop a probability of burst for the worst case degraded tube. If the probability of burst of the worst case degraded tube is less than 5%, then the plugging criteria and inspection interval are satisfactory. The projected EOC probabilities of burst for the population of indications in each damage mechanism category were calculated for Unit 2 at 100% power for a full cycle of operation (1.577 Effective Full Power Years, EFPY).The projected EOC probabilities are compared with the 95% probability 50% confidence EPRI guidelines [14]criteria to demonstrate the OA structural integrity criteria for AVB and TSP wear are satisfied for a full fuel cycle of operation at 100% reactor power.Retainer Bar Wear Because of the potential for continued retainer bar wear of Unit 2, tubes adjacent to retainer bars have been removed from service. Tubes with retainer bar wear indications were stabilized with U-bend cable stabilizers. The tubes on either side of all retainer bars, at each end of the retainer bars, and at the center of the retainer bars, were also stabilized with U-bend cable stabilizers. These corrective actions provide reasonable assurance that retainer bar wear will not challenge the structural and leakage integrity performance criteria during the remaining life of the SGs. In addition, the stabilization of these tubes provides reasonable assurance that a tube severance event will not occur as a result of retainer bar wear. The SG Program [2] will monitor the tubes adjacent to these plugged tubes during future SG inspections. Page 14 J SOUIIERIN CALIFORNIA 10/3/2012 EDISON, An EDI)SON\ IRT"',IIO\;AL Compam, SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment Foreign Object Wear All Unit 2 SG tubes were examined full length with Eddy Current Testing (ECT) bobbin coil probes. Two adjacent tubes in SG 2E-089 were identified with foreign object wear indications. The foreign object was identified as weld slag and retrieved from the SG. No other foreign objects were found. The foreign object is not indicative of degradation of secondary side internals. Because the foreign object has been removed, no potential exists for degradation to progress at these locations. After removal of the object, the affected indications were inspected with ECT. Since the indications are below the SONGS plugging limit and the object was removed, these tubes are left in service.Based on ECT inspections, secondary side visual examinations, and FOSAR, no foreign objects capable of causing tube degradation remain in the Unit 2 SGs. There is reasonable assurance that foreign objects will not cause the structural or leakage integrity performance criteria to be exceeded prior to the next tube inspection in each SG.OA for Degradation Mechanisms Other than TTW Conclusion The OA demonstrates there is reasonable assurance that the SIPC and AILPC for non-TTW will be satisfied for 18 months at 100% power.3.2 TTW OA Using Tube-to-AVB Support Conditions and Contact Force The "SONGS U2C1 7 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear" [Appendix-B] assesses the TTW degradation mechanism deterministically, without taking credit for in-plane support. The OA also implements a probabilistic approach using tube to AVB contact forces for defining an effective tube support. The OA predicts the probability of in-plane FEI and compares this value to the probabilistic SIPC (95% probability at 50% confidence). The deterministic approach uses Stability Ratios (SRs) as the criterion for susceptibility to FEl. The SR is calculated conservatively using Thermal-Hydraulic (T/H) and tube support conditions on the secondary side of the SG. The T/H conditions are determined using an ATHOS computer model.The deterministic approach demonstrates in-plane stability (SR less than 1.0) at 70% power with no effective in-plane AVB supports. This demonstrates TTW will not occur and SIPC limits will be met.As discussed above, a SR of less than 1.0 indicates the SG tubes will be stable. To demonstrate margin, a probabilistic evaluation was performed assuming instability may occur at a calculated SR as low as 0.75. In the probabilistic approach, the number of effective AVB supports for each tube uses a probabilistic contact force distribution and criteria for determining whether a support is effective for a given contact force. A finite element model of tubes, AVBs, tube-to-AVB gaps, and support structures is used to calculate contact forces at AVB locations. Tube wear inputs to the finite element model are determined from actual wear observed in Units 2 and 3. Results from published technical literature, confirmed by benchmarking the FEI probability model to Unit 3 TTW, indicate that effective supports have a contact force that exceeds a specified value.SRs are determined for each U-bend tube as a function of the number of consecutive ineffective supports and power level. The distributions of contact forces are calculated for each AVB location in the bundle. Tube wear at AVB locations decreases the contact force at those locations. The required contact force for an AVB support to be considered effective is calculated for each AVB location.Page 15 SOutHERN CALIFORNIA 10/3/2012 EDISON°An EDISON INTER V.AtTIONAI O CompanN SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment Using the above as inputs, Monte Carlo trials of a SG are simulated. The probability of instability is the number of trials where the SG contained one or more unstable tubes divided by the total number of trials.TTW OA Using Tube-to-AVB Support Conditions and Contact Force Assessment Conclusion The deterministic approach demonstrates FEI will not occur. Using a SR of <1.0 at 70% power, the SIPC and AILPC are satisfied for an 18 month inspection interval. The probabilistic approach also demonstrates that there is safety margin in the planned inspection interval of 150 cumulative days at power. The approach demonstrates that if instability is assumed to initiate at a calculated SR of 0.75, rather than a value of 1.0, the SIPC acceptance standard is satisfied for approximately 8 months at 70% power.3.3 "Traditional" Probabilistic OA for TTW The "Operational Assessment for SONGS Unit 2 SG for Upper Bundle Tube-to-Tube Wear Degradation at End of Cycle 16" [Appendix-C] uses established industry methods for assessing degradation mechanisms. This OA uses empirical models for degradation growth and engineering models for determining burst pressure and through-wall leak rates. The non-traditional aspect of this OA is to characterize the presence and severity of TTW degradation indications using wear indices defined by the state of AVB and TSP wear for a specific tube.Unit 3 wear data establish the initiation and growth of TTW indications in Unit 2 SG. An empirical correlation using a wear index (a measure of the state of wear degradation in each tube) provides the method for comparing the Unit 3 wear to Unit 2. A probabilistic model representing the high-wear region of the tube bundle evaluates TTW for inspection interval. Tube burst and leakage probabilities are calculated by Monte Carlo simulation for initiation and growth of TTW.Two OA cases are evaluated using the sizing techniques that define the Unit 3 TTW depths. Case 1 evaluates eddy current indication sizing using EPRI ECT Examination Technique Specification Sheet (ETSS) 27902.2 to establish the TTW depth distributions. In Case 2, the TTW depths were determined using a more representative calibration standard."Traditional" Probabilistic OA for TTW Conclusion The results for Case 1 indicate that the SIPC margin requirements are satisfied for an inspection interval of 16 months at 70% power. In Case 2, the SIPC margins are met for a cycle length of 17 months at 70% power. The results of this analysis are displayed in Figure 3-1. The figure identifies the probability of burst as a function of operating cycle length (inspection interval) and power.The SIPC (Tube burst at 3xNOPD) is the limiting requirement for the inspection interval. The AILPC is satisfied since burst margins at 3xNOPD are maintained during the inspection interval.This OA demonstrates there is a reasonable assurance that the SIPC and AILPC for TTW will be satisfied for 16 months at 70% power level.Page 16 I SO uIHERN CALIFORNIA E'DISON 0 An Cempsnme SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment 10/3/2012 Figure 3-1: Traditional Operational Assessment Results Operational Assessment for TTW for Cycle 17 0.16 0.14 0.12 0 m S0.1'o 0.08 0.06 a.0.04 0.02 0 W_~1.00 1.05 1.10 1.15 1.20 1.25 1.30 1.35 1.40 1.45 1.50 1.55 1.60 Cycle Length, (Years at Power)3.4 Deterministic TTW OA A deterministic TTW OA [Appendix-D] was completed for tube wear at AVBs and TTW. Tube wear projections for in-service tubes confirm the SG performance criteria will be satisfied during the inspection interval. Tube wear projections for plugged tubes confirm that severance will not occur during the inspection interval.Evaluation of TTW of the two tubes in SG 2E-089 concludes the wear did not result from in-plane vibration of the tubes. ECT data demonstrate the tube wear indications at AVBs did not extend beyond the width of the AVBs in Unit 2. Wear extending beyond the width of AVBs was strongly correlated with Unit 3 tubes with TTW. In-plane SRs indicate that the two Unit 2 tubes with TTW are stable at 100% power. Pre-service inspection data indicates these two tubes were in close proximity prior to SG operation. The OA postulates that during operation out-of-plane vibration and/or turbulence caused the two tubes to wear.The potential for in-plane vibration leading to TTW in Unit 2 is evaluated by calculating in-plane SRs. The OA methodology predicts in-plane vibration in Unit 3 and confirms the absence of in-plane vibration in Unit 2.This OA projects the depth of indications to the next inspection using current inspection data. ATHOS results provide the T/H inputs for flow velocity, density, and void fraction along the length of the tube. These conditions are used in the Flow Induced Vibration analysis to generate the SR for out-of-plane and in-plane vibration of the Page 17 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 10/3/2012 EDISON An EDISON INTERV ATIOVAL. Cumpan\SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment tube for various tube support conditions. The support conditions define whether or not a support location such as an AVB intersection is effective, meaning that the structure provides adequate support with respect to motion of the tube due to vibration. Presence of tube-to-AVB wear indicates an ineffective support.The vibration analysis results and support conditions are used to make wear projections in the next operating cycle. This calculation is based on empirical test results and involves several input assumptions related to tube-to-AVB gap, the AVB twist, and the wear coefficient between the tube and AVB. The expected ranges of these parameters are known from test results, published data and experience. Wear depth projection is made taking into consideration the inspection results at the current outage. After setting the inputs to match the inspection results for a given indication, the wear calculations are extended to determine the projected wear depth at the next inspection. Deterministic TTW OA Conclusion The OA demonstrates there is reasonable assurance that the SIPC and AILPC for TTW will be satisfied for 18 months at 70% power.3.5 Evaluation of Leakage Integrity The AREVA non-TTW OA [Appendix-A], Section 6.3, discussed the evaluation of leakage integrity for both in-service and plugged tubes. Since the preparation of the AREVA non-TTW OA, SCE plugged five additional tubes.The five additional tubes resulted in a negligible change to the postulated operational and accident-induced leakage attributed to all of the tube plugs using the methodology from the AREVA non-TTW OA.The operational leakage performance criterion is met through the plant monitoring program. The accident-induced leakage performance criterion is met by projecting leakage attributed to all degradation mechanisms along with postulated plug leakage and comparing the projected leakage to the allowable accident-induced leak rate limit.For tubes retumed to service, the onset of pop-through and leakage for axially oriented indications with limited circumferential extent -the nature of the degradation identified in the Unit 2 SGs -is coincident with burst. None of the identified degradation mechanisms in Unit 2 are projected to exceed the structural performance criteria prior to the next scheduled inspection. The accident-induced leakage is only attributed to postulated plug leakage through out-of-service tubes. There is reasonable assurance the accident-induced leakage performance criteria will not be exceeded prior to the next inspection of the Unit 2 SGs.Page 18 J SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 10/3/2012 EDISON 0 An EDISOt)\ h\ TI'\ " 7IO,',l 2 ('ompinx SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment 3.6 Summary of All OA Conclusions The OA provide reasonable assurance, as required by NRC regulations that Unit 2 will operate safely at 70%power for 150 cumulative days. The OAs (See Table 3-1) summarized in Sections 3.1 and 3.2 conclude the SIPC and AILPC are satisfied. The alternative OA methodologies summarized in Sections 3.3 and 3.4 also confirm the SG tube integrity will be maintained during the inspection interval.Table 3-1: OA Approach and Results Comparison OA for Degradation TTW OA With No "Traditional" OA Description Mechanisms Other Effective AVB Probabilistic OA D i Than TrW Supports Prepared for TTW Reference A B C D Appendix Degradation Mechanisms All but TTW TTW TTW TTW & AVB Wear Addressed Type Probabilistic Deterministic Probabilistic Deterministic Thermal Power 100% 70% 70% 70%Assumption Resulting 18 months 18 months 16 months 18 months Inspection Interval As identified in Table 3-1 above, the OAs result in an acceptable inspection interval of at least 16 months at 70%power. These OAs determined that at 70% power, the T/H conditions that cause FEI will be eliminated from the SONGS Unit 2 SGs. As discussed in Section 3.2, an additional probabilistic evaluation, assuming a calculated SR of 0.75, was performed to demonstrate margin. The approach assumes instability initiates at a calculated SR of 0.75 (rather than a SR of 1.0). Using this approach, the SIPC acceptance standard is satisfied for approximately 8 months at 70% power.Accordingly, the 150 cumulative day inspection interval being implemented by SCE demonstrates substantial conservative margin using any of the OA methodologies. Page 19 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA 10/3/2012 EDISON 0 An EDISON INTERNATIONAL Curnpany SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment

4.0 REFERENCES

1. Confirmatory Action Letter 4-12-001 -"San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Units 2 and 3, Comments to Address Steam Generator Tube Degradation," March 27, 2012 2. SONGS Steam Generator Program, S023-SG-1 3. SONGS Technical Specifications Sections 5.5.2.11, "Steam Generator (SG) Program," Amendment 204 4. SONGS Technical Specifications Section 3.4.12, "RCS Operational Leakage," Amendment 204 5. NEI 97-06, "SG Program Guidelines," Rev. 3, January 2011 6. AREVA NP Document 51-9176667-001, "SONGS 2C17 & 3C17 Steam Generator Degradation Assessment." 7. SCE Drawing S023-617-1 -D 116 Rev. 2, "San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2 & 3 Replacement Steam Generators

-Design Drawing -Tube Bundle 1/3" (MHI Drawing L5-04FU051 Rev.1)8. SCE Drawing S023-617-1-D507 Rev. 5, "San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2 & 3 Replacement Steam Generators -Design Drawing -Anti-Vibration Bar Assembly 1/9" (MHI Drawing L5-04FU 111 Rev. 2)9. SCE Drawing S023-617-1-D542 Rev. 9, "San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2 & 3 Replacement Steam Generators -Design Drawing -Anti-Vibration Bar Assembly 7/9" (MHI Drawing L5-04FU 117 Rev. 9)10. SCE Drawing S023-617-1-D296 Rev. 3, "San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2 & 3 Replacement Steam Generators -Design Drawing -Tube Support Plate Assembly 3/3" (MHI Drawing L5-04FU 108 Rev. 3)11. SCE Drawing S023-617-1-D17 Rev. 2, "San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2 & 3 Replacement Steam Generators -Design Drawing -Tube Bundle 2/3" (MHI Drawing L5-04FU052 Rev.1)12. SCE Drawing S023-617-1-Dl 18 Rev. 4, "San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station Unit 2 & 3 Replacement Steam Generators -Design Drawing -Tube Bundle 3/3" (MHI Drawing L5-04FU053 Rev.3)13. AREVA NP Document 51-9182368-003, "SONGS 2C17 Steam Generator Condition Monitoring Report" 14. EPRI Report 1019038, "Steam Generator Management Program: Steam Generator Integrity Assessment Guidelines: Revision 3", November 2009.Page 20 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA njEDISON 0 An L!)ISOQ\ '110:\iL Compuny SONGS Unit 2 Return to Service Report ATTACHMENT 6 -Appendix A SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment [Proprietary Information Redacted] A 20004-018 (10/18/2010) AREVA AREVA NP Inc.Engineering Information Record Document No.: 51 -9182833 -002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Supplier Status Stamp VPL 1814- 1-M0157 =Nov 0 Ioc:N/A 1 IOESIGN DOCUMENT ORDER NO. 800918458 DOCUMENT-INFORMATION ONLY C1VIRP IOM MANUAL MFG MAY PROCEED: EYES [-NO EN/A STATUS -A status is required for design documents and is optional for reference ,ocuments. Drawings are reviesed and approved for arrangements and conformanreto specification only. Approval does not relieve the submitter from the responsibility of Kdeqvay and suitability of design, materials, and/or equipment represented. I'-1. APPROVED E]2. APPROVED EXCEPT AS NOTED -Make changes and resubmit.I-fl3. NOT APPROVED -Correct and resubmit for review. NOT for field use.APPROVAL: (PRINT / SIGN I DATE)RE: E. GRIBBLE 10/01/12 FLS: Other: SCE DE(123) 5 REV. 3 07111

REFERENCE:

S0123-XXIV-37.8.26 1814-AU651-M01 57, REV. 0 Page 1of32 Page 1 of 32 A A.REVA 20004-018.(!018!202 0)DocUment No,: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Safety Re!ated? M YES O NO Does. this document contain assumpripns requiring verification? -YES .( NO Does this document contain CLustrn~br Reqiired Formiat? , YES. [2 NO Signature Block.L Note: P!LP designates Preparer (P), Lead Preparer (LP)RILR desicjnatps'Reviwe6i- (R), Lead'RevieW&r-'(LR) A/AWCRF designabtes Approxkdr (A), Apprý66r of Custorer Requested Forimat(A-QRF) A/A-CRIdresignties Ap 1 rover(A)Approver C6nfiriing Reviewer Indeperdence (A-CRI)Page 2 1814-AU651-M0157, REV. 0 Page 2 of:, 32 A AREVA 20004-018 (10/18/2010) Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Record of Revision Revision Pages/Sections/ No. Paragraphs Changed Brief Description I Change Authorization 000 All Original Release 001 Sections 2.0 and 5.2.1.3 Section 2.0; changed Mode 4 to Mode 2 Section 5.2.1.3; last sentence; inserted "2C 17" before "depth distribution" 002 All Added Section 2.0 and Table 2-1 Added References 13 through 20 Incorporated other miscellaneous comments throughout remainder of document 1814-AU651-MOI 57, REV. 0 Page 3 of 32 Page 3 1814-AU651 -M01 57, REV. 0 Page 3 of 32 Page 3 A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Table of Contents Page SIG NATURE BLOCK ............................................................................................................................. 2 RECO RD O F REVISIO N ....................................................................................................................... 3 LIST O F TABLES .................................................................................................................................. 5 LIST O F FIG URES ................................................................................................................................ 6 1.0 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................. 7 2.0 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRO NYMS ................................................................................... 7 3.0 SCO PE ...................................................................................................................................... 9 4.0 PERFO RMANCE CRITERIA .................................................................................................. 9 5.0 BACKGRO UND ....................................................................................................................... 10 5.1 Steam Generator Design ........................................................................................... 10 5.2 Tube-to-Tube W ear Finding ...................................................................................... 10 5.3 Condition Monitoring Assessment Sum m ary ............................................................. 11 6.0 O PERATIO NAL ASSESSM ENT ........................................................................................... 15 6.1 Input Param eters ...................................................................................................... 15 6.2 Evaluation of Structural Integrity ............................................................................... 18 6.2.1 AVB W ear and TSP W ear ....................................................................... 18 6.2.2 Retainer Bar W ear .................................................................................. 28 6.2.3 Tube-to-Tube W ear ................................................................................. 28 6.2.4 Foreign Object W ear ................................................................................ 29 6.3 Evaluation of Leakage Integrity ................................................................................ 29 6.4 Secondary Side Internals ......................................................................................... 30 7.0 O PERA TIONAL ASSESSM ENT CO NCLUSIO N .................................................................. 30

8.0 REFERENCES

......................................................................................................................... 31 1814-AU651-M0157, REV. 0 Page 4 of 32 Page 4 A ARE VA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment List of Tables Page TABLE 2-1: ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS ............................................................................ 7 TABLE 6-1: UNIT 2 STEAM GENERATOR INPUT VALUES ........................................................... 16 TABLE 6-2: EDDY CURRENT ETSS INPUT VALUES [4] ............................................................. 17 TABLE 6-3: PROJECTED PROBABILITY OF NON-BURST ............................................................ 21 TABLE 6-4: U2C17 TUBE-TO-TUBE WEAR INDICATIONS ............................................................ 28 TABLE 6-5: POSTULATED PLUG LEAKAGE ................................................................................ 30 1814-AU651 -MOl 57, REV. 0 Page 5 of 32 Page 5 1814-AU651 -IM01 57, REV. 0 Page 5 of 32 Page 5 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment FIGURE 5-1: FIGURE 5-2: FIGURE 5-3: FIGURE 6-1: FIGURE 6-2: FIGURE 6-3: FIGURE 6-4: FIGURE 6-5: FIGURE 6-6: List of Figures Page SONGS STEAM GENERATOR SUPPORT STRUCTURE LAYOUT .......................... 12 VIEW FROM ABOVE BUNDLE SHOWING RETAINER BAR LOCATIONS .............. 13 SKETCH SHOWING RETAINER/RETAINING BAR CONFIGURATION .................... 14 ADJUSTED GROWTH RATE DISTRIBUTION, AVB WEAR >20%TW ...................... 22 ADJUSTED GROWTH RATE DISTRIBUTION, AVB WEAR <20%TW ...................... 23 ADJUSTED GROWTH RATE DISTRIBUTION, TSP WEAR >10%TW ...................... 24 ADJUSTED GROWTH RATE DISTRIBUTION, TSP WEAR <10%TW ...................... 25 AVB W EAR DEPTH HISTOGRA M ............................................................................ 26 TSP W EAR DEPTH HISTOGRA M ............................................................................ 27 1814-AU651-MOI 57, REV. 0 Page 6of32 Page 6 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 6 of 32 Page 6 A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment 1.0 PURPOSE In accordance with the SONGS Steam Generator Program [18] and EPRI Steam Generator Integrity Assessment Guidelines [2], an operational assessment (OA) must be performed to ensure that steam generator (SG) tubing will meet established performance criteria for structural and leakage integrity during the operating period prior to the next planned inspection. The OA evaluates and projects tube degradation mechanisms which have affected the SGs to date. The performance criteria are defined in plant Technical Specifications [13] [14]. The performance criteria are based on NEI 97-06 [1] (see Section 4.0 below).This report documents the OA performed during the SONGS Unit 2 C17 Refueling Outage. This OA addresses the detected tube degradation OTHER THAN tube-to-tube wear (TTW). TTW will be addressed in a separate OA [15]. This OA concludes that operation at full power for a full cycle of 1.577 Effective Full Power Years (EFPY) is justified based on detected tube degradation other than TTW. The OA for TTW [15] may prescribe operation at reduced power and/or a shorter inspection interval. The more conservative OA shall govern plant operation. 2.0 ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS The following table provides a listing of abbreviations and acronyms used throughout this report.Table 2-1: Abbreviations and Acronyms Abbreviation or Definition Acronym 01C to 07C Tube Support Plate Designations for Cold Leg (7 Locations) 01H to 07H Tube Support Plate Designations for Hot Leg (7 Locations) 2E-088 Unit 2 Steam Generator 88 2E-089 Unit 2 Steam Generator 89 3E-088 Unit 3 Steam Generator 88 3E-089 Unit 3 Steam Generator 89 3 NOPD 3 Times Normal Operating Pressure Differential AILPC Accident Induced Leakage Performance Criterion ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers AVB Anti-Vibration Bar C Column CE Combustion Engineering CL or C/L Cold Leg CM Condition Monitoring DA Degradation Assessment ECT Eddy Current Testing EFPD Effective Full Power Days EOC End of Operating Cycle EPRI Electric Power Research Institute 1814-AU651 -MOI 57, REV. 0 Page 7 of 32 Page 7 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 7 of 32 Page 7 A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Table 2-1: Abbreviations and Acronyms Abbreviation or Definition Acronym ETSS Examination Technique Specification Sheet FOSAR Foreign Object Search and Retrieval GPD Gallons per Day GPM Gallons per Minute HL or H/L Hot Leg KSI Thousand Pounds per Square Inch MHI Mitsubishi Heavy Industries MSLB Main Steam Line Break NDE Non Destructive Examination NEI Nuclear Energy Institute NN Nuclear Notification NOPD Normal Operating Pressure Differential NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission OA Operational Assessment PSI Pounds per Square Inch PSIG Pounds per Square Inch Gage PWR Pressurized Water Reactor QA Quality Assurance R Row RB Retainer Bar RCS Reactor Coolant System SCE Southern California Edison SG Steam Generator SIPC Structural Integrity Performance Criteria SLB Steam Line Break SONGS San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station SSI Secondary Side Inspection TEC Tube End Cold TEH Tube End Hot TSP Tube Support Plate"TS Top of Tubesheet TTW Tube to Tube Wear TW Through Wall UB U-bend 1814-AU651 -MOI 57, REV. 0 Page 8 of 32 Page 8 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 8 of 32 Page 8 A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment 3.0 SCOPE This evaluation pertains to the SONGS Unit 2 replacement steam generators which are reactor coolant system components. This report addresses all tube degradation mechanisms except for TTW. The OA for TTW will be addressed separately. In accordance with Reference 10, the OA documented in this report is required to be completed prior to plant entry into Mode 2 during start up from the current outage.Note that the required SG condition monitoring (CM) assessment is documented in a separate report[11] and is summarized below in Section 5.3.4.0 PERFORMANCE CRITERIA The Unit 2 performance criteria, based on NEI 97-06 [1] are shown below. The structural integrity and accident-induced leakage criteria were taken from Section 5.5.2.11 [13] from the Unit 2 Technical Specifications. The operational leakage criterion was taken from Section 3.4.13 [14] of the Unit 2 Technical Specifications. Structural Integrity Performance Criterion (SIPC): All in-service steam generator tubes shall retain structural integrity over the full range of normal operating conditions (including startup, operation in the power range, hot standby, and cooldown, and all anticipated transients included in the design specification) and design basis accidents. This includes retaining a safety factor of 3.0 against burst under normal steady state full power operation primary-to-secondary pressure differential and a safety factor of 1.4 against burst applied to the design basis accident primary-to-secondary pressure differentials. Apart from the above requirements, additional loading conditions associated with the design basis accidents, or combination of accidents in accordance with the design and licensing basis, shall also be evaluated to determine if the associated loads contribute significantly to burst or collapse. In the assessment of tube integrity, those loads that do significantly affect burst or collapse shall be determined and assessed in combination with the loads due to pressure with a safety factor of 1.2 on the combined primary loads and 1.0 on axial secondary loads.* Accident Induced Leakage Performance Criterion (AILPC): The primary to secondary accident induced leakage rate for any design basis accident, other than a SG tube rupture, shall not exceed the leakage rate assumed in the accident analysis in terms of total leakage rate for all SGs and leakage rate for an individual SG. Leakage is not to exceed 0.5 gpm per SG and 1 gpm through both SGs.* Operational Leakage Performance Criterion (OLPC): RCS operational leakage shall be limited to 150 gallons per day primary to secondary leakage through any one steam generator." 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 9 of 32 Page 9 A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C1 7 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment

5.0 BACKGROUND

5.1 Steam Generator Design SONGS Unit 2 is a two loop Combustion Engineering (CE) Pressurized Water Reactor (PWR) plant which began commercial operation in 1983. The original CE steam generators were replaced in 2009-2010 with new SGs designed and manufactured by Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI). The replacements, referred to by MHI as model 1 16TT-1, incorporate thermally treated Inconel Alloy 690 (I-690TT) tubing which has demonstrated, through laboratory testing and industry experience, superior resistance to stress corrosion cracking as compared with the 1-600 tubing used in the original SGs.Other design features include full tubesheet depth hydraulic tube expansion and seven stainless steel trefoil broached Tube Support Plates (TSPs) which are features chosen primarily to minimize the potential for tube corrosion. There are 9727 tubes in each SG, in 142 rows and 177 columns, in a triangular pitch arrangement. The tubes in rows 1-13 are thermally stress-relieved to further minimize the potential for in-service stress corrosion cracking in the U-bends. The tube bundle U-bend region is supported by a floating Anti-Vibration Bar (AVB) structure consisting of six V-shaped flat-bar AVBs between each tube column.The AVBs were fabricated from ASME SA-479, Type 405 ferritic stainless steel and are equipped with two Alloy 690 (ASME SB-168 UNS N06690) end caps. Each AVB end cap is welded to an Alloy 690 retaining bar. The retaining bars with AVBs attached are supported by twenty four chrome-plated Alloy 690 retainer bars that anchor the assembly to the tubes. Thirteen Alloy 690 bridges run perpendicular to the retaining bars and retainer bars, and hold the entire assembly together. The AVB structure is not attached to any other steam generator component. Figure 5-1 illustrates the general layout of the tube support structures. Figure 5-2 and Figure 5-3 illustrate the retainer bar and retaining bar arrangement. 5.2 Tube-to-Tube Wear Finding During the U2C1 7 outage, SONGS Unit 3 was shut down due to a primary-to-secondary SG tube leak.Eddy current inspections of the Unit 3 steam generators revealed that the cause of the leak was TTW in the U-bend region of the tube bundle. A root cause evaluation has concluded that the tube-to-tube wear in the SONGS steam generators was caused by tube movement caused by fluid-elastic instability (FEI) [16]. No indications of TTW were reported during the initial inspections of the Unit 2 steam generators which included full-length inspections of all tubes with bobbin coil probes. However, to apply the Unit 3 experience to Unit 2 steam generators, supplemental +PointTm inspections of the U-bends were performed in Unit 2. These supplemental inspections included the full-length of the U-bend for a group of tubes in the same tube bundle region which experienced TTW in Unit 3. These supplemental inspections resulted in the finding of two adjacent tubes with shallow (14% TWVD as measured with +Point T M) tube-to-tube wear in the 2E-089 SG.1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 10 of 32 Page 10 A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment 5.3 Condition Monitoring Assessment Summary A detailed description of the SG scope of work and findings, and the CM assessment of SG tube condition as determined during the U2C1 7 outage are documented in Reference

11. The U2C1 7 inspections revealed many indications of wear. Wear indications were reported at anti-vibration bars (AVBs), tube support plates (TSPs), retainer bars (RB), and due to a foreign object. In addition, as discussed above, tube-to-tube wear in the U-bend region was also reported in two adjacent tubes in the 2E-089 SG.Except for one retainer bar wear indication, all tubes passed CM analytically.

The tube with the deep RB wear indication was in-situ pressure tested and successfully met all performance criteria.The CM assessment evaluated all SG tube degradation detected during the U2C1 7 outage against the three SONGS technical specification performance criteria in References 13 and 14. Through a combination of eddy current inspection, analytical evaluation, in-situ pressure testing, and operational leakage monitoring, it was determined that all three of the performance criteria were met.1814-AU651-MOI 57, REV. 0 Page 11 of 32 Page 11 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 11 of 32 Page 11 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Figure 5-1: SONGS Steam Generator Support Structure Layout 1814-AU651-MOI 57, REV. 0 Page 12 of 32 Page 12 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 12 of 32 Page 12 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C1 7 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Figure 5-2: View From Above Bundle Showing Retainer Bar Locations 02 0 2E-088 i270-180" 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 13 of 32 Page 13 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Figure 5-3: Sketch Showing Retainer/Retaining Bar Configuration 1814-AU651-MO1 57, REV. 0 Page 14 of 32 Page 14 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 14 of 32 Page 14 A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment 6.0 OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT The SONGS SG Program requires that a "forward looking" operational assessment (OA) be performed in accordance with Reference 2 to determine if the SG tubing will continue to meet the structural and leakage integrity requirements prior to the next inspection. The OA is based upon an evaluation of the degradation mechanisms observed during the current inspection. As discussed in Reference 11, the following tube degradation mechanisms were identified during the U2C1 7 outage:* Anti-vibration bar (AVB) wear" Tube support plate (TSP) wear* Retainer bar (RB) wear* Foreign object wear" Tube-to-tube wear (TTW)The degradation mechanisms covered by this operational assessment are being evaluated assuming a full cycle of operation at 100% reactor power. Per Reference 7, the upcoming fuel cycle is planned to be 576 EFPD (Effective Full Power Days). Converting this to EFPY gives a length for Cycle 17 of 1.577 EFPY. As discussed previously, this report addresses all degradation mechanisms except for TTW.The OA for TTW will be documented separately. In the TTW OA, the permissible reactor power level and inspection interval may be reduced from that evaluated in this document. The more conservative OA shall govern plant operation. 6.1 Input Parameters Table 6-1 and Table 6-2 identify the input parameters used to perform the operational assessment. Consistent with the structural integrity criteria described in Section 4.0, the limiting pressure loading occurs at a value of three times the normal operating pressure differential (NOPD). For Unit 2 at full power, this value is 4290 pounds per square inch differential (psid) and is based on a conservative assessment of Unit 2 secondary side steam pressure during the previous operating cycle. A review of the secondary side steam pressures for the previous operating cycle showed a secondary side steam pressure of about 820 pounds per square inch absolute (psia). With a primary side pressure of 2250 psia, a 3 NOPD value of 4290 psid is obtained. As discussed earlier, it is possible that operation during the next inspection interval will be at reduced power. Operation at reduced power will increase the secondary side steam pressure. Therefore, the 3 NOPD value will be also reduced by operation at reduced power levels and using the 4290 psid value bounds the potential operating conditions for the upcoming operating period.In addition to pressure loads, the OA must also consider the impact of non-pressure accident loads if they could have a significant effect on the burst pressure of the degraded tubes. The CM assessment [11] provides the basis for concluding that design basis, non-pressure accident loads are not limiting for the tube wear mechanisms identified for the Unit 2 SG tubes. Consequently, the limiting loading scenario for evaluation of structural and leakage integrity is that involving pressure loads evaluated with a safety factor of three (i.e., 3 NOPD).1814-AU651-M01 57, REV. 0 Page 15 of 32 Page 15 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment In order for a degraded tube to be returned to service, the degradation must be measured using a qualified Eddy Current Testing (ECT) sizing technique and the degradation must be evaluated as acceptable for continued operation. The ECT sizing techniques qualified for use at Unit 2 are identified in the degradation assessment [5] and their sizing performance parameters are summarized in Table 6-2. The techniques are identified by their EPRI ETSS (Examination Technique Specification Sheet)numbers. If tube degradation cannot be sized with appropriate sizing confidence, the tube is plugged upon degradation detection. All degradation identified during the current outage was measured with a qualified ECT technique. Table 6-1: Unit 2 Steam Generator Input Values Parameter Value Desired probability of meeting burst pressure limit 0.95 Tubing wall thickness 0.043 inch, [7]Tubing outer diameter 0.750 inch, [7]Mean of the sum of yield and ultimate strengths at temperature 116000 psi, [8]Standard deviation of the sum of yield and ultimate strengths 2360 psi, [8]3 Normal Operating Pressure Differential (3 NOPD) 4290 psid, [7]MSLB Pressure Differential 2560 psid, [9]EFPD from SG Replacement until U2C17 Refueling Outage 627.11 EFPD, [7]Operating interval for upcoming fuel cycle as evaluated in this OA* 1.577 EFPY* This OA only addresses detected degradation mechanism other than TTW. The OA for TTW will be documented separately. The OA for TTW may prescribe operation at lower reactor power and a shorter inspection interval. Whichever OA is more conservative shall govern plant operation. 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 16 of 32 Page 16 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Table 6-2: Eddy Current ETSS Input Values [4]Parameter ETSS ETSS ETSS ETSS ETSS ETSS 96004.1 10908.4 27903.1 27901.1 27902.2 96910.1 Probe Type Bobbin Coil +PointTM +PointTM +PointTM +PointTM +Point T M NDE depth sizing Slope = 0.98 Slope = 1.06 Slope = 0.97 Slope = 1.05 Slope = 1.02 Slope = 1.01 Negdepthsiing pIntercept = Intercept = Intercept = Intercept = Intercept = Intercept =regression parameters 2.89 %TW 0.13 %TW 2.80 %TW -1.97 %TW 0.94 %TW 4.30 %TW NDE depth sizing technique uncertainty 4.19 %TW 3.78 %TW 2.11 %TW 2.30 %TW 2.87 %TW 6.68 %TW (standard deviation) NDE depth sizing analysis uncertainty 2.10 %TW 1.89 %TW 1.06 %TW 1.15 %TW 1.44 %TW 3.34 %TW (standard deviation) Total NDE (Sizing and Technique) (standard 4.69 %TW 4.23 %TW 2.36 %TW 2.60 %TW 3.22 %TW 7.48 %TW deviation)* IIIII Total uncertainty is the technique and analysis uncertainties combined via the square root of the sum of the squares.1814-AU651-MO1 57, REV. 0 Page 17 of 32 Page 17 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 17 of 32 Page 17 A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment 6.2 Evaluation of Structural Integrity The fundamental OA structural integrity criteria is that the projected worst case degraded tube for each existing degradation mechanism must meet the limiting structural performance parameter with a 95%probability and 50% confidence [2]. Due to the relatively large number of AVB wear and TSP wear indications identified during the U2C1 7 outage, a probabilistic approach for analysis of the full bundle is necessary and was used to perform the OA for these mechanisms in accordance with Section 8.3 of Reference 2.6.2.1 AVB Wear and TSP Wear With the finding of TTW in Unit 2, over 300 tubes were preventatively plugged in Unit 2 in the region deemed most susceptible to fluid-elastic instability. These tubes contained a significant number of AVB wear indications. Therefore, the number of AVB wear indications returned to service for the next operating interval is significantly less than the number of indications reported during the U2C1 7 inspection. The quantities of indications detected and returned to service are shown in Table 6-3.The typical deterministic approach for performing an OA for wear is to identify the worst case flaw during the current outage, apply an upper bound growth rate to reflect growth during operation prior to the next inspection, and compare the resulting depth (i.e., the end-of-cycle (EOC) depth) to the CM limit curve. This is generally appropriate for degradation mechanisms which involve a small number of indications. However, when a large number of indications of a particular mechanism are expected to develop or are left in-service, it is not conservative to perform a deterministic OA evaluation of this type.A probabilistic approach addresses the fact that the presence of a large number of in-service flaws increases the probability that one or more of the flaws will grow to a structurally significant depth by the EOC. Hence, this evaluation approach will yield a lower plugging limit for a SG which has a large population of flaws than would a typical deterministic approach. For the Unit 2 AVB wear and TSP wear, it is prudent to use a probabilistic approach. Consequently, the OA for AVB and TSP wear was performed using AREVA's full tube bundle probabilistic OA tool [6].AREVA's full-bundle probabilistic OA tool was developed specifically for wear at support structures using the flaw model from Section 5.3.3 of Reference 3 and the Monte Carlo approach from Reference 2. This tool receives as key inputs: 1) the population of wear flaws identified, 2) the growth rate distribution anticipated during the next operating period, 3) Non-Destructive Examination (NDE)Examination Technique Specification Sheet (ETSS) regression and uncertainty parameters, 4) a conservative estimation of the number of flaws present, but not detected, during the U2C1 7 outage inspection, and 5) newly initiated flaws expected during the next operating period. The tool "grows" each flaw that is left in-service by randomly sampling from the growth rate distribution, yielding one estimate of the EOC depth for each flaw. In addition, the entire population of expected newly initiated flaws is added to the EOC flaw population. From this EOC combined population the burst pressure of the worst case degraded tube is calculated and compared with the value of 3 NOPD. This process is repeated thousands of times (via a Monte Carlo process) in order to develop a probability of survival for the worst case degraded tube. This value must be at least 95% to satisfy the fundamental OA criteria.If the result is less than 95%, a lower plugging limit must be implemented. The calculation also considers uncertainties associated with material strength, ECT sizing, the ratio of maximum flaw depth to structurally significant flaw depth, and the burst equation itself. Within the full bundle OA tool, AVB and TSP wear are evaluated using the EPRI Flaw Handbook [3] degradation model for axial part-throughwall degradation less than 1350 in circumferential extent, subjected to pressure loading of 3 NOPD. The basis for the use of this flaw model is discussed in the CM assessment [11].1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 18 of 32 Page 18 A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment 6.2.1.1 Growth Rates One of the underlying assumptions implemented within the full bundle OA tool is that growth rates going forward are random with respect to the current wear depth. Because the Unit 2 SGs have operated for only one cycle and have only one in-service inspection, it is not known if or to what extent this behavior will manifest itself in the future. Consequently, AVB wear was evaluated as two separate populations: flaws >20%Through Wall (TW) in one population, and flaws <20%TW in the other population. Flaws >20%TW are assumed to continue to grow at a rate based on their growth during the first operating cycle. In the evaluation, this forces deeper flaws to grow at a higher rate. Likewise, flaws <20%TW are grown at a rate based on their growth during the first cycle. TSP wear flaws sized>10%TW were similarly evaluated as a separate population from those sized <10%TW. Because there are very few TSP flaws sized >20%TW, a cutoff value of 1 0%TW was chosen. The selections of the breakpoints at 20%TW for AVB wear and 1 0%TW for TSP wear were based on AREVA Engineering experience and the numbers of flaws being returned to service in each depth category.For AVB wear, 2E-088 has the limiting growth distribution. Therefore, the 2E-088 growth distribution was applied to both SGs. Due to the relatively small population of TSP wear indications, the growth rate distribution used in the OA was based on a combined data set from both SGs.Prior to developing a growth rate distribution, the measured depths of the wear reported must be adjusted to account for the tendency of the EPRI sizing technique in ETSS 96004.1 to undersize flaw depth. This systematic sizing bias need not be considered when growth rate distributions are developed from two consecutive inspections because the sizing bias drops out when calculating depth change.However, because only one inspection result is available this adjustment is necessary. Another way to understand this is to recognize that prior to initial operation of the SGs the actual flaw depths were zero.To obtain an unbiased estimate of the growth during the first cycle of operation, the best estimate of actual depth during the U2C1 7 outage is required. Consequently, the through wall depths were adjusted upward by applying the sizing regression for ETSS 96004.1.In addition, an adjustment was also made to account for the fact that, as the flaw deepens, the wear contact area increases. The volume of tube material removed is proportional to the wear work rate [19].If the wear work rate is assumed to be constant (i.e., constant volume removal), then the growth rate, as measured in terms of through wall depth, will decrease because more tube material must be removed for a given increase in flaw depth. Based on an evaluation of tube geometry, with constant work rate and a second operating period of the same length as the first period, the growth in depth would be about 60% of the growth in the first cycle. Therefore, based on the assumption of constant volume loss, the first operating period growth rate could be adjusted by a factor of 0.6 to reflect the expectation of constant volume growth rate. For tapered wear such as that observed at the TSPs, this factor would be expected to be even lower since a tapered wear scar would also grow in length with increasing depth. For the OA, full credit for this growth rate reduction was not taken. Instead, a factor of 0.7 was applied to the AVB and TSP wear growth rates. Data from recent replacement steam generators with tube-to-support wear and multiple inspections support the constant volume loss assumption. Because the upcoming operating period could be at a reduced power level due to TTW, the effect of power level on growth rate of AVB and TSP wear was also evaluated. A reduction in power level will change the velocities and densities on the secondary side of the tube bundle. The growth rate for wear indications is expected to be roughly proportional to the square of the dynamic pressure (where dynamic pressure = pV 2; density times the square of velocity) [19]. As power level is decreased, the density increases. However, the increase in density is more than offset by the decrease in velocity.1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 19 of 32 Page 19 A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Therefore, if there is any noticeable change in growth rate, it is expected to be a decrease in the observed growth rate. For this OA, no adjustment to the growth rate was made to account for any potential change in power level.The growth rate distributions applicable to AVB wear and TSP wear are provided in Figure 6-1 through Figure 6-4. The AVB wear growth rates are based upon the data for 2E-088 which exhibited a slightly higher growth rate than 2E-089. For TSP wear, the data from the two SGs were combined due to the relatively low number of TSP wear indications. 6.2.1.2 Structural Depths and Lengths Structural depths and lengths were obtained for 22 AVB wear indications that were line-by-line sized with the +PointTM probe using EPRI ETSS 10908.4. These structurally equivalent dimensions correspond to a rectangular flaw which would burst at the same pressure as the measured flaw;determined using the methods described in Section 5.1.5 of Reference

3. The selection of indications for line-by-line sizing was based on depth of the indication with emphasis placed on the deeper indications.

Since the results of the operational assessment are highly dependent on the deepest flaws returned to service, use of the structural lengths and depths from 22 of the deeper indications is justified. The structural depths were compared to the maximum depths for each flaw to obtain a ratio of structural to maximum depth. The ratio of structural depth to maximum depth ranged from a low of 0.76 to a high of 0.94. The average and the standard deviation of this ratio are 0.882 and 0.052, respectively. These values were used as inputs to the full bundle OA tool for the AVB wear evaluations. Using the distribution of structural to maximum depth ratios, the OA tool randomly applies a ratio value, sampled from this normal distribution, to each postulated maximum depth at the EOC. The sampled ratio value is constrained to a minimum and maximum of 0.8 and 1.0, respectively. For TSP wear, a fixed value of 1.0 was conservatively used for the ratio of structural to maximum depth.For the structural length, a fixed value of 0.7" was used for AVB wear. This is conservative since the width of the AVB is only 0.59". This conservative value was selected based on the observation that some of the AVB wear flaws in Unit 3 extended outside the confines of the AVB intersection. This phenomenon in Unit 3 is believed to be due to the in-plane motion of the affected tubes. No AVB wear indications in Unit 2 were observed to extend outside the AVB intersection. However, based on the Unit 3 observation and the fact that shallow TTW was observed in Unit 2, a conservative length of 0.7" was applied for AVB wear indications in Unit 2.The structural length for TSP wear was set to a fixed value of 1.6" which is longer than the 1.38" thickness of the TSPs. Again, this conservative value was selected based on the observation that some of the TSP wear flaws in Unit 3 extended outside of the TSP intersection. 6.2.1.3 Initiation and Depth Distribution of New Indications Based on industry experience with other replacement SGs experiencing relatively large quantities of wear during early operation, it is likely that another operating period of equal length at SONGS would produce fewer new wear flaws than the number reported during the U2C17 inspection. However, for this OA it was assumed that the cumulative number of wear flaws will trend linearly with the cumulative operating EFPY. In addition, it was conservatively assumed that the depth distribution of new indications anticipated after a full fuel cycle of operation will be the same as that observed during the U2C1 7 outage for the flaw category under evaluation (i.e., AVB wear >20%TW, AVB wear <20%TW, etc.). Again, the OA for AVB and TSP wear is being performed as if a full cycle of operation at 100%power will occur prior to the next inspection. For each category, the flaw population used to model growth was also used to model new flaw size. Figure 6-5 and Figure 6-6 provide histograms illustrating the overall U2C1 7 depth distribution of each degradation mechanism. 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 20 of 32 Page 20 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment 6.2.1.4 Results of Probabilistic OA for AVB Wear and TSP Wear The fundamental OA structural integrity criterion is that the projected worst case degraded tube for each existing degradation mechanism must meet the limiting structural performance parameter with a 95% probability and 50% confidence. The results of the probabilistic OA for AVB wear and TSP wear are provided in Table 6-3. The values provided in the table represent the projected probability of non-burst for the entire population of flaws in the specified group. These values compare directly with the 95/50 OA criteria. Note that the combined probability of non-burst is simply the product of the probabilities for the different groups evaluated (e.g., 0.9997 x 0.9921 x 0.9996 x 0.9992 = 0.9906). In all cases, the OA structural integrity criteria for AVB and TSP wear is satisfied for a full cycle of operation at 100% reactor power. The operational assessment for TTW will be documented separately. In the TTW OA, the permissible reactor power level and inspection interval may be reduced from that evaluated in this document. The more conservative OA shall govern plant operation. Table 6-3: Projected Probability of Non-Burst End-of-Cycle No. of Indications No. of Indications Tube Degradation Flaw Detected Returned to Service Probability of Non-Burst* Category 2E-088 2E-089 2E-088 2E-089 2E-088 2E-089 AVB Wear >20% 66 64 24 22 0.9997 0.9996 AVB Wear <20% 1691 2527 1157 1407 0.9921 0.9902 TSP Wear >10% 77 59 68 31 0.9996 0.9997 TSP Wear,;10% 148 80 127 49 0.9992 0.9996 AVB & TSP ar Cobied 1982 2730 1376 1509 0.9906 0.9891 Wear Combined* Results shown are for a full cycle of operation (1.577 EFPY) at full power. The operational assessment for TTW will be documented separately. In the TTW OA, the permissible reactor power level and inspection interval may be reduced from that evaluated in this document. The more conservative OA shall govern plant operation. 1814-AU651-MOI 57, REV. 0 Page 21 of 32 Page 21 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 21 of 32 Page 21 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Figure 6-1: Adjusted Growth Rate Distribution, AVB Wear >20%TW 1--SG88 AVB >20%0.8 -.--SG89 AVB >20%-Both SG AVB >20%0.6 E 0.4 0.2 0 o-O 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Adjusted Growth Rate (Percent Throughwall per EFPY)1814-AU651-MO1 57, REV. 0 Page 22 of 32 Page 22 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 22 of 32 Page 22 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Figure 6-2: Adjusted Growth Rate Distribution, AVB Wear <20%TW 1-- SG88 AVB <=20%0.8 -SG89 AVB <=20%--Both SG AVB <=2096 0.6 E 0.4 0.2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Adjusted Growth Rate (Percent Throughwall per EFPY)1814-AU651-MO1 57, REV. 0 Page 23 of 32 Page 23 1814-AU651 -M01 57, REV. 0 Page 23 of 32 Page 23 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Figure 6-3: Adjusted Growth Rate Distribution, TSP Wear >10%TW 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 0 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Adjusted Growth Rate (Percent Throughwall per EFPY)10 1814-AU651-M0157, REV. 0 Page 24 of 32 Page 24 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Figure 6-4: Adjusted Growth Rate Distribution, TSP Wear <10%TW 1-- SG8R TSP <=10%0.8 SG-- 89 TSP <=10%Both SG TSP <=10%0.6 E 0.4 0.2 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Adjusted Growth Rate (Percent Throughwall per EFPY)1814-AU651 -MOl 57, REV. 0 Page 25 of 32 Page 25 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 25 of 32 Page 25 A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Figure 6-5: AVB Wear Depth Histogram 800 700 600-400*1 300 200<ý6 8 10 E SG88 0 SG89 mmN 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 AVB Wear Depth In Percent Throughwall 100 0 34 36 >36 1814-AU651-MOI 57, REV. 0 Page 26 of 32 Page 26 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 26 of 32 Page 26 A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Figure 6-6: TSP Wear Depth Histogram 100 80* 5G88 Q SG89 g60 V E Is Z 40 20<=6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 34 36 >36 TSP Wear Depth in Percent Throughwall 1814-AU651-MOI 57, REV. 0 Page 27 of 32 Page 27 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 27 of 32 Page 27 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment 6.2.2 Retainer Bar Wear To eliminate the potential for future RB wear in in-service tubes, all tubes adjacent to the retainer bars have been plugged in both SGs. Prior to plugging, all tubes with RB wear indications were stabilized with U-bend cable stabilizers. The tubes on either side of all retainer bars, at each end of the retainer bars, and at the center of the retainer bars, were also stabilized prior to plugging in both SGs. This augmented stabilization provides additional material volume to resist continued RB wear, and provides added assurance that the retainer bars will not interact with in-service tubes. These corrective actions provide reasonable assurance that retainer bar wear will not challenge the structural and leakage integrity performance criteria during the remaining life of the SGs. In addition, the stabilization of these tubes provides reasonable assurance that a tube severance event will not occur as a result of RB wear during the remaining life of the SGs. Monitoring of the tubes adjacent to these plugged tubes must be performed on a periodic basis during future SG inspections. 6.2.3 Tube-to-Tube Wear As discussed earlier and in Reference 11, shallow TTW was detected in two tubes in the 2E-089 SG.The inspections that led to the finding of TTW in Unit 2 were performed based on the finding of significant TTW in SONGS Unit 3. Although the numbers and depths of indications between the two units are vastly different, it has been found that Unit 2 was susceptible to TTW. The locations of the indications along with the measured depths and lengths are provided in Table 6-4.The OA for TTW will be documented separately. In the TTW OA, the permissible reactor power level and inspection interval may be reduced from that evaluated in this document. The more conservative OA shall govern plant operation. Table 6-4: U2C17 Tube-to-Tube Wear Indications Maximum Structural Structural SG Row Col Location Depth Length (in.) Depth Length (in)(%TVV) (___ o/w) Length(in 2E-089 111 81 B09 +1.63 to +7.95 15 6.32 14.0 2.28 2E-089 113 81 B09 +2.03 to +8.22 14 6.19 13.7 1.67 1814-AU651-MOI 57, REV. 0 Page 28 of 32 Page 28 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 28 of 32 Page 28 A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment 6.2.4 Foreign Object Wear All Unit 2 SG tubes were examined full length with bobbin coil probes. Two tubes in the 2E-088 SG were identified with foreign object and foreign object wear indications. The object which caused the foreign object indication and associated wear was retrieved from the SG. Consequently, there is no possibility for this degradation to progress during future operation. After removal of the object, the affected locations were inspected with a +Point T M technique qualified for depth sizing (with the object not present). Neither indication exceeded the SONGS 35%TW plugging limit. Since the indications were below the SONGS plugging limit and the object was removed, these tubes were left in service. No other foreign objects or foreign object wear flaws were identified during the ECT inspection. Subsequent analysis by SCE identified the object as weld metal debris. Therefore, the presence of this object was not indicative of degradation of secondary side internals. The SG work activities performed during this refueling outage included post sludge lancing, secondary side visual inspections of the top-of-tubesheet (TTS) annulus and no-tube lane regions in both SGs, and visual inspections of the upper bundle, including the retainer bars, and the retainer bar-to-retaining bar and AVB end cap-to-retaining bar welds. Other than the object discussed above, these examinations identified no foreign objects, loose parts or conditions which could credibly generate foreign objects or loose parts capable of impacting tube integrity. In summary, based on extensive ECT inspections augmented by secondary side visual inspections and Foreign Object Search and Retrieval (FOSAR), no foreign objects or loose parts capable of causing tube degradation are known to remain in the Unit 2 SGs. Hence, there is reasonable assurance that foreign objects or loose parts will not cause the structural or leakage integrity performance criteria to be exceeded prior to the next tube inspection. 6.3 Evaluation of Leakage Integrity All tubes with degradation exceeding the Technical Specification plugging limit have been removed from service by plugging. In addition, many additional tubes were preventatively plugged. For the tubes that were removed from service, primary-to-secondary leakage past the plugs must be considered. applying this value to each plug and adjusting the leak rate to the normal operating and accident differential pressures, gives the postulated leak rates provided in Table 6-5. All leak rate values are provided at room temperature conditions because the SONGS leakage performance criteria are specified as volumetric leak rates at room temperature conditions. These values are well below the allowable leak rates as shown in this table.For the tubes returned to service, per Reference 2, the onset of pop-through and leakage for axially oriented volumetric flaws with limited circumferential extent -the nature of the degradation identified in the Unit 2 SGs -is coincident with burst. Because none of the identified degradation mechanisms are projected to exceed the structural performance criteria prior to the next scheduled inspection in each SG, there is reasonable assurance that neither the operational, nor the accident-induced leakage performance criteria will be exceeded prior to the next inspection of the Unit 2 SGs.1814-AU651 -M01 57, REV. 0 Page 29 of 32 Page 29 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment Table 6-5: Postulated Plug Leakage 2E-088 2E-089 Number of Tubes Plugged 205 305 Total Number of Plugs 410 610 Allowable Accident-Induced Leak Rate 0.5 0.5 (gpm at room temperature) 0.5 0,5 6.4 Secondary Side Internals No degradation of SG secondary side internals was identified during this outage. No tube support degradation or misplacement was identified during the ECT or secondary side visual inspections. 7.0 OPERATIONAL ASSESSMENT CONCLUSION This report documents the OA for all detected degradation mechanisms except for TTW. This OA concludes that there is reasonable assurance that the performance criteria for the non-TTW degradation will be met if Unit 2 were to operate for a full fuel cycle of 1.577 EFPY at 100% reactor power.The TTW OA will be documented separately. Operation at reduced reactor power and a shorter inspection interval may be prescribed in the TTW OA. The more conservative OA shall govern plant operation. 1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 30 of 32 Page 30 A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2CI17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment

8.0 REFERENCES

1. NEI 97-06, "SG Program Guidelines," Rev. 3, January 2011.2. EPRI Report 1019038, "SG Integrity Assessment Guidelines:

Revision 3", November 2009.3. EPRI Report 1019037 "Steam Generator Degradation Specific Management Flaw Handbook, Revision 1", December 2009.4. EPRI, SG Management Project, "sgmp.epriq.com".

5. AREVA Document 51-9176667-001, "SONGS 2C17 & 3C17 Steam Generator Degradation Assessment".

6. AREVA Document 32-9104082-002, "MATHCAD Implementation of SG Full Probabilistic Operational Assessment".

7. *Matheny, Southern California Edison, "Numerical Values for the SG OAs, SONGS Units 2 and 3," February 8, 2012.8. *SONGS Unit 2 Replacement Steam Generator Receipt Inspection QA Document Review Package.9. *SONGS UFSAR Chapter 5.10. NRC, "Confirmatory Action Letter -SONGS Units 2 and 3, Commitments to Address SG Tube Degradation," CAL 4-12-001, March 27, 2012.11. AREVA Document 51-9182368-002, "SONGS 2C17 Steam Generator Condition Monitoring Report".12. AREVA Document 51-1177797-009, "0.750 Mechanical Rolled Plug Design Verification Report-Alloy 690".13. *SONGS Technical Specifications Section 5.5.2.11, "Steam Generator (SG) Program", Amendment 204 14. *SONGS Technical Specifications Section 3.4.13, "RCS Operational Leakage", Amendment 204.15. AREVA Document 51-9187230-000, "SONGS 2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear".16. *Root Cause Evaluation, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Condition Report: 201836127,"Unit 3 Steam Generator Tube Leak and Tube-to-Tube Wear", Revision 0, 5/7/2012.17. *Root Cause Evaluation NN 201843216, "Steam Generator Tube Wear, San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station, Unit 2".18. *SONGS Steam Generator Program, S023-SG-1.

1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 31 of 32 Page 31 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9182833-002 SONGS U2C17 Outage -Steam Generator Operational Assessment

19. Au-Yang, M.K., "Flow-Induced Vibration of Power and Process Plant Components:

A Practical Workbook", ASME Press, 2001.20. *SONGS RGR-U2/3-C17, "SONGS Units 2/3 Cycle 17 Reload Ground Rules", Item X.003, Revision 2.*Documents are not retrievable from the AREVA document control system, but can be retrieved from the SCE document control system. Therefore, these are acceptable reference per AREVA Administrative Procedure 0402-01, Attachment 8, as authorized by the Project Manager's signature on page 2.1814-AU651-MO157, REV. 0 Page 32 of 32 Page 32 SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA JEDISON ,\n I:VT'IE, N 110 \ALI0 Company SONGS Unit 2 Return to Service Report ATTACHMENT 6- Appendix B SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear[Proprietary Information Redacted] A 20004-018 (10/18/2010) AREVA AREVA NP Inc.Engineering Information Record Document No.: 51 -9187230 -000(NP)SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear Supplier Status Stamp VPL 1814-AU651-M0160 Rev, 0 jQCN/A No: NO:[-]DESIGN DOCUMENT ORDER NO. R111Q I R4I WIREFERENCE DOCUMENT-INFORMATION ONLY F-1VIRP IOM MANUAL I MFG MAY PROCEED: DYVES CINO XONA I STATUS -A status is required for design documents and is optional for reference documents. Drawings are reviewed and approved for arrangements and conformance to spectficatlon only. Approval does not relieve the submitter from the responsibility of adequacy and suitability of design, materials, and/or equipment represented. .APPROVED 2 APPROVED EXCEPT AS NOTED -Make changes and resubmitAI*DO~fl'n.- C,,r..~. .n,, r~lhri f,, r KifT fr APPROVAL: (PRINT / SIGN / DATE)RE: E. GRIBBLE 10/2/12 FLS: Other: SCE DE(123) 5 REV. 3 07/11

REFERENCE:

S0123-XXIV-37.8.26 Page 1 of 129 1814-AU651-MO160, REV. 0 Page 1 of 129 A AREVA 20004-018 (10/1812010) Document No.: 51-9187230-000 PROPRIETARY SONGS U2C1 7 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear Safety Related? v YES L-n NO Does this document contain assumptions requiring verification? F"] YES NO Does this document contain Customer Required Format? [jYES [ NO Signature Block.PLP, R/LR, PageslSections Nameand A/A-CRF, Prepared/Revlewed/ T1t1leDIsclplne Signature A/A-CRI Date Approved or Commvents Figures in Sections 4, 5, 6, and 8.All All Note: P/LP designates Preparer (P), Lead Preparer (LP)RILR designates Reviewer (R), Lead Reviewer (LR)A/A-CRF designates Approver (A), Approver of Customer Requested Format (A-CRF)A/A-CRI desiguates Approver (A), Approver -Confinring Revicwer Independence (A-CRI)References 1, 3,4, 8, 9,10, 11, 18,20,21, 22, 24, and 27 identified in Section 11.0 are available from Southern California Edison (SCE) and are approved for use as required by AREVA NP procedure 0402-01.I I Date Name & Title Signature Page 2 1814-AU651-M0160, REV. 0 Page 2 of 129 A AREVA 20004-018 (10/18/2010) Document No.: 51-9187230-000 (NP)SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear Record of Revision Revision PageslSections/ No. Paragraphs Changed Brief Description / Change Authorization 000 All Original Release_ _ _ I _ ___ I ________£ -I-£ -I-1 4 1 4 3 4 I I.Page 3 1814-AU651-M0160, REV. 0 Page 3 of 129 A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9187230-000 (NP)SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear Table of Contents Page SIGNATURE BLOCK ................................................................................................................................ 2 RECORD OF REVISION ......................................................................................................................... 3 LIST OF FIG URES ................................................................................................................................... 6 LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................................................... 10 1.0 PURPOSE ................................................................................................................................... 12 2.0 BACKGROUND .......................................................................................................................... 12

3.0 INTRODUCTION

......................................................................................................................... 15 4.0 OPERATIONAL ASSESSM ENT STRATEGY ........................................................................ 16 4.1 Development of TTW ................................................................................................. 16 4.2 Operational Assessment Strategy ............................................................................... 20 5.0 STABILITY RATIOS .................................................................................................................... 43 6.0 CONTACT FORCES ................................................................................................................... 56 6.1 M HI Quarter Bundle Steam Generator M odel ............................................................ 56 6.2 Contact Force Distributions -Unit 3 .......................................................................... 57 6.3 Contact Force Distributions -Unit 2 .......................................................................... 59 6.4 Dent Evaluation ........................................................................................................... 59 6.4.1 Pre-Service Dents ...................................................................................... 59 6.4.2 Non-Classical Dents ................................................................................. 60 6.5 Tube-to-AVB Gap Evaluation ...................................................................................... 61 6.5.1 Unit 2 Tube-to-AVB Gaps .......................................................................... 62 6.5.2 Effect of Gap Size on Tube-to-AVB W ear ................................................. 62 6.5.3 Unit 3 Tube-to-AVB Gaps .......................................................................... 62 6.6 Conclusions -Contact Forces ................................................................................... 63 7.0 CRITERIA FOR EFFECTIVE VERSUS INEFFECTIVE SUPPORTS .................................... 97 7.1 Equal Contact Force at Each AVB ............................................................................ 97 7.2 Variable Contact Force at Each AVB .......................................................................... 97 7.3 Single AVB Effective (Upper Bound Contact Force) .................................................. 98 7.4 Chosen Approach for the OA ...................................................................................... 98 7.5 Sum mary -Criteria for Support Effectiveness ............................................................ 99 1814-AU651-M0160, REV. 0 Page 4 of 129 Page 4 A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9187230-000 (NP)SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear Table of Contents (continued) Page 8.0 PROBABILITY OF INSTABILITY RESULTS ............................................................................ 104 9.0 D E F E N S E -IN -D E P T H ............................................................................................................... 113 10 .0 C O N C L U S IO N S ........................................................................................................................ 1 17 1 1.0 R E F E R E N C E S .......................................................................................................................... 1 18 APPENDIX A: ESTIMATES OF FEI-INDUCED TTW RATES ....................................................................... A-1 Page 5 1814-AUb51-1VlU1bU, Kt .U P'age 0 O oI ZV A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9187230-000 (NP)SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear List of Figures Page FIGURE 2-1: AVB ARRANGEMENT FOR SONGS STEAM GENERATORS ................................... 13 FIGURE 2-2: VIEW OF TOP OF BUNDLE ...................................................................................... 14 FIGURE 2-3: ENDS OF AVBS ATTACHED TO RETAINING BARS, BRIDGES AND RETAINER BARS A LS O S H O W N ...................................................................................................................... 14 FIGURE 4-1: DEPTH VERSUS AXIAL LENGTH PROFILE FOR THE LEAKING TUBE IN UNIT 3, SG E -0 8 8 ..................................................................................................................................... 2 3 FIGURE 4-2: FIGURE FROM A BOOK BY M. K. AU YANG, "FLOW INDUCED VIBRATION IN POWER AND PROCESS PLANT COMPONENTS", ASME PRESS, 2001 ..................... 24 FIGURE 4-3: SPIDER DIAGRAM OF THE OPERATIONAL ENVELOPE FOR LARGE U-BEND STEA M G E N E RA TO R S ........................................................................................................ 25 FIGURE 4-4: TUBESHEET MAP OF TT'"W INDICATIONS, UNIT 3, SG E-088 ............................... 26 FIGURE 4-5: TUBESHEET MAP OF TTW INDICATIONS, UNIT 3, SG E-089 ............................... 27 FIGURE 4-6: EXPANDED VIEW OF TTW INDICATIONS, UNIT 3, SG E-088 ................................. 28 FIGURE 4-7: EXPANDED VIEW OF TTW INDICATIONS, UNIT 3, SG E-089 ................................. 29 FIGURE 4-8: COMBINED VIEW OF TTW INDICATIONS ............................................................... 30 FIGURE 4-9: TTW DEPTH VERSUS ROW AND COLUMN, UNIT 3 SG E-088 ............................. 31 FIGURE 4-10: TTW DEPTH VERSUS ROW AND COLUMN, UNIT 3 SG E-089 ............................. 32 FIGURE 4-11: NO ELONGATED AVB WEAR FOUND BEYOND THE REGION OF TTW, UNIT 3 SG E -0 8 8 ..................................................................................................................................... 3 3 FIGURE 4-12: NO ELONGATED AVB WEAR FOUND BEYOND THE REGION OF TTW, UNIT 3 SG E -0 8 9 ..................................................................................................................................... 3 4 FIGURE 4-13: TUBE WEAR LENGTH AT AVBS FOR UNIT 3 SG E-088 ....................................... 35 FIGURE 4-14: TUBE WEAR LENGTH AT AVBS FOR UNIT 3 SG E-089 ....................................... 36 FIGURE 4-15: MODE 1 DISPLACEMENT PATTERN ........................................................................ 37 FIGURE 4-16: ELONGATION OF AVB WEAR AT EACH AVB ......................................................... 38 FIGURE 4-17: IMPACT LOCATIONS OF UNSTABLE TUBES ......................................................... 39 FIGURE 4-18: MODE 2 DISPLACEMENT PATTERN ........................................................................ 40 FIGURE 4-19: MODE 3 DISPLACEMENT PATTERN ...................................................................... 41 FIGURE 4-20: [ ] ....................................... .42 FIGURE 5-1: SPIDER DIAGRAM OF THE SUCCESSFUL OPERATIONAL ENVELOPE FOR NUCLEAR STEAM GENERATORS WITH LARGE U-BENDS ....................................... 46 FIGURE 5-2: [ I ................................ .47 ,, ,, , , , .. .... ..... ..Page 6.4 fl 10 1 &+-/-%UOD I -Mv IOU, mr-v. U Page 6 OT -Ldbf A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9187230-000 (NP)SONGS U2C1 7 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear List of Figures (continued) Page FIGURE 5-3: STABILITY MAP AT 100% POWER, NO PLUGGING, 9 5 TH PERCENTILE SR, SR > 1.48 FIGURE 5-4: STABILITY MAP AT 70% POWER WITH PLUGGING AND SPLIT STABILIZERS, 9 5 TH P ER C EN T ILE S R , S R > 1 ................................................................................................ 49 FIGURE 5-5: [............................................................................................................ 5 0 FIGURE 5-6: STABILITY MAP AT 100% POWER, 9 9 TH PERCENTILE SR, SR > 1 ........................ 51 FIGURE 5-7: STABILITY MAP AT 70% POWER WITH PLUGGING AND SPLIT STABILIZERS, 9 9 TH PER C E NT ILE S R , S R > 1 ................................................................................................ 52 FIGURE 5-8: DEPTH OF AVB WEAR INDICATIONS VERSUS AVB NUMBER, UNIT 2, SG E-088 A N D S G E -0 8 9 ...................................................................................................................... 5 3 FIGURE 5-9: NUMBER OF AVB WEAR INDICATIONS VERSUS AVB NUMBER ........................... 54 FIGURE 5-10: STABILITY MAP AT 70% POWER WITH PLUGGING AND SPLIT STABILIZERS, 9 5 TH PERC ENTILE SR , SR a 0.75 .......................................................................................... 55 FIGURE 6-1: QUARTER MODEL CONTACT FORCE AND GAP LOCATIONS ............................... 64 FIGURE 6-2: ZONES USED TO DEVELOP CHARACTERISTIC DISTRIBUTIONS OF CONTACT FORCES FOR EACH AVB IN THE ZONE ....................................................................... 65 FIGURE 6-3: CUMULATIVE CONTACT FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS, ZONE 1, UNIT 3, BOC 16 ..... 66 FIGURE 6-4: CUMULATIVE CONTACT FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS, ZONE 3, UNIT 3, BOC 16 ..... 67 FIGURE 6-5: CUMULATIVE CONTACT FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS, ZONE 5, UNIT 3, BOC 16 ..... 68 FIGURE 6-6: CUMULATIVE CONTACT FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS, ZONE 8, UNIT 3, BOC 16 ..... 69 FIGURE 6-7: CUMULATIVE CONTACT FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS, ZONE 29, UNIT 3, BOC 16 ......... 70 FIGURE 6-8: CUMULATIVE CONTACT FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS, ZONE 35, UNIT 3, BOC 16 ........ 71 FIGURE 6-9: CUMULATIVE CONTACT FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS, ZONE 32, UNIT 3, BOC 16 ........ 72 FIGURE 6-10: CUMULATIVE CONTACT FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS, ZONE 56, UNIT 3, BOC 16 ...... 73 FIGURE 6-11: CUMULATIVE CONTACT FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS, ZONE 5, UNIT 3, BOC 16 + 3 M O N T H S ............................................................................................................................... 7 4 FIGURE 6-12: CUMULATIVE CONTACT FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS, ZONE 5, UNIT 3, BOC 16 + 11 M O N T H S ............................................................................................................................... 7 5 FIGURE 6-13: CUMULATIVE CONTACT FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS, ZONE 1, UNIT 2, BOC 16 ........ 76 FIGURE 6-14: CUMULATIVE CONTACT FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS, ZONE 3, UNIT 2, BOC 16 ........ 77 FIGURE 6-15: CUMULATIVE CONTACT FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS, ZONE 5, UNIT 2, BOC 16 ........ 78 FIGURE 6-16: CUMULATIVE CONTACT FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS, ZONE 8, UNIT 2, BOC 16 ........ 79..... ~ Page 7 J A 1814-AU651-M0160, RE .0 Page f OT I Z!d A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9187230-000 (NP)SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear List of Figures (continued) Page FIGURE 6-17: CUMULATIVE CONTACT FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS, ZONE 5, UNIT 2, EOC 16 (BOC 16 + 22 M O N T H S ) ................................................................................................................ 80 FIGURE 6-18: CUMULATIVE CONTACT FORCE DISTRIBUTIONS, ZONE 5, UNIT 2, BOC 17 + 6 M O N T H S ............................................................................................................................... 8 1 FIGURE 6-19: TUBESHEET MAP OF DENTS FOUND IN PRE-SERVICE INSPECTION, UNIT 3, SG E -0 8 9 ..................................................................................................................................... 8 2 FIGURE 6-20: TUBESHEET MAP OF DENTS FOUND IN PRE-SERVICE INSPECTION, UNIT 2, SG E -0 8 9 ..................................................................................................................................... 8 3 FIGURE 6-21: [................................................................................... ..8 4 FIGURE 6-22: r] ............................ 85 FIGURE 6-23: [ ].............................. .86 FIGURE 6-24: [ ].............................. .87 FIGURE 6-25: [ I......................... .88 FIGURE 6-26: [.... .................................................................................................................. 8 9 FIGURE 6-27: [.......................................................................................................................... 9 0 FIGURE 6-28: [ ............... 91 FIGURE 6-29: TUBESHEET MAP OF ECT GAP MEASUREMENTS, TOTAL GAP FOR ALL AVB LOCATIONS PER TUBE, UNIT 2, SG E-088, ISI ............................................................. 92 FIGURE 6-30: TUBESHEET MAP OF ECT GAP MEASUREMENTS, TOTAL GAP FOR ALL AVB LOCATIONS PER TUBE, UNIT 2, SG E-089, ISI ............................................................. 93 FIGURE 6-31: ILLUSTRATIVE SCHEMATIC OF AVB WEAR RATES, HIGH WEAR RATES ARE POSSIBLE FOR VERY SMALL OR LARGE GAPS ......................................................... 94 FIGURE 6-32: TUBESHEET MAP OF ECT GAP MEASUREMENTS, TOTAL GAP FOR ALL AVB LOCATIONS PER TUBE, UNIT 3, SG E-088, ISI ................................... 95 FIGURE 6-33: TUBESHEET MAP OF ECT GAP MEASUREMENTS, TOTAL GAP FOR ALL AVB LOCATIONS PER TUBE, UNIT 3, SG E-089, ISI ............................................................. 96 FIGURE 7-1: SCHEMATIC ILLUSTRATION OF A THE AMPLITUDE OF MOTION AS A U-BEND B E C O M E S U N STA B LE ...................................................................................................... 100 FIGURE 7-2: .................... 101 A.

n. Page 8.4 '10 1 -f-^UUU I -1viv I ou, mr- .U r-age 8of 1T2I A AR EVA Document No.: 51-9187230-000 (NP)SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear List of Figures (continued)

Page FIGURE 7-3: SCHEMATIC OF A U-BEND WITH AVB LOCATIONS SHOWN ................................... 102 FIGURE 7-4: ILLUSTRATIVE EXAMPLE OF A LOG NORMAL DISTRIBUTION OF THE PROBABILITY OF SUPPORT INEFFECTIVENESS .......................................................... 103 FIGURE 8-1: [] ...................................................................................................... 1 0 8 FIG URE 8-2: [ ....................... 109 FIGURE 8-3: [........................................................................................................ 1 1 0 FIGURE 8-4: MAP OF CALCULATED FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF IN-PLANE IN S T A B ILIT Y , U N IT 3 ......................................................................................................... 111 FIGURE 8-5: MAP OF CALCULATED FREQUENCY OF OCCURRENCE OF IN-PLANE IN S T A B ILIT Y , U N IT 2 ......................................................................................................... 112 FIGURE 9-1: TUBES REMOVED FROM SERVICE AS A PREVENTATIVE MEASURE RELATIVE TO IN -P LA N E FE I, U N IT 2 S G 2-88 ......................................................................................... 115 FIGURE 9-2: TUBES REMOVED FROM SERVICE AS A PREVENTATIVE MEASURE RELATIVE TO IN -P LA N E FE I, U N IT 2 SG 2-89 ......................................................................................... 116 Page 9 A 1814- U651-multw, RE .0 Page V OT I ZV A AREVA Document No.: 51-9187230-000 (NP)SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear List of Abbreviations Abbreviation Definition 01C to 07C Tube Support Plate Designations for Cold Leg (7 Locations) 01H to 07H Tube Support Plate Designations for Hot Leg (7 Locations) 2E-088 Unit 2 Steam Generator 88 2E-089 Unit 2 Steam Generator 89 3E-088 Unit 3 Steam Generator 88 3E-089 Unit 3 Steam Generator 89 3 NOPD 3 Times Normal Operating Pressure Differential ABAQUS A finite-element structural analysis program sold by Dassault Systemes AILPC Accident Induced Leakage Performance Criterion ASME American Society of Mechanical Engineers AVB Anti-Vibration Bar BOC Beginning of Operating Cycle C Column CDF Cumulative Distribution Function CE Combustion Engineering CL or C/L Cold Leg CM Condition Monitoring DA Degradation Assessment ECT Eddy Current Testing EFPD Effective Full Power Days EOC End of Operating Cycle EPRI Electric Power Research Institute ETSS Examination Technique Specification Sheet FEA Finite Element Analysis FEI Fluid-elastic Instability FOSAR Foreign Object Search and Retrieval FSM Fluid-elastic Stability Margin GPD Gallons per Day GPM Gallons per Minute HL or H/L Hot Leg kHz kilohertz KSI Thousand Pounds per Square Inch MHI Mitsubishi Heavy Industries MSLB Main Steam Line Break NDE Non Destructive Examination NEI Nuclear Energy Institute Page 10 1814-AU651-MO160, REV. 0 Page 10 of 129 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9187230-000 (NP)SONGS U2C1 7 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear List of Abbreviations (continued) Abbreviation Definition N Newtons (a measure of force in metric units)NN Nuclear Notification NOPD Normal Operating Pressure Differential NRC Nuclear Regulatory Commission OA Operational Assessment PSI Pounds per Square Inch PSI Pre-service Inspection PSIA Pounds per Square Inch Absolute PSIG Pounds per Square Inch Gage PWR Pressurized Water Reactor QA Quality Assurance R Row RB Retainer Bar RCS Reactor Coolant System RxxxCyyy Steam Generator tube location, where xxx is the row number and yyy is the column number SCE Southern California Edison SG Steam Generator SIPC Structural Integrity Performance Criteria SLB Steam Line Break SONGS San Onofre Nuclear Generating Station SR Stability Ratio SSI Secondary Side Inspection TEC Tube End Cold TEH Tube End Hot TSP Tube Support Plate TTS Top of Tubesheet TTW Tube-to-tube Wear TW Through Wall U2C17 SONGS Unit 2 End-of-Cycle 17 Outage UB U-bend UT Ultrasonic Testing Page 11 1814-AU651-M0160, REV. 0 Page 11 of 129 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9187230-000 (NP)SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear 1.0 PURPOSE In accordance with the SONGS Steam Generator Program [1] and EPRI Steam Generator Integrity Assessment Guidelines [2], an operational assessment (OA) must be performed to ensure that steam generator (SG) tubing will meet established performance criteria for structural and leakage integrity during the operating period prior to the next planned inspection. The OA projects and evaluates tube degradation mechanisms which have affected the SGs to date. The performance criteria are defined in plant technical specifications [3] & [4] and are based on NEI 97-06 [5].This report documents the OA developed for tube-to-tube wear (TTW) that was discovered during the 2012 SONGS Unit 2 C17 outage. This OA considers the TTW identified in the SONGS-3 steam generators and determines the operating power level and associated inspection interval that provides the required margin relative to the onset of in-plane fluid-elastic instability and thus prevent TTW. This OA only addresses TTW. The OA for all other degradation is documented in a separate report [6].2.0 BACKGROUND Note: The steam generator design information in this section is taken from References [7], [8], [9], and [10].in Page 12 1814-AU651-M0160, REV. 0 Page 12 of 129 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9187230-000 (NP)SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear Anti-Vibration Bars Tube Support Plates ,Tubesheet-J V Figure 2-1: AVB Arrangement for SONGS Steam Generators Page 13 1814-AU651-M0160, REV. 0 Page 13 of 129 A AREVA Document No.: 51-9187230-000 (NP)SONGS U2C17 Steam Generator Operational Assessment for Tube-to-Tube Wear-7 Figure 2-2: View of Top of Bundle MHI Proieta Figure 2-3: Ends of AVBs Attached to Retaining Bars, Bridges and Retainer Bars Also Shown Page 14 1814-AU651-MO160, REV. 0 Page 14 of 129}}

v t e Letter Sequence Request
TAC:ME9727, (Withdrawn, Closed)
Initiation Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request, Request Acceptance Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement, Supplement Administration Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting, Meeting Questions 21 February 2013 21 February 2013 1 February 2013 20 February 2013 15 March 2013 30 November 2012 10 December 2012 20 December 2012 27 February 2013 18 March 2013 22 March 2013 10 May 2013 Answers 8 January 2013 9 January 2013 9 January 2013 10 January 2013 16 January 2013 21 January 2013 18 January 2013 21 January 2013 17 January 2013 18 January 2013 24 January 2013 25 January 2013 25 January 2013 29 January 2013 31 January 2013 4 February 2013 4 February 2013 6 February 2013 7 February 2013 25 February 2013 25 February 2013 15 March 2013 15 March 2013 20 March 2013 20 March 2013 20 March 2013 20 March 2013 22 March 2013 22 March 2013 22 March 2013 29 March 2013 1 April 2013 2 April 2013 2 April 2013 10 April 2013 15 April 2013 16 April 2013 30 May 2013 Results Withdrawal Other: ML13051A192, ML13051A193, ML13051A197, ML13051A199, ML13074A793, ML13074A794, ML13098A018, ML13098A020, ML13122A145
MONTHYEAR2013-01-25 [Table View]

ML12285A267: Difference between revisions

Revision as of 20:27, 1 August 2018

Text

REFERENCE:

Subject:

Subject:

Subject:

Subject:

4.0 REFERENCES

SUMMARY

4.0 REFERENCES

REFERENCE:

8.0 REFERENCES

5.0 BACKGROUND

8.0 REFERENCES

REFERENCE:

3.0 INTRODUCTION

Navigation menu