ML15014A120
| ML15014A120 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | San Onofre |
| Issue date: | 01/14/2015 |
| From: | Southern California Edison Co |
| To: | NRC/EDO |
| Cai J, OEDO, 415-5192 | |
| References | |
| Download: ML15014A120 (8) | |
Text
Survey: SONGS Communications Feedback Feedback for Specific Public Meetings Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Neutral Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Not Applicable/
No Opinion Responses
- a. The meeting location, starting time, and duration were reasonably convenient 2
25.0%
0 0.0%
1 12.5%
2 25.0%
3 37.5%
0 0.0%
8
- b. The meeting facility was appropriate for the size of the meeting 2
25.0%
1 12.5%
0 0.0%
1 12.5%
4 50.0%
0 0.0%
8
- c. The room set up supported the purpose of the meeting 2
25.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 12.5%
5 62.5%
0 0.0%
8
- d. The purpose/objectives of the meeting were made clear 2
25.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
2 25.0%
4 50.0%
0 0.0%
8
- e. The structure of the meeting (e.g.,
presentation format and flow) supported the meeting objectives 3
37.5%
1 12.5%
0 0.0%
2 25.0%
2 25.0%
0 0.0%
8
- f. The presentations and explanations given by the NRC staff were understandable 2
25.0%
0 0.0%
1 12.5%
4 50.0%
1 12.5%
0 0.0%
8
- g. The amount of time allotted for topics was appropriate 2
25.0%
2 25.0%
1 12.5%
2 25.0%
1 12.5%
0 0.0%
8
- h. The meeting helped me to understand the topics discussed 2
25.0%
0 0.0%
2 25.0%
1 12.5%
3 37.5%
0 0.0%
8
- i. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express their views 3
37.5%
1 12.5%
1 12.5%
2 25.0%
1 12.5%
0 0.0%
8
- j. Attendees were listened to and understood by NRC staff 2
25.0%
1 12.5%
1 12.5%
2 25.0%
2 25.0%
0 0.0%
8
- k. The facilitator maintained control and focus of the meeting 2
25.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
3 37.5%
3 37.5%
0 0.0%
8
- l. The facilitator was fair and balanced 2
25.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
3 37.5%
3 37.5%
0 0.0%
8
- m. Overall, the meeting achieved its stated purpose 2
25.0%
1 12.5%
0 0.0%
4 50.0%
1 12.5%
0 0.0%
8
- n. Overall, I am satisfied with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting 2
25.0%
1 12.5%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
5 62.5%
0 0.0%
8 For the 06/18/2012 meeting at the San Juan Capistrano Community Center, to the best of your recollection, please provide feedback on the following:
1
Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Neutral Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Not Applicable/
No Opinion Responses
- a. The meeting location, starting time, and duration were reasonably convenient 3
27.3%
1 9.1%
1 9.1%
4 36.4%
2 18.2%
0 0.0%
11
- b. The meeting facility was appropriate for the size of the meeting 3
27.3%
1 9.1%
0 0.0%
1 9.1%
6 54.5%
0 0.0%
11
- c. The room set up supported the purpose of the meeting 3
27.3%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
2 18.2%
6 54.5%
0 0.0%
11
- d. The purpose/objectives of the meeting were made clear 4
36.4%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 9.1%
6 54.5%
0 0.0%
11
- e. The structure of the meeting (e.g.,
presentation format and flow) supported the meeting objectives 5
45.5%
1 9.1%
1 9.1%
1 9.1%
3 27.3%
0 0.0%
11
- f. The presentations and explanations given by the NRC staff were understandable 3
27.3%
0 0.0%
1 9.1%
4 36.4%
3 27.3%
0 0.0%
11
- g. The amount of time allotted for topics was appropriate 4
36.4%
1 9.1%
0 0.0%
4 36.4%
2 18.2%
0 0.0%
11
- h. The meeting helped me to understand the topics discussed 3
27.3%
0 0.0%
1 9.1%
3 27.3%
4 36.4%
0 0.0%
11
- i. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express their views 5
45.5%
1 9.1%
1 9.1%
3 27.3%
1 9.1%
0 0.0%
11
- j. Attendees were listened to and understood by NRC staff 4
36.4%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
3 27.3%
4 36.4%
0 0.0%
11
- k. The facilitator maintained control and focus of the meeting 4
36.4%
1 9.1%
0 0.0%
3 27.3%
3 27.3%
0 0.0%
11
- l. The facilitator was fair and balanced 4
36.4%
0 0.0%
1 9.1%
2 18.2%
4 36.4%
0 0.0%
11
- m. Overall, the meeting achieved its stated purpose 4
36.4%
1 9.1%
1 9.1%
4 36.4%
1 9.1%
0 0.0%
11
- n. Overall, I am satisfied with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting 4
40.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
2 20.0%
4 40.0%
0 0.0%
10 For the 10/09/2012 meeting at the St. Regis Monarch Beach, to the best of your recollection, please provide feedback on the following:
2
Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Neutral Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Not Applicable/
No Opinion Responses
- a. The meeting location, starting time, and duration were reasonably convenient 1
14.3%
0 0.0%
2 28.6%
2 28.6%
2 28.6%
0 0.0%
7
- b. The meeting facility was appropriate for the size of the meeting 1
14.3%
1 14.3%
0 0.0%
3 42.9%
2 28.6%
0 0.0%
7
- c. The room set up supported the purpose of the meeting 1
14.3%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
3 42.9%
3 42.9%
0 0.0%
7
- d. The purpose/objectives of the meeting were made clear 1
14.3%
0 0.0%
1 14.3%
2 28.6%
3 42.9%
0 0.0%
7
- e. The structure of the meeting (e.g.,
presentation format and flow) supported the meeting objectives 2
28.6%
0 0.0%
1 14.3%
2 28.6%
2 28.6%
0 0.0%
7
- f. The presentations and explanations given by the NRC staff were understandable 1
14.3%
0 0.0%
1 14.3%
2 28.6%
3 42.9%
0 0.0%
7
- g. The amount of time allotted for topics was appropriate 2
28.6%
1 14.3%
0 0.0%
1 14.3%
3 42.9%
0 0.0%
7
- h. The meeting helped me to understand the topics discussed 1
14.3%
0 0.0%
2 28.6%
2 28.6%
2 28.6%
0 0.0%
7
- i. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express their views 2
33.3%
1 16.7%
0 0.0%
2 33.3%
1 16.7%
0 0.0%
6
- j. Attendees were listened to and understood by NRC staff 1
14.3%
0 0.0%
1 14.3%
3 42.9%
2 28.6%
0 0.0%
7
- k. The facilitator maintained control and focus of the meeting 1
14.3%
1 14.3%
0 0.0%
4 57.1%
1 14.3%
0 0.0%
7
- l. The facilitator was fair and balanced 1
14.3%
0 0.0%
1 14.3%
2 28.6%
3 42.9%
0 0.0%
7
- m. Overall, the meeting achieved its stated purpose 1
14.3%
0 0.0%
3 42.9%
2 28.6%
1 14.3%
0 0.0%
7
- n. Overall, I am satisfied with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting 1
14.3%
0 0.0%
1 14.3%
1 14.3%
4 57.1%
0 0.0%
7 For the 11/30/2012 meeting at the Hills Hotel, to the best of your recollection, please provide feedback on the following:
3
Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Neutral Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Not Applicable/
No Opinion Responses
- a. The meeting location, starting time, and duration were reasonably convenient 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- b. The meeting facility was appropriate for the size of the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
1
- c. The room set up supported the purpose of the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
1
- d. The purpose/objectives of the meeting were made clear 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- e. The structure of the meeting (e.g.,
presentation format and flow) supported the meeting objectives 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- f. The presentations and explanations given by the NRC staff were understandable 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- g. The amount of time allotted for topics was appropriate 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- h. The meeting helped me to understand the topics discussed 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- i. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express their views 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- j. Attendees were listened to and understood by NRC staff 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- k. The facilitator maintained control and focus of the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- l. The facilitator was fair and balanced 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- m. Overall, the meeting achieved its stated purpose 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- n. Overall, I am satisfied with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
1 For the 12/18/2012 meeting at NRC headquarters in Rockville, MD, to the best of your recollection, please provide feedback on the following:
4
Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Neutral Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Not Applicable/
No Opinion Responses
- a. The meeting location, starting time, and duration were reasonably convenient 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
1
- b. The meeting facility was appropriate for the size of the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
1
- c. The room set up supported the purpose of the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- d. The purpose/objectives of the meeting were made clear 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
1
- e. The structure of the meeting (e.g.,
presentation format and flow) supported the meeting objectives 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
1
- f. The presentations and explanations given by the NRC staff were understandable 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
1
- g. The amount of time allotted for topics was appropriate 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
1
- h. The meeting helped me to understand the topics discussed 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
1
- i. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express their views 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
1
- j. Attendees were listened to and understood by NRC staff 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
1
- k. The facilitator maintained control and focus of the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
1
- l. The facilitator was fair and balanced 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
1
- m. Overall, the meeting achieved its stated purpose 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
1
- n. Overall, I am satisfied with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
1 For the 01/16/2013 meeting at NRC headquarters in Rockville, MD, to the best of your recollection, please provide feedback on the following:
5
Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Neutral Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Not Applicable/
No Opinion Responses
- a. The meeting location, starting time, and duration were reasonably convenient 0
0.0%
1 20.0%
1 20.0%
1 20.0%
2 40.0%
0 0.0%
5
- b. The meeting facility was appropriate for the size of the meeting 0
0.0%
2 40.0%
1 20.0%
0 0.0%
2 40.0%
0 0.0%
5
- c. The room set up supported the purpose of the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
1 20.0%
2 40.0%
2 40.0%
0 0.0%
5
- d. The purpose/objectives of the meeting were made clear 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
1 20.0%
1 20.0%
3 60.0%
0 0.0%
5
- e. The structure of the meeting (e.g.,
presentation format and flow) supported the meeting objectives 1
20.0%
0 0.0%
1 20.0%
2 40.0%
1 20.0%
0 0.0%
5
- f. The presentations and explanations given by the NRC staff were understandable 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
1 20.0%
2 40.0%
2 40.0%
0 0.0%
5
- g. The amount of time allotted for topics was appropriate 1
20.0%
1 20.0%
0 0.0%
1 20.0%
2 40.0%
0 0.0%
5
- h. The meeting helped me to understand the topics discussed 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
2 40.0%
1 20.0%
2 40.0%
0 0.0%
5
- i. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express their views 1
20.0%
1 20.0%
0 0.0%
2 40.0%
1 20.0%
0 0.0%
5
- j. Attendees were listened to and understood by NRC staff 0
0.0%
1 20.0%
0 0.0%
2 40.0%
2 40.0%
0 0.0%
5
- k. The facilitator maintained control and focus of the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
1 20.0%
3 60.0%
1 20.0%
0 0.0%
5
- l. The facilitator was fair and balanced 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
1 20.0%
2 40.0%
2 40.0%
0 0.0%
5
- m. Overall, the meeting achieved its stated purpose 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
2 40.0%
3 60.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
5
- n. Overall, I am satisfied with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
1 25.0%
0 0.0%
3 75.0%
0 0.0%
4 For the 02/12/2013 meeting at the Capo Beach Church, to the best of your recollection, please provide feedback on the following:
6
Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Neutral Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Not Applicable/
No Opinion Responses
- a. The meeting location, starting time, and duration were reasonably convenient 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0
- b. The meeting facility was appropriate for the size of the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0
- c. The room set up supported the purpose of the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0
- d. The purpose/objectives of the meeting were made clear 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0
- e. The structure of the meeting (e.g.,
presentation format and flow) supported the meeting objectives 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0
- f. The presentations and explanations given by the NRC staff were understandable 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0
- g. The amount of time allotted for topics was appropriate 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0
- h. The meeting helped me to understand the topics discussed 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0
- i. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express their views 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0
- j. Attendees were listened to and understood by NRC staff 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0
- k. The facilitator maintained control and focus of the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0
- l. The facilitator was fair and balanced 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0
- m. Overall, the meeting achieved its stated purpose 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0
- n. Overall, I am satisfied with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 For the 02/27/2013 meeting at the NRC headquarters in Rockville, MD, to the best of your recollection, please provide feedback on the following:
7
Strongly Disagree Somewhat Disagree Neutral Somewhat Agree Strongly Agree Not Applicable/
No Opinion Responses
- a. The meeting location, starting time, and duration were reasonably convenient 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
1
- b. The meeting facility was appropriate for the size of the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
1
- c. The room set up supported the purpose of the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
1
- d. The purpose/objectives of the meeting were made clear 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- e. The structure of the meeting (e.g.,
presentation format and flow) supported the meeting objectives 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- f. The presentations and explanations given by the NRC staff were understandable 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- g. The amount of time allotted for topics was appropriate 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- h. The meeting helped me to understand the topics discussed 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- i. Attendees were given sufficient opportunity to ask questions or express their views 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- j. Attendees were listened to and understood by NRC staff 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- k. The facilitator maintained control and focus of the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- l. The facilitator was fair and balanced 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- m. Overall, the meeting achieved its stated purpose 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1
- n. Overall, I am satisfied with the NRC staff who participated in the meeting 0
0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
0 0.0%
1 100.0%
0 0.0%
1 For the 04/03/2013 meeting at the NRC headquarters in Rockville, MD, to the best of your recollection, please provide feedback on the following:
8