ML16209A204: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 27, 2016 Douglas A. Broaddus, Chief Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing | UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 27, 2016 Douglas A. Broaddus, Chief Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing | ||
("' Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager /'{</ j Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CAC NOS. MF7143 AND MF7144) The attached draft request for additional information (RAI) was transmitted on June 30, 2016, to Ms. Stephanie Hanson of Exelon Generation | ("' Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager /'{</ j Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CAC NOS. MF7143 AND MF7144) The attached draft request for additional information (RAI) was transmitted on June 30, 2016, to Ms. Stephanie Hanson of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee). | ||
This information was transmitted to facilitate a conference call in order to clarify the licensee's amendment request for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3, dated December 3, 2015, as supplemented by letter dated June 9, 2016. The proposed amendment would revise the technical specification (TS) surveillance requirements (SRs) associated with the emergency diesel generator (EDG) fuel oil transfer system. Specifically, the amendment would allow for the crediting of manual actions, in lieu of automatic actions, without having to declare the EDGs inoperable. | |||
This information was transmitted to facilitate a conference call in order to clarify the licensee's amendment request for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), | |||
Units 2 and 3, dated December 3, 2015, as supplemented by letter dated June 9, 2016. The proposed amendment would revise the technical specification (TS) surveillance requirements (SRs) associated with the emergency diesel generator (EDG) fuel oil transfer system. Specifically, the amendment would allow for the crediting of manual actions, in lieu of automatic | |||
The draft RAI was sent to Exelon to ensure that the questions are understandable, the regulatory basis for the questions is clear, and to determine if the information was previously docketed. | The draft RAI was sent to Exelon to ensure that the questions are understandable, the regulatory basis for the questions is clear, and to determine if the information was previously docketed. | ||
During a telephone call to discuss the draft RAI on July 25, 2016, the licensee agreed to provide a response to the questions by August 5, 2016. This memorandum and the attachment do not convey or represent an NRC staff position regarding the licensee's request. | During a telephone call to discuss the draft RAI on July 25, 2016, the licensee agreed to provide a response to the questions by August 5, 2016. This memorandum and the attachment do not convey or represent an NRC staff position regarding the licensee's request. Docket Nos. 50-277 and 50-278 | ||
Docket Nos. 50-277 and 50-278 | |||
==Attachment:== | ==Attachment:== | ||
Draft RAI DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING PROPOSED LICENSE AMENDMENT EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL TRANSFER SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS EXELON GENERATION | Draft RAI DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING PROPOSED LICENSE AMENDMENT EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL TRANSFER SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION -UNITS 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-277 AND 50-278 By letter dated December 3, 2015, as supplemented by letter dated June 9, 2016 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML 15337 A413 and ML 16162A 101, respectively), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3. The proposed amendment would revise the technical specification (TS) surveillance requirements (SRs) associated with the emergency diesel generator (EOG) fuel oil transfer system. Specifically, the amendment would allow for the crediting of manual actions, in lieu of automatic actions, without having to declare the EDGs inoperable. | ||
Exelon Generation | |||
Units 2 and 3. The proposed amendment would revise the technical specification (TS) surveillance requirements (SRs) associated with the emergency diesel generator (EOG) fuel oil transfer system. Specifically, the amendment would allow for the crediting of manual actions, in lieu of automatic | |||
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the information the licensee provided that supports the proposed amendment and would like to discuss the following issues to clarify the submittal. | The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the information the licensee provided that supports the proposed amendment and would like to discuss the following issues to clarify the submittal. | ||
Human Factors Branch (APHB) Reviewer: | Human Factors Branch (APHB) Reviewer: | ||
Brian Green APHB-RAl-8 In APHB-RAl-7 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 16134A474), | Brian Green APHB-RAl-8 In APHB-RAl-7 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 16134A474), the NRC staff requested the licensee to address the following: | ||
the NRC staff requested the licensee to address the following: | Describe the process used to monitor manual actions to ensure that they remain feasible and reliable over the long term, and are not degraded because of design changes, inadequate training, or other mechanisms. | ||
Describe the process used to monitor manual actions to ensure that they remain feasible and reliable over the long term, and are not degraded because of design changes, inadequate | |||
In the June 9, 2016, response to this request for additional information (RAI), the licensee indicated that there is no specific training required to support this LAR. The licensee also referenced procedure CC-AA-102, Revision 29, "Design Input and Configuration Change Impact Screening,'' | In the June 9, 2016, response to this request for additional information (RAI), the licensee indicated that there is no specific training required to support this LAR. The licensee also referenced procedure CC-AA-102, Revision 29, "Design Input and Configuration Change Impact Screening,'' | ||
and stated that, in accordance with the procedure, impacts on operator manual actions need to be assessed as part of the design change process. | and stated that, in accordance with the procedure, impacts on operator manual actions need to be assessed as part of the design change process. The licensee's response does not fully address the staff's concern as discussed below. Section 3.11, "Human Performance Monitoring Strategy'' | ||
The licensee's response does not fully address the staff's concern as discussed below. Section 3.11, "Human Performance Monitoring Strategy'' | of NUREG-1764 (ADAMS Accession No. ML07260413), contains review criteria intended to ensure that operators remain capable of Attachment performing manual actions throughout the lifetime of the plant. Subsequent changes to plant systems or procedures, operators becoming unfamiliar with rarely used procedures, or other factors may influence operators in a way that impedes future task performance. | ||
of NUREG-1764 (ADAMS Accession No. ML07260413), | |||
contains review criteria intended to ensure that operators remain capable of Attachment performing manual actions throughout the lifetime of the plant. Subsequent changes to plant systems or procedures, operators becoming unfamiliar with rarely used procedures, or other factors may influence operators in a way that impedes future task performance. | |||
Licensees typically track and trend credited operator manual actions to ensure that these actions remain feasible. | Licensees typically track and trend credited operator manual actions to ensure that these actions remain feasible. | ||
The procedure referenced in the RAI response dated June 9, 2016 (i.e., CC-AA-102) was not docketed so it's not clear to the NRC staff if it provides for tracking and trending of operator manual actions. | The procedure referenced in the RAI response dated June 9, 2016 (i.e., CC-AA-102) was not docketed so it's not clear to the NRC staff if it provides for tracking and trending of operator manual actions. Additional information is necessary to clarify how the review criteria in Section 3.11 of NUREG-1764 are met. One potential method for submitting this material is to provide a brief summary of the tracking/trending program that will track this action accompanied by indication that the credited manual actions described in this LAR will be included in this program. Alternatively, you may choose to provide the procedure, or portion of the procedure that indicates how this particular manual action is tracked and maintained over time. | ||
Additional information is necessary to clarify how the review criteria in Section 3.11 of NUREG-1764 are met. One potential method for submitting this material is to provide a brief summary of the tracking/trending program that will track this action accompanied by indication that the credited manual actions described in this LAR will be included in this program. | |||
Alternatively, you may choose to provide the procedure, or portion of the procedure that indicates how this particular manual action is tracked and maintained over time. | |||
July 27, 2016 MEMORANDUM TO: Douglas A. Broaddus, Chief Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager /RA/ Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | July 27, 2016 MEMORANDUM TO: Douglas A. Broaddus, Chief Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager /RA/ Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | ||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CAC NOS. MF7143 AND MF7144) The attached draft request for additional information (RAI) was transmitted on June 30, 2016, to Ms. Stephanie Hanson of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee). | |||
PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CAC NOS. MF7143 AND MF7144) The attached draft request for additional information (RAI) was transmitted on June 30, 2016, to Ms. Stephanie Hanson of Exelon Generation | This information was transmitted to facilitate a conference call in order to clarify the licensee's amendment request for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3, dated December 3, 2015, as supplemented by letter dated June 9, 2016. The proposed amendment would revise the technical specification (TS) surveillance requirements (SRs) associated with the emergency diesel generator (EOG) fuel oil transfer system. Specifically, the amendment would allow for the crediting of manual actions, in lieu of automatic actions, without having to declare the EDGs inoperable. | ||
This information was transmitted to facilitate a conference call in order to clarify the licensee's amendment request for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), | |||
Units 2 and 3, dated December 3, 2015, as supplemented by letter dated June 9, 2016. The proposed amendment would revise the technical specification (TS) surveillance requirements (SRs) associated with the emergency diesel generator (EOG) fuel oil transfer system. Specifically, the amendment would allow for the crediting of manual actions, in lieu of automatic | |||
The draft RAI was sent to Exelon to ensure that the questions are understandable, the regulatory basis for the questions is clear, and to determine if the information was previously docketed. | The draft RAI was sent to Exelon to ensure that the questions are understandable, the regulatory basis for the questions is clear, and to determine if the information was previously docketed. | ||
During a telephone call to discuss the draft RAI on July 25, 2016, the licensee agreed to provide a response to the questions by August 5, 2016. This memorandum and the attachment do not convey or represent an NRC staff position regarding the licensee's request. | During a telephone call to discuss the draft RAI on July 25, 2016, the licensee agreed to provide a response to the questions by August 5, 2016. This memorandum and the attachment do not convey or represent an NRC staff position regarding the licensee's request. Docket Nos. 50-277 and 50-278 | ||
Docket Nos. 50-277 and 50-278 | |||
==Attachment:== | ==Attachment:== | ||
Draft RAI DISTRIBUTION: | Draft RAI DISTRIBUTION: | ||
PUBLIC LPL 1-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl 1-2 Resource RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsNrrPMPeachBottom Resource ADAMS Accession No.: ML 16209A204 OFFICE LPL 1-2/PM NAME REnnis DATE 07/27/16 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY SEdmonds, NRR/DE/EEEB VGoel, NRR/DE/EEEB | PUBLIC LPL 1-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl 1-2 Resource RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsNrrPMPeachBottom Resource ADAMS Accession No.: ML 16209A204 OFFICE LPL 1-2/PM NAME REnnis DATE 07/27/16 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY SEdmonds, NRR/DE/EEEB VGoel, NRR/DE/EEEB PSnyder, NRR/DSS/STSB BGreen, NRR/DRA/APHB}} | ||
Revision as of 07:16, 8 July 2018
| ML16209A204 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Peach Bottom  |
| Issue date: | 07/27/2016 |
| From: | Richard Ennis Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| To: | Broaddus D A Plant Licensing Branch 1 |
| Ennis R B | |
| References | |
| CAC MF7143, CAC MF7144 | |
| Download: ML16209A204 (4) | |
Text
MEMORANDUM TO: FROM:
SUBJECT:
UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 July 27, 2016 Douglas A. Broaddus, Chief Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing
("' Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager /'{</ j Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CAC NOS. MF7143 AND MF7144) The attached draft request for additional information (RAI) was transmitted on June 30, 2016, to Ms. Stephanie Hanson of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee).
This information was transmitted to facilitate a conference call in order to clarify the licensee's amendment request for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3, dated December 3, 2015, as supplemented by letter dated June 9, 2016. The proposed amendment would revise the technical specification (TS) surveillance requirements (SRs) associated with the emergency diesel generator (EDG) fuel oil transfer system. Specifically, the amendment would allow for the crediting of manual actions, in lieu of automatic actions, without having to declare the EDGs inoperable.
The draft RAI was sent to Exelon to ensure that the questions are understandable, the regulatory basis for the questions is clear, and to determine if the information was previously docketed.
During a telephone call to discuss the draft RAI on July 25, 2016, the licensee agreed to provide a response to the questions by August 5, 2016. This memorandum and the attachment do not convey or represent an NRC staff position regarding the licensee's request. Docket Nos. 50-277 and 50-278
Attachment:
Draft RAI DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION REGARDING PROPOSED LICENSE AMENDMENT EMERGENCY DIESEL GENERATOR FUEL OIL TRANSFER SURVEILLANCE REQUIREMENTS EXELON GENERATION COMPANY, LLC PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION -UNITS 2 AND 3 DOCKET NOS. 50-277 AND 50-278 By letter dated December 3, 2015, as supplemented by letter dated June 9, 2016 (ADAMS Accession Nos. ML 15337 A413 and ML 16162A 101, respectively), Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee) submitted a license amendment request (LAR) for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3. The proposed amendment would revise the technical specification (TS) surveillance requirements (SRs) associated with the emergency diesel generator (EOG) fuel oil transfer system. Specifically, the amendment would allow for the crediting of manual actions, in lieu of automatic actions, without having to declare the EDGs inoperable.
The Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) staff has reviewed the information the licensee provided that supports the proposed amendment and would like to discuss the following issues to clarify the submittal.
Human Factors Branch (APHB) Reviewer:
Brian Green APHB-RAl-8 In APHB-RAl-7 (ADAMS Accession No. ML 16134A474), the NRC staff requested the licensee to address the following:
Describe the process used to monitor manual actions to ensure that they remain feasible and reliable over the long term, and are not degraded because of design changes, inadequate training, or other mechanisms.
In the June 9, 2016, response to this request for additional information (RAI), the licensee indicated that there is no specific training required to support this LAR. The licensee also referenced procedure CC-AA-102, Revision 29, "Design Input and Configuration Change Impact Screening,
and stated that, in accordance with the procedure, impacts on operator manual actions need to be assessed as part of the design change process. The licensee's response does not fully address the staff's concern as discussed below. Section 3.11, "Human Performance Monitoring Strategy
of NUREG-1764 (ADAMS Accession No. ML07260413), contains review criteria intended to ensure that operators remain capable of Attachment performing manual actions throughout the lifetime of the plant. Subsequent changes to plant systems or procedures, operators becoming unfamiliar with rarely used procedures, or other factors may influence operators in a way that impedes future task performance.
Licensees typically track and trend credited operator manual actions to ensure that these actions remain feasible.
The procedure referenced in the RAI response dated June 9, 2016 (i.e., CC-AA-102) was not docketed so it's not clear to the NRC staff if it provides for tracking and trending of operator manual actions. Additional information is necessary to clarify how the review criteria in Section 3.11 of NUREG-1764 are met. One potential method for submitting this material is to provide a brief summary of the tracking/trending program that will track this action accompanied by indication that the credited manual actions described in this LAR will be included in this program. Alternatively, you may choose to provide the procedure, or portion of the procedure that indicates how this particular manual action is tracked and maintained over time.
July 27, 2016 MEMORANDUM TO: Douglas A. Broaddus, Chief Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation FROM: Richard B. Ennis, Senior Project Manager /RA/ Plant Licensing Branch 1-2 Division of Operating Reactor Licensing Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
SUBJECT:
PEACH BOTTOM ATOMIC POWER STATION, UNITS 2 AND 3, DRAFT REQUEST FOR ADDITIONAL INFORMATION (CAC NOS. MF7143 AND MF7144) The attached draft request for additional information (RAI) was transmitted on June 30, 2016, to Ms. Stephanie Hanson of Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon, the licensee).
This information was transmitted to facilitate a conference call in order to clarify the licensee's amendment request for Peach Bottom Atomic Power Station (PBAPS), Units 2 and 3, dated December 3, 2015, as supplemented by letter dated June 9, 2016. The proposed amendment would revise the technical specification (TS) surveillance requirements (SRs) associated with the emergency diesel generator (EOG) fuel oil transfer system. Specifically, the amendment would allow for the crediting of manual actions, in lieu of automatic actions, without having to declare the EDGs inoperable.
The draft RAI was sent to Exelon to ensure that the questions are understandable, the regulatory basis for the questions is clear, and to determine if the information was previously docketed.
During a telephone call to discuss the draft RAI on July 25, 2016, the licensee agreed to provide a response to the questions by August 5, 2016. This memorandum and the attachment do not convey or represent an NRC staff position regarding the licensee's request. Docket Nos. 50-277 and 50-278
Attachment:
Draft RAI DISTRIBUTION:
PUBLIC LPL 1-2 R/F RidsNrrDorlLpl 1-2 Resource RidsNrrDorlDpr Resource RidsNrrPMPeachBottom Resource ADAMS Accession No.: ML 16209A204 OFFICE LPL 1-2/PM NAME REnnis DATE 07/27/16 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY SEdmonds, NRR/DE/EEEB VGoel, NRR/DE/EEEB PSnyder, NRR/DSS/STSB BGreen, NRR/DRA/APHB