ML20072B350: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot insert |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) StriderTol Bot change |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:/ | ||
'o,, | |||
UNITED STATES g, g tf d | |||
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o | |||
,I WASHINiTON, C.C.20565 b | |||
'+, * * * * | |||
* M January 8, 1990 | |||
((u) f l | |||
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER l | |||
MEMORANDUM FOR: | |||
Samuel J. | |||
Chilk Secretary Ob FROM: | |||
James R. | |||
Curtiss | |||
==SUBJECT:== | |||
CANADIAN CANDU-3 DESIGN CERTIFICATION (SECY-89-350; COMKR-89-5) | |||
I have the following views on the subject initiatives: | |||
i l | |||
1) | |||
With respect to FY 1990 resources, I endorse the staff's plan to budget one FTE for the CANDU-3 review in FY 1990. | |||
2) | |||
I endorse the staff's proposed plan to process a CANDU-3 application, as set forth in SECY-89-350, subject to the j | |||
availability of resources. | |||
3) | |||
With respect to resources for FY 1991 and beyond, while I l | |||
concur in the action taken by the Commission to eliminate funding and resources at this time from our FY 1991 budget request for review of the CANDU-3 design, if the Canadian Government should come forward with the funds necessary to support this review, I think we should proceed in accordance l | |||
with the plan set forth in SECY-89-350. | |||
4) | |||
I would recommend that the Office of General Counsel solicit the views of the U.S. Trade Representative on the implications of the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement for our consideration of this matter. | |||
5) | |||
I would direct the staff to evaluate the question of whether a prototype will be required for the CANDU-3 design and submit that evaluation to the Commission for our consideration. | |||
~ | |||
6) | |||
I would direct the staff to apprise the Commission of any expression of interest on the part of potential domestic customers for an NRC-certified CANDU-3 design. | |||
7) | |||
I agree to the release of SECY-89-350. | |||
cc: | |||
Chairman Carr Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Remick OGC EDO 9400160092 940629 PDR COMMS NRCC CDRRESPONDENCE PDR | |||
.._.--~c.- | |||
----,,n, i | |||
l' 7 | |||
s 4 | |||
I | |||
{ | |||
ii i | |||
l | |||
!.1 st l | |||
i I | |||
l 14 l | |||
b 4 | |||
a l | |||
4 m | |||
It i | |||
i 4 | |||
l i | |||
i i | |||
1 l | |||
l l | |||
,r; 1 | |||
4 i. | |||
4 4 | |||
4 J | |||
r** | |||
71 | |||
't I | |||
........ -..}} | |||
Latest revision as of 05:49, 15 December 2024
Text
/
'o,,
UNITED STATES g, g tf d
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION o
,I WASHINiTON, C.C.20565 b
'+, * * * *
- M January 8, 1990
((u) f l
OFFICE OF THE COMMISSIONER l
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Samuel J.
Chilk Secretary Ob FROM:
James R.
Curtiss
SUBJECT:
CANADIAN CANDU-3 DESIGN CERTIFICATION (SECY-89-350; COMKR-89-5)
I have the following views on the subject initiatives:
i l
1)
With respect to FY 1990 resources, I endorse the staff's plan to budget one FTE for the CANDU-3 review in FY 1990.
2)
I endorse the staff's proposed plan to process a CANDU-3 application, as set forth in SECY-89-350, subject to the j
availability of resources.
3)
With respect to resources for FY 1991 and beyond, while I l
concur in the action taken by the Commission to eliminate funding and resources at this time from our FY 1991 budget request for review of the CANDU-3 design, if the Canadian Government should come forward with the funds necessary to support this review, I think we should proceed in accordance l
with the plan set forth in SECY-89-350.
4)
I would recommend that the Office of General Counsel solicit the views of the U.S. Trade Representative on the implications of the U.S.-Canada Free Trade Agreement for our consideration of this matter.
5)
I would direct the staff to evaluate the question of whether a prototype will be required for the CANDU-3 design and submit that evaluation to the Commission for our consideration.
~
6)
I would direct the staff to apprise the Commission of any expression of interest on the part of potential domestic customers for an NRC-certified CANDU-3 design.
7)
I agree to the release of SECY-89-350.
cc:
Chairman Carr Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Rogers Commissioner Remick OGC EDO 9400160092 940629 PDR COMMS NRCC CDRRESPONDENCE PDR
.._.--~c.-
,,n, i
l' 7
s 4
I
{
ii i
l
!.1 st l
i I
l 14 l
b 4
a l
4 m
It i
i 4
l i
i i
1 l
l l
,r; 1
4 i.
4 4
4 J
r**
71
't I
........ -..