ML20071L357

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Ack Receipt of DOE 891128 Response to Licensing & Standardization Issues Re Advanced Reactor Concepts,Per Secy 88-202 & 88-203.Response Will Be Reviewed & Secy 88-203 Revised as Appropriate
ML20071L357
Person / Time
Issue date: 12/11/1989
From: Taylor J
NRC OFFICE OF THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR FOR OPERATIONS (EDO)
To: Carr, Roberts, Rogers
NRC COMMISSION (OCM)
Shared Package
ML20024G666 List: ... further results
References
NUDOCS 9408030077
Download: ML20071L357 (2)


Text

-.

i 8['

'o UNITED STATES

+

^^

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION j

l n

i y,

iE

. ASHINGTON D. C. 20555 W

17 NNED

^;

j a

DEC 11 1989 j

....153 DEC 12 Kl O 13 7

+

l j

i MEMORANDUM FOR: Chairman Carr i

Commissioner Roberts Commissioner Rogers Hiemmissioner Curtiss 3

Commissioner Remick FROM:

James M. Taylor, Executive Director for Operations i

SUBJECT:

COMMISSION ACTION ON THE KEY LICENSING AND STANDARDIZATION ISSUES ASSOCIATED WITH THE DOE ADVANCED REACTOR CONCEPTS j

(SECY-88-202andSECY-88-203) j j

~'

In a memorandum dated August 18, 1988, Mr. Stello requested that the Commission withhold action on the subject SECY papers until the Department of Energy (DOE) responded to an apparent inconsistency in D0E's approach to -

l containment on two similar MHTGR designs (one for consercial electric power i

production presented to us for review and the other proposed as a production-reactor).

In a subsequent me:norandum from Mr. Chilk to Mr. Stello dated l

November 14, 1988, the staff was instructed to revise the subject SECY papers as appropriate and resubmit them for Commission consideration after we l

received DOE's rationale for their differing positions on the MNTGR i

containment.

We received DOE's response in the enclosed letter from Mr. Young to A

Mr. Beckjord, dated November 28, 1989. We will review DOE's response and revise SECY-88-203 as appropriate. We will also provide a copy of DOE's response to the ACRS and ask them to review the revised paper.before we send it to the Commission. After we have received the Commission's guidance, then we will finalize our SERs for the MHTGR and PRISM in accordance with Commission guidance. We will not revise SECY-88-202 because that document.

proposed criteria that were included-in 10 CFR 52.

/

r xecutive rector for Operations cc: SECY w/ encl.

ACRS w/o enc 1.

GPA a

0GC CONTACT: Jerry N. Wilson RES, x23729 9400030077 940629 PDR COP 9fS IWCC C(NRESPONDENCE PDR

4 8 13 l

2 E

d t

I