ML20199G119: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(StriderTol Bot insert)
 
(StriderTol Bot change)
 
Line 18: Line 18:


=Text=
=Text=
{{#Wiki_filter:-                                                                              .      .
{{#Wiki_filter:,
r y
r y
as s
* *'4 as kr o,
o,
s 9'o,j 4 e._,
                            * *'4 UNITED STATES kr 4 e ._,
UNITED STATES i
i
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3
                ;                  9'o,j                          NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION                               '
E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
3                        E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 4
/
                                        /           :
9 *. * * *,d 4
9 * . * * * ,d     .
MEMORANDUM FOR:
MEMORANDUM FOR:                         Vincent S. Noonan, Director
Vincent S. Noonan, Director Comanche Peak Project FROM:.
                .                                              Comanche Peak Project FROM:.                                 Herbert Livermore, QA/QC Group Leader Comanche Peak Technical Review Team
Herbert Livermore, QA/QC Group Leader Comanche Peak Technical Review Team


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
MEETING WITH JOHN HANSEL, TUEC
MEETING WITH JOHN HANSEL, TUEC RECOVERY TEAM LEADER On February 15, 1985, at his request, Mr. John Hansel gave me a short presentation of his group's activities at Comanche Peak. The handout he i
;                                                              RECOVERY TEAM LEADER On February 15, 1985, at his request, Mr. John Hansel gave me a short i
provided and the presentation were the same as he had provided the Contention 5 Panel while on-site the previous week.
presentation of his group's activities at Comanche Peak. The handout he provided and the presentation were the same as he had provided the Contention 5 Panel while on-site the previous week.
5 In my estimation the presentation contained nothing new, in fact, I considered it as having only generalities and lacking specific detail.
5                       In my estimation the presentation contained nothing new, in fact, I considered i                      it as having only generalities and lacking specific detail. I informed i                     Mr. Hansel that I neither approved nor disapproved of anything in his presentation and that it was nothing other than general information.
I informed i
I                     I wish to note that during some aside discussions, it was learned that another
i Mr. Hansel that I neither approved nor disapproved of anything in his presentation and that it was nothing other than general information.
[                     Corporation (PAC) is on-site, working for TUEC, actively revising procedures i                     and changing QC cualification tests and methods. A general impression was l                     gained indicating that there is a great amount of active recovery effort being performed on-site.
I I wish to note that during some aside discussions, it was learned that another
l                       =
[
f i'     %4               ZA4# %
Corporation (PAC) is on-site, working for TUEC, actively revising procedures i
J.                         Herbert H. Livermore, QA/QC Group Leader i                                                 r                           Comanche Peak Technical Review Team I
and changing QC cualification tests and methods. A general impression was l
i
gained indicating that there is a great amount of active recovery effort being performed on-site.
_                                                                                            FCJA-85-59 V 90 8606250084 860611 PDR FOIA GARDE 85-59                         PDR b
l f i'
[S '     ._
%4 ZA4# %
          .                    , ,m-~       ...      _ _ . , .      ,2_
=
                                                                                                      "      2'   -    =-   ^
J.
Herbert H. Livermore, QA/QC Group Leader i
r Comanche Peak Technical Review Team I
i FCJA-85-59 V 90 8606250084 860611 PDR FOIA GARDE 85-59 PDR b
[S '
,,m-~
,2_
2'
=-
^


'                      ~ ~ ~
~ ~ ~
_..__.,_....T
_..__.,_....T
                                                                                                                              ..a
..a
                                                                                                                /         5
/
                    ~,
5
1                                                                                                       /
~,
l   -
1
p b
/
i L
l p
MEMORANDUM FOR:       Vincent S. Noonan, Ofrector j                                                 Comanche Peak Project W                         FRON:                 Herbert I.ivermore, QA/QC Group leader Comanche Peak Tech.nical Review Team
b i
L MEMORANDUM FOR:
Vincent S. Noonan, Ofrector j
Comanche Peak Project W
FRON:
Herbert I.ivermore, QA/QC Group leader Comanche Peak Tech.nical Review Team


==SUBJECT:==
==SUBJECT:==
MEETING tilth JOHN HANSEL, TUEC
MEETING tilth JOHN HANSEL, TUEC
[                                               RECOVERY TEAM LEADER On February 15, 1985, at his request, Mr. John Hansel gave me a short presentation of his group's activities at Comanche Peak. The handout he l                         provided and the presentation were the same as he h&d provided the Contention 5 Panel while on-site the previous week.                                             ,
[
4'                       In my estimation the presentation contained nothlng new, in fact, I considered
RECOVERY TEAM LEADER On February 15, 1985, at his request, Mr. John Hansel gave me a short presentation of his group's activities at Comanche Peak. The handout he l
  ,                        it as having only generalities and lacking specific detail. I inforraed                               ,
provided and the presentation were the same as he h&d provided the Contention 5 Panel while on-site the previous week.
Mr. Hansel that I neither approved nor disapproved of anything in his                                 .
4' In my estimation the presentation contained nothlng new, in fact, I considered it as having only generalities and lacking specific detail.
  .                        presentation and that it was nothing other than general information.
I inforraed Mr. Hansel that I neither approved nor disapproved of anything in his presentation and that it was nothing other than general information.
I wish to note that during some aside discussions, it was learned that another Corporation (PAC) is on-site, working for TUEC, actively revising procedures
I wish to note that during some aside discussions, it was learned that another Corporation (PAC) is on-site, working for TUEC, actively revising procedures and changing QC qualification tests and methods. A general impression was gained indicating that there is a great amount of active recovery effort being performed on-site.
    '.                      and changing QC qualification tests and methods. A general impression was gained indicating that there is a great amount of active recovery effort being                       -
t i
performed on-site.                                                                                   ,
WOW r
t                                                                                           ,
erbert H. Li ermore, QA/QC Group Leader l_
i                                                           -
Comanche Peak Technical Review Team l.
r                   ,
WOW
  ':                                                            erbert H. Li ermore, QA/QC Group Leader l_                                                           Comanche Peak Technical Review Team                               ,
l.
i l
i l
  }
}
l 1
l 1
f:                                                                                                                             *
f:
                                        -                            -                            -                +
0FC :TRT:QA/QC
0FC :TRT:QA/QC                         -                              -
+
            .....: ______ .___:__.            _____ p_______....:.___....____:.......          ____:..............____,...._.
_____ p_______....:.___....____:.......
NAME     :HLivermore:pf _ _ _.lg
NAME :HLivermore:pf _ _ _.lg.$ :
        . DATE :2/ /85                 :          :                :            :                :                :          ;
. DATE :2/ /85 l
l                          OFFICIAL RECORD COPY                                         .
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY e
e            .                          _          :                                      -}}
-}}

Latest revision as of 07:37, 10 December 2024

Summary of 850215 Meeting W/Util Re Util Recovery Team Activities at Plant
ML20199G119
Person / Time
Site: Comanche Peak, 05000000
Issue date: 02/26/1985
From: Livermore H
NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
To: Noonan V
NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM)
Shared Package
ML20197J178 List: ... further results
References
FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8606250084
Download: ML20199G119 (2)


Text

,

r y

  • *'4 as kr o,

s 9'o,j 4 e._,

UNITED STATES i

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3

E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555

/

9 *. * * *,d 4

MEMORANDUM FOR:

Vincent S. Noonan, Director Comanche Peak Project FROM:.

Herbert Livermore, QA/QC Group Leader Comanche Peak Technical Review Team

SUBJECT:

MEETING WITH JOHN HANSEL, TUEC RECOVERY TEAM LEADER On February 15, 1985, at his request, Mr. John Hansel gave me a short presentation of his group's activities at Comanche Peak. The handout he i

provided and the presentation were the same as he had provided the Contention 5 Panel while on-site the previous week.

5 In my estimation the presentation contained nothing new, in fact, I considered it as having only generalities and lacking specific detail.

I informed i

i Mr. Hansel that I neither approved nor disapproved of anything in his presentation and that it was nothing other than general information.

I I wish to note that during some aside discussions, it was learned that another

[

Corporation (PAC) is on-site, working for TUEC, actively revising procedures i

and changing QC cualification tests and methods. A general impression was l

gained indicating that there is a great amount of active recovery effort being performed on-site.

l f i'

%4 ZA4# %

=

J.

Herbert H. Livermore, QA/QC Group Leader i

r Comanche Peak Technical Review Team I

i FCJA-85-59 V 90 8606250084 860611 PDR FOIA GARDE 85-59 PDR b

[S '

,,m-~

,2_

2'

=-

^

~ ~ ~

_..__.,_....T

..a

/

5

~,

1

/

l p

b i

L MEMORANDUM FOR:

Vincent S. Noonan, Ofrector j

Comanche Peak Project W

FRON:

Herbert I.ivermore, QA/QC Group leader Comanche Peak Tech.nical Review Team

SUBJECT:

MEETING tilth JOHN HANSEL, TUEC

[

RECOVERY TEAM LEADER On February 15, 1985, at his request, Mr. John Hansel gave me a short presentation of his group's activities at Comanche Peak. The handout he l

provided and the presentation were the same as he h&d provided the Contention 5 Panel while on-site the previous week.

4' In my estimation the presentation contained nothlng new, in fact, I considered it as having only generalities and lacking specific detail.

I inforraed Mr. Hansel that I neither approved nor disapproved of anything in his presentation and that it was nothing other than general information.

I wish to note that during some aside discussions, it was learned that another Corporation (PAC) is on-site, working for TUEC, actively revising procedures and changing QC qualification tests and methods. A general impression was gained indicating that there is a great amount of active recovery effort being performed on-site.

t i

WOW r

erbert H. Li ermore, QA/QC Group Leader l_

Comanche Peak Technical Review Team l.

i l

}

l 1

f:

0FC :TRT:QA/QC

+

_____ p_______....:.___....____:.......

NAME :HLivermore:pf _ _ _.lg.$ :

. DATE :2/ /85 l

OFFICIAL RECORD COPY e

-