ML20199G119: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot insert) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (StriderTol Bot change) |
||
| Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:, | ||
r y | r y | ||
as | * *'4 as kr o, | ||
o, | s 9'o,j 4 e._, | ||
UNITED STATES i | |||
i | NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3 | ||
E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555 | |||
/ | |||
9 *. * * *,d 4 | |||
9 * . * * * ,d | MEMORANDUM FOR: | ||
MEMORANDUM FOR: | Vincent S. Noonan, Director Comanche Peak Project FROM:. | ||
Herbert Livermore, QA/QC Group Leader Comanche Peak Technical Review Team | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
MEETING WITH JOHN HANSEL, TUEC | MEETING WITH JOHN HANSEL, TUEC RECOVERY TEAM LEADER On February 15, 1985, at his request, Mr. John Hansel gave me a short presentation of his group's activities at Comanche Peak. The handout he i | ||
provided and the presentation were the same as he had provided the Contention 5 Panel while on-site the previous week. | |||
presentation of his group's activities at Comanche Peak. The handout he provided and the presentation were the same as he had provided the Contention 5 Panel while on-site the previous week. | 5 In my estimation the presentation contained nothing new, in fact, I considered it as having only generalities and lacking specific detail. | ||
5 | I informed i | ||
I | i Mr. Hansel that I neither approved nor disapproved of anything in his presentation and that it was nothing other than general information. | ||
[ | I I wish to note that during some aside discussions, it was learned that another | ||
l | [ | ||
f i' | Corporation (PAC) is on-site, working for TUEC, actively revising procedures i | ||
J. | and changing QC cualification tests and methods. A general impression was l | ||
i | gained indicating that there is a great amount of active recovery effort being performed on-site. | ||
l f i' | |||
[S ' | %4 ZA4# % | ||
= | |||
J. | |||
Herbert H. Livermore, QA/QC Group Leader i | |||
r Comanche Peak Technical Review Team I | |||
i FCJA-85-59 V 90 8606250084 860611 PDR FOIA GARDE 85-59 PDR b | |||
[S ' | |||
,,m-~ | |||
,2_ | |||
2' | |||
=- | |||
^ | |||
~ ~ ~ | |||
_..__.,_....T | _..__.,_....T | ||
..a | |||
/ | |||
5 | |||
1 | ~, | ||
l | 1 | ||
/ | |||
l p | |||
MEMORANDUM FOR: | b i | ||
L MEMORANDUM FOR: | |||
Vincent S. Noonan, Ofrector j | |||
Comanche Peak Project W | |||
FRON: | |||
Herbert I.ivermore, QA/QC Group leader Comanche Peak Tech.nical Review Team | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
MEETING tilth JOHN HANSEL, TUEC | MEETING tilth JOHN HANSEL, TUEC | ||
[ | [ | ||
4' | RECOVERY TEAM LEADER On February 15, 1985, at his request, Mr. John Hansel gave me a short presentation of his group's activities at Comanche Peak. The handout he l | ||
provided and the presentation were the same as he h&d provided the Contention 5 Panel while on-site the previous week. | |||
Mr. Hansel that I neither approved nor disapproved of anything in his | 4' In my estimation the presentation contained nothlng new, in fact, I considered it as having only generalities and lacking specific detail. | ||
I inforraed Mr. Hansel that I neither approved nor disapproved of anything in his presentation and that it was nothing other than general information. | |||
I wish to note that during some aside discussions, it was learned that another Corporation (PAC) is on-site, working for TUEC, actively revising procedures | I wish to note that during some aside discussions, it was learned that another Corporation (PAC) is on-site, working for TUEC, actively revising procedures and changing QC qualification tests and methods. A general impression was gained indicating that there is a great amount of active recovery effort being performed on-site. | ||
t i | |||
performed on-site. | WOW r | ||
t | erbert H. Li ermore, QA/QC Group Leader l_ | ||
i | Comanche Peak Technical Review Team l. | ||
r | |||
l. | |||
i l | i l | ||
} | |||
l 1 | l 1 | ||
f: | f: | ||
0FC :TRT:QA/QC | |||
0FC :TRT:QA/QC | + | ||
_____ p_______....:.___....____:....... | |||
NAME | NAME :HLivermore:pf _ _ _.lg.$ : | ||
. DATE :2/ /85 l | |||
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY e | |||
-}} | |||
Latest revision as of 07:37, 10 December 2024
| ML20199G119 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Comanche Peak, 05000000 |
| Issue date: | 02/26/1985 |
| From: | Livermore H NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM) |
| To: | Noonan V NRC - COMANCHE PEAK PROJECT (TECHNICAL REVIEW TEAM) |
| Shared Package | |
| ML20197J178 | List:
|
| References | |
| FOIA-85-59 NUDOCS 8606250084 | |
| Download: ML20199G119 (2) | |
Text
,
r y
- *'4 as kr o,
s 9'o,j 4 e._,
UNITED STATES i
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION 3
E WASHINGTON, D. C. 20555
/
9 *. * * *,d 4
MEMORANDUM FOR:
Vincent S. Noonan, Director Comanche Peak Project FROM:.
Herbert Livermore, QA/QC Group Leader Comanche Peak Technical Review Team
SUBJECT:
MEETING WITH JOHN HANSEL, TUEC RECOVERY TEAM LEADER On February 15, 1985, at his request, Mr. John Hansel gave me a short presentation of his group's activities at Comanche Peak. The handout he i
provided and the presentation were the same as he had provided the Contention 5 Panel while on-site the previous week.
5 In my estimation the presentation contained nothing new, in fact, I considered it as having only generalities and lacking specific detail.
I informed i
i Mr. Hansel that I neither approved nor disapproved of anything in his presentation and that it was nothing other than general information.
I I wish to note that during some aside discussions, it was learned that another
[
Corporation (PAC) is on-site, working for TUEC, actively revising procedures i
and changing QC cualification tests and methods. A general impression was l
gained indicating that there is a great amount of active recovery effort being performed on-site.
l f i'
%4 ZA4# %
=
J.
Herbert H. Livermore, QA/QC Group Leader i
r Comanche Peak Technical Review Team I
i FCJA-85-59 V 90 8606250084 860611 PDR FOIA GARDE 85-59 PDR b
[S '
,,m-~
,2_
2'
=-
^
~ ~ ~
_..__.,_....T
..a
/
5
~,
1
/
l p
b i
L MEMORANDUM FOR:
Vincent S. Noonan, Ofrector j
Comanche Peak Project W
FRON:
Herbert I.ivermore, QA/QC Group leader Comanche Peak Tech.nical Review Team
SUBJECT:
MEETING tilth JOHN HANSEL, TUEC
[
RECOVERY TEAM LEADER On February 15, 1985, at his request, Mr. John Hansel gave me a short presentation of his group's activities at Comanche Peak. The handout he l
provided and the presentation were the same as he h&d provided the Contention 5 Panel while on-site the previous week.
4' In my estimation the presentation contained nothlng new, in fact, I considered it as having only generalities and lacking specific detail.
I inforraed Mr. Hansel that I neither approved nor disapproved of anything in his presentation and that it was nothing other than general information.
I wish to note that during some aside discussions, it was learned that another Corporation (PAC) is on-site, working for TUEC, actively revising procedures and changing QC qualification tests and methods. A general impression was gained indicating that there is a great amount of active recovery effort being performed on-site.
t i
WOW r
erbert H. Li ermore, QA/QC Group Leader l_
Comanche Peak Technical Review Team l.
i l
}
l 1
f:
0FC :TRT:QA/QC
+
_____ p_______....:.___....____:.......
NAME :HLivermore:pf _ _ _.lg.$ :
. DATE :2/ /85 l
OFFICIAL RECORD COPY e
-