ML19031A649: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title I. Pressure Transient Analysis II. System Description and Design Criteria III. Design Evaluation IV. Administrative Controls | TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title I. Pressure Transient Analysis II. System Description and Design Criteria III. Design Evaluation IV. Administrative Controls | ||
: v. Conclusion Appendix A Westinghouse Report-Pressure Mitigating Systems Transient Analysis Report | : v. Conclusion Appendix A Westinghouse Report-Pressure Mitigating Systems Transient Analysis Report LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Title Page 1 Reactor Coolant System 13 Pressure-Temperature versus Cooldown Rates 2 Reactor Coolant System 14 Pressure-Temperature* versus Heatup Rate Schematic and Logic Diagrams 3 CD-249108 15 4 CD-249109-Rev. 1 16 5 CD-249110 17 6 CD-249111-Rev. 1 18 7 CD-249112 19 LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title 1 Comparison of Salem and Westinghouse 12 Reference Parameters I. Pressure Transient Analysis Examination of past and postulated Reactor Coolant System overpressurization events of recent concern has resulted in the identification of two basic types of overpressurization mechanisms. They are categorized as mass input and heat input. For the mass input case the most severe transient has been identified as the inadvertent starting of a Safety Injection Pump, due to its high flow capacity. For the heat input case, the most severe transient is the inadvertent starting of a Reactor Coolant Pump with the presence of a significant temperature differential between the Reactor Coolant System and the Steam Generator in the affected loop. | ||
LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Title Page 1 Reactor Coolant System 13 Pressure-Temperature versus Cooldown Rates 2 Reactor Coolant System 14 Pressure-Temperature* versus Heatup Rate Schematic and Logic Diagrams 3 CD-249108 15 4 CD-249109-Rev. 1 16 5 CD-249110 17 6 CD-249111-Rev. 1 18 7 CD-249112 19 | |||
LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title 1 Comparison of Salem and Westinghouse 12 Reference Parameters | |||
I. Pressure Transient Analysis Examination of past and postulated Reactor Coolant System overpressurization events of recent concern has resulted in the identification of two basic types of overpressurization mechanisms. They are categorized as mass input and heat input. For the mass input case the most severe transient has been identified as the inadvertent starting of a Safety Injection Pump, due to its high flow capacity. For the heat input case, the most severe transient is the inadvertent starting of a Reactor Coolant Pump with the presence of a significant temperature differential between the Reactor Coolant System and the Steam Generator in the affected loop. | |||
Background and justification for the above determination are described further in Appendix A of this report. | Background and justification for the above determination are described further in Appendix A of this report. | ||
A. Mass Input Case The Reactor Coolant System pressure transient to be expected in the Salem Plant for the identified worst case mass input incident was calculated in accordance with the algorithm described in Appendix A. Using the assumptions, inherent in that algorithm, the peak mass input induced pressure was calculated at 446 psig. This peak pressure transient is a function of mass input rate, valve setpoint, valve opening time, RCS volume and the assumption that only one relief valve is available. The peak pressure transient when compared to the 13EFPY (Effective Full Power Years) | A. Mass Input Case The Reactor Coolant System pressure transient to be expected in the Salem Plant for the identified worst case mass input incident was calculated in accordance with the algorithm described in Appendix A. Using the assumptions, inherent in that algorithm, the peak mass input induced pressure was calculated at 446 psig. This peak pressure transient is a function of mass input rate, valve setpoint, valve opening time, RCS volume and the assumption that only one relief valve is available. The peak pressure transient when compared to the 13EFPY (Effective Full Power Years) | ||
Line 43: | Line 37: | ||
These reasons are as follows: | These reasons are as follows: | ||
(1) The calculation of the pressure transient was based on the use of a single pressurizer relief valve. | (1) The calculation of the pressure transient was based on the use of a single pressurizer relief valve. | ||
The Salem Pressurizer Overpressure Protection System (POPS), provides for actuation of a second pressurizer relief valve and the use of the RHR suction line relief | The Salem Pressurizer Overpressure Protection System (POPS), provides for actuation of a second pressurizer relief valve and the use of the RHR suction line relief r (1) (Cont'd) valve (which has a comparable capacity and the same setpoint) . | ||
r (1) (Cont'd) valve (which has a comparable capacity and the same setpoint) . | |||
The effect on overpressurization of the second pressurizer relief valve was not calculated for the Salem Plant due to the unavailability of an appropriate algorithm in Appendix A. It should be noted, however, that sensitivity studies conducted by Westinghouse for a 6,000 cubic foot plant showed that the addition of a second pressurizer relief valve reduced the over-pressurization (and, hence, the peak pressure) by 30 psi. | The effect on overpressurization of the second pressurizer relief valve was not calculated for the Salem Plant due to the unavailability of an appropriate algorithm in Appendix A. It should be noted, however, that sensitivity studies conducted by Westinghouse for a 6,000 cubic foot plant showed that the addition of a second pressurizer relief valve reduced the over-pressurization (and, hence, the peak pressure) by 30 psi. | ||
(2) The pressure transient calculated was based on pressurizer relief valve opening time. | (2) The pressure transient calculated was based on pressurizer relief valve opening time. | ||
Line 53: | Line 45: | ||
(3) The reference parameter algorithm (Appendix A) was developed using conservative bounding input parameters and parameter sensitivity studies which provided a linearized method for calculating a plant specific analysis. As a result of the assumptions made and the linearization method used for the bounding algorithm, pressure transient calculations yield greater magnitudes than would be realized under actual process conditions, and are therefore conservative. | (3) The reference parameter algorithm (Appendix A) was developed using conservative bounding input parameters and parameter sensitivity studies which provided a linearized method for calculating a plant specific analysis. As a result of the assumptions made and the linearization method used for the bounding algorithm, pressure transient calculations yield greater magnitudes than would be realized under actual process conditions, and are therefore conservative. | ||
(4) The Technical Specification Curves include significant conservatisms in both temperature and pressure to account for instrument error. | (4) The Technical Specification Curves include significant conservatisms in both temperature and pressure to account for instrument error. | ||
B. Heat Input Case The calculations for the heat input case were performed in accordance with the supplement to the Westinghouse Report (Appendix A). The peak pressure transient was calculated by interpolating combinations of the following variables; relief valve setpoint, relief valve opening time, reactor coolant system volume and steam generator heat transfer area. In all cases, the calculated peak pressure was less than the worst case previously described under Mass Input Case. | B. Heat Input Case The calculations for the heat input case were performed in accordance with the supplement to the Westinghouse Report (Appendix A). The peak pressure transient was calculated by interpolating combinations of the following variables; relief valve setpoint, relief valve opening time, reactor coolant system volume and steam generator heat transfer area. In all cases, the calculated peak pressure was less than the worst case previously described under Mass Input Case. | ||
II. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND DESIGN CRITERIA The POPS is a two-train overpressurization mitigating system which uses separate and independent pressure transmitters to open the two pressurizer power operated relief valves (lPRl and 1PR2) in the event Reactor Coolant System Pressure exceeds the preset value of 375 psi. This automatic action takes place provided the system has been armed by placing two key-locked pushbuttons in the "ON" position as shown in Figures 3 thru 7. The system will be armed whenever the reactor coolant system is below 3120F. | II. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND DESIGN CRITERIA The POPS is a two-train overpressurization mitigating system which uses separate and independent pressure transmitters to open the two pressurizer power operated relief valves (lPRl and 1PR2) in the event Reactor Coolant System Pressure exceeds the preset value of 375 psi. This automatic action takes place provided the system has been armed by placing two key-locked pushbuttons in the "ON" position as shown in Figures 3 thru 7. The system will be armed whenever the reactor coolant system is below 3120F. | ||
Each relief valve is actuated by its own logic relay which is energized by a bistable device. The bistable | Each relief valve is actuated by its own logic relay which is energized by a bistable device. The bistable | ||
Line 63: | Line 53: | ||
When Reactor Coolant System temperature increases above 3120F, the "OFF" pushbutton for each POPS train is depressed. This action removes the opening permissive signal to the relief valve, removes the opening signal from the associated motor operated valve, and provides an alarm to indicate that the system is d.isarmed if temperature is subsequently decreased below 3120~. Upon actuation, the valves will open and will reset when system pressure decreases below 375 psi. | When Reactor Coolant System temperature increases above 3120F, the "OFF" pushbutton for each POPS train is depressed. This action removes the opening permissive signal to the relief valve, removes the opening signal from the associated motor operated valve, and provides an alarm to indicate that the system is d.isarmed if temperature is subsequently decreased below 3120~. Upon actuation, the valves will open and will reset when system pressure decreases below 375 psi. | ||
Reactor Coolant System pressure and temperature instrumentation are provided which enable the operator to monitor the above parameters. An alarm is provided on the main control console to inform the operator of a POPS system initiation. Valve position indicating lights inform the operator that the valves have opened. In addition, a computer generated alarm informs the operator of an impending pressure excursion beyond the Technical Specification limits. | Reactor Coolant System pressure and temperature instrumentation are provided which enable the operator to monitor the above parameters. An alarm is provided on the main control console to inform the operator of a POPS system initiation. Valve position indicating lights inform the operator that the valves have opened. In addition, a computer generated alarm informs the operator of an impending pressure excursion beyond the Technical Specification limits. | ||
Testing provisions in the POPS circuitry allow for test opening of the relief valves prior to arming of the system below 3120F. The "TEST" pushbutton, when depressed, will operate the relief valve provided that the associated upstr~am motor operated valve is closed. Other portions of the POPS can be tested in a manner similar to other plant protection systems. | Testing provisions in the POPS circuitry allow for test opening of the relief valves prior to arming of the system below 3120F. The "TEST" pushbutton, when depressed, will operate the relief valve provided that the associated upstr~am motor operated valve is closed. Other portions of the POPS can be tested in a manner similar to other plant protection systems. | ||
This design meets the four design criteria established in the NRC's November 17, 1976 letter. | This design meets the four design criteria established in the NRC's November 17, 1976 letter. | ||
Line 73: | Line 62: | ||
some provision for testing on a schedule consistent with the frequency that the system is used for pressure protection. | some provision for testing on a schedule consistent with the frequency that the system is used for pressure protection. | ||
The POPS design provides for testing of the analog circuitry any time the RHR suction valves from the Reactor Coolant System are closed. The relief valves lPRl and 1PR2 can be tested prior to entry into a water-solid condition by use of the POPS functional test pushbutton. The POPS is designed to function during low temperature, low pressure operating conditions and therefore, periodic testing of the system during power operation is not planned. | The POPS design provides for testing of the analog circuitry any time the RHR suction valves from the Reactor Coolant System are closed. The relief valves lPRl and 1PR2 can be tested prior to entry into a water-solid condition by use of the POPS functional test pushbutton. The POPS is designed to function during low temperature, low pressure operating conditions and therefore, periodic testing of the system during power operation is not planned. | ||
(4) "Seismic Design and IEEE 279 Criteria" - Ideally, the pressure protection system should meet both seismic category 1 and IEEE 279 criteria. The basic objective, however, is that the system should not be vulnerable to an event which both causes a pressure transient and causes a failure of equipment needed to terminate the transient. | (4) "Seismic Design and IEEE 279 Criteria" - Ideally, the pressure protection system should meet both seismic category 1 and IEEE 279 criteria. The basic objective, however, is that the system should not be vulnerable to an event which both causes a pressure transient and causes a failure of equipment needed to terminate the transient. | ||
The POPS design meets seismic Category I criteria for all equipment required to open the relief valves. | The POPS design meets seismic Category I criteria for all equipment required to open the relief valves. | ||
The instrumentation and actuating circuitry meet the applicable requirements of IEEE 279 - 1971, provided the system is armed by the operator. | The instrumentation and actuating circuitry meet the applicable requirements of IEEE 279 - 1971, provided the system is armed by the operator. | ||
III. DESIGN EVALUATION The POPS is designed as a "protection grade" system in accordance with the applicable portions of IEEE 279 - 1971. | III. DESIGN EVALUATION The POPS is designed as a "protection grade" system in accordance with the applicable portions of IEEE 279 - 1971. | ||
The use of proven devices provides assurance that the system is compatible with other protection system equip-ment. The use of administrative controls to arm the POPS is considered acceptable due to the infrequency of low pressure, low temperature operation. | The use of proven devices provides assurance that the system is compatible with other protection system equip-ment. The use of administrative controls to arm the POPS is considered acceptable due to the infrequency of low pressure, low temperature operation. | ||
Line 84: | Line 71: | ||
A "loss of station power" will not affect the POPS since the protection logic power is provided by inverters and control power for the relief valves originates at the batteries. | A "loss of station power" will not affect the POPS since the protection logic power is provided by inverters and control power for the relief valves originates at the batteries. | ||
In the event that one relief valve were to open on a false signal or transmitter failure at a time when protection is not required, a depressurization of the Reactor Coolant System would occur. Any such depressurization would be less severe than those analyzed in FSAR Section 14.1.2. The discharge through the relief valve can be terminated by operator action, thus minimizing the effects of the transient. | In the event that one relief valve were to open on a false signal or transmitter failure at a time when protection is not required, a depressurization of the Reactor Coolant System would occur. Any such depressurization would be less severe than those analyzed in FSAR Section 14.1.2. The discharge through the relief valve can be terminated by operator action, thus minimizing the effects of the transient. | ||
IV. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS The following components and conditions have Administrative Controls placed on them to prevent any overpressurizing of the reactor coolant system. | IV. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS The following components and conditions have Administrative Controls placed on them to prevent any overpressurizing of the reactor coolant system. | ||
(1) A reactor coolant pump is not to be started unless there is a bubble in the pressurizer, except when filling and venting the Reactor Coolant System. | (1) A reactor coolant pump is not to be started unless there is a bubble in the pressurizer, except when filling and venting the Reactor Coolant System. | ||
Line 91: | Line 77: | ||
Additionally, when the RCS temperature is reduced below 2000F, the remaining centrifugal charging pump's electrical supply will be deenergized and racked out. (OI-I-3.6) | Additionally, when the RCS temperature is reduced below 2000F, the remaining centrifugal charging pump's electrical supply will be deenergized and racked out. (OI-I-3.6) | ||
V. CONCLUSION In summary, we believe that the material presented in this report meets all of the NRC staff's concerns related to overpressurization incidents. This system described herein provides satisfactory overpressure protection during low pressure, low temperature operation for both water solid and non-solid modes of operation, up to 3120F. | V. CONCLUSION In summary, we believe that the material presented in this report meets all of the NRC staff's concerns related to overpressurization incidents. This system described herein provides satisfactory overpressure protection during low pressure, low temperature operation for both water solid and non-solid modes of operation, up to 3120F. | ||
RWS:jk P77 98 39/52 TABLE I | RWS:jk P77 98 39/52 TABLE I COMPARISON OF SALEM AND WESTINGHOUSE REFERENCE PARAMETERS Westinghouse Actual "reference" Salem plant plant A. GENERAL | ||
: 1. RCS volume, ft3 13,000 12,800 | : 1. RCS volume, ft3 13,000 12,800 | ||
: 2. Pressurizer relief valve | : 2. Pressurizer relief valve | ||
Line 111: | Line 96: | ||
: 2. Relief Valve Opening 1.5 2.0 3.0 Time, sec (AT) | : 2. Relief Valve Opening 1.5 2.0 3.0 Time, sec (AT) | ||
: 3. Reactor Coolant System Volume ft3 (VRCS) 6,000 12,800 13,000 | : 3. Reactor Coolant System Volume ft3 (VRCS) 6,000 12,800 13,000 | ||
: 4. Steam Generator Heat Transfer area, ft2 51,500 58,000 | : 4. Steam Generator Heat Transfer area, ft2 51,500 58,000 r | ||
1!i i:'. :: | |||
11 **** -** | 11 **** -** | ||
I I-' | I I-' | ||
Line 128: | Line 112: | ||
~I. | ~I. | ||
sV'siE:M *HEAT-UP LIMITAT10Ns APPLlcAei_e I:;* :*M1N1MuM 1NsERv1cE, i-:-:-~LEAK TEST | sV'siE:M *HEAT-UP LIMITAT10Ns APPLlcAei_e I:;* :*M1N1MuM 1NsERv1cE, i-:-:-~LEAK TEST | ||
:1 *1 :1* ::: " | :1 *1 :1* ::: " | ||
irh .,: :-:-:: | |||
:~ i~: ..:.. ..,. * ,..... | :~ i~: ..:.. ..,. * ,..... | ||
2 FOR FIRST 13.0 EFFECTIVE FULL POWER YEARS. (MARGINS OF : . TEMPERATURE ~7 t : 1.: :::: . l | 2 FOR FIRST 13.0 EFFECTIVE FULL POWER YEARS. (MARGINS OF : . TEMPERATURE ~7 t : 1.: :::: . l | ||
-oo PSIG ANO 10°F ARE INCLUDED FOR POSSIBLE INSTRUMENT ... -- .. -- ,.... :* -- "'.::fl ~J: * | -oo PSIG ANO 10°F ARE INCLUDED FOR POSSIBLE INSTRUMENT ... -- .. -- ,.... :* -- "'.::fl ~J: * | ||
Line 141: | Line 121: | ||
* 1 ii | * 1 ii | ||
.'INCLUDED FOR POSSIBLE INSTRUMENT ERROR, TO ELIMINATE . *- ... | .'INCLUDED FOR POSSIBLE INSTRUMENT ERROR, TO ELIMINATE . *- ... | ||
. ....... : -~- ~l I:~ .I.. l-- --* / -- :*_ | . ....... : -~- ~l I:~ .I.. l-- --* / -- :*_ | ||
i * | i * | ||
Line 151: | Line 130: | ||
w PRESSURE.) | w PRESSURE.) | ||
1800 -- - -* 1*---rhr1 --l-rl . ! .. , . r ** * --~-~.:~~1~~~~~~ ;~ | 1800 -- - -* 1*---rhr1 --l-rl . ! .. , . r ** * --~-~.:~~1~~~~~~ ;~ | ||
a: | |||
I ........ *-I * -* . --- ~-- | I ........ *-I * -* . --- ~-- | ||
~~~l:l;~;~:~~~l~TE g~:;~~rJ:iLE U) | ~~~l:l;~;~:~~~l~TE g~:;~~rJ:iLE U) | ||
U) 1600 %T *-* ........ --* | U) 1600 %T *-* ........ --* | ||
Line 161: | Line 139: | ||
:?: | :?: | ||
UJ 1-- | UJ 1-- | ||
U) | U) en 1-z 1.400 | ||
en 1-z 1.400 | |||
=~ 13.0 EFPY RTNOT :~~:: ~~~o: | =~ 13.0 EFPY RTNOT :~~:: ~~~o: | ||
o 1 2 00r~+--+-+---+---+--+---+---+-*-+---+--+--<f--+-PRESSURE-TEMPERATURE-t--+---t---t---t---1''-+--t-- | o 1 2 00r~+--+-+---+---+--+---+---+-*-+---+--+--<f--+-PRESSURE-TEMPERATURE-t--+---t---t---t---1''-+--t-- | ||
. . , . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . /_ . . | . . , . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . /_ . . | ||
j | j | ||
. II 11-t*-l-- | . II 11-t*-l-- | ||
*CRITICALltY | *CRITICALltY | ||
Line 180: | Line 155: | ||
/ | / | ||
*U cc 0 | *U cc 0 | ||
-~---- | -~---- | ||
....... : .... --~/ .... -,- | ....... : .... --~/ .... -,- | ||
*:- --- *~- | *:- --- *~- | ||
800>--+--+---t--+---+--+---+---+--+---t--+--<>~>--+-+---+--+---+--t--+--~-+--+--+__,_,__,_..+--+---t--rt---T--+--Ol--t-->--<>--<,_......;--<J 1- | 800>--+--+---t--+---+--+---+---+--+---t--+--<>~>--+-+---+--+---+--t--+--~-+--+--+__,_,__,_..+--+---t--rt---T--+--Ol--t-->--<>--<,_......;--<J 1- | ||
Line 216: | Line 186: | ||
Pow&e. P4L18tr Vtt41.V4 /Pit/ Tt:I AUTO Mo06 (I. ocr.1c DIA6, c/?*24,Jo') | Pow&e. P4L18tr Vtt41.V4 /Pit/ Tt:I AUTO Mo06 (I. ocr.1c DIA6, c/?*24,Jo') | ||
LIG~TS t..l<SHTS L1tS~iS 0,./ OFF r~sr f'J) * ~8$.f. *C8 PP*~S5~*C8 PP*'JSSl-*~8 CONSol.6 CDl<J$ol.~ Ct:11<J5t:1l.ll I | LIG~TS t..l<SHTS L1tS~iS 0,./ OFF r~sr f'J) * ~8$.f. *C8 PP*~S5~*C8 PP*'JSSl-*~8 CONSol.6 CDl<J$ol.~ Ct:11<J5t:1l.ll I | ||
ov61tN4AD "P.o.il&. cN.% | ov61tN4AD "P.o.il&. cN.% | ||
DIS.IJZ/,l/I D OR IP~fil Cl.IJ$ED re;.~p, .:: .312 *r: | DIS.IJZ/,l/I D OR IP~fil Cl.IJ$ED re;.~p, .:: .312 *r: | ||
Line 230: | Line 199: | ||
I . | I . | ||
c,µ, % ~IM 11..A/Z. . Cl-I.IL 6/M!L-AJZ ' | c,µ, % ~IM 11..A/Z. . Cl-I.IL 6/M!L-AJZ ' | ||
,, | ,, | ||
* 1 | * 1 | ||
Line 282: | Line 250: | ||
*11 iPRI LOGIC DIAGRAM | *11 iPRI LOGIC DIAGRAM | ||
,IPR2 ~ | ,IPR2 ~ | ||
POWER RELIEF VALVES | POWER RELIEF VALVES PRESSURIZER CONTROLS I | ||
JJW PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY ELECTRIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT NEWARK. N. J, | JJW PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY ELECTRIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT NEWARK. N. J, | ||
~* \ | ~* \ | ||
Line 289: | Line 256: | ||
-L<O- | -L<O- | ||
2 3 4 5 8 7 | 2 3 4 5 8 7 VALVE FULLY VALV! FUl..LY VALVE rutLY VALVE FULLY VALVE FULLY VALVE FULLY OPEN OPEN P.B. CLOSE: P.B'. ClOSED OPtN OPEN OPEN P.S* CLOSE RB. CLOSED OPEN | ||
VALVE FULLY VALV! FUl..LY VALVE rutLY VALVE FULLY VALVE FULLY VALVE FULLY OPEN OPEN P.B. CLOSE: P.B'. ClOSED OPtN OPEN OPEN P.S* CLOSE RB. CLOSED OPEN | |||
" LIMIT .SWITCJ.I (33/0VO) | " LIMIT .SWITCJ.I (33/0VO) | ||
MOMENTAR'f (ND.SZ81*CB) | MOMENTAR'f (ND.SZ81*CB) | ||
Line 298: | Line 263: | ||
[_ | [_ | ||
ff£SSUll/MR OV4'1eP/¥5*/RG AE'or. .5)'.S. t:N. I Ri'55Vllli44iR D "ON" O'oe/:l~~ Ril5ssatlli!5.Q | ff£SSUll/MR OV4'1eP/¥5*/RG AE'or. .5)'.S. t:N. I Ri'55Vllli44iR D "ON" O'oe/:l~~ Ril5ssatlli!5.Q | ||
/LD6tC Dt/116. ;:;e,:,r.~.t:11Z 0/llF~.PR45"5t:l.M CD*Z4"JIOfiJ) | /LD6tC Dt/116. ;:;e,:,r.~.t:11Z 0/llF~.PR45"5t:l.M CD*Z4"JIOfiJ) t'to6/t: ~tJ',. | ||
t'to6/t: ~tJ',. | |||
tt>>-249/0I!>) | tt>>-249/0I!>) | ||
R&:J7: 6)5. Qll. Jr | R&:J7: 6)5. Qll. Jr | ||
Line 328: | Line 291: | ||
a-IANNil. *I I 7ti fl.Nil. 1---*---*- | a-IANNil. *I I 7ti fl.Nil. 1---*---*- | ||
IWCNI ~Acr.::*.11 CQtUAA17' V'1*54'- | IWCNI ~Acr.::*.11 CQtUAA17' V'1*54'- | ||
NO, 11 1¥07' '-4'1 | NO, 11 1¥07' '-4'1 | ||
Line 346: | Line 308: | ||
?.a. 0t11w.11* | ?.a. 0t11w.11* | ||
t:IAI ,r:l,6N64. IJ1~ | t:IAI ,r:l,6N64. IJ1~ | ||
i/IJl!ll&A>TOA llA*1~'lZa o | i/IJl!ll&A>TOA llA*1~'lZa o | ||
* 90CIO l'IZ Pof'~ "I" A.IZ/lff6l> ~ f161V:r411 ~Nr P~uAll | * 90CIO l'IZ Pof'~ "I" A.IZ/lff6l> ~ f161V:r411 ~Nr P~uAll | ||
Line 367: | Line 328: | ||
'0Dt-AAl7 7EMA PRGSS .SGLBC710N C.D- 24"ill-REY/ | '0Dt-AAl7 7EMA PRGSS .SGLBC710N C.D- 24"ill-REY/ | ||
_,.,. . tltJlilA ;10,,.J ALA*""1 &II. ~%¥ | _,.,. . tltJlilA ;10,,.J ALA*""1 &II. ~%¥ | ||
..L 1.oA | ..L 1.oA | ||
Line 381: | Line 341: | ||
I I | I I | ||
.. flf,J "'" . , . A c->-----~*~--~....~~. . . . . . . . . . . . . ~....~..._~._~..__.~~~_.~~. . . .~+-~._~~---.t.......__.~~~+-~._--..__~.._~~___..~....._~....._--~1t----<.._---.t.._--........~_._---~.......:::;t==-==-=~.......__. | .. flf,J "'" . , . A c->-----~*~--~....~~. . . . . . . . . . . . . ~....~..._~._~..__.~~~_.~~. . . .~+-~._~~---.t.......__.~~~+-~._--..__~.._~~___..~....._~....._--~1t----<.._---.t.._--........~_._---~.......:::;t==-==-=~.......__. | ||
71-*I I~ | |||
,,-A-.. | ,,-A-.. | ||
IAZJOV.~I.~ | IAZJOV.~I.~ | ||
,_,. t:N.Z l'IVIT/14 r&D 1'11P1~/M llS~T f'ii!'essue16Eli! DV6,P61~$.,.#tt:IT4t::TIOl'ol | ,_,. t:N.Z l'IVIT/14 r&D 1'11P1~/M llS~T f'ii!'essue16Eli! DV6,P61~$.,.#tt:IT4t::TIOl'ol | ||
: n. OVIR. l?C.'5 . /1(:5 . ec 11/<fll/,UIJ. ,,,, ~.,,.... | : n. OVIR. l?C.'5 . /1(:5 . ec 11/<fll/,UIJ. ,,,, ~.,,.... | ||
Line 429: | Line 384: | ||
~"'a;c!-1 cO-Zlf9112 .REVZ.J | ~"'a;c!-1 cO-Zlf9112 .REVZ.J | ||
APPENDIX A WESTINGHOUSE REPORT - PRESSURE MITIGATING SYSTEMS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS REPORT | APPENDIX A WESTINGHOUSE REPORT - PRESSURE MITIGATING SYSTEMS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS REPORT | ||
}} | }} |
Latest revision as of 13:29, 2 February 2020
ML19031A649 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Salem ![]() |
Issue date: | 10/26/1977 |
From: | Librizzi F Public Service Electric & Gas Co |
To: | Lear G Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
Download: ML19031A649 (22) | |
Text
PS~G 9 Public Service Electric and Gas Company 80 Park Place Newark, N.J. 07101 Phone 201/430-7000
.~
October 26, 1977 Director of Nuclear Reactor Regulation U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Washington, D. c. 20555 Attention: Mr. George Lear, Chief Operating Reactors Branch 3 Division of Operating Reactors Gentlemen:
OVERPRESSURE PROTECTION NO. 1 UNIT SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272 By our letter of March 25, 1977, Public Service committed to the installation of an interim system to prevent reactor pressure overpressurization by December 31, 1977 and to have a final system installed by the end of the first refueling outage. Enclosed is a report of the design which will meet both of these commitments and which we plan to have operational by December 31, 1977.
Should you have any questions concerning this report, we will be pleased to discuss them with you.
Very truly yours, F. P. Librizzi General Manager -
Electric Production Encl.
P77 98 39 The Energy People 95-0942
J r.*'
REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM OVERPRESSURIZATION OVERPRESSURE PROTECTION NO. 1 UNIT SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION DOCKET NO. 50-272
TABLE OF CONTENTS Section Title I. Pressure Transient Analysis II. System Description and Design Criteria III. Design Evaluation IV. Administrative Controls
- v. Conclusion Appendix A Westinghouse Report-Pressure Mitigating Systems Transient Analysis Report LIST OF FIGURES Figure No. Title Page 1 Reactor Coolant System 13 Pressure-Temperature versus Cooldown Rates 2 Reactor Coolant System 14 Pressure-Temperature* versus Heatup Rate Schematic and Logic Diagrams 3 CD-249108 15 4 CD-249109-Rev. 1 16 5 CD-249110 17 6 CD-249111-Rev. 1 18 7 CD-249112 19 LIST OF TABLES Table No. Title 1 Comparison of Salem and Westinghouse 12 Reference Parameters I. Pressure Transient Analysis Examination of past and postulated Reactor Coolant System overpressurization events of recent concern has resulted in the identification of two basic types of overpressurization mechanisms. They are categorized as mass input and heat input. For the mass input case the most severe transient has been identified as the inadvertent starting of a Safety Injection Pump, due to its high flow capacity. For the heat input case, the most severe transient is the inadvertent starting of a Reactor Coolant Pump with the presence of a significant temperature differential between the Reactor Coolant System and the Steam Generator in the affected loop.
Background and justification for the above determination are described further in Appendix A of this report.
A. Mass Input Case The Reactor Coolant System pressure transient to be expected in the Salem Plant for the identified worst case mass input incident was calculated in accordance with the algorithm described in Appendix A. Using the assumptions, inherent in that algorithm, the peak mass input induced pressure was calculated at 446 psig. This peak pressure transient is a function of mass input rate, valve setpoint, valve opening time, RCS volume and the assumption that only one relief valve is available. The peak pressure transient when compared to the 13EFPY (Effective Full Power Years)
Pressure Temperature limit curves (Figures 1 and 2),
is within limits down to a reactor coolant temperature of 1800F during heatup and 1500F during cooldown.
Below these temperatures the peak pressure exceeds the Technical Specification curves by 20 and 46 psig, respectively.
There are several compelling reasons to believe th~t the actual pressure transients which would be experienced in the worst case would not exceed the pressure limits of 10CFR50 Appendix G even though slight infringement on the Technical Specification curves is indicated.
These reasons are as follows:
(1) The calculation of the pressure transient was based on the use of a single pressurizer relief valve.
The Salem Pressurizer Overpressure Protection System (POPS), provides for actuation of a second pressurizer relief valve and the use of the RHR suction line relief r (1) (Cont'd) valve (which has a comparable capacity and the same setpoint) .
The effect on overpressurization of the second pressurizer relief valve was not calculated for the Salem Plant due to the unavailability of an appropriate algorithm in Appendix A. It should be noted, however, that sensitivity studies conducted by Westinghouse for a 6,000 cubic foot plant showed that the addition of a second pressurizer relief valve reduced the over-pressurization (and, hence, the peak pressure) by 30 psi.
(2) The pressure transient calculated was based on pressurizer relief valve opening time.
Sensitivity studies performed by Westinghouse indicated that the pressure transient is extremely sensitive to relief valve opening times, i.e.
the quicker acting the valve, the more effective it is in mitigating the pressure transient. In comparison, the RHR relief valve opens within a fraction of a second whereas the pressurizer relief valves open in two seconds.
Thus, given the expected availability of the RHR suction relief valve, a significantly lower peak is indicated.
(3) The reference parameter algorithm (Appendix A) was developed using conservative bounding input parameters and parameter sensitivity studies which provided a linearized method for calculating a plant specific analysis. As a result of the assumptions made and the linearization method used for the bounding algorithm, pressure transient calculations yield greater magnitudes than would be realized under actual process conditions, and are therefore conservative.
(4) The Technical Specification Curves include significant conservatisms in both temperature and pressure to account for instrument error.
B. Heat Input Case The calculations for the heat input case were performed in accordance with the supplement to the Westinghouse Report (Appendix A). The peak pressure transient was calculated by interpolating combinations of the following variables; relief valve setpoint, relief valve opening time, reactor coolant system volume and steam generator heat transfer area. In all cases, the calculated peak pressure was less than the worst case previously described under Mass Input Case.
II. SYSTEM DESCRIPTION AND DESIGN CRITERIA The POPS is a two-train overpressurization mitigating system which uses separate and independent pressure transmitters to open the two pressurizer power operated relief valves (lPRl and 1PR2) in the event Reactor Coolant System Pressure exceeds the preset value of 375 psi. This automatic action takes place provided the system has been armed by placing two key-locked pushbuttons in the "ON" position as shown in Figures 3 thru 7. The system will be armed whenever the reactor coolant system is below 3120F.
Each relief valve is actuated by its own logic relay which is energized by a bistable device. The bistable
- is energized when reactor coolant pressure exceeds the setpoint. Existing installed pressure sensors are used to develop the signal for valve actuation. These are the same sensors which provide automatic closure of the RHR suction paths at 600 psi.
Operation of the POPS is governed by two adminis-tratively controlled, keylocked pushbuttons which perform three functions. When the Reactor Coolant System temperature is less than 312oF, the system is armed by depressing the "ON" pushbutton for each POPS train.
An actuation signal to open the motor operated valves upstream of the relief valves is initiated as well as an alarm to indicate that the POPS is armed if temperature should subsequently increase above 3120F. In this mode of operation, the relief valve will be opened automatically if Reactor Coolant System pressure exceeds 375 psi.
When Reactor Coolant System temperature increases above 3120F, the "OFF" pushbutton for each POPS train is depressed. This action removes the opening permissive signal to the relief valve, removes the opening signal from the associated motor operated valve, and provides an alarm to indicate that the system is d.isarmed if temperature is subsequently decreased below 3120~. Upon actuation, the valves will open and will reset when system pressure decreases below 375 psi.
Reactor Coolant System pressure and temperature instrumentation are provided which enable the operator to monitor the above parameters. An alarm is provided on the main control console to inform the operator of a POPS system initiation. Valve position indicating lights inform the operator that the valves have opened. In addition, a computer generated alarm informs the operator of an impending pressure excursion beyond the Technical Specification limits.
Testing provisions in the POPS circuitry allow for test opening of the relief valves prior to arming of the system below 3120F. The "TEST" pushbutton, when depressed, will operate the relief valve provided that the associated upstr~am motor operated valve is closed. Other portions of the POPS can be tested in a manner similar to other plant protection systems.
This design meets the four design criteria established in the NRC's November 17, 1976 letter.
(1) "Credit for Operator Action" - No credit can be taken for operator action until 10 minutes after the operator is aware that a pressure transient is in progress.
The POPS requires no operator action other than to arm the system prior to operation with reactor coolant system temperature less than 3120F. All protective action is performed automatically.
(2) "Single Failure Criteria" - The pressure protection system should be designed to protect the vessel given a single failure that initiates the pressure transient. In this area redundant or diverse pressure protection sistems would be considered as meeting the single failure criteria.
The POPS incorporates redundancy and separation of pressure transmitters, logic, and valves in a channelized system. Single failures within the POPS will not defeat the safety function. Single failures which are capable of initiating a pressure transient cannot cause failures in the POPS which would render it unable to provide protection.
( 3) "Testability" - The equipment design should include.
some provision for testing on a schedule consistent with the frequency that the system is used for pressure protection.
The POPS design provides for testing of the analog circuitry any time the RHR suction valves from the Reactor Coolant System are closed. The relief valves lPRl and 1PR2 can be tested prior to entry into a water-solid condition by use of the POPS functional test pushbutton. The POPS is designed to function during low temperature, low pressure operating conditions and therefore, periodic testing of the system during power operation is not planned.
(4) "Seismic Design and IEEE 279 Criteria" - Ideally, the pressure protection system should meet both seismic category 1 and IEEE 279 criteria. The basic objective, however, is that the system should not be vulnerable to an event which both causes a pressure transient and causes a failure of equipment needed to terminate the transient.
The POPS design meets seismic Category I criteria for all equipment required to open the relief valves.
The instrumentation and actuating circuitry meet the applicable requirements of IEEE 279 - 1971, provided the system is armed by the operator.
III. DESIGN EVALUATION The POPS is designed as a "protection grade" system in accordance with the applicable portions of IEEE 279 - 1971.
The use of proven devices provides assurance that the system is compatible with other protection system equip-ment. The use of administrative controls to arm the POPS is considered acceptable due to the infrequency of low pressure, low temperature operation.
The effects of various failures have been considered in the POPS design. These failures considered include "loss of control air" and "loss of station power." Failures within the POPS cannot cause a loss of protective function, due to the two-train design, and failures capable of causing an overpressurization event cannot cause failures within the POPS or prevent operation of the system.
The "loss of air" situation is provided for by provision of an air accumulator for each relief valve. The accumulators are sized to provide control air for up to 100 cycles of valve opening and closing. The accumulators are designed to seismic Category I requirements. The air accumulators are provided with an alarm which will alert the operator to a low air pressure condition. The accumulator design thus precludes a total loss of control air to the relief valves.
A "loss of station power" will not affect the POPS since the protection logic power is provided by inverters and control power for the relief valves originates at the batteries.
In the event that one relief valve were to open on a false signal or transmitter failure at a time when protection is not required, a depressurization of the Reactor Coolant System would occur. Any such depressurization would be less severe than those analyzed in FSAR Section 14.1.2. The discharge through the relief valve can be terminated by operator action, thus minimizing the effects of the transient.
IV. ADMINISTRATIVE CONTROLS The following components and conditions have Administrative Controls placed on them to prevent any overpressurizing of the reactor coolant system.
(1) A reactor coolant pump is not to be started unless there is a bubble in the pressurizer, except when filling and venting the Reactor Coolant System.
It can be jogged for 1 to 1 1/2 minutes while venting the system (OI's II-1.3.1 and II-1.3.4).
(2) To prevent the accidental starting of a safety injection or charging pump when RCS temperature is below 3500F, the power supplies to both safety injection pumps and to one centrifugal charging pump are deenergized and racked out.
Additionally, when the RCS temperature is reduced below 2000F, the remaining centrifugal charging pump's electrical supply will be deenergized and racked out. (OI-I-3.6)
V. CONCLUSION In summary, we believe that the material presented in this report meets all of the NRC staff's concerns related to overpressurization incidents. This system described herein provides satisfactory overpressure protection during low pressure, low temperature operation for both water solid and non-solid modes of operation, up to 3120F.
RWS:jk P77 98 39/52 TABLE I COMPARISON OF SALEM AND WESTINGHOUSE REFERENCE PARAMETERS Westinghouse Actual "reference" Salem plant plant A. GENERAL
- 1. RCS volume, ft3 13,000 12,800
- 2. Pressurizer relief valve
- a. opening time, sec. 3 2
- b. rating @ 1 psig. 50 gpm @ 600F 55 gpm @ 600F
- c. size, inches 2 2
- a. plug characteristic linear linear
- 3. RHR suction relief valve
- a. opening time, sec. not considered << 1
- b. rating @ setpoint of 375 psig + 10%
accumulation not considered 900 gpm @ 600F
- c. size, inches not considered 3
- d. type not considered spring relief valve B. MASS INPUT
- 1. SI pump input @
375 psig 129.3 lb/sec 10 8. 4 lb/sec Westinghouse Westinghouse Lower Limit Salem Upper Limit
- c. HEAT INPUT
- 1. Relief Valve Setpoint, 350 375 400 psig ( s)
- 2. Relief Valve Opening 1.5 2.0 3.0 Time, sec (AT)
- 3. Reactor Coolant System Volume ft3 (VRCS) 6,000 12,800 13,000
- 4. Steam Generator Heat Transfer area, ft2 51,500 58,000 r
1!i i:'. ::
11 **** -**
I I-'
w I
MAXIMUM PRESSURE 400
~POPS" CIRCUIT 1.50° AVERAGE REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM TEMPERATURE (°F) 3120 DISARMED ABOVE 312°
,, REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE - TEMPERATURE LIMITS VERSUS COOLDOWN RATES Ci) c:
- 0 rn
2600 1*. L*. .l:i- :.L T* I.I**]** 11 ..,.. :1.I ... *1 ,.. 1* *1 I 1*' : I ,... ,. *:1 . .... , !1****
. :L. ... I .. ,...'1** . I I I ., .... , ...** ,* * ,.... !,.... .... **d I"' '
400 ~
- -RE"AciC>°R*-caotA"iii=r
~I.
sV'siE:M *HEAT-UP LIMITAT10Ns APPLlcAei_e I:;* :*M1N1MuM 1NsERv1cE, i-:-:-~LEAK TEST
- 1 *1 :1* ::: "
irh .,: :-:-::
- ~ i~: ..:.. ..,. * ,.....
2 FOR FIRST 13.0 EFFECTIVE FULL POWER YEARS. (MARGINS OF : . TEMPERATURE ~7 t : 1.: :::: . l
-oo PSIG ANO 10°F ARE INCLUDED FOR POSSIBLE INSTRUMENT ... -- .. -- ,.... :* -- "'.::fl ~J: *
- 1-: :i-- *~ :.;.:-*:* *- - -:*
2200 ~ERROR ABOVE 150°F. BELOW 150°F MARGINS OF 30 PSIG ARE--~ * * ..
- 1 ii
.'INCLUDED FOR POSSIBLE INSTRUMENT ERROR, TO ELIMINATE . *- ...
. ....... : -~- ~l I:~ .I.. l-- --* / -- :*_
i *
~-
i
. _*- - *-* ... . . Ly *.* - :. I ..........
2000 CONFLICT WITH MINIMUM REACTOR COOLANT PUMP OPERATION . : *~ '-trc--+--r......--t-"1--t--+--'I
~ r:--
w PRESSURE.)
1800 -- - -* 1*---rhr1 --l-rl . ! .. , . r ** * --~-~.:~~1~~~~~~ ;~
a:
I ........ *-I * -* . --- ~--
~~~l:l;~;~:~~~l~TE g~:;~~rJ:iLE U)
U) 1600 %T *-* ........ --*
-.. *--- . . . v* . . . . . I w
cc
- ~= ~~l~~~~B~~~~~ ~-!:o~u ......... --.. ~~~~~~~~~E a..
- ?:
UJ 1--
U) en 1-z 1.400
=~ 13.0 EFPY RTNOT :~~:: ~~~o:
o 1 2 00r~+--+-+---+---+--+---+---+-*-+---+--+--<f--+-PRESSURE-TEMPERATURE-t--+---t---t---t---1-+--t--
. . , . . . . . . . .. . . .. . . . /_ . .
j
. II 11-t*-l--
- CRITICALltY
...-i"iuMIT
.. -t-t---+--t-~t--+--.--.--,--,..-i I
I-' <!
....I ..... ** *:-- ...... , .. ;*-: :---: :-:* -::- .... .. :LIMIT FOR HEATUP RATES .. * ...... , .... *V *:* -:- :::c
.!=>-
I 0
0 10001~+-+--+--l--t---t--t--+---t--t--t---1f--l-UP TO 60°F/HR. I ~ . . :*
/
- U cc 0
-~----
....... : .... --~/ .... -,-
- - --- *~-
800>--+--+---t--+---+--+---+---+--+---t--+--<>~>--+-+---+--+---+--t--+--~-+--+--+__,_,__,_..+--+---t--rt---T--+--Ol--t-->--<>--<,_......;--<J 1-
........ ~/".'::. ... ---- _... ::: -:~
u ... -- ---'":...- __.__:_I 4.'. .... *: .. -* ......
w a: 6001~+-+-+--+--l--t---t--t--+--+--+--+--t--+--t---t--t~.1~t--1 446--~1-*-~-tc:-..:..:.t._:~.-1: _j_ ~,::__--i_..: - -;t;~;.,- -'*'*,; ~; j;*-; ,*-~-. ;* .:_ ~*-;;:;;.. ;..,.. j,,,.._;;;.. j; .: _; , * ~..1-~*~:t*~:.:..'1~= ~~ *-.:_:~* -*~~- --.:__~* -::_::* --:~-- ~.:.:*I-:_,_ ...:__..- *-:_,:_ -
-:_-=t:,_:_h
_ _:::,=--:1
.. MAXIMUM 375 _:_~~40~0~:j:::::j:::::j:::::j:::::j::=:j::=:+=:+=~:f=:f=+:::+='~+=:::\=::t=*t*-=1=>--=l=:::j:=l==J:=J::::::j:=t:-:=f:=J:=J:=J:=lt=J::=l==~=t==t=:::;:j:::::;:j:::::;:j::~r.-=-~ PRESSURE PRESSURIZER_/
RELIEF VALVE 200 .. -.. -.t--+--+-
1* -__ -! ...+.-.--+_-...-.1~f--l--l--l--1--1--1-1--- -t I 1
i SETPOINT o,____.._.._.......-..... _..._....~_..~ ..... ~----..._
I
..........-+-~-----_.... ...... _.._...__.~ ......--............""'+-__ ..._..,..._.__...._..._......._...
0 100 1800 200 300 400 AVERAGE REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM TEMPERATURE (°Fl ~POPS" CIRCUIT DISARMED ABOVE 312°
.,, REACTOR COOLANT SYSTEM PRESSURE - TEMPERATURE LIMITS VERSUS 60°F/HOUR ~ATE - HEATUP RATE Ci) c
- 0 fTI N
4 Ii I 7 (PG
- 4-0SP) /ZC 1'#65&.
Plt455, :::a- .3tE.G.. PSI
,:'u..ic.1, OiA"'11::41/!
C~- Zf?l/11 T~ 312°,e P'IZE!$St.11Zli161Z oVSll'IZG!.5 /IY,()r, SYSi~M CJI. % f'p-~£{. *cs
('PC-~SC)IC*P#/SS,
.flt .AD/llJ/Jld1'6ATIV4
- SP > 8'¥ P6% GUAlttJi ¥,I Y
'f:lhJC T. DIAllfl/IM LOCl:/N~ llliTOIJ co- Z.4'ill II)
TIZ,ti f\/S/:612!. PH~
Pow&e. P4L18tr Vtt41.V4 /Pit/ Tt:I AUTO Mo06 (I. ocr.1c DIA6, c/?*24,Jo')
LIG~TS t..l<SHTS L1tS~iS 0,./ OFF r~sr f'J) * ~8$.f. *C8 PP*~S5~*C8 PP*'JSSl-*~8 CONSol.6 CDl<J$ol.~ Ct:11<J5t:1l.ll I
ov61tN4AD "P.o.il&. cN.%
DIS.IJZ/,l/I D OR IP~fil Cl.IJ$ED re;.~p, .:: .312 *r:
A A f'O~ t:H. r
/NITIATeD OP£/'IS 5AL4M j.Jt.lt:.t.t-4/Z C5~/.JEIZ.4i1-.1~ 5/Ailo,./
PIZ.69SJ.llZ.1* Ste.
f'P*9B54 *<:l!J Pow~e teELll.~ "-'**I l.ll<JI{- PIZESSulZ12e!Z AllllNI I VA'-11.i ,,,. I PIZ~Sst1.£17E.IZ av4.ef'~l!SSt.1~~ f'ltorl5c;10,.;
(;PN01r/D/ol t ((.OtSIC DIA6trANf LD&IC OIA6. C01'.J'T1lot.s
(;(). z ~' 10,) I
~t:lf<JSGL~ PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY
~ll>ltS *~t::.I: "4t.A~M ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT NEWARK. N. J,
\ P!ZlfESSt.1,e:'/ZZee ovt:2P2ES.5'1.ea P20T/?C.r;o,.,; c1-1.:r /ZC. PIZGHS'!S. H'lcS.t-C/.i.I lc1'1f?L_~[~
I .
c,µ, % ~IM 11..A/Z. . Cl-I.IL 6/M!L-AJZ '
,,
- 1
" 0 Ill
( Pc-4S"E) Pl!Z./llC,W Pl!t:ss.
{Pc-4SSE) PRZ.l./ltfWPIZESS.
~c PA516 SP> a1s P6r
/It:' p,ee.. 6P .::i. !li'!S PsZ. !WO ~PIS t::H. :tr NON' AHo ~ t:ll, r "ON* /:bPa &H. I *atJ" aR PIJPS &'/ol. :rt '/:,toJµ
- ' OA ('661e ~. a.. et/-">IO&) ("'61C J)"4{J. ~* Ztl"llOB).
. Plt>Pa* t:'N, r t:MJ "!li&T.t4/JO PoPG cl/. zr ON "76*1'" Alolb
~R. Ret.ltil= /lt,<:J, S'TbP ~
Pi!R. ~*'16/: N,D, .$TOP 11.4, (PC*457E) p,e z. MJAJ. Pl!5S S.
IPR. 7 t:'t.o.s41> (PC-4748) P/i!Z.111/oJ. f'A!li!.~.
JP/l6 t:O.S60 . (IN/I I..&, MANUAL P.l!J, A/JTOP.B. LOSS OF LO.SSOf' OPE/J P.8. MANUAL P.B. AUTO-P*B* LO" OF
- LOSS OF i:
- ~ /lStltlt:* Mill, t:D
- Z4~108) ~>' ltlOMENTAlfY MOMENTAllY CLOISE'P*l!l*
M6MENTARY 125v.o.c. 21:11..:0.c.
(t'161~ /;ht/(,*. co- tl~'f)/08) -i!WTAllY MOMENTARY MOMENTARY CL.OSEP.tJ, MOMENTARY /f!.5V.D.C esv.D.c.
CA1l>*5Ul*c6) (ND-528/*CB) (ND -52B I -ca) (ND*52Bt*CtJ) Lo55 OF CONT-lll'LT. CONl:.YOLT. (llD 6SBZ<8) 0 (ND-'5282-CB) (NO-S262*CB) (ND-5?8?.CB) CONT. VOLT. a:JNT- 'Yl:JL.T.
CONTROL. AIR.
LofJG oF cONTROLAIR
. Mcfi<J,, EMSR4,
~,4/R..,
Ct.YfrR /ff/I(. 61JPPJ.'(
~ 51JPPJ..'(
PD-,85'3 PO-<JB'-O cu !I)
'9 '9.
OP6.N VA. ~
511-11'-'8 Cl'\ oPEIJ VA.
!!JV-lt!J'J
~I
~ ~
£16HT MANUAL l..IGHT Auro l.lf;UT AUTO ll6HT MANUAL LIGHT AUTO Lt4NT AUTO PU~HlJIJTTON PUSHBUTTON PUSHBUTTON
- PUSHBUTTON BLOC.It: 8£0Clt:'
wo ..5291- ce) (N0-5?81-CIJ) (No-s2a1-c.s) (ND-5282.-CB) (ND-5282-CB). (N0-5282-CB)
!P.12,e *,
AUX /t/~
sup,oLY P.t:1.e"11s
.c..*<10 Psr.
OPEN VALVE Cl.DSE VALVE OPEN VALVE CLOSE VALVE
. r7~Fi"'I')
1 '* .
r7cmciN"N6"1 T~ ~.I I PUSN/JJITrO;~ I LIGHT OPEN 1..IGHT CL.OISE LIGHT OPEN LIGHT CLOSE I ~C.!'l4N~-:>J, (Po-s213-_;aJI PUSHIJUTTON PUSHBUTTON PUSHBUTTON PUSHBUTTON (N0-5~151- cil) lJ......~....JJ- CAjAliM ~ ~
(ND *528/ - CtJ) ':II\. OH ..4\~# r.4'\.AAS )l'\.AA.5 (ND-52B2:CB) (N0-52B2-CB) 'A\. OH ~\.QI'/ '.A'\.AAS '.A'\.AA.5 At.4*"4 . .
UJllOlrlON, . . *
- p, 8.
/l.Nlf &4CK Alll~M CN t::rJ~ISa'-4=
PRESSURIZER PQWER, RELIEF VALVE IPRI (PCV-456) PRESSU8 IZER POWER RELIEF VALVE IPR2 (Pcv 455C)
F\G.4 SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STrn NO.I UNIT *PRESSURIZER
- 11 iPRI LOGIC DIAGRAM
,IPR2 ~
POWER RELIEF VALVES PRESSURIZER CONTROLS I
JJW PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY ELECTRIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT NEWARK. N. J,
~* \
5KETC"/..I CD-24~/03-~EV. I.
-L<O-
2 3 4 5 8 7 VALVE FULLY VALV! FUl..LY VALVE rutLY VALVE FULLY VALVE FULLY VALVE FULLY OPEN OPEN P.B. CLOSE: P.B'. ClOSED OPtN OPEN OPEN P.S* CLOSE RB. CLOSED OPEN
" LIMIT .SWITCJ.I (33/0VO)
MOMENTAR'f (ND.SZ81*CB)
MOMENTARY MOMENTARY TORQUE SW* LIMIT SWITCH
{ND*S 82-CB) (ND-5 82-CB) ('J/cvo)'
[_
ff£SSUll/MR OV4'1eP/¥5*/RG AE'or. .5)'.S. t:N. I Ri'55Vllli44iR D "ON" O'oe/:l~~ Ril5ssatlli!5.Q
/LD6tC Dt/116. ;:;e,:,r.~.t:11Z 0/llF~.PR45"5t:l.M CD*Z4"JIOfiJ) t'to6/t: ~tJ',.
tt>>-249/0I!>)
R&:J7: 6)5. Qll. Jr
~,.,.:*a<~lh (Z"61t:"D~.
CD*~49/o8) c
~ALVE IRP~ VALVE IRP7 Lo:;s OF LOSS OF LOSS OF LOSS O!=
VAlVI: FUllY OPEN VALVE FULLY ClOSED . 211v.o.c. 115V.A:c. VALVE FULLY OPEN VALVE FULLY CLOS£D 2ev.o.c. 115 V.A.C*
B
( L.5. 33/CVO) (L* S
- 33/CVC) CONTROL VOl TAGI: CONTROL VOLTAGE: (l*S* 33/CVO) (l*S. 33CVC) CONTROL VOLTAGE CONTROL VOLTA.i£ I I I OP/fN VALVE CLOSE VALVE' LIGHT OPEN
~USJ.lauTTON (ND* 5281 *CB)
LIGHT CL05 FUSHBUTTON (ND*52Bl-CB)
I
!AAS A AAS OPEN VALVE CLOSE VALVE LIGHT OPEN PU:.HBUTTON (ND-5282-CB)
LIGHT CLOSE PUSHBUTTON (ND* 5282-CB) 1~ l~
PRESSURIZER RELIEF STOP VALVE IPR6 (8000A) PRESSURIZER RELIEF STOP VALVE IPR? l'Aes~~
l!Pt'$/P/?415'5~
f'!llor. &>>". t:"/I*.tr l'~lf:65URlltl5' D'll!llPllt:.551/AO
- ttJTL/(5 I A.I.A~
e'&t16 l.P4'1C D/A4'. A A P.Qar, S\fB. Q{. :r &D*24,IOS)
ZNTt.J<S , A~.AllNf:S
('.Slita "°"11&. Q1A~.
t:D* Z4"JIOS)
SALEM NUCLEAR GENERATING STATION NO.I UNIT *PRESSURIZER IPR6, IPR7 PRESSURIZER RELIEF STOP VALVES A RAM CONTROLS PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND GAS COMPANY ELECTRIC ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT NEWAR'<. N. J.
SK.IE/CJ-/ C0-249110
-rr-
a-IANNil. *I I 7ti fl.Nil. 1---*---*-
IWCNI ~Acr.::*.11 CQtUAA17' V'1*54'-
NO, 11 1¥07' '-4'1
- y,_
11__,AI ou=IN 0111'~111' ti
""fPuf Z Ill P41ii:5~
-31' <}; 00 PS/ti QUT,01/f' I 01.JTtl. * '#I Ae4'ti6
, ~loOOAZt;
- Nl6H />NSS . IN
--'-S."'-'P_..>.-.5""'
75 -.P.-~~:z:-trt* aP~N IMI t:IJftl/~IJ7'4A
~*IJAJ..
CONOl"?'IOJ'llA CC/tl/PU'f'*~
IS!tiAht.~
t:OAJ1!117'1011J4A
.Ui:o4044 (Miii 1'A*OOl~AO ON PA4'M. '1Jl1>4 i' A'o!COUd'>Q l'i¥N Iii)
?.a. 0t11w.11*
t:IAI ,r:l,6N64. IJ1~
i/IJl!ll&A>TOA llA*1~'lZa o
- 90CIO l'IZ Pof'~ "I" A.IZ/lff6l> ~ f161V:r411 ~Nr P~uAll
/:)15,4/2/46/J (O. II, A'-~M'S)
ZNi'1C"*r1011tJ f t:aAJr/fl~
~
"I!"#. I Pl?C'SS HIGH Re
/HMP ~ 3/2 °P" 616IAJ*'-
CQMA-612..1'.:M i:1urb (i::t1~'"4NM)
IN T~31'2.*p
.CcM~~ C~J!Wr IW . .~41-RI zwo1t:*r10AJ f t:DltJrAt:u..
',Pi),~85a>*Cl!J ...,0, ,8, 1'1*86$~*&8 * ~,6,
'---.....---' :llSIG-* .s;.4, 41*. *rA.
iJ07E: .5AJ.ENI NUCU#A.tl GeA.leR-67"/AJcir $7"~"1
- - !Nlll&Artl* 11/IW ~Ul,MINT NO. I t./Nlr PR5/f$lJRl'i!6R OV8RP/M6StJd ~'1'1!ic;-rtt:JN
$'/S7"SNf QI Al>JAJli'i. J' f'E -
~"" ct::J/.JTA&JI.
PUBLIC SERVICE ELECTRIC AND. SAS COMPANY ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT NEWARK. N. J.
r11101r::A>Ta~ INOIC'A7W!l i'A-9861*r6 PA-?85S*Z8 0-~PSI o- 7ao" I=
'0Dt-AAl7 7EMA PRGSS .SGLBC710N C.D- 24"ill-REY/
_,.,. . tltJlilA ;10,,.J ALA*""1 &II. ~%¥
..L 1.oA
(#) ~*----.....--~...-........~~~~~~~--..-.---.~+-~~.,_~~~...---..-~~~~~...-~~~~~~~~~~-.-~---~~~~....,..---,
I I
-~
I -'- I r-*--*- - - - -*- -- - - - -*-,
1 .!._ -'-
PD-<MS4-*~
,}.r 1 I AMol. "'"' .!!!"_Qt:/#- - - - - - - - - __ '....J I
I I
I I
I I
.. flf,J "'" . , . A c->-----~*~--~....~~. . . . . . . . . . . . . ~....~..._~._~..__.~~~_.~~. . . .~+-~._~~---.t.......__.~~~+-~._--..__~.._~~___..~....._~....._--~1t----<.._---.t.._--........~_._---~.......:::;t==-==-=~.......__.
71-*I I~
,,-A-..
IAZJOV.~I.~
,_,. t:N.Z l'IVIT/14 r&D 1'11P1~/M llS~T f'ii!'essue16Eli! DV6,P61~$.,.#tt:IT4t::TIOl'ol
- n. OVIR. l?C.'5 . /1(:5 . ec 11/<fll/,UIJ. ,,,, ~.,,....
l'*r. ~~, % TfiMP. NU£ a1.t.*cr10"' l'llf. 6'11, z O) CD (ii)
QP/:
(OS} 6}
TEST I; 7 20 TMT
.(:,<D~:; I~
(%) (W)
/Q D) (I) (it)
PCPS "&;,.- ~~
,,7/fiif.!r: ' 0 0 I, lrrz
_,n5,
\ /Pzr~*$,4'
)
. 'I 1/L~*7 L ,..,
i(1'P.'JIS¢.*c#;f'U \~/ "7*~."'6) 'IP*9.
L :P.s--:L_._ (PS*i-i) (PS *JI) ( PS-6)
Cc;"' So(..E - r/ZoN/ V/E'tl\/
Pi!IZ IZ!1..1E/fl 5Tt:JP (-'!.' AOM1N1sr~T!VE 6uA20 C~IY~c&1w~ llJrToiJ) vA.vE .v.orce. IZEl=e/26;..;;c.E CleAw11VG5
~,,,.,, NVCL4'4£ G4w81lA;11..1& 5rAr10,.J
- >ae ~~~Zl"'E.i!SS. pzi:;;-: c ... :: -i...01£1C - .Stt*iCJ.I Cf;) *Zl-,iOS P*ll l'<:Jw*112~~1c~ v~tv.!1P£/-1.t:J&1c -
P6/l. IZ4ii.1E~ $1'0P VA* v~ ii"£~ -/.0~1~ -
" :t'o~
- Z4'9 1 1~
- FlG .. 7 No. 1 uw1; - Pil~$SlJ~1a~~
~w1Z. IZU*6~ v,t.1Pz1, IZ~t.141= 4,-op llA.tl'#r.I
~~ ov4Jl,Pl145$, l~c:J,'"&CT/a,..; - H/Alc.;. - ?..¢.<::1 1 , Qv461'£6$Sl.lll4 f'llOT"4~i10'41 sys. e:N. %
SCJ.ll!MArlt::. t:.owr. o/,
PUBLIC SEIVICE ELECTRIC AND HS COMPANY
'Va/~:!
I ENGINEERING DEPARTMENT NEWARK. N. J.
!..,,. ! ;, lzt . - ... s ,.,....eo1..
z- ~2.~ __,,....,
1w&J/t:41 i45 NIH/ II~*"' t:JR .-~,.~,,a-.,*i r:-..~2 c1-.. ,.L; c1.;. :!'~Mn.~,-~£.
T°'T-"TA'
- c IJ ~ ('O*r. .a,* Ai//{, AIM,.,,
~---~~ ... _...., .... ____......,, -...-.. ~**-------._- ........_, ---- ------>-...._..,_,,,_ ..........___ ,_.._ ..,. ___.,_ _,._,__________________________
~
~"'a;c!-1 cO-Zlf9112 .REVZ.J
APPENDIX A WESTINGHOUSE REPORT - PRESSURE MITIGATING SYSTEMS TRANSIENT ANALYSIS REPORT