Information Notice 1997-38, Level-Sensing System Initiates Common-Mode Faulure of High-Pressure-Injection Pumps: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) Created page by program invented by StriderTol |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
| page count = 7 | | page count = 7 | ||
}} | }} | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES | {{#Wiki_filter:UNITED STATES | ||
COMMISSION | NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION | ||
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION | |||
NOTICE 97-38: LEVEL-SENSING | WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 June 24, 1997 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 97-38: LEVEL-SENSING SYSTEM INITIATES COMMON- | ||
MODE FAILURE OF HIGH-PRESSURE-INJECTION | |||
SYSTEM INITIATES | |||
COMMON-MODE FAILURE OF HIGH-PRESSURE-INJECTION | |||
PUMPS | PUMPS | ||
==Addressees== | ==Addressees== | ||
All holders of operating | All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power reactors. | ||
licenses or construction | |||
permits for nuclear power reactors. | |||
==Purpose== | ==Purpose== | ||
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory | The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert | ||
Commission (NRC) is issuing this information | |||
notice to alert | |||
addressees to a recent incident in which two high-pressure-injection (HPI) pumps were | |||
level | damaged as a result of an inaccurate letdown storage tank (LDST) level-sensing system. | ||
The inaccuracy was caused by a drained reference leg. As a result, an incorrect level was | |||
displayed, permitting the pumps to take suction from an empty tank. It is expected that | |||
for applicability | recipients will review this information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as | ||
appropriate. However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not NRC | |||
requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required. | |||
===Descdrition of Circumstances=== | |||
On May 3, 1997, the licensee for Oconee Unit 3 was conducting a planned shutdown to | |||
inspect an HPI line. During cooldown of the plant, HPI pump 3B was operating in the reactor | |||
coolant system (RCS) makeup mode. The pump's discharge pressure dropped to the "low' | |||
pressure setpoint initiating the automatic start of standby HPI pump 3A. The operators later | |||
secured pump 3A when reactor coolant pump (RCP) seal injection flow indicated "high". The | |||
HPI header pressure decreased again. HPI pump 3A automatically restarted. The pump's | |||
motor current began oscillating. The operators secured HPI pump 3B because of an | |||
indication of low motor current. Shortly afterwards, HPI pump 3A was also secured when its | |||
motor current decreased sharply. The licensee issued a Notification of an Unusual Event | |||
because of the loss of two of the three HPI pumps. | |||
The licensee later concluded that both HPI pumps became hydrogen bound and possibly | |||
damaged when they took suction from an empty LDST even though adequate tank inventory | |||
was indicated. | |||
De4e NOrTLdE 1-0o3' 970o6 4 U(WH)oLA .B~O~ 31O1 lMa rz I c - reP | |||
Undi aqquafac @) | |||
IN 97-38 June 24, 1997 Discussion | IN 97-38 June 24, 1997 Discussion | ||
The HPI pumps at Oconee perform the dual functions | The HPI pumps at Oconee perform the dual functions of RCS makeup and high-pressure | ||
safety injection. These pumps normally take suction from the LDST (also referred to as the | |||
makeup or volume control tank by other vendors). A 25-psi (172.4 kPa) hydrogen | |||
overpressure is maintained in this tank to scavenge oxygen from the RCS. | |||
During this event, two level transmitters monitored tank level. These transmitters produce | |||
level alarms in the control room. The alarms alert operators to initiate makeup to the LDST. | |||
Both level transmitters shared a common reference leg. Because the shared reference leg | |||
was partially drained, the indicated letdown tank level remained at 9 inches above the | |||
low-level alarm setpoint. The tank was actually empty, its contents having been depleted | |||
during normal charging. Letdown tank level was investigated only after both HPI pumps | |||
developed problems. | |||
Indicated level in the control room was derived from the equivalent pressure difference | |||
leg | between the drained reference leg and the back pressure from the 25 psi hydrogen | ||
overpressure in the LDST. Because both level instruments shared the common reference | |||
leg, both gave the same erroneous indication. Therefore, operators failed to provide makeup | |||
inventory to the LDST. Two of the three HPI pumps became gas-bound, cavitated, and, as a | |||
result, were structurally damaged. | |||
If an actual safety injection actuation occurs, the suction isolation valve to the LDST remains | |||
open while the suction isolation valve to the borated water storage tank (BWST) opens on the | |||
safety injection signal. All three HPI pumps receive a start signal and take suction on both | |||
the LDST and the BWST. With the two tanks cross-tied, the potential existed for this event to | |||
have caused the loss of all HPI pumps as a result of gas binding. Loss of all three HPI | |||
pumps could prevent the successful mitigation of a loss of coolant accident. During normal | |||
operations, loss of all HPI pumps would result in the loss of reactor coolant pump seal | |||
injection, normal RCS makeup, and normal boration. | |||
in | The level transmitters were last calibrated in February 1997. Sometime between that last | ||
calibration and the event, a leak developed from a scored cap on a test connection that | |||
drained the reference leg. The cap was used to isolate the test connection. A drained | |||
reference leg or a reference leg with entrained air can result in incorrect level indication. | |||
Incorrect level indication will prevent appropriate setpoints being reached when process | |||
conditions demand, defeat critical automatic safety functions, and could mislead plant | |||
operators into taking less than conservative actions. | |||
Pressure and level sensors, in any safety-related application, that rely on a reference leg for | |||
a differential pressure reading, are sensitive to changes in reference leg level. Normal | |||
surveillances that Include only channel checks with other instruments sharing the reference | |||
leg or transmitter calibrations with external hydrostatic test sets will not reveal the true | |||
condition of the reference leg. In the absence of an automatic reference leg fill system, periodic verification of reference leg level based on the plant-specific environment is needed | |||
to ensure the operational integrity of the critical systems that are relied upon for manual and | |||
automatic functions. | |||
IN 97-38 June 24, 1997 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any | |||
questions about information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed | |||
below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager. | |||
Marylee M. Slosson, Acting Director | |||
Division of Reactor Program Management | |||
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
Technical contacts: Thomas Koshy, NRR | |||
301-415-1176 E-mail: txkenrc.gov | |||
Nick Fields, NRR | |||
301-415-1173 E-mail: enfenrc.gov | |||
Attachment: List of Recently Issue Information Notices | |||
4' ln.44 | |||
I | |||
Attachment | |||
IN 97-38 | |||
.June 24, 1997 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED | |||
NRC INFORMATION NOTICES | |||
Information Date of | |||
Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to | |||
96-53, Retrofit to Amersham 660 06/23/97 All industrial radiography | |||
Supp. 1 Posilock Radiography licensees | |||
Camera to Correct Incon- sistency in 10 CFR Part 34 Compatibility | |||
97-37 Main Transformer Fault 06/20/97 All holders of OLs or CPs | |||
with Ensuing Oil Spill for nuclear power reactors | |||
into Turbine Building | |||
97-36 Unplanned Intakes by 06/20/97 All holders of OLs and CPs | |||
Worker of Transuranic permits. All licensees of | |||
Airborne Radioactive of nuclear power reactors | |||
Materials and External in the decommissioning | |||
Exposure Due to Inadequate stage and fuel cycle | |||
Control of Work | |||
97-35 Retrofit to Industrial 06/18/97 All industrial radiography | |||
Nuclear Company (INC) licensees | |||
IR100 Radiography Camera | |||
to Correct Inconsistency | |||
in 10 CFR Part 34 Compatibility | |||
97-34 Deficiencies in Licensee 06/12/97 All holders of OLs or CPs | |||
Submittals Regarding for test and research | |||
Terminology for Radio- reactors | |||
logical Emergency Action | |||
Levels in Accordance | |||
With the New Part 20 | |||
OL = Operating License | |||
CP = Construction Permit | |||
I | |||
KU | |||
IN 97-38 June 24, 1997 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any | |||
questions about information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed | |||
below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager. | |||
original signed by S.H. Weiss for | |||
Marylee M. Slosson, Acting Director | |||
Division of Reactor Program Management | |||
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
Technical contacts: Thomas Koshy, NRR | |||
301-415-1176 E-mail: txk@nrc.gov | |||
Nick Fields, NRR | |||
301-415-1173 E-mail: enf@nrc.gov | |||
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices | |||
Tech Editor has reviewed and concurred on 5/14197 DOCUMENT NAME: G:XNICKIOCONEE.IN *SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES | |||
To receive a co of this document. indicate In the box C=Coov wlo attachmentlendosure E=Coov with attachment/endosure N = No coy | |||
OFFICE Tech x HICB* x PECB* DRPM | |||
Contacts* | |||
NAME NFields JWermiel AChaffee MSlosson 5 | |||
___ __ __ TK oshy _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ | |||
DATE 06/09/97 06/09/97 06/12/97 | |||
- | |||
V07 OFFICIAL KRCORU COPY | |||
I | |||
S . - | |||
K- | |||
-4 IN 97-xx | |||
June xx, 1997 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any | |||
questions about information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed | |||
below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager. | |||
Marylee M. Slosson, Acting Director | |||
Division of Reactor Program Management | |||
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
Technical contacts: Thomas Koshy, NRR | |||
301-415-1176 E-mail: txk@nrc.gov | |||
Nick Fields, NRR | |||
301-415-1173 E-mail: enfenrc.gov | |||
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices | |||
DOCUMENT NAME: G:%NICKkOCONEE.IN *SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES | |||
To receive a conv of this document indicate in the box C=Coov wlo attachmentlenclosure E=Coov with attachmentlenclosure N = No copy | |||
OFFICE Tech x HICB* l x PECB* DRPM | |||
Contacts* ll | |||
NAME NFields JWermiel AChaffee MSlosson | |||
TKoshy | |||
DATE 06/09/97 06/09/97 06112/97 4/ /97 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY | |||
~ 6171k | |||
K'J | |||
IN 97-xx | |||
; I June xx, 1997 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any | |||
questions about information in this notice, please contact on6 of the technical contacts listed | |||
below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager. | |||
Marylee M. Slosson, Acting Director | |||
Division of Reactor Program Management | |||
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation | |||
Technical Contacts: Thomas Koshy, NRR | |||
301-415-1176 e-mail:txk@nrc.gov | |||
Nick Fields, NRR | |||
301-415-1173 e-mail:enfenrc.gov | |||
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices | |||
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\NICK\OCONEE.IN | |||
To receive a copy of tis document, indicate in the box C=Copy wlo attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachment/enclosure N = No copy | |||
OFFICE Tech x HICB x PECB DRPM | |||
Contacts l | |||
4.5-A C)l | |||
NAME NFields AT JWermiel J A haffee MSlosson | |||
. TKoshyA UW P | |||
67 DATE 61 /97 OF FICAL 7 41 /97 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY}} | |||
{{Information notice-Nav}} | {{Information notice-Nav}} | ||
Revision as of 04:40, 24 November 2019
UNITED STATES
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION
OFFICE OF NUCLEAR REACTOR REGULATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555-0001 June 24, 1997 NRC INFORMATION NOTICE 97-38: LEVEL-SENSING SYSTEM INITIATES COMMON-
MODE FAILURE OF HIGH-PRESSURE-INJECTION
PUMPS
Addressees
All holders of operating licenses or construction permits for nuclear power reactors.
Purpose
The U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission (NRC) is issuing this information notice to alert
addressees to a recent incident in which two high-pressure-injection (HPI) pumps were
damaged as a result of an inaccurate letdown storage tank (LDST) level-sensing system.
The inaccuracy was caused by a drained reference leg. As a result, an incorrect level was
displayed, permitting the pumps to take suction from an empty tank. It is expected that
recipients will review this information for applicability to their facilities and consider actions, as
appropriate. However, suggestions contained in this information notice are not NRC
requirements; therefore, no specific action or written response is required.
Descdrition of Circumstances
On May 3, 1997, the licensee for Oconee Unit 3 was conducting a planned shutdown to
inspect an HPI line. During cooldown of the plant, HPI pump 3B was operating in the reactor
coolant system (RCS) makeup mode. The pump's discharge pressure dropped to the "low'
pressure setpoint initiating the automatic start of standby HPI pump 3A. The operators later
secured pump 3A when reactor coolant pump (RCP) seal injection flow indicated "high". The
HPI header pressure decreased again. HPI pump 3A automatically restarted. The pump's
motor current began oscillating. The operators secured HPI pump 3B because of an
indication of low motor current. Shortly afterwards, HPI pump 3A was also secured when its
motor current decreased sharply. The licensee issued a Notification of an Unusual Event
because of the loss of two of the three HPI pumps.
The licensee later concluded that both HPI pumps became hydrogen bound and possibly
damaged when they took suction from an empty LDST even though adequate tank inventory
was indicated.
De4e NOrTLdE 1-0o3' 970o6 4 U(WH)oLA .B~O~ 31O1 lMa rz I c - reP
Undi aqquafac @)
IN 97-38 June 24, 1997 Discussion
The HPI pumps at Oconee perform the dual functions of RCS makeup and high-pressure
safety injection. These pumps normally take suction from the LDST (also referred to as the
makeup or volume control tank by other vendors). A 25-psi (172.4 kPa) hydrogen
overpressure is maintained in this tank to scavenge oxygen from the RCS.
During this event, two level transmitters monitored tank level. These transmitters produce
level alarms in the control room. The alarms alert operators to initiate makeup to the LDST.
Both level transmitters shared a common reference leg. Because the shared reference leg
was partially drained, the indicated letdown tank level remained at 9 inches above the
low-level alarm setpoint. The tank was actually empty, its contents having been depleted
during normal charging. Letdown tank level was investigated only after both HPI pumps
developed problems.
Indicated level in the control room was derived from the equivalent pressure difference
between the drained reference leg and the back pressure from the 25 psi hydrogen
overpressure in the LDST. Because both level instruments shared the common reference
leg, both gave the same erroneous indication. Therefore, operators failed to provide makeup
inventory to the LDST. Two of the three HPI pumps became gas-bound, cavitated, and, as a
result, were structurally damaged.
If an actual safety injection actuation occurs, the suction isolation valve to the LDST remains
open while the suction isolation valve to the borated water storage tank (BWST) opens on the
safety injection signal. All three HPI pumps receive a start signal and take suction on both
the LDST and the BWST. With the two tanks cross-tied, the potential existed for this event to
have caused the loss of all HPI pumps as a result of gas binding. Loss of all three HPI
pumps could prevent the successful mitigation of a loss of coolant accident. During normal
operations, loss of all HPI pumps would result in the loss of reactor coolant pump seal
injection, normal RCS makeup, and normal boration.
The level transmitters were last calibrated in February 1997. Sometime between that last
calibration and the event, a leak developed from a scored cap on a test connection that
drained the reference leg. The cap was used to isolate the test connection. A drained
reference leg or a reference leg with entrained air can result in incorrect level indication.
Incorrect level indication will prevent appropriate setpoints being reached when process
conditions demand, defeat critical automatic safety functions, and could mislead plant
operators into taking less than conservative actions.
Pressure and level sensors, in any safety-related application, that rely on a reference leg for
a differential pressure reading, are sensitive to changes in reference leg level. Normal
surveillances that Include only channel checks with other instruments sharing the reference
leg or transmitter calibrations with external hydrostatic test sets will not reveal the true
condition of the reference leg. In the absence of an automatic reference leg fill system, periodic verification of reference leg level based on the plant-specific environment is needed
to ensure the operational integrity of the critical systems that are relied upon for manual and
automatic functions.
IN 97-38 June 24, 1997 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any
questions about information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed
below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
Marylee M. Slosson, Acting Director
Division of Reactor Program Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical contacts: Thomas Koshy, NRR
301-415-1176 E-mail: txkenrc.gov
Nick Fields, NRR
301-415-1173 E-mail: enfenrc.gov
Attachment: List of Recently Issue Information Notices
4' ln.44
I
Attachment
.June 24, 1997 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
NRC INFORMATION NOTICES
Information Date of
Notice No. Subject Issuance Issued to
96-53, Retrofit to Amersham 660 06/23/97 All industrial radiography
Supp. 1 Posilock Radiography licensees
Camera to Correct Incon- sistency in 10 CFR Part 34 Compatibility
97-37 Main Transformer Fault 06/20/97 All holders of OLs or CPs
with Ensuing Oil Spill for nuclear power reactors
into Turbine Building
97-36 Unplanned Intakes by 06/20/97 All holders of OLs and CPs
Worker of Transuranic permits. All licensees of
Airborne Radioactive of nuclear power reactors
Materials and External in the decommissioning
Exposure Due to Inadequate stage and fuel cycle
Control of Work
97-35 Retrofit to Industrial 06/18/97 All industrial radiography
Nuclear Company (INC) licensees
IR100 Radiography Camera
to Correct Inconsistency
in 10 CFR Part 34 Compatibility
97-34 Deficiencies in Licensee 06/12/97 All holders of OLs or CPs
Submittals Regarding for test and research
Terminology for Radio- reactors
logical Emergency Action
Levels in Accordance
With the New Part 20
OL = Operating License
CP = Construction Permit
I
KU
IN 97-38 June 24, 1997 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any
questions about information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed
below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
original signed by S.H. Weiss for
Marylee M. Slosson, Acting Director
Division of Reactor Program Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical contacts: Thomas Koshy, NRR
301-415-1176 E-mail: txk@nrc.gov
Nick Fields, NRR
301-415-1173 E-mail: enf@nrc.gov
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
Tech Editor has reviewed and concurred on 5/14197 DOCUMENT NAME: G:XNICKIOCONEE.IN *SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES
To receive a co of this document. indicate In the box C=Coov wlo attachmentlendosure E=Coov with attachment/endosure N = No coy
OFFICE Tech x HICB* x PECB* DRPM
Contacts*
NAME NFields JWermiel AChaffee MSlosson 5
___ __ __ TK oshy _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _
DATE 06/09/97 06/09/97 06/12/97
-
V07 OFFICIAL KRCORU COPY
I
S . -
K-
-4 IN 97-xx
June xx, 1997 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any
questions about information in this notice, please contact one of the technical contacts listed
below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
Marylee M. Slosson, Acting Director
Division of Reactor Program Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical contacts: Thomas Koshy, NRR
301-415-1176 E-mail: txk@nrc.gov
Nick Fields, NRR
301-415-1173 E-mail: enfenrc.gov
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
DOCUMENT NAME: G:%NICKkOCONEE.IN *SEE PREVIOUS CONCURRENCES
To receive a conv of this document indicate in the box C=Coov wlo attachmentlenclosure E=Coov with attachmentlenclosure N = No copy
OFFICE Tech x HICB* l x PECB* DRPM
Contacts* ll
NAME NFields JWermiel AChaffee MSlosson
TKoshy
DATE 06/09/97 06/09/97 06112/97 4/ /97 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY
~ 6171k
K'J
IN 97-xx
- I June xx, 1997 This information notice requires no specific action or written response. If you have any
questions about information in this notice, please contact on6 of the technical contacts listed
below or the appropriate Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation (NRR) project manager.
Marylee M. Slosson, Acting Director
Division of Reactor Program Management
Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation
Technical Contacts: Thomas Koshy, NRR
301-415-1176 e-mail:txk@nrc.gov
Nick Fields, NRR
301-415-1173 e-mail:enfenrc.gov
Attachment: List of Recently Issued NRC Information Notices
DOCUMENT NAME: G:\NICK\OCONEE.IN
To receive a copy of tis document, indicate in the box C=Copy wlo attachment/enclosure E=Copy with attachment/enclosure N = No copy
OFFICE Tech x HICB x PECB DRPM
Contacts l
4.5-A C)l
NAME NFields AT JWermiel J A haffee MSlosson
. TKoshyA UW P
67 DATE 61 /97 OF FICAL 7 41 /97 OFFICIAL RECORD COPY