Information Notice 1985-85, Systems Interaction Event Resulting in Reactor System Safety Relief Valve Opening Following a Fire-Protection Deluge System Malfunction: Difference between revisions

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
(Created page by program invented by StriderTol)
Line 14: Line 14:
| page count = 4
| page count = 4
}}
}}
{{#Wiki_filter:SSINS No.: 6835 IN 85-85 UNITED STATES NUCLEAR REGULATORY
{{#Wiki_filter:SSINS No.: 6835 IN 85-85 UNITED STATES


COMMISSION
NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION


OFFICE OF INSPECTION
OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT


===AND ENFORCEMENT===
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 October 31, 1985 IE INFORMATION NOTICE 85-85:  SYSTEMS INTERACTION EVENT RESULTING IN REACTOR
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 October 31, 1985 IE INFORMATION


NOTICE 85-85: SYSTEMS INTERACTION
SYSTEM SAFETY RELIEF VALVE OPENING FOLLOWING


EVENT RESULTING
A FIRE-PROTECTION DELUGE SYSTEM MALFUNCTION
 
IN REACTOR SYSTEM SAFETY RELIEF VALVE OPENING FOLLOWING A FIRE-PROTECTION
 
===DELUGE SYSTEM MALFUNCTION===


==Addressees==
==Addressees==
:
:
All nuclear power reactor facilities
All nuclear power reactor facilities holding an operating license (OL) or a
 
holding an operating


license (OL) or a construction
construction permit (CP).
 
permit (CP).


==Purpose==
==Purpose==
: This notice is provided to alert licensees
:
This notice is provided to alert licensees of a serious systems interaction


of a serious systems interaction
event involving the fire-protection deluge system located in the control room


event involving
ventilation charcoal filter housing. Following inadvertent actuation of this


the fire-protection
system, an analog transient trip system (ATTS) panel was sprayed with water


deluge system located in the control room ventilation
causing malfunctions in certain safety system components.


charcoal filter housing. Following
It is expected that recipients will review this notice for applicability to


inadvertent
their facilities and consider actions, if appropriate, to preclude a similar


actuation
problem occurring at their facilities. However, suggestions contained in this


of this system, an analog transient
notice do not constitute requirements; therefore, no specific action or written


trip system (ATTS) panel was sprayed with water causing malfunctions
response is required.


in certain safety system components.
==Description of Circumstances==
 
:
It is expected that recipients
On May 15, 1985, at Georgia Power Company's Hatch Unit 1, personnel manually
 
will review this notice for applicability
 
to their facilities
 
and consider actions, if appropriate, to preclude a similar problem occurring
 
at their facilities.
 
However, suggestions
 
contained
 
in this notice do not constitute
 
requirements;
therefore, no specific action or written response is required.Description
 
of Circumstances:
On May 15, 1985, at Georgia Power Company's
 
Hatch Unit 1, personnel
 
manually scrammed the reactor from 75% power because of a stuck open low-low-set
 
safety relief valve (LLS-SRV).
 
Shorting of one of the two redundant
 
power supplies and/or possibly intermittent
 
shorting of logic system contacts in the ATTS panel is believed to have caused the stuck open LLS-SRV. The panel is one of two redundant
 
panels located in the control room. The cause of the electrical
 
shorts in the affected panel was water intrusion
 
into the panel.The event began about 8:35 p.m. when an instrument
 
water supply vent valve was damaged, apparently
 
by dragging of a crane hook along the line. The instru-ment water supply line eventually
 
depressurized


causing a portion of the fire-protection
scrammed the reactor from 75% power because of a stuck open low-low-set safety


deluge system to actuate. The water supply line is located above the control building and the deluge system is located in the control room charcoal filter housing.Following
relief valve (LLS-SRV). Shorting of one of the two redundant power supplies


actuation
and/or possibly intermittent shorting of logic system contacts in the ATTS


of the deluge system, approximately
panel is believed to have caused the stuck open LLS-SRV. The panel is one of


15 to 25 gal of water backed up into the ventilation
two redundant panels located in the control room. The cause of the electrical


header before the system could be secured. The 8510290039 IN 85-85 October 31, 1985 backup was caused by plugged drains in the charcoal filter housing. Water eventually
shorts in the affected panel was water intrusion into the panel.


leaked through a hole in the ventilation
The event began about 8:35 p.m. when an instrument water supply vent valve was


piping that was located above the ATTS panel in the control room. Whenthe water sprayed onto the panel, one of two redundant
damaged, apparently by dragging of a crane hook along the line. The instru- ment water supply line eventually depressurized causing a portion of the fire- protection deluge system to actuate. The water supply line is located above


panel power supplies apparently
the control building and the deluge system is located in the control room


shorted because of water intrusion
charcoal filter housing.


into the panel. As a result, a LLS-SRV valve began to cycle open and closed. The SRV cycled three t imes and then opened and remained open. The operator manually scrammed the reactor from 75% power. A false turbine high exhaust pressure trip signal also was generated, temporarily
Following actuation of the deluge system, approximately 15 to 25 gal of water


disabling
backed up into the ventilation header before the system could be secured. The


the high pressure core injection (HPCI) system. The reactor core isolation
8510290039


cooling (RCIC) system was inoperable
IN 85-85 October 31, 1985 backup was caused by plugged drains in the charcoal filter housing. Water


at the time, so neither HPCI nor RCIC was imme-diately available
eventually leaked through a hole in the ventilation piping that was located


for use. Fortunately, neither system was needed during the event. This is because the water level was restored and maintained
above the ATTS panel in the control room. Whenthe water sprayed onto the panel, one of two redundant panel power supplies apparently shorted because of water


by the reactor feedwater
intrusion into the panel. As a result, a LLS-SRV valve began to cycle open and


system until the MSIVs were shut. Subsequent
closed. The SRV cycled three times and then opened and remained open. The


to MSIV closure, water level was maintained
operator manually scrammed the reactor from 75% power. A false turbine high


by the control rod drive (CRD) system with the excess water being dumped to the condenser
exhaust pressure trip signal also was generated, temporarily disabling the high


via the reactor-water
pressure core injection (HPCI) system. The reactor core isolation cooling


cleanup-system.
(RCIC) system was inoperable at the time, so neither HPCI nor RCIC was imme- diately available for use. Fortunately, neither system was needed during the


The LLS-SRV closed without operator action at 9:52 pm.Discussion:
event. This is because the water level was restored and maintained by the
The event is of considerable


concern because of the potential
reactor feedwater system until the MSIVs were shut. Subsequent to MSIV closure, water level was maintained by the control rod drive (CRD) system with the


for multiple safety system failures through unanalyzed
excess water being dumped to the condenser via the reactor-water cleanup-system.


systems interactions.
The LLS-SRV closed without operator action at 9:52 pm.


In this event, the water from the fire-suppression
Discussion:
The event is of considerable concern because of the potential for multiple


deluge system in the control room caused opening of a safety relief valve and loss of primary system inventory.
safety system failures through unanalyzed systems interactions. In this event, the water from the fire-suppression deluge system in the control room caused


The event could have been seriously
opening of a safety relief valve and loss of primary system inventory. The


aggravated
event could have been seriously aggravated by the spurious HPCI turbine high


by the spurious HPCI turbine high exhaust pressure-trip-that-wasreceived-also
exhaust pressure-trip-that-wasreceived-also apparently as a result of the


apparently
water intrusion. Because the RCIC system was inoperable at-the time of the


as a result of the water intrusion.
event, no safety-related high pressure injection system'would have been imme- diately available to restore water level should that have been necessary.


Because the RCIC system was inoperable
The HPCI turbine trip signal was reset shortly after it occurred, however, and


at-the time of the event, no safety-related
the system was returned to operability.


high pressure injection
Perhaps more serious is the potential effect the water could have had on


system'would
numerous other safety systems. The ATTS panels have permissive and arming


have been imme-diately available
logic and trip, logic for various safety systems, as well as water level inputs


to restore water level should that have been necessary.
to the HPCI, RCIC, core spray (CS)., automatic depressurization system (ADS),
  residual heat removal (RHR) system, and diesel activation logic. It is hard to


The HPCI turbine trip signal was reset shortly after it occurred, however, and the system was returned to operability.
predict the anomalous behavior that could occur if both power supplies had been


Perhaps more serious is the potential
lost, or if other portions of the logic had been shorted; but quite possibly, several safety systems could have malfunctioned, seriously handicapping the


effect the water could have had on numerous other safety systems. The ATTS panels have permissive
operators during their efforts to stabilize the unit.


and arming logic and trip, logic for various safety systems, as well as water level inputs to the HPCI, RCIC, core spray (CS)., automatic
Prior to this event, no procedures were in place at Hatch Unit 1 for adequately


depressurization
cleaning the ventilation plenums or drains in the charcoal filter units. Had


system (ADS), residual heat removal (RHR) system, and diesel activation
these procedures been prepared and implemented, the drain's would have functioned


logic. It is hard to predict the anomalous
as designed with no serious adverse effects. In response to this event, the


behavior that could occur if both power supplies had been lost, or if other portions of the logic had been shorted; but quite possibly, several safety systems could have malfunctioned, seriously
licensee cleaned and inspected drains in the remaining filter units and is


handicapping
preparing cleanout and inspection procedures to be added to the maintenance
 
the operators
 
during their efforts to stabilize
 
the unit.Prior to this event, no procedures
 
were in place at Hatch Unit 1 for adequately
 
cleaning the ventilation
 
plenums or drains in the charcoal filter units. Had these procedures
 
been prepared and implemented, the drain's would have functioned
 
as designed with no serious adverse effects. In response to this event, the licensee cleaned and inspected
 
drains in the remaining
 
filter units and is preparing
 
cleanout and inspection
 
procedures
 
to be added to the maintenance


schedules.
schedules.


IN 85-85 October 31, 1985 Another example of a design feature which interactions
IN 85-85 October 31, 1985 Another example of a design feature which could cause potential adverse system
 
was recently found at Unit 1 seismic, non-category
 
I potable water line room envelope via a relay room next to the solid-state
 
protection
 
system cabinets anc system located nearby to water damage foll unit is under construction, it does point could cause potential
 
adverse system of the South Texas Project. A non-> was found to pass through the control> control room. This could subject the I the Westinghouse
 
7300 process control owing a seismic event. Although this out that these problems can occur.Also, IE Information
 
Notice 83-41, "Actuation
 
of Fire Suppression
 
System Causing Inoperability


of Safety Related Equipment," was issued on June 22, 1983.That notice identified
interactions was recently found at Unit 1 of the South Texas Project. A non- seismic, non-category I potable water line> was found to pass through the control


a number of instances
room envelope via a relay room next to the> control room. This could subject the


in which automatic
solid-state protection system cabinets ancI the Westinghouse 7300 process control


actuation
system located nearby to water damage foll owing a seismic event. Although this


of fire suppression
unit is under construction, it does point out that these problems can occur.


systems degraded or jeopardized
Also, IE Information Notice 83-41, "Actuation of Fire Suppression System


the operability
Causing Inoperability of Safety Related Equipment," was issued on June 22, 1983.


of safety-related equipment.
That notice identified a number of instances in which automatic actuation of


No specific action or written response is required by this information
fire suppression systems degraded or jeopardized the operability of safety- related equipment.


notice.If you have any questions
No specific action or written response is required by this information notice.


regarding
If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Regional


this matter, please contact the Regional Administrator
Administrator of the appropriate NRC regional office or the technical contact


of the appropriate
listed below.


NRC regional office or the technical
w4ar  . Jordan, Director


contact listed below.w4ar .Jordan, Director Divis n of Emergency
Divis n of Emergency Preparedness


===Preparedness===
and Engineering Response
and Engineering


Response Office of Inspection
Office of Inspection and Enforcement


and Enforcement
===Technical Contact:===


Technical
===David R. Powell, IE===
                    (301) 492-8373 Attachment:  List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices


Contact: David R. Powell, IE (301) 492-8373 Attachment:
Attachment 1 IN 85-85 October 31, 1985 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED
List of Recently Issued IE Information


Notices
IE INFORMATION NOTICES


Attachment
Information                                  Date of


1 IN 85-85 October 31, 1985 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED IE INFORMATION
Notice No.    Subject                        Issue    Issued to


NOTICES Information
85-84          Inadequate Inservice Testing 10/30/85  All power reactor


Date of Notice No. Subject Issue Issued to 85-84 85-83 85-82 85-81 85-80 Inadequate
Of Main Steam Isolation Valves          facilities holding


Inservice
an OL or CP


Testing 10/30/85 Of Main Steam Isolation
85-83          Potential Failures Of General 10/30/85 All power reactor


Valves Potential
Electric PK-2 Test Blocks              facilities holding


Failures Of General 10/30/85 Electric PK-2 Test Blocks Diesel Generator
an OL or CP


Differen-  
85-82          Diesel Generator Differen-     10/18/85 All power reactor
10/18/85 tial Protection


Relay Not Seismically
tial Protection Relay Not               facilities holding


Qualified Problems Resulting
Seismically Qualified                   an OL or CP


In 10/17/85 Erroneously
85-81          Problems Resulting In         10/17/85 All power reactor


High Reading With Panasonic
Erroneously High Reading               facilities holding


800 Series Thermoluminescent
With Panasonic 800 Series               an OL or CP and


Dosimeters
Thermoluminescent Dosimeters           certain material


Timely Declaration
and fuel cycle


Of An 10/15/85 Emergency
licensees


Class Implemienta- tion Of An Emergency
85-80          Timely Declaration Of An       10/15/85 All power reactor


Plan, And Emergency
Emergency Class Implemienta-            facilities holding


===Notifications===
tion Of An Emergency Plan,              an OL or CP
Possible Sticking Of ASCO 10/1/85 Solenoid Valves Inadequate


Communications
And Emergency Notifications


9/30/85 Between Maintenance, Operations, And Security Personnel Event Notification
85-17          Possible Sticking Of ASCO      10/1/85 All power reactor


9/23/85 All power reactor facilities
Sup. 1        Solenoid Valves                        facilities holding


holding an OL or CP All power reactor facilities
an OL or CP


holding an OL or CP All power reactor facilities
85-79          Inadequate Communications    9/30/85  All power reactor


holding an OL or CP All power reactor facilities
Between Maintenance,                    facilities holding


holding an OL or CP and certain material and fuel cycle licensees All power reactor facilities
Operations, And Security                an OL or CP; research


holding an OL or CP All power reactor facilities
Personnel                              and nonpower reactor


holding an OL or CP All power reactor facilities
facilities; fuel


holding an OL or CP; research and nonpower reactor facilities;
fabrication and
fuel fabrication


and processing
processing facilities


facilities
85-78          Event Notification            9/23/85  All power reactor


All power reactor facilities
facilities holding


holding an OL or CP 85-17 Sup. 1 85-79 85-78 OL = Operating
an OL or CP


License CP = Construction
OL = Operating License


Permit}}
CP = Construction Permit}}


{{Information notice-Nav}}
{{Information notice-Nav}}

Revision as of 02:39, 24 November 2019

Systems Interaction Event Resulting in Reactor System Safety Relief Valve Opening Following a Fire-Protection Deluge System Malfunction
ML031180210
Person / Time
Site: Beaver Valley, Millstone, Hatch, Monticello, Calvert Cliffs, Dresden, Davis Besse, Peach Bottom, Browns Ferry, Salem, Oconee, Mcguire, Nine Mile Point, Palisades, Palo Verde, Perry, Indian Point, Fermi, Kewaunee, Catawba, Harris, Wolf Creek, Saint Lucie, Point Beach, Oyster Creek, Watts Bar, Hope Creek, Grand Gulf, Cooper, Sequoyah, Byron, Pilgrim, Arkansas Nuclear, Braidwood, Susquehanna, Summer, Prairie Island, Columbia, Seabrook, Brunswick, Surry, Limerick, North Anna, Turkey Point, River Bend, Vermont Yankee, Crystal River, Haddam Neck, Ginna, Diablo Canyon, Callaway, Vogtle, Waterford, Duane Arnold, Farley, Robinson, Clinton, South Texas, San Onofre, Cook, Comanche Peak, Yankee Rowe, Maine Yankee, Quad Cities, Humboldt Bay, La Crosse, Big Rock Point, Rancho Seco, Zion, Midland, Bellefonte, Fort Calhoun, FitzPatrick, McGuire, LaSalle, 05000000, Zimmer, Fort Saint Vrain, Shoreham, Satsop, Trojan, Atlantic Nuclear Power Plant, Skagit, Marble Hill, Crane
Issue date: 10/31/1985
From: Jordan E
NRC/IE
To:
References
IN-85-085, NUDOCS 8510290039
Download: ML031180210 (4)


SSINS No.: 6835 IN 85-85 UNITED STATES

NUCLEAR REGULATORY COMMISSION

OFFICE OF INSPECTION AND ENFORCEMENT

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20555 October 31, 1985 IE INFORMATION NOTICE 85-85: SYSTEMS INTERACTION EVENT RESULTING IN REACTOR

SYSTEM SAFETY RELIEF VALVE OPENING FOLLOWING

A FIRE-PROTECTION DELUGE SYSTEM MALFUNCTION

Addressees

All nuclear power reactor facilities holding an operating license (OL) or a

construction permit (CP).

Purpose

This notice is provided to alert licensees of a serious systems interaction

event involving the fire-protection deluge system located in the control room

ventilation charcoal filter housing. Following inadvertent actuation of this

system, an analog transient trip system (ATTS) panel was sprayed with water

causing malfunctions in certain safety system components.

It is expected that recipients will review this notice for applicability to

their facilities and consider actions, if appropriate, to preclude a similar

problem occurring at their facilities. However, suggestions contained in this

notice do not constitute requirements; therefore, no specific action or written

response is required.

Description of Circumstances

On May 15, 1985, at Georgia Power Company's Hatch Unit 1, personnel manually

scrammed the reactor from 75% power because of a stuck open low-low-set safety

relief valve (LLS-SRV). Shorting of one of the two redundant power supplies

and/or possibly intermittent shorting of logic system contacts in the ATTS

panel is believed to have caused the stuck open LLS-SRV. The panel is one of

two redundant panels located in the control room. The cause of the electrical

shorts in the affected panel was water intrusion into the panel.

The event began about 8:35 p.m. when an instrument water supply vent valve was

damaged, apparently by dragging of a crane hook along the line. The instru- ment water supply line eventually depressurized causing a portion of the fire- protection deluge system to actuate. The water supply line is located above

the control building and the deluge system is located in the control room

charcoal filter housing.

Following actuation of the deluge system, approximately 15 to 25 gal of water

backed up into the ventilation header before the system could be secured. The

8510290039

IN 85-85 October 31, 1985 backup was caused by plugged drains in the charcoal filter housing. Water

eventually leaked through a hole in the ventilation piping that was located

above the ATTS panel in the control room. Whenthe water sprayed onto the panel, one of two redundant panel power supplies apparently shorted because of water

intrusion into the panel. As a result, a LLS-SRV valve began to cycle open and

closed. The SRV cycled three times and then opened and remained open. The

operator manually scrammed the reactor from 75% power. A false turbine high

exhaust pressure trip signal also was generated, temporarily disabling the high

pressure core injection (HPCI) system. The reactor core isolation cooling

(RCIC) system was inoperable at the time, so neither HPCI nor RCIC was imme- diately available for use. Fortunately, neither system was needed during the

event. This is because the water level was restored and maintained by the

reactor feedwater system until the MSIVs were shut. Subsequent to MSIV closure, water level was maintained by the control rod drive (CRD) system with the

excess water being dumped to the condenser via the reactor-water cleanup-system.

The LLS-SRV closed without operator action at 9:52 pm.

Discussion:

The event is of considerable concern because of the potential for multiple

safety system failures through unanalyzed systems interactions. In this event, the water from the fire-suppression deluge system in the control room caused

opening of a safety relief valve and loss of primary system inventory. The

event could have been seriously aggravated by the spurious HPCI turbine high

exhaust pressure-trip-that-wasreceived-also apparently as a result of the

water intrusion. Because the RCIC system was inoperable at-the time of the

event, no safety-related high pressure injection system'would have been imme- diately available to restore water level should that have been necessary.

The HPCI turbine trip signal was reset shortly after it occurred, however, and

the system was returned to operability.

Perhaps more serious is the potential effect the water could have had on

numerous other safety systems. The ATTS panels have permissive and arming

logic and trip, logic for various safety systems, as well as water level inputs

to the HPCI, RCIC, core spray (CS)., automatic depressurization system (ADS),

residual heat removal (RHR) system, and diesel activation logic. It is hard to

predict the anomalous behavior that could occur if both power supplies had been

lost, or if other portions of the logic had been shorted; but quite possibly, several safety systems could have malfunctioned, seriously handicapping the

operators during their efforts to stabilize the unit.

Prior to this event, no procedures were in place at Hatch Unit 1 for adequately

cleaning the ventilation plenums or drains in the charcoal filter units. Had

these procedures been prepared and implemented, the drain's would have functioned

as designed with no serious adverse effects. In response to this event, the

licensee cleaned and inspected drains in the remaining filter units and is

preparing cleanout and inspection procedures to be added to the maintenance

schedules.

IN 85-85 October 31, 1985 Another example of a design feature which could cause potential adverse system

interactions was recently found at Unit 1 of the South Texas Project. A non- seismic, non-category I potable water line> was found to pass through the control

room envelope via a relay room next to the> control room. This could subject the

solid-state protection system cabinets ancI the Westinghouse 7300 process control

system located nearby to water damage foll owing a seismic event. Although this

unit is under construction, it does point out that these problems can occur.

Also, IE Information Notice 83-41, "Actuation of Fire Suppression System

Causing Inoperability of Safety Related Equipment," was issued on June 22, 1983.

That notice identified a number of instances in which automatic actuation of

fire suppression systems degraded or jeopardized the operability of safety- related equipment.

No specific action or written response is required by this information notice.

If you have any questions regarding this matter, please contact the Regional

Administrator of the appropriate NRC regional office or the technical contact

listed below.

w4ar . Jordan, Director

Divis n of Emergency Preparedness

and Engineering Response

Office of Inspection and Enforcement

Technical Contact:

David R. Powell, IE

(301) 492-8373 Attachment: List of Recently Issued IE Information Notices

Attachment 1 IN 85-85 October 31, 1985 LIST OF RECENTLY ISSUED

IE INFORMATION NOTICES

Information Date of

Notice No. Subject Issue Issued to

85-84 Inadequate Inservice Testing 10/30/85 All power reactor

Of Main Steam Isolation Valves facilities holding

an OL or CP

85-83 Potential Failures Of General 10/30/85 All power reactor

Electric PK-2 Test Blocks facilities holding

an OL or CP

85-82 Diesel Generator Differen- 10/18/85 All power reactor

tial Protection Relay Not facilities holding

Seismically Qualified an OL or CP

85-81 Problems Resulting In 10/17/85 All power reactor

Erroneously High Reading facilities holding

With Panasonic 800 Series an OL or CP and

Thermoluminescent Dosimeters certain material

and fuel cycle

licensees

85-80 Timely Declaration Of An 10/15/85 All power reactor

Emergency Class Implemienta- facilities holding

tion Of An Emergency Plan, an OL or CP

And Emergency Notifications

85-17 Possible Sticking Of ASCO 10/1/85 All power reactor

Sup. 1 Solenoid Valves facilities holding

an OL or CP

85-79 Inadequate Communications 9/30/85 All power reactor

Between Maintenance, facilities holding

Operations, And Security an OL or CP; research

Personnel and nonpower reactor

facilities; fuel

fabrication and

processing facilities

85-78 Event Notification 9/23/85 All power reactor

facilities holding

an OL or CP

OL = Operating License

CP = Construction Permit