W3F1-2006-0027, License Amendment Request to Delete Vendor Recommended Diesel Generator Surveillance Requirement: Difference between revisions
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 18: | Line 18: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter: | {{#Wiki_filter:Entergy Nuclear South Entergy Operations, Inc. | ||
17265 River Road Killona, LA 70057 SEntergy Tel 504 739 6660 Fax 504 739 6678 jvenabl@entergy.com Joseph E.Venable Vice President, Operations Waterford 3 W3F1-2006-0027 June 14, 2006 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555 | |||
==SUBJECT:== | ==SUBJECT:== | ||
License Amendment Request To Delete Vendor Recommended Diesel Generator Surveillance Requirement Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 Docket No. 50-382 License No. NPF-38 | License Amendment Request To Delete Vendor Recommended Diesel Generator Surveillance Requirement Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 Docket No. 50-382 License No. NPF-38 | ||
==Dear Sir or Madam:== | ==Dear Sir or Madam:== | ||
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy) hereby requests an amendment of the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3) Technical Specifications (TS). The proposed change will delete Waterford 3 TS Surveillance Requirement (SR) 4.8.1.1.2.f. This SR requires that the emergency diesel generator (EDG) be subjected to an inspection in accordance with procedures prepared in conjunction with its manufacturer's recommendations. The proposed change is based on NUREG-1432, Revision 3.1, Standard Technical Specifications Combustion EngineeringPlants. | |||
The proposed change has been evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 50.91 (a)(1) using criteria in 10 CFR 50.92(c) and it has been determined that this change involves no significant hazards consideration. The bases for these determinations are included in the attached submittal. | |||
The proposed change includes new commitments as summarized in Attachment 3. The NRC has approved a similar Technical Specification change for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2. | |||
Entergy requests approval of the proposed amendment by February 1, 2007. Once approved, the amendment shall be implemented within 60 days. Although this request is neither exigent nor emergency, your prompt review is requested. | |||
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Dana Millar at 601-368-5445. | |||
ADoO( | |||
This letter is a request to amend the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3)Operating License NPF-38.The proposed change will delete the Waterford 3 Technical Specification (TS) Surveillance Requirement (SR) 4.8.1.1.2.f associated with the Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG). This SR requires that the EDG be subjected to an inspection in accordance with procedures prepared in conjunction with its manufacturer's recommendations. | W3F1-2006-0027 Page 2 of 3 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 14, 2006. | ||
The proposed change is based on NUREG-1432, Revision 3.1, Standard Technical Spedifications Combustion | Sincerely, JEV/DM/cbh Attachments: | ||
1, 2007 in order to accommodate scheduling activities related to the manufacturer's recommended inspections. | : 1. Analysis of Proposed Technical Specification Change | ||
: 2. Proposed Technical Specification Changes (mark-up) | |||
: 3. List of Regulatory Commitments | |||
W3F1-2006-0027 Page 3 of 3 cc: Dr. Bruce S. Mallett U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Waterford 3 P.O. Box 822 Killona, LA 70066-0751 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. Mel B. Fields MS O-7E1 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway Attn: J. Smith P.O. Box 651 Jackson, MS 39205 Winston & Strawn Attn: N.S. Reynolds 1700 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3817 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP ATTN: T.C. Poindexter 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Office of Environmental Compliance Surveillance Division P. 0. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312 American Nuclear Insurers Attn: Library 95 Glastonbury Blvd. | |||
Suite 300 Glastonbury, CT 06033-4443 | |||
Attachment I W3FI-2006-0027 Analysis of Proposed Technical Specification Change | |||
Attachment 1 to W3F17-2006-0027 Page 1 of 5 | |||
==1.0 DESCRIPTION== | |||
This letter is a request to amend the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3) | |||
Operating License NPF-38. | |||
The proposed change will delete the Waterford 3 Technical Specification (TS) Surveillance Requirement (SR) 4.8.1.1.2.f associated with the Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG). This SR requires that the EDG be subjected to an inspection in accordance with procedures prepared in conjunction with its manufacturer's recommendations. The proposed change is based on NUREG-1432, Revision 3.1, Standard Technical Spedifications Combustion EngineeringPlants (Reference 1). | |||
Entergy requests approval of the proposed amendment by February. 1, 2007 in order to accommodate scheduling activities related to the manufacturer's recommended inspections. | |||
Once approved, the amendment shall be implemented within 60 days. Although this request is neither exigent nor emergency, your prompt review is requested. | Once approved, the amendment shall be implemented within 60 days. Although this request is neither exigent nor emergency, your prompt review is requested. | ||
==2.0 PROPOSED CHANGE== | ==2.0 PROPOSED CHANGE== | ||
Waterford 3 SR 4.8.1.1.2.f states the following: "At the first refueling outage, and thereafter, at intervals not to exceed 24 months, subject the diesels to an inspection in accordance with the procedures prepared in conjunction with its manufacturer's recommendations for this class of standby service." The proposed change will delete this SR.In summary, changes consistent with NUREG-1432 (Reference | |||
Waterford 3 SR 4.8.1.1.2.f states the following: | |||
"At the first refueling outage, and thereafter, at intervals not to exceed 24 months, subject the diesels to an inspection in accordance with the procedures prepared in conjunction with its manufacturer's recommendations for this class of standby service." | |||
The proposed change will delete this SR. | |||
In summary, changes consistent with NUREG-1432 (Reference 1) are proposed. | |||
Surveillance Requirement 4.8.1.1.2.f will be deleted. | |||
==3.0 BACKGROUND== | ==3.0 BACKGROUND== | ||
Surveillance Requirement 4.8.1.1.2.f requires that the EDG be subjected to an inspection in accordance with procedures prepared in conjunction with its manufacturer's recommendations. | Surveillance Requirement 4.8.1.1.2.f requires that the EDG be subjected to an inspection in accordance with procedures prepared in conjunction with its manufacturer's recommendations. This SR is a maintenance activity that does not verify the ability of the EDG to perform its safety function. The manufacturer's recommended inspections required by this surveillance are included in plant procedures. | ||
This SR is a maintenance activity that does not verify the ability of the EDG to perform its safety function. | |||
The manufacturer's recommended inspections required by this surveillance are included in plant procedures. | |||
The manufacturer's recommended inspections are not described in the Waterford 3 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR). | The manufacturer's recommended inspections are not described in the Waterford 3 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR). | ||
to W3F1-2006-0027 Page 2 of 5 | |||
The manufacturer's recommended inspections of the EDG required by this surveillance are included in plant procedures and will continue to be included in plant procedures upon approval of this amendment. | |||
Any changes to the surveillance procedures are subject to reviews in accordance with Entergy's 10 CFR 50.59 Review Program. The proposed change is consistent with Generic Letter 95-10, Relocation of Selected Technical Specifications Requirements Related to Instrumentation (Reference 2), and NUREG-1432, Standard Technical | ==4.0 TECHNICAL ANALYSIS== | ||
Engine 1. Inspect turning gear.2. Ensure engine and generator foundation bolts are tight.3. Remove injection nozzles. Check opening pop pressure and spray pattern if engine analysis indicates out of balance combustion pressure or timing conditions. | |||
: 4. Inspect the interior of all power cylinders including liners, heads, piston crowns, valves and seats.5. Visually inspect engine crankcase cylinder liners, expansion seal, visual portions of the piston skirt, and general appearance of all components including fasteners. | Surveillance Requirement 4.8.1.1.2 f is a maintenance activity that does not verify the ability of the EDG to perform its safety function. The manufacturer's recommended inspections of the EDG required by this surveillance are included in plant procedures and will continue to be included in plant procedures upon approval of this amendment. Any changes to the surveillance procedures are subject to reviews in accordance with Entergy's 10 CFR 50.59 Review Program. The proposed change is consistent with Generic Letter 95-10, Relocation of Selected Technical Specifications Requirements Related to Instrumentation(Reference 2), | ||
and NUREG-1432, Standard Technical SpecificationsCombustion Engineering Plants (Reference 1). | |||
The manufacturer's recommended inspection and maintenance activities include the following: | |||
Engine | |||
: 1. Inspect turning gear. | |||
: 2. Ensure engine and generator foundation bolts are tight. | |||
: 3. Remove injection nozzles. Check opening pop pressure and spray pattern if engine analysis indicates out of balance combustion pressure or timing conditions. | |||
: 4. Inspect the interior of all power cylinders including liners, heads, piston crowns, valves and seats. | |||
: 5. Visually inspect engine crankcase cylinder liners, expansion seal, visual portions of the piston skirt, and general appearance of all components including fasteners. | |||
: 6. Replace fuel oil filter elements if differential pressure indicates this is necessary. | : 6. Replace fuel oil filter elements if differential pressure indicates this is necessary. | ||
: 7. Inspect lube oil strainers for foreign material and metal particles. | : 7. Inspect lube oil strainers for foreign material and metal particles. | ||
Line 63: | Line 85: | ||
: 10. Inspect rocker arm assemblies. | : 10. Inspect rocker arm assemblies. | ||
: 11. Check operation and/or calibration of control and safety shutdown devices not covered by site specific inspection and maintenance procedures. | : 11. Check operation and/or calibration of control and safety shutdown devices not covered by site specific inspection and maintenance procedures. | ||
: 12. Change lube oil in the speed regulating and over speed governors on a three-year basis or compatible site specific program.13. Check valve timing and tappet clearance on at least one cylinder per bank.14. Inspect fuel pump and valve cam lobes and rollers.15. Measure turbocharger thrust bearing clearance. | : 12. Change lube oil in the speed regulating and over speed governors on a three-year basis or compatible site specific program. | ||
: 13. Check valve timing and tappet clearance on at least one cylinder per bank. | |||
: 14. Inspect fuel pump and valve cam lobes and rollers. | |||
: 15. Measure turbocharger thrust bearing clearance. | |||
: 16. Inspect air inlet system for evidence of dirt or debris, and replace/clean filter media as necessary. | : 16. Inspect air inlet system for evidence of dirt or debris, and replace/clean filter media as necessary. | ||
: 17. Inspect forward end auxiliary drive.18. Inspect flywheel end camshaft drive.19. Re-time high pressure fuel pumps, if needed.20. Replace/repair jacket water pump, lube oil pump, fuel oil pump, and high pressure fuel oil pump as needed based on specific pump performance trending.21. Replace all non-metallic flexible hoses.22. Clean rod bearing trip valves and replace their O-rings.23. Replace thermostatic elements in jacket water and lube oil temperature control valves.24. Inspect and clean cylinder head breathers. | : 17. Inspect forward end auxiliary drive. | ||
Attachment 1 to W3F1 -2006-0027 Page 3 of 5 25. Replace lube oil in the outboard bearing based upon site specific periodic or analysis program.26. Inspect and clean coolers -lube oil, jack water, and intercoolers. | : 18. Inspect flywheel end camshaft drive. | ||
Generator 1. Check tightness of thermal connections on the generator. | : 19. Re-time high pressure fuel pumps, if needed. | ||
: 2. Measure and evaluate generator winding insulation resistance measurements to ground.3. Clean insulated generator windings.4. Measure and record generator rotor to stator air gap at four locations 900 apart at the outboard bearing end of the rotor.5. Replace lube oil in the generator outboard pedestal bearing.6. Clean air inlet casing to the generator stator.7. Inspect all electrical motors.8. Inspect collector rings, brushes including alignment, and pigtails.9. Check for insulation cracks in the region around the generator pole bolts.10. Inspect generator frame and fasteners for unusual signs of distress.11. Ensure insulation between outboard bearing and pedestal is not painted and there is no electrical continuity across it.Miscellaneous Electrical | : 20. Replace/repair jacket water pump, lube oil pump, fuel oil pump, and high pressure fuel oil pump as needed based on specific pump performance trending. | ||
: 21. Replace all non-metallic flexible hoses. | |||
: 22. Clean rod bearing trip valves and replace their O-rings. | |||
: 23. Replace thermostatic elements in jacket water and lube oil temperature control valves. | |||
: 24. Inspect and clean cylinder head breathers. | |||
Attachment 1 to W3F1 -2006-0027 Page 3 of 5 | |||
: 25. Replace lube oil in the outboard bearing based upon site specific periodic or analysis program. | |||
: 26. Inspect and clean coolers - lube oil, jack water, and intercoolers. | |||
Generator | |||
: 1. Check tightness of thermal connections on the generator. | |||
: 2. Measure and evaluate generator winding insulation resistance measurements to ground. | |||
: 3. Clean insulated generator windings. | |||
: 4. Measure and record generator rotor to stator air gap at four locations 900 apart at the outboard bearing end of the rotor. | |||
: 5. Replace lube oil in the generator outboard pedestal bearing. | |||
: 6. Clean air inlet casing to the generator stator. | |||
: 7. Inspect all electrical motors. | |||
: 8. Inspect collector rings, brushes including alignment, and pigtails. | |||
: 9. Check for insulation cracks in the region around the generator pole bolts. | |||
: 10. Inspect generator frame and fasteners for unusual signs of distress. | |||
: 11. Ensure insulation between outboard bearing and pedestal is not painted and there is no electrical continuity across it. | |||
Miscellaneous Electrical | |||
: 1. Maintain lube oil and jacket water pump motors in accordance with established site specific procedures. | : 1. Maintain lube oil and jacket water pump motors in accordance with established site specific procedures. | ||
: 2. Check the calibration of the differential current sensing relay.3. Check mechanical condition of switchgear including diesel generator output breaker and safety related relays.4. Where applicable, inspect dropping resistor in Woodward 2301 governor for indications of overheating or deterioration. | : 2. Check the calibration of the differential current sensing relay. | ||
: 5. Replace Agastat GP and EGP series relays in accordance with vendor recommendations or site specific programs.Maintenance and inspection-activities are performed on a frequency driven and/or condition based approach. | : 3. Check mechanical condition of switchgear including diesel generator output breaker and safety related relays. | ||
Some items are performed on a fixed frequency and others are deferred or modified based on trending and previous inspection results.5.0 REGULATORY ANALYSIS 5.1 Applicable Regulatory Requirements/Criteria The proposed change has been evaluated to determine whether applicable regulations and requirements continue to be met.General Design Criteria (GDC) 17, Electric | : 4. Where applicable, inspect dropping resistor in Woodward 2301 governor for indications of overheating or deterioration. | ||
The proposed change to the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford | : 5. Replace Agastat GP and EGP series relays in accordance with vendor recommendations or site specific programs. | ||
Maintenance and inspection-activities are performed on a frequency driven and/or condition based approach. Some items are performed on a fixed frequency and others are deferred or modified based on trending and previous inspection results. | |||
The maintenance activities associated with the vendor recommended inspections are not process variables, design features, or operating restrictions that would result in the failure of or present a challenge to the integrity of a fission product barrier. The ability of the EDG to perform its safety function is not proven by the performance of the vendor recommended inspections and therefore, does not impact the systems capability of mitigating a design basis accident or transient that either assumes the failure of or presents a challenge to the integrity of a fission product barrier. Deletion of the SR does not result in the deletion of the requirement to maintain the EDG operable; therefore, the health and the safety of the public will be assured.5.2 No Significant Hazards Consideration The proposed change deletes the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3)Technical Specification (TS) Surveillance Requirement (SR) that requires the emergency diesel generator (EDG) be subjected to an inspection in accordance with procedures prepared in conjunction with 'its manufacturer's recommendations. | |||
The proposed change is based on NUREG-1432, Revision 3.1, | ==5.0 REGULATORY ANALYSIS== | ||
Response: | |||
No.The ability of the emergency diesel generator to perform its safety function is not proven by the performance of the manufacturer's recommended inspections. | 5.1 Applicable Regulatory Requirements/Criteria The proposed change has been evaluated to determine whether applicable regulations and requirements continue to be met. | ||
The inspections are not considered an initiator or mitigating factor in any previously evaluated accidents. | General Design Criteria (GDC) 17, Electric PowerSystems, of Appendix A, General Design Criteriafor NuclearPower Plants,to 10 CFR 50, Domestic Licensing of Productionand Utilization Facilities,requires that an onsite electric power system and an offsite electric power system be provided to permit functioning of structures, systems, and components | ||
Attachment 1 to W3F1-2006-0027 Page 4 of 5 important to safety. The GDC 17 also includes requirements concerning system capacity, capability, independence, redundancy, availability, testability, and reliability. The proposed change to the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3) Technical Specifications (TS) associated with the emergency diesel generator (EDG) to delete the manufacturer's recommended inspections does not reduce Waterford 3's conformance with GDC 17. | |||
Entergy has determined that the proposed change does not require any exemptions or relief from regulatory requirements, other than the TS, and does not affect conformance with any GDC differently than described in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR). | |||
The deletion of SR 4.8.1.1.2 f has been evaluated against the four criterion of 10 CFR 50.36, Technicalspecifications,to determine if the SR should be included in the TSs. Performance of the vendor recommended inspections does not impact the reactor coolant system pressure boundary. The maintenance activities associated with the vendor recommended inspections are not process variables, design features, or operating restrictions that would result in the failure of or present a challenge to the integrity of a fission product barrier. The ability of the EDG to perform its safety function is not proven by the performance of the vendor recommended inspections and therefore, does not impact the systems capability of mitigating a design basis accident or transient that either assumes the failure of or presents a challenge to the integrity of a fission product barrier. Deletion of the SR does not result in the deletion of the requirement to maintain the EDG operable; therefore, the health and the safety of the public will be assured. | |||
5.2 No Significant Hazards Consideration The proposed change deletes the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3) | |||
Technical Specification (TS) Surveillance Requirement (SR) that requires the emergency diesel generator (EDG) be subjected to an inspection in accordance with procedures prepared in conjunction with 'its manufacturer's recommendations. The proposed change is based on NUREG-1432, Revision 3.1, StandardTechnical Specifications Combustion Engineering Plants. | |||
Entergy Operations, Inc. has evaluated whether or not a significant hazards consideration is involved with the proposed amendment by focusing on the three standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92, "Issuance of amendment," as discussed below: | |||
: 1. Does the proposed change involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated? | |||
Response: No. | |||
The ability of the emergency diesel generator to perform its safety function is not proven by the performance of the manufacturer's recommended inspections. The inspections are not considered an initiator or mitigating factor in any previously evaluated accidents. | |||
Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated. | Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated. | ||
Attachment 1 to W3F1-2006-0027 Page 5 of 5 2. Does the proposed change create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated? | |||
Response: | Attachment 1 to W3F1-2006-0027 Page 5 of 5 | ||
No.The proposed change results in the deletion of the SR associated with the performance of manufacturer's inspections. | : 2. Does the proposed change create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated? | ||
No modifications to plant structures, systems, or components, or changes in the design of the plant structures, systems, or components are required to support the proposed TS change.Therefore, the proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated. | Response: No. | ||
: 3. Does the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety?Response: | The proposed change results in the deletion of the SR associated with the performance of manufacturer's inspections. No modifications to plant structures, systems, or components, or changes in the design of the plant structures, systems, or components are required to support the proposed TS change. | ||
No.The ability of the emergency diesel generator to perform its safety function is not proven by the performance of the manufacturer's recommended inspections. | Therefore, the proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated. | ||
: 3. Does the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety? | |||
Response: No. | |||
The ability of the emergency diesel generator to perform its safety function is not proven by the performance of the manufacturer's recommended inspections. | |||
Inspection activities will continue to be performed. | Inspection activities will continue to be performed. | ||
Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.Based on the above, Entergy concludes that the proposed amendment presents no significant hazards consideration under the standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c), and, accordingly, a finding of "no significant hazards consideration" is justified. | Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety. | ||
5.3 Environmental Considerations The proposed amendment does not involve (i) a significant hazards consideration, (ii) a significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluent that may be released offsite,-or (iii) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. | Based on the above, Entergy concludes that the proposed amendment presents no significant hazards consideration under the standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c), and, accordingly, a finding of "no significant hazards consideration" is justified. | ||
Accordingly, the proposed amendment meets the eligibility criterion for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). | 5.3 Environmental Considerations The proposed amendment does not involve (i) a significant hazards consideration, (ii) a significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluent that may be released offsite,-or (iii) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. Accordingly, the proposed amendment meets the eligibility criterion for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the proposed amendment. | ||
Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the proposed amendment. | 6.0 PRECEDENCE | ||
6.0 PRECEDENCE | |||
: 1. ANO-2 TS Amendment No. 237 dated December 17, 2001. This amendment included the deletion of the SR to perform the vendor recommended inspections. | : 1. ANO-2 TS Amendment No. 237 dated December 17, 2001. This amendment included the deletion of the SR to perform the vendor recommended inspections. | ||
==7.0 REFERENCES== | ==7.0 REFERENCES== | ||
: 1. NUREG-1432, Revision 3.1, Standard Technical | : 1. NUREG-1432, Revision 3.1, Standard Technical SpecificationsCombustion EngineeringPlants | ||
: 2. Generic Letter 95-10, Relocation of Selected Technical Specifications Requirements Related to Instrumentation | |||
: 8. During shutdown, verifying the diesel generator's capability to: a) Synchronize with the offsite power source while the generator is loaded with its emergency loads upon a simulated restoration of offsite power, b) Transfer its loads to the offsite power source, and c) Be restored to its standby status.9. During shutdown, verifying that with the diesel generator operating in a test mode (connected to its bus), a simulated safety injection signal overrides the test mode by (1) returning the diesel generator to standby operation and (2) automatically energizes the emergency loads with offsite power.10. Verifying that each fuel transfer pump transfers fuel to its associated diesel oil feed tank by taking suction from the opposite train fuel oil storage tank via the installed cross connect.11. During shutdown, verifying that the automatic load sequence timer is OPERABLE with the time of each load block within +/-10% of the sequenced load block time.12. Verifying that the following diesel generator lockout features prevent diesel generator starting only when required: a) turning gear engaged b) emergency stop c) loss of D.C. control power d) governor fuel oil linkage tripped subject the .isl | |||
WATERFORD | Attachment 2 W3FI-2006-0027 Proposed Technical Specification Changes (mark-up) to W3F17-2006-0027 Page 1 of 1 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE REQUI REMENTS (Continued) | ||
-UNIT 3 3/4 8-6a AMENDMENT NO. 23,92,126,18, Attachment 3 W3FI-2006-0027 List of Regulatory Commitments | : 8. During shutdown, verifying the diesel generator's capability to: | ||
'The following table identifies those actions committed to by Entergy in this document. | a) Synchronize with the offsite power source while the generator is loaded with its emergency loads upon a simulated restoration of offsite power, b) Transfer its loads to the offsite power source, and c) Be restored to its standby status. | ||
Any other statements in this submittal are provided for information purposes and are not considered to be regulatory commitments. | : 9. During shutdown, verifying that with the diesel generator operating in a test mode (connected to its bus), a simulated safety injection signal overrides the test mode by (1) returning the diesel generator to standby operation and (2) automatically energizes the emergency loads with offsite power. | ||
TYPE (Check one) SCHEDULED ONE- CONTINUING COMPLETION COMMITMENT TIME COMPLIANCE DATE (If ACTION Required)The manufacturer's recommended inspections of the EDG required by this surveillance are included in plant procedures and will continue to be included X in plant procedures upon approval of this amendment.}} | : 10. Verifying that each fuel transfer pump transfers fuel to its associated diesel oil feed tank by taking suction from the opposite train fuel oil storage tank via the installed cross connect. | ||
: 11. During shutdown, verifying that the automatic load sequence timer is OPERABLE with the time of each load block within +/-10% of the sequenced load block time. | |||
: 12. Verifying that the following diesel generator lockout features prevent diesel generator starting only when required: | |||
a) turning gear engaged b) emergency stop c) loss of D.C. control power d) governor fuel oil linkage tripped subject the o nisection | |||
.isl in accordance with; procedures prepared in con~junction w~ith its manufacturer's ccO~mmcndations for this class of standby sepviee. Deleted | |||
: g. At least once per 10 years or after any modifications which could affect diesel generator interdependence by starting the diesel generators simultaneously, during shutdown, and verifying that the diesel generators accelerate to at least 600 rpm (60 +/- 1.2 Hz) in less than or equal to 10 seconds. | |||
: h. At least once per 10 years by: | |||
: 1. Draining each diesel generator fuel oil storage tank, removing the accumulated sediment, and cleaning the tank using a sodium hypochlorite solution or equivalent. | |||
WATERFORD - UNIT 3 3/4 8-6a AMENDMENT NO. 23,92,126,18, | |||
Attachment 3 W3FI-2006-0027 List of Regulatory Commitments to W3F1-2006-0027 Page 1 of I List of Regulatory Commitments | |||
'The following table identifies those actions committed to by Entergy in this document. Any other statements in this submittal are provided for information purposes and are not considered to be regulatory commitments. | |||
TYPE (Check one) SCHEDULED ONE- CONTINUING COMPLETION COMMITMENT TIME COMPLIANCE DATE (If ACTION Required) | |||
The manufacturer's recommended inspections of the EDG required by this surveillance are included in plant procedures and will continue to be included X in plant procedures upon approval of this amendment.}} |
Latest revision as of 17:31, 23 November 2019
ML061670071 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Waterford |
Issue date: | 06/14/2006 |
From: | Venable J Entergy Nuclear South, Entergy Operations |
To: | Document Control Desk, Office of Nuclear Reactor Regulation |
References | |
W3F1-2006-0027 | |
Download: ML061670071 (13) | |
Text
Entergy Nuclear South Entergy Operations, Inc.
17265 River Road Killona, LA 70057 SEntergy Tel 504 739 6660 Fax 504 739 6678 jvenabl@entergy.com Joseph E.Venable Vice President, Operations Waterford 3 W3F1-2006-0027 June 14, 2006 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Document Control Desk Washington, DC 20555
SUBJECT:
License Amendment Request To Delete Vendor Recommended Diesel Generator Surveillance Requirement Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 Docket No. 50-382 License No. NPF-38
Dear Sir or Madam:
Pursuant to 10 CFR 50.90, Entergy Operations, Inc. (Entergy) hereby requests an amendment of the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3) Technical Specifications (TS). The proposed change will delete Waterford 3 TS Surveillance Requirement (SR) 4.8.1.1.2.f. This SR requires that the emergency diesel generator (EDG) be subjected to an inspection in accordance with procedures prepared in conjunction with its manufacturer's recommendations. The proposed change is based on NUREG-1432, Revision 3.1, Standard Technical Specifications Combustion EngineeringPlants.
The proposed change has been evaluated in accordance with 10 CFR 50.91 (a)(1) using criteria in 10 CFR 50.92(c) and it has been determined that this change involves no significant hazards consideration. The bases for these determinations are included in the attached submittal.
The proposed change includes new commitments as summarized in Attachment 3. The NRC has approved a similar Technical Specification change for Arkansas Nuclear One, Unit 2.
Entergy requests approval of the proposed amendment by February 1, 2007. Once approved, the amendment shall be implemented within 60 days. Although this request is neither exigent nor emergency, your prompt review is requested.
If you have any questions or require additional information, please contact Dana Millar at 601-368-5445.
ADoO(
W3F1-2006-0027 Page 2 of 3 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. Executed on June 14, 2006.
Sincerely, JEV/DM/cbh Attachments:
- 1. Analysis of Proposed Technical Specification Change
- 2. Proposed Technical Specification Changes (mark-up)
- 3. List of Regulatory Commitments
W3F1-2006-0027 Page 3 of 3 cc: Dr. Bruce S. Mallett U. S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Region IV 611 Ryan Plaza Drive, Suite 400 Arlington, TX 76011 NRC Senior Resident Inspector Waterford 3 P.O. Box 822 Killona, LA 70066-0751 U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Attn: Mr. Mel B. Fields MS O-7E1 Washington, DC 20555-0001 Wise, Carter, Child & Caraway Attn: J. Smith P.O. Box 651 Jackson, MS 39205 Winston & Strawn Attn: N.S. Reynolds 1700 K Street, NW Washington, DC 20006-3817 Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP ATTN: T.C. Poindexter 1111 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW Washington, DC 20004 Louisiana Department of Environmental Quality Office of Environmental Compliance Surveillance Division P. 0. Box 4312 Baton Rouge, LA 70821-4312 American Nuclear Insurers Attn: Library 95 Glastonbury Blvd.
Suite 300 Glastonbury, CT 06033-4443
Attachment I W3FI-2006-0027 Analysis of Proposed Technical Specification Change
Attachment 1 to W3F17-2006-0027 Page 1 of 5
1.0 DESCRIPTION
This letter is a request to amend the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3)
Operating License NPF-38.
The proposed change will delete the Waterford 3 Technical Specification (TS) Surveillance Requirement (SR) 4.8.1.1.2.f associated with the Emergency Diesel Generator (EDG). This SR requires that the EDG be subjected to an inspection in accordance with procedures prepared in conjunction with its manufacturer's recommendations. The proposed change is based on NUREG-1432, Revision 3.1, Standard Technical Spedifications Combustion EngineeringPlants (Reference 1).
Entergy requests approval of the proposed amendment by February. 1, 2007 in order to accommodate scheduling activities related to the manufacturer's recommended inspections.
Once approved, the amendment shall be implemented within 60 days. Although this request is neither exigent nor emergency, your prompt review is requested.
2.0 PROPOSED CHANGE
Waterford 3 SR 4.8.1.1.2.f states the following:
"At the first refueling outage, and thereafter, at intervals not to exceed 24 months, subject the diesels to an inspection in accordance with the procedures prepared in conjunction with its manufacturer's recommendations for this class of standby service."
The proposed change will delete this SR.
In summary, changes consistent with NUREG-1432 (Reference 1) are proposed.
Surveillance Requirement 4.8.1.1.2.f will be deleted.
3.0 BACKGROUND
Surveillance Requirement 4.8.1.1.2.f requires that the EDG be subjected to an inspection in accordance with procedures prepared in conjunction with its manufacturer's recommendations. This SR is a maintenance activity that does not verify the ability of the EDG to perform its safety function. The manufacturer's recommended inspections required by this surveillance are included in plant procedures.
The manufacturer's recommended inspections are not described in the Waterford 3 Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR).
to W3F1-2006-0027 Page 2 of 5
4.0 TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
Surveillance Requirement 4.8.1.1.2 f is a maintenance activity that does not verify the ability of the EDG to perform its safety function. The manufacturer's recommended inspections of the EDG required by this surveillance are included in plant procedures and will continue to be included in plant procedures upon approval of this amendment. Any changes to the surveillance procedures are subject to reviews in accordance with Entergy's 10 CFR 50.59 Review Program. The proposed change is consistent with Generic Letter 95-10, Relocation of Selected Technical Specifications Requirements Related to Instrumentation(Reference 2),
and NUREG-1432, Standard Technical SpecificationsCombustion Engineering Plants (Reference 1).
The manufacturer's recommended inspection and maintenance activities include the following:
Engine
- 1. Inspect turning gear.
- 2. Ensure engine and generator foundation bolts are tight.
- 3. Remove injection nozzles. Check opening pop pressure and spray pattern if engine analysis indicates out of balance combustion pressure or timing conditions.
- 4. Inspect the interior of all power cylinders including liners, heads, piston crowns, valves and seats.
- 5. Visually inspect engine crankcase cylinder liners, expansion seal, visual portions of the piston skirt, and general appearance of all components including fasteners.
- 6. Replace fuel oil filter elements if differential pressure indicates this is necessary.
- 7. Inspect lube oil strainers for foreign material and metal particles.
- 8. Replace elements in lube oil filter if differential pressure indicates this is necessary.
- 9. Replace elements in turbocharger lube oil filter if differential pressure indicates this is necessary.
- 10. Inspect rocker arm assemblies.
- 11. Check operation and/or calibration of control and safety shutdown devices not covered by site specific inspection and maintenance procedures.
- 12. Change lube oil in the speed regulating and over speed governors on a three-year basis or compatible site specific program.
- 13. Check valve timing and tappet clearance on at least one cylinder per bank.
- 14. Inspect fuel pump and valve cam lobes and rollers.
- 15. Measure turbocharger thrust bearing clearance.
- 16. Inspect air inlet system for evidence of dirt or debris, and replace/clean filter media as necessary.
- 17. Inspect forward end auxiliary drive.
- 18. Inspect flywheel end camshaft drive.
- 19. Re-time high pressure fuel pumps, if needed.
- 20. Replace/repair jacket water pump, lube oil pump, fuel oil pump, and high pressure fuel oil pump as needed based on specific pump performance trending.
- 21. Replace all non-metallic flexible hoses.
- 22. Clean rod bearing trip valves and replace their O-rings.
- 23. Replace thermostatic elements in jacket water and lube oil temperature control valves.
- 24. Inspect and clean cylinder head breathers.
Attachment 1 to W3F1 -2006-0027 Page 3 of 5
- 25. Replace lube oil in the outboard bearing based upon site specific periodic or analysis program.
- 26. Inspect and clean coolers - lube oil, jack water, and intercoolers.
Generator
- 1. Check tightness of thermal connections on the generator.
- 2. Measure and evaluate generator winding insulation resistance measurements to ground.
- 3. Clean insulated generator windings.
- 4. Measure and record generator rotor to stator air gap at four locations 900 apart at the outboard bearing end of the rotor.
- 5. Replace lube oil in the generator outboard pedestal bearing.
- 6. Clean air inlet casing to the generator stator.
- 7. Inspect all electrical motors.
- 8. Inspect collector rings, brushes including alignment, and pigtails.
- 9. Check for insulation cracks in the region around the generator pole bolts.
- 10. Inspect generator frame and fasteners for unusual signs of distress.
- 11. Ensure insulation between outboard bearing and pedestal is not painted and there is no electrical continuity across it.
Miscellaneous Electrical
- 1. Maintain lube oil and jacket water pump motors in accordance with established site specific procedures.
- 2. Check the calibration of the differential current sensing relay.
- 3. Check mechanical condition of switchgear including diesel generator output breaker and safety related relays.
- 4. Where applicable, inspect dropping resistor in Woodward 2301 governor for indications of overheating or deterioration.
- 5. Replace Agastat GP and EGP series relays in accordance with vendor recommendations or site specific programs.
Maintenance and inspection-activities are performed on a frequency driven and/or condition based approach. Some items are performed on a fixed frequency and others are deferred or modified based on trending and previous inspection results.
5.0 REGULATORY ANALYSIS
5.1 Applicable Regulatory Requirements/Criteria The proposed change has been evaluated to determine whether applicable regulations and requirements continue to be met.
General Design Criteria (GDC) 17, Electric PowerSystems, of Appendix A, General Design Criteriafor NuclearPower Plants,to 10 CFR 50, Domestic Licensing of Productionand Utilization Facilities,requires that an onsite electric power system and an offsite electric power system be provided to permit functioning of structures, systems, and components
Attachment 1 to W3F1-2006-0027 Page 4 of 5 important to safety. The GDC 17 also includes requirements concerning system capacity, capability, independence, redundancy, availability, testability, and reliability. The proposed change to the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3) Technical Specifications (TS) associated with the emergency diesel generator (EDG) to delete the manufacturer's recommended inspections does not reduce Waterford 3's conformance with GDC 17.
Entergy has determined that the proposed change does not require any exemptions or relief from regulatory requirements, other than the TS, and does not affect conformance with any GDC differently than described in the Updated Final Safety Analysis Report (UFSAR).
The deletion of SR 4.8.1.1.2 f has been evaluated against the four criterion of 10 CFR 50.36, Technicalspecifications,to determine if the SR should be included in the TSs. Performance of the vendor recommended inspections does not impact the reactor coolant system pressure boundary. The maintenance activities associated with the vendor recommended inspections are not process variables, design features, or operating restrictions that would result in the failure of or present a challenge to the integrity of a fission product barrier. The ability of the EDG to perform its safety function is not proven by the performance of the vendor recommended inspections and therefore, does not impact the systems capability of mitigating a design basis accident or transient that either assumes the failure of or presents a challenge to the integrity of a fission product barrier. Deletion of the SR does not result in the deletion of the requirement to maintain the EDG operable; therefore, the health and the safety of the public will be assured.
5.2 No Significant Hazards Consideration The proposed change deletes the Waterford Steam Electric Station, Unit 3 (Waterford 3)
Technical Specification (TS) Surveillance Requirement (SR) that requires the emergency diesel generator (EDG) be subjected to an inspection in accordance with procedures prepared in conjunction with 'its manufacturer's recommendations. The proposed change is based on NUREG-1432, Revision 3.1, StandardTechnical Specifications Combustion Engineering Plants.
Entergy Operations, Inc. has evaluated whether or not a significant hazards consideration is involved with the proposed amendment by focusing on the three standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92, "Issuance of amendment," as discussed below:
- 1. Does the proposed change involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
The ability of the emergency diesel generator to perform its safety function is not proven by the performance of the manufacturer's recommended inspections. The inspections are not considered an initiator or mitigating factor in any previously evaluated accidents.
Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant increase in the probability or consequences of an accident previously evaluated.
Attachment 1 to W3F1-2006-0027 Page 5 of 5
- 2. Does the proposed change create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any accident previously evaluated?
Response: No.
The proposed change results in the deletion of the SR associated with the performance of manufacturer's inspections. No modifications to plant structures, systems, or components, or changes in the design of the plant structures, systems, or components are required to support the proposed TS change.
Therefore, the proposed change does not create the possibility of a new or different kind of accident from any previously evaluated.
- 3. Does the proposed change involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety?
Response: No.
The ability of the emergency diesel generator to perform its safety function is not proven by the performance of the manufacturer's recommended inspections.
Inspection activities will continue to be performed.
Therefore, the proposed change does not involve a significant reduction in a margin of safety.
Based on the above, Entergy concludes that the proposed amendment presents no significant hazards consideration under the standards set forth in 10 CFR 50.92(c), and, accordingly, a finding of "no significant hazards consideration" is justified.
5.3 Environmental Considerations The proposed amendment does not involve (i) a significant hazards consideration, (ii) a significant change in the types or significant increase in the amounts of any effluent that may be released offsite,-or (iii) a significant increase in individual or cumulative occupational radiation exposure. Accordingly, the proposed amendment meets the eligibility criterion for categorical exclusion set forth in 10 CFR 51.22(c)(9). Therefore, pursuant to 10 CFR 51.22(b), no environmental impact statement or environmental assessment need be prepared in connection with the proposed amendment.
6.0 PRECEDENCE
- 1. ANO-2 TS Amendment No. 237 dated December 17, 2001. This amendment included the deletion of the SR to perform the vendor recommended inspections.
7.0 REFERENCES
- 1. NUREG-1432, Revision 3.1, Standard Technical SpecificationsCombustion EngineeringPlants
- 2. Generic Letter 95-10, Relocation of Selected Technical Specifications Requirements Related to Instrumentation
Attachment 2 W3FI-2006-0027 Proposed Technical Specification Changes (mark-up) to W3F17-2006-0027 Page 1 of 1 ELECTRICAL POWER SYSTEMS SURVEILLANCE REQUI REMENTS (Continued)
- 8. During shutdown, verifying the diesel generator's capability to:
a) Synchronize with the offsite power source while the generator is loaded with its emergency loads upon a simulated restoration of offsite power, b) Transfer its loads to the offsite power source, and c) Be restored to its standby status.
- 9. During shutdown, verifying that with the diesel generator operating in a test mode (connected to its bus), a simulated safety injection signal overrides the test mode by (1) returning the diesel generator to standby operation and (2) automatically energizes the emergency loads with offsite power.
- 10. Verifying that each fuel transfer pump transfers fuel to its associated diesel oil feed tank by taking suction from the opposite train fuel oil storage tank via the installed cross connect.
- 11. During shutdown, verifying that the automatic load sequence timer is OPERABLE with the time of each load block within +/-10% of the sequenced load block time.
- 12. Verifying that the following diesel generator lockout features prevent diesel generator starting only when required:
a) turning gear engaged b) emergency stop c) loss of D.C. control power d) governor fuel oil linkage tripped subject the o nisection
.isl in accordance with; procedures prepared in con~junction w~ith its manufacturer's ccO~mmcndations for this class of standby sepviee. Deleted
- g. At least once per 10 years or after any modifications which could affect diesel generator interdependence by starting the diesel generators simultaneously, during shutdown, and verifying that the diesel generators accelerate to at least 600 rpm (60 +/- 1.2 Hz) in less than or equal to 10 seconds.
- h. At least once per 10 years by:
- 1. Draining each diesel generator fuel oil storage tank, removing the accumulated sediment, and cleaning the tank using a sodium hypochlorite solution or equivalent.
WATERFORD - UNIT 3 3/4 8-6a AMENDMENT NO. 23,92,126,18,
Attachment 3 W3FI-2006-0027 List of Regulatory Commitments to W3F1-2006-0027 Page 1 of I List of Regulatory Commitments
'The following table identifies those actions committed to by Entergy in this document. Any other statements in this submittal are provided for information purposes and are not considered to be regulatory commitments.
TYPE (Check one) SCHEDULED ONE- CONTINUING COMPLETION COMMITMENT TIME COMPLIANCE DATE (If ACTION Required)
The manufacturer's recommended inspections of the EDG required by this surveillance are included in plant procedures and will continue to be included X in plant procedures upon approval of this amendment.