ML18346A517: Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
StriderTol (talk | contribs) (Created page by program invented by StriderTol) |
||
Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
=Text= | =Text= | ||
{{#Wiki_filter:}} | {{#Wiki_filter:Brian Gutherman The Role of for the Nuclear Energy Institute NEI 12-04 In Improving the NRC REG CON December 12, 2018 Focus on Safety | ||
NEI 12-04 Endorsement Status | |||
* NEI 12-04, Revision 2 submitted to NRC in September 2018 | |||
* Deletes appendices and modifies the document to remove references to those appendices | |||
* Corrects a section numbering error | |||
* Endorsement is expected via a revision to Regulatory Guide 3.72 | |||
* Draft RG summer 2019 | |||
* Licensees and CoC holders awaiting formal endorsement to incorporate the revised guidance into 72.48 training programs | |||
Part of Broader Regulatory Improvements | |||
* The value of 72.48 guidance is limited to the information not requiring NRC approval to change | |||
* Graded approach project seeks to increase the 72.48 change scope based on safety and risk, akin to Part 50 TS improvement program | |||
* Long term value depends on the NRC having confidence that industry 72.48 processes will consistently identify those issues requiring NRC approval | |||
* NRC inspection and enforcement program visibility increases with increased industry responsibility | |||
Accomplishments of NEI 12-04 | |||
* Distinguishes between specific licensees, general licensees, and CoC holders, where appropriate | |||
* Identifies the 72.212 Report as a licensing basis document requiring review for proposed activities (RIS 2012-05) | |||
* Addresses unique needs of CoC holders having 72.48 authority and no history of 50.59 authority | |||
* Addresses general licensee - CoC holder interface | |||
* GL processing of CoC holder changes | |||
* Cask FSAR revision(s) of record for GLs | |||
* Brings 72.48 guidance into alignment with 50.59 for changes involving Methods of Evaluation (MOE) | |||
* Solidifies the basis for licensee and CoC holder training programs | |||
Lessons Learned | |||
* Enforcement actions of 2000s resulted in lingering confusion for both industry and NRC | |||
* 50.59 guidance did not translate to 72.48 as directly as imagined for general licensees and CoC holders | |||
* Industrys request for NRC endorsement could have been defined better | |||
* Some enforcement actions were based on different industry and NRC understanding of the rule and guidance rather than mistakes | |||
What is Expected of Industry? | |||
* Understand that the need, appropriateness, and technical quality of changes is assured before the 72.48 review | |||
* Implement a rigorous 72.48 training/qualification program | |||
* Ensure 72.48 documentation matches the elements of the 72.48 guidance, especially MOE changes | |||
* Frequently and critically review your 72.48 training and implementation programs (solicit outside feedback) | |||
* Embrace conservative decision-making and questioning attitude | |||
* Licensees should critically review CoC holder work | |||
What is Expected of the NRC? | |||
* Consistency among Regions and individual inspectors | |||
* Risk-informed decision-making | |||
* More 72.48 knowledge in the Regions to improve inspection process efficiency | |||
* Hold industry accountable for the integrity of the process | |||
What Does Success Look Like? | |||
* Industry better understands the 72.48 rule and guidance evidenced by fewer mistakes | |||
* NRC increases confidence in 72.48 implementation and allows more information to be under licensee/CoC holder change control | |||
* Fewer 72.48 enforcement actions | |||
The Bottom Line | |||
: 1. 10 CFR 72.48 intends for the NRC to review changes having a nexus to the original safety basis with a focus on public health and safety | |||
: 2. Updating the 72.48 implementation guidance was necessary but not sufficient for long-lasting regulatory process improvement | |||
: 3. Right-sizing information in licenses and CoCs will put change control authority where it belongs and better focus resources on safety | |||
Questions? | |||
mar@nei.org gutherman@comcast.net}} |
Latest revision as of 09:19, 20 October 2019
ML18346A517 | |
Person / Time | |
---|---|
Site: | Nuclear Energy Institute |
Issue date: | 12/12/2018 |
From: | Gutherman B Nuclear Energy Institute |
To: | Haile Lindsay NRC/NMSS/DSFM/IOB |
Lindsay H | |
Shared Package | |
ML18338A059 | List: |
References | |
Download: ML18346A517 (10) | |
Text
Brian Gutherman The Role of for the Nuclear Energy Institute NEI 12-04 In Improving the NRC REG CON December 12, 2018 Focus on Safety
NEI 12-04 Endorsement Status
- NEI 12-04, Revision 2 submitted to NRC in September 2018
- Deletes appendices and modifies the document to remove references to those appendices
- Corrects a section numbering error
- Endorsement is expected via a revision to Regulatory Guide 3.72
- Draft RG summer 2019
- Licensees and CoC holders awaiting formal endorsement to incorporate the revised guidance into 72.48 training programs
Part of Broader Regulatory Improvements
- The value of 72.48 guidance is limited to the information not requiring NRC approval to change
- Graded approach project seeks to increase the 72.48 change scope based on safety and risk, akin to Part 50 TS improvement program
- Long term value depends on the NRC having confidence that industry 72.48 processes will consistently identify those issues requiring NRC approval
- NRC inspection and enforcement program visibility increases with increased industry responsibility
Accomplishments of NEI 12-04
- Distinguishes between specific licensees, general licensees, and CoC holders, where appropriate
- Identifies the 72.212 Report as a licensing basis document requiring review for proposed activities (RIS 2012-05)
- Addresses unique needs of CoC holders having 72.48 authority and no history of 50.59 authority
- Addresses general licensee - CoC holder interface
- GL processing of CoC holder changes
- Cask FSAR revision(s) of record for GLs
- Brings 72.48 guidance into alignment with 50.59 for changes involving Methods of Evaluation (MOE)
- Solidifies the basis for licensee and CoC holder training programs
Lessons Learned
- Enforcement actions of 2000s resulted in lingering confusion for both industry and NRC
- 50.59 guidance did not translate to 72.48 as directly as imagined for general licensees and CoC holders
- Industrys request for NRC endorsement could have been defined better
- Some enforcement actions were based on different industry and NRC understanding of the rule and guidance rather than mistakes
What is Expected of Industry?
- Understand that the need, appropriateness, and technical quality of changes is assured before the 72.48 review
- Implement a rigorous 72.48 training/qualification program
- Ensure 72.48 documentation matches the elements of the 72.48 guidance, especially MOE changes
- Frequently and critically review your 72.48 training and implementation programs (solicit outside feedback)
- Embrace conservative decision-making and questioning attitude
- Licensees should critically review CoC holder work
What is Expected of the NRC?
- Consistency among Regions and individual inspectors
- Risk-informed decision-making
- More 72.48 knowledge in the Regions to improve inspection process efficiency
- Hold industry accountable for the integrity of the process
What Does Success Look Like?
- Industry better understands the 72.48 rule and guidance evidenced by fewer mistakes
- NRC increases confidence in 72.48 implementation and allows more information to be under licensee/CoC holder change control
- Fewer 72.48 enforcement actions
The Bottom Line
- 1. 10 CFR 72.48 intends for the NRC to review changes having a nexus to the original safety basis with a focus on public health and safety
- 2. Updating the 72.48 implementation guidance was necessary but not sufficient for long-lasting regulatory process improvement
- 3. Right-sizing information in licenses and CoCs will put change control authority where it belongs and better focus resources on safety
Questions?
mar@nei.org gutherman@comcast.net