ML24228A210

From kanterella
Jump to navigation Jump to search
2024 NEI Early Warning System (EWS) Presentation - NEI Slides
ML24228A210
Person / Time
Site: Nuclear Energy Institute
Issue date: 08/20/2024
From:
Nuclear Energy Institute
To: Leach T
NRC/NSIR/DPCP/RPPB
References
ML24228A209
Download: ML24228A210 (1)


Text

Response Requirements and Credit for Early Warning Systems

August 20, 2024

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute Presentation Overview

  • Terminology
  • Methodology and Analysis
  • Required Systems
  • Questions on Required Systems
  • Voluntary Systems
  • Questions on Voluntary Systems

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 2 Terminology

The term early warning system (EWS) was used dating back to the mid-2010s to describe a system beyond the protected area barrier, which would be used to provide early engagement opportunities for some licensees protective strategies and would be the point needed to effectively implement other licensees response to ensure interdiction.

In 2016 the NRC and industry used the terms voluntary system and required system to differentiate between the two systems with different objectives.

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 3 Terminology

For purposes of this presentation the terms voluntary system and required system will be used to ensure a common understanding of the system being discussed, however these terms are not defined in the 10 CFR and do not adequately represent the description of each system in meeting the specific objective for the system.

The industry proposes new terms be developed that more closely represent the intend function of the systems.

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 4 Analysis of 10 CFR 73.55 related to Required and Voluntary Systems Analysis

An excel spreadsheet (crosswalk) containing each section of 73.55 was reviewed to determine the minimum requirements as well as additional requirements a licensee may need to meet the specific objective of the sites required or voluntary system.

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 6 Benefits of using the Crosswalk

The crosswalk allows for:

  • A clear indication of the licensees system objective related to existing regulations
  • A basis for system design and capabilities
  • A tie to existing inspection criteria
  • A foundation to develop a Security Plan summary
  • Evaluation of when a licensing action may be required

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 7 Analysis

In 2016, the NRC proposed descriptions in the Security Plan as the method to inspect a required or voluntary system.

Although the description would still be required, the crosswalk eliminates ambiguity in the Licensees description of the plan and Physical provides direct ties to inspectable Security criteria based on the systems Plan specific objective.

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 8 Required Systems Federal Register / Vol. 44, No. 230 / Wednesday, November 28,1979

10 CFR 73.55(h)(4) (1979)

(4) Upon detection of abnormal presence of activity of persons or vehicles within an isolation zone, a protected area, or a vital area, or upon evidence of intrusion into a protected area or a vital area, the facility security organization shall:

(i) Determine whether or not a threat exists, (ii) Assess the extent of the threat, if any, (iii) Inform local law enforcement agencies of the threat and request assistance, if necessary.

(iv) Require guards or other armed response personnel to interpose themselves between vital areas and any adversary attempting entry for purposes of industrial sabotage, and -

(v) Instruct guards or other armed response personnel to prevent or delay an act of industrial sabotage by applying a sufficient degree of force to counter that degree of force directed at them, including the use of deadly force when there is a reasonable belief it is necessary in self -

defense or in the defense of others.

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 10 10 CFR 73.55(b)

(3) The physical protection program must be designed to prevent significant core damage and spent fuel sabotage. Specifically, the program must:

(i) Ensure that the capabilities to detect, assess, interdict, and neutralize threats up to and including the design basis threat of radiological sabotage as stated in §73.1, are maintained at all times.

(ii) Provide defense-in-depth through the integration of systems, technologies, programs, equipment, supporting processes, and implementing procedures as needed to ensure the effectiveness of the physical protection program.

Required systems are designed to ensure one specific aspect of 10 CFR 73.55(b)(3) can be achieved. Specifically, the ability to interdict.

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 11 Required system vs. Protected Area

Objectives Required System Protected Area Barrier Access Control X Detection X X Assessment X* X Initiate response X X Storage for SNM X Unescorted Access X First barrier for Vital Area X

  • May be needed based on site specific design

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 12 Minimum Requirements of a Required System

The minimum requirements for a required system are appropriate sections of:

  • 73.55(i), Detection and assessment systems
  • 73.55(n), Maintenance, testing, and calibration, and
  • 73.55(o), Compensatory measures

Additional section of 10 CFR 73.55 may be applicable depending on the site capability to meet the specific objective of interdiction.

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 13 Additional Requirements as Applicable

In addition to 73.55(i), 73.55(n), and 73.55(o), licensees may need to meet additional sections of 10 CFR 73.55 depending on the sites capability to detect, assess, and interdict. These sections may include, as applicable:

  • 73.55(e)(1)-(4), Physical barriers
  • 73.55(e)(6), Owner controlled area
  • 73.55(e)(7), Isolation zone
  • 73.55(g), Access controls
  • 73.55(h), Search programs

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 14 Alternative Measures and Exemptions

In certain circumstances a licensee may need a licensing action to meet the limited scope objective. In these instances, justification should be provided for NRC approval, as to how the system meets or exceeds the specific performance objective of which it was designed for.

Possible licensing actions include:

  • 73.55(r), Alternative measures
  • 73.5, Specific exemptions

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 15 Documentation of a Required System

The crosswalk provides the appropriate sections of the existing 10 CFR 73.55 requirements the system is designed to meet. This crosswalk is essential for the licensee and regulator to have a common understanding of the design basis and intended capabilities of the required system.

This crosswalk can be used to develop a description in the security plan consistent with design and intended capabilities of the system.

Inspection criteria is already available for each section of the code credited. NEI 03-12, Revision 8, will contain a section to document the description and design requirements of the sites required system.

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 16 Questions?

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 17 Voluntary Systems Minimum Requirements of a Voluntary System

Unlike a required system, voluntary systems are not needed to meet the performance objective of 73.55 and therefore have no minimum requirements, however, in addition to the specific sections the licensee identifies based on the sites enhancement, the following sections as applicable would apply to receive credit during inspections:

  • 73.55(n), Maintenance, testing, and calibration, and
  • 73.55(o), Compensatory measures

73.55(n) and 73.55(o) provides reasonable assurance that the system is adequately maintained and reliable.

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 19 Example of Voluntary System

In this example a licensee selected certain aspects that meet the design and objectives for the system that was installed.

These 73.55(i) requirements combined with applicable sections of 73.55(n) and (o) comprise the requirements of the licensee voluntary system to be inspected and therefore given credit during inspections.

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 20 Example of Voluntary System

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 21 Documentation of a Voluntary System

The crosswalk used in the previous slide provides the appropriate sections of the existing 10 CFR 73.55 requirements the system is designed to meet. This crosswalk is essential for the licensee and regulator to have a common understanding of the design basis and intended capabilities of a voluntary system.

This crosswalk can be used to develop a description in the security plan consistent with design and intended capabilities of the system.

Inspection criteria is already available for each section of the code credited. NEI 03-12, Revision 8, will contain a section to document the description and design requirements of the sites voluntary system.

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 22 Documentation of a Voluntary System

There could be cases where the code does not provide a requirement applicable to system design.

Example: Alarms are received at a static post other than an alarm station.

In this case the licensee would describe the design feature in the security plan without citing a specific section of 10 CFR 73.55.

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 23 Questions?

©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 24