ML24291A006
| ML24291A006 | |
| Person / Time | |
|---|---|
| Site: | Nuclear Energy Institute |
| Issue date: | 10/17/2024 |
| From: | Nichol M Nuclear Energy Institute |
| To: | Advisory Committee on Reactor Safeguards |
| References | |
| Download: ML24291A006 (1) | |
Text
©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute Rapid High-Volume Deployable Reactors for Remote Applications ACRS Subcommittee Meeting October 17, 2024 Marc Nichol, Executive Director New Nuclear
©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 2 Status and Whats New Status of previously identified Micro-reactor regulatory issues Some are resolved (e.g., Emergency Preparedness)
Some are partially resolved (e.g., Annual Fees)
Some are in the process of being resolved (e.g., Remote Operations)
Whats New Interest in Oil & Gas Upstream and business needs for regulatory schedule and cost
- 1. Less than 180 days from specific site identification to operations
- 2. Regulatory costs are less than 1% of capital and O&M ADVANCE Act Section 208-Regulatory Framework for Micro-Reactors Scope of effort Clarify regulatory needs for rapid and cost effective large-scale deployments Resolve expanded scope of regulatory issues and propose solutions
©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 3 Micro-Reactor Topics Previously Identified NEI 2019 Paper NRC SECY 20-0093 Review Scope and Effort X
Regulatory Oversight X
X Physical Security X
X Aircraft Impact Assessment X
X Staffing and Training X
Annual Fee X
Manufacturing License Scope X
NEI 2021 Paper NRC SECY 24-0008 Factory Fabricated X
X Factory Fuel Load (Preclude criticality)
X X
Factory Operational Testing X
X Timing Authorize to Operate (Hearing & ITAAC)
Enclosure Replacement at Site X
Enclosure General License X
Fueled Transport Enclosure Storage of Used Fuel Enclosure Decommissioning Enclosure Maritime Applications Enclosure Space Applications Enclosure Commercial Mobile Enclosure NEI 2019 Paper NRC SECY 20-0093 NEI 2022 Paper NRC SECY 24-0008 Autonomous & Remote Ops X
X Enclosure Dense Populations Sites X
Enclosure 22 Topics; 16 are part of the 31 Topics in the NEI RHDRA Proposal
©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 4 RHDRA Regulatory Topics and Priorities NEI Paper July 31, 2024 (ML24213A337)
Near-Term Urgent Resolution Longer-Term Resolution High Priority 1 - Environmental Reviews 2 - Standardized Design Approvals 5 - Site License 10 - Meteorology and Weather Data 11 - Geologic and Geotechnical 14 - Operations Staffing 19 - Physical Security 3 - Construction Authorization Upon Docketing 6 - Contested Hearing 7 - Mandatory Hearing 17 - Remote Operations 21 - AA/FFD Medium to Low Priority 9 - AIA 13 - Fire Brigade 16 - Remote Monitoring 18 - Cyber Security 22 - Radiation Protection 23 - Oversight 25 - Use of Contractors by ML 28 - Features to Preclude Criticality 31 - Used Fuel 4 - ITAAC 8 - Licensing fees 12 - Other External Hazards 15 - Autonomous Operations 20 - Emergency Preparedness 24 - Annual Fees 26 - Loading Fuel at Factory 27 - Testing at the Factory 29 - Transport Modules to Site 30 - Replace Modules at Site Topics addressed in NRCs October 2024 NOAK White Paper
©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 5 Adapting the Regulatory Framework to Address New Technologies and Applications Design Features
- Physically small and simple
- Low risks and consequences
- Small footprint - land and environmental
- Safety relatively insensitive to site conditions
- Factory construction
- Site assembly
- May load fuel at factory and ship fueled
- Fully replaceable modules Applications and Use Cases
- Remote locations and micro-grids
- Industrial applications (heat and power)
- Not near population centers
- Large volume of deployments
- Deployment in months not years
- No disproportionate regulatory costs
- Limited or no on-site fuel movements
- Limited time of used fuel on-site Alternative Regulatory Approaches
- Incentivize safety enhancements
- Avoid undue regulatory burden
- Leverage use of manufacturing license or design certification
- Technology-inclusive, performance-based and risk-informed
- Oversight scaled to the safety profile
- More similar to research and test reactors
©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 6 Relative Comparison of Potential Consequences from Selected Nuclear Technologies
©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 7 A Different Imperative Yields Different Results Work on the Margins of Large LWR Approaches RTR Apply and Adapt Non-Power Approaches Innovation -> Revolutionary Change New technologies Question past/current practices Avoid weve always done it that way Understand bases for current approaches (characteristics of technologies and assumptions)
Question whether bases are still valid, if not form new bases and new approaches Current Efforts RHDRA Proposal LLWR vs RTR vs RHDRA Same Dose Limits Same Normal/Accident Requirements RTR = Low potential consequences EPZ = 10 miles vs small site boundary Different Implementation Guidance Different Security (RTR = No DBT)
RTR = No AIA RTR = Combined CP/OL is OK RTR = USGS/NOAA data is OK RTR = No min ops staff
Rapid Efficient Repeatable Licensing (ReLic)
Current Site Licensing (Part 50 CP + OL)
(Part 52 COL + 103.g Finding)
Approved with Design (e.g., ML, DC, SDA)
Approved for Range of Technologies (e.g., GEIS, Rulemaking)
Licensee Pre-Approvals (e.g., TR)
Site Site Applications of <100 pages Enable Deployments of <6 months Site Applications of 6,000 to 10,000 pages Enable Deployments 8 to 10 years
©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 9 Potential to Minimize Scope of Site-Specific Review Traditional COL or CP/OL Scope Rulemakings (Not Design or Site Dependent)
ANR GEIS (100 issues)
GEIS Micro Supplement (21 issues)
General Approvals (Specific to a Design)
Part 52 ML or DCD Part 70 Fueled Micro Reactor Seismic Isolators Site Parameter Envelope General Site Approvals General Licensee Approvals (e.g., Programs, Financial Qual)
Site #1 (Confirm site conditions within SPE)
Site #N (Confirm site conditions within SPE)
ITAAC (Closed at Factory)
- Site Specific Approval*
©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 10 NRC Approval of the Design and Site T - 60+ Months->
T - 24 Months->
T - 18 Months->
T - 12 Months->
T - 6 Months->
T = 0->
Site Approval
<-Application->
Submitted NRC ML Review NRC Approval NRC Review 2 Months Manufacturing License Approved Facilities for Fabrication Operational Manufacturing License Application Submitted Duration Dependent upon Scope of Novel Approaches and Site Issues Addressed 2025 2030 Contingency for 1st (Additional NRC Review) 6 Months Design Approval
©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 11 Y1H1 Y1H2 Y2H1 Y2H2 Y3H1 Y3H2 Y4H1 Y4H2 Site Selected Site Characterization (24 Months)
Figure 4-1: NRC Current Licensing Timeline (Expectations for NOAK RHDRA)
Accept COL Approval Submit Application Final SER (4 Months)
Draft SER (8 Months)
Final EA (4 Months)
Draft EA (8 Months)
Decision on Contentions (200 Days)
Decision on New Contentions (85 Days)
Mandatory Hearing (2 Months)
Commission Decision (45 Days)
Safety & Enviro.
Complete 49 Months ITAAC Review (90 Days)
Hearings (90 Days) 103(g) Finding Operations AEA 180 Day ITAAC Notice
©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 12 Month 1 Month 2 Month 3 Month 4 Month 5 Month 6 Month 7 Month 8 Month 9 Site Selected Figure 4-2: NRC Licensing Timeline (Expectations for ReLic Process)
Accept Application CP/OL Approval Submit Application Final SER (15 Days)
Draft SER (45 Days)
Final EA (15 Days)
Draft EA (45 Days)
Comments/Contentions/Petitions (30 Days)
Decision on Contentions (30 Days - End if No Hearing Granted)
Mandatory Hearing - If Necessary (30 Days)
Commission Decision (30 Days)
Safety & Enviro. Complete 5 Months Site Characterization (1 Month)
Responses and Replies (30 Days)
Decision on New Contentions (60 Days)
If EA Necessary CP/OL Approval (6 Months with EA)
Issue FRN for Contested Hearing
©2024 Nuclear Energy Institute 13 On-Site Staffing Design (inherent safety features, active safety components, and technology) with functional analysis
Determines if/what role is need for human action.
Sites Concept of Operations:
- 1. One (1) on-site operator Automatic operations Away from controls/other duties Remote Monitoring Optional
- 2. No (0) on-site staff, Remote Operator Automatic and Remote Operations
- 3. No Operators - Longer-term Autonomous operations No human action, high-level oversight only (Not needed but included)
Remote Operations Automatic Operations Local Human Actions Design-Required Operator Functions
QUESTIONS?
By Third Way, GENSLER
Backup Slides
Table 2-2: Summary and Functional Grouping of Specific Issue Topics Topic Area Priority AR RTR GL AEA Reg/Pol Group 1 (Licensing Process)
- 1) Generically Resolved Environmental Considerations High Applicable Non-App Benefit Option Need
- 2) Design Approval Scope and Authorizations High Applicable Non-App Benefit Option Need
- 3) Construction Authorization Upon Docketing High Applicable Non-App Benefit Option Need
- 4) Inspections, Tests, Analyses and Acceptance Criteria Medium Applicable Non-App Benefit Option Need
- 5) Site License Scope and Purpose High Applicable Applicable Benefit Option Need
- 6) Streamlined Contested Hearing High Applicable Non-App Benefit Option Need
- 7) Elimination of Mandatory Hearing High Applicable Non-App Benefit Solution Need
- 8) Licensing Review Resources and Costs Medium Non-App Non-App Benefit Option No-Need Group 2 (Concept of Deployment)
- 9) Aircraft Impact Considerations Medium Non-App Applicable No-Benefit Option Need
- 10) Meteorology and Weather Data High Applicable Applicable No-Benefit Option No-Need
- 11) Geologic and Geotechnical High Applicable Applicable Benefit Option Need
- 12) Other External Hazards Low Non-App Non-App No-Benefit No-Need No-Need Group 3 (Concept of Operations)
- 13) Fire Brigade Medium Applicable Non-App No-Benefit No-Need No-Need
- 14) Operations Staffing High Applicable Applicable No-Benefit Option Need
- 15) Autonomous Operations Medium Applicable Non-App No-Benefit Option Need
- 16) Remote monitoring Low Applicable Non-App No-Benefit Option No-Need
Table 2-2: Summary and Functional Grouping of Specific Issue Topics (contd)
Topic Area Priority AR RTR GL AEA Reg/Pol Group 3 (Concept of Operations) - Continued
- 17) Remote operations Medium Applicable Non-App No-Benefit Option Need
- 18) Cyber security Low Applicable Non-App No-Benefit Option Need
- 19) Physical Security High Applicable Applicable No-Benefit Option Need
- 20) Emergency preparedness Low Applicable Applicable No-Benefit Option No-Need
- 21) FFD/Access Authorization Medium Applicable Applicable No-Benefit Option Need
- 22) Radiation Protection Medium Applicable Applicable No-Benefit Option No-Need
- 23) NRC Oversight Medium Applicable Applicable Benefit No-Need Need
- 24) Annual Fees Medium Non-App Applicable No-Benefit Option Need Group 4 (Total Lifecycle)
- 25) Use of Contractors By Manufacturing Licensees Medium Applicable Non-App Benefit No-Need Need
- 26) Loading Fuel at Factory Medium Non-App Non-App Benefit No-Need No-Need
- 27) Testing at the Factory Medium Non-App Applicable Benefit No-Need Need
- 28) Features to Preclude Criticality Medium Non-App Non-App Benefit No-Need No-Need
- 29) Transport of Fueled Reactor Medium Non-App Non-App Benefit No-Need Need
- 30) Replace Modules at Site Medium Non-App Non-App Benefit No-Need No-Need
- 31) Storing Used Fuel at Site Medium Applicable Non-App No-Benefit Option Need